Slashdot Mirror


Wireless Mouse with no Batteries

GI Joe writes "Hardcoreware.net have posted a review of a mouse with no batteries; it receives its charge through induction from the USB powered mousepad. Of course this means you must use the mouse on this mousepad, taking away some of the big advantages of a wireless mouse. However, they said that the mouse is otherwise very accurate, and has no lag at all since it uses RFID."

329 comments

  1. RFID? Don't they mean RF? by Trogre · · Score: 2, Funny

    Oh, BTW, FP!
    Ack, too many TLAs!

    --
    "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
  2. hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So instead of powering the mouse, you power the mouse pad... Seems kinda pointless. The only advantage is not having to replace batteries all the time.

    1. Re:hmm... by Mycroft_VIII · · Score: 2, Informative

      Not entirely, I have such a device where the 'pad' provides power. However it's a Wacom pad and bothe the included pen and mouse are powered by the pad.
      In this case it makes sense because it not about being completly wireless per se, but about having the ability to switch between normal mousework and pressure sensitive pen work with a BUNCH of wires or batteries.

      Mycroft

      --
      https://signup.leagueoflegends.com/?ref=4c3ed6600b6ea
    2. Re:hmm... by NevermindPhreak · · Score: 1

      many gamers sometimes feel the mouse wire gets in the way. this eliminates the wire. it may be targeted towards them, but im not sure.

    3. Re:hmm... by Allen+Zadr · · Score: 1

      I fully agree in that this things seems to be no different than a digitizer pad. The only benefit is that this will likely be cheaper, but you loose the pen.

      --
      Kinetic stupidity has a new brand leader: Allen Zadr.
    4. Re:hmm... by ikewillis · · Score: 1

      Seems especially pointless considering it has already been accomplished about 10 years ago by Wacom...

    5. Re:hmm... by Mycroft_VIII · · Score: 1

      I should hope it's cheaper, this wacom pad cost $100. Was an impulse buy of the sort I rarely engage in these days.

      Mycroft

      --
      https://signup.leagueoflegends.com/?ref=4c3ed6600b6ea
    6. Re:hmm... by FinestLittleSpace · · Score: 1

      ugh yeah. The wacom tablets and massively expensive. Just try looking for a A4 one (note: its not a good ide aunless you're loaded...)... theyre marvellous but heck are they high priced. I've yet to swallow and buy one.... but soon, soon.......

    7. Re:hmm... by Mycroft_VIII · · Score: 1

      The Price is what I don't entirely understand. Shure when the tech was new I could see it, but what the heck causes them to cost so much. Mine is only 4"x6" in active area. That's about $4 per square inch!
      Hmm, I'm gonna have to see if I can find more about how they work. 256 pressure levels, dunno what the x,y resolution is though. It can differentiate wich end of the pen is in use, and the pen has a two way button, but it feels like a plastic toy and ways almost nothing.
      I'd guesse somthing like how RFID tags work, only a bit more complex.

      Mycroft

      --
      https://signup.leagueoflegends.com/?ref=4c3ed6600b6ea
    8. Re:hmm... by Mycroft_VIII · · Score: 1

      Whoops, got it wrong. 512 pressure levels and 4x5. or $5(us) per squre inch on the one I got (the dark blue graphire3.

      Mycroft

      --
      https://signup.leagueoflegends.com/?ref=4c3ed6600b6ea
  3. There goes that... by powerlinekid · · Score: 5, Funny

    See if the company was smart they'd leave "RFID" out of the documentation because all the tin foil hat nuts are going to freak about their mouse tracking brain patterns or something.

    Although now that I think about, I would like a mouse that tracked my brain patters. Free up an extra hand and such.

    --

    can't sleep slashdot will eat me
    1. Re:There goes that... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      interesting...

    2. Re:There goes that... by noidentity · · Score: 5, Funny

      See if the company was smart they'd leave "RFID" out of the documentation because all the tin foil hat nuts are going to freak about their mouse tracking brain patterns or something.

      Holy shit! With this they can probably track every move you make at 600 dpi or more! When will they stop???

    3. Re:There goes that... by dabigpaybackski · · Score: 1
      See if the company was smart they'd leave "RFID" out of the documentation because all the tin foil hat nuts are going to freak about their mouse tracking brain patterns or something.

      Why should I worry about it tracking my brain wave patterns if I'm wearing my tinfoil hat?

      Sheesh, you probably don't even know what the word "conspiracy" means.

      --
      "OH SHIT, THERE'S A HORSE IN THE HOSPITAL!"
    4. Re:There goes that... by aka.Daniel'Z · · Score: 1

      Although now that I think about, I would like a mouse that tracked my brain patters. Free up an extra hand and such.

      That may be a bit off-topic, but I do remember seeing somewhere around 3DTop (that 3d desktop which should be here) about a company that built such a device. Unfortunately, a quick google doesn't return anything and I'm unable to open the site to check... I've seen it around year 2002, by the way.

    5. Re:There goes that... by powerlinekid · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I'm more concerned about what happens when you get your tin foil hat really close to a microwave.

      --

      can't sleep slashdot will eat me
    6. Re:There goes that... by radio.cgt · · Score: 3, Informative

      Not sure if this is related to what you were looking for, but SplashPower are making 'charging pads' that charge any (electrical) device as long as the battery is fitted with a kind of reciever. Unavailable in shops at the moment though, although apparently they're working with some unnamed companies for launch in 2005.

    7. Re:There goes that... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Although now that I think about, I would like a mouse that tracked my brain patters. Free up an extra hand and such.

      And what exactly would you do with that extra hand?

    8. Re:There goes that... by caino59 · · Score: 3, Funny
      Free up an extra hand and such.


      that would be helpfull for so many slashdotters....

      not only does it free up that hand, but your mind automagically goes to the proper pr0n page...
    9. Re:There goes that... by powerlinekid · · Score: 1

      not only does it free up that hand, but your mind automagically goes to the proper pr0n page...

      you've read my mind... ba-ba-ching

      --

      can't sleep slashdot will eat me
    10. Re:There goes that... by mikiN · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Just imagine the looks from the poor chap happily clocking up some mouse-miles when a bunch of governmentt health officials knock down his door demanding that he "TAKE A MICROPAUSE RIGHT NOW!"
      --
      Workrave - Helps relieve the strain on your wrists without straining your wallet.

      --
      The Hacker's Guide To The Kernel: Don't panic()!
    11. Re:There goes that... by Aeiri · · Score: 1

      I'm more concerned about what happens when you get your tin foil hat really close to a microwave.

      His lead bra explodes.

    12. Re:There goes that... by devilspgd · · Score: 1

      Okay... THAT is cool.

      --
      Give a man a fish, he'll eat for a day, but teach a man to phish...
    13. Re:There goes that... by MacGod · · Score: 1

      Holy shit! With this they can probably track every move you make at 600 dpi or more! When will they stop???

      They'll probably stop once they hit 2400dpi. Beyond that, you're just tracking individual neurons!

      --
      "Reality is merely an illusion, albeit a very persistent one " -Albert Einstein
  4. Bleh.. by Karamchand · · Score: 3, Interesting

    ..if you already "invent" a wireless mouse, why not get the power from the movement the human being makes? I guess I'd notice a slight strenghtening of the movement!

    1. Re:Bleh.. by davidbrit2 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That's exactly what I was thinking. Aren't there wristwatches that do something like that?

    2. Re:Bleh.. by Calroth · · Score: 1

      ...why not get the power from the movement the human being makes?

      I've often wondered why they don't make a wireless keyboard that works that way. Surely there's enough energy from hitting keys to power a RF signal (after all, there's enough to make sound when you hit keys).

      On the other hand, the two AA batteries in my wireless keyboard tend to last several months, so there's probably little demand. And it doesn't address what I consider to be the main limitation of wireless keyboards: not having the little caps/num/scroll-lock lights on them.

    3. Re:Bleh.. by Calroth · · Score: 4, Insightful

      ...why not get the power from the movement the human being makes?

      Oh, and whilst I think about it:

      Normal wireless mouses contain batteries, which add extra weight, which makes them slightly harder to move around. So if you have a wireless mouse without batteries, but which was powered by hand movements, it's possible that it could still be easier to move around!

    4. Re:Bleh.. by Karamchand · · Score: 1

      lol, that's a nice thought. Thanks for it! :) Kind regards, Calroth! K.

    5. Re:Bleh.. by empaler · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yep. Perfect for people like me who tend to forget my watch on a shelf for a few days. Or months. Just pick it up and shake it back and forth (making you look as if you're excessively masturbating), and presto: it works again.

    6. Re:Bleh.. by rainman_bc · · Score: 1

      Think back to the days of the light that was powered by the wheel of your bicycle. (I love the simpsons episode that spoofed that). You'd have some kind of friction on some sort of traction mechanism to generate energy.

      We'd be back to the old trackball days :(

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    7. Re:Bleh.. by sjwrick · · Score: 1

      I thought the battery weight was figured into the design of the mouse. I can't stand those mini usb mice which weigh next to nothing. I once opened an old phone handset and it had a weight in it. The weight was there to give the handset some intrinsic value.

    8. Re:Bleh.. by Hes+Nikke · · Score: 1

      it doesn't address what I consider to be the main limitation of wireless keyboards: not having the little caps/num/scroll-lock lights on them.

      I'd rather that my wireless keyboard not have caps/num/scroll-lock *BUTTONS*.... they are useless remnants of an older age. Just look how Scroll Lock has been repurposed for use in kvms.... and when i'm on a PC, I pop the num-lock keycap off... otherwise I hit it about 1/6th of the time I go for the 7 key. uhg.

      (Posted by someone who's done something about his Caps Lock key...)

      Getting back on topic, a wireless mouse that requires a pad rather than batteries has been around for ages and ages. [link]

      --
      Don't call me back. Give me a call back. Bye. So yeah. But bye our, well, but alright we are on a shirt this chill.
    9. Re:Bleh.. by TheUnknownOne · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The watches do not generate electric power, they have a weight that winds a spring. Mice are not typically moved in only one direction, so you would lose a good bit of energy, also I doubt even if it was moving straight that it would generate enough power for an optical mouse and a transmitter. (Besides the fact that you would still need batteries :) )

    10. Re:Bleh.. by chipset · · Score: 1

      It is done in all sorts of products. By adding weight, people believe they are more solid than they thought. For example, I worked for Iomega. The Iomega Buz's (a video capture device) breakout box had a weight in the bottom to give it the a truly solid feeling.

      I believe the new iPof disktop dock is the same way....

      Strange how solid = quality.

    11. Re:Bleh.. by Drakonite · · Score: 1, Informative
      The watches do not generate electric power, they have a weight that winds a spring.

      Um... no. While a watch like you describe MIGHT exist (I've never seen one, nor heard of one working on that priciple) I promise you the majority of batteryless watches are electrically powered quarts watches.

      They have a small knetic generator (you can google if you want to know how they work) which charges a power cell, which in turn runs the watch as though it was a (semi) normal quartz watch.

      The Seiko Knetic is a good example of this type of watch.

      --
      Shoot Pixels, Not People!
    12. Re:Bleh.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Reminds me of the huge iron weights IBM used to put in the bottom of some of their 370 mainframes, but those had a real purpose. If they weren't there, the weight of the logic gates would cause the frame to tip over and bend out of shape.

    13. Re:Bleh.. by servognome · · Score: 2, Informative

      Most self-winding watches I've seen work on that principle. Even the rolex knockoffs I've seen use the moving weight to wind a spring.

      --
      D6 63 0D 70 89 81 BB 8E 7B 7C 5F 5D 54 EA AB 73
    14. Re:Bleh.. by MConlon · · Score: 1
      Um... no. While a watch like you describe MIGHT exist (I've never seen one, nor heard of one working on that priciple) I promise you the majority of batteryless watches are electrically powered quarts watches.

      You need to look up self-winding watches.

      MJC

    15. Re:Bleh.. by Aeiri · · Score: 1

      Some people use the arrow keys and home, pgup/down, del, etc on the number pad, believe it or not. I happen to know at least one person that does.

      I have to take off not only just CAPS Lock, but also Insert. The only times that I hit those buttons are when I'm turning it off because I accidentally hit it in the first place.

      I still don't even know what Scroll Lock did... I've read about it before but all I remember about it is it isn't very memorable.

    16. Re:Bleh.. by Aeiri · · Score: 1

      I think it's because it feels more durable, like it's not going to break. Also the fact that it feels like you are buying more than you really are (which is technically true, but you are just buying more metal ;)).

    17. Re:Bleh.. by stoborrobots · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'd guess that the weight was there to provide enough force on the spring-loaded cutoff-switch when the handset was in the cradle... Those things took some pressing. Modern phones have much lighter switches, which the weight of the plastic is enough to press down.

    18. Re:Bleh.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While Seiko watches do use a cap, a generator, and a quartz crystal, and a motor, a GREAT MANY self winding watches (which have indeed been around for decades) do no such thing... And this especially goes for the "high end" watches, who's manufactuers relish the engineering that goes into their tiny mechanical marvels, and hold quartz and electricity in disdain.

      So... Um... YES. They do exist, so stfu and look it up before you open your steam hole next time.

    19. Re:Bleh.. by bdbolton · · Score: 2, Interesting

      They have watches powered by the movement of the hand. Why not mice?

    20. Re:Bleh.. by frankvl · · Score: 1

      why not track the movement of the hand without a mouse at all? it's got a lot of specific radiation which could be easily and accurately located (I think..)

    21. Re:Bleh.. by martingunnarsson · · Score: 1

      I don't know what kind of watch you use, but in most cases watch batteries last for years. And you can get them replaced really cheap! It's kind of cool to have a watch without a battery, but that's about it. You're not going to save any money using it, since they are usually rather expensive.

      --
      Martin
    22. Re:Bleh.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What, like a laptop trackpad for instance?

    23. Re:Bleh.. by jeremymiles · · Score: 1
      Excessively masturbating
      What's that then? Is that like a "excessively quick network", "overpowered CPU", or "too many bullets"?
      --
      GENERATION 26: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation.
    24. Re:Bleh.. by Hal_Porter · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      LOL!

      Your hands might be trackable, but I wear tinfoil gloves.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    25. Re:Bleh.. by Mwongozi · · Score: 1

      I dunno. If I leave my watch on a shelf for a few days, or months, I can pick it up and... well it's already working. The battery in mine lasts for a good few years, and replacing a battery every few *years* is hardly a chore.

    26. Re:Bleh.. by malfunct · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The only reason caps lock would go extinct is if all of the real typists died. Its a very useful key when used correctly and makes the keyboard far more ergonomic than not having it (because holding down shift can't be good for your hands/wrists).

      --

      "You can now flame me, I am full of love,"

    27. Re:Bleh.. by lamplighter · · Score: 1

      I have three Palm cradles (and one Palm ... long story); these things are heavier than they need to be, and I'm glad, because it keeps them from being top-heavy and easily knocked over when the Palm is actually in them. I haven't taken one apart yet, but there must be a weight in there.

    28. Re:Bleh.. by empaler · · Score: 1

      I've had this watch since Seiko first released it into the market (don't get me wrong, I'm not a rich bastard; my aunt is), and that's quite a few years... And it happens often that I forget it for a few months in the pocket of a coat I don't wear that season (or forget that I have...).
      On top of that, I'm a lazy bastard. As I've learned easily to do without a watch (I have my Palm, for instance), I tend to not get myself gathered to go have the batteries changed... Therefore - it's a perfect watch for me.

    29. Re:Bleh.. by Zone-MR · · Score: 1

      Making the mouse power itsself from hand
      movements will not neccessarily make it lighter.

      A heavier mouse has a large inertia, and hence a larger amount of energy is required to move it around. This energy could be harnessed to power the electronics.

      If you make the mouse lighter, you need to put significantly less energy into accelerating it, so it's unlikely you can tap enough energy from the movment to power the optical sensor.

  5. Induction? What the hell? by Realistic_Dragon · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Why has no one build a mouse with a optical sensor that ALSO has a old style ball hooked up to a small dynamo.

    Self powered, never needs the batteries changed. And since precision doesnt matter the ball never needs cleaning, so it's not a disadvantage like it is for tracking.

    Easily enough power could be generated for the optical system and a low power RF transmitter :\

    --
    Beep beep.
    1. Re:Induction? What the hell? by loconet · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The ball still needs cleaning as it is used over time, gunk accumulates and the movement of the mouse over the mousepad's surface is not smooth.

      --
      [alk]
    2. Re:Induction? What the hell? by fireboy1919 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Ball doesn't move = no induction.

      Ball moves slower than necessary = not enough induction.
      It would need cleaning. Also, I doubt you could actually get enough power that way.

      --
      Mod me down and I will become more powerful than you can possibly imagine!
    3. Re:Induction? What the hell? by noidentity · · Score: 1

      Self powered, never needs the batteries changed. And since precision doesnt matter the ball never needs cleaning, so it's not a disadvantage like it is for tracking.

      I still use a classic mouse and when the rollers start to accumulate crud it drives me nuts since I can feel the "thump thump" when I do quick horizontal sweeps with my wrist. I've used mice with thick caked crud on the rollers and never encountered any accuracy problems.

    4. Re:Induction? What the hell? by DarkMantle · · Score: 1

      That's an RFID transmitter :D

      --
      DarkMantle I been bored, so I started a blog.
    5. Re:Induction? What the hell? by TummyX · · Score: 1

      Cause that's a stupid idea (although it sounds good). You will have all the disadvantages of a ball -- needing a hard straight surface, cleaning (yes you still need to clean it), expense and mechanical failures. My Microsoft cordless mouse goes for *at least* 3 months (that's as long as I've had it and I haven't changed the batteries yet) on one set of batteries and I use it all the time. The mouse can also run on only one AA battery (rather than two) if needed. I really don't think having to change your batteries every 3 months is a chore.

    6. Re:Induction? What the hell? by Michael+Spencer+Jr. · · Score: 1

      This may be because to generate that power one would have to slow the mouse down to do it. Your mouse would no-longer glide effortlessly across a smooth mouse pad, but instead would feel as if it was moving through molasses.

      Experiment 1: Put one finger on top of your mouse, push down hard, and then use the rest of your fingers to grasp the mouse and move it around. It still moves, but how much would your wrist hurt after doing that for 8 hours?

      Experiment 2: Connect a hand-crank generator to a variable resistor and voltmeter, so you can measure the power output from the crank. Attach a mouse to the crank of the generator, and establish a slow crank rate that gives you 0.8 volts on the voltmeter. Orient the mouse so it's horizontal, so its movement is similar to how you move a mouse on a mouse pad. Now slowly increase resistance to around 61.5 ohms, which gives you 13 mA consumption. (Your resistor will only be eating about 10 miliwatts, so the resistor should barely even get warm.) Now keep moving the mouse like that for about 10 minutes. What does your forearm feel like?

      Don't cheat and use your whole arm, or change your hand position to something more suited to turning a crank. You're moving a mouse around, not cranking a survival flashlight or radio.

      (Microsoft and Logitech Cordless Mouse battery life comparison, which is my source for 0.8 volts and 13 mA: http://www.percept.com/media/MicrosoftMouseBattery ExecSummary.pdf )

      --Michael Spencer

    7. Re:Induction? What the hell? by Lihtan · · Score: 1

      Oh boo hoo... So your pointing device needs a little occasional maintenance. You can scrape the crud off the rollers AND wipe them down with alcohol in less time than it take to do an oil change in your car. Lemme guess, you don't do your own oil changes either?

      --
      Divide by zero hurts my brain.
    8. Re:Induction? What the hell? by cbiltcliffe · · Score: 1
      And since precision doesnt matter the ball never needs cleaning, so it's not a disadvantage like it is for tracking.
      I don't clean a mouseball because it starts tracking poorly. I generally clean them because the movement starts to feel like shit. It bothers me physically way before it bothers me digitally....
      --
      "City hall" in German is "Rathaus" Kinda explains a few things......
    9. Re:Induction? What the hell? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      who the fuck has time or energy to change their own oil when it cost like $20 to have some HS dropout do it for you?

      Lemme guess, you mow your own lawn and clean your bathroom yourself?

    10. Re:Induction? What the hell? by op00to · · Score: 2, Funny

      I don't do my own oil changes. Is there oil to change in a commuter train?

    11. Re:Induction? What the hell? by Mycroft_VIII · · Score: 1

      You must have one that actually shuts the damn light off, My brother was looking at cordless mice/keyboard combo's and though I tried to convince him to get the logitec set (slightly cheaper, less 'eye-candy' crap) he insisted on the MS pair because 'windows is so unreliable I don't want to give it any more excuse than I have to. I expect microsoft would at least support thier own hardware right'. (I dunno how I kept from laughing myself sensless at that gem)
      Needless to say the thing is a pos, takes 2 minutes if you switch channels because of inerference to find one it can use (and of course you have NO mouse or keyboard during that time) and it needs the batteries replace every 3-4 weeks because it keeps the bright red led lit 24/7.

      Mycroft

      --
      https://signup.leagueoflegends.com/?ref=4c3ed6600b6ea
    12. Re:Induction? What the hell? by tech49er · · Score: 1

      A Better idea would be to use those motion-based generator things. You move, weight inside mouse moves, turns some generator gizmo. Kind of like how some watches wind themselves.

      BTW, doesn't this hark back to those old-style optical mice where you had to use a special reflective mouse-pad that got scratched and dirty and were crap?

      And doesn't the fact that you have to use your mouse with a mouse-pad at all defeat one of the key feature's of an optical mouse in the first place?

      --
      "... always going forward 'cause we cant find reverse! "
    13. Re:Induction? What the hell? by TummyX · · Score: 1

      I've got the new intellimouse pro 2.0. i think the old optical intellimouse pro shut the light off but it was so imprecise because of it. Moving the mouse a pixel or two to the left after the light had turned off was pretty mich impossible because it took too long for it to start sampling again.

      Anyway, my mouse goes for months on a pair of batteries. Remember not to use rechargables -- only alkalines. NiCADs can supply huge currents (which isunnecessary for a mouse) and don't hold their charge for very long (certainly not months).

    14. Re:Induction? What the hell? by Mycroft_VIII · · Score: 1

      Actually he just uses regular alkalines in his, and the light never shuts off, just dims a bit. and the thing rarely gets past 4 weeks, usually it starts dying midway through the third and goes out completely within a day or two at most.
      I was under the impression the led was an eyecandy item and an IR led or laser was used for tracking, at least I've seen optical mice without a visible led.
      His looks a lot like the intelli-mouse series, but it's part of wireless keyboard and mouse combe that only has one reciever, that odly enough connect to both a usb and a ps2 conector (ps2 for the kb and usb for the mouse iirc).

      Mycroft

      --
      https://signup.leagueoflegends.com/?ref=4c3ed6600b6ea
    15. Re:Induction? What the hell? by rgarcia · · Score: 1

      AND, if it's an MS Optical Mouse 2.0 like mine, you'll not have to change the batteries for another month or so. I got mine mid July and it's still chugging along. I recently got a warning to "have batteries ready", but it is still working flawlessly even with low batts.

      --

      I couldn't fail to disagree with you less.

    16. Re:Induction? What the hell? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah! Imagine all the power it'll charge up with when someone visits a porn site. You could practically power you're whole computer.

    17. Re:Induction? What the hell? by Lihtan · · Score: 1

      There's plenty of reason why you don't want some flunky changing your oil for you. Do you know what kind of filter is being fitted on your car? "America's favorite oil filter"-- Fram, has the shittiest internal construction as far as oil filters go. Do you know what keeps dirty oil from coming back out a Fram? A lousy piece of cardboard! How about the oil? The shop probably has a discount on some Quaker State oil. I sure as hell don't want all that ash and wax in *my* engine. Overfilling your oil can mess up your lifters, not to mention it looks pretty stupid when it comes spitting out your PCV valve, making your car produce blue smoke. But does the guying doing your oil change care? Why should he? He's only making $8/hr anyways.
      You can't buy a good oil change for $20 anywhere. $20 is just not quite enough to pay for 4 liters of Mobil 1, and a K&N ProGold oil filter. I do my oil changes for piece of mind knowing that it's done right.
      An oil change is not hard to do, it only takes 10 minutes to do, and you spend most of your time waiting for the oil to drain out!
      * Get some gloves if you want to keep your hands clean.
      * As soon as you park your car (the oil drains faster when it's still hot), slide a drain pan under it and open the drain valve. I install a drain valve on every vehicle I own. I've only ever fussed with the stock drain plug during the drain valve installation.
      * Loosen your oil cap and wait 10 minutes or so for the oil to drain out. Now's a good time to take the groceries in the house, detail the car or clean the garage.
      * Remove your old oil filter.
      * Slide drain pan out from under the car, and pour it into an empty paint bucket for oil disposal.
      * Close your drain valve.
      * Install new oil filter. put a thin film of oil on the gasket, partly fill the oil filter with oil, spin on until it presses against the block, then add another full rotation to seal.
      * Insert a funnel into the oil filler on your valve cover.
      * Pour fresh oil down the filter. your owner's manual will specify how many liter you should add. You can also just wait a couple minutes until it flows to the drain pan and check with the dipstick.
      * Replace the oil cap.
      * Disconnect the fuel injection fuse, and crank engine over until it builds oil pressure. This ensures that the oil is distributed without the stress of combustion. (I bet your lube shop doesn't do this!)
      * That's it! you're done. When you get good at it you won't even get a drop of oil on your hands.
      * The paint bucket will hold several oil changes worth of oil. Before it gets full, take it down to the lube shop for recycling.

      For the record, I don't have a lawn, and if everyone takes some person responsibility with the bathroom, it should never get messy.

      --
      Divide by zero hurts my brain.
  6. rfid? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    rfid? it uses an rfid tag to communicate with the host? check your buzzwords. i think you mean rf, buddy.

  7. Really? by ilyanep · · Score: 0

    Of course this means you must use the mouse on this mousepad, taking away some of the big advantages of a wireless mouse.

    I use my mouse on a pad so it doesn't scratch the desk. I don't have a wireless so I don't need a pad, I have it so that when I want to move, I can (instead of sitting scrunched up), and also because it involves less confusion with wires.

    Also, couldn't you get shocked if the mousepad conducts electricity? Or is it like touching the edges of a battery?

    --
    ~Ilyanep
    To get message, take amount of carrier pigeons at each stage mod 2. Then decode binary.
    1. Re:Really? by arekq · · Score: 1
      The point is not about using mousepad, but using this mousepad.

      The mousepad provides power to the mouse so you cannot just replace it with a regular mousepad.

      The mousepad is connected to the computer with wire so you cannot just move it, either.

      No cable attached directly to the mouse is a good thing, though.

  8. Seen this before... by kahei · · Score: 5, Informative

    ...from Wacom! Who, incidentally, are the best hardware company ever.

    http://www.wacom.com for your batteryless pointing device needs.

    --
    Whence? Hence. Whither? Thither.
    1. Re:Seen this before... by nukem996 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yes but that mouse costs from 100 to 200 dollars. This is much much cheaper.

    2. Re:Seen this before... by SetupWeasel · · Score: 2, Informative

      My graphire 3 pad came with mouse and pen for $85, and the pen was the only thing I was interested in. The mouse works well though, and though I didn't need it, it has been pretty helpful.

    3. Re:Seen this before... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My Graphire (original) was less than US$80 way back when Wacom tablets weren't as common (i.e. pricier) as they are now!

      And as the post above mentions...I also got a pen!

    4. Re:Seen this before... by upsidedown_duck · · Score: 1

      ...from Wacom!

      I have a Wacom Intuos 2 tablet with a battery-less wire-less mouse. I don't like the mouse at all, because I cannot stand lifting the damn thing 1/4" inch to exit the tracking field to reposition the mouse. I quickly found that the mouse really is useful only for a 1:1 coordinate mapping between the pad and screen, where no lifting would be needed.

      The battery-less wire-less pen, however, is excellent, and, after enough painful X server configuration, it even works great with the GIMP.

      --
      -- "Makes Little Debbie look like a pile of puke!" - Moe Szyslak
    5. Re:Seen this before... by GreenKiwi · · Score: 1

      Well... someone beat me too it. Wacom's been doing this for a while. Wireless mouse, no battery. Plus, you have the pen which is totally awesome!

    6. Re:Seen this before... by g_braad · · Score: 1

      and you can even use several pencils/pens with the same tablet and give each of them a seperate color! i haven't seen any else do this... WACOM is just above the rest. (Oh yeah, they also created the TabletPC in cooperation with Microsoft. But they call it Penabled)

      --
      F/OSS & IT Consultant
    7. Re:Seen this before... by zsazsa · · Score: 1

      I was going to post a message lambasting Wacom, as they were owned by self-appointed Messiah Reverend Sun Myung Moon's Unification Church cult (the "Moonies") through his Happy World front company (more info can be found through Google). Fortunately, it looks like they've broken free from Happy World.

    8. Re:Seen this before... by Ash+and+Flame · · Score: 1

      I have been using a Wacom Intuos2 tablet for about two years now. It works using exactly the same premise as the mouse in this article.
      However, the Wacom mouse is 2540 dpi whereas the BatteryFREE is a measly 670 dpi. The Wacom is designed to be a tool for artists, and is far more than just a mouse. It is awesome for sketching digitally, especially with the stylus which has over a thousand levels of pressure sensitivity.

      On the other hand, the BatteryFREE is $35, and my Wacom cost me $297.

      --

      ----
      Ph-nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn
    9. Re:Seen this before... by zbuffered · · Score: 1
      --
      Synergy is your friend
    10. Re:Seen this before... by K8Fan · · Score: 1
      Yes but that mouse costs from 100 to 200 dollars. This is much much cheaper.

      The patent has expired...so, other than inertia, there is little reason to buy Wacom's version. I've seen "Wacom style" tablets selling for as little as $39. All we need now is a standard set of drivers for us to have universal support in all software. Tablets and pens are so enjoyable to use. I used to do most of my 3D modeling with a Wacom pen; it is a lot easier on the wrist than a mouse, causing a LOT less strain. I'd bet a lot of gamers will discover the joys of pen tablets if games started supporting them, especially the pressure and angle features.

      --
      "How perfectly Goddamn delightful it all is, to be sure" Charles Crumb
    11. Re:Seen this before... by kanweg · · Score: 1

      I've bought Wacom tablets twice. You are right that they are an excellent hardware company: The software s****, looks like yesteryear, and is such unintuitive that I can't get the darn tablet to work properly.

      Bert

    12. Re:Seen this before... by mcleaver · · Score: 1

      I was wondering how long it would be before someone commented that - oindeed - this has been around for years. I have two... but the kids have lost one pen :(
      Rgds
      Martin

    13. Re:Seen this before... by LS · · Score: 1

      This is neat in concept, but in execution it just doesn't work. With a regular ball or optical mouse, you move the cursor in a straight horizontal line by sweeping your mouse in an arc, keeping the mouse perpendicular to the direction of motion. The Wacom mouse is not aware of the direction it's pointing, so if you sweep it in an arc, the point will also move in an arc instead of a straight line. It's somewhat subtle, so you can compensate, but it's disconcerting and non-intuitive... enough to where I switched back to my normal mouse.

      Also, the Wacom mice are not optical, unlike the A4tech mouse. The A4Tech mouse does not suffer this problem.

      LS

      --
      There is a fine line between being a cultivated citizen and being someone else's crop. - A. J. Patrick Liszkie
    14. Re:Seen this before... by kahei · · Score: 1


      That's an extremely interesting point, and it might explain why I don't actually use the Wacom mouse -- I point with the wacom pen, which I think is a technological marvel.

      Incidentally, check out the Intuous 3 -- the tablet is the same, but the 'touch strips' and thumb buttons help more than you'd think.

      --
      Whence? Hence. Whither? Thither.
    15. Re:Seen this before... by Tom7 · · Score: 1

      Indeed. The Wacom ArtZ II is the only piece of hardware I still have and use from my first computer 10 years ago!

    16. Re:Seen this before... by clandestine_nova · · Score: 1

      What OS are you running under? I've just upgraded from a Graphire 2 to an Intuos 3, mostly for size reasons, and I feel that the software is perfect. It's small, doesn't get in the way, and lets me change basically any feature of my tablet.

      Which model do you have? Get an Intuos 3 - they're a fucking wonderful piece of equipment, haven't had a single problem with mine.

      --
      Discworld.
  9. Wait For The Other Shoe To Drop... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Aaaaand in other news, Wacom files a multi-bazillion dollar patent infringement suit against A4Tech...

  10. dedicated mousepad vs batteries... by Soulfarmer · · Score: 1

    Which one people find worse, sticking to the required usb powered mousepad, or replacing batteries/rechargeable batteries...?

    I will surely keep changing the batteries. Besides, I get them free from at my workplace.

    --
    -Is the meaning of life vanity, or is vanity the meaning of life?
    1. Re:dedicated mousepad vs batteries... by fodi · · Score: 1

      "... I get them free from at my workplace."

      They give out free batteries at kindergarten?

    2. Re:dedicated mousepad vs batteries... by Soulfarmer · · Score: 1

      What gave you that idea? Is the kindergarten the only place you have gotten them for free?

      --
      -Is the meaning of life vanity, or is vanity the meaning of life?
  11. Can you say RSI? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I'm going back to a wired mouse because they're lighter. No need to further punish my wrists with the weight of a dynamo and the friction of one or more geared balls.

    1. Re:Can you say RSI? by EvilNTUser · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Why is this modded funny? I switched back to a wired mouse for the exact same reason.

      (Well, that, and I realized that buying batteries for the thing just to get rid of a cable that doesn't even disturb me was a horrible thing to do to the environment)

      --
      My Sig: SEGV
    2. Re:Can you say RSI? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about one of these?

    3. Re:Can you say RSI? by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      There may be a point. I stayed away from optical mice because I thought they were too light. I hated it that the cable was heavier than the mouse. I had considered adding weights to a mouse.

      Now, I have a few optical mice, although I still use a ball mouse on occasion. The real problem I have with mice is, oddly, the button clicks.

    4. Re:Can you say RSI? by Nahor · · Score: 1

      Or they should use the same system that we can now find in some flashlight. Shake and charge. Ideal when playing FPS games :)

    5. Re:Can you say RSI? by martinX · · Score: 2, Funny

      ... or looking at pr0n.

      --
      When they came for the communists, I said "He's next door. Take him away. Goddam commies."
    6. Re:Can you say RSI? by thogard · · Score: 1

      My father got me a trackman marble wheel years ago and at first I didn't like it but now I can't stant a real mouse. I don't like the design you use since you use fingers to roll the ball and I find the thumb trackballs work much better.

      Too bad Logictech got rid of the old white design which was gery good and replaced it with a stylish thing that isn't nearly as good.

    7. Re:Can you say RSI? by Yo+Grark · · Score: 1

      1. Try a trackball, no pushing the mouse at all.

      2. Rechargeable batteries.

      3. Make a trackball self powered.

      4. Patent

      5. PROFIT!

      Yo Grark

      --
      Canadian Bred with American Buttering
    8. Re:Can you say RSI? by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 1

      I went back to wired mice because they're cheaper... I had a logitech one but its USB connector just fell apart after 3 months (and it wasn't even unplugged during that time... the first time I needed to unplug it it broke). £50 ($75) down the crapper because of a 1p connector.

      Since then I've been using cheap wired opticals.. if/when they break it's no big deal to replace them.

    9. Re:Can you say RSI? by Dr.+Spork · · Score: 1
      That's funny. My old wired mouse felt too light and flimsy to me, so I opened it and glued some pennies inside with a glue gun to make it feel more substantial. It really seemed to increase the accuracy.

      Now I'm happy with my optical wired mouse. It's exactly the weight I want.

    10. Re:Can you say RSI? by /dev/trash · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I have used rechargeables for my wireless mouse for, over 3 years, on the same two. In fact I cursed myself for buying the 4 pack of AAA's since the other two haven't been used yet.

    11. Re:Can you say RSI? by sahonen · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yes! I wish someone would make a silent mouse. Especially for those late night sessions that keep everyone within earshot awake, like when Half-Life 2 came out.

      --
      Make me a friend and I'll mod you up
    12. Re:Can you say RSI? by servognome · · Score: 1

      I did the same thing, went to the logitech mx510 from the mx700. I was so used to a lighter mouse that extended gaming use made my wrist feel uncomfortable with the wireless. I also had problems with mouse control, though most of my friends say once you get used to a heavier mouse you'll get better accuracy.

      --
      D6 63 0D 70 89 81 BB 8E 7B 7C 5F 5D 54 EA AB 73
    13. Re:Can you say RSI? by shawn(at)fsu · · Score: 1

      no no no, patent first then let some one else make it then sue them, gees have you learned nothing ;)

      --
      500 dollar reward for tip(s) leading to the arrest of the person(s) who stole my sig.
    14. Re:Can you say RSI? by wertarbyte · · Score: 1

      My father got me a trackman marble wheel years ago and at first I didn't like it but now I can't stant a real mouse.

      Oh yes, the good old Trackman Marble Wheel. I wish I could get another one of those, I totally love it :-)

      --
      Life is just nature's way of keeping meat fresh.
    15. Re:Can you say RSI? by Mycroft_VIII · · Score: 1

      The 'old white design' for the Trackman with the thumb ball is indeed very good. I bought one when they were $70+ and this thing has survived so many 2'-4' falls(I got it for lack of space, and still manage to add enough clutter to knock it off) over the years (2-3 I forget) without a hitch I'm just amazed. It's got two buttons and a clickable wheel that works as a middle button with OS's that actually understand such for more than panning web pages. I'm quite happy with it.
      But you do have a valid point about the awkwardness at first, not mention the sore thumb muscles at first, but it's been well worth it. My only complaint is Black&White's idiot failure to have decent shortcut keys make it hard to play with a trackball because of the subtle differences in motions.
      Mouse gestures sound cool, but what if you don't have a mouse?

      Mycroft

      --
      https://signup.leagueoflegends.com/?ref=4c3ed6600b6ea
    16. Re:Can you say RSI? by oexeo · · Score: 1

      > £50 ($75)

      It's about $100 actually

    17. Re:Can you say RSI? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why is this modded funny?

      Geared balls.

  12. Why complain? by serps · · Score: 3, Funny

    I don't know about you, but i like wireless mice because they have no annoying wires, not because I feel constrained by having my mouse so close to the rest of my computer.

    However, the downside of wireless mice is changing batteries. It's annoying to stop to replace the batteries, especially when you're in the middle of round of CounterStrike, trying to defuse a bomb at the same time as not get shot at by AK47s.

    So, I'd love to buy this mouse, because otherwise, Terrorists Win!

    --
    "Einstein argued that [...] God is not capricious or arbitrary. No such faith comforts the software engineer." ~ Brooks
    1. Re:Why complain? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or...Terrorists lose...

    2. Re:Why complain? by Calroth · · Score: 2, Informative

      However, the downside of wireless mice is changing batteries. It's annoying to stop to replace the batteries, especially when you're in the middle of round of CounterStrike...

      Well, I'm not sure about yours, but mine starts giving warnings (a blinking red light) when I've got a good hour or so of battery left. Defusing the bomb takes less than an hour (god bless Counter-Strike) so you can wait until you've done that before swapping the batteries ;-)

    3. Re:Why complain? by fbjon · · Score: 1

      Well, keep an eye on the battery indicator, and change before you run out. Also, use rechargeable batteries to save on your environment. Better yet: get a newer mouse with built-in battery, low lag and high update rate. I can personally recommend Logitech's laser mouse.

      --
      True confidence comes not from realising you are as good as your peers, but that your peers are as bad as you are.
    4. Re:Why complain? by swimin · · Score: 1

      MY wireless mouse DOES have wires, and yes they are annoying, and no Im not making this up.

    5. Re:Why complain? by ricotest · · Score: 1
      Changing batteries? Why aren't more mice like mine:
      • Put two rechargeables into the mouse (usually provided)
      • Connect the wire provided between your wireless reciever and your mouse.
      • Use the mouse like a wired one for ~8 hours while it recharges from USB.
      • Disconnect and it'll run wireless for about a week.
      When I'm not gaming, I don't care too much about the wire, then I remove it when I want to play HL2 or whatever. It works if you're that sort of person.
    6. Re:Why complain? by SamSim · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'm amazed at the number of people who point to battery-changing as a drawback of wireless mice. You can get them with chargers now.

  13. why the hell? by sensei_brandon · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Why in the hell would anyone want a wireless mouse but a wired mousepad? And I dont really like the idea that I cant use it on a metal desk. I'll stick to my wired ball-less 3 button mouse, thanks.

    1. Re:why the hell? by sixy · · Score: 5, Funny
      Why in the hell would anyone want a wireless mouse but a wired mousepad? And I dont really like the idea that I cant use it on a metal desk. I'll stick to my wired ball-less 3 button mouse, thanks.
      They prefer to be called neutered.
    2. Re:why the hell? by empaler · · Score: 1

      Because part of the annoyance of having a wired mouse is that the wire can get caught under/between stuff... Not a problem with a part you don't actually have to move around all the time.

  14. My thought... by Mold · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Doesn't having a wired mouse pad kind of defeat the purpose of a wireless mouse?

    Especially when the mouse has to be used with said mouse pad?

    1. Re:My thought... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep. I have an idea for completely wireless and battery-less mousepad, I might patent it. The only powered part should be the mouse itself...

    2. Re:My thought... by FlipmodePlaya · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Many people's problem with wired mice is that the cord will sort of pull on the mouse, distorting the desired path of movement. A wired pad, and unwired mouse, would fix this. I agree with you, though, it seems like a convoluted solution to a minor issue.

    3. Re:My thought... by WolfWithoutAClause · · Score: 1

      I find the wire gets in the way; particularly in FPSs where you are moving around a lot.

      --

      -WolfWithoutAClause

      "Gravity is only a theory, not a fact!"
    4. Re:My thought... by IO+ERROR · · Score: 1

      Next we'll be having computers without hard drives, CD players without speakers, and /. without CowboyNeal.

      --
      How am I supposed to fit a pithy, relevant quote into 120 characters?
    5. Re:My thought... by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "Doesn't having a wired mouse pad kind of defeat the purpose of a wireless mouse?"

      Heh. Yep. This really isn't all that exciting. Wacom tablets have had 'mouse' styluses for a while now. I seriously doubt anybody on the planet is using one.

      I dunno, maybe if the pad covered my entire desk or something. But, no, even on a 12" surface, it's weird.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    6. Re:My thought... by merdark · · Score: 1

      Wacom tablets have had 'mouse' styluses for a while now. I seriously doubt anybody on the planet is using one.

      Um... I understand designers love those things because they like pretending to draw much more than they like 'mousing' art. Also, those pens have tilt and pressure sensing... mice don't.

    7. Re:My thought... by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "Um... I understand designers love those things because they like pretending to draw much more than they like 'mousing' art. Also, those pens have tilt and pressure sensing... mice don't."

      I apologize for not communicating clearly. When I said "Mouse stylus" I mean a stylus in the housing of a mouse, not a pen stylus. Sorry, I really should have been more clear. Pen styluses are great for drawing. Heck, I bought a TabletPC just for that and have 0 regrets.

      Have a peek here and you'll see what I'm referring to.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    8. Re:My thought... by Trejkaz · · Score: 1

      A great many CD players already come without speakers, and you can get a number of diskless computers as well. So Cowboy, when you going to step down? :-)

      --
      Karma: It's all a bunch of tree-huggin' hippy crap!
    9. Re:My thought... by merdark · · Score: 1

      Interesting. I didn't know such mice existed. I guess it sort of makes sense to sell them along with the pen like that.

    10. Re:My thought... by bulli · · Score: 1

      My annoyance with wired mouses is that the wire usually hangs over the desk edge, pulling the mouse towards the edge of the desk, pulling the pointer along with it. (Nasty if your preferred configuration is to change window focus with the mouse.)

      Another annoyance is that accidentally brushing against the mouse wire makes the pointer go crazy on the screen. Also tripping over an open can of your preferred beverage with your mouse cable can make you an unhappy camper.

      Now, with a wireless mouse but wired mousepad, you can actually bury the wire somewhere under the pile of random papers on your desk, or actually make it look neat and straight. True, you still need to operate the mouse on the pad, but hey, that is still enough for many of us.

      Is it worh the money spent on it? I'll leave that one to the people making the purchase decision...

  15. So uncool... by Soulfarmer · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    The parent of this has nothing to do the grandparent of this... And please feel free to mod THIS one down, not the parent of this :)

    --
    -Is the meaning of life vanity, or is vanity the meaning of life?
    1. Re:So uncool... by powerlinekid · · Score: 1

      Yeah damn him for being on-topic!

      --

      can't sleep slashdot will eat me
  16. Been done before :) by |<amikaze · · Score: 1

    http://www.afrotechmods.com/cheap/arnoldpad/arnold pad.htm

    This mouse is also induction charged, although it seems this new one may have some of the bugs worked out, like the pad-heating problem...

    1. Re:Been done before :) by ukcb · · Score: 1
  17. RIAA.. they use the RFID tags to track you by ylikone · · Score: 3, Funny

    and the mousepad to "conveniently" electrocute you when you download those MP3s.

    --
    Meh.
  18. Supermouse? by AnthonyFielding · · Score: 0, Redundant

    "Do not operate on any metal surfaced table"

  19. Apart from the "cool factor" by hacknslashdot · · Score: 3, Informative

    Why would anyone want one?
    Pehaps i'm unusual, but the major advantage of an optical mouse to me is that it can be used on any surface ... not with this mouse, gotta be used on the mousepad it comes with.
    AND the major advantage of wireless is that the mouse is in no way connected to the computer (apart from a distance/obstruction restraint for the wireless connection) ... not with this mouse, you can only use it as far away as the cord for the mousepad will reach.
    I'm not trying to start a flamewar but I just honestly can't see any advantages of this. Can someone point some out for me?

    1. Re:Apart from the "cool factor" by Vectorferret · · Score: 1

      All the wireless mice I have seen need corded recievers. I have had several Logitech mice, and all of them had external radio recievers for the wireless. Internal bluetooth just isn't common enough. I'd really go for something like this, as battery problems are more annoying than the slight annoyingness of a cord. I have abandoned wireless mice completely for wired again because of that, and signal interference would make my pointer do funny things from time to time. With this, not only are battery problems gone, but we also have the reciever very close to the mouse (touching) so interference will probably be lessened (though not eliminated). Would be really cool if they were able to send the data back to the computer through the same induction.

    2. Re:Apart from the "cool factor" by Joe+Random · · Score: 1
      All the wireless mice I have seen need corded recievers.
      Yeah, but not corded receivers that must be practically touching the mouse!
      With this, not only are battery problems gone, but we also have the reciever very close to the mouse (touching) so interference will probably be lessened (though not eliminated).
      So, basically, it's just like an optical mouse (no battery problems, but limited to the distance of a cable), with the added bonuses of being locked onto a specific mousepad and the possiblity of interference? Color me unimpressed.
    3. Re:Apart from the "cool factor" by zx75 · · Score: 1

      The only advantage is that the mouse is lighter than a battery operated wireless mouse and because the cord is not directly attached to the mouse, it doesn't get in the way. Have you ever had one of those magically shrinking mouse cords? As you use your mouse it slowly drop over the side of the table making it harder to move until you have to reach back and pull out the slack.

      However, I think the advantages are very limited and really not worth the trouble. I'll keep my wired optical mouse tyvm.

      --
      This is not a sig.
  20. Wacom tablet? by khrtt · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Some hot fucking news!

    My Wacom Graphire came with a mouse like that, wireless, but had to be used on the pad only. That was, what, only 10 years ago. Glad to see something just like it finally make the fucking news! Oh, wait, it's not news, it's slashdot...

    1. Re:Wacom tablet? by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 1

      It had the magic word RFID in the body.

      Its as much a sure fire winner as putting "on the internet" in a patent application ;)

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    2. Re:Wacom tablet? by w4rl5ck · · Score: 1

      yep, same thing here. Stupid "invention", IMO... guess they got a patent for it... ;)

    3. Re:Wacom tablet? by wanchai · · Score: 1

      I am waiting for some company to come up with a battery powered/re-chargeable wireless USB hub for USB devices like a wacom tablet. Then I can truly enjoy wireless mouse when I am on the couch.

      oh wait... ... maybe a DC power USB hub can do the job better

      oh wait...

    4. Re:Wacom tablet? by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      Can someone please describe what advantage RFID has vs. the old Wacoms? The article simply doesn't say. The complaint about the lack of navigation buttons seems to fall short. I try to use those buttons on my mouse, but I keep forgetting.

      Other problems with the article:

      "What does that mean? Well, as you can see on the list of features on the box, it is light, saves some money (compared to using non-rechargable batteries), and protects the environment."

      Gee, why not use rechargeable batteries? OK, it still uses some batteries with toxic chemicals, it just seems silly to use non-rechargeable batteries for this if at all possible.

  21. Not good enough by roman_mir · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The mice that use a docking station for recharging have it right, this one does not have buttons, it looks like, but it has a scroll wheel. And it has to be used on the included mousepad which is in fact a radio emmiter. I don't know, I use a touch pad most often (on my laptop, so no extra batteries anyway,) but when I use a mouse I like to be able to move it anywhere without having to move the mousepad with it. Now, make that radio emmiter recharge a battery inside the mouse, add a couple of buttons, and now it's useful to me.

    1. Re:Not good enough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You could even go one better. Make a compatible laptop that could run/recharge from such pad. A universal lazy man's docking station.

      One station, good for recharging compatable mice, laptops, cameras, camcorders, cell phones, whatever.

      The day will come. First comes chaos before a defacto, say H-P, or IEEE standard.

  22. Old news? by AC-x · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Articles dotted so can't be sure, but are these actually any different to the mice that used to come with Wacom tablets about 4 years ago?

    1. Re:Old news? by AC-x · · Score: 1

      ok article is readable after all, and it's not the same as the wacom tablets.

      They used to use the tablet to sense the position of the mouse (so the movement was always relative to the pad, so it went a bit funny if you had the mouse at the wrong angle...), where as this one is an optical mouse powered by the pad.

      Of course as I said in a different post it seems pretty pointless when you can get wireless mice with rechargable batteries and a docking station.

    2. Re:Old news? by Jace+of+Fuse! · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Of course as I said in a different post it seems pretty pointless when you can get wireless mice with rechargable batteries and a docking station.

      I will also add to that...

      Modern day (as in released this year) cordless, rechargable, optical mice with docking stations are not only more sensitive, but also have low battery indicators that give really good warning about a low battery.

      I have to put my Logitech MX700 on the charger about once every few days or the light will start to flash by the fourth. The flashing light is a good reminder that it needs to be done soon, but seeing the light doesn't mean the batteries are critical yet, so I can get by with using it for a while even then.

      Only a few times have I pressed my luck to the point of complete battery drain, and even in those cases I was able to put the mouse on the charger, go use the restroom and make Tea and I was back in the game when I returned.

      So nearly every complaint I could have is gone with my most recent cordless mouse (and I've had several).

      The only remaining complaint now is that the mouse isn't ambidextrous. This is only a minor complaint to me since I am right handed, but other people might find this to be a major turn off.

      --

      "Everything you know is wrong. (And stupid.)"

      Moderation Totals: Wrong=2, Stupid=3, Total=5.
  23. ever superhero by ylikone · · Score: 0, Troll
    has there kryptonite.

    Metal happens to be this supermouses.

    --
    Meh.
  24. What's new? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is just like my wacom tablet, except without a pen... I must say it is very nice to have a wired pad and a non wired mouse.

  25. Great for the paranoid by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 4, Interesting

    A mouse pad with an induction coil eh? sounds like a great diskette/ZIP/hard-disk eraser to me...

    --
    "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
    1. Re:Great for the paranoid by goon+america · · Score: 2, Funny

      This is an exciting new feature. You can just remove the files you don't want by dragging the mouse over them and clicking to delete! No OS involved.

    2. Re:Great for the paranoid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      What if you were wearing a bracelet would it get all inducted and shock you ?

      I like my corded mouse its like a teather. I had a cordless and lost it sometimes (cleaning my room would probably solve that, but i digress) And also when I got pissed off at my computer there was nothing to stop my mouse from hitting the wall when I fired it off my desk.

  26. Why not a wireless mouse... by Zangief · · Score: 1

    That is not optical, but mechanical, and generates its energy from the movement of the wheels that also read the movements?

    I don't think it would be enough energy, but it maybe is. I haven't made the calculations.
    --
    Wiki de Ciencia Ficcion y Fantasia

  27. Free mousepad, just like old Sun mice by G4from128k · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'm sure they'll advertise this one as having a "free mouse pad" like its some grand deal. They'll not tell the buyer that the provided mouse pad is an essential part of the system and not a magnanimous offer on their part. I wonder how many people will try to use this mouse with the pad of their choice, get a few days use and then complain when it dies.

    It reminds me of those old Sun optical mice with the metal grid-pattern mouse pads. I always like turning coworkers pads 90 degrees and watching the ensuing hilarity.

    --
    Two wrongs don't make a right, but three lefts do.
    1. Re:Free mousepad, just like old Sun mice by mlk · · Score: 1

      Ahh, Sun optical mice are the best thing to ever come out of Sun.

      They are just so much fun, as long as it is not you using it.

      --
      Wow, I should not post when knackered.
    2. Re:Free mousepad, just like old Sun mice by OblongPlatypus · · Score: 1

      It'll be nothing short of a miracle if they "get a few days use" out of this mouse on a normal mouse pad... try reading the title of the story again.

      --
      -- If no truths are spoken then no lies can hide --
  28. Afroman did it FIRST by s0rbix · · Score: 2, Funny

    This is not so original: Arnold and afroman did it first

  29. Uh, question by jcuervo · · Score: 0, Redundant

    What's the point of a wireless mouse that needs the mousepad to be plugged in?

    --
    Assume I was drunk when I posted this.
  30. Utterly pointless by AC-x · · Score: 1

    According to the box this mouse provides "wireless freedom", but the article says "The pad is what powers the mouse itself, using induction. It doesn't charge batteries in the mouse, or anything like that, so you cannot use the mouse anywhere else."

    So what's the point? It's actually worse then a standard wired optical mouse because you have to use it on the pad.

    If you want a "battery free" wireless optical mouse just get one with rechargable batteries and a charging station. No battery replacements and you can still actually use with wirelessly.

    1. Re:Utterly pointless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks, we haven't covered this previously in the thread.

  31. Technocluelessness by Clueless+Moron · · Score: 5, Funny
    I usually avoid wireless mice like the plague (even the vaunted MX900 and MX1000) due to mouse lag attributed to the use of RF communication.

    Right; this mouse uses Subspace Communication (tm Star Trek). Not this old-fashioned RF stuff.

    Whatever the BF does, it has essentially eliminated wireless mouse lag (I am guessing it has to do with the use of RFID

    Ah. "RFID". Cue the "Princess Bride" I-do-not-think-that-word-means-what-you-think-it means quotes.

    and the fact that the receiver is never further than a few inches from the mouse).

    Let's see, RF at 3E8 m/s will cover one inch in about... 85 picoseconds. Yes, I'm sure RF propagation has always been the cause of your lag. Definitely when your mouse is on the moon and the computer is on earth.

    Oh wait, I forgot. This device doesn't use RF. It uses... RFID.

    I give up.

    1. Re:Technocluelessness by geekoid · · Score: 1

      haha..I wish I had mod points. That was funny.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:Technocluelessness by ediron2 · · Score: 1

      Maybe g'parent is correct, and this is some new standard. RFID may be RF for IDiots. Or the RF-IDaho standard. Spud-space transmission and all that.

      Kudos. Thank god for jargon: it makes it so easy for clued people to quietly recognize blathering idiots.

  32. In other news... by uberchicken · · Score: 0

    Batteryless cordless phone that takes power from its cradle.

  33. A pointer to a generic solution... by myc_lykaon · · Score: 1

    SplashPower who seem to be making a more cross-device version of this.

  34. Personally by Chuck+Chunder · · Score: 2, Informative

    The wire on my mouse isn't annoying when you use it in it's normal position (ie where I've positioned my mouse mat).

    It only gets annoying when I want to move it and use it in another position for some reason (such as needing that bit of deskspace for something) in which case the wired mousemat is going to be just as annoying, if not more so (I'd have to move both the mouse and the mousemat as they work in tandem, whereas now I can get away with just moving the mouse).

    --
    Boffoonery - downloadable Comedy Benefit for Bletchley Park
  35. Mouse by mdrjr · · Score: 1

    Dammit.. I replaced my mouse batterys today.. I could buy one of those. very nice.. i was wondering. if someone hack's your computer they could use it to give you chocks. and you can use it to keep your child's off porn sites. just send a chock if SEX word is found on a website.

    1. Re:Mouse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shock... the word is SHOCK.

    2. Re:Mouse by fr2asbury · · Score: 1
      and you can use it to keep your child's off porn sites. just send a chock if SEX word is found on a website.
      OW! Damn you! Your post 'chocked' me!
  36. Get rid of the mouse. It's unnecessary. by rice_burners_suck · · Score: 1
    Forget these stupid optical mice. What they need to do is bring back the little ball thing that gets hair and dust in it, so the mouse cursor only moves horizontally when you move the mouse diagonally. But the advantage will be they'll put a generator on the little ball thing, so when you move the mouse, you will generate the electricity necessary to transmit the mouse position back to the computer.

    Or better yet, keep the optical thing, so the mouse moves accurately and doesn't annoy the living "F" word out of you, and then add the ball thing to generate the electricity.

    Or better yet, get rid of the stupid ball thing and add a special device that collects the heat from your hand when you operate the mouse, and converts that into electricity. And then, when everybody's mouse is like that, the excess energy will be used to power government computer systems, and then we will live in the Matrix.

    All that from a stupid mouse. Who cares anyway if the cottonpicking thing needs a battery to operate? That's a small price to pay when it allows you to avoid slavery to machines.

    1. Re:Get rid of the mouse. It's unnecessary. by mscnln · · Score: 0

      Converting heat to electricity is kinda impossible given the current laws of thermodynamics, besides that, good idea.

    2. Re:Get rid of the mouse. It's unnecessary. by sponge_absorbent · · Score: 1

      you sir, are a fool..

      dont talk about thermodynamics until you actually have the slightest clue what it means.

    3. Re:Get rid of the mouse. It's unnecessary. by Cecil · · Score: 1

      Converting heat to electricity is kinda impossible given the current laws of thermodynamics

      What the hell are you talking about? Do you even know what the laws of thermodynamics are? I guarantee they have nothing to do with converting heat to electricity. It's not particularly easy to convert heat to electricity, especially not directly, but it's far from impossible. In fact, that's where more than 95% of our electricity comes from in one way or another.

      There are plenty of ways to convert heat to electricity. Your thermostat probably has one. It's called a thermocouple, and is used in almost all modern temperature sensors. It's two different types of metal (often zinc and copper) joined together. When heated, one wants to expand at a different rate from the other, but it can't because it is attached to the other, and electricity is generated instead.

      Indirectly there are even more ways. The Stirling Engine is a fairly obvious one. Less obvious are the main types of power plant we use to generate base load power around the world:

      Nuclear: Cooling water runs past the core, gets heated to ridiculous temperatures, expands into steam and drives turbines in the process.

      Coal, Natural gas, Oil, Wood: Fuel burns to boil water which expands into steam to drive turbines

      Solar (powerplant, not photovoltaic cells): Sunlight is focused by mirrors to boil water which expands into steam to drive turbines.

      Amazing how rudimentary our power systems are when you think about it, but yes, the majority of our power comes from the simple process of converting heat to kinetic energy via an expanding gas, which then is converted to rotational energy by a turbine, and finally into electricity using those quaint little nearly 100% efficient bundles of copper we call a generator.

      Admittedly, none of these scale down particularly well, and none of them work well or at all when presented with a diffuse, low temperature source of heat instead of a direct, high temperature source. But to claim it's impossible is just plain ludicrous.

    4. Re:Get rid of the mouse. It's unnecessary. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually all of those technologies use temperature *differences* to generate electricity. Some part of the mouse would have to be (and stay) considerably colder than your hand to effectively generate power. Better would be to have the top and "feet" of the mouse separated by some kind of peizoelectric rig that uses the friction-generated shear force between the surface and the mouse to generate power.

      I'm wondering about this induction mouse. Do you think you could wiggle it back and fro fast enough to make it blow up?

  37. Forget the induction pad... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...just use a really old monitor that doesn't have that sissy electromagnetic radiation shielding.

  38. Couldn't they by nametaken · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Just go back to ball-mouse, instead of optical, and use the ball movement to power the RF?

    1. Re:Couldn't they by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks, because this hasn't been covered before.

      RTFC

    2. Re:Couldn't they by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One buried comment mentioned it before I did. I was just visually lower in the thread. Play in traffic shitbag.

  39. How much energy would it take? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Radio transmission on a small scale would probably have enough power from that... Maybe have some crank or pushbutton to charge the mouse if it isn't charged up.

  40. Coral link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Site's very slooooow.

    Try the Coral link here

  41. nope it's "rfid" by Nykon · · Score: 1

    or at least according to their marketing guys..

    according to their site,"...deriving its power from A4's patented RFID-Pad,using our advanced RFID technology..."

    --
    "It's better to be a pirate then join the Navy"
  42. What ever happened to the cell phone charge pad? by smug_lisp_weenie · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I remember these were being touted a couple of years ago by Splashpower: link

    My guess is these just take too long to charge your phone... or is there another reason these never caught on?

  43. Rechargable batteries by empaler · · Score: 1

    have been seen before. Just a thought.

  44. Re:RFID? Don't they mean RF? by JPriest · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So why is a USB mousepad any better than a USB mouse? I don't use a mouse pad because none of them provide a large enough mousing surface. When you are gaming you can't pick up your mouse and move it to the other side of the pad or the other guy kills you. This wireless mouse is not much good as it is useless as soon as it leaves the mouse pad.

    --
    Saying Java is nice because it works on all OS's is like saying that anal sex is nice because it works on all genders.
  45. Re:RFID? Don't they mean RF? by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 1
    Why would RF make it accurate? For that matter, why would RFID? I guess it could use RFID to prevent you getting cross-talk from other RF mice, but surely RFID won;t make it track better.

    Seems to me they just want to stuff in more buzzwords to sound flash.

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
  46. I did not RTA, but.... by zogger · · Score: 1

    maybe they use rfid so only THAT mouse can be used with THAT pad on THAT computer as some sort of security feature.

    1. Re:I did not RTA, but.... by Trejkaz · · Score: 1

      And also so that signals from other miscellaneous RF devices around the house don't interfere with the signal from the mouse, including other mice of the same type.

      --
      Karma: It's all a bunch of tree-huggin' hippy crap!
  47. What would make more sense... by Synesthesiatic · · Score: 2, Interesting

    is if the whole desk was one big "power pad" that your laptop, printer, mouse etc could all be powered by. I could eliminate the last must-have cables running all over my desk. This is pretty much useless.

  48. Re:What ever happened to the cell phone charge pad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wirelessly charge any electonic device? I'm guessing that these never caught on because it's not possible to practically do that.

  49. Use the wheel. by ozlan · · Score: 1

    Why not just use the scroll wheel on the mouse to generate the power to run it. Instead of a battery, it could charge a capacitor to store the power.

    1. Re:Use the wheel. by Dorsai65 · · Score: 1

      My trackball doesn't HAVE a wheel, you insensitive clod! :-)

      --
      --- Asking inconvenient questions for over 30 years...
    2. Re:Use the wheel. by Trejkaz · · Score: 1

      Ignoring the wisecrack, a trackball would be a damn good candidate for this sort of trick, when you think about it. It probably generates a lot of energy, and it wouldn't particularly matter if there was a gigantic weight added to it for the dynamo. I just wonder how much harder it would be to turn the ball with the dynamo pushing against it... :-)

      --
      Karma: It's all a bunch of tree-huggin' hippy crap!
    3. Re:Use the wheel. by Dorsai65 · · Score: 1

      A major portion of the reason I like a trackball (the one I have, at least) is that moving the ball around is pretty easy. That would seem to imply that there wouldn't be much energy available for collection.

      Then again, if you did some magical Mechanical Engineering stuff (I'm a trons weenie) to collect more energy, then it would tend to screw up the low inertia of it, making it harder to position precisely.

      Maybe you could use something like Peltier devices to collect energy from the heat differential between the users hand and ambient temperature. Wouldn't be a whole lot, but might be enough...

      PS Sorry for the comment, but I just couldn't pass it up.

      --
      --- Asking inconvenient questions for over 30 years...
    4. Re:Use the wheel. by madstork2000 · · Score: 1

      I always liked heavy trackballs, like the kind with pool balls in them. I found the heavier balls more precise for small movements, when photoshopping (and later gimping) images.

      Its been sevreal years since I have used a track ball though, since I have not found a new one that feels right.

    5. Re:Use the wheel. by ozlan · · Score: 1

      I was talking about developing NEW technology for the masses, not requesting that Neanderthals trade in thier clubs for machine guns.

  50. Re:RFID? Don't they mean RF? by kbranch · · Score: 3, Informative

    I don't use a mouse pad because none of them provide a large enough mousing surface.

    You obviously haven't seen this.

  51. Re:RFID? Don't they mean RF? by Keruo · · Score: 1

    Useless? Bah, any true nerd would mod that mouse with large capacitor.
    Large enough capacitor=power to run the mouse 5 minutes after leaving the mouse pad.
    And probably wouldn't cause any excess weight either, since most modern mouses have extra metal added in for weight, just remove that to balance the capacitor weight.

    --
    There are no atheists when recovering from tape backup.
  52. Just to get it out of the way... by Dorsai65 · · Score: 1

    In Soviet Russia, the tinfoil hat RF(ID) overlords welcome insensitive clods. PROFIT!

    --
    --- Asking inconvenient questions for over 30 years...
  53. Not a friction mechanism. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    You know how battery-less watches work?
    There's a very eccentric cam inside the watch, attached to a very small generator.
    Any movement of the watch would move the cam slightly, generating a small amount of current in the generator.
    An efficient power circuit captures that spike and stores it in a capacitor.

    The same method could be used in a cordless mouse.

    Power requirements are little bit higher, but not much.
    Also, there could be a small generator attached to the scroll wheel.

  54. Re:RFID? Don't they mean RF? by Trogre · · Score: 2, Informative

    When you are gaming you can't pick up your mouse and move it to the other side of the pad or the other guy kills you.

    Trackballs don't have that problem.

    --
    "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
  55. Re:What ever happened to the cell phone charge pad by radio.cgt · · Score: 1

    Apparently first devices will be available 2005, not many other details than that on their site. Other than that the devices need a special reciever as part of / attatched to the battery.

  56. technically... by caino59 · · Score: 1

    isn't this the same thing as having a touchpad? except you still have a mouse, albeit without a tail.

    just more complex....touchpad gives a designated area for mousing, you pick up from the pad, no pointer movement. Um, sorry, but I fail to see any benefits here.

  57. Exposure to RF? by FatTux · · Score: 1
    A problem with this setup is that in order to keep the mouse powered there's a need of an electromagnetic field that's far from negligible.

    I'd not like to keep my hand lying on such a device for hours a day.

    My 2 cents.

  58. Re:RFID? Don't they mean RF? by Allen+Zadr · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Trackballs have a whole different set of problems. Typically - I use a trackball for doing most things, but I need to game with a regular mouse (preferably optical).

    What I don't get is what makes this 'MOUSE' any different than a digitizer pad (most come with mouse-like pointing devices along with the pen style interface). Seems like it's a lot of bother over something that's been available for a dozen or more years.

    --
    Kinetic stupidity has a new brand leader: Allen Zadr.
  59. Another link to the review by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seems like the site is down.

    Check out another review of the same mouse:

    http://www.cooltechzone.com/index.php?option=con te nt&task=view&id=794&Itemid=0

    link

  60. MOD PARENT UP. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wish I had mod points.

  61. you mean... by jeif1k · · Score: 1

    You mean like Wacom and other graphics tablets have been doing for, oh, about 20 years?

  62. Re:RFID? Don't they mean RF? by airjrdn · · Score: 1
  63. Re:RFID? Don't they mean RF? by FalconZero · · Score: 1

    Large enough capacitor=power to run the mouse 5 minutes after leaving the mouse pad.

    Which is great if your playing minesweeper. I prefer games which don't require a break every 5 mins to reacharge my mouse.

    And before you say 'just pause the game every 5 mins' - that just destroys the realism for games that rely on it (read:FPS), even if
    you could get some magic capacitor that'd manage 5 mins @ 100mA @ 5v (mouse power consumption reference here).

    Anyway, how's this very different than graphics tablets that have mice? (Like this Wacom one)
    which granted its not optical, but it is wireless, runs on a USB pad, is arguably far more accurate, and definatly more flexible as an input device.

    --
    Windows in 6 Bytes (IA-32) : 90 90 90 90 CD 19
  64. bumper mouse? by evilnissan · · Score: 1

    What not just make a mouse pad box with a electric conductor on the top. Then put a whip antenia on you mouse thats just like a bumper car.

    Im sure all the l337 speakers would crap there pants when you show off your noob fraging sparks.

    --
    This Sig for rent.
  65. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2, Informative

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  66. So how long eh... by cobryce · · Score: 0

    until someone finds a way to mod the pad and make a cheap RFID reader?

  67. Why not power by motion? by EvilCabbage · · Score: 1

    I'm not even going to pretend to understand how it works, but my Grandfather has a watch that recharges just through the motion of him walking around, moving his arm, etc.

    Couldn't something like this be introduced in a larger scale (lots of room inside those mice) to power a cordless mouse? It's not like they sit static for great deals if time.

    I'm sure someone smarter than me is aware of this method and can probable tell me why it won't work?

    1. Re:Why not power by motion? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It might work but compare the difference between swinging your arm when walking and operating a mouse both in distance and power. Also and for the same reasons, I suspect that if one of those watches were mounted on your mouse you would feel an annoying "clickclack" sensation every time you moved the mouse.

    2. Re:Why not power by motion? by neurocutie · · Score: 2, Informative
      Well, what's happening in those self-winding watches is that the motions of your wrist through-out the day can transfer much greater mechanical energy than it takes to move those tiny little watch hands over the same time period. The energy is captured by a unbalanced flywheel and stored in a spring.

      In the case of the mouse, it is unlikely that you could generate and capture enough energy to power a mouse. You would also have to factor in the very poor efficiency of converting mechanical to electrical energy (maybe 30%). Then you'd have to have batteries in there anyways to provide energy when the mouse is not moving. I think you'd be better off charging up these batteries in other ways. Like how about using several high powered 860nm IR LED's to power solar cells on the mouse (but solar cells are about 20% efficient).

    3. Re:Why not power by motion? by EvilCabbage · · Score: 1

      Groovy, thanks for the info.

      I'm not much of any kind of nerd, much of the concepts about energy are quite beyond me. I'm more like a PR guy wearing cargo pants than a real techy ;)

  68. This is nothing new... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wacom has been doing this for years with their famed pen and mouse tablets.

  69. TANSTAAFPOC by Stephen+Samuel · · Score: 1
    ( There Ain't No Such Thing As A Free Piece Of Cheese )

    We had pad-tethered mice almost 20 years ago (although it was the mice that were wired back then). We don't have them any more because people didn't seem to like the pad tether. Now these people are giving us a new mouse that provies all of the advantages of a wireless mouse -- excep that it's tethered to a wired mousepad.

    In other words, it's really wireless in name only.

    --
    Free Software: Like love, it grows best when given away.
  70. Voltage drop by tepples · · Score: 1

    Not all devices that run on 3 V (two alkaline cells) can run properly on 2.4 V (two NiCd or NiMH cells).

    1. Re:Voltage drop by Dr.+Spork · · Score: 1
      Not all devices that run on 3 V (two alkaline cells) can run properly on 2.4 V (two NiCd or NiMH cells).

      Maybe not, but I know of one that can: My wireless optical mouse (and keyboard)!

    2. Re:Voltage drop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you pay the extra 2 dollar and get some decent rechargables, cheapskate.

  71. Yawn. This is SO 1979! by muonzoo · · Score: 1

    This is interesting because .... ?
    I had a direct entry tablet with pen for my TRS-80 Color Computer in 1979 that had a wireless mouse (ok, puck) attachment! Jeeze. You kids don't remember anything ! :-)

  72. so in other words.... by kertong · · Score: 1

    its like a wacom graphire, but without the pen.

    Gee, I'll take 3!

  73. Re:RFID? Don't they mean RF? by jproffer · · Score: 1

    Why is this slashdot material? Watcom has had this available for YEARS. They even have wireless battery-less pens.

  74. New?? by jproffer · · Score: 1

    Oops posted as a reply to someone else's post instead of the original post.. Wanted to say, why is this slashdot material? Because Watcom has had this available for YEARS.. they even have wireless, battery-less pens.

  75. What about watches? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What would this do to a watch with a metal clasp and metal backplate? Being someone that works on computers regularly(mine and other people's), I also have no shortage of screws and tools lying around on my desk. Now for my pathetic attempt at a joke: This is about as useful to a nerd as a solar powered mouse.

  76. Another review by z3021017 · · Score: 2, Informative
    --
    Bored? Visit my exciting counter page!
  77. Crazy idea: Solar? by MrLogic17 · · Score: 1

    Call me crazy... [pause] I say, call me crazy, but how about a solar-rechargeable mouse? Just like those solar cordless lawn-lights. Slow trickel charge when your hand isn't on it- gotta be 90% of the day!

    -MrLogic
    [clever sig here]

    1. Re:Crazy idea: Solar? by Lihtan · · Score: 1

      That's because slashdoters live their lives in darkness.

      --
      Divide by zero hurts my brain.
  78. What the fuck does RFID have to do with it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What the hell does RFID have to do with it being fast?

    Wow, I bet crypt'ing a data path sur will make it faster.
    Bunch of pseudo scientist...

    The Sun is warmer, 5 times warmer than the greenhouse gas contribution!

    Idiots....

  79. Wait, what about "hand boiler" technology? by davidbrit2 · · Score: 1

    You know those little glass hand boiler things with the color liquid inside? You hold it, and the liquid bubbles up the tube and into a second bulb. Surely this sort of setup (slightly miniaturized of course) would be enough to turn a very small generator turbine. Since your hand would be on the mouse while using it, thus heating it up, I could see this working...

    1. Re:Wait, what about "hand boiler" technology? by TheUnknownOne · · Score: 1

      Whats the big deal with a wireless mouse, esp one without batteries anyway? They get to be a pain in the arse if you have other stuff operating on similar frequencies or other sources of interference (I.E. your at a lan party and someone else has a wireless mouse, or you work in a microwave testing facility :) ) Does the cord really get in the way that badly? (I personally have never had a problem)

    2. Re:Wait, what about "hand boiler" technology? by Methuseus · · Score: 1

      Yes, it does.

      --
      Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity, though I'm not yet sure about the universe. - A Einstein
    3. Re:Wait, what about "hand boiler" technology? by Jedi+Alec · · Score: 1

      the odds of mice interfering with each other at a lan party are slim at best, and even if they do, only one of the interfering parties needs to change channels and voila, problem solved.

      as for cable clutter it's not just a matter of the cord getting in the way, cords on a desk are just plain ugly. not to mention that the space taken up by cords can now be used to put papers, pretty trinkets etc.

      --

      People replying to my sig annoy me. That's why I change it all the time.
  80. Re:RFID? Don't they mean RF? by chaoaretasty · · Score: 1

    No, it charges while being used on the mat. The capacitor idea isn't to use it without the mat, but so that you can go off the mat for short periods and not have to lift it up, and reposition it (which is not good during an fps). And it's different because it is optical. Graphics tablet mice are passive, they could never generate a beam and tablet mice i found to not have good accuracy compared to my optical mice.

  81. how come nobody is pointing by geekoid · · Score: 1

    out that this was already done by Wacom...

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  82. Re:RFID? Don't they mean RF? by Guspaz · · Score: 3, Interesting

    What I want to know is how this is any better than the usual graphics tablets that come with wireless batteryless mice already. Mice that are tracked by the tablet, not the mouse, so the mouse is small and light. And some of them even have crosshairs attached to the top side for precision movements.

  83. Holy crap! by Trejkaz · · Score: 1

    They had an optical mouse 10 years ago? That must have cost a bomb!

    --
    Karma: It's all a bunch of tree-huggin' hippy crap!
    1. Re:Holy crap! by mabinogi · · Score: 1

      Optical mice have been around for more than 20 years...

      Although the earlier ones required a special pad that was usually metal with hexagons or red and blue lines printed on it..

      --
      Advanced users are users too!
    2. Re:Holy crap! by Trejkaz · · Score: 1

      So you're saying that Wacom were using these?

      --
      Karma: It's all a bunch of tree-huggin' hippy crap!
    3. Re:Holy crap! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I remember using Sparc machines with optical mice back in '92. They were old machines when I used them. They needed metal mouse pads with a blue grid printed on them, and if you moved them too fast or didn't keep them aligned with the printed grid, the cursor jumped all over.

  84. The perfect mouse by accelleron · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This is a neat toy (one I wouldn't mind playing around with myself), but this is not the perfect mouse.

    Logitech is definitely onto something with their mouse dock. It's quite easy to slip the mouse into the dock when leaving the PC and take it back out when coming back, but with BT (and IR) mice, I find that there is still a problem: distance. I'm not sure about you, but having three displays on my desktop, the last thing I need is another device that MUST be there. Between my PDA's cradle, my sound system's remote, a satellite speaker, and various crap from ThinkGeek, the real estate on my desk is extremely scarce. My perfect mouse would be one with the design of an Intellimouse Explorer 4.0, based on RF technology to allow for reliable use several feet from the base. The cradle can then be placed somewhere where real estate isn't quite so scarce (a shelf, for example.)

    As for my take on the battery-free tech, it's a toy. A cool, definitely nerdy toy, but still a toy. There's no reason anyone should be too lazy to slip a mouse into its cradle once every few days.

    --
    Genius may have its limitations, but stupidity is not thus handicapped.
    1. Re:The perfect mouse by grumpygrodyguy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      There's no reason anyone should be too lazy to slip a mouse into its cradle once every few days.

      It's not laziness, it's forgetfullness. The last thing I'd want to do is wake up and go over to my computer only to learn that I need to wait two hours for my mouse to charge because I forgot to dock my mouse recently.

      I prefer 4 AAA rechargable NmHi batteries sitting in a battery charger. That way you have the mouse as normal, and only need to change your behavior every few months to switch out the batteries.

      --
      The government has a defect: it's potentially democratic. Corporations have no defect: they're pure tyrannies. -Chomsky
    2. Re:The perfect mouse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > I'm not sure about you, but having three displays on my desktop, the last thing I need is
      > another device that MUST be there. Between my PDA's cradle, my sound system's remote, a
      > satellite speaker, and various crap from ThinkGeek, the real estate on my desk is
      > extremely scarce.

      Maybe it's about time you got rid of that dried out can of silly putty.

    3. Re:The perfect mouse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You want the Gyration mouse. It comes with a charging cradle that you can put on your shelf, and a small RF receiver that you just need to hook up to your USB port and then put where ever you want. you also get the advantage of being able to use the mouse in mid-air. They are very comfortable to use.

    4. Re:The perfect mouse by accelleron · · Score: 1

      Great! now I can toss my mouse against the wall AND capture the precise output. Console gamers - rejoice.

      --
      Genius may have its limitations, but stupidity is not thus handicapped.
  85. wireless mousepad by wanchai · · Score: 1

    i hope some innovative high tech company can develope a wireless mousepad.

  86. Anyone notice the WARNING? by Lihtan · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Do not operate on any metal surfaced table

    I presume this thing will function like an inductive heater if any large piece of metal comes in contact with this. Might be good for cooking some noodles though.

    --
    Divide by zero hurts my brain.
    1. Re:Anyone notice the WARNING? by aXis100 · · Score: 1

      Hope no-one is left handed, or wears a watch on their right arm, or has any metal jewelery. Nasty!

  87. RFID IZ TEH EVILZZ!!!!!11111one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    D00D, MU$7 B0YK077 D1Z!!!111

    IT U$3$ TEH EVILZ RFID!!!!11

  88. Re:RFID? Don't they mean RF? by FalconZero · · Score: 1

    Sigh...
    No, it charges while being used on the mat.
    Yes, clearly it charges on the mat (as the article header states).

    The capacitor idea isn't to use it without the mat... ...and not have to lift it up
    Based on your premise how does the cap help? You still have to 'lift it up' to get back on the pad after you go off. Also if this was the intention of the parent to my first post, why would they suggest a time of 5 mins?

    And it's different because it is optical...
    Again, Yes, clearly the technology is different, but the function is the same [Tablet Vs Pad Optical : mouse works on pad], hence my question about the difference between the two beyond a trivial difference in application of existing technologies.

    tablet mice i found to not have good accuracy
    This is far too subjective to get into an argument about, theres too many factors, but it probably boils down to the amount of cash you want to fork out. I've seen tablets far nicer than any optical I've used, and some that are rubbish.

    --
    Windows in 6 Bytes (IA-32) : 90 90 90 90 CD 19
  89. Buy a WACOM! by g_braad · · Score: 2, Informative

    Try a Wacom Graphire 3 with mouse... first of all you have a real drawing tablet which is pressure sensitive... and you have a mouse with NO optical! all is done by the Tablet itself and you can even make it work with the Tablet PC version of Windows XP when you install the Penabled drivers. Hurrah!

    --
    F/OSS & IT Consultant
  90. How about... by PHanT0 · · Score: 1

    Using kinetics... I mean, watch manufacturers use it already... How much trouble would it be to put that into a mouse? Maybe I'll make it my weekend project :-)

    Seriously though, the average person never spots a mouse on the screen before it moves... hence, the extra moves to 'find the pointer' and every subsequent movement could be used to charge the mouse.

    Just food for thought.

  91. Re:RFID? Don't they mean RF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wacom, not Watcom. Watcom made a nice compiler for a while. Wacom makes tablets.

  92. Re:RFID? Don't they mean RF? by anon*127.0.0.1 · · Score: 2, Funny

    That's why you set your mouse sensitivity to max, then edit the .cfg file to set it even higher, so that even when you're just resting your hand on your mouse, your pulse your gun twitch around like you're having a siezure.

    --
    I am NOT a man!
    I am a free number!
  93. Re:RFID? Don't they mean RF? by Aeiri · · Score: 2, Funny

    They even have wireless battery-less pens.

    What about pencils? I've always wanted one of those.

  94. Next... by LavaDevil94 · · Score: 1

    ...they'll have real live mice that you move around on a special mousepad, energy for the wireless is generated by sucking the life force from the poor bastard that you caught half-alive in your trap last night.

  95. exercise wheel by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

    What about charging the mouse through its rolling ball? Or, preferably, a trackball with the same mechanism? And Bluetooth, to boot (pun intended)?

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  96. what? by Frennzy · · Score: 1

    It uses 'RFID' for power? Amazing...I suppose next we'll see cop cars that use Driver's Licenses for fuel.

  97. New! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wireless Mouse nailed to your desk!

  98. Wacom tablet? by Barlo_Mung_42 · · Score: 1

    My Wacom tablet came with a wireless mouse years ago.

  99. Geared Balls... hehe by dj42 · · Score: 4, Funny

    I don't think I could keep a straight face in person discussing geared balls.

    --
    We are one consciousness experiencing itself subjectively. Back to you with the weather, Bob!
  100. Why go wireless anyway? by Timbotronic · · Score: 1
    Not meaning to troll, but what's the attraction with wireless mice and keyboards anyway?

    I can see the advantage for couch surfing and boardroom presentations, but why bother with desktops? A company I did some contracting for just moved offices and to look "funky" put wireless mice and keyboards on every desk. What a disaster! The batteries on all the mice started running out in a couple of weeks and the ctrl keys on the keyboards only worked half the time 'cause the signal was flakey.

    Guess this product would fix the problem for the mice at least but really, why bother for a machine that you always sit at?

    --

    One of these days I'm moving to Theory - everything works there

    1. Re:Why go wireless anyway? by Anonymous+Freak · · Score: 1

      I had a Logitech wireless set for my PC desktop, and yeah, it was overkill. It was more to keep the desktop LOOKING decluttered than anything else.

      But with my PowerBook, and a Bluetooth keyboard and mouse, it has actual useful benefits. Notably, I can store them in a drawer, and when I want to use my notebook on my desk, I just set it on top of the inevitable pile of papers, dig out the keyboard, set it on the pile of papers, and clear a small space (either revealing the actual desk, or just a large-enough area of paper,) to mouse around. It's great. No more hunting for, or fiddling with, the free end of the cable, or digging under the mess for the keyboard and mouse. I just pull them out when I need them. (And the mouse is nice and portable, all self-contained, no wire, no adaptor, just the mouse.)

      --
      Another non-functioning site was "uncertainty.microsoft.com."
      The purpose of that site was not known.
  101. Wacom Tablets? by raider_red · · Score: 1

    Hasn't Wacom been making this type of product for about 15 years now?

    --
    It's good to use your head, but not as a battering ram.
  102. Re:RFID? Don't they mean RF? by Methuseus · · Score: 1

    You don't have to lift it up to get on the pad. You just make a pad that has the charging pad in the middle. That way you have a seamless very large pad and if you need to go off the charging pad you can, but you can just return it to the center.

    --
    Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity, though I'm not yet sure about the universe. - A Einstein
  103. Mouse Microwaving Body Parts by Mulletproof · · Score: 1

    Just reminds me of microwaving your brain with a cell phone. How long will it be before people find out that you can not only get carpletunnel, but liquify the nerve endings in your wrist at the same time while powering the mouse...?

    That is a joke, lest you missed the tags.

    --
    You need a FREE iPod Nano
  104. One good point to this? by seangw · · Score: 1

    I can't think of one really good point to this, other than that you can use the mouse at all points.

    My wireless mouse has a battery, that needs to be charged for about 20 min. every 2 weeks at maximum (I normally go for about 3-4 weeks depending on use, and I use heavily to begin with).

    This type of mouse will save me while playing those games that I can't take a 20 min. break from, and I have forgotten to dock my mouse for over two weeks.

    I guess this is more of the "I can do it" technologies not "I should do it".

  105. No buttons? by satoshi1 · · Score: 1

    Am I the only one that read that as "Wireless mouse with no buttons"? I stared at my monitor for a bit, trying to figure out how that would work, then I realized I read it wrong...

  106. Re:WOW MAN WHAT A FUCKIN RAD IDEA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    54th and Cermak, you mean?

  107. Tiny Little Generator? by grgcombs · · Score: 1

    What about having a wireless, batteryless mouse operate off the motion of the mouse itself? Couldn't you have a tiny little generator run off the ball of the mouse to produce electricity? It brings new meaning to the idea of shaking your mouse to get it to unfreeze, though, doesn't it? Hey, maybe I should patent this before someone like M$ does.

    Greg

  108. How about condenser? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Instead of battery, how about using condenser for charging power?

    Yes, condenser can't store as much power as pattery. But, it can be charged very fast and it don't have deterioration.
    And mice don't use so much power.

    So, condenser is the best way to charge power, I think.

  109. Wacom Graphire Tablet by Wonko · · Score: 1

    I have a Wacom Graphire tablet around here somewhere. I am not sure exactly what model it is, I haven't had it plugged in in a long time. It came with a pen and a mouse. At first, I was actually quite excited about the mouse. It has no chord and it has almost no weight (I never liked chordless mice because of the weight of the batteries).

    I tried it out and it works very well... Except for one issue that I will never be able to get past. The mouse pointer moves in relation to the direction you move the mouse on the pad. This means that if you tilt the mouse 90 degrees in relation to the tablet and push the mouse horizontally, the pointer will move vertically.

    That is the most extreme example. Even when using it normally you can tell the pointer just isn't moving the way it should. If this mouse has the same problem I wouldn't go anywhere near the thing :).

  110. Simple answer.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    what happens when you have to hold a key or mouse button down?
    it still uses power, so if hand movement stops power generation stops, and it stops sending a signal to the computer, which would suck for FPS or other games because after holding down w for a second or 2 you would stop running....
    ways to get arround it you ask?
    well we could add a battery ..... but then we just would have ran in a retarded little circle back to the current solution wouldnt we?

    the answer isnt no batteries its longer lasting ones or adding a hand movement Discharge/recharge so the built in batt never dies, but thats not very wallet friendly...

    if its not broke, dont fix it..

    1. Re:Simple answer.... by shenanigans · · Score: 1

      Well, you could send one signal when pressing the button, and another when releasing.

  111. Hmmm.. by DaneelGiskard · · Score: 1

    Can't the mouse be powered by you moving it around? Similar to those (swatch) watches which use this principle?

  112. After several seconds of brainstorming... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I bet they'll introduce the next generation product soon enough: a wireless mouse pad!

  113. ...RFID? by skinfitz · · Score: 1

    It uses RFID?

    "Hey I got like this really cool mouse? It's totally useless in that the pointer doesn't do anything when you move it around but I can tell you EXACTLY which Walmart shelf it was on before I bought it and the feds know which hand I'm using. How cool is that?"

  114. afroman did this years ago... by philo_enyce · · Score: 1
  115. ah yes, geek wit at its finest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow..tin foil hats still gets modded up around here?
    Doesnt take much in terms of humor to get a response.

    I guess its the online version of the 'pull my finger joke'

    1. Re:ah yes, geek wit at its finest by powerlinekid · · Score: 1

      I think you should get your tin foil hat checked for lead, its poisoning your brain.

      --

      can't sleep slashdot will eat me
  116. Totally useless by great_snoopy · · Score: 1

    So, we get a mouse WITHOUT a wire, just to get a pad WITH wire. So, what's the use of this thing ? On the other side, this is WAY too stupid : > Since when RFID is equivalent with "no lag" ? Since wheb RFID implies SPEED ? Is RFID using some other form of energy that propagates signals at speeds greater than the speed of light ? Jeez, this world seems to be falling apart. Every day appears a new idiot with a new (and totally USELESS) "invention". I suppose someday another idiot will invent the method to preserve farts in cans or bottles and everybody will say he's the 21'st century's Einstein.

  117. Wacom has made such mouses for a long time by alarch · · Score: 1

    Wacom adds to their tablets mouses, wireless, which use no batteries and has do be used on the tablet.

    --
    Deliriant isti Americani.
    1. Re:Wacom has made such mouses for a long time by Zareste · · Score: 1

      True. I'm using one right now. It's been working almost two years and of course, no need for battery change. Plus it doesn't use RFID (or does it?) and has no lag. Maybe it's more an issue of price.

      The 'wireless mouse' mentioned in the article looks absolutely useless, but maybe it'll make for a smidge of competition.

      --
      I am NOT a number! I am a - oh wait, I'm number 761710. Look! 761710!
  118. Just like the Apple graphics tablet? by Gordonjcp · · Score: 1

    I used to have an Apple II graphics tablet, which would erase disks and credit cards placed on top. I'm not really that happy about putting something designed to give off magnetic fields right where unsuspecting users could drop tapes or other magnetic media on them...

  119. Re:RFID? Don't they mean RF? by zakezuke · · Score: 1

    When you are gaming you can't pick up your mouse and move it to the other side of the pad or the other guy kills you.

    I rather thought that in FPS game you set your mouse sensitivity relative to how far you want to move the mouse to do a 360. I guess this falls into personal taste. Some gamers prefer ball mice, others like trackballs. I must admit in the past I enjoyed the accuracy of the old sun optical mice with the reflective pad, this usb pad doesn't sound half bad in theory.

    --
    There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
  120. Mouse cradle to recharge... by malfunct · · Score: 1

    I think that this idea would be great if instead of always needing to be on the pad it had some batteries so that maybe once a week you needed to leave the mouse on the pad or in a cradle for 2 or 3 hours. That way you wouldn't have to switch batteries but you would still be able to mouse wherever you wanted. It wouldn't solve the issue of batteries being heavy but that wasn't what made me upset about my mouse. Dead batteries and interferance from the tower (my pc tower sits right next to the mousepad and caused mouse movement with the early wirless mouse I used to be erratic) were the problems.

    --

    "You can now flame me, I am full of love,"

  121. Why is RFID faster? by Dan+East · · Score: 1

    has no lag at all since it uses RFID.

    What is that supposed to mean? RFID uses radio waves that travel faster than the radio waves used by ordinary cordless mice?

    Or perhaps this mouse is faster than a (fictional) mouse that uses sound to communicate with the PC?

    Dan East

    --
    Better known as 318230.
  122. Not all have that problem by Moraelin · · Score: 1

    Dunno about Intuos, but with a Graphire it only happens if you haven't installed the graphics. A Graphire 2 can pretend it's an USB mouse even without the Wacom drivers, but then it has exact the same problem you described.

    On the other hand, if you did install the driver, it's smart enough to make a difference between the pen and the mouse. It tracks the pen up to the 1/4 inch distance you describe, yes, but lifting the mouse barely a millimeter stops the tracking. I.e., it behaves exactly like a ball mouse.

    And it's _waaay_ nice to have a mouse with:

    - no cord to get tangled, _and_

    - without the idiotic re-activation lag of normal wireless mice, which go to sleep as soon as you don't move them for half a second. (Like I'm gonna keep wiggling the mouse when I'm sniping.) _and_

    - without a ball to get dirty, _and_

    - without a led/scanner that gets confused by quick movements

    For me, it's the perfect mouse, bar none. And the stylus is a nice bonus too.

    --
    A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
  123. DIY Wireless Mouse Charging! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Screw paying for these fancy "features" -- Ahnold will tell you how to do it yourself.

  124. Re:RFID? Don't they mean RF? by dnoyeb · · Score: 1

    The RF engineers at my job would prefer to call it LF, or low frequency as opposed to radio frequency.

    But yes, RFID is just an ID tag, it holds at most 200 bytes of data on the ones I have seen. Tag, not data storage, and certainly not a communication technology.

  125. Well, I'm using one by Moraelin · · Score: 1

    Yep, I'm using one. In fact, one on each computer I own. For the mouse. It's hard to describe, and it does take some getting used to, but picture this:

    - no cord to get in the way or pull at the mouse,

    - none of that idiotic wake-up lag of normal wireless mice (Which go to sleep if you don't move them all the time. And, yes, even Logitech's have it. A lot shorter, but it exists.)

    - no ball to get dirty

    - no laser to get confused by very quick movements or by a hair getting stuck to the bottom of the mouse right in front of the LED. (Don't laugh, it actually happened to me.)

    - no batteries to run out when you need them the most

    Personally I rate the combination as _waay_ nice.

    The available surface is one problem, yes, but:

    1. Being a twitch-gamer, I'm used to work with high sensitivity and small mouse movements. I can cover the whole screen in less than an inch mouse movement. At which point, the A6 active surface of a Graphire is more than enough.

    2. You can buy larger pads anyway. Even in the budget range you can get the Graphire XL. And Intuos, now that you can literally get one that covers half the desk.

    --
    A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
  126. Re:RFID? Don't they mean RF? by wisdom_brewing · · Score: 1

    i cant understand why anyone would ever want to use a trackball... cant stand them... :)

    but anyway, a power generator of some sort within a mouse could easily power a wireless mouse... a mouse moves A LOT... compared to a watches, though im sure the amount of power requires is of another order of magnitude...

  127. Bloody murder! by palad1 · · Score: 1

    I do scream bloody murder!

    Signed: the Apple zealot.

  128. Re:RFID? Don't they mean RF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think with those you have to keep the mouse oriented at a certain angle, but not with this design.

  129. Trackballs by PhYrE2k2 · · Score: 1

    Trackballs are king. Super precision. And why use your whole arm to move the mouse when you can use your finger. The precision of my finger is much that of my clunky arm [who needs them?]. Anyone who seriously does CAD, Graphics, or pretty much anything uses trackball or trackpoint (the eraser-point on laptops). Sadly most vendors find people like their touchbads despite horrible acuracy and poor tracking... which is why Dell has almost phased out the trackpoint. -M

    --

    when you see the word 'Linux', drink!
    1. Re:Trackballs by mink · · Score: 1

      As someone who does CADD I use a 12"x12" Sumasketch III tablet with 15 button puck. Hard to digitize hand drawn drafting/art accurately with a trackball. Yes you can use a scanner but you are left with a lot of clean up work there.
      One nice feature of the tablet is it can be set to map 1:1 to your screen, meaning where ever on the tablet you have the puck/pen is where you are on the screen (this means pick up the puck and move to the other side and the pointer jumps), or you can have it act more like a normal mouse.

      --
      Well I've wrestled with reality for thirty five years doctor, and I'm happy to say I finally won out over it.
  130. Who said optical? by khrtt · · Score: 1

    Where the wack did you pull "optical" out of? Is "optical" a buzzword so buzzy it starts to buzz for you before anyone actually invoked it? Wacom thingy is a goddamn tablet, for creeps sake. The only piece of optical technology in it is the power LED.

    In case you're wondering, the mouse has nothing on its bottom, nothing at all. No ball, no lense, no little wheels.. Amazing!

    1. Re:Who said optical? by Trejkaz · · Score: 1

      You said it.

      My Wacom Graphire came with a mouse like that,

      The mouse in the article was optical, therefore you were saying yours was optical.

      Easy enough to understand.

      --
      Karma: It's all a bunch of tree-huggin' hippy crap!
  131. Similar Amazing Invention! by slashusrslashbin · · Score: 1

    I've just invented a fully functional car with no engine! Does 0-60 in 7 seconds, top-speed 120mph, at the same time boasting a fuel consumption of infinity mpg! The car literally uses no energy, produces no pollution, and will go on and on for miles and miles, literally until the wheels wear out! Coming to a major motor manufacturer near you soon!!*

    * requires 4-litre diesel operated tread-mill to be in contact with wheels at all times.
  132. I have some A4Tech stuff by hattig · · Score: 1

    I have a wireless keyboard and mouse, it was only £17, albeit PS2 (which was good in the end, as Linux didn't like it when I tried a USB keyboard/mouse recently). It wasn't the mouse reviewed, and the keyboard has a strange ergonomic layout (angled keys, and numberpad on the left so right hand is closer to the mouse) but it is pretty good.

    One thing I liked though, is that the wireless PS2 receiver also integrated a battery charger, so you never had to go around and hunt for the recharger, it was straight in front of you. It also came with 6 batteries, so there is always a spare set.

    Sadly the mouse isn't the best, and does get through the batteries at a fair rate, although I do use the computer a lot.

  133. there's still a wire by FractiousWeasel · · Score: 1

    so let me get this straight... I can have a wireless mouse, but now my mousepad needs to be plugged in? No thanks... I'll stick with a wired mouse and a mousepad (or lack of one) of my choosing.

  134. Wasted story. by atheken · · Score: 1

    maybe the submitter hasn't seend any wacom tablets. This is not new technology.

  135. When will they.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Come out with a wireless mousepad?

  136. defeating the purpose... by Run4yourlives · · Score: 1

    You can use a wireless mouse anywhere... on the plugged in pad.

    Never mind that this is exactly how my wacom tablet works, (which is why I only use it for the pen) but doesn't it strike anyone that this completely defeats the purpose of being "wireless"?

  137. Wireless mouse with a wired mousepad by timadev · · Score: 1

    it ain't wireless afterall :D

  138. Wow...so they ripped off Wacom??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is nothing new. The Wacom Tablets have long since been doing this. Graffire 1 and 2 were often packaged with a 'Mouse' that was wireless, no batteries, and had perfect accuracy. I still have mine. Works fine...nearly 3 years after I bought it.

    I find the pen much more useful, though.

  139. People still use batteries?! by MrNemesis · · Score: 1

    I modded by wireless mouse to use an RTG to power it. I just filled the battery cavity with plutonium 238, threw in a thermocouple and I was good to go.

    The thing worked fine until it melted through the floor. Maybe I'll stick to go-fasta stripes next time...

    --
    Moderation Total: -1 Troll, +3 Goat
  140. Re:RFID? Don't they mean RF? by JPriest · · Score: 1

    I do increase my mouse sensitivity but there is a happy medium between getting on large targets fast, and being able to dial into precision distance shots. I use a corded optical Intellimouse Explorer

    --
    Saying Java is nice because it works on all OS's is like saying that anal sex is nice because it works on all genders.
  141. I've invented the wireless no battery mouse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Trouble is, I keep getting 0wned in Counterstrike when I need to stop to wind it up again.

  142. Nearly Useless by DirtyLiar · · Score: 1

    Unless you REALLY can't stand getting your mouse cable caught on stuff, or can't seem to keep your cordless mouse charged, I really can't see a need for this. Not at more than double the price of a decent mouse.

    I've got a $15 cordless mouse I love. And my corded mice are decent too.

    I haven't paid more than $30 for a mouse in 20 years!

    --

    THINK! It's patriotic

  143. Crusty balls by DirtyLiar · · Score: 1

    Where else but /. would you find a serious discussion of mouse balls? *sigh* Say, does anyone else hate that crusty buildup you get on your balls? *grin*

    --

    THINK! It's patriotic

  144. Re:RFID? Don't they mean RF? by zero_offset · · Score: 1

    The biggest problem with trackballs: Your thumb is not a precision instrument. It did not evolve to move over a large range or with any accuracy. Using your thumb as a pointer is like using a hammer to measure distance.

    --

    Slashdot quality declines as the number of hot grits posts decreases. - Provolt's Law, Apr-09-2005