Slashdot Mirror


Mel Brooks Says 'Spaceballs' Sequel In The Works

BlueDino writes "Several news sites are reporting that Mel Brooks will release a sequel to Spaceballs. As far as a release date, Brooks says, 'Best case scenario: a week before the new Star Wars opens. Worst Case Scenario: a year after the new star wars opens.'"

427 comments

  1. We knew this.. by xTK-421x · · Score: 5, Funny

    This shouldn't be news to anyone, they already told us it was coming.

    LONE STARR: Thanks. Well, we'd better get going. I wonder, we will we ever see each other again.

    YOGURT: Who knows. God willing we'll all meet again in Spaceballs II: The Search for More Money.

    --
    "TK-421, why aren't you at your post?"
    1. Re:We knew this.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I was just thinking that if they named the sequel anything BUT The Search for More Money it'd be disappointing...

    2. Re:We knew this.. by DenDave · · Score: 2, Interesting

      They did din't they.. but then at the end of history of the world part 1 they promised us Hitler on Ice and Jews in Space but they never got any of it done.. must be all that high anxiety in show business, or was it Joan Rivers that got pregnant? Oh whatever, just get me to Mr. Coffee...

      --
      -if at first you don't succeed, stay the heck away from paragliding.
    3. Re:We knew this.. by Wind_Walker · · Score: 5, Funny
      In an interview with Mel Brooks a while ago (on the order of years) he stated that he would not name a Spaceballs sequel "Spaceballs II", but would instead name it:

      "Spaceballs III: The Search for Spaceballs II"

    4. Re:We knew this.. by The_K4 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well he DID give you Drews in space.

      "Funny, she doesn't look Drewish."

    5. Re:We knew this.. by DarkHelmet · · Score: 5, Funny

      YESS!!!!! I knew this slashdot username would come in handy one day!

      --
      /^[A-Z0-9._%+-]+@[A-Z0-9.-]+\.[A-Z]{2,4}$/i
    6. Re:We knew this.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I always have coffee when I watch Radar. You know that. Everybody knows that.

    7. Re:We knew this.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually the people from Druidia would probably be called Druids not Drews. Although Druish does work too.

    8. Re:We knew this.. by DrCash · · Score: 0
      Screw the sequel! I just want to know when I can buy the Spaceballs: The Flame Thrower in stores! The kids are gonna love that one! ;-)

    9. Re:We knew this.. by pacc · · Score: 1

      Why not a prequel? So unimaginative...

    10. Re:We knew this.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      On behalf of Mel Brooks and his lawyers, we respectfully request that you to cease and desist from using that name. Failure to comply will result in your being "detained" indefinitely in Git'mo.

      You have been warned!

      We are serious!

      Seriously!

    11. Re:We knew this.. by JudeanPeople'sFront · · Score: 1

      he-he, here is hoping for a Life of Brian sequel...

    12. Re:We knew this.. by Short+Circuit · · Score: 2, Funny

      Good idea...we can learn more about about Lone Starr's father's brother's nephew's cousin's former roommate!

    13. Re:We knew this.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nah, we don't need more movies about alcoholics.

    14. Re:We knew this.. by jafiwam · · Score: 1

      Well, they should follow Lucas' footsteps and digitally re master Yogurt to be female and attractive (but still green) and have her shoot first.

      With new dialogue, they could change the entire meaning and importance between the characters in the scene.

    15. Re:We knew this.. by maw · · Score: 1

      Of course we do sir!

      --
      You're a suburbanite.
    16. Re:We knew this.. by Lt.Hawkins · · Score: 1

      I've heard this too, and always thought the third flick should be "Spaceballs IV: We found it!" and then do spaceballs 2.

      either that, or "Spaceballs IV: I give up, I've looked everywhere, and can't find it."

      --
      -- My Sig is a P228.
    17. Re:We knew this.. by Space_Balls · · Score: 1

      Mine is even better;)

      --
      this.showSig(false)
    18. Re:We knew this.. by yanos · · Score: 1

      Do you have a reference for that on the web? I keep telling my friend about this working title, but he just won't believed me because i cant seem to find any evidence.

    19. Re:We knew this.. by Ryosen · · Score: 1

      The "sneak peak" at History of the World Part II was a joke. If you think about them, you'll realize they were one-line gags (Hitler on Ice? A Viking Funeral?). There never was an actual Part II intended.

      --

      Ryosen
      One man's "Troll, +1" is another man's "Insightful, +1".
    20. Re:We knew this.. by foobar2222 · · Score: 1

      On behalf of Mel Brooks and his lawyers, we respectfully request that you to cease and desist from using that name. Failure to comply will result in your being "detained" indefinitely in Git'mo.

      Great!

      I/we are surrounded by assholes!

      I guess it is springtime for lawyers.

  2. Damn by Bai+jie · · Score: 2, Funny

    There goes the neighborhood.

    1. Re:Damn by microTodd · · Score: 2, Funny

      Actually, the line is:

      Oh shit, there goes the planet. *slowly shakes head*

      --
      "You cannot find out which view is the right one by science in the ordinary sense." - C.S. Lewis on Intelligent Design
  3. May the schwartz be with you by cOdEgUru · · Score: 1

    Cause by God!! My schwartz is bigger than yours..

  4. Working Title - SpaceBalls 2: by Gothmolly · · Score: 0, Redundant

    The Search for More Money

    --
    I want to delete my account but Slashdot doesn't allow it.
  5. sooo, ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    we will have a pair of Spaceballs now?...

  6. Obligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Lonestar shoots first!

    1. Re:Obligatory by eegad · · Score: 2, Funny

      That's funny! Seriously, though, it would be awesome if Mel somehow managed to really stick it to Lucas for all this editing garbage. He might even be able to make it a major plot element. They might have some kind of time machine where they go back to change something that happened in the past but then argue about it later.

      "You idiot! You shot him before he fired at you!"

      "No, that's the way I meant to do it!"

    2. Re:Obligatory by niteice · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Will they be able to change the Instant Videocasettes?

      (note: for a seriously 'damn...'-inducing monent, watch that scene on the dvd version. you really notice the quality between dvd and vhs.)

      --
      ROMANES EUNT DOMUS
    3. Re:Obligatory by taernim · · Score: 1

      $50 says that will be in the movie. Sure, only the fanboy "geeks" will get it, but that's part of the humor that Brooks enjoys doing.

      --
      "PC Load Letter? What the $@#% does that mean?!"
  7. Can't be worse then the last two Star Wars! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can't be worse then the last two Star Wars, and is more likely to be acted well too!

  8. goody by kippy · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Maybe this will be as good as Robin Hood: Men in Tights. Oh wait, that sucked.

    Mel's great but he jumped the shark after Young Frankenstein, Blazing Sadles and the Producers.

    1. Re:goody by chegosaurus · · Score: 0

      Don't forget "High Anxiety". That's good. And "Life Stinks" is *easily* as bad as "Men In Tights".

    2. Re:goody by plover · · Score: 1, Informative
      I think Robin Hood: Men In Tights was the shark-jump. All three of the earlier movies you mentioned were brilliant.

      imdb doesn't show the upcoming Spaceballs II in Mr. Brooks' production bio, but it does show an announcement that "The Producers (2005)" is currently in production, and he's bringing in the cast from the Broadway production to do it. That was by far the funniest play I have ever seen in my life -- I hope he can pull it off again.

      --
      John
    3. Re:goody by gphinch · · Score: 1

      If you wanna talk bad Mel Brooks how can you leave out "Dracula: Dead and Loving It"? That's the bottom of the barrel

      --
      in bed.
    4. Re:goody by Captain+Rotundo · · Score: 1

      I dont know if your aware of this, but as far as a "Producers" movie goes, he already pulled it off.

      The musical is based on the original film.

    5. Re:goody by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe it will be. You know, there are those of us who liked Robin Hood: Men in Tights. Saying that it "sucked" is an opinion dressed up as fact. You think it sucks. I don't.

      Frankly, I found Spaceballs to be quite disappointing. I thought the "bad" guys were hysterical and "good" guys were annoying.

    6. Re:goody by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Schwartz? We don't need no stinking schwartz.

    7. Re:goody by MORTAR_COMBAT! · · Score: 1

      Hilarity is: "Springtime for Hitler" sung while the chorus marches around in a swaztika formation...

      --
      MORTAR COMBAT!
    8. Re:goody by Wireless+Joe · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Mel's great but he jumped the shark after Young Frankenstein, Blazing Sadles and the Producers.

      That's quite a long jump, 1974 (Fankenstein) to 2001 (Producers).

      Isn't it more fair to say that he's had his hits and misses over his 65+ year career?
    9. Re:goody by kippy · · Score: 3, Informative

      The Producers was made in 1968.

    10. Re:goody by Fnkmaster · · Score: 4, Interesting
      I'm not sure if you realize this, but Mel Brooks recently turned his old Producers movie into the most financially successful (and one of the funniest) Broadway shows ever. I paid an ungodly sum for two Orchestra seats, not once but twice, during the recent "revival" of the Nathan Lane/Matthew Broadrick casting, once to bring my mother and once a lady friend.


      Anyway, the point is that while much of his work in the 90s was pure crap, his career can now officially be considered back off life support.

    11. Re:goody by yamahito · · Score: 1

      what, all of them?

    12. Re:goody by mstra · · Score: 1
      I don't know. The original The Producers film was damn funny. I haven't seen the Broadway musical, but from what I understand, a lot of what I consider the best parts of the film (Lorenzo St. Dubois, for instance) have been excised.

      Of course, that doesn't surprise me, as jokes about freaky hippies are a lot less culturally relevent these days.

      --
      Photography, technology, and my dog Scout - http://mattstratton.com
    13. Re:goody by kfg · · Score: 1

      I'm rather fond of Silent Movie, if only for the wheelchair race with Paul Newman, plus I have a fondness for Morgans.

      That and giving a Marcel Marceau the only spoken word in the movie was at least a clever gag, if not exactly fall down laughing. I can appreciate cleverness, something that I'm afraid Mr. Brooks has been lacking of late.

      He definately hit his peak with Young Frankstein though. He suffers from the disease that all artists who do their best work early do, all of the later works get compared against their previous to their detriment. Even if they're actually OK they come off looking worse than they are because of the expectations.

      If only Lucas had that excuse.

      KFG

    14. Re:goody by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Oh, come on, I can't believe nobody here sees the pattern. GOOD Mel Brooks movies have Gene Wilder in them. BAD Mel Brooks movies don't.

    15. Re:goody by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You obviously haven't been to San Francisco lately.

    16. Re:goody by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "God is an American"

      God didn't exist before 1776?

    17. Re:goody by Tebriel · · Score: 1

      The musical was even funnier than the movie. By a longshot. And I'm a fan of the original.

      --
      The Blaster Master Fighting for Truth, Justice, and Evil Pie since 1979
    18. Re:goody by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nor after then, either.

    19. Re:goody by mstra · · Score: 1

      Of course I realize it. I said "I haven't seen the musical yet". That implies I am aware of its existence.

      --
      Photography, technology, and my dog Scout - http://mattstratton.com
    20. Re:goody by Fnkmaster · · Score: 1

      That's good, but my post wasn't in reply to yours. :)

    21. Re:goody by zenneth · · Score: 0

      Blazing Saddles and Young Frankenstein preceded Spaceballs. Does this mean Spaceballs sucks? I think not!

      --
      The Chronic *WHAT* les of Narnia!
    22. Re:goody by mstra · · Score: 2, Funny
      Then this post isn't a reply to your reply that replied to my reply to your non-reply.

      Glad we got that squared away.

      --
      Photography, technology, and my dog Scout - http://mattstratton.com
    23. Re:goody by Rytsarsky · · Score: 1

      If we're not forgetting things... let's not forget History of the World: Part I. So many easy-to-miss subtleties that leave you laughing (and quote) for quite some time. Apparently, I have different taste than most people around here... I like all of Mel's movies that I've seen. Some better than others, but they're all good to me.

      --
      God became man to enable men to become sons of God. -C.S. Lewis
    24. Re:goody by neurojab · · Score: 2, Insightful

      >If only Lucas had that excuse.

      Maybe THAT's the reason he's going back and F*&#ing up Star Wars. He doesn't want his current movies to be compared to such a high standard, so he's lowering the standard. It has a twisted genius about it.

    25. Re:goody by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 5, Insightful
      ' Maybe this will be as good as Robin Hood: Men in Tights. Oh wait, that sucked."

      Newsflash buddy, there's a LOT of people out there who loved Men in Tights.

      Yet another ignorant person who assumes that their opinion is fact...

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    26. Re:goody by plover · · Score: 1
      The movie was able to easily show this with a top-view camera, so I was wondering how they were going to pull that off in the theatre. We had the best main floor seats I've ever had in my life when we saw this show (they were worth the $$$, trust me,) but obviously you won't see the swastika formation from below. They had a brilliant low-tech solution. While we were distracted with the antics of the dancers, they positioned large mirrors over the stage. You were already laughing at the guys with the bolt-on-mannequins goose stepping around the stage, and then the mirrors tilted to get your attention. You looked up and realized they were dancing in swastikas, and it just got funnier and funnier!

      The entire show was laugh-till-your-eyes-watered from start to finish. I literally ached from laughter afterwards ... the pigeons, oh god the pigeons were great!

      The original movie was hilarious (a bit dated by the time I saw it, since I was only 7 when it came out) but the stage performance completely blew me away. Words can't describe how they were able to get us laughing from start to finish, and kept it going full throttle the entire time.

      If you ever get the chance to see the travelling company's live performance, beg, borrow or steal tickets to it; and drag as many friends as you can

      --
      John
    27. Re:goody by pi_rules · · Score: 5, Funny
      Newsflash buddy, there's a LOT of people out there who loved Men in Tights.

      In the future you may want to slide the words "the movie" in there somewhere.
    28. Re:goody by R2.0 · · Score: 1

      You are misusing the phrase "jump the shark", which was coined after the Happy Days episode where Fonzie literally jumped a shark on water skis in an attempt to boost ratings and inject life into a failing series.

      I can't think of anything particularly egregious in "Men in Tights" that counts as jumping the shark, even if one views all of Mel Brooks' movies as a "series". It simply wasn't as good as some of his previous stuff.

      --
      "As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly." A. Carlson
    29. Re:goody by rainman_bc · · Score: 1

      Uh, Blazing saddles was awesome! It's a classic!

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    30. Re:goody by Punk+Walrus · · Score: 1
      "Unlike other Robin Hoods, I have a British accent..."

      Not his best film, but I liked it, too.

    31. Re:goody by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you are admitting to everyone on /. that you are gay?

    32. Re:goody by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Clearly he was referring to the Producers movie (1968), not the gay ass musical.

    33. Re:goody by Fnkmaster · · Score: 1
      Uhh, I brought a chick to the Producers, what part of that didn't you understand? Would you like me to describe in detail the rest of the evening, after she came back to my apartment?


      In any case, it's obvious you're not from New York, since you don't seem to understand that A) most people who can afford to go to the theater at least once in a while and B) taking a girl to a 10 dollar movie, vs. taking her to a 100 dollar Broadway show - what do you think is more likely to get you laid?

    34. Re:goody by Drooling+Iguana · · Score: 1

      No. Emmett Brown is God.

      --
      ... I'm addicted to placebos
    35. Re:goody by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      "Uhh, I brought a chick to the Producers, what part of that didn't you understand? Would you like me to describe in detail the rest of the evening, after she came back to my apartment?"

      Not classy, dude. If you did have sex, just be happy you had sex, why do you feel the need to defend yourself on Slashdot of all places? You went to see a broadway musical, that opens the door to gay jokes. Methinks he doth protest too much!

    36. Re:goody by Fnkmaster · · Score: 1
      Would you stop trolling, already? There are some things I feel insecure about in this world, but one of them is not my sexual preference. In any case, like I said, only somebody not from New York would even suggest that seeing a musical implies that you are gay.


      I pointed this out for the benefit of the many uncultured geeks on Slashdot. It would be their loss if they visit New York and don't see a musical because they think it's 'gay' when in fact chicks generally dig it.


      As for me, I'll just go back to taking it up the rear here, since you've so smartly called me out on my homosexual lifestyle.

    37. Re:goody by taernim · · Score: 1

      I paid an ungodly sum for two Orchestra seats, not once but twice, during the recent "revival" of the Nathan Lane/Matthew Broadrick casting, once to bring my mother and once a lady friend.

      So your mother isn't a lady? :P

      --
      "PC Load Letter? What the $@#% does that mean?!"
    38. Re:goody by G-funk · · Score: 1

      Nah, Emmett Brown is Doc.

      --
      Send lawyers, guns, and money!
    39. Re:goody by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Blazing Saddles had Wilder in it?

    40. Re:goody by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Yet another ignorant person who assumes that their opinion is fact"

      It wasn't an opinion. Men in Tights did suck, and badly. That's a fact, not an opinion.

    41. Re:goody by Spunk · · Score: 1

      And oddly enough, they're making the movie again.

  9. How about History Of The World Part 2? by simetra · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Really, that's begging to be made.


    --

    "Would it kill you to put down the toilet seat?" -- Maya Angelou
    1. Re:How about History Of The World Part 2? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hitler on Ice!!11!!one!

    2. Re:How about History Of The World Part 2? by glowimperial · · Score: 2, Funny

      Jews in Space!

    3. Re:How about History Of The World Part 2? by MustardMan · · Score: 5, Funny

      Jewsssss Innnn Sppaaaaaaccceeeeeee

    4. Re:How about History Of The World Part 2? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hitler on Ice!

    5. Re:How about History Of The World Part 2? by Noksagt · · Score: 5, Informative
      Whoever modded this and the other Jews in Space post as Troll has obviously not seen the movie. At the end of History of the World: Part 1:
      See Hitler On Ice! See A Viking Funeral! See Jews In Space!
    6. Re:How about History Of The World Part 2? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no way, the real taste of Mel would be his spoof of LOTR.

      that movie would absolutely rock. anything that pisses all over the shrine of people that worship their favorite movie is ALWAYS a great movie.

      Lord of the Wings, a drewish adventure in middle yemen!

    7. Re:How about History Of The World Part 2? by TarrVetus · · Score: 0

      Speaking of History of the World Part I, notice that the French movie poster for Spaceballs calls the movie "The Insane History of Space." Maybe we will see Jews in Space some day; I've been singing the song for years....

    8. Re:How about History Of The World Part 2? by MustardMan · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Since we're being informative, I will also point out that the Jews in Space tune seems to be a Mel Brooks favorite.
      Compare...

      We're Jews, we're Jews in space...
      Patrolling the skies defending the Hebrew race

      with

      We're men, we're men in tights
      We roam around the forest looking for fights


      I love Mel Brooks as much as the next geek, but it's amusing to see what a one-trick pony he is sometimes.

    9. Re:How about History Of The World Part 2? by AdrainB · · Score: 1

      Mel Brooks and Rick Moranis are both jewish so we already saw jews in space.

    10. Re:How about History Of The World Part 2? by RyuuzakiTetsuya · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but he never re-did it so that way Roger Rees shot first, not Carey Elwes. Also Dave Chappelle wasn't replaced with a CG ewok.

      --
      Non impediti ratione cogitationus.
    11. Re:How about History Of The World Part 2? by RyuuzakiTetsuya · · Score: 1

      oops. meant to reply to the other reply in this thread.

      --
      Non impediti ratione cogitationus.
    12. Re:How about History Of The World Part 2? by rainman_bc · · Score: 1, Troll

      Buy if you use the word Jew in a sentence you're considered an Anti-Semite (by some - Many really good Jewish people out there, but some really draw that dagger way too quickly IMO).

      Here it comes.... -5 (Troll | Flamebait)... What the hell, I have Karma to burn.

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    13. Re:How about History Of The World Part 2? by Noksagt · · Score: 1
      I think any post that refers to a specific race or religion is often modded down & this has nothing to do with the word "Jew." Negative mods are more likely for short posts, many of which are meant as jokes (and not necessarily with any ill-will). Even more likely if the context is somewhat obscure, as in this case. It is too bad that the knee-jerk response to even slightly esoteric posts is often the worst possible one, but it IS often appropriate--there are more trolls and flamebaits than positive posts on these topics. But perhaps it is better to make more of an effort trying to understand a post before modding it in either direction. If there are at least three posts from three posters mentioning "Jews in Space" under a specific story, maybe you're missing the reference!

      Of course Brooks himself is Jewish, so I'd hope that those who got the context wouldn't mod down.
      He must be one of dem self-hating Jews
      --Family Guy
    14. Re:How about History Of The World Part 2? by MilenCent · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I love Mel Brooks as much as the next geek, but it's amusing to see what a one-trick pony he is sometimes.

      Ah-ha, caught you! You can't be a one-trick pony "sometimes," you either are or you aren't.

      To only be a one-trick pony sometimes implies the existance of more than one trick, existing outside the time period refered to. Thus, the question is moved to, how are you defining the one-trick period?

      Anyway, seriously, it's not an uncommon tune structure, and Brooks has written enough other songs that I think he can be forgiven for repeating a melody once in a while. After all, he gave us Springtime for Hitler....

      My god, I just realized what that sounds like to the uninitiated. Um, er... I'm not a Nazi!!

    15. Re:How about History Of The World Part 2? by Reteo+Varala · · Score: 1

      Is it unoriginality, or consistency? You might also notice the phrase "It's good to be the king" outside of "History of the World, Part 1?"

    16. Re:How about History Of The World Part 2? by jellybear · · Score: 1

      I must disagree.

      To only be a one-trick pony sometimes implies the existance of more than one trick, existing outside the time period refered to. Thus, the question is moved to, how are you defining the one-trick period?

      I don't see that question is moved at all. You're just asking a new question. OP stated, simply, that there exists interval [x1,x2] for which tricks, T, is equal to 1. To put it in layman's terms, he is a one-trick pony sometimes. I believe the statement is true.

      If you are saying the statement is false, then you are implying that there is no interval [x1, x2] such that T(x1,x2)=1. That is to say, even as the time interval approaches zero, there will be at least two or more tricks, or else there will be no tricks. To put it in layman's terms, he always does two or more tricks instantaneously, never only one.

    17. Re:How about History Of The World Part 2? by rainman_bc · · Score: 1

      Told you I'd get modded down as a troll :) Oh well, I spoke my mind anyway.

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    18. Re:How about History Of The World Part 2? by MilenCent · · Score: 1

      Strictly logically, you are correct. But my point was (or was intended to be, at least), there is little value in saying that a person is a one-trick pony sometimes: this is true of all people who have A. executed a trick at some time in their lives, and B. did not do it concurrently with another trick.

      Argh, hell with it! You're clearly better at this than I am. I dispense one kudo to your account.

  10. Yay! by slavemowgli · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Wow, that certainly is one movie I'll be looking forward to. Let's just hope it'll be able to live up to the quality and humour of first Spaceballs movie instead of ending up as yet another crappy and unfunny sequel; given Mel Brooks' mixed movie history (which included some really funny stuff, but also some rather crappy failed attempts) I'm not sure just what to expect, but I do hope for the best.

    --
    quidquid latine dictum sit altum videtur.
    1. Re:Yay! by Bonker · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Brooks' stuff is uneven, but some of it is great.

      Remember that a great deal of his directoral work is influenced heavily by 30s and 40s movie direction techniques, with long, drawn out pauses, long establishing shots, and great care to extract maximum emotional impact from the viewer. It relies more on in-jokes, subtle ethnic humor, and wild-takes.

      Compare to today's comedies, which are influenced by the dramatically shorter attention span created by TV, Video games, and the intrnet. They rely more on extremely visual humor rather than situational humor and cut establishment to the bare minimum. Satires in particular rely on deadpan 'straight man' jokes, at a pace that seems rapid-fire in comparison to earlier works.

      I'm not saying one format is better. They're just different formats. Don't group Brooks with the Farelli Brothers or Mike Meyers any more than you'd group Peter Jackson with Alfred Hitchcock.

      I submit that 'Men in Tights' would have been an *incredible* film if only it had been edited differently.

      --
      The next Slashdot story will be ready soon, but subscribers can beat the rush and slashdot the links early!
    2. Re:Yay! by stratjakt · · Score: 1

      The first Spaceballs wasn't a work of genious. It had a few laughs, but was never on the level of Blazing Saddles or Young Frankenstein.

      This movie was much funnier, IMHO.

      "I wan't to eat.... your face"

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    3. Re:Yay! by MemoryDragon · · Score: 1

      Well, what quality, Brooks basically wanted to do a junk movie and he did one. The reason why Spaceballs is so beloved is, that nobody really expected anything else and the humor was fashionable at that time. The problem is if he is going to do the same a second time, it wont work anymore. The humor he used in spaceballs is outdated. He will be measured against a movie which was not really that good (he had done better before and after) but became for a weird reason a classic.

    4. Re:Yay! by MasterOfUniverse · · Score: 1

      you'd group Peter Jackson with Alfred Hitchcock.
      Umm..i think a better comparison would be M.Night shyamalam with Alferd Hitchcock.

      --
      "There is no flag large enough to cover the shame of killing innocent people."--Howard Zinn
    5. Re:Yay! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      subtle ethnic humor ...

      Does your parallel-universe Mel have a goatee?

    6. Re:Yay! by soulsteal · · Score: 1

      I submit that 'Men in Tights' would have been an *incredible* film if only it had been edited differently.

      Not all of us want Men in Tights to be about the contents of said tights.

    7. Re:Yay! by freakmn · · Score: 1
      Not all of us want Men in Tights to be about the contents of said tights.
      Some would rather have it be about contents of implied chastity belt. /sarcasm
      But then again, I just accept it the way it is. It wasn't that bad of a movie! If you whiny people (the grandparent, not the parent) could do any better, do it, and make people like me shut up. /rant
      --
      warning: This post is likely to contain gobs of dripping sarcasm. Consume at your own risk.
    8. Re:Yay! by bar-agent · · Score: 1

      "Subtle" ethnic humor?

      Ladies and gentlemen of the jury, I present Exhibit 1: "Blazing Saddles"

      Also, Exhibit 2: "Men in Tights".

      Case closed.

      --
      i'd hit it so hard, if you pulled me out you'd be the king of britain [bash.org]
    9. Re:Yay! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wan't to eat.... your face

      "want".

  11. Haha finally! by TheKubrix · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I remember as a kid when that movie came out there was all these rumors (hey were little kids!) that they were coming out with Spaceballs 3: The search for Spaceballs 2. Anyone else hear that?

    1. Re:Haha finally! by finkployd · · Score: 1

      Oddly enough, yes I do remember hearing that.

    2. Re:Haha finally! by imsabbel · · Score: 5, Funny

      No, it will be spaceballs 1.
      THe current one will be renamed "spaceballs it was always episode 4"

      --
      HI O WISE PRINCE. WHT TOOK U SO DAM LONG?
    3. Re:Haha finally! by JFMulder · · Score: 2

      Yep! Me too.

      Also, I read long ago (must have been a rumor after all) that Brooks was acutally making a prequel, with young dark helmet played by the kid who stared in Little Vampires.

    4. Re:Haha finally! by TheKubrix · · Score: 1

      hehe this is just plain weird.... For some reason that rumor has always stuck in my mind, and now with this story, its good to see that it wasn't some schmuck kid who told be and I was just plain gullible (unless we went to the same elementary school!). Never tried this before, but I can't seem to find anything about this on google. Weird stuff.

    5. Re:Haha finally! by Gudlyf · · Score: 4, Funny

      BAH! They need to star this kid as young Dark Helmet!

      --
      Trolls lurk everywhere. Mod them down.
    6. Re:Haha finally! by tomhudson · · Score: 0, Troll
      No, it will be spaceballs 1.
      THe current one will be renamed "spaceballs it was always episode 4"
      Actually, since the sequel comes AFTER the first one, it should be named "SpaceBUTTS",.

      It could even have the goatman playing "Dark Anus". Tubgirl could be the "shrewish princess".

      Or, we could have "SpaceTITS, since we've already had portions of male anatomy. Think of it - no "Cooper's Droop" in zero g, and certain portions of the anatomy tend to swell :-)

    7. Re:Haha finally! by JimTheta · · Score: 3, Informative

      That thing you read was one of those no-story headline-and-a-picture things on The Onion. The headline was something like "Jonathan Lipnicki confirmed to play Dark Helment in Spaceballs Prequel" and it was accompanied by a headshot of the kid. It stuck in my head because I thought it was hilarious.

      (That's the same kid from Jerry Maguire, you might remember.)

      But yeah, The Onion, so no ground in fact.

    8. Re:Haha finally! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obviously someone either has no sense of humour, or doesn't know about "Cooper's Droop" and zero-g.

    9. Re:Haha finally! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're not funny.
      I'm too lazy for an account....
      feel free to e-mail me.
      Raineycore@msn.com.

      Also...leave the ideas to people with brains, dipshit.

    10. Re:Haha finally! by abb3w · · Score: 1
      But yeah, The Onion, so no ground in fact.

      ...yet. After all, Mel Brooks has something resembling a sense of humor. It might tickle his funny bone to try the kid out, just BECAUSE the Onion said it first. Of course, if the kid can't act... Brooks will be doing about his usual par, and doing about as well as Lucas did in his choice. =)

      --
      //Information does not want to be free; it wants to breed.
  12. May the schwartz be with you! by plover · · Score: 5, Funny
    Please let there be lots of killing of the ewok things... please o please... and a JarJar. He's gotta kill a lot of JarJars!!

    Could be the Greatest Movie Ever!

    --
    John
    1. Re:May the schwartz be with you! by beacher · · Score: 5, Funny

      Don't forget the evil marketing droid army!

    2. Re:May the schwartz be with you! by Refrag · · Score: 1

      On the commentary track on the DVD, George Lucas said that Ewoks are short, low-tech Wookies. He wanted more Wookies, but Wookies are higher-tech and it's hard to find a lot of 7'3" extras. So, he made the Ewoks.

      Would you like the next Spaceballs to also kill Chewbacca?

      --
      I have a website. It's about Macs.
    3. Re:May the schwartz be with you! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Would you like the next Spaceballs to also kill Chewbacca?
      As long as he gets Lumpy and Itchy in the process.

    4. Re:May the schwartz be with you! by Shadow+Wrought · · Score: 1

      You can't make an omelette without breaking a few Wookies.

      --
      If brevity is the soul of wit, then how does one explain Twitter?
    5. Re:May the schwartz be with you! by freqres · · Score: 1

      Would you like the next Spaceballs to also kill Chewbacca?

      Only the midget low-tech Chewbaccas.

      --
      Rampant Ninja related crimes these days...Whitehouse is not the exception
    6. Re:May the schwartz be with you! by tomcode · · Score: 1

      The title of the movie should be:

      The Passion of Jar-Jar.

      Two and a half hours of whipping. Meesa no!

      --
      f u cn rd ths u cn gt a gd jb n cmptr prgmng
  13. /.'ing Those News Sites by BRock97 · · Score: 5, Funny

    My God, they've gone to plaid!

    --

    Bryan R.
    The price of freedom is eternal vigilance, or $12.50 as seen on eBay.....
    1. Re:/.'ing Those News Sites by drinkypoo · · Score: 4, Funny

      No, plaid is what happens when you go fast. The news sites have gone paisley.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:/.'ing Those News Sites by david.given · · Score: 1
      My God, they've gone to plaid!

      You know, it's probably just a cultural thing, and I know that jokes should never be explained, but... I just don't get this. I never have. Would anyone like to illuminate me?

    3. Re:/.'ing Those News Sites by apt142 · · Score: 1

      He's an Asshole sir. Major Asshole.

    4. Re:/.'ing Those News Sites by the+unbeliever · · Score: 1

      Have you never actually seen Spaceballs?

    5. Re:/.'ing Those News Sites by jjhall · · Score: 1

      Assuming this isn't just a troll post, I'll explain it as I saw it. I believe they were making fun of the change in light patterns that movies always portrayed when a ship started to go faster. For example, on Starwars when using hyper drive, the stars would extend out into lines and kind of flash away, and you'd see a big flash on screen.

      From my take, "going Plaid" made a different light pattern, and that was the whole joke, making fun of the special effects in space movies.

    6. Re:/.'ing Those News Sites by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 1

      Watch the original Spaceballs movie...

      --
      retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
    7. Re:/.'ing Those News Sites by apt142 · · Score: 1

      It's a funny quote in a funny scene.

      I believe it's referring to the color shift that happens when objects accelerate very quickly.

      http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0094012/quotes

    8. Re:/.'ing Those News Sites by david.given · · Score: 1
      Assuming this isn't just a troll post, I'll explain it as I saw it. I believe they were making fun of the change in light patterns that movies always portrayed when a ship started to go faster.

      Mmf. That's it? I was expecting something... well, funnier. I was assuming that 'plaid' had some connotations in the US that they don't over here.

      Well, now I understand it --- but I still don't get it.

    9. Re:/.'ing Those News Sites by twbecker · · Score: 1

      I knew it, I'm surrounded by Assholes!!!

      --
      "The problem with internet quotations is that many are not genuine" -Abraham Lincoln
    10. Re:/.'ing Those News Sites by D-Cypell · · Score: 1

      If you havent seen spaceballs (and it sounds like you havent) go rent it and all will become very clear.

      Also you mention you are not from the US, so incase you are not aware (and apologies if you are) plaid = tartan.

    11. Re:/.'ing Those News Sites by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I knew it, I'm surrounded by Assholes!!!

      Yep, this is slashdot, after all.

    12. Re:/.'ing Those News Sites by david.given · · Score: 1
      If you havent seen spaceballs (and it sounds like you havent) go rent it and all will become very clear.

      I have. I've seen it many times and I love it. I've just never understood the point of that particular bit.

      It sounds like plaid is just one of those things that strikes Americans as being intrinsically funny, which isn't over here...

    13. Re:/.'ing Those News Sites by RailRide · · Score: 1
      For example, on Starwars when using hyper drive, the stars would extend out into lines and kind of flash away, and you'd see a big flash on screen.

      But "hyper drive" (I believe it was referred to as "light speed") wasn't fast enough for Dark Helmet (Rick Moranis)--he demanded "Ludicrous Speed" over the objections of Spaceball One's captain.

      As the ship accelerated past "Light Speed", the speed indicator on the bridge first moved to "Ridiculous Speed, then finally to "Ludicrous Speed", at which point the stretched-out stars in the forward viewscreen receded off-screen, replaced by a square tunnel of plaid-patterned light advancing from the distance.

      And as Spaceball One roared past its target, the occupants of the fleeing space winnebago saw the ship as an immense ribbon of plaid racing over and ahead of them, prompting the astonished remark "It's Spaceball One. She's gone to Plaid". (as if nobody thought it possible)

      At least that's how I remember it--"Spaceballs" was the first flick I bought to try out my first DVD-equipped laptop.

      ---PCJ

    14. Re:/.'ing Those News Sites by |/|/||| · · Score: 1
      Keep firing, Assholes!

      --
      [javac] 100 errors
    15. Re:/.'ing Those News Sites by BRock97 · · Score: 3, Informative

      "It sounds like plaid is just one of those things that strikes Americans as being intrinsically funny, which isn't over here..."

      The deal, here in the US at least, is that for all the different sci-fi movies that have been released, they all treat faster than light travel with these insanely bright textures that twist and turn. Plus, the faster the speed, the more colorful and chaotic the pattern. Any movie that has a ship go that fast will have that feature. So, Mel Brooks was lampooning this with the fact that they were going so fast, their pattern turned to plaid. It still makes me laugh out loud.

      --

      Bryan R.
      The price of freedom is eternal vigilance, or $12.50 as seen on eBay.....
    16. Re:/.'ing Those News Sites by jjhall · · Score: 1

      Too many space movies melding together. You are probably correct about it being "light speed."

      I still think it is even funnier when they drop out of "Ludicrous Speed" by pulling the emergency brake.

      Definitely one of my favorite comedy movies.

    17. Re:/.'ing Those News Sites by CaptainAvatar · · Score: 1
      t sounds like plaid is just one of those things that strikes Americans as being intrinsically funny, which isn't over here...

      Yeah, could be, there's also that Steve Martin (?) movie, Dead Men Don't Wear Plaid. I think over here (Australia), the equivalent "instrinsically amusing pattern" would be paisley ...

      --
      The real Captain Avatar is a fictional character, so I suppose he doesn't mind if I impersonate him.
    18. Re:/.'ing Those News Sites by Xoder · · Score: 1

      Plaid is intrinsically funny.

      And I still enjoy wearing it! (Especially the warm flannel!)

      --
      The previous sig has been removed due to /. protecting your best interests
  14. I disagree. by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If ever there was a series that needed mocking, it's the new starwars series. Anyone who's willing to throw a pie at lucas and his giant ego has got my vote.

    --
    ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
    1. Re:I disagree. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anyone who's willing to throw a pie at lucas and his giant ego has got my vote.

      Oh like he cares... It's obvious that he doesn't give a shit what anyone thinks as he just carries on making more and more stupid bullshit additions and "special versions" for people to buy.

    2. Re:I disagree. by EvilAlien · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Thats a lot of people.

      Doesn't Lucas realize that Empire Strikes Back, with screenwriters Who Aren't Named Lucas and a director Who Isn't Named Lucas, was the best of the Star Wars movies? The awful acting out of Mannequin Skywalker and Amidala good have been hammered out with somebody capable of writing good dialog and a director capable of recognizing stale delivery.

      --
      perl -e 'print $i=pack(c5, (41*2), sqrt(7056), (unpack(c,H)-2), oct(115), 10)'
    3. Re:I disagree. by bckrispi · · Score: 1

      Very relevant to this discussion.

      --
      Xenon, where's my money? -Borno
    4. Re:I disagree. by The+Infamous+Grimace · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Doesn't Lucas realize that Empire Strikes Back...was the best of the Star Wars movies?

      Gotta disagree, and say that Star Wars was the best. Empire was good, but Star Wars stood by itself. Involving, action-packed, love-interest that wasn't predominant or over-bearing, and most importantly, a solid ending. Empire needed a sequel, 'cause of the questions it left (Han, Darth/Luke etc.)

      (tig)
      --
      Ignorance and prejudice and fear
      Walk hand in hand
    5. Re:I disagree. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Empire's plotline was left open for a sequel, the third film was kinda inevitable after the success of the first one. ESB is the better film in every other way possible and the one which Lucas revisionist CGI wankery ruined least.

    6. Re:I disagree. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and the one which Lucas revisionist CGI wankery ruined least

      It's funny, I just had a conversation with someone about the 'Special Edition VHS' changes not-long-ago and that came up. The CG additions are one of the following:

      1. Useless & Annoying
      2. Useless & 'Cool' (as in flashy)
      3. Detrimental to the original movie

      The difference between #1 and #2 vary from person to person, but the gist of it is this:

      Ep V was the only one with no entries in #3. Even the poor-ass 'Alert my Star Destroyer ...' line wasn't detrimental, just annoying. The added lighting in Cloud City was flashy-cool.

      Looking at the rest of the movies, we have the most *hated* changes showing up: Han shooting first, the Ep IV Jabba scene, the changed ending to Ep VI.

      Although, all this goes out the window when you look at the new DVD release. Ep V has been *ruined* by the scene they re-did with the Emperor. Just *ruined*.

    7. Re:I disagree. by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      From what I understand Lucas envisioned a nine-movie epic arc, and then he picked the third of the arc which seemed most promising, then made the first of those movies and hoped for the best. That might be revisionist, though.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  15. Re:Well we all know the title by semifamous · · Score: 4, Funny

    No, no no.

    That was just kidding.

    This will be "Spaceballs 3: The Search for Spaceballs 2"

  16. Good is dumb by Nuclear+Elephant · · Score: 4, Funny

    And Evil will always triumph, because good is dumb.

  17. Jon Candy is dead... by JeeNam · · Score: 5, Interesting

    ...so who will play Barf?

    1. Re:Jon Candy is dead... by networkBoy · · Score: 1

      A CGI controlled CG animation.
      Real time web control anyone?
      -nB

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    2. Re:Jon Candy is dead... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Man that would be fantastic!

    3. Re:Jon Candy is dead... by AdolChristin · · Score: 1

      Man, I was just about to post the same thing. Will they try to get someone else to play Barf? Or will his tragic death be explained in the intro to the movie? It seems like a challenge to replace John Candy...

      --
      #include "forums.h"
      int main() {while (bollox) postcount++;}
    4. Re:Jon Candy is dead... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jack Black?

      Kevin James?

    5. Re:Jon Candy is dead... by pixelpusher220 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I can see the "Son of Barf" being a decent character replacement that doesn't really need explaining


      --
      People in cars cause accidents....accidents in cars cause people :-D
    6. Re:Jon Candy is dead... by plaid747 · · Score: 0

      Artie Lang would be good for the part!!!

    7. Re:Jon Candy is dead... by somethinghollow · · Score: 4, Funny

      They'll get John Belushi. Oh, wait. No...

      They'll get Chris Farley. Ah, damn. Not again...

      Maybe that guy from Mad TV?

    8. Re:Jon Candy is dead... by BW_Nuprin · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Chris Farley is an obvious replacement! Oh... wait...

    9. Re:Jon Candy is dead... by nizo · · Score: 0
      It seems like a challenge to replace John Candy...

      To do it right they will need at least two or three people.

    10. Re:Jon Candy is dead... by cranky_slacker · · Score: 1

      I think the obvious choice is John Goodman...although the Son of Barf idea ain't too bad either..

    11. Re:Jon Candy is dead... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can see Drew Carey hopped up on crystal meth as being a good fit for this role.

    12. Re:Jon Candy is dead... by AdolChristin · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If, as has been suggested here, they go the Prequel route, Jack Black as a young Barf would be awesome! Good call!

      --
      #include "forums.h"
      int main() {while (bollox) postcount++;}
    13. Re:Jon Candy is dead... by CrimeDoggy · · Score: 1

      I heard that they are just going to use CGI to pop in the old Barf...

    14. Re:Jon Candy is dead... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because the Barf suit was controlled by several puppeteers? or was that a fat joke?

    15. Re:Jon Candy is dead... by rsmith-mac · · Score: 1

      It would fit, Barf could be the Jar Jar parody this time around, and I certainly wouldn't complain.

    16. Re:Jon Candy is dead... by mustangsal66 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Artie Lang would be great as Barf Jr. (From Mad TV, Dirty Work, etc...)

      --
      Why worry? Each of us is wearing an unlicensed "nucular" accelerator on his back.
      Sig changed for readability by G.W.
    17. Re:Jon Candy is dead... by festers · · Score: 1

      Easy, Jack Black.

      --


      -------
      "Every artist is a cannibal, every poet is a thief."
    18. Re:Jon Candy is dead... by gosand · · Score: 1
      Artie Lang would be great as Barf Jr. (From Mad TV, Dirty Work, etc...)


      Or even Horatio Sans from SNL.

      --

      My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

    19. Re:Jon Candy is dead... by PortHaven · · Score: 1

      I actually think this is why Spaceballs II never happened. Without Candy it just couldn't be done.

      I believe the NEW Spaceballs II will focus on the prequels, thus they will occur before Spaceballs.

      In fact, if Mel Brooks were a genius, he'd name it Spaceballs 0.5 and open it up with them rewinding the video tape scene. From "Now" to "Way Back Then"

      LOL

    20. Re:Jon Candy is dead... by Chiron+Taltos · · Score: 1
      I can see the "Son of Barf" being a decent character replacement that doesn't really need explaining

      He could be called "Reflux".

      --
      CT

    21. Re:Jon Candy is dead... by identity0 · · Score: 1

      Duh, they're going to cast McCauly Caulkin as Young Barf.... I mean, if it's going to mock Star Wars now, it's gotta be a prequel, right?

    22. Re:Jon Candy is dead... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No way, its gotta be Artie Lang.

    23. Re:Jon Candy is dead... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sheesh, I posted almost the exact same comment and got modded down to -1, presumably for being too tasteless. Sigh - No justice on slashdot.

    24. Re:Jon Candy is dead... by sharkey · · Score: 1

      Personally, I'd think "Ralf" would be more fitting.

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    25. Re:Jon Candy is dead... by Chiron+Taltos · · Score: 1
      I can see the "Son of Barf" being a decent character replacement that doesn't really need explaining

      "Ralf" could be good too. Personally, I just thought calling him "SOB" was a bit harsh ... ;-)

      --
      CT

    26. Re:Jon Candy is dead... by Khith · · Score: 1

      His captured stunt double, of course.

    27. Re:Jon Candy is dead... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Waitress: "Hey, watch the tail, pal."
      Jar-Jar Barf: "Messa so sorry lady, Meesa canta do a thing with it!"

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    28. Re:Jon Candy is dead... by barzok · · Score: 1

      Only if Mel Brooks calls up and asks him to be in it.

      He doesn't audition. Sure, he's not valued enough in Hollywood to not have to audition, he just hates it, then gripes about how he never gets any parts. So until someone calls him up and says "hey, we want you in this" he'll be on the sidelines.

      (and yes, I'm entirely serious, he just explained this very thing on the Stern Show earlier this week).

    29. Re:Jon Candy is dead... by pixelpusher220 · · Score: 1

      Funny...hadn't even come up with that take on Son of Barf ;-) makes it even more fitting for a Mel Brooks movie!


      --
      People in cars cause accidents....accidents in cars cause people :-D
  18. Re:Another classic down the blackhole... by slavemowgli · · Score: 1

    Yet another classic ruined by an unnecessary sequel.

    Well, we don't know that yet, do we? Expect the worst, but hope for the best...

    --
    quidquid latine dictum sit altum videtur.
  19. Re:Another classic down the blackhole... by networkBoy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    "Yet another classic ruined by an unnecessary sequel."

    I'm not so sure about this. If anyone but Mel was doing it I'd agree with you 100%. As it is I think it has the possibility of being even better than the first one.

    I rarely watch movies in the theater (I hate crowds for one, and don't have the disposable income for another). This is one that I will be in line for, if only to add a couple bucks to Mel's pocket and to let the movie conglomerates know that real comedy is still sellable.

    -nB

    --
    whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
  20. Re:Well we all know the title by napa1m · · Score: 1

    I remember hearing that being the title when I was younger. Was that something Mel said once or just some random rumor that spread?

  21. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 5, Funny

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  22. Huh? by WPIDalamar · · Score: 5, Funny

    I thought episodes 1 & 2 were already parodys of the star wars universe.

  23. The first one was the best experience I've had by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Yoghurt and the first one was the best experience I've had making a movie since Blazing Saddles.

    I wish I could say the same for the audience. I love Brook's work, but by the time this came out, he was well past his best work. The Producers may be okay (as Broadway musicals go, which ain't far) but it's still older the Young Frankenstein or High Anxiety. The parody is very tired for all but the most slavish Star Wars fans.

    1. Re:The first one was the best experience I've had by lucabrasi999 · · Score: 1
      The parody is very tired for all but the most slavish Star Wars fans

      I don't know, George Lucas made a ton of money when he released his TWO most recent Star Wars parodies....Oh, wait....

  24. History of the World Part 2 by ari_j · · Score: 3, Funny

    I'm still waiting to SEE!!!...Jews in space!

    1. Re:History of the World Part 2 by Jacco+de+Leeuw · · Score: 4, Funny

      Obligatory Simpsons quote:

      "You mean Mel Brooks is Jewish??!"

      --
      -------
      Warning: Slashdot may contain traces of nuts.
    2. Re:History of the World Part 2 by Nemith · · Score: 3, Funny

      Funny.... he doesn't look druish.

    3. Re:History of the World Part 2 by sharkey · · Score: 1

      I loved that movie "Young Frankenstein"... scared the hell out of me.

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  25. What would be hilarious... by ticklemeozmo · · Score: 4, Funny

    Is they watch a scene from the original Spaceballs (from Mr. Rental, of course) and during the scene where Vespa picks up the gun, she shoots firsT. ;)

    --
    When modding "Informative", please make sure it both has a source and IS actually informative.
  26. Actors by ect5150 · · Score: 1

    I wonder what actors they would get for this one? I mean John Candy has passed away, but everyone else is available... right?

    --
    I have never let my schooling interfere with my education.
  27. And naturally.... by Conspiracy_Of_Doves · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    when I submitted this yesterday, it was rejected.

  28. May the schwartz be with you-Bankruptcy court. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Cause by God!! My schwartz is bigger than yours.."

    Man. You've been lied to.

  29. Comb the desert, do you hear me... by DA_MAN_DA_MYTH · · Score: 1

    COMB THE DESERT!

    With the release of the SE and the three new prequels, movies like Battlefield Earth, it won't be hard to find GREAT material for this movie.

    --
    "It takes many nails to build a crib, but one screw to fill it."
    1. Re:Comb the desert, do you hear me... by s_mencer · · Score: 4, Funny

      We aint found SHIT!

    2. Re:Comb the desert, do you hear me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      That guy was Tim Russ, who later played Tuvok in Star Trek: Voyager.

    3. Re:Comb the desert, do you hear me... by Maldon · · Score: 1

      Haha. I love that quote. Maannn....

      : )

      --
      Hard work often pays off after time, but laziness always pays off now.
  30. Meesa thinks oy vey by $RANDOMLUSER · · Score: 0

    Theesa suck big time.

    --
    No folly is more costly than the folly of intolerant idealism. - Winston Churchill
  31. How about a prequel? by raider_red · · Score: 4, Funny

    He could make a prequel that really sucks, but in a funny way.

    --
    It's good to use your head, but not as a battering ram.
    1. Re:How about a prequel? by Bigby · · Score: 1

      He could call it, "Spaceballs 0: The Search For Spaceballs 2: The Search For More Money"

    2. Re:How about a prequel? by invid · · Score: 1

      Too easy.

      --
      The Moore-Murphy Law: The number of things that will go wrong will double every 2 years.
    3. Re:How about a prequel? by gwayne · · Score: 1

      "Oh my God! She's gone from suck to blow!"

  32. If he's good it won't be the Search for More Money by unlinear · · Score: 5, Interesting

    If Brooks really wants to do a good satire, he'll open SpaceBalls II with a flashback to the Yogurt scene 'SpaceBalls II' and then re-dub the dialogue to have a different title for SpaceBalls. Preferably by one of those bad-asian-flick re-dub voice actors, clearly re-dubbed and badly synched.

    It'd be the perfect jab at Lucas's revisional approach to Star Wars...

  33. Awesome by CrazyJim1 · · Score: 1

    Spaceballs episode 0? I wanted to write Mel Brooks and suggest it because I liked his work in Spaceballs. God spoke to me: www.geocities.com/James_Sager_PA

  34. it should start with a review by mbonig · · Score: 1

    I hope they start the movie out with a review of the first one... by going to the "movie wall" and picking out Spaceballs 1 and then watching key portions... especially the part where Dark Helment goes head on into the control panels after dropping out of ludicrious speed.. and then some comment about how we were "never supposed to see that again"...

  35. Another classic down the blackhole...Al Gore. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    "Well, we don't know that yet, do we? Expect the worst, but hope for the best..."

    The motto for the upcoming November elections.

    1. Re:Another classic down the blackhole...Al Gore. by stfvon007 · · Score: 1

      But they said there was going to be a sequal in the original movie. Remember, yogert said they would meet up again in "Spaceballs 2: the search for more money"

      --
      All misspellings and grammatical errors in the above post are intentional and part of my artistic expression.
  36. Re:Well we all know the title by AdolChristin · · Score: 1

    Kind of like History of the World Part 2? "See Hitler on ice!" Man, I really wish that Brook's would have released that...

    --
    #include "forums.h"
    int main() {while (bollox) postcount++;}
  37. Great Idea by MandoSKippy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The Star wars prequels have created so much stuff to parady it's unbelievable. I think they shoudl scrap the idea of a sequel and do a prequel. Adding young barf, lonestars father. (Could be darth helmet) So much story possibilty here. I have been telling co-workers for a while that we have needed a sequel/prequel to spaceballs. I'm wearing plaid to the theater!!!

    1. Re:Great Idea by maw · · Score: 2, Funny
      Adding young barf, lonestars father. (Could be darth helmet)

      No no no no no no. It should be his father's brother's nephew's cousin's former roommate.

      --
      You're a suburbanite.
    2. Re:Great Idea by pdxaaron · · Score: 1

      Adding young barf, lonestars father. (Could be darth helmet)

      Darth helmet can't be Lonestar's Father. It was already revealed in the first movie that he is Lonestar's Father's Cousins' Newphew's Brother's former Roommate.

      That kind of revisionism just won't play.

    3. Re:Great Idea by The+Unabageler · · Score: 1

      the kid that plays malcolm in "malcolm in the middle" could be a great kid version of rick moranis. put him in drag and call him Annie Lonestar

      --
      perl -e '$_="\007/4`\cp%2,".chr(127);s/./"\"\\c$&\""/gees; print'
  38. Shit... by TheWickedKingJeremy · · Score: 2, Funny

    ... there goes the planet.

    --

    my religion lies somewhere between buddhism and super monkey ball - pamphlet?
  39. Ill-conceived sequels... by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

    or prequels, as the case may be, rarely live up to their predecessors even remotely. Spaceballs is to space hilarity as Star Wars is to space adventure. And both were sat on for ~20 years before their creator decided to continue. In Mel Brooks case, we've seen what he's released since the peak of Spaceballs, and let's just say that only makes things look worse -- "Dracula Dead and Loving It", anyone?

    Oh well. The nice thing about Mel Brooks is that even if it turns out to be a good movie I won't miss much if I give the theatrical release a miss.

    --

    The enemies of Democracy are
    1. Re:Ill-conceived sequels... by DreadSpoon · · Score: 1

      "Dracula Dead and Loving It", anyone?

      [in a squeeky bat voice]: "Burke, you asshole!"

      ~_^

    2. Re:Ill-conceived sequels... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dracula, Dead and Loving It is what has me worried, too. I loved most of Mel's earlier work, but my God that was a sorry piece of work. I'm hoping it was a fluke.

      Then again, there are Slashdotters who speak in defense of The Matrix sequels, so apparently anything is forgivable. ;)

    3. Re:Ill-conceived sequels... by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      Funniest line in the movie, and it felt accurate after blowing $6.50 on a ticket. :)

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    4. Re:Ill-conceived sequels... by handorf · · Score: 1

      Hey, even Dracula, Dead and Loving it was a better way to spend money than some recent flicks with a lot of potential.

      Sky Captain, anyone?

      I'll take a bad Mel movie over most other crap that gets foisted on us.

      --
      -- IANAEG - I am not an elder god.
  40. Maybe he's joking? by Monofilament · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Well i know i've read interviews with Brooks where he has said, pretty plainly, that he doesn't believe in sequals. This mounted with the fact that he jokingly refers to sequals in his movie. I'd really think that this may be some sort of offhand comment he was making just to stir things up. He does to comedy afterall!!!

    Though on the other hand, if he made a sequal to anything it'd might as well be Spaceballs, with all the deal with the Star Wars Pre-quals.

    Who knows.. he could be serious

    --


    Who makes you Sig?
    1. Re:Maybe he's joking? by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 1

      i've read interviews with Brooks where he has said, pretty plainly, that he doesn't believe in sequals.

      Does that mean that The History of The World, Part Two isn't going to be made? :( :( :(

    2. Re:Maybe he's joking? by mustangdavis · · Score: 1
      he has said, pretty plainly, that he doesn't believe in sequals.



      He never said tht he doesn't believe in pre-quals :)

      Here it comes: Spaceballs -1 (or Spaceballs 0, depending on how you'd like to count) - A new flavor (of yogurt) :)

  41. Wondering... by dcigary · · Score: 1

    ...if the Druids will still be around...

    Princess Vespa : I am Princess Vespa, daughter of Roland, King of the Druids.
    Lone Starr : Oh great. That's all we needed. A Druish princess.
    Barf : Funny, she doesn't look Druish.

    /misses John Candy

    --
    ...my Karma ran over your Dogma...
    1. Re:Wondering... by iapetus · · Score: 1

      Of course they will. You just won't be able to notice them. After all... these aren't the Druids you're looking for...

      --
      ++ Say to Elrond "Hello.".
      Elrond says "No.". Elrond gives you some lunch.
  42. Re:Well we all know the title by richy+freeway · · Score: 1

    It's a line from the original film.

  43. A sequel? by Mirk · · Score: 1

    Surely a prequel would be more appropriate?

    --

    --
    What short sigs we have -
    One hundred and twenty chars!
    Too short for haiku.
    1. Re:A sequel? by DrCash · · Score: 0
      Surely a prequel would be more appropriate?



      Of course, a prequel would be more appropriate! And stop calling me Shirley!


  44. Bring Closure by Comatose51 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If this movie is as good as the original, then all those horrible Star Wars prequels would not have been made in vain. They will at least be source material for another new classic. It will bring some measure of closure to my violated childhood memories. I hope Mel Brooks will throw a bone out to Star Wars fans and have a Jar-Jar + Ewoks massacre scene so we can at least pretend it really happened. J/K.

    --
    EvilCON - Made Famous by /.
    1. Re:Bring Closure by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      to me, the only way this movie can be worth making is if it goes over the top, like the inquisition song did. Who knows, torq, you might win a buck.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  45. Re:Another classic down the blackhole... by SlashdotLemming · · Score: 5, Funny

    Yet another classic ruined by an unnecessary sequel.

    They didn't even make the movie yet and you're already pissing on it.

    Honestly, I hope it blows, and I hope Brooks makes a ton of money, and I hope he makes a third which blows even more, and I want Lucas and Brooks to make a Seinfeldesque bizarro world Christmas special featuring Anakin and Dark Helmet and all their friends that look alike, and I want Kenner to release the special edition "Ruining geek childhood memories" action figure line. I just like seeing all you cranks bitch and moan over pointless things that you have no control over. It's great that you take this all so personally.

  46. Re:Another classic down the blackhole... by RLiegh · · Score: 2, Insightful


    If anyone but Mel was doing it I'd agree with you 100%.

    After "dracula dead and loving it" and "robin hood, men in tights" I don't have the trust in Mel Brooks to think that way, personally.

    The fact that he's rehashing a semi-successfull outing makes me more nervous, in fact (of course he couldn't pick something too obvious, such as blazing saddles two or sth).

    As it is I think it has the possibility of being even better than the first one.


    No, that is highly, highly unlikely. A rehash is a rehash, wether it's parody or not.

  47. Re:Another classic down the blackhole... by closedpegasus · · Score: 1

    Way to judge the movie before it has even been made.

  48. Story Ideas by raider_red · · Score: 1

    Richard Branson and his cool rocket ship?

    Dark Helmet getting his ass kicked on the Planet Of The Apes?

    President Scroob gets thrown out of office and replaced by a big headed guy from Massachusetts?

    --
    It's good to use your head, but not as a battering ram.
    1. Re:Story Ideas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      gotta be a prequel that shows some handsome leading man type and his transformation into Rick Moranis.

  49. feh by ed.han · · Score: 1

    mel brooks george lucas.

    seriously: if brooks can adapt the producers from film to musical so well, i think he deserves the benefit of the doubt. we've never seen brooks do a sequel, despite the multiple-decade wait for history of the world, part 2.

    ed

  50. It's all good... by xenostar · · Score: 1

    As long as it's better than Starballs.

  51. SPACE BALLS I REMASTERED DVD! by Anubis333 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Amazon has a new remastered Spaceballs DVD soon to be released. Aparently it has a lot of new scenes, here's a blurb from Mel Brooks:

    "When we created the original SpaceBalls, we really didn't have enough money or the ability to fulfill my full artistic vision, but thanks to the dawn of computer graphics, the remastered SpaceBalls I DVD will finally allow the public to see my full, unhindered, artistic vision."

    New features include:
    - A CG sidekick Jin Dar Jinx, who beguiles audiences with his slapstick 'off-the-hook' hijinx!
    - A 2 hour space battle.
    - Set extensions created with 3D computer graphics modeled after miniature sets, which were used as matte backdrops in the original film!
    - Computer Generated spacecraft copies of original model spacecraft, now allowing for motion blur!
    - New, more realistic, contemporary, engine sounds for galatic space ships.

    1. Re:SPACE BALLS I REMASTERED DVD! by geekboy2k · · Score: 1

      I know the parent was joking, but I WOULD like to see a newer spaceballs DVD - one that at least has an anamorphic transfer (so I can watch it properly on my widescreen (HD)TV). It would be nice to have an anamorphic "Office Space" too.

    2. Re:SPACE BALLS I REMASTERED DVD! by edrams · · Score: 2, Funny

      I really looked on Amazon. I feel like such a 11@m@.

    3. Re:SPACE BALLS I REMASTERED DVD! by PXE+Geek · · Score: 1

      You know, with this new news, there's got to be a Collector's edition box set of Spaceballs 1 & 2 in the future somewhere. I just hope it's not in a galaxy far, far away... 'Til then I'll stick with my Laserdisc version.

  52. ah, I know the answer by squarefish · · Score: 1

    'Best case scenario: a week before the new Star Wars opens. Worst Case Scenario: a year after the new star wars opens.'

    in other words, 'as soon as we can get the big star to sign the contract'

    --
    Creationists are a lot like zombies. Slow, but powerful and numerous. And they all want to eat our brains.
    1. Re:ah, I know the answer by karnal · · Score: 1

      After checking the link, saw this:

      # Magic 7, The (2005) (TV) (in production) (voice) .... Smokestack Sam

      Risen from the grave, indeed.... In production, no less.

      --
      Karnal
  53. Barf! by Jozxyqk · · Score: 1

    Will they replace John Candy with CG?

  54. 145 posts like this? I want mine! by orzetto · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Spaceballs 2: The Search for More Money!

    --
    Victims of 9/11: <3000. Traffic in the US: >30,000/y
  55. Talk about mixed feelings by Strange_Attractor · · Score: 1
    I thought the first Spaceballs pretty much sucked (tho there were a few good gags mixed among the obvious and/or ancient and/or unfunny ones). And I liked the first (well, fourth, I guess) Star Wars, and SW was relatively unpretentious. So, my first reaction to this is a groan.

    However...
    A big chunk of the problem was that Spaceballs came out nearly a decade after the (good) flick it was lampooning. But this one'll follow three big, sucking, black holes of craptacular filmmaking - and at worst, be only a year afterward. Mel will have bloated budgets, ridiculous self-importance, insipid dialog, wooden acting, and lots of other DESERVING targets of parody (Jar Jar, anyone?).

    So, Spaceballs 2 could be the only redeeming reason for SW 1-3. At worst, it can't be much worse than the first...

    --

    ----
    WWJD...For a Klondike Bar?
  56. I wish I will, I wish I might by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    But when is his son, Max Brooks, going to do a Zombie Survival Guide Movie. or is it too late now that Shawn of the Dead is coming stateside...

  57. Sound Effects Guy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    This movie will fail without that black dude that makes all the sound effects. That guy was the coolest back in the 80s...

    Best scene in the film:

    Lone Star: Not if we jam em

    [Cut scene of Jam hurtling through space hitting a radar]

    Officer:We've been ......... jammed!
    Dark Helmet: Raspberry... nobody give me the Raspberry except.. LONE STAR.

    1. Re:Sound Effects Guy by schon · · Score: 1

      Best scene in the film:

      No, the best scene was in the diner, with the cast of Alien, when the alien pops out of John Hurt, and sings "Hello My Baby" while dancing across the counter..

      That just had me in stitches.

  58. And reprising role as the 'bitchy' robot by grunt107 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Joan Rivers - who now only needs gold paint to resemble the original.

  59. CGI Madness by Slendro · · Score: 5, Funny

    I hope that Brooks pokes a little fun at Lucas
    by showing a scene from the first Spaceballs with
    tons of excessive CGI characters inserted...

    --
    God is my Palm Pilot.
  60. WOOHOO! by CestusGW · · Score: 1

    WOO WOO WOO WOO WOO WOO WOO WOO WOO WOO WOO WOO WOO WOO WOO WOO WOO WOO WOO WOO WOO WOO WOO WOO WOO WOO WOO WOO WOO WOO WOO WOO WOO WOO WOO WOO WOO WOO WOO WOO WOO WOO WOO WOO!

    When I was a kid, I literally wore out the VHS copy of Spaceballs I owned ... I used to be able to pretty accurately quote the entire movie to boot. Of course, the problem right now is that most of us are adults/mature-type people. Most of us watched Spaceballs when we were kids, and watching people get shot in the crotch was funny. So there's bound to be all sorts of bitching if Mel Brooks makes another kids' movie, and we all go "wtf the guy gets hit in the crotch, that wasn't in the first one at all the first was so much better omgwtf ..... oh wait"

    --
    Too much repetition my too much repetition!
    1. Re:WOOHOO! by rainman_bc · · Score: 1

      Uh, I still watch Spaceballs today and find it funny - the jokes get better in time :)

      Like Monty Python - Life of Brian bored me as a kid. never saw the humour in it. Now it's hysterical.

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    2. Re:WOOHOO! by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      There's a lot of jokes in there that my old man didn't catch, but I did, being an observant little 12 year old and all. (Dark Helmet's tie, the "chew your gum" crack at the twins (Doublemint), etc..)

      Now that I'm all growed up, definitely adds rewatch value to a new one.

  61. I was under the impression... by slungsolow · · Score: 1

    That Mel Brooks is in the process of preparing The Producers for another film based outing. It seems to still be doing very well on broadway, and a majority of people don't know that it was originally a Mel Brooks film.

    If he is currently in the pre-production process of the producers he really shouldn't be able to start up something on Spaceballs. Perhaps this is just some new publicity stunt or something. Who the fuck knows.

    1. Re:I was under the impression... by Strange_Attractor · · Score: 1

      The quote from Brooks is extracted from an interview about The Producers movie. He says he won't be in The Producers, but that he's writing himself into the script for Spaceballs 2. IF it's not an off-hand joke (doesn't sound that way to me, FWIW), he's doing some writing while working on The Producers (the latter's probably taking the majority of his time).

      --

      ----
      WWJD...For a Klondike Bar?
  62. Is The Best Case Even POSSIBLE? by DLWormwood · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Best case scenario: a week before the new Star Wars opens

    Even assuming that Brooks can do the film low budget to get it green-lighted quickly, is it even possible to produced a mass-marketable motion picture in just 8 months? Even indie flukes like Blair Witch took time to gain momentum during production, and there's still the editing, distribution and merchandising infrastructure that must be deployed. That is where the real money from the movie is made, you know.

    I just don't see this happening, especially since the material being parodied doesn't lend itself to a low budget. You just have to have enough SFX to make it look like a sci-fi flick, after all...

    That said, I would like to see the follow-up to the "instant cassette" gag; that one got dated real quick, didn't it?

    --
    Those who complain about affect & effect on /. should be disemvoweled
    1. Re:Is The Best Case Even POSSIBLE? by Alien+Being · · Score: 1

      "...is it even possible to produced a mass-marketable motion picture in just 8 months?"

      Yes, at ludicrous speed.

    2. Re:Is The Best Case Even POSSIBLE? by stratjakt · · Score: 1

      Its already in production, so sure. As far as we know, it's already filmed and shot.

      You only need to shoot something like this over a week. You can add some SFX and stuff later, but Brooks' style is corny humor and sight gags.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
  63. Whta will it be called by 91degrees · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Mel Brooks claimed he'd never make a Spaceballs 2. However, he might make a Spaceballs 3: The search for Spaceballs 2.

  64. Revisionist Spaceballs I on TV by YankeeInExile · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Recently, I came across Spaceballs on TV here, with subtitles, and the subtitling sometimes takes liberty with the script - for example to translate idiomatically.

    When it came to the scene where they went to get the video of the movie to see what happened later, the subtitles diverged FAR from the original dialog in a much funnier way. Instead of "home video" the source of the film was....
    Pirates.
    Pirates?
    Yes, Pirates. Piracy has become so rampant, that you can now get a copy of the movie before it is even finished!

    Which is especially funny here, because often you can get pirated VCDs or VHS copies of movies before they're even released locally. The quality is horrendous, and the subtitling is

    WRTN LK PPL TALK IN CHAT ROOMS
    .

    Just for a price-check: A VHS copy of a film is about a dollar eighty, and a VCD is two dollars fifty. DVDs are sometimes burned, and they sell for four or five bucks. Bit-copies of commercial DVDs sell for as much as ten bucks.

    --
    How does the Slashdot Effect happen given that no slashdotters ever RTFA?
    1. Re:Revisionist Spaceballs I on TV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where is "here"?

    2. Re:Revisionist Spaceballs I on TV by UserGoogol · · Score: 1

      Tijuana, according to his webpage.

      --
      "Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity." -- Hanlon's Razor
  65. Mega Maid by jakel2k · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Sweeet, with new CGI Mega Maid would be the bomb. But will they try to use the original cast were possible? (John Candy has passed on so Barf should be no longer be kept in the story... pay some respect to the guy.)

    Will it be Lone Stars kids? What about Dark Helmet? Are they going to have Rick Moranis back as the Dark Lord?

    Yogert anyone??? How about Raspberry Jam???

  66. Mod as... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    +1 Bitter Bastard... :)

  67. Re:mar3 by richy+freeway · · Score: 1

    Man, you took the words right outta my mouth!

  68. Unnecessary necessaries. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Yet another classic ruined by an unnecessary sequel."

    Is there such a thing as a classic being ruined by a necessary sequal?

    1. Re:Unnecessary necessaries. by EnderWiggnz · · Score: 1

      yes, "the matrix" comes to mind here... the original screamed for a sequel, begged for it, promised it...

      and then the sequels sucked ass.

      --
      ... hi bingo ...
    2. Re:Unnecessary necessaries. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really? I thought the original fit very well as a stand alone. That's why I didn't bother to see the sequels, I didn't need to see what even bigger and bigger threats they would throw up against Neo, Dragonball Z-style.

  69. Good news... by hencethus · · Score: 3, Interesting

    ...but I'm still waiting for Men in Tights on DVD!

    1. Re:Good news... by Knight2K · · Score: 1

      I think a few video stores carry that already.

      Oh.

      You mean the Mel Brooks movie.

      Nevermind.

      *whistles nonchalantly*

      --
      ======
      In X-Windows the client serves YOU!
    2. Re:Good news... by Stuart+Gibson · · Score: 1

      Well, assuming you have a region free DVD player, you could get it from the UK.

      Stuart

      --
      It's all fun and games until a 200' robot dinosaur shows up and trashes Neo-Tokyo... Again
    3. Re:Good news... by Lifthrasir · · Score: 1

      if you're talking about robin hood:men in tights, it's been out in australia for a fairly long time (maybe 12 months?)

      --
      No beer, no TV make Lifthrasir something something
  70. Re:Let's play Ain't It Cool News! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Wow, dude. Not only do you FAIL IT, but you're a good 2 minutes behind the real frist psot.

    Not good. Work on your technique, then try again.

  71. Finally by nizo · · Score: 1

    A Star Wars related movie I can look forward to seeing.

  72. That guy from MadTV by The+Queen · · Score: 4, Informative

    Will Sasso

    He was a brilliant retard in "Drop Dead Gorgeous" and I think he'd make a wonderful Barfolomew Jr. :-)

    --

    The House Between - Original Sci-Fi Series
  73. Re:Another classic down the blackhole... by sgant · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I actually worked on the original Space Balls. I was a production assistant at the now defunct Apogee which did the effects for the film.

    Apogee was the original ILM near Van Nuys airport, but John Dykstra kept it after ILM moved north. It was cool working there seeing some of the original models of the X-wing in the lobby of Apogee.

    But this was way before CGI came to the scene.

    --

    "Leo Fender was in a 'state of grace' when he designed the Stratocaster." -- Paul Reed Smith
  74. I stand alone by Call+Me+Black+Cloud · · Score: 1


    I've been conducting an informal survey over the years and I seem to be alone in my opinion that Spaceballs is horrible. It's second only to Mad Dog and Glory in the "worst movie ever" category. It wasn't funny; it was just stupid. I saw it in college after an evening of pizza and beer...just not funny. I like other Mel Brooks' movies. I like other movies that are funny: Army of Darkness. Animal House. Vacation. Caddyshack. Holy Grail. Life of Brian. Princess Bride.

    I for one do not welcome our Spaceballs-sequel-making overlords.

  75. What would be really funny... by ReadbackMonkey · · Score: 3, Funny

    Is if it makes more money than the Star Wars movie released around the same time.. funny because of the title, and well, because the new movies suck and I hope someone gets punished for the sucking.

  76. Nah by c0ldfusi0n · · Score: 1

    It's not 'new', he just digitally enhances it.

    --
    A computer makes it possible to do, in half an hour, tasks which were completely unnecessary to do before.
  77. Not a sequel. by theendlessnow · · Score: 3, Funny
    It's just a re-release with some updated cgi that helps ease the relationship between it and Blazing Saddles. The emperor is added and will be played by Harvey Korman as Hedley Lamarr.

    There are some other changes that will happen when B.S. is re-released as well involving the saloon scene which will have some cgi work as well to make it more catina-like.

  78. Coming full circle? by Hershmire · · Score: 1

    So, Mel Brooks makes a hilarious film in 1968 called The Producers with Gene Wilder and Zero Mostel, who pretty much make the movie. Then he makes the Broadway musical, which, from what I hear, was amazing. Now he wants to make another movie called The Producers, this time with the exact same plot but different actors?

    Please, Mr. Brooks, why re-invent the wheel? The original was brilliant, and doesn't need to be remade! Come out with something new and original instead of remakes and sequels.

    --
    if(!toilet_paper) roll.replace(new roll); //Stupid roommates.
    1. Re:Coming full circle? by AceCaseOR · · Score: 1

      Well, it's an adaptation of the musical, with the original Broadway cast (Nathan Lane in Zero Mostel's part, etc.). Frankly, I'll watch it. I was broke when the musical came to Portland, and it didn't have the original Broadway cast anyway, so no Nathan Lane.

      --
      Zagreus sits inside your head, Zagreus lives among the dead, Zagreus sees you in your bed and eats you in your sleep.
  79. MOD PARENT UP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    You have made my day. Thank you.

  80. God DAMMIT! by Orclover · · Score: 1

    And to think I wasted all my moderator points yesterday on that stupid starwars complete set dvd version "whatever" story.

    Spaceballs on regular TV is ok....spaceballs on cable or in FULL vulger language mode is fucking hillarious.

    --
    I am Jack's complete lack of surprise. -Fight Club
    1. Re:God DAMMIT! by |/|/||| · · Score: 1
      Yeah, I'm sure it loses a lot of humor when edited. I heard that when Blazing Saddles was first broadcast on TV, they took out the farting sounds during the chili scene. In other words, that entire scene had no humor whatsoever.

      --
      [javac] 100 errors
    2. Re:God DAMMIT! by csimpkin · · Score: 1

      They did take out the farting sounds. They were replaced with the sound of horses whinneying.

  81. There's been a new breakthrough in... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    ...home-video marketing.

    Instant DVDs - They're out in stores before the
    movie is finished.

    So let's all rent it now! :)

  82. Uh by rd_syringe · · Score: 1

    That was uttered in a film that came out 15 years ago. Why would we believe a sequel was in the works just because of a Lucas-merchandising joke?

    Incidentally, last year the rumor was that the sequel would be called "Spaceballs 3: The Search For Spaceballs 2."

    1. Re:Uh by rd_syringe · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Then why the "+5 Informative"?

  83. And of course... by Minwee · · Score: 1

    Absolute worst case scenario: The new Star Wars opens.

  84. Re:Another classic down the blackhole... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    can you tell the future? damn why do people have to bitch when they know absolutely nothing, damn.

  85. Spaceballs 3? by Zefram · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Not sure the magazine was pulling my leg, but I heard a long, long time ago (1990?) that they were making Spaceballs 3. The title? "Spaceballs 3: In Search of Spaceballs 2".

    Brilliant.

    --
    What about MEEPT?!?!
  86. Re:Another classic down the blackhole... by Bohnanza · · Score: 1

    "Spaceballs" was a CLASSIC????

    --

    -----

    Sorry, I'm only a 1336 h4x0r.

  87. Re:Another classic down the blackhole... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I'm still waiting for "History of the World Part II" that he promised so long ago :)

  88. Favorite part of first movie... by MoeMoe · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Dark Helmet: "How many assholes do we have on this ship anyhow?"

    Crew: "YO!"

    Dark Helmet: "I knew it! I'm surrounded by assholes... Keep firing assholes!"



    That part always made me laugh... I think they're gonna stick with what made the first movie funny and play off of how badly the new Star Wars movies turned out (IMHO ofcourse). That would explain why we haven't seen a sequel yet, Mel was just waiting to play off of George Lucas again... Well played, Mel.

    --
    Business \Busi"ness\, n.;
    A scam in which all people involved perceive as beneficial...
  89. Spaceballs: Episode -1 by hollismb · · Score: 5, Funny

    Of course, it has to be a prequel, about how Rick Moranis becomes Darth Helmet, possibly revealing more backstory about his father's sister's uncle's brother's cousin's roomate.

    1. Re:Spaceballs: Episode -1 by clacke · · Score: 3, Informative

      Former roommate, if I may.

  90. Re:Another classic down the blackhole... by Nexzus · · Score: 5, Funny
    They didn't even make the movie yet and you're already pissing on it.

    Must be that instant cassette feature.

    --
    Karma: Can only be portioned out by the Cosmos.
  91. Spaceballs 3 by rsmith-mac · · Score: 1

    Considering that Mel is looking to time this with the release of Star Wars 3, I would not be the least bit surprised if they did indeed use Spaceballs 3 as the title, although perhaps not the "search for Spaceballs 2" sub-title.

  92. Three words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    About damn time.

  93. Sequel? by sadiklis · · Score: 2, Funny

    I hope thats a mistake, because i'm loking forward to see a prequel.

    And i hope the movie will leverage Star Wars Kid documentaries.

  94. Mel Brooks needs Gene Wilder by Odd+John · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Mel Brooks was brilliant when he was teamed up with Gene Wilder. That's why Blazing Saddles and Young Frankenstein were wonderful.

    Mel Brooks without Gene Wilder is mediocre at best.

    1. Re:Mel Brooks needs Gene Wilder by korbin_dallas · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Sorry I disagree. There is no evidence for your claim. The genius behind blazing saddles was the writers which included Richard Pryor but not Wilder. And Cleavon Little made the movie. Young Frankenstein was written by Wilder. I see no correlation.

      --
      They Live, We Sleep
    2. Re:Mel Brooks needs Gene Wilder by Thuktun · · Score: 1

      Harvey Korman was also great in Blazing Saddles, and Madeline Kahn was excellent in both Blazing Saddles and Young Frankenstein. Both were in High Anxiety, which wasn't all that spectacular.

      All in all, Mel Brooks has some good films and some not-so-good films. I don't think any particular actor has had any significant influence on that.

  95. Awww, forget the sequel... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Let's see the special edition re-release of the original.

    Maybe John Candy will shoot first in this one.

  96. Mel Brooks, like George Lucas, is vastly overrated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    So this is entirely appropriate.

    I never found Spaceballs especially funny. It's more of an ethnic comedy than anything else - like most Mel Brooks movies. The jokes - like in most Mel Brooks movies - are racial, sexual and excretory. Blazing Saddles was not popular because it was an incisive parody of the western genre, it was popular because it was packed with crass and/or puerile humor. There's no difference between Mel Brooks and the Zuckers, or the Farrellys.

    I'd far prefer to see a real parody of Star Wars done, ala Galaxy Quest for Star Trek, as opposed to one that merely takes the trappings and stuffs them with dick+fart jokes.

  97. And yet, strangely attractive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No sir, I didn't see you playing with your trolls again.

  98. I knew this day would come! by crashnbur · · Score: 1

    Heheh, I said come.

    For comedic effect, the best idea for a subtitle was first proposed by Yogurt himself some 18 years ago: Spaceballs 2: The Quest for More Money!

  99. favorite line by snwobird122 · · Score: 0

    My favorite line from the original was: Sir - she just went from suck to blow.

    1. Re:favorite line by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My favorite was when they were combing the planet, literally.

      White soldiers with giant comb:
      "We've found nothing sir!"

      Black soldiers with giant afro comb:
      "We ain't found shit!"

  100. Re:Another classic down the blackhole... by tomhudson · · Score: 5, Funny
    Honestly, I hope it blows, and I hope Brooks makes a ton of money, and I hope he makes a third which blows even more,
    Remember:
    Lonestar: "we're not doing it for the money, Barf"
    Barf: "We're not?"
    Lonestar: "No, we're doing it for a SHITLOAD of money!"
    Gotta love it :-)
  101. Another sequel from Brooks by neehon · · Score: 2, Interesting

    What I'm really looking forward to, is to see sequel to "History of the World, Part I" , which was announced at the end of the movie: "History of the World, Part II: Jews In Space". Star Warescue hexagon (Star of David) shaped spaceships, shooting at some target with Star War sounds were hilarious.

  102. Real worst case scenario... by CrazyTalk · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It sucks as much as his last several movies. Don't get me wrong, I have great respect for the man and like so many others loved his early stuff - but nothing lately (Witness "Men in Tights") has been nearly as good.

  103. I agree -- like Lucas, Brooks should just stop by Jonathan · · Score: 1

    Funny Mel Brooks movies are "The Producers", "Blazing Saddles", and "Young Frankenstein" . Pretty much everything that he's made since sucked. Much like Lucas and Woody Allen, he's basically used up every good idea he's had, and is just recycling.

    Consider, say "High Anxiety", Brooks' spoof of "Vertigo" -- the funniest moment was when we hear dramatic music, and the main character looks around and sees the band playing it. Pretty clever, right? Well, it *would* be if he hadn't *already* used it in "Blazing Saddles"...

    1. Re:I agree -- like Lucas, Brooks should just stop by raeler · · Score: 1

      Can't stop, have to slow down first!

      --
      This is my post. See sig above ^
  104. Re:Another classic down the blackhole... by Dachannien · · Score: 2, Insightful

    In all likelihood, Brooks will (among other things) be spoofing the concept of movie sequels. He's always been very willing to poke fun at the "meta" aspect of the films he parodies (that being, the moviemaking process itself), and Spaceballs was probably the best example of that out of all his movies.

    "Spaceballs the Flamethrower! ...The kids love that one."

  105. Mo Mo Bleeps by gral · · Score: 1

    Character Idea: Basically, every other word his programming makes him bleep out the cuss words. Of course, only after you know what he was going to say.

    --
    Scott Carr
  106. Spaceballs Episode -2 would be better :) by fracai · · Score: 0

    Ya know, just to be consistent. Or re-issue Spaceballs as "Spaceballs Episode 2 'I Planned This All Along'" and then come out with Episode 1 The Search For More Money

    --
    -- i am jack's amusing sig file
  107. Actually I was hoping for a remake. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ala George Lucas, with kinder gentler more PC space balls. Perhaps make them fluffy(harry)? That way when they bang into her chin while Lea's giving Han fellatio in the cantina, no innocent bystandards will have been hurt along with being rightous when he shoots Guido in self defense...

  108. So if an asian voice actor was used... by the_meager · · Score: 1

    Wouldn't it be, "God wirring, we're arr meet again in Spacebarrs III: The Search for Spacebarrs II:?

    --
    Speckpot?
  109. Oh no! by WolfTattoo · · Score: 1

    Oh no, shes gone from suck to blow! -Spaceballs

  110. Writer Ronny Graham Dead by ackthpt · · Score: 1

    Brooks' key collaborator on writing Spaceballs was Ronny Graham, who passed away in 1999. Maybe Mel is still good enough, but without a good collaborating writer it could be a bomb. Brooks gave a lot of the credit for the success of Spaceballs to Graham's writing.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    1. Re:Writer Ronny Graham Dead by lucabrasi999 · · Score: 1

      Maybe Mel could get writing help from Gene Wilder, Barry Levinson or Richard Pryor for this sequel.

  111. Lone Star shoots first by Moby+Cock · · Score: 2

    Lucas et al could use some serious lampooning. It certainly seems that they disregard every fansite out there. Maybe they need the likes of Brooks to get themselves squared off.

    I wish Brooks would write in a scene where a couple of the characters argue about whether Lone Star should have fired first or not. That would really tickle my funny bone.

  112. Worst Case Scenario... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...the movie actually gets made.

  113. As long as I can get Spaceballs II the T-shirt... by Rooked_One · · Score: 2, Funny

    i'll be happy... Also, It would be a shame if pizza the hut didn't get .... excrimented by himself - because after all, he did eat himself to death.

  114. Re:Another classic down the blackhole... by lavar78 · · Score: 2, Insightful
    "Spaceballs" was a CLASSIC????
    Yes.

    (Classic like "Airplane!," not classic like "It's A Wonderful Life")

    --
    "Dave, I stand still--the conclusions jump to me!" - Bill McNeal, NewsRadio
  115. Re:Another classic down the blackhole... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just like seeing all you cranks bitch and moan over pointless things that you have no control over. It's great that you take this all so personally.

    I actually find it funnier that nearly no one on Slashdot has a sense of humor anymore. They don't seem to care to dig deeper than the surface text and actually think about what was written.

    So let's break it down for everyone:

    You know what would be hysterical in the sequel? If they used good CGI that was actually adding another dimension to the film and not just wasted because the director had money! Oooh another funny thing would be to have a good script. Dialogue between Star Warsish characters would just be hysterical! Ahahha!

    Obviously he was jabbing at the real Star Wars here and not the sequel. The more recent Star Wars movies have little or no dialogue and instead rely on overpriced CGI that no one really wants but that the director puts in because he likes it.

    I have a feeling that they aren't going to show a young Dark Helmet. Instead they are going to show an old and feeble one that has to take Viagra to get his Schwartz up.

    Obviously funny, again, because it is probably true. They might even rebrand the Viagra and have Dole fight Helmet for it.

    Yet another classic ruined by an unnecessary sequel.

    And now for the kicker! The original three Star Wars movies did just fine on their own. They were ok for their time and they actually had good special effects. Now the wealthy director makes three more to continue to live off the name created 20 years before and expects to be able to receive no criticism when he blows it.

    I wish people here could understand sarcasm as it is obvious that some people still use it as a literary device. But I guess that's all over your helmets.

  116. Re:As long as I can get Spaceballs II the T-shirt. by canfirman · · Score: 1
    It would be a shame if pizza the hut didn't get .... excrimented by himself

    Oh, that is a mental image I didn't need before lunch...

    --
    It is not our abilities that show what we truly are... it is our choices.
  117. Real Worst Case Scenario by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Worst case scenario: The movie comes out at all.

  118. Shit ... by guybarr · · Score: 1


    may be a great fertilizer, but it doesn't mean one should eat it as well as the real fruit ...

    --
    Working for necessity's mother.
  119. Correction: The Search for More Money by dowobeha · · Score: 1
    Correction:

    Spaceballs 2: The Search for More Money

    --
    I am concerned about any program, any piece of hardware, any treaty, any law that treats me as a consumer, not a citizen
    1. Re:Correction: The Search for More Money by crashnbur · · Score: 1

      Ah, right. I guess I missed it because of the way Yogurt said "soich", although I'm not sure why that would make me mistake the word for "quest"...

  120. yet another obligatory Simpsons quote by Savatte · · Score: 1

    "I loved that movie Young Frankenstein. Scared the hell outta me!"

  121. Mel Brooks & Money by mrvis · · Score: 1

    Blair Witch was also made on a tiny budget. Mel has made the most successful play in Broadway history. With that, he probably has the ability to throw money at problems that Blair Witch could only dream about.

  122. Wow, talk about missing the joke by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1

    He is a comedian, his estimate was clearly a joke. Anyone with a sense of humor would understand that there is no date set yet.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  123. Spaceballs 3: The Search for Spaceballs 2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Go Mell Brooks ! Please make something funny!

    Not only should you Mock Lucas - but like the
    'Scary Movie' movies, toss in a few mocking scenes for
    other popular sci fi - just a few...
    star trek (any one)
    battlestar galactica
    I, Robot (have bots working at $tar-Buck$ coffee!)
    X-files (oh please mock them!)
    Men in Black
    and working some good mocking of:
    Titanic (in space)
    Lord of the Rings and Harry Potter (I don't know how - your the writer!)
    and The Passion
    - go for it! Mel Gibson SHOULD be mocked by Mel Brooks!

    I Look forward to buying the tickets! :-)

  124. Re:Yay! (Y B h8r?) by gosand · · Score: 1
    Compare to today's comedies, which are influenced by the dramatically shorter attention span created by TV, Video games, and the intrnet.

    Y RUA h8r? My attn span r not short.

    --

    My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

  125. Re:If he's good it won't be the Search for More Mo by jrod2027 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Personally I can't wait for the double secret special edition to come out on DVD. I hear Mel has changed it to suck rather than just blow!

  126. Spaceballs -2 by crashfrog · · Score: 1

    Didn't the Onion have a thing where they "announced" that they were going to have Jonathan Lipnicki play the young "Darth Helmet" in the Spaceballs prequel? A friend of mine thought that the perfect name for that would be "Spaceballs -2" (Spaceballs 1 minus the difference between Star Wars I and Star Wars IV).

    But Jon Lipnicki does look like a really young Rick Moranis, or did, so that would actually be pretty funny.

    --
    I never have frustrations, the reason is, to wit:
    If at first I don't succeed, I quit!
  127. The PERFECT candidate.... by gosand · · Score: 1

    three words: Star Wars Kid

    --

    My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

  128. Re:Well we all know the title by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He did have Hitler on stage, that's almost as good.

  129. Re:If he's good it won't be the Search for More Mo by teh*fink · · Score: 1

    Preferably by one of those bad-asian-flick re-dub voice actors, clearly re-dubbed and badly synched.

    because gee gosh golly, THAT conceit hasn't been overdone...

    --
    "I DARE you to make less sense!"
  130. DID YOU SAY ABE LINCOLN??? by DownTownMT · · Score: 1

    After "dracula dead and loving it" and "robin hood, men in tights" I don't have the trust in Mel Brooks to think that way, personally.
    Are you crazy? That movie had some of the greatest lines of all time....

    Achoo: Hey, Blinkin!
    Blinkin: Did you say "Abe Lincoln"?
    Achoo: No. I said, "Hey, Blinkin!"

    Prince: Such an unusual name, "Latrine." How did your family come by it?
    Latrine: We changed it in the 9th century.
    Prince: You mean you changed it TO "Latrine"?
    Latrine: Yeah. Used to be "Shithouse."
    Prince: It's a good change. That's a good change!

    Blinkin: This never would have happened if your father had been here.
    Robin Hood: He's dead?
    Blinkin: Yes.
    Robin Hood: And my mother?
    Blinkin: She died of pneumonia while -- while you were away.
    Robin Hood: My dog Pongo?
    Blinkin: Run over by a carriage.
    Robin Hood: My goldfish Goldie?
    Blinkin: Eaten by the cat.
    Robin Hood: My cat?
    Blinkin: Choked on the goldfish. It's great to be home, isn't it, Master Robin?

    --
    "Insert Sig Here"
    1. Re:DID YOU SAY ABE LINCOLN??? by Elsebet · · Score: 1

      I too adore the Abe Lincoln quote. :) Don't forget:

      (keep in mind Blinkin is blind)

      Robin: [exasperated] Blinkin, what are you doing?
      Blinkin: Guessing? I guess no ones coming?

      then after Blinkin falls off the ladder:

      Blinkin: [excited] I can see! I can see!
      (walks hard into a nearby tree)
      Blinkin: Nope, I was wrong.

      Blinkin: [feeling a statue] Oh Master Robin! You've lost your arms in battle...but you grew some nice boobs!
      Robin: Blinkin, I'm over here.

      --
      Sacré-bleu! Where is me mama?
  131. booo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    no, booo, ...why, simple...john is dead!

  132. Re:Another classic down the blackhole... by ...+James+... · · Score: 1

    Sorry AC, wrong answer...

    From the FAQ at www.ilmfan.com:

    Lucas decided to build his own facility, and he hired John Dykstra to head the facility. It was located in old warehouses in Van Nuys, California.

  133. Re:Another classic down the blackhole... by sgant · · Score: 3, Interesting

    All the misinformation in your post makes me question your original assertion that you ever worked in the space balls movie.

    I hope others catch you in your lies and mod you down to -5 liar.


    Actually, you're very wrong indeed. ILM DID start at the same facilities as Apogee...I know, I was fucking there. Where YOU there? Of course not, course, couldn't prove it either way since you hid behind an anonymous coward post.

    Apogee didn't start up shop until AFTER ILM moved north, Dykstra remained behind and went on his own and did Battlestar Galactica.

    Hell, you can even look at old pictures of them doing the original Star Wars where they're out in the parking lot shooting some of the Death Star scenes. That was the same parking lot at Apogee!

    Sheesh. Also, I was a production assistant, which ment that I took film to the lab...that's it. I didn't work on the film per-se...I was a peon. Want the name and address of the Lab I took the film to also?

    --

    "Leo Fender was in a 'state of grace' when he designed the Stratocaster." -- Paul Reed Smith
  134. Sweet! But... by Rich+Klein · · Score: 2, Funny

    This is definitely a movie I'll want to see, but I'd like to see History of the World: Part II even more. It's good to be the king!

    --
    -Rich
  135. *A tear in my eye* by megarich · · Score: 1

    I've been waiting for this day! Mel Brooks is a comedic genius and space balls absolutely rocked.

    I still joke around with a guy at work about the luggage combo. "Yes i need an invoice" 'Ok the number is 1..2...3...4...5."

    And how can we forget good ol pizz the hut!

    And..and..and...this is the best part, while it may/may not be better than the first space balls, I'm confident in Brooks' ability to now screw it up like the debacle known as episode 1!!!

  136. New cast by base_chakra · · Score: 1

    Since another parody of the original trilogy would seem a bit dated, I think it's more likely that the next Spaceballs will satirize the prequel--which would mean that very few of Spaceballs' castmembers would return to reprise their original roles.

    It's probably wishful thinking, but I really hope that the cast includes a lot of old greats in true Brookes fashion, rather than a assemblage of Hollywood's current mugging dipshits of the week... you know, the ones who wouldn't know comic timing and subtle humour even if it cut them a check for $7 million?

  137. Could this be...? by MikeVx · · Score: 1

    Could this be the long-awaited Spaceballs III: The Search for Spaceballs II that was rumored all those years ago?

    --
    Sigmentation fault - core dumped
  138. Re:...Let me guess..... by gadget+junkie · · Score: 2, Funny

    Your most-used password is: 1-2-3-4-5, right?

    --
    "If a boss demands loyalty, give him integrity. But if he demands integrity, give him loyalty." (John Boyd, 1927-1997)
  139. Re:Another classic down the blackhole... by Erik+Fish · · Score: 3, Informative

    "ILM was then housed in an old warehouse in an industrial area of Van Nuys (on or near Kester St, as I recall). By coincidence, Van Nuys was where I grew up, so I knew the area well."
    -- Alan Dean Foster, Some interview

    "In fact, Apogee was none other than the original shop set up for Industrial Light and Magic in Van Nuys, California, by George Lucas in 1975."
    -- Some site on model building

    "At this point, John Dykstra got a call from Glen Larson. Glen had contacted either George Lucas or Gary Kurtz to find out if he and Universal could lease the ILM Van Nuys facility we had used to create the VFX for Star Wars, in order to shoot Battlestar Galactica."
    -- Some site with an ad that wants to install an IE plug-in

    "Lucas hired effects expert John Dykstra to head a new production facility, located in old warehouses in Van Nuys, California. After completing Star Wars he relocated ILM to the Bay Area."
    -- Some .edu site about the history of CG

    That's just a few picks from the first page of Google results, too.

  140. Also, more info in case anyone was interested. by sgant · · Score: 3, Informative

    To respond to that idiot anonymous troll earlier, a quick Google search will show quite a few sites and quotes such as:

    LIGHTING V'GER - a site about the original Star Trek: The Motion Picture
    Apogee closed it's doors a couple of years ago, but in 1979 it was barely two years old, having formed when Dykstra, and several other key players from Lucas' Star Wars, remained at the former ILM facility in Van Nuys after Lucas moved north.

    Hollywood VFX Master, Richard Edlund, Talks About His Work On The Original Battlestar Galactica
    At this point, John Dykstra got a call from Glen Larson. Glen had contacted either George Lucas or Gary Kurtz to find out if he and Universal could lease the ILM Van Nuys facility we had used to create the VFX for Star Wars, in order to shoot Battlestar Galactica. And apparently, George agreed to it. So our main team, minus Robby Blalack, signed on to do the Galactica visual effects.

    And one more:
    A Critical History of Computer Graphics and Animation
    Lucas hired effects expert John Dykstra to head a new production facility, located in old warehouses in Van Nuys, California. After completing Star Wars he relocated ILM to the Bay Area.

    Apogee was the FX facility created by John Dykstra, the original Star Wars supervisor. John Dykstra decided not to move to Northern California and opened shop in the old ILM facilities of Van Nuys. There he worked on several projects like Star Trek The Motion Picture, Firefox and Invaders From Mars. In 1993 Apogee closed. John Dykstra continued working as an independent VFX Supervisor and currently works for Imageworks on such projects as Stuart Little and Spider-Man.


    Ok class...any questions?

    --

    "Leo Fender was in a 'state of grace' when he designed the Stratocaster." -- Paul Reed Smith
  141. Re:Another classic down the blackhole... by Kevin_Peters · · Score: 1

    Amen!

    --
    The music is all around us. I can hear it. Can you?
  142. Re:Mel Brooks, like George Lucas, is vastly overra by neurojab · · Score: 4, Insightful

    >The jokes - like in most Mel Brooks movies - are racial, sexual and excretory. Blazing Saddles was not popular because it was an incisive parody of the western genre, it was popular because it was packed with crass and/or puerile humor. There's no difference between Mel Brooks and the Zuckers, or the Farrellys.

    You ought to give "Young Frankenstien" a try. Sure, it contains a bit of low-brow humor, and some of it is over the top, but overall it is a very incisive parody of a monster movie.

    Of course, It might not be that way if Gene Wilder didn't have his hand in it, but that's beside the point.

  143. MOD UP PARENT! by mustangdavis · · Score: 1

    This comment really needs to be modded up!

    Great point!

    Spaceballs -1 : The Phantom Cracker Jack Box

    Lonestar: I lost the ring!
    Yogurt: Forget the ring. The ring is popcus - I found it in a cracker jack box. ...

    1. Re:MOD UP PARENT! by Thuktun · · Score: 1

      Forget the ring. The ring is popcus

      ITYM "bupkis"

  144. Hells Ya by Hard_Code · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Fuck that soap opera in space Star Wars.

    But who will play Barf now that Candy is dearly departed? :'(

    may the yogurt be with you

    --

    It's 10 PM. Do you know if you're un-American?
    1. Re:Hells Ya by evilviper · · Score: 1
      But who will play Barf now that Candy is dearly departed?

      My vote is for John Goodman. About the same physique as Candy, and has done plenty of comedy.

      Dink, dink.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  145. Before the movie by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1, Funny

    How about releasing "Spaceballs The Flamethrower"?

    Everytime I go to the mall and ask if it's available yet, they call security on me.

    LK

    --
    "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
  146. Re:Another classic down the blackhole... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mod this up up up

  147. Title by monkeymanatwork · · Score: 1

    Spaceballs II: The Menacing Phantom

  148. Re:John Candy is dead... by sakasune · · Score: 1

    i saw it as saying that john candy had such great talent, no one person could ever replace him

    --
    "You're arguing for a universe with fewer waffles in it," I said. "I'm prepared to call that cowardice."
  149. Classic Mel by davidmcw · · Score: 2, Interesting

    On his death bed in 'Mad About You', when he is trying to persuade them to name the baby after him. You could just tell that every scene he was in was barely scripted and a lot of fun.

    Young Frankenstein, although not with him in it, is is classic humour....

    --
    Just because your paranoid doesn't really mean they aren't out to get you
  150. Re:Another classic down the blackhole... by LnxAddct · · Score: 1

    This should not be modded as a troll. Are the mods on crack today?
    Regards,
    Steve

  151. Krusty retires by gad_zuki! · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I dont think the shift in comedy has anything to do with "attention spans," which is at best a ham-fisted word used as a generic complaint about modern times.

    I think the best commentary on modern humor I've seen was the Simpsons episode in which Krusty retires. Krusty's old-school brand of Brooks-like comedy simply grew old and hackneyed. The comedians in this episode were of the typical genx-stock irreverant kind, but also the kind who would look down upon the old Brooks/Don Rickles ethnic-type jokes.

    This commentary is even more interesting as its a Simpsons episode, a show which pretty much defines post-modern humor. Things simply grow old and change. I don't see how the attention span complaint applies here. Its not like Don Rickles was ever known for his long drawn out monologues or anything and a lot of Brooks' gags and movies are pretty far from sophistication. If anything Brroks is a versatile performer/writer/director who can do anything from vaudville-esque comedy to today's postmodern stuff. Although his attempts at the latter do seem to suffer and his best work tends to lean on the "silly, simple gags" side.

    1. Re:Krusty retires by Binky+The+Oracle · · Score: 1

      I dont think the shift in comedy has anything to do with "attention spans," which is at best a ham-fisted word used as a generic complaint about modern times.

      I really wanted to read your entire post, but it had three paragraphs in it and... OOOH! A SPARKLY!

      --

      Slashdot comments... splitting hairs since 1997.

    2. Re:Krusty retires by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Krusty's old-school brand of Brooks-like comedy simply grew old and hackneyed. The comedians in this episode were of the typical genx-stock irreverant kind, but also the kind who would look down upon the old Brooks/Don Rickles ethnic-type jokes.

      Me so solly!

    3. Re:Krusty retires by Colonel+Cholling · · Score: 1

      a Simpsons episode, a show which pretty much defines post-modern humor.

      Moe: It's po-mo.
      Homer: What?
      Moe: Postmodern.
      Homer: What?
      Moe: Weird for weird's sake.

      --

      I am Sartre of the Borg. Existence is futile.
  152. MOD PARENT UP!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mod parent up! That would be hilarious, and maybe the kid could get some redemption for his embarassment.

  153. Re:Mel Brooks, like George Lucas, is vastly overra by smclean · · Score: 1
    "There's no difference between Mel Brooks and the Zuckers, or the Farrellys."

    Exactly!!

    Oh wait, you are saying that's a bad thing?

    *plonk* opinion rejected.

    --

    "'Yrch!' said Legolas, falling into his own tongue."

  154. John Goodman by cryptochrome · · Score: 1

    Also a fat actor, and one with some serious acting credentials.

    --

    ---If you can't trust a nerd, who can you trust?

  155. Remastered version? by Comrade64 · · Score: 2, Interesting



    Does this mean he's going to digitally remaster the first Spaceballs? Will we see that never before seen footage of Pizza the Hutt at the spaceport?

    Hurry and buy the original Spaceballs before you can't get anything but the remastered version!

    --
    If you are reading this, then you are one of those people whom I just can't take seriously.
  156. No, he plays Barfolomew... by Rimbo · · Score: 2, Informative

    ...and it plays right into the hands of the satire:

    "Barf? You look different."
    "No, see? I'm the same Barf I always was."
    *cut to scene from Spaceballs: The Movie with Barf replaced by poorly digitally edited-in New Barf where Old Barf used to be* :)

    Oh, and MadTV rocks.

  157. Re:Mel Brooks, like George Lucas, is vastly overra by R2.0 · · Score: 1

    You are soooo off base on that one. "Blazing Saddles" if funny not because of the words, but who is speaking them. Its sendup of the western genre turns everything on its head, and yet shows probably a truer picture of how people actually spoke prior to the sanitizing effect of the movies.

    Remember, in the "Old West" (hell, anything prior to the 60's), people actually used the word nigger with relative frequency and unselfconciously. Contrast that to "Unforgiven," which won an award and was praised for its "real" look at the Old West, where "nigger" was never spoken, even as they were whipping Morgan Freeman to death.

    People don't laugh at the use of "nigger" in "Blazing Saddles," they laugh at the confusion and consternation of the people who use the word so blithely to refer to an authority figure.

    But yeah, the farting scene had no social value - but it was funny as hell.

    --
    "As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly." A. Carlson
  158. Uh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You mean how it says "+5 Funny"?

    OP was right. You are a prick.

  159. Could be good, or not... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mel was -awesome- in his older days--the Producers is legendary comedy.... ....
    Then he kinda wussed out, the stories got weaker on down the line, and then he canned all the racial and sexual jokes and made a sappy movie about homeless people.
    That NOBODY liked.
    Will this be the new Mel or the old?

    PS: I think Oprah Winfrey should play Barf.

  160. Re:Mel Brooks, like George Lucas, is vastly overra by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Perhaps attempting to watch his films without wearing your backside as a hat may improve your viewing experience.

  161. Given that Spaceballs is a parody of Star Wars.... by Matt+Apple · · Score: 1

    ...it would be funnier if it were a prequel and not a sequel.

  162. Lucas admits collaboration? by ahdeoz · · Score: 1

    Could this be George Lucas's acknowledgement that the Star Wars series could not possibly become any more rediculous.

    I'm still waiting for Star Wars to come out on DVD. Does anyone know when the movie (not Lucas's botched remake) is coming out?

  163. What I'm waiting for... by frank_adrian314159 · · Score: 1

    ... is either "The Spaceballs Christmas Special" or the Broadway production.

    --
    That is all.
  164. blows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...and then follow it up with a sequel that really /blows/.

  165. About Time!! by Godboy_g · · Score: 0

    WOW, I never thought that the sequel would be released. I heard a number of years ago that one was going to be made. I believe the title was "SpaceBalls 3: The search for SpaceBalls 2" Now we only have to wait for "The history of the world Part 2"

    --
    I LIKE TOAST!!!
  166. Where Jar-Jar ... by ehiris · · Score: 1

    ... gets tortured somwhere in a corner.

  167. Jesus Christ! by Greyfox · · Score: 1
    How old is that man? Probably older than Jesus Christ...

    The moment I saw the headline I knew, as if God Himself had come down and told me, that Jar Jar Binks would somehow be involved. Mark my words...

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

  168. Mel Brooks movies I've seen, and reactions by MilenCent · · Score: 2, Informative

    My opinion is that Spaceballs is the dividing line in Brooks' output. Most of the stuff before it ranges from great to awesomely brilliant (with the highlights being Young Frankenstein and the movie version of The Producers), most of the stuff after is rather lame.

    - The good ones -

    The Producers: We still watch this one. We even own the soundtrack from the Broadway show and have obsessively read through the book of the show. One of the funniest movies ever made, I'd put it up there with Duck Soup.

    Young Frankenstein: Almost as great, but in a very different way. It goes back and forth between working as a Frankenstein movie and being a brilliant parody of them.

    Blazing Saddles: This is the one that hit it big, and the production values are very high. I actually think the humor is a little too random in places, the bugs bunny "telegram" scene sticks out in my mind, and the movie almost melts down at the end, but all in all I still like it.

    Silent Movie: I like this one a lot, but it's not seen much these days. Worth seeing for Marty Feldman, Young Frankenstein's Igor, in his only other Brooks-directed role.

    Other earlier movies include High Anxiety (Hitchcock parody), To Be Or Not To Be (which I've never even seen in a video store) and The Twelve Chairs (which I know nothing about).

    - So-so movies -

    Spaceballs:
    Some people I know who used to really like this one, including myself, have changed opinions recently. It certainly has some great moments, but sometimes it seems taken with its own cleverness. The "Mega Maid" bit doesn't really work for me, John Candy seems a little too taken with his own lines ("Funny, she doesn't look Druish"), and while Rick Moranis is perfectly cast as Dark Helmut, the leading man and lady (whose names I can't even remember) are really bland. This is the beginning of that phase in Brook's career where he started attracting big-name stars, and his films tend to suffer for it. I'd pay *money* (well, ticket-money, not movie production-money) to see another Mel Brooks/Gene Wilder collaboration, but Mel's tone on the Young Frankenstein DVD commentary makes it sound like that's unlikely.

    - Robin Hood: Men in Tights -
    I really disliked this one, though the staff-fighting scene on the bridge is very clever there isn't a lot I enjoyed.

    - Dracula: Dead and Loving It -
    Haven't seen it, and there is probably no force on earth that could make me.

    Somewhere in there is Life Stinks, which I want to see but can't seem to find.

    What have I missed?

    1. Re:Mel Brooks movies I've seen, and reactions by Ent · · Score: 1

      You have missed what I consider my all time favorite Brooks film, The History of the World Part I.

      One of my favorite scene's from a brooks film is still when Moses comes to deliver the "15 ..[drops stone tablet].. 10, 10 commandments for all to obey"!

    2. Re:Mel Brooks movies I've seen, and reactions by MilenCent · · Score: 1

      Considering that I also posted in a thread entitled "RE: How about History of the World Part I", I really have no excuse for forgetting about this one.

      I think HotW1 is probably one of the better ones.

  169. Re:Another classic down the blackhole... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Jay: "What the fuck is the internet?"
    Ben Affleck: "The internet is a communications tool used the world over where people can come together to bitch about movies and share pornography with one another."

  170. Re:Another classic down the blackhole... by FIRESTORM_v1 · · Score: 1

    Yogurt: And God willing we'll all meet again in Spaceballs 2: The search for more money.

    See? Mel Brooks himself (or insert scriptwriter here) even set the movie up for a sequel.

    --
    Partnership for an idiot free America!
  171. Idiot! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I guess we've forgotten about History of the World, Part I? Yeah, you are a dumbass! Probably one of the best comedies of the Eighties. "It's good to be the king" Check here for more hilarious lines from the movie: http://www.garnersclassics.com/qhiswrld.htm

    syrrys posted here, biatches!

  172. Sequel Title from original? by aggiefalcon01 · · Score: 1

    What I want to know is, will they use the sequel title mentioned by the Yogurt character in the original movie, i.e.:
    Spaceballs II: The Search for More Money

    --
    Global warming is neither science, nor politics. It is a religion.
  173. Re:If he's good it won't be the Search for More Mo by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    And we all know that Mel Brooks would never do a gag to death...

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  174. Re:Mel Brooks, like George Lucas, is vastly overra by Sj0 · · Score: 1

    These days it's not acceptable to have a sense of humor.

    Why?

    Because hitler had a sense of humor, and we all see how that turned out.

    Observe:

    Soldier:"The jews didn't invite you to the big bar mitzvah, mein furher!"

    Chancellor Hitler:"Talk about pretentious! Bastard jews, Kill zem all ven I rule zee vorld!"(giggles at the thought of killing the jews over a silly bar mitzvah)

    Soldier:"Yes sir! We'll have them destroyed immediately, and we'll have the democratic government disbanded so you can begin the process of taking over zee world!" (walks off)

    new dictator Hitler:(stops laughing)"Vat just heppened?"

    Now you aren't allowed to laugh at stupid jokes anymore. You have to have at LEAST thirteen layers of humor, because otherwise someone might not get the joke if it isn't funny from absolutely every angle. The only other joke allowed is the pretentious "hah, I caught the reference, and it's amusing because I don't think most people did" jokes. Those are popular because in soviet russia jokes tell you(with naked and trembling natalie portman and hot grits) , but only in japan.

    --
    It's been a long time.
  175. There's also a LOT who didn't by spoco2 · · Score: 1

    ie: What about IMDB's rating: 5.6/10 (8,939 votes)

  176. OB. by dontbgay · · Score: 1

    "I knew it, I'm surrounded by assholes!" -Dark Helmet

    --
    Sig not found.
  177. Milk, milk.. by YowzaTheYuzzum · · Score: 1

    Mel Brooks is raping my childhood!!!

  178. Re:Another classic down the blackhole... by Richard+Whittaker · · Score: 1
    They didn't even make the movie yet and you're already pissing on it.

    What are you talking about? I've already downloaded it on Bittorrent!

  179. Re:Mel Brooks, like George Lucas, is vastly overra by kcdoodle · · Score: 1

    Mel Brooks makes political and social commentary by the absurdity in many of his movies.

    If you can't see this, then you don't "get it".

    Kind of like Archie Bunker showed us, through humor, how funny it can be to laugh at, not with, a racist bigot.

    --

    - I live the greatest adventure anyone could possibly desire. - Tosk the Hunted
  180. This should already be filmed! by ScreamingSlave · · Score: 1

    HELMET: How could there be a cassette of Spaceballs- the Movie. We're still in the middle of making it. SANDURZ: That's true, sir, but there's been a new breakthrough in home-video marketing. HELMET: There has? SANDURZ: Yes. Instant cassettes. They're out in stores before the movie is finished.

  181. Barfolemew Lives/Dies ? by IllogicalStudent · · Score: 1

    The question of my mind is who is going to take over from John Candy in the role of Barf? You can't easily replace such a comic genius -- assuming you can at all.

    --
    But Maaa! Everyone else has a .sig !
  182. Monty Python and the Life of Brian by some+guy+I+know · · Score: 1
    here is hoping for a Life of Brian sequel
    No chance.
    Monty Python disbanded when Graham Chapman died.
    It's unlikely that they will ever get back together, as he was the soul of the show.
    This is a good thing, IMO, because Monty Python would not be the same today.
    Laurel and Hardy, Abbot and Costello, Monty Python, the original SNL cast, were all quite funny, but were products of their times.
    I doubt that they would be as successful today.

    Back on-topic, I don't see why Brooks is making a SB sequel.
    The original wasn't all that funny.
    In fact, except for Blazing Saddles, The Producers, and Young Frankenstein, nothing that Brooks has done is really very funny.
    (At most, it's mildly amusing.)
    --
    Those who sacrifice security to condemn liberty deserve to repeat history or something. - Benjamin Santayana
  183. Re:Mel Brooks, like George Lucas, is vastly overra by abb3w · · Score: 1
    There's no difference between Mel Brooks and the Zuckers, or the Farrellys.

    Actually, I think Brooks is noticably more old-fashioned-- he's much more likely than the others to merely make crass jokes about bare female breasts, rather than showing them outright. He understands the old Vaudeville merits of the tease. It's rather mindboggling to imagine ("Baby, I'm not from Havana!"), but Mel may have some sense of restraint or taste in his work.

    --
    //Information does not want to be free; it wants to breed.
  184. it should be called by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Space Balls 2: the search for more money" was what yogurt said in the movie so why shouldn't that be the title.