Sure, but he seems very naive believing that generated XAML code would be easier to read and edit by humans than C# code. There seems to be even more reasons to fear that it will be ofuscated by bad indentation, duplication of redundant code, unneccessary attibutes with default values added in random (or worse alphabetically sorted) instead of using the schema order etc. etc.
"urinals in restrooms", that would be good reading - but on slashdot I can read crap without ads.
Too bad that there is no better way than vandalism and grafitti to get rid of ads IRL, especially "community sponsored" ads on buses etc pisses me off, why do we pay tax and tickets...
As a spinoff from this the Swedish Computer Inspection Agency (boring government department) decided to consider any logging of IP-numbers as equal to logging personal data, which is illegal without premission from either the agency or the persons affected.
To reply to myself, from what I have found XUL developers won't have any use for this: works with HTML/XHTML loaded via file: or http: URL, it doesn't work with XUL loaded from chrome it seems.
Since XUL itself is XML any way to handling it in a more structured way would make Mozilla easier to code for.
However, XSLT has been in Mozilla for ages with no possible way to use it for dynamic XUL generation - is this just another way to presenting static XML data?
Claiming US nuclear power plants are unsafe because of what happened in Chernobyl is foolish at best.
Hey don't think we can't see "24" outside the US. Now we know all about your nuclear security. Fox corporation also opened my eyes about your muslim minority, every one of them seem to be potential sui^H^H^Hhomicide bombers.
And we are to believe that human activity is somehow solely resposible for global warming?
Believe whatever you want to, but if you have build your house on permafrost (or some crucial resources, like oil-pipelines in your society) you will surely have to pay for it.
Seriously, some problems with computers might be related to them being infumigated with bromine-based flame-retardants. Which is as useful and effective as DDT were, in more ways than intended.
An article I wrote that is being published in the Summer 2004 issue of 2600 that is all about magstripe interfacing. This provided the basis for Stripe Snoop. Another application is this homebrew coke machine I built.
Even though slavery is forbidden the most common form of it is through aquired or even inherited debts, and there is no better way to tax money of someone than to drag him through the US legal system - no matter how legit the case may be.
They seem busy removing unwanted features that should't have been there in the first place, while keeping their promise not to do anything that could improve their product or move it closer to any standard.
You actually claim that old problems are learned from and the mistakes are never repeated....
It might be true that new quality routines rule out the possibility of the same thing happening again, but quality routines don't communicate the actual cause and can't prevent similar things from happening out of the same couse.
Nowadays it has been reported that whiskers can form inside the computers themselves, because of the new lead-free circuits that are to replace every mainboard in a few years time and no filters can do anything about them there.
Sure, this is a nice syntax to describe one-off problem. Though for a database you'd hope that it is done once to transform it to something useful instead of 100 times per second.
//*[@color = "Red"] is taken as a good example in your sense but is actually the worst case in the article. A database would hopefully aleady have track of "red things" and shouldn't have to traverse a tree full of other useless data. Multiple trees spanning the same data is only a contradiction in XML.
Yup, but trying hard enough to make a car using nano-technology will probably result in vast amounts of byproducts small enough to get into your cells and subtly kill you.
Of course we learned that when trying to create biocompatible compounds using chemical means, but remember that they are creating materials and not cars and couldn't care less about your well-being.
Why not implement a deposit sum for patent to be granted to the person that found prior art or faults invalidating it. This would probably end all talk about underpaid or overworked reviewers and spawn a new profession on the internet.
Sure,
but he seems very naive believing that generated XAML code would
be easier to read and edit by humans than C# code. There seems
to be even more reasons to fear that it will be ofuscated by
bad indentation, duplication of redundant code, unneccessary
attibutes with default values added in random (or worse alphabetically
sorted) instead of using the schema order etc. etc.
Argh, what's next?
Consumers ignoring disclaimers!
"some of the story themes are a little mature"
I'm not sure if they were mature or wether an unspoiled mind would have got more out of the background story. For the ending I have no words.
More wicked japanese stuff for the children!
"urinals in restrooms", that would be good reading - but on slashdot I can read crap without ads.
Too bad that there is no better way than vandalism and grafitti to get rid of ads IRL, especially "community sponsored" ads on buses etc pisses me off, why do we pay tax and tickets...
As a spinoff from this the Swedish Computer Inspection Agency (boring government department)
decided to consider any logging of IP-numbers as equal to logging personal data, which is illegal without premission from either the agency or the persons affected.
To reply to myself,
l e6f%2438r1%40ripley.netscape.com
from what I have found XUL developers won't have any use for this:
works with HTML/XHTML loaded via file: or http: URL, it doesn't work with XUL loaded from chrome it seems.
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=sv&lr=&selm=d5
Since XUL itself is XML any way to handling it in a more structured way would make Mozilla easier to code for.
However, XSLT has been in Mozilla for ages with no possible way to use it for dynamic XUL generation - is this just another way to presenting static XML data?
Claiming US nuclear power plants are unsafe because of what happened in Chernobyl is foolish at best.
Hey don't think we can't see "24" outside the US. Now we know all about your nuclear security.
Fox corporation also opened my eyes about your muslim minority,
every one of them seem to be potential sui^H^H^Hhomicide bombers.
Adults use palm.
But now the wait is over for those adults waiting for the limited hello kitty styled Palm V.
I'd mod you either -1 Terrorist or +1 Unamerican for that, but I'm stuck since it's a tie.
And we are to believe that human activity is somehow solely resposible for global warming?
Believe whatever you want to, but if you have build your house on permafrost (or some crucial resources, like oil-pipelines in your society) you will surely have to pay for it.
Why not a prequel? So unimaginative...
Well, every computer I use ought to take
a simple push on the powerbutton when I go
to bed if I forgot to login, su and "shutdown -h now".
"User errors" don't exist, though I could need an atomic filsystem from time to time...
Maybe he is looking for a computer with built in perfumer:
First Look at ABIT DiGiDice: What Does a Barebone Smell Like?
Seriously, some problems with computers might be related to them being infumigated with
bromine-based flame-retardants. Which is as useful and effective as DDT were, in more ways than intended.
Linked from the Stripe Snoop page:
An article I wrote that is being published in the Summer 2004 issue of 2600 that is all about magstripe interfacing. This provided the basis for Stripe Snoop. Another application is this homebrew coke machine I built.
Even though slavery is forbidden the most common form of it is through aquired or even inherited debts, and there is no better way to tax money of someone than to drag him through the US legal system - no matter how legit the case may be.
I stumbled upon a fresh article on this subject:
Zombie contracts in the EDA industry
Of course,
and naturally the laws applied ought to be the ones effective at the time it was written.
They seem busy removing unwanted features that should't have been there in the first place,
while keeping their promise not to do anything that could improve their product or move it closer to any standard.
You actually claim that old problems are learned from and the mistakes are never repeated....
It might be true that new quality routines rule out the possibility of the same thing happening again, but quality routines don't communicate the actual cause and can't prevent similar things from happening out of the same couse.
Nowadays it has been reported that whiskers can form inside the computers themselves, because of the new lead-free circuits that are to replace every mainboard in a few years time and no filters can do anything about them there.
Yeah, but the only site still forcing me to use IE is my local bank...
Sure, this is a nice syntax to describe one-off problem. Though for a database you'd hope that it is done once to transform it to something useful instead of 100 times per second.
Yup, but trying hard enough to make a car using nano-technology will probably result in vast amounts of byproducts small enough to get into your cells and subtly kill you.
Of course we learned that when trying to create biocompatible compounds using chemical means, but remember that they are creating materials and not cars and couldn't care less about your well-being.
Why not implement a deposit sum for patent to be granted to the person that found prior art or faults invalidating it. This would probably end all talk about underpaid or overworked reviewers and spawn a new profession on the internet.
I'm sure Brigitte Bardot couldn't make the difference between dogs and rats either.
But if I'd blame her someone ought to tell me what it is first.
It seems to me that you are a person that would enjoy living in China.