Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft Authorized Refurbishers

An anonymous reader writes "Microsoft has announced a program to 'establish a vibrant community of computer refurbishers across 133 countries in Europe, the Middle East and Africa who will be authorized to re-install its Windows operating system in donated pre-used PCs destined for schools, charities, non-profit organizations and under-served communities...Microsoft will provide re-installation of Windows 98 Second Edition and Windows 2000 Professional in over 18 languages. The refurbished PCs will be accompanied by a Certificate of Authenticity (COA) and a special End User Licence as evidence of a legally installed operating system.' XBruticusX submits a story on news.com about the program.

367 comments

  1. In related news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny
    In related news,
    Slackware and Debian announced free operating systems for these refurbished computers...

    ...10 years ago.

    1. Re:In related news by Avihson · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It is a shame that the refurbished computers can't be loaded with low cost Lindows.

    2. Re:In related news by magarity · · Score: 4, Informative

      "It is a shame that the refurbished computers can't be loaded with low cost Lindows"

      I'll tell you why they can't as until recently I worked at a nonprofit MAR member. People who run the local community center / church / shelter / adult day care / whatever nonprofit have NO IDEA about computers other than they've heard that Microsoft Windows is what they're supposed to have. At $5 per MAR license or $0 for [insert distro here] Linux, they'd rather pay. There is no amount of patient explaination that will change their minds, I assure you as one who has tried. They also want to pay for MS Office rather than OpenOffice for the same reason. Never heard of it? Don't want it and don't want to know! And all of my persuasions were based on cost and performance on older computers, not a fanatical open source agenda.

    3. Re:In related news by ZigiSamblak · · Score: 0

      These computers were already refurbished 10 years ago?

      I'm surprised they run Windows at all!

    4. Re:In related news by westlake · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Have you considered the possibility that all the staff, volunteers and clients who maintain these programs have years of experience with Windows at home and at work?

      No money in the budget for training and support, fundamentally no need, and, for related reasons, I've seen exactly zero interest in maintaining old, cheap, hardware.

      Here in town, the Civic Guild donated a gorgeous 19" LCD color monitor to the local library. Seniors manning the desk were tiring under the strain of using the new electronic check-out system. The aging CRT that had served well enough before went to the dumpster when no one would take it even as a gift.

    5. Re:In related news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At $5 per MAR license or $0 for [insert distro here] Linux, they'd rather pay.

      I'd take a legal copy of Windows for $5, too.

    6. Re:In related news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I'll pay you $5 to take my legal copy of windows.

    7. Re:In related news by Danathar · · Score: 3, Informative

      Has it ever occured to you NOT to tell them it's not Windows? That's what I did with a friend of my mother's. I set everthing up so it was easy.. the Icon for Open Office said "Start Word Processor".....Replaced the Mozilla Icon with Netscape Icon....ect..

      She's been using it for months...with no complaint. If they are igonrant enough to not know about LINUX...they are igorant enough not to understand why they need to run Windows....or even what windows IS! She wanted to add a digital camera to the system....It works without a hitch (MEPIS works great as a newbie distro!!)

    8. Re:In related news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hate to break this to you, but NPOs often need more than OpenOffice.org and Mozilla.

    9. Re:In related news by Lothsahn · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Actually, I'm doing just that. I'm setting up a computer lab for an inner city homeless outreach with little or no computer budget. I've managed to scrape together 3 different computers, and for consistancy, I've used Knoppix for Kids on all of them.

      It comes pre-installed with educational software, word processing, web browsing, and if it ever fails, they just reboot the computer.

      On the other hand, I could use an illegal copy of windows, or even if I could get a legal copy of windows for free, it would contain little or NO educational software. Then I'd have to go pay for educational software, which isn't cheap.

      Linux has really been the best thing ever for these kids learning about computers. Many of these kids have never used a computer before at all.

      --
      -=Lothsahn=-
    10. Re:In related news by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 1
      No surprise here...

      To 90% of computer users having "Windows" means having a GUI, like Hoovering means using a vacuum cleaner, and Xeroxing means photocopying. In other words "Windows" is no longer a trade mark, but a generic term.

      A quick research project revealed the following facts

      Out of 10 teenage boys in central London picked because they happened to be in the room with me:

      8 could name P.Diddy's jeweler.

      2 knew there was another operating system than Windows. (Slighly more after it was pointed out that some mobile phones had WinCE and regularly crashed, and the others didn't.)

      --
      Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
    11. Re:In related news by mcbridematt · · Score: 1

      Lin----?, well, nope.

      For other Linux distros, if someone were to say that, depending on what kind of hardware you were talking about I have to turn around and scream "BULLSHIT!".

      I'm currently doing volunteer work for the local pc recycling shop (The exact same one which got fucked over by Microsoft years ago for piracy), and we loaded Slackware, KDE 3.0 and OpenOffice on an old Digital Veritas FX which has a Pentium MMX 166 and 64meg of SDRAM (after I added another 32MB stick because it's original 32 made OpenOffice choke).

      OpenOffice took around 1 min 30 seconds to load, but it works.

    12. Re:In related news by bickerdyke · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Uhmm... This would be $5 to install Windows AGAIN on a PC it was already legally installed on....

      So it's not like a pricetag, but like a "installing fee" for re-installing software.

      --
      bickerdyke
    13. Re:In related news by spamnix · · Score: 0, Funny
      Has it ever occured to you NOT to tell them it's not Windows?


      "I can't believe it's not Windows!"
      --
      I have a BS in BS.
    14. Re:In related news by Skye16 · · Score: 1

      OpenOffice takes around 50 seconds to load on my box (Athlon XP 1900+, 512MB DDR, 40gb 7200RPM harddrive). Everything else opens like lightning, but OO takes forever. I can't figure out why.

    15. Re:In related news by cybermancer · · Score: 1
      To 90% of computer users having "Windows" means having a GUI, like Hoovering means using a vacuum cleaner, and Xeroxing means photocopying. In other words "Windows" is no longer a trade mark, but a generic term.

      Back before Microsoft released Microsoft Windows the term "Windows" meant software that provided different windows to work in. Not even a GUI for that matter (anyone remember DesqView? - it was a text based windowing enviroment.

      --
      "Anything is possible with enough programmers, time and pizza." (Substitute caffeine for time as needed.)
    16. Re:In related news by Ben+Hutchings · · Score: 1

      I think this may have improved a little in version 1.1 but I'm not sure. On my PC (similar to yours but 2000+ and 80 GB) it takes 15 seconds to start and then 5 seconds to start again after closing it. So that's at least 10 seconds spent just loading files.

  2. smooth move by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful


    A way to fight back as all the recycled machined getting Linux/*BSD installed on them. That's why they're "giving" Win98 for the lower end machines.

  3. Windows 98? by phearlez · · Score: 5, Insightful

    How odd that they would officially support the installation of an OS that's been EOLed (WinME is the oldest 16 bit still supported, yes?)

    --
    Bad management trumps ideology - Show the world you want better leadership. http://www.timefornewmanagement.com
    1. Re:Windows 98? by jsupreston · · Score: 2, Informative

      IIRC, 98SE is supported until '06.

      --
      "It's a dog eat dog world out there, and I'm wearing Milk-Bone underwear."- Norm (from Cheers)
    2. Re:Windows 98? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And now we know why. It doesn't look so good to donate spoiled milk.

    3. Re:Windows 98? by LEgregius · · Score: 1
      No, they extended 98 for a while, but it looks like to only paying customers. I didn't read the page completely.

      I think the point, if you notice, is that they refuse to install the latest OS on a refurbished PC. I think they hope to coax people, who now would feel "legit" since they have a valid license, to buy the upgrade to ME or XP.

    4. Re:Windows 98? by phearlez · · Score: 4, Interesting
      My mistake/misstatement - the deployment of Windows98 has ceased in any endorsed manner and consumer support for a product extends 5 years past its initial date of availability - in the case of Win98SE that means the end of June.

      So I was close, and NOW say... odd that they'd support deploying something that's ABOUT to be discontinued in support.

      --
      Bad management trumps ideology - Show the world you want better leadership. http://www.timefornewmanagement.com
    5. Re:Windows 98? by Homology · · Score: 1, Redundant
      How odd that they would officially support the installation of an OS that's been EOLed (WinME is the oldest 16 bit still supported, yes?)

      Quite the contrary! WinME can run on the older hardware that is available on many countries, and on those PC's *BSD/Linux runs just fine. Actually, there is a UN program for introducing IT in Afghanistan that uses old hardware and software from FSF. Win2000 won't run nicely on those machines, but Linux will.....

    6. Re:Windows 98? by neowolf · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Not odd at all- they are relicensing a deprecated and almost completely worthless OS. They don't make or lose any money off of it and don't have to support it, but they get good free publicity because of this announcement.

    7. Re:Windows 98? by Laebshade · · Score: 1, Informative

      Windows 9x (95, 98, ME) are 16/32-bit hybrids. None of these are a pure 16-bit OS. Windows 3.11 and below, however, are.

    8. Re:Windows 98? by anon*127.0.0.1 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      True, but would you want to load WinXP on a P166 with 32 meg of RAM?

      There are old, refurbished computers in countries where there's not that much modern hardware to begin with. Wouldn't suprise me if some of those suckers were 486's. At least give Microsoft credit for realizing what sort of hardware they're dealing with.

      --
      I am NOT a man!
      I am a free number!
    9. Re:Windows 98? by fredrik70 · · Score: 1

      well, 3.1 and 3.11 had the win32s subsystem, which allowed soem 32 bit code to run via thunking, remember netscape used that, was a very bolted on solution though - and quite bug prone.

      --
      if (!signature) { throw std::runtime_error("No sig!"); }
    10. Re:Windows 98? by thebes · · Score: 0, Troll

      I believe that is extended support if any support at all. That means it'll cost you an arm and a leg for help.

    11. Re:Windows 98? by reinard · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You completely missed the point. It's not about whether the OS can run on those machines, but the fact that they are giving away/install an OS that is no longer supported (ie EOLed - End Of Life-ed).

      And why did the post get modded up? Because it suggested that Linux may work on a machine that Win2K won't? Lamers.

      --
      Reinard
    12. Re:Windows 98? by zdzichu · · Score: 1

      Argh! My eyes pain. Windows since '95 is 32 bit with 16 compatibility. Last 16 bit was Windows 3.11

      --
      :wq
    13. Re:Windows 98? by ottffssent · · Score: 3, Insightful
      At least give Microsoft credit for realizing what sort of hardware they're dealing with.


      Hah! Since when have Microsoft ever done anything but make hardware as slow as they can get away with?

      No, they have a solid grasp of the market they're dealing with. That being emerging markets where Microsoft has no sizeable installed base with which to compete with Linux. You did notice this doesn't apply in the US or any of the major European countries, right?

      This program exists for the same reason that Microsoft practically gives away their software to college students: so people in target markets will be familiar with their product. That familiarity is absolutely crucial to Microsoft: as Linux continues to be more and more compelling from a technical perspective, the only advantage Microsoft has is its familiarity and continuity with the old standard.
    14. Re:Windows 98? by Homology · · Score: 2, Insightful
      You completely missed the point. It's not about whether the OS can run on those machines, but the fact that they are giving away/install an OS that is no longer supported (ie EOLed - End Of Life-ed).

      Of course the OS no longer supported by Microsoft, since it's intended to run on PC that in the rich world is "obsolete". Do you think that P4 3.4 GHz with 1GB RAM and DSL line is common i Africa?

      And why did the post get modded up? Because it suggested that Linux may work on a machine that Win2K won't? Lamers.

      Perhaps because the moderator realizes that very many in the world is poor, and has to do with what they have? Btw, as far as I know, Win 2000 is not EOLed. But then again, you don't run obsolete and old software when you can have shiny new XP to impress your friends?

    15. Re:Windows 98? by mallardtheduck · · Score: 3, Informative

      Actually... Even Windows 3.11 had tiny bits of 32-bit code in... (Im talking Wfw3.11 here..)

      It had 32-bit disk access, 32-bit TCP stack, and a few other things. Of course with the Win32s (remember those?) it had a whole lot of 32-bit code.

      Not that I am nitpicking here...

    16. Re:Windows 98? by eclectro · · Score: 2, Insightful

      but they get good free publicity because of this announcement

      And more people "hooked" on windows that will be future customers. And more developers writing software in third world countries for Windows.

      Brilliant really.

      --
      Take the cheese to sickbay, the doctor should see it as soon as possible - B'Elanna Torres, "Learning Curve"
    17. Re:Windows 98? by Laebshade · · Score: 0

      No it's ok, thanks for setting me straight.

    18. Re:Windows 98? by netsharc · · Score: 1

      Aaah yeah, win32s, the 32 bit extension to the 16 bit Windows (yes we all now the joke, although I can never remember it).. it was like an engine upgrade, "Damn now it's 32 bits!" you feel after you install it.

      I remember installing IE on Win32s on Win 3.1, damn that was a resource hog.

      --
      What time is it/will be over there? Check with my iPhone app!
    19. Re:Windows 98? by reinard · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What on earth are you blathering about?

      "Of course the OS no longer supported by Microsoft, since it's intended to run on PC that in the rich world is "obsolete". Do you think that P4 3.4 GHz with 1GB RAM and DSL line is common i Africa?"

      What does that have to with what I said? You totatally missed the point on the parent post. Why is it "Of Course" no longer supported? There are several large companies that support their products for decades, and the fact that Win98 is no longer supported is one of a constantly reoccuring heated debate, even here on slashdot.

      What does your snotty comment try to say? No I don't think that a state of the art computer is common in Africa overall, but I also completly resent your notion that it's not there. Africa is not all 3rd world. There are big, civilized cities and even Democracies. And yes, they have modern computers and Internet access.

      Go back and read what the parent wrote and what you replied. Your post makes no sense, and taking a cheap shot at me is not going to change that, ass.

      And a machine that runs Win98 is by no means obsolete. What does the OS have to do with the hardware? I still run Win98 SE on several machines. It's a very stable single user OS. But again, that wasn't part of this discussion you moron.

      "Perhaps because the moderator realizes that very many in the world is poor, and has to do with what they have?"

      Again, your lack of reading comprehension is monumental. Not only did you miss what the orignal poster said, and what I said, but even though I specifically pointed out that you missed the point, you didn't go back and read what was said. RTFA. This has __NOTHING__ to do with how poor someone is.
      a) these computers are being provided for FREE anyway.
      b) it doesn't cost M$ anything to provide copies of their OS
      c) what the OP pointed out is that since it doesn't cost them anything anyway, why didn't they put a supported OS like WinME on the machines, but instead chose a product that has EOLed like Win98. Either one will run fine on comparable Hardware.

      "Btw, as far as I know, Win 2000 is not EOLed."

      NOONE said Win2K was EOLed. Where do you pull this crap from? And by the way, it was supposed to EOL just a few days ago on 03/31/04. From what I understand they extended it another year, but I'm not sure on that.

      "But then again, you don't run obsolete and old software when you can have shiny new XP to impress your friends?"

      Another cheap shot at me for what? And again, stop pulling shit out of your ass. I never said I run XP or anything like that. In fact, the machine I'm writing this on uses *gasp* Win98 SE.

      Learn how to read, and how to think logically, then RTFA otherwise don't bother replying.

      Oh, and since you don't understand logic, try this: go fuck yourself.

      --
      Reinard
    20. Re:Windows 98? by Hes+Nikke · · Score: 0

      Windows is a 32-bit extension to a 16-bit graphical shell for an 8-bit operating system originally coded for a 4-bit microprocessor by a 2-bit company that can't stand 1 bit of competition.

      Mods remember: this is not a karma whore as "funny" mods don't give any karma.

      --
      Don't call me back. Give me a call back. Bye. So yeah. But bye our, well, but alright we are on a shirt this chill.
    21. Re:Windows 98? by Homology · · Score: 1
      ....Learn how to read, and how to think logically, then RTFA otherwise don't bother replying.

      Oh, and since you don't understand logic, try this: go fuck yourself.

      I'm deeply impressed with your thoughtful opinions expressed with such an elevated language. I'm sure we'll all be delighted when you share with us your profound thoughts in your next Slashdot post. Your karma bonus should really +5 so we can be sure that no one can ignore you. Several moderators have already achieved Nirvana and moderated your post to +4 Insightful.

    22. Re:Windows 98? by reinard · · Score: 1

      Heh you know what's funny? I perfectly predicted your inability to have a meaningful conversation. The only thing you chose to reply to was the part that I figured you'd get. Bravo!

      By the way I had good reasons to be upset at you. You made several snipes at me due to your ineptitude in reading comprehension. If you attack people for wrong reasons after they point out to you that you are incorrect.. well what do you expect?

      Just as I expected, people like you can't be argued with. So I just call you a name and leave it at that, because I know you understand that.

      And now you bitch about the moderators, who actually understand what I was saying and agree.

      Get lost.

      --
      Reinard
    23. Re:Windows 98? by Homology · · Score: 1
      Just as I expected, people like you can't be argued with. So I just call you a name and leave it at that, because I know you understand that.

      Yet again I'm dazzled by your razor sharp intellects ability to rip apart any argument, and to show the world for what it relly is. I'm sure that this unique talent of yours must have been honed to perfection by pondering over the latest Fox News bulletin.

    24. Re:Windows 98? by reinard · · Score: 1

      You can mock me all you want.

      If you have something to say, respond to my long post that explains why your post makes no sense and disprove it.

      I did rip apart your argument there and I did show the world what a moron you are, and if you look at the score on the post, it seems people agree.

      Now show us that you can do more than mock me and respond with an intelligent post and prove me wrong. If you can do that, I have no problem admitting my fault.

      See I feel it's ok to call someone a moron or whatever if there is some beef behind what I say. I made a long post explaining my point. If you have one, write something that's more than two sentences making fun of me. Stop acting like a child and attack my argument instead of me.

      --
      Reinard
    25. Re:Windows 98? by Homology · · Score: 1
      Now show us that you can do more than mock me and respond with an intelligent post and prove me wrong. (...)

      See I feel it's ok to call someone a moron or whatever if there is some beef behind what I say.

      I'm not particularly impressed by your abusive language in lack of real arguments. But since I'm in a friendly mood, but friendless, I might add, I've made you my first abusive Slashdot friend.

    26. Re:Windows 98? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What the hell is "NOONE" ?? are you trying to spell no one? NEXT TIME TRY SPELL CHECK MORON! OR THIS: http://dictionary.reference.com/

    27. Re:Windows 98? by SYSS+Mouse · · Score: 1

      If my memory serves me, Mirosoft extended Win98 support for 2 years several months ago.

    28. Re:Windows 98? by reinard · · Score: 1

      "I'm not particularly impressed by your abusive language in lack of real arguments."

      Since you obviously have some serious difficulty navigating around /. here is a link to the argument I made in great detail.

      "But since I'm in a friendly mood, but friendless, I might add, I've made you my first abusive Slashdot friend."

      I'm not surprised you are friendless..

      And regarding "abusive Slashdot friend", the word you're looking for is "foe".

      Still daring you to actually respond to my arguments. But I'm not holding my breath..

      By the way, once again you made some weird choice in what to reply to. The first part of what you replied to (Now show us that you can do more than mock me and respond with an intelligent post and prove me wrong. (...)) you completely ignored. Why did you put it there? Need some instructions on how to copy and paste? Or can't put the bong down long enough to remember what you were going to reply to?

      And the second part that you replied to (See I feel it's ok to call someone a moron or whatever if there is some beef behind what I say.) also has nothing to do with what you replied to. That's a fully valid statement. If someone is an idiot (and since you don't get generalizations, I am NOT calling you an idiot) and I can show "they" are an idiot, then I feel it is fully apropriate for me to call them an idiot.

      Did you want to disagree and actually make an argument? Go ahead.

      That is not abusive language, and that is a real argument.

      You were saying?

      --
      Reinard
    29. Re:Windows 98? by reinard · · Score: 1

      Whoops my bad... English is actually my second language. Thanks for pointing it out.

      --
      Reinard
    30. Re:Windows 98? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most people wouldn't be thankful for such a comment.

    31. Re:Windows 98? by RedBear · · Score: 1

      c) what the OP pointed out is that since it doesn't cost them anything anyway, why didn't they put a supported OS like WinME on the machines, but instead chose a product that has EOLed like Win98. Either one will run fine on comparable Hardware.

      My experience with WinME says otherwise. It seems to be a monster compared to Win98/98SE (which in turn of course is a monster compared to Win95, which will happily run much faster even on a 486/33 with 8MB of RAM, so if it weren't so unstable and riddled with security holes it would probably be a better choice for older hardware).

      I agree with everything else you said.

      Still, on the topic at hand, it would be really cool to see a few Linux distros with features equivalent to Win95 that would run on comparable hardware at the same speed. Anyone know of a distro that can be easily installed on a computer with only 7 or 8MB of RAM and a 486/Pentium-I level processor? Over the years I kept hearing some BS from Linuxites about how Linux will "revitalize your old hardware", but besides turning that old hardware into a non-GUI router or X-terminal, I've been largely disappointed.

      That's what these non-profits and poor countries really need, a Free Software distro that will run with fairly modern features (modern web browser, office suite, email) on *really* old hardware. I know it can be done. The proof is Windows 95 itself. There's also that NewDeal Office thing which is a GUI for DOS that is supposed to run in just 2MB of RAM as a minimum, with an office suite, web browser, email, etc.

      I have a feeling it could be done just as well if not better with a Linux distro, but all the distros I've tried require a lot more memory or a Linux guru who can maybe read and understand those decade-old Howto's about shoehorning Linux into low-memory computers.

      And if I remember right that Howto ended up telling me I couldn't run a GUI on a machine that low-powered. Why not? Win95 is a GUI and it worked just fine on the same hardware. I'm always hearing about projects like TinyX and Linux-based portable devices (with GUI) with about the equivalent hardware as a really old 486. Why can't some of that technology be used to make those old desktops and 486/Pentium laptops usable again? I truly don't understand it.

      If there were a real Linux distro out there that could just drop-n-run on old hardware like that as well as Win95 did, people would be going crazy over Linux in these sorts of situations. (Old, donated hardware.)

      As it is, the appearance is that Linux keeps requiring more and more hardware to run any type of semi-modern platform (just not quite as bad as each new release of Windows), but that may just be my perception. Prove me wrong. I've got an old 486/100 laptop with 7.5MB of RAM. It's perfectly usable with Win95 and an old copy of Microsoft Office. Why can't it be usable with Linux in the same capacity? (As a desktop with a GUI, not as a router.)

      Seriously, anyone know of distros or projects focused specifically on making *really* old computers usable again? To many parts of the world, this would be a godsend. Even in this country, I know a lot of people who would be really impressed if Linux allowed them to avoid having to buy a new computer just to continue to participate with the world safely (Internet, email, etc).

    32. Re:Windows 98? by Lennie · · Score: 1

      Actually Windows98 can run and part of it still is/was 16 bit software.

      --
      New things are always on the horizon
    33. Re:Windows 98? by Ben+Hutchings · · Score: 1

      GDI and USER are still 16-bit, hence the limitation to 16-bit coordinates in GDI and something like ~16000 windows (I think the window table indexed by window handles contains 32-bit far pointers and is itself limited to 64K). The Windows 9x architecture is really not that different from Windows 3.11 plus Win32s, though Win32 programs can be preempted in 9x.

  4. Ready pitchforks! by NanoGator · · Score: 5, Funny

    Boy I can't wait to see how everybody takes this as a creative writing exercise to tell us about how this is proof Microsoft is evil.

    --
    "Derp de derp."
    1. Re:Ready pitchforks! by thelexx · · Score: 2, Funny

      We don't need any more proof.

      --
      "Gold still represents the ultimate form of payment in the world." - Alan Greenspan, 1999
    2. Re:Ready pitchforks! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not Microsoft, it's SKYNET. This is just another step in SKYNET spreading around the world- mean, it has to take over the developing world too, y'know.

      Nuclear proliferation is a bitch, even for evil AI's bent on world domination.

    3. Re:Ready pitchforks! by computersareevil · · Score: 2, Funny

      You need proof?

    4. Re:Ready pitchforks! by Avihson · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'll bite this bait:

      Why pay to reinstall the same OS that came originally on the system?
      If It came with 98, then it has a legal license for 98, no need to buy a new one. If I donate it to a charity, then I donate my license.

      If Some Evil Company manipulates the EULA to prohibit this act of charity, then I will just keep legal ownership of the PC and allow the charity to use My PC and My Licence to the OS as they see fit.

    5. Re:Ready pitchforks! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What fucking crackhead modded this insightful? I hope I get this one in meta.

    6. Re:Ready pitchforks! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please, don't spout off your nonsense. Microsoft is a corporate institution. They have one purpose as a corporation, profit. Any action they take must be understood as a profit motive in some direct or indirect sense. Even give-aways have a purpose. Image, publicity, tax breaks, etc. To treat Microsoft as a person doing good or evil is an example of dillusion. Microsoft is a coporate institution that has many employees and various people working within the institution some with ownership. Don't treat the company as a person. The reasons for putting into effect such a program are pretty obvious. Most people will never know all the details, but it isn't hard to determine the main objectives of this action.

    7. Re:Ready pitchforks! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your mom's penis did.

    8. Re:Ready pitchforks! by NanoGator · · Score: 2, Insightful
      "Why pay to reinstall the same OS that came originally on the system?"

      Actually, the article mentions an upgrade to a newer OS.

      "Computers donated by large companies are typically three years old and the MAR program upgrades the software to newer versions of Windows that donated PCs can support, for a nominal charge that covers materials and program operations."


      "If It came with 98, then it has a legal license for 98, no need to buy a new one. If I donate it to a charity, then I donate my license."

      It doesn't always work like that. People can donate the computer without donating the license. (Whether Microsoft sees it that way is a different matter I suppose, but if you went to Office Depot and bought a Windows box...) Ultimately, it means that the original owner of the machine may be using that Windows license elsewhere. This service provides a way to legitimize the computer.
      Personally, I think Microsoft's being a little too restrictive with its licenses. Then again, it is creating a situation for them, though, where they can have companies line up to make sure that Windows is the OS they use down the road. Microsoft may be evil, but man I wouldn't mind having some stock.
      --
      "Derp de derp."
    9. Re:Ready pitchforks! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But you have forgotten about the absolute scale they use for such things. This sort of mumbo jumbo would never hold up in a court of law. Name twice over what kind of thing you are getting about to here?

      I for one will be buying 3 or four licesences to make sure they last through the transition, because as I have heard you only lose the first license when you give it away, the other ones are there to stay.

    10. Re:Ready pitchforks! by Ubi_NL · · Score: 0, Troll

      If It came with 98, then it has a legal license for 98, no need to buy a new one. If I donate it to a charity, then I donate my license.

      Because the license is not tranferable.

      This is mentioned nearly everywhere. It is in fact part of the license agreement to which the orinigal computer owner, err.. agreed. It does not matter whether both of us think that that is stupid

      --

      If an experiment works, something has gone wrong.
    11. Re:Ready pitchforks! by StormyMonday · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I see it a bit differently. Microsoft (and other software vendors) are desperate to maintain the fiction that shrinkwrap/clickthru EULAs actaully mean anything (they viiolate just about every common law principal of business agreements).

      By getting people to agree that they *need* to worry about the transfer of license when a PC is sold, they reinforce the idea that the EULA actually means something.

      It's a lot better on the ol' PR than suing an orphanage somewhere over EULA viiolations.

      --
      Welcome to the Turing Tarpit, where everything is possible but nothing interesting is easy.
    12. Re:Ready pitchforks! by SurgeonGeneral · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Why pay to reinstall the same OS that came originally on the system?

      Simply put, because they're not.

      As TFA says, recipients of these computers will pay "a nominal charge that covers materials and program operations."

      What is happening here is good. These computers were largely destained for landfills, and their hardware contains many toxic chemicals, such as high concentrations of lead, that seep into our environment. No one likes lead in the watertable. Furthermore, these computers will be upgraded to Windows 2000, the most stable Windows OS.

      Large and small corporations alike were finding it hard to give away they're hardware with the software because of the restrictive licences. The alternative would be to install Linux on these computers and THEN give them away. To hedge its bets, Microsoft decided not to ease up on the license, but rather implement a program to make it easier to give computers away. Ok so its not all good..

      So the program allows people to become authorized redistributers of this hardware, and in the process they will *relicense* the software on the hardware so it can be legally used. They're not paying for a new license, they're paying for the paperwork involved with keeping track of said license, and thats a big difference.

      I agree, its not the most ethical way of going about this : it ensures a stranglehold on the obsolete hardware market, however it is not to increase profits, but merely to maintain marketshare and domination over a segment of the digital population that would otherwise likely migrate to Linux. They need to keep all those terminals around schools and libraries on Windows, otherwise people might realize that Linux isnt the bogeyman its made out to be.

      Yeah, ok, I admit, its bad... but at least now I understand why its bad, and I'm not merely reaching for my pitchfork.

      --
      -- "Man is born free, and everywhere he is in chains." Jean Jacques Rousseau
    13. Re:Ready pitchforks! by jargoone · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Because the license is not tranferable.

      Bullshit. You are just plain 100% wrong on this.

    14. Re:Ready pitchforks! by Lockjaw · · Score: 1

      Read up on first sale doctrine. The EULA can't make you relinquish that right.

    15. Re:Ready pitchforks! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
      It doesn't always work like that. People can donate the computer without donating the license. (Whether Microsoft sees it that way is a different matter I suppose, but if you went to Office Depot and bought a Windows box...) Ultimately, it means that the original owner of the machine may be using that Windows license elsewhere.

      Devil is in details. OEM version that came with the machine is NOT transferable by the owner (according to MS, that is); it is only licensed to be used by that machine. But whether it's also bound to person who owned it.... that's another matter; I don't think it could.

      As to buying the box, that's different story. That may or may not be transferable.

      As to MS stock; there are lots of online brokers that can help you purchase MSFT shares. I don't want to -- they are not going to be stellar performers, since at best growth could be solid, their growth in sector is limited. Bit like most other big corporations; solid, sound, fairly low-risk; but also not-that-hot prospects for growth. Kind of your retirement stocks. And since there are plenty of more interesting companies to own, I don't even need to consider moral dilemma of ownership I would have.

    16. Re:Ready pitchforks! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Not really the case. The license is transferrable as long as there's a COA to prove it's there. The problem is that a great many "retired" PC's are actually the result of someone keeping their software and doing a "hardware upgrade" that consisted of replacing the entire box. And yes, Microsoft does allow you to install their stuff on a new box if you're junking the old one. Of course, you don't necessarily tell 'em you're taking the old hardware and redeploying it as a Bering Leaf firewall or something like that.

      That's actually not a half bad deal. Recently Sun has been rather loudly reminding people that the RTU on Solaris does **NOT** go with one of their boxes when it changes hands. (Just an example.)

    17. Re:Ready pitchforks! by timeOday · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think it's more a credit to Linux than a discredit to Microsoft.

    18. Re:Ready pitchforks! by griffjon · · Score: 1

      Even in the case where the computer is legally 'licensed' and has been donated, often the actual CD didn't come with it. Remember, in 98, you need the CD to change the IP (well, not really, but it asks you for it ad nauseum), add/remove components, etc.

      And woe be to you if you lose something, office breaks, etc...

      Further, as much as people complain about 98SE, it's not that bad for low-end systems, as long as you manage it and keep it clean, and free of ActiveDesktop (twitch). I mean, it's better than ME, 98, or 95, and runs on computers than XP would laugh at. Win2k is sometimes a better alternative.

      Linux could work well, but have you tried installing a easy-to-use Linux on a POS computer recently? It's not as easy as we like to think. And if you're trying to wedge it into 32MB of ram (or less!), with not much HDD space...

      --
      Returned Peace Corps IT Volunteer
    19. Re:Ready pitchforks! by zcat_NZ · · Score: 3, Informative

      Microsoft is really unclear on this;

      If you have an OEM install of Windows, it MUST be sold with the machine. You can't sell the bare machine and reinstall WIndows on your new computer.

      If you buy a second-hand machine, apparently you don't ever get Windows with it and are supposed to buy a new version.

      It looks to me like someone is trying to sell at least one new windows licence every time a second-hand machine gets sold or donated.

      --
      455fe10422ca29c4933f95052b792ab2
    20. Re:Ready pitchforks! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I'm sorry, but I call BS on 90% of the comments in this article. Why does Microsoft specifically say that you don't need written permission to transfer a license if they're so desparate to "resell", as some misguided people may think, Windows 98?

      Oh wait, you must be talking about if the user is missing their original installed media! Yes, DAMN Microsoft for charging a $5 per computer fee for media and license! How could they?!

    21. Re:Ready pitchforks! by TheSpoom · · Score: 1

      Argh. Damn Public Terminal login. Dah well.

      --
      It's better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it.
      - E. Debs
  5. yay! by gl4ss · · Score: 4, Insightful

    so you'll essentially pay for the license for a computer that already most probably had a license!

    So I guess this makes sense for them(microsoft).

    --
    world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    1. Re:yay! by Godeke · · Score: 4, Informative

      Since the license is non transferable (a rule I thinks needs legal review, but that's how it stands) this is an unfortunate necessity. I have worked with Microsoft in the past, and it was difficult to get a relicense approved, even for non profits. Instead they wanted to sell new licenses at a discounted rate, but still at a cost that makes the "donated" hardware a liability rather than an asset.

      --
      Sig under construction since 1998.
    2. Re:yay! by daviddennis · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Could you (or someone else) explain why the license is non-transferable when it comes with the computer and becomes worthless with the computer?

      Does this mean that if I have an old machine and I sell it, I still own its licenses and the successor owner doesn't?

      Could I then buy a new machine without an OS and legally install Windows 2000 on it if my old machine had Windows 2000?

      I don't understand what's wrong with the common-sense idea that an operating system license always goes with the computer when sold unless other arrangements are made.

      D

    3. Re:yay! by stephanruby · · Score: 1
      ...but still at a cost that makes the "donated" hardware a liability rather than an asset.

      Since noone has said it yet, I'll say it now.

      With Linux at least, you can turn this former asset-morphed-liability into a fully functioning religious idol everyone can worship.

    4. Re:yay! by micromoog · · Score: 1
      I don't understand what's wrong with the common-sense idea that an operating system license always goes with the computer when sold unless other arrangements are made.

      What's wrong with the idea that the license should allow the software to be installed on any one machine, by anyone? This is how virtually all other types of goods work.

    5. Re:yay! by Fnkmaster · · Score: 4, Interesting
      I'm not clear how those sorts of license terms (license bound to not only a particular piece of hardware but also to a particular owner) complies with the first sale doctrine or would be ruled as a permissable sort of EULA in most, if not all, jurisdictions around the world.


      I realize that unfortunately rulings on EULAs here in the US have been mixed, but this kind of restriction is not a reasonable one. I bought the hardware, I paid for it, the software comes with it, you can't tell me when I sell the hardware that I can't sell the software. That's as outrageous as telling me that when I sell my car I can't transfer the "license" to run the engine control software because there was an EULA in addition to the standard sale contract when I bought my car.


      Just because the stuff behind the scenes is done by software and the software itself is protected by copyright law, doesn't mean that a person who bought it can't use it in the standard way it is intended to be used. This kind of use just plain old doesn't require accepting any license - mark my words, the first auto manufacturer that tries this shit will get torn to shreds by an angry mob, and I think it will take something like that to get the commoners to understand how they are being raped by companies like Microsoft.

    6. Re:yay! by Godeke · · Score: 2, Informative

      It may be common sense, but the rule is that if a machine transfers ownership *neither* the original owner, *nor* the new owner can legally use the software without a "transfer of ownership". Cisco most recently decided that IOS (the software that runs from firmware on Cisco routers) did *not* transfer with the hardware, and you have to pay them *full hit* to use the hardware you just bought, because to their mind, you don't legally have a license to the *software* that runs it.

      --
      Sig under construction since 1998.
    7. Re:yay! by T-Ranger · · Score: 1
      In Cisco's case it is a component of a plan/conspiracy to try and regain control over the used Cisco hardware market. A 2501 may be all you need, and you can get one on EBay for $100. Cisco would rather you buy something new from them for $2000. It is also the reason why they would give you closer to $1000 for a trade in on a 2501.

      Sun also gives far more then the street value on used gear for trade in. OTOH, Solaris is a free download these days.

    8. Re:yay! by TenPin22 · · Score: 1

      "Since the license is non transferable"

      In Europe they are transferable. You can even sell your license.

    9. Re:yay! by jayminer · · Score: 1

      A software license permits the usage of the software. There is a common misunderstanding that the license owner owns the software. No (s)he does not.

    10. Re:yay! by Mateito · · Score: 1

      > Cisco most recently decided that IOS (the
      > software that runs from firmware on Cisco
      routers)

      To lazy to Google... but is there a project to install linux on Cisco routers? I know that most cisco platforms use different CPUs, but I don't know much about cross-compiling OSs as to how difficult the 2500 version would be to port to a 2600 (for example).

      And, given the price of old cisco hardware, man.. you could like... run a router on it or something.

      In all seriousness... give a Cisco Router some real firewalling power, or make a Snort box.

    11. Re:yay! by Halfbaked+Plan · · Score: 1

      Sun also gives far more then the street value on used gear for trade in.

      I'd like to know more about that deal with Sun. It wouldn't be a bad deal for me to trade in five SS5's and four SS10's, plus five or six IPXs and five or so IPCs if I could get a Blade 100 for a hundred bucks or so.

      I'd want to keep a representative example of each old Sun box for the collection, of course, but I'm up to my ears in Sun hardware at the moment.

      --
      resigned
    12. Re:yay! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      so you'll essentially pay for the license for a computer that already most probably had a license!

      Not necessarily. Back in the 486/586/PII days, it was common for large IT shops to buy "bare" PCs and use floating MS licences. This practice only ended around 1997 or so (and only restarted recently).

      So, especially if it's a corporate donation, there is not necessarily an OEM licence to transfer. And I supposed MS has to be a stickler about this, as EULAs are their business.

    13. Re:yay! by Kris_J · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Since the license is non transferable
      So don't transfer it. If I install a Windows licence I own on a PC it's not against the law for someone else to use it, so who cares who owns the licence so long as only one install exists for each licence?
    14. Re:yay! by T-Ranger · · Score: 1
      I havent done anything myself recently, but I suspect that they wouldnt take anything less then an Ultra-1.

      The might take memory modules from a SS-20 though. The rub them dowm with some cleaner and sell them as "refurbished".

    15. Re:yay! by Halfbaked+Plan · · Score: 1

      They probably test the memory modules in some sort of a burn-in fixture. I'd hate to think they'd just clean and resticker them.

      I have a whole pile of memory modules for some-odd Sun hardware that I wouldn't mind 'trading in' for something. I bought a pile of them that were supposed to work in my SS5's from somebody on eBay and he shipped me totally different modules. Then sent the right ones and said 'keep the other's.' I think they're StarFire Server memory or something.

      --
      resigned
    16. Re:yay! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      A software license permits the usage of the software. There is a common misunderstanding that the license owner owns the software. No (s)he does not.

      So why does Microsoft keep talking about TCO "Total Cost of Ownership"?

      When you buy a computer YOU BUY IT.

      Money for OWNERSHIP!

    17. Re:yay! by shadowbearer · · Score: 1


      It's the Perpetual Payment loop condition; a common bug in business plans. A fix is comin^H^H^H^H^H^H not likely.

      SB

      --
      It's old. The more humans I meet, the more I like my cats. At least they are honest.
    18. Re:yay! by daviddennis · · Score: 1

      What if, when I sell my computer, I sign an agreement:

      I do hereby transfer all rights I have in the Windows software license contained on this machine. /s/
      David H Dennis

      I would think that as long as those rights exist, I should have a right to hand them to someone else.

      How can the law vaporize those rights? That seems like something so patently unfair as to not work even for lawyers.

      D

    19. Re:yay! by Brandybuck · · Score: 1

      *nor* the new owner can legally use the software without a "transfer of ownership"

      The sales (or donation) receipt is all that you need. In fact, you don't even need that. If you disagree, please show me the law where it says otherwise.

      The software manufacturers may bitch about it, but the last time I checked, they were NOT the law.

      --
      Don't blame me, I didn't vote for either of them!
    20. Re:yay! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Since the license is non transferable"

      Irrespective of what the EULA says, in some
      areas of the world it is transferrable. Basically
      if the EULA violates local law, you are not bound
      by those aspects of the EULA, even if you agree
      to them. (This makes sense, otherwise you'd have
      the potential for criminals to take people to
      the civil court for breaking contracts requiring
      people to engage in activities which are
      incompatible with the local laws).

    21. Re:yay! by Ozric · · Score: 1

      What about an Xbox. With DRM they are trying to lock the OS to the hardware. So what way is it? How about systems running as Demos in Store ? They have no owners yet, I see them booted into windows,

      If the OS was bought with the computer and not alacart. It should be sellable with the comptuer.

      This whole thing is a scam ... Try to get your money back for the EULA. MSFT will tell you to talk to your OEM.... Oh so they are the ones that own it? WTF... If they dont stick to the ELUA why should you.

    22. Re:yay! by Godeke · · Score: 1

      Long after the issue, but please refer to

      http://zdnet.com.com/2102-1105-963696.html

      for just one example of a company blocking transfer of licenses. Because you don't "buy" software, but "license a copyrighted product", actually it *is* the law that you can't just give those licenses to others.

      The law in this case is similar to the law that holds if I were to license a movie, music or book property: I would get any rights in the license, but I *could not* then give my license to someone else unless my license *specifically grants* such permission. Software licenses specifically contain the words "non transferable", which means exactly what it sounds like it does.

      The fact you are holding a CD in your hand is not "proof of ownership", nor is holding the hologram bearing proof of ownership or license. I think it is stupid. You think it is stupid. Welcome to stupid copyright laws.

      --
      Sig under construction since 1998.
    23. Re:yay! by Godeke · · Score: 1

      Duplicate posting is bad, but your comment is similar:

      Long after the issue, but please refer to

      http://zdnet.com.com/2102-1105-963696.html

      for just one example of a company blocking transfer of licenses. Because you don't "buy" software, but "license a copyrighted product", actually it *is* the law that you can't just give those licenses to others.

      The law in this case is similar to the law that holds if I were to license a movie, music or book property: I would get any rights in the license, but I *could not* then give my license to someone else unless my license *specifically grants* such permission. Software licenses specifically contain the words "non transferable", which means exactly what it sounds like it does.

      The fact you are holding a CD in your hand is not "proof of ownership", nor is holding the hologram bearing proof of ownership or license. Your "transfer" agreement is invalid without involving the property holder (read: software company). When you involve the software company, they will charge some value, from nothing to more than the original purchase price. I think it is stupid. You think it is stupid. Welcome to stupid copyright laws.

      --
      Sig under construction since 1998.
  6. WTF? by Lord+Kano · · Score: 3, Interesting

    establish a vibrant community of computer refurbishers across 133 countries in Europe, the Middle East and Africa who will be authorized to re-install its Windows operating system

    I didn't know that the BSA had offices in Karachi and Djibouti. Who the fuck cares about Microsoft certification in the third world?

    LK

    --
    "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    1. Re:WTF? by tuxtomas · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Seriously, this has to throw your head back. Especially in the regions suffering from hunger, AIDS, ethnic conflicts, civil wars, you name it.

      Who's gonna care about about that little sticker on your box when you're an orphan suffering from dysentery with tsetse flies and mosquitoes flying around your head as you stare at a blue screen. Open source- the greatest equalizer mankind has ever seen.

      --
      Open source- the greatest equalizer mankind has ever seen.
    2. Re:WTF? by dankney · · Score: 1
      Who the fuck cares about Microsoft certification in the third world? Microsoft cares, of course.

      Bill aside, many of the charities/non-profits that work in the third world have offices in the west. Many of them are probably branches of the UN.

      And many of the large ones have assets worth going after for liscense violations.

    3. Re:WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who the fuck cares about Microsoft certification in the third world?

      Microsoft. And maybe some of its partners.

      Note: This might be somewhat OT, it's just to remind that big software companies are not charities to the eyes of developing countries.

      It doesn't mean that in the third world or other developing countries licenses for software are cheaper than, say, the US. Proof: in Chile, the Consumer Protection Service sued Autodesk and ADS (the BSA equivalent in Chile) for charging over three times the cost of a license bought in the US. Some bussinesses (both chilean and foreign) began to buy licenses in the US, but Autodesk refused to honor warranties and support contracts for this licenses. Bussinesses are free to charge whatever they want for their products*, sure, but the basis for the suit are some provisions in a Free Trade Agreement with the US.

      At least there is some good in all the evil of that FTA (do you think anyone cared about the DCMA-like provisions of the agreement? Hey, it even was shown as a Good Thing(TM) )

      *Unless they're monopolies...

    4. Re:WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      They certainly do in Karachi. I'm not sure about Djibouti, but they, like Pakistan, are WIPO signatories, so I'd say there's probably a small BSA lobby there too.

      Basically if there's anywhere PCs are being used - refurbished or otherwise - you can be damn sure the BSA is right there.

    5. Re:WTF? by Soul-Burn666 · · Score: 1

      And I see that just went straight into (or from) your sig ;)

      --
      ^_^
    6. Re:WTF? by Halfbaked+Plan · · Score: 1

      The greatest equalizer mankind has ever seen is probably a volcano or a forest fire.

      I wouldn't classify Open source as a similar phenomenon, and I hope you wouldn't either.

      --
      resigned
    7. Re:WTF? by CdBee · · Score: 1

      "I didn't know that the BSA had offices in Karachi and Djibouti. Who the fuck cares about Microsoft certification in the third world?"

      Everyone, since US corporations can put the squeeze on a country by way of their influence in matters of international commerce

      Stomp on a big Western corp too many times and just watch the trade tariffs on your exports rise.

      --
      I have been a user for about 10 years. This ends Feb 2014. The site's been ruined. I'm off. Dice, FU
    8. Re:WTF? by shadowbearer · · Score: 1

      Let's rephrase this a bit :) (apologies)

      As a overworked doctor in the third world, who's going to care about what operating system you're using to access knowledge databases to try to find info that will help you save some kid - except when it gets owned by a vulnerability/bug that Microsoft is not going to fix - and you don't have the resources to fix it either, and can't afford a MS support contract? But maybe...just maybe... there might be someone you can call who will help you fix it for free, because he/she puts in volunteer time to do so and has access to the deepest levels of the system, if necessary.

      Open source - the greatest equalizer mankind has ever seen, because it doesn't require the support of an organization whose sole goal is making more money.

      If you think this is flamebait, then so be it. But think about it.

      SB

      --
      It's old. The more humans I meet, the more I like my cats. At least they are honest.
    9. Re:WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Open source- the greatest equalizer mankind has ever seen.

      No, that would be the gun.

  7. Their duty ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Make sure Bill Gates' tax decductible donations come back to him via Microsoft dividends and cap gains.

    Man, I wish all my tax deductions went to pay for purchases from my company.

  8. just like robin hood by virtualone · · Score: 0

    take from the poor give to the .. uuhmm.no. thats another story..

    --
    Only morons moderate based on a sig.
    1. Re:just like robin hood by kfg · · Score: 1

      take from the poor give to the .. uuhmm.no. thats another story..

      Dennis Moore, Dennis Moore, riding through the land. . .

      "Blimey! This redistribution of software is tricker than I thought"

      KFG

  9. Old machines. by Godeke · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I think it is great there will be a legal way to bring these machines online: having worked with charities, often the limiting factor was the difficulty of getting Microsoft to relicense the software. Obviously, part of the motivation is to stem the use of free software, which was previously the only surefire way to remain legal. The implementation question that remains is how expensive the refurbishing services will be... too expensive and the practice of simply using an unlicensed copy of Windows or punting and using free products will continue.

    --
    Sig under construction since 1998.
    1. Re:Old machines. by jeffasselin · · Score: 2, Informative

      There's already plenty of ways to bring those machines online legally.

      They're called Linux distributions. there's no need to pay more Microsoft tax. Imagine, now you don't need to pay the tax once, you must pay it twice or three times!

      --
      If he explores all forms and substances Straight homeward to their symbol-essences; He shall not die.
    2. Re:Old machines. by Halfbaked+Plan · · Score: 1

      And I, conversely, am a little worried about this.

      Part of how I make my living is buying and selling used computer hardware. If there comes to be an easy and tax-advantageous way for instututions to donate their computers to a formal organization, the supply to people like me will dry up. Similarly, the suppy of surplus computers for people to experiment with software like Linux and the BSD Unixes will dry up. Many people have gotten their start experimenting with OSS on spare machines they got for almost nothing.

      If the market tightens up, because Microsoft makes it easier to relicense and use 'legitimate' Windows on said machines, the current 'secondary market' which I am a part of, will wither and die.

      I'm not interested in joining the Peace Corps and donating my time.

      --
      resigned
  10. Always butting into the market by t_allardyce · · Score: 3, Interesting

    isnt there already a vibrant community of people who will install linux for free on old pc's?:P

    --
    This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
    1. Re:Always butting into the market by Belsical · · Score: 1, Troll

      Yeah, except they'll actually be able to use this OS.

      I know many people who will gladly install linux on a box for you (which is a total pain in the ass, so that's nice of them), but very few who will come and fix it when you have a problem. With an old windows box, when you have a problem...just reinstall! Anyone can do that...

      --

      "There are no such things as mutual fantasies. Yours bore us and ours offend you."
      - Bill Maher
    2. Re:Always butting into the market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes. Most NGOs that currently refurb/recycle computers to less-priveleged communities install Linux on the PCs, and often provide training to the locals when the PCs are brought in. See http://graham.dhs.org/techmobius.html for a list of computer recycling organizations if you're ever interested in helping out or starting a similar project from your own community. I think this is a nice (and politically clever) gesture by M$. Just bringing computer hardware and software into these communities is a huge first step. I just hope that M$ also provides some support for when computers in remote communities get a Blue Screen or the latest viruses...

  11. Isn't it a leaga install already by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If the laptop/PC was bought with a install of Windows on it is it not legal to reinstall it?
    As I recall the License says it is the install that is on that PC, it should transfer to the new owner shouldn't it?

  12. Are they going to offer a certification for this? by Ride-My-Rocket · · Score: 4, Funny

    MCOSR: Microsoft Certified Operating System Refurbishers?

  13. Nice deal for MS! by Greg@RageNet · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So Microsoft can get refurbishers to pay again for an operating system that was licensed and installed on the system in the first place, since 99+% of PC's ship with windows when originally sold? Nice deal.

    -- Greg

    --
    Slashdot, would a spell-checker for posting be too much to ask? It's not rocket science!
    1. Re:Nice deal for MS! by morleron · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The double dipping for license fees shouldn't surprise anyone. After all, MS recently told the SEC that Linux is a significant threat to its revenue stream. This is simply a way for MS to enhance their cash flow, give them more money with which to fund SCO lawsuits, and play the PR game to show how "thoughtful and caring" it is. Gates and company are evil, but they're not stupid.

      Just my $.02,
      Ron

      --
      Impeach Barack Obama for violating the Constitutional requirement to be a "natural born" citizen to hold the office of P
    2. Re:Nice deal for MS! by NanoGator · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "So Microsoft can get refurbishers to pay again for an operating system that was licensed and installed on the system in the first place, since 99+% of PC's ship with windows when originally sold? Nice deal."

      Umm. Think about how this would really work.

      1.) How many machines would be donated with the original Windows disc? I doubt there's a significant number. If the original user kept the disc and installed it elsewhere, then they would be violating the license by reinstalling it.

      2.) They don't say how much it costs, but they describe it as a 'nominal fee for the service'. My guess is, and I could easily be wrong, but this is considerably cheaper than buying another license. Additionally, it is installed by somebody trained for it. Icing.

      3.) They would probably get an upgrade to the OS out of it. Depending on the machine, they might get Windows 2000 instead of 98. Boy would they be pleasantly surprised by the deal.

      I doubt this is about double-charging people for the OS, I bet it's so that recycled computers all run Windows, thus making Microsoft the company that's in the face of students and the like down the road. Trading one evil for another? I'm not going to comment. Just trying to put a more realistic face on what's happening here.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    3. Re:Nice deal for MS! by DarkBlackFox · · Score: 1

      I didn't RTFA, but I am an OEM, and have conversed with many representatives concerning licensing in the regard of upgrading/refurbrishing.

      I believe this initiative is targeting "refurbrished" machines as in machines made of many components. If you have a COA with a product key (either sticker or book) that originally came with a machine, and the machine still has a majority of it's original parts (I surmise based on my conversations with the MS representative "majority" means essentially the original case), it's legal to use the old license.

      The problem occurs with older machines that predate the COA sticker- those Win98 licenses whos keys are on the manual- as many people either loose or didn't keep their Win98 book. Thus, when a machine is donated, the license doesn't go with it unless the key does. If the computer has the sticker, it's legal to use that product key. If it does not, it's not legal to install anything unless you have the original booklet that came with that machine.

      If a book is lost, the license is lost with it, even if you can extract the product key from the registry, you can not use it unless you have a COA for it in front of you. MS is cashing in on the lost booklet market in an effort to make a dime off it's old products.

    4. Re:Nice deal for MS! by metamatic · · Score: 1

      How many machines would be donated with the original Windows disc?

      About as many as actually come with an original Windows disc in the first place.

      --
      GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
    5. Re:Nice deal for MS! by ckedge · · Score: 1

      Oh I bet ya they're simply *giving* away the licenses, then claiming a $50 tax writeoff or something. Hence the "certificates of authenticity".

      So how much tax has Microsoft the uber-rich corporation paid in the most recent fiscal year? Historically they never paid ANY tax, despite managing to accumulate how many billion dollars in cash reserves?

  14. Something Similar... by The-Dalai-LLama · · Score: 4, Funny

    Hasn't Linux had a similar program in place for a while now?

    The Dalai Llama
    ...nevermind...

    1. Re:Something Similar... by KrispyKringle · · Score: 1

      This has been around for well over a year. I work in such an organization, and we get MS licenses for $5 a pop. Granted, not as free as Linux, but I don't think our recipients would appreciate Linux PCs quite as much. Hey, I use Linux on my desktop full time. I don't even own a Windows machine. But those are the realities, I'm afraid.

    2. Re:Something Similar... by stor · · Score: 1

      Hasn't Linux had a similar program in place for a while now?

      Yes but it doesn't cost $5, it costs $time. :)

      Cheers
      Stor

      --
      "Yeah well there's a lot of stuff that should be, but isn't"
  15. Microsoft does this type of thing all the time. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    While it is nice that people will be getting functioning (well, to Windows standards at least) computers, it nauseates me to realize that when the people using the computers enter the global economic system they will be 'hooked' on Micro$oft. Ugh. This is just like M$ 'donating' software to schools. It is not altruistic in the least, they just want to develop future customers.

    1. Re:Microsoft does this type of thing all the time. by VividU · · Score: 1

      While your sentiment is understandable and I'm sympathetic, you speak as if there is a alternative. There is not.

    2. Re:Microsoft does this type of thing all the time. by Laebshade · · Score: 0

      It's no different than the idea behind most fast-food restaurants. Take McDonald's for example. Kids are boasted as the #1 customer. Why do you think that is? Kids are very impressional, and once you hook them as kids, they're hooked for life. And then their kids get hooked.

    3. Re:Microsoft does this type of thing all the time. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While it is nice that people will be getting functioning (well, to Windows standards at least) computers, it nauseates me to realize that when the people using the computers enter the global economic system they will be 'hooked' on Micro$oft. Ugh. This is just like M$ 'donating' software to schools. It is not altruistic in the least, they just want to develop future customers.

      Alot of the time we are talking about people who are struggling to survive, and the fact that they can learn something new is enough. As long as they can get access to a computer, you think they give a shit what OS they are using?

    4. Re:Microsoft does this type of thing all the time. by esac17 · · Score: 1

      And corporations have been doing this for years, this is why tobacco companies tried to market to kids, and why most kids can tell you the name brand of a product from its logo. Microsoft is no different and shouldn't be slapped on the wrist for doing what is a common business pratice.

    5. Re:Microsoft does this type of thing all the time. by tunabomber · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I'm waiting for someone to mention that this is analogous to the way your friend who's peer-pressuring you to try a drug says that he'll supply you for free since it's your first time.
      However that analogy is tired and wrong.

      I had to buy my OWN damn reef the first time I got high.

      --

      pi = 3.141592653589793helpimtrappedinauniversefactory71 ...
    6. Re:Microsoft does this type of thing all the time. by bwy · · Score: 1

      Is there any way Microsoft could give software away to anybody and not have you make these accusations? So if Outback Steakhouse donates steaks to poor hungry bums, they're still evil because they are doing it to hook people on their steaks? At some point does it/should it matter to the liberals and altruists? Do they HAVE to have some form of self-sacrafice behind helping others? Because I really thought what they were after was making sure the poor got their food and computers. By the same token if someone only gives a donation for the tax break, does it matter? You're after helping people, right? I will maintain that whenever you're asking or expecting someone to "donate" or "give something away" you better damned well take what you get and not worry about the how's or why's as long as everything is legal. Don't take stolen property or drug money but don't be a critic if the purpose is something like a tax break and you don't agree with it.

    7. Re:Microsoft does this type of thing all the time. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And you think Apple doesn't offer steep discounts and free machines to educational facilities? If anything, they probably give more, compared to their percentage in their market.

  16. Basically... by LordK3nn3th · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...this seems to be a way for Microsoft to ensure that if the old operating systems need to be installed (on older hardware), someone will be "certified" to support them. Also, it's to ensure that the installation is legal.

    It's basically second-party support.

    --

    ---
    Never criticize religion on Slashdot. You will be modded down for "Troll" no matter how factual it is.
    1. Re:Basically... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      err... learn to count, it's 3rd party support, 2nd party is the end user, 1st party is M$

    2. Re:Basically... by LordK3nn3th · · Score: 2, Funny


      Uh..

      1st- Microsoft
      2nd- Someone affiliated with but NOT actually Microsoft
      3rd- company not affiliated with microsoft

      --

      ---
      Never criticize religion on Slashdot. You will be modded down for "Troll" no matter how factual it is.
  17. Giving out obsolete operating systems by Steepe · · Score: 3, Insightful

    and of course they take the full retail version fees on their taxes as a charity contribution. They won't support Win98, or probably the 2k because of some stipulation in the "special eula", but uncle sam will get charged the full brunt for a full OS purchase with support.

    --
    Just three more hours seapeople and you can finally take me away from this crappy God Damned planet full of hippies
  18. Re:Ready pitchforks! - Hem by lazy_arabica · · Score: 2, Funny
    Boy I can't wait to see how everybody takes this as a creative writing exercise to tell us about how this is proof Microsoft is evil.

    And this is modded "insightful" ? Well, I don't know what's worse, to claim everything Microsoft does is evil, or to judge people before they even say anything ;-)

    ---
  19. It's not like this costs them anything... by timmi · · Score: 3, Interesting
    or at least it doesn't cost them much, and Why was North and South America excluded?

    (I will bow to any proof that MS gives away licenses to American Non-Profit Orgs.)

    I can see excluding Asia, Because much of that part of the world doesn't respect Copyrights, but still.

    Is it just because MS is unable to establish the MS tax in the EU or something?--computers ship with OEM licenses that must be transferred along with ownership of the computer...

    1. Re:It's not like this costs them anything... by The-Dalai-LLama · · Score: 1
      (I will bow to any proof that MS gives away licenses to American Non-Profit Orgs.)

      I would also be interested in seeing proof that MS gives licenses to American Non-Profit Orgs, since we've been paying for all of ours.

      The Dalai LLama
      ... the non-profit world: innovators in the fine art of doing more with less...

    2. Re:It's not like this costs them anything... by lspd · · Score: 1

      (I will bow to any proof that MS gives away licenses to American Non-Profit Orgs.)

      They sell to nonprofits through TechSoup.

  20. linux and copyright by Datasage · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Considering that in several countries you can vist a shop to purchase a cd with windows longhorn even for less than $5. How many of these countries will actually care that you get a legal copy of windows with the referbished computer?

    I guess its Microsoft's futile attempt to stop linux from taking over the world.

    --
    In America we are imprisoned by our fear of them.
    1. Re:linux and copyright by illuminata · · Score: 1

      I guess its Microsoft's futile attempt to stop linux from taking over the world.

      Or Microsoft's attempt to try and save their operating system business?

      --


      Until Slashdot fixes the funny modifier, use insightful or interesting. The poster knows your intentions.
    2. Re:linux and copyright by WhatAmIDoingHere · · Score: 1

      Why does it have to have something to do with Linux? How do you know it's not an attempt to get people to stop going to the shops where you can purchase Longhorn for $5?

      --
      Not a Twitter sockpuppet... but I wish I was.
    3. Re:linux and copyright by Homology · · Score: 1
      Considering that in several countries you can vist a shop to purchase a cd with windows longhorn even for less than $5. How many of these countries will actually care that you get a legal copy of windows with the referbished computer?

      There are several organizations that work to introduce IT in the third world (and elsewhere, of course), and they of course can't buy cracked versions of Windows.

    4. Re:linux and copyright by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From your argument about 5$ Longhorn CDs it sounds more like they're trying to stop Windows from taking over the world.(?)

    5. Re:linux and copyright by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Considering that in several countries you can vist a shop to purchase a cd with windows longhorn even for less than $5. How many of these countries will actually care that you get a legal copy of windows with the referbished computer?

      Maybe they are providing some level of support that one obviously doesn't get from a $5 copy of Longhorn that they can buy in the store.

    6. Re:linux and copyright by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Support is overrated. Is the ability to make a phonecall to an unhelpful helpdesker who says unhelpful things worth the premium Microsoft charges? I say it isn't.

  21. Free Microsoft software, paid by overcharging us by frovingslosh · · Score: 2, Insightful

    So another way to look at it is that Microsoft is giving out free software to the "third world", and someone is going to pay for it. Which explains why Microsoft software in the U.S keeps getting more and more expensive

    --
    I'm an American. I love this country and the freedoms that we used to have.
  22. EOL? by Joff_NZ · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I know they've extended it, but isn't Win98 about to be EOL'ed? Is that to say MS is sanctioning the installation of an unsupported (support, patches, etc) OS?

    --
    The revolution will not be televised. It won't be on a friggin blog either
    1. Re:EOL? by aking137 · · Score: 1

      Hang on... are you telling me that Microsoft at some point do support their operating systems?

      My god... I hope my customers don't get to find out about this... I'll be out of a job!

  23. Beware..... by overbyj · · Score: 3, Interesting

    As the saying goes "Beware of Greeks bearing gifts". (From The Iliad for those thinking it is racist.) This act is a trojan horse for Microsoft. They donate their wonderful products to those poor, pitiful people in the Third World so we they get them hooked on their technological crack. Once they get them hooked, they can peddle the more expensive crack because now everbody is hooked and has to have it.

    Fight it people. Linux is free now and in the future. Can't say the same thing about MS Windows

    --
    No trees were harmed in the composition of this; however, numerous electrons were inconvenienced.
    1. Re:Beware..... by chris_mahan · · Score: 4, Interesting

      That's the lesson from Hollywood.

      A film like star wars will make 350M in US but 800M worldwide, even though they pay a smaller ticket price a the box office.

      Never under-estimate the purchasing power of 4 billion third-worlders with 20 cents each.

      But the lesson behind the lesson is when you make a movie that targets the third-world audience, the US public thinks it's crap (except LOTR of course, but there's wizardry at work there). Likewise by third-world standards, win98 is "good enough", since they have nothing.

      --

      "Piter, too, is dead."

    2. Re:Beware..... by TykeClone · · Score: 2

      I misread that to say "Beware of Geeks bearing gifts..."

      --
      A fine is a tax you pay for doing wrong and a tax is a fine you pay for doing all right.
    3. Re:Beware..... by Bitseeker · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Does this mean that MS is endorsing the use of outdated OSes to create yet more zombie machines ready to be hacked into? Or does it mean that Win98 will continue to get patches as long as third-world countries are using it?

    4. Re:Beware..... by sethamin · · Score: 1
      So if they charge full price they get lambasted for ripping off non-profits and the education sector, and if they give discounts they get attacked for that, as well. If they gave it away for free we all know the same thing would happen, too.

      Get off your high horse and give it a rest already.

    5. Re:Beware..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Such are the perils of being convicted of illegally using their monopoly status.

    6. Re:Beware..... by Belsical · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This reminds me of Nestle's baby formula in the 80's. They gave out free samples in hospitals and villages in various impovrished countries in Africa, saying it would make babies much healthier than breast milk. Mothers would use the formula and their breast milk would dry up. Then they'd be forced to buy the product because there were no other alternatives. Unfortunately, lots of babies died because the mothers flat out couldn't afford the formula after the samples ran out.

      --

      "There are no such things as mutual fantasies. Yours bore us and ours offend you."
      - Bill Maher
    7. Re:Beware..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This act is a trojan horse for Microsoft.

      Sigh...once again, it's not a trojan horse, it's a virus...

      Never mind.

    8. Re:Beware..... by valproate · · Score: 1
      timeo danaos et dona ferentes

      actually from the Aeneid (Virgil) not the Iliad (Homer). Close none the less.

    9. Re:Beware..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They're still doing it... here

    10. Re:Beware..... by eclectro · · Score: 1


      No, it means simply that MS doesn't care one way or the other.

      I don't think they have any people working on W98 in Redmond.

      --
      Take the cheese to sickbay, the doctor should see it as soon as possible - B'Elanna Torres, "Learning Curve"
    11. Re:Beware..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So the entire world apart from the US is the third world and can only afford 20 cents for tickets? God, you fucking arogant American cunt.

      I think you'll find that prices are about the same in other first world countries (there are others aprart from the US, fucker!) such as the UK, France, Canada...

    12. Re:Beware..... by chris_mahan · · Score: 1

      Oh, 6 billion people in the world: US: 300M, europe, 400M, Japan + South Korea: 200M, that's 900 million.

      Add another 1.1 billion in the "Second World" you still have 4 billion left.

      --

      "Piter, too, is dead."

  24. Third world market by The_Mystic_For_Real · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I seem to remember a story on slashdot a while ago about open source programs (particualrly word processing programs) getting support for obscure third world languages because people who knew them could just add support for new languages themsleves. They were doing it more to help others in the region they came from so they didn't worry if there was a nice market or not. Microsoft may have caught on that the third world is going to develop into a bigger market and wanted to make sure that it wasn't already dominated by Linux.

    --

    _____

    Thank you.

    1. Re:Third world market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, may have caught on.

      Considering the fact that Office 2003 shipped in more than 120 languages, my conclusion is that you may have walked out of your mom's bedroom and saw the real world.

      Microsoft has always supported localization and internationalization of its products. In each country they sell, they prefer to set up a local authority or hire a contractor capable of doing an outstanding job in translating the entire OS/office suite/spellchecker/grammar packages.

  25. Mailing list by chris_mahan · · Score: 3, Insightful

    1) build a mailing list using good intentions.

    2) Send list to BSA's foreign equivalents

    3) Profit!!!

    Remember, Microsoft is a for-profit corporation. They do NOTHING without a profit-derived motive. If they do, the Board is not doing its job.

    --

    "Piter, too, is dead."

    1. Re:Mailing list by bckrispi · · Score: 2, Informative
      Remember, Microsoft is a for-profit corporation. They do NOTHING without a profit-derived motive.

      Emerging 3rd world countries using refurbed hardware has been a huuuge market for Linux in the past two years. It could profit M$ greatly just to slow this adoptation down.

      --
      Xenon, where's my money? -Borno
    2. Re:Mailing list by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      a huuuge market

      Do you fucktard have some special definition of a market we're not aware of? Since I didn't notice anyone making money in the process.

      And FYI, emerging 3rd world countries are the biggest in Windows piracy foremost. Any idea why would that be?

  26. i worked in a charity, we just warezed windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    in the u.k. we didnt worry about it.
    i think its safe to say developing countries will warez windows if they want it, and not bat an eyelid about the licence.

  27. Re:Ready pitchforks! - Hem by NanoGator · · Score: 2, Funny

    "And this is modded "insightful" ? Well, I don't know what's worse, to claim everything Microsoft does is evil, or to judge people before they even say anything ;-)"

    Heh, don't blame me, I was aiming for 'funny'.

    --
    "Derp de derp."
  28. We do this already - with Linux by timelady · · Score: 4, Interesting

    ItShare SA, Computer Angels, and Computerbank Australia, are related groups in Australia doing this already - but with Linux. We provide safer systems accordingly, without the need for third party software to be paid for - such as Open Office etc. Having a donated Windows box is all well and good (Now, I don't actually think its that good..;) ), but what about the unsupported nature of Win98, the virus and other security issues, and the need to pay for third party software (unless someone points them towards OO, and other FOSS for Windows...).

    --
    Nothing - well thats something.
    1. Re:We do this already - with Linux by westlake · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Microsoft is currently developing a language pack for the Inuit population of the Canadian Arctic, roughly 20,000 native speakers. I think it's fair to ask how much localized free and open software is available in communities where programs like this would be the most useful. These systems are also likely to be much older than you expect. It may be a mistake to assume you're good to go in loading OpenOffice.org or any other contemporary program.

    2. Re:We do this already - with Linux by timelady · · Score: 3, Informative

      As one of our volunteers is doing, developing Tetun versions for East Timor....such developments are actually MUCH more likely in Linux. Computerbank Victoria is shipping Farsi boxes....I would suggest to you there would be more possibility of FOSS than commercial software for such limited 'customer base'....

      --
      Nothing - well thats something.
    3. Re:We do this already - with Linux by westlake · · Score: 1

      A quick check with Google suggests that Windows support for Farsi has been around at least since Word 6 and Win 3.1. Computerbank Victoria suggests as minimum specs for donation a Pentium class system, with 32 MB RAM and a 1 GB HDD. Windows 98 is much less demanding.

    4. Re:We do this already - with Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Linux (and that means all of KDE + openoffice) has support for Nowegian nynorsk and samisk. You'll never see that in Windows, ever...

  29. Fresh Start program in US schools by thf · · Score: 2, Informative

    Microsoft already allows schools to "re-install" Win 98 and 2000 (sp3) on donated, older computers in the US. One registers, gets install media from Microsoft, tracks use, etc.

    What does this do to the possible use of Linux in making older PCs useful in a school setting?

    1. Re:Fresh Start program in US schools by David+Hume · · Score: 1

      Microsoft already allows schools to "re-install" Win 98 and 2000 (sp3) on donated, older computers in the US. One registers, gets install media from Microsoft, tracks use, etc.


      The Microsoft Authorised Refurbishers (MAR) Programme FAQ addresses the distinction between the two programs:

      Q How does MAR compare to the Fresh Start for Donated Computers programme?

      A The Fresh Start for Donated Computers programme is part of the Microsoft Partners In Learning initiative. The programme is designed to remove the licensing barriers that prevent primary and secondary schools using donated computers. The programme covers Pentium II (or equivalent) and older computers.

      Primary and secondary schools have a choice about how they ensure donated PCs are legally licensed. If they wish to obtain media and carry out their own installation of Windows, they can use the Fresh Start for Donated Computers programme, which is free of charge. Alternatively, if they wish to work with a third party who can help with installation and testing of operating systems for donated PCs, they can work with a MAR who will not only refurbish donated PCs, but also install operating system software if required.

      Members of the MAR programme pay for participation in the scheme and some charge for the services they provide. However, this is still an extremely cost-effective way to obtain Windows licences for refurbished computers.

      Details of the Fresh Start for Donated Computers programme can be found at www.microsoft.com/education/freshstart
    2. Re:Fresh Start program in US schools by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What does this do to the possible use of Linux in making older PCs useful in a school setting?

      But from reading Slashdot I thought there were thousands of school workers and students desperately dying to get a Linux installed on their desktop, and in doing so, choosing Linux purely on technical matters, like ease of use, simplicity of installation, availability of educational software and games.

  30. It suddenly occurs to me by inode_buddha · · Score: 1

    that this will probably have a *much* better effect on their bottom line than any of their "openness" here in the US.

    --
    C|N>K
  31. Should make a nice tax deduction by Performer+Guy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Give away software save on you taxes. The key is to ensure that the software you give away doesn't impact your top line with the products you sell.... Hmm... windows 98 & 2K on refurbished systems, no danger there.

  32. What? Windows 98? by ajutla · · Score: 1

    Microsoft will provide Windows 98 to schools, charities and non-profit organizations? Dear God. Is that not just a horrible form of torture? What have non-profit organizations ever done to deserve having Windows 98 put on their computers? That's just too harsh.

  33. Already have a windows license? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Yeah, you're right. Donated PC's *SHOULD* come with the license to the (Microsoft, at least) OS that was installed on it. That's according to their EULA, at least.
    here's where reality kicks in

    Have you ever *SEEN* most "donated" PCs? You'll be lucky if they're even functioning, let alone coming with things like the Windows license, documentation, peripherals, etc. Take what you can get, if MS wants to make it easy for people to put legit versions of Windows on their computers... more power to them. It certainly isn't my favorite OS, but if people are going to install it (illegally) anyway, at least now they'll be able to do it legally.

    Some people are going to talk about how Free Software has been doing this for years; and they're right, it has. However if you're in a situation where you're fortunate to even have donated low-end computers, you're going to go with what your users know. And before you start in with the "thriving community of *nix users" etc...how many of those in the thriving community are willing to travel to some third world country to teach people how to use linux? I don't see the volunteers...

    1. Re:Already have a windows license? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if they cover my living expenses i'll do it. could be an interesting trip (as long as i dont get lynched or something, stupid americans and all that rot)

    2. Re:Already have a windows license? by advocate_one · · Score: 1
      .how many of those in the thriving community are willing to travel to some third world country to teach people how to use linux? I don't see the volunteers...

      I've got news for you... they already know how to install and use Linux. They don't need teaching. They've got plenty of local talent available.

      --
      Donald 'Duck' Dunn: We had a band powerful enough to turn goat piss into gasoline.
    3. Re:Already have a windows license? by jrumney · · Score: 1
      However if you're in a situation where you're fortunate to even have donated low-end computers, you're going to go with what your users know.

      If you're in a situation where you're unfortunate enough to have to rely on donated low-end computers, then your users are going to be a blank slate. Or are underpriveldged children born with an inate ability to use Windows these days?

    4. Re:Already have a windows license? by paxmark1 · · Score: 1

      Canada, very multicultural non profit residential setting. yeah, got in a whole bunch of P-Pro Seanix with 32 to 64 mb ram, 2.5 gb hdd. Little bit small on hdd for a modern Linux distro. The Kenyans, Chileans, the Germans, the Brits, all but one prefer Win 98 to Mandrake 9.2 on my p-4 2.4 ghz. 5 of 6 houses standardized on Win98. BUT - ha, I did load Open Office on all of them - so they are seeing a little bit of open software. Opera also installed - some are starting to like it better than IE. one just does ones best - but it is going to be a long haul for BSD/Linux domination in North America.

    5. Re:Already have a windows license? by whoami-ky · · Score: 1

      Volunteer #1 right here... You line up the funding, and I'll go.

      --
      See my blog at Who's Who
  34. *clap* *clap* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    *looks around feverishly*

    isn't this a good_hearted_move(TM) by M$?

  35. Grr by 5lash · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This is mean. I'd imagine microsofts intention is to install windows 98 for free/cheap, then flood the client with adverts and reasons why they need to pay $100 to upgrade to Windows XP.

  36. The tax man giveth, M$ taketh away by imgumbydamnit · · Score: 1

    So now M$ benfits from the charitable acts of less rapacious companies. It would have made sense for them to charge no fee and take a tax writeoff of their own (for what exactly?), BUT NOOOO!

    My other sig is in Aruba.

    --
    To err is human. To arr is pirate.
  37. Haha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let's see how the slashbots manage to spin this charitable act into another "Evil M$!!!!" ploy.

  38. FAQ and Fees by David+Hume · · Score: 4, Informative

    so you'll essentially pay for the license for a computer that already most probably had a license!


    The Microsoft Authorised Refurbishers (MAR) Programme FAQ addresses this issue:

    Q Why is a programme required? Why can't the original owner donate the licence?

    A Typically, the original owner of a computer no longer has the original media and documentation when donating a computer some years after its original purchase. In accordance with Microsoft licensing rules, this original media and documentation would be required for the licence to be donated.


    As for the "adminstrative fee," the FAQ explains:

    Q Is there a charge to become a MAR?

    A No charge is made to join the programme but an administrative fee is charged to cover the management and supply of materials for the programme for each computer MARs wish to refurbish and reinstall a licence on. The fee is US$5.00 per computer.

    Q Are there any other charges to participate in the programme?

    A No - the only charge is the administrative fee of US$5.00 per licence.


    To answer other questions, people may want to check out:

    Microsoft Authorised Refurbishers Programme.

    1. Re:FAQ and Fees by pommiekiwifruit · · Score: 1
      Typically, the original owner of a computer no longer has the original media and documentation

      What is this mythical media and documentation? Are we talking windows 3.1 here, which came on actual discs with actual paper? These days PCs seem to just come with a harddrive loaded with stuff, and one I bought from a major retailer didn't even admit who made the hardware (the manual just said (c) 2001 without saying who it was (c) to!).

    2. Re:FAQ and Fees by Halfbaked+Plan · · Score: 1

      Microsoft can be real pricks about what is required to transfer their software.

      I wanted to sell my copy of Office 2000 on eBay recently. It's the early edition of O2K from before there was even an 'activation' requirement. I have the CD, the jewel case, and the jewel case has the original CD key on it.

      I got an email from one of Microsoft's eBay spies warning me that since I wasn't including the manual, the box, etc. that I couldn't resell the CD on eBay.

      Now, I've seen countless instances where people have gotten away with such sales, usually of older versions. In fact, I bought Microsoft Office 4 for Macintosh that way on eBay. But Microsoft knows that O2K is still a 'cash cow' for them and they go to considerable effort to make sure (even to the point of employing people to crack down on individual sales of single copies) that nobody is reselling their software.

      --
      resigned
    3. Re:FAQ and Fees by kisielk · · Score: 3, Informative

      I had an eBay auction for Visual Studio .Net Student Edition in its original shrink-wrapped package including everything. Microsoft had my auction shut down because apparently it was against the EULA to resell it. However, I'd never even opened the box nor installed the software, so I don't see how the EULA would even apply to me since I was never a "user" of the software and never agreed to their damn license. I guess eBay just does whatever Microsoft says to avoid any kind of trouble from the m..

    4. Re:FAQ and Fees by Halfbaked+Plan · · Score: 1

      I bought what I thought was a retail-box version of MASM (Microsoft's Macro Assembler). It's the last version they ever sold of that product, so it's relatively 'current.' I bought it on eBay and paid a fairly stiff price for it.

      Now, I've decided that I don't need it anymore. I found a textbook that has the same version of MASM on a CD-ROM, and I found a place to download all the user and reference manuals as PDF files. So I decided to relist it and try to recoup my losses on eBay (would make sense, since the reason I paid so much for it there was that people bid against me so there is a market for something as arcane as MASM.) Almost immediately after I listed it someone (whose bidding history shows that they buy and resell Microsoft and Borland development tools cheap on eBay preusmably for resale) asked me for details about it. I looked on the part number, and yes, there was an AE in it, indicating it's an Academic Edition. So I delisted it.

      Effectively, you can get away with selling Microsoft products on eBay without them having 'clean' credentials, but you take a risk when doing so. And you take a risk when buying such software on eBay that you're buying something that you'll not be able to sell back.

      But I am a boxed-software collector, so I've just put the MASM box and manuals and stuff up on the shelf. It's not as old as the IBM BASIC Compiler 1.0, PC-DOS 1.0, Windows 1.03, and DR-DOS/GEM boxes that I have in intact condition, but it's part of 'the collection' (sigh).

      --
      resigned
  39. Insightful? by DukeyToo · · Score: 1

    Parent is insightful? Where are my mod points when I need them!? At best, its funny. At worst, a troll. Argh!

    --
    Most writers regard truth as their most valuable possession, and therefore are most economical in its use - Mark Twain
    1. Re:Insightful? by frovingslosh · · Score: 1

      Perhaps it's a good thing you don't habve mod points at the moment; mod points are not intended for you to just mod down things you don't agree with. When you don't agree post back your point of view (and don't just call someone a troll; explain why). Personally, I resent over 50% of my modest income going to taxes: Federal Income tax, social security and "unemployment" tax, state income tax, property tax, sales tax, and a few others. I resent even more when non-government groups add extra cost to my utility bills and items I buy to give free telco services to "special" groups, or breaks on power to "special" groups because power costs are so high, or free or discounted drugs to other countries (even Canada - when we in the U.S. usually funded most of that research that led to the drugs through our taxes!) or any of a number of other "special" price breaks that in reality just discriminate against the average working guy. And now to see a company that has been convicted in Federal Courts of abusing it's monopoly power but suffered no real penality continue to abuse it's monopoly power by spendig money (the media and Certificate of Authenticity might be small in cost but are not free) this way to fight Linux in the "developing world" while the same benefit is denied to the people who the monopoly victimized in the first place is really disgusting.

      --
      I'm an American. I love this country and the freedoms that we used to have.
  40. Spammer's heaven by Querty · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Just what we need, the entire third world running unsupported Microsoft OS'es. I thought Microsoft wanted to stop spam, not encourage it...

    Anyone going online using one of these computers in a year or so will find out the hard way what the term "HaX0red" means.

    1. Re:Spammer's heaven by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and doesn't play right into their hands for support of their damned Palladium scheme?

      Don't you realize that Microsoft doesn't give a damn about the spam in your inbox? Quite the opposite; the more spam there is, the more outcry there is for a solution to it. So Microsoft gets paid for creating the problem AND they get paid for the solution AND they get paid forever by locking everyone else out!

    2. Re:Spammer's heaven by Lennie · · Score: 1

      Then they can get a new donated PC and buy a new (supported) Windows, that's what they care about.

      Money.

      --
      New things are always on the horizon
  41. Windows Update by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Who's going to do windows update on these? These PC's will be one big DDOS launcher and spam host for all the spammers and kiddies out there. There are three upcoming remote vulnerabilites in windows 2000 according to Eeye's upcoming vuln. page.

    http://www.eeye.com/html/Research/Upcoming/index .h tml

    I dont think these will be patched any time soon.

    1. Re:Windows Update by surgeonsmate · · Score: 1
      These PC's will be one big DDOS launcher and spam host for all the spammers and kiddies out there.

      Yeah. The Third World is hooked up to the Internet big time.

  42. newer? by Tango42 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    From the article:

    "Computers donated by large companies are typically three years old and the MAR program upgrades the software to newer versions of Windows that donated PCs can support, for a nominal charge that covers materials and program operations.

    Through the EMEA MAR program, Microsoft will provide re-installation of Windows 98 Second Edition and Windows 2000 Professional in over 18 languages."

    Since when would installing 98SE onto a 3 year old machine be a newer OS?

    1. Re:newer? by eclectro · · Score: 1

      Since when would installing 98SE onto a 3 year old machine be a newer OS?

      As hard as it is to believe, their are a lot of machines that are three years (or more likely older) that have plain Windows 98(not Se), Windows 95 or Windows 3.1 installed on them.

      I see them at the thrift store often (like a pentium 166).

      You can put Windows 98Se on these machines and it would be a "newer" OS.

      Granted, some of the 486/386/286 can't run Windows 98 (as they have only 4 meg of RAM - 286 is only a dos machine).

      But the number that can is significant. It's rare to see a 286/386 these days, as most of them have reached the landfill (in my area at least).

      Some charities also refuse to take donations of 286/386 (and often other hardware - like dot matrix printers), as they languish on the shelf unsold, take up space, and they end up having to pay for their disposal.

      --
      Take the cheese to sickbay, the doctor should see it as soon as possible - B'Elanna Torres, "Learning Curve"
    2. Re:newer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      486/386/286 can't run Windows 98

      Don't forget that Win98 was the last MS OS to include a full version of DOS, which makes it somewhat useful for old 86/286/386 machines.

    3. Re:newer? by Spoing · · Score: 1

      The PCs were 3 years old and had earlier versions of Windows on them. A Pentium 166 was 'new' 8 years ago in 1996, not 3 years ago in 2001. The OS typically used on the boxes 3 years ago was Windows 98 though Windows 98 was being discontinuted at the time and Windows ME was being forced on (only old copies of Win98 could be bought if available).

      --
      A firewall can not protect you from yourself. Turn off what you do not need. Do not use the firewall to do your work.
  43. I prefer... by flacco · · Score: 1

    ...the "Go Fuck Yourself, Microsoft - I'm Installing Linux!" license. not only are the terms far better than MS's EULA, it's also more fun to say.

    --
    pr0n - keeping monitor glass spotless since 1981.
    1. Re:I prefer... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Wow, thanks for sharing. That's why I come to Bashdork, to read up on the insightful commentary of the open source community.

      Thanks ever so much.

    2. Re:I prefer... by acceleriter · · Score: 1

      So who is more pathetic, the poster? Or you who has nothing better to do but make a meta comment about what you believe to be so insipid?

      --

      CEE5210S The signal SIGHUP was received.

  44. DOS central by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    Some these machines may end up being connected to the net, at which point they will almost immediately be infected with a worm or turned into a DDOS or spam hosting zombie box.

    I'm guessing M$FT doesnt care.

  45. My First Thoughts... by Necromancyr · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Sadly, my first thoughts on this weren't "Oh that's a good thing...", it was "What's the catch?"

  46. So why is it illegal to install an OS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can see that it might be considered illegal to COPY an OS, but installing? I didn't realize that I had to be an "authorized installer"

  47. Pre-Used? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    ...authorized to re-install its Windows operating system in donated pre-used PCs...

    Doesn't this mean BEFORE they have been used? Pre-Used?

  48. With cheap upgrade to Win XP by Kozar_The_Malignant · · Score: 1

    I am sure that Tou Doua's Quality Discount Software and Authorized Microsoft Refurbishing Agency will be able to provide an easy upgrade to Windows XP Professional for the equivalent of $2.98 US and will include Office 2003 for an additional $1.50.

    --
    Some mornings it's hardly worth chewing through the restraints to get out of bed.
  49. Read the article! by bartwol · · Score: 1
    There's a big difference between the cost of a Microsoft *license* and this program which " runs on a cost-recovery basis in which refurbishers pay a small administrative fee for license materials and MAR program operations. Any surplus funds generated will be placed in a Digital Inclusion Fund to be used in (a) support of refurbishment activities and projects in the EMEA region and (b) support of community projects in the EMEA region."

    Also note that "program Fresh Start for PCs provides Microsoft software installation CDs and license at no cost to primary and secondary schools utilising donated computers."

    <bart

  50. MS not 1337 by awkScooby · · Score: 1

    They're only 133. Says so right in the article.

  51. Jesus Fucking Christ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's a Friday afternoon, and a quick scan reveals there are no good trolls in sight. Come on people, it's time to get with the program...

    I am very, very disappointed with the Slashdot trolls' performance and it will be noted on your review.

  52. they won't install or run by zogger · · Score: 3, Interesting

    not easily anyway, not any modern distro with a windowing desktop that a non guru can install and operate. Not on them old 16 meg ram machines they won't. 95 will though, and will work perfectly fine, it will surf, email whatever, type a report,etc. I have this problem all the time the olden antiques I refurb and give away, I haven't found a linux equivalent that will do all this with a GUI on these pent 1s.

    I still have my old mac 512k. This has a nice GUI that ran off a dang undersized floppy, and I think if I recall it has one meg of RAM, something small like that anyway. Maybe it even has only half a meg, hence the name, I disremember now, but it ain't much, but IT WORKED.

    What is it, why can't we (I mean linux) have something that will even come close now without requiring at least 128 megs? Is it just technically impossible because of the way a unix like system is designed? I find even 64megs RAM to be the bare-ly minimum for anything at all practically speaking, and even then it's a kludgy buggy slow exasperating experience. And no, I don't mean installing a CLI only thing, or having to hand carve your desktop windowing gui-like thing out of rocks and old sticks and spending half your spare time keeping it running muttering incantantions and entering runeish commands from a terminal, I mean a slide in a CD and install it and it works thing. Nothing fancy,it don't got to be real fast, just a GUI and a few normal apps.

    MS is smart in this case, even with piracy over there as a norm, it costs them almost nothing, and we're talking about a still mostly untapped market of hundreds of millions of people, over a billion easy really. Hearts and minds.....

    1. Re:they won't install or run by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      What are you talking about?

      I'm typing this on a P-133, with a whopping 48MB of RAM (but a buttlaod of swap space), running current Debian testing, kernel 2.4.25, with full on KDE, and mozilla firefox, plus it's doing the routing for my home office.

      Yeah, it's not the quickest thing, but you know what? It works. OO.org is a drag on it, but it drags on even "modern" equipment, can't hardly complain.

    2. Re:they won't install or run by jrumney · · Score: 1

      Ditch Gnome and KDE, and run WindowMaker. I used to run that on a P100 laptop with 32Mb of RAM and it flew compared with W95. Upgrading to 72Mb sped things up a lot though, both in W95 and WindowMaker.

    3. Re:they won't install or run by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I'm typing this on a P-133, with a whopping 48MB of RAM (but a buttlaod of swap space), running current Debian testing, kernel 2.4.25, with full on KDE, and mozilla firefox, plus it's doing the routing for my home office. Yeah, it's not the quickest thing, but you know what? It works. OO.org is a drag on it, but it drags on even "modern" equipment, can't hardly complain.

      Not the quickest thing?
      That's an understatement.

      Yes you can run KDE and FireFox on a P133, but it's so incredibly slow who would want to? Windows 98, on the other hand, runs at a good clip on that hardware.

    4. Re:they won't install or run by Halfbaked+Plan · · Score: 1

      Back in the day I ran Linux and X on my 486DX-33 with 16 megs of RAM. It ran pretty nicely. Probably better, since it had a lot more apps, than your Mac 512K did.

      At the time, a 486 with 16 megs of RAM was the NORM, and many, many people ran Linux, with X, on such machines.

      Pointing back to your Mac with 512K is a little ridiculous and irrelevant, to be honest.

      --
      resigned
    5. Re:they won't install or run by eclectro · · Score: 1

      What is it, why can't we (I mean linux) have something that will even come close now without requiring at least 128 megs?

      If linux (and free software advocates) wanted to really take over the world, they would ask themselves this question heartfully. And then find an easy (no command line but gui) solution for all these older machines. And something that doesn't thrash the entire 200 meg harddrive with swap space either.

      It would be hard to do, and a lot less fun and glamorous than the MP3 player your working on, but it could be done.

      --
      Take the cheese to sickbay, the doctor should see it as soon as possible - B'Elanna Torres, "Learning Curve"
    6. Re:they won't install or run by EvilAlien · · Score: 1

      Blackbox and Fluxbox are my favorite lightweight window managers. I've tinkered with Windowmaker in the same context for what feels like forever, but now I find myself always going back to Blackbox. As a note, I also find that Enlightenment (with the appropriate feature tweaks to increase performance) works well on a relatively low power box.

      --
      perl -e 'print $i=pack(c5, (41*2), sqrt(7056), (unpack(c,H)-2), oct(115), 10)'
    7. Re:they won't install or run by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think most later 486 machines shipped with 4MB standard -- you would only get 16MB if you were running OS/2 or Linux or something, but there was little point for DOS/Windows.

      And I imagine that old Macs did have a better selection of productivity apps than your Linux setup -- Word 5 and Excel 2 ran great on my 1MB Mac SE and are really aren't missing that many features compared to modern versions. OTOH, Linux had Mosaic/Netscape.

    8. Re:they won't install or run by zogger · · Score: 1

      that's nice, back in the day. Was it a full GUI like I asked, does it install from a CD, what's it's name, is it still there, does it rerquire a ton of command line to get it installed?

      I think people are missing what I am asking, here is a linux enthusiast-me-asking for simple pointer to a distro that will easily install and run a full GUI on a low speed pent 1 and with 16 megs ram, and that I can turn loose to the end user to use without becomg full time cental fix it command, because I can not do that. I'm not trying to insult anyone, just looking for a win 95 equivalent, something just as good, a similar experience. win 95 you stick in the cd, click a few things it's in there. Show me the distro that does that now on a pent 1 at 90 or 100 mghz with 16 ram and I will BUY it as soon as the mailman leaves tomorrow. IF that exists now, give me the URL for it. I do NOT care about personal examples of leetness from yesteryear. I pointed out my mac experience because it was a full gui from 1985 that ran ON A FLOPPY DISK OF 400K. That was my first box I owned, but I had used others before. I was using it as an example, not to claim leethood, I do not have any sort of typing commands unix or windows background, I tried dos for awhile and hated it with a passion, discovere a GUI on mac and use them for years. So WHAT.. I DO use linux now, but I WOULDN'T if I hadn't been given a copy and my machine had had less than the minimum amount of ram, lucky for me I got it to install or I would have tossed it in the trash. And that was 64 megs, I've tried since then, many, many times, I can't make any of the distros I've tried install on these low end machines with GUI. Sorry I ain't leet! I was wondering why we don't have a decent example now that can do what windows, mac, and probably many others (amiga?) could do 15 years ago. It's a VALID observation,a question, and I don't need to take a shred of abuse overit, because it's true.

      Excuse me, I am taking time off pushing linux to other folks now, thanks for your wonderful encouragement.

      Hey,you BSD guys! Any of you folks got a distro will do what I want, given my exact specs? Let me know,BECAUSE I'LL FOR DANG SURE SWITCH. I'm getting tired of LEET.

      Someplace I'll find a distro or OS home where folks can get helped and welcomed, not put down for non-leethood, or ignored like what happens on those IRC channels. Screw this crap.

    9. Re:they won't install or run by smithwis · · Score: 1
      Please don't judge all of the linux community based on a few bad apples.

      Having never owned a PC until my current one(800mhz PIII) I can't tell you authoritatively how well any of these linux distribution work. However, the following distros are supposed to work well on your target systems:
      • Peanut Linux sounds pretty good
      • Damn Small Linux
        This is a live linux distribution which means that it runs off the CD. It's supposed to be a little difficult to install try following these directions:
        To install Damn Small Linux to the HD...
        From the damn small desktop (no pun intended) ...
        Ctrl-Alt-F1 to get to SU root outside X.
        Type "dsl-hdinstall" (a mod off Knoppix's knx-hdinstall)...
        Follow the prompts... (cfdisk, etc.......)
        I've done it & tested it -- works. --bosspacman
      • Basic Linux might work but it might be difficult if you don't know linux very well.
      • I hear RedHat's 6.0 distro is light weight too if you can find it.
      You friendly googler;
      --Steve
    10. Re:they won't install or run by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think people are missing what I am asking

      I'm not surprised. Your English, or at least your writing style, could use some improvement.

    11. Re:they won't install or run by shadowbearer · · Score: 1

      Be nice to zogger. I've been following his posts off and on for around a year and I don't think that English is his native language. He has a lot to say. He's definitely not an asshole - just frustrated and doesn't have access to the kind of resources a lot of us do. Flaming him (however mildly) for his english is not constructive, eh?

      SB

      --
      It's old. The more humans I meet, the more I like my cats. At least they are honest.
    12. Re:they won't install or run by zogger · · Score: 1

      hahahaha! Oh man, I r embarrassed. I'm a murkin, sure enough. I just type slang, and do stream of consciousness writing style. I admit freely it's quite unique and ...strange. People don't forget it though...

      pretty funny, I'm still laughing.. aww geez... that's hysterical.

      Hey, it gives me an excuse now though! I just need to come up with a fictious country that sounds good enough to maybe be real, I'll claim I'm from there.. that's the ticket, ya!

    13. Re:they won't install or run by shadowbearer · · Score: 1


      Being a Geek of All Trades often results in in confusion among other people trying to deal with you :) does it not?

      But hey;

      Shadowbearer:#3247, Level 12, Docking Bay Arm, Asimov Solar Transfer Station (L5)

      SB
      PS: Seriously, I do remember you for your writing style. I also know that you've had a lot to say, and it's not bullshitting, just direct brain dumps. Nothing wrong with that...I do the same thing, I just have a grammar asshole between my brain and my fingers :)

      --
      It's old. The more humans I meet, the more I like my cats. At least they are honest.
    14. Re:they won't install or run by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 1
      What is it, why can't we (I mean linux) have something that will even come close now without requiring at least 128 megs? Is it just technically impossible because of the way a unix like system is designed?
      It is quite possible. 25 years ago, I was running Uniflex on a 168K bytes 6809 box with two 1.5 megs 8 inch floppies. This Unix clone could support up to 4 simultaneous users on terminals (the box had 4 serial ports). I still have the wired-wrap box in a closet somewhere.
  53. Don't ya see what's really occurring here? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    MS most likely had a bunch of CDs laying around costing money in storage. Also, don't have to pay tax on dontated software, in fact can now claim it as a tax credit for donating software. Microsoft will make money on this, one way or another.

  54. Software "charity" by misleb · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Ah, I love it when software makers give away software and call it charity as if it were a real sacrafice or loss.

    "Hmm, we have all this 'product' that costs practially nothing to reproduce once it has already been developed. And we also have a bunch of poor people threatening to move to Linux.... hmmm. I know! Lets give away old versions of our software to indoctrinate these poor people and make them dependant on us! Yay!"

    Wake me up when Ford starts giving away F150's to African farmers.

    -matthew

    --
    "THERE IS NO JUSTICE, THERE IS ONLY ME." -Death
    1. Re:Software "charity" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But from reading Slashdot I thought that anyone choosing between free copy of Windows and free copy of Linux would choose Linux.

      Ease of use and functionality, you know.

      Could it be that in free markets with the cost of the OS rouchgly equal to the cost of stamping CDs the customers still choose Windows? Why would that be?

    2. Re:Software "charity" by DoctorRad · · Score: 1
      Ah, I love it when software makers give away software and call it charity as if it were a real sacrafice or loss.

      At least they're not making complete fools of themselves by trying to enforce licensing in the places where these PCs will end up...

      Matt...

  55. Re:Ready pitchforks! - Hem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It came up as , though.

  56. this should be from a different dept. by fliptout · · Score: 1

    The "You've got to be kidding me" dept

    --
    A witty saying proves you are wittier than the next guy.
  57. Microsoft and Security by awkScooby · · Score: 1

    Microsoft recently said something along the lines of the security problem being partly due to many users being unwilling to [shell out money to] upgrade to the newest version of their OS. So which is it? Is Microsoft for security or against it? I'm confused.

  58. Stop bashing Microsoft! by seekr_hidr · · Score: 1, Flamebait
    Stop bashing Microsoft for once! I really can't stand it anymore! No matter what Microsoft does, either good or bad, it's always evil in the eye of some people here in Slashdot!

    If you read the article carefully, it says:

    Microsoft will provide re-installation of Windows 98 Second Edition and Windows 2000 Professional in over 18 languages.

    What Microsoft is doing is that they are giving away software. It really is charity, not a scam like some people say!

    Think about it, if a company from the US donates a computer with a Windows 2000 license to some foreign country, most likely the license will be for the English version of Windows 2000.

    As anyone who has ever worked for a company using different language of Windows knows, a license for the English version of Windows does not equal a license for Windows in another language!!! This is not only true for Microsoft software, but also true for many companies that sell software in different languages!

    That said, Microsoft is really giving away a new license, and not asking to be paid twice for the same license that came with the original purchase of the computer!

    1. Re:Stop bashing Microsoft! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That said, Microsoft is really giving away a new license, and not asking to be paid twice for the same license that came with the original purchase of the computer!

      Don't you mean, not asking to be paid twice any more?

      Also, I'm sure Microsoft will get to claim these "donated" licenses of obsolete software at their full retail value they carried when Win98 and Win2K were brand new. Not to mention giving their old shit away means the charities won't have to turn to Linux to run on the ancient hardware they have to work with.

      Moral: Microsoft never, ever, ever does anything just to be nice. Always look for the "what's in it for them?" angle.

    2. Re:Stop bashing Microsoft! by acceleriter · · Score: 2, Interesting

      They're not giving away a damned thing. Due to their monopoly, the vast majority of machines already came with a license that was paid for once.

      --

      CEE5210S The signal SIGHUP was received.

    3. Re:Stop bashing Microsoft! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I think most of those that bash MS on /., would agree that they would not bash MS if MS themselves would not use FUD and bashing techniques against other operating systems. If MS flings mud, so shall we.

    4. Re:Stop bashing Microsoft! by adelayde · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Man haven't you got it yet? We bash Micro$oft because THEY ARE EVIL INCARNATE. They are Beelzebub my friend and they couldn't give a shit about you, me or anyone else in this world. More money for the man is all they're interested in.

      This is NOT charity it's MANIPULATION. They are using their position to close up a little hole in the market called "using Open Source alternatives becuase you can't get legitimate Window$ licences", that is all. They could have done this years ago, but they didn't and they never would if it wasn't for the threat of Linux and *BSD.

      Think about it. As an example, I've been involved in a community project to give low-income people computers so they can learn a bit about the Internet and IT and perhaps gain some higher-paid skills or just use their minds a bit more than having them jellified by that other great evil the television. Anyway, we get donations given to us by universities, companies and other organisations, with their discs wiped (or to be wiped) to comply with data protection laws. The Window$ licences aren't transferrable and therefore we use Debian on them all. Some of them need to write in Hindu, some in Arabic and a plethora of other languages. All this is achievable BECUASE we use Linux and it doesn't cost us a penny, except our time, which we are willing to give up.

      Now the problem for Micro$oft is that these people then get to learn about computing by using Linux - imagine that eh? leaning about computing using an OS that isn't Micro$haft's - hasn't happened for years that. This is dangerous for them and it's all about potential or future markets and consumers, just the same as giving cheap software to schools is - hook them young, get them drinking Coke, wearing Levis, eating Big Mac$ using M$, they'll never know any different and they'll never leave you.

      On your point about languages, it's got absolutely nothing to do with being NICE enough to give versions in different languages, it's because Linux is available in around 60 and non-English speakers will NOT ACCEPT anything else - it pisses me off enough if I don't have a spell-checker that understands British English.

      Stop bashing Micro$haft you say?? I won't, I've been bashing them for 15 years now and I'll continue to do so until they are relegated to the history books as one of those bad periods in our history, like the Third Reich, the Crusades, the Bubonic Plague .....

      Upgrade Your Life at www.computertorture.com

  59. i can see what is going to happen... by narkotix · · Score: 2, Funny
    Warlord fighter: Chief momotoobo, representative from microsoft mr gates here to claim moneys owed to him for windows on our computers.

    Chief: what the fonoono?

    2 weeks later on cnn: Bill gates dead! Parts of him were found around a bunch of lions, weeks after he went on a mission to africa to sell refurbished licenses for software installed on african computers.

    seriously tho, how the fuck does microsoft think they are going to sell windows in african countries when ever bigger oil/mining companies shit themselves to have bases there because of the locals being treated like crap and uprising once in a while!

    --
    We played dungeons and dragons for 3 hours.....then i was slain by an elf
  60. Only a matter of time.. by Magickcat · · Score: 2, Informative

    Microsoft can try to hedge every single bet from here on, and still I think it's only a matter of time before Linux beats them in every market.

    --

    Si tacuisses philosophus mansisses. If you had kept quiet, you would have remained a philosopher.

  61. Re:Jesus Effing Christ by Lershac · · Score: 0, Troll

    Hey man its like...GOOD FRIDAY how about a little respect!

    --
    Chuck
  62. Evil ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The fact that an organisation gives out anthrax is not turned into a good deed just because the recipients are charities.

  63. Uh Oh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A second Independent Thinker on Slashdot in just 7 days.

    Mods, please kill his user account. Reasons: cannot follow groupthink, would not agree that Microsoft==evil, would not spell company name with a dollar sign.

  64. MAR... the latest acronym by Supp0rtLinux · · Score: 1

    Is there any irony in the acronym made by the new "Microsoft Authorized Refurbisher"? I've always known that Windows mar's my computer, but how nice of M$ to admit it.

    Yeah, yeah... flamebait... troll... I know, I know, but the obviousness of the implied acronyn was just too much to pass up.

    The only thing necessary for Micro$oft to triumph is for a few good programmers to do nothing". North County Computers

  65. Re:What? Windows 98? by rsadelle · · Score: 1

    You clearly do not work for a non-profit. I am, at this very moment, in the building of a non-profit organization that has five out of eleven systems running Windows 95. I would love to have Windows 98 on those systems instead.

  66. Oh great, putting even MORE crap in schools... by Goeland86 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    that's just great! Not only does MS find a way to make more money, but they also find a way to make hackers and virus writers even more happy by putting ultra vulnerable systems back on the web... I mean, sorry, but this just doesn't sound like a good idea to use win 2000 now that the source code has leaked! Not to mention the ever-growing number of viruses that will infect these machines and create a non-protectable because obsolete "virus pit" of the internet... It's like keeping someone with chicken pox in a public place: most people are vaccinated, but the few that aren't risk death if they get the disease. Oh, and of course it's an attempt to keep the youth prefering windows.... Everytime I read slashdot I get more unneverd by MS's outrageous actions! This is against common sense!!! When will law start following common sense???? probably not until the next Wallstreet crash because of the stupidest lawsuit ever... (which I thought was going to be SCO/IBM but it's not going to be bad enough to make a change in the legal system necessary...)

    --
    ---- I am certain of only one thing : I know nothing else.
  67. Start bashing Microsoft! by Duhavid · · Score: 2, Informative

    Computers donated by large companies are typically three years old and the MAR program upgrades the software to newer versions of Windows that donated PCs can support, for a nominal charge that covers materials and program operations.

    Giving away? Doesnt look like it from here.

    --
    emt 377 emt 4
  68. Re:PIRATES! by Frizzle+Fry · · Score: 1
    I really think that piracy should make a come back. The ones on the high seas!

    It has. If you do some research (I'm too lazy to hunt for links for you), there are people now who basically pull up near a cargo ship in a small boat with a bazooka (or rocket launcher or whatever it is) and demand payment/ goods or they will sink the ship. Also, some guy who had competed in the America's Cup or some other sailing-type event was killed by pirates. Seriously. Piracy is like slavery in that most of think of it as just history, but it's still going on in parts of the world.
    --
    I'd rather be lucky than good.
  69. Just another ploy to undermine Linux+*BSD by adelayde · · Score: 2, Insightful

    They're doing this just to combat the use of Linux and *BSD etc, because they know that up until now they've never provided any of older copies of their OS free of charge for use in older machines because they are in CAHOOTS WITH INTEL AND OTHERS in the great and evil CULT OF THE UPGRADE.

    The ONLY reason they're doing this is to try to undermine what has become one of the key uses of Linux and *BSD, installing legally in refurbished, recycled machines. It's even more dispicable than that because it's no even the an action taken in the free market, it's normally for charitable reasons that machines are refurbished, so they are doing this just to flex their corporate muscles NOT for any alturistic reason.

    REMEBER. MICROSOFT IS NOT NICE, IT IS EVIL, THEY ARE GREEDY, SELFISH BASTARDS AND THAT IS ALL THERE IS TO IT. They run MSNBC, they give money to the Republicans. Don't trust them, wipe your hard drive of that horrible, despicable, evil virus that is their joke of an OS. FREE YOURSELF. Go on you know you can!

    Upgrade your life.

  70. VERY insightful ! by Teun · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Indeed, this must be the the main reason for M$ to come up with the plan.

    And every computer running their product is one less for the competition...

    A Eula restricting transfer of the use of the product is rather worthless in most (European) countries I know, in Africa and Asia most people and governements couldnt care less anyway.

    --
    "The likes of Facebook and WhatsApp are free to those whose privacy is of zero value."
    1. Re:VERY insightful ! by Halfbaked+Plan · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yes, but the computers in Africa and Asia had to be shipped there somehow, by somebody.

      I buy used computers at auction and resell them on eBay. I find deals like 80 Pentium II machines that I get by the skid for $40. If I, as an American, tried to refurbish those machines and donate them to an overseas charity, I would find myself in lots of trouble if I didn't ship them as bare machines. And shipping them as bare machines raises the likelihood that they'll end up as nothing, since I'm handing off systems that aren't going to do a single thing out-of-the-box, which makes it less likely anybody at the other end will have the know-how and resources to bring up an OS on them. So if there's a clear 'legitimate' path for the machines to get Windows installed on them for use overseas, and I can see to it that they're installed properly and ready-to-go, I am more likely to find it worthwhile to participate in such a program.

      --
      resigned
  71. Amazing... by afabbro · · Score: 1
    I submit a suggestion for an interview with the head of FreeGeek.org, a company that refurbishes PCs, puts Linux on them, gives them to needy families, and teches said families how to use Linux...

    2004-04-08 14:53:31 Interview with FreeGeek head Oso Martin (interviews,linuxbiz) (rejected)
    ...meanwhile, a Slashdot advertiser's story is accepted.
    --
    Advice: on VPS providers
  72. I refurbish computers by pair-a-noyd · · Score: 2, Insightful

    and I authorize myself to install Linux on them and erase windows as fast as humanly possible..

    http://www.systemrecycler.com

  73. Good move by microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From what I see, this is a good move by Microsoft. This is an untapped market while they spend no money on development and they make a profit at the same time.

  74. It's like being taxed twice by SocietyoftheFist · · Score: 2, Insightful

    50+ billion in the bank and they still can't modify a license to accomodate donating to charity. Sad really.

  75. What about Knoppix? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did you give them a demonstration of a LiveCD distro such as Knoppix? Quick, easy, and a real eye-opener for even the most ardent of MS-supporters.

    1. Re:What about Knoppix? by eclectro · · Score: 4, Interesting

      As the parent poster pointed out, many if not most people have made up their minds unconditionally that they want windows.

      And in a sense, you can't blame them. You walk into any department store and you see a wall of windows applications.

      Not linux apps.

      --
      Take the cheese to sickbay, the doctor should see it as soon as possible - B'Elanna Torres, "Learning Curve"
    2. Re:What about Knoppix? by dwave · · Score: 1

      I still see lots of clipper apps in stores and in restaurants. They seem to fit the needs in those places where they are still in use. No Windows, because they'd require up-to-date hardware. The chef of your favorite restaurant doesn't see why an upgrade would be necessary. And consultans go there to to spend money and not to talk him into something he doesn't need.

      Microsoft tries to be nice, because their image is taken more damage every day since last august when
      blaster/lovesan hit.
      Their software has a polished look and feel. Documentation of key features for the end-user is reasonable (it it's rotten when they have it translated, though). So even computer-illiterates can get their work done without ever opening the puny command shell.

      A stand-alone Windows computer is OK for users who can cope with a bluescreen every now and then. It just works and when it doesn't they try to click around a bit until it somehow works again in an esoterical way.
      Real problems start if they need networking. Then there are costs and downfalls that will make the giveaway a time and money consuming burden. See it as a sort of embedded device for gaming and text precessing: If this is all you want, then it's nice. If you want to do more - like, check your e-mail - then it's just not the right platform.

      Microsofts software has a broken implementation of networking and multi-user right-management. And it won't get better if they give their OS away precompiled and without sources for free/at low price. They'll have to make the sources available officialy. It's the only thing that will save Windows from extinction on the long term.

      Microsoft should provide their customers with free running shoes. Admins need it when maintaining a Windows-network.

    3. Re:What about Knoppix? by Brandybuck · · Score: 1

      So all those titles on that wall of Windows applications will work on that old 75MHz Pentium running Win98? Wow!

      --
      Don't blame me, I didn't vote for either of them!
    4. Re:What about Knoppix? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Windows applications are sold in stores?

    5. Re:What about Knoppix? by eclectro · · Score: 1

      Walmart.

      --
      Take the cheese to sickbay, the doctor should see it as soon as possible - B'Elanna Torres, "Learning Curve"
  76. Microsoft's Evil Will Kill Us All by pemulius · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Hello, I hate everything in the world. However, I bequeath my deepest hate towards Microsoft for their charitable deeds, because as with all entities that spawned from Satan's uterus (bet you didn't know Satan was a woman), every good deed comes with vile ulterior motive. I won't be surprised if most of the users declare Jihad on the world, after having exhausted their capacity to restart the computers on an absurdly frequent basis.

    So cheers to Microsoft for its relentless, evil ambitions. And remember, when the world is inevitably taken over by robots, the robots commiting the hate crimes will without a doubt be powered by the Longhorn OS.

  77. missed the target specs by zogger · · Score: 3, Interesting

    what am I talking about? What are YOU reading, and why is this difficult to understand? 48 megs of RAM, you are OVER the top by a factor of 3x as much RAM by my criteria. I have a lot of old pent 1s at 90 or 100 mghz with 16 megs of ram, and hunting down and getting after market RAM sticks is extremely cost prohibitive, and a lot of these older machines take very precise sticks. Extremely, even if you can find the crap. The best I have done is on a 166 mghz machine that had a single stick of 64 megs in it, I got both redhat and knoppix to (barely) run on it. I'm on a 200PP right now, and it works OK,I like it actually, *after* I bought another 64stick, and then another stick of 128 megs ram,now it works swell, before it had come with 32 and wouldn't run (or install) RH7.1, the first distro I owned and tried. I've got 7.1, 7.2, mandrake 8.0, RH 8.0, various knoppix and a morphix, and FC1 here, and around 128 seems to be the magic number in non-guru land, for me anyway.

    See the problem really is the ram, not the cpu speed, near as I can see, and a free or 5$ machine is not worth spending literally 60-70 dollars on just to try and track down some oddball RAM. I'd add another stick of 128 to my own machine, but they want 90$ for it!!!! Not happening. I've borked a few machines now using RAM that alleged gurus told me "would work in your machine".

    Now imagine you are joe third world, how hard it is going to be to get more RAM of the exact correct kind, or even maybe another hard drive that is large wenough to both install the system and have enough swap space. A lot of these machines only have like 600 meg hard drives. It's a pain in the tush to make anything but windows work on them. I don't even try, I mean after you've tried a dozen times, it gets old, and I'm not command line tweaking installing compiling all kinza crap for a freebie give away machine, I got other things to do.

    I'm not trying to say it can't be done, but I am merely asking for a pointer to a distro with any example where someone has a normal system running a full fledged easy to install and config GUI on 16 megs on a low end pent 1, and I ain't seen it yet. Every example I have seen requires a lot of command line, and when you get done you still have to comamand line some window like thing, then do this that and the otherand it's still not much of a GUI. No thanks. I'm not a guru, just someone who gives away old boxes to kids who's families are so poor they don't even own telephones (yes, this is USA I am talking about), and until I can find a linux equivalent, these boxes go out the door with 95 or 98 on them, because at least those will boot and run and install easy on 16 megs, you get a window system, etc, and I *wish* it weren't so, because I'd love to turn these kids onto linux.

    I repeat, it needs to run on 16 megs RAM, 32 at the most, be able to easily install from a cd without using a geek dictionary for acronyms and vague man commands that make little sense, and to be run almost 100% GUI after installation.

    And no matter WHAT I type, someone leeter than me who can't read is gonna retort they got foodows window like-experience desktopping manager running after tweaking the config sys/etc/stab yo momma file blather yada yada, etc, well, except for the video and audio and the drives don't seem to work and .......

    Nope

    I don't care about that, these are going to end users even lamer than I am. I am between aunt tillie and.. whatever, and if I can't install and run it, sure as heck the end users are gonna be frustrated within 5 minutes and borrow their cuzzin leroys copy of windows and install it anyway.

    I think it's better to just admit that X is a full bore no doubt about it gross resource hog, and not pretend it ain't. I'm not a coder and I don't know why, but it sure is or seems to be. I am not complaining, I appreciate all the work that has gone into it and the price is right, but I think my observations are *true facts*. If someone can point me to a Distro th

    1. Re:missed the target specs by OldJohnno · · Score: 0

      I ran a 32meg box for a couple of years using IceWm under Linux 2.2x/2.4x. Performance was quite acceptable, the IceWm GUI was familiar to anyone with Win9* experience and there were none of the stability or security headaches associated with Windows. I don't know why people say Linux won't run on slow machines; with lightweight graphical apps like IceWm, Sylpheed, Firefox, XWC etc. it runs just fine. The only time some patience is needed is when OO.org is started, but once it's up it runs well. There's more to graphical Linux than GNOME and KDE...

    2. Re:missed the target specs by shadowbearer · · Score: 3, Informative

      and getting after market RAM sticks is extremely cost prohibitive, and a lot of these older machines take very precise sticks

      God, Zogger... wish I'd known. I just sold a 8 lb box of 486/PI/II ram - a lot from prop machines like IBMs and gateways - on ebay. If I'd known you were looking I'd have just shipped it to you (didn't get enough money to pay for my time, only about fifty bucks)

      Hey, man, don't feel bad. Before I moved I had tons of old equipment around, and that's how I learned to do stuff. Think of it as an education - in frustration - which is often the best teacher *grin* but seriously, sometimes just doing install after install on various machines is the best way to learn it. I'm biased - that's how I did it - but hey :)

      That said, for a lot of older systems, you might try Damn Small Linux - which I use on my 486 laptop and which works quite well. It's a massively shrunken (50 mb image) version of Knoppix which is geared for min memory and cpu - and still has the hardware autodetect. Works pretty well (just doesn't update well, it's a mix of Debian stable, unstable and testing - so one has to be careful :) (see below)

      You don't need a CDrom, either - if you can get the 50mb image on the hard drive, even if it's in a DOS partition, you can boot it from a DSL boot floppy, or with tomsrblt you can boot it over NFS if the network card is supported (takes a little tweaking tho in some configs)

      DSL boots with fluxbox and a fb X and even on my 486 33mhz laptop is quite usable (I use the 486 to monitor the big machines from bed and surf slashdot occasionally :)

      DSL is also quite nice for doing chroot to a debian install without having to go thru the crap of loading floppies - read the howtos there (too long to get into in this post)

      BTW, none of the machines I've used DSL on have more than 16mb ram - more helps, but it's very usable without them, as long as you aren't using modern browsers (ram-hungry) or things like Open Office. To boot DSL requires only 8 mb ram if you're willing to deal with a lot of HD swap. Installation is easy - there's a script in the image that is really easy to run thru, all you need to know is what partition it needs to be on. Oh, and it pretty much installs and runs itself. Give it a try. I'd be interested in hearing your experiences (no, I'm not affiliated, I just think that Damn Small Linux rocks!)

      Hey, good luck, man - seriously. Don't have time to play like that anymore, and I kind of miss it. If you'd like some non-RTFM help, post back - and we'll figure out a contact. I can't promise FT replies but I'll damn sure help you out - I'd consider it payback for those who helped me learning this.

      Cheers!
      SB

      --
      It's old. The more humans I meet, the more I like my cats. At least they are honest.
    3. Re:missed the target specs by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 2, Informative

      Well, I can't point you to a specific distribution, but I would suggest mirroring MandrakeMove and building it from source for a little while. Why?

      WEll, it's easy to get, and it's a CD-bootable distribution, so you can *experiment*.

      I'd start with a 2.6 kernel, seriously. RAM being the biggest problem, what kind of video cards are we looking at? Make sure you can get the exact right drivers for those, and then you want to tone back the resolution and a few other things anyway. So go hack into your XF86Config file and make sure you're set to a lower resolution (800x600 at the most) and fewer colors (more than 256, but somewhere around 16bpp, or less). That'll get you a decent-looking desktop and cut down dramatically on your RAM requirements.

      Now google for "video card RAM linux swap" and learn how to configure your system to use your video card RAM for swap space. That should improve performance quite a bit since your computer won't have to swap to hard drive every time, it can swap across the PCI bus which is a lot faster.

      I can't think of any other easy way to bring down total memory usage. You do, of course, have to take a completely different approach to system services than you otherwise might take. You have to decide "which ones do I need to run and which ones can I live without/start on demand?". Every distribution, as far as I know, starts a bunch of services at boot time, and then they usually get swapped to hard disk until they're needed. Problem is, put your computer on a network and a number of those services will be constantly swapped in and out just from being polled on the network. SO eliminate every service you don't need.

      Now, the reason you mirrored the MandrakeMove source tree is so you could make the modifications there, build the distribution, test it, and so forth, and ultimately post a patch or something so that other people can use your low-RAM MandrakeMove. ;)

      --
      Like what I said? You might like my music
    4. Re:missed the target specs by krunk7 · · Score: 1
      I'm doing the same thing you are with impoverished kids. We run fedora on most of our donated PC's. No they don't meet your "minimum" requirements, but that's my main point. The headache involved with hardware that out of date isn't worth it.

      I don't think the kids I work with would have any harder of a time with a linux distro than with IRQ assignments on a buggy ass '95 or '98 install. 98 was a bad dream to most users only trumped my ME.


      The reason you can't find an adequate linux gui dating back that far is simple. It doesn't exist. The linux kernel was only a twinkle in a College Sophomore's eyes in 1991. And mostly intended for production, not desktop at thatpoint. X? it was an admins interface for the most part. Nothing else. What your asking is that current coders "back-port" to older hardware and that's not going to happen. If you want a desktop linux distro you have to be talking about recent distros since that animal for the most part did_not_exist_than. You might as well be complaining that 98 is sluggish on 1980 computers and asking for someone to point out a single Microsoft gui OS that runs on that hardware....not going to happen.



      Suggestion: dump the 50mhz computers, recycle them. Coordinate with your local Universities, businesses, and charities. Put adds in the paper in order to let the community know that that "old" pc in their closet could be worth a lot to a little kid. I think you'll find most of these will fall within the 200mhz+ range with 64mb of ram. That's my experience anyway. These machines most definately can run linux, if you so choose. Especially with a lightweight Desktop like XFCE4. My roommate uses XFCE4 and he's a complete computer illiterate.

  78. The bad news and the good news by foofoodog · · Score: 1

    The bad news about dinner. The cat dumped in our pot and it all taste like shit. The good news about dinner. There's plenty of it.

    --
    Can I bum a sig?
  79. Re:PIRATES! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That is fucking awesome!!!!!!

  80. tax advantages by pemulius · · Score: 2, Funny

    Here's a little something for the conspiracy theory majors: what if what they're doing provides them with handsome tax advantages.

    I'm lovin' it.

  81. but i thought... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    microsoft evil....

    can't breathe....

    aaaaarrrrrgggggggggggggg.....

  82. Volunteers DO go OS to teach.... by timelady · · Score: 1

    We have sent systems to East Timor, including a volunteer to teach a core group who can then provide support..so YES, it does happen

    --
    Nothing - well thats something.
  83. Viruses and Worms by ajayvb · · Score: 2, Insightful

    One of the more important points that has been raised here, which I find relevant is the problems of viruses and worms. A worm has a payload of a few KB at most, while the patches that are required are a few MB( if ever M$ puts them out).

    In Africa and poorer parts of Asia, phone lines still charge by the minute. Dial-up is still slower than 56 Kbps (I've worked on connections of 7-8 Kbps too, due to less bndwidth/more customers at the ISP, who is milking everyone for all his worth). Connections break and have to be re-established. What is the chance of a non-profit taking the effort to actually download and install the patches? Conversely, there is a high chance of it being infected. (I speak from experience in a small town in India, where I've sat up half the night to get my Windows 98 box upto speed on all patches). Of course, it would be too much to expect M$ to give away CDs of patches as well.

  84. Thank you miscroschroft. by Retep+Vosnul · · Score: 1

    Thank you Steve and Bill. Finally normal people can depend on one single company that just does not beat around the bush when it comes to ripping you off. person 1 : "In the past I could not count on companies ripping me off as they should, but with microsoft i know i'm paying triple the price for a crummy product, thank you MS !!" and another happy customer. person 2 : " I took some deals on IT and got just what I asked for. Now thats not right. But with this new Microsoft deal I can finally pay as many times for a piece of crap as I want to.. great deal people !." And now the sales dude . " YES, It's true. the product you never wanted comes at a premium price of 3000 times the value and 10 times the normal price. get one version of windows today and pay for it like you bought 10 copies. You can count on us not to rip you off". I really do not like them.. ( +5 for understatement of the year. retep.

    --
    -- forget /. It's gone.
  85. Win 2000 EOL by prandal · · Score: 1

    31st March 2005. Win ME expired on 31 Dec, 2003.

    See here for more details.

  86. Awesome Spin by GoatJuggler · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Wow, I wish I had their skills.

    Problem: People are using old computers to experiment with Linux, and aren't paying us enough money.
    Solution: Provide a seemingly philanthropic way for these people to donate their computers, and make them feel bad for selfishly hoarding computers that could otherwise be used for kids. Then, when this plan works, sell more addon licenses for products such as Office. When these refurbished Win98 and Win2000 machines propagate, scare the schools into buying new computers with WinXP by inundating them with stories of hackers and crackers.

    1. Re:Awesome Spin by surgeonsmate · · Score: 1
      Wow, I wish I had their skills.

      You obviously have a rich fantasy life. Ask yourself why Linux folk aren't funding something positive like this.

    2. Re:Awesome Spin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Because the "Linux folk" are busy giving people free software and expertise, and don't have any reason to provide "certified" (legally, not technically) reinstalls of software?

  87. Upgrading by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh, I guess that means that the PCs will need upgrading very soon then.
    With a bit of luck MS will be kind to remind the new owners.

    --
    Do as I - be yourself.

  88. Old news... by fataugie · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I for one, tried to submit a similar story...the details are exactly the same, except it was for k-12 schools, not other countries...but I'm sure its the same program. Check it out:

    Microsoft giving free licenses to K12 schools Monday February 23, @12:35PM Rejected

    --

    WTF? Over?

  89. my brother's company... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Switched from Win95 to XP last year. Machines they bought only a year ago were loaded with Win95.

    So it can be newer.

    1. Re:my brother's company... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      1. Switched from Win95 to XP last year. Machines they bought only a year ago were loaded with Win95.
      2. So it can be newer.

      I doubt it, unless they were using an old CD of Windows 95 on white box systems. Illegal, impractical, and silly.

  90. Re:still missing the target specs by zogger · · Score: 2, Insightful

    isn't what I am asking, but getting closer. Look back at it again. You said "linux 2.2, 2.4", but that doesn't tell me what distro it is. Linux is a kernel, there isn't a distro called "linux". Well, there is but it's a RH clone. Anyway, did you compile it,install from a command line in a terminal, have to tweak drivers and whatnot, or dids it install from a CD pretty easily? answer a few questions, click here, clcik there? See, I have to think about the end users/kids I give this to, if it gets screwed up, THEY got to be able to fix it if it's bad by re installing from a disk.

    See? I get responses, I appreciate it,but they haven't answered my questions. This winow manager is lightweight, this other one might work, etc, and such and such from the olden days, but yet no single answer, because I know why, it ain't been done, can't be done. And linux gurus wonder why man pages are hard for people to understand, regular old english can be hard to understand too.

    I ain't mad, I'm just giving up on this project, I will finish out giving away the boxes I have, with windows on them, and someone else can be the linux evangelist, I won't be doing it anymore, too frustrating. I'll use it personally, but I can't recommend it yet to other people with older machines, and if they buy new machines some OS or another will be on them. It was just something I thought I could do to help some poor kids from poor families. Screw it, thanks anyway for replying though, you and the other guys. Not answering anymore on this thread, I'm getting too frustrated. That less than half a dozen spec points are too hard to understand it seems. Sheesh.

    Which means that in the third world,which has the fastest growing population and is starved for computers, and is gonna get them,old and used first, but the ones that make the impression on them, that MS is gonna arrive on those machines and stay on 99% of those machines, too.

    I got no dog in this fight, but some ya'all who DO got a financial dog in the OS fight might want to think on that some... that's a lotta eyeballs and people out there who could use some help, roughly along the same lines I was outlining. I'll let *someone else* tell muhammed magooba josse whatever to CLI install the 2.xxx kernel, and to be sure to roll in the fluxbox then adjust the video raster on his monitor and freq and re compile the horiontal audio module, etc, cuz I sure as heck can't tell anyone over there that.

    MS is gonna slap a cd in their hands that they can click thru on ancient boxes and it will more or less work.

    Over one billion people, new markets, where most of the oil comes from,.and a lot of our food in the near future, and raw materials, etc, and most will be running on MS unless this is addressed, soon. I don't code, can't help there. Since I've first used it, it's got ridiculous, I am thinking about a personal "distro freeze" and stopping upgrading, because I can't afford a new machine right now, and last install I barely squeaked through with lots more ram than 16.

    Old PB still works though. for now. Jobs priced me right out of apple, no way could I get anything today from them. sigh. I feel third worlded in my own country, I'm being priced or bloat coded right out of computing, I can smell it coming.

    Sorry, I am just sad, that's all, this is like pulling teeth to get what I am asking and pointing out understood, it ain't worth it. "close enough" but still 2 or 3 times off in specs and size and speed and complexity of install and use combined with vagueness is only good for warfare with hand grenades in close situations, it isn't what I have been asking for or pointing out observationally.

    I do appreciate the reply though, thanks. I give up.

  91. Re:PIRATES! by Frizzle+Fry · · Score: 1
    Also, some guy who had competed in the America's Cup or some other sailing-type event was killed by pirates.

    I stopped being lazy and found a link. Apparently they were "river pirates".
    --
    I'd rather be lucky than good.
  92. Because by KalvinB · · Score: 1

    many of the companies/charities supplying the refurbs are based in the US or other countries which do care about copyright violations. A company based in such a country committing a crime in another country will be prosecuted in their home country.

    It'd be like Sony opening up shop somewhere to sell/give away pirated CDs of competing record companies. Sony would be taken to court in whatever country it's parent headquarters is in.

    If a charity has no ties to the US or any other nation that enforces copyright laws then they would be capable of not caring.

    If a charity is knowingly working with a company committing piracy it could bite them in the ass no matter if they do think of themselves as Robin Hood.

    Ben

  93. Linux taking over the world? by surgeonsmate · · Score: 1
    I guess its Microsoft's futile attempt to stop linux from taking over the world.

    Just quietly, but Microsoft seems to be winning that battle. Check out Google Zeitgeist - Linux's main competitor for user base is Windows 95, both on 1%. On these real world figures, Microsoft should be more scared of Macintosh.

  94. you got my points. Maybe the big guys will too... by zogger · · Score: 2, Insightful

    thanks, you 100% got what I was saying and asking. There exists a TERMENDOUS international niche market that would go with all these millions of used machines out there, that instead of going to the landfill, could be used, with a free open source OS, would get all these third world folks juiced on computing, and using open source, but are gonna be using win 95 or 98 or close to that, because... I don't know why not. I've been looking for over a year now for a solution, haven't found it yet. Leave out one of the criteria, it's a non starter. If and when someone comes out with such a distro, it will be quite well received. I tried morphix lately it's a decent start, but still not quite there, it wouldn't run at all on most of the antiuqe boxes I have, let alone the older monitors, most of those won't use linux at all, I have to purchase 14 inch svgas and still hand tweak them to display, which ups my cost(real low semi retired fixed income, this gets pricey for me) on the give-aways. I got a shelf full of color monitors that are useless now, but they WILL run windows easily, every one of them. Not an engineer, I don't know why,(don't care, I accept it) but that's my reality. Windows goes on the boxes, much as I don't wanna.

    Huge giant growing and expanding international market almost completely untapped, just opening up going *begging*,gonna be handed to microsoft on a silver platter, seems like such a waste.. oh well

  95. MS ever hear of this: by buss_error · · Score: 1
    "Microsoft has announced a program to 'establish a vibrant community of computer refurbishers ... who will be authorized to re-install its Windows operating system ... The refurbished PCs will be accompanied by a Certificate of Authenticity (COA) and a special End User Licence as evidence of a legally installed operating system.'

    Because, Saints forbid! that someone actually do something to a computer that MS doesn't bless!

    One wonders if MS has ever heard of illegal product tying, the principal of first sale, the MS consent decree, and unrevocable rights of users. Naaa. They just fork over more money to the elected officials and pretend the law doesn't apply to them.

    I've been sitting on a domain name for a while, I think now is the time to put it to work.

    --
    Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves.
  96. Re:still missing the target specs by OldJohnno · · Score: 1, Informative

    Don't give up just yet. Do you know about the RULE Project? (an up to date yet lightweight version of RH made for just this sort of application) And then there are the distros like Crux, Peanut and Vector etc. My own systems were stock standard Mandrake, all I did was select the appropriate packages. In fact I'm still using those lightweight tools under Mdk 9.2 - IceWm/Sylpheed/Firebird/OO.org etc are all included on the install CDs. I'm not sure how hard it would be to create a customised reinstall-CD for such a system, but I am sure it can be done. You can see examples of a lightweight Mdk at The Lofat Linux page.

  97. pre-used by Neward+Rylet · · Score: 1

    Is a pre-used computer different than a used computer?

    1. Re:pre-used by demon · · Score: 1

      They just come used from the factory.

      --

      Sam: "That was needlessly cryptic."
      Max: "I'd be peeing my pants if I wore any!"
  98. Re:still missing the target specs by chrsbrwn · · Score: 2, Informative

    Don't give up completely yet!

    There are people who agree with you, and are working on something similar to what you are asking for. Note that I am not an expert on this, but I thought it was an interesting and valid question, as I have a penchant for running Linux on old/retired (mostly non-x86 though) hardware. I am a professional sysadmin, so I don't think too much about getting something up and running on a weird machine, as that is what interests me. But I am also aware of the ease of use/installation issue, because I have supported Macs and Windows machines for years, and used Macs at home for years as well. You can't beat the "stick a CD in the drive, click a button, walk away, and when you come back there is a working system" model of installation.

    Anyway, for a project that seems to be aligned to what you are asking for, you might want to check out the RULE project. I just found out about them recently, and I don't know how up to date they are, but they seem to have similar goals to what you have described. They claim that one of their installers can run in 12Mb of RAM, and the other in 6Mb. They install mainly a stock copy of Redhat, but with the package list stripped down to make a smaller profile. In addition, it appears that they are doing some work on the Kdrive X server, which is a very small XFree86 replacement.

    Unfortunately, my lowest spec Intel machine (a p133 laptop), that I used to test and run things to make sure it worked on slower machines, was stolen when somebody broke into my house, so I have no way at the moment to test the RULE project out. Most of my other machines are SPARCs or Powerpcs, so they don't work with this project. You might want to check out your local Linux user group, as in my experience they are usually packrats, and have lots of old machines, and a willingness to help.

  99. Microsoft competes with Intel, AMD, Dell by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 3, Interesting

    These refurb'ed computers compete with new and refurbished Dells, Gateways, and every other new x86 PC, and their sales are largely at the expense of that market share. That of course ripples up the supply chain to Intel and AMD. Microsoft is flexing its muscle as these HW vendors continue to grow their Linux support and marketing. By Longhorn/2006, we'll be seeing new M$ brand computers competing directly.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  100. Re:you got my points. Maybe the big guys will too. by swv3752 · · Score: 1

    VectorLinux was created to fulfill this need.

    Older distros should work well enough. It is not necessary to use KDE, as most Distros contain alternat WindowManagers. BlackBox, FluxBox, TWM, IceWM, Sawfish/Sawmill, or FVWM will all work fine on low RAM machines.

    --
    Just a Tuna in the Sea of Life
  101. all right, cool... by zogger · · Score: 1

    ... that's getting more like it. I tell you, I feel like issuing a big public coding/packaging challenge that follows my criteria *freeking exactly*. If I had prize money or something I would do it. What say, good idea or whack? My thinking is, if the coding goes back in time, if code gets written that will run excellently on these olden days machines,using those as a minimum benchmark, think how it might run on newer faster machines. From my point of view, if it could be done 15 years ago or longer off a single floppy, or even a single cd, 16 megs ram, pent 1 class, under one gig hard drive,maybe even just a half a gig, and still have E-Z GUI install, be NON confusing to run, had a dozen apps for the most popular uses in "computing", it would be a hit, a smash. The high end bleeding edge is being covered in spades, all over, by Mac, MS, and the *big* linux guys. Swell, that's cool, but that's much less than 1% of the population has these machines that that sort of effort is being designed for. It's necessary those efforts are being made,obviously, I am glad it's happening, but it's also necessary to help insure that computers are not relegated to the scrap heap after only a few years. That leaves 100 million computers + world wide out there that NONE of these high end efforts are addressing, outside a very few hobbyists, and this new MS initiative. Someone is sure missing the boat here.

    Thanksagain! I'll check out the link. Still thinking about the Grande OS Challenge though, I'll write it up if anyone thinks this is a worthwile challenge and will be responded to, and if anyone wants to help me get it going offically with host space or whatnot for the (minimal) website.

    I can offer a nifty scrawled certificate of mega-coolness and one (1) "Ohh it's shiny and pretty!" silver dollar as prize money to the winner who has the best offering that hits all the criteria. Miss one, no see gar.

    Cool, or whack? Heck, anyone can run brute force crypto attacks using a 1700 node distributed cluster **^%,

    well, maybe not but I want to see someone hit this OS challenge using free/open source. I'd be impressed with that.

  102. Re:you got my points. Maybe the big guys will too. by eugene+ts+wong · · Score: 1

    Try The RULE Project. Their specs are different from yours, but the sentiment is there, & yes, they are trying to create a CD installer, with a gui. Another important factor is that they are trying to create a customized distribution that is up to date. Most small distributions are using old kernels & software that should no longer be used.

    I should point out, though, that a gui should not be the only way to install. The important thing is whether or not there is feed back. I'm open to using a BASH script that explains why you have to do such-n-such or can't use this or that. I think that as long as the feed back is meaningful & much of it is automated, then they should be okay.

    I must say, though, whether we're talking about MS or Linux, I can't imagine getting useful wordprocessors on those old computers. Browsers & email, maybe, but I don't know of any good Linux word processors for small computers. Maybe Corel would help?

    If anybody creates a distro for small computers, then please put aside your GPL religion for a moment, & install Opera. It's faster, smaller & better than Mozilla. It's also allows users to customize style sheets for the web sites that they visit.

  103. MORONS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I see a lot of people telling other people thy are morons,go RTFA,learn how to read etc,etc. some of those same people maybe should LEARN HOW TO FUCKING SPELL! why do i say this? well,because those same people think NOONE is a fucking word,IT IS NOT!! no one is not a compound word! A compound word is made when two words are joined to form a new word,and noone is not one of them,ok assholes? don't believe it? try this: http://dictionary.reference.com/

  104. Re:still missing the target specs by shadowbearer · · Score: 1

    I ain't mad, I'm just giving up on this project, I will finish out giving away the boxes I have, with windows on them, and someone else can be the linux evangelist, I won't be doing it anymore, too frustrating.

    I know of what you speak. I was the linux "evangelist" in a little dinky town in northern minnesota where nobody had heard of it at all. Made a few converts here and there...

    See? I get responses, I appreciate it,but they haven't answered my questions.

    In all honesty, zogger, what you need is a friend who you can share these experiences with and is willing to help; posting on slashdot is not the answer. Not flaming, being serious. Slashdot is not a help forum - it happens, but it's not. (for that matter most of usenet is useless the same way nowadays, but that's another rant). See my other response.

    that MS is gonna arrive on those machines and stay on 99% of those machines, too.

    On the machines you describe, it'll be W95 and W98; and not to offend, but you'll be opening these people up to more problems than they can deal with, given the age of the OS and lack of real security fixes. Some of that might account for the huge rise of zombied windows machines lately (not you, just the increased use of older win). I know that doesn't affect the short term where you are at, but long term can be much, much worse (I know, I was a win9Xtech for years).

    As to hideous installs; see my other post. It's not all ground zero :)

    Can't say as to what you are dealing with WRT to your users; but I know well the trials of getting linux installed on old systems with minimal support. Dialup on old phone lines from buttfuck minnesota :) Forums? hehe. Usenet? *snort*. IRC? who kidding...

    Good luck to you...

    SB

    --
    It's old. The more humans I meet, the more I like my cats. At least they are honest.
  105. M$moke and Mirror$ by AetherBurner · · Score: 3, Interesting

    In reading the M$ FAQ on this, I see that it is Windoze98 SPECIAL EDITION and not SECOND EDITION, whatever the difference is. Plus I did not see in the FAQ that all of the virus patches (current and future) are to be applied. It just looks like the base system and no install CD's are to be provided. Just think...MAR systems being used in 419 scams and virus hacked to spam to boot...woo hoo!!!

  106. Re:still missing the target specs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You are correct.

    A possibility

  107. How fucking magnanimous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They're gracefully allowing for the software to be "reinstalled", probably the same software that came already in the machine with one of their shitty OEM licenses but became unusable due to viruses, worms, and plain bloatware their shitty operating system accumulates, and needs a reinstall.

  108. Re:you got my points. Maybe the big guys will too. by zogger · · Score: 1

    I guess text would be OK, as long as it was extremely clear, straight forward, and did the job without acronym hell. Most people don't even know what a partition is, other than they got one someplace "in there".

    I've got a few more good leads in the responses so far at the links, I will pursue it some more. Vector claims 32 megs, a pent 1, but recommends about double that. I'll check out the others. Being on a slow dialup means like 5$ or so per distro snail mail though. I guess I'll find one. Rules looks good, too.

  109. I'll do it by ewe2 · · Score: 1

    Seriously, show me the plane and i'll get on it. I don't care where or when (and I don't even have a passport), but if you want someone to help, I'll be there.

    Anything's got to be better than administering a win98 network for idiots.

    --
    insecurity asks the wrong question irritation gives the wrong answer
  110. Modern Piracy by SEWilco · · Score: 1
    It's simpler than threats. Nightly people buzz up to a ship, climb up the side or stern, then steal anything they can pull off, or use as much violence as they want on the crew. Or hold the crew for ransom, or steal the whole ship.

  111. About your sig. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There really should be a Godwin's law corellary for when people use the term 'jack booted'.

    1. Re:About your sig. by acceleriter · · Score: 1

      I just call a spade a spade. If we have to be literal, I guess they can't call me a "pirate," then, right?

      --

      CEE5210S The signal SIGHUP was received.

  112. Re: Also In related news by Gabrill · · Score: 2, Informative

    Microsoft dumps unneeded Win98se licences on third world countries after the product is EOLed . . .

    --
    Always going forward, 'cause we can't find reverse.
  113. Re:still missing the target specs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    See? I get responses, I appreciate it,but they haven't answered my questions. This winow manager is lightweight, this other one might work, etc, and such and such from the olden days, but yet no single answer, because I know why, it ain't been done, can't be done. And linux gurus wonder why man pages are hard for people to understand, regular old english can be hard to understand too.

    You might want to look outside of Linux. I was attempting to do precisely what you're trying to do. And I found that Linux may not be the best choice. I came across muLinux...which is a lightweight Linux that's supposed to work off of a floppy. I never was able to install it on my test system and it seemed rather limited (as it fits on a handful of floppies).

    So I searched for another solution and came across NetBSD. NetBSD will run on very old hardware...I installed it on an 80386-25MHz system with 4MB of RAM and a 100MB HD. The version I am using is fairly recent: 1.5.3. There's only two versions newer than this. Granted I am not using the GUI with this configuration but I suspect that given a Pentium class system with 16MB of RAM you could use the GUI. I intend to install the GUI on this system after bumping up the RAM another 4MB (the systems maximum) and increasing the HD to a 4GB model (which may be difficult as this system has fixed C/H/S...I cannot specify my own).

    It's a very easy install...insert a 1.44MB floppy and restart the computer. The install was performed over the network via FTP...it's very easy to do.

    Not saying this is the solution...but if it runs on an 80386 with 4MB of RAM a 16MB system would probably work.
  114. why blame when you can fix? by twitter · · Score: 3, Interesting
    ... you can't blame them. You walk into any department store and you see a wall of windows applications.

    Ignorance is poverty. Everything on the wall costs money, might not work with a particular version of winblows, and is available without cost in free software. Show them kpackage, deselect or aptitude. People who have used music sharing programs shrug and ask, "so what". Then you tell them that all that software is free and intended to be so by the authors. Boom, the ignorance is over. You then tell your client that you can make anything on the list work for them for a small fee anytime they have a problem doing it themselves and you have business.

    It works for you and it can work for them and make you money too. Free software is like that. Offshore that jog, Balmer baby!

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

    1. Re:why blame when you can fix? by jadavis · · Score: 1

      Then again, different people choose to be ignorant of different topics.

      Some of these people are very well educated and make a lot of money. It would not be wise for these people to forgo high pay to learn about computers when the knowledge will save them only a small amount.

      It makes much more sense for these people to pick a company that they blindly trust (e.g. Microsoft) and let them do the work.

      How much time would they need to spend before they could trust OSS as much?

      --
      Social scientists are inspired by theories; scientists are humbled by facts.
    2. Re:why blame when you can fix? by JPriest · · Score: 1

      In my experience even the free windows replacements for most of that software is better than the free Linux versions of it. Many of the OSS windows replacements are under a "do what ever you want with it license" also. It is my opinion that GPL is restrictive, I prefer LGPL or BSD. Linux is not an operating system for end users. Trying to make Linux something it is not will only hold it back for those of us that accept it for whar it is.

      --
      Saying Java is nice because it works on all OS's is like saying that anal sex is nice because it works on all genders.
    3. Re:why blame when you can fix? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Moderators: Please note that "twitter" is a known fanatical psycophant whose obnoxious offtopic rants are legend here on Slashdot. It doesn't matter what the topic is, he'll find a way to scrape in some pointless Microsoft bashing. While nobody expects us to love Microsoft in any way, his particularly tepid style of calling anyone he replies to "troll" or "liar" because he happens to disagree with whatever they're saying is well documented and should not be rewarded. If anything, twitter is the type of person that should not be part of the open source/free software community. He is an anathema to all that is good about free software.

      I'm posting this so that you (the moderator) have some context to consider twitter and not mod him up whenever he posts his filler preformatted rants about installing Knoppix or whatever that unfortunately get him karma every single time and allow him to continue posting his trademark toxic crap (read on) day in and day out. You may consider this a troll - I consider it community service. And I ain't kidding.

      If you're a /. subscriber, I invite you to look through some of his posting history. I guarantee that you'll be hard pressed to find someone that is more "out there" than twitter. You'll also probably notice he's got quite an AC following. Don't just read his posts, make sure you go through the replies.

      For example, in this recent post twitter not only calls the OP a troll but attempts to "tell it like it is" while making some vague argument about "GNU". Yes, if you're confused, you're not alone. The reply (modded +4) proceeds to simply destroy his bogus argument. You will notice he did not reply. This is what some people call "drive-by advocacy". A sort of I'll just leave you with my thoughts here and move on to the next flamebait kind of deal. In fact, he almost never replies because he knows that his fanatical arguments simply do not hold up to any sort of discussion. It's not that he's chosen the wrong cause - he's just going at it in a completely wrong way.

      More? Just read though this post and the subsequent replies. I guess this stands on its own.

      More? Bad spelling in astounding conspiracy theories, more offtopic FUD and uninformed "I'm right, look at me" rants, promptly proven wrong. Worse even, twitter wants to be RMS, apparently (that first one is a winner). I mean, really. You think?

      FUD, FUD, FUD, FUD, offtopic FUD, and more FUD. This guy is like the Monty Python SPAM skit, but with FUD and more FUD instead of canned meat. Amazed

  115. riiiiiight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    proof?

  116. Re:you got my points. Maybe the big guys will too. by eugene+ts+wong · · Score: 1

    I was just thinking, that since this discussion is focused on reusing old computers, then it is likely that the user won't want to dual boot. Maybe the installation process could be smoothed over by autopartitioning the drives. Since the software should be able to detect the amount of memory, it should also be able to estimate the amount of swap required.

    As far as I can tell, the only partitions needed are /boot
    /
    swap /home [recommended]

    Heh, whatever. I hope something happens soon, though.

  117. I mean no. No on all counts.

    --

    What we call folk wisdom is often no more than a kind of expedient stupidity.-Edward Abbey

  118. I HATE THEM by Die+Microsoft+Die · · Score: 1

    WHAT about my old PC's? What about when I WAS IN MY HOUR of NEED and MS shafted me and told me to get lost, go to hell, piss up a rope there Mister, we own yer shit and have nothing for you. WHAT about that? I BOUGHT TWO LAPTOPS and I did not OWN the MONOPOLY O/S. Microsoft owned it and they would do NOTHING but I could not legally turn on the machines. I ripped both of them to pieces with my bare hands. I WILL NOT BE PLAYED like a RUMMY. I will not be HAD by those CROOKED JERKS. DIE MICROSOFT - FUCKING DIE. I still find MS-RIGGED websites in the most official places. DIE MICROSOFT DIE. HAS ANYONE thought of making Congress make a GD'd interoperability LAW? Or are you all just a bunch of stupid backwards Americans? THE NEW MANDRAKE 10.0 looks GOOD. I put it on a THINKPAD today. SUSE. YOPER. MANDRAKE. I WAS on the telephone with NOVELL today. And WHY? you may ask? DIE MICROSOFT! DIE ! FUCKING DIE MICROSOFT ! ! ! DIE ! ! ! GOODBYE ! & DIIIIEEEEEE ! !!!

    --
    If you hate them, do it properly and hate them fully.
  119. "Vibrant community of refurbishers" by melted · · Score: 1

    reminds me of "revolutionary advance in toilet bowl cleaning technology" (believe it or not, they actually say this in commercials on american TV). Someone got their adjectives seriously wrong. :0)

  120. Anyone catch on to the fact... by nmc-tcm · · Score: 2, Interesting

    that MS is using 98SE for the program instead of Millennium Edition? Even THEY believes ME is a pile of crap!

  121. There is only one thing to know and apply.... by 3seas · · Score: 1

    ...to Microsoft...

    They are IN FACT criminals.... in more than one county...

  122. Road to Ruin program in US schools by Die+Microsoft+Die · · Score: 1

    Just quit. Microsoft - worse than smoking cigarettes. Should be outlawed in the schools. How to be butt-ugly-stupid? -Spend five minutes on a Microsoft (owned) machine. NEVER ever again. PS I HATE THEM, I HATE THEIR STINKING GUTS.

    --
    If you hate them, do it properly and hate them fully.
  123. Re:still missing the target specs by JPriest · · Score: 1

    So well stated that you have inspired me to use the "friend" button. It is nice to see that there are people on the internet that see the way things are and not just how they want them to be.

    --
    Saying Java is nice because it works on all OS's is like saying that anal sex is nice because it works on all genders.
  124. Realising Potential by rixstep · · Score: 1

    Program helps under-served communities, schools and NGOs realise their potential

    How are people going to realise their potential using Microsoft products?

    This is like the Gates Foundation donating computers to libraries - computers that MUST be configured with exactly the Microsoft products the Foundation insists on, and which may NOT use any other software whatsoever.

    Something like the gorgeous Mother Teresa.

    A few years back Gates was asked about software piracy in China. Yes, they're stealing software in China, said Gates, and as long as they're going to steal it, we want them to steal OUR software. Then in a few years, when they're hooked on it, we'll figure out a way to make them pay.

    This is more snake-oil business. Get these people hooked on MS Shiteware and then make them pay through the nose later.

    Gates doesn't have a benevolent bone in his body.

  125. The first hit is always free by alizard · · Score: 2, Insightful
    One can assume that the end users find themselves buying at retail when the users finally have to upgrade, and find that they'll have to replace the computers themselves as well in order to make the upgrades work and they'll have to stay with MS in order to read their legacy file formats. (we should all wish them luck with this, they'll need it)

    Meanwhile, MS gets its tax rebates based on the full retail price of 98SE, a product they no longer sell to anyone.

  126. Competition for Indymedia / Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow, cool. Competition for Indymedia / Linux. Indymedia is currently occassionaly busy with moving old recycled computers to parts of the world (2nd / 3rd world countries). From what i understand, they put a Linux distribution which is focused or set up for the local language. (info is public on lists.indymedia.org)

    I am wondering though. Doesn't this proof that the product they license is actually too expensive here? There are even stories where hosting companies get free (as in beer) licenses when they didn't make the switch. Munich got a discount. Ordinary people who buy a computer however (Joe Doe & Co, official member of the middle class) have to buy the fool/full price whereas the OEM is laughing 3rd party. Aren't they selling it too expensive? When they had competition who sold their product for $X less they'd had to lower their price. Heck, who dares to compete with MS these days...

    In another way, the price could be relative to what people earn. But that's not the way it goes with technical products either afaik. So why should it be for MS products like MS Windows?

    I sincerely hope this project will not hold much waters. I hope instead Linux and FLOSS will be adopted...

  127. Re:Windows 98 -- Windows 3.1! by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
    That's what these non-profits and poor countries really need, a Free Software distro that will run with fairly modern features (modern web browser, office suite, email) on *really* old hardware. I know it can be done. The proof is Windows 95 itself. There's also that NewDeal Office thing which is a GUI for DOS that is supposed to run in just 2MB of RAM as a minimum, with an office suite, web browser, email, etc.

    You can get all of that, except "modern" web browser, with Win 3.1. I ran that on a 286, 4MB RAM, for years. Office 4.3/Lotus Smartsuite /Word Perfect all do everything you could need in an office suite. Email -- Eudora 3, which I still use on Win 98. Browser -- Netscape 3 or 4. There are better ones I'm sure; as I was on a 28k modem, as most of those will be who are restrictd to old hardware, that was the bottleneck more than the computer or software. I often just logged on to a command line and ran lynx to find stuff quickly. Also of course, none of the viruses or exploits going around will have any luck with this setup.

  128. OEM licenses are transferable..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just had this clarified last week with the Microsoft OEM manager for my country (lets just say some place in the south Pacific) because my firm trades in ex-lease equipment.

    The OEM license is transferable as long as the COA remains with the PC and the original conditions of the OEM license are met (e.g. the hardware of the machine does not significantly change). I was asking this question of MS because a lot of machines are shipped from the big PC vendors to corporate customers without individual media kits (CDs / manuals), which are actually part of the MS definition of a license (along with a COA).

    The only proviso was that the version of Windows listed on the COA must be installed with legitimate media, but that could come from any source - OEM, select, retail etc....

    For clarification do get onto the MS licensing people and start asking some questions, that's what they are there for.

  129. time to use free and open software by twitter · · Score: 1
    It makes much more sense for these people to pick a company that they blindly trust (e.g. Microsoft) and let them do the work. How much time would they need to spend before they could trust OSS as much?

    It takes about 5 minutes to boot Mepis and 15 to install it. Most high paying professionals will have an IT staff or company. A 30 minute demo is all it takes to cinch the bid and get the work. The free price will always be lower and the product will always be better.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

    1. Re:time to use free and open software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      bah blah blah mepis blah blah blah please kill me blah blah blah

  130. Another MS Revenue Stream... From Charities! by webzombie · · Score: 1

    Ok, I think its time for the software business to take the next big baby step to adulthood and once and for all abolish licenses.

    I mean come on... does that GM or Ford car come with a licence. NO. Does that Magtag washer come with a license. Of course NOT.

    So why then should a computer OS come with a license? What is the need for a ELUA with any software other then to set out VERY SIMPLE TERMS OF USE.

    Simple. Its a monopolists way to control the market. PERIOD.

    Fuck MS, Fuck Bill Gates and that fat fuckin' prick Steve Ballmer. I'm going to donate my PCs and software to whom ever I choose and if they want to take me to court for donating my stuff to charity then fine... see you in the headlines!

    We've got to do something about this fuckin' company before they completely cover the planet with their corporate bile! Please. A revenue stream from charities...how fuckin' sick is that!

  131. Re:you got my points. Maybe the big guys will too. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Opera and AbiWord are very good for old hardware and available on both Linux and Win.

    AbiWord is very small and has an on-the-fly spell checker (like smart tags). Opera browser is also very small and faster than most browsers and can run on older hardware. You can download older versions somewhere on the opera site, for Linux, Windows and even win 3.11. Pressed for time, can't find link...

    If installing AbiWord on win95, some versions ask for updated DLLs, but some previous versions do not. Likewise, newer versions of Opera are slightly slower then older version.

  132. Obvious Motive by ajs318 · · Score: 1

    It is obvious that Microsoft is terrified at the thought that all those donated PCs could be used for running Linux. Think about this; once someone has got used to using OpenOffice.org on Linux, they have no reason to spend money on Microsoft Windows and Microsoft Office -- and that satisfied Open Source user is likely to spread the message to friends and relations. So if Microsoft can prevent people from installing Open Source, they will take a slight loss in order to do so. Just like a crack dealer giving free samples to kids -- the initial investment will pay a dividend when they have no option save to start coming back for more .....

    So Microsoft is fighting back with a PR move and FUD spreading exercise. "Look," they are saying, "We are making it easy for you to stay legal." {Never mind that there's another, very easy way to make sure you stay legal and you might already be legal; see below}. I suppose they also want to prick a few consciences. In the past, they have turned a blind eye towards "casual copying" -- they'd rather you used a pirated copy of Word than OpenOffice. They'd still rather you paid for it, though, and this initiative looks like an attempt to catch flies with honey as opposed to vinegar.

    There are two things wrong with the suggestion that a licence would not be valid if the equipment was passed onto another person. Firstly, the Microsoft EULA cannot prevent you from transferring your licence, because the law of the land says nobody can take away your right to do that. Secondly, the law of the land also says that you are innocent until proven guilty -- that is, that even if you have lost the original installation media, C. of A. or other proof of your licence, the onus would be on Microsoft to prove that you never had it in the first place.

    But, of course, ignorance of your rights is good for Microsoft, and they are likely to be able to persuade at least some people to buy new licences to use software they were already licenced to use.

    --
    Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
  133. I might try that... by zogger · · Score: 1

    ...on one of these boxes here to rebuild. Got a new customer today, a 4 year old kid who wants a computer of his own. He even asked me! I was in the church thrift store, I've seen him before, a very outgoing talker kid, he's a born ratchet jaw, I can relate on that issue... Anyway. So I said, "your folks got a computer you can use?" He goes "Ya they do! but I want MY OWN!!!" heheheheh WELL WHO DON'T! I talked to his mom, he got a birthday next month. We'll see what we can do here get him fixed up with something.

  134. OK, I won't give up... by zogger · · Score: 1

    ... last night I was just getting frustrated, dragging in over emotionalism to what was a simple observation combined with a question. I've got a ton of decent responses so far, it's more than I thought existed last I looked at small distros.

    Man, I gotz TOO MANY PROJECTS! HAHAHAHAHA!

    I'm still accumulating parts for my MONSTER MOWER I want to build, just for a hoot. Like them monster trucks. It's a geezer suburban thing.... no one cares about your ride, bragging points are YOUR LAWNMOWER! HAHAHAHA! I guess I need a computer crammed on there too. So far it ain't monsterized, but I got a cb and an am/fm radio and dual batteries.

  135. dial up by zogger · · Score: 1

    dial up makes it redickalus hard to try out various distros and whatnot, just keeping a kitchen sink install patched and updated is tedious.

    BUT, to me the other advantages of living in north_cow_flop rural USA make up for it. Always tradeoffs.

    Cool stuff living rural:

    Hmm, never no problem finding a place to take a leak....

    traffic jam is two bubbas parked next to each other in the road jawin'. You just wait till they are done, cuz next week you will do similar.

    Lax driving laws on weird mechanized stuff being operated on the "roads", ie, no one gives a care, even the cops

    The "supermarket" is out in the back yard all summer for most things

    The winter heating energy crisis can be mostly solved with you + saw + handy woods next door

    There's always someone with a worse looking truck than you, and his is still running, so you don't feel pressurised to go "upgrade" your pickemup so often, saves on cash you ain't got anyway...

    "Steaks" are lame enough to come over to your backyard "supermarket" and turn themselves in for packaging....

    You can actually see the stars at night... if you don't mind swatting mosquitoes...

    and my favorite:

    If your old lady is into getting a little sun outside once in awhile, it can be REAL DANG INTERESTIN'

    1. Re:dial up by shadowbearer · · Score: 1

      Amen, Bog brother :)

      Where I live, I have some of those; and not others. I do know what you mean :) What I do have here is some serious scenery and 5000 foot vertical hiking opportunity (and a small town full of very great people who aren't stuck in the 50s culturally :)

      Have an option on a farmhouse about 12 miles out right now; hope I win the sale. It'll put a burden on my finances right now, and means I'll have to give up any fulltime internet, but I'm finding I'm caring less and less for that, so it's not much of a sacrifice, I guess.

      My fridge is still full of last years venison...I can't eat it fast enough, especially since my SO went back to her hometown to find work. She says she's coming back this summer...she's not the kind to not scare the neighbors sunning, but she's my oldest and closest friend. That counts for me most.

      Gardens - miss digging dirt out from under the fingernails. Seriously. Been here a year and no communal gardens; just clay in the backyard. Hope I win that year option on the 40 acre farm property. (that's a whole friccin 50kword short story on it's own right now) Doing the apartment living thing right now, tomorrow (Easter) going to rake, seed and spread 24-3-3 on the lawn for the landlord. Nice to find one who appreciates and compensates for what I consider fun - he also pays for the birdfeeders and flowerpots I build. Doing garden here would mean building and cultivating a 12"+ raised bed, and I don't want to put the money into something that would die after I left. *shrug*

      Been back and forth on the tradeoffs in this and that living for twenty some years. What's got me now, tho, is being able to browse 60 million years of geology within a couple miles hike; that and being around people who are old-fashioned yet are not stuck in the 19th century moral wise, if you know what I mean :)

      That, and more job offers than I can possibly deal with in a town of 10k and a state of 600k :) liking South Dakota. Very much. The acreage I'm lusting after is outside my budget, but it's at the foot at the third highest peak in the Black Hills! :) Woot! Trying to convince myself to go into debt again...it's hard. Meanwhile I'm getting paid well to essentially teach how to fix things. Been here a year May 15th; think I've found home again.

      Gotta go check the beer perking in the closet before I crash tonite, too, come to think of it. Dangit, list of things to do is almost as long as my overtime hours. :) Fscking slashdot addiction.

      Cheers, zogger

      SB
      PS Zogger, do you follow/post Backwoods Home / Countryside sites?

      --
      It's old. The more humans I meet, the more I like my cats. At least they are honest.
  136. them old macs.... by zogger · · Score: 1

    .... kept me interested in computers. I was starting to learn DOS, bleech, couldn't stand it. Just wasn't (and still really isn't) my bag. I didn't own a computer, but tried out various friends 286s, it was OK, but..... it lacked. Going by a yard sale one day, spotted the 512k for sale, 50 clams. I asked the girl selling it, "well, let's get an extension cord out here, I wanna see this badboy fired up". Yep, I talk like that. Anyway, 5 minutes later I was doing more stuff with a mouse than I did fooling around with DOS, that's for sure. Graduated to an LC, that was nice, still got it, too. got nuts then, now I got all kinza boxes. I think I still got a couple of IIcs, too, have to check in the junker pile. GFs quadra is still a practical machine if ya ask me, it does about anything joe casual user would want to do, inside of surfin, sounds, email, drawing, text stuff. Probably still a lot of 68k apps out there. I never did try to put linux on any of my macs, I should try that sometime.

  137. Re:still missing the target specs by zogger · · Score: 1

    sometimes I guess you got to let it all hang out, like we used to say in the hipster days. I read this article about MS and i got steamed over it, really. I mean, it's a hearts and minds thing, and working along similar goals for awhile and getting frustrated with it got me hot.

    I appreciate what MS did initially, it got computing out there to millions of people. It got computing JOBS out there to millions of people. this was a good thing, same with apple, IBM building the cloneable box, and etc.

    Time goes on though, they got sorty dinkus, and now are being professional dinkus. Open source/free is the wave of de future, you can just see it, I saw it several years ago when I realsed a ton of the younger geeks were into it. I know that is what fuels innovations in tech/society/economics/politics, young people with a lot of energy hot rodding whatever they can get their hands on. Any tech you care to name,going back in history, whatever the young people adopt to be interested in is what becomes mainstream when they are the "breadwinner" segment of the population. I may be slow but I ain't dumb enough to miss that.

  138. once in a while by zogger · · Score: 1

    .. I follow those sites you mention when there's a linkage referencing them someone turns me on to. I've been writing on survival/preparedness topics for a LONG time,it is my expertise, and I used to take consulting work on same. To make it fancy I called it "threat analysis and mitigation". I used an honor system sliding scale fee schedule.

    Raised beds, nifty. We just moved to our new place last summer, it's a caretaking position that came with some pretty dismal housing. Had to approach the extremely neglected yard with a chainsaw and bushhog and work from there. No one had lived in this place for over 5 years, it was abandoned and un trimmed deluxe.. Right now we have the major garden area almost finished planting (started with chainsaw, then articulated bushhog, then bulldozer, then fill dirt, now the fine tuning), it has two dozen raised beds constructed with pine logs. It is Mother Earth News quality.., been taking "as we go" pics.. heh The paths between the beds are filled with woodchips we got chipping all winter, and the beds themselves got filled with old well composted cow exhaust we get free for the shoveling from a paddock next door.

    I never worry about making a place better, even when I move, I have always done that wherever I have lived, that's the deal, Mr. bigshot in the sky "recommends" that we be good stewards of the land, and it works out good if that principle is followed. Landlors like it too.. No real need to fixate on the ownership part. You get to enjoy the fruits of labor while you are there, this is full compensation enough methinks. Ownership is a big plus of course, but sometimes it isn't possible, like I am in no way in any position to purchase any place, but I get paid (not great but I can stay semi retired and only have to work part time) to live and work here. Tradeoffs.

    Also, the real estate bubble will be the next one that pops. I think some *much* better deals are ahead shortly, you might luck out and get your dream place now then be in a position to renegotiate price and terms later from a strong position, if you can keep income semi steady and bankroll now... big hint, precious metals are an outstanding deal now, especially silver. The global demand for physical last year surpassed total mining production... think on that one a scosh......

    If you haven't read any of his financials and geopoliticals, try Bob Chapman, google for him, good thinker. Another is Joel Skousen, incredible brain, wrote the two preparedness classics, "the secure home" and "strategic relocation". Hi site I remember top of the head, easy, joelskousen.com

    I also recommend a lot of the radio shows carried on gcnlive.com, not so much preparedness, but common sense politics and news that help you consider preparedness topics. In no particular order a few of my favorite shows, the power hour, alex jones, the common sense coalition, a closer look, and on another network, I like Jeff Rense show, such a variety of topics bound to be some that infuriate you, make ya go "hmm", make ya go "hell YA!' , make ya go "huh?" Soup to nuts there, entertaining and informative. that's rense.com

    sounds cool where you live, never visitied that area of the country. Have thought about relocating to idaho though, for a variety of reasons, but man, just moving two counties over gets expensive and involves this "work" stuff if you got a lot of gear.... We live in north georgia, last place mountains, but now we are back down in the more farming flatlands. Still pretty though, dogwoods and wild choke cherries and whatnot all blooming now

    1. Re:once in a while by shadowbearer · · Score: 1

      Caretaking is basically the deal on this farmhouse; I live there for a year payment free as long as I make improvements to the place and keep the orchards up; then at end of year I get C4D, low payments and title, maybe, my credit rating is a smoking crater from taking too many years to pay off student loans. House needs a lot of work tho and I'm not sure I can afford it right now, overtime or not, sigh. Hate to pass it up tho, owner is a customer and great guy and he really needs someone trustworthy out there so he's not running back and forth hundreds of miles each week. Tradeoffs.

      You're probably right about the real estate bubble, but I doubt it'll affect things around here much; lots of construction and area is expanding rapidly because it's a great place to live, super climate, jobs and nice people and good schools. Property within the Hills is hellishly expensive; go 15 miles out and it gets cheap, but not as nice place to live. Hurk. That and we get a million+ people out here for Sturgis every year - it's money week - missed my chance last year, but this year, muhahahaha ;)

      Steady income is no prob; more work than I can handle and I practically pray for days off.

      I don't play stock market or investment games; too dangerous and I've never taken the time to learn how (and don't want to). Prefer to put my money into tools, books and (hopefully soon) land.

      Tangible stuff :)

      I'll check out some of those links/shows, if/when I get a chance. Printed out your post and stuck it on the wall (next to ten million other things :)

      If you ever do take a break, come out and visit. The Hills are a great place. I agree about moving - moved a thousand miles last May, totally blind wrt to new place and it wiped my savings out. Was worth it tho - work was drying up where I was and the winters really sucked. I sure hear you about gear - I sold/gave away/junked 95% of what I owned and still piled a truck bed 6 feet high. Danged packrat, that's me :)

      Never been to Georgia - probably never will, but it sounds nice. I've heard there's lot of cheap land there if you don't mind being way the hell beyond the sidewalks. I can't take heat+humidity anymore tho, part of the reason I moved out here.

      Darnit, stuck inside today, weather bit me - it's snowing. 80 degrees last week, supposed to be 70 by Tuesday, snowing today - that's 'Hills' weather :) Love it, and we need the moisture. But the cabin fever is creeping in...

      Sounds like you've got a nice place going there. I miss having the room ; it's been some years since I could garden and it's left a big hole in my heart. Raised beds mulched and turned over winter worked really well for me - lots of sweat but the results are worth it. Out here is going to be different from where I was - too much water there, not enough here, and lots of clay/lime soil. Should be ideal for peppers tho *grin*

      Anyway, if you'd like to chat more (I would, I love this stuff) shoot an email tonite off to shadowbearer at yahoo com (obfuscated of course)

      Cheers!
      SB

      --
      It's old. The more humans I meet, the more I like my cats. At least they are honest.
  139. 3 years old? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Computers donated here (a non-profit serving the homeless) are about 7 years old. Most are Windows 95 and less than 40MB RAM.

    If a donation is better than 200 MHz, there is a fatal hardware flaw such as a dead motherboard.

    There are a lot of ink jet printers.

  140. Re:you got my points. Maybe the big guys will too. by Cloud+K · · Score: 1

    Very well said, and you're far from alone. I'm in exactly the same situation (working for a charitable organisation refurbishing older computers for those on a low income or emergency need) and just as frustrated by the apparent lack of an easy to use Linux distro that runs on them with any kind of sanity.

    Don't be disheartened by Slashdot - it's a great wealth of information, but some of the users as you've already observed are very "leet" here - it's probably not the greatest place to try and find information on a high usability distro.

    Best of luck to you, and if you do find anything please try to get an article up or let us know somehow. I too have spent many hours searching, trying distros like Peanut and Vector but haven't found anything that comes close to the ease of use and speed of Win95 on older computers.

    I've hit the friend button so I can keen an eye out!

  141. we need a niche forum... by zogger · · Score: 1

    ... there appears to be a demand for linux on old machines, but who the heck wants to lurk on a coupla dozen separate forums and newsgroups? We need a one stop discussion place to exchange ideas on this, and perhaps the impetus might get some of the small distro vendors to cooperate with each other. They could be invited either way. Maybe,don't know. I think that the same small footprint distro might be OK for more modern machines too, easy way to maintain a speed and efficiency curve without getting stuck on the upgrade cycle. I see no real need for a distro for most people that can't fit on a single CD. I will tell you one trick I did for myself on my older machine (200 PP), I took a small spare hard drive and made that my swap partition.