Okay, I'm not sure it really matters. But yes, not the law per se, but one of the "corollaries and usages," as Wikipedia puts it:
"There is a tradition in many Usenet newsgroups that once such a comparison is made, the thread is finished and whoever mentioned the Nazis has automatically "lost" whatever debate was in progress."
So, however I should label it, that's what I want.
I would like to propose an addendum to Godwin's law, whereby all references to Tiananmen Square with respect to search engines immediately ends the thread, and whoever mentioned Tiananmen Square automatically loses any debate in progress.
So we've got 10 points for "my girlfriend," a smooth 7 points for "intra-office," 12 for the "friends on the cutting edge" combo and 20 for the obvious I've-been-living-in-a-cave question.
49 points total, not bad at all for a Wednesday afternoon!
What kind of phone do you have? All of the phones that I've tried with vibrate I can't feel when they're on a belt clip... and I'm not about to put my phone in my pocket... that hurts when I sit.
Or how about you read the article (Google Cache, perhaps?)... you'll find that they suggest using multiple lasers or a CCD to read 100 tracks at a time.
Slashdot Mirror
Woah! You got me.
Ignorant much?
But found the interface chunky and slow. It uses twice the RAM of iTunes and sounds like crap (when playing the same file in both).
Seattle? Portland? Vancouver?
There isn't a top eight on Facebook... so I guess problem solved.
Bio-diesel (referring to a diesel fuel additive and/or substitute) is not the same as ethanol (in this case referring to a gasoline additive).
Okay, I'm not sure it really matters. But yes, not the law per se, but one of the "corollaries and usages," as Wikipedia puts it:
"There is a tradition in many Usenet newsgroups that once such a comparison is made, the thread is finished and whoever mentioned the Nazis has automatically "lost" whatever debate was in progress."
So, however I should label it, that's what I want.
Have a good one.
I would like to propose an addendum to Godwin's law, whereby all references to Tiananmen Square with respect to search engines immediately ends the thread, and whoever mentioned Tiananmen Square automatically loses any debate in progress.
So we've got 10 points for "my girlfriend," a smooth 7 points for "intra-office," 12 for the "friends on the cutting edge" combo and 20 for the obvious I've-been-living-in-a-cave question.
49 points total, not bad at all for a Wednesday afternoon!
You seem to be lost. That party is down the hall and to your right.
No, really... they do it all the time.
Between this and Don't Copy That Floppy, I'm not sure how much more I can take....
Nicholas
Apparently they're competing with the EMP in Seattle for most hideous building in the States.
And then there's the real world. Would you like a tour?
It's going to be a long day...
What gap?
Well, I see you have your priorities straight. Good thing we have people like you to help better our education system.
Yes, this is how we Americans think. Since we all think exactly the same.
You may now continue your "Ha ha, look we're better than the US" masturbation.
"Americans tend to view cellphones ringing about as enjoyable as listening to a car alarm going off."
That's why.
I could be wrong, but I thought the point of warchalking was to mark your _own_ wireless network so that others could use it.
--Nicholas
I would have to agree... I closed the window as soon as I saw/heard your flash animation start. No thanks.
Boy, you are a _nasty_ one, aren't you?
It was a simple question, I was not calling for the bitches to come out of the woodwork and start screaming.
What kind of phone do you have? All of the phones that I've tried with vibrate I can't feel when they're on a belt clip... and I'm not about to put my phone in my pocket... that hurts when I sit.
Or how about you read the article (Google Cache, perhaps?)... you'll find that they suggest using multiple lasers or a CCD to read 100 tracks at a time.
I do believe that calls from cell phones work with together with POTS.
Isn't it correct that once your call reaches the nearest cell tower, it travels over POTS to get the cell tower of the person you are calling?