"I'm anxiously waiting to hear your proposed solution."
The solution is easy. Allow the return of the refugees and their descendants to live as equals under the law on the land.
The reason you won't agree to this is because Israel is a racist Jew only State and you don't want more non-Jews to be there because it would by definition signify the end of the Zionist enterprise. Hasbaras will likely come back and claim that Israel is a multicultural nation and has many Muslim Arabs.
I will ask them a question right now:
How many Muslim Arabs who were not born in Israel/Palestine immigrated into Israel and were granted full Israeli Citizenship with equal rights, Israeli passports etc.., last year? What about over the past 10 years?
How many non-Jewish Africans, Chinese and Indians were granted full Israeli Citizenship with equal rights, Israeli passports etc.., last year? What about over the past 10 years? What official Israeli government programs exist to encourage the immigration of qualified non Jewish Indians, Chinese and Africans into Israel on a pathway to eventually become full Israeli citizens, to raise their children as full Israeli citizens and access its health care and education etc...? The answer, as you know is close to, if not completely equal to, ZERO. So let's not pretend that Israel is not a racist Jew only state.
Now you will want to claim that Jews are not a race and therefore Israel cannot be a racist state. You know, I suspect, that that argument is utter bullshit and is based on the semantics of the word "race" which has been altered over time and are aware that there are many references to "Jewish Race" throughout the literature, not to mention the many Jewish studies on DNA which try to prove that there is such a thing as Jewish DNA (aka race). You know that there are many people who are defined by Israel to be Jewish even though they are Atheists, showing that Jewishness has nothing to do with religious belief - their Jewishness being defined by having been born to Jewish parents (aka DNA aka race). So let's not play that game.
If you want peace then give the refugees the right to return to live in the land as equals under the law as full citizens and don't define the state as the Jewish State. If you want an escalating war which is leaving the Jewish People looking increasingly bad, globally, then continue to murder children with your US supplied WMD's. It is your choice as a Jew really. You are making a bed, and soon you might have to lay in it.
What you write is complete and utter bullshit and you clearly know nothing factual about the history of the region. The fact is that there was never more than 8% Jew in the land we call Palestine/Israel today, until the Jews decided to create a racist Jew only state in that land in the late 1800's. All of the troubles stem from this. Trying to create a Jew only state on land that was inhabited by fewer than 8% Jews.
Don't believe it? Well tell it to your Jewish friends - they might need to change history to suit your ridiculous viewpoint! http://www.jewishvirtuallibrar...
"Who's right? Who's wrong? I don't know, but history is quite an eye opener." It is easy to answer this question! The Jews are wrong and Hamas is right. Hamas has the right to resist the occupation and annexation of their land, and their exclusion from living on it as equals under the law, using violence. That is their right. Israel does not have the right to claim self-defence when it acts to defend the existence of Israel wherever Israel is defined as a Jew only state built on the land of the refugees to whom it refuses the right to return to live as equals under the law on the land. When Israel accepts the right of return of the refugees to live in the land as equals under the law, then Israel can claim that it is a legitimate state and has the right the defend itself.
Look, you are obviously a bit doughy, so here is a simple analogy for your tiny brain to process: I break into your house and start raping your wife. You try to defend her by attacking me with your puny body. I turn around and snap your head off of your body. The police come to arrest me. I tell them that I was acting in self-defence - because you attacked me. The "Community", which consists of people under my control and in my pay, agree with me and I am accordingly rewarded for heroically managing to defend myself against your attack by being allowed into your 18 year old daughters bedroom for some more "fun"! That is the best analogy of the Israel/Palestine conflict which has ever been written.
"That area has been inhabited by Jews for centuries" - the population of Jews was less than 8%. Sure there were some Jews there, but only 8%. The Jews decided in 1897 to create a Jew only state on a land that contained only 8% Jews. That is the entire cause of the "conflict". Here are the numbers from a Jewish, pro-Israel website: http://www.jewishvirtuallibrar...
"In addition in modern Israel 20% of the citizens are muslim arabs with the same rights as everyone." Those Arabs are the descendants of Arabs who were already living on the land before 1948. The Jews tried to get rid of them, many fled in terror but unfortunately for the Jews, some of them did not. If Muslim Arabs are so welcome in Israel, then please tell us how many Muslim Arabs immigrated to Israel and became full Israeli citizens last year compared to Jews? How about over the last 10 years?
"PS : The word Palestine that you mean is a modern invention. The ancient Palestine is something completely different." Spare us your crappy word plays. The word Palestinian has come to mean: "A non-Jewish person who has the right to live in the land which in modern days is called Palestine/Israel". Just like the word Anti-Semite in modern times has come to mean a person (like me) who dislikes Jews - their beliefs, their culture and their behaviour even though the word "Semite" does not mean "Jew".
"This conflict would end the SECOND Hamas stopped their aggression. "
No, it would not.
This conflict began in the late 1800's when the Jews decided to create "home-land for the Jewish people", which meant to create a racist state which was for Jews only, on a land that was already populated and whose population had *never* at any time contained more than 8% Jew. In order to make lebensraum for the racist Jew only state, the Jews committed acts of terror which resulted in the native population of non-Jews be pushed out as refugees into Gaza, West Bank and surrounding Arab states.
That is the cause of the problem. The Arabs did not create the "conflict". The Jews did. Hamas does not "attack" Israel. Israel attacked the Arabs and Hamas is their legitimate and legally allowed resistance to the occupation of their lands - yes, that includes Tel Aviv and all of what you would call "Israel".
Hamas represents the refugees who do have the right to use violence in order to regain control of their territory from which they have been illegally expelled and which the Jews have annexed, which is an illegal action. This conflict will end when the Jews agree to allow the refugees to return to live in the land as equals under the law. That is the only condition under which Hamas or any other militant resistance organisation should ever agree to a ceasefire.
The Israelis can NEVER claim self-defence. Ever. Period. They only option they have as a "self-defence", is to obey the law and allow the refugees to return to live as equals under the law on the land.
How dare you suggest that the western media, which is controlled by Jewish people who support Israel, somehow side with Hamas! You are clearly a hasbara troll. This entire article is trying to give the impression that Hamas have "high-technology" at their disposal. Utter nonsense. A Hamas rocket barely makes an impact when it lands. It has no guidance system and no explosive warhead. The Israeli missiles are guided missiles of the highest technology and carry huge explosive payloads that can kill everyone within a 100 metre radius. It is extremely disingenuous to compare the number of Hamas rockets fired with the number of Israel rockets fired. It is like comparing the number of punches landed in a fight between a two year old girl and Mike Tyson in his prime.
Din't call me a lib* you dumb homo. Fucking Anonymous Coward talking to me about waving dicks around. If you think you are a big man then use your real name.
"separating the individual from the actions of the Israeli government"
Bullshit. Most Jews do support Israel, globally. Yes you will see a couple in the limelight who oppose it, but most Jews do support it. Don't give me any of that fucking libtard crap about "Jews are not responsible for Israel's actions". The majority of Jewish organisations, including the media, fully support Israel in their rhetoric, financially and politically and have a wide base of members from the "Jewish Community".
Did AIPAC or ADL issue a statement condemning the Israeli actions? NO!
Israel exists and is able to slaughter the Palestinians, who they have already dispossessed of their homes and lands, precisely and only because of the Jewish powerbase in the west (http://thezog.info/list-summaries/) which extracts huge funding and exerts massive pressure and influence on anybody who dares so much as tweet "#freepalestine" after being contronted with a video, and via distortions of the truth in the "main stream media".
What is more, if you read the Jewish press you will see the venom and hatred that Jews have for the Palestinians and how they cheer when a child is murdered and the calls for genocide by government officials (http://www.jonathan-cook.net/blog/2014-07-21/calls-for-genocide-enter-israeli-mainstream/) which of course you don't see on BBC CNN FOX or any of the other Hasbara agencies.
Not to mention the utter out-and-out racism which is prevalent throughout Jewish society and philosophy - not just against Arabs but against every person who is not Jewish. See Professor Israel Shahak's Jewish History Jewish Religion (full text: http://www.biblebelievers.org.... or buy http://www.amazon.com/Jewish-H...).
What is Israel? It is the Jew only state that was built on Palestine, beginning roughly late 1800's, a land where since the 1600's to 1900's there was a minority of fewer than 8% Jews. A land where even in biblical times there was only a minority of Jews in the land, and when they were there all they did was commit atrocities. They built their Jew only state by terrorising the inhabitants to flee and become refugees.
Ethics, Morals and Law: The occupying power does not have the right to defend itself from attacks. It does not. It has a single right. Only one right. The right to obey the law and withdraw the occupation/annexation by allowing the refugees to return and live as equal citizens in the land, all of the land. Anything else is not self defence but an action to maintain the occupation, the annexation and the oppression. None of this stupid two-state-solution bullshit. There is one land and the refugees are entitled to return to all and any part of it!
The occupied, the annexed, on the other hand, they do have the right to use violent force against their occupiers and oppressors until such a time as the occupier ceases its occupation and annexation and allow the refugees to return to their homes and land and to live as equals under the law in the land.
Aside: Before any Jew or misguided libtard replies with stupid analogies of native Americans or Aborigines etc... you only prove MY POINT! Any of those people's or their descendents are guaranteed citizenship in the US and Australia and can live as equals under the law in the land, all of the land, any part of the land.
Before any Jew or libtard pipes up and tells us that Israel is multicultural and diverse and has many Arabs then here is a question, of all of the Arab-Israelis, which of them are not descendants of Arabs who did not flee in 1948 and 1967, how many new, non-Jewish Arabs immigrated to Israel last year? How many non-jewish Blacks? How man non-Jewish Chinese? How many non-Jewish Indians? The answer is of course 0. Because Israel is a racist jew only state where you have to be Jewish to immigrate into and become a citizen.
"It is Hamas that is responsible for the death toll of civilians in Palestine."
Israel *cannot* possibly claim self-defence. It has the Iron Dome which is a defense, it claims, against the "rockets". So if they have a defence, called Iron Dome, then why do they need to murder 1,000 civilians to defend against the "rockets" which are already defended against and which have caused almost no impact?
1. Between 1600's and 1900's there was roughly only 8% Jew in the land of Palestine. Even back to biblical times there was never a majority of Jew in the land. NEVER.
e.g. "Year Arab Population Jewish Population 1600 250,000 5,000 1850 480,000 17,000 1890 530,000 43,000 1922 590,000 84,000 1931 760,000 174,000 1939 900,000 450,000 1948 980,000 650,000 1954 192,000 1,530,000 1969 423,000 2,500,000 1989 843,000 3,700,000 1997 1,120,000 4,640,000" http://www.torah.org/learning/...
2. In late 1800's the Jew decided that they would create racist Jew only state on the land which had been and still was mainly inhabited by non-Jewish people.
E.g. "Zionism seeks to establish a home for the Jewish people in EretzIsrael secured under public law. The Congress contemplates the following means to the attainment of this end:
A. The promotion by appropriate means of the settlement in Eretz-Israel of Jewish farmers, artisans, and manufacturers. B. The organization and uniting of the whole of Jewry by means of appropriate institutions, both local and international, in accordance with the laws of each country. C. The strengthening and fostering of Jewish national sentiment and national consciousness. D. Preparatory steps toward obtaining the consent of governments, where necessary, in order to reach the goals of Zionism."
3. As a result of the Jew actions to commit this Demographic Genocide, by all means foul and fair, many Arabs fled their homes and land and now live in the Gaza, West Bank, surrounding Arab countries and elsewhere and are correctly called refugees.
4. The Jew did not allow the refugees to return to the land as is their responsibility because the aim was and is to create a Jew only racist state on the land of Palestine/Greater Israel.
5. The refugees have the right to return to the land and to live as equal citizens, with the Jew, in peace, under the law in the land.
6. They do not have the right to expel the Jew who has purposefully created "facts on the ground" which would lead to a humanitarian crisis should they be removed and would form yet another Ethnic Cleansing/Genocide.
7. Until the refugees (and their descendents) are allowed to return to live as equal citizens on the land, they will continue to violently oppose their expulsion from and the occupation of their land, as is their right. That is the true self-defence here, by the way. When the Palestinians attack "Israel", that is self-defence. It is defence of their land. When the "Israelis" attack, that is not self-defence. You cannot be the aggressor from the outset and then claim that you are acting in self-defence.
You see, it is very simple. The Jew stole the land and kicked out the non-Jewish population. Now the Jew says that they want to "have peace". Well what do they mean by peace? What they mean is the following: We want to be able to steal your land, all of it, to disallow you to return to your land, to mistreat you, to kill you, to kill your children, and we want you to give us peace in return.
That is what they mean by the word "peace", it is very different to what non-Jewish people think the word means.
the actions of the Jewish State. Unless of course we ignore the fact that it is the Jewish State and that the war crimes are being committed by (almost 100%) Jewish People in the name of Jewish People and supported by most Jewish People on the planet.
Hey that's right! Nobody is stopping an athlete from chopping off a leg or two and replacing them with these artificial bad boys! Just the same as buying a new pair or pumps. The question is, how badly do they want to win? If they are not willing to chop their legs off, then perhaps they should do something that they are more passionate about and committed to!
The whole point of bitcoin is that it is an anonymous currency which the government can't track. Once it is "regulated" nobody will need to use it! They will find another way to exercise their right to transact in private.
"Or the general problem of lots of poor and violent Muslims in French cities?"
Well why are all of these Muslims in Paris anyway? They certainly don't belong there. The white French people certainly never wanted them to be there in such vast numbers. So why are they there?
Listen to this Jew whore who claims to be an "American", who "made Aliya" to Israel, the Jew only state where only Jews can immigrate to and which wants racial (Jewish) purity in their own nation, but who now promotes "diversity" and "multiculturalism" in Europe: https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
The hypocrisy is astounding, coming from a woman who exercised her right as a Jew to be a citizen of the Jew only state which is only for Jews. She is saying: Whites, pay attention, I am here to destroy you. I know you don't want to become a minority in your own lands, but tough, we have the power and we will make it happen. I know you will hate us for it but we will just call it anti-semitism. We will just say that you hate us for no reason even though I just said that the reason you will hate us is because of what we are purposefully doing to your nations.
Anger? You think those Muslims are angry? You have not seen anything yet.
Slashdot Mirror
"I'm anxiously waiting to hear your proposed solution."
The solution is easy. Allow the return of the refugees and their descendants to live as equals under the law on the land.
The reason you won't agree to this is because Israel is a racist Jew only State and you don't want more non-Jews to be there because it would by definition signify the end of the Zionist enterprise. Hasbaras will likely come back and claim that Israel is a multicultural nation and has many Muslim Arabs.
I will ask them a question right now:
How many Muslim Arabs who were not born in Israel/Palestine immigrated into Israel and were granted full Israeli Citizenship with equal rights, Israeli passports etc.., last year? What about over the past 10 years?
How many non-Jewish Africans, Chinese and Indians were granted full Israeli Citizenship with equal rights, Israeli passports etc.., last year? What about over the past 10 years? What official Israeli government programs exist to encourage the immigration of qualified non Jewish Indians, Chinese and Africans into Israel on a pathway to eventually become full Israeli citizens, to raise their children as full Israeli citizens and access its health care and education etc...? The answer, as you know is close to, if not completely equal to, ZERO. So let's not pretend that Israel is not a racist Jew only state.
Now you will want to claim that Jews are not a race and therefore Israel cannot be a racist state. You know, I suspect, that that argument is utter bullshit and is based on the semantics of the word "race" which has been altered over time and are aware that there are many references to "Jewish Race" throughout the literature, not to mention the many Jewish studies on DNA which try to prove that there is such a thing as Jewish DNA (aka race). You know that there are many people who are defined by Israel to be Jewish even though they are Atheists, showing that Jewishness has nothing to do with religious belief - their Jewishness being defined by having been born to Jewish parents (aka DNA aka race). So let's not play that game.
If you want peace then give the refugees the right to return to live in the land as equals under the law as full citizens and don't define the state as the Jewish State. If you want an escalating war which is leaving the Jewish People looking increasingly bad, globally, then continue to murder children with your US supplied WMD's. It is your choice as a Jew really. You are making a bed, and soon you might have to lay in it.
What you write is complete and utter bullshit and you clearly know nothing factual about the history of the region. The fact is that there was never more than 8% Jew in the land we call Palestine/Israel today, until the Jews decided to create a racist Jew only state in that land in the late 1800's. All of the troubles stem from this. Trying to create a Jew only state on land that was inhabited by fewer than 8% Jews.
Don't believe it? Well tell it to your Jewish friends - they might need to change history to suit your ridiculous viewpoint!
http://www.jewishvirtuallibrar...
"Who's right? Who's wrong? I don't know, but history is quite an eye opener." It is easy to answer this question! The Jews are wrong and Hamas is right. Hamas has the right to resist the occupation and annexation of their land, and their exclusion from living on it as equals under the law, using violence. That is their right. Israel does not have the right to claim self-defence when it acts to defend the existence of Israel wherever Israel is defined as a Jew only state built on the land of the refugees to whom it refuses the right to return to live as equals under the law on the land. When Israel accepts the right of return of the refugees to live in the land as equals under the law, then Israel can claim that it is a legitimate state and has the right the defend itself.
Look, you are obviously a bit doughy, so here is a simple analogy for your tiny brain to process: I break into your house and start raping your wife. You try to defend her by attacking me with your puny body. I turn around and snap your head off of your body. The police come to arrest me. I tell them that I was acting in self-defence - because you attacked me. The "Community", which consists of people under my control and in my pay, agree with me and I am accordingly rewarded for heroically managing to defend myself against your attack by being allowed into your 18 year old daughters bedroom for some more "fun"! That is the best analogy of the Israel/Palestine conflict which has ever been written.
"That area has been inhabited by Jews for centuries" - the population of Jews was less than 8%. Sure there were some Jews there, but only 8%. The Jews decided in 1897 to create a Jew only state on a land that contained only 8% Jews. That is the entire cause of the "conflict". Here are the numbers from a Jewish, pro-Israel website:
http://www.jewishvirtuallibrar...
"In addition in modern Israel 20% of the citizens are muslim arabs with the same rights as everyone."
Those Arabs are the descendants of Arabs who were already living on the land before 1948. The Jews tried to get rid of them, many fled in terror but unfortunately for the Jews, some of them did not. If Muslim Arabs are so welcome in Israel, then please tell us how many Muslim Arabs immigrated to Israel and became full Israeli citizens last year compared to Jews? How about over the last 10 years?
"PS : The word Palestine that you mean is a modern invention. The ancient Palestine is something completely different."
Spare us your crappy word plays. The word Palestinian has come to mean: "A non-Jewish person who has the right to live in the land which in modern days is called Palestine/Israel". Just like the word Anti-Semite in modern times has come to mean a person (like me) who dislikes Jews - their beliefs, their culture and their behaviour even though the word "Semite" does not mean "Jew".
"This conflict would end the SECOND Hamas stopped their aggression. "
No, it would not.
This conflict began in the late 1800's when the Jews decided to create "home-land for the Jewish people", which meant to create a racist state which was for Jews only, on a land that was already populated and whose population had *never* at any time contained more than 8% Jew. In order to make lebensraum for the racist Jew only state, the Jews committed acts of terror which resulted in the native population of non-Jews be pushed out as refugees into Gaza, West Bank and surrounding Arab states.
That is the cause of the problem. The Arabs did not create the "conflict". The Jews did. Hamas does not "attack" Israel. Israel attacked the Arabs and Hamas is their legitimate and legally allowed resistance to the occupation of their lands - yes, that includes Tel Aviv and all of what you would call "Israel".
Hamas represents the refugees who do have the right to use violence in order to regain control of their territory from which they have been illegally expelled and which the Jews have annexed, which is an illegal action. This conflict will end when the Jews agree to allow the refugees to return to live in the land as equals under the law. That is the only condition under which Hamas or any other militant resistance organisation should ever agree to a ceasefire.
The Israelis can NEVER claim self-defence. Ever. Period. They only option they have as a "self-defence", is to obey the law and allow the refugees to return to live as equals under the law on the land.
How dare you suggest that the western media, which is controlled by Jewish people who support Israel, somehow side with Hamas! You are clearly a hasbara troll. This entire article is trying to give the impression that Hamas have "high-technology" at their disposal. Utter nonsense. A Hamas rocket barely makes an impact when it lands. It has no guidance system and no explosive warhead. The Israeli missiles are guided missiles of the highest technology and carry huge explosive payloads that can kill everyone within a 100 metre radius. It is extremely disingenuous to compare the number of Hamas rockets fired with the number of Israel rockets fired. It is like comparing the number of punches landed in a fight between a two year old girl and Mike Tyson in his prime.
remains completely open and unguarded.
Some spineless cunt has marked this as troll... another anonymous cowardly aggressor: Must be eligible for an Israeli passport.
Din't call me a lib* you dumb homo. Fucking Anonymous Coward talking to me about waving dicks around. If you think you are a big man then use your real name.
"separating the individual from the actions of the Israeli government"
Bullshit. Most Jews do support Israel, globally. Yes you will see a couple in the limelight who oppose it, but most Jews do support it. Don't give me any of that fucking libtard crap about "Jews are not responsible for Israel's actions". The majority of Jewish organisations, including the media, fully support Israel in their rhetoric, financially and politically and have a wide base of members from the "Jewish Community".
Did AIPAC or ADL issue a statement condemning the Israeli actions? NO!
Israel exists and is able to slaughter the Palestinians, who they have already dispossessed of their homes and lands, precisely and only because of the Jewish powerbase in the west (http://thezog.info/list-summaries/) which extracts huge funding and exerts massive pressure and influence on anybody who dares so much as tweet "#freepalestine" after being contronted with a video, and via distortions of the truth in the "main stream media".
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
What is more, if you read the Jewish press you will see the venom and hatred that Jews have for the Palestinians and how they cheer when a child is murdered and the calls for genocide by government officials (http://www.jonathan-cook.net/blog/2014-07-21/calls-for-genocide-enter-israeli-mainstream/) which of course you don't see on BBC CNN FOX or any of the other Hasbara agencies.
Not to mention the utter out-and-out racism which is prevalent throughout Jewish society and philosophy - not just against Arabs but against every person who is not Jewish. See Professor Israel Shahak's Jewish History Jewish Religion (full text: http://www.biblebelievers.org.... or buy http://www.amazon.com/Jewish-H...).
What is Israel? It is the Jew only state that was built on Palestine, beginning roughly late 1800's, a land where since the 1600's to 1900's there was a minority of fewer than 8% Jews. A land where even in biblical times there was only a minority of Jews in the land, and when they were there all they did was commit atrocities. They built their Jew only state by terrorising the inhabitants to flee and become refugees.
Ethics, Morals and Law:
The occupying power does not have the right to defend itself from attacks. It does not. It has a single right. Only one right. The right to obey the law and withdraw the occupation/annexation by allowing the refugees to return and live as equal citizens in the land, all of the land. Anything else is not self defence but an action to maintain the occupation, the annexation and the oppression. None of this stupid two-state-solution bullshit. There is one land and the refugees are entitled to return to all and any part of it!
The occupied, the annexed, on the other hand, they do have the right to use violent force against their occupiers and oppressors until such a time as the occupier ceases its occupation and annexation and allow the refugees to return to their homes and land and to live as equals under the law in the land.
Aside:
Before any Jew or misguided libtard replies with stupid analogies of native Americans or Aborigines etc... you only prove MY POINT! Any of those people's or their descendents are guaranteed citizenship in the US and Australia and can live as equals under the law in the land, all of the land, any part of the land.
Before any Jew or libtard pipes up and tells us that Israel is multicultural and diverse and has many Arabs then here is a question, of all of the Arab-Israelis, which of them are not descendants of Arabs who did not flee in 1948 and 1967, how many new, non-Jewish Arabs immigrated to Israel last year? How many non-jewish Blacks? How man non-Jewish Chinese? How many non-Jewish Indians? The answer is of course 0. Because Israel is a racist jew only state where you have to be Jewish to immigrate into and become a citizen.
and now occupy 40% of the Gaza as a "buffer zone"... and /. is concerned about the Israelis getting hacked! I SPIT ON ./!
That's a great word which in the world of science reporting means: This story is a filler, if you don't have much time then skip this one.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
Cry me a fucking river already!
"It is Hamas that is responsible for the death toll of civilians in Palestine."
Israel *cannot* possibly claim self-defence. It has the Iron Dome which is a defense, it claims, against the "rockets". So if they have a defence, called Iron Dome, then why do they need to murder 1,000 civilians to defend against the "rockets" which are already defended against and which have caused almost no impact?
Here are the facts:
1. Between 1600's and 1900's there was roughly only 8% Jew in the land of Palestine. Even back to biblical times there was never a majority of Jew in the land. NEVER.
e.g. "Year Arab Population Jewish Population
1600 250,000 5,000
1850 480,000 17,000
1890 530,000 43,000
1922 590,000 84,000
1931 760,000 174,000
1939 900,000 450,000
1948 980,000 650,000
1954 192,000 1,530,000
1969 423,000 2,500,000
1989 843,000 3,700,000
1997 1,120,000 4,640,000"
http://www.torah.org/learning/...
see also:
http://www.jewishvirtuallibrar...
2. In late 1800's the Jew decided that they would create racist Jew only state on the land which had been and still was mainly inhabited by non-Jewish people.
E.g. "Zionism seeks to establish a home for the Jewish people in EretzIsrael secured under public law. The Congress contemplates the following means to the attainment of this end:
A. The promotion by appropriate means of the settlement in Eretz-Israel of Jewish farmers, artisans, and manufacturers.
B. The organization and uniting of the whole of Jewry by means of appropriate institutions, both local and international, in accordance with the laws of each country.
C. The strengthening and fostering of Jewish national sentiment and national consciousness.
D. Preparatory steps toward obtaining the consent of governments, where necessary, in order to reach the goals of Zionism."
https://www.jewishvirtuallibra...
3. As a result of the Jew actions to commit this Demographic Genocide, by all means foul and fair, many Arabs fled their homes and land and now live in the Gaza, West Bank, surrounding Arab countries and elsewhere and are correctly called refugees.
4. The Jew did not allow the refugees to return to the land as is their responsibility because the aim was and is to create a Jew only racist state on the land of Palestine/Greater Israel.
5. The refugees have the right to return to the land and to live as equal citizens, with the Jew, in peace, under the law in the land.
6. They do not have the right to expel the Jew who has purposefully created "facts on the ground" which would lead to a humanitarian crisis should they be removed and would form yet another Ethnic Cleansing/Genocide.
7. Until the refugees (and their descendents) are allowed to return to live as equal citizens on the land, they will continue to violently oppose their expulsion from and the occupation of their land, as is their right. That is the true self-defence here, by the way. When the Palestinians attack "Israel", that is self-defence. It is defence of their land. When the "Israelis" attack, that is not self-defence. You cannot be the aggressor from the outset and then claim that you are acting in self-defence.
You see, it is very simple. The Jew stole the land and kicked out the non-Jewish population. Now the Jew says that they want to "have peace". Well what do they mean by peace? What they mean is the following: We want to be able to steal your land, all of it, to disallow you to return to your land, to mistreat you, to kill you, to kill your children, and we want you to give us peace in return.
That is what they mean by the word "peace", it is very different to what non-Jewish people think the word means.
You can always tell the Jewish kids though - because the sun shines out of their asses.
the actions of the Jewish State. Unless of course we ignore the fact that it is the Jewish State and that the war crimes are being committed by (almost 100%) Jewish People in the name of Jewish People and supported by most Jewish People on the planet.
"Shoes are available to anyone."
Hey that's right! Nobody is stopping an athlete from chopping off a leg or two and replacing them with these artificial bad boys! Just the same as buying a new pair or pumps. The question is, how badly do they want to win? If they are not willing to chop their legs off, then perhaps they should do something that they are more passionate about and committed to!
Buy viagra today. I made $5000 a day selling viagra.
1. Irrational fear of losing my eye sight. I know it is irrational, but the truth is I do fear it anyway.
2. Squeamishness at the thought of the process.
Oh, I didn't know that. Thanks for the info.
The whole point of bitcoin is that it is an anonymous currency which the government can't track. Once it is "regulated" nobody will need to use it! They will find another way to exercise their right to transact in private.
" I'd rather visit a country which doesn't have a lot of religious extremists running around." Can you suggest anywhere?
looks hot, I sure would like to bang her.
"Or the general problem of lots of poor and violent Muslims in French cities?"
Well why are all of these Muslims in Paris anyway? They certainly don't belong there. The white French people certainly never wanted them to be there in such vast numbers. So why are they there?
Listen to this Jew whore who claims to be an "American", who "made Aliya" to Israel, the Jew only state where only Jews can immigrate to and which wants racial (Jewish) purity in their own nation, but who now promotes "diversity" and "multiculturalism" in Europe:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
The hypocrisy is astounding, coming from a woman who exercised her right as a Jew to be a citizen of the Jew only state which is only for Jews. She is saying: Whites, pay attention, I am here to destroy you. I know you don't want to become a minority in your own lands, but tough, we have the power and we will make it happen. I know you will hate us for it but we will just call it anti-semitism. We will just say that you hate us for no reason even though I just said that the reason you will hate us is because of what we are purposefully doing to your nations.
Anger? You think those Muslims are angry? You have not seen anything yet.
Unless those guys are a pair of homos, that boat looks decidedly uncomfortable!
Me too. I won't be dining there anytime soon since I read this story.