I don't know about you, but that sounds pretty good to me. How many tons of coal were mined and consumed? It's be nice to know if production is staying ahead of consumption.
"Hey! It's all ball bearings nowadays. Now you prepare that Fetzer valve with some 3-in-1 oil and some gauze pads, and I'm gonna need 'bout ten quarts of anti-freeze, preferably Prestone. No, no make that Quaker State."
So I would be more inclined to blame the/. server, than the Gecko rendering engine.
No, it's Gecko. I misremember the Bugzilla #, but Firefox, Mozilla, et al have trouble rendering the legacy sites that abuse tables to provide layout. It would be nice if they would fix it, since there are sites that many people like to view where the authors lack the education, skill or drive to produce clean HTML.
It's the constant problem of developers dragging the browsers into the modern age kicking and screaming.
I think you have that backwards. It the developers that are so dedicated to their half-assed, broken-down non-standard webpages who go so far as to block connections from the W3C's HTML validator out of shame that are being dragged kicking and sreaming into 1998.
Slashdot Mirror
How many of those were at whitehouse.gov?
Also called "TMI-2 Procedure".
I don't know about you, but that sounds pretty good to me. How many tons of coal were mined and consumed? It's be nice to know if production is staying ahead of consumption.
"Hey! It's all ball bearings nowadays. Now you prepare that Fetzer valve with some 3-in-1 oil and some gauze pads, and I'm gonna need 'bout ten quarts of anti-freeze, preferably Prestone. No, no make that Quaker State."
I thought they took that off the market after all those hillbillies starting screaming and sweating uncontrollably?
I would think that the lack of Spice Girls would be a selling point.
No, it's Gecko. I misremember the Bugzilla #, but Firefox, Mozilla, et al have trouble rendering the legacy sites that abuse tables to provide layout. It would be nice if they would fix it, since there are sites that many people like to view where the authors lack the education, skill or drive to produce clean HTML.
It's hard to blame them, though. There are other bugs that have a higher priority than diapering some web developers who are unwilling to progress past a Frontpage level of coding.
I think you have that backwards. It the developers that are so dedicated to their half-assed, broken-down non-standard webpages who go so far as to block connections from the W3C's HTML validator out of shame that are being dragged kicking and sreaming into 1998.
God has a special place for the pathetically optimistic. Next year indeed!
Now we just need a "Go Ugly Early" theme to round it out.
Not yet. Check out - http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=122411
Such as 0.9.1 bitching at you daily to upgrade to 0.9.2, and 0.9.2 bitching at you daily to upgrade to 0.9.1?
Gopher-fucking?
Are you aware that you're not wearing pants?
SCO has contracted a city in Idaho to represent them in court?
Did it come with a Sorny radio?
I thought Kirk was from Iowa.
When Larry's cat took a shit in one of the servers?
Isn't enticing females into technical jobs one of the common goals today?
No kidding. 32 megabytes is pretty low by today's standards.
Finally! An improvement in grammar and spelling in the "editor's comments".
Or have a good fake ID. Then you can buy beer for everyone else in the dorm, and make money too!
Oh, and start fires in other people's rooms. Between that and urinating on everything, you WON'T be trifled with.
What do you make of this?
"Oh, I could make a hat! or a brooch! or a teradactyl! Caw!"
Texas A&M?
Just like "Wizard of Oz"?