Windows still doesn't have umask or use file permissions to control executability?
Uhh, yeah it does and has since NTFS was released. ACLs are inherited (not quite umask, but close), and you can make something non-executable with permissions.
Boing Boing releases all of their stuff under CC NC SA, so you may not have a case there. IANAL, but that's probably the last one you'd want to take on over other companies.
Anyone who left is also likely on their mailing list, so the next e-mail would've disabused them of that notion.
Yeah, because that person would also never go to /., Joystiq, Wired, PC Gamer, Escapist, Blues News... again either.
Is it related to this Orion or did they just reuse the name?
That's funny, your first example has the button on the LEFT.
Windows still doesn't have umask or use file permissions to control executability?
Uhh, yeah it does and has since NTFS was released. ACLs are inherited (not quite umask, but close), and you can make something non-executable with permissions.
I've never heard a 700 page specification called "not highly complicated"
In this case, you'd be wrong.
Libel tourism has recently been explicitly eliminated, with UK being used as the poster child.
It's enough to say "let's do market research" rather than just doing Windows if there's a 50% split.
Perhaps you've missed the stats from here where Linux users paid more than Windows users.
Exactly, which is different from the absolute claim that the photograph is the proof.
No, it's not.
Was there a police officer waving people through?
Is the timing of the camera correct?
Is the aiming of the camera correct?
There have been tickets issued because of all of these factors.
I think it hinges on "If a website has ads, is it commercial". Yes, they are making money off it, but no, they're not directly selling the content.
That's something that needs to be directly addressed in the CC licenses.
You can't?
Ever see the emulations of Space Invaders that are colored? Space Invaders is black and white, the color was from plastic on the screen.
Boing Boing releases all of their stuff under CC NC SA, so you may not have a case there. IANAL, but that's probably the last one you'd want to take on over other companies.
Work on both of them to make them great.
Considering that companies have finite resources and finite time, how exactly should this be divvied up?
What gotcha?
You distribute something under a license, you obey that license. Open source or not is completely irrelevant.
Since there's freeze distillation (per here), is it still a beer?
[Citation needed]
Thing is, online reputation and such works with pseudonymous speech; you don't need real name, you just need a consistent identity.
I've used this nym on /. for about 15 years.
Exactly. I was originally planning for getting AC2 right when it came out. I'm still waiting for the full version.
Call it a hunch but I don't think your last name is squid or quid.
They got discovered and fixed, which is good.
They got into production releases, which is not. They shouldn't have been in the stable release, only nightlies.
Doesn't Google purge if you ask?
I definitely agree, and that's the main reason I don't buy downloaded (GoG being the exception on PC. XBLA / PSN games I almost never consider).
I was just addressing the cost issue, not the value issue.
The mark up of the store combined with all the intermediaries is not negligible.