ya exactly. if we all find out that the iphone 5 had only minor upgrades over the 4 but that 35% buy it asap anyway, then it would be all about social symbol and status etc
on one hand, we have the companies that sell the products that are most likely to cause global warming funding the research that conveniently finds no evidence of global warming. on the other hand, who is funding those finding evidence for global warming? hippies?
being a lab scientist, that was painful to read. the explanation of the treatment is borderline gibberish. i've read better biology research reports by high school kids.
an intellectual: someone who does not whip out their phone in order to answer questions beyond the scope of "hi how are you?" or "how 'bout that weather?"
ya, that's cause almost anyone can be witty, nice, sweet, whatever when they've got time to think about it, type it out, re-think what they typed, and ultimately send the best possible response. when you're forced to carry on a conversation you don't have time come up with the best possible response... unless you want to be weird and think about it for a minute before speaking!
But SD is 6% related to people getting busted at work for screwing around on the internet instead of working...then getting fired will surely catalyze a divorce.
*warning* semi-naive physics question here: does the LHC smash particles at a high enough velocity (or energy?) to definitively solve these problems? does the absence of a Higgs boson from the previous experiments disprove supersymmetry, or are we not smashing hard enough?
wrong analogy. if you walk up to some guy on the street, let's call him oh i don't know, Mr G. Oogle, and say "Hey, G. Oogle, where can i find some music for a discount price...y'know, spelled P--I--R--A...". If Mr G. Oogle doesn't tell you how to get discount music, is he performing an act of censorship? obviously not.
if you became town crier and were yelling to everyone how to get free copyrighted materials off the internet and Mr G. Oogle pulls up in an unmarked minivan with no back windows, gets out and mugs you, then THAT is censorship. and done in style no less.
I saw one of the TV announcers for the Toronto Raptors chatting on his cell phone when it loudly rang in his ear. guess he was one of the 13%.
ya exactly. if we all find out that the iphone 5 had only minor upgrades over the 4 but that 35% buy it asap anyway, then it would be all about social symbol and status etc
on one hand, we have the companies that sell the products that are most likely to cause global warming funding the research that conveniently finds no evidence of global warming. on the other hand, who is funding those finding evidence for global warming? hippies?
being a lab scientist, that was painful to read. the explanation of the treatment is borderline gibberish. i've read better biology research reports by high school kids.
too late. this is clearly the hit song "Imagine" originally written and recorded by Avril Lavigne.
"OTOH, I can see Watson being immensely useful on the back end."
Totally. Doctors hate having to look around back there, it's gross.
an intellectual: someone who does not whip out their phone in order to answer questions beyond the scope of "hi how are you?" or "how 'bout that weather?"
"I want freedom to eat non-GMO food."
You have that freedom. Grow your own veggies. Eat 'em.
but he has flesh and blood over top of the robot skeleton...that's more like a terminator...
so green....sooooo green.
anything is toxic in a great enough quantity.
there will be towers of old crappy laptops like the garbage in Wall-e.
ya, that's cause almost anyone can be witty, nice, sweet, whatever when they've got time to think about it, type it out, re-think what they typed, and ultimately send the best possible response. when you're forced to carry on a conversation you don't have time come up with the best possible response... unless you want to be weird and think about it for a minute before speaking!
NOOOO!!!
what a way to ruin pi day!
i created a festive character for the occasion: O
Terminator shoots man in leg.
John Connor: what the hell did you do that for???
Terminator: because you told me to.
the ol' makeup shotgun???
But SD is 6% related to people getting busted at work for screwing around on the internet instead of working...then getting fired will surely catalyze a divorce.
*warning* semi-naive physics question here: does the LHC smash particles at a high enough velocity (or energy?) to definitively solve these problems? does the absence of a Higgs boson from the previous experiments disprove supersymmetry, or are we not smashing hard enough?
Brian Greene can write another book.
regarding point #2: the scientists that generate the data (ie: PhD and MSc students) are typically flat broke.
ah, so you nailed someone while being blinded by the sun too!
funny enough, the honda insight also had that butt ugly covered-up back wheel style...
wrong analogy. if you walk up to some guy on the street, let's call him oh i don't know, Mr G. Oogle, and say "Hey, G. Oogle, where can i find some music for a discount price...y'know, spelled P--I--R--A...". If Mr G. Oogle doesn't tell you how to get discount music, is he performing an act of censorship? obviously not. if you became town crier and were yelling to everyone how to get free copyrighted materials off the internet and Mr G. Oogle pulls up in an unmarked minivan with no back windows, gets out and mugs you, then THAT is censorship. and done in style no less.