They are 'pretty' much done, if you pay Cluster File Systems Inc. (US$ 5000), they'll give you the latest version and support if something doesn't work.
You could say, they are between stable and beta-testing (lot's of things are done, just a number of corner cases that there current customer-base doesn't need yet).
If I understand this right, what you then could do is use a full-duplex system, when using 2 channels, one for sending, one for sending from the otherside (receiving).
This could really speed it up when using directional equipment.
However there is no pfsync (or similair) for netfilter (if you'd like to have failover-firewalls).
But supposedly it doesn't matter, because netfilter doesn't have TCP window tracking.
And because existing connections are considered new by netfilter, it should work in theory (if you allow new connections, for all the established-connections).
Balancing won't work however, because UCARP doesn't do that, if I understand it correctly.
As there is no replication, rules should be replicated an other way (something like rules from LDAP for example would be a usefull way).
That's why web application are good, if there are only webapplications, you only need a NC.
This could then be Linux and desktops can be simple again, maybe games at home, what do I care. If there is no data on there, you can just reinstall after installing a game or something or get an X-Box type thing from Microsoft
Microsoft creates to difficult desktops, they want something the DoD wants and sell it to every1 else (I'm talking rights & capabilities here).
In the meanwhile Microsoft fucks up all the other software and makes it insecure with bufferoverruns.
So what do you have ? Every1 uses default security settings, the system sometimes kills itself because it was to complex to make.
Coupled with the buffer overruns... ok, sorry for the rant
Because msttcorefonts is non-free (as by Debian Non-Free definitions), as everything (expect maybe 1 very recent package on sourceforge ?) from Microsoft.
Slashdot Mirror
Which costs a lot of processing power.
Maybe you should take a better look at the screenshots, these are screenshots of the installation and setup of the server your looking at.
I'm not too surpriced they use root for that, are you ?
But people can compile/install djbdns instead (automated compile ofcourse... because of the license... yes I know it's a bit annoying)
a bot would only be able to start after a reboot if the same user logged back in, I think that's an important difference.
That's why there is gnome-sudo (or something), it will popup username/password-popup-window
It's of CD, no floppy or ROM needed. :-)
People want/need a good Network Laser Printer.. don't they ?
;-) ).
Who wants to give up desk-space for something silly as a printer ?
If it prints to a set of 3 printers in seperate room, that's just perfect (automatic printer routing, weeeeh !
As Novell will be releasing a Linux and a Netware bases File-server/whatever, they need to be able to easily migrate between those.
Filesystem-support is definitly something you'd need.
I guess that's what they are doing with Lustre.
Only then Linux is de 'file-server'.
They are 'pretty' much done, if you pay Cluster File Systems Inc. (US$ 5000), they'll give you the latest version and support if something doesn't work.
You could say, they are between stable and beta-testing (lot's of things are done, just a number of corner cases that there current customer-base doesn't need yet).
Occasionally, when I need new wood to keep the firewall burning.
important difference: Apple is tied to a certain type of hardware, that a lot of people don't have (and buying hardware is thus an other hurdle).
When Visio wasn't a Microsoft product, it was much better (try the snapping for example).
Actually that doesn't work, there are background processes involved.
I've done the LogOff/LogOn
and still have the same problem, where reboot would solve it.
I've not figured out yet, which processes those are though.
Mailinglist with a wiki, who needs anything else ?
Reminds me, we need at work.
Sounds a lot like:
http://www.junkbuster.org/
to me.
If I understand this right, what you then could do is use a full-duplex system, when using 2 channels, one for sending, one for sending from the otherside (receiving).
This could really speed it up when using directional equipment.
However there is no pfsync (or similair) for netfilter (if you'd like to have failover-firewalls).
But supposedly it doesn't matter, because netfilter doesn't have TCP window tracking.
And because existing connections are considered new by netfilter, it should work in theory (if you allow new connections, for all the established-connections).
Balancing won't work however, because UCARP doesn't do that, if I understand it correctly.
As there is no replication, rules should be replicated an other way (something like rules from LDAP for example would be a usefull way).
Only if they use an appropriate condom, thank you.
Then they can get a new donated PC and buy a new (supported) Windows, that's what they care about.
Money.
Actually Windows98 can run and part of it still is/was 16 bit software.
That's why web application are good, if there are only webapplications, you only need a NC.
This could then be Linux and desktops can be simple again, maybe games at home, what do I care. If there is no data on there, you can just reinstall after installing a game or something or get an X-Box type thing from Microsoft
Microsoft creates to difficult desktops, they want something the DoD wants and sell it to every1 else (I'm talking rights & capabilities here).
In the meanwhile Microsoft fucks up all the other software and makes it insecure with bufferoverruns.
So what do you have ? Every1 uses default security settings, the system sometimes kills itself because it was to complex to make.
Coupled with the buffer overruns... ok, sorry for the rant
Because msttcorefonts is non-free (as by Debian Non-Free definitions), as everything (expect maybe 1 very recent package on sourceforge ?) from Microsoft.
SGI tried lower-end and went back to high-end.
Don't know if it's good or bad though.
Maybe IBM is trying to go much more core-business (services ?) they went out the HD-business for example.
whatever, I'm talking shit today.
That's what rsync is for, you can also keep history that way (see the --backup and --backup-dir options).
It was created by Andrew Tridgell to be used on "wet string", as he called the Australian internet connections.
No this was before the ARPANet. Had to start somewhere. :-)