That's about as much as Wiki can do, as they're pretty essential
That's the freaking POINT of making it an utter blackout. Make people understand what it would be like if it passed. A click through isn't going to change squat.
Remote to me means "it's connected, you're vulnerable". This requires the user to take an action, getting some local data. From the description, you could have the same files on the file system and it would work.
Bad? Yeah. But not "plug it in, computer is pwned" bad.
Clause 1. If you deliver software with complete and buildable source code and a license that allows disabling any functionality or code by the licensee, then your liability is limited to a refund.
Slashdot Mirror
Servers for games that have direct connections between players?
How long have you been PC gaming?
Really, the only company I trust with digital distribution these days is GOG, who don't use DRM in any of their games
While looking at the details of some of the recent sales and additions, I found out that at least some of the games do
You mean like that update to the NYT in the cloud...
Or the Gannett one. Yup, free all right.
Guess which branch funds the TSA and ask that question again.
Point. I have the slim though, so that was never an option.
This generation has been closer to general purpose than any before it, so there's going to be some friction there.
Not enough of a value obviously. FTFA: Even the Steam version includes this nice 'feature.'
Consoles aren't general purpose, they're game appliances.
DRM on the console won't interfere with my ability to do other things that aren't related to games.
Oh, good.
A clickthrough blackout in the rest of the world isn't a bad idea though.
Java? So they're breaking the EULA too?
Or does control of radiographic equipment not count as a nuclear facility?
That's about as much as Wiki can do, as they're pretty essential
That's the freaking POINT of making it an utter blackout. Make people understand what it would be like if it passed. A click through isn't going to change squat.
Supply is sort of an issue, at least from the consumer's point of view.
Not all movies are in all theaters.
There ain't nothing about carving it in KJV
That's the closest he's come to admitting failure.
He was fully able to control the customer, but that requires controlling yourself which he can't manage.
He's psychopathic, not schizophrenic.
Then why is there a Bible verse banning them?
Remote to me means "it's connected, you're vulnerable". This requires the user to take an action, getting some local data. From the description, you could have the same files on the file system and it would work.
Bad? Yeah. But not "plug it in, computer is pwned" bad.
From 10 feet
No, it's not.
The content gives you something to sell, exactly what you do with it is the business model.
MAC
(and I don't mean the computers from Cupertino)
When that 52 minutes is much less than 1% of the content? Yeah.
That view makes others insecure in their own person.
Who wins, the one or the many?
The early 80's wants its program back.
The only thing this has demonstrated is computing power has increased. Whoop de doo.
RTFA. It's bald propaganda FOR open source software.
Provide the source, no liability over cost.
Because GTA III is of the same complexity as Atari 2600 Space Invaders. Gotcha.
What liability?
Clause 1. If you deliver software with complete and buildable source code and a license that allows disabling any functionality or code by the licensee, then your liability is limited to a refund.