Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft FrontPage License Prohibits Anti-Microsoft Speech

According to this story running at Info World, the license from FrontPage 2002 contains a clause that says 'You may not use the Software in connection with any site that disparages Microsoft, MSN, MSNBC, Expedia, or their products or services ...' An unfortunate clause that will prevent me from my long term plan of migrating Slashdot to Frontpage (cough). There's lots of other nastiness in this article too. Can anyone find that specific clause? Can anyone find the EULA itself? Update: 09/20 18:10 GMT by T : According to reader bteutsch "FWIW, the clause appears only in the EULA agreement for use of the FrontPage Logo, not with the product or server extensions license."

548 comments

  1. Another Example of Losing RIghts by DestroyahX · · Score: 1

    I am sick and tired of corporatism that injures the consumer.

    Eventually corporate rules and regualtions will have shoved the U.S. Constitution to the back of the line-- while it says we can speak freely, everyone else will have taken everything to speak about away.

    Rise up.

    1. Re:Another Example of Losing RIghts by bstrahm · · Score: 1
      Ok... Consitutional Law 101... (US Constitution that is)


      The Bill of Rights does NOTHING to protect citizens from each other. I have EVERY right to say you can't talk about things in my house, restrict the press on my property, even require you to submit to a strip search to enter my home.


      None of those things are allowed if the government is doing those... Big difference between what I can do as a citizen and what the government is not allowed to do.


      Saying that Microsoft is reducing your rights, well you have the choice to a) Not use computers at all, there for Microsoft is irrelevant b) Not use Microsoft products at all, therefor Microsoft is not relavant c) Use Microsoft and abide by the rules that they set in place d) Sue Microsoft in court and hope the court system grants you some extra rights in contractual law...


      Of those a-c are rather cheap, d is going to cost you a bunch of lawyers for quite a bit of time

    2. Re:Another Example of Losing RIghts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well.. I am very anti-open source. I think the government should make it illegal and sue any people who work on open source projects.

      Now see, maybe you disagree with me.. Maybe you think I shouldn't have any right to modify a product you decide to use. That's how everyone else feels about loud mouth zealots.

      See how fun it is to apply your own choice on others and fake some type of "OUTRAGE!" at everyone for not agreeing with you?

    3. Re:Another Example of Losing RIghts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      If it's not a criminal matter, you don't really have any constitutional rights. UCC rules civil courts... these are banking laws (debtor, creditor). Don't beleive me, show me a resent case using constitutional arguemnets. How did this happen? Just like the matrix you have to see the evidence yourself to believe it.


      But that's OK keep believing you have constitutional rights and I'll keep believing the world is flat. The facts support both arguments equally well.

    4. Re:Another Example of Losing RIghts by ichimunki · · Score: 2

      Hmmm. So if an employer offers me $2/hr to work a job, and I accept the offer, the law has nothing to say about it?

      No contract law can take away certain rights, and software licensing is a (unproven) form of contract.

      --
      I do not have a signature
    5. Re:Another Example of Losing RIghts by ichimunki · · Score: 1

      Erm, rather that second line should start "no contract can..."

      --
      I do not have a signature
    6. Re:Another Example of Losing RIghts by Lonath · · Score: 1

      Well.. I am very anti-open source. I think the government should make it illegal and sue any people who work on open source projects.

      Truthfully, I have had people disparage me and things I've written and I don't care. I would never even think of putting a "Oh, btw you can't attack me in any way if you use this." line into a license. That kind of a line is just a sign of insecurity and stupidity IMO.

    7. Re:Another Example of Losing RIghts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well, if you accepted it thats fine.
      It would be different if they had lowered your wage below the minimum set by your state AFTER you accepted the intial legal offer and threaten to terminate your employment if the offer is refused.

    8. Re:Another Example of Losing RIghts by ichimunki · · Score: 1

      well, if you accepted it thats fine.
      It would be different if they had lowered your wage below the minimum set by your state AFTER you accepted the intial legal of


      um, dumbass, unless you are a waiter or waitress, an offer that is below minimum wage IS illegal. That's why there's a law about it.

      --
      I do not have a signature
    9. Re:Another Example of Losing RIghts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just wish god would have complided and hide all the laws of nature so I couldn't manipulate anything. That way I would have been 100 dependant on him and not have to think for my self. I know you corporate types think you should be realished as gods and that we people should forever have to worship you for creating tools useful to use. But that would take away the evolutionary process now wouldn't it. Seems god likes open source projects, but then he doesn't fear exstinction.

    10. Re:Another Example of Losing RIghts by pigeonhed · · Score: 1

      An important distinction to note is that you cannot give up ANY constitutional rights.

      An example would be that you cannot waive your right to free speach. Microsoft can make that part of the contract yet it will mean nothing in court. It is not possible to prevent me from having constitutional law on my side. All citizens have the same constitutional rights and those rights cannot be infringed upon even in a state court or your private property.

    11. Re:Another Example of Losing RIghts by jrockway · · Score: 1

      as long as nobody reports it, yeah. as I said earlier, it's only illegal if you get caught

      --
      My other car is first.
    12. Re:Another Example of Losing RIghts by he-sk · · Score: 1

      An important distinction to note is that you cannot give up ANY constitutional rights.

      An example would be that you cannot waive your right to free speach. Microsoft can make that part of the contract yet it will mean nothing in court.


      Crap. If that were the case, then NDAs and trade secrets wouldn't work. Your Constitution makes sure that your government can't take away your right to free speech, but if you declare that you waive it to another party (note: not the government) and start singing afterwards, the other party will very likely kick your ass in court.
      --
      Free Manning, jail Obama.
    13. Re:Another Example of Losing RIghts by ichimunki · · Score: 1

      "It's only illegal if you get caught" is a poor attempt to play games with semantics. The fact is the activity is still proscribed by law-- and that's the usual definition of "illegal". But you're absolutely right, as long as no one reports it, it will happen. In fact, paying people who are not legally allowed to work in the USA less than minimum wage is probably doing wonders (or was, until last week anyway) for our economy.

      --
      I do not have a signature
  2. This will mean less FrontPage users by epsalon · · Score: 2, Funny

    Microsoft is actually contributing to standartization on the net, as less users will use FrontPage. Great!

    1. Re:This will mean less FrontPage users by azzy · · Score: 1

      No it isn't. This clause won't affect how Frontpage is used. But it will allow Microsoft to try and pick on people they don't like that also happen to be Frontpage users.

      One interesting thing to do would be to add metatags to any Anti-Microsoft website that claims it was made in Frontpage. Of course the site won't have been.. but who can prove it one way or the other?

    2. Re:This will mean less FrontPage users by bhny · · Score: 1

      There are plenty of legal departments that will be telling their companies to stop using FrontPage.

      This clause basically means all news web site must stop using it.

      I imagine other companies with overactive legal departments like IBM will stop using it too.

    3. Re:This will mean less FrontPage users by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can I get a big "FUCK MICROSOFT"? Damn you MacroSloth, I got my Win98SE with my drive that I dual-boot with Mandrake 8. And don't expect to see much if any of my money in the future (XP my ass) either (except save AOE III: The Bitchslappers!(tm)).

  3. a bit weird but still not by isudoru · · Score: 0

    it's weird because it infringes on free speech but still it's just like saying: "don't use this weapon on the one who gave it to you"

    --

    ----
    "I believe in karma. That means I can do bad things to people and assume they deserve it" - Dogbert
    1. Re:a bit weird but still not by dogbot · · Score: 1
      That is the strange bit. Why write a clause that will piss people off, is unenforceble and will be thrown out in court in nearly every country?

      I can only conclude self-delusion and yes-men. This is the Pontiac Aztec of sw licenses.

      Can management with such loose a grip on reality run sucessfully run a company?

    2. Re:a bit weird but still not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can management with such loose a grip on reality run sucessfully run a company?

      Apparently, yes. And very well. >90% market share, holding steady.

    3. Re:a bit weird but still not by Herschel+Cohen · · Score: 1

      Just about the percentage the Mafia had before the federal prosecutors became tougher and J. Edgar was no longer around to deny its existence.

  4. Ha! by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 1, Troll

    Why does big corporations always want to curtail liberty? (1st pst?)

    1. Re:Ha! by ReelOddeeo · · Score: 2

      Why does big corporations always want to curtail liberty? (1st pst?)

      The question we should really be asking is: Is our corporations learning?

      --

      Those who would give up liberty in exchange for security and DRM should switch to Microsoft Palladium!
    2. Re:Ha! by Alex+Belits · · Score: 2

      Why does big corporations always want to curtail liberty? (1st pst?)

      Because after indoctrinating the American society to think that everyone must accumulate money, they are going after their real goal, that is infinitely more valuable than money.

      Power.

      --
      Contrary to the popular belief, there indeed is no God.
    3. Re:Ha! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The next question you should ask is if "Is our coporations learning?" a real sentence or is the grammer off a bit?

    4. Re:Ha! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nah, the question is: Is we being implaling or hanging Pig Fucker?

    5. Re:Ha! by biohazard99 · · Score: 1

      sorry I had to go OT, but as for your sig, SDI is not a rehash of the Ligne Maginot (Maginot line, for those of you who don't read french), unless of course W and those who follow him leave a gap in the coverage the size of belgum. Oh yeah, for SDI to be such a monumental failure, there would have been an attack that should have destroyed said dumbass nation launched in this same area within the last 20 years. The benefits of the US staying out of WWI would have been huge, and frankly would have saved millions of lives, across the world, not to mention removing the wart known as the French from the planet. Hell, wilson should have let the Kaiser have Quebec, just to fully get rid of those frog bastards. Flame me, moderate me, I don't care, I don't understand why we in the US keep bailing those frogs out.

  5. Unbelievable, even from Microsoft. by Augusto · · Score: 2

    They just seem to be getting more and more arrogant. Thankfully, I don't use Frontpage, but I've never seen a license for a tool that says you can't criticize the makers of the tool !!!

    It's like putting a "license" around the use of a hammer saying you can't build a sign that protests the hammer's maker.

    Incredible !

    --

    - sigs are for wimps.
    1. Re:Unbelievable, even from Microsoft. by lunatik17 · · Score: 1

      Anti-virus software firms used to do something similar, for instance McAfee used to have a clause that said you couldn't criticise their software without their permission. I wouldn't worry about it, stuff like this wouldn't hold up more than a second under First Amendment scrutiny.

      --

      Here's my DeCSS mirror, where's yours?

    2. Re:Unbelievable, even from Microsoft. by Sir_Real · · Score: 2

      I wouldn't worry about it, stuff like this wouldn't hold up more than a second under First Amendment scrutiny.


      Oh, I know! I'm glad the First Amendment was there to save us from the DCMA! Can you IMAGINE the implications of THAT being passed?

    3. Re:Unbelievable, even from Microsoft. by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yes, unbelievable. Unbelievable that anyone would believe it. According to this page, you can't use the Frontpage logo on a site that disparage Microsoft.

      --
      Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
    4. Re:Unbelievable, even from Microsoft. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "You may not display the Logo on any site that disparages Microsoft or its products or services, infringes any Microsoft intellectual property or other rights, or violates any state, federal, or international law" - What about the use of it on Microsoft's own page - aren't they accused of violating certain state laws?

    5. Re:Unbelievable, even from Microsoft. by kz45 · · Score: 0

      Frontpage logo on a site that disparage Microsoft

      I think that is within microsoft's right, don't you?

    6. Re:Unbelievable, even from Microsoft. by Lonath · · Score: 1

      And this, too:

      The Logo may be displayed only on Web pages that make accurate references to Microsoft or its products or services,

      Could have lots of fun with this. :)

    7. Re:Unbelievable, even from Microsoft. by well_jung · · Score: 2
      I wouldn't worry about it, stuff like this wouldn't hold up more than a second under First Amendment scrutiny.
      I agree. But just to be sure, I donated my $300 tax refund to the EFF.

      --
      Carl G. Jung
      --
      "With one breath, with one flow, You will know Synchronicity" -La Policia
    8. Re:Unbelievable, even from Microsoft. by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 2

      Correction: read this.

      It's not apparent exactly what the restriction applies to, but it's not broad.

      --
      Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
    9. Re:Unbelievable, even from Microsoft. by dorzak · · Score: 1
      Look at the bottom of that page. The guidelines tell you how to use it but then they disclaim the whole thing, saying even against infringement.


      To me that seems to say, you can use it by the following rules but if you find a way around it we will hit you with a infringement lawsuit.


      In addition anybody besides me notice how fast Microsoft Pages CHANGE? Look at the link they tell you to point it to, stating it must be an active link. Translation: If we move the page, we can revoke your use of the logo.

    10. Re:Unbelievable, even from Microsoft. by T.+Will+S.+Idea · · Score: 1
      This is what I love about Microsoft. They are consistantly overzealous and dumb. Why in the world would they want to prevent maintainers of anti Microsoft sites from displaying a "Created by Microsoft" logo? Anyone who did such a thing would be instantly and blatantly exposed as a hypocrite and their anti Microsoft message diluted.

      I suppose that they are trying to prevent people from disparaging the logo itself, or using the logo to criticize Microsoft. It won't work. All you have to do is fire up gimp, add your own customizations and viola! You've got a parody. Ain't nothin' that Microsoft's lawyers can do about that.

      --
      If electricity is produced by electrons is morality produced by morons?
    11. Re:Unbelievable, even from Microsoft. by plumby · · Score: 1

      I know it's not quite the same, but I've seen plenty of licences for development products that say that you can't use it to develop a product that competes with anything that the company develops.

    12. Re:Unbelievable, even from Microsoft. by blazerw11 · · Score: 1

      What does Northwestern's purchase agreement have to do with Front Page's EULA? All you've done is point out a License agreement between NU and MS that doesn't have the line mentioned in the InfoWorld story.
      I've got a EULA from Windows 3.1 that doesn't have the statement either. If it were in electronic form, I'd post a link [here]. Hell, I've even got an article about NU Football in today's Chicago Tribune that doesn't have the stated MS EULA exclustions, here.

      --
      A great many people think they are thinking when they are merely rearranging their prejudices. -- William James
    13. Re:Unbelievable, even from Microsoft. by DunbarTheInept · · Score: 2

      Gee, can't they make up their minds? With Microsoft products, accurate references == disparaging comments.

      --

      Don't label something "offtopic" unless you know the topic well enough to tell what's on topic.

    14. Re:Unbelievable, even from Microsoft. by sealawyer · · Score: 1

      I think if you wanted to put up a site slamming Microsoft's logo policy, you could legitimately display the logo as part of your description of the policy. You'd have to avoid using the logo in a way the makes it appear that MS endorses your remarks. That ought to be fairly easy to accomplish on a page slamming Microsoft.

      If I were going to put up such a page, I wouldn't use Frontpage to develop the page, so it wouldn't be possible for anyone to claim I'd agreed to any shrinkwrap license. No reason not to use Notepad though!

      Of course if you wanted to fight this thing out in court, you'd have to be prepared to do so in Washington rather than in your home state. I'm not prepared to do so.

    15. Re:Unbelievable, even from Microsoft. by damiam · · Score: 1

      That means almost nothing .. if you use the logo, you're saying you use FrontPage. As long as that's accurate, you're fine. It just keeps you from using the FrontPage logo on a site that doesn't use it.

      --
      It's hard to be religious when certain people are never incinerated by bolts of lightning.
    16. Re:Unbelievable, even from Microsoft. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, basically, you can't display the Frontpage logo on any web site, since it's impossible to meet both conditions at the same time.

    17. Re:Unbelievable, even from Microsoft. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If I were going to put up such a page, I wouldn't use Frontpage to develop the page, so it wouldn't be possible for anyone to claim I'd agreed to any shrinkwrap license.


      Without a license you can't use the logo due to copyright and tradmark issues, unless you are doing so under fair use.

    18. Re:Unbelievable, even from Microsoft. by The+Mighty+Bill · · Score: 1

      No, I dont. This _is_ a form of control on the part of M$ that is unparalleled in todays world. I cant think of any other situation where a software vendor has explicitly told me that I must curtail my content if I speak badly about them. Now, they do have the right not to allow the logo (copyright) to be displayed (assuming the logo is not public domain). But that's not how it's stated. M$ would have been better off saying "you must contact us to use the Front page logo on your web pages". The way it's stated (I think) infringes on the users freedom of expression (idealistically of course).

      --
      The Mighty Bill
    19. Re:Unbelievable, even from Microsoft. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What I don't understand is number 6...

      "6.You may not alter the Logo in any manner, including size, proportions, colors, or elements, or animate, distort, or otherwise change its perspective or appearance."

      If I change the logo, then I've got a new logo...not the one published by Microsoft. In that case, I'm no longer bound by the "official usage guidelines for the Created and Managed with Microsoft FrontPage Logo Program", right? Or does it matter...it's whatever the corporate lawyers decide to enforce...?

    20. Re:Unbelievable, even from Microsoft. by sealawyer · · Score: 1

      "Without a license you can't use the logo due to copyright and tradmark issues, unless you are doing so under fair use."

      And what would be more clearly fair use than using the logo in a piece critiquing the logo policy?

  6. Hmmm..... by soulsteal · · Score: 0, Troll

    Must be based on Slashdot's user agreement clause of promising to never read the articles.

  7. taco so funny, ha ha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    slashdot on fronpage...bwahahahahahaha

  8. Now that is Funny - but take it further by elbarsal · · Score: 1
    Run a pirated copy of FrontPage to create an MS-Bashing page to be served on a pirated copy of IIS running on a pirated copy of Win2K, just to violate as many licenses as possible!


    ed

    1. Re:Now that is Funny - but take it further by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hahah, well, at least if it's a pirated copy, it's actually wourth what u paid for it!!

    2. Re:Now that is Funny - but take it further by b0r1s · · Score: 1

      it's almost certainly been done ... go to a university sometime, run nmap on the subnet (for educational purposes only) , watch how many win2k/win2k server boxes are running, and then guess at how many of them paid for it ... or, alternatively, go to netcraft, and search in the subnet of your choice, and see whe IIS/win2k distribution at the college level.

      --
      Mooniacs for iOS and Android
    3. Re:Now that is Funny - but take it further by Tackhead · · Score: 2
      > Run a pirated copy of FrontPage to create an MS-Bashing page to be served on a pirated copy of IIS running on a pirated copy of Win2K, just to violate as many licenses as possible!

      Write a variant of Nimda that, instead of using IIS to serve the .eml file to more victims, creates a uses IIS to display the Frontpage logo alongside a picture of Bill Gates buggering a goat.

      "This is your web content. This is your web content on Frontpage. Any questions?"

      For bonus points, have the hijacked server mail the BSA goons and/or the piracy hotline @microsoft.com, with a message saying "Suspected license violation - web site created by Frontpage makes disparaging comments about Microsoft products".

    4. Re:Now that is Funny - but take it further by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or just check your logs and find how many infected Windows computers have been attacking your Linux box.

  9. EULA infringement by stud9920 · · Score: 1

    Does that mean that CmdrTaco will have to either switch to unconditional Windows advocacy, either to stop using Frontpage for slashdot ?

    1. Re:EULA infringement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought it was already using Front Page. It would explain all the downtime to apply Code Red patches and deleting whole discussions because the server can't handle the load.

      Of course, by saying this the m.i.c.h.a.e.l. bot will instantly delete this comment.

    2. Re:EULA infringement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He couldn't have used Frontpage to make Slashdot. Frontpage simply isn't capable of making the complex bugs that Slashcode does.

    3. Re:EULA infringement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm guessing that he hasn't either to start using it yet.

  10. When did... by dso · · Score: 1

    Microsoft gain the authority to restrict free speech? Doesn't the US Constitution guarantee the right to say what you want?

    1. Re:When did... by statusbar · · Score: 1

      Read up on the US Constitution. The constitution has nothing to do with restrictions of corporations, only restrictions of government.

      --jeff

      --
      ipv6 is my vpn
    2. Re:When did... by xTown · · Score: 1
      Doesn't the US Constitution guarantee the right to say what you want?


      No, it guarantees that the government will not restrict your ability to say what you want. The First Amendment doesn't apply to corporations.

    3. Re:When did... by dso · · Score: 1

      Sorry, I'm Canadian so I hear a lot about free speech and try to understand it more. Canada is a little stricter on free speech. Example: you can be charged for spreading racial hatred

    4. Re:When did... by Sir_Real · · Score: 1

      That's a great quote in your sig. Who said that originally?

    5. Re:When did... by trongey · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Doesn't the US Constitution guarantee the right to say what you want?

      Sure it does (mostly). But it doesn't guarantee the right to say it with MS FrontPage.

      Try actually reading the document to see what it really says about your rights.

      On a related topic: Has anyone ever noticed that the President is only given the power of supreme commander of the army, navy, and, sometimes, militia. The air force and marines are never mentioned in any articles or ammendments. Who's in charge of them?

      --
      You never really know how close to the edge you can go until you fall off.
    6. Re:When did... by xiaix · · Score: 1

      I remember a similar quote in the movie "Ever After", the baroness speaking to her youngest daughter...

      --

      Have you read the Moderator Guidelines yet?

    7. Re:When did... by rmgrotkierii · · Score: 1

      So technically, the First Amendment is null and void... Seeing we are now living in the United States of Corporate America, a subsidiary fully owned by the MPAA, RIAA, M$, etc. I guess it's back to vim and apache for me :( And I really wanted to use CodeDestroyer 2002 on my |33t h4x0r s1t3 that bashed M$.

      --
      Reality is for those who can't face Science Fiction.
    8. Re:When did... by ZaMoose · · Score: 3, Informative

      Air Force grew out of the Army Air Corps after WWII and the Marines are officially a subset of the Navy, so the President is officially CIC of those branches as well.

      --
      I wish I had a kryptonite cross, because then you could keep Dracula and Superman away.
    9. Re:When did... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      I'm not sure about the air force, but the marines are considered part of the Navy.

    10. Re:When did... by jazman_777 · · Score: 1
      No, it guarantees that the government will not restrict your ability to say what you want. The First Amendment doesn't apply to corporations.


      Actually, the Constitution doesn't guarantee a thing. The US government has abused it willy-nilly. A well-armed populace with a will to resist, however, does.

      --
      Slashdot: Failed Car Analogies. Amateur Lawyering. Anecdote Battles.
    11. Re:When did... by rmgrotkierii · · Score: 1

      Left wing fuck? That's really funny. I just happen to be a conservative Republican and voted for George Bush Jr in the last election. (: But all of that doesn't matter, but I was called a "Left wing fuck". I AM getting real. The American govt. is owned by big business. Why not look at the contributions to politicans. You AC fsck.

      --
      Reality is for those who can't face Science Fiction.
    12. Re:When did... by VulgarBoatman · · Score: 1

      The Constitution doesn't prevent MS putting the clause in the contract and threatening people with lawsuits. The Constitution may, however, prevent the courts (read: the government) from abridging free speech by *upholding* the contract. No recourse through the courts, no way to enforce (that part of) the contract against a user.

      --
      "Because I love Pat Benatar." -- Britney Spears, when asked why she covered Joan Jett's "I Love Rock 'n' Roll"
    13. Re:When did... by AstroJetson · · Score: 1

      Interesting observation.....

      The Marines are considered part of the Navy and when that document was written, no one even concieved of an Air Force. It's one of those things that have to be interpreted in the context of modern times. The interpretation in this case is "all of the military".

      --
      Admit nothing, deny everything and make counter-accusations.
    14. Re:When did... by gaj · · Score: 1
      I believe that should be:

      rm -rf /bin/Laden

      shouldn't it? And while we're at it:

      rm -rf /al\ Qaeda

    15. Re:When did... by sydbarrett74 · · Score: 1

      The federal, state and local governments and their agents may not restrict speech. However, private parties can restrict your speech all they want.

      --
      'He who has to break a thing to find out what it is, has left the path of wisdom.' -- Gandalf to Saruman
    16. Re:When did... by jmccay · · Score: 1

      What you say is guaranteed, but not how you use a product.

      --
      At the next eco-hypocrisy-meeting, count the private jets used to get to the meeting. Should be interesting to see that
    17. Re:When did... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What do you expect from a company that have a few top butt-boys that claim that Linux is anti-American? Do they inbreed people so that mik40$0f7 can have a large consumer base for outright pathetic crap? Has Micro actually cornered the market in cloning tech too? Screw them to hell. Anyone else hear anything about that. It might be bullshit, but I don't put it past One Microsoft Way.

    18. Re:When did... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL That's funny. Because most of my views, are conservative. All my liberal views are on foreign policy. So screw yourself. I could say you are a typical American, basically uneduated on the ways of the world, that anyone who doesn't fit your view is a liberal. Atleast I've travelled outside the United States for 12 years.

      I'm posting this AC because you aren't worth my time.

  11. BASTARDS!!! by Drunken_Jackass · · Score: 1


    --
    There are 01 types of people in this world. Those that understand binary, and me.
  12. LOL - Ralph Nader by sys$manager · · Score: 1
    "Don't blame me, I voted for Nader!"

    I think MS would be in a far different postion if someone with some consumer-protecting cajones was voted in.

    1. Re:LOL - Ralph Nader by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, like Gore. Butthead.

    2. Re:LOL - Ralph Nader by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yea, nader might be breaking up microsoft as we speak, but he's useless in foreign policy ... he'd prolly be sending convoys of supporters asking for peace to the middle east, instead of getting ready to take action ... now run the fuck along, nader's useless.

    3. Re:LOL - Ralph Nader by sys$manager · · Score: 1

      I didn't ACTUALLY vote for him. That wasn't the point, it was a joke. The point was, the GOP are the bitches of big business.

    4. Re:LOL - Ralph Nader by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gore?

      You mean that slumlord guy with the zinc mine and the tobacco farm?

    5. Re:LOL - Ralph Nader by ShavenYak · · Score: 1

      On the other hand, Nader might have pulled all the US military out of the Middle East the minute he took office, and perhaps there wouldn't be quite so many arabs willing to die to hurt Americans once that happened.
      Then again, it might not have made any difference. Point is, we can't possibly imagine how different the current situation might be if the presidential election had gone differently, because there's been 8 months of stuff happening that wouldn't have happened. And vice-versa, too.

      --

      Hey kids, there's only 5 days left 'til Yak Shaving Day!
    6. Re:LOL - Ralph Nader by frknfrk · · Score: 1

      too bad the democratic party is also one of big business' bitches. but i think that was your point.

      reminds me of indecision 2000:
      gore: 'like bush, but towards the middle'
      bush: 'like gore, but towards the middle'

      -sam

      --
      The REAL sam_at_caveman_dot_org is user ID 13833.
    7. Re:LOL - Ralph Nader by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So big business gives MILLIONS split evenly between the 2 major parties just to be nice guys?

      Oh, please.

    8. Re:LOL - Ralph Nader by maryesme · · Score: 0

      Those should be "cojones". "cajones" are drawers, as in chest of drawers.

    9. Re:LOL - Ralph Nader by sys$manager · · Score: 1
      I'm a staunch Libertarian, but it's like they said in the Simpsons when the left handed store was going under:


      "Next week it becomes Libertarian Party Headquarters. I just hope they have more success than I had."

      People don't seem to want to do things on their own and be responsible for themselves. They want to be babysat. It makes me sick.

  13. Maybe a good thing? by mjh · · Score: 3, Interesting
    IANAL, but isn't there something in contract law that says that if you put a clause in a contract that is illegal, then the contract is null and void on its face. For example, I can't put a clause in a contract that says that you will become my slave if you agree to the contract. Slavery is illegal and no contract is allowed to supercede that (AFAIK).

    So the fact that this exists, does it not render the license restrictions that MS is putting into place null and void? In other words, has MS just ceded their rights to control Front Page?

    (Please chill on the flames. If I knew what I was talking about I wouldn't have had to ask!)

    --
    Key to financial independence: Spend less than you earn. Save and invest the difference. Do it for a long time.
    1. Re:Maybe a good thing? by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 1

      IANAL either, but it's pretty standard practice to include language in a contract or license to the effect of "If any clause in this document is found to be illegal, all the other clauses not affected by that finding shall remain in effect."

      The question is, is THAT clause legal or not?

    2. Re:Maybe a good thing? by Skyshadow · · Score: 2

      I dunno, man.

      I'd like to think you were right on this one, but you've got to remember that NDAs are apparently legal, so speech obviously isn't always gaurenteed.

      --
      Every year during my review, I just pray the words "slashdot.org" aren't mentioned.
    3. Re:Maybe a good thing? by M-G · · Score: 2, Informative

      Most contracts have a severability clause in them that states that if any part of the contract is found to be invalid or illegal, it doesn't invalidate the rest of the contract.

    4. Re:Maybe a good thing? by realdpk · · Score: 1

      IAANAL (also), but I believe this is what the "survivability" clauses in contracts are for. Basically, if any part of the contract is ruled null, then the remainder of the contract remains in force.

    5. Re:Maybe a good thing? by leviramsey · · Score: 1

      A standard part of EULAs is:



      The legal status of any clause does not affect the legal status of any other clause.



      Or something to that effect.

    6. Re:Maybe a good thing? by Syberghost · · Score: 2

      The word you need to look up is "severability".

    7. Re:Maybe a good thing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is not strickly true. A given clause in a contract can be invalidated, such as this one, without voiding the contract as a whole. Many contracts also have explicit clauses to that effect that if one clause is found invalid, it does not invalidate the contract as a whole. Contracts of adhesion and contracts with terms that are illegal or otherwise unenforcable are made every day. Just visit human resources :)

    8. Re:Maybe a good thing? by Velex · · Score: 1

      IANAL either (do there exist any net users who are lawyers that can help?), but the only things I know of that protect free speech in the United States are state Constitutions and the First Amendment: "Congress shall make no law... abridging the freedom of speech...." (State Constitutions generally likewise limit this to the legeslative body, and this is extended to the state legislatures by the Fourteenth Amendment.) Compare this to the Thirteenth Amendment:

      "Section 1. Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction.

      "Section 2. Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation."

      Here, a blanket rule is made, and permission is given to Congress to enforce it. So, it follows that, unfortunatly, Microsoft is allowed to do this.

      I've got a couple Supreme Court precedents up at my webpage at http://velex.0catch.com/constitution/main.html, if anyone wants to check out my notes from Constitutional Law

      --
      Join the Slashcott! Stay away entirely Feb 10 thru Feb 17! Close all tabs to prevent autorefresh!
    9. Re:Maybe a good thing? by MindStalker · · Score: 1

      NDAs have to be two party contacts, which both parties present, and most likly a lawyer. A shrinkwrap, or any other one party license like this is very limited in what it can do.

    10. Re:Maybe a good thing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Even if this would null the licence, it will not null copyright.

      The real guestion is, what if the licence of some of Microsoft's server product was found illegal? MS charges per connected host, but this is a usage restriction imposed by the licence, not a copyright issue (no copies are made when a client connects, and I don't think spawning a new processes can be construed as copying). So if the licence of Windows Datacenter (or whatever) was found illegal, would it mean that an infinete number of clients could connect even if you had just one-client license?

    11. Re:Maybe a good thing? by JabberWokky · · Score: 2
      NDAs are apparently legal

      I wouldn't be so sure... I've heard they (and non-compete upon exiting a company and several other common contracts) are not very east to defend in court. YMMV, IANAL, etc...

      --
      Evan

      --
      "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
    12. Re:Maybe a good thing? by GunFodder · · Score: 1

      Does anyone think Microsoft will ever try to sue anyone for breaking this clause? The EULA has a bunch of stuff in it that MS probably doesn't want in the news, and the harsh spotlight of judicial review could very well melt the EULA away.

    13. Re:Maybe a good thing? by Jerf · · Score: 5, Interesting
      'IANAL, but isn't there something in contract law that says that if you put a clause in a contract that is illegal, then the contract is null and void on its face. For example, I can't put a clause in a contract that says that you will become my slave if you agree to the contract. Slavery is illegal and no contract is allowed to supercede that (AFAIK).'

      'So the fact that this exists, does it not render the license restrictions that MS is putting into place null and void? In other words, has MS just ceded their rights to control Front Page?'

      IANAL, but you don't need to be a lawyer for this.

      First, as one person pointed out, licenses invariably have clauses that say if one part is found invalid, then only that part is invalidated, not the whole thing. Second, even if what you said is true, then what is nullified is the license. That doesn't mean Microsoft has "ceded" their rights to FrontPage, it means that you no longer have the right to use it.

      This is why contracts have those clauses. For any non-trivial contract, it would not be good that the whole contract was nullified for obvious reasons, for either side.

      Finally, I am surprised this wasn't noticed in a reply, but in states where the UCITA or compatible varient has been passed, this clause is likely to be completely legal, merely a varient on the non-review clause.

    14. Re:Maybe a good thing? by Skiamorphic · · Score: 1

      Strengthen that statement minutely and you have a contract which can never be challenged in court:

      "The legal status of any clause does not affect the legal status of any clause."

    15. Re:Maybe a good thing? by zulux · · Score: 2
      That doesn't mean Microsoft has "ceded" their rights to FrontPage; it means that you no longer have the right to use it.



      You don't need a license to USE FrontPage - you only need a license to COPY FrontPage. Microsoft doesn't have a 'use-rights' on FrontPage, it has a copyright on FrontPage. Microsoft sells copies of FrontPage, and people who purchase them are allowed to use them. GM sells Corvettes - you get to use them, but you don't get to copy them without a license. (Corvettes are copyrighted and patented works). There is a small group of people who feel that because you don't run software off the CD-Rom, you need a license to copy it onto your hard-drive and a license to copy it the software into ram. These are the same people who think they can renounce their US citizenship and not pay the IRS it's due. The only way you can cede you right to use things you have purchased legally, is if you sign a contract (physically or digitally) or a nasty laws get passed.

      --

      Moneyed corporations, non-working 'poor' and criminal prisoners are turning productive citizens into tax-slaves.

    16. Re:Maybe a good thing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not so in the UK - it has to be 'signed' by both parties -but pre-signed stuff is ok and both parties dont have to sign in each others company.

      (IANAL either, and posting AC cos my employer needs NDSa)

    17. Re:Maybe a good thing? by error0x100 · · Score: 1

      There is one more aspect, psychologically, the "fear" aspect. Even if that clause in the contract is actually not legal (I don't know the details but I know there are some rights you can't sign away, UCITA or not), the majority of people would not know that for sure, and they would avoid saying anything bad about MS on their sites "just in case". Moreover, they would probably be also less inclined to even link to sites that criticise Microsoft in any way.

      So no matter what the legalities, the end result will be less MS criticism on the Internet.

    18. Re:Maybe a good thing? by Lonath · · Score: 1

      IANAL either, but it's pretty standard practice to include language in a contract or license to the effect of "If any clause in this document is found to be illegal, all the other clauses not affected by that finding shall remain in effect."

      The question is, is THAT clause legal or not?


      I dunno but let's look at section 7 from the GNU GPL:

      7. If, as a consequence of a court judgment or allegation of patent infringement or for any other reason (not limited to patent issues), conditions are imposed on you (whether by court order, agreement or otherwise) that contradict the conditions of this License, they do not excuse you from the conditions of this License. If you cannot distribute so as to satisfy simultaneously your obligations under this License and any other pertinent obligations, then as a consequence you may not distribute the Program at all. For example, if a patent license would not permit royalty-free redistribution of the Program by all those who receive copies directly or indirectly through you, then the only way you could satisfy both it and this License would be to refrain entirely from distribution of the Program.

      If any portion of this section is held invalid or unenforceable under any particular circumstance, the balance of the section is intended to apply and the section as a whole is intended to apply in other circumstances.

      (Emphasis mine.)

      So, let's hope that statements like that are valid. :)

    19. Re:Maybe a good thing? by NecroPuppy · · Score: 2

      So no matter what the legalities, the end result will be less MS criticism on the Internet.

      Unless someone takes the initiative and purposely creates such a site to draw a challange from MS. Then gets the ACLU, FSF, EFF, etc on thier side, and doesn't let MS drop the lawsuit.

      Hmmm... Can you run FrontPage 2002 on a 98 box?

      --
      I like you, Stuart. You're not like everyone else, here, at Slashdot.
    20. Re:Maybe a good thing? by Teun · · Score: 1
      I think we're all looking too far ahead, the solution is much closer by.

      Ed Foster writes: "You may not use the Software in connection with any site that disparages Microsoft, MSN, MSNBC, Expedia, or their products or services ... " the license reads in part. Good thing InfoWorld doesn't use FrontPage 2002 to post this column, I guess.

      It's not the SITE or the user of the software that disparages M$, M$ is as usual doing it all by themself!
      The site is only a tool for it's owner to excersise his/hir right of free speach.

      --
      "The likes of Facebook and WhatsApp are free to those whose privacy is of zero value."
    21. Re:Maybe a good thing? by ajakk · · Score: 2

      Actually, you are quite wrong. Microsoft does not sell you a copy of frontpage. Microsoft grants you a license to use a copy of Frontpage. Microsoft has the right to revoke your license of its use, and you can no longer use the product. Because of the nature of the license, Microsoft has much less legal liability in areas such as consumer defects.

      The first paragraph of Microsoft's Fronpage EULA says, "This Software Product is licensed, not sold. "

    22. Re:Maybe a good thing? by zulux · · Score: 2
      The first paragraph of Microsoft's Fronpage EULA says, "This Software Product is licensed, not sold. "



      To be fair - the question of "if retail software is sold with an implicit license to use, or requires a license to be agreed to after the purchase" is a question that hasn't been decided by the courts. Currently, retail Software is treated like a CD, Video or Book - you get to use the copy they sold to you. You don't get to copy it because they have the copyright. Recently the BSA has been making the argument that EULA are real contracts with the argument that "Everybody does it, so it must be right." Only a court case, or law like the UCITA will decide this issue. Please read my following rebuttal with the consideration that i'm only correct if the court rules that retail software is like a CD, video or a book.

      Microsoft would love for you to think that they are not selling you a product, but just try returning your product for a full refund under terms of their EULA, and they will tell you that you are stuck with it (Search for google for Windows Refund Day). They claim that you didn't 'license' the product from Microsoft and are hence entitled for a refund, but that you purchased it from the store.

      Microsoft has very clever counsel - for example: if you read the text on the CD they - it says "Don't Make Illegal Copies of this Disk", note that it doesn't say, "Making Copies of this disk is illegal." They are very precice in their wording in order not to run afoul of the law. It is legal to make a backup of your CD.

      The claim that "This software is licensed not sold" is vastly different than "Use of this software is illegal without agreeing to the supplemental EULA." The license they are referencing it their statement is the implicit license to use the software that you obtained by the retail purchase of the software, not the supplemental EULA. As for the "not sold" - They are correct, but somewhat misleading, in that they didn't sell you "FrontPage" - you would then have the copyright, they sold you a copy of FrontPage.

      Again, untill the courts decide, it would be smart to treat EULA like they were legal and don't agree to any that are not reasonable, but don't depend on them to limit damages in software that you create and try to licence to your users with an click-tough(unsigned) EULA.

      --

      Moneyed corporations, non-working 'poor' and criminal prisoners are turning productive citizens into tax-slaves.

    23. Re:Maybe a good thing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unless someone takes the initiative and purposely creates such a site to draw a challange from MS. Then gets the ACLU, FSF, EFF, etc on thier side, and doesn't let MS drop the lawsuit.


      Someone reply to this with a link to the logo. I will put up an anti-microsoft site which uses it.

    24. Re:Maybe a good thing? by einhverfr · · Score: 2

      Well, I think it is a good thing for other reasons-- credibility of your Microsoft-bashing site.

      If Microsoft really wanted to, they would do better saying, "if you use our product, and you want to say bad things about is, you MUST use our logo so that people realize that you are just whining and really use all our products, loser!"

      If you have a Microsoft-bashing site, what on earth are you doing writing it in FrontPage and using the logo? Who will take you seriously?

      --

      LedgerSMB: Open source Accounting/ERP
    25. Re:Maybe a good thing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The base assumption of your post is that EULAs are unenforcable. Fine, lets leave that aside.

      You very clearly do not need a licence to copy software to your harddrive or into RAM, assuming that no other valid contract comes into play. http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/117.text.htm l

      (Also, your corvette example is grossly simplied. Car companies 'copy' other cars all the time. Only small parts of a Corvette are patented, and maybe the general shape is considered 'trade-dress' but only because it's fairly distinctive. Still, it's quite easy to buy 'clone' parts for any give auto.)

    26. Re:Maybe a good thing? by allism · · Score: 1

      Oh, good. I never read EULAs and there's always been a sneaking suspicion at the back of my mind that somewhere along the line I sold my soul to Lucifer or promised my first-born child to Rev. Moon.

    27. Re:Maybe a good thing? by Rob+Kaper · · Score: 1
      If you have a Microsoft-bashing site, what on earth are you doing writing it in FrontPage and using the logo? Who will take you seriously?


      This is not about anti-Microsoft sites. It's about sites that offer technical reviews such as on-line magazines or on-line publications or print magazines.


      If that site happens to be built with FrontPage and uses that logo, it could be problematic to post an article trashing a Microsoft product. Not because of Microsoft, but simply because it might be a bad product. Critizing the XP Activating stuff, for example.

    28. Re:Maybe a good thing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not really... the 13th amendment isn't a law, it's a constitutional amendment, which is designed to be the basis for other laws (or so say my lawyer friends/relatives). A constitutional amendment is thus supposed to be broad and sweeping, while an individual law is not, and certainly not a contract.

    29. Re:Maybe a good thing? by Sheng+Long · · Score: 1

      This is a sticky question:

      It is true that a contract requiring illegal action is unenforcable (i.e. a contract requiring me to kill Richard Simmons) as is a contract entered into under duress.

      Also, it is true that no one can sign away their first amendment rights, but there are situations where speech can be legally limited. For instance, "nondisclosure" agreements, in which one party agrees (under penalty) to keep certain information secret, are commonplace. There's also the 'yelling fire in a crowded theatre' limitation, etc.

      It seems as if Microsoft would have the right to limit your use of their products or logos (after all, unlike some open source software, you are paying for the right of usage, NOT for ownership). But that's just my lay opinion.

      --
      ___________I've found a remarkable proof of this fact, but there is not enough space in the sig to write it.
  14. This is GOOD news everyone! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As long as this fact is spread wide enough and enough people hear about it, it can only be a good thing.

    Any news site (especially technical ones) will surely dump this software immediately if they want to keep their reputations of impartiality intact. There is no WAY they will risk using it if there's a chance it will make their readers think less of them.

    Having to do this may well annoy the news sites so they will probably take to oppurtunity of telling the world why they did. Other sites may then follow suit.

    1. Re:This is GOOD news everyone! by kz45 · · Score: 0

      Any news site (especially technical ones) will surely dump this software immediately if they want to keep their reputations of impartiality intact. There is no WAY they will risk using it if there's a chance it will make their readers think less of them.

      Since MS products are so popular, people are pirating (making illegal copies) them across the internet. I seriously doubt anyone is going to stop using it because of this clause. The general public, which makes up about 98% of the internet, doesn't give a shit.

  15. IANAL but.. by derrickh · · Score: 2

    Is that legal? If I buy a Chevy, I'm allowed to paint 'Chevy Sucks' on it and drive it to the Chevy Sucks 2001 convention.

    If I buy a pair of Nike shoes, I'm allowed to wear them while running in an 'Anti-Nike Slave Labor' 5k run/walk.

    If I buy MSFP, then I can use it to create 'Frontpagesucks.com'.

    D

    1. Re:IANAL but.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who cares if you anal? Why must all of you people announce it all the time? ...I mean it...don't hurt me...

  16. Complete BS. by Skyshadow · · Score: 4, Flamebait
    Jesus, I wonder how long before this "feature" makes it into other MS products -- Internet Explorer anyone?

    I can't believe that Microsoft [The remainder of this post has been sanitized by MS Internet Explorer. Please go back about your business, and remember that Microsoft is only trying to conduct legitimate, non-predatory business. You have been warned.]

    --
    Every year during my review, I just pray the words "slashdot.org" aren't mentioned.
    1. Re:Complete BS. by frknfrk · · Score: 2

      should be fine. after all, it's not like there is a browser monopoly or anything... why shouldn't 99% of the people get their information gently sanitized by either MSIE or AOL?

      -sam

      --
      The REAL sam_at_caveman_dot_org is user ID 13833.
    2. Re:Complete BS. by JabberWokky · · Score: 2
      Odd how that happened. Oh, well... I'll just hit "Help|Report bug" and file a Konqueror bug report.

      --
      Evan

      --
      "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
    3. Re:Complete BS. by liquidsin · · Score: 1

      Who's to say it'll stop at IE or Word? If they get away with this on Frontpage, what's keeping them from modifying the EULA for Windows, so that you can't do/say/type/draw/code anything disparaging about MS from within Windows without violating your license agreement?

      --
      do not read this line twice.
  17. Didn't work the first time... by Drunken_Jackass · · Score: 1

    <META NAME="SUCKS" CONTENT="Microsoft Page 4.0"></PRE>

    --
    There are 01 types of people in this world. Those that understand binary, and me.
  18. That's the last straw, get rid of EULAs by mickeyreznor · · Score: 1

    Why do we need EULAs,anyway? Why can't we just go with the "I buy something, it's mine" way of doing things? Once it leaves their hands and I own it, who the fuck are they to tell me what i can and can't do with it. Once it enters my computer(as long as i obtained it from legal means), it's mine to do with how i please.

    1. Re:That's the last straw, get rid of EULAs by SpcJWH · · Score: 1

      That's the whole point in licensing, my friend. You don't own it, you only paid for the right to use it. Seem to recall this being one of the things Microsoft started back in the eighties.

    2. Re:That's the last straw, get rid of EULAs by mickeyreznor · · Score: 1

      I know what licensing is. My point is that it's time for this licensing bullshit to end. We don't have this licensing crap for other types of products, why should computer software be any different?

    3. Re:That's the last straw, get rid of EULAs by Wariac · · Score: 1

      Before you get rid of UELA's, you have to destroy the source...KILL LAWYERS!

      Wariac

      --
      Remember it, write it down, take a picture, I dont give a fsck!
    4. Re:That's the last straw, get rid of EULAs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      After recent events can we avoid using language like Kill (insert generic group)

      I think rehabilitation with an eye toward making corporate lawyers productive members of society would be more usefull - sort of a US version of the cultural revolution.

    5. Re:That's the last straw, get rid of EULAs by Wariac · · Score: 1

      Good point...I hit submit to quick.
      I should never read /. before my first cup o coffee :)

      --
      Remember it, write it down, take a picture, I dont give a fsck!
    6. Re:That's the last straw, get rid of EULAs by kz45 · · Score: 0

      because Microsoft created it, that's why. It's just like when someone creates a piece of Open Source Software and releases it under the GNU license. (that was their choice)

    7. Re:That's the last straw, get rid of EULAs by saider · · Score: 2

      So stop buying software with unfriendly licenses. End of problem.

      --


      Remember, You are unique...just like everyone else.
    8. Re:That's the last straw, get rid of EULAs by kanthoney · · Score: 1
      We don't have this licensing crap for other types of products

      I've seen videos that claim to be licensed for home viewing only. I'm not sure whether copyright law backs this up - as far as I can see, broadcasting and copying are two entirely different processes.

  19. Does this mean by canning · · Score: 1, Offtopic
    'You may not use the Software in connection with any site that disparages Microsoft, MSN, MSNBC, Expedia, or their products or services ...'

    If the public were to follow this the only site using FrontPage would be Microsoft. They continually blow sunshine up their own asses.

    --
    I love the smell of Karma in the morning
  20. Bad link... by leviramsey · · Score: 1

    All I got was an article focusing on MS clickthrough licenses.

  21. I might start using Frontpage :) by Lonath · · Score: 1

    I think we should all make a little webpage using Frontpage and put a comment disparaging this license requirement on it. :)

  22. IANAL by PenguinX · · Score: 3, Informative

    However it is my understanding of the law that you can create a contract that has a clause in it that breaks the law - (the US Constitution in this case - you know free speech and all) and it just blows the entire contract out of the water.

    Seems like a stupid move on the part of Microsoft IMHO.

    1. Re:IANAL by Smoking · · Score: 1

      I think that (at least here in Switzerland) if a clause in a contract is illegal, the rest of the contract stills holds. Only the illegal part of the contract would be invalid...

      Quentin

    2. Re:IANAL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In US contract law, you generally have to say this explicitly in the contract.

      For those nobs who don't know, contract law generally falls outside the scope of the constitution, other than you cannot contractually obligate someone to do something illegal. Sure, you can write it, but it can be eventually challenged. Even in US military law this exists, although it generally takes a lot of balls to challenge an order as being illegal, as there is really no anonymous way to do it. And you're screwed royally if a military court eventually upholds the order.

    3. Re:IANAL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The US Constitution applies to goverment. Not to voluntary organisations like businesses.

      Didn't you pay attention in class?

    4. Re:IANAL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IOALS (I'm only a law student) but I think you're wrong. You can't have a contract to break the law (for example a contract to bribe a public official) you can however have a clause in the contract that is void with out rendering the entire intrument void. Basically this clause may or may not be valid but that does not invalidate the rest of the liscense (at least the sections not relating to the clause such as "I promise not to pirate this software").

      Steve

    5. Re:IANAL by Tony-A · · Score: 1

      So, Microsoft is unconstitutional?

    6. Re:IANAL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      These days legality of contracts mean nothing to corporations. Having the power to sue for breaking the contract(whether they lose or win) can buy them valuable market time if they are suing a competitor. This is extremely effective when the competitor makes a lot less then the company suing, because the costs can be absorbed by the larger company...What happens when this is applied to individuals? If Microsoft threatened to sue me because something on my homepage broke one of their contracts. Well, I would remove(censor) the content that they request. Because I can't afford a lengthy(time or money) court battle.

  23. Buy This Expansion(tm) by Trifthen · · Score: 1

    Your base system works fine with its original key, but add a large hard drive, or more memory, and product activation informs you that you have to reactivate. At that point, there's nothing to keep Microsoft from declaring that your new equipment constitutes an advanced configuration, requiring you to pay more in order to obtain an activation key that would enable you to use it.

    Now *that* is frightening. I never even really thought of that, and it makes perfect sense. If they know what users are using, they can arbitrarily set up pricing schemes on what the OS will support.

    "Oh, you want to use a CDR? You need the Content Production Expansion(tm)."

    If this is the way things are going... I really fear for the future of computing. Especially if they pass the Bill for requiring digital content controls.

    ::shudder::

    --
    Read: Rabbit Rue - Free serial nove
    1. Re:Buy This Expansion(tm) by stephend · · Score: 1

      But they already do it, albeit to a very small extent. Win2K Pro will work with up to two processors, the next version up 8 and the top one 16 or 32 (can't remember). I believe XP Home will only work with a single processor.

      I guess the flip-side is that you only have to pay for what you actually use. I don't care about 3D graphics support or multi-processor stuff on my desktop, so why should I pay for it?

      It's something that could be useful, but can easily be abused. Let's try to guess which end of that spectrum Microsoft chooses...

    2. Re:Buy This Expansion(tm) by ShavenYak · · Score: 1

      Incidentally, that was one of the things which drove corporations away from big iron to PC's. A lot of business software for minis and mainframes would be licensed with different costs based on the power of the hardware running it. I remember seeing a print-spooler add-on for the HP3000 whose price tripled from our development machine to our production machine. The cost of the annual 'support agreement' (read: continual profit generator) tripled as well.
      It's quite humurous watching Microsoft making some of the same mistakes IBM did twenty years prior.

      --

      Hey kids, there's only 5 days left 'til Yak Shaving Day!
    3. Re:Buy This Expansion(tm) by MaxwellStreet · · Score: 1
      If this is the way things are going... I really fear for the future of computing. Especially if they pass the Bill for requiring digital content controls.

      No reason to fear for the future of computing.

      Even the most casual users will find this sort of crap so repugnant that either (1) Microsoft will have to reverse it, or (2) they will find a free (as in speech, literally) alternative.

    4. Re:Buy This Expansion(tm) by rnturn · · Score: 2
      ``A lot of business software for minis and mainframes would be licensed with different costs based on the power of the hardware running it.''

      You make it sound like this is a thing of the past.

      Oracle not too long ago ignited a firestorm of protests by introducing a license pricing plan that scaled according to the processor clock speed. (They might have dumped this plan, though, there was a great gnashing of teeth when it was announced.) I heard no justification from Oracle as to why my employer, having just shelled out $20K to doubled the speed of a pair of 4xCPU Alphaservers, should have to pay Oracle any more money because we're now executing their compiled code twice as fast. It would be like the power company coming after me for more money because I switch to florescent bulbs from incandescent because, now, I'm getting more lumens for the same (or lower) wattage. Silly? No more silly than Oracle reaching into our wallet to tax our hardware investment.

      Anyway, I cringe every time I hear a vendor telling me that they need to know how many processors are in our servers and at what clock speed are they running. I can just imagine the ``corrected'' invoices rolling in...

      --
      CUR ALLOC 20195.....5804M
  24. The world has gone mad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And I don't know who to be MORE scared of. Us or them.

  25. But you are NOT buying by Archfeld · · Score: 1, Redundant

    frontpage just licensing the use of the code for WAY too much money. It seems illegal to me as well but I cannot see the ARMY of lawyers M$ has letting somthing that silly slip by.

    --
    errr....umm...*whooosh* *whoosh* Is this thing on ?
  26. Interesting experiment. by Black+Parrot · · Score: 3, Offtopic

    If there's anyone here with that product and no great love for Microsoft, set up a "lauds" page that the average reader will immediately detect as being sarcastic (like the famous Micorsoft/Space Cadet page), but be careful to say nothing overtly critical. Then see whether they come after you.

    I'd volunteer, but they haven't released the Linux version yet.

    --
    Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    1. Re:Interesting experiment. by FattMattP · · Score: 2

      Got any links to this Space Cadet page?

      --
      Prevent email address forgery. Publish SPF records for y
    2. Re:Interesting experiment. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is zero chance that a zealot like you would install the Linux version of Front Page on your machine.

      Stick to the cracked corn, Polly.

    3. Re:Interesting experiment. by JabberWokky · · Score: 2
      Not really worth it in my opinion, but for completeness's sake:

      http://geraldholmes.freeyellow.com/whyMSrules.html

      --
      Evan

      --
      "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
    4. Re:Interesting experiment. by Brazilian+Geek · · Score: 2

      Got any links to this Space Cadet page?

      Here you go: Welcome to Gerald Holmes'es Why Micorsoft rules my Univrese .

      Please beware of the incredibly annoying popups on the page - disable javascript in your browser, it'll make the page more enjoyable.

      --
      All browsers' default homepage should read: Don't Panic...
    5. Re:Interesting experiment. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Black Parrot ruled it legal to have an axe to grind in a signature for all eternity, and demonstrated how to do it.

  27. You don't buy FP2002 by wiredog · · Score: 2
    You license it. The copy you're running belongs to Microsoft. Since they own it, they have a perfect right to limit the way you use it.

    Which is why they love DMCA, UCITA, et. al. and why we despise those laws.

    1. Re:You don't buy FP2002 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep.

      And the GNU project owns the 'Gnu' software the same way. They have a perfect right to limit the way you use it.

    2. Re:You don't buy FP2002 by bnenning · · Score: 2
      You license it. The copy you're running belongs to Microsoft.


      That's what Microsoft would have you believe, but as far as I know this has never been tested in court. I fail to see how a non-negotiated EULA can retroactively alter the terms of an already completed sale.

      --
      How to solve most of our problems: 1.Lots of nuclear plants. 2.Cure aging.
    3. Re:You don't buy FP2002 by Karn · · Score: 1

      Wrong. When you download Linux, the code is yours to keep, sell, whatever, for as long as you live. Linus could change the license of Linux, but that doesn't affect the code you have. It is "free".

      --


      Why do I keep typing pythong?
    4. Re:You don't buy FP2002 by dorzak · · Score: 1

      That is why the put the fine print on the outside of the box, that the sale of this BOX is subject to additional licensing terms. Then they also tell you to return the product if you don't like the terms.

    5. Re:You don't buy FP2002 by No+One · · Score: 1

      Yup, that's right. However, unlike Microsoft, they choose not to. Furthermore, GNU software is only a very small percentage of GPL licensed software, and the FSF doesn't have any control whatsoever over the rest.

      --

      There is no sin except stupidity -- Oscar Wilde
  28. That one's easy by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 3, Informative

    Okay, so use FrontPage to create your page's layout, write all the words in the page that don't refer to M$, M$NBC, M$N such as "the", "tarball" or "grandmother", then complete your page with VI or EMACS, which are pieces of software released under a non-M$-centric license.

    --
    "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
    1. Re:That one's easy by Accipiter · · Score: 2

      ...then complete your page with VI or EMACS, which are pieces of software released under a non-M$-centric license.

      Have you ever tried opening a frontpage-generated HTML file in a text editor? Bleedin' Christ, it's a damned mess.

      It would just be easier to dump the shitty WYSIWYG editors and just write the site in plain-jane HTML.

      If you standardize it, they will come. (AND they will be able to read it!)

      --

      -- Give him Head? Be a Beacon?
      (If you can't figure out how to E-Mail me, Don't. :P)

    2. Re:That one's easy by scrytch · · Score: 2

      It would just be easier to dump the shitty WYSIWYG editors and just write the site in plain-jane HTML.

      I beg to differ -- DreamWeaver often produces prettier HTML than I could have produced myself. What's nice about it is that if you do decide to reformat it later, it doesn't touch your formatting when you edit it (unless you outright delete and replace an element). I find I get all my ALT tags in more reliably when I use DW too, because such properties are considered a property of the library object, not the particular instance of it.

      FrontPage on the other hand, is a mess, and can't even manage to correctly balance its own autogenerated tags.

      --
      I've finally had it: until slashdot gets article moderation, I am not coming back.
    3. Re:That one's easy by CrackElf · · Score: 2

      "You may not use the Software in connection with any site"

      IANAL, but it seems to me that you would still be in violation, even if you completed it with another editor. That would not alter the fact that the site would still be anti-ms.

      --
      "Blake is an idealist, Jenna. He cannot afford to think." - Kerr Avon, Star One, Blakes 7
  29. Why would you expect otherwise? by Grim+Metamoderator · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's a sensible idea, I think. Why would Microsoft allow its products to be used against them? It reminds me of Lenin's famous remark, "The capitalists will sell us the rope with which we will hang them." Naturally, Microsoft not being stupid, they're not going to let you use their rope that way. Of course, most Slashdotters are against free-market capitalism, so I suppose it's understandable, in a pathetic sort of way, that this would be considered "newsworthy" around here.

    1. Re:Why would you expect otherwise? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, most Slashdot people ARE in favor of Free Market Capitalism, and recognize that the current economic system espoused by EuroChinoJapoAmerica is at best a simple bastardization of the original ideas about it.

      EBay is just about as pure literal Free Market Capitalism as you can get. You or I can easily be killed, but look at how hard it actually is to kill a corporation, from the outside.

    2. Re:Why would you expect otherwise? by jamesoden · · Score: 1

      Sir,

      This has nothing to do with capitilism. If you
      sell me paper I can write anything I want on it.
      If you sell me a pen, I can write anything I want
      with it. How is front page different.

      Beyond that I am sure it is not legal for a
      company to try to supersede the constitution in
      their authority and restrict your rights to free
      speech contractually. Actually, that more people do not see this as an offense is what is the real
      problem.

      On another point, capitalism (which I am completely for) does not negate the laws of the land. Otherwise, it would be OK to fence stolen
      items, or to sell various contraband. Hey, its
      capitalism, so its OK to kill people for a fee...I have gone to the absurd side, but that is exactly
      what Microsoft has done by trying to deny constitutional rights by their EULA.

      --
      Have you tried UNIX today, its most satisfying...
    3. Re:Why would you expect otherwise? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course, most Slashdotters [slashdot.org] are against free-market capitalism [forbes.com]
      That's rather unfortunate capitalism gives us our luxeries, of course you can look at a if you don't like capitalism you don't have to be America, Haiti for example...I hear they don't have capitalism.
      You want to blame the corperations, it's actally the consumer that turns around, bends over and takes it up. The consumer is at fault for corperations having so much money and power.

    4. Re:Why would you expect otherwise? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, they're not anti-free market, they're anti success. I find it hypocritical for linux users to complain about "Micro$pend Corp and their nazi business tactics" when you can be fairly certain that any one of those individuals would pursue a business methodology that would make them individually the richest person on the entire planet, if only they were smart enough to do it for themselves instead of taking other people's GPL code, spending hours hacking it about, and releasing it free again. They are jealous, more than anything, because they can't share in the success. If Linus was a Microsoft investor in the 80s and now had a projected $30million, he wouldn't give a flying ("puck" - ed) about producing a free operating system. Nix people are driven by their own disillusion. As I always say, 99% of the software I *need* to run loads in Windows and does not exist in Linux. Why make a change for the worse?

    5. Re:Why would you expect otherwise? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      addendum to my last note: The reason they love Linux so, is because they DO get a chance to share in the glory that they don't with MS, due to it's open source nature. God you people have low self esteem.

  30. Recruiter.. by vbrtrmn · · Score: 1

    I had a recruiter call me one day for a web development job at the US Post Office .. or maybe the Patent Office, I can't remember. Anyway, she said that the following skills are required: HTML, JavaScript, GUI design, FrontPage; I interrupted her after she said FrontPage, and I said that no professional developer uses that program, I am not interested in the job.

    --
    it's a sig, wtf?
    1. Re:Recruiter.. by maxpublic · · Score: 1

      Imagine my surprise when I found out that the organization I currently work for employs 'web designers' who exclusively use FrontPage to build the organization's web sites.

      Imagine my complete lack of surprise when I found out that these 'developers' couldn't code from scratch in a text editor and had no idea what a CGI was and how it might be useful for interactivity or even form processing.

      One of these developers dropped by while I was teaching basic HTML to a class of middle school kids and asked me why I wasn't using FrontPage. I said "because I want to teach them something useful, something that could help them get a job, and no professional web designer uses FrontPage". What a remarkable shade of red he turned....

      Max

      --
      My god carries a hammer. Your god died nailed to a tree. Any questions?
  31. Linkage now! by jxqvg · · Score: 1

    How can you make such juicy references without providing linkage?

  32. This will be a pain for pro-microsoft sites also, by bob_jordan · · Score: 2

    Think about it. Your site has a review of windows XP and it finishes off with the conclusion that it is much better then 2000 and everyone should go out and upgrade from 2000.

    Hey you just disparaged 2000 and broke your frontpage license agreement.

    Bob.

  33. so does this mean... by lyapunov · · Score: 1

    that microsoft will finally shut the hell up? Any reference to Frontpage conjures up images of many a disparaging remark, e.g. "I think I would rather sit around and lick the cat's ass than use Frontpage."

    --

    Either give it away or get top dollar, but never sell yourself cheap.
  34. frontpage bashing by djneko · · Score: 1
    So now all those sites where the author says "Yeah, I know FrontPage sucks, but I use it because it's all I know" are going to get sued or something?

    Cause just about everyone I know that uses FrontPage either has to, or it's all they know, but they still think it sucks (especially the professionals I know that are forced to use it for their jobs).

    -dj (who is now wondering if there's something in the license for IE that says you can't use the browser to post comments disparaging MS. am I scrooed too? or maybe they'll make it so you can't view sites that bash MS. soon the http agent logs of /. will stop showing IE :D

    --
    `/\/\
    (^.^)
    (")(")
    not quite an analog pussy, just a cat that plays with vinyl
    1. Re:frontpage bashing by Sir_Real · · Score: 1

      IE? How about the Microsoft OS? You can't use it to produce unauthorized content, or view content not pre-approved by Bill himself... Why not, this seems like the next step to me...

  35. Remove the META tags? by Fox+MacLeod · · Score: 1

    Just remove all the crap that mentions FrontPage and upload what you damn well please.

    Or better yet, just use a damned text editor. I would if I wasn't so damn lazy...

  36. Berserk all you want, MS. by Perianwyr+Stormcrow · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's been said before, and I suppose I'll end up having to say it this time.

    The more MS squeezes, the more slips through their fingers.

    Already, people are pretty much opting out of all this by continuing to run Windows 95 6 years after its release, and Office 97 4 years after its release. Many people have intimated that they'll hang onto 2000 as long as they can. If the longevity of previous MS OS's is any indicator, this may be five years or more.

    And of course, there's always our favorite X-Factor, waiting in the wings to scoop up faithful even from MS's latest and greatest.

    This effect becomes more obvious the more MS tightens the strings...

    --

    What we call folk wisdom is often no more than a kind of expedient stupidity.-Edward Abbey

    1. Re:Berserk all you want, MS. by sulli · · Score: 1

      I'm still running Office 97, and Frontpage 97 occasionally. Why upgrade!?

      --

      sulli
      RTFJ.
    2. Re:Berserk all you want, MS. by tswinzig · · Score: 2

      It's been said before, and I suppose I'll end up having to say it this time.

      The more MS squeezes, the more slips through their fingers.


      Yeah, it's been said before, and it seems logical, but where is the marketshare to prove your point? Has Microsoft OS marketshare slipped? Or is it still in the area of 95%?

      --

      "And like that ... he's gone."
    3. Re:Berserk all you want, MS. by trix_e · · Score: 1

      Frankly, I'm not sure why this comment is Insightful, or on point for that matter...

      Microsoft's onerous licensing practices continue to sink to new lows, however this merely points to the fact that it may take longer for some of these provisions to be widely applicable (and honestly who believes this one will survive the PR nightmare this is going to generate anyway...), but folks continue to use and upgrade Microsoft products, just at a slower pace than the 'softies would like...

      Don't kid yourself, stunts like this won't bring Microsoft down, no matter how much you might hope that it would...

      -c

      --
      No man is an island, but Gary is a city in Indiana.
    4. Re:Berserk all you want, MS. by WhiteKnight07 · · Score: 1

      Except for Windows 2000 itself, I don't use any Miscrosoft software at all. Wordperfect Office 2002, Star Office 5.2, Mozilla v0.94, Mozilla Mail, Apache for win32, Borland C++, Encyclopedia Britannica, Winamp (with video plugins), Photoshop, Norton File Manager, and Norton SystemWorks. All excelent programs that let you do anything you could ever need to do on your computer without having to use Microshaft $hit. Recomended alternatives to Frontpage are Dreamweaver, NotePad, TextPad, SynEdit, HotMetal Pro, and Mozilla/NS Composer.

      Non MS stuff is usually better and almost always cheaper, usually both.

      --


      We're going to make information free Mr. Anderson, whether you like it, or not.
    5. Re:Berserk all you want, MS. by ceswiedler · · Score: 2

      IMO, Windows 2000 is the best desktop operating system available. Everything I have seen or heard about XP leads me to believe that it is a piece of monopolistically hogtied shit. I will not upgrade if I have any say in the matter. I'm not fond of Linux desktops but I would go there before XP.

    6. Re:Berserk all you want, MS. by dragons_flight · · Score: 2

      I would guess that the people using old software are rarely concerned with the liscensing and other MS tricks. Like most of my family, they probably simply don't need anything better right now. Win 95, Office 97 already have more features than your typical user needs and remain suitable for most of people's needs. As you might remember Win 3.1 was something of a pain, whereas 95 is managable for most people especially with a little practice.

      One of MS's problems is that they want to sell products and retain market share, but you can't do that by asking hundreds of dollars for incremental upgrades (especially when the software the consumer has already does everything they think they want). It's "killer apps" and stuff that you just got to have that gets average people to go out and buy software.

      I don't think XP is going to do it for MS, there are some interesting new features, but nothing that strikes me as something Joe Average will rush out to get. To my mind, the next big thing will require better broadband apps and broadband saturation. For instance, I'd be willing to pay for video conference hardware and software, if I knew more than 2 people who had that functionality in their home.

  37. FrontPage by DestroyahX · · Score: 1

    I used FrontPage in high school, and never looked back. Vim or Xemacs under Linux work best, period.

    1. Re:FrontPage by AtaruMoroboshi · · Score: 1

      on the mac, BBEdit is where it's at. and if you need a gui, then dreamweaver or go live.

  38. Time for another amendment... by CokeBear · · Score: 2

    The first amendment prevents the federal government from restricting speech. The 14th extended that restriction to the individual states. Time to extend again, to cover corporations.
    Something along the lines of: "No corporation may violate any rights which the government is not allowed to violate."
    (Me is not versed in Lawyerly ways, so there should probably be more to it than that)

    --
    Reality has a liberal bias
    1. Re:Time for another amendment... by lemox · · Score: 2

      Does anyone else notice the grim irony of someone babbling about "freedom" while simultaneously demanding more laws?

      --

      "We obviously need a new moderation category: (-1, Woo-fucking-hoo)" --Mr. AC

    2. Re:Time for another amendment... by CokeBear · · Score: 1

      OK, you're right, maybe they won't go that far. But how about something that at least protects our rights from monopolistic media controlling corporation?
      Alternatively, could the same thing be accomplished with a Supremem Court Decision?

      --
      Reality has a liberal bias
    3. Re:Time for another amendment... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The constitution is there to protect the freedom of the people. The framers recognized that you need to restrict the freedoms of government in order to enhance the freedom of the people. I would argue that in our time, the same applies to corporations. We may need to restrict the freedoms of corporation in order to enhance the freedom of the people.

    4. Re:Time for another amendment... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, since freedoms in the United States are guarenteed by laws (think Bill of Rights) it makes at least some sense.

    5. Re:Time for another amendment... by tdandh · · Score: 1

      Nobody is violating your rights. You are not obligated under any law to purchase the software. That's what the free market is all about. If you don't like their rules, don't buy their product.

    6. Re:Time for another amendment... by jafac · · Score: 2

      since it would be the government that would have to enforce that contract, then the government would be restricting the speech.

      I don't know if it's legal or not from a DMCA standpoint - but it's certainly NOT ethical, from a humanity standpoint.

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    7. Re:Time for another amendment... by dachshund · · Score: 1
      Gosh, you're right! Let's get rid of all laws and let society degenerate into barbaric feudalism. Then we'll all be completely free!

      Jeez, lemox, it's not always the case that simplicity == freedom. This seems to trip up a lot of really hard-core libertarians. (I'm not saying you're necessarily one of them, by the way.) Just by living in close proximity to each other, we limit each others' freedom. If we didn't have a gov't and a bill of rights, you would appreciate that fact a great deal more.

    8. Re:Time for another amendment... by dachshund · · Score: 1
      since it would be the government that would have to enforce that contract, then the government would be restricting the speech.

      Sorry... Why would the government have to restrict speech? If I put a "no-talking-nasty-about-me" clause into a contract, the clause simply becomes unenforceable when it's taken to court. Nobody swoops in and prevents me from writing the clause.

    9. Re:Time for another amendment... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thats the problem with monopolies!! There is no more "free market" when it comes to markets that Microsoft is in!

    10. Re:Time for another amendment... by PaperTie · · Score: 1

      Uhh... there are lots of other editors, etc. than are not made by Microsoft... what *ARE* you talking about?

    11. Re:Time for another amendment... by scrytch · · Score: 2

      Does anyone else notice the grim irony of someone babbling about "freedom" while simultaneously demanding more laws?

      No kidding. Corporations are the creation of laws, and most of their power is gained from laws that give them that power. Why do we need to have laws on the books that give them power with one hand, then another that takes it away. Time to start erasing the laws that cancel each other out and make the lawyer mills actually work for their money.

      --
      I've finally had it: until slashdot gets article moderation, I am not coming back.
    12. Re:Time for another amendment... by lemox · · Score: 2

      Always take an extreme example to warp the views of who you are trying to disprove. This seems to be the nature of most "There should be a law..." type people (not saying you're one of them). My point is that laws should only be pursued when all other avenues of dealing with an issue have been pursued. I'm talking about knee-jerk "there should be a law!" statements just because the speaker doesn't agree with someone's course of action. Laws should be in place to keep us from killing each other, they should not be in place merely to advance one particular group's world-view.

      --

      "We obviously need a new moderation category: (-1, Woo-fucking-hoo)" --Mr. AC

    13. Re:Time for another amendment... by dachshund · · Score: 1
      Laws should be in place to keep us from killing each other, they should not be in place merely to advance one particular group's world-view.

      There are plenty of societies that don't guarantee freedom of speech or religion, or provide measures to prevent unreasonable search and siezure. Many of those societies seem to get by ok (in the sense that people aren't slaughtering each other.) In fact, if the yardstick of civilization is personal safety, than many of them are doing better than the US.

      In this country, on the other hand, we strive for something a little bit better than the simple right to exist. And we use laws to achieve this goal. It'd be easy to write this off as just another group's "world-view", and if that's what it is... Then I've got nothing against laws being used in this manner. Let's agree to disagree.

      PS I'm just responding to your statement above. If I've misconstrued what you're saying, I apologize in advance.

  39. Control the world by VEGETA_GT · · Score: 1

    See, this s just one more thing that is leading to the eventual control of the world my mcrosoft. Do what we do, use our software. >:)=

    personally I will never use frontpage, Just hope they don't extend this license to notepad >:)=.

    my 2 cents plus 2 more

  40. Just wait till they do IE by sjh · · Score: 1

    "You may not use IE to _view_ any page that
    disparages Microsoft,..."

  41. Interesting License by mnordstr · · Score: 0

    Hmm... I should read the Windows licence. It probably contains something like:

    You may not swear when Windows or any of its programs stop responding, crash or perform an illegal operation.

  42. whewwwwww by Aqua+OS+X · · Score: 1

    Good thing FrontPage is a pile of gabage that generates horable HTML and litters your site directories with random files and folders that you'll never use.

    This is just another reason for me to advise people not to use this generator. It's a POS. Period.

    Now, wouldn't MS have some REAL balls if they said I couldn't slander Microsoft with MS Word? hehe. That'll probably come in due time....bleh.

    --
    "Things are more moderner than before- bigger, and yet smaller- it's computers-- San Dimas High School football RULES!"
  43. profits by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    corporations are all about profit. there's no soul or morality or business ethics whatsoever involved. it's all for the pursuit and acquisition of more money.

  44. Someone needs to test this! by mjh · · Score: 2, Offtopic

    Someone who actually uses Front Page needs to test this. They need to create a site that criticizes Microsoft, and loudly proclaims that the site uses Front Page. This someone has to have enough money to be able to defend themselves and then test this. This has *got* to be an unreasonable clause to put in a license agreement, and needs to be tested.

    I officially un-volunteer! (Not enough $$)

    --
    Key to financial independence: Spend less than you earn. Save and invest the difference. Do it for a long time.
    1. Re:Someone needs to test this! by cyb3r0ptx · · Score: 1

      How about using a version of Front Page 2002, maybe FrontPage 2000? That way they have no 'legal' leg to stand on when they go after said person..

      p.

  45. So don't buy it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Free enterprise works. People don't buy stuff that they don't want. Stop bitching.

    1. Re:So don't buy it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly! Put Microsoft on the same permanent shit list that local gas stations that charged $5.00 are on.

  46. Slashdot editors by jxqvg · · Score: 1

    should be using FrontPage. I hear it comes with a nifty grammer and spell checker.

    1. Re:Slashdot editors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      uhh... grammer, is that anything like grammar?

    2. Re:Slashdot editors by RedX · · Score: 2
      should be using FrontPage. I hear it comes with a nifty grammer and spell checker.

      Hopefully those editors that you disparage will also allow *some* Slashdot posters to use those facilities to prevent people from confusing the word grammar with some town in Indiana

  47. This relates only to Front Page SERVER COMPONENTS by rodbegbie · · Score: 5, Informative

    This does not relate to documents edited with Front Page. It say that you are not allowed to use server-side elements such as the MSN MoneyCentral stock ticker on your website, if you are publishing anti-MS comments.

    rOD.

    --
    Rod Begbie done this, and he's not
  48. How do they get away with this? by D3 · · Score: 1, Redundant

    How does M$ get away with this?
    If Ford/Chevy/Dodge made buyers sign an agreement that said you can't bad-mouth their car/suv after you bought it they'd be in a world of trouble.

    --
    Do really dense people warp space more than others?
    1. Re:How do they get away with this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      However, you seem to forget that when you buy a car, the car actually belongs to you. When you "buy" software, you are only borrowing it from the company that created it. You do not actually own the program, you are simply buying a license to use the program.

    2. Re:How do they get away with this? by jafac · · Score: 2

      . . .yeah, if your car rusts out in two years, smokes, and the muffler's dragging, then you're not permitted to drive it in public - so that everyone can see what a piece of crap a 2 year old Ford/Chevy/Dodge is.

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
  49. um, no. by mikeee · · Score: 2

    IANAL, but...

    The Constitution says that the Government can't pass laws impeding freedom of the press; this doesn't mean that they guarentee everyone the right to speak. If you sign a contract not to talk about X that's more-or-less binding.

    Whether enforcing licenses which restrict press freedom could be held as violating the 1rst amendment is way unclear to me...

    1. Re:um, no. by aozilla · · Score: 2

      The Constitution says that the Government can't pass laws impeding freedom of the press


      Actually, the Constitution doesn't even say that. It says that congress shall make no law impeeding freedom of the press. You are right that it doesn't say "Microsoft shall make no law..." though.

      --
      ok then your [sic] infringing on my copyright! Could you as [sic] me next time before STEALING my comments for your own?
  50. Ahh, but Nike had their own version of this claus by KosovoYankee · · Score: 1

    Anyone remember the old story, about 8 months ago, where Nike had a promotion that you could customize your sneakers by getting a word or two added on at the factory? Well, a guy in the U.S. tried to get the words "Sweatshop" or "Slavery" on the side of his sneaks, and he was denied, even after repeated letters and inquiries/complaints. Essentially, he was attempting to use the company's own product to mock/draw attention to their shortfalls, and Nike was not amused.

    -

    --
    - If This Peace Is Fictious, I Shall Destroy It
  51. Trump: Product (de)Activation by Perianwyr+Stormcrow · · Score: 2

    Who cares what the law says- MS is your master when it comes to these things, since they hold the remote killswitch on your OS. yay.

    --

    What we call folk wisdom is often no more than a kind of expedient stupidity.-Edward Abbey

  52. welcome to the Corporate States of America by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    in another ten years, you won't even have the right to complain about products you don't use.

    1. Re:welcome to the Corporate States of America by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what makes you say so?

  53. Smells like Slashdot spirit by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    According to this page, you can't use the Frontpage logo on a site that disparage Microsoft. Which seems pretty reasonable to me.

    Good lord! Lies about Microsoft on Slashdot? Nah, couldn't be.

    --
    Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
    1. Re:Smells like Slashdot spirit by Dooferlad · · Score: 0

      From the article, quoting the EULA:

      "You may not use the Software in connection with any site that disparages Microsoft, MSN, MSNBC, Expedia, or their products or services ... "

      Did you misunderstand the article or just assume CmdrTaco was talking crap?

      -- Dooferlad

    2. Re:Smells like Slashdot spirit by Bazman · · Score: 3, Funny

      Point 7 --

      "7. You may not display the Logo on any site that disparages Microsoft or its products or services"

      kinda makes it impossible to comply with point 4 --

      "4. The Logo may be displayed only on Web pages that make accurate references to Microsoft."

      Oops.

    3. Re:Smells like Slashdot spirit by blafasel · · Score: 1

      yah, but the fact that it applies to the logo does not mean it does not apply to the rest of the package. ;-)
      i could not find the original license on their page, so the latter does seem to be hard to verify.

      --

      check your speling
    4. Re:Smells like Slashdot spirit by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 5, Informative

      Actually, forget the above. I think I found where this came from. Take a look at this PDF that has the phrase. Unfortunately, the PDF reader sucks when it comes to selecting text. But I think this is the relevent part: "For purposes of this section, the Software means the FrontPage Web components, including the MSNBC news headline compone nt, the MSN MoneyCentral Stock Quote component, and the MSN Search component."

      This section looks like it specifically about components that interface with MSNBC news sites or something like that. It's not clear exactly what this section is referring to.

      In any case, it's not a broad "you can't create an anti-Microsoft web site with Frontpage".

      --
      Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
    5. Re:Smells like Slashdot spirit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hahahaha

    6. Re:Smells like Slashdot spirit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Good lord! Lies about Microsoft on Slashdot? Nah, couldn't be...
      Actually, forget the above...
      In any case, it's not a broad "you can't create an anti-Microsoft web site with Frontpage".

      Gotta hold off on your Slashdot damnation just a little bit longer next time, buddy.

    7. Re:Smells like Slashdot spirit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, our Slashdot readers are correct-- see page 2 of your pdf, "General License Grant"-- Exceptions for FrontPage (section 2).

      Restrictions:

      You may not use the Software in connection
      with any site that disparages Microsoft, MSN, MSNBC, Expedia or their products or services, infringe any intellectual property or other rights of these parties, violate any state, federal or international law, or promote racism, hatred, or pornography.

    8. Re:Smells like Slashdot spirit by error0x100 · · Score: 1

      In any case, it's not a broad "you can't create an anti-Microsoft web site with Frontpage

      Maybe not, but as worrying as that is that it does seem to be a broad "you can't link to an anti-Microsoft web site" if you're using those components. So if a site that happened to use an MS stock ticker or something wanted to link (say) to my MS crash gallery for some reason, they wouldn't be able to. So MS-criticism gets much less exposure. News sites like zdnet that are sometimes critical of MS would suddenly take on a far more neutral tone toward MS, if they wanted to use those components (and in future this license will undoubtedly extend to more and more MS software, e.g. FrontPage itself, MS Word, Windows itself). This of course is just the beginning of a trend, MS is just getting people used to the idea. Once people are used to the idea, it will be popping up everywhere.

      It somewhat reminds me of totalitarian governments which make it illegal to criticise the government. Although I doubt Microsoft is going to be setting up "rehabilitation camps" very soon :), so obviously its not quite as bad.

    9. Re:Smells like Slashdot spirit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look back at the beginning of that section.

    10. Re:Smells like Slashdot spirit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh...

      People who make fun of microsoft are not going to stop just because it's against the eula. Slashdot is stupid for becoming upset by this. Microsoft is stupid for thinking that they are going to solve anything by this.

      What's microsoft going to do if I wipe my butt on their logo, take a picture of it and put it one my website?

    11. Re:Smells like Slashdot spirit by buss_error · · Score: 2
      According to this page [microsoft.com], you can't use the Frontpage logo on a site that disparage Microsoft. Which seems pretty reasonable to me.



      IANAL - Except that I seem to recall that you can use trademarks in product identification in critizism. So they can prohibit away, won't do any good. HOWEVER: Before I do this, I'd check it out with my own legal team. Nothing like trained attack begeals from MS to ruin your lunch hour. - IANAL

      --
      Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves.
  54. Vote with your dollar. by zod1025 · · Score: 0

    I personally see Microsoft going to hell in a handbasket. Please, everyone, vote with your dollar - if you like Microsoft's latest "innovations" buy their stock! Buy XP! If not, DON'T for God's Sake. Install Linux. Tell your friends.

    --

    -ZOD-
  55. new MS feature added to future .NET products by count0 · · Score: 1

    Yahoo News reported today that the upcoming Office.NET suite will come in significantly larger packaging. The new larger boxes are not, as some initially assumed, for actual paper manuals. Sources have revealed that the extra room will be used for a roll of duct tape. Duct tape use will be mandatory on all mouths for Office.NET users unless they agree to only speak for purposes of praising Microsoft*.

    * some sources indicate that critics of Linux, Linus Torvalds, or Open Source will also qualify for a duct tape exemption.

  56. What if the site is hacked? by ediron2 · · Score: 1
    So, what if a site is hacked and the homepage is replaced with something unflattering about Microsoft? Will they come out and patch their crappy software and fix the site since it's their own damn fault?

    Personally, I'm starting to think the anti-Microsoft contingent has already secretly invaded Redmond and all the Anti-Customer tactics we've seen over the last year is their doing. Nobody's dumb enough to do this crap to their customer base on purpose...

    1. Re:What if the site is hacked? by WhiteKnight07 · · Score: 1

      you'd be suprised....

      --


      We're going to make information free Mr. Anderson, whether you like it, or not.
  57. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  58. Whatever... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...all you really need is emacs =)

    1. Re:Whatever... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      emacs sux. use vi =)

  59. Why would you...? by rkischuk · · Score: 1

    If you're of the opinion that Microsoft or any of their products suck, why would you use FrontPage in the first place?

    And especially, if you're going to use any Microsoft product, why would you use FrontPage? Do you LIKE your HTML source full of &nbsp and <font> tags for every single line of code?

    --
    Seen any BadMarketing lately?
    1. Re:Why would you...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have to agree here... Let MS come up with whatever crap they want to bind thier users under the one ring. Meanwhile, life in LinuxLand goes on unabated. Have fun you MS weenies!

  60. Show me where... by The+Bastard · · Score: 5, Informative
    I'm no fan of Microsoft, but I reamed Foster in an e-mail for reporting this crap. Upon reading this the other day, I went to a co-worker who has FrontPage 2002 installed, and we both looked through the included on-line EULA. Damned if we could find any mention of this "prohibition".

    So, show me where in the EULA this is stated. Are there multiple EULAs? Then which one takes precedence ("the last one? well, that wasn't the one I got when I bought it" concept)?

    Damn it...THINK PEOPLE...investigate these things on your own and don't just knee-jerk a reaction because someone says something exists. Doesn't help perceptions much, especially if the liars/FUDers this time around are the open-source proponets....

    1. Re:Show me where... by overturf · · Score: 1

      This comment needs to be modded up. I also looked through my OfficeXP With FrontPage EULA and could find no such quote.
      He's blowing smoke up our ass just to get a slashdot's load of hits on his column, methinks.

    2. Re:Show me where... by mobiux · · Score: 1

      Well...
      I am looking at the single user license right now.
      And in section 1. Grant of License, the sub-paragraph labeled "restrictions". I count it as the 5th sentence. It's is smack dab in the middle of the paragraph. Over all about 2/3rds of the way down the front page of the EULA.

      Maybe it's different on Office XP but i see it here.

    3. Re:Show me where... by dr_db · · Score: 1
      the last one? well, that wasn't the one I got when I bought it" concept

      Ahhh, but you forget that through the horrors of UCITA, they can change the license on the fly....

  61. U.S. Constitution: First Amendment by hex1848 · · Score: 1

    U.S. Constitution: First Amendment:

    "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."

    that clause is going to be very hard to enforce legally.

    1. Re:U.S. Constitution: First Amendment by pclminion · · Score: 1
      that clause is going to be very hard to enforce legally.

      How so? "Congress shall make no law..."

      Last time I checked, Microsoft was not Congress. Sick, but some judges would probably uphold it.

    2. Re:U.S. Constitution: First Amendment by hex1848 · · Score: 1

      Congress, aka government. Microsoft may not want you to make anti-company comments using their software, but they cant legally enforce it. at least that's my interpretation of the law (please correct me if im wrong), other wise what the hell do we have a constitution for?

    3. Re:U.S. Constitution: First Amendment by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 2

      Well, the only way for Microsoft to enforce this is ... through the legal system. Congress makes the laws which allow enforcement of license agreements, after all.

      --
      The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
    4. Re:U.S. Constitution: First Amendment by jd · · Score: 2

      Unfortunately, the US constitution only governs the Government. This clause is entirely in the private sector, would be prosecuted using civil law rather than federal law, and would therefore (to my untutored, but cynical eye) seem to be immune to Constitutional safeguards.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    5. Re:U.S. Constitution: First Amendment by hex1848 · · Score: 1

      Bah, I dont understand how the American legal system can enforce a license agreement which restricts one of the most important (IMHO) amendments of our constitution. Its really sad that just because someone has more money then another person they can restrict there freedoms.

    6. Re:U.S. Constitution: First Amendment by Salsaman · · Score: 2
      Remember the Golden Rule:


      "He who has the gold makes the rules"

    7. Re:U.S. Constitution: First Amendment by TheMidget · · Score: 1
      Well, the only way for Microsoft to enforce this is ... through the legal system. Congress makes the laws which allow enforcement of license agreements

      Interesting... Does that mean that UCITA (which makes click-through licenses legally binding) could be struck down as unconstitutional, because (at least in this case...), it is a law "abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press"...

      But then, I'm just daydreaming: UCITA has been made by the various state government, and not by the (federal) Congress :(

    8. Re:U.S. Constitution: First Amendment by liquidsin · · Score: 1

      Last time I checked, Microsoft was not Congress

      True, Microsoft may not be Congress, but doesn't that also mean that Microsoft cannot make laws? I can hang a sign on my front door that says 'By walking into my house, you grant me permission to beat you with a large stick', but that doesn't mean it'll hold up in court. MS can say whatever they want...doesn't make it law.

      Then again... I.A.N.A.L. and all...

      --
      do not read this line twice.
    9. Re:U.S. Constitution: First Amendment by charon_on_acheron · · Score: 1

      There are all kinds of agreements that "restrict" your right to free speech. Many companys have non-disclosure agreements. You can find out about their most secret new products and ad campaigns, but you can't blab to their competitors about it, or even to your spouse. Noone complains about that. This doesn't violate the First amendment, because Congress has nothing to do with it.

    10. Re:U.S. Constitution: First Amendment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thats right MS has no right to make any laws whatsoever(besides being extremely illegal) that is the privilege of congress and senate.

  62. Totally Offtopic (and a major bitchfest to boot) by FatRatBastard · · Score: 1

    * 2001-09-18 15:09:47 More Microsofts Licensing Hijinks (articles,news) (rejected)

    Dammit. I'm off to have a good lunch time mope...

    Taco, ya bastard!

    :)

    N.

  63. Would a Steve Ballmer fan page... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Would a Steve Ballmer fan page with the infamous insane dancing Steve video be considered disparaging?

  64. Not exactly new by codegen · · Score: 1

    I rember a particular compiler for Windows that had a clause in the EULA that prohibited the compiler from being used to build a compiler, a database, or any of several other applications. That is: you could not use the compiler to build anything that would compete with products from the company that sold you the compiler.

    --
    Atlas stands on the earth and carries the celestial sphere on his shoulders.
  65. Slashdot Censors Too by SIGFPE · · Score: 4, Funny

    If I say that slashdot is a load of old crap with contributions from a bunch of smelly spotty sex-starved geeks who think something like an operating system can actually be cool I'll get censored into oblivion by offended moderators pretty damn quickly. Here, watch:

    <Ducks for cover>
    Slashdot is a load of old crap with contributions from a bunch of smelly spotty sex-starved geeks who think something like an operating system can actually be cool
    </Ducks for cover>

    --
    -- SIGFPE
    1. Re:Slashdot Censors Too by TomK32 · · Score: 1

      I think you mean the "first post" and "Look my new PC" dudes, I'm very happy with /.'s moderator system.

      --
      -- just a geek - trying to change the world
    2. Re:Slashdot Censors Too by hex1848 · · Score: 1

      sex-starved? ive been using my Haptic feedback toys for weeks now...

    3. Re:Slashdot Censors Too by Homewrecker · · Score: 0
      I'm very happy with /.'s moderator system.

      If you can say that, you've obviously never made any statement that avoids toeing the Linux company line and/or contradicts the sheep. Try it someday and you'll understand.

      --

      --- Linux R00lz!

    4. Re:Slashdot Censors Too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Karma Ho.

      You knew that kind of remark would generate a response from the twisted folk who call themselves moderators around here... or at bloody least you could whine "I told you so" and that would get modded up.

      TANJ, I tell you.

      -1 Karma Troll.

    5. Re:Slashdot Censors Too by thejake316 · · Score: 1

      How come when I bust on this site people call me a troll (even though they appear have no idea what that even means)?

      Although considering I've had things rejected from slashduh.org I guess I'm the one who's wrong.

      --
      AC's cheerfully ignored
    6. Re:Slashdot Censors Too by SIGFPE · · Score: 1

      ;-)

      --
      -- SIGFPE
    7. Re:Slashdot Censors Too by sharkey · · Score: 2

      Slashdot is a load of old crap with contributions from a bunch of smelly spotty sex-starved geeks who think something like an operating system can actually be cool

      You can say this on /., and be thought funny. Just don't ask about Anne Tomlinson.

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    8. Re:Slashdot Censors Too by diosan · · Score: 1

      I wonder whether this your actual opinion. If so it begs the question that da fuck r u doing here. more dan dat allow me to state, dat my sex life is fine thank u. There is a good chance your woman(assuming u are male), would get fucked too if she came around. one more thing. The open source solutions have begun to gain market share quite quickly, thank u very much. The "revolution" for actual quality has begun aand is inevitable. watch da news idiot.

    9. Re:Slashdot Censors Too by SIGFPE · · Score: 1

      Who's Anne Tomlinson?

      --
      -- SIGFPE
  66. Jeeze! by Conspiracy_Of_Doves · · Score: 1

    This sounds like an article from The Onion

  67. I don't see the problem. by Colin+Smith · · Score: 2

    Only the people who want to use Microsoft software and agree to the license terms are bound by them.

    It doesn't affect the rest of the world.
    If you don't like the terms, don't use the software.

    --
    Deleted
    1. Re:I don't see the problem. by dachshund · · Score: 2
      Only the people who want to use Microsoft software and agree to the license terms are bound by them. It doesn't affect the rest of the world.

      In a general sense, it does affect the rest of the world. I don't like the idea of corporations adding anti-speech clauses to their standard contracts. I sign dozens of contracts every month just to get by; everything from credit card slips to delivery receipts to click-throughs on web pages. Often, we don't read the fine print of these documents, and they're getting longer and more common.

      So you don't use Microsoft products. Imagine if your credit card company/phone company/electric company/ISP added anti-speech clauses to their TOS. You may be one of those rare few who always reads the whole page before you sign, or doesn't rely on modern conveniences, but most people aren't like that. That's why we ought to be concerned about issues like this, even if we don't use this particular piece of software.

  68. Classic M$.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This would never hold up in court.

    It'll be interesting too see who, if anyone, challenges this and what the results are. Any judge who's followed the comedy of M$ B$ for any period of time would shoot them down instantly on this one.

  69. You know what... by way2muchsense · · Score: 1

    I think I will launch Front Page Express, type the following:

    Micro$oft $ucks!
    This page composed with Front Page.

    and see if MicroSuck will come after me.

    The next thing you know, they'll say you can't use Windows to rip on MicroSuck either.

  70. Re:This relates only to Front Page SERVER COMPONEN by rodbegbie · · Score: 5, Informative
    In the spirit of fighting FUD, here is the whole section of the EULA (emphasis added by myself):

    2. FrontPage*
    (*version corresponding to Office XP)

    FrontPage web components. For purposes of this section, the Software means the FrontPage Web components, including the MSNBC news headline compone nt, the MSN MoneyCentral Stock Quote component, and the MSN Search component.

    Installation and Use. You may install and use any number of copies of the Software on server computers to provide services as part of your web site on the Internet that you des ign with FrontPage and that is not a mobile wireless or interactive television site ("Your Web Site").

    Restrictions. You may not edit or modify the Software in any manner whatsoever. You may not display any of the logos that appear in the Software in any manner that implies sponsorship, endorsement, or license of Your Web Site by the owners of such logos. If the Software contains any active links to other sites, you agree to maintain such active links and not redirect or modify them. You may not market, distribute, sublicense, lease or rent the Software on a stand- alone basis. You may not use the Software in connection with any site that disparages Microsoft, MSN, MSNBC, Expedia or their products or services, infringe any intellectual property or other rights of these parties, violate any state, federal or international law, or promote racism, hatred, or pornography. You shall not convert the news headlines in the MSNBC component into an audio format for redistribution to audio users. You agree to immediately remove the Software from Your Web Site if you do not abide by any of these restrictions after notice.

    rOD.

    --
    Rod Begbie done this, and he's not
  71. Abuse of Property Rights by Compulawyer · · Score: 2

    As an intellectual property attorney, I can only say that this is the most disgusting and repugnant use of intellectual property rights I have ever seen.

    --

    Laws affecting technology will always be bad until enough techies become lawyers.

    1. Re:Abuse of Property Rights by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As an intellectual property attorney, wouldn't it behoove you to actually investigate this so-called "misuse of intellectual property rights" before jerking your knee and spouting off inanities? If you're indicative of the IP law community, then I sure hope I never get into an IP dispute.

    2. Re:Abuse of Property Rights by Compulawyer · · Score: 2
      As an Anonymous Coward, I can see that you have done NO investigation of your comments or you would have found out that I DID investigate this. You also would have found out that I share the views of many attorneys: that is is unethical to place clauses in contracts that are unenforceable or that the client has no intention of enforcing merely because the client hopes for collateral effects, i.e., the mere presence of the words in the contract implies that it is proper for those words to be there.

      In addition, it is absolutely absurd for a company to sell a product and then try to control how it is used (assuming of course it is not being used in a dangerous fashion - case in point: warnings about removing safety devices from power tools, etc.). In my view as an intellectual property attorney, a software engineer, and a consumer, I think that if a company wants to avoid criticism about its products, then it should make good products. It is irrelevant that those products happen to be intangible and protected by IP rights.

      You should hope you never get into an IP battle - people who steal IP are thieves, plain and simple. Same as a pursesnatcher, just with a bigger purse.

      --

      Laws affecting technology will always be bad until enough techies become lawyers.

  72. Misconstrued Motives by stoothman · · Score: 1

    Now, my fellow /.ers, I am sure we are all simply misunderstanding the motive behind this clause. It is surely meant to be a caution to those developers who use Frontpage to design websites. I see it like this. Microsoft assumes that if you are using Frontpage you are also likely using IIS on Windows 2000. If a developer were to post an anti-microsoft page using Frontpage on IIS, the resulting increase in traffic from 3 views per minute to 6 views per minute would so overwhelm the server that it would be forced to shutdown. Thus see it is simply a public service by Microsoft to help keep IIS functioning and reduce support calls they receive at the same time.

  73. You still have the freedom to choose... by TheCaptain · · Score: 1

    I am sick and tired of everyone who wants the Government to beat Microsoft down, when they have the right to sell their product however the hell they choose. What about THEIR rights? Sure...it's total bullshit...which brings me to the solution:

    You can choose NOT to use it. Seriously. Quit complaining about rights and vote with your money. If they want your money, M$ has to play by your rules. If people aren't smart enough to vote with their money, they have no one to blame with themselves.

    BTW...shouldn't an anti MS person use a non-MS OS and editor anyways? vi works great!

    1. Re:You still have the freedom to choose... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's all fun and games with "money voting," until your place of business actually requires you to use a Microsoft product. Since Microsoft is King of the Universe, this happens a great deal.

      Rather than "beat down" Microsoft, I think the parent was simply venting a frustration that many people in the IT world are forced to live by. Today I can't link a GPL program using forthcoming SDKs, and I can't say how much Microsoft is a piece of shit with Frontpage, but what wonderful totalitarian act will Microsoft force upon its consumers?
      Gee, all mighty single source of mainstream computing products, what is your order today?

    2. Re:You still have the freedom to choose... by bill0r · · Score: 0

      Of course, those of us who complain *DON'T* use them, but we can still say M$ sucks, can't we? or are they gonna ban that too?
      Don't assume that we complain because we use it, we complain because it's an attack to everyone's freedom of expression.

    3. Re:You still have the freedom to choose... by wltack · · Score: 2

      Call me a quibbler, but it seems to me that the rights granted by the US Constitution are meant to inhere to humans, not pretend-people like Microsoft, Inc. Grrr.

    4. Re:You still have the freedom to choose... by plague3106 · · Score: 1

      MS is not a human, and therefore has no rights. Its not hard to understand.

      Oh since you know so little about linux. How about trying Star Office or even gnotepad.

    5. Re:You still have the freedom to choose... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about trying Star Office or even gnotepad.

      If I wanted my computer to perform as well as a 486 running Windows 3.1, I would buy a 486 running Windows 3.1.

    6. Re:You still have the freedom to choose... by TheCaptain · · Score: 1

      It's owned a run by humans. They have rights. Are you saying they can't do what they want with their property?

      And what kind of things do you say when people tell you that YOU can't do what you want with YOUR property?

    7. Re:You still have the freedom to choose... by Herschel+Cohen · · Score: 1

      If your serious, use your 486 as a gateway which we plan to do as soon as some components arrive. Until then you could do as I: order an AMD chip at 1.4G and some DDRAM add a disc or two and other items coming in at less than $1K U.S. and Star Office is no problem. I speak from experience having used the later on my son's machine with only a 1.2G AMD CPU and 'regular' SDRAM.

      Anyway, when I had Windows 3.1 running on my 486DX2-66 it was a dog. It will be much happier as a Linux Gateway (and Firewall) for our internet connections and Linux network.

      I would tell you the fates of the few Windows machines still present, but that's another story to be told later.

      Be happy ...

    8. Re:You still have the freedom to choose... by Glothar · · Score: 1

      Its like buying a heatsink fan, but opening the box and finding out:

      It is prohibited to use SuperDuper Heatsink Fan in any device running Microsoft Software.


      Or should SuperDuper, Corp be allowed to specify your behavior?

      • By purchasing this car, you void all rights to complain about it
      • By eating McDonalds(tm) food, you must, when asked, enthusiastically say you enjoyed it.
      • By opening this can of Pepsi, you are affirming your agreement to never agree to or advocate the sale of any Coke product.
      • Ownership of this Dell(tm) Computer requires that you never attempt to point out flaws with the US Government
      • Please note that your Adobe e-Book(tm) license may be revoked if you are ever found to have thought about decrypting said e-Book. Furthermore, any attempts to complain to Adobe will result in not only the revocation of all e-Book licenses, but a prohibition against obtaining new e-Book licenses for a period not less than 2 (solar) years.
    9. Re:You still have the freedom to choose... by Herschel+Cohen · · Score: 1

      Remember that, when they tell you how you can use the machine you paid for and they "use" to your determent.

      That is, unless you are a MS employee or have some other vested interest ...

    10. Re:You still have the freedom to choose... by TheCaptain · · Score: 1

      Nice strawman arguement. That's almost by the book.

      Strawman: Arguing against a position by creating a different, weaker, or irrelevant position and refuting that new position instead of the original.

      Of COURSE the cases you stated would be wrong and horrible things...a complete fucking idiot could see that. However...those are VERY different things than not using frontpage to make an anti-ms site...which actually doesn't even turn out to be the case anyways. Read the update on slashdot's front page. The point is, is that if you don't agree with the license...don't buy the fucking product. The license is a part of the product you bought...and if it isn't, then Linux is in trouble, because Linux depends on a certain license agreement too, like any operating system really. Personally, I like BSD's license, but that's just my humble opinion. Not buying it will create pressure to change it...if we don't buy it, they don't survive.

      The whole arguement is pretty silly now anyways...read the update.

    11. Re:You still have the freedom to choose... by TheCaptain · · Score: 1

      I don't buy a product if I don't agree with the license. If I don't agree with the license, I buy another product. Choice is a wonderful thing we have in this part of the world.

      Damn people...read the friggin' fine print.

      Vested interest? Do you think I am a paid Microsoft advocate? Seriously...that's almost funny...

    12. Re:You still have the freedom to choose... by zangdesign · · Score: 2

      Oh, so everyone should be allowed to use whatever tools they want in the corporate workplace and to hell with tech support trying to keep their heads above water supporting a billion different standards? Is that it?

      Well, shit, son. Start your own goddamn corporation and run it however you want, but don't come begging for a job when the cost of experts in everything under the sun consumes way more than your gross profit margin.

      Oh, wait! Let me guess, you wouldn't work for a corporation that would hire you, would you?

      Lameass whiner.

      --
      To celebrate the occasion of my 1000th post, I will post no more forever on Slashdot. Goodbye.
    13. Re:You still have the freedom to choose... by Craig+Maloney · · Score: 2
      When was the last time you were able to purchase a pre-packaged machine and not have a Microsoft OS loaded? Unless you're prepared to completely roll-your-own, you can't escape Microsoft.

      That is where money-voting fails. There is no consumer choice to NOT use Microsoft unless you roll-your-own or buy an Apple.

    14. Re:You still have the freedom to choose... by Herschel+Cohen · · Score: 1

      Not meant to be funny.

      Have you ever purchased a computer with licences that you were aware of their entire contract in advance? Time for you to get serious - I was responding to an AC post, was that you?

      How does the average individual computer purchaser avoid being presented with a 'package', e.g. the operating system for which one pays whether they use the bundled items or not?

      You pay for Windows on nearly every packaged box whether you use it or not. Moreover, it is 'licensed' to you for only that box.

      Not too funny in my view, and that's only one of the reasons I will no longer purchase vendor CPU offerings.

    15. Re:You still have the freedom to choose... by Herschel+Cohen · · Score: 1

      Sorry, I did not notice your alias - I had been answering AC's. Jumped the gun on this one.

      This may be late, because I ran into the 2 minute warning.

    16. Re:You still have the freedom to choose... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Their rights? Its a company not a person. Institutions don't have rights, people do. As for people not buying M$ products, if they keep producing products full of security holes and forcing bullshit licensing on consumers people will have no choice but to find alternatives, if M$ lets them exist.

    17. Re:You still have the freedom to choose... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As and artifical person NO Microsoft has no rights. It does have priviledges grant to it by it's creator.... the government. Which include SOME of the same rights humans have. The real question become.... when standing in a court room who is it being judged a person .... or a human they are not the same thing in the eyes of the law. legal definitions are NOT the same as what we might think as regular people. Does the constitution mention person? If it doesn't, where is it defined? If you choose not to be addressed or thought of as a person does this change what rights you have? Hmmmmm... Who is your creator? quantum foam... So if you say
      guantum foam = god (the symbol god)
      god created me so you can't not put another label on me like "person" to define me as an artifical thing you created (corporation) because this against my religion (physics and mathmatics)

      Because if I am X and your call my Y then X and Y must be equal...... To say Y is something less is against my religious principle (Math).

      .

    18. Re:You still have the freedom to choose... by DavidRavenMoon · · Score: 1
      It's the worst web authoring program out there anyway! Why anyone would use it is beyond me ... you might as well do your webpages in MS Word!

      But then again, I don't see what people like about DreamWeaver...

      (I'm a GoLive user... and yes, I can code by hand, but why bother? ;-)

      --
      -- if it was so, it might be; and if it were so, it would be; but as it isn't, it ain't. That's logic - Lewis Carrol
    19. Re:You still have the freedom to choose... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      who owns it after you pay for it? If you sold it you don't own it any more so have not say. BUT...

      The truth is the government owns it. If you look closely at existing banking laws. Because you have (TRADED one debt for another) Look at the money in your pocket it says for all debts public and private. This is a promisary note issued by the Fed(private bank) to the United states. Money borrowed against US assests which include all corporations operating in the US ... (which includes you as an atifical "person". This is why you can operate you own business with you social security number .... you have astablish an artifical identity belonging to the government. (who owns the number?) Not you read your card. You are being used as colladeral on money borrowed from the Fed. Any property you think you own actually belongs to your parent company the US Federal Government. This why the UCC (banking laws) is used in civil court. Because it all boils down to disputes of the government liablity to the private banking institutions. NOT your constitutional rights.

    20. Re:You still have the freedom to choose... by YourFingerYouFool · · Score: 0

      Actualy, In most cases you don't. Even those manufacturers selling computers preinstalled with linux still *charge* you for windows due to the licensing agreement they have with microsoft. I'm *paying* for it whether I want it or not. There is not a real choice for most people.

      --
      "pull my finger" - Uncle Chuckles
    21. Re:You still have the freedom to choose... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tech support is appropriate for customers. Employees should be proficient enough with their favorite tools that they don't need help doing their own jobs.

    22. Re:You still have the freedom to choose... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh, while you're right that the license doesn't say what people says it does, his examples were vaid analogies.

      You clearly don't understand the first thing about the GPL and EULAs; EULAs take away rights you would ordinarily expect to have with respect to purchased chattel, whereas the GPL grants additional permissions under specific circumstances.

    23. Re:You still have the freedom to choose... by NathanL · · Score: 1
      See Microsoft article....Microsoft bad. HURRY AND POST FLAME ON SLASHDOT!

      See Linux zealots see Microsoft article....Microsoft bad. HURRY AND POST FLAMES ABOUT CAPITALISM AND MICROSOFT!

      See someone read article about Microsoft. Read EULA......oops, Microsoft not so bad. HURRY AND BURY THE STORY!



      Pathetic.

    24. Re:You still have the freedom to choose... by pharokom · · Score: 1

      Yeah we all need to give Microsoft a break. bill is just doing what he does best the way he knows how in our Capitalist society...

    25. Re:You still have the freedom to choose... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I totally agree. IMHO The best way to fight the tbeast is to start a massive campaign to do away with MS product use. The biggest problem with this type of idea is that companies are so tied to Exchange/Outlook. I believe if companies were able to see that by using the somehting like the iPlanet messaging/calendar suite that the number of sys admins, machines, etc. that are currently dedicated to Windows/Exchange/Outlook is drastically reduced. Such a boycott would also get companies out from under the ridiculous MS license policies.

    26. Re:You still have the freedom to choose... by TheCaptain · · Score: 1

      EULA's only take away rights from people who didn't read the EULA in the first place to know what they were getting. If you knew what you can do with the product and still bought it, then your the one kicking yourself.

      The GPL also places RESTRICTIONS on how something can be used/distributed, and make requirements on them as well. Not just more permissions. They aren't all that valid as analogies go either. Creating a webpage using frontpage to flame frontpage, is VERY VERY different from never being able to SAY that you think frontpage is a piece of donkey-shit, or even using another web editing tool to make the site anyways. Do NOT confuse those two conditions...as they are VERY different...hence: The Strawman.

      To me, the gripes are still somewhat justified actually...it would be a pretty shitty thing to do...however, I don't think that we should run crying to the government just anything. If you agree to the EULA, then your the one who agreed to it, not me. My rights are in pretty good shape over here.

    27. Re:You still have the freedom to choose... by wltack · · Score: 1

      Pretend-people like Microsoft are not actually owned by anyone. The CEO, for instance, is an officer of the corporation. The rights of the persons in the corporation inhere to them, but the corporation itself is not human. There is no logic to anthropomorphizing these organizations - it's mere assertion. And foolish, IMHO.

    28. Re:You still have the freedom to choose... by tg5027 · · Score: 1

      close, but the worst one is visual interdev 6.0. the adjenda content is far greater than it's web page creation capability.

    29. Re:You still have the freedom to choose... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      or you could have bought a P500 a year or so ago and loaded win2k and office2k to acheive the same results. only the unknowledgable would claim performance an issue between linux and windoze.

    30. Re:You still have the freedom to choose... by chrylis · · Score: 1

      Not true. A long time ago, in what I personally consider to be one of the turning points in U.S. society, the Supreme Court ruled that corporations have all the rights of "natural persons". This, coupled with the change of corporate status from a reward granted to groups providing some sort of public service to something that simply costs $300 for an application, has opened wide the door for all sorts of abuses.

    31. Re:You still have the freedom to choose... by stevo42 · · Score: 1

      You have to be kidding. I can see very significant parallels with the 'so called' strawman arguments, especially when you take into consideration all the other covert activities that the dirty giant is up to. What you defenders of the 'rights' of MS tend to forget (either because it's convienient or just because your stupid) is that the vast majority of people out there buying PCs are blissfully unaware of what MS is doing and because of that don't care. This allows the monster to grow and get away with whatever it likes because most of it's customers don't know any better. Sure we can vote with our money but the monster has got so big now and is bloated with people who don't even know that there is a choice that the ones of us who do don't number enough to make a difference. We need to use forums like this to let people know what is happening. People who complain about this being an anti-MS place - bloody oath it is. How can we compete with the marketing juggernaut that is MS, we need to chip away anyway we can - catch them in the lies they sprout every day. Interesting you mentioned vi in your original post - I'm surprised you know how to spell it...

    32. Re:You still have the freedom to choose... by TheCaptain · · Score: 1

      Competition is alive and well. Linux on the server is a very solid platform. The company I work for is testing our product on it now. (It's an enterprise web based app.) ALOT of companies use it. FreeBSD is also actually fairly common...and with MacOS X having BSD's guts beneath the eye candy...it's even somewhat mainstream. Solaris is pretty common on servers too. It's not like you have no valid options.

      Letting people know whats going on is a VERY good thing...however, let your bias at the door. You say how can you compete with a marketing juggernaut? Well...there's a story a few up from this one on the front page right now about google rising to the top with no marketing. The answer is simple. Be the best. Spend less time bitching and more time coding....woopsie...most slashdotters are more content to bitch all day about a problem, than to fix the problem. You can't bitch it to death here guys...it just doesn't work well. (pardon the generalization on that one - it's not pointed at you - it's a general observation of alot of the people who frequent these forums...far too many of them IMHO.)

      What I don't think you understand, is that we are actually on the same side here. My idea of a solution is just quite a bit different from yours. Rather than cry to the government, I'd rather get off my ass and fix something, or at least support people who can and will. I really wish more people would at least TRY to master their own fate instead of trying to elect people to do it for them.

      With that being said: Whats up with the Ad Hominem remark there? Surprised I know how to spell vi? I am stupid? Please....You can't very well make a good arguement by attacking the character of someone who states an opposing arguement. It's really obvious...and it makes you look bad. If you want to put me down, do it with real substance...if you have any - and so far, you don't have much. And with that in mind...I am not going to stoop to your level. I am done for now...have a good night.

    33. Re:You still have the freedom to choose... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmmm whats the court case? I think what they ruled was in reguard to US citizens which are not the same as state citizens. They are NOT guarantteed all constitutional rights. US citizens are a creation of the government therefor subject to all laws passed by that body. UNLIKE state citizens. CONgress can NOT extend the power granted to in in the constitution. So it created a second class citizen it COULD regulate. It like the corporation has no rights only priviledges.

    34. Re:You still have the freedom to choose... by zangdesign · · Score: 1

      Shoulda, woulda, coulda ...

      Keep dreaming.

      --
      To celebrate the occasion of my 1000th post, I will post no more forever on Slashdot. Goodbye.
    35. Re:You still have the freedom to choose... by Kamel+Jockey · · Score: 1

      Call me a quibbler, but it seems to me that the rights granted by the US Constitution are meant to inhere to humans, not pretend-people like Microsoft, Inc. Grrr.

      The Constitution grants no rights. It merely lists the ones you have and then states the government cannot take them away.

      --
      In case of fire, do not use elevator. Use water!
    36. Re:You still have the freedom to choose... by stevo42 · · Score: 1

      I have never heard sooooo much verbal diatribe. You don't make a good argment simply by putting a lot of words together. Your arguments are invalid and proven so by simple statistics and even recent history should give you some clue that even though you say you are on the same side you haven't really got the point yet. I'm not arguing for the government to stomp on anyone who gets big - I want the government or someone to do something to help the little guy and not always bow down to the big end of town. MS could give a rats about anyone except MS, they don't practice fair business tactics and they don't care - they think they are invincible and the laws and principles of the world don't apply to them. They have invented NOTHING, inovated NOTHING, contributed NOTHING USEFUL. The argument that you become successful because you are good is bunkum - MS apps are very poorly designed and written. Do you really think that X86 architecture is the BEST - PLEASE !!! There are hundreds of cases in the 20th century alone where the best technology didn't win. Have a look at history before making statements about bigger must be better...
      I'm not surprised you also don't understand a little light sarcasm - my vi comment - you really need to get out more, see a movie or two that don't need explaining... oops more sarcasm

    37. Re:You still have the freedom to choose... by TheCaptain · · Score: 1

      If you think MS has invented and innovated nothing useful, then your showing little more than how little you know. I don't think they've given us nearly as much as alot of other companies, but to say that it's nothing is rather misinformed. Yes...they are a bastardly company...they look out for their own interests...what a concept. There aren't any rules that state that we have to play nice here.

      X86 as the best platform? (Greeeaaat....haven't had an X86 debate since the mac zealots quieted down.) From a technology standpoint, of course not. When exactly did I even SAY anything about that? I am not kidding...I want a quote there kiddo... X86 however, is a very mature platform, and a very common platform...with alot of very good tools written for it.

      The argument that you become successful because you are good is bunkum - MS apps are very poorly designed and written. Do you really think that X86 architecture is the BEST - PLEASE !!!

      Sure...then explain Google. I never said it was THE ONLY way to be successful...I would say it's a pretty good way. It certainly gives you some of the best odds. Does it always work? No...what DOES? I also realize that MOST MS apps are badly designed and written. If you think they are all terrible...again...your smoking something that I need some of.

      There are hundreds of cases in the 20th century alone where the best technology didn't win. Have a look at history before making statements about bigger must be better...


      Again...when did I say "bigger must be better". I think you have me confused with someone else here. And yeah...the best tech doesn't always win. It only would in an ideal world, and the sooner you realize that we aren't living in one of those, the better.

      I'm not surprised you also don't understand a little light sarcasm - my vi comment - you really need to get out more, see a movie or two that don't need explaining... oops more sarcasm


      Sarcasm? Your talking out your ass on half of this stuff. Show me where I said those things, and back up your claims with proof! Seriously...I don't have time to defend things I didn't say.

    38. Re:You still have the freedom to choose... by plague3106 · · Score: 1

      The property you speak of however is not owned by humans, its owned by the company.

      And human or not, those rights are lost as soon as i purchase said property from them. Once i buy a car, the dealer loses any right to tell me what i can do with that car.

    39. Re:You still have the freedom to choose... by Delphis · · Score: 1

      Employees should be proficient enough with their favorite tools that they don't need help doing their own jobs.

      LOL!!!! .. thanks for that, I needed a laugh. Most people (definitely all the way to the top) don't even know how to turn the damn things on. It's pathetic.

      --
      Delphis
    40. Re:You still have the freedom to choose... by corwinss · · Score: 1

      I agree... Take for example...if you're working for a company where you make web documents, you should be allowed to use HTML with whatever editor you so desire, so long as you get the job done. You should be allowed to use ASP or CGI or javascript. The only problem with this being if others have to work on the same pages you do. Then the workers should be allowed to agree on the standard.

      --
      "Who am I" and "Why are we here" are not the problems.
      The problem is when someone asks "Why are they here."
    41. Re:You still have the freedom to choose... by wltack · · Score: 1

      Good point. These rights are affirmed, of course, not merely for US citizens, but for all human beings.

    42. Re:You still have the freedom to choose... by D2Deek · · Score: 1
      Not true. A long time ago, in what I personally consider to be one of the turning points in U.S. society, the Supreme Court ruled that corporations have all the rights of "natural persons".
      It wasn't the Supremes, it was a district court judge.
    43. Re:You still have the freedom to choose... by CakerX · · Score: 1

      486s ran win 3.1 flawlessly(Well as flawless as windows gets!), not to mention fast. Trust me, I have one in my room....

  74. EPI DVD by ocie · · Score: 2

    I wonder if Lucas is considering a similar clause on the upcomming DVD.

    --
    JET Program: see Japan, meet intere
    1. Re:EPI DVD by TomK32 · · Score: 1

      no more "Unix Wars"?
      no more "Editor Wars?"no more "windowmanager Wars"?

      aaaaaaahhhhhhhhhhhhhh

      --
      -- just a geek - trying to change the world
  75. Microsoft's new dictionary EULA by Jonathunder · · Score: 1

    Use of this Dictionary of the English Language, or any of the words contained herein, constitutes acceptance of the following terms: You shall not use this dictionary, or any of the words derived therefrom, to disparage Microsoft, Encarta, or any of the companies we swallow up.

    Resistance is futile.

  76. My paper company... by Pong5 · · Score: 1

    is going to issue a new license such that you can't write anything that might disparage Microsoft on our pressed dead tree flesh. This applies to photocopies as well.

  77. EULAs and the First Amendment by Corgha · · Score: 3, Informative

    I wouldn't worry about it, stuff like this wouldn't hold up more than a second under First Amendment scrutiny.

    uhhh:

    Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

    Microsoft != Congress
    (...last I checked, anyway. If that changes, time to fall on my sword.)

    Really, the EULA is a voluntarily entered contract between the end user and Microsoft, and is not to be confused with a law passed by Congress. One might compare this clause of the agreement to an NDA, in that both place restraint upon your speech, but neither is unconstitutional.

    The defense against this kind of practice is not to complain and wave the First Amendment, but to remove Microsoft from the position that allows them to make these demands.

    1. Re:EULAs and the First Amendment by Alex+Belits · · Score: 2

      Contracts are enforced by government.

      --
      Contrary to the popular belief, there indeed is no God.
    2. Re:EULAs and the First Amendment by Fweebles · · Score: 1

      But they are not imposed upon you by the government...you volunteer to abide by them when you buy the product.

    3. Re:EULAs and the First Amendment by Gleef · · Score: 2

      Disclaimer: I am not a lawyer, the below is the personal opinion of a layman, and is not legal advice.

      I agree that Microsoft != Congress, and it is perfectly legal for a contract to include terms restricting behavior in a way that would be unconstitutional were it a law produced by Congress. It happens all the time, and the courts uphold such contracts.

      On the other hand, I would argue that an EULA is not a voluntarily entered contract. Valuable consideration has changed hands (i.e. you've paid for the software) before any terms of the contract are even revealed. There certainly is no opportunity to negotiate terms. There is no signature indicating assent.

      In the FrontPage 2002 packaging I've seen, there is not even a EULA envelope around the software. The license document is sandwitched between other pieces of paper. You can literally install the software without even seeing that there is a license document in the box. I do not see how any terms on such a license could possibly be a "voluntarily entered contract".

      --

      ----
      Open mind, insert foot.
    4. Re:EULAs and the First Amendment by Herschel+Cohen · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If you cannot read the contract until you have purchased the product and upon breaking the seal you and you lose your right to return the product - how is that voluntary? Moreover, did you ever see a case where the power was considered so disproportional that this sort of contract was thrown out? Well GM has lost cases based on that legal tenet. However, given the current composition of much of the federal judiciary I would not bet the farm on its immediate help.

      Nonetheless, Microsoft has been labelled a monopolist using illegal business practices. You might wish to quibble and say it's not over having not seen a Supreme Court decision. But you should notice that they even pushed a more friendly applet court to issue an unanimous decision stating MS did not understand the conclusions the court had made.

      Perhaps I am an optimist, which few people accuse me of being in person, but like all powers counter forces arise and MS may meet its match soon.

    5. Re:EULAs and the First Amendment by Fweebles · · Score: 1

      Never said MS weren't jerks...I just said that the First Amendment was probably not the most useful way to fight them.

  78. Whoops.. by cyb3r0ptx · · Score: 1

    That should have been 'less than 2002'.. I put in a less than sign that was stripped.. doh.

  79. contradicts itself by www.sorehands.com · · Score: 1
    4. The Logo may be displayed only on Web pages that make accurate references to Microsoft or its products or services, and must be displayed adjacent to the reference or at the bottom of the same page. Your Web page title and other trademarks and logos must appear at least as prominently as the Logo. You may not display the Logo in any manner that implies sponsorship, endorsement, or license by Microsoft.

    Now, how can you be accurate and not disparage Microsoft.

  80. The Ultimate Irony... by A_Non_Moose · · Score: 1

    Anyone that uses any other (Dream weaver or *coff* even Golive *hack, ptui*) product that puts front page to shame, will regard frontpage as a dispariging remark to any HTML editor.

    So, what MS is saying is: don't say anything bad about our bad software.
    sort of their view of the antitrust trial "I refuse to tell the truth, the whole truth and anything even remotely close to the truth, so help me Bill Ga...err, ummm, God...that's it".

    usually the opposite holds true, so, I guess when/if they *do* make a good product they will have to sue all their users that make *good* claims about FP.

    final verdict:
    a) damned if you do
    b) damned if you don't
    c) damned if I know!
    d) all of the above

    Moose.

    --
    Have you read the moderator guidelines? Well, have you, PUNK? (and I want a Karma: Gnarly option)
  81. By buying this tire, you agree not to complain by WillSeattle · · Score: 1

    when it blows out and kills you. You also indemnify our tire company from any deaths, injuries, destruction, and you and all your heirs swear fealty and vassalage unto our feudal kingdom.

    ... in small print on the inner side of a tire ...

    --
    --- Will in Seattle - What are you doing to fight the War?
  82. Do not taunt Happy Fun Ball by Ukab+the+Great · · Score: 2

    I know I've seen the Windows XP license somewhere before.

    http://www.happyfunball.com/hfb.html

  83. Gotta hand it to them by sirgoran · · Score: 1

    Only the M$ legal department could come up with something so stupid.

    Maybe the next thing will be to add a clause that states it's a violation of your licence to install anything other than a M$ product on your computer. After all, that will prove that their not a monopoly. Right?

    Sure. And suddenly I'll become an absolute dweeb and only be able to code using a WYSIWYG.

    I guess they figure if it's hidden in the TOS or licence they can get away with anything. After all who really reads the fine print...

    Goran

    --
    Carpe Scrotum - The only way to deal with your competition.
  84. hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seems to me this is going to be a hard one for Microsoft to enforce.
    If WinXP with all it's "protection" is ALREADY being warezd, and isn't even in the hands of consumers yet, then I don't see HOW they're going to enforce any of their EULA's.
    Does anyone care about the EULA's anyways? Businesses might. And any business that knows what they're doing in the marketing department wouldn't put MS bashing stuff on their website (unless they're in direct competition!)...

    So it's a fairly moot point, and any lawsuits that came out of it would be thrown out by the judge.

  85. Sounds somewhat familiar by TheTomcat · · Score: 1


    In the province where I grew up (New Brunswick, Canada), there are three (3) daily newspapers. They're all owned by J.D. Irving Inc.

    I can't remember EVER reading anything bad about the Irvings in the 'paper.

  86. Code snippet: by Mr_Icon · · Score: 2

    if (IsInOneSentence("Microsoft", "sucks")){
    throwFits();
    popupEula();
    lockComputer();
    notifyAuthorities();
    showBillWavingHisFingerAndSaying("Naughty Boy!");
    }

    --
    If you open yourself to the foo, You and foo become one.
  87. on the other hand. . . by jafac · · Score: 2

    if you're out there disparaging Microsoft software and services, and you're USING them, then that's pretty hypocritical, and you should switch to vi/Linux/Apache.

    Right?

    I mean, doing that, and enforcing a license like that, are roughly ethically equivalent things.

    --

    These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    1. Re:on the other hand. . . by sammy+baby · · Score: 2
      if you're out there disparaging Microsoft software and services, and you're USING them, then that's pretty hypocritical, and you should switch to vi/Linux/Apache.

      So, I shouldn't write a blog entry that says, "Jesus, I'm stuck here using vi. I hate vi,"?

      Or use Frontpage 2000 to write an article critical of Microsoft's OEM licensing practices?

      Or - extending the analogy a bit - use MS Word to write a negative review of Asheron's Call?

      Come to think of it, I'm already on shaky ground. I'm posting that this policy is bullshit using MSIE!

      (Oh, for the record - I dig vi.)

    2. Re:on the other hand. . . by greysky · · Score: 1

      There's a difference between using something and hating it, and using something and wanting it to be better. I use Linux and I want cd burning to be easier to setup. If the GPL prohibited negative speech about Linux if I use it, then I wouldn't be allowed to state that I think rebuilding my kernel just to burn a cd is a pain in the ass. Likewise, there are probably scores of people out there that are fine with running windows, but have a few gripes about specific aspects of the operating system/applications that they run (Blue screens and viri come to mind). They're effectively hurting their "happy" users by including a clause like this in their licensing agreement, not the people who outright bash the company and refuse to use their products.

    3. Re:on the other hand. . . by jafac · · Score: 2

      but that's different. It's open source. if you don't like vi. . . fix it. :)

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
  88. Re:This relates only to Front Page SERVER COMPONEN by nhavar · · Score: 2

    mod this up

    --
    "Do not be swept up in the momentum of mediocrity." - anon
  89. So? by 0xdeadbeef · · Score: 2

    No one is putting a gun to your head forcing you to license this software. If you don't like it, buy something else.

  90. MS Word by pagsz · · Score: 1

    Jesus, I wonder how long before this "feature" makes it into other MS products

    Then, it'll show up in MS Word

    New Document - MS Word 2002
    _________________________
    Microsoft Sucks [Typing this statement has violated your EULA. MS Windows will now contact Microsoft headquarters to inform them of the infraction. Expect MS Storm Troopers within the next hour. -- Emperor Gates]

    I'm as mad as Hell and I can't take it anymore,

    --
    -- If any of the above made sense, I assure it was purely by accident.
  91. Re:I miss my home! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Greetings, fellow Katy lover.

    It seems that no-one (not even InfoWorld who first 'reported' it) has confirmed this alleged license nonsense, though there is a denial further down the comments, possibly from the person on Earth who will actually admit to using frontPage.

    Any evidence for the prosecution, or is this just another anti-MS FUDfest? On Slashdot! *GASP* On InfoWorld! *HORROR* The two final bastions of quality reportage online! *SHOCK*

    BTW, fix the fucking database. FrontPage and Access would do a better job.

  92. Re:This relates only to Front Page SERVER COMPONEN by ShavenYak · · Score: 1

    Hmmm, looks like you're OK as long as you don't use any of the FrontPage Web Components. Of course, if you're not using the FP Web Components, you're not really gaining much of anything by using FrontPage in general.
    Just one more good reason to not fool with the crap. Besides, the FP Server Extensions for Apache wreak havoc on your security, and there's no way anyone in their right mind would run IIS after this week.

    --

    Hey kids, there's only 5 days left 'til Yak Shaving Day!
  93. LOL Indeed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Had he been elected, we wouldn't have this mess, or even the terrorist bombings. He would have destroyed all of our business and infrastructure by now, and there would have been no need to do any further damage.

    Please don't make it seem like he's crusading to get rid of children's toys like "shiny pointy bouncy razor ball," he's an anti-corporate relic who hates successful companies, and would destroy them in the name of the "workers" who would then be safe from the corporations who don't exist any more.

  94. The actual License... where is the text? by Caball · · Score: 1

    END USER LICENSE AGREEMENT FOR MICROSOFT SOFTWARE.

    IMPORTANT-READ CAREFULLY: This Microsoft End-User License Agreement ("EULA") is a legal agreement between you (either an individual person or a single legal entity, who will be referred to in this EULA as "You") and Microsoft Corporation for the Microsoft software product that accompanies this EULA, including any associated media, printed materials and electronic documentation (the "Software Product"). The Software Product also includes any software updates, add-on components, web services and/or supplements that Microsoft may provide to You or make available to You after the date You obtain Your initial copy of the Software Product to the extent that such items are not accompanied by a separate license agreement or terms of use. By installing, copying, downloading, accessing or otherwise using the Software Product, You agree to be bound by the terms of this EULA. If You do not agree to the terms of this EULA, do not install, access or use the Software Product; instead, You should return it to Your place of purchase for a full refund.

    SOFTWARE PRODUCT LICENSE

    The Software Product is protected by intellectual property laws and treaties. The Software Product is licensed, not sold.

    1. GRANT OF LICENSE. This Section of the EULA describes Your general rights to install and use the Software Product The license rights described in this Section are subject to all other terms and conditions of this EULA.

    General License Grant to Install and Use Software Product. You may install and use one copy of the Software Product on a single computer, device, workstation, terminal, or other digital electronic or analog device ("Device"). You may make a second copy of the Software Product and install it on a portable Device for the exclusive use of the person who is the primary user of the first copy of the Software Product. A license for the Software Product may not be shared.

    Alternative License Grant for Storage/Network Use. As an alternative to the rights granted in the previous section, You may install a copy of the Software Product on one storage Device, such as a network server, and allow individuals within Your business or enterprise to access and use the Software Product from other Devices over a private network, provided that You acquire and dedicate a license for the storage Device upon which the Software Product is installed and each separate Device from which the Software Product is accessed and used. A license for the Software Product may not be used concurrently on different Devices.

    General License Grant to Install and Use Subscription Product. The following licensing terms apply to You instead of the license grants in the previous two paragraphs if You licensed a subscription-based Software Product (a "Subscription Product"). You may install one copy of the Subscription Product on a single Device and use the Subscription Product for the term of Your subscription. You may also exercise the additional license rights described in the paragraphs below, but only for the term of Your subscription. The initial subscription period begins on the date You first activate Your copy of the Subscription Product and ends three hundred and sixty five (365) days thereafter. You cannot use the Subscription Product after Your subscription expires unless You renew or extend Your subscription. By renewing or extending Your subscription, You will be entitled to continue using the Subscription Product for a specified period of time beyond the date when Your previous subscription would have otherwise ended. All the terms and conditions of this EULA will continue to apply to Your use of the Subscription Product during any subsequent renewal periods unless otherwise specified. After the expiration of Your subscription, You can continue to open, view and print any documents You created with the Subscription Product.

    Additional License Grant for Media Elements. The Software Product may include certain photographs, clip art, animations, sounds, music and video clips (together "Media Elements"). If so, the following terms describe Your rights to the Media Elements:

    o Except as specified in the next Section, You may use, copy and modify the Media Elements and distribute copies of the Media Elements, along with Your modifications, as part of Your software product(s) and service(s), including Your web site(s).

    o You are not licensed to do any of the following:

    o You may not sell, license or distribute copies of the Media Elements on a stand-alone basis or as part of any collection, product or service where the primary value of the product or service are the Media Elements.

    o You may not use or distribute any of the Media Elements that include representations of identifiable individuals, governments, logos, initials, emblems, trademarks, or entities for any commercial purposes or to express or imply any endorsement or association with any product, service, entity, or activity.

    o You may not create obscene or scandalous works, as defined by federal law at the time the work is created, using the Media Elements.

    o You must indemnify, hold harmless, and defend Microsoft from and against any claims or lawsuits, including attorneys' fees, that arise from or result from the use or distribution of Media Elements as modified by You.

    o You must include a valid copyright notice on Your products and services that include copies of the Media Elements.

    o You may not permit third parties to distribute copies of the Media Elements except as part of Your product or service.

    Additional License Grant for SharePoint Team Services. The Software Product may contain a copy of the Sharepoint Team Services. If so, You may install one copy of such software on one Device and allow an unlimited number of individuals within Your business or enterprise to access and use the Sharepoint Team Services from other Devices provided that You acquire and dedicate a license to the Software Product for the Device upon which the Sharepoint Team Services are installed.

    Reservation of Rights. All rights not expressly granted are reserved by Microsoft.

    2. DESCRIPTION OF OTHER RIGHTS AND LIMITATIONS.

    Academic Edition Software. If the Software Product is identified as "Academic Edition" or "AE," You must be a "Qualified Educational User" to use the Software Product. If You are not a Qualified Educational User, You have no rights under this EULA. To determine whether You are a Qualified Educational User, please contact the Microsoft Sales Information Center/One Microsoft Way/Redmond, WA 98052-6399 or the Microsoft subsidiary serving Your country.

    Mandatory Activation. You may not be able to exercise Your rights to the Software Product under this EULA after a finite number of product launches unless You activate Your copy of the Software Product in the manner described during the launch sequence.

    Copy Protection. The Software Product may include copy protection technology to prevent the unauthorized copying of the Software Product or may require original media for use of the Software Product on the Device. It is illegal to make unauthorized copies of the Software Product or to circumvent any copy protection technology included in the Software Product.

    Not for Resale Software. If the Software Product is labeled "Not For Resale" or "NFR," then, notwithstanding other sections of this EULA, Your use of the Software Product is limited to use for demonstration, test, or evaluation purposes and You may not resell, or otherwise transfer for value, the Software Product.

    Limitations on Reverse Engineering, Decompilation, and Disassembly. You may not reverse engineer, decompile, or disassemble the Software Product, except and only to the extent that such activity is expressly permitted by applicable law notwithstanding this limitation.

    Separation of Component Parts. The Software Product is licensed as a single product. Its component parts may not be separated for use on more than one Device unless expressly permitted by this EULA.

    Trademarks. This EULA does not grant You any rights in connection with any trademarks or service marks of Microsoft.

    No rental, leasing or commercial hosting. You may not rent, lease, lend or provide commercial hosting services to third parties with the Software Product.

    Support Services. Microsoft may provide You with support services related to the Software Product ("Support Services"). Use of Support Services is governed by the Microsoft policies and programs described in the user manual, in "online" documentation, or in other Microsoft-provided materials. Any supplemental software code provided to You as part of the Support Services are considered part of the Software Product and subject to the terms and conditions of this EULA. You acknowledge and agree that Microsoft may use technical information You provide to Microsoft as part of the Support Services for its business purposes, including for product support and development. Microsoft will not utilize such technical information in a form that personally identifies You.

    Software Transfer. Except as specified in this Section, the initial licensee of the Software Product may make a one-time permanent transfer of this EULA and Software Product only directly to an end user. This transfer must include all of the Software Product (including all component parts, the media and printed materials, any upgrades, this EULA, and, if applicable, the Certificate of Authenticity). Such transfer may not be by way of consignment or any other indirect transfer. The transferee of such one-time transfer must agree to comply with the terms of this EULA, including the obligation not to further transfer this EULA and Software Product. Subscription Products are non-transferable.

    Termination. Without prejudice to any other rights, Microsoft may terminate this EULA if You fail to comply with the terms and conditions of this EULA. In such event, You must destroy all copies of the Software Product and all of its component parts.

    3. UPGRADES.

    Standard Software Product. If the Software Product is labeled as an upgrade, You must be properly licensed to use a product identified by Microsoft as being eligible for the upgrade in order to use the Software Product. A Software Product labeled as an upgrade replaces or supplements (and may disable) the product that formed the basis for Your eligibility for the upgrade. You may use the resulting upgraded product only in accordance with the terms of this EULA. If the Software Product is an upgrade of a component of a package of software programs that You licensed as a single product, the Software Product may be used and transferred only as part of that single product package and may not be separated for use on more than one Device.

    Subscription Based Software Product. The following terms apply to You instead of the terms in the previous paragraph if You licensed a Subscription Product. If Microsoft releases any upgrades or new versions of the Subscription Product during the term of Your subscription, You will be entitled to receive a copy of such upgrade(s) or new version(s) at no additional cost, except for any applicable connection charges, taxes, duties and shipping costs if You select fulfillment by mail. Such upgrades shall be considered part of the Subscription Product and subject to all of the terms and conditions of this EULA unless otherwise indicated in any license agreement that accompanies such upgrade or new version.

    4. INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS. All title and intellectual property rights in and to the Software Product (including but not limited to any images, photographs, animations, video, audio, music, text, and "applets" incorporated into the Software Product), the accompanying printed materials, and any copies of the Software Product are owned by Microsoft or its suppliers. All title and intellectual property rights in and to the content that is not contained in the Software Product, but may be accessed through use of the Software Product, is the property of the respective content owners and may be protected by applicable copyright or other intellectual property laws and treaties. This EULA grants You no rights to use such content. If this Software Product contains documentation that is provided only in electronic form, you may print one copy of such electronic documentation. You may not copy the printed materials accompanying the Software Product.

    5. BACKUP COPY. After installation of one copy of the Software Product pursuant to this EULA, you may keep the original media on which the Software Product was provided by Microsoft solely for backup or archival purposes. If the original media is required to use the Software Product on the Device, you may make one copy of the Software Product solely for backup or archival purposes. Except as expressly provided in this EULA, you may not otherwise make copies of the Software Product or the printed materials accompanying the Software Product.

    6. U.S. GOVERNMENT LICENSE RIGHTS. All Software Product provided to the U.S. Government pursuant to solicitations issued on or after December 1, 1995 is provided with the commercial license rights and restrictions described elsewhere herein. All Software Product provided to the U.S. Government pursuant to solicitations issued prior to December 1, 1995 is provided with RESTRICTED RIGHTS as provided for in FAR, 48 CFR 52.227-14 (JUNE 1987) or DFAR, 48 CFR 252.227-7013 (OCT 1988), as applicable.

    7. EXPORT RESTRICTIONS. You acknowledge that the Software Product is of U.S. origin. You agree to comply with all applicable international and national laws that apply to the Software Product, including the U.S. Export Administration Regulations, as well as end-user, end-use and destination restrictions issued by U.S. and other governments. For additional information, see http://www.microsoft.com/exporting/.

    8. APPLICABLE LAW.

    If you acquired this Software Product in the United States, this EULA is governed by the laws of the State of Washington.

    If you acquired this Software Product in Canada, unless expressly prohibited by local law, this EULA is governed by the laws in force in the Province of Ontario, Canada; and, in respect of any dispute which may arise hereunder, you consent to the jurisdiction of the federal and provincial courts sitting in Toronto, Ontario. If this Software Product was acquired outside the United States, then local law may apply.

    Should you have any questions concerning this EULA, or if you desire to contact Microsoft for any reason, please contact the Microsoft subsidiary serving your country, or write: Microsoft Sales Information Center/One Microsoft Way/Redmond, WA 98052-6399.

    9. LIMITED WARRANTY

    LIMITED WARRANTY FOR SOFTWARE PRODUCTS ACQUIRED IN THE US AND CANADA. Microsoft warrants that the SOFTWARE PRODUCT will perform substantially in accordance with the accompanying materials for a period of ninety (90) days from the date of receipt.

    If an implied warranty or condition is created by your state/jurisdiction and federal or state/provincial law prohibits disclaimer of it, you also have an implied warranty or condition, BUT ONLY AS TO DEFECTS DISCOVERED DURING THE PERIOD OF THIS LIMITED WARRANTY (NINETY DAYS). AS TO ANY DEFECTS DISCOVERED AFTER THE NINETY (90) DAY PERIOD, THERE IS NO WARRANTY OR CONDITION OF ANY KIND. Some states/jurisdictions do not allow limitations on how long an implied warranty or condition lasts, so the above limitation may not apply to you.

    Any supplements or updates to the SOFTWARE PRODUCT, including without limitation, any (if any) service packs or hot fixes provided to you after the expiration of the ninety (90) day Limited Warranty period are not covered by any warranty or condition, express, implied or statutory.

    LIMITATION ON REMEDIES; NO CONSEQUENTIAL OR OTHER DAMAGES. Your exclusive remedy for any breach of this Limited Warranty is as set forth below. Except for any refund elected by Microsoft, YOU ARE NOT ENTITLED TO ANY DAMAGES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES, if the Software Product does not meet Microsoft's Limited Warranty, and, to the maximum extent allowed by applicable law, even if any remedy fails of its essential purpose. The terms of Section 11 below ("Exclusion of Incidental, Consequential and Certain Other Damages") are also incorporated into this Limited Warranty. Some states/jurisdictions do not allow the exclusion or limitation of incidental or consequential damages, so the above limitation or exclusion may not apply to you. This Limited Warranty gives you specific legal rights. You may have others which vary from state/jurisdiction to state/jurisdiction.

    YOUR EXCLUSIVE REMEDY. Microsoft's and its suppliers' entire liability and your exclusive remedy shall be, at Microsoft's option from time to time exercised subject to applicable law, (a) return of the price paid (if any) for the Software Product, or (b) repair or replacement of the Software Product, that does not meet this Limited Warranty and that is returned to Microsoft with a copy of your receipt. You will receive the remedy elected by Microsoft without charge, except that you are responsible for any expenses you may incur (e.g. cost of shipping the Software Product to Microsoft). This Limited Warranty is void if failure of the Software Product has resulted from accident, abuse, misapplication, abnormal use or a virus. Any replacement Software Product will be warranted for the remainder of the original warranty period or thirty (30) days, whichever is longer. Outside the United States or Canada, neither these remedies nor any product support services offered by Microsoft are available without proof of purchase from an authorized international source. To exercise your remedy, contact: Microsoft, Attn. Microsoft Sales Information Center/One Microsoft Way/Redmond, WA 98052-6399, or the Microsoft subsidiary serving your country.

    LIMITED WARRANTY FOR SOFTWARE PRODUCTS ACQUIRED OUTSIDE THE US AND CANADA. FOR THE LIMITED WARRANTIES AND SPECIAL PROVISIONS PERTAINING TO YOUR PARTICULAR JURISDICTION, PLEASE REFER TO YOUR WARRANTY BOOKLET INCLUDED WITH THIS PACKAGE OR PROVIDED WITH THE SOFTWARE PRODUCT PRINTED MATERIALS.

    10. DISCLAIMER OF WARRANTIES. THE LIMITED WARRANTY THAT APPEARS ABOVE IS THE ONLY EXPRESS WARRANTY MADE TO YOU AND IS PROVIDED IN LIEU OF ANY OTHER EXPRESS WARRANTIES (IF ANY) CREATED BY ANY DOCUMENTATION OR PACKAGING. EXCEPT FOR THE LIMITED WARRANTY AND TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT PERMITTED BY APPLICABLE LAW, MICROSOFT AND ITS SUPPLIERS PROVIDE THE SOFTWARE AND SUPPORT SERVICES (IF ANY) AS IS AND WITH ALL FAULTS, AND HEREBY DISCLAIM ALL OTHER WARRANTIES AND CONDITIONS, EITHER EXPRESS, IMPLIED OR STATUTORY, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY (IF ANY) IMPLIED WARRANTIES, DUTIES OR CONDITIONS OF MERCHANTABILITY, OF FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, OF ACCURACY OR COMPLETENESS OR RESPONSES, OF RESULTS, OF WORKMANLIKE EFFORT, OF LACK OF VIRUSES AND OF LACK OF NEGLIGENCE, ALL WITH REGARD TO THE SOFTWARE, AND THE PROVISION OF OR FAILURE TO PROVIDE SUPPORT SERVICES. ALSO, THERE IS NO WARRANTY OR CONDITION OF TITLE, QUIET ENJOYMENT, QUIET POSSESSION, CORRESPONDENCE TO DESCRIPTION OR NON-INFRINGEMENT WITH REGARD TO THE SOFTWARE.

    11. EXCLUSION OF INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL AND CERTAIN OTHER DAMAGES. TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT PERMITTED BY APPLICABLE LAW, IN NO EVENT SHALL MICROSOFT OR ITS SUPPLIERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, INDIRECT, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES WHATSOEVER (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF PROFITS OR CONFIDENTIAL OR OTHER INFORMATION, FOR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION, FOR PERSONAL INJURY, FOR LOSS OF PRIVACY, FOR FAILURE TO MEET ANY DUTY INCLUDING OF GOOD FAITH OR OF REASONABLE CARE, FOR NEGLIGENCE, AND FOR ANY OTHER PECUNIARY OR OTHER LOSS WHATSOEVER) ARISING OUT OF OR IN ANY WAY RELATED TO THE USE OF OR INABILITY TO USE THE SOFTWARE PRODUCT, THE PROVISION OF OR FAILURE TO PROVIDE SUPPORT SERVICES, OR OTHERWISE UNDER OR IN CONNECTION WITH ANY PROVISION OF THIS EULA, EVEN IN THE EVENT OF THE FAULT, TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE), STRICT LIABILITY, BREACH OF CONTRACT OR BREACH OF WARRANTY OF MICROSOFT OR ANY SUPPLIER, AND EVEN IF MICROSOFT OR ANY SUPPLIER HAS BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES.

    12. LIMITATION OF LIABILITY AND REMEDIES. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY DAMAGES THAT YOU MIGHT INCUR FOR ANY REASON WHATSOEVER (INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, ALL DAMAGES REFERENCED ABOVE AND ALL DIRECT OR GENERAL DAMAGES), THE ENTIRE LIABILITY OF MICROSOFT AND ANY OF ITS SUPPLIERS UNDER ANY PROVISION OF THIS EULA AND YOUR EXCLUSIVE REMEDY FOR ALL OF THE FOREGOING (EXCEPT FOR ANY REMEDY OF REPAIR OR REPLACEMENT ELECTED BY MICROSOFT WITH RESPECT TO ANY BREACH OF THE LIMITED WARRANTY) SHAL BE LIMITED TO THE GREATER OF THE AMOUNT ACTUALLY PAID BY YOU FOR THE SOFTWARE OR U.S. $5.00. THE FOREGOING LIMITATIONS, EXCLUSIONS AND DISCLAIMERS (INCLUDING SECTIONS 7, 8, AND 9 ABOVE) SHALL APPLY TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT PERMITTED BY APPLICABLE LAW, EVEN IF ANY REMEDY FAILS ITS ESSENTIAL PURPOSE.

    13. ENTIRE AGREEMENT. This EULA (including any addendum or amendment to this EULA which is included with the Software Product) is the entire agreement between you and Microsoft relating to the Software Product and the support services (if any) and they supersede all prior or contemporaneous oral or written communications, proposals and representations with respect to the Software Product or any other subject matter covered by this EULA. To the extent the terms of any Microsoft policies or programs for support services conflict with the terms of this EULA, the terms of this EULA shall control.

    Si vous avez acquis votre produit Microsoft au CANADA, la garantie limitée suivante vous concerne :

    GARANTIE LIMITÉE

    Microsoft garantit que le Produit fonctionnera conformément aux documents inclus pendant une période de 90 jours suivant la date de réception.

    Si une garantie ou condition implicite est créée par votre État ou votre territoire et qu'une loi fédérale ou provinciale ou État en interdit le déni, vous jouissez également d'une garantie ou condition implicite, MAIS UNIQUEMENT POUR LES DÉFAUTS DÉCOUVERTS DURANT LA PÉRIODE DE LA PRÉSENTE GARANTIE LIMITÉE (QUATRE-VINGT-DIX JOURS). IL N'Y A AUCUNE GARANTIE OU CONDITION DE QUELQUE NATURE QUE CE SOIT QUANT AUX DÉFAUTS DÉCOUVERTS APRÈS CETTE PÉRIODE DE QUATRE-VINGT-DIX JOURS. Certains États ou territoires ne permettent pas de limiter la durée d'une garantie ou condition implicite de sorte que la limitation cidessus peut ne pas s'appliquer à vous.

    Tous les suppléments ou toutes les mises à jour relatifs au Produit, notamment, les ensembles de services ou les réparations à chaud (le cas échéant) qui vous sont fournis après l'expiration de la période de quatre-vingt-dix jours de la garantie limitée ne sont pas couverts par quelque garantie ou condition que ce soit, expresse ou implicite.

    LIMITATION DES RECOURS; ABSENCE DE DOMMAGES INDIRECTS OU AUTRES. Votre recours exclusif pour toute violation de la présente garantie limitée est décrit ciaprès. Sauf pour tout remboursement au choix de Microsoft, si le Produit ne respecte pas la garantie limitée de Microsoft et, dans la mesure maximale permise par les lois applicables, même si tout recours n'atteint pas son but essentiel, VOUS N'AVEZ DROIT À AUCUNS DOMMAGES, NOTAMMENT DES DOMMAGES INDIRECTS. Les modalités de la clause Exclusion des dommages accessoires, indirects et de certains autres dommages sont également intégrées à la présente garantie limitée. Certains États ou territoires ne permettent pas l'exclusion ou la limitation des dommages indirects ou accessoires de sorte que la limitation ou l'exclusion cidessus peut ne pas s'appliquer à vous. La présente garantie limitée vous donne des droits légaux spécifiques. Vous pouvez avoir d'autres droits qui peuvent varier d'un territoire ou d'un État à un autre. VOTRE RECOURS EXCLUSIF. L'obligation intégrale de Microsoft et de ses fournisseurs et votre recours exclusif seront, selon le choix de Microsoft de temps à autre sous réserve de toute loi applicable, a) le remboursement du prix payé, le cas échéant, pour le Produit ou b) la réparation ou le remplacement du Produit qui ne respecte pas la présente garantie limitée et qui est retourné à Microsoft avec une copie de votre reçu. Vous recevrez la compensation choisie par Microsoft, sans frais, sauf que vous êtes responsable des dépenses que vous pourriez engager (p. ex., les frais d'envoi du Produit à Microsoft). La présente garantie limitée est nulle si la défectuosité du Produit est causée par un accident, un usage abusif, une mauvaise application, un usage anormal ou un virus. Tout Produit de remplacement sera garanti pour le reste de la période de garantie initiale ou pendant trente (30) jours, selon la plus longue entre ces deux périodes. À l'extérieur des États-Unis ou du Canada, ces recours ou l'un quelconque des services de soutien technique offerts par Microsoft ne sont pas disponibles sans preuve d'achat d'une source internationale autorisée. Pour exercer votre recours, vous devez communiquer avec Microsoft et vous adresser au Microsoft Sales Information Center/One Microsoft Way/Redmond, WA 98052-6399, ou à la filiale de Microsoft de votre pays.

    DÉNI DE GARANTIES. La garantie limitée mentionnée ci-dessus constitue la seule garantie expresse qui vous est donnée et remplace toutes autres garanties expresses (s'il en est) mentionnées dans un document ou sur un emballage. Sauf en ce qui a trait à la garantie limitée et dans la mesure maximale permise par les lois applicables, le Produit et les services de soutien technique (le cas échéant) sont fournis TELS QUELS ET AVEC TOUS LES DÉFAUTS par Microsoft et ses fournisseurs, lesquels par les présentes dénient toutes autres garanties et conditions expresses, implicites ou en vertu de la loi, notamment (le cas échéant) les garanties, devoirs ou conditions implicites de qualité marchande, d'adaptation à un usage particulier, d'exactitude ou d'exhaustivité des réponses, des résultats, des efforts déployés selon les règles de l'art, d'absence de virus et de négligence, le tout à l'égard du Produit et de la prestation des services de soutien technique ou de l'omission d'une telle prestation. PAR AILLEURS, IL N'Y A AUCUNE GARANTIE OU CONDITION QUANT AU TITRE DE PROPRIÉTÉ, À LA JOUISSANCE OU LA POSSESSION PAISIBLE, À LA CONCORDANCE À UNE DESCRIPTION NI QUANT À UNE ABSENCE DE CONTREFAÇON CONCERNANT LE PRODUIT.

    EXCLUSION DES DOMMAGES ACCESSOIRES, INDIRECTS ET DE CERTAINS AUTRES DOMMAGES. DANS LA MESURE MAXIMALE PERMISE PAR LES LOIS APPLICABLES, EN AUCUN CAS MICROSOFT OU SES FOURNISSEURS NE SERONT RESPONSABLES DES DOMMAGES SPÉCIAUX, CONSÉCUTIFS, ACCESSOIRES OU INDIRECTS DE QUELQUE NATURE QUE CE SOIT (NOTAMMENT, LES DOMMAGES À L'ÉGARD DU MANQUE À GAGNER OU DE LA DIVULGATION DE RENSEIGNEMENTS CONFIDENTIELS OU AUTRES, DE LA PERTE D'EXPLOITATION, DE BLESSURES CORPORELLES, DE LA VIOLATION DE LA VIE PRIVÉE, DE L'OMISSION DE REMPLIR TOUT DEVOIR, Y COMPRIS D'AGIR DE BONNE FOI OU D'EXERCER UN SOIN RAISONNABLE, DE LA NÉGLIGENCE ET DE TOUTE AUTRE PERTE PÉCUNIAIRE OU AUTRE PERTE DE QUELQUE NATURE QUE CE SOIT) SE RAPPORTANT DE QUELQUE MANIÈRE QUE CE SOIT À L'UTILISATION DU PRODUIT OU À L'INCAPACITÉ DE S'EN SERVIR, À LA PRESTATION OU À L'OMISSION D'UNE TELLE PRESTATION DE SERVICES DE SOUTIEN TECHNIQUE OU AUTREMENT AUX TERMES DE TOUTE DISPOSITION DU PRÉSENT EULA OU RELATIVEMENT À UNE TELLE DISPOSITION, MÊME EN CAS DE FAUTE, DE DÉLIT CIVIL (Y COMPRIS LA NÉGLIGENCE), DE RESPONSABILITÉ STRICTE, DE VIOLATION DE CONTRAT OU DE VIOLATION DE GARANTIE DE MICROSOFT OU DE TOUT FOURNISSEUR ET MÊME SI MICROSOFT OU TOUT FOURNISSEUR A ÉTÉ AVISÉ DE LA POSSIBILITÉ DE TELS DOMMAGES.

    LIMITATION DE RESPONSABILITÉ ET RECOURS. Malgré les dommages que vous puissiez subir pour quelque motif que ce soit (notamment, tous les dommages susmentionnés et tous les dommages directs ou généraux), l'obligation intégrale de Microsoft et de l'un ou l'autre de ses fournisseurs aux termes de toute disposition du présent EULA et votre recours exclusif à l'égard de tout ce qui précède (sauf en ce qui concerne tout recours de réparation ou de remplacement choisi par Microsoft à l'égard de tout manquement à la garantie limitée) se limite au plus élevé entre les montants suivants : le montant que vous avez réellement payé pour le Produit ou 5,00 $US. Les limites, exclusions et dénis qui précèdent (y compris les clauses ci-dessus), s'appliquent dans la mesure maximale permise par les lois applicables, même si tout recours n'atteint pas son but essentiel.

    La présente Convention est régie par les lois de la province d'Ontario, Canada. Chacune des parties à la présente reconnaît irrévocablement la compétence des tribunaux de la province d'Ontario et consent à instituer tout litige qui pourrait découler de la présente auprès des tribunaux situés dans le district judiciaire de York, province d'Ontario.

    Au cas où vous auriez des questions concernant cette licence ou que vous désiriez vous mettre en rapport avec Microsoft pour quelque raison que ce soit, veuillez contacter la succursale Microsoft desservant votre pays, dont l'adresse est fournie dans ce produit, ou écrivez à : Microsoft Sales Information Center, One Microsoft Way, Redmond, Washington 98052-6399.

  95. RE:MS and Frontpage by wyverns · · Score: 1

    Hmm, but don't most people that are/post material against Microsoft use Notepad or better yet, pico? :)

    -Wyverns

  96. MS Outlook/IE by nick357 · · Score: 1

    The latest beta version of outlook that I am beta testing automatically disconnects from any web sites that Microsoft has ranked as unfai

  97. Get the state to pass a law by browser_war_pow · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Get your state to pass a law voiding such contracts. Microsoft relies on contract law, a state legal system. If the state code says: "The liberties established in the US Constitution shall apply in all contractual relationships; no party shall abridge or void these rights. Any contract which does the preceding shall be invalid. In the event of intellectual property contracts violating this statute, the intellectual property shall be covered under the sections of the state code regarding sale of non-intellectual property to consumers and the property shall be regarded as a physical commodity bought and sold rather than a good licensed or leased." then there is nothing MSFT can do about it.

    1. Re:Get the state to pass a law by Zordok · · Score: 1

      Sure there is something MS can do about it:

      Give the state and/or state legislators enough money to convince them to not pass such a law.

    2. Re:Get the state to pass a law by scrytch · · Score: 2

      There doesn't need to be any such law any more than there needs to be a law saying the law must be obeyed. The constitution by definition trumps contract law ... hell, just plain federal law does, as can be seen by many contracts that were modified when they were found to be discriminatory (such as affirmative-action influenced public works contracts). However, invalidating sections of a contract still doesn't invalidate the whole thing.

      --
      I've finally had it: until slashdot gets article moderation, I am not coming back.
    3. Re:Get the state to pass a law by jonnythan · · Score: 2

      The Constitution enumerates the powers of the government. The Bill of Rights lists things the _government_ cannot do. It has nothing to do with corporations. The government can't prohibit you from free speech on the land it owns, but any entity can prohibit you from free speech on the land _it_ owns.

    4. Re:Get the state to pass a law by Bastian · · Score: 2

      I'm not so sure that's a good thing. . .
      IANAL, but to me, it would seem that it would make it illegal to have employees sign non-disclosure agreements which, though they have been used for purposes I don't like (think: 80586 & probe mode), I can also see where it may be useful. If companies can't keep their employees from releasing trade secrets, they might be less inclined to develop new technologies. Same for other contracts ensuring peoples' privacy.

  98. Re:This relates only to Front Page SERVER COMPONEN by sulli · · Score: 1

    So what? It's still stupid.

    --

    sulli
    RTFJ.
  99. Slavery... by Da+VinMan · · Score: 1

    And to that end, the best way to get profits is to enslave, as much as possible anyone who can contribute to your bottom line. People can be flighty and unpredictable, and that's our nature. We don't always do the same thing time after time because the best course of action is usually a patchwork of compromises and actions that best benefit us in our current situation. Organizations that seek consistent results (not just corporations) have to homogenize the environment in order to reduce their risk factors and facilitate easy growth. Once they do that, they expand. Once they've expanded, they control. And once they start to control.. they tell you who to associate with, what your goals are, where to be, when to do tasks, and how to live.

    In ceding your personal power to an organization, you'll be giving them some level of control. It's inevitable then that you become secondary to the system and be controlled by it.

    Note that this isn't always a bad thing, but a balance must exist.

    --
    Please mod this post only if you think others should/n't read this. I have enough ego^H^H^Hkarma. Thanks!
  100. Pure BS, here's the EULA by duplicate-nickname · · Score: 1

    There ain't nothing in there....
    -----------
    END USER LICENSE AGREEMENT FOR MICROSOFT SOFTWARE.
    IMPORTANT-READ CAREFULLY: This Microsoft End-User License Agreement ("EULA") is a legal agreement between you (either an individual person or a single legal entity, who will be referred to in this EULA as "You") and Microsoft Corporation for the Microsoft software product that accompanies this EULA, including any associated media, printed materials and electronic documentation (the "Software Product"). The Software Product also includes any software updates, add-on components, web services and/or supplements that Microsoft may provide to You or make available to You after the date You obtain Your initial copy of the Software Product to the extent that such items are not accompanied by a separate license agreement or terms of use. By installing, copying, downloading, accessing or otherwise using the Software Product, You agree to be bound by the terms of this EULA. If You do not agree to the terms of this EULA, do not install, access or use the Software Product; instead, You should return it to Your place of purchase for a full refund.
    SOFTWARE PRODUCT LICENSE
    The Software Product is protected by intellectual property laws and treaties. The Software Product is licensed, not sold.
    1. GRANT OF LICENSE. This Section of the EULA describes Your general rights to install and use the Software Product The license rights described in this Section are subject to all other terms and conditions of this EULA.
    General License Grant to Install and Use Software Product. You may install and use one copy of the Software Product on a single computer, device, workstation, terminal, or other digital electronic or analog device ("Device"). You may make a second copy of the Software Product and install it on a portable Device for the exclusive use of the person who is the primary user of the first copy of the Software Product. A license for the Software Product may not be shared.
    Alternative License Grant for Storage/Network Use. As an alternative to the rights granted in the previous section, You may install a copy of the Software Product on one storage Device, such as a network server, and allow individuals within Your business or enterprise to access and use the Software Product from other Devices over a private network, provided that You acquire and dedicate a license for the storage Device upon which the Software Product is installed and each separate Device from which the Software Product is accessed and used. A license for the Software Product may not be used concurrently on different Devices.
    General License Grant to Install and Use Subscription Product. The following licensing terms apply to You instead of the license grants in the previous two paragraphs if You licensed a subscription-based Software Product (a "Subscription Product"). You may install one copy of the Subscription Product on a single Device and use the Subscription Product for the term of Your subscription. You may also exercise the additional license rights described in the paragraphs below, but only for the term of Your subscription. The initial subscription period begins on the date You first activate Your copy of the Subscription Product and ends three hundred and sixty five (365) days thereafter. You cannot use the Subscription Product after Your subscription expires unless You renew or extend Your subscription. By renewing or extending Your subscription, You will be entitled to continue using the Subscription Product for a specified period of time beyond the date when Your previous subscription would have otherwise ended. All the terms and conditions of this EULA will continue to apply to Your use of the Subscription Product during any subsequent renewal periods unless otherwise specified. After the expiration of Your subscription, You can continue to open, view and print any documents You created with the Subscription Product.
    Additional License Grant for Media Elements. The Software Product may include certain photographs, clip art, animations, sounds, music and video clips (together "Media Elements"). If so, the following terms describe Your rights to the Media Elements:
    o Except as specified in the next Section, You may use, copy and modify the Media Elements and distribute copies of the Media Elements, along with Your modifications, as part of Your software product(s) and service(s), including Your web site(s).
    o You are not licensed to do any of the following:
    o You may not sell, license or distribute copies of the Media Elements on a stand-alone basis or as part of any collection, product or service where the primary value of the product or service are the Media Elements.
    o You may not use or distribute any of the Media Elements that include representations of identifiable individuals, governments, logos, initials, emblems, trademarks, or entities for any commercial purposes or to express or imply any endorsement or association with any product, service, entity, or activity.
    o You may not create obscene or scandalous works, as defined by federal law at the time the work is created, using the Media Elements.
    o You must indemnify, hold harmless, and defend Microsoft from and against any claims or lawsuits, including attorneys' fees, that arise from or result from the use or distribution of Media Elements as modified by You.
    o You must include a valid copyright notice on Your products and services that include copies of the Media Elements.
    o You may not permit third parties to distribute copies of the Media Elements except as part of Your product or service.
    Additional License Grant for SharePoint Team Services. The Software Product may contain a copy of the Sharepoint Team Services. If so, You may install one copy of such software on one Device and allow an unlimited number of individuals within Your business or enterprise to access and use the Sharepoint Team Services from other Devices provided that You acquire and dedicate a license to the Software Product for the Device upon which the Sharepoint Team Services are installed.
    Reservation of Rights. All rights not expressly granted are reserved by Microsoft.
    2. DESCRIPTION OF OTHER RIGHTS AND LIMITATIONS.
    Academic Edition Software. If the Software Product is identified as "Academic Edition" or "AE," You must be a "Qualified Educational User" to use the Software Product. If You are not a Qualified Educational User, You have no rights under this EULA. To determine whether You are a Qualified Educational User, please contact the Microsoft Sales Information Center/One Microsoft Way/Redmond, WA 98052-6399 or the Microsoft subsidiary serving Your country.
    Mandatory Activation. You may not be able to exercise Your rights to the Software Product under this EULA after a finite number of product launches unless You activate Your copy of the Software Product in the manner described during the launch sequence.
    Copy Protection. The Software Product may include copy protection technology to prevent the unauthorized copying of the Software Product or may require original media for use of the Software Product on the Device. It is illegal to make unauthorized copies of the Software Product or to circumvent any copy protection technology included in the Software Product.
    Not for Resale Software. If the Software Product is labeled "Not For Resale" or "NFR," then, notwithstanding other sections of this EULA, Your use of the Software Product is limited to use for demonstration, test, or evaluation purposes and You may not resell, or otherwise transfer for value, the Software Product.
    Limitations on Reverse Engineering, Decompilation, and Disassembly. You may not reverse engineer, decompile, or disassemble the Software Product, except and only to the extent that such activity is expressly permitted by applicable law notwithstanding this limitation.
    Separation of Component Parts. The Software Product is licensed as a single product. Its component parts may not be separated for use on more than one Device unless expressly permitted by this EULA.
    Trademarks. This EULA does not grant You any rights in connection with any trademarks or service marks of Microsoft.
    No rental, leasing or commercial hosting. You may not rent, lease, lend or provide commercial hosting services to third parties with the Software Product.
    Support Services. Microsoft may provide You with support services related to the Software Product ("Support Services"). Use of Support Services is governed by the Microsoft policies and programs described in the user manual, in "online" documentation, or in other Microsoft-provided materials. Any supplemental software code provided to You as part of the Support Services are considered part of the Software Product and subject to the terms and conditions of this EULA. You acknowledge and agree that Microsoft may use technical information You provide to Microsoft as part of the Support Services for its business purposes, including for product support and development. Microsoft will not utilize such technical information in a form that personally identifies You.
    Software Transfer. Except as specified in this Section, the initial licensee of the Software Product may make a one-time permanent transfer of this EULA and Software Product only directly to an end user. This transfer must include all of the Software Product (including all component parts, the media and printed materials, any upgrades, this EULA, and, if applicable, the Certificate of Authenticity). Such transfer may not be by way of consignment or any other indirect transfer. The transferee of such one-time transfer must agree to comply with the terms of this EULA, including the obligation not to further transfer this EULA and Software Product. Subscription Products are non-transferable.
    Termination. Without prejudice to any other rights, Microsoft may terminate this EULA if You fail to comply with the terms and conditions of this EULA. In such event, You must destroy all copies of the Software Product and all of its component parts.
    3. UPGRADES.
    Standard Software Product. If the Software Product is labeled as an upgrade, You must be properly licensed to use a product identified by Microsoft as being eligible for the upgrade in order to use the Software Product. A Software Product labeled as an upgrade replaces or supplements (and may disable) the product that formed the basis for Your eligibility for the upgrade. You may use the resulting upgraded product only in accordance with the terms of this EULA. If the Software Product is an upgrade of a component of a package of software programs that You licensed as a single product, the Software Product may be used and transferred only as part of that single product package and may not be separated for use on more than one Device.
    Subscription Based Software Product. The following terms apply to You instead of the terms in the previous paragraph if You licensed a Subscription Product. If Microsoft releases any upgrades or new versions of the Subscription Product during the term of Your subscription, You will be entitled to receive a copy of such upgrade(s) or new version(s) at no additional cost, except for any applicable connection charges, taxes, duties and shipping costs if You select fulfillment by mail. Such upgrades shall be considered part of the Subscription Product and subject to all of the terms and conditions of this EULA unless otherwise indicated in any license agreement that accompanies such upgrade or new version.
    4. INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS. All title and intellectual property rights in and to the Software Product (including but not limited to any images, photographs, animations, video, audio, music, text, and "applets" incorporated into the Software Product), the accompanying printed materials, and any copies of the Software Product are owned by Microsoft or its suppliers. All title and intellectual property rights in and to the content that is not contained in the Software Product, but may be accessed through use of the Software Product, is the property of the respective content owners and may be protected by applicable copyright or other intellectual property laws and treaties. This EULA grants You no rights to use such content. If this Software Product contains documentation that is provided only in electronic form, you may print one copy of such electronic documentation. You may not copy the printed materials accompanying the Software Product.
    5. BACKUP COPY. After installation of one copy of the Software Product pursuant to this EULA, you may keep the original media on which the Software Product was provided by Microsoft solely for backup or archival purposes. If the original media is required to use the Software Product on the Device, you may make one copy of the Software Product solely for backup or archival purposes. Except as expressly provided in this EULA, you may not otherwise make copies of the Software Product or the printed materials accompanying the Software Product.
    6. U.S. GOVERNMENT LICENSE RIGHTS. All Software Product provided to the U.S. Government pursuant to solicitations issued on or after December 1, 1995 is provided with the commercial license rights and restrictions described elsewhere herein. All Software Product provided to the U.S. Government pursuant to solicitations issued prior to December 1, 1995 is provided with RESTRICTED RIGHTS as provided for in FAR, 48 CFR 52.227-14 (JUNE 1987) or DFAR, 48 CFR 252.227-7013 (OCT 1988), as applicable.
    7. EXPORT RESTRICTIONS. You acknowledge that the Software Product is of U.S. origin. You agree to comply with all applicable international and national laws that apply to the Software Product, including the U.S. Export Administration Regulations, as well as end-user, end-use and destination restrictions issued by U.S. and other governments. For additional information, see http://www.microsoft.com/exporting/.
    8. APPLICABLE LAW.
    If you acquired this Software Product in the United States, this EULA is governed by the laws of the State of Washington.
    If you acquired this Software Product in Canada, unless expressly prohibited by local law, this EULA is governed by the laws in force in the Province of Ontario, Canada; and, in respect of any dispute which may arise hereunder, you consent to the jurisdiction of the federal and provincial courts sitting in Toronto, Ontario. If this Software Product was acquired outside the United States, then local law may apply.
    Should you have any questions concerning this EULA, or if you desire to contact Microsoft for any reason, please contact the Microsoft subsidiary serving your country, or write: Microsoft Sales Information Center/One Microsoft Way/Redmond, WA 98052-6399.
    9. LIMITED WARRANTY
    LIMITED WARRANTY FOR SOFTWARE PRODUCTS ACQUIRED IN THE US AND CANADA. Microsoft warrants that the SOFTWARE PRODUCT will perform substantially in accordance with the accompanying materials for a period of ninety (90) days from the date of receipt.
    If an implied warranty or condition is created by your state/jurisdiction and federal or state/provincial law prohibits disclaimer of it, you also have an implied warranty or condition, BUT ONLY AS TO DEFECTS DISCOVERED DURING THE PERIOD OF THIS LIMITED WARRANTY (NINETY DAYS). AS TO ANY DEFECTS DISCOVERED AFTER THE NINETY (90) DAY PERIOD, THERE IS NO WARRANTY OR CONDITION OF ANY KIND. Some states/jurisdictions do not allow limitations on how long an implied warranty or condition lasts, so the above limitation may not apply to you.
    Any supplements or updates to the SOFTWARE PRODUCT, including without limitation, any (if any) service packs or hot fixes provided to you after the expiration of the ninety (90) day Limited Warranty period are not covered by any warranty or condition, express, implied or statutory.
    LIMITATION ON REMEDIES; NO CONSEQUENTIAL OR OTHER DAMAGES. Your exclusive remedy for any breach of this Limited Warranty is as set forth below. Except for any refund elected by Microsoft, YOU ARE NOT ENTITLED TO ANY DAMAGES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES, if the Software Product does not meet Microsoft's Limited Warranty, and, to the maximum extent allowed by applicable law, even if any remedy fails of its essential purpose. The terms of Section 11 below ("Exclusion of Incidental, Consequential and Certain Other Damages") are also incorporated into this Limited Warranty. Some states/jurisdictions do not allow the exclusion or limitation of incidental or consequential damages, so the above limitation or exclusion may not apply to you. This Limited Warranty gives you specific legal rights. You may have others which vary from state/jurisdiction to state/jurisdiction.
    YOUR EXCLUSIVE REMEDY. Microsoft's and its suppliers' entire liability and your exclusive remedy shall be, at Microsoft's option from time to time exercised subject to applicable law, (a) return of the price paid (if any) for the Software Product, or (b) repair or replacement of the Software Product, that does not meet this Limited Warranty and that is returned to Microsoft with a copy of your receipt. You will receive the remedy elected by Microsoft without charge, except that you are responsible for any expenses you may incur (e.g. cost of shipping the Software Product to Microsoft). This Limited Warranty is void if failure of the Software Product has resulted from accident, abuse, misapplication, abnormal use or a virus. Any replacement Software Product will be warranted for the remainder of the original warranty period or thirty (30) days, whichever is longer. Outside the United States or Canada, neither these remedies nor any product support services offered by Microsoft are available without proof of purchase from an authorized international source. To exercise your remedy, contact: Microsoft, Attn. Microsoft Sales Information Center/One Microsoft Way/Redmond, WA 98052-6399, or the Microsoft subsidiary serving your country.
    LIMITED WARRANTY FOR SOFTWARE PRODUCTS ACQUIRED OUTSIDE THE US AND CANADA. FOR THE LIMITED WARRANTIES AND SPECIAL PROVISIONS PERTAINING TO YOUR PARTICULAR JURISDICTION, PLEASE REFER TO YOUR WARRANTY BOOKLET INCLUDED WITH THIS PACKAGE OR PROVIDED WITH THE SOFTWARE PRODUCT PRINTED MATERIALS.
    10. DISCLAIMER OF WARRANTIES. THE LIMITED WARRANTY THAT APPEARS ABOVE IS THE ONLY EXPRESS WARRANTY MADE TO YOU AND IS PROVIDED IN LIEU OF ANY OTHER EXPRESS WARRANTIES (IF ANY) CREATED BY ANY DOCUMENTATION OR PACKAGING. EXCEPT FOR THE LIMITED WARRANTY AND TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT PERMITTED BY APPLICABLE LAW, MICROSOFT AND ITS SUPPLIERS PROVIDE THE SOFTWARE AND SUPPORT SERVICES (IF ANY) AS IS AND WITH ALL FAULTS, AND HEREBY DISCLAIM ALL OTHER WARRANTIES AND CONDITIONS, EITHER EXPRESS, IMPLIED OR STATUTORY, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY (IF ANY) IMPLIED WARRANTIES, DUTIES OR CONDITIONS OF MERCHANTABILITY, OF FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, OF ACCURACY OR COMPLETENESS OR RESPONSES, OF RESULTS, OF WORKMANLIKE EFFORT, OF LACK OF VIRUSES AND OF LACK OF NEGLIGENCE, ALL WITH REGARD TO THE SOFTWARE, AND THE PROVISION OF OR FAILURE TO PROVIDE SUPPORT SERVICES. ALSO, THERE IS NO WARRANTY OR CONDITION OF TITLE, QUIET ENJOYMENT, QUIET POSSESSION, CORRESPONDENCE TO DESCRIPTION OR NON-INFRINGEMENT WITH REGARD TO THE SOFTWARE.
    11. EXCLUSION OF INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL AND CERTAIN OTHER DAMAGES. TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT PERMITTED BY APPLICABLE LAW, IN NO EVENT SHALL MICROSOFT OR ITS SUPPLIERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, INDIRECT, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES WHATSOEVER (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF PROFITS OR CONFIDENTIAL OR OTHER INFORMATION, FOR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION, FOR PERSONAL INJURY, FOR LOSS OF PRIVACY, FOR FAILURE TO MEET ANY DUTY INCLUDING OF GOOD FAITH OR OF REASONABLE CARE, FOR NEGLIGENCE, AND FOR ANY OTHER PECUNIARY OR OTHER LOSS WHATSOEVER) ARISING OUT OF OR IN ANY WAY RELATED TO THE USE OF OR INABILITY TO USE THE SOFTWARE PRODUCT, THE PROVISION OF OR FAILURE TO PROVIDE SUPPORT SERVICES, OR OTHERWISE UNDER OR IN CONNECTION WITH ANY PROVISION OF THIS EULA, EVEN IN THE EVENT OF THE FAULT, TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE), STRICT LIABILITY, BREACH OF CONTRACT OR BREACH OF WARRANTY OF MICROSOFT OR ANY SUPPLIER, AND EVEN IF MICROSOFT OR ANY SUPPLIER HAS BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES.
    12. LIMITATION OF LIABILITY AND REMEDIES. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY DAMAGES THAT YOU MIGHT INCUR FOR ANY REASON WHATSOEVER (INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, ALL DAMAGES REFERENCED ABOVE AND ALL DIRECT OR GENERAL DAMAGES), THE ENTIRE LIABILITY OF MICROSOFT AND ANY OF ITS SUPPLIERS UNDER ANY PROVISION OF THIS EULA AND YOUR EXCLUSIVE REMEDY FOR ALL OF THE FOREGOING (EXCEPT FOR ANY REMEDY OF REPAIR OR REPLACEMENT ELECTED BY MICROSOFT WITH RESPECT TO ANY BREACH OF THE LIMITED WARRANTY) SHAL BE LIMITED TO THE GREATER OF THE AMOUNT ACTUALLY PAID BY YOU FOR THE SOFTWARE OR U.S. $5.00. THE FOREGOING LIMITATIONS, EXCLUSIONS AND DISCLAIMERS (INCLUDING SECTIONS 7, 8, AND 9 ABOVE) SHALL APPLY TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT PERMITTED BY APPLICABLE LAW, EVEN IF ANY REMEDY FAILS ITS ESSENTIAL PURPOSE.
    13. ENTIRE AGREEMENT. This EULA (including any addendum or amendment to this EULA which is included with the Software Product) is the entire agreement between you and Microsoft relating to the Software Product and the support services (if any) and they supersede all prior or contemporaneous oral or written communications, proposals and representations with respect to the Software Product or any other subject matter covered by this EULA. To the extent the terms of any Microsoft policies or programs for support services conflict with the terms of this EULA, the terms of this EULA shall control.

    --

    ÕÕ

  101. Shhhh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ix-nay on the inances-fay. He's a Democrat and can therefore get away with all of that nonsense.

    And don't mention the Occidental Oil holdings or the Chinese influence selling, it might scare voters away from the "good guys."

    1. Re:Shhhh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      or that the DMCA was passed by Clinton/Gore

    2. Re:Shhhh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bzzt. Was *passed* by both parties in both houses of Congress by acclamation, then was *signed* by Clinton. Learn how the fucking US government works before commenting, dumbfuck.

      Hmmm... Given the DMCA, "passed" is a pretty good word for it.

  102. Re:This relates only to Front Page SERVER COMPONEN by iceT · · Score: 2


    Oh, well, that's OK then.

    !?!?!?!?!!

    --
    -- You can't idiot-proof anything, because they're always coming out with better idiots.
  103. Re:This relates only to Front Page SERVER COMPONEN by GypC · · Score: 2

    I don't know if you've noticed, but there is a huge number of network administrators and PHBs who will run all Microsoft shops no matter what happens... I work in such a shop. It is downright sickening.

  104. What's most interesting to me... by KupekKupoppo · · Score: 1

    ...is that this just was realized. It shows how effective those EULAs are, if nobody actually read it and raised a red flag upon seeing that.

    -k.

  105. oh well why didn't you say so! by ebbv · · Score: 1


    that makes it all better!! of course that seems like a perfectly reasonable and non-predatory thing to do.

    jackass.
    ...dave

    --

    Think different? I'd be happy if most people would just think...
  106. Slashdot: Print a Retraction/Correction by owillis · · Score: 1

    Read this comment. Realize that you are as guilty in this instance of the FUD you accuse MS of. Do the right thing and ammend/correct the story.

    --
    OliverWillis.Com
    An Operative with an Agenda
  107. Quote by dso · · Score: 1

    It's a very old quote from the Inuit in Canada and Alaska. I've heard other adaptations of it but this source is the original.

    1. Re:Quote by TyFoN · · Score: 1
      In an old norse poem you have a verse which sais:
      Uklok mann
      mellom andre folk,
      for ham er det tryggest og tie;
      ingen vet
      at han ingenting kan
      holder han tungen i tømme

      Roughly translated it means:
      Unwise man between other people, for him it's safest to keep silent;
      noone knows that he does not know anything if he can heep his mouth shut. (Thungue in check).

      There are a lot of old stuff like that written all over the world. It's still very applicable :)

  108. Give it a rest by GruffDavies · · Score: 1

    How many businesses are going to bring out a product and happily let you use it to slag them off? I don't see anything strange in what MS have done here. This is just mindless anti-Microsoft banality again.

    1. Re:Give it a rest by Luminous · · Score: 2

      Boy, you've missed the boat. Does Ford make me sign an agreement that I won't put anti-Ford bumper stickers on the truck I just bought from them?

      If Microsoft was so concerned about what their product was used for, then why don't they have provisions against using it to create porn or warez sites? Nope, clearly some MS exec bristled at the idea of an MS product being used to slam MS. Now, I can't wait until I write up my draft copy of how much this license agreement sucks using MS-Word before they tell me what I can and cannot say using that program.

      --
      This is not the way to build a lasting empire.
    2. Re:Give it a rest by BinaryAlchemy · · Score: 1

      As stated above in rodbegbie's posting of the ULA for the sever side components, It does say you can't use them in a porn or wares site ...violate any state, federal or international law(no Warez), or promote racism, hatred, or pornography.(no porn too)

      --
      ----- The problem with browsing at +5 is that everyone thinks you're being redundant
  109. Not going to work tomorrow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Why? My boss asked that when I told him about my intentions. My reply: "I don't feel like coming to work tomorrow."

    Instead I thought about getting really pissed tonight and vomit all over my apartment.

  110. Re:Someone needs to test this! NOT by ReelOddeeo · · Score: 3, Insightful

    What will testing it accomplish?

    Either the court will throw it out or uphold it. Examine each possibility for a moment.

    What is the end result? Even if this licensing provision is thrown out, an MS critic (or several) have spent millions of dollars and their time in litigation. An ingenious way to drain resources from your enemy. [The Borg weapon seems to be designed merely to drain the shields.]

    OTOH, if the licensing is upheld, it may mean that copyright law needs to be modified to include features that recognize licenses like this.

    --

    Those who would give up liberty in exchange for security and DRM should switch to Microsoft Palladium!
  111. Nyah! by Da+VinMan · · Score: 1

    It just means we will write what we want about Microsoft using FrontPage or any other tool we wish anyway. They come to your door complaining you used FrontPage to disparage them (how *ARE* they going to know anyway unless you leave in their crappy custom META tags?), then tell them to F*CK OFF!

    Come on people, get a grip.

    Too many people have died in the defense of our liberties to give companies like Microsoft the time of day on crap like this. What the hell are they thinking anyway?!

    Oh, and before someone ever so smartly points out that Microsoft is a private organization and can do whatever they like in a EULA because it's a contract, think twice. Think about it, why should Microsoft get to control the discourse of the common man when the government (for the most part) can not?

    Are we saying that Microsoft is a special large organization that should have *MORE* power than the government?

    Who would die to defend Microsoft's right to do that???

    I didn't think so.

    --
    Please mod this post only if you think others should/n't read this. I have enough ego^H^H^Hkarma. Thanks!
    1. Re:Nyah! by epsalon · · Score: 1

      Any site using Microsoft Frontpage properitary junk tags has to have been made using FrontPage. Nobody in his right mind will put all that junk into his HTML.
      Microsoft should now scan the web for pages with FrontPage fingerprint and refrence them negatively. They could write a spider to search for these kind of sites...

    2. Re:Nyah! by ebh · · Score: 2
      Are we saying that Microsoft is a special large organization that should have *MORE* power than the government?

      Depends on what you mean by "more". If you're asking whether corporations should be above the law, then no. If you're asking whether corporations should have broader powers over their day-to-day operations than governments have over them, then yes. Otherwise all the corporate intervention in our lives (like repressive EULAs) will be replaced by equally repressive government intrusion, with the big difference that under corporations you can vote with your feet more easily than you can with governments.

      --
      All your Qa'eda are belong to US.

    3. Re:Nyah! by AndrewHowe · · Score: 2

      What have your liberties got to do with this issue? Absolutely nothing! None of your liberties, assured by your Constitution or otherwise, have been taken away. You have the right to free speech, but you never had the right to use Microsoft software. They allow you to use it, at their own discretion.
      And before you protest, consider that the GPL does exactly the same thing. It's conditional. You don't agree with the license, you don't use the source code. I don't agree with the GPL, so I don't involve myself with GPL'd source.

    4. Re:Nyah! by jcrowe · · Score: 1

      Microsoft EULA:
      Agree that you have no rights.

      GPL:
      Agree that you will not take away the rights of others.

      Wait.... you're right it's the same thing.

    5. Re:Nyah! by AndrewHowe · · Score: 2

      The thing that you're agreeing to is irrelevant to my point. So yes, it's the same thing. You agree to the license or you don't. If you agree to it, you agree to be bound by its terms. If this were not the case, then the GPL would be worthless (and I will resist the obvious cheap shot, because I'm trying to make a point about agreements in general).

    6. Re:Nyah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll step up to the plate to take that obvious cheap shot:

      AndrewHowe is a cum-sucking gutter whore.

  112. Lawsuit by supabeast! · · Score: 2

    This prompts a lawsuit that would probably fail, but would bring a huge amount of attention to the problematic liscences arising in the software industry, especially from Microsoft.

    We need to sue the US Government. A suit should be filed against the US Government for violating the first amendment by requiring government employees to use Microsoft software. Crazy, somewhat frivilous, and doomed to fail, but if the media would pick it up it might work out.

    Of course, no lawyer would be crazy enough to take the case, and I can't pay for one, but this could definately be a cool way to let the public realize what kind of thing comes up in those licenses that they do not read.

  113. Ok, so I promise not to use FrontPage then. by Dog+and+Pony · · Score: 1

    Darn it. I feel Sooo handicapped without it.

  114. Err... no. by strags · · Score: 1

    Slashdot doesn't censor.

    By browsing at +1 (or whatever), the reader is making a decision to ignore posts that (generally like-minded) reads have chosen to ignore. This is extraordinarily effective at filtering out annoying "first post" drivel.

    One might accuse moderators of modding down things they don't agree with, but if you look closely, there are many pro-MS posts that get modded up to +5 because they're intelligently written and raise good points that are worth thinking about. Remember that moderators aren't necessarily evil people - they're ordinary readers, just like you and me.

    Regardless of all this, however, there is still no censorship. Your post doesn't get deleted. Anyone who wants to read your post can do so by browsing at -1.

    1. Re:Err... no. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually some posts have been deleted from Slashdot. Usually, and reasonably, this has been attributed to database errors.

      Also, at least once that I know of, a comment has been deleted from an archived discussion.

      This is as well as the successful efforts of the Scientologists.

  115. Whew! by rnturn · · Score: 2
    ``And [sic] unfortunate clause that will prevent me from my long term plan of migrating Slashdot to Frontpage (cough).''

    God bless Microsoft for that, as that migration would surely be a sign that the End of Days were upon us.

    --
    CUR ALLOC 20195.....5804M
  116. Re:This relates only to Front Page SERVER COMPONEN by MMORG · · Score: 1
    Yes, exactly. And note that in the text of the license, it doesn't exclude only sites that disparage MS, but also sites that contain racist content, pornography, etc, etc.

    So why did MS include this restriction? So that elements that are visibly linked to Microsoft (the Frontpage logo, the MSNBC news ticker, etc) are not associated in reader's minds with content that Microsoft would rather not be associated with. Or to say it another way, MS doesn't want anyone to make the mistake of thinking that they actually endorse or support objectionable content.

    The license does NOT restrict in any way what you can publish with Frontpage! It merely restricts visible elements (server-side controls and such) from being associated with objectionable content. And that seems pretty reasonable to me.

    Do you suppose that CmdrTaco will update the headline to make it more accurate? Naw, this is Slashdot, MS-bashing is the #1 sport, accuracy be damned.

  117. Stallman releases GPL 3.0 by Bollie · · Score: 1

    In a similar move Richard M Stallman released the much improved newer version of the GNU Public License today. In order to use the wording of the license in existing software, several key requirements have to be met:

    Firstly, the author must be a staunch advocate of all things Open Source. The author must explain (in 100 words or more) why it is EVIL, insanitary and unhygienic to use any other option. Bonus marks are awarded for a comparison between Shared Souce and Shared Sores. (Ripped of shamelessly from User Friendly)

    Secondly, the author must not buy into commercial software whatsoever, since commercial software is like a virus which affects anything it touches, in the end, forcing all software to be commercial.

    Finally, the author must not use the term Linux for anything other than the kernel of the GNU/Linux operating system. Bonus marks are awarded if the author uses Hurd as an example of the ideal kernel.

    Mr. Linus Torvalds was not available for comment, but upon reading this press release, Mr. William Gates called in his top lawyers mumbling something about "copyright infringement" and "those bastards can't use my own words against me!".

    In related news, aliens have just been confirmed to ... ... ... ...

  118. hello! by sehryan · · Score: 1

    besides the obvious fact that it is speaking of components and not the editor itself, lets take into account how many anti-microsoft people are going to be using frontpage to make a webpage.

    i mean, the odds of that happening are about the same as a slashdot editor/user actually reading the article they are commenting on.

    --
    The world moves for love. It kneels before it in awe.
  119. How about IIS server components? by mblase · · Score: 2

    Will I soon be prohibited from posting anti-MS information on sites that use IIS? How about Web servers that use Windows? If they can put this into a license legally, can they also prevent me from using IE to post anti-MS speech or Outlook to e-mail it?

    No, seriously, The clause for those actions wouldn't have to be much different from this one, if you read how it's written.

  120. X-Factor? by flimflam · · Score: 2

    Hmmm... is that LinuX (with X-Windows), or is it Mac OS X? (I guess it couldn't be Windows XP)...

    --
    -- It only takes 20 minutes for a liberal to become a conservative thanks to our new outpatient surgical procedure!
    1. Re:X-Factor? by cyb0rq_m0nk3y · · Score: 1
      I thought they meant the comic from Marvel...

      --
      eat shit and die, Bambi!
  121. funny as hell by daanger0us · · Score: 1

    CmdrTaco,

    That was the funny as hell.

    Thank you,
    Daanger0us

    --
    Aliens? Magnetic Rings?! Bah! Who needs that when we have
  122. MS Shooting itself in the foot by FlightTest · · Score: 1


    You may not use the Software in connection with any site that disparages Microsoft, MSN, MSNBC, Expedia or their products or services, infringe any intellectual property or other rights of these parties, violate any state, federal or international law, or promote racism, hatred, or pornography.


    Wow, MS just told the largest segment of the web that they can't use MS software! If the porno servers all have to convert to Apache as a result of this, at least we'll be able to get porn when the next IIS virus comes along.

    --
    Merde, il pleut encore!
  123. Infighting at Microsoft Inc.? by Dr.Dubious+DDQ · · Score: 2

    My current theory is that Microsoft, as a whole, doesn't really push stuff like this. My theory is that it's SPECIFICALLY the software divisions that are desparately trying to justify their budgets to the corporation as a whole (who, from what I've heard, makes much more money as an investment bank than as a software company). As their software slowly dwindles from competition, they take more and more desperate measures to try to prop up their short-term income figures and continue their budgets and salaries.

    My optimistic prediction is that sometime in the future (I have no idea how many years this would take, but...) the software division will be scaled back quite a bit in Microsoft Inc as a whole, and poor Mr. Ballmer will have to dance for his wealth in a different context.

    Microsoft will likely stay wealthy and powerful, but no longer through client-side software at some point.

    My crackpot theory, anyway.

  124. Re:Is it just me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seems as though there was enough to make your post -1...

  125. Civil Rights Lawsuit? by Alien54 · · Score: 2
    We need a couple of anti Microsoft free speech sites built using front page, just so that we can have a class action suit against Microsoft for violation of our civil rights.

    Maybe we should just sue anyhow.

    And they wonder why people don't like them

    --
    "It is a greater offense to steal men's labor, than their clothes"
    1. Re:Civil Rights Lawsuit? by cavemanf16 · · Score: 2
      boycottxp.com probably fits the bill on what you're talking about.

      Seriously, since when are you allowed to rewrite the Constitution with rules defined in your contract? Wouldn't this make the EULA void and null anyways since it circumvents you're Constitutional rights? IANAL so I really don't know the legal standings there, but I think people will be able to quickly realize sites like boycottxp.com are not backed by Microcrap.

  126. Re:This relates only to Front Page SERVER COMPONEN by dangermouse · · Score: 1

    someone mod this up, please. voices of reason are handy, and should be kept around.

  127. Uh.. Excuse me, but.. by pedro · · Score: 1

    The First Amendment in this case has a viral, GPL-like quality.

    Who, do you think wrote the legislation that makes a corporation possible in the first place, hmmm?

    That's right.. CONGRESS!

    A court with its' head(s) screwed on correctly could obviate this license restriction in a heartbeat, as it IS unconstitutional.

    --
    Brak: What's THAT?
    Thundercleese: A light switch.. of TOTAL DEVASTATION!
  128. fool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the constitution protects you from the government. It does not protect you from someone other person or company telling you what you can/can't say.

  129. YEAH! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Damn straight! We want action, not words!

  130. What about other apps? by Asgard · · Score: 1

    So what happens when the next version of Word comes out with this clause (or equivalent) attached? If they can do it for on component, I see no reason they couldn't attach it to another. Imagine the level of control a corporation that controls a very significant portion of the desktop publishing market could exert. OR, what happens if the 'this license subject to change without notice' clause is added too -- they could retroacticely make it a breach of contract for anything written with their software.

  131. So what? by Mr_Silver · · Score: 2
    Okay, i'll stick my neck out here.

    So what? So what if it says you can't say nasty things about Microsoft? So what if it says that when you use it you have to utter a praise to Bill Gates before you start? So what if it says you must not use it to provide a platform for free software?

    Whenever someone bitches about the GPL and how it doesn't allow companies to take the code and use it in their own propriatory products they're almost deafened by the chant of people shouting "if you don't like the licence, don't use the code"

    Same here. Quite frankly I think they can pretty much put whatever they want in it (provided its legal). If I don't like what they want me to agree to, then i won't use it.

    --
    Avantslash - View Slashdot cleanly on your mobile phone.
  132. Future income for M$? by Garion911 · · Score: 1

    If this can hold up in court, imagine what they could do wth this... They could add other cluases like "can't use to create disparing remarks about the following companies: Microsoft, Sony, Ford,......."

    Sony, and others could pay M$ to add them to their clause.. Man.. that would be bad..

    --
    Slashdot is like Playboy: I read it for the articles
  133. Re:This relates only to Front Page SERVER COMPONEN by interiot · · Score: 3, Insightful

    What about community sites that allow user posting? If the admin doesn't wish to read every single post to be able to remove all disparaging remarks about Microsoft, then they can't use FrontPage Web components anywhere on that site?

  134. This is outragous by rayoumand · · Score: 1

    What happened to my freedom of speech? If i want to say that Microsoft Sucks, shouldn't I have the right to say so? This just shows how much of a monopoly microsoft has; they cearly are controlling what people have to say about them; this is total sensorship, and I'm extremely against it, and this comprimises what web publisher, have to say about Microsoft..... Anyone else that has the same opinion? Speak UP

    1. Re:This is outragous by cbwsdot · · Score: 1

      "What happened to my freedom of speech?"
      You lost it when you agreed to the license, obviously.

      If i want to say that Microsoft Sucks, shouldn't I have the right to say so?
      According to the terms of this agreement, apparently not.

      "This just shows how much of a monopoly microsoft has;"
      No, it does not. Other actions do that, such as denying people the right to compete.

      "they cearly are controlling what people have to say about them"
      If by "people", you mean the fools who agreed to the contract then, yes.

      The whole point is that you agree to this. (Assuming this article is accurate, I see posts already that deny the exsistance of this clause.)

      [OT]
      US citizen? Want to pick a fight worth fighting? Contact your government representatives, tell them your opinon on the DMCA, copyright law, software patents, crypto regulations.... I could go on...

  135. hmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Microsoft is harboring Terrorists

    These lawyers are in their base at Redmond.

  136. He was just joking! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Please do not file a bug report. Besides, he was using IE, not Konqueror. Egads.

    _doug_

    1. Re:He was just joking! by JabberWokky · · Score: 2
      And I was serious. I'm also serious when I tell you that if you lick the screen right now, it will taste like cake.

      Emoticons have dulled people's recognition of dry and/or subtle humor.

      --
      Evan

      --
      "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
    2. Re:He was just joking! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It tastes like chicken.

  137. MS doesn't care about us. by scott1853 · · Score: 2

    It's true, MS doesn't care about the slashdot community. They don't care about the people that know that what they do is wrong. Because we are not only a minority, but we don't spend that much (if anything) on MS software. We're basically nothing to MS's bottom line. So, sadly enough, complaining on Slashdot won't hurt them.

    You want to get back at MS? Make open source software better than MS's. Now when I say that I don't simply mean make it more secure or stable, which is what most oss zealots seem to hear. I mean, make it more secure & stable PLUS faster, more flexible, and have a nicer, easier to use interface. Security and stability alone will not win any battles. The latter are just as important, if not more important in the eyes of the average user.

  138. The obvious implication, of course . . . by hawk · · Score: 2

    >Yes, exactly. And note that in the text of the license, it doesn't
    >exclude only sites that disparage MS, but also sites that contain
    >racist content, pornography, etc, etc.


    is that microsoft is classifying itself in the same category as hate speech and pornography.


    o.b. gratutitious recursive acronym-like stuff: Does this mean that publishing this portion of the license violates the license???


    :)


    hawk

  139. I think it is fine... by spagma · · Score: 1

    I didn't agree to or pay for the license anyway.

    --
    If it won't boot, Fsck it!
  140. Re:This relates only to Front Page SERVER COMPONEN by jdbo · · Score: 1

    While this seems to be not _quite_ as vicious as if MS's license restricted usage of the entire software... think this through a bit more.

    These components (ticker, etc.) are dependent upon continual communication with MS's central servers - so the license's assumption is that because you are (in a very technical way) making yourself a "business" partner of MS by using these components, you must not badmouth your "business" partner while you make use of these components. This is "fair enough" at face value.

    Taking the long-term perspective, this approach to licensing is the direct result of the "software-as-a-service" model which MS is pushing all of their software towards.

    With that in mind, how long do you think it will be before MS begins to license _the entirety_ of their applications in this way? After all, they'll all be "services" provided by MS's central servers, requiring constant access to MS's servers, not to mentione authentication under MS's new licensing requirements.

    Now imagine that you're a reporter/lawyer (everyday Joe & not a Linux geek), and having your access to using your Windows desktop revoked becuase MS doesn't like a document you wrote up about them.

    This kind of licensing is the thin end of an infinitely wide wedge between everyday users and control over what they do with their computers.

  141. If you disparage M$ you can't use features you pai by sjonke · · Score: 1

    It's very, very silly that people are saying oh, it's OK because it's just components for the server. I.e. if you are a gung-ho-Microsoft-can do-no-wrong kind of person you get full use of the software you paid for, but if you even question Microsoft once on your web site you lose the right to use parts of the software you paid for?

    Here's the next step: Microsoft Word XP2: new clause in the license makes it such that if you ever write anything bad about Microsoft in a document created with Word XP2 you may no longer use the "Save component".

    --
    --- What?
  142. Have fun making this unenforcable! by Bonker · · Score: 2

    Heh, Gatesco's army of trained attack lawyers outta have fun scanning geocities and tripod anti-MS pages for 'generator = "MS Frontpage"' meta tags.

    BUT... we should remember data on the web is always mutable. I understand that there are Apache mods which will appened information to any document served, letting a free hosting provider 'add' banners to any given webpage for example. It wouldn't be any trick at all to add code to Apache or any other server software that would add the formentioned meta tag to every document served from a high-traffic site such as /.

    We all know that ever last bit of /. is generated on Linux, Taco. How 'bout giving the MSies something to froth about and have Apache or Slash add the tag?

    --
    The next Slashdot story will be ready soon, but subscribers can beat the rush and slashdot the links early!
  143. Nothing MS could do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sure, providing you ever managed to get that law passed...

    But MS has Deep Pockets. How many "campaign contributions" do you think it would take to kill anything remotely like this?

    Bah.

  144. Ms is again cutting their own throats by WyldOne · · Score: 1

    Consider this.

    Government Investigates MS for Monopolistic practices.

    They need put up results on WEB site

    Someone 'mentions' new licencing scheme to Gov.

    Concludes that calling MS a monopoly would put Gov in difficult position

    Gov finds it can't use MS Frontpage

    Gov goes to Linux

    MS looses massive amounts of money on Governement contracts.

    We laugh our asses off.

    --

    make Linux, not Microsoft. sin(beast) = -0.809016994374947424102293417182819
  145. Re:This relates only to Front Page SERVER COMPONEN by nhavar · · Score: 2

    The misinformed article is probably talking about either a specific componenent and content or about the logo program. I dislike reporters who report "a reader informed me" as FACT. If a reader informs you then research it and post it as fact and not as rumor. MS is just protecting it's rights of trademark and copyright, and while most people here don't agree that anyone should have those rights they do still exist. Note that there are laws that allow criticism and sarcasm about a company, person, government, or product. This allows for reviews and parody, which differ from disparagement. Disparage is primarily to lower in rank or character using words that cause harm or resentment. Therefore MS is attempting to reduce the number of people using it's logo/content/product to spread discontent about it's product.

    I don't see any harm done.

    The Frontpage 2002 EULA (in it's entirety):

    END USER LICENSE AGREEMENT FOR MICROSOFT SOFTWARE. IMPORTANT-READ CAREFULLY: This Microsoft End-User License Agreement ("EULA") is a legal agreement between you (either an individual person or a single legal entity, who will be referred to in this EULA as "You") and Microsoft Corporation for the Microsoft software product that accompanies this EULA, including any associated media, printed materials and electronic documentation (the "Software Product"). The Software Product also includes any software updates, add-on components, web services and/or supplements that Microsoft may provide to You or make available to You after the date You obtain Your initial copy of the Software Product to the extent that such items are not accompanied by a separate license agreement or terms of use. By installing, copying, downloading, accessing or otherwise using the Software Product, You agree to be bound by the terms of this EULA. If You do not agree to the terms of this EULA, do not install, access or use the Software Product; instead, You should return it to Your place of purchase for a full refund. SOFTWARE PRODUCT LICENSE The Software Product is protected by intellectual property laws and treaties. The Software Product is licensed, not sold. 1. GRANT OF LICENSE. This Section of the EULA describes Your general rights to install and use the Software Product The license rights described in this Section are subject to all other terms and conditions of this EULA. General License Grant to Install and Use Software Product. You may install and use one copy of the Software Product on a single computer, device, workstation, terminal, or other digital electronic or analog device ("Device"). You may make a second copy of the Software Product and install it on a portable Device for the exclusive use of the person who is the primary user of the first copy of the Software Product. A license for the Software Product may not be shared. Alternative License Grant for Storage/Network Use. As an alternative to the rights granted in the previous section, You may install a copy of the Software Product on one storage Device, such as a network server, and allow individuals within Your business or enterprise to access and use the Software Product from other Devices over a private network, provided that You acquire and dedicate a license for the storage Device upon which the Software Product is installed and each separate Device from which the Software Product is accessed and used. A license for the Software Product may not be used concurrently on different Devices. General License Grant to Install and Use Subscription Product. The following licensing terms apply to You instead of the license grants in the previous two paragraphs if You licensed a subscription-based Software Product (a "Subscription Product"). You may install one copy of the Subscription Product on a single Device and use the Subscription Product for the term of Your subscription. You may also exercise the additional license rights described in the paragraphs below, but only for the term of Your subscription. The initial subscription period begins on the date You first activate Your copy of the Subscription Product and ends three hundred and sixty five (365) days thereafter. You cannot use the Subscription Product after Your subscription expires unless You renew or extend Your subscription. By renewing or extending Your subscription, You will be entitled to continue using the Subscription Product for a specified period of time beyond the date when Your previous subscription would have otherwise ended. All the terms and conditions of this EULA will continue to apply to Your use of the Subscription Product during any subsequent renewal periods unless otherwise specified. After the expiration of Your subscription, You can continue to open, view and print any documents You created with the Subscription Product. Additional License Grant for Media Elements. The Software Product may include certain photographs, clip art, animations, sounds, music and video clips (together "Media Elements"). If so, the following terms describe Your rights to the Media Elements: o Except as specified in the next Section, You may use, copy and modify the Media Elements and distribute copies of the Media Elements, along with Your modifications, as part of Your software product(s) and service(s), including Your web site(s). o You are not licensed to do any of the following: o You may not sell, license or distribute copies of the Media Elements on a stand-alone basis or as part of any collection, product or service where the primary value of the product or service are the Media Elements. o You may not use or distribute any of the Media Elements that include representations of identifiable individuals, governments, logos, initials, emblems, trademarks, or entities for any commercial purposes or to express or imply any endorsement or association with any product, service, entity, or activity. o You may not create obscene or scandalous works, as defined by federal law at the time the work is created, using the Media Elements. o You must indemnify, hold harmless, and defend Microsoft from and against any claims or lawsuits, including attorneys' fees, that arise from or result from the use or distribution of Media Elements as modified by You. o You must include a valid copyright notice on Your products and services that include copies of the Media Elements. o You may not permit third parties to distribute copies of the Media Elements except as part of Your product or service. Additional License Grant for SharePoint Team Services. The Software Product may contain a copy of the Sharepoint Team Services. If so, You may install one copy of such software on one Device and allow an unlimited number of individuals within Your business or enterprise to access and use the Sharepoint Team Services from other Devices provided that You acquire and dedicate a license to the Software Product for the Device upon which the Sharepoint Team Services are installed. Reservation of Rights. All rights not expressly granted are reserved by Microsoft. 2. DESCRIPTION OF OTHER RIGHTS AND LIMITATIONS. Academic Edition Software. If the Software Product is identified as "Academic Edition" or "AE," You must be a "Qualified Educational User" to use the Software Product. If You are not a Qualified Educational User, You have no rights under this EULA. To determine whether You are a Qualified Educational User, please contact the Microsoft Sales Information Center/One Microsoft Way/Redmond, WA 98052-6399 or the Microsoft subsidiary serving Your country. Mandatory Activation. You may not be able to exercise Your rights to the Software Product under this EULA after a finite number of product launches unless You activate Your copy of the Software Product in the manner described during the launch sequence. Copy Protection. The Software Product may include copy protection technology to prevent the unauthorized copying of the Software Product or may require original media for use of the Software Product on the Device. It is illegal to make unauthorized copies of the Software Product or to circumvent any copy protection technology included in the Software Product. Not for Resale Software. If the Software Product is labeled "Not For Resale" or "NFR," then, notwithstanding other sections of this EULA, Your use of the Software Product is limited to use for demonstration, test, or evaluation purposes and You may not resell, or otherwise transfer for value, the Software Product. Limitations on Reverse Engineering, Decompilation, and Disassembly. You may not reverse engineer, decompile, or disassemble the Software Product, except and only to the extent that such activity is expressly permitted by applicable law notwithstanding this limitation. Separation of Component Parts. The Software Product is licensed as a single product. Its component parts may not be separated for use on more than one Device unless expressly permitted by this EULA. Trademarks. This EULA does not grant You any rights in connection with any trademarks or service marks of Microsoft. No rental, leasing or commercial hosting. You may not rent, lease, lend or provide commercial hosting services to third parties with the Software Product. Support Services. Microsoft may provide You with support services related to the Software Product ("Support Services"). Use of Support Services is governed by the Microsoft policies and programs described in the user manual, in "online" documentation, or in other Microsoft-provided materials. Any supplemental software code provided to You as part of the Support Services are considered part of the Software Product and subject to the terms and conditions of this EULA. You acknowledge and agree that Microsoft may use technical information You provide to Microsoft as part of the Support Services for its business purposes, including for product support and development. Microsoft will not utilize such technical information in a form that personally identifies You. Software Transfer. Except as specified in this Section, the initial licensee of the Software Product may make a one-time permanent transfer of this EULA and Software Product only directly to an end user. This transfer must include all of the Software Product (including all component parts, the media and printed materials, any upgrades, this EULA, and, if applicable, the Certificate of Authenticity). Such transfer may not be by way of consignment or any other indirect transfer. The transferee of such one-time transfer must agree to comply with the terms of this EULA, including the obligation not to further transfer this EULA and Software Product. Subscription Products are non-transferable. Termination. Without prejudice to any other rights, Microsoft may terminate this EULA if You fail to comply with the terms and conditions of this EULA. In such event, You must destroy all copies of the Software Product and all of its component parts. 3. UPGRADES. Standard Software Product. If the Software Product is labeled as an upgrade, You must be properly licensed to use a product identified by Microsoft as being eligible for the upgrade in order to use the Software Product. A Software Product labeled as an upgrade replaces or supplements (and may disable) the product that formed the basis for Your eligibility for the upgrade. You may use the resulting upgraded product only in accordance with the terms of this EULA. If the Software Product is an upgrade of a component of a package of software programs that You licensed as a single product, the Software Product may be used and transferred only as part of that single product package and may not be separated for use on more than one Device. Subscription Based Software Product. The following terms apply to You instead of the terms in the previous paragraph if You licensed a Subscription Product. If Microsoft releases any upgrades or new versions of the Subscription Product during the term of Your subscription, You will be entitled to receive a copy of such upgrade(s) or new version(s) at no additional cost, except for any applicable connection charges, taxes, duties and shipping costs if You select fulfillment by mail. Such upgrades shall be considered part of the Subscription Product and subject to all of the terms and conditions of this EULA unless otherwise indicated in any license agreement that accompanies such upgrade or new version. 4. INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS. All title and intellectual property rights in and to the Software Product (including but not limited to any images, photographs, animations, video, audio, music, text, and "applets" incorporated into the Software Product), the accompanying printed materials, and any copies of the Software Product are owned by Microsoft or its suppliers. All title and intellectual property rights in and to the content that is not contained in the Software Product, but may be accessed through use of the Software Product, is the property of the respective content owners and may be protected by applicable copyright or other intellectual property laws and treaties. This EULA grants You no rights to use such content. If this Software Product contains documentation that is provided only in electronic form, you may print one copy of such electronic documentation. You may not copy the printed materials accompanying the Software Product. 5. BACKUP COPY. After installation of one copy of the Software Product pursuant to this EULA, you may keep the original media on which the Software Product was provided by Microsoft solely for backup or archival purposes. If the original media is required to use the Software Product on the Device, you may make one copy of the Software Product solely for backup or archival purposes. Except as expressly provided in this EULA, you may not otherwise make copies of the Software Product or the printed materials accompanying the Software Product. 6. U.S. GOVERNMENT LICENSE RIGHTS. All Software Product provided to the U.S. Government pursuant to solicitations issued on or after December 1, 1995 is provided with the commercial license rights and restrictions described elsewhere herein. All Software Product provided to the U.S. Government pursuant to solicitations issued prior to December 1, 1995 is provided with RESTRICTED RIGHTS as provided for in FAR, 48 CFR 52.227-14 (JUNE 1987) or DFAR, 48 CFR 252.227-7013 (OCT 1988), as applicable. 7. EXPORT RESTRICTIONS. You acknowledge that the Software Product is of U.S. origin. You agree to comply with all applicable international and national laws that apply to the Software Product, including the U.S. Export Administration Regulations, as well as end-user, end-use and destination restrictions issued by U.S. and other governments. For additional information, see http://www.microsoft.com/exporting/. 8. APPLICABLE LAW. If you acquired this Software Product in the United States, this EULA is governed by the laws of the State of Washington. If you acquired this Software Product in Canada, unless expressly prohibited by local law, this EULA is governed by the laws in force in the Province of Ontario, Canada; and, in respect of any dispute which may arise hereunder, you consent to the jurisdiction of the federal and provincial courts sitting in Toronto, Ontario. If this Software Product was acquired outside the United States, then local law may apply. Should you have any questions concerning this EULA, or if you desire to contact Microsoft for any reason, please contact the Microsoft subsidiary serving your country, or write: Microsoft Sales Information Center/One Microsoft Way/Redmond, WA 98052-6399. 9. LIMITED WARRANTY LIMITED WARRANTY FOR SOFTWARE PRODUCTS ACQUIRED IN THE US AND CANADA. Microsoft warrants that the SOFTWARE PRODUCT will perform substantially in accordance with the accompanying materials for a period of ninety (90) days from the date of receipt. If an implied warranty or condition is created by your state/jurisdiction and federal or state/provincial law prohibits disclaimer of it, you also have an implied warranty or condition, BUT ONLY AS TO DEFECTS DISCOVERED DURING THE PERIOD OF THIS LIMITED WARRANTY (NINETY DAYS). AS TO ANY DEFECTS DISCOVERED AFTER THE NINETY (90) DAY PERIOD, THERE IS NO WARRANTY OR CONDITION OF ANY KIND. Some states/jurisdictions do not allow limitations on how long an implied warranty or condition lasts, so the above limitation may not apply to you. Any supplements or updates to the SOFTWARE PRODUCT, including without limitation, any (if any) service packs or hot fixes provided to you after the expiration of the ninety (90) day Limited Warranty period are not covered by any warranty or condition, express, implied or statutory. LIMITATION ON REMEDIES; NO CONSEQUENTIAL OR OTHER DAMAGES. Your exclusive remedy for any breach of this Limited Warranty is as set forth below. Except for any refund elected by Microsoft, YOU ARE NOT ENTITLED TO ANY DAMAGES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES, if the Software Product does not meet Microsoft's Limited Warranty, and, to the maximum extent allowed by applicable law, even if any remedy fails of its essential purpose. The terms of Section 11 below ("Exclusion of Incidental, Consequential and Certain Other Damages") are also incorporated into this Limited Warranty. Some states/jurisdictions do not allow the exclusion or limitation of incidental or consequential damages, so the above limitation or exclusion may not apply to you. This Limited Warranty gives you specific legal rights. You may have others which vary from state/jurisdiction to state/jurisdiction. YOUR EXCLUSIVE REMEDY. Microsoft's and its suppliers' entire liability and your exclusive remedy shall be, at Microsoft's option from time to time exercised subject to applicable law, (a) return of the price paid (if any) for the Software Product, or (b) repair or replacement of the Software Product, that does not meet this Limited Warranty and that is returned to Microsoft with a copy of your receipt. You will receive the remedy elected by Microsoft without charge, except that you are responsible for any expenses you may incur (e.g. cost of shipping the Software Product to Microsoft). This Limited Warranty is void if failure of the Software Product has resulted from accident, abuse, misapplication, abnormal use or a virus. Any replacement Software Product will be warranted for the remainder of the original warranty period or thirty (30) days, whichever is longer. Outside the United States or Canada, neither these remedies nor any product support services offered by Microsoft are available without proof of purchase from an authorized international source. To exercise your remedy, contact: Microsoft, Attn. Microsoft Sales Information Center/One Microsoft Way/Redmond, WA 98052-6399, or the Microsoft subsidiary serving your country. LIMITED WARRANTY FOR SOFTWARE PRODUCTS ACQUIRED OUTSIDE THE US AND CANADA. FOR THE LIMITED WARRANTIES AND SPECIAL PROVISIONS PERTAINING TO YOUR PARTICULAR JURISDICTION, PLEASE REFER TO YOUR WARRANTY BOOKLET INCLUDED WITH THIS PACKAGE OR PROVIDED WITH THE SOFTWARE PRODUCT PRINTED MATERIALS. 10. DISCLAIMER OF WARRANTIES. THE LIMITED WARRANTY THAT APPEARS ABOVE IS THE ONLY EXPRESS WARRANTY MADE TO YOU AND IS PROVIDED IN LIEU OF ANY OTHER EXPRESS WARRANTIES (IF ANY) CREATED BY ANY DOCUMENTATION OR PACKAGING. EXCEPT FOR THE LIMITED WARRANTY AND TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT PERMITTED BY APPLICABLE LAW, MICROSOFT AND ITS SUPPLIERS PROVIDE THE SOFTWARE AND SUPPORT SERVICES (IF ANY) AS IS AND WITH ALL FAULTS, AND HEREBY DISCLAIM ALL OTHER WARRANTIES AND CONDITIONS, EITHER EXPRESS, IMPLIED OR STATUTORY, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY (IF ANY) IMPLIED WARRANTIES, DUTIES OR CONDITIONS OF MERCHANTABILITY, OF FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, OF ACCURACY OR COMPLETENESS OR RESPONSES, OF RESULTS, OF WORKMANLIKE EFFORT, OF LACK OF VIRUSES AND OF LACK OF NEGLIGENCE, ALL WITH REGARD TO THE SOFTWARE, AND THE PROVISION OF OR FAILURE TO PROVIDE SUPPORT SERVICES. ALSO, THERE IS NO WARRANTY OR CONDITION OF TITLE, QUIET ENJOYMENT, QUIET POSSESSION, CORRESPONDENCE TO DESCRIPTION OR NON-INFRINGEMENT WITH REGARD TO THE SOFTWARE. 11. EXCLUSION OF INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL AND CERTAIN OTHER DAMAGES. TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT PERMITTED BY APPLICABLE LAW, IN NO EVENT SHALL MICROSOFT OR ITS SUPPLIERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, INDIRECT, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES WHATSOEVER (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF PROFITS OR CONFIDENTIAL OR OTHER INFORMATION, FOR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION, FOR PERSONAL INJURY, FOR LOSS OF PRIVACY, FOR FAILURE TO MEET ANY DUTY INCLUDING OF GOOD FAITH OR OF REASONABLE CARE, FOR NEGLIGENCE, AND FOR ANY OTHER PECUNIARY OR OTHER LOSS WHATSOEVER) ARISING OUT OF OR IN ANY WAY RELATED TO THE USE OF OR INABILITY TO USE THE SOFTWARE PRODUCT, THE PROVISION OF OR FAILURE TO PROVIDE SUPPORT SERVICES, OR OTHERWISE UNDER OR IN CONNECTION WITH ANY PROVISION OF THIS EULA, EVEN IN THE EVENT OF THE FAULT, TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE), STRICT LIABILITY, BREACH OF CONTRACT OR BREACH OF WARRANTY OF MICROSOFT OR ANY SUPPLIER, AND EVEN IF MICROSOFT OR ANY SUPPLIER HAS BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES. 12. LIMITATION OF LIABILITY AND REMEDIES. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY DAMAGES THAT YOU MIGHT INCUR FOR ANY REASON WHATSOEVER (INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, ALL DAMAGES REFERENCED ABOVE AND ALL DIRECT OR GENERAL DAMAGES), THE ENTIRE LIABILITY OF MICROSOFT AND ANY OF ITS SUPPLIERS UNDER ANY PROVISION OF THIS EULA AND YOUR EXCLUSIVE REMEDY FOR ALL OF THE FOREGOING (EXCEPT FOR ANY REMEDY OF REPAIR OR REPLACEMENT ELECTED BY MICROSOFT WITH RESPECT TO ANY BREACH OF THE LIMITED WARRANTY) SHAL BE LIMITED TO THE GREATER OF THE AMOUNT ACTUALLY PAID BY YOU FOR THE SOFTWARE OR U.S. $5.00. THE FOREGOING LIMITATIONS, EXCLUSIONS AND DISCLAIMERS (INCLUDING SECTIONS 7, 8, AND 9 ABOVE) SHALL APPLY TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT PERMITTED BY APPLICABLE LAW, EVEN IF ANY REMEDY FAILS ITS ESSENTIAL PURPOSE. 13. ENTIRE AGREEMENT. This EULA (including any addendum or amendment to this EULA which is included with the Software Product) is the entire agreement between you and Microsoft relating to the Software Product and the support services (if any) and they supersede all prior or contemporaneous oral or written communications, proposals and representations with respect to the Software Product or any other subject matter covered by this EULA. To the extent the terms of any Microsoft policies or programs for support services conflict with the terms of this EULA, the terms of this EULA shall control. Si vous avez acquis votre produit Microsoft au CANADA, la garantie limitée suivante vous concerne : GARANTIE LIMITÉE Microsoft garantit que le Produit fonctionnera conformément aux documents inclus pendant une période de 90 jours suivant la date de réception. Si une garantie ou condition implicite est créée par votre État ou votre territoire et qu'une loi fédérale ou provinciale ou État en interdit le déni, vous jouissez également d'une garantie ou condition implicite, MAIS UNIQUEMENT POUR LES DÉFAUTS DÉCOUVERTS DURANT LA PÉRIODE DE LA PRÉSENTE GARANTIE LIMITÉE (QUATRE-VINGT-DIX JOURS). IL N'Y A AUCUNE GARANTIE OU CONDITION DE QUELQUE NATURE QUE CE SOIT QUANT AUX DÉFAUTS DÉCOUVERTS APRÈS CETTE PÉRIODE DE QUATRE-VINGT-DIX JOURS. Certains États ou territoires ne permettent pas de limiter la durée d'une garantie ou condition implicite de sorte que la limitation cidessus peut ne pas s'appliquer à vous. Tous les suppléments ou toutes les mises à jour relatifs au Produit, notamment, les ensembles de services ou les réparations à chaud (le cas échéant) qui vous sont fournis après l'expiration de la période de quatre-vingt-dix jours de la garantie limitée ne sont pas couverts par quelque garantie ou condition que ce soit, expresse ou implicite. LIMITATION DES RECOURS; ABSENCE DE DOMMAGES INDIRECTS OU AUTRES. Votre recours exclusif pour toute violation de la présente garantie limitée est décrit ciaprès. Sauf pour tout remboursement au choix de Microsoft, si le Produit ne respecte pas la garantie limitée de Microsoft et, dans la mesure maximale permise par les lois applicables, même si tout recours n'atteint pas son but essentiel, VOUS N'AVEZ DROIT À AUCUNS DOMMAGES, NOTAMMENT DES DOMMAGES INDIRECTS. Les modalités de la clause Exclusion des dommages accessoires, indirects et de certains autres dommages sont également intégrées à la présente garantie limitée. Certains États ou territoires ne permettent pas l'exclusion ou la limitation des dommages indirects ou accessoires de sorte que la limitation ou l'exclusion cidessus peut ne pas s'appliquer à vous. La présente garantie limitée vous donne des droits légaux spécifiques. Vous pouvez avoir d'autres droits qui peuvent varier d'un territoire ou d'un État à un autre. VOTRE RECOURS EXCLUSIF. L'obligation intégrale de Microsoft et de ses fournisseurs et votre recours exclusif seront, selon le choix de Microsoft de temps à autre sous réserve de toute loi applicable, a) le remboursement du prix payé, le cas échéant, pour le Produit ou b) la réparation ou le remplacement du Produit qui ne respecte pas la présente garantie limitée et qui est retourné à Microsoft avec une copie de votre reçu. Vous recevrez la compensation choisie par Microsoft, sans frais, sauf que vous êtes responsable des dépenses que vous pourriez engager (p. ex., les frais d'envoi du Produit à Microsoft). La présente garantie limitée est nulle si la défectuosité du Produit est causée par un accident, un usage abusif, une mauvaise application, un usage anormal ou un virus. Tout Produit de remplacement sera garanti pour le reste de la période de garantie initiale ou pendant trente (30) jours, selon la plus longue entre ces deux périodes. À l'extérieur des États-Unis ou du Canada, ces recours ou l'un quelconque des services de soutien technique offerts par Microsoft ne sont pas disponibles sans preuve d'achat d'une source internationale autorisée. Pour exercer votre recours, vous devez communiquer avec Microsoft et vous adresser au Microsoft Sales Information Center/One Microsoft Way/Redmond, WA 98052-6399, ou à la filiale de Microsoft de votre pays. DÉNI DE GARANTIES. La garantie limitée mentionnée ci-dessus constitue la seule garantie expresse qui vous est donnée et remplace toutes autres garanties expresses (s'il en est) mentionnées dans un document ou sur un emballage. Sauf en ce qui a trait à la garantie limitée et dans la mesure maximale permise par les lois applicables, le Produit et les services de soutien technique (le cas échéant) sont fournis TELS QUELS ET AVEC TOUS LES DÉFAUTS par Microsoft et ses fournisseurs, lesquels par les présentes dénient toutes autres garanties et conditions expresses, implicites ou en vertu de la loi, notamment (le cas échéant) les garanties, devoirs ou conditions implicites de qualité marchande, d'adaptation à un usage particulier, d'exactitude ou d'exhaustivité des réponses, des résultats, des efforts déployés selon les règles de l'art, d'absence de virus et de négligence, le tout à l'égard du Produit et de la prestation des services de soutien technique ou de l'omission d'une telle prestation. PAR AILLEURS, IL N'Y A AUCUNE GARANTIE OU CONDITION QUANT AU TITRE DE PROPRIÉTÉ, À LA JOUISSANCE OU LA POSSESSION PAISIBLE, À LA CONCORDANCE À UNE DESCRIPTION NI QUANT À UNE ABSENCE DE CONTREFAÇON CONCERNANT LE PRODUIT. EXCLUSION DES DOMMAGES ACCESSOIRES, INDIRECTS ET DE CERTAINS AUTRES DOMMAGES. DANS LA MESURE MAXIMALE PERMISE PAR LES LOIS APPLICABLES, EN AUCUN CAS MICROSOFT OU SES FOURNISSEURS NE SERONT RESPONSABLES DES DOMMAGES SPÉCIAUX, CONSÉCUTIFS, ACCESSOIRES OU INDIRECTS DE QUELQUE NATURE QUE CE SOIT (NOTAMMENT, LES DOMMAGES À L'ÉGARD DU MANQUE À GAGNER OU DE LA DIVULGATION DE RENSEIGNEMENTS CONFIDENTIELS OU AUTRES, DE LA PERTE D'EXPLOITATION, DE BLESSURES CORPORELLES, DE LA VIOLATION DE LA VIE PRIVÉE, DE L'OMISSION DE REMPLIR TOUT DEVOIR, Y COMPRIS D'AGIR DE BONNE FOI OU D'EXERCER UN SOIN RAISONNABLE, DE LA NÉGLIGENCE ET DE TOUTE AUTRE PERTE PÉCUNIAIRE OU AUTRE PERTE DE QUELQUE NATURE QUE CE SOIT) SE RAPPORTANT DE QUELQUE MANIÈRE QUE CE SOIT À L'UTILISATION DU PRODUIT OU À L'INCAPACITÉ DE S'EN SERVIR, À LA PRESTATION OU À L'OMISSION D'UNE TELLE PRESTATION DE SERVICES DE SOUTIEN TECHNIQUE OU AUTREMENT AUX TERMES DE TOUTE DISPOSITION DU PRÉSENT EULA OU RELATIVEMENT À UNE TELLE DISPOSITION, MÊME EN CAS DE FAUTE, DE DÉLIT CIVIL (Y COMPRIS LA NÉGLIGENCE), DE RESPONSABILITÉ STRICTE, DE VIOLATION DE CONTRAT OU DE VIOLATION DE GARANTIE DE MICROSOFT OU DE TOUT FOURNISSEUR ET MÊME SI MICROSOFT OU TOUT FOURNISSEUR A ÉTÉ AVISÉ DE LA POSSIBILITÉ DE TELS DOMMAGES. LIMITATION DE RESPONSABILITÉ ET RECOURS. Malgré les dommages que vous puissiez subir pour quelque motif que ce soit (notamment, tous les dommages susmentionnés et tous les dommages directs ou généraux), l'obligation intégrale de Microsoft et de l'un ou l'autre de ses fournisseurs aux termes de toute disposition du présent EULA et votre recours exclusif à l'égard de tout ce qui précède (sauf en ce qui concerne tout recours de réparation ou de remplacement choisi par Microsoft à l'égard de tout manquement à la garantie limitée) se limite au plus élevé entre les montants suivants : le montant que vous avez réellement payé pour le Produit ou 5,00 $US. Les limites, exclusions et dénis qui précèdent (y compris les clauses ci-dessus), s'appliquent dans la mesure maximale permise par les lois applicables, même si tout recours n'atteint pas son but essentiel. La présente Convention est régie par les lois de la province d'Ontario, Canada. Chacune des parties à la présente reconnaît irrévocablement la compétence des tribunaux de la province d'Ontario et consent à instituer tout litige qui pourrait découler de la présente auprès des tribunaux situés dans le district judiciaire de York, province d'Ontario. Au cas où vous auriez des questions concernant cette licence ou que vous désiriez vous mettre en rapport avec Microsoft pour quelque raison que ce soit, veuillez contacter la succursale Microsoft desservant votre pays, dont l'adresse est fournie dans ce produit, ou écrivez à : Microsoft Sales Information Center, One Microsoft Way, Redmond, Washington 98052-6399.
    --
    "Do not be swept up in the momentum of mediocrity." - anon
  146. New mods by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Am I the only one who sees the need for "-1: Irony-impaired" moderation?

  147. Freedom of Speech? by darkfus · · Score: 1


    The Internet, the most widely used medium for communication and freedom of speech is controlled by the tools that allow us to speak. Whether its a messaging system such as ICQ or AIM or your HTML editor itself...

    I find it very startling that it is legally possible to license such communication tools as if they were in a communist or censored environment. Now that Microsoft has set the precedent, where do we go from here?

    Will every company put in a clause in their licensing saying you can't bash them? How far will it go and where will it end?

    Regardless of the fact that you probably wouldn't buy FrontPage 2002 if you had strong regards towards Microsoft - I have to wonder how this is even legal under the laws of free speech. Big companies are going to all out war to control Internet content and make their software the standard, does this mean their licensing will be able to dicate what we can say? Feature-wise it already has some control of what we can do...

    How interesting it would be to have a communist Internet in a democratic country.

    Scott

    --
    [sig]darkfus[/sig]
    1. Re:Freedom of Speech? by charon_on_acheron · · Score: 1

      What laws for free speech are you referring to?
      The only thing I can think of that supposedly guarantees freedom of speech is the First Amendment of the US Constitution. That isn't a law, it's the Constitution. All other laws regarding speech are actually placing limits on that freedom of speech, despite the Constitution. Can't say hateful things, can't say pornographic things, can't shout Fire in a theater, can't tell the Ruskies how to build a nuclear bomb, can't make a prank phone call threatening the President, can't etc.

      Same for freedom of the press, which would seem more appropriate in this case.

  148. Microsoft != US Government. by jefft · · Score: 1

    There is a very common misperception that there's some law or amendment or something that prevents companies from trying to censor people. There's not. The First Amendment restricts what the government is able to do. Not private people or corporations.
    Let's get this straight once and for all. The Constitution for the most part restricts what the government is able to do. Let's take a look at the First Amendment.

    Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.


    Please note that it is Congress being restricted here. There's no mention of private parties. It is quite common for contracts between private entities to place restrictions on speech. NDA's for employees and timed NDA's for review hardware. Settlements of big lawsuits almost always have a restriction in them about speaking about the case.
    For example, if you work for a company and make a very public statement criticizing that company. They have every right to fire you. Your "First Amendment" rights aren't being violated. The government isn't doing anything. This is just is just a general example and there are some protected behaviors like whistle-blowing and such.

  149. Re:This relates only to Front Page SERVER COMPONEN by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 2

    Different items. I think the FrontPage Web Components != FP Server extensions. I think that the web components are small units of content that you can get from MSN. The Server Extensions on the other hand are required to serve frontpage HTML.

    --

    There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
  150. How about IE users? by ackthpt · · Score: 2
    Is there an upcoming clause that "you may not use the Software to browse a site which disparages MSN, MSNBC", etc.?

    If there were, then whither slashdot, as so many users actully use IE.

    Still using NS 4.75 =p

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    1. Re:How about IE users? by DunbarTheInept · · Score: 2

      Even a company as low and slimy as MS probably wouldn't do that because the user at the browser end doesn't really know what the content will be like until after he reads it. So such a clause as you suggest would be essentially making something illegal that the person might have no control over. It's like making it illegal to *receive* SPAM, rather than making it illegal to send it.

      --

      Don't label something "offtopic" unless you know the topic well enough to tell what's on topic.

    2. Re:How about IE users? by Rob+Kaper · · Score: 1
      It's like making it illegal to *receive* SPAM, rather than making it illegal to send it.

      I've seen worse laws pass, so what's your point?

      Maybe I should put a small layer on the bottom of my site stating a license that if one makes use of one of the hyperlinks that point to another page on my site, one accepts the terms and conditions which state that browsing with an unauthorized browser (MSIE) entitles me to $50/pageview.

  151. Not a First Amendment issue. by addison · · Score: 1

    The First Amendment (to the Constitution of the United States of America) explictly disallows the government from abridging your right to free speech.

    This is a contract issue, and as such, not bound by it, or concerned with it.

    NDAs, trade secrets, and contracts often have exclusions - legally upheld many times - on what can be said and when.

    Addison

  152. Solution! by www.sorehands.com · · Score: 2
    Put on the website a term of use. This term of will state that you agree not to use anything on this site as a basis for a lawsuit. If you don't agree with this, then leave this site immediately.

    If they try to claim the bot can't read it, then claim you did not read their EULA.


    Fight fire with fire, but never bring a knife to a gun fight.

  153. All this bitching, and no-one posted the EULA by blowdart · · Score: 2

    OK then here it is, or at least the one I have. Excuse the fucked formatting, apparently the lameness filter objected to some of the HTML.

    Now, where's that clause? Well shit, it's not there. Surprise.

    END USER LICENSE AGREEMENT FOR MICROSOFT SOFTWARE.


    IMPORTANT-READ CAREFULLY:

    SOFTWARE PRODUCT LICENSE



    The Software Product is protected by intellectual property laws and treaties.
    The Software Product is licensed, not sold.



    1. GRANT OF LICENSE. This Section of the EULA describes Your general
    rights to install and use the Software Product The license rights described in
    this Section are subject to all other terms and conditions of this EULA.




    General License Grant to Install and Use Software Product. You may
    install and use one copy of the Software Product on a single computer, device,
    workstation, terminal, or other digital electronic or analog device
    ("Device"). You may make a second copy of the Software Product and
    install it on a portable Device for the exclusive use of the person who is the
    primary user of the first copy of the Software Product. A license for the
    Software Product may not be shared.



    Alternative License Grant for Storage/Network Use. As an alternative to
    the rights granted in the previous section, You may install a copy of the
    Software Product on one storage Device, such as a network server, and allow
    individuals within Your business or enterprise to access and use the Software
    Product from other Devices over a private network, provided that You acquire
    and dedicate a license for the storage Device upon which the Software Product
    is installed and each separate Device from which the Software Product is
    accessed and used. A license for the Software Product may not be used
    concurrently on different Devices.



    General License Grant to Install and Use Subscription Product. The
    following licensing terms apply to You instead of the license grants in the
    previous two paragraphs if You licensed a subscription-based Software Product
    (a "Subscription Product"). You may install one copy of the
    Subscription Product on a single Device and use the Subscription Product for
    the term of Your subscription. You may also exercise the additional license
    rights described in the paragraphs below, but only for the term of Your
    subscription. The initial subscription period begins on the date You first
    activate Your copy of the Subscription Product and ends three hundred and
    sixty five (365) days thereafter. You cannot use the Subscription Product
    after Your subscription expires unless You renew or extend Your subscription.
    By renewing or extending Your subscription, You will be entitled to continue
    using the Subscription Product for a specified period of time beyond the date
    when Your previous subscription would have otherwise ended. All the terms and
    conditions of this EULA will continue to apply to Your use of the Subscription
    Product during any subsequent renewal periods unless otherwise specified.
    After the expiration of Your subscription, You can continue to open, view and
    print any documents You created with the Subscription Product.



    Additional License Grant for Media Elements. The Software Product may
    include certain photographs, clip art, animations, sounds, music and video
    clips (together "Media Elements"). If so, the following terms
    describe Your rights to the Media Elements:


    o Except as specified in the next Section, You may use, copy and modify
    the Media Elements and distribute copies of the Media Elements, along with
    Your modifications, as part of Your software product(s) and service(s),
    including Your web site(s).

    o You are not licensed to do any of the following:

    o You may not sell, license or distribute copies of the Media
    Elements on a stand-alone basis or as part of any collection, product or
    service where the primary value of the product or service are the Media
    Elements.

    o You may not use or distribute any of the Media Elements that
    include representations of identifiable individuals, governments, logos,
    initials, emblems, trademarks, or entities for any commercial purposes
    or to express or imply any endorsement or association with any product,
    service, entity, or activity.

    o You may not create obscene or scandalous works, as defined by
    federal law at the time the work is created, using the Media Elements.

    o You must indemnify, hold harmless, and defend Microsoft from and
    against any claims or lawsuits, including attorneys' fees, that arise
    from or result from the use or distribution of Media Elements as
    modified by You.

    o You must include a valid copyright notice on Your products and
    services that include copies of the Media Elements.

    o You may not permit third parties to distribute copies of the Media
    Elements except as part of Your product or service.





    Additional License Grant for SharePoint Team Services. The Software
    Product may contain a copy of the Sharepoint Team Services. If so, You may
    install one copy of such software on one Device and allow an unlimited number
    of individuals within Your business or enterprise to access and use the
    Sharepoint Team Services from other Devices provided that You acquire and
    dedicate a license to the Software Product for the Device upon which the
    Sharepoint Team Services are installed.



    Reservation of Rights. All rights not expressly granted are reserved by
    Microsoft.




    2. DESCRIPTION OF OTHER RIGHTS AND LIMITATIONS.


    Academic Edition Software.

    If the Software Product is identified as
    "Academic Edition" or "AE," You must be a "Qualified
    Educational User" to use the Software Product. If You are not a Qualified
    Educational User, You have no rights under this EULA. To determine whether You
    are a Qualified Educational User, please contact the Microsoft Sales
    Information Center/One Microsoft Way/Redmond, WA 98052-6399 or the Microsoft
    subsidiary serving Your country.

    Mandatory Activation. You may not be able to exercise Your rights to the
    Software Product under this EULA after a finite number of product launches
    unless You activate Your copy of the Software Product in the manner described
    during the launch sequence.



    Copy Protection. The Software Product may include copy protection
    technology to prevent the unauthorized copying of the Software Product or may
    require original media for use of the Software Product on the Device. It is
    illegal to make unauthorized copies of the Software Product or to circumvent any
    copy protection technology included in the Software Product.



    Not for Resale Software. If the Software Product is labeled "Not For
    Resale" or "NFR," then, notwithstanding other sections of this
    EULA, Your use of the Software Product is limited to use for demonstration,
    test, or evaluation purposes and You may not resell, or otherwise transfer for
    value, the Software Product.



    Limitations on Reverse Engineering, Decompilation, and Disassembly. You
    may not reverse engineer, decompile, or disassemble the Software Product, except
    and only to the extent that such activity is expressly permitted by applicable
    law notwithstanding this limitation.



    Separation of Component Parts. The Software Product is licensed as a
    single product. Its component parts may not be separated for use on more than
    one Device unless expressly permitted by this EULA.



    Trademarks. This EULA does not grant You any rights in connection with
    any trademarks or service marks of Microsoft.



    No rental, leasing or commercial hosting. You may not rent, lease, lend
    or provide commercial hosting services to third parties with the Software
    Product.



    Support Services. Microsoft may provide You with support services related
    to the Software Product ("Support Services"). Use of Support Services
    is governed by the Microsoft policies and programs described in the user manual,
    in "online" documentation, or in other Microsoft-provided materials.
    Any supplemental software code provided to You as part of the Support Services
    are considered part of the Software Product and subject to the terms and
    conditions of this EULA. You acknowledge and agree that Microsoft may use
    technical information You provide to Microsoft as part of the Support Services
    for its business purposes, including for product support and development.
    Microsoft will not utilize such technical information in a form that personally
    identifies You.



    Software Transfer. Except as specified in this Section, the initial
    licensee of the Software Product may make a one-time permanent transfer of this
    EULA and Software Product only directly to an end user. This transfer must
    include all of the Software Product (including all component parts, the media
    and printed materials, any upgrades, this EULA, and, if applicable, the
    Certificate of Authenticity). Such transfer may not be by way of consignment or
    any other indirect transfer. The transferee of such one-time transfer must agree
    to comply with the terms of this EULA, including the obligation not to further
    transfer this EULA and Software Product. Subscription Products are
    non-transferable.



    Termination. Without prejudice to any other rights, Microsoft may
    terminate this EULA if You fail to comply with the terms and conditions of this
    EULA. In such event, You must destroy all copies of the Software Product and all
    of its component parts.




    3. UPGRADES.


    Standard Software Product.

    If the Software Product is labeled as an
    upgrade, You must be properly licensed to use a product identified by
    Microsoft as being eligible for the upgrade in order to use the Software
    Product. A Software Product labeled as an upgrade replaces or supplements (and
    may disable) the product that formed the basis for Your eligibility for the
    upgrade. You may use the resulting upgraded product only in accordance with
    the terms of this EULA. If the Software Product is an upgrade of a component
    of a package of software programs that You licensed as a single product, the
    Software Product may be used and transferred only as part of that single
    product package and may not be separated for use on more than one Device.

    Subscription Based Software Product. The following terms apply to You
    instead of the terms in the previous paragraph if You licensed a Subscription
    Product. If Microsoft releases any upgrades or new versions of the Subscription
    Product during the term of Your subscription, You will be entitled to receive a
    copy of such upgrade(s) or new version(s) at no additional cost, except for any
    applicable connection charges, taxes, duties and shipping costs if You select
    fulfillment by mail. Such upgrades shall be considered part of the Subscription
    Product and subject to all of the terms and conditions of this EULA unless
    otherwise indicated in any license agreement that accompanies such upgrade or
    new version.




    4. INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS. All title and intellectual property
    rights in and to the Software Product (including but not limited to any images,
    photographs, animations, video, audio, music, text, and "applets"
    incorporated into the Software Product), the accompanying printed materials, and
    any copies of the Software Product are owned by Microsoft or its suppliers. All
    title and intellectual property rights in and to the content that is not
    contained in the Software Product, but may be accessed through use of the
    Software Product, is the property of the respective content owners and may be
    protected by applicable copyright or other intellectual property laws and
    treaties. This EULA grants You no rights to use such content. If this Software
    Product contains documentation that is provided only in electronic form, you may
    print one copy of such electronic documentation. You may not copy the printed
    materials accompanying the Software Product.



    5. BACKUP COPY. After installation of one copy of the Software Product
    pursuant to this EULA, you may keep the original media on which the Software
    Product was provided by Microsoft solely for backup or archival purposes. If the
    original media is required to use the Software Product on the Device, you may
    make one copy of the Software Product solely for backup or archival purposes.
    Except as expressly provided in this EULA, you may not otherwise make copies of
    the Software Product or the printed materials accompanying the Software Product.



    6. U.S. GOVERNMENT LICENSE RIGHTS. All Software Product provided to the
    U.S. Government pursuant to solicitations issued on or after December 1, 1995 is
    provided with the commercial license rights and restrictions described elsewhere
    herein. All Software Product provided to the U.S. Government pursuant to
    solicitations issued prior to December 1, 1995 is provided with RESTRICTED
    RIGHTS as provided for in FAR, 48 CFR 52.227-14 (JUNE 1987) or DFAR, 48 CFR
    252.227-7013 (OCT 1988), as applicable.



    7. EXPORT RESTRICTIONS. You acknowledge that the Software Product is of
    U.S. origin. You agree to comply with all applicable international and national
    laws that apply to the Software Product, including the U.S. Export
    Administration Regulations, as well as end-user, end-use and destination
    restrictions issued by U.S. and other governments. For additional information,
    see http://www.microsoft.com/exporting/.



    8. APPLICABLE LAW.



    If you acquired this Software Product in the United States, this EULA is
    governed by the laws of the State of Washington.


    If you acquired this Software Product in Canada, unless expressly prohibited
    by local law, this EULA is governed by the laws in force in the Province of
    Ontario, Canada; and, in respect of any dispute which may arise hereunder, you
    consent to the jurisdiction of the federal and provincial courts sitting in
    Toronto, Ontario. If this Software Product was acquired outside the United
    States, then local law may apply.


    Should you have any questions concerning this EULA, or if you desire to
    contact Microsoft for any reason, please contact the Microsoft subsidiary
    serving your country, or write: Microsoft Sales Information Center/One Microsoft
    Way/Redmond, WA 98052-6399.



    9. LIMITED WARRANTY



    LIMITED WARRANTY FOR SOFTWARE PRODUCTS ACQUIRED IN THE US AND CANADA.
    Microsoft warrants that the SOFTWARE PRODUCT will perform substantially in
    accordance with the accompanying materials for a period of ninety (90) days from
    the date of receipt.


    If an implied warranty or condition is created by your state/jurisdiction and
    federal or state/provincial law prohibits disclaimer of it, you also have an
    implied warranty or condition, BUT ONLY AS TO DEFECTS DISCOVERED DURING THE
    PERIOD OF THIS LIMITED WARRANTY (NINETY DAYS). AS TO ANY DEFECTS DISCOVERED
    AFTER THE NINETY (90) DAY PERIOD, THERE IS NO WARRANTY OR CONDITION OF ANY KIND.
    Some states/jurisdictions do not allow limitations on how long an implied
    warranty or condition lasts, so the above limitation may not apply to you.


    Any supplements or updates to the SOFTWARE PRODUCT, including without
    limitation, any (if any) service packs or hot fixes provided to you after the
    expiration of the ninety (90) day Limited Warranty period are not covered by any
    warranty or condition, express, implied or statutory.


    LIMITATION ON REMEDIES; NO CONSEQUENTIAL OR OTHER DAMAGES. Your exclusive
    remedy for any breach of this Limited Warranty is as set forth below. Except for
    any refund elected by Microsoft, YOU ARE NOT ENTITLED TO ANY DAMAGES, INCLUDING
    BUT NOT LIMITED TO CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES, if the Software Product does not meet
    Microsoft's Limited Warranty, and, to the maximum extent allowed by applicable
    law, even if any remedy fails of its essential purpose. The terms of Section 11
    below ("Exclusion of Incidental, Consequential and Certain Other
    Damages") are also incorporated into this Limited Warranty. Some
    states/jurisdictions do not allow the exclusion or limitation of incidental or
    consequential damages, so the above limitation or exclusion may not apply to
    you. This Limited Warranty gives you specific legal rights. You may have others
    which vary from state/jurisdiction to state/jurisdiction.


    YOUR EXCLUSIVE REMEDY. Microsoft's and its suppliers' entire liability and
    your exclusive remedy shall be, at Microsoft's option from time to time
    exercised subject to applicable law, (a) return of the price paid (if any) for
    the Software Product, or (b) repair or replacement of the Software Product, that
    does not meet this Limited Warranty and that is returned to Microsoft with a
    copy of your receipt. You will receive the remedy elected by Microsoft without
    charge, except that you are responsible for any expenses you may incur (e.g.
    cost of shipping the Software Product to Microsoft). This Limited Warranty is
    void if failure of the Software Product has resulted from accident, abuse,
    misapplication, abnormal use or a virus. Any replacement Software Product will
    be warranted for the remainder of the original warranty period or thirty (30)
    days, whichever is longer. Outside the United States or Canada, neither these
    remedies nor any product support services offered by Microsoft are available
    without proof of purchase from an authorized international source. To exercise
    your remedy, contact: Microsoft, Attn. Microsoft Sales Information Center/One
    Microsoft Way/Redmond, WA 98052-6399, or the Microsoft subsidiary serving your
    country.


    LIMITED WARRANTY FOR SOFTWARE PRODUCTS ACQUIRED OUTSIDE THE US AND CANADA.
    FOR THE LIMITED WARRANTIES AND SPECIAL PROVISIONS PERTAINING TO YOUR PARTICULAR
    JURISDICTION, PLEASE REFER TO YOUR WARRANTY BOOKLET INCLUDED WITH THIS PACKAGE
    OR PROVIDED WITH THE SOFTWARE PRODUCT PRINTED MATERIALS.



    10. DISCLAIMER OF WARRANTIES. THE LIMITED WARRANTY THAT APPEARS ABOVE IS
    THE ONLY EXPRESS WARRANTY MADE TO YOU AND IS PROVIDED IN LIEU OF ANY OTHER
    EXPRESS WARRANTIES (IF ANY) CREATED BY ANY DOCUMENTATION OR PACKAGING. EXCEPT
    FOR THE LIMITED WARRANTY AND TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT PERMITTED BY APPLICABLE LAW,
    MICROSOFT AND ITS SUPPLIERS PROVIDE THE SOFTWARE AND SUPPORT SERVICES (IF ANY) AS
    IS AND WITH ALL FAULTS
    , AND HEREBY DISCLAIM ALL OTHER WARRANTIES AND
    CONDITIONS, EITHER EXPRESS, IMPLIED OR STATUTORY, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO,
    ANY (IF ANY) IMPLIED WARRANTIES, DUTIES OR CONDITIONS OF MERCHANTABILITY, OF
    FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, OF ACCURACY OR COMPLETENESS OR RESPONSES, OF
    RESULTS, OF WORKMANLIKE EFFORT, OF LACK OF VIRUSES AND OF LACK OF NEGLIGENCE,
    ALL WITH REGARD TO THE SOFTWARE, AND THE PROVISION OF OR FAILURE TO PROVIDE
    SUPPORT SERVICES. ALSO, THERE IS NO WARRANTY OR CONDITION OF TITLE, QUIET
    ENJOYMENT, QUIET POSSESSION, CORRESPONDENCE TO DESCRIPTION OR NON-INFRINGEMENT
    WITH REGARD TO THE SOFTWARE.



    11. EXCLUSION OF INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL AND CERTAIN OTHER DAMAGES. TO
    THE MAXIMUM EXTENT PERMITTED BY APPLICABLE LAW, IN NO EVENT SHALL MICROSOFT OR
    ITS SUPPLIERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, INDIRECT, OR CONSEQUENTIAL
    DAMAGES WHATSOEVER (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF PROFITS
    OR CONFIDENTIAL OR OTHER INFORMATION, FOR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION, FOR PERSONAL
    INJURY, FOR LOSS OF PRIVACY, FOR FAILURE TO MEET ANY DUTY INCLUDING OF GOOD
    FAITH OR OF REASONABLE CARE, FOR NEGLIGENCE, AND FOR ANY OTHER PECUNIARY OR
    OTHER LOSS WHATSOEVER) ARISING OUT OF OR IN ANY WAY RELATED TO THE USE OF OR
    INABILITY TO USE THE SOFTWARE PRODUCT, THE PROVISION OF OR FAILURE TO PROVIDE
    SUPPORT SERVICES, OR OTHERWISE UNDER OR IN CONNECTION WITH ANY PROVISION OF THIS
    EULA, EVEN IN THE EVENT OF THE FAULT, TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE), STRICT
    LIABILITY, BREACH OF CONTRACT OR BREACH OF WARRANTY OF MICROSOFT OR ANY
    SUPPLIER, AND EVEN IF MICROSOFT OR ANY SUPPLIER HAS BEEN ADVISED OF THE
    POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES.



    12. LIMITATION OF LIABILITY AND REMEDIES. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY DAMAGES
    THAT YOU MIGHT INCUR FOR ANY REASON WHATSOEVER (INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION,
    ALL DAMAGES REFERENCED ABOVE AND ALL DIRECT OR GENERAL DAMAGES), THE ENTIRE
    LIABILITY OF MICROSOFT AND ANY OF ITS SUPPLIERS UNDER ANY PROVISION OF THIS EULA
    AND YOUR EXCLUSIVE REMEDY FOR ALL OF THE FOREGOING (EXCEPT FOR ANY REMEDY OF
    REPAIR OR REPLACEMENT ELECTED BY MICROSOFT WITH RESPECT TO ANY BREACH OF THE
    LIMITED WARRANTY) SHAL BE LIMITED TO THE GREATER OF THE AMOUNT ACTUALLY PAID BY
    YOU FOR THE SOFTWARE OR U.S. $5.00. THE FOREGOING LIMITATIONS, EXCLUSIONS AND
    DISCLAIMERS (INCLUDING SECTIONS 7, 8, AND 9 ABOVE) SHALL APPLY TO THE MAXIMUM
    EXTENT PERMITTED BY APPLICABLE LAW, EVEN IF ANY REMEDY FAILS ITS ESSENTIAL
    PURPOSE.



    13. ENTIRE AGREEMENT. This EULA (including any addendum or amendment to
    this EULA which is included with the Software Product) is the entire agreement
    between you and Microsoft relating to the Software Product and the support
    services (if any) and they supersede all prior or contemporaneous oral or
    written communications, proposals and representations with respect to the
    Software Product or any other subject matter covered by this EULA. To the extent
    the terms of any Microsoft policies or programs for support services conflict
    with the terms of this EULA, the terms of this EULA shall control.


    Si vous avez acquis votre produit Microsoft au CANADA, la garantie limitée
    suivante vous concerne :


    GARANTIE LIMITÉE


    Microsoft garantit que le Produit fonctionnera conformément aux documents
    inclus pendant une période de 90 jours suivant la date de réception.


    Si une garantie ou condition implicite est créée par votre État ou votre
    territoire et qu'une loi fédérale ou provinciale ou État en interdit le
    déni, vous jouissez également d'une garantie ou condition implicite, MAIS
    UNIQUEMENT POUR LES DÉFAUTS DÉCOUVERTS DURANT LA PÉRIODE DE LA PRÉSENTE
    GARANTIE LIMITÉE (QUATRE-VINGT-DIX JOURS). IL N'Y A AUCUNE GARANTIE OU
    CONDITION DE QUELQUE NATURE QUE CE SOIT QUANT AUX DÉFAUTS DÉCOUVERTS APRÈS
    CETTE PÉRIODE DE QUATRE-VINGT-DIX JOURS. Certains États ou territoires ne
    permettent pas de limiter la durée d'une garantie ou condition implicite de
    sorte que la limitation cidessus peut ne pas s'appliquer à vous.


    Tous les suppléments ou toutes les mises à jour relatifs au Produit,
    notamment, les ensembles de services ou les réparations à chaud (le cas
    échéant) qui vous sont fournis après l'expiration de la période de
    quatre-vingt-dix jours de la garantie limitée ne sont pas couverts par quelque
    garantie ou condition que ce soit, expresse ou implicite.


    LIMITATION DES RECOURS; ABSENCE DE DOMMAGES INDIRECTS OU AUTRES. Votre
    recours exclusif pour toute violation de la présente garantie limitée est
    décrit ciaprès. Sauf pour tout remboursement au choix de Microsoft, si le
    Produit ne respecte pas la garantie limitée de Microsoft et, dans la mesure
    maximale permise par les lois applicables, même si tout recours n'atteint pas
    son but essentiel, VOUS N'AVEZ DROIT À AUCUNS DOMMAGES, NOTAMMENT DES
    DOMMAGES INDIRECTS. Les modalités de la clause Exclusion des dommages
    accessoires, indirects et de certains autres dommages sont également
    intégrées à la présente garantie limitée. Certains États ou territoires ne
    permettent pas l'exclusion ou la limitation des dommages indirects ou
    accessoires de sorte que la limitation ou l'exclusion cidessus peut ne pas s'appliquer
    à vous. La présente garantie limitée vous donne des droits légaux
    spécifiques. Vous pouvez avoir d'autres droits qui peuvent varier d'un
    territoire ou d'un État à un autre. VOTRE RECOURS EXCLUSIF. L'obligation
    intégrale de Microsoft et de ses fournisseurs et votre recours exclusif seront,
    selon le choix de Microsoft de temps à autre sous réserve de toute loi
    applicable, a) le remboursement du prix payé, le cas échéant, pour le Produit
    ou b) la réparation ou le remplacement du Produit qui ne respecte pas la
    présente garantie limitée et qui est retourné à Microsoft avec une copie de
    votre reçu. Vous recevrez la compensation choisie par Microsoft, sans frais,
    sauf que vous êtes responsable des dépenses que vous pourriez engager (p. ex.,
    les frais d'envoi du Produit à Microsoft). La présente garantie limitée est
    nulle si la défectuosité du Produit est causée par un accident, un usage
    abusif, une mauvaise application, un usage anormal ou un virus. Tout Produit de
    remplacement sera garanti pour le reste de la période de garantie initiale ou
    pendant trente (30) jours, selon la plus longue entre ces deux périodes. À l'extérieur
    des États-Unis ou du Canada, ces recours ou l'un quelconque des services de
    soutien technique offerts par Microsoft ne sont pas disponibles sans preuve d'achat
    d'une source internationale autorisée. Pour exercer votre recours, vous devez
    communiquer avec Microsoft et vous adresser au Microsoft Sales Information
    Center/One Microsoft Way/Redmond, WA 98052-6399, ou à la filiale de Microsoft
    de votre pays.


    DÉNI DE GARANTIES. La garantie limitée mentionnée ci-dessus constitue la
    seule garantie expresse qui vous est donnée et remplace toutes autres garanties
    expresses (s'il en est) mentionnées dans un document ou sur un emballage.
    Sauf en ce qui a trait à la garantie limitée et dans la mesure maximale
    permise par les lois applicables, le Produit et les services de soutien
    technique (le cas échéant) sont fournis TELS QUELS ET AVEC TOUS LES
    DÉFAUTS
    par Microsoft et ses fournisseurs, lesquels par les présentes
    dénient toutes autres garanties et conditions expresses, implicites ou en vertu
    de la loi, notamment (le cas échéant) les garanties, devoirs ou conditions
    implicites de qualité marchande, d'adaptation à un usage particulier, d'exactitude
    ou d'exhaustivité des réponses, des résultats, des efforts déployés selon
    les règles de l'art, d'absence de virus et de négligence, le tout à l'égard
    du Produit et de la prestation des services de soutien technique ou de l'omission
    d'une telle prestation. PAR AILLEURS, IL N'Y A AUCUNE GARANTIE OU CONDITION
    QUANT AU TITRE DE PROPRIÉTÉ, À LA JOUISSANCE OU LA POSSESSION PAISIBLE, À LA
    CONCORDANCE À UNE DESCRIPTION NI QUANT À UNE ABSENCE DE CONTREFAÇON
    CONCERNANT LE PRODUIT.


    EXCLUSION DES DOMMAGES ACCESSOIRES, INDIRECTS ET DE CERTAINS AUTRES DOMMAGES.
    DANS LA MESURE MAXIMALE PERMISE PAR LES LOIS APPLICABLES, EN AUCUN CAS MICROSOFT
    OU SES FOURNISSEURS NE SERONT RESPONSABLES DES DOMMAGES SPÉCIAUX, CONSÉCUTIFS,
    ACCESSOIRES OU INDIRECTS DE QUELQUE NATURE QUE CE SOIT (NOTAMMENT, LES DOMMAGES
    À L'ÉGARD DU MANQUE À GAGNER OU DE LA DIVULGATION DE RENSEIGNEMENTS
    CONFIDENTIELS OU AUTRES, DE LA PERTE D'EXPLOITATION, DE BLESSURES CORPORELLES,
    DE LA VIOLATION DE LA VIE PRIVÉE, DE L'OMISSION DE REMPLIR TOUT DEVOIR, Y
    COMPRIS D'AGIR DE BONNE FOI OU D'EXERCER UN SOIN RAISONNABLE, DE LA
    NÉGLIGENCE ET DE TOUTE AUTRE PERTE PÉCUNIAIRE OU AUTRE PERTE DE QUELQUE NATURE
    QUE CE SOIT) SE RAPPORTANT DE QUELQUE MANIÈRE QUE CE SOIT À L'UTILISATION DU
    PRODUIT OU À L'INCAPACITÉ DE S'EN SERVIR, À LA PRESTATION OU À L'OMISSION
    D'UNE TELLE PRESTATION DE SERVICES DE SOUTIEN TECHNIQUE OU AUTREMENT AUX
    TERMES DE TOUTE DISPOSITION DU PRÉSENT EULA OU RELATIVEMENT À UNE TELLE
    DISPOSITION, MÊME EN CAS DE FAUTE, DE DÉLIT CIVIL (Y COMPRIS LA NÉGLIGENCE),
    DE RESPONSABILITÉ STRICTE, DE VIOLATION DE CONTRAT OU DE VIOLATION DE GARANTIE
    DE MICROSOFT OU DE TOUT FOURNISSEUR ET MÊME SI MICROSOFT OU TOUT FOURNISSEUR A
    ÉTÉ AVISÉ DE LA POSSIBILITÉ DE TELS DOMMAGES.


    LIMITATION DE RESPONSABILITÉ ET RECOURS. Malgré les dommages que vous
    puissiez subir pour quelque motif que ce soit (notamment, tous les dommages
    susmentionnés et tous les dommages directs ou généraux), l'obligation
    intégrale de Microsoft et de l'un ou l'autre de ses fournisseurs aux termes
    de toute disposition du présent EULA et votre recours exclusif à l'égard de
    tout ce qui précède (sauf en ce qui concerne tout recours de réparation ou de
    remplacement choisi par Microsoft à l'égard de tout manquement à la
    garantie limitée) se limite au plus élevé entre les montants suivants : le
    montant que vous avez réellement payé pour le Produit ou 5,00 $US. Les
    limites, exclusions et dénis qui précèdent (y compris les clauses ci-dessus),
    s'appliquent dans la mesure maximale permise par les lois applicables, même
    si tout recours n'atteint pas son but essentiel.


    La présente Convention est régie par les lois de la province d'Ontario,
    Canada. Chacune des parties à la présente reconnaît irrévocablement la
    compétence des tribunaux de la province d'Ontario et consent à instituer
    tout litige qui pourrait découler de la présente auprès des tribunaux situés
    dans le district judiciaire de York, province d'Ontario.


    Au cas où vous auriez des questions concernant cette licence ou que vous
    désiriez vous mettre en rapport avec Microsoft pour quelque raison que ce soit,
    veuillez contacter la succursale Microsoft desservant votre pays, dont l'adresse
    est fournie dans ce produit, ou écrivez à : Microsoft Sales Information
    Center, One Microsoft Way, Redmond, Washington 98052-6399.



  154. Where... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    have all the mod points gone? God, it's depressing... and it sucks. There's so few of them, it's tough to sift the +1's from the karma bonus crowd - that makes for lame reading.

  155. Re:Ahh, but Nike had their own version of this cla by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes...I remember that...i have the whole email conversation somewhere. Hmm....wonder where it is.

  156. Not interesting by clovis · · Score: 1

    This would only be interesting if it had appeared in the Apache or GNU license.

    'You may not use the Software in connection with any site that disparages Microsoft, MSN, MSNBC, Expedia, or their products or services

    Because IIS is guaranteed to get you 'owned', and thus be a source of disparagement, the license simply means that you aren't allowed to use Frontpage with IIS.

  157. I have problems by INicheI · · Score: 0

    I guess I will be being sued, my site doesnt really "promote" microsoft. More of like Demote, and I did use FrontPage 2002.

  158. Have a look at this by Mr_Perl · · Score: 1
    Well you see doctor, I have these fantasies about taking over the world...


    (bill gates currently pictured laying back on a loveseat surrounded by half lit lightbulbs)

    --

    My poetry site welcomes the unusual.
  159. So, what's the difference, ethically? by DunbarTheInept · · Score: 2
    Okay, so instead of it being illegal to use product "MS foo" to say disparaging things about MS, it's actually "MS bar" that's illegal to use to say disparaging things about MS. From an ethical standpoint, the issue is no different. It's still just as slimy either way.

    And, further, in this case, the "MS bar" in question is a product that, while not technically always required for MS foo to work, is required for the full set of features of MS foo to work.

    In practice, however, this probably won't come up often, given that a site that is disparaging of MS is probably NOT going to be edited in Frontpage.

    --

    Don't label something "offtopic" unless you know the topic well enough to tell what's on topic.

  160. Hmmm... I wonder... by DA_MAN_DA_MYTH · · Score: 1

    How does that stand against the First Amendment? A license agreement that loudly that prohibits free speech? Our government would never allow that...

    Oh wait the DMCA and possibly coming soon to a computer near you... the 3SCA!

    --
    "It takes many nails to build a crib, but one screw to fill it."
  161. Did anyone actually read the rest of the article by PaulZ · · Score: 1

    It actually has some very interesting points about his view of the future of Microsoft and where they are headed...

    Its a shame the submitter had to focus on this minor point in the article.

  162. Do I have this right? by lcypher · · Score: 2, Interesting

    From what I understand, you cannot read the EULA until you have purchased the product, opened the shrink wrap, and placed the CD in your CD-ROM and begun the install process.

    So, if you end up disagreeing with the EULA, you cannot take it back because most stores do not allow returns of opened software if there was no defect.

    Do I have this right?

  163. Did anyone read the EULA? by CthulhuDragon · · Score: 1

    Did anyone bother to check the EULA itself? Here is what it says:


    For purposes of this section, the Software means the FrontPage Web components, including the MSNBC news headline component, the MSN MoneyCentral Stock Quote component, and the MSN Search component.

    You may not use the Software in connection
    with any site that disparages Microsoft, MSN, MSNBC, Expedia or their products or services, infringe any intellectual property or other rights of these parties, violate any state, federal or international law, or promote racism, hatred, or pornography.


    They are not talking about Frontpage! They are only covering the Microsoft Web components! This has nothing to do with pages made with Frontpage itself! But then it was too hard for the author of the article to verify the "tip" he got from a reader.

    1. Re:Did anyone read the EULA? by blowdart · · Score: 1

      That clause isn't even in my EULA. It does however talk about not using the clip art to make anything obscene. Spoilsports.

    2. Re:Did anyone read the EULA? by abumarie · · Score: 1

      Ok, lets grant you your point. M$ is still attempting to gag you through the eula in their software. Further, one of the takaway points of the article is that given the structure that is going to be in place going forward, today's eula is not necessarilly tomorrows eula.

      --


      Sex is heriditary, if your parents didn't have it chances are good you won't either.
    3. Re:Did anyone read the EULA? by Chris+Johnson · · Score: 2
      Alright: so you cannot make a page which compares MSNBC reporting with, say, Reuters, and draws comment to MSNBC's version using the news headline component- and you cannot make a page with MSN Search annotated with some search terms and MS-biased results that wouldn't be found by normal search engines.

      But this is a smokescreen because you're not lawyer enough to read what you've posted. The web components INCLUDE those wizzy features. They are not LIMITED to those things, they just include them. Anyone have a complete list of what constitutes a FrontPage web component? Like, say, an uploading tool, perchance? Is it even possible to make and upload a FrontPage page without using a 'FrontPage web component'?

      You are waaaaay too naive for anything named 'CthulhuDragon' ;)

    4. Re:Did anyone read the EULA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      'Is it even possible to make and upload a FrontPage page without using a 'FrontPage web component'?
      Of course you can! Frontpage creates standard HTML compatible pages now, and they can be FTP'ed as you would any other file.
      Not everyone uses FP for 'sites', but, as in my case, for their massively powerful table building tools.
      FP HTML = text.
      (Please note, I think that /. would run better with FP.)
      :-)

    5. Re:Did anyone read the EULA? by CthulhuDragon · · Score: 1

      Of course it should also be noted (as the story itself was also corrected) that this is found in the license agreement for the Frontpage LOGO. I didn't notice that at first either. My only beef with this entire post, and the article that it came from, is that people can't be bothered to even check the most basic facts about a story before posting it. If you check it out first you are on much stronger grounds with your arguments, and I for one would be much more prone to listen. Otherwise I just write it off as baseless Microsoft bashing.

      As for the 'CthulhuDragon', I came up with that name about 7 years ago (I was 15 at the time), and am just too lazy to come up with a new nic. ;)

  164. That would only invalidate ALL contracts EVER by kryzx · · Score: 1

    Something along the lines of: "No corporation may violate any rights which the government is not allowed to violate."

    The whole point of contracts is to get you to agree to do something you wouldn't otherwise be bound to do. For example, the gov't can't tell me not to go to work for company X. But when company Y hires me they want me to sign a non-compete agreeing not to go to work for company X. That is, giving up my *right* to work for company X. All contracts are about giving up some rights in exchange for something. (Naturally, IM ANAL, no, wait, that's not what I meant...)

    --
    "I don't know half of you half as well as I should like, and I like less than half of you half as well as you deserve."
    1. Re:That would only invalidate ALL contracts EVER by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, but there are some rights you can't give up by contract, such as the right to work... Whether or not this is one of those rights, I don't know.

  165. You give up your rights by CiceroLove · · Score: 1

    The constitution ensures that no one may abridge your right to free speech except where you give up that right yourself. That is what happens here. By using the product, you agree to the terms of its use and you abridge your own right to say what you want. The constitution would provide recourse if there were no clause and M$ were tryign to stop you from saying things about it because you use their products. You all need to read more than just the Constitution.

  166. Have a read, it's been quoted in a comment by Cardinal · · Score: 2

    http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=21808&cid=2325 883 Odd. I couldn't format that as an anchor, the lameness filter kicked in. But anyway, the EULA is quoted in that comment. Enjoy.

  167. Re:This relates only to Front Page SERVER COMPONEN by DunbarTheInept · · Score: 4, Interesting
    It merely restricts visible elements (server-side controls and such) from being associated with objectionable content. And that seems pretty reasonable to me.
    Not all server-side things are "visible elements" to the user. No, plain and simple MS is saying you can't use MS FOO to communicate something bad about MS. It doesn't matter one iota whether MS FOO is an entire product or a subset of a prodcut (as in this case). The ethical issue is still the same. Here's an analogy: The phone company saying you can't use their three-way calling, caller ID, call waiting, or voice mail to say bad things about the phone company to your friends, but you can still use the more mundane generic phone call to do so. If you can't see what's wrong with that, then your psychology is so different from mine that you might as well be an alien.
    --

    Don't label something "offtopic" unless you know the topic well enough to tell what's on topic.

  168. Hotmail Users by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Next M$ will say "All Hotmail users cannot repond, or read forums which bash M$".

  169. Re:Did anyone actually read the rest of the articl by alexmogil · · Score: 1
    It's kind of hard to read any of that article objectively when the main thrust of the article doesn't exist. Unless there's some Illuminati-like hidden EULA on my system, there is no such anti-MS clause in the FrontPage EULA.

    Perhaps it's in French?

    --
    A winner is you!
  170. Please Guys!!! by cOdEgUru · · Score: 1

    It really hurts the whole community as such to see some crap being reported with an ounce of truth, and then having to revert it.

    We are not a bunch of fanatics.

    Lets not post stories without checking first. The whole slashdot community would look in front of the whole world to be a bunch of open source fanatic geeks who goes ballistic after a mis-reported piece of rumour.

    Lets check the stories for consistency and truth before posting them, or else, we pose the risk of going down in history as a bunch of idiots who clamour for war at anything with the tag "Microsoft" on it.

  171. Not a good thing - unless you're MS by Durindana · · Score: 1

    Unfortunately, the Supreme Court hasn't concluded free speech is as important as free action. People are completely at liberty to sign away their rights to freedom of speech, whether it be technical information or simply expression of opinion. Contract law allows this (see The Insider for a good pop take on this phenomenon) and the only way to combat MS is the simplest way - don't buy their products. Don't use Hotmail. Don't patronize their websites. Isolate and destroy. Period.

  172. Frontpage 2002 EULA by DCowern · · Score: 1

    Well, I'm not a MS fan to say the least but I didn't see anything in the EULA saying what I could or could not publish using FP2002. To top it off, apparently Slashdot REALLY doesn't like MS EULAs... every time I tried to post it here I get: Lameness filter encountered. Post aborted! so I've put the EULA up at http://www.perplexion.org/fp2002eula.htm complete with MS's stylesheets so it looks just as it does in Frontpage's help.

    1. Re:Frontpage 2002 EULA by blowdart · · Score: 1

      I encoutered the same problem. it's the font tags that slashcode barfs on.

  173. Have you been censored yet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Doesn't look that way. Oh well.

  174. Re:This relates only to Front Page SERVER COMPONEN by dragons_flight · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    Neat trick rOD.

    First you write a 5, Informative article with a little information and then reply to your own article with more information and getting another 5, Informative.

    I'd call you a karma whore, but judging solely from your ID number you probably don't need the karma. This will probably get modded down but then I don't need the karma either.

    I am glad you posted this though, while others might disagree there does seem to be a substantial difference between "don't use our tools to bash us" and "don't use our tools to make stuff that bashes us".

  175. Free speech freaks everywhere rejoice! by ziplux · · Score: 1

    Yet again slashdot manages to make a big deal out of NOTHING! First rule of journalism...verify the facts before you write an article. Jeez!

  176. I wouldn't want people to either . . . . by evilroot · · Score: 1

    While I love M$ no more than the next /. reader, I'm inclined to side them on this one. I have no problems with people criticizing my work, yet nonetheless I wouldn't want them using logos or banners of my creation on their site that does so. And its not just M$ that does this either; I'm a student at NCSU and it says quite clearly in my web space usage policy that their "Wolf" logos may not be used on any site which insults the university, or that is designed to generate a profit. It simply means that they don't want it to appear that such sites are sponsored by the university. Is there anything wrong with that?

    *Sigh* A few hours ago if someone had told me I'd be defending M$ in a /. discussion, I would have laughed for long time . . . . .

  177. woops by nsanit · · Score: 1
    I wonder if the new versions of IE will have something like:

    • The end user shall not view anti-MS material with this browser
    • The end user shall not post anti-MS statements in chat rooms or on message boards with this browser
    • The end user shall not visit any site promoting products of any company other than MS
    • The end user shall not install any other web browsing software on the computer where this browser resides, unless the other browser is a newer version of IE
    • By downloading and installing this browser you have agreed to the terms of this license retroactively to the date of your birth
    • If you are found in contempt of this agreement you agree to render all personal worth to MS, and to spend the rest of your natural life imprisoned in a facility of the choosing of MS


    In all seriousness, dont use it if you dont like the license. The thing I dislike about most EULs and that sort of thing is that most of the time when you're buying software you can't agree to the license before heading to the checkout line. Additionally, most companies (esp MS) like to hide the language that limits the use of the software from the end user. Or making it where once you've been able to read the EUL it's too late (I think MS got in trouble for that one already).
    --
    They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.-Franklin
  178. Frontpage, what's that? by genkael · · Score: 1

    I didn't know there was any other choice for editing web pages than vi. At least I could make an anti vi or M$ site with it without breaking the license. And if I was really going to make an anti vi site wouldn't I want to do it with emacs? So why would I use Frontpage for an anti M$ site?

    --
    GeneralKael -- Slacker Extraordinaire
  179. Why would scientists try to censor something? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Doesn't make sense...

  180. Another clause that you should know about... by chinton · · Score: 1
    • In order to use this product you must kill your first born son while chanting "Give this soul over to William H. Gates (the one true god) so that he may rule wisely. Praise be to Bill.". In the event that you do not have children you must seek out the first male child you see, kill him while chanting the above.


    Oh, that clause isn't in there, you say? To that I say "bullshit" because no one on Slashdot would doubt it and waste their time doing any independant verification.

  181. Re:This relates only to Front Page SERVER COMPONEN by MMORG · · Score: 1
    You're right - not every Frontpage web component is Microsoft-branded and creates an association between the page content and MS in the reader's mind. However, many of them are. There's a bCentral banner ad control. There's an Expedia map control. There's an MSN search control. There's an MSNBC headline control.

    If someone creates a web site with objectionable material - say, praising last week's terrorist actions - and plasters those Microsoft web controls all over the page, people who read that page will see Microsoft, Microsoft, Microsoft everywhere they look. Someone will call the news media, and the next thing you know, there are reports that Microsoft supports terrorism. If you think that's ridiculous, just think back to the wingdings episode, which I see has been revived again due to last week's events. You still think people wouldn't stoop to spreading ridiculous, out-of-context, warped FUD like that? See this link.

    If you step back from the legalese that inevitably accompanies a document like a license agreement and ask yourself, "What are they TRYING to say?", it's obvious that they're not trying to restrict the types of content that people may produce. All they're trying to do is prevent implied endorsement of objectionable content by use of Microsoft-branded controls. Any attempt to read it differently probably demonstrates an over-active paranoia at work.

  182. Not quite the same by Bilbo · · Score: 2
    In this case, it was NIKE putting the letters/words on the sneekers, even though it was at the request of the customer. As such, they were to some extent legally responsible for them. Hence, I'm sure they wouldn't have put in words like F--K YOU or FREE S-X or whatever.

    Granted, putting NIKE SUX on their own shoes isn't in quite the same category as the examples above, but I don't think it's unreasonable for them to refuse.

    On the other hand, if I create a MS.SUX website, I am responsible for the content regardless of what tool I use to create it. I don't see how MS can legitimately bitch about it. On the other hand, I can see how it would be legal to create such restrictions (not that much different from the "no published benchmarks" clause in other EUL's), but it sure sounds sleezy...

    --
    Your Servant, B. Baggins
  183. Damn, there goes my excuse... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "FWIW, the clause appears only in the EULA agreement for use of the FrontPage Logo, not with the product or server extensions license."

    Damn, there goes my chance to pull its use at the university...oh, but i will find a way.

  184. Against all constitutional laws by Chris+Hill · · Score: 1

    Well, Microsoft has done it again... This time, they have gone againsts constitutional laws in several countries, and thus can be prosecuted for this, in the same way a government can be prosecuted for breaking, for example, the first amendment law of the US. These laws are there for a reason. By having this, you allow a democracy. Microsoft, in using this has enabled us to list them as people who are attempting to create a tyrany, or at the very least, a dictatorship. This is the first time, however, that Microsoft's lawyers, who should have known better while designing the service agreement, have completely chucked out all forms of legal propriety. They have now fully admited, in terms of this service agreement, that laws, federal, provincial, state, or international, do not matter. They prefer to be known as people who are against the public, and wish to control them and the thoughts that they have. Ironic, considering that MSNBC, a Microsoft subdivision with NBC News Productions depends upon the very law they are trampling.

  185. Re:Did anyone actually read the rest of the articl by PaulZ · · Score: 1

    This wasn't the main thrust of the article. Perhaps you should read it again.

  186. Help! by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

    Frontpage is a shoddy, worthless piece of...let go of me...where are you taking me!!!...aaahhhhhh!

    --
    It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
  187. So, What's Different? by Bilbo · · Score: 2
    Have you ever tried opening a frontpage-generated HTML file in a text editor? Bleedin' Christ, it's a damned mess.
    'Tis the Microsoft Way!

    Actually, it's not all that different from using any other GUI editor. The whole point of using a WYSIWYG editor is that you don't need to see the ugly underlying formatting code! Fer chrissakes, if we all wanted to deal with format codes, we'd still be using nroff/troff and dot commands. The point of using Frontpage, or any other GUI based editor, is that it makes it easier to maintain the page, in a way that sort-of looks like it did when you edited it. Of course, this points out the sillyness of the original suggestion. Once you've doinked with the underlying HTML, you can't use (legally) FP to update or maintain the pages.

    --
    Your Servant, B. Baggins
  188. Alert: Bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have FrontPage 2002, went to the help screen to find the license, and discovered that no such clause exists in it. This entire thread is bullshit. A search throught the text found no instances of the clause referred to 'You may not use the Software in connection with any site that disparages Microsoft, MSN, MSNBC, Expedia, or their products or services ...', particularly, I searched for disparages, MSN, MSNBC, and Expedia. These words are not in the license agreement. If they are, please point out which section and paragraph (There are 13 sections in the "END USER LICENSE AGREEMENT FOR MICROSOFT SOFTWARE"). Otherwise, stop wasting your time, and for God's sake, stop wasting everyone else's.

    And apparently the only person who found the real place that the clause is, and gave you all a link to it, got a score of 2: Flamebait for posting it. That link is: http://www.microsoft.com/frontpage/logo.htm

    1. Re:Alert: Bullshit by Pituritus+Ani · · Score: 1

      Of course, as a holder of a Frontpage licence, you have to say that.

      --

      Another proud carrier of the $rtbl flag

  189. Re:This relates only to Front Page SERVER COMPONEN by MMORG · · Score: 1

    Hey, how about that! CmdrTaco did update the article!

  190. Ummm, sex-starved? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ok, I concede to the smelly, and I'm a geek, but I don't have spots, and my wife doesn't appreciate having her strong efforts to please me (yes, in that way) being degraded as such. No, my wife isn't a geek, no, she isn't a model, but you didn't mention anything about looks in the post (I still think she's beautiful).

  191. The EULA in Office XP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Office XP in the EULA states you can not run benchmark tests of this product and publish them without the written consent of Microsoft...whats up with that?

  192. A Libertarian masquerading as a Greenie? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Worship Satan. Just kidding, I'm a devout Christian.

    ???????

    I don't get it.

    1. Re:A Libertarian masquerading as a Greenie? by sys$manager · · Score: 1

      IT WAS A JOKE! Nader protects consumers. If Nader was in, MS would be toast. That was the point.

  193. So they'll simply add filtering by epsalon · · Score: 1

    So we'll see next version of MSIE will have a 'feature' to automatically filter out objectionable material.
    Ofcourse, MS will decide what the nature of the objectionable material is. I guess /. will be on the filer list as well as all Linux sites.
    As usual, MS will make this feature very hard/impossible to disable in order to further cripple the user's web experience.

  194. Microsoft in verse... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Home home on the web
    Where the folks who have FrontPage can play
    Where seldom is heard
    A disparaging word...

    because our lawyers have wrote it that way...

  195. Another example of Microsoft bashing by pvera · · Score: 1

    Is it really that hard to check the facts first before slashdotting something?

    I know you are going to bash Microsoft no matter what, but it would be nice if every now and then you actually try to check the story first.

    --
    Pedro
    ----
    The Insomniac Coder
  196. The Thought Police are after me. by ErichTheRed · · Score: 1

    http://www.suffusions.net/~eric

  197. Sun does the same thing by lseltzer · · Score: 1
    See http://www.sun.com/logos/dot-com/trademark-static. html

    "You may not use the Logo in connection with any disparaging statements about Sun or its products, or statements that otherwise reflect poorly on Sun."

    I bet this is standard practice for any logo program

  198. Re:This relates only to Front Page SERVER COMPONEN by 5KVGhost · · Score: 1

    You are correct in assuming that the FP Server Extensions are a different animal from the "FrontPage Web Components".

    You are incorrect in stating that the server extensions are "required to serve frontpage HTML". FP will indeed work on a web server without the server extensions installed. Some extra server-side functionality provided by the extensions will be disabled, but everything else works just fine, including serving the pages.

  199. Not really by einhverfr · · Score: 2

    Not really--

    IIS is insecure, FrontPage server extensions can effectively reduce the uptime of a site, and Windows XP requires activation on most installations creating a real liability for small to midsize companies.

    All of this is not to diminish the fact that Microsoft is a really great company. They have been at least partly responsible for making computers affordable because of innovation, if not in technical fields, at least in economic ones.

    Can I use the logo now?

    --

    LedgerSMB: Open source Accounting/ERP
  200. Not really by einhverfr · · Score: 2

    Let me see.

    I myself would have some problem recommending all-Microsoft products to customers. IIS is insecure, and along with FrontPage Server Extensions, can lead to downtime on e-commerce web-sites much in excess of what one sees in the UNIX world. Also Windows XP requires activation, and the tampering with certain files can render this action void, creating a very real liability for many companies.

    All of this is not to dimish the fact that Microsoft is a really great company. What they have lacked in technical know-how or innovation (or security) they have made up for in economic innovation, helping to reduce the price of software well below that of other proprietary products.

    Can I use the logo now?

    --

    LedgerSMB: Open source Accounting/ERP
  201. How Does Crow Taste? by VividU · · Score: 1

    Does it taste like Chicken?

  202. I don't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let's assume ... just for the sake of argument ... that the Front Page license actually contained a clause that said you cannot use Front Page to create an anti-Microsoft web site.

    If you were going to create an anti-microsoft website, wouldn't you use a non-microsoft program to do it?

  203. Properly Retrack this Article by BlingBlings · · Score: 1

    Nice reporting. God forbid you should double check before you post.

    This is typical EULA for any company's logo.

    I also like the way you appended a retraction at the end of the article. The better thing to do would be to also change the article title to reflect the retraction.

    You guys totally rip on Microsoft(and most of the time your in the right) and then when you clearly in the wrong, you tag a little change on the end of the article, but leave the errant title up.

    I call shenanigans on this. Come on guys, slashdot is usually better than this. Check your sources and when your in the wrong fess up.

    BlingBlings
    --Flossin it Slashdot style.

    --
    -BlingBlings Flossin it /. style
    1. Re:Properly Retrack this Article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it is not! suck my feet? please?
      -- heidi wall

  204. Other Microsoft Logos by DavidJA · · Score: 1
    From the Microsoft MSCE site:

    Using the Logo
    You must enter into the Microsoft Certified Professional Program Agreement (the "Agreement") before using the Logo. The Logo may be used only to indicate that you have met the criteria to be a Microsoft Certified Professional. If you do not maintain your certification, or your Microsoft Certified Professional Program Agreement has expired or is terminated, you must immediately discontinue use of the Logo.
    You may use the Logo only on your business cards, letterhead, and resume to indicate that you are a Microsoft Certified Professional. You may not use the Logo on any product or material.
    You may not alter the Logo artwork in any way. The Logo may not be translated or otherwise localized into any other language. Any localized versions of the Logo must be provided by Microsoft.
    You may not display the Logo in any manner that suggests you are an employee of Microsoft or in a manner that suggests "Microsoft" is a part of your company name. Your use of the Logo must clearly indicate that you are independent from Microsoft.
    You may not use the Logo in any manner that is derogatory to or critical of Microsoft or any Microsoft product.
    Your name, trade name, or company name must appear on any materials where the Logo is used. The Logo cannot appear larger or more prominent than your name, product or service name, trademark or service mark, logo, or trade or company name.
    The Logo may not be used in any manner that expresses or might imply Microsoft's affiliation, sponsorship, endorsement, certification, or approval, other than as set forth by the Microsoft Certified Professional Program Agreement.
    The Logo, or any elements thereof, may not be included in your trade or business name, domain name, product or service name, logo, trade dress, design, slogan, or other trademarks.
    You may not combine the Logo with any other object, including, but not limited to, other logos, icons, words, graphics, photos, slogans, numbers, design features, symbols, or Web site audio files.
    The Logo may not be used as a design feature on any of your materials.
    The Logo may not be imitated in any manner in your materials.
    The Logo shall be attributed to Microsoft Corporation with the following attribution clause in all materials where it is used: "Microsoft is a registered trademark of Microsoft Corporation in the United States and other countries."

    Link Microsofts MCSE site

  205. So were those great American heroes.... by MemeRot · · Score: 2

    So were those great American heroes, the Dukes of Hazard...
    "Making their way,
    the only way they know how,
    but that's just a little bit more
    than the law'll allow"

    The problem is that Bill's way is also a "little bit more than the law'll allow". I think it's high time we sicced Roscoe P. Coltrane on him. Without the General Lee Bill's got no chance :)

  206. Re:This relates only to Front Page SERVER COMPONEN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It took some digging to figure out what the FP Server Extentions actually *do*. At first I thought they were for content uploading only, but it appears that they have some CGI-like features.

    http://cte.uncwil.edu/how2/fp_extensions/

  207. what next by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    unfortunatly any legal attempt to address the issues of freespeach in frontpage was ended as the licence of using MS word wich had been resently modified to say that "no agruments or anything negative about MS could be created with that program either"

    don't worry. . sigularity is coming ..

  208. Oh well.... by brad3378 · · Score: 1

    I'd rather use a pic like this one anyway.

    --

  209. Have microsoft broken their own guidelines by moatz · · Score: 1

    Guideline No 5 states: "The Logo must appear by itself, with a minimum spacing (30 pixels) between each side of the Logo and other graphic or textual elements on your page....."

    If you look at the logo at the bottom of the screen it is only 13 pixels away from the text at the bottom of the screen.

  210. Re:This relates only to Front Page SERVER COMPONEN by DunbarTheInept · · Score: 2
    It doesn't matter what was intended. What is *written* is NOT what you say. What is written is that you cannot use frontpage server-side elements for anything disparaging of Microsoft. Period. It does not say, "but only if the MS logo shows up on the screen when you do it."


    And besides, any idiot can tell that "group Foo uses MS software to do Bar" is not the same thing as "MS supports Bar". Or at least it would if MS didn't go around plastering their logo on every little component. (Do they? I don't know since I don't use their web stuff, I'm insuating that they do from your response {otherwise your response doesn't make any sense at all}.)

    --

    Don't label something "offtopic" unless you know the topic well enough to tell what's on topic.

  211. Umm.. no.. by Danse · · Score: 2

    If someone creates a web site with objectionable material - say, praising last week's terrorist actions - and plasters those Microsoft web controls all over the page, people who read that page will see Microsoft, Microsoft, Microsoft everywhere they look. Someone will call the news media, and the next thing you know, there are reports that Microsoft supports terrorism.


    If you read it, I could do exactly that without violating the license. They're only concerned with me using their controls in conjunction with disparaging Microsoft itself, not using them in conjunction with unpopular speech.

    --
    It's not enough to bash in heads, you've got to bash in minds. - Captain Hammer
  212. Writing a M$ hate site. by attobyte · · Score: 1

    Anyone that would know enough, to want to write a M$ hate site. Would not need to use Front Page... end of story, next.

    --
    I didn't use the preview button, so get over it!!!!

    Mike

  213. Sig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sig (Score:)
    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday September 19, @07:00PM (#)
    One of the big problems with the internet is people find it too easy, to do things on the internet anonomously with no come back,
    spoofing mungs in a blizzard of hotmail accounts, a hailstorm of electronic virtual litter. Then releasing hideously configured
    worms, with very nasty virii, all set to gobble bandwidth, gobble gobble. And steal peoples identity, rootle about in their hard
    drives doing who knows what, virtual vampires desecrating our soulfull bytes, UUURRGGHH. The music, the vids, pictures,
    writings, programs, half started projects, half finished projects. Emails, thousands and thousands of them. Jottings, Chess games.
    All kinds of stuff really. I started out with a 850 meg then when that started to fill up, I bought a 5.1 gig and imaged the 850 on it.
    Then came a 10.1 gig partitioned that to run Linux. Swapped out the 5.1 gig for a 30 gig imaging the 5.1 on it, of course. I can't
    wait for the day firewire hard drives become affordable. Infinite harddrive space yay.
    I got a firewire card so it won't be long.

    When they unravelled the sequence of our genome the reason they were able to do it so quickly was IBM came up with a chip
    that could read DNA, the answer is simple, get one of these chips, make it read your DNA, and get your root password from
    there, sort of lick your finger and bung it in a hole in your keyboard type thing. Make it so that web content can only be altered by
    people with root access. ie only a machine that is capable of recognising the person using it. This would make all web use,
    ulimately tracable in terms of everything other than web based emails and message boards. Sort of limit those channels to ascii
    code only. Force organisations like slashdot, to automatically turn URLs that are written in text to hyperlinks. The nameless shall
    be named and the shameless shall be shamed.

    Nobody minds having a real address in meat space, why should they mind having a real address in virtual space.

    Sig: Subject

  214. So... by SoupIsGoodFood_42 · · Score: 1
    That's irrelivent in this case

    You can't buy something else, cause you can't get a refund for the software that you didn't know you couldn't use, when you bought it.

    Sure, no one is forceing you to buy frontpage, but if you do choose to, you are tricked into agreeing with the licence, or having wasted your money on a software packege that you can't use or return.
    That's where the problem lyes.

  215. As always... by --daz-- · · Score: 1

    ... slashdotters are so eager to bash on MS, that they'll even make stuff up to do it. As you see in the update, this is only for using the FP logo, which only makes sense. Bash MS all you want, even use FP to do it, but don't put "Designed by FP" on your site when you're doing it. Duh!

    Calm down, read, and think...

  216. M$ vs computer industry = U$ vs world community by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    It occured to me that the similarites between M$ and the U$ are just to great to ignore. If you work for M$ and have gotten fat dumb and happy from their success you really don't care to much about anyone else having to deal with the crap the M$ produces or the way they conduct business, just like a U$ citizen feels about the way their government behaves. From the M$ employee point of view everything is just fine with the world, if only they had more time to enjoy thier wealth, same goes for the U$ citizen.

    M$ only has problems with those who don't fall in line with thier way of thinking, but in the end they will convert them or crush them, the same approach used by the U$ government.

    Everyone else on the other hand is either to ignorant to understand what is going on, or they understand and are filled with rage, just read the comments on this thread.

  217. Microsoft New EULA (Proposed) by entraxon · · Score: 1

    Microsoft is the Lord your God,
    You Shall have no Other software Before Me

    You Shall Not Make for Yourself
    Open Source Code

    You Shall Not Take Microsoft's Name in Vain, nor MSNBC, nor any Affiliated Company, nor anyone nor anything that Microsoft or its Affilated Companies determine at any time undeserving of any comment made for any reason by anybody.

    Keep Holy the Day of any Microsoft Announcement or Rollout

    Honor your License Agreement, and Do Not Expect Microsoft to Honor any Agreement, Fitness for Service, or Product Guarantee.

    Do Not Kill. That's Microsoft's job.

    Do Not Commit Adultery with Other Non-Microsoft Products

    Do Not Steal This Software, and pay for all upgrades whether functional or not.

    Do Not Lie, and Report Anyone Who Does Not Appear to Be A True Microsoft Follower

    Honor Microsoft's Goods and All That Belongs to Microsoft, and All that Microsoft Deems to Belong to Microsoft, even When Stolen from those Determined by Microsoft Not to Properly Honor Microsoft with their contributions

    --
    Cogito Tute (desiderata nostra eriximus, vestra nunc erigite)
  218. yeah right CmdrTaco by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You put the MS Frontpage logo on Slashdot? At least we'll know when you're gone mentally unbalanced ;-)

  219. Constitutional Right! by topet · · Score: 1

    It goes against the freedom of speech. It is protected by our constitutional rights. They cannot eliminate that!

  220. DOJ can't publish anti Microsoft Findings?. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'l sure they are using publisher, not open source. Somehow I doubt MS will bust DOJ, and revoke their licence(s). If so, then discrimination and market abuse comes in to play. Or maybe this is why DOJ are self-censoring their own publications. I think one of the DOJ staffers should stick it and say 'sorrry, I cant publish this', and see what reaction it gets.

  221. Well said! by jawtheshark · · Score: 1
    Well said! I think that just like programming you must learn "the hard way first", that is: work with a text editor exclusively. If you get better you *can* use generators. I made my site using just a texteditor, no it is not perfect, but at least I got the satisfaction of knowing it's guts. Learning HTML is usefull, learning a tool is just that: learning a tool. The day it is obsolete (because Windows XYZ refuses to run the older version of FrontPage ABC), you can start from scratch learning a new one.

    One of my best friends is a "webdesigner" and I thought he was knowledgable....was I surprised when he wanted a form-based site accessing a database and I had to explain him *what* CGI was and *what* a database was. He thought all that could be done with some JavaScript and a plain text file. Ouch! He's still my friend, but his ignorance shocked me.

    --
    Ahhh...the great dumpster continuum. Many a free computer will be found there. -- sowth (748135)
  222. Weird by jawtheshark · · Score: 1
    Weird thing is that everyone stated that before the release of Windows 2000 too, but yet many slashdotters are using it (including me). The reputation of Win XP here is not very high, but W2K didn't have a good one either.

    As for the Linux desktops, I tend to disagree...there are teriffic desktops under Linux, you just need to get used to them: this means, using them more than 10 minutes and say "bah, it isn't like windows, I'm going back". I personally use WindowMaker as desktop under Linux, first it was very weird but after a week or two it's just like any other environment (in some case I feel that it's even easier).

    --
    Ahhh...the great dumpster continuum. Many a free computer will be found there. -- sowth (748135)
  223. Shouldn't Non-News Be removed from /.? by CleverMonkey · · Score: 1
    The "addendum" that this covers only the use of the logo rather than the product seems, to me at least, to make this into an absolute non-issue... probably one which is covered in most trademark use licenses.


    Why does the /. community persist in badmouthing something that everyone does simply because MSFT does it as well? There are times and places for that certainly, but generally those should have a 'Bill of Rights' icon, rather than a 'Bill of Borg' icon.

  224. "most ...repugnant use" by Animats · · Score: 2
    PacBell Internet has similar terms. Here's their DSL service agreement. See section 8A(C):
    • SBCIS reserves the right to suspend or terminate the Service to you, or to suspend or terminate any userID, electronic mail address, Universal Resource Locator or domain name used by you, in the event it is used in a manner which ... (iv) tends to damage the name or reputation of SBCIS, its parent, affiliates and subsidiaries; or ...

    And this is from an "unregulated subsidiary" of a public utility. One that has achieved a de facto monopoly on residential DSL service in most of California.

  225. OT: Your .Sig by virg_mattes · · Score: 2

    OMG, your .sig made me laugh out loud. It's about 5 lines shorter than the last one I saw about the woodchuck thing, and it's the whole code tuning for faster chuckage that made me laugh.

    Well done.

    Virg