Yes... the point is the "only released in digital format" thing doesn't seem to hold true to me. There aren't any cases of significant books "only released in digital format" that I can think of, let alone "more and more" of them.
It's more or less a technological spectacle. Like the matrix proving we could do slow-motion AND rotating pan shots at the same time, we got magical overlay cameras which let us get 'natural' movements that apply mo-cap to the cameraman as well as the actors and their facial expressions. All that was half-rendered live to give a preview through the pseudo-cameras.
If we're comparing things like that, then I think you better quit the internet and donate your computer/internet subscription money to cancer research. Much more useful than this comment.
Conservation of energy: the power that you burn out of the gasoline has to come from something. Would it be the sun? Some form of energy from the chemicals in the reaction?
Slashdot Mirror
Russia breaks new ground in the inflatable doll industry.
Not a win. I just thought you actually had an example. Was looking forward to either being excited or disappointed in a loss of physical media.
So... not "more and more" then. Thanks.
Yes... the point is the "only released in digital format" thing doesn't seem to hold true to me. There aren't any cases of significant books "only released in digital format" that I can think of, let alone "more and more" of them.
Yes, but artists people care about actually were and are releasing stuff in digital form.
My question, while somewhat vulgar, was an honest question: How many books that people actually care about doesn't have SOME physical copy?
I can answer that question in related to artists: Jonathan Coulton. And even HE has physical copies of his stuff!
More and more books? How many books that we give two shits about won't release at least SOME form of physical copy?
No, this is Idle. Derp.
I'll bite: Why did the office members use their mice with their left hands?
"Hitting the water activates an expanding foam unit..."
What about hitting a drowning human?
G2 is by HTC, and I'm fairly sure isn't running MotoBlur.
I bet people would be masters of raves and/or the disco with proper application of this tech.
With this technology, new, more sophisticated Rickrolling is now possible.
That's pretty strange. It's almost as if he's the one on trial.
I know. I accidentally the whole thing, and yet I can still it lightheartedly.
I think the parent was talking about a movie that the STORE lost, and charged for, not the parent. Which seems stupid/unfair to me.
Remember to help yourself before assisting others.
"gonna be fun to tell the defendant they're GUILTY."
Hmm. Nope.
It's more or less a technological spectacle. Like the matrix proving we could do slow-motion AND rotating pan shots at the same time, we got magical overlay cameras which let us get 'natural' movements that apply mo-cap to the cameraman as well as the actors and their facial expressions. All that was half-rendered live to give a preview through the pseudo-cameras.
Has Internet Explorer thought hard about what it wants to do with its life? It's very nearly all grown up, isn't it time to think about college?
It hasn't been 23 years since the iPad came out, and the article says "23 years ago" anyway.
If we're comparing things like that, then I think you better quit the internet and donate your computer/internet subscription money to cancer research. Much more useful than this comment.
Psh, if AOL got their hands on Web 2.0, they'd be all the way to Web 6.0 in a year.
Conservation of energy: the power that you burn out of the gasoline has to come from something. Would it be the sun? Some form of energy from the chemicals in the reaction?
My general methods for outperforming expectation are to ensure low ones to begin with. How certain are we that the same did not happen here?
You're obviously not trying hard enough if you only frustrate them a single day with a program.