Slashdot Mirror


Evil Bit Added to TCP/IP Packets

Absolut Ralts notes that " RFC 3514 is now available. It provides for an additional so called 'Evil Bit' that can be used to determine the nature of the TCP/IP packet. This should vastly simplify networking and internet security, and prevent the beepers of tired sysadmins from going off and interfering with Warcraft III!"

319 comments

  1. Three times!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Third post, then?

    1. Re:Three times!? by MattCohn.com · · Score: 1

      They didn't slashdot it the first time, April 1st is just an excuse for them to try, try again.

  2. Most postings on the front page of a single story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    This is the third posting of this on the front page in the SAME DAY!!!!

    I want what TACO smokes ;-)

  3. Clever by _bug_ · · Score: 5, Funny

    Post a dupe and get away with it by posting another and chalk it up to April Fool's day.

    Very clever.

    And you would have gotten away with it too! Had it not been for those meddlesome kids.

    1. Re:Clever by dr_dank · · Score: 1

      Get away with it? I don't think so. All in favor of demoting CmdrTaco to the rank of corporal, say aye.

      --
      Where does the school board find them and why do they keep sending them to ME?
    2. Re:Clever by ornil · · Score: 1

      You mean to the rank of "petty officer third class"?:)

    3. Re:Clever by Cpt_Kirks · · Score: 3, Funny

      It's a poodle. Put it on delicate.

      I'd prefer to put it on the grill. Maybe that new iGrill?

      mmm, hot dog...

  4. Re:I was hoping they would wait. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    FP? It's pretty bad when you have to start duplicating hoaxes!

  5. REP! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Forst pest?
    REPEAT!

  6. Hmmmm.... by reddeno · · Score: 5, Funny

    It's going to be a long day...

  7. Triple duping, now? by Robotech_Master · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Or is this just a cruel Slashdot April Fool's prank?

    Oh, and first (subjectively, anyway) post! :)

    --
    Editor Emeritus and Senior Writer, TeleRead.org
    1. Re:Triple duping, now? by azaroth42 · · Score: 2, Funny

      If a post in duplicate is a Dupe, then a triplicate must be Tripe!

      (groan!)

      --Azaroth

    2. Re:Triple duping, now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By posting the same thing over and over, Taco it trying to make it appear that he isn't a clueless moron that can't even get stories posted correctly on April Fools Day. Unforunately, it isn't working out too well.

    3. Re:Triple duping, now? by toriver · · Score: 1

      Repeating it too many times makes it trite as well.

    4. Re:Triple duping, now? by PygmyTrojan · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't triple duping been six?

      --

      Trying is the first step towards failure.

    5. Re:Triple duping, now? by Lemmy+Caution · · Score: 1

      O of n^2. Eight.

  8. Good job! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At least this time it's ACTUALLY April Fool's day...

  9. Third post! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject ;-)

  10. triple post? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    first time, vaguely amusing.
    second time, not funny.
    third time, comedy gold.

    don't push your luck ;)

  11. This story must be real... by mivok · · Score: 1

    its been posted three times now!
    Its not just a dupe.. its a tripe!

    1. Re:This story must be real... by mindriot · · Score: 4, Funny

      When it comes around the next time, should we call it Quad Damage?

    2. Re:This story must be real... by DShard · · Score: 1

      Lisa: They can't seriously expect us to swallow that tripe.

      Cmdr_Taco: Now as a special treat courtesy of our friends at Slasdot, please help yourself to this tripe.

    3. Re:This story must be real... by shfted! · · Score: 1

      M-M-M-MONSTER KILL!!! Come on, get it right now ;)

      --
      He who laughs last is stuck in a time dilation bubble.
  12. bits eh.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just curious. Do they also allow for a subclass of Evil Bits, such as a 'Holy Stupid Dupe From The Same Editor On April 1st Batman' bit?

  13. Deja Vu? by freaker_TuC · · Score: 1

    I have the strange feeling this world is upside down because of DEJA VU's ?

    --
    --- I am known for the ones who want to find me on the net. Is that a privacy risk or a privilege? One might wonder..
    1. Re:Deja Vu? by gmuslera · · Score: 1

      Is not deja vu... is just a bug in the Matrix, or maybe just Agent Taco playing with us.

  14. If you say it ofter enough... by wheany · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If you say it often enough, it will become funny. Just like CowboyNeal.

    1. Re:If you say it ofter enough... by devaudio · · Score: 1

      He is just trying to use the rule of comedic thirds.

    2. Re:If you say it ofter enough... by CSG_SurferDude · · Score: 2, Funny
      If you say it often enough, it will become funny. Just like CowboyNeal.

      If you say it often enough, it will become funny. Just like CowboyNeal.

      If you say it often enough, it will become funny. Just like CowboyNeal.

      If you say it often enough, it will become funny. Just like CowboyNeal.

      If you say it often enough, it will become funny. Just like CowboyNeal.

      Hmmm, I don't think so....

    3. Re:If you say it ofter enough... by Becki · · Score: 1

      ....but them moderators seem to think so.

  15. Get some coffee by Ahlee · · Score: 1

    Better brew yourself a pot there Taco. Duping April Fool's jokes is bad, mmmmkay?

    1. Re:Get some coffee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think he did brew himself a pot of some pot. It's that short term memory loss kicking in.

  16. Had me. by dnoyeb · · Score: 3, Funny

    I read the first one. Evil bit. I was thinking of legitimate usages and stuff. Then I saw the dupe and was thinking...idiots. Then I saw the 3rd one and I was thinking...idiot. :-D

    I hope this slashdotting of slashdot is not a joke! Don't mess with my information drip!

    1. Re:Had me. by _anomaly_ · · Score: 1
      Had me too... till I actually started to read the RFC... pretty funny stuff, esp:

      Intrusion detection systems (IDSs) have a harder problem. Because of their known propensity for false negatives and false positives, IDSs MUST apply a probabilistic correction factor when evaluating the evil bit. If the evil bit is set, a suitable random number generator [RFC1750] must be consulted to determine if the attempt should be logged. Similarly, if the bit is off, another random number generator must be consulted to determine if it should be logged despite the setting.

      --
      "I have no special gift, I am only passionately curious." - Albert Einstein
    2. Re:Had me. by bimmergeek · · Score: 1

      Though you are the first person to correctly recognize this misquoted verse (any time it is used, it is misquoted as saying "the love of money is the root of all evil") you're still a bit off. The verse correctly reads: For the love of money is the root of all kinds of evil.

      --
      -Everyone laughs at lemmings but no one ever wants to admit to ever being one.
    3. Re:Had me. by dnoyeb · · Score: 1

      Possibly. Though the New Revised Standard is probably the most 'updated' version in that it includes all the latest codecies and info we found in last 500 years, the KJV is still my favorite to quote from :D

  17. April Fool's Day by Nefrayu · · Score: 3, Funny

    God I love April Fool's Day. Keep on posting dupes, it makes the page more fun to read.

    --
    Friends help you move. Real friends help you move bodies.
    1. Re:April Fool's Day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's their excuse every other day?

    2. Re:April Fool's Day by Michael_Burton · · Score: 1

      Keep on posting dupes, it makes the page more fun to read.

      Well, it certainly is a time-saver.

      --
      When all you have is an axe, everything looks like a grindstone.
  18. Google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I expected them to make searches for Linux give only results for Windows and vice versa.

  19. Hoo Hah by ackthpt · · Score: 4, Funny
    This just in:

    Rob "CmdrTaco" Malda, founder and editor on Slashdot.Org, an internet news site was found to be infected by a mysterious new virus. The infection had been long suspected, but its severity has increased recently by reducing his memory window. A posting on the news site "New RFC Adds "Evil Bit", posted on Tuesday April 01, @05:02AM was reposted less than three hours later, revealing the crippling effect and progression of the disease. In prior instances articles would be repeated several hours or over a day apart.

    Experts have issued grave predictions for Mr. Malda. "It was that 534th viewing of Spirited Away, while popping blue penis pills that did it", CowboyNeal, an associate lamented.

    In other news: Intel unveiled a previously unknown high priority development project for a 64 bit CPU aimed at the consumer and server markets. Codenamed "Upsidaisyium" it shows Intel did take the AMD Opteron threat seriously after all, further, upstaging Opteron with an earlier release. "We have no software whatsoever which can run on it," said an anonymous source, "because the engineers accidently based it on the 6502 8-bit core. It should make for great new versions of the Commodore 64 and Apple II, though."

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  20. Moo by Chacham · · Score: 1

    A dupe of a dupe, about an RFC that's not even that funny.

    Oh well, at least there's a spelling mistake to laugh at. "Insecure systems MAY chose to crash," Go figure...

  21. Hate to say it by binaryDigit · · Score: 1
  22. Enough already - it's not funny any more! by stevey · · Score: 3, Informative

    Now even for April fools day this is a bit much, this story has now been posted three times today!

    1. Re:Enough already - it's not funny any more! by rangerx · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It looks like I was correct in suspecting /. changing thier firewall ruleset to allow packets with the evil bit enabled first. Normal packets are trottled down to a crwal. It took me only a few minutes to change the tcpip stack so I can read /. again at decent speeds :)

  23. Again? by sporty · · Score: 0

    Is this Taco's way at getting back at us for complaining about dupes in the first place?

    KHAN!

    --

    -
    ping -f 255.255.255.255 # if only

  24. Jesus Christ! 3rd time's a charm! by nate.sammons · · Score: 0


    OK, so Slashdot has no editors. OK, but posting the same story 3 times in one day? What the hell?

  25. Repetitive by blues-l · · Score: 1

    Okay it is April Fools but why the same thing three times on the same page?

  26. Sigh. by rco3 · · Score: 0

    Same story. Same editor. Two hours, 28 minutes apart.

    I realize that April Fool's on Slashdot stopped being funny years ago, but this is ridiculous.

    --

    Ce n'est pas un vrai mouvement de robot!
  27. April Fool's by zero-g · · Score: 1

    I think the April fool's joke wasn't the multiple posts, but the horrendous load time.

    Either way, i'm calling it -- another post of this story in an hour or so.

  28. Terrible April Fool's Joke by p0rnking · · Score: 1

    K, in the last 12 hours (~10:30pm last night, and 8:30am this morning), this has been posted twice.

    And then it took another 5 minutes, to get to the comments (which there were none that I seen at the time of posting.)

  29. yup, still not funny by AssFace · · Score: 0, Redundant

    First try... not really that funny.
    Second try... not funny.
    Third try... yeah... still not funny.

    Try for another 8 times or so - maybe there is a threshold that isn't obvious. Maybe on it takes 9 or 10 tries before the hilarity kicks in.

    --

    There are some odd things afoot now, in the Villa Straylight.
  30. It's the Magic Slashdot Article! by frankie · · Score: 0
    Wow! I've read this article three times now, and I like it better each time!

    This must be why Slashdot is so badly Slashdotted today. I had to try a dozen times before it would even serve up the page. But it was worth it!

  31. April fools by Wubby · · Score: 0

    Yeah yeah, three dup's, same page, by taco, on April 1st.

    At least try to be imaginative, like M$ files for bankruptcy, or George Bush Jr helps the environment or something.... sheesh!

    --
    Sig
    Appended to the end of comments you post. 120 chars
  32. Hmmm by Captain+Rotundo · · Score: 0

    Duplicates of jokes? This is totally getting out of hand. Normally on a day like today I would let this slide, but since duplicates are the norm, this can't be a joke!

  33. haha, I get it! by jtheory · · Score: 0

    Everybody and everything gets duped on April Fools Day! We're all dupes!

    Oh, that Taco is a real cut-up.

    Hey, is it just me (or is it another clever joke?) that /. seems /.'ed this morning?

    --
    There are only 10 types of people: those who understand decimal, those who don't, and, uh, 8 other types I forget.
  34. No sleep CmdrTaco? by PerlGuru · · Score: 0

    See here for the comments on the other posting on this subject further down the page, also posted by CmdrTaco... perhaps CmdrTaco was up a bit too late last night sampling some tasty beverages ;-)

  35. Is this the joke? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I get it. Its April fools. You're filling the front page with same story over and over. Ha ha ha!

    I promise to never complain about dupes again.

  36. Great... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So not only is this an April Fool's joke, it's been posted on /. not once, not twice, but THREE times in the past day. I mean, it wasn't *that* funny.

  37. Bah...just the Diet Coke of evil. by numbski · · Score: 1

    Just one calorie *not evil enough!*

    --

    Karma: Chameleon (mostly due to the fact that you come and go).

  38. Tripe! by The+Swedish+Chef · · Score: 2, Insightful

    First Taco dupes someone else's post, then he dupes himself. A double-dupe, or "tripe" (pun intended).

    This is a perfect example of why I will NEVER pay for /.

  39. Triple post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Triple post. 2 of them by the same guy.

  40. I prefer dirty bit by CrypticOutsider · · Score: 1

    (b/c of the caching reference) but this will be great if routers adjust their priorities .. I want to sniff all the evil bit packets. mmmmm, evil.

  41. working site by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    rfc editor's ftp is slashdotted, this is a working link:

    http://hektik.org/rfc3514.txt

  42. C'mon already - get at least a little original by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    First post = slightly amusing

    Second post = ludicrous

    Third post = annoying

  43. Aaarrrgggghhhh!!! by TopShelf · · Score: 3, Funny

    This is truly Evil!!! Make it stop!!!

    --
    Stop by my site where I write about ERP systems & more
  44. A new record for repeats.... by g051051 · · Score: 1

    Gosh, how many times are we going to see this "story" today? I know it April 1st, but "repetition != funny". Don't the guys that run /. site even read it?

  45. Ooops by zm · · Score: 1

    Looks like CmdrTaco is stuck in some kind of a temporal loop. Quick, tell CmdrData to send a message to himself over a subspace channel, this is our only chance!

    --
    Sig ?
  46. Wow, Taco! by Kredal · · Score: 2, Funny

    third repeat, second by you in 2.5 hours.

    That takes talent!

    --
    Whoever stated that signature sizes should be limited to one hundred and twenty characters can just go ahead and kiss my
    1. Re:Wow, Taco! by robb_c · · Score: 1

      all on one page, I think this might be a first!

  47. In other news... by kauttapiste · · Score: 1

    In unrelated news, a suggested improvement to the slashdot engine, which would add a so-called redundancy bit to the posted news, was presented to the Internet community. This 'bit' would be set when the story posted to slashdot.org had alreadybeen posted earlier, thus informing the editors to reject the post. Unfortunately everyone took this as an April fools joke and the idea was rejected..as we have been just shown!

    Yep.

  48. Here's Your Problem ... by Col.+Panic · · Score: 1

    Repairman: [pointing to a Good/Evil switch on the back of the doll]
    Yup, here's your problem. Someone set this thing to ``Evil''.

  49. I thought it was April Fools day? by sprouty76 · · Score: 1

    Not Groundhog Day...

    --

    No, I don't want a free iPod

  50. Awesome triple post, guys. by dave-fu · · Score: 1

    Once, twice, thrice an unfunny fake RFC makes it to the front page. Adding to the in-jokey humor, CmdrTaco greenlighted two of them. Ho ho! Poking fun of your inability to implement story management or spend any time editing a site you expect people to pay money for? You truly are the living end!
    Just post this story and nothing else all day and be done with it. It can't be any worse than any of the dreck you normally shovel off on us for April Fool's. Oh, wait. Maybe you could work in a story about Microsoft going open source because the FSF figured out a way to make open source software profitable. That'd be great, thanks.

    --
    Easy does it!
    This comment has been submitted already, 276865 hours , 59 minutes ago. No need to try again.
  51. Slashdot not RFC3514 complaint by b1t+r0t · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I sniffed the packets from this duplicate article, and the evil bit was not set! I demand Slashdot immediately implement RFC3514 for all duplicate articles!

    --

    --
    "Open source is good." - Steve Jobs
    "Open source is evil." - Microsoft
    1. Re:Slashdot not RFC3514 complaint by quantum+bit · · Score: 1

      I sniffed the packets from this duplicate article, and the evil bit was not set! I demand Slashdot immediately implement RFC3514 for all duplicate articles!

      They're waiting for Debian to release updated packages...

    2. Re:Slashdot not RFC3514 complaint by michrech · · Score: 1

      From what I hear, that will be a while. There probably WILL be an RFC3514 by the time that happens....

      --
      bork bork bork!
  52. Of course, we could add a "DOUBLE POST" bit to /. by Destoo · · Score: 1

    That would be a great day and our browsers will know it's duplicate and mod accordingly.

    But then we'd be stuck with them triple posting, setting the bit twice and either reverting the post back to "double post bit: off" or just crashing the whole universe.

    In any case, it should be interesting.

    --
    Nouvelles de jeux et technologies en français. TC
  53. First triplets on Slashdot by lipi · · Score: 1


    I knew it was worth getting up today.

  54. This is the most important RFC since RFC 1 by Crapflooder+Supreme · · Score: 1

    so it DEMANDS reposting at every opportunity, damnit!

    --
    "Don't worry, it's not loaded." --Terry Kath
  55. Is it really April Fools?? by daoine · · Score: 1

    With all this story repetition, I'm starting to think I'm in 'Groundhog Day'...

  56. WTF!? 2nd dupe! Trupe? Poop! by www!!!1 · · Score: 1

    Also, what's with slashdot being all broken? Anyone else getting this or does it just hate me? This was supposed to be a "FP!!!!!111" but I haven't been able to reply for hours.

  57. HAHA when will it stop!! by Wakko+Warner · · Score: 1, Redundant

    Rob, this story was great the first time I saw it. It was even better when you posted it 2 hours later. Now it's just utterly hilarious! Please post it again and again so it becomes the best April Fool's Joke EVAR .

    Go for it!!!

    - A.P.

    --
    "Remember when the U.S. had a drug problem, and then we declared a War On Drugs, and now you can't buy drugs anymore?"
  58. Ah HA! by g051051 · · Score: 1

    I figured it out. The "joke" is that they'll post this one story EVERY TIME someone submits it. Diabolical!

  59. Slasdot evil bit by mrycar · · Score: 1

    In the recent news, Slashdot has been found to have an Evil bit. This Evil bit was activated whenever the month of March rolled over to April and the Bit went to 1.

    --
    Gator/Claria is Spyware.
  60. The first ever threepeat? by Drakonian · · Score: 1

    Is this the first time the same Slashdot story has been posted 3 times.... and ALL ON THE SAME DAY? We have entered a new era my friends! Now come drink the Koolaid with me, this is the sign we have been waiting for!

    --
    Random is the New Order.
  61. Am i Going mad or by boogy+nightmare · · Score: 1

    De Ja Vuuuuu -hooo

    --
    Kingdom of Loathing (www.kingdomofloathing.com) Addicted is me
  62. Who's the April Fool? by HardCase · · Score: 1

    And the winner for the shortest time to post a dupe?

    Taco! -- 5 minutes.

  63. Wrong day! by mbbac · · Score: 3, Funny

    It's April Fool's day, not Groundhog Day!

    Get it right, Taco.

    --

    mbbac

  64. Slashdot implodes into own lameness filter... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...when a dupe of a lame story was postetd to the front page only two slots above itself.

  65. This wasn't funny 2 hours ago by 1337_h4x0r · · Score: 1

    ... and it's not funny now. Wtf.

  66. whata... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    first post... but with a message: "what the hell?".. shouldn't the editors look at least the frontpage to check they don't post the same storie twice?..
    i suppose they are to bussy to read slashdot.

  67. haha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    fp

  68. triumph by RowdyReptile · · Score: 1

    So, CmdrTaco, now you see that the evil bit will always triumph, because the good bit is dumb.

    --

    You want a sig? I can get you a sig... Hell, I can get you a sig by 3 o'clock this afternoon... with nail polish.
  69. Taking bets... by merz · · Score: 1

    on how many times this will be posted. I'm guessing 5.

  70. a first for slashdot? by prewashedironman · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Three posts all on the same subject...must be a new record, even for slashdot...
    Evil Bit Added to TCP/IP Packets
    Posted by CmdrTaco on 03:30 PM -- Tuesday April 01 2003
    New RFC Adds "Evil Bit"
    Posted by CmdrTaco on 01:02 PM -- Tuesday April 01 2003
    RFC 3514: New Bit Defined for IPv4 Headers
    Posted by jamie on 03:25 AM -- Tuesday April 01 2003

  71. Thanks! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was just about to forget it.

  72. HAHA! MAKE IT STOP! by Wakko+Warner · · Score: 1

    Rob, this story was great the first time I saw it. It was even better when you posted it 2 hours later. Now it's just utterly hilarious! Please post it again and again so it becomes the best April Fool's Joke EVAR .

    Go for it, man!!!

    - A.P.

    --
    "Remember when the U.S. had a drug problem, and then we declared a War On Drugs, and now you can't buy drugs anymore?"
  73. CmdrTaco works to break his own dupe record! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First, the original by jamie last night - RFC 3514: New Bit Defined for IPv4 Headers, then CmdrTaco dupes it with New RFC Adds "Evil Bit", but never to let himself be out done, he's BACK 2 and a half hours later with Evil Bit Added to TCP/IP Packets! Way to go, Taco! Congrats!

  74. Triplicates and slashdot has been slashdotted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why is /. so freaking slow? And what's up with the triplicate stories that appear on the FRONT PAGE?!?!!

  75. Troll: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This one is for slashdot for repeating an article:)

  76. It's not funny anymore. by mackman · · Score: 1

    Ok, now it's funny again.

  77. First April Fool's day Triple Post?? by tweakt · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Whee! First triple, april fool's day post:

    I only wish it was a joke... *sigh*

    1. Re:First April Fool's day Triple Post?? by syle · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Rob was making fun of himself. Of course it was a joke.

      --

      /syle

    2. Re:First April Fool's day Triple Post?? by Monkey-Man2000 · · Score: 1

      Apparently, Taco doesn't think the April's Fools jokes are coming in fast enough, so he's overcompensating to meet the Slashdot April's Fools Day quota.

      --
      This post was generated by a Cadre of Uber Monkeys for Monkey-Man2000 (603495).
    3. Re:First April Fool's day Triple Post?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, seems like Taco was getting a b*lowj*b and instead of yelling "Yeah , yeah" kept hitting the "Yes" button on submission page ;-)

    4. Re:First April Fool's day Triple Post?? by sam_handelman · · Score: 1

      *MY* unique, inspired, BRILLIANT april fool's day submission was rejected, and in order to make room for THIS?

      Q. Isn't complaining about what the editors post offtopic and flamebait?
      A. No! WRONG.

      Q. Isn't grousing about rejected submissions offtopic?
      A. DOUBLE WRONG.

      Q. How about the moderation system? Complaining about that, surely is offtopic.
      A. TRIPLE WRONG.

      Q. Wasn't my posting rascist, libelous and vile? Also, not funny? Weren't slashdot's editors correct to reject it?
      A. WRONG TO THE FOURTH POWER!

      That's TEN TIMES that slashdot's editors have been wrong.

      These ten mistakes are 100% likely under a model where the slashdot editors are ALWAYS WRONG. Meanwhile, under a model where they are merely mostly wrong, ten wrong answers in a row still only happens 3^10/4^10 = 5% of the time. THEREFORE, it is 95% likely that the slashdot editors are ALWAYS wrong; that is scientific certainty! SCIENCE says that slashdot editors are always wrong. This also proves that Rob Malda is a plagiarist neo-nazi pedophile.

      --
      The good and new comes from no quarter where it is looked for, and is always something different from what is expected.
  78. sigh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    dude, you're not fooling us. you screwed up and posted yet another dupe, and now you're playing the "i meant to do that game". whatever, either you care enough to check for dupes or you don't, and it's been pretty clear lately that you don't.

  79. Sigh. by rco3 · · Score: 1

    April Fool's Day on Slashdot stopped being funny years ago. But now, we get DUPE April Fool's Day stories?

    Same editor. Same story. 2 hours, 28 minutes apart. Is this intended as a joke? Because it's even less funny than the story itself...

    Hint for geeks who are still trying to cultivate a sense of humor: If it's not as funny the second time, it's REALLY not as funny the 350th time. Yes, that includes All Your Base, Natalie Portman's hot grits, etc.

    And no, dupe posts of a semi-funny joke aren't funny.

    Sigh.

    --

    Ce n'est pas un vrai mouvement de robot!
  80. Good one... by jgerman · · Score: 1

    ... it's nice to see Taco has a sense of humor about the things he (and /. in general) get's flamed for. Especially considering /. is free (if you want it that way) and no one has much right to complain. Next year, the editors should all get FP's and mod themselves way down ;)

    --
    I'm the big fish in the big pond bitch.
  81. Is it eviler than the evil bit.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    posted 3 stories ago? Or just not a funny as the original not funny april fool?

  82. oh boy. by vena · · Score: 1

    here's a tough one - april fools, or sad reality of slashdot?

  83. Disappointed by rkohutek · · Score: 1

    You'd think they would really fool us on this particular day by not duping...

    rk

  84. Third time's a charm? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So does this become an amusing april fool's story after the third time it's posted?

  85. dupe the comments too... :) by muffen · · Score: 4, Funny

    I still find it amusing that people have comments the third time this article is posted :)

    1. Re:dupe the comments too... :) by Icculus · · Score: 1

      heh, the best part is that there are more comments each time it's reposted.

    2. Re:dupe the comments too... :) by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      I still find it amusing that people have comments the third time this article is posted :)

      Ronald Reagan reads the same magazine every day and never gets tired of it

    3. Re:dupe the comments too... :) by frostman · · Score: 1

      actually they're the same comments as on the other two posts, but the randomness of the moderation system brings different ones to the top.

      --

      This Like That - fun with words!

  86. How about a repeat bit for /. submissions? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That might help. April fools!

  87. What's better than April Fool's Day once... by RevLimiter · · Score: 1

    ...the same April Fool's joke twice!

  88. The true 1st April joke.. by MrNop · · Score: 0

    This is not about this third dupe. The true joke is all these people saying "hey third dupe, its lame!"...

    when, tomorrow, they will discover its the same everyday :-)

  89. WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    is it my connex, or is /. getting hammered?

  90. This needs implementation support in browsers by MotownAvi · · Score: 1

    Certainly when executing an HTTP GET this needs browser support:

    if (httpReferer.matches("slashdot.org"))
    getRequest.setFlags(EVIL_FLAG); // adios, sucker! /* and I don't care if this joke is a dup; so is the story! */

  91. Dear CmdrTaco by ewithrow · · Score: 1

    Please stop the madness.

    Thank you.

  92. dupe++ by bgeer · · Score: 1

    Meta-april fools joke or has Taco's short term memory finally dropped to the level of a fruit fly from too much UT2003?

  93. Evil? by cardozo · · Score: 1

    Would all packets coming from Microsoft computers be flagged evil?

  94. Re: RFC 3514 by MerBat · · Score: 3, Funny

    As a member of the IETF*, I argued vociferously for a minimum of 3 bits (two to encode [good evil neutral], the third to encode [lawful chaotic]); but after much argument over the space limitations, and confusion over how to interpret the "extra" bit pattern, I was finally shouted down with cries of "you're either with us, or against us!" * Not.

  95. seriosely by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    why dont you guys just stop withthe April Fool's garbage.

    you are not any good at it.
    3 posted on the main page abotu the evil bit, which wasnt all that funny to begin with

  96. FP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First Post

    Ti* is a bfm

  97. Repost by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This has got to be the lamest repost I have ever seen.

    Lame.

  98. /. first by evenprime · · Score: 1

    I've seen redundant stories posted here before, but this is the first time I've seen it happen so quickly that the first posting was still up on the front page!

    --

    "Weapons should be hardy rather than decorative" - Miyamoto Musashi
    I think that goes for OS's too
  99. Is this for real by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can understand doing april fools jokes but 3 freaking times??? What is going on around here?

  100. um by RogueProtoKol · · Score: 1

    haven't we seen this before http://slashdot.org/articles/03/04/01/133217.shtml ?tid=95 [slashdot.org]

  101. /. editor enthusiasm by Alain+Williams · · Score: 1

    Did CmdrTaco have the evil bit set when he uploaded this article ?

    Is this the slashdot editor's equivalent of the first post game ?

  102. *sigh* by 3.1415926535 · · Score: 1

    Why not just post all articles five times in a row? Then we'll be sure to see it!

  103. evil bit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    interesting noone thouight to update the batch patch

  104. Duplicate by pgregg · · Score: 0

    C'mon CmdrTaco... and its only 3 articles down...

    http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=03/04/01/1332 17 &mode=thread&tid=95

  105. I call shennanigans! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    On this obvious dupe, posted by CmdrTaco, of all people!

  106. wow it must be really evil!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    this is the second warning by CmdrTaco about the Evil Bit, (and the third one in the front page) so I'm going quickly to save all my bits.

    PS: I think that there's still place for another Evit Bit story.

  107. This is getting... by owlet · · Score: 1

    ...funnier each time. A few more times and I need replacement abs. Oh wait, you probably need to have some first...

  108. Tripe? by Broege · · Score: 1

    Uh, oh, I've seen many dupes on Slashdot, but tripe?
    A new era begins...

    --
    homepage: www.tls.pl
    signature: not found
  109. How many times will this story be posted today?.. by diatonic · · Score: 1

    I'm guessing probably 5... maybe up to 7.

  110. DUPE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you big fat twat taco

  111. Already slashdotted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Would the evil bit have prevented this? ;)

  112. yup. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Come on, at least have different people post each one.

  113. Wow by The+Only+Druid · · Score: 1, Funny

    Already a double post of an April Fools joke within 2 hours. Very impressive.

    Incidentally, shouldn't these jokes be funny? Jeesh.

    --
    "Stumble before you crawl"
  114. Duplicate again? by dafozzee · · Score: 0

    http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=03/04/01/133217 &mode=nested&tid=95

  115. Good job. by MortisUmbra · · Score: 1

    I read /., does taco read /.? Apparently not.

    --

    "The saddest words of mice and men, are not those which were, but should have been."
  116. It's almost as funny the second time in one day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ssia

  117. Beating a Dead Horse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now it's just silly. A couple times was amusing. Now yer just engaging in sado-masochism bestial necrophilia.

  118. The improvement in latency by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The addition of the extra bit is believed to improve the utilization of time slots during routing. The current windowing algorithm fluctuates based on even-odd packet sizes. The extra bit only applies to odd sized packets and thus "evens" everything out. People at Caltech have been saying this for the past 10 years!

    There is a potential for increased packet loss due to a slight degradation in detecting corrupt packets ... now that all packets will have an even byte size.

    Oh well ... back to WC3.

  119. Grrr by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Apparently they think all these dupes make a good April Fool's joke.

    Of course, it's not a joke if you're used to it :-)

  120. Quick! Somebody call Guinness! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We're going for a dupe world record!!

  121. Two evil bits added ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow, now we can represent 3 types of evil...

  122. duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    f all stories today and they still can't spot dupes

  123. At least one thing doesn't change on April 1... by pjrc · · Score: 1

    ...dupes!

  124. 3 times? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    honestly three times on the front page...

  125. Oh yeah by Dr+Thrustgood · · Score: 1

    Let me see... this deliberate re-posting wouldn't have *anything* to do with April Fool's, would it now?

  126. Dupe of a dupe of a dupe by Fragmented_Datagram · · Score: 1

    Can someone explain to me how Taco can dupe his own dupe?

  127. New Slashdot RFC by LinuxParanoid · · Score: 4, Funny
    Hey, could someone help me finish up this RFC?
    Slashdot Working Group
    Request for Comments: 3514b
    Category: Informational

    The Duplicate Article Flag in the Posting Queue

    Status of this Memo

    This memo provides information for the Slashdot community. It does not specify an Slashdot standard of any kind- we don't have standards around here. Distribution of this memo is unlimited.

    1. Introduction

    Slashdot authors [CBR03], lameness filters, troll detection systems, and the like often have difficulty distinguishing between articles that have are duplicates and those that are merely redundant or stale. The problem is that making such determinations is hard. To solve this problem, we define a duplicate flag, known as the "dupe" bit, in the Slashdot article posting [RFC T4C0] queue. Genuinely novel articles have this bit set to 0; those that are used for boring the reader with redundancy will have the bit set to 1.

    ....
    Must... get... back... to... work...

    --LP ;-)
  128. moron looking for evile bytes.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    buy referencing trustworthycomputing.com)misa, &/or FUDge.controll.ceNTroll.

    lookout bullow. va lairIE turning up the volume of his patentdead PostBlock(tm) device is not good gnus.

    the Godless frauduleNT payper liesense hostage ransom stock markup felons upon the pacific crest annex of wall street of deceit, are still busy trying to make a profit on yOUR dreams/exploding babies, etc...

    the creator is monitoring the situation, & is participating. lookout bullow.

  129. probably not a joke... by nsebban · · Score: 1

    ...as it's been posted twice :)

    --
    ____
    nico
    Nico-Live
  130. Gah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Could you guys please just die and burn in hell for all eternity?

  131. Dupe! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Could a dupe be more obvious?

    Must be some kind of April fool's troll...

  132. Where are the comments? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is it me or did Taco dupe his own story, on the same day whilst the old one is still on the front page?

  133. Where's the Enlighten bit by BigFire · · Score: 1

    We need that for all of our 'positive' gamin'.

  134. Oh yeah by Dr+Thrustgood · · Score: 1

    Let me see... This deliberate reposint of stories wouldn't have *anything* to do with April Fool's day, would it?

  135. april fools day ... by frederik · · Score: 1

    ... is such a nice thing ....

  136. Nomenclature by YuppieScum · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Well, if the abbreviated form of duplicate is "dupe", that must make this story... tripe!

    --
    This sig left unintentionally blank.
  137. story posted in triplicate by x0n · · Score: 2, Funny

    "Hey Mr. Taco, this story appears three times on the homepage, being attributed twice to you as a poster."

    "Yes, I know. April fool! Hahahah!"

    "I want to laugh and feel caught out by the joke, but I'm finding it difficult to derive humour from it."

    "That's because it was a genuine mistake! hahhah! April Fool!"

    "It's still not funny. You're not getting out that easily."

    "..."

    --

    PGP KeyId: 0x08D63965
  138. You suck! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    wow, slashdot is simply unbelievable, two, i repeat 2 posts of the same stupid joke within a few hours. Don't you even check the frontpage before you post , taco?

  139. Dupe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    dupe

  140. so i'm going to fall for it twice am i? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And also by Cmdr Taco:

    New RFC Adds "Evil Bit"
    On April 1st, 2003 with 143 comments
    Nashirak writes "This is new RFC that introduces new security measures into IPv4 header. The measures include an "evil bit" that can be set an unset according...

  141. "Evil Bits"? by skydude_20 · · Score: 1

    Whats with this recent surge of evil bits stories? Is this some let-Bush-edit-for-a-day thing slashdot is trying out?

    --
    Jesus saves souls and redeems them for valuable cash prizes
  142. Heh. by Mr+Z · · Score: 1

    Maybe they should call the "Evil Bit" the DRM bit. DRM packets are the only non-evil packets, of course. ;-)

    Also, it looks like /.'s implemented the bit already, and it's had a negative impact on TCP/IP retransmits. Particularly packets that result in an article being posted (and reposted) to /.

    --Joe
  143. Taco sensitive? by div_2n · · Score: 1

    I wonder if Taco got a little chapped about my 10 point joke about dupes in the previous dupe?

    Taco, did I frost your mouse?

  144. Dupe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Duped story

  145. Hatrick!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Even by ./ standard this must be a record, hat rick of same post and twice by Taco....
    Luckily there are more creative journalists in the world.

  146. AGAIN???? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If I resubmit this story, will it become the fourth copy????

  147. Wow by s3ti · · Score: 0

    I had no idea the IETF worked that fast. 2 RFC's within... hmmm lets see... 2 hours?!

    Go Taco go!

  148. A new low... by Lurch00 · · Score: 1

    Not only is this the third time today this article has been posted, but the second time by CmdrTaco.. I hate april fools day.

  149. third time, not a dupe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So what would we call the third post of the same article? Plus since there are no comments this has got to be the best April Fools Joke in that everyone will think they have first post. Woohoo

  150. third time's a charm by cpfeifer · · Score: 1

    I love the jokes today, but we really need to start being more innovative.

    --
    it's not going to stop until you wise up, no it's not going to stop. so just give up.
  151. Frist Stop! by Noryungi · · Score: 1


    First Post in a TRIPLICATE April Fool post that is ruled, in Soviet Russia, by Beowulf cluster of nude Nathalie Portman, covered in hot grits and saying that BSD is DEAD, Doggoneit!!

    There... I feel better...

    --
    The right to offend is far more important than the right not to be offended. (Rowan Atkinson)
  152. New phrase by phlack · · Score: 1

    April Dupe's Day!

  153. I'm glad I didn't pay to access /. by Malc · · Score: 1

    The number of duplicated stories is silly. Especially when they're only a couple of positions apart on the main page! I would feel ripped off if I'd paid. It's not like it's a new issue either.

  154. ...what do you call a dupe of a dupe? by Viqsi · · Score: 1

    Posting a dupe of a story, and then two and a half hours later posting ANOTHER dupe of the SAME story?

    Taco, I sincerely hope this is your idea of an April Fool's joke, because otherwise... you've got some serious attention span issues, hon.

    --

    --
    viqsi - See "vixen"
    If we do not change our direction we are likely to end up where we are headed.
  155. Yeah by handelaar · · Score: 1

    You *so* funny.

  156. April fool I assume? by Confessed+Geek · · Score: 1


    Double posting? Normal. Twice on the same page? Amusing but not really unbelievable. Thrice in one Day... Gotta be April first (I hope).

    Since there was about a 2 minute delay between hitting reply and getting a post window I'm assuming this is already redundent :(

  157. Its past 12 pm by Neophytus · · Score: 1

    *slaps cowboy, the jokes on you!

  158. A dupe, OK, but a Trip? by trveler · · Score: 1

    ... trip must be what Taco's on.

    --
    ... is whot bwings os tugevza tsuzay.
  159. hey subscribers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    you should have pointed out this was a dupe that is only a couple of stories down.

    hooray for slashdot subscriptions. Now what is the point of paying for this garbage again??

    ontopic meta criticism.

  160. April fools? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Knowing CmdrTaco, this might NOT be an April fools joke..

  161. So the joke is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Three duplicates on the same page?

    Slashdot on April 1st is ultra gay.

  162. WTF is with all these posts about this dang bit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    WTF is with all these posts about this dang bit, sure it's April 1, is this a joke or something, if so, it's quite boring actually.

  163. Finally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A fresh story.

  164. Come on now . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Triple dupes? This is getting absurd.

  165. Slashdot invents sys to eliminate duplicate posts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    April fools
    April fools

  166. All your bits are belong to us. by Juiblex · · Score: 1

    Headlines:
    Microsoft steal all bits, to make them more evil than the devil himself.

    --
    Life would be so simple if packets were clearly marked by either setting or not setting their evil bit. It would make the process of deciding which packets to discard so much easier.

    1. Re:All your bits are belong to us. by Juiblex · · Score: 1

      Headlines:
      Microsoft steal all bits, to make them more evil than the devil himself.

      --
      The basic strategy seems to be one owing to Monty Python. Microsoft plans on making special contraptions that write evil bits onto memory. No one else may have these evil bit writing devices without "overcoming economic and/or legal hurdles." All your evil bits are belong to us.

    2. Re:All your bits are belong to us. by Juiblex · · Score: 1

      Headlines:
      Microsoft steal all bits, to make them more evil than the devil himself.

      --
      Virtual money is the root of all evil bits.

  167. Ground hog day by Morgahastu · · Score: 1

    Come on taco, this is April Fools day, not Groundhog day starring Bill Murray.

  168. whoa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    zuh? I'm confused

  169. What's in April? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    April fools day! Jokes on you Mr. Bellovin. :P

  170. FP? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Absolut Ralts notes that " RFC 3514 is now available. It provides for an additional so called 'Evil Bit' that can be used to determine the nature of the TCP/IP packet. This should vastly simplify networking and internet security, and prevent the beepers of tired sysadmins from going off and interfering with Warcraft III!"

  171. DUPE! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OK do you /. editors even read the front page anymore??

    Not even 2.5 hours later and this ones a dupe.

    Let's see we have:

    This one

    and then,

    This one

    RTFFP please.

    xyzzy

    [poof]

  172. Repeat Bit... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Apparently CmdrTaco has also found the other new bit, the repeating one...

  173. dup by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    dup

  174. Enough is enough! by Deven · · Score: 1

    This is a cute April Fool's RFC (although I prefer the classic "TELNET Subliminal Message Option" or "IP Transmission Over Avian Carriers" RFCs), but did we really need to be told about this three times today?

    --

    Deven

    "Simple things should be simple, and complex things should be possible." - Alan Kay

  175. April fools thrice over by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lovely!

  176. The dupe game... by guido1 · · Score: 1

    Current scores:
    CmdrTaco: 2
    Timothy: 0

    In a resounding move, Rob "CmdrTaco" Malda has leaped into the lead over Timothy "I love dupes" with an amazing double-dupe!

    Analyists believe Timothy's only chance to get back into the game is to try for a double-doggy-dupe.

    We'll keep you updated...

  177. tripe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's not a dupe, it's a tripe, right?

  178. Ok we got it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I understand that this is great news but isn't posting it 3 times in the same day too much ? :>

  179. April Fools Joke by OldFNG · · Score: 0

    This has to be one of the lamest april fools RFC's I've seen in a long time

  180. CmdrTaco strikes again by Berylium · · Score: 1

    Evil Dupe Added to Slashdot News-post

    And two and a half hours later at that. Impressive.

  181. e-fucking-gad. by intermodal · · Score: 1

    what happened to the day when people would post a simple note pointing to an article rather than giving the whole damn thing away before you read the RFC? If I got sent a link to WOM (write only memory) or CPIP (RFC for carrier pidgeon IP) that gave away the whole damn thing i would be pissed.

    --
    In SOVIET RUSSIA... erm...NSA AMERICA, the Internet logs onto YOU!
  182. Conjecture by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe the evil bit is responsible for all these dupes!

  183. April Fools?? by notanatheist · · Score: 1

    Could it be that CmdrTaco has caught the bug and feels the need to repost or is that a tad bit of relevance to each post. BTW, Micro$oft bought linux today. :)

  184. Second dupe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is probably not a first (this is Slashdot after all) but this is a rare happening. Let the fun and flames begin.

  185. This is getting old by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Third time isn't a charm

  186. Repeat? by BlackHawk · · Score: 1

    Oh my GODS, Taco repeated a story! He's having a stroke, folks!!

    --

    Believe nothing, not even if I say it, if it violates your sense of reason -- Buddha

  187. The first time it was mildy funny... by Da+Fokka · · Score: 1

    The third time it's downright annoying.

    And are slashdot's evil bits currently set? slashdot behaves like it's being slashdotted itself.

  188. Re:How many times will this story be posted today? by swordgeek · · Score: 1

    I'm thinking this might be the /. April fools joke--dupe the story over and over and over. The fact that Taco's posted it twice is suspicious.

    All in all, not a bad joke.

    --

    "People who do stupid things with hazardous materials often die." -- Jim Davidson on alt.folklore.urban
  189. Impressive! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not only is this an unprecedented triple-dup, but Taco has actually resorted to doing dups of his own articles...

    (First post?)

  190. uggg, April 1st by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can't wait until this is over...

  191. Not funny anymore by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    THREE times?

    It's gone from funny to annoying. Even the first time, the RFC was cute but no side-splitter.

    If you can't be funny, at least be useful. There must be SOME tech news today....

  192. Dup! by Yotus · · Score: 1

    Is it possible to add evil bits to duplicate posts on /.? :)

    --
    Just because I ROCK; it doesn't mean I am made out of stone!
  193. Dupe! Dupe! Dupe! Bad Taco... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Yo, Taco! You posted this same story at Tuesday April 01, @08:02AM, less than two-and-a-half hours before this one! And just three stories ago!

    See New RFC Adds "Evil Bit"

  194. Sure, make it easier to get past firewalls by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If, this RFC is accepted then all I have to do is create a program that does not follow this standard, set the bit to 0 and attack.

  195. Hey, what are you moderators smoking? by haraldm · · Score: 1

    Can I have some of the stuff too? ;-)

    --
    open (SIG, "</dev/zero"); $sig = <SIG>; close SIG;
  196. Triple Post!? by ShawnLeBlanc · · Score: 1

    Jesus Freaking Christ!

    DJCC

  197. I'm starting to detect a theme... by Lindril · · Score: 3, Funny

    Of course, if duplicate stories are an April Fool's prank, then the editors must believe that every day is April Fool's on Slashdot.

  198. Ditch the Cowboy Neal Option! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why do we need the "dickhead" option?

    We have Cmdr Taco posting the same story twice!

  199. RFC Hattrick by diggem · · Score: 1

    How many times can we post about the same stinkin RFC?! Third time's a charm? .. and a hat-trick! Yay! Two story posts were even about the same feature I think. What's extra cool is they're all from CmdrTaco.

    Methinks there's a RoboTaco who's taken over lately?

  200. solution for Microsoft by the overpants gnomes by Genyin · · Score: 1

    1. Profit
    2. ???
    3. Set evil bit!

  201. Oh, Geez by hackwrench · · Score: 2, Interesting

    What's the point of having an evil bit if you don't do something evil with it time and again. I mean, it IS an evil bit after all, what do you expect. It's not every person who knows how to make the most of an evil bit. It's not like it's an evil byte you know, but one of those could come in handy, it's an evil bit, and you simply have to make the most of an evil bit, because it's only so much evil, hardly enough to go around, don't you know.

  202. Oh come on by agby · · Score: 1

    This is getting silly now...

  203. Ethereal already decodes EVIL bit by slashnik · · Score: 1

    How's that for the wonders of Open Source. The great Guys at Ethereal http://www.ethereal.com have already written a patch to decode the evil bit

    http://www.ethereal.com/lists/ethereal-dev/20030 4/ msg00000.html

    slashnik

  204. doesnt it just remind you of... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That movie with Bill Murray where the same day keeps happening ... over .. and over.. again ... oh ... Groundhog Day..

    and why do I feel like I'm a participant and Slashdot is the host?

  205. Drug of choice? by foo+fighter · · Score: 1

    April Fools Day is not a license to get stoned before noon.

    --
    obviously no deficiencies vs. no obvious deficiencies
  206. Utter tripe by Glorat · · Score: 1

    Slashdot is not about the dupe now. It's full of TRIPE.

  207. Slashdot appreciation day by Codex+The+Sloth · · Score: 4, Funny

    The annual april fools crapfest serves to remind us all, on this very special day, how much worse the whole mess of perl scripts and duct tape could be.

    --
    I am not a number! I am a man! And don't you ... oh wait, I'm #93427. Ha ha! In your face #93428!
  208. UGH! by curtisk · · Score: 1
    Ok....ok...ok...you guys can poke fun at yourselves, since a dupe is not all that uncommon, and the third time is the "exclamation point" on your joke, we get it....crimey.....enough is enough already....

    you'd almost think that there was no real news today at all! Too bad we can't moderate the mods who post the news!

    --

    Sehr geehrter Toilettenbenutzer!

  209. Evil bits everywhere! by fazzumar · · Score: 1

    How many times are we going to see the evil bits story posted on the front page of /. today?? I'm putting my money on 5. Any takers?

  210. reminds me of the time when by theLime · · Score: 5, Funny

    OH ITS A DUPE OH MAN WHY CAN'T TACO READ HIS OWN POSTS YOU WOULD THINK THIS IMPORTANT SITE WOULD BE RUN BY PEOPLE WHO KNEW WHAT THEY WERE DOING PULL YOUR HEAD OUT OF YOUR ASS /. AND *THINK* FOR A SECOND GOD THIS TOTALLY INVALIDATES SLASHDOT IN MY EYES OBVIOUSLY THEY ARE AMATEURS WHO HAVE NEVER HAD ANY REAL RESPONSIBILITY JEEZE AT LEAST LOOK DOWN 3 OR 4 POSTS BEFORE YOU CLICK SUBMIT AAAAAA BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH I LOVE TO HEAR MYSELF TALK IMPORTANT IMPORTANT IMPORTANT *BONK* OW JESUS WHAT WAS THAT

    *sigh*. I was going to leave it at that, but the /. 'lameness filter' wont let it go through. Putting all of this normal text down here at the bottom really takes something away from the knee-jerk idiot image i was trying to portray, but oh well, I guess you all get the idea.

    1. Re:reminds me of the time when by Buck2 · · Score: 1

      WHAT
      WAS
      YOUR
      POINT
      AGAIN
      I
      SEEM
      TO
      HAVE
      MISSED
      IT

      --

      As my father lik@(munch munch)... ....
  211. Analogy by Lindril · · Score: 1

    Having a Slashdot editor post several dupes in honor of April Fool's Day is sort of like Saddam celebrating by gassing 10,000 Kurds.

  212. Triple Duplicate Fake Out by kris_lang · · Score: 1, Redundant
    So there we have it. A triple duplicate posting to fool some of the ./ers some of the time, especially those who do not look at the top page simultaneously containing all three postings at once! This was obviously done to counteract the comment in the first posting stating that if this were a REAL story, there'd be duplicate submissions.

    But really folks, a duplicate submission by the same editor within 148 minutes? Outrageous!!!

    New game for those tired of google-games: find the shortest interval duplicate submission. Easy attack mode: look for duplicated links, e.g. ftp://ftp.rfc-editor.org/in-notes/rfc3514.txt, as the giveaway and compare posting times.

    New idea for a submission filter for the editors: implement the comparison of links concept to weed out duplicate postings by editors. If this were really implemented in the slashcode, however, it could destroy the whole nature of reality for ./ers who have come to expect, nay rely upon, the duplicates.

    I didn't use the word "dupe" because I must admit the first time I saw an editorial comment saying "yes it's a dupe", I thought someone had been duped into believing something that is untrue. Of course, that's an everyday occurence here, not something which is reserved for April 1st.

    I must admit that I enjoy these April Fools' items.

  213. Slashdot dupe bit by ray-auch · · Score: 1

    Ok so with the first dupe everyone proposed the slashdot dupe bit, which would clearly have been 1 for that dupe.

    But for the second dupe does it wrap to 0 again or take on some other value to be defined only by IETF^H^H^H^HSlashdot consensus ?

  214. Uh huh ... by A+nonymous+Coward · · Score: 1

    ... about 24 hours worth.

    1. Re:Uh huh ... by yugami · · Score: 1

      well, 24 hrs redone 3 times to make it funny.

  215. BI = 3 by gorbachev · · Score: 1

    wasn't that just a fun April's fool. Had to post it three times.

    --
    In Soviet Russia, I ruled you
  216. Re:"Evil Bits"? And then some by Havokmon · · Score: 1
    I saw a proposed addtion to that RFC.. It provides the ability to mark packets as:

    Lawful Good
    Lawful Neutral
    Lawful Evil
    Neutral Good
    True Neutral
    Neutral Evil
    Chaotic Good
    Chaotic Neutral
    Chaotic Evil

    --
    "I can't give you a brain, so I'll give you a diploma" - The Great Oz (blatently stolen sig)
  217. Slashdot hacked? by morcheeba · · Score: 1

    CmdrTaco posts the same story 2 1/2 hours apart... is that how long his memory is, or is someone else helping out?

  218. How will it work with... by Coz · · Score: 1

    IP over Avian Carriers with Quality of Service? Do I feed the pigeons spoiled grain, and let the receiver analyze the poop? Do I spraypaint them black? What if they're black already - do I spraypaint them white?

    Clearly, this RFC needs a lot of work to integrate it into the Internet we've come to know and love.

    --
    I love vegetarians - some of my favorite foods are vegetarians.
  219. Re:Moderators on crack, again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Note: Parent should be moderated to -1 Redundant for being obtuse and clearly Not Getting It.

    It's a joke on a joke. Consider it a meta-joke. Consider thyself stupid (not meta-stupid, although you probably are that as well).

  220. I don't think you get it just yet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The triple-posting is not the joke... The joke is the RFC itself, and I think CmdrTaco's posting it again and again until the /. community catches on. You're the dopes!!! From the RFC:

    "This document defines the behavior of security elements for the 0x0 and 0x1 values of this bit. Behavior for other values of the bit may be defined only by IETF consensus [RFC2434]."

    Which is obviously a joke. Are bits in ternary logic all of the sudden?!?!?

  221. Evil Bit for /. Articles Needed by saikou · · Score: 1

    Evil Bid would be set for all repeats, occuring within given time period, which would significantly simplify routing and weeding off articles :)

  222. CmdrTaco, I salute you :). by powerlinekid · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Taco, you are friggin awesome :).

    Hes doing it on purpose to get a rise out of you all. No matter how stupid Slashdotters in general think Taco is, hes not stupid enough to post the same story twice. Yeah he does dupes but come on... do you really think he'd post the same story twice unless it was on purpose?

    The best part of this is that Taco is trolling the crap out of all of you and hes probably sitting at work reading the comments and laughing his ass off.

    Now a real April fools joke would be Katz posting a story that didn't have the phrase "... in these post 9/11 times..." ;).

    --

    can't sleep slashdot will eat me
    1. Re:CmdrTaco, I salute you :). by dubstop · · Score: 1

      As soon as I saw it, I thought that the p*ss was being taken. I was expecting another 'evil bit' story to appear a couple further up. That would have been four of the same story on the front page at the same time. That would have been awesome. Looks like the George Foreman USB iGrill means that isn't going to happen, though.

    2. Re:CmdrTaco, I salute you :). by powerlinekid · · Score: 1

      They just posted it :).

      --

      can't sleep slashdot will eat me
    3. Re:CmdrTaco, I salute you :). by haggar · · Score: 1

      ... do you really think he'd post the same story twice unless it was on purpose?

      How sadly and pityfully deluded you are:
      Google Releases an API for Their Database

      Google to Offer API

      Both posted by El Taquito. And check this out: both have been posted in April, for f*ck's sake!!

      --
      Sigged!
    4. Re:CmdrTaco, I salute you :). by Oriumpor · · Score: 1

      You mean there are people who DON'T filter that horrible semi-writer out with their articles preferences?

  223. Triple Dupe? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    C'mon guys, this is the third time this story has been posted. Both of the last two were posted by senior taco himself! What gives?

  224. Submit Story by Hornstar · · Score: 1

    Slashdot Story Submissions

    Here is where you can submit a story for the Slashdot Editors to peer at it, poke it with a stick, and perhaps post it for all to share and enjoy. It is very important that you write a clear simple subject, and include relevant links in your story. If you wish to be anonymous, feel free to leave the identifying fields blank. Anonymity has no effect on whether we will accept or reject the story.

    Your Name (Leave Blank to be Anonymous)
    Hornstar

    Your Email or Homepage (Where Users Can Contact You)
    Yeah, right.

    Subject (Be Descriptive, Clear and Simple!)
    (bad subjects='Check This Out!' or 'An Article'. We get many submissions each day, and if yours isn't clear, it will be deleted.)
    Check This Out! It's An Article!

    Topic and Section (Almost everything should go under Articles)
    Articles

    The Scoop (HTML is fine, but double check those URLs and HTML tags!)
    There's a wicked cool RFC that's just been posted at ftp.rfc-editor.org/in-notes/rfc3514.txt. It's like the best prank EVER! Like, it'll make people post like CRAZY! They'll be all like "Post it again, Taco!" and then Taco will be like "DUUUUDE!", and then like he'll post it a whole buch-a-times, and everybody will be like "whoa, is this Groundhog Day, like that Bill Murray movie", and they'll start like coming up with their own anti-multi-post-slashdot-rfc's and it'll be like so totally funny. But then like some people will be like "that's not funny", but like, that will be TOTALLY funny, so like ya gotta post it cause this will just be SOOOOOO cool pimp dawg! Sup?

    Are you sure you included a URL? Didja test them for typos?
    Why would I include a urinal?

    Submission format: Like, totally HTML-Formatted, Plain Old Text

    You must preview once, provide a subject, some text, and a topic before you can submit
    I did. Post it rookie beeeotch!

  225. Already the third "evil bit"! Great work! by tsvk · · Score: 3, Funny

    OK, as I have understood from all the reports today, this is the third "evil bit" added to the Internet Protocol.

    Using all these three bits together, it is now possible to express 2^3 = 8 different levels of evilness, ranging from 000 = "not an evil datagram at all" to 111 = "a more evil datagram than anything you can imagine". And yesterday we had no means of indicating the degree of evilness in a datagram at all! Talk about progress!

  226. alternative link by kaufi · · Score: 1

    hmm... where did I see that before???

    for me the link never worked, this one did:
    http://www.networksorcery.com/enp/rfc/rfc351 4.txt

    set your bits!

    --

    ---
    awake and alert!
    -Penguin Mints

  227. Obligatory Simpsons Quote by cygnus · · Score: 1

    That's your problem! This TCP/IP packet is set to *evil*!

    --
    Just raise the taxes on crack.
  228. Taco dupes self, priceless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You know, you really have to admire a man who can laugh at himself.

  229. Re:Moderators on crack, again by Rick+the+Red · · Score: 1
    Oh, NOW I get it! So modding all these posts Redundant is a meta-meta-joke! Ha ha ha ha! LMAO! God, how stupid I was! You are so damn smart, AC!

    The parent is both "Insightful" and "Redundant"? MOC, again. I rest my case.

    --
    If all this should have a reason, we would be the last to know.
  230. In other April Fools news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Slashdot subscription based dupe-checking a complete success!

  231. rrite by Eudial · · Score: 1

    Right...........

    Exactly how does this work?

    When you ping someone it asks "Are you evil? - Please tell the truth." or "Do you want send this package as a part of a malicious scheme?"...?

    --
    GAAH! MY PRINTER IS ON FIRE!!! PUT IT OUT! PUT IT OUT!
  232. Not again... by Stackster · · Score: 1

    Man, this is the third time today I got fooled by that same RFC...

    --

    There are 010 kinds of people. Those who understand octal, those who don't, and 06 other kinds of morons.
  233. A dupe is a dupe is a dupe is a dupe is a dupe is by dmauer · · Score: 1

    First. Funny Slashdot April Fools' Joke. Ever.

    --
    === "Some people see the glass as half-empty. Others see it as half-full. I see the glass as too big." -G. Carlin.
  234. Firewall by Fuzzums · · Score: 3, Funny

    I'm prepared!!

    it does require a patch, but it's integrated in the statefull module of ipchains.

    example: iptables -A INPUT -m state --state EVIL -j DROP

    --
    Privacy is terrorism.
  235. chrissakes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    taco, you fuckup.

    i bet he just gives his slashdot account to monkeys and lets them randomly post things.

    i'd been loathing this day on this site for a while, and it has not let me down. or it has. i can't tell.

  236. Slashdot! The only place where . . . by Sodium+Attack · · Score: 1

    1) A first exclusive interview gets posted twice.

    2) New scientific discoveries sound familiar.

    3) 10 questions turn into 20.

    4) Last interviews turn into next to last.

    5) Congress is considering the first ever digital cloning ban.

    6) Duplicate replies to duplicate posts get duplicate moderation.

    7) The only thing not duplicated is polls (not even sure about that).

    8) 1000/1 = The ratio of time it takes for moderators to discover a dupe vs. the readers.

    9) 0 = The number of dupes deleted.

    10) The post (God forbid) announcing its closing will probably be posted twice.

    --

    Never take moderation advice from sigs, including this one.

  237. What about this? by toph42 · · Score: 1

    Hey guys, nevermind this article, I found something even more amazing.
    I know it's offtopic, but have you guys heard about this new RFC3514 that implements an "Evil Bit" for TCP/IP?

  238. Baha! by Chymaera · · Score: 1

    Haha, good joke! Good thing the EVIL BIT told me it was a dupe!

  239. Both of you should know better by DaveAtFraud · · Score: 1

    You know the law: Use a pun; go to prison!

    --
    They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither safety nor liberty.
    Ben
  240. ha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What's amusing about this is how he has you all up in arms. :D

  241. The best posts ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    are all moderated 1

  242. That tears it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm submitting this article right now! It my best chance to be published on /.!

  243. I already own patent by BagMan2 · · Score: 1

    Sorry to disappoint everybody, but I already have a patent covering this idea. My licensing fees are very reasonable though, so I don't expect it to be a problem.

  244. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  245. THIS IS A TERRIBLE APRIL FOOL'S JOKE! by mustangdavis · · Score: 1


    and prevent the beepers of tired sysadmins from going off and interfering with Warcraft III!"



    Beepers interfering with Warcraft III!!!

    AHHHHHHH!!!!!


    Silly people .... you should turn those off BEFORE you start playing!


    What a nightmere! A beeper going off while I'm chain lightning a bunch of wisps!!!


    NOT FUNNY!


  246. It's a joke. Laugh by Amer · · Score: 1

    What's really funny is reading all the comments of people getting pissed off :) Way to go, Taco!

    --
    -- To gain that which is worth having, it may be necessary to lose everything else. Bernadette Devlin McAliskey
  247. Offensive, Inflammatory, Innappropriate, Offtopic by Oriumpor · · Score: 1

    now that we have established a BAD april fools article, how about we stop doing them. After the first few years it gets kinda old.

    AND not that long ago, this was A DUPLICATE AND an april fools article BOTH which I HATE.

    Stop with the april fools, tag them jokes, put them in the humor section WHATEVER, just make it so I can filter this garbage out.

  248. Brainwashing by jd · · Score: 1
    In a move long expected by the Department of Homeland Security, CmdrTaco was revealed to have Suspected AlQwerty links, after he attempted to brainwash the readers of Slashdot with a triple posting.


    AlQwerty is a terrorist organization aimed at the overthrow of the Dvorkian empire and the establishment of the Old Key Order.

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
  249. I understand now by Obfiscator · · Score: 1
    The previous posting of this story today only got about 150 comments.

    Posting it again has spawned almost 300.

    Very clever...

    --
    "Nothing shocks me. I'm a scientist." -Indiana Jones
  250. *Real* RFC's are 100+ pages long by badfish2 · · Score: 1

    word is bond.

    --
    "On the Internet, nobody knows you're a dog!" - a dog
  251. We are all very sad people. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I started laughing when i read this and explained to my girlfriend about the triple post and the evil bit. She just squinted at me and left. Girls just dont get it. Why doesnt chris rock talk all jiggity about tcp/ip standards.

    1. Re:We are all very sad people. by boy_afraid · · Score: 1

      Yeah, there's got to be a geek comedian somwhere.

      "And then I said, that's not a serial port, that's a USB 2.0 port, HA HA HA!"

  252. Has this every happened, triple dupe ?? by boy_afraid · · Score: 1

    Has this every happened, triple dupe ??

    I guess because it's April Fool's Day, 4-1-2003.

  253. Did it occur to you by UberQwerty · · Score: 2, Insightful

    that he might be doing it on purpose? To annoy you?

    --


    PUBLIC SPLIT ON WHETHER BUSH IS A DIVIDER -CNN scrolling banner, 10/15/2004
  254. Obligatory ISIHAC Late Arrival by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Arriving late at the Slashdot Ball, give a warm welcome to Mr and Mrs BennettDoesntTacoRereadIfNotRewrite, and their son, Gordon BennettDoesntTacoRereadIfNotRewrite.

  255. I can't get published, but this crap goes 3x. by gurps_npc · · Score: 1

    I find a great article about an invisibility cloak try to submit and they reject, but this crap gets published 3 times? Someone needs a karma adjustment.

    --
    excitingthingstodo.blogspot.com
  256. OMG a third dupe, go taco ! go! by oPless · · Score: 1

    Network Working Group S. Bellovin
    Request for Comments: 3514 AT&T Labs Research
    Category: Informational 1 April 2003
    The Security Flag in the IPv4 Header

    Status of this Memo

    This memo provides information for the Internet community. It does not specify an Internet standard of any kind. Distribution of this memo is unlimited.

    Copyright Notice

    Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2003). All Rights Reserved.

    Abstract

    Firewalls, packet filters, intrusion detection systems, and the like often have difficulty distinguishing between packets that have malicious intent and those that are merely unusual. We define a security flag in the IPv4 header as a means of distinguishing the two cases.

    1. Introduction

    Firewalls CBR03 , packet filters, intrusion detection systems, and the like often have difficulty distinguishing between packets that have malicious intent and those that are merely unusual. The problem is that making such determinations is hard. To solve this problem, we define a security flag, known as the "evil" bit, in the IPv4 RFC791 header. Benign packets have this bit set to 0; those that are used for an attack will have the bit set to 1.

    1.1. Terminology

    The keywords MUST, MUST NOT, REQUIRED, SHALL, SHALL NOT, SHOULD, SHOULD NOT, RECOMMENDED, MAY, and OPTIONAL, when they appear in this document, are to be interpreted as described in RFC2119 .

    2. Syntax

    The high-order bit of the IP fragment offset field is the only unused bit in the IP header. Accordingly, the selection of the bit position is not left to IANA.

    The bit field is laid out as follows:

    0
    +-+
    |E|
    +-+

    Currently-assigned values are defined as follows:

    0x0 If the bit is set to 0, the packet has no evil intent. Hosts, network elements, etc., SHOULD assume that the packet is harmless, and SHOULD NOT take any defensive measures. (We note
    that this part of the spec is already implemented by many common desktop operating systems.)

    0x1 If the bit is set to 1, the packet has evil intent. Secure systems SHOULD try to defend themselves against such packets. Insecure systems MAY chose to crash, be penetrated, etc.

    3. Setting the Evil Bit

    There are a number of ways in which the evil bit may be set. Attack applications may use a suitable API to request that it be set. Systems that do not have other mechanisms MUST provide such an API; attack programs MUST use it.

    Multi-level insecure operating systems may have special levels for attack programs; the evil bit MUST be set by default on packets emanating from programs running at such levels. However, the system MAY provide an API to allow it to be cleared for non-malicious activity by users who normally engage in attack behavior.

    Fragments that by themselves are dangerous MUST have the evil bit set. If a packet with the evil bit set is fragmented by an intermediate router and the fragments themselves are not dangerous, the evil bit MUST be cleared in the fragments, and MUST be turned back on in the reassembled packet.

    Intermediate systems are sometimes used to launder attack connections. Packets to such systems that are intended to be relayed to a target SHOULD have the evil bit set.

    Some applications hand-craft their own packets. If these packets are part of an attack, the application MUST set the evil bit by itself.

    In networks protected by firewalls, it is axiomatic that all attackers are on the outside of the firewall. Therefore, hosts inside the firewall MUST NOT set the evil bit on any packets.

    Because NAT RFC3022 boxes modify packets, they SHOULD set the evil bit on such packets. "Transparent" http and email proxies SHOULD set the evil bit on their reply packets to the innocent client host.

    Some hosts scan other hosts in a fashion that can alert intrusion detection systems. If the scanning is part of a benign research project, the evil bit MUST NOT be set

  257. Taking bets on whether scripties actually use this by Squelch+Oil · · Score: 0

    I believe some joker already released an NMAP patch that flips this bit. Who want's to bet there are scans occuring on the net with this bit set already? =)

  258. Dear god, people.. the article itself is a joke by c0d3h4x0r · · Score: 1

    While you are all bickering about whether the triplicate posts are a joke or not, you're missing out on the fact that the RFC itself is a complete joke!

    3. Setting the Evil Bit. There are a number of ways in which the evil bit may be set. Attack applications may use a suitable API to request that it be set. Systems that do not have other mechanisms MUST provide such an API; attack programs MUST use it.

    Wait a minute... as a virus author, it is my duty to make sure my virus sets the EVIL bit so as to clearly identify itself as harmful? LOL... yeah, THAT's clearly real.

    --
    Moderator hint: a comment is neither "Flamebait" nor "Troll" if it is true.
  259. Slashdot Mirror... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Since /. has been /.'ed today, bbspot has posted a couple mirrors of all of todays headlines here Mirror 1 and Mirror 2

  260. Ethnic Origin Identifier Flag in IPv4 RFC by NynexNinja · · Score: 1

    RFC 3515 specifies the Ethnic Origin Identifier (EOID) flag added to IPv4 packets.

  261. MEGA dupe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    enough, this have been posted FOUR separate times so far:


    http://slashdot.org/articles/03/04/01/0218226.sh tm l


    http://slashdot.org/articles/03/04/01/133217.sht ml


    http://slashdot.org/articles/03/04/01/1434209.sh tm l


    http://slashdot.org/articles/03/04/01/1440230.sh tm l

  262. April First by pommiekiwifruit · · Score: 1

    Gosh, all this effort each year just to make fun of people who still think April 1st is the first day of the year. I.e. the tax departments of the world, who don't care what that uppity new guy Julius Caesar says, starting the year in January will never catch on.

  263. As far as journalistic integrity goes... by Hallucinosis · · Score: 1

    we're still on track.

  264. IN SOVIET RUSSIA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...Evil bit sets YOU!

  265. boring the reader with redundancy, heh ! by forged · · Score: 1
    those that are used for boring the reader with redundancy will have the bit set to 1.

    LOL !!!!!!!!!

    If Slashdot had any value between 0 and 1, your post alone had made it worthwhile for me today =)

  266. GWB names himself good bit by Creepy · · Score: 1


    George W Bush today named himself the Good bit, and anything Arab the Evil bit. Everyone else will be sorted on a case-by-case basis. The NSA hailed this development, stating that it will help packet sorting by at least threefold, as well as aiding in priority sorting for Carnivore.

  267. Microsoft Will No Support RFC-3514 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mirosoft will not support RFC 3514, as it does not align with our security directions. We currently use certificates to identify trusted hosts. This proposal would mean millions of Windows users and the Microsoft domain would effectively be denied internet access. This is just another attempt by SUN and the government of China to prevent customers from using our software. We believe that everyone should just get a MS Passport account and let us identify those that are a security risk. We expect to announce a deal with a major airline carrier shortly that will provide a 5% discount to passengers that are cleared for boarding through the Microsoft Passport system. Such measures cannot be even imagined under RFC-3514. Although too advanced for Windows XP and earlier operating systems. Windows 2003 will have support for the first phase of this comprehensive security initiative. Microsoft will be expanding and offering these security services to Corporations as well as Individuals as .NET-BACK services. I think this provides another compelling reason not to install Linux or any Open Source software. It is not enough to trust the 'bit', you have to trust the bit man.

  268. HAT TRICK!!! by billstewart · · Score: 1

    Wow! A hat trick!
    And apparently this is only the evil beginning....

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  269. Re:HAHA! MAKE IT STOP! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey, I enjoyed reading your dupe too. Why not post that again?

    <g>

  270. Last Post! by alpg · · Score: 0

    * This is complicated. Has to do with interrupts. Thus, I am
    * scared witless. Therefore I refuse to write this function. :-P
    -- From the maclinux patch

    - this post brought to you by the Automated Last Post Generator...