Well yes, it's a matter of pride. To admit you are occupied is to admit weakness. So, we create euphemisms, like "allies" and "coalition of the willing".
It still relates to past (the definition of history) events, which may have the potential to become historic. Some events become historic immediately after they happen, and some a long time afterwards, but not before.
*History* presumes the event has already happened. Well, *history* doesn't, but using the word for a future event seems illogical. Let's compromise and call it an historic attempt (up to, but not including the present moment), until the 12th, in the afternoon or evening.
Well, I hope you're not singling him out. I've been watching the same thing for a very long time with many different actors. But the one thing remains as true as it ever has, the blame lies squarely on the shoulders of the voters, and nowhere else.
And once there is healthy competition among them...
You gotta vote for people who will make it so, and stop protecting monopoly contracts. And while you're at it, try to get prohibition taken off the books too.
It certainly is! That is exactly my complaint. Before all this "nK" shit. Video was measured by its fixed vertical resolution. The horizontal (even though aspect ratio didn't change, 4:3 was all we got) was whatever the bandwidth the machine could muster, and what was legal to transmit. I just expected them to stick with what we knew and keep using a known way of measuring video screens, and we did up through hi-def. The flip was a little like switching from imperial to metric, or vicey-versy. Eh, whatever... the compression still sucks. 4K is just going to give me a better view of those big ol' gray blocks.
Hey! Wait a minute! Film people never measured resolution in pixels until digital video came along. And your aspect ratios were determined by the lens (hell of a lot easier to change than the film gate). On film the frame size is set in stone. You're right, marketing, but it was no film standard.
Well yes, it's a matter of pride. To admit you are occupied is to admit weakness. So, we create euphemisms, like "allies" and "coalition of the willing".
I really hate things that are made to "appeal to women".
You haven't shot the Lady Smith. Just remember you only have five rounds.
What will probably happen is that you will pay an odometer tax every year when you get a new sticker for your plates. Simple and convenient.
You and this guy are sitting next to each other, right?
famous or important in history
History - a study of past events. An event has the potential of being historic after it happens.
Read the rest of the thread. I don't feel like repeating myself.
Cool, Giant eight legged spider goats, head butting little kids into the ravine.
It still relates to past (the definition of history) events, which may have the potential to become historic. Some events become historic immediately after they happen, and some a long time afterwards, but not before.
Like you say there: important in *history*
*History* presumes the event has already happened. Well, *history* doesn't, but using the word for a future event seems illogical. Let's compromise and call it an historic attempt (up to, but not including the present moment), until the 12th, in the afternoon or evening.
The texts of the laws are available...
Depends...
The world is full of secret sauces...
It's why a lot of people switched to Apple.
Boy, are they in for a surprise!
A tiny bit presumptuous, no?
Yeah, I do... It's not always a shoot-em-up...
The bases are still there, ready for action.
Well, I hope you're not singling him out. I've been watching the same thing for a very long time with many different actors. But the one thing remains as true as it ever has, the blame lies squarely on the shoulders of the voters, and nowhere else.
Of course it should end. Takeoff and landing is when I want the camera rolling. It's the best chance to record a wreck.
It doesn't matter which ones it is. We are all screwed as long as we remain tied to their wire. Circumvention, by whatever means, is our only hope.
And once there is healthy competition among them...
You gotta vote for people who will make it so, and stop protecting monopoly contracts. And while you're at it, try to get prohibition taken off the books too.
And yet Germany, Italy, and Japan are all major economies.
And yet, they are still occupied countries.
America: Our courts force us to obey the first amendment.
Oof! How I wish!
The big crooks are the ones making the rules.
Why? Aside from marketing gimmicks, I don't see the reason.
no
In the US, the people in charge are still the health insurance companies.
Hey, you handed it to them on a silver platter. You voted for the guy, I didn't... And save your "lesser evil" crap.
It certainly is! That is exactly my complaint. Before all this "nK" shit. Video was measured by its fixed vertical resolution. The horizontal (even though aspect ratio didn't change, 4:3 was all we got) was whatever the bandwidth the machine could muster, and what was legal to transmit. I just expected them to stick with what we knew and keep using a known way of measuring video screens, and we did up through hi-def. The flip was a little like switching from imperial to metric, or vicey-versy. Eh, whatever... the compression still sucks. 4K is just going to give me a better view of those big ol' gray blocks.
Hey! Wait a minute! Film people never measured resolution in pixels until digital video came along. And your aspect ratios were determined by the lens (hell of a lot easier to change than the film gate). On film the frame size is set in stone. You're right, marketing, but it was no film standard.