How about we take the Rabid Rabbis as being representative of the views of Jews?
So does that mean that all Jews believe that "Non Jews are donkeys put here only to serve the Jews" as the highly revered (e.g. the Israeli prime minister gave him a great speech when he died) Rabbi Ovidia Yosef recently stated? Does that mean that all Jews believe that "even" a Homosexual Jew has a higher soul than a goy as one of the Rabid Rabbis recently stated? Does that mean that all Jews believe that they are entitled to kill a non Jews in order to take his organs should a Jew need them, as one of the Rabid Rabbis recently stated?
Of course not! The Jews and their supporters will shout! He is on the fringe! He does not represent us!
But on the other hand you are all okay with taking these few extremist's words are being representative of the views of all Muslims!
The fact is that there are nut bags on all sides and Jews and Christians have their fair share of them too. They just don't get the biased press coverage for some strange reason.
If they really want a "Land without a people for a people without a land"!
Any complaints of anti-semitism can be filed under: What is good for the goose is good for the gander. Since it appears to be okay for people to snipe at Muslims with quips about "virgins" and "blow yourself up when you get there" without accusations of Islamophobia.
1. A genuine troll who adds nothing to the topic. 2. Anybody who posts negative comments about Israel, no matter how valid their points are. 3. Anybody who looks at the global temperature graphs and concludes that actually, the temperature has not gone up for almost 2 decades.
It is that most of time large organisations such as slash dot ought to leave things alone.
Microsoft has completely fucked up Windows and made millions of peoples lives a misery by getting rid of the start button and with that stupid fucking charms bar and tiles.
Google has completely ruined Youtube with Google+. It is now impossible to "discuss" a youtube video, impossible to follow a thread. What a bunch of wankers google are for effectively silencing discussion. It is obvious that users want threaded conversations for each video. They do not want Circles, they want threaded conversations and they want to converse with people outside of their "circle". That is the entire fucking point of the internet. it let's us talk even though we do not know each other.
So why does Slashdot think that it is not going to piss off most of their user base by wasting oodles of money on changing something which already works?
In that case, Sir/Madam, you are a sexist! You are saying that women are better at certain roles than men simply because of their sex.
Can you imagine if the shoe was on the other foot and companies were saying that men are better at certain roles than women and that they ought to reduce the number of women in those roles and increase the men! There would be an outrage!
What about the case of maternity leave? If a company employs a woman of child bearing age then there is a risk that she will claim maternity leave. Shouldn't a company avoid employing those women? You seem to be okay with denying a job to a man in favour of a woman because you think that women "tend to be a LOT more sane than men are, or at least have better social skills", so shouldn't you also accept that there should be lower salaries for women due their tendency to claim maternity leave?
What is good for the goose is good for the gander!
In any case, the particular case you cite is anecdotal. You link the badness of the guy in your story to the fact that he is a guy and the goodness of the woman to the fact that she is a woman. There is no evidence that that particular guy is representative of men in general. The same goes for the woman.
How about this: Leave people alone! Let companies hire who they want, when they want!
Parent's job is to do that. But it is nobody's job to try to get more women into tech.
Is there a business case for it? What are the benefits? None. None at all. Unless of course we are sexists at heart and believe that women would "bring something different". Well they wouldn't. They couldn't. We are all robots. All equals. There are no differences, remember.
Why do we need to encourage a group or people to do something? A woman wants to work in tech can work in tech. If not then she does not have to. We do not require any social engineering. The same goes for gays, blacks and the disabled. If they want to do something then they can and it is already illegal to discriminate against them. But we do not need quotas or any kind of PR or subsidy campaign to encourage them to do things. Government and lobby groups please just f*ck off and mind your own frigging business.
I didn't spoil anything, dickwad. I did not say which character dies in the end and in American movies you can pretty much guarantee that multiple people are going to die since the people who control the movie industry in America are obsessed with violence, death and destruction.
Just look at what happened to that guy in Gravity. He died in the end, and all because we don't have traffic lights in space yet. We need to get out there and paint some no parking lines too. That way we can fund the project, and make a lot on the side, from space parking fines. I hear that there is not a lot of room outside the Moon in the evenings. Probably best to leave the spaceship at home and use the Transporter.
Even to read some news site requires that you go through the stupid account creation process. I doubt that most are using these simple passwords for anything important, just for the stupid sites who are so full of their own self importance that the creators believe that at some stage in the future a huge corporation i going to offer them $100M for their database of users.
Look, I bought a box to hook up to my tv to watch youtube on my tv. It requires me to enter a google email address. Well, I did not want to use my usual email address. What if I give the box to somebody Do I have to spend an hour trying to delete my account details from the stupid thing? So I did what everybody else does. I spent half an hour creating YET ANOTHER F*CKING GOOGLE ACCOUNT with a fake name and simple password (123456 or something like that so just so that I could use the thing.
If you try to watch "Tayo The Little Bus" it asks you to sign in because apparently some idiot user has marked it as not "Age Appropriate" or some other nanny state BS like that.
That is why there are so many "easy" passwords. Because the idiots in charge have created a situation where we have to have so many passwords.
To deny that there has been a pause is ridiculous. It does not matter about the "bigger picture". The "bigger picture" *must* show a rise in order for there to be a *pause*. If it was not rising in the past then there could be no pause now.
This is the way of the future. Give the consoles away and stream in-game adverts. Look at the revenue just from those crappy facebook "games", can you imagine what they could get from Grand Theft Auto streaming live adverts... people saying things like "Hey man, I love Coca-Cola" and stuff like that.
"I do not. I believe people, including myself, are foolish enough without alcohol” “I am not using mind altering substances. I have not used any mind altering substances since 1983. I do not even drink. I am aggressively opposed to drugs and alcohol. I do drink coffee, and recently took up smoking" http://www.whoismcafee.com/fre...
Slashdot Mirror
as being representative of Islam or Muslims.
How about we take the Rabid Rabbis as being representative of the views of Jews?
So does that mean that all Jews believe that "Non Jews are donkeys put here only to serve the Jews" as the highly revered (e.g. the Israeli prime minister gave him a great speech when he died) Rabbi Ovidia Yosef recently stated? Does that mean that all Jews believe that "even" a Homosexual Jew has a higher soul than a goy as one of the Rabid Rabbis recently stated? Does that mean that all Jews believe that they are entitled to kill a non Jews in order to take his organs should a Jew need them, as one of the Rabid Rabbis recently stated?
Of course not! The Jews and their supporters will shout! He is on the fringe! He does not represent us!
But on the other hand you are all okay with taking these few extremist's words are being representative of the views of all Muslims!
The fact is that there are nut bags on all sides and Jews and Christians have their fair share of them too. They just don't get the biased press coverage for some strange reason.
If they really want a "Land without a people for a people without a land"!
Any complaints of anti-semitism can be filed under: What is good for the goose is good for the gander. Since it appears to be okay for people to snipe at Muslims with quips about "virgins" and "blow yourself up when you get there" without accusations of Islamophobia.
...the Klingon or Romulan home world's and either steal a cloaking device in a covert mission or at least try to trade some precious gems for it?
I second that!
This is the typical: If God is the Creator then who created God argument.
If we are a simulation then who wrote the simulation and are they too inside a simulation written by somebody else.
Absolute non-scientific junk.
1. A genuine troll who adds nothing to the topic.
2. Anybody who posts negative comments about Israel, no matter how valid their points are.
3. Anybody who looks at the global temperature graphs and concludes that actually, the temperature has not gone up for almost 2 decades.
A "consultant C" hired at 5x the rate.
their software. Not!
I thought that he had handed it all over to the Guardian and that the Guardian had destroyed it all. How is "new" stuff being released by him?
It is that most of time large organisations such as slash dot ought to leave things alone.
Microsoft has completely fucked up Windows and made millions of peoples lives a misery by getting rid of the start button and with that stupid fucking charms bar and tiles.
Google has completely ruined Youtube with Google+. It is now impossible to "discuss" a youtube video, impossible to follow a thread. What a bunch of wankers google are for effectively silencing discussion. It is obvious that users want threaded conversations for each video. They do not want Circles, they want threaded conversations and they want to converse with people outside of their "circle". That is the entire fucking point of the internet. it let's us talk even though we do not know each other.
So why does Slashdot think that it is not going to piss off most of their user base by wasting oodles of money on changing something which already works?
In that case, Sir/Madam, you are a sexist! You are saying that women are better at certain roles than men simply because of their sex.
Can you imagine if the shoe was on the other foot and companies were saying that men are better at certain roles than women and that they ought to reduce the number of women in those roles and increase the men! There would be an outrage!
What about the case of maternity leave? If a company employs a woman of child bearing age then there is a risk that she will claim maternity leave. Shouldn't a company avoid employing those women? You seem to be okay with denying a job to a man in favour of a woman because you think that women "tend to be a LOT more sane than men are, or at least have better social skills", so shouldn't you also accept that there should be lower salaries for women due their tendency to claim maternity leave?
What is good for the goose is good for the gander!
In any case, the particular case you cite is anecdotal. You link the badness of the guy in your story to the fact that he is a guy and the goodness of the woman to the fact that she is a woman. There is no evidence that that particular guy is representative of men in general. The same goes for the woman.
How about this: Leave people alone! Let companies hire who they want, when they want!
for advice on women! My guess is that the closest most readers get to a woman is using public transport at rush hour.
Parent's job is to do that. But it is nobody's job to try to get more women into tech.
Is there a business case for it? What are the benefits? None. None at all. Unless of course we are sexists at heart and believe that women would "bring something different". Well they wouldn't. They couldn't. We are all robots. All equals. There are no differences, remember.
Why do we need to encourage a group or people to do something? A woman wants to work in tech can work in tech. If not then she does not have to. We do not require any social engineering. The same goes for gays, blacks and the disabled. If they want to do something then they can and it is already illegal to discriminate against them. But we do not need quotas or any kind of PR or subsidy campaign to encourage them to do things. Government and lobby groups please just f*ck off and mind your own frigging business.
It's a great movie. Definitely in my top 1 Billion American movies which were released last year.
I didn't spoil anything, dickwad. I did not say which character dies in the end and in American movies you can pretty much guarantee that multiple people are going to die since the people who control the movie industry in America are obsessed with violence, death and destruction.
Just look at what happened to that guy in Gravity. He died in the end, and all because we don't have traffic lights in space yet. We need to get out there and paint some no parking lines too. That way we can fund the project, and make a lot on the side, from space parking fines. I hear that there is not a lot of room outside the Moon in the evenings. Probably best to leave the spaceship at home and use the Transporter.
Let's converse again in 20 years.
Even to read some news site requires that you go through the stupid account creation process. I doubt that most are using these simple passwords for anything important, just for the stupid sites who are so full of their own self importance that the creators believe that at some stage in the future a huge corporation i going to offer them $100M for their database of users.
Look, I bought a box to hook up to my tv to watch youtube on my tv. It requires me to enter a google email address. Well, I did not want to use my usual email address. What if I give the box to somebody Do I have to spend an hour trying to delete my account details from the stupid thing? So I did what everybody else does. I spent half an hour creating YET ANOTHER F*CKING GOOGLE ACCOUNT with a fake name and simple password (123456 or something like that so just so that I could use the thing.
If you try to watch "Tayo The Little Bus" it asks you to sign in because apparently some idiot user has marked it as not "Age Appropriate" or some other nanny state BS like that.
That is why there are so many "easy" passwords. Because the idiots in charge have created a situation where we have to have so many passwords.
52 years.
What about the other reports?
To deny that there has been a pause is ridiculous. It does not matter about the "bigger picture". The "bigger picture" *must* show a rise in order for there to be a *pause*. If it was not rising in the past then there could be no pause now.
This is the way of the future. Give the consoles away and stream in-game adverts. Look at the revenue just from those crappy facebook "games", can you imagine what they could get from Grand Theft Auto streaming live adverts... people saying things like "Hey man, I love Coca-Cola" and stuff like that.
"I do not. I believe people, including myself, are foolish enough without alcohol” “I am not using mind altering substances. I have not used any mind altering substances since 1983. I do not even drink. I am aggressively opposed to drugs and alcohol. I do drink coffee, and recently took up smoking"
http://www.whoismcafee.com/fre...
I'm pretty sure it is illegal. Would love to see the contract.