Slashdot Mirror


User: fustakrakich

fustakrakich's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
13,737
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 13,737

  1. Why? What gives you or anybody else the right to decide what can be promoted?

  2. Doesn't matter, and your concept of monopoly is way off base. Users have the right to pick and choose as they wish. MySpace is still up, and you can still use it. It's not facebook's fault if your friends decide to stay with them. If facebook could take MySpace down, you would have case. As it is, you don't. Facebook is not a monopoly over anything outside of facebook.com. That's the way it's supposed to be. The government needs to butt out and work on the ISP problem, where we have real monopolies over access to the entire internet.

  3. And in case you haven't noticed, MySpace is still up and running. So you're really making no sense at all.

  4. Am I to take it that you no longer dispute my original assertion that Facebook is a monopoly?

    No, it is not. I implied nothing of the sort. User choice does not make a monopoly. Alternatives are still available.

  5. So what? That's by user choice. The users make and break this stuff. You just gotta come up with another pretty face and a gimmick, and you're in business. Facebook didn't force anybody to abandon MySpace.

  6. Competitors to what? Name an instance where they don't have competition. What does Facebook offer that you can't find somewhere else?

  7. For one thing, they are not monopolies. Content should not be regulated. The real issue is open internet service. That's where you bump into monopoly markets that need to be pried open.

  8. Re:Then what on Ban Fortnite, Says Prince Harry (gamespot.com) · · Score: 1

    Solitaire is ok. Minesweeper is too violent.

  9. Re:Whew, that's a relief! on Facebook Says it Will Now Block White-Nationalist, White-Separatist Posts (washingtonpost.com) · · Score: 1

    It is but one lane on the highway... Until they can restrict your access to the internet, you still don't have a case for regulating them. If they want to put up their own wire or satellite, then we have to make them share, and nothing but share.

  10. Being a service provision, it will have to be subject to all the net neutrality rules we should be demanding from the other ISPs. I hope this will be the case

  11. Re:It was a message on Debris From India's Anti-Satellite Test Poses Threat To ISS, Says NASA (npr.org) · · Score: 1

    Then, as such, we can take it as an act of war, and to tell the truth, I would agree. It is a real threat that must be dealt with.

  12. Re:How can this be anti-trust? on Justice Department Warns Academy About Changing Oscar Rules To Exclude Streaming (techcrunch.com) · · Score: 2

    the DOJ antitrust division

    Yeah, no high drama political theater there, right? The Academy owes them an award!

  13. Re:How can this be anti-trust? on Justice Department Warns Academy About Changing Oscar Rules To Exclude Streaming (techcrunch.com) · · Score: 1

    At that point, the Academy is supporting traditional studios to the exclusion of potential competition.

    Yes, it is self promotion, an advertisement for the studios. What is the problem? Netflix can have their own awards show. I am fascinated that this is a hot button issue.

  14. Re:Reflect on US rights and total EU control on French ISPs Ordered To Block Sci-Hub, LibGen (torrentfreak.com) · · Score: 2

    France should send a new Alexis de Tocqueville...

    We should send France a new Alice B. Toklas, with a big batch of brownies...

  15. WTH is DoJ thinking?

    Grabs the headlines, doesn't it? It's absolutely wonderful Theater of the Absurd...

  16. Re:How can this be anti-trust? on Justice Department Warns Academy About Changing Oscar Rules To Exclude Streaming (techcrunch.com) · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Only one question, who has enough money to get the DOJ involved?

  17. Free speech, you big dummy!

  18. Define "good quality".

    Good composition
    Steady shooting
    No stupid effects interfering with the content
    Cut the wind noise!
    Run at regular speed, with audio, then do your slo-mo.
    No stupid background music when we want to hear the racket your flying car makes!
    Follow through (complete) on the fucking shot!

    There are several others, but these are some "guidelines" that should be followed if the shooter doesn't want to be strung up for committing actionable offensives in violation.

  19. I think it is fine to ban extremely graphic content

    Damn, man! I thought you were a true believer.. This is a sad day

  20. See, but here's the thing. Irresponsible speech that promotes violence will always lead to suppression. You 4chan jackoffs knew this a long time ago

    Yes, they did! Think about that. Maybe you might discover the goal... Sounds vaguely familiar doesn't it?

  21. Re:Good on YouTube Executives Ignored Warnings, Letting Toxic Videos Run Rampant (bloomberg.com) · · Score: 2, Informative

    illegal content

    Oops.. That's pretty arbitrary, don't you think? Anything can be made illegal at the drop of a hat. Or has everybody forgotten already?

    The only thing that is truly threatened by "toxic" content is mass media and the institutions dependent on its propaganda.

  22. Re:That's nice and all on LA County Is Using An Algorithm To Clear 50,000 Pot Convictions Faster (engadget.com) · · Score: 1

    Uh huh...

    From Holder we heard plenty of tough talk also. And from Sessions? Little man would never attack anything his own size...

  23. Re:If only you could block without jamming! on US Lawmakers Propose Allowing Prisons To Jam Signals From Smuggled Cellphones (apnews.com) · · Score: 1

    Warden Faraday

    Exactly, jamming is stupid.. I believe the idea is to justify something much worse on the "outside"...

  24. It was the day the dinosaurs became tar sands. on Scientists Find 66-Million-Year-Old Fossils From The Day The Dinosaurs Died (usatoday.com) · · Score: 2

    A planet of mammals? No, a planet of the Lizard People!

    Be sure to vote for the right one next year.