but it will be a feature in any Linux distro soon enough.
It's the weirdest thing. Take any Linux app and it turns out to be a clean rip-off of a Microsoft app. Interface, function and all. Albeit ten times slower.
"Name one that has not had this same problem in the last year? Just one"
Windows 2000
Take this post as a challenge. Reply with a link that shows that there is/was a bug in Windows 2000 that caused the loss of a ENTIRE FILE SYSTEM ala Linux or Apples iTunes.
All I've read is complaints about MS requiring just one password to use PassPort. As if typing in a series of numbers and letters is how a user will self-authenticate in the near future.
Look for voice-recognition, fingerprint ID and retinal scan capability being built-in into the next version of Windows.
1) Using Explorer navigate to the directory of the source folder.
2) Click to select the file or files that you want to move or copy.
3) Press CTRL-C or CTRL-X to choose to copy or move the files respectivly.
4) Using Explorer navigate to the desired destination directory
5) Press CTRL-P.
Done
I can tell you that a good 80% of audiophile hardward is nothing more than ego stroking.
Ask any audio professional. We all laugh at these so called "audiophiles".
Why? Because all this "audiophile" gear only serves to sweeten the sound rather accuratly reproduce it in a way intended by the musician, producer and engineer.
Although a recording studio can cost millions of dollars, most of that is spent on gear used to capture and record the audio signal. Not play it back.
The play back chain is as simple as it can be:
Source -> Amp -> Monitors -> Ears
Granted, the amp and the monitors can cost thousands of dollars but its still nowhere near the amounts spent by these so-called "audiophiles".
Its really silly to think that they can somehow make it sound "better" than the recording studio from whence it came.
Any audio recording engineer will tell you the same thing:
We'll take a good clean amp feeding two good montitors in a good room over these sweetened "audiophile" systems any day.
1. Negative assertations aimed at Microsoft, Microsoft products or Microsoft users.
2. Said assertations are at best only half-correct but usually completely wrong on the critical details.
3. SlashFUD is rarely informed by facts but rather by an irrational contempt of all things Microsoft.
4. Following the journalistic lead of Slashdot editors, those who post SlashFUD rarely take the time to actually research the veracity of the material supporting their arguments.
1. Negative assertations aimed at Microsoft, Microsoft products or Microsoft users.
2. Said assertations are at best only half-correct but usually completely wrong on the critical details.
3. SlashFUD is rarely informed by facts but rather by an irrational contempt of all things Microsoft.
4. Following the journalistic lead of Slashdot editors, those who post SlashFUD rarely take the time to actually research the veracity of the material supporting their arguments.
Slashdot Mirror
I would bring my Win2k laptop or Powerbook to work.
"As a person worried about the future with .NET..."
.Net actually is.
.NET for those who have'nt taken the trouble to learn what .NET truly is.
.NET as a whole.
It's kinda sad to see how uninformed some people are about what
It's been a long day in front of the PC so I'm not gonna bother explaining
But, needless to say, it would be a huge mistake to think that this is somehow related to the success or failure of
In light of your thoughtfull comments, I have to admit your correct and I completely missed the sarcasm.
:)
But because this is Slashdot (where the anti-MS FUD flows freely) I think I can be forgiven this oversight on my part.
Sincerely
"Frontpage is a program for designging print media."
It is? I think you know not what you say.
but it will be a feature in any Linux distro soon enough.
It's the weirdest thing. Take any Linux app and it turns out to be a clean rip-off of a Microsoft app. Interface, function and all. Albeit ten times slower.
And it got moderated to a 5.
Download - Execute as Administrator - Reboot - Done.
:)
And it didnt have to "de-integrate" the browser from local file aceess either. Mike
IE will not launch any file with a .EXE extension without first asking for permission.
"Name one that has not had this same problem in the last year? Just one"
Windows 2000
Take this post as a challenge. Reply with a link that shows that there is/was a bug in Windows 2000 that caused the loss of a ENTIRE FILE SYSTEM ala Linux or Apples iTunes.
"If you want stable, solid kernels, that are heavily QA'd...."
Yes I do and that why I use Windows 2000.
Expecting a OS to not destroy files is not holding a high standard. Just the opposite.
Can it be otherwise?
Got it streaming on ie5.5 as I type.
Does it taste like Chicken?
All I've read is complaints about MS requiring just one password to use PassPort. As if typing in a series of numbers and letters is how a user will self-authenticate in the near future.
.NET.
Look for voice-recognition, fingerprint ID and retinal scan capability being built-in into the next version of Windows.
*Then* you'll see the value of Passport and
At least they have been tested.
Can anyone else, with their 2% market share make the same claim?
So you should'nt use....it unless you need it?
You need to post on Slashdot more.
It might be the end of Slashdot as I knew it.
Rest in Peace
That you would be 30Khz which is a tiny high frequency indeed, beyond the perceptible hearing range of most humans.
30Hz is deep and low. Audible too! ( if you got good ears ).
Enough with your whining about the New York Times registration.
Its their web site, it is up to them how they want to manage it.
If you dont like it STOP LINKING TO THEIR ARTICLES.
But since its seems the NYTimes is providing a great portion of your content, thats not very likely is it?
1) Using Explorer navigate to the directory of the source folder.
2) Click to select the file or files that you want to move or copy.
3) Press CTRL-C or CTRL-X to choose to copy or move the files respectivly.
4) Using Explorer navigate to the desired destination directory
5) Press CTRL-P.
Done
Ask any audio professional. We all laugh at these so called "audiophiles".
Why? Because all this "audiophile" gear only serves to sweeten the sound rather accuratly reproduce it in a way intended by the musician, producer and engineer.
Although a recording studio can cost millions of dollars, most of that is spent on gear used to capture and record the audio signal. Not play it back.
The play back chain is as simple as it can be:
Source -> Amp -> Monitors -> Ears
Granted, the amp and the monitors can cost thousands of dollars but its still nowhere near the amounts spent by these so-called "audiophiles".
Its really silly to think that they can somehow make it sound "better" than the recording studio from whence it came.
Any audio recording engineer will tell you the same thing:
We'll take a good clean amp feeding two good montitors in a good room over these sweetened "audiophile" systems any day.
1. Negative assertations aimed at Microsoft, Microsoft products or Microsoft users.
2. Said assertations are at best only half-correct but usually completely wrong on the critical details.
3. SlashFUD is rarely informed by facts but rather by an irrational contempt of all things Microsoft.
4. Following the journalistic lead of Slashdot editors, those who post SlashFUD rarely take the time to actually research the veracity of the material supporting their arguments.
What is SlashFUD?
1. Negative assertations aimed at Microsoft, Microsoft products or Microsoft users.
2. Said assertations are at best only half-correct but usually completely wrong on the critical details.
3. SlashFUD is rarely informed by facts but rather by an irrational contempt of all things Microsoft.
4. Following the journalistic lead of Slashdot editors, those who post SlashFUD rarely take the time to actually research the veracity of the material supporting their arguments.
Wow, I would love this. Hear that Slashdot!.