I'm willing to be that there are less drugs due to the drug war, just as there was less alcohol during prohibition (a 30% reduction).
This is not to support the war on drugs, a 50% increase in drug use would be a small price to pay for the money saved, and not destroying the lives of those motivated enough to be entrepreneurs.
This action could be argued to be bad because it is technically reducing supply without touching demand.
I assume you mean the government couldn't do such? I see no reason the lack of criminality of someone saying something false interferes with my ability to sue for the damages of the falsehood. We are allowed to sue for many non criminal acts that Congress has made no laws about mild negligence for examples.
In my experience with jury exit interviews (civil only), the jury ignores all experts, and votes their gut, using any credible explanation that matches any snippit of what they've heard.
In the US, the idea of "not guilty by reason of insanity" (the term most frequently used) implies the type of insanity that is actually defensive. Yes, over the centuries it has been narrowed down as to be consistently applied, but it is a plea that the defendant can make, and the jury gets to determine weather or not it is valid.
I don't have specific access to cases or rulings (where the interpretation is certainly already spelled out, but a quick reading of a random law dictionary gives "ordinary or usual in the circumstances". Like insanity though, it is almost certainly an issue of fact, and not law, meaning the judge can guide the jury as to what reasonable means, with un-related (and usually farcical, but illustrative examples), but cannot make the determination of insanity or reasonableness.
Winning the lotto implies you have the money to do those things.
If I had 40 more hours of free time, but the same amount of money I have now, I'd love it, but I certainly wouldn't be able to just do more of the things I love. Also, I like doing things with the people in my life, and they'd still all have jobs. It can see how it'd get tedious.
Correct, and if you look at ancient law (Code of Hammurabi for example), you will see that it was not particularly intuitive throughout history (or even now, really).
Isn't the reasonableness of the act a matter of fact, not a matter of law?
I would expect the jury questionnaire to read along the lines of
"... If you answered yes to the above, do you believe that the act was reasonable for the circumstances?", which would lead to a not guilty if answered yes. Reasonable may be broken down into specific questions, rather than over-all just reasonable, but it sounds very unlikely a judge would deem reasonableness as a matter of law (though in an extreme case the affirmative defense could be bared from being let in).
IANAL, but I've sat through a dozen (civil) verdicts for cases lasting over a month, and obviously the US isn't Canada (and I am US).
Hmmm, in this area (delaware) they make that claim in all the driving classes, but the reality is that without other evidence they cannot force the test. You aren't in violation of the refusal to submit until you refuse after being arrested. You're best bet (aside from being legal of course, or hiring a cab) is to crack the window, and refuse all field tests, and hope the judge doesn't decide "glassy eyes, smell of alcohol" counts as probable cause. But to submit to the official test that happens after arrest (the field breathalyzer is in admissible in court, but used to establish probable cause).
Male sperm travel faster, it sounds credible to me that based on cycle the male sperm could have an advantage (less effective at waiting for an egg to drop perhaps, but if the egg is right there, they get in it first). 120 M to 100 F at fertilization I think.
Doesn't matter, it would encourage the drilling companies to act more honestly.
The Amish want fair dealings without lawsuits, the corporations want to take advantage of the lack of lawsuits to deal unfairly. If a third party reaps 100% of the reward of a lawsuit, things are likely to be more, not less enforced, which should encourage fairer dealings with the Amish than the general population, a win win for the Amish.
Your club example (if there's any attendance ) leans me to a number far under 5% . If you only here about 10% on nights you are there, and 200 people attend on a given night, one phone a night is 5%.
Over the last 40 years we have already lost more cultural artifacts that were created for the entirety of human history.
If this is true, it stands to reason we are creating cultural artifacts at such an increased rate that even if only a small percentage survive, future generations will have a more detailed picture of now than has existed in the past. I believe I read that half of all photographs ever taken were taken in the last few years. It doesn't take a high keep rate for things to be better preserved than from any other time in history.
I think (observationally/anecdotally) that humans have a variety of predispositions in the monogamy area. Some people are incapable of it, some are super predisposed to it. I haven't personally seen these traits correlate with peoples adherence to social norms in other areas. We'll see more public non-monogamy I assume that just as there is a spectrum of suexual orientations, and sex drives, there is a spectrum of pairing drive for lack of a better term. The way that people are driven to behave non-monogamously is pretty varied even.
Only when it's a complete waste of my money, when they are trying to guilt me into the system with lies themself (it is not sound waves, or basically sound waves).
I always opt for the pat down, they often try to tell me it's sound waves, I tell them I am a physicist by trade (I am not at all) and that I know what a millimeter wave is, I also tell them I hope they are getting paid enough because it's unlikely they will have a long healthy retirement. They go quiet.
Slashdot Mirror
Proof that the *AAs hate the children!
I'm willing to be that there are less drugs due to the drug war, just as there was less alcohol during prohibition (a 30% reduction).
This is not to support the war on drugs, a 50% increase in drug use would be a small price to pay for the money saved, and not destroying the lives of those motivated enough to be entrepreneurs.
This action could be argued to be bad because it is technically reducing supply without touching demand.
Quick, say that the terrorists make all their money with CP, then you can do both.
We could at least verify the 300 number, and that all that exists is names and phone numbers.
I assume you mean the government couldn't do such? I see no reason the lack of criminality of someone saying something false interferes with my ability to sue for the damages of the falsehood. We are allowed to sue for many non criminal acts that Congress has made no laws about mild negligence for examples.
House, though generic, usually refers to the lower house.
In my experience with jury exit interviews (civil only), the jury ignores all experts, and votes their gut, using any credible explanation that matches any snippit of what they've heard.
In the US, the idea of "not guilty by reason of insanity" (the term most frequently used) implies the type of insanity that is actually defensive. Yes, over the centuries it has been narrowed down as to be consistently applied, but it is a plea that the defendant can make, and the jury gets to determine weather or not it is valid.
I don't have specific access to cases or rulings (where the interpretation is certainly already spelled out, but a quick reading of a random law dictionary gives "ordinary or usual in the circumstances". Like insanity though, it is almost certainly an issue of fact, and not law, meaning the judge can guide the jury as to what reasonable means, with un-related (and usually farcical, but illustrative examples), but cannot make the determination of insanity or reasonableness.
Winning the lotto implies you have the money to do those things.
If I had 40 more hours of free time, but the same amount of money I have now, I'd love it, but I certainly wouldn't be able to just do more of the things I love. Also, I like doing things with the people in my life, and they'd still all have jobs. It can see how it'd get tedious.
Correct, and if you look at ancient law (Code of Hammurabi for example), you will see that it was not particularly intuitive throughout history (or even now, really).
Isn't the reasonableness of the act a matter of fact, not a matter of law?
I would expect the jury questionnaire to read along the lines of
"...
If you answered yes to the above, do you believe that the act was reasonable for the circumstances?", which would lead to a not guilty if answered yes. Reasonable may be broken down into specific questions, rather than over-all just reasonable, but it sounds very unlikely a judge would deem reasonableness as a matter of law (though in an extreme case the affirmative defense could be bared from being let in).
IANAL, but I've sat through a dozen (civil) verdicts for cases lasting over a month, and obviously the US isn't Canada (and I am US).
Hmmm, in this area (delaware) they make that claim in all the driving classes, but the reality is that without other evidence they cannot force the test. You aren't in violation of the refusal to submit until you refuse after being arrested. You're best bet (aside from being legal of course, or hiring a cab) is to crack the window, and refuse all field tests, and hope the judge doesn't decide "glassy eyes, smell of alcohol" counts as probable cause. But to submit to the official test that happens after arrest (the field breathalyzer is in admissible in court, but used to establish probable cause).
Which is a shame, because Wayland was supposed to address weird bad behaviors.
They can take blood from you, if they arrest you, using other probably cause to establish the need to arrest. They cannot take your blood pre-arrest.
Yes, by using a localized phenomenon they controlled for the general decline of things such as that.
Male sperm travel faster, it sounds credible to me that based on cycle the male sperm could have an advantage (less effective at waiting for an egg to drop perhaps, but if the egg is right there, they get in it first). 120 M to 100 F at fertilization I think.
Doesn't matter, it would encourage the drilling companies to act more honestly.
The Amish want fair dealings without lawsuits, the corporations want to take advantage of the lack of lawsuits to deal unfairly. If a third party reaps 100% of the reward of a lawsuit, things are likely to be more, not less enforced, which should encourage fairer dealings with the Amish than the general population, a win win for the Amish.
Your club example (if there's any attendance ) leans me to a number far under 5% . If you only here about 10% on nights you are there, and 200 people attend on a given night, one phone a night is 5%.
Over the last 40 years we have already lost more cultural artifacts that were created for the entirety of human history.
If this is true, it stands to reason we are creating cultural artifacts at such an increased rate that even if only a small percentage survive, future generations will have a more detailed picture of now than has existed in the past. I believe I read that half of all photographs ever taken were taken in the last few years. It doesn't take a high keep rate for things to be better preserved than from any other time in history.
I think (observationally/anecdotally) that humans have a variety of predispositions in the monogamy area. Some people are incapable of it, some are super predisposed to it. I haven't personally seen these traits correlate with peoples adherence to social norms in other areas. We'll see more public non-monogamy I assume that just as there is a spectrum of suexual orientations, and sex drives, there is a spectrum of pairing drive for lack of a better term. The way that people are driven to behave non-monogamously is pretty varied even.
Only when it's a complete waste of my money, when they are trying to guilt me into the system with lies themself (it is not sound waves, or basically sound waves).
I always opt for the pat down, they often try to tell me it's sound waves, I tell them I am a physicist by trade (I am not at all) and that I know what a millimeter wave is, I also tell them I hope they are getting paid enough because it's unlikely they will have a long healthy retirement. They go quiet.
By market forces do you mean foreign powers regulations?
Look at the number of doctors per capita in each country and see how bad it is here (in the US).
Does surface area to volume ratio not come into play?