I love how people get so uppity about incorrect wording. Yes, you can get a correct result from a false assumption, however, this result has not been proven to be LOGICALLY SOUND.
Interesting. Have you actually contacted Sasktel about this? I've had rock solid service for years from them, and can't actually remember there being an outage (except for when someone broke into the phone cabinet in my building and ripped out the patches).
You do have a completely valid point about artifacting though. This is inherent to all digital cable systems, not just the DSL ones.
Just a satisfied customer testimonial: We had a click-type ratchet that started not clicking anymore. We went to Sears and asked them about it. They gave us a bearing-replacement kit and offered to install it for us, to pick back up tomorrow. We looked at the instructions and did it ourselves in about 10 minutes.
Very satisfied with their lifetime deal. They didn't even ask for a receipt, because you can't really buy Craftsman tools anywhere else.
The problem with doing patent searches is that if you KNOWINGLY violate a patent (in the US), then you are subject to treble damages. IANAL, IANAA (I am not an American), but this is my understanding of the situation. In many companies you are expressly forbidden from doing any kind of patent research.
Local root vulnerabilities, while bad, are still not AS bad as remote root vulnerabilities. When you can spam a few packets at a machine and be given back a root shell, that's when you have serious issues.
ca.ingrammicro.com has this horrible javascript. Here's the double-bad part. They detect if you're running Netscape 6, and return proper javascript if you are. Otherwise, it returns IE dependant javascript that uses non-existant parts of the mozilla DOM.
That's why you have to do it over and over:). Make some noise. Get the problem noticed. If it's a commercial site, and they start believing they're losing customers over it, then they might take notice. Or they might lose you as a customer.
Indeed they are. However, if you want to participate in a huge act of civil disobedience, you should damn well know what you are facing for consequences, and be prepared to accept them.
Being a manual, you would not have had to crank the engine again. Simply by leaving it in gear would keep turning the engine over much faster than the starter ever could.
This part of the argument always makes me smile. I'm not targetting you, but this was the first post I saw that mentioned Civil Disobedience. Civil Disobedience is NOT a valid legal excuse. The nature of Civil Disobedience is this: you disagree with a law, and are willing to accept the consequences (arrest) to try to illustrate the problems with it. The part that most people miss regarding copyright is the fact that they must STILL FACE THE CONSEQUENCES.
99% of the time when you're trying to get rid of Grub, you've already decided that you don't want to use Linux. This would make your drive perfectly suitable to run Windows again.
Every time I've heard someone complain about Grub not disappearing was after removing their linux installs and try to re-install Windows, while finding that Grub still wants to load.
Windows 95/98: fdisk/mbr Windows XP: from a recovery console, use fixmbr Linux: if you want to completely remove it: dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/hda bs=512 count=1
I love how people get so uppity about incorrect wording. Yes, you can get a correct result from a false assumption, however, this result has not been proven to be LOGICALLY SOUND.
Interesting. Have you actually contacted Sasktel about this? I've had rock solid service for years from them, and can't actually remember there being an outage (except for when someone broke into the phone cabinet in my building and ripped out the patches).
You do have a completely valid point about artifacting though. This is inherent to all digital cable systems, not just the DSL ones.
Just a satisfied customer testimonial: We had a click-type ratchet that started not clicking anymore. We went to Sears and asked them about it. They gave us a bearing-replacement kit and offered to install it for us, to pick back up tomorrow. We looked at the instructions and did it ourselves in about 10 minutes.
Very satisfied with their lifetime deal. They didn't even ask for a receipt, because you can't really buy Craftsman tools anywhere else.
Close
Watts is measured in Joules (energy) / second. If you multiply by time, you can either get Joules, or Watt-Hours (depending on how you scale it).
Still 100 watts for 3 hours != 300 watts.
http://service1.symantec.com/SUPPORT/nav.nsf/docid /2001092114452606
http://www.afrotechmods.com/cheap/arnoldpad/arnold pad.htm
This mouse is also induction charged, although it seems this new one may have some of the bugs worked out, like the pad-heating problem...
The problem with doing patent searches is that if you KNOWINGLY violate a patent (in the US), then you are subject to treble damages. IANAL, IANAA (I am not an American), but this is my understanding of the situation. In many companies you are expressly forbidden from doing any kind of patent research.
Americans complain about having to master dribble like C++.
Do you mean drivel?
Local root vulnerabilities, while bad, are still not AS bad as remote root vulnerabilities. When you can spam a few packets at a machine and be given back a root shell, that's when you have serious issues.
ca.ingrammicro.com has this horrible javascript. Here's the double-bad part. They detect if you're running Netscape 6, and return proper javascript if you are. Otherwise, it returns IE dependant javascript that uses non-existant parts of the mozilla DOM.
That's why you have to do it over and over
It would hurt the engine terribly if it were stuck with the accelerator to the floor.
Indeed they are. However, if you want to participate in a huge act of civil disobedience, you should damn well know what you are facing for consequences, and be prepared to accept them.
Being a manual, you would not have had to crank the engine again. Simply by leaving it in gear would keep turning the engine over much faster than the starter ever could.
This part of the argument always makes me smile. I'm not targetting you, but this was the first post I saw that mentioned Civil Disobedience. Civil Disobedience is NOT a valid legal excuse. The nature of Civil Disobedience is this: you disagree with a law, and are willing to accept the consequences (arrest) to try to illustrate the problems with it. The part that most people miss regarding copyright is the fact that they must STILL FACE THE CONSEQUENCES.
That probably was the plan... Problem is, there are no shuttles coming up anymore.
WOW! That's amazingly cheap! In Canada, you'd need two 5 "guilder" coins and some extra change!
I second that motion! Man, was that awesome!
My university is using it just fine!
Not necessarily. Let's say my father has a brother, Bob. Bob marries Margaret. Margaret is my aunt. Margaret's father is not my grandfather.
Completely remove.... means... COMPLETELY REMOVE.
99% of the time when you're trying to get rid of Grub, you've already decided that you don't want to use Linux. This would make your drive perfectly suitable to run Windows again.
Every time I've heard someone complain about Grub not disappearing was after removing their linux installs and try to re-install Windows, while finding that Grub still wants to load.
What are you trying to replace it with?
Windows 95/98: fdisk
Windows XP: from a recovery console, use fixmbr
Linux: if you want to completely remove it: dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/hda bs=512 count=1
That's why new users should have to start on Macs. A mouse with a single button. Point at it and hit the big button
Of course, because that's blatantly obvious to a new user.
Emm Er deux sounds more like merdeux, but to my rusty French, I believe that would translate to "shitty".