Slashdot Mirror


XBox Netplay Already

ElectusUnum writes "Well, it's been a little while since the XBox was released and people are already playing online! The folks at xboxgw.com have written a program to create an ethernet bridge between xbox's over the net, fooling the xbox's into thinking they're on a LAN. 1v1 seems to create no major lag and reports have come in like this one that claim up to four xbox's work fine. It seems a DSL connection is preferred for hosting the server." I want an X-Box so bad, or as I would call it, a DOA3-Box.

303 comments

  1. You're not the only one. by schmoli · · Score: 1

    I'm dying to give Halo a try, but after my short relationship with the PS2, I need to wait for CostCo to carry the Xbox, as they will take it back 6 months later when I'm bored with it.

    -Toli

    1. Re:You're not the only one. by __aaaaxm1522 · · Score: 2

      Halo is visually quite nice, and has a decent plot to it.

      My main complaint is I finished it in two days, and I did *not* stay up all night to do it. I actually went outside, talked to people, and generally lived my life.

      A little annoying, given the hype surrounding it.

    2. Re:You're not the only one. by schmoli · · Score: 0

      I know what you mean, same thing happened to me with Max Payne, that is exactly why I'm buying things at CostCo now. If a game or system does not 100% satisfy me with replay value, I'm taking it back, and they will be happy to give me a ps2, gamecube, or 200lb's of rib-eye.

      -Toli

    3. Re:You're not the only one. by jhestyr · · Score: 2, Informative

      After beating halo on easy and a roommate beating the game on normal, I have to say In my opinion i'm pretty dissapointed with HALO. Yes it's very pretty and i like that there are checkpoints frequently, and it can be very difficult at times. It was missing gameplay though. I was dissapointed by the lack of weapons, mobs, unique level design and the ending was very lackluster.

      SPOILER
      No big final bosses, just a 4 minute crazy ride on the warthog through mobs of chittering Covenant and Flood. Surviving this gives you a short cinematic in which you fly off into the universe in search of a sequel.

      so all in all, probably the smoothest and prettiest Console first person shooter i've played, but the hype and potential far succeded the end product.

    4. Re:You're not the only one. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Next time you head to the warehouse to pick up that two-pack of jerky and a case mountain dew, take a look at the sign on the side of the building -- it says:

      Costco Wholesale

      We are Costco, not CostCo, and certainly not Cost Co.

      And thank you for making full use of our return system.

    5. Re:You're not the only one. by Sparr0 · · Score: 1

      There is a much better Cinematic ending if you beat the game on legendary

    6. Re:You're not the only one. by Afrosheen · · Score: 1

      Smoothest? You must not have played it in 2 player mode. Get a few enemies onscreen and c-h-u-n-k time. It gets about 5fps at times. Terrible.

    7. Re:You're not the only one. by mgblst · · Score: 2, Funny

      Perhaps this is more a reflection on you than the game.... our little Zorkon is growing up!

    8. Re:You're not the only one. by guinsu · · Score: 2

      I like that there are no "bosses" in the game, having bosses seems so contrived adn very 8-bit Nintendo-ish.

    9. Re:You're not the only one. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I like that there are no "bosses" in the game, having bosses seems so contrived adn very 8-bit Nintendo-ish.


      Nah, to seem really 8-bit, the bosses would only take 8 hits to beat!
    10. Re:You're not the only one. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      www.MyGmaer.com has posted some really l33t shit.. SO get your warez on..

  2. other platforms by cornflux · · Score: 4, Informative
    The XboxGW FAQ is pretty interesting. Specifically:
    Q: Do you need help writing code?
    A: We could definately use help in the area of porting it to Other platforms. If you are interested in seeing the requirements for this, please send an e-mail to info@xboxgw.com, letting us know which platform you have your expertise in.
  3. Microsoft can't be to happy about this... by autopr0n · · Score: 5, Insightful

    There goes the revenue I'm sure they were hoping to get off online gamers. How much do you want to bet future games won't work like this? Or even have any LAN support at all.

    While it's true that developers can do whatever they want, I doubt Microsoft would let them use the system however they want (after all, do you think Sony would be very happy if someone released a 'game' that let people pirate PS2 games easily?)

    This hack is pretty sweet, though. It would be really cool to play online games with people across the country (or world) without going through some stupid intermediary.

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
    1. Re:Microsoft can't be to happy about this... by Telek · · Score: 5, Insightful

      don't you think that it might be a good thing for them, since if it becomes this open, then more people will buy them, and more and more games? It's bound to make them more money in the long run.

      The only thing that they might be angry about is that they didn't get there first, or they won't be able to provide the service if it's free.

      --

      If God gave us curiosity
    2. Re:Microsoft can't be to happy about this... by DahGhostfacedFiddlah · · Score: 1

      don't you think that it might be a good thing for them

      Not really - not even on the games front unless people are buying only MS games. It's like selling Windows instead of only licensing it...eventually everyone who wants one will have one, and there'll be little else to sell. Subscriptions are the only way to make customers keep providing you with money.

    3. Re:Microsoft can't be to happy about this... by alen · · Score: 4, Insightful

      My guess is that Microsoft will allow this and maybe even encourage it. All to sell as many X-Boxes as possible. Then in the next version of the X-Box or X-Box version 3 they will crack down and lock the system down. But by then Nintendo and Sony may only be shadows of their former selves and it will be time for the X-Box to be a money maker.

      Just like MS looked the other way at casual piracy of Win9x and NT for years it will probably do so with the X-Box. But sooner or later payday will come.

    4. Re:Microsoft can't be to happy about this... by Sparr0 · · Score: 1

      Actually Halo will probably be the exception rather than the rule. Look at THPS3 for PS2. It supports its own internet service. I fully expect future xbox games to go that route and not require 3rd party software (or 1st party software, ala XBox Online from MS) to play online.

    5. Re:Microsoft can't be to happy about this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The ps2 allready has a piece of software available that makes pirating games easy. It's called the Gameshark 2. You use it to swap in copies in conjunction with a mod chip. You don't see sony screaming about it, probably because they know that market share is what gets you on top, not locked down unhackable consoles.

    6. Re:Microsoft can't be to happy about this... by cornflux · · Score: 2, Interesting
      While it's true that developers can do whatever they want, I doubt Microsoft would let them use the system however they want (after all, do you think Sony would be very happy if someone released a 'game' that let people pirate PS2 games easily?)
      But, this isn't really about pirating games, is it?

      Anyway, maybe MS will use this, and other types of "hacks," as a sort of pseudo-loss leader?

      I can see a scenario like this: MS sells a decently hackable (not just hardware, as we're finding out) system which attracts a significant interest in the above average consumer. (I think we can agree that those people are sometimes the ones that drive new features, technology, etc.) So, then, MS has gotten a good idea of what the above average user wants/needs and can then sell a new version that incorporates "the best" of those.

      I'm sure some will dismiss my scenario. (Maybe they'd prefer the word scheme?)

      Well, regardless, I think MS is very aware of what's going on and is looking forward to the next xbox.

    7. Re:Microsoft can't be to happy about this... by Docrates · · Score: 2

      I believe you're mistaken. Halo, as I understand it, already supported network play as long as you're on a LAN. What these guys did is write a bridging app that makes many networks over the internet look like a single LAN to the XBox. In esence, Microsoft isn't loosing money on this one.

      What they might lose money on is a replacement for their centrilized networking system, where they probably expected to charge you a monthly fee so that you can play games with larger number of people (unlike their current LAN option which limits significantly the number of players). But even this will be highly hackable. I mean, there are many clone servers for Everquest and Ultima Online, it's virtually impossible for microsoft to actually avoid this. They'll have to rely on value added services if they want to make money off their private network.

      --

      There are two kinds of people in the world: Those with good memory.
    8. Re:Microsoft can't be to happy about this... by fobbman · · Score: 2

      " don't you think that it might be a good thing for them"

      Not if they planned on doing this through the gaming arm of MSN for a monthly fee.

    9. Re:Microsoft can't be to happy about this... by Osty · · Score: 2, Informative

      Microsoft said time and again during the development of the XBox that you would be able to use whatever existing broadband ISP you have for internet access for your XBox (this only makes sense, as it would be extremely foolish for Microsoft to try to get into the cable/DSL/dedicated line business more than they already are). Halo was not an online game for quality issues and time constraints. Meaning, there was not enough time to accurately test Halo online and tweak it to run well and also go gold in time for the XBox launch. This isn't going to affect negatively, because

      1. It'll very likely sell more XBox units. Even if those people only buy Halo, the fact that they have an XBox will very likely cause them to eventually buy more games (you cannot resist DOA3 ...).
      2. If the online performance of Halo is shite, Microsoft can simply state that Halo was never meant for online play, and it only does so through the work of some hackers. I don't think many people will complain, though, as multiplayer Halo is fun (I've only played over a LAN, though), and PC gamers have learned to live with a bit of lag.

      Anyway, as other people have already pointed out, Halo is likely the exception rather than the rule. I wouldn't be surprised if there were some games you could play online for free (look at the MSN Gaming Zone -- the premium content includes games like Crimson Skies that you can play online for free once you've bought the game, and also games like Asheron's Call that require a subscription even after buying the box), but I'm guessing most online games will require a subscription (probably a $10/mo subscription to some premium service that lets you play all your online games, rather than $10/game/mo).
    10. Re:Microsoft can't be to happy about this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But you need Linux! heh. Billy G must be pissed.

    11. Re:Microsoft can't be to happy about this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In case you haven't heard, MSFT is pushing services hard (.NET?). This would be an obvious extension of that framework.

    12. Re:Microsoft can't be to happy about this... by telstar · · Score: 1

      What these guys did is write a bridging app that makes many networks over the internet look like a single LAN to the XBox. In esence, Microsoft isn't loosing money on this one.

      Yeah ... and all Napster did was combine a search engine with an FTP client. I agree with you that what they did was use existing technology to connect users and left the XBOX untouched, but I wouldn't be surprised if future XBOX games have stricter requirements for online play to ensure that they utilize whatever service Microsoft eventually promotes.

    13. Re:Microsoft can't be to happy about this... by ez76 · · Score: 2, Interesting
      My guess is that Microsoft will allow this and maybe even encourage it. All to sell as many X-Boxes as possible.
      I am guessing not. They will want to nip this in the bud (see next comment). Only part of the money in X-Box is in up-front unit sales. They are no doubt counting on a lot of cash from recurring revenue (i.e. online service subscriptions).
      Then in the next version of the X-Box or X-Box version 3 they will crack down and lock the system down.
      They stand to lose a lot of goodwill if they wait too long. By that point, there will be huge communities, web sites, etc. rallied around this neat little hack. Maybe they could figure out a compromise (lock out only new games) but my guess is it won't take two generations of machines for this to happen.
    14. Re:Microsoft can't be to happy about this... by sirsnork · · Score: 1

      Absolutly! In my opinion that it the biggest thing consoles are lacking and the biggest reason gamers are still buying that latest/greatest PC. When you can go down to the shop and buy a game, drop it in your console and immediatly start playing with everyone in the world by simple plugging in your net connection, consoles may finally start to beat PC's for playing games!

      --

      Normal people worry me!
    15. Re:Microsoft can't be to happy about this... by 42forty-two42 · · Score: 1

      *ahem* that actually lose money on each X-Box, they make money on game licences...

    16. Re:Microsoft can't be to happy about this... by Geekboy(Wizard) · · Score: 1

      They stand to lose a lot of goodwill if they wait too long.

      You are making a flawed assumption. You are assuming they have goodwill in the first place.

    17. Re:Microsoft can't be to happy about this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Everybody says this about the consoles, but I don't believe it. I want PROOF that they are losing money on each console, straight from the horse's mouth. I've never seen it..

    18. Re:Microsoft can't be to happy about this... by siphoncolder · · Score: 1

      i think this is going to be one of those deals where they "officially come out against this practice", but unofficially won't worry that much about it since it won't hurt sales, and instead cause popularity and buzz. MS has so much cash going into marketing the box just to get people to buy it - no troubles on this front.

      i seem to recall previous slashdot articles telling us not to sink our money into the xbox and "yawn, big whoop, this/that is/will be better". seems the joke's on michael, as this box's popularity seems to be going through the roof in this particularly anti-ms forum ;) hell, even CmdrTaco wants one "so badly".

      it's fun, it seems to be hackable and being an MS product, is a rather more prolific target of such hacking. i think we have a winner, folks.

      --
      i'm amazed that i survived - an airbag saved my life.
    19. Re:Microsoft can't be to happy about this... by LinuxHam · · Score: 5, Informative

      don't you think that it might be a good thing for them, since if it becomes this open, then more people will buy them

      I think you've read enough replies to your post, but I wanted to add this. I saw the Microsoft "CXO" being interviewed on CBNC, and Mark Haines *grilled* him about, "how do you expect to make any money if you're losing big bucks on every single unit?" The CXO replied that the unit ships ready for broadband access, and they plan make all their money selling online services.

      I say be prepared for MSFT to attack anything and everything threatening their main source of income. They're banking on it.

      --
      Intelligent Life on Earth
    20. Re:Microsoft can't be to happy about this... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1
      Just like MS looked the other way at casual piracy of Win9x and NT for years it will probably do so with the X-Box. But sooner or later payday will come.

      Payday ain't here for Windows XP; If you have the pro-corporate edition, no registration/activation is necessary.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    21. Re:Microsoft can't be to happy about this... by MiTEG · · Score: 1

      Microsoft will never say their product is costing them money, but they released the amount it costs to produce the Xbox at $375 (and that's just the production, it doesn't include marketing, etc.) Check out this article about a Merrill Lynch report about XBox last March

      --
      The future isn't what it used to be.
    22. Re:Microsoft can't be to happy about this... by 42forty-two42 · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure I'd want to look at anything that was in a horse's mouth, but that's just me...

    23. Re:Microsoft can't be to happy about this... by rbeattie · · Score: 1


      What the fsck do you mean "allow"? How is making XBoxes connect over the internet using your own PC as a hub infinging on any of Microsoft's rights? How would they not "allow" it?

      Someone tell me if I'm missing something and Microsoft can pull a little DMCA action on this? IT doesn't look like it to me.

      -Russ

      --
      Me
    24. Re:Microsoft can't be to happy about this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, they do. Ignoring this == goodwill. I don't care how much you hate the Windows division of Microsoft.

    25. Re:Microsoft can't be to happy about this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It looks like half of the current demand for Dreamcast is related to the ease of doing nifty things with it. (Running your own software, emulators, etc.) They'll just hope they'll get their production costs down before too much of that sort of thing is created, or that people will buy enough licenced games to make up for it.

    26. Re:Microsoft can't be to happy about this... by Lumpy · · Score: 2

      that's the fun part.

      this is nothing but a bridge.
      the thing to do is set up a server on a t3 and start hosting games for people.

      the limitation on players is the bandwidth used by the server (5 connects is 5 times the traffic that a single player uses.)

      start a fee per game or a monthly fee setup and kick microsoft directly in the groin.

      the really cool part, they cant sue anyone for anything

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    27. Re:Microsoft can't be to happy about this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only reason I'm buying one ASAP is because of this hack.

      If they get too crazy, then me stop's buying games at 50.00 a piece. Its a very easy formula, really.

      -GG

    28. Re:Microsoft can't be to happy about this... by Erasmus+Darwin · · Score: 2
      "How would they not "allow" it? Someone tell me if I'm missing something and Microsoft can pull a little DMCA action on this?"

      While you're thinking of "allow" in the legal sense (for example, how Microsoft doesn't allow you to distribute copies of Windows on a website), everyone else is discussing "allow" in a technical sense (for example, how the Playstation wouldn't allow you [unless you modded it] to play imported games, even before the DMCA garbage).

      Microsoft can finagle the hardware and/or software to make network gaming more difficult. While no protection scheme is perfect, they only need to make it difficult enough to break that most people won't bother. For example, if playing a networked version of the game requires you to physically modify the X-box's hardware (a la PSX modchipping) and use a special burned disc to patch the game, they'll probably eliminate a number of people from the unofficial networking pool and boost their subscriber base.

  4. When will MS' netplay be up? by anotherone · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I mean, this is cool and all if you want to play with someone you know across the country or something, but it's not really that useful until there are actual servers up with gamespy type software. I mean, you can only fight the same people so many times, you know?

    --
    Username taken, please choose another one.
    1. Re:When will MS' netplay be up? by jhestyr · · Score: 1

      www.xbox.com/support/default.htm
      it's about halfway down the page

      The service is planned to go live in the summer of 2002

  5. M$ seem to be on to a winner here by Master+Of+Ninja · · Score: 3, Informative

    I'm getting more and more tempted into getting one of these things now. Anandtech reported the DVD playback was better than the PS2s which boosts its cred. All that is needed are some great games (i'd like to see midtown madness and maybe championship manager for it) and a crack to play multi-region DVDs, then I should be begging for one.

    After this they just need to buy up bleem and release it so I can play my old PS games on the machine. If they can get EA, Namco and Capcom to support them they should make a killing.

    The problem is that in America there is no price differential between the PS2 and XBox (both $299 me thinks). In the UK the Xbox should be coming out at £299, with the PS2 already at £199. There seems to be no incentive in the US for people to favour the PS2. But even over here I'm wanting a Xbox now. Oh well - only have to wait till next spring!

    1. Re:M$ seem to be on to a winner here by zeno_2 · · Score: 1
      There seems to be no incentive in the US for people to favour the PS2. But even over here I'm wanting a Xbox now.

      I think your forgetting something about the ps2 that is a pretty good feature of it.. being able to play all the old ps1 games. This brings the ps2 library up to hundreds of games, where as the xbox only has 20 or so. And since the ps2 has been out for a while, the developers are starting to learn the hardware, and we see some great games like Devil May Cry, Tony Hawk 3, SSX Tricky, Metal Gear Solid 2, the list goes on and on.

      After this they just need to buy up bleem and release it so I can play my old PS games on the machine.

      Why wait to see if bleem will be on xbox (I really doubt it, but im all for it!) when the ps2 has this capability out of the box?

      I myself haven't noticed much bad with the DVD playback of the ps2. I haven't sat down and tested it really, I usually watch movies on a normal sony dvd player, the only thing I notice with both is in some movies it will pause for a split second when switching chapters, I don't mind it too much though.

    2. Re:M$ seem to be on to a winner here by newbiescum · · Score: 1

      The pause is usually due to a DVD dual layer disc when it is switching from one layer to another. Most movies/shows do this at a chapter stop or during a scene transition so you don't notice it as much. I haven't seen a DVD player that doesn't have the pause.

      And as for the original poster saying that the X-Box is a better DVD player than the PS2 that doesn't tell a whole lot. The cheaper $100-$150 do a better job nowadays than both. X-Box also isn't progressive (for DVD movies, not games) so it isn't that forward thinking and eliminates one of its hyped advantages, although by the time that progressive TVs (mostly just HDTVs) are standard, we might be on X-Box 2, PS3, and GameCube 2, so it might be a moot point and might have saved consumers or MS some dollars.

      The one thing that I was astonished to find out was that the number one complaint regarding the PS2's official DVD remote wasn't fixed on the X-Box official remote. The power/reset button is missing and while it isn't so much a hassle, I would figure they would have addressed it since the X-Box's remote is so much more basic than the PS2's.

    3. Re:M$ seem to be on to a winner here by Jace+of+Fuse! · · Score: 3, Informative

      If they can get EA, Namco and Capcom to support them they should make a killing.

      EA is already on. Supporting the XBox was a no-brainer for EA. Anything done for the XBox is an easy port to the PC, one of EA's lovely little battle turfs.

      Capcom have discussed going totally multiplatform for a very long time. One option they have even mentioned several times was using emulation to lower the costs of making games. I believe this mostly applied to their fighting games, though. No matter how they do it, Capcom has expressed their desire to move away from exclusive platform titles. They are a software company wanting to sell games. They don't care about the platform. They're also a big name. At this point no single platform is so dominant that it can twist Capcoms huge arms. Capcom does what Capcom wants.

      Namco on the other hand could be tricky. They're pretty big too but I think they are signed up with certain exclusivity deals, but how in depth those deals are I'm not too sure about. They certainly don't seem to be as restrictive as they once were, since we saw Soul Calibur on the Dreamcast, and will now see a version for the Gamecube. I wouldn't be surprised to see XBox support from Namco, but if I were to hear that certain contracts prevented them from doing so, I wouldn't be surprised by that either.

      Sega is the one that has my attention. I know Sega plans to support the Gamecube, and have even allowed Acclaim to do a port of Crazy Taxi for the PS2. So far it seems Sega's biggest push seems to be towards the Gamecube but things may just appear that way at the moment (with Sonic Adventure 2 and Phantasy Star Online v2). It's my opinion that the XBox is really going to need some Sega titles. Rumor has it that ShenMu will be an XBox exclusive but that's just a rumor as far as I know. Still, exclusives can't hurt.

      --

      "Everything you know is wrong. (And stupid.)"

      Moderation Totals: Wrong=2, Stupid=3, Total=5.
    4. Re:M$ seem to be on to a winner here by zeno_2 · · Score: 1
      Ya, like I said the pausing thing isn't that big of a deal, and I have seen that they put that change in spots where its hard to tell.

      Im not sure if the xbox has an optical out, but I use that to hook my ps2 up to my stereo and the sound is great, no artifacts of anything really.. That is a pretty big plus when it comes to DVD movies.

      I think when it comes down to it, the dvd feature of these consoles is just an extra added feature, nothing that should really make your decision on what console to buy. Dvd players are real cheap, and any big movie buff should have one by now.. I mainly use mine (ps2) as a mobile dvd player if I ever use that feature on it, its pretty small and easy to move around compared to a normal DVD player.

      I haven't ever bought any remotes for the ps2, i just use the controller, not the best in the world, but it works.

      And by the way, I still think that the playstation controllers are the best controllers hands down, no other console has come close to the great feel you get from them. And they are SMALL controllers, not the wreckingball sized controllers that come with the xbox.. Thats probably my biggest beef so far with the xbox.. The controllers that come with the system usually are much better then any 3rd party controllers you can buy, and the one with the xbox, I have to actually reposition my hands on the controller to reach all the buttons.. not a good thing IMO..

      Zeno

    5. Re:M$ seem to be on to a winner here by stew-a-cide · · Score: 0

      MS isn't totally out in the cold with Sega. They are getting (exclusively I think) Jet Set/Grind Radio 2, which will probably be the game that 'forces me' to get an X-box (It's the only game I ever 'bought' for my Dreamcast).

    6. Re:M$ seem to be on to a winner here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Namco and Capcom -have- committed to support the XBox. Capcom has Genma Onimusha in development for a Q1 2002 release for the XBox, while Namco is developing Soul Calibur 2 for all three major platforms (Gamecube, XBox and Playstation 2).

      As far as Square developing games for the XBox, that's highly unlikely. Sony has invested a great deal of money into Square, thus making their going cross-platform highly unlikely. Same as how Nintendo now has sole control of the Resident Evil franchise, you won't be seeing any new RE games on anything other than the Gamecube.

      My advice to any avid games out there that might be reading this is to go for all three consoles if you can afford it. They're all very powerful and have their own various strengths and weaknesses.

  6. XBox is going to be the hacker's dream by Sc00ter · · Score: 2
    As much as slashdotter's hate MS, it looks like the XBox is going to be much more hackable then the GameCube.

    1. Re:XBox is going to be the hacker's dream by Vardamir · · Score: 0, Troll

      Where comes the joy in hacking a PC - thats all this Wintendo is.

    2. Re:XBox is going to be the hacker's dream by rlowe69 · · Score: 2

      Hey, it worked for Quake et al. Being hackable ain't that bad, as long as you can still make money.

      MS doesn't care how you connect X-boxes, they want you to buy games.

      True, this will take away from the "XMSN" service, but not everyone will use that anyway. Some technically savy people scream and run when they see MSN anywhere because of the requirements of Passport.

      As far as MS is concerned, this is win-win. If anything, it will increase online games' popularity (with consoles) and drive the less technically savy people to XMSN.

      --
      ----- rL
    3. Re:XBox is going to be the hacker's dream by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Xbox is a low end PC, in a big black box. Of course it will be more hackable.

  7. Funny by Anonymous+DWord · · Score: 2, Redundant

    I like how the download is an RPM. That'll make Bill G happy. Besides, without him we couldn't have things like RPMs anyway.

    --
    "If he thinks he can hide and run from the United States and our allies, he's sorely mistaken." Bush on bin Laden
  8. Re:blerg by autopr0n · · Score: 2, Funny

    if taco wants an xbox then wtf doesn't he buy one? It's not like he's poor.

    Have you seen VA's stock price lately? :P

    Actualy, yeh that surprized me to. You can get them on ebay these days for like $350

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
  9. I'm curious by Anonymous+DWord · · Score: 1, Redundant

    After this they just need to buy up bleem and release it so I can play my old PS games on the machine.

    What would be the legality of this? Any NALs want to comment? I know Bleem was found legal, but would it be different because of the direct competition between consoles? It certainly would be cool to play PSX games on Xbox. A PS(Linu)X-Box would be neat.

    --
    "If he thinks he can hide and run from the United States and our allies, he's sorely mistaken." Bush on bin Laden
    1. Re:I'm curious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you can get bleem for dreamcast already (it was sold in eb).

    2. Re:I'm curious by HeUnique · · Score: 2

      1. Bleem is dead - look at their web site.

      2. Go ahead - try to make a bootable DVD - you'll need it to be bootable from the 2nd layer, not the first one..

      --
      Hetz (Heunique)
  10. XBOX Development Team by jcnnghm · · Score: 5, Informative

    It's nice to see so many people interested in this. I have been on the development team and would just like to let you all know where this project is headed. We are currently working on a matching server to hook people up to each other. The software is highly stable and fast. I just finished a 3xbox game less than a half hour ago. Pings were about 150ms, and there was NO lag. We are also working to implement chat. Expect another release in the next couple of days.

    --
    You don't make the poor richer by making the rich poorer. - Winston Churchill
    1. Re:XBOX Development Team by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what about web browsing? gee, i'd love to look at pr0n with this thing. schweet! hehe j/k

    2. Re:XBOX Development Team by Pyrosz · · Score: 1

      While 4xbox games are nice and the work done so far is amazing, Im missing something in all this...

      I just finished playing a 20+ person game of Q3UT2 online with a 50msec ping with no lag on my cable modem. If the XBox is only going to support 4 players (a few more later?), why would I want one over my current system setup? Although maybe the games don't require more people to be as fun...?

      --

      An optimist believes we live in the best world possible; a pessimist fears this is true.
    3. Re:XBOX Development Team by newbiescum · · Score: 1

      Not all games are FPSes nor were they designed for 16+ players. Check out THPS3. It's pretty good for 4 players (haven't heard too much about lag, built-in Internet support via USB ethernet adapters / future Sony official ethernet addon). I find it kinda funny tho that one machine that has the capability to do Internet support out of the box does not have a game that uses it officially, and another console that does not have Internet support out of the box, not to mention an official add-on yet, does have a game that goes online and has built in support.

      Rumor also has it that Halo will have a sequel/expansion pack for the X-Box that brings it online officially, so maybe it will have a more massive multiplayer (16+ players) focus.

    4. Re:XBOX Development Team by Pyrosz · · Score: 1

      Rumor also has it that Halo will have a sequel/expansion pack for the X-Box that brings it online officially, so maybe it will have a more massive multiplayer (16+ players) focus.

      This brings up a good point.
      If a game sells enough copies and does well in the market overall, there is more "backing" to create a multiplayer addon. This of course works in the oposite if the game sucks and it doesnt sell as well as it should have, then they may not go ahead and create the multiplayer addon. The multiplayer addon can be looked as an additional form of revenue. $70 for the first game (cdn) and $40 for the addon. (cdn)

      --

      An optimist believes we live in the best world possible; a pessimist fears this is true.
    5. Re:XBOX Development Team by Namarrgon · · Score: 2
      Xbox doesn't have official Internet support yet, but that's planned for Feb. These guys just jumped the gun, that's all.

      And you can certainly run 16 players on a LAN (4 linked Xboxen), so I assume it's possible via XboxGW too. The only question would be the lag.

      Now all we need is a little microphone that plugs into one of the pseudo-USB connectors on each controller, some support for realtime voice chat during the game, and we're really in business :-) I'd be very cool to hear a teammate yelling at me from over my left shoulder (carefully placed there by DirectSound3D & realtime Dolby Digital encoding).

      I'd lay large sums of money this is already planned by MS - after all, this exact ability has been supported by DirectPlay for quite some time...

      --
      Why would anyone engrave "Elbereth"?
  11. Midtown Madness? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your crazy... I was big into street racing games for the PC and I thought Midtown madness was OK. I have an XBox and Project Gotham Racing is unreal. If it wasn't for the cartoony colorings of the buildings in the background, you almost can't tell the cars are computer generated. Watching the replay's it like watching a race on a digital television. They even went as far as adding the detail to the brake calipurs behind the rims! I love it!

  12. Hobbyist Community by r.suzuka · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Several days ago I posted a note about a friend of mine who got in trouble with Sony after posting home programming tools to the Internet. To revise my previous post, I believe it was a tool that allowed someone to write a PlayStation boot sector on a CD. My friend used it for writing his own programs to run on a PlayStation but perhaps Sony was understandably concerned it might lead to the copying of their games.

    I just want to say how fascinating I find this culture of console hacking and programming. Here is Japan in the home of the console, I wish we had a more active community, but it does not seem to be so. I am not sure why not, especially since consoles are nearly uniform in popularity among all age groups and such.

    My only fear is for these programmers. Microsoft is well know for its business practices, and I worry that they will disaprove of this Xbox net-play project. I do not see how this will hurt them but I still think they will not like it. Too bad since it will only make their console more popular.

    R. Suzuka

    1. Re:Hobbyist Community by JoeShmoe · · Score: 3, Interesting

      So where is the mirror of this program your friend wrote? It sounds very interesting. Even if I'm only able to get Pong ported over to the PSX hardware that sounds pretty darn cool.

      Typical Sony overreaction. There are plenty of different boot loaders (CDs that you boot, then swap out for a CD-R copy of a game) and plenty of mod chips (chips you solder onto your PSX board to force it to ignore PS-specific boot sector). If anyone is interested in playing pirated games they are already doing in. Buy a mod chip for $30 bucks and then rent all the PSX games you can from Blockbuster, copy them, and presto instant game collection. So if Sony things this little program is going to lead to any more game copying than already exists they are clueless beyond belief. More likely they are afraid people will be able to write quality games WITHOUT having to pay the Sony tax to become an official PSX licensee.

      Meanwhile this tool could be very useful for this like porting MAME over to the PSX (would be nifty for the PS1 to make a portable MAME machine) and as you put it, writing your own games.

      So, please tell me your friend passed the tool around a bit before Sony shut him down? What was the file name so we can know to keep an eye out should it just "happen" to appear on Kazaa/eDonkey/LimeWire/etc (maybe, oh, sometime this week)?

      - JoeShmoe

      --
      -- I wonder which will go down in history as the bigger failure: the War on Drugs or the War on Filesharing
    2. Re:Hobbyist Community by r.suzuka · · Score: 2, Informative

      Hello. My friend wrote the program during 1996/7 while he was finishing his Math degree at the University of Tokyo. (I will note it was not related to his degree but only a project he was completing for enjoyment.) He is now gone from the University but I would be happy to contact him to see if he still has a copy of the program.

      I am sure he would be happy to give away the source code as long as it does get him in trouble to Sony again ^_^

      I will write him and ask him what became of it and if he still has it. I am sorry I do not remember the name of the program but I will tell you as soon as I hear back from him. He also wrote several other tools for the hobbyist PlayStation programmer and I will ask him about those tools also.

      Thank you.

      R. Suzuka

    3. Re:Hobbyist Community by vrmlknight · · Score: 1

      can i get put on that list id be interested as well

      --
      This must be Thursday, I never could get the hang of Thursdays.
    4. Re:Hobbyist Community by Nullsmack · · Score: 1

      If you get that, try to get an anonymous news client and cross post it in all the playstation binaries' newsgroups.. give it a good description and it would be spread like it should be :)

  13. What about PC's.. by gizmoiscariot · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Now the trick would be to get it so that when some of these games are ported to Windows, to have them able to play against eachother across the internet. That would be the real gem in the Xbox and online gaming. I wonder if this would be even possible due to the obviously differences in the controls and the games themselves, but it would still be worth a try to get it to work.

    --
    Gizmo
    1. Re:What about PC's.. by gakido · · Score: 1

      uhhh... there's this crossplatform online FPS already, it's called Quake 3 Arena, maybe you've heard of it?

      not mmofps, but there's Planetside for that.

      and playing an FPS with a thumb stick, ick. micros~1 probably isn't going to release a keyboard/mouse for the X-box anytime soon, in a vain attempt to debunk the "X-box is just a PC" thing. I can hear the kiddies whining already, how they can't compete with PC/Mac HALO players, because their thumbstick is useless for aiming compared to a mouse.

  14. According to M$ - Summer 2002 by Lawmeister · · Score: 2

    So if you can't wait or would rather tweak and hack (and we are /.'ers right?) then the Xbox Gateway project is utterly fantastic..

    Remember, the Xbox was only released 9 days ago... just wait another month, there will be so many mods and services added (think Gamespy-like) that once again, M$ will be behind the 8-ball just like they were with that 'internet' thing.

  15. he wants an xbox???? by Juln · · Score: 0, Troll

    Why the fuck does commander taco want an xbox again????? One game? I thought if anyone realized that Microsoft and most anything made by them fucking sucks. The first time I read slashdot I was actually cheered by the little picture of Bill Gates as a Borg. Perhaps CT has been assimilated??

    Anyhow, my opinio is the X-Box, besides being MS's way to make money in spite of flat PC sales, and also being their way to rip off an entire new segment of the industry, is MS's way to close the loop - to start manufacturing the hardware their OSes run on as well as all of the software. Basically, it's a bold step for Microsoft disguised as a game system, and I doubt if that is lost on the likes of Gateway, Compaq, and others who concentrate on the home PC business.

    --
    Juln
    1. Re:he wants an xbox???? by Anonymous+DWord · · Score: 1

      Sure, except they're not making the hardware, it's contracted out.

      --
      "If he thinks he can hide and run from the United States and our allies, he's sorely mistaken." Bush on bin Laden
    2. Re:he wants an xbox???? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Go away you fucking zealot.

      Noboby will miss you.

    3. Re:he wants an xbox???? by Juln · · Score: 1

      I didn't say they were ripping off consumers - I meant they are ripping off Sony, Nintendo, and Sega, probably Atari too somehow. Earlier this year, i read an article in EGM about how Microsoft got together grioups of gamers and asked them what they liked about previous consoles design, controllers, etc. Good business (how else would you do it if you had no clue about consoles?), but basically, they ended up stealing all sorts of ideas from previous consoles, like the dreamcats's cotrollers. Big surprise.

      --
      Juln
    4. Re:he wants an xbox???? by Juln · · Score: 1

      Thats not the point, who does the actual manufacture. MS is, obviously, solidly in control of the hardware... Thats the issue they are concerned about.

      --
      Juln
    5. Re:he wants an xbox???? by Nykon · · Score: 1

      actually it was in an article along time ago when xbox was first announced that they wern't even that serious about breaking ground in the console market, this was only to be a stepping stone to get them into the set top entertainment arena

      --
      "It's better to be a pirate then join the Navy"
    6. Re:he wants an xbox???? by Juln · · Score: 1

      No kidding. Try telling that to whoever modded my post as a troll.
      (incidentally,a troll is someone who says something they don't necessarily believe, simply to inflame discussion. how insulting)

      --
      Juln
    7. Re:he wants an xbox???? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, God forbid they give the public something they want... Better off making something COMPLETELY new which works horribly.

  16. Different worlds... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Whatever MS has coming down the pipe when they launch their XBox Online component will, I'm sure, be alot sweeter and better integrated with the games that come out around that time. What the fine folks at XBoxgw.com have done is simply allow XBoxes to connect to each other via the "System Link" and bridge that link thru the internet. Kudos to them.

    Yep, the metaserver they're hinting at will add more to the mix, but you're still dealing with a setup that not many Xbox users will be able to grok.

    In other words, I'm hoping MS can see that this stuff is not threatening to them (after all, you still need to buy an XBox and Halo to play) and that they'll make Xboxonline even more robust. And I'm hoping the xboxgw guys realize that they should change the name of their software to something WITHOUT 'xbox' in the name to keep the lawyers away :)

    - Miguel / Freewill / bs.bungie.org

  17. oddwrold-sortof on topic by gimpboy · · Score: 1

    this is the first tim'e i've noticed this:

    the description of oddworld on the xbox.com website is as follows:


    Save Oddworld from greedy corporate bigwigs and evil animal-testing researchers. You'll laugh, you'll cry, you'll meet Fuzzles about to fry. Simply neurotic...


    i added the bold. am i the only one who finds this funny?

    --
    -- john
    1. Re:oddwrold-sortof on topic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "am i the only one who finds this funny?"

      yes

    2. Re:oddwrold-sortof on topic by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

      no, no, I also find that f***ing amuseing as all hell.

      You are not alone

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
  18. 2 XBox? by gabester · · Score: 1

    So what you're saying is that I have to use two boxes to play online games with an XBox? I think I'll wait until the Sony PS2 Networking kit (or better yet that much rumored Linux kit) is available...

    Do the math. XBox + linux PC for online play is not a deal. $300 + time to set up your xboxgw software alone, assuming you already have yourself setup on a Linux box... wait, better yet, I'll get 2 XBoxes, install Linux on 1 of them and set it up as the gateway for the other... then M$ will lose twice the money!
    g=

    1. Re:2 XBox? by Sparr0 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Time to set up?? It took me almost 5 (yes, FIVE) minutes to set up an xboxgw game for the first time. I just stuck the boot floppies from their web site into my spare PC, ran the appropriate ethernet cables between my router / hub / xbox / linuxbox, and it was done. My only problem with XBoxGW so far is the lag, as Halo has no anti-lag code for clientside movement so theres actually a delay between you pressing forward and your character actually moving.

    2. Re:2 XBox? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok, people need to realize that by buying an XBox, you are helping Microsoft. Period. To NOT buy an XBox at all would be the most damaging to them.
      YOU do the math, unsold XBoxes = $400 loss per console, sold XBoxes are a mere $100 loss, that is probably covered by game bundles that retail stores force people to buy. And that's even assuming MS is ACTUALLY losing 100 bucks per console, which I truly doubt.

    3. Re:2 XBox? by vrmlknight · · Score: 1

      actually they sell them at a loss.. you do the math

      --
      This must be Thursday, I never could get the hang of Thursdays.
    4. Re:2 XBox? by CaseyB · · Score: 2
      YOU do the math, unsold XBoxes = $400 loss per console,

      They are *all* going to be sold, one way or another, for the next year or more. If you don't believe that, you're deluding yourself. So the worst case for MS is if those boxes go to people who aren't going to subsequently buy games.

    5. Re:2 XBox? by gabester · · Score: 1


      Sorry folks, my bad, I forgot about boot floppies...
      Using OS X and Macs so much, slipped my mind that the xboxgw software did say "boot floppy" and I thought, "hm, that's funny, now why would you need those." Duh.
      Still, the point is for this coolio hack to work you need an XBox & ethernet equipped PC. More hardware, and that's kinda an expensive hub to run with your 45 watt P4, isn't it?
      g=

    6. Re:2 XBox? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First off, nobody's getting Linux working on the Xbox until 2003 at least -- mark my words.

      Second, they all will be sold, but not necessarily at $300. Price cuts are quite possible, post XMas.

      Furthermmore, yur 'worst case' doesn't exist. Anyone hacking Linux on these guys is also going to be a good game customer.

  19. How's this for irony!! by azizu · · Score: 1

    From the xboxgw.com website.

    >> XBOXGW currently only runs on Linux.

    I'm having a great laugh!!!

  20. Its WAY easier than that! by jkerman · · Score: 5, Informative

    using the standard TAP/TUN driver for linux, I was able to set up an ethernet TAP tunnel between my friends house and mine. (128K ISDN links).

    Just pop the ethernet cards into promisc mode, set up a kernel IP filter to filter out any unnecessary traffic, and bridge the TAP to the ethernet card! works great! no noticible lag!

    1. Re:Its WAY easier than that! by srvivn21 · · Score: 3, Informative
      Very cool idea. I see a couple of issues with it as a viable solution for many users:

      1) Both of you must have a dedicated gateway computer (with the xboxgw software, you just need to reboot, using a boot disk). Not a problem for some, but the person quoted in the forum thread only has a Win98 box (with one NIC, and is "not a tech wiz".

      2) According to the xboxgw HOWTO:

      ...if you attempted to play more than two (1 to 1) players, then it would really kill Jbandwidth[sic], as it would mesh (bridge to everywhere) all traffic. This isn't needed, since with the "System Link" games, one console is a server, and all other clients only need to talk to that one server, not to eachother. Thus, this would be another huge waste of bandwith.

      Perhaps I am off base here, as I have not actually used TUN/TAP, nor do I own a XBox. Maybe all you would have to do is create links from each client to the server (a start instead of a mesh). Very good thinking all the same.
  21. Net Ready by ryanw · · Score: 1, Troll

    > I want an X-Box so bad, or as I would call it, a DOA3-Box.

    My Athlon I ordered came "net ready too" .. imagine that.

    The XBox is the whore of gaming consoles. It's a celeron processor with an nvidia video card. Whow, some great amazing technology that Microsoft gets to put their name on. I don't get it.

    Gaming consoles are ment to be DIFFERENT then when I play games on my PC. The XBox is making you play games that you could play on your PC except with not as high resolutions (unless you plug into a HDTV that costs over $3,000.) ...

    Play Metal Gear Solid 2 before you decide to jump on the xBox bandwagon.

    1. Re:Net Ready by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 2

      Yeah, lord knows, for example, that you can run out and buy an Athlon with a Unified Memory Architecture.

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
    2. Re:Net Ready by damiam · · Score: 3, Insightful
      The XBox is the whore of gaming consoles. It's a celeron processor with an nvidia video card. Whow, some great amazing technology that Microsoft gets to put their name on.

      And the GameCube has a PPC processor and an ATI video card. AFAIK, all modern consoles have parts not made by the company that sells them. The XBox is no different.

      --
      It's hard to be religious when certain people are never incinerated by bolts of lightning.
    3. Re:Net Ready by xxavierg · · Score: 1

      uhhh...can't you just by a mobo with a built-in video card?

    4. Re:Net Ready by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1. it's how things are done. Consoles don't have the overhead of pcs (yes, even ones running linux toughguy)

      2. it's a PIII, not a celeron (yes, a difference here also)

      3. MGS2 is being ported to the xbox. And according to Hideo (the dude that wrote/directed it.) It'll look better due to the xbox being basically more stout hardware wise than ps2/gb.

      So, put your hateraid away and give it a chance. Just because it has MS on it doesn't mean it instantly sucks.

      Yes, it may be trendy to hate microsoft, but get off it, it's a good console with decent games, not a plot to take over the world.

      people like you make me laugh.

    5. Re:Net Ready by vrmlknight · · Score: 1

      whoa their cowboy built-in video card and Unified Memory Architecture are way very different things

      --
      This must be Thursday, I never could get the hang of Thursdays.
    6. Re:Net Ready by xxavierg · · Score: 1

      what's the difference? (not a challenge, just trying to shed off some ignorance)

    7. Re:Net Ready by Osty · · Score: 5, Informative

      It's a celeron processor with an nvidia video card.

      Ah, but it's not a celeron. You'd know this, had you read Anandtech's article yesterday. And while it is an nVidia video card, it's not one you can go out and buy for your PC. Sure, it's somewhere between the GF3 and GF3ti500 in terms of clock and memory speed, but that's ignoring the extra shaders on the card. And it's also ignoring the fact that the XBox IS A CONSOLE. What that means is that it's hardware that won't change for 5+ years. Developers can write directly to that hardware, and do many other programming tricks that they can't do with a PC because they don't know what hardware their game will run on. Yes, it uses some PC hardware. That doesn't make it a PC (if that were the case, then the GameCube is a Macintosh).


      Gaming consoles are ment to be DIFFERENT then when I play games on my PC. The XBox is making you play games that you could play on your PC except with not as high resolutions (unless you plug into a HDTV that costs over $3,000.) ...

      And the XBox IS different than the PC, where the games are concerned. While you might find Halo on a PC, you're not going to find Munch's Oddysey, Amped, DOA3, Cel Damage, SSX Trickey, and more. And as far as Halo goes, the XBox isn't the only console to have FPS games on it (nor is it the first). Hell, the old Super Nintendo had a port of Wolf3D. The PS2 has ports of NOLF and Half-Life , among many others. So just because you think that the FPS is the realm of computers doesn't make it so. But rarely will you play a fighting game or party game, for instance, on a PC. Oh, and you might want to go re-price HDTV's. You can get good ones for $2000 or so these days.


      Play Metal Gear Solid 2 before you decide to jump on the xBox bandwagon.

      And play Halo before you write off the XBox for good. Then again, there's nothing saying you can't have both an XBox and a PS2. or an XBox and a Gamecube, or PS2 and Gamecube, or even all three.

    8. Re:Net Ready by ryanw · · Score: 1

      > And play Halo before you write off the XBox for good. Then again, there's nothing saying you can't have both an XBox and a PS2. or an XBox and a Gamecube, or PS2 and Gamecube, or even all three.

      I did play halo. .. framerate sucked ... and graphics weren't as good as metal gear solid 2. sorry.

    9. Re:Net Ready by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 4, Informative

      PC = lets say 64 megs of RAM, 64 megs of Video RAM and an AGP bus that lets you copy between the two (think having two buckets and a hose) Unified Memory Arch = 64 megs of RAM which both your video chips and processor are plugged into. Note that originally AGP was designed to work as a poor man's UMA; the card would go directly to system RAM over the AGP bus, obviating the need for on-board RAM. Nobody actually does this. :-) So lets say you want to create a texture on the fly. On the PC, your processor creates it, dumps it in RAM, and it's then copied (and this is the bit that takes time) over to the video card's RAM, where it's read and displayed. On a UMA machine, the processor creates it, dumps it in RAM, and the video card reads it and displays it. Now, IIRC, the PlayStation2 does this the exact opposite way; lots of little bitty cup sized RAM caches, and a firehose of a bus. The idea being grab some data, use it, get rid of it. You need it later? Just grab it again, you've got bandwidth to spare.

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
    10. Re:Net Ready by xxavierg · · Score: 1

      thanks for clearing it up... :)

    11. Re:Net Ready by zurmikopa · · Score: 1

      The framerate on Halo, while not being the 100+ fps you can get on a PC with quake3, is definatly more than playable. There's some (very minor) slowdown when you have a mass of enemies on both screens in a large area with split screen, but that's about it. I also have metal gear solid 2, which is a totally different kind of very awesome game. Both are much too short. =( Or at least they feel too short.

    12. Re:Net Ready by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well yeah, but the graphical advantage of the xbox is what is being touted as the big reason to get one. get the fuck of slashdot.

    13. Re:Net Ready by Brat+Food · · Score: 1

      Play Metal Gear Solid 2 before you decide to jump on the xBox bandwagon

      1st of all, ill prolly get flamed for this, but, MGS2 isnt all it was cracked up to be (short, umm, erratic and kinda stupid plot, easy). Oh, and I seem to remember reading a while ago(dont know if its still true) that MGS2 would be coming to the xbox. And in all truth, the xbox version would more then likely look way better(higer rez textures, shaders, AA, etc), use the HD for more permanent game world interaction, etc. Truth be told, the xbox has more potentiol for better games at this point in time. Only time will tell.

      And, while buying a game+system for hype is all well and good, its far better to buy a system for a game youve played and know you like. If mr. taco likes fighting games, and has played DOA3, that has prolly why he would "jump on the xbox bandwagon", as it were.

      --

      "Stuff... In my home!? NEVER!" - Zim on Invader Zim
      "I want the toilet seat!" - Little Dog on Two Stupid Dogs
    14. Re:Net Ready by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who cares what the hardware is? It's a GAMING CONSOLE, the only thing that matters are the games. You don't have to worry about minimum system requirements, incompatibilities, a thousand cables, etc...

      It sounds like you're just coming up with reasons to hate the Xbox based out of some hatred for Microsoft or some strange attachment to Nintendo.

    15. Re:Net Ready by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and whats the difference between that and the discount pcs and laptops which share the video ram and system ram?>
      Nothing....
      its a cheap design, not a big difference.

    16. Re:Net Ready by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      people like you make ME laugh...
      what makes you tihnk MS isn't trying to take over the world, again? basically, they've made it clear that their plan is essentially to make EVERY other industry dependant on them (more than they already are...) by controlling transactions on the internet. And now, they want in on your living room too.

      NO, its a PIII with half the L2 cache... isn't that about what a celeron was, a pII with half of the L2 cache? Wowo. Big difference!
      Trendy to hate MS... like thats the reason people dislike them.. maybe it because they perceive the constant lies MS public relations spews, and people notice the slimy way they conduct rtheir business. and how ready they are to screw every other company over...
      Attach your brain firmly, please, next time!

    17. Re:Net Ready by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      SO, why can't they just release all of those games for the PC, and i'll plug a controller in the back?
      IS there something about 'Munched Odyssey' and 'Amped' that make them impossible to make for PC hardware unless it's packaged in console form?
      I don't think so...

      PS... playing FPSs with a Joystick SUCKSSSSSSSS
      i'm waiting for Halo on my Pc....

    18. Re:Net Ready by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 2
      Nothing.... its a cheap design, not a big difference
      Nope, sorry. Don't believe me? Ask somebody from SGI.
      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
    19. Re:Net Ready by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In your post, you described what makes the SGI O2 a really freakin cool computer. Made in 96, beaten in bandwith in late 2000 by consumer PCs. Want a video as a texture? Change a pointer in the code. Same performance. How feakin cool is that? Sure, the 3D preformace is pretty slow compared to modern machines... Nonetheless, very sexy.

    20. Re:Net Ready by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Note that the XBox has hardware a lot closer to 'discount pc' than it does to an SGI. If there's a difference, it's probably in software.

    21. Re:Net Ready by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 2

      So the 1996 implementation of tech A is beaten by the 2000 implementation of tech B. What about the 2001 implementation of tech A?

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
    22. Re:Net Ready by hyoo · · Score: 1

      ... difference is that they don't have 6.4 GB/s second of throughput like the XBox. Instead of letting the GPU share the slow CPU's RAM (like on those ghetto UMA PCs/laptops).. the Xbox lets the CPU share the GPU's (fast) RAM.

    23. Re:Net Ready by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well, I still don't understand why economy PCs are produced which share the ram and video ram. If is such an advantage, why does it not appear in PCs that cost more than $700? Probably because its the cheap way to do things, and MS obviously wants to make a system that doesn't cost too much to make.

    24. Re:Net Ready by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 2
      If is such an advantage, why does it not appear in PCs that cost more than $700?
      It's the HOW of it. Going back to my example. You've got a pail full of water, an empty pail, and a garden hose to transfer the water from one bucket to the other. That's your standard PC. You've got one full pail, and a garden hose to drink through. That's your 700 dollar PC. You've got one full pail, and a firehose to drink through. That's UMA. In other words, there's a difference between sharing RAM, and having RAM designed to be shared at maximum efficiency.
      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
  22. Microsoft should be happy about this... by MadMirko · · Score: 1

    There goes the revenue I'm sure they were hoping to get off online gamers. How much do you want to bet future games won't work like this? Or even have any LAN support at all.

    IMHO the opposite might as well be true. There is nothing to earn from LAN playing, there never has been a price aside that of the equipment you need (think of the GameBoy link cable, or ethernet adapters for PCs), and people wouldn't accept one.

    Microsoft hasn't planned an XBOX online service (AFAIK), and even if they have, they would be planning to earn from MMO games like World Of Warcraft & Co. With this tool we see the first Hacker development, and many others will follow. This will make the XBox immensly popular among hackers (which is a small crowd) and, even better, among all the wannabes and normal gamers and parents looking for the coolest machine(which is a huge crowd).

    Merry XMas, Mr. Gates

  23. PC-BOX by snotgun · · Score: 1

    I have no idea if this has been talked about, doesn't anyone here feel that xbox games could be easily had on a computer with comparable features? GF3, DVD-ROM, x-box games. Don't they already use directx to develop their software? I don't know, seems to me that Microsoft could easily put out something. Be it hardware/software, like what Sega did for the Saturn.

    1. Re:PC-BOX by 10+Speed · · Score: 1
      there is a difference between consoles and PC's.

      A pc sits on/under a desk plugs into your monitor and is usually at a 1 person desk.

      A Console however is small plugs into a tv and can be operated while sitting on the couch with a couple of mates.

      Think of it as comparing a dvd player with a dvd drive - both devices are similar in function but have very obvious differences....

      I guess to sum it up a console is more sociable than a computer....

  24. I wonder. by NoMoreNicksLeft · · Score: 2, Interesting

    How many game studios are being told that, if they want the SDK's early, or even at all, that they must sign exclusivity contracts with M$ ? My prediction for sure, is this. No game released for Xbox will ever be released for linux. My 80% sure prediction is this... no game released for Xbox will be released for ANYTHING else.

    Sega is gone. It's possible Nintendo is hurting. How far can they be pushed, before they have to give up too? Even Sony might have to pull out, if M$ behaves as I've suggested. Bingo. Video Game Industry Monopoly.

    But... it gets worse. The powers that be have always HATED people building their own computers, upgrading them. Here is a viable PC platform, that is almost completely sealed. Even a bigger hard drive might be impossible for a user to install, if M$ wants to really cheat. If they release this as a home pc, or even business... and Office XP2 is released for it, what then? "People buy the Xbox, it's the end to all those hardware conflicts, software too!". Compaq(HP?), Dell, Gateway... their days are numbered.
    Bingo. PC Industry Monopoly.

    Won't affect you, you say? "I'll always buy my own, and build as I chooose!". Noble thoughts. But the fact is, the prices you pay for hardware are in part subsidized by the fact that everyone else is doing the same. People like you and I might be left paying prices similar to those that corporate enterprise purchasers are paying, since they will be the only other market that won't be able to use a sealed system like Xbox. The future looks grim, my friend.

    1. Re:I wonder. by fishebulb · · Score: 1

      Uh what prices enterprise's are paying? they are a hell of a lot cheaper than pricewatch when you are buying 1000 dimms ram etc.

    2. Re:I wonder. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes yes.

      They're all out to get you.
      They're going to kill you.
      They're going to shut down all competition in all fields.

      What's that? 20 years from now we'll be driving Microsoft cars to work? Riight.
      Please, take your end of the world signs and shopping cart and move along...
      :)

    3. Re:I wonder. by Namarrgon · · Score: 2
      My prediction for sure, is this. No game released for Xbox will ever be released for linux.

      You'd be wrong. Carmack has said he plans Doom3 for Xbox, and I'd like to see MS stopping him from releasing under Linux too.

      --
      Why would anyone engrave "Elbereth"?
    4. Re:I wonder. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope, microsfot wants to be the giant corporation that takes over the world. However, they are too incompetent. Perhaps they will be acquired by the real corporation that takes over the world (the US gov't??).
      No, MS is just going to stifle development and true innovation in their monopolized fields for another few years, and use their ill goten pile of $40,000,000,000 cash to help propel them everywhere else.

    5. Re:I wonder. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, they way they'll do that is to say : want to release your game for any MS system? want to actually get the specs on the next ms systems? want to know what is going on with ms xp2 ?(or whatever the hell they call it).
      They are not concerend with Linux as game competition, yet, obviously. It's Nintendo and Sony (duh.)
      Try and stop him.. heh, do you think MS cares about some developer, even one as big as Carmack? To MS, he's of very little importance. Just another game company, just another devloper.

    6. Re:I wonder. by twenty3 · · Score: 1

      Well, I have no doubt that Microsoft will do what they can to ensure that there are some XBox exclusive games. Still there have been plans for PC and Mac versions of Halo even after Bungie was purchased by Microsoft. You'll notice that the PC and Mac versions are at least 6 months away. This time delayed exclusiveness may be all M$ needs to ensure that PC owners still want an XBox.

      Additionally, one of the appeals that M$ has been making to game developers is that ports to XBox will be easy because of the use of Direct X and a scaled down Windows OS. This would imply that they understand some developers will intend to have ports for both the desktop and the XBox.

      I don't think that the XBox as is will be able to displace the PC. Perhaps version 3?

      -- 23

      --
      -- 23
  25. Kali? by atomray · · Score: 1

    Hmmm, a virtual LAN...this sounds familiar. I believe that a software package called Kali (www.kali.net) has been doing this for years and years. I remember using this for doom or quake or something like that.

    IIRC it's a decent package. Check it out.

    --
    take your sig and shove it
    1. Re:Kali? by Forkenhoppen · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That was for piping IPX traffic over TCP/IP. This is for piping whatever comes out of an XBox (lan TCP/IP, I'd expect) over internet TCP/IP. Same idea, different protocol.

      See, essentially you just wrap all the packets coming from the XBox in a TCP/IP packet, and throw 'em over the internet. On the other end, you unwrap 'em and send 'em on. Not too difficult. (in theory..)

      Main problems are looking after people joining and quitting, and the problem of finding other people to play against. These are reasons why services like Battle.net and Kali took off; not so much because of the software, but because of the meet-others service that they provided.

    2. Re:Kali? by atomray · · Score: 1

      Ahh, true, that was IPX. My memory is a bit hazy, it's been about 6 years since I've used it, and it took me 5 minutes to remember the name (I was convinced it was Shiva for a few minutes - which unfortunately also produced some networking related hits on google...).

      It can't be too hard to create virtual lans though (all tcp/ip traffic), and even linking two lans via a VPN should allow the XBox to find other machines to play against.

      I guess I'll have to actually go to the site and read what the obstacles were instead of just talking out of my ass :)

      --
      take your sig and shove it
  26. OH THE IRONY! by gatesh8r · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This can be taken two ways: 1) Linux screws over M$'s plans for the future, or 2) The Linux community is going to help capitalize on M$'s plans to move into the game community. This post may seem a little redundant, but I'll make some points here that I haven't seen scrolling through previous comments:

    * The gateway may not be the best thing to see for those that would rather see the X-Box go away. This only strengthens its position for anyone with broadband; immediately jumping into the online world where Sega and possibly Sony have already entered, and Nintendo is lagging behind... I haven't heard about its broadband, but Nintendo best have something.

    * This little Linux program should allow for more than JUST X-Box -- especially if other services out there can too be taken away and allow for more of a P2P gaming experience. No middle man for Phantasy Star Online, for example. I feel if it gets more fanfare it'll spark more projects to be done for other consoles, which is totally a Good Thing(TM).

    * Misc. points: It would as been said before spark a Game Spy-ish service, but I would not be suprised of Game Spy themselves took intrest in tapping into this market for consoles if we got more of a P2P way of finding games. I know I would have some intrest along with my brother and our PS2's to be able to find opponents in say, Tekken Tag that we have sitting there collecting dust because we've beat all our friends in it.

    Oh well, in the end Billy G. may get shafted out of another subcription service :-D

    --
    Karma whorin' since 1999
  27. who gives a shit by mickeyreznor · · Score: 0, Troll

    mod me down as trolling if you like, but i'd like to voice my opinion:

    consoles were never meant for online gaming. It just doesn't make sense. If they were, then why the fuck do they bother to give you 2-4 controllers. If i want online gaming, I'll do it with a pc game. Consoles are for games that you either play by youself, or when you bring friends to your room. I'm getting a PS2 for christmas and I can't think of a single game I want for it that would make any sense at all to use as a multiplayer game.

    Repeat after me: PC = online net gaming, Console = 2-4 player splitscreen/sports/whatever.

    1. Re:who gives a shit by ElectusUnum · · Score: 1

      Obviously you're not into doing something just for the fun of it. Sure I'm probably only going to play Halo online once or twice online, but it's FUN to set it up and get it to work. Halo works very well as a large multiplayer game because it was developed for a LAN of xbox's, supporting a max of 16 players. The difference between doing this with a lot of tv's and the same over the internet isn't different in terms of gameplay. Sounds to me like you have a problem with the Xbox and it's LAN capabilities, not connecting over the net....

    2. Re:who gives a shit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wrong, the console insustry didnt realize how good it would be if people could play together online until recently.

    3. Re:who gives a shit by blixel · · Score: 5, Interesting

      consoles were never meant for online gaming. It just doesn't make sense.

      Well here's my 2 cents.

      Consoles are far more convenient and more simple than a computer. How are they more convenient? They are small, light, and very portable. How are they more simple? Plug in a cartridge or put in your CD, press the power button and you're done. No installation required. I'm not suggesting that it's difficult to install a game, at least it isn't for most people, but not doing something is always easier than doing something.

      Personally I think it would be great to have the simplicity of a console and the power, graphical quality, and networking capabilities of a PC all combined into one small, light weight, and portable machine.

      I love getting together with friends for a weekend of LAN gaming at someones house, but I hate lugging my computer over there. On the other hand, if I had a console system like the GameCube (6x6x4.3 inches), it certainly would make LAN gaming a lot easier. A console and an LCD panel would be very portable.

      Furthermore, if games were no longer any kind of a priority for my Desktop PC, I could save a fortune on PC parts. You wouldn't need to spend $350 for a ti500 GeForce3 video card. A $29 8MB AGP card would be fine for most people who just need to display 1280x1024 at 85Hz or less on a 19" monitor. Of course if you have other reasons for needing 3D power, like CAD, then this wouldn't be a factor for you. I also wouldn't be as quick about upgrading the rest of my PC parts if games weren't a factor. Games require more computing power than any other software for the most part.

      Bottom line for me - I'm not willing to give up the awesome networking ability of PC gaming so until consoles can match the ability of PC's in that respect, I will continue to play games on the PC. But I would have no reservations at all about dropping PC gaming in favor of consoles when that day comes. So I think it's cool to see a project like this even if it is for the XBox.

      I think you are right to say that "consoles were never meant for online gaming"... That's true in terms of all past consoles... But moving forward, I think consoles will be meant for online gaming and IMHO, it does make sense.

      Let the flame begin.

  28. Xbox OS? by vrmlknight · · Score: 1

    I was wondering what OS the xbox is based off of the games use directx 8 and such so should it be a fairly easy thing to get the game to run on a win32 box?

    --
    This must be Thursday, I never could get the hang of Thursdays.
    1. Re:Xbox OS? by DeeKayWon · · Score: 2

      It uses a stripped-down version of the Win2k kernel optimized for a console (i.e. everything runs in ring 0 at the kernel level, etc).

    2. Re:Xbox OS? by ElectusUnum · · Score: 1

      The Xbox runs a modded version of windoze XP, the games won't run on ur comp right off the bat. The xbox has a modified geforce3 and a unique memory setup (someone correct me if im wrong) so it'll need some SERIOUS hardware and one hell of an emulator. Personally I'm hoping for a VGA adapter so I can play halo on my 21 inch monitor :^>.

    3. Re:Xbox OS? by vrmlknight · · Score: 1

      but its running a 733 Mhz IIRC p3 and 64 megs of ram(Unified Memory Architecture) my home computer 1200 Mhz and 512 megs of ram and 64 meg radion i think that it wouldnt be a problem of hardware for most home users

      --
      This must be Thursday, I never could get the hang of Thursdays.
    4. Re:Xbox OS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      umm..but to run an emulator you usually need 5x the original hardware. so if you have a 3500MHz P-III equivalent machine with a 30 GB/s bus you can emulate it.

    5. Re:Xbox OS? by Namarrgon · · Score: 4, Interesting
      It's not a PC. The CPU might use a PIII and the OS might be based on Win2k, but it isn't Win2k, even the DirectX8 being is significantly different, and the system architecture is quite different to a PC.

      All software runs in kernel mode, unified memory means the CPU and GPU get equal access to textures & vertex data, a second vertex pipe & some other fancy texture stuff on the GPU, specialised controllers - none of that exists in the PC space, and would all have to be emulated.

      Of course, it'll be much easier to port an Xbox game to Windows & vice versa, compared to a PS2, but it's still far too different to just run.

      --
      Why would anyone engrave "Elbereth"?
    6. Re:Xbox OS? by vrmlknight · · Score: 3, Interesting

      "...unified memory means the CPU and GPU get equal access to textures & vertex data..."

      This is where AGP comes in it was originally designed so the GPU can access system RAM I don't know how hard it would be it implement due to no one using AGP this way and as for running in kernel mode I know enough to BS about how to get around that...

      "specialised controllers"

      They are USB but w/ a different connector and I'm sure someone could figure out how to use a CompUSA USB controller and remap the buttons or rewire the connector to a USB connector... I'm not saying I know how to do this but theirs a lot of people out their and I haven't seen anything talking about running xbox games on a regular win2k box or something similar

      --
      This must be Thursday, I never could get the hang of Thursdays.
    7. Re:Xbox OS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You wouldn't need true emulation. Same processor, same OS almost. I doubt that much is very different about the Xbox than a PC. I THOUGHT THAT WAS THE POINT OF THE XBOX?>?

    8. Re:Xbox OS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, look! Sargent Dork! Nyah hah!

    9. Re:Xbox OS? by Nullsmack · · Score: 1

      Don't listen to these people.. It is not XP, nor is it 9x..

      The operating system on the xbox is a highly modified, and stripped down, version of windows 2000. All programs run in Ring 0 (root) mode. There is DirectX, but I'm not sure if it's 8 or if they got 8.1 on there.

      As far as loading it.. there has been research into this and they have a small bootstrap on a rom on the mobo, and it loads the operating system off of a small spot on the hard drive. Also, all developers are required to included the latest version on their game discs, and the xbox will auto-update whenever a disc with a new version is inserted. IIRC. Also that servs to restore the os if the copy on the xbox becomes corrupt, just insert a game disc and it'll be okay.

    10. Re:Xbox OS? by Namarrgon · · Score: 2
      Sure, the idea was for AGP to provide pseudo-unified memory that the CPU and video card could share (mostly to reduce costs), but it's way too slow (i740 anyone?). Only (theoretical) 1 GB/s vs. 6.4 GB/s on the Xbox. There is no substitute for the real thing, as SGI will repeatedly insist.

      And yeah, I'm sure the controllers could be very easily adapted to fit a standard USB port. AFAIK it's only the physical connector that's different - all the interface chips are normal USB, to take advantage of economies of scale (like the rest of the hardware). Of course, that doesn't mean your target market will have one...

      --
      Why would anyone engrave "Elbereth"?
  29. whoopsie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dont you mean "xboxes" and not xbox's

    whatever...

    1. Re:whoopsie by scorcherer · · Score: 1

      xboxen

      --

      --
      The Cap is nigh. Time to get a fresh new account.

  30. MMOFPS? by gakido · · Score: 1

    Are there still plans for HALO to become an MMOFPS as originally intended by Bungie? Or is it just going to become another 32 player DM thing?

    1. Re:MMOFPS? by ElectusUnum · · Score: 1

      The PC/MAC version is still in development so it's possible, but really not likely. Hopefully halo2 or maybe a mod. Keep your fingers crossed!

    2. Re:MMOFPS? by gakido · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There is always Planetside . It's going to be what HALO was supposed to, or at least that's what I keep telling myself.

  31. Re:Of course I'm serious! by gazbo · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I can't believe you got a bite out of that one. The I'm a consultant for Fortune 500... Linux troll was pretty good, but this was way too obvious (though I liked the throwaway comment about Perl - if you'd left it at that, it'd have been a great troll)

    I was going to suggest you tried something a bit more subtle, but Dave21212 seems to have proven me wrong.

    Tip of the hat, sir.

  32. PS2 ? by sam@caveman.org · · Score: 1

    what is the state of broadband kits for the PS2 or GameCube? things become infinitely more fun when an actual person is involved, rather than just the cheesy, predictable game AI.

    --
    burn the computers. go back to the abacus.
    1. Re:PS2 ? by sam@caveman.org · · Score: 1

      well after a bit of google searching i found that supposedly a 39.99 broadband adapater is being shipped this month for the PS2.

      details at gaming-age.com.

      -sam

      --
      burn the computers. go back to the abacus.
    2. Re:PS2 ? by zhensel · · Score: 2

      Tony Hawk 3 is compatible with a bunch of USB ethernet adapters (check out the review at ps2.ign.com ... I think they listed them there). I'm not sure whether this is a feature of the ps2 or if it's due to work by the team that created tony hawk 2 though. It seems sensical for sony to make a USB ethernet add on though... I can't see where else it'd plug in.

  33. Microsoft FUD by hound3000 · · Score: 1

    You'd better be careful on those index page posts, before you know it Microsoft will say that they have been endorsed by Slashdot!

    > I want an X-Box so bad, or as I would call it, a DOA3-Box.

    1. Re:Microsoft FUD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It certainly looks like m$ has paid for space on this forum.

      It also seems like the m$ marketeering department's astroturf campaign controls hundreds of slashdot accounts that its agents can post from.

      Suggested moderation: -2 troll ( Post does not comply with objectives of m$ astroturf campaign, which of course does not exist. MS would never be that low.)

    2. Re:Microsoft FUD by beable · · Score: 1

      You should consider boycotting Xboxes, because they did a "Vandal Marketing" campaign in Sydney. This was similar to the IBM campaign. Microsoft paid another company to go and paint green "X"s all over the place. The Councils are very annoyed about the damage to their footpaths and want to charge the advertising company for the cost of cleaning off the advertising.
      Xbox vandals

      --
      ...
    3. Re:Microsoft FUD by hound3000 · · Score: 1

      I don't have to consider boycotting XBoxes. I haven't owned a game console since the Super Nintendo.
      Now if I could completely avoid Windows... That would be something. :)

    4. Re:Microsoft FUD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sydney is a hole anyway. Anyone who lives in Sydney is a drug dealer.

  34. Some incomplete thoughts there. by El+Camino+SS · · Score: 2, Insightful


    First thing... the Xbox is not going to replace the pc market. It is going to play games... and there will always be a market for PCs. There are businesses out there that have to buy PCs. Programmers that have to bu PCs. Server people that have to buy servers.... hooked up to PCs.

    If the computer revolution has taught us anything, it is that computers got more complex, interchangeable, and personlized. In the beginning you had Texas Instruments and Commodore. Now how many technology manufacturers are there? You theory is that the marketplace will become less diverse. People will all line up to get the same system... under someone else's idea of what services they want. That is insane. People have been bucking M$ for years. And their product does pracitcally anything the user friendlies want on their computer.

    This topic alone is counter to your argument.
    There you show your Xbox, the universal computer replacement, and IN DAYS people are already customizing it. Making it more diverse. Making it to their liking. Cracking it. They aren't lining up to do all the same things, they're breaking out.

    So the ideas that everyone will be planting the Xbox4 in the bowels of their home next to the washing machine is preposterous. The world will never dance to the tune of one drummer forever.

    1. Re:Some incomplete thoughts there. by NoMoreNicksLeft · · Score: 1

      Oh, sure. And M$ will never get away with their current crimes, will they? The goverment has had enough, and will punish them severely.

      Haha. The businesses already lease prepackaged systems, and hardly ever open the boxes up. A closed system would be very favorable to them, and its not just M$ pushing towards one.

      Developers? They'll pay incredible fees for "DevBox" systems that don't work very well. A substantial chunk of M$'s cash is from various Visual $tudio licensing schemes, and related products.

      Servers? I believe you mean those who are buying corp. enterprise style hardware. Sure that will still be there to be bought, at $600+ per motherboard. Granted, it would be my kind of motherboard, but that doesn't mean I'll be able to afford it.

      Customizing it? Sure, M$ is caught off guard, (Aren't they always? I've never claimed they were smart giants, only giants) but this will change.

  35. You don't need linux, it boots off a disk.. by ElectusUnum · · Score: 1

    It just loads into ram..

  36. get your facts straight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Read the anad article, the chip is not a Celeron, but a P3 with reduced cache.
    Also, MGS2 is coming out for the XBOX and chances are it would feature all the goodies that will be added to the JAP version.

    Sony's saving grace this season are the games.
    The tech in the XBOX and gamecube is already ahead though.

  37. Thanks! by ElectusUnum · · Score: 1

    Your post was so clear and well written, the message just JUMPED out of a page, I thought I'd say thanks..... *sarcasm* if you're too stupid to figure that out yourself...

    1. Re:Thanks! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please don't post to Slashdot again. Ever.

  38. Poor Soul... by ElectusUnum · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Hey buddy, why don't you get a life k? I mean REALLY, how much time did u spend thinking about and posting that message, why do you even waste a minimal amount of energy. Now you will no doubt flame me, but...surprise surprise you'll forget to mention the idea behind my post...I feel sorry for you.

    1. Re:Poor Soul... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I see why you're so bitter... YOU were the one to actually submit the story. That's hilarious that you would take the time to seek out every little troll who would criticize your (no offense) horrendous punctuational skills. Anyway, keep it up.

    2. Re:Poor Soul... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      You have six posts to your name. All of those six are under this article, and three of those six are you bashing people who made fun of your incompetence, illiteracy, or general shitheadedness. Why don't you take some Prozac, realize that the world doesn't revolve around your super-l33t article-submitting skillz, and realize that you're posting to Slashdot, the one place in the world where someone is going to flame you no matter what the fuck you say?

      kthxbye.

  39. Re:Thank you! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, that's hilarious. I knew someone would bite at that one STILL!

  40. dude.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Taco, you're such a tool. Seriously.

  41. Re:C: A Dead Language? by Gizzmonic · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I like the troll about being a "Visual Basic Kernel developer" the best. When is someone gonna post that one again?

    --
    (-1, Raw and Uncut is the only way to read)
  42. Inventive use of the apostrophe. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Clever idea, good story, I especially liked the inventive use of the apostrophe.

    "up to four xbox's"

    Let bob the angry flower tell it:
    http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif

  43. XBOX vs. * by Brat+Food · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This program is a godsend. I have a feeling MS wont have a netplay service set up for some time, and now i can play with my friends full screen w/o having to drag TVs and such over to one persons house. The XBOX may have 4 controller ports, but playing 4 to a screen really doesnt compare to haveing a screen to yourself. Console NET gaming will take off. SEGA made huge headway in to this arena, and it will only get more popular. XBox is going to be hacked left and right, and i cant wait =)

    And to gaming bigots - I am an avid collector of consoles, and have a PC and MAC for gaming as well, and what ticks me off more then anything is people who have some blind attachment to one way of gaming, usually because its what they blew 300 bucks on. Heres the point, for all those who still dont get it:

    ITS ABOUT THE GAMES STUPID

    Finally, about seeing Xbox games directly playable on PC... its going to be a while if ever. Fist reason is MS wont want to cannibalize their own market(although a lot of games will be ports, the strength will be original titles, and XBox first titles, to drive sales). The second is a technical hurdle: XBox on the surface may look just like a PC with a gForce3, but, it has one very important advantage: the programmers have ONE target spec to reach the whole audiance. This has always been a console advantage from a game making standpoint. So while on paper its looks like less then a high end pc, in then end you have better looking games because programmers write games to take full advantage of what resources are available, the target output is a TV (relativly low resolution and a constant), and no huge OS overhead.

    --

    "Stuff... In my home!? NEVER!" - Zim on Invader Zim
    "I want the toilet seat!" - Little Dog on Two Stupid Dogs
  44. it might be a good thing, that dosn't mean they li by autopr0n · · Score: 1

    like it.

    I mean, that's like saying the RIAA likes napster because it increases album sales. It may increase album sales, but that doesn't mean they're happy about it. These companies care a lot more about control then they do about money. Control means you know how much money you're going go get. control means you can squeeze people for as much money as they have. Stockholders want instant profits, rather then long-term effectiveness.

    If Microsoft can control the method of connection, that means they can charge whatever they want, if they need a bit more money this quarter, they can jack them up like 2 cents or whatever. They don't get that if people connect them themselves, even if they do sell more boxes.

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
  45. Someone tell me by mindstrm · · Score: 2

    how this is any different than, say, setting up an ethernet bridge?

    How is this specific to the xbox?

    1. Re:Someone tell me by Have+Blue · · Score: 3, Insightful

      According to the site, it's different in that it doesn't require a huge investment in professional VPN software and a huge investment of time in learning how to set it all up.

    2. Re:Someone tell me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My understanding is the EVERY xBox assigns itself an IP address of 0.0.0.1. When it talks over the LAN, it only sends broadcasts (255.255.255.255). There is no peer to peer networking going on what-so-ever, so the fact that every box has the same IP really does not matter. Microsoft probably did this to make it a little more difficult for such a hack to find it's way on to the internet.

  46. For us less technical OS X people... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Could someone that understands what jkerman is doing explain how this might be done using Mac OS X? If the software needed is not included with OS X, could you suggest what might be used/found at sourceforge?

    As long-time Mac user, but new to a Unix like environment, could the above be explained with as much simplicity as warrented?

    Thanks!

    1. Re:For us less technical OS X people... by jkerman · · Score: 1

      This solution IS pretty technically complicated for now. What it does is take the raw ethernet frames seen by the ethernet cards on your two boxes, encapsulate them in TCP/IP and spit them out at the other end.

      To do this requires an OS that supports bridging and tunneling, as well as a "promiscuous" mode on the network adapter.

      I dont know much about OSX, but I hope this helps!

    2. Re:For us less technical OS X people... by profeti · · Score: 1

      according to this the xboxgw people are working on OS X and liniuxppc ports.

  47. Unfortunately, it's already doomed by WillSeattle · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    I was just reading Business Wire, and apparently Nintendo will sell out it's initial 700,000 unit shipment this weekend, has added an additional 200,000 units to the next shipment, and MSFT still has backlog after shipping only 300,000 units (originally scheduled for 600,000).

    If you're hoping to get these as hack machines (a pretty good deal, actually), you better hurry, cause it's likely the xBox will be dead by springtime. The game industry only rewards the #1 and #2 spots, and xBox is radipdly becoming in danger from holding on to #3.

    [caveat - I own both MSFT and NTDOY stock]
    -

    --
    --- Will in Seattle - What are you doing to fight the War?
    1. Re:Unfortunately, it's already doomed by arson1 · · Score: 1

      I agree. I have a relative who works for Best Buy (the corporate headquarters), and she says the gamecube is destroying the xbox in terms of untis sold across all of their stores in the US. She couldn't remember the exact figures... but it wasn't even close. Could it be the $100 extra? probably.

      --


      --
      Don't sweat the petty things, and don't pet the sweaty things.
    2. Re:Unfortunately, it's already doomed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also, the crashing Xbox kiosks can't help. I went to Sam Goody, and the PS2 kiosk was up and fun... the Gamecube was working, man that thing is small! And the graphics look great.
      The Xbox... hmm, mysteriously not operating!
      I would have at least liked to check it out, as much as I hate MS. Guess it's nothing very new to me, as a PC gamer for a a few years. i might as well plug a controller into my computer and go play a game on that...

    3. Re:Unfortunately, it's already doomed by jest3r · · Score: 1

      Yes, I think half the problem is that FutureShop (Canadian electronics giant) will only sell the XBOX as a bundle so when its all said and done you need to spend CDN$700+ on the thing .. whereas they are selling the GameCube units separately (CDN$299)from the games and accessories ..

      I wonder if this is the case everywhere?

    4. Re:Unfortunately, it's already doomed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you think MS spent billions developing and is spending half billion $ marketing the XBox just to let it die within months? MS has over $30 billion in cash, some of the most successful marketing people and very deep reasons other than just gaming to put the XBox in as many households as possible. Most households do not yet have a DVD player and the XBox is just a $100 or so more expensive than most DVD players, maybe cheaper and plays games. The Gamecube is cheaper because it is for a cheaper market level. The broadband capability is also it's key to the future. Hopefully MS will really push the online/networked gaming with XBox to help spread broadband. MS has the resources to kickstart broadband that will help get other broadband services and companies finally become viable. It is actually in MS's interest to have independents enabling net gaming with the XBox now. Later iterations will likely restrict it. In a year or so, it may be the Playstation and the XBox at nr 1 and 2 with Nintendo fairly successful at a simpler level gaming experience.

  48. M$ seem to be on to a whiner here by WillSeattle · · Score: 1

    Actually, industry stats on business wires show that PS2 is doing pretty well, and that Nintendo is not able to keep up with the demand (had to add an additional 200,000 units to an already increased allotment for next ship batch for US). xBox, even with reduced shipments, is developing a backlog due to low demand.

    Me, I just preordered my Mandrake 8.1 with The Sims bundle anyway - should scream on my dual CPU boxen.

    -

    --
    --- Will in Seattle - What are you doing to fight the War?
  49. Don't be lured into the Xbox by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    MS is all about evil.
    They will use the xbox to try to take over the
    hardware market.

    There are more important things than scratching
    your gamer itch.

    Support Nintendo, Sega, and Sony.

    no new revenue for MS.

    s

    1. Re:Don't be lured into the Xbox by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Spare us the FUD, please. Take your Linux goggles off and look at what the XBox is: A very powerful console with great potential for being hackable into all sorts of different things. Lots of functionality, great graphics, a hard drive, ethernet, DVD, all for $300. If the fact that Microsoft makes it is the only thing stopping you from wanting one, then you need to take a step back and get a grip on reality. Go outside and try to darken that green, semi-translucent geek skin. Look at a girl or two. Maybe even talk to them. Then go back and look again.

      Since you geeks worship crap like MST3K, I'll repeat their mantra. Maybe it'll register in your nartow mind:

      "Repeat to yourself: It's just a show, I should really just relax!"

      The fate of the free world and the future of Microsoft do not hinge on whether or not you buy an XBox, or are you directly funding the executions of kittens and puppies if you dare to buy one.

  50. EA, Namco, Capcom... by gatesh8r · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ...yet no one mentions Squaresoft. Why do I have a PS2? Squaresoft. They make some *real* kick-ass games, especially RPG. These guys always get the attention of the hard-core gamers because of how they use the platform they design for, their story plots, and how much fun their console RPGs really are! Seems to me the critical company is Squaresoft, and Sony's got them. Not M$, not Nintendo, and certainly not Sega. Nintendo had their chance to keep them for the N64, but since Nintendo wanted to dictate to them their releases, Squaresoft jumped ship and went to Sony's camp. Let that be a lesson to Sony so they don't lose out on a critial player in their age market, because M$ will be more than happy to take them in and take a seige at the market.

    Personally, if M$ can't get Squaresoft, they can't dominate. This isn't the OS industry, M$ -- you can't do it all in-house; you need a huge backing.

    --
    Karma whorin' since 1999
  51. Not a console... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Sorry bub, but it's still a PC system pretending to be an XBox. Majority of the games are all on the PC, except for a few that were paid off to make it XBox first THEN release it on the PC a few months later (Read: Halo). You wont find anything new that you can't already play on Win95. Hell go to Best Buy and look side by side with the XBox and Gamecube. Xbox looks like my PC .. Bland but fast .. Gamecube looks awesome and totally jazzed up compared to anything on the PC(Xbox). They're all the same games, and in a lot of cases, much faster on a P4 system. Thanks for playing.

    Now, the GameCube on the otherhand is almost entirely EXCLUSIVE Nintendo games. Games that will NEVER be played on the PC. Games that will NEVER be surpassed in gameplay anywhere else. You wont ever see Metroid, Kid Ikarus, Zelda, or Mario on ANY OTHER SYSTEM. Not to mention, the graphics just blow away the Xboxs easily. It doesnt matter who pushes more polys if they dont look good.

    1. Re:Not a console... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      theres going to be some awesome sega games too!
      I'm looking forward to phantasy star online for the gamecube... I never though i'd be saying that about a nintendo system!!

    2. Re:Not a console... by Osty · · Score: 1

      Sorry bub, but it's still a PC system pretending to be an XBox. Majority of the games are all on the PC, except for a few that were paid off to make it XBox first THEN release it on the PC a few months later (Read: Halo). You wont find anything new that you can't already play on Win95.

      So where exactly can I pick up DOA3 for my PC? Or Munch's Oddysey? Or Cel Damage, Fuzion Frenzy, Project Gotham Racing, NFL Fever 2002, Amped, and so on? Because the majority of these must be on the PC, right? Oh, wait, they're not. I wonder why ...


      Hell go to Best Buy and look side by side with the XBox and Gamecube. Xbox looks like my PC .. Bland but fast .. Gamecube looks awesome and totally jazzed up compared to anything on the PC(Xbox).

      So it's the system's fault that the textures are bland? Nevermind that textures are just art, and it's up to the artist to make them look good. Besides, what games were you looking at? (I'll laugh if you say the Munch's Oddysey demo disk, as that is not indicative of the game at all) DOA3 has bright, lively textures and geometry, with many nice subtle touches, like being able to visually tell the difference between cloth types, nice water effects, snow that gets packed down as you walk over it, etc. Fuzion Frenzy is full of dark textures with lots of bright neon light effects and particles. I'll admit Halo is pretty boring graphically -- until you get into the outside world. Then it's astounding. My point? It takes a good artist to make any console look good, regardless of power. Nintendo definitely has them. Microsoft and affiliates also have them.


      Now, the GameCube on the otherhand is almost entirely EXCLUSIVE Nintendo games.

      I hope not, for Nintendo's sake. If this is going to be the case, then expect the GameCube to end up exactly like the N64 -- several Nintendo titles released per year, little from anybody else, and people only buy it for Pokemon or Mario Party. Nintendo has had problems wooing third-party developers lately, and unless they fix that, the Gamecube will not be a contender.


      Games that will NEVER be surpassed in gameplay anywhere else.

      In your opinion, of course. Some of us may not like some of those games. For instance, I thought the N64 versions of Zelda were pretty poorly done (yes, the graphics were pretty, and the control wasn't so bad, but they were boring). And if Metroid goes FPS like it appears to be doing (Metroid Prime), I'll pass on that, too.


      Not to mention, the graphics just blow away the Xboxs easily. It doesnt matter who pushes more polys if they dont look good.

      Again, in your opinion. I happen to be of the opinion that the XBox is quite beautiful, as exemplified by DOA3 and Shrek (Shitty gameplay, awesome graphics). You're right in that the number of polys doesn't matter (well, not too much, though the number of polys does determine how detailed your models are going to be). You happen to like the more childish (not as an insult) art of Nintendo, while I like the art of DOA3, for instance. You play what you want, I'll play what i want. Sweeping generalizations need not apply.

    3. Re:Not a console... by newbiescum · · Score: 1
      I hope not, for Nintendo's sake. If this is going to be the case, then expect the GameCube to end up exactly like the N64 -- several Nintendo titles released per year, little from anybody else, and people only buy it for Pokemon or Mario Party. Nintendo has had problems wooing third-party developers lately, and unless they fix that, the Gamecube will not be a contender.
      Except Nintendo's titles are still constantly ranked in the top 10 console games consisently and without fail, even with the release of PS2. They might not be a contender in quantity, but apparently, they're a contender in quality if sales figures dictate that. BTW, Zelda and Mario 64 were pretty big titles too for N64, and honestly, I really liked the games. Plus with the gain of titles like Star Wars: Rogue Leader II (LEC), and Resident Evil series (Capcom), it appears that they are wooing the other third party developers. Sega is jumping on board too with Sonic and PSO which seems to be the biggest score IMO since Sega will become one of the biggest console software publishers with multiple franchises, and this is the time to be one apparently with all indiciations that sotware publishers are going to rake it in (see news stories on news.com, gamespot.com, or your dedicated gaming source).
    4. Re:Not a console... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So where exactly can I pick up DOA3 for my PC? Or Munch's Oddysey? Or Cel Damage, Fuzion Frenzy, Project Gotham Racing, NFL Fever 2002, Amped, and so on? Because the majority of these must be on the PC, right? Oh, wait, they're not. I wonder why ...
      I wonder why too. They should make all of those games for the PC. Then I would be interested. In fact, i'd buy them. But have to buy another system to do that? No thanks

    5. Re:Not a console... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      s0ty!!!

  52. something's not right by aechols · · Score: 1

    there are linux users that own xboxes? who'da thunk it...

    --
    Are you pondering what I'm pondering?
    1. Re:something's not right by 42forty-two42 · · Score: 1

      They're busy porting it...

    2. Re:something's not right by ozzmosis · · Score: 1

      One simple reason, Most of us (linux and BSD users) hate Windows and not Microsoft.
      But there are some who just hate Microsoft.

      This is just my opnion but I feel Xbox is a great system. And it should not be discriminated just because it came from Microsoft. Microsoft may make a few products alot of people don't care for but people should (with everything, not just xbox) always atleast try something before making their final decision or flameing the product.

  53. wtf by gtx · · Score: 5, Funny

    I want an X-Box so bad, or as I would call it, a DOA3-Box.

    who are you and what the hell have you done with rob malda?

    --


    "I hope I don't make a mistake and manage to remain a virgin." - Britney Spears
    1. Re:wtf by NetGuruFL · · Score: 2, Funny

      Heh. She kicks high...

    2. Re:wtf by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course, we all know what you'd like to do with Rob Malda...

  54. XBox by Ford+Fulkerson · · Score: 2, Funny
    I want an X-Box so bad

    Are you sure you wouldn't rather have Mandrake Gaming edition

    --

    Somewhere in the heavens... they are waiting.
    1. Re:XBox by wadetemp · · Score: 1

      Hah hahh... please mod up. I don't know if this was meant to be funny but it reminded me of timothy's comment a while back. Oh come on now... admit it... you really do want Mandrake Gaming edition.

  55. It should be noted.. by Deltan · · Score: 1

    That you've been able to play Tony Hawk Pro Skater 3 on PlayStation 2 over the net for quite sometime now. Get yourself a USB Ethernet Adapter and away you go.

    Booo Hisss... XBox

  56. Re:Answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You know what, your right. the accompleshments of Microsoft have impressed me for a long time, and I left my career as a health store manager to become an MCSE. Linux is so stupid. You can't even see into the Network Neighborhood. The registry editor doesn't work very well either and I can't even get Outlook to install. Linux is a worthless piece of shit. Until it has support for all microsoft poffice formats I won't even touch it ever again and Suse can't install on my perfectly fine IMAC and also,
    hmm a dick is stuck up my nose

  57. US based console by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is it just me or is the Xbox not really all bad? I mean, it's a great console system for one, and it's the first US based console system since the Atari Jaguar. Sony, Nintendo, Sega are all based in Japan, and quite frankly it's refreshing to see the US put up some competition. Maybe I'm the only one who thinks keeping money in the country is a good idea, though.

    1. Re:US based console by coed.jpg · · Score: 1

      I for one am excited that a console is finally being designed in the United States and manufactured in the United States. The US deserves some credit... we certainly play enough games, we should be the ones making them! Now if only we could move great companies like Electronic Arts into the United States, so we'd have great software to go along with great hardware.

      I think the X-Box is a great chance for the United States to show the world what our own game machines are really worth. And we'd be doing the Japanese such a favor... they won't have to write such difficult code for the Dreamcast or GameCube or PS2 anymore... they can just spit out the code once and ship it as soon as it compiles. Game development will go into overdrive, and the quality of the products will finally reflect some AMERICAN standards of ingenuity, creativity, and stability.

      God Bless America, Goddammit!

      --

      Pictures |

    2. Re:US based console by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL. That was a joke, right?

    3. Re:US based console by CityZen · · Score: 1

      What makes you think the Xbox is made in the US? I've heard the factories are in Hungary and Mexico (or was it Malaysia?).

      Besides, the GameCube is also designed in the US. Nintendo has a hardware design team in Redmond, and with ArtX/ATI in California and IBM (here and there in the US), it's as American as the Xbox is.

    4. Re:US based console by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is this post supposed to be sarcastic?

      I first I thought you might be serious but then I got to the second paragraph. The sarcasm was a bit too obvious to be very funny. Next time try to be more subtle.

    5. Re:US based console by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and the gamecube is easyer to develop for according to 3rd party developers.

  58. Re:good but kind of useless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    not just linux users...
    anybody who can recognize suckiness is sure to stay far, far away...
    also, people who aren't easily manipulated might be wondering 'why the hell would I buy a console from those guys again, with all the obviously bad things about their corporate lifestyle'?
    Microsoft as a company must have some VERY BAD company KARMA. if there is such a thing as karma, theirs stinks. I hope they get what is coming to them soon.

  59. Only DOA3? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Microsoft must really have it in for you, Taco. I overheard the butterball behind the counter at the local EB telling somebody on the phone about Microsoft's new policy:

    Retailers are not supposed to sell XBox by itself. You are supposed to buy the box and 3 games as a package for a mere $500. Retailers who do not adhere to this policy will have their XBox shipments cut off. That's why EB has XBoxes out the wazoo and nobody else has any.

    Or maybe it's just a plot by EB to sell more games, and they still have XBoxes because nobody wants to spend the $500.

  60. mandrake gaming edition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Its a good idea, except it comes with only one game (sims). They should've added quake 3 (at least the demo) and some otehr decent games. Xbox will perform lot better tho, i have tried quake in both linux and windows and windows won it perfromace-wise (on opengl)

    1. Re:mandrake gaming edition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Depends on your card - we'll see opengl performance get better on linux as more companies start making the drivers for their cards themselves, instead of xfree86 doing it for us (and for them).
      I get pretty good performance on my TNT2. I'm happy that the new geforces are well supported in Linux, because i'm getting one!
      I agree, the mandrake gaming edition shold come with more games.
      but if you really want linux games, go to lokigames.com... their demo thing is really cool, lets you install and launch all of their demos from one program, really easily. i was impressed.

  61. yeah, really???? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    good fucking question.

  62. Metal Gear Solid 2 X by Vaystrem · · Score: 1

    A lot of people have been saying
    "Don't ditch the PS/2 go play MGS2"

    Well incase a lot of people didn't know
    Metal Gear Solid 2 will be coming out to xbox
    So really, if that's the only reason to hold onto a ps/2.....

    1. Re:Metal Gear Solid 2 X by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, it won't. What's coming out for the XBox is the original Metal Gear Solid game that debuted on Playstation years ago.... But XBox fans don't like to add that particular detail. Have fun. ;)

  63. Re:XBox is going to be the Cheater's dream by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    XBox-The Cheating Gamer's Dream Machine. Now the Virus Community has a *NEW* platform to infect.

  64. CmdrTaco's turnaround? by SilentChris · · Score: 3, Funny
    "I want an X-Box so bad, or as I would call it, a DOA3-Box."

    Wow, that was a quick turnaround. I've been arguing for the benefits of an XBox in the living room for awhile (one of my posts during the release day Slashdot article generated over 20 replies), but I never expected Taco to become a convert.

    Makes you wonder, though, if he has some kind of syndrome? :) Swings from one technology canvas to another. There should be something in the DSVIV for CmdrTacoism.

  65. NEat..but.. by mindstrm · · Score: 2

    How is building an ethernet bridge something new? I mean, great that they packaged it up like this...
    but this is nothing new.

    Some mention KALI.. kali was based on bridging IPX I believe....

    Of course, MS could always just make the damn game support tcp/ip in the first place...

  66. "She kicks high" by Decimal+Dave · · Score: 1

    I want an X-Box so bad, or as I would call it, a DOA3-Box.

    Only for the pixel shaded bump-mapping and rich plot development, no doubt. ;)

    --

    "Leave the strategizing to those of us with planet-sized brains." -Tycho
  67. Xbox over the internet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Will someone explain it to me so I can get a better grasp on what is going on? Do they acutally put linux on the Xbox or do they just connect the Xbox to a linux box with these special settings?

  68. CompUSA in Dallas has plenty in stock by bstadil · · Score: 1

    MSFT still has backlog after shipping only 300,000 units
    Just came home from CompUSA. They have a pile of Xbox's in inventory +50 or so. The demo machine is dead, due to overheating according to the sales guy. Xbox might be sold-out from MS but plenty in the channel.

    --
    Help fight continental drift.
    1. Re:CompUSA in Dallas has plenty in stock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just came home from CompUSA. They have a pile of Xbox's in inventory +50 or so. The demo machine is dead, due to overheating according to the sales guy. Xbox might be sold-out from MS but plenty in the channel.

      Is the overheat problem endemic?

      (Microsoft sent my work one of these and a few games, I can't say I was impressed. I'm not a gamer so I can't really compare it to PS2 & Gamecube, all my gamer friends seem to have Gamecubes now. I had high expectations because I've been happy with all my GeForce & Quadro cards, and was expecting environment maps, anisotropic surfaces, anti-aliasing, etc. What I got was the sensation that I was playing an Atari. I later got my kicks with a Tetris clone on my Palm... I was playing with a 8' backprojection screen and 5.1 sound system so maybe that did made the deficiencies stick out more than they would in a normal environment. I dunno. The Playstation was fun with the same setup.)

      Before the aside, my point was going to be, "Hey every hacker has to be salivating about the idea of turning this into a cheap SGI, they'll prolly get even cheaper, and well maybe a peltier will make it reliable."

  69. Connect the xbox to ANY box, witha linux boot DISK by ElectusUnum · · Score: 1

    THe whole thing loads into ram, as mentioned earlier u dont even need a hard drive.

  70. Guilty as charged by Dave21212 · · Score: 1

    Passion is best left to notions of love

    ... and not responding to obvious troll ;)

    (and yes, still offtopic after 6 replies)

    --
    "Whoever would overthrow the liberty of a nation must begin by subduing the freeness of speech."--Benjamin Franklin
  71. MOD THIS UP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bottom line for me - I'm not willing to give up the awesome networking ability of PC gaming so until consoles can match the ability of PC's in that respect, I will continue to play games on the PC. But I would have no reservations at all about dropping PC gaming in favor of consoles when that day comes.

    Moderate this comment up. I couldn't have said it better myself. I too love to play games on a high speed LAN connection. It's way better than playing over the Internet. I've invested all kinds of time, energy, and money into making my system more portable but the fact is PC's aren't designed to be portable and Laptops aren't designed to be gaming machines. Give me a console system with "awesome networking ability" and I would definately be a happy camper. No pun intended. :)

  72. No DVD progressive scan output... by SuperKendall · · Score: 2

    Read the review at IGN.com. While some of the features are better (zoom from 1x to 10x!), one thing it lacks is - DVD progressive scan output!! That's right, while the games will output in progressive scan movies will not.

    Also, they do not seem to have more than 2x FF. When will these idiot console makers wake up and give me a 2x - 100x FF?

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  73. After having played Halo a few times online... by Blackwulf · · Score: 4, Informative

    I can safely say that these launch titles were not supposed to be on the Internet in the first place. Now, I have a cable modem, which is second tier to the DSL's I was running agianst. I realize this. But, the game was created with LAN play in mind, with 1ms ping times. However, when I was getting a 350ms ping time (awful, I know), it wasn't compensating at all.

    For instance, you can look around when you lag, but can't move or shoot in Halo. Since there's no error detection built into these games, you wind up in strange places when you resync with the server, and then get blown to bits. Many times.

    The server doesn't lag, obviously. But the clients do.

    Now, the game isn't bad multiplayer, but it was made with a LAN in mind. So, before everybody goes out and buys XBox's because of this, have that in mind. The programmers didn't think they would have to deal with Internet Latency in Halo, so there is nothing to help you if you have a high ping.

  74. Hit return too soon. by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    One thing I meant to add there before my hand brushed "return" by accident, is that I'm not at all sure the PS2 yet offers progressive scan output for DVD play - so the XBox may still have better quality than the PS2, but not as good as you would hope.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  75. Hypocrite. Pure and Simple by VividU · · Score: 1

    Can it be otherwise?

  76. What the Xbox mean for Console Gaming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Xbox is good for console gaming like Cancer is good for old people.

    Taco, im holding you personally responsible for being such a tool.

  77. What market? by Halcyon-X · · Score: 1
    Fist reason is MS wont want to cannibalize their own market

    What market? What could, say, "Dead Or Alive 3" on PC compete with? There is no PC equivilant. This goes with many console games. Also, there are so little PC gamers that it would hardly make a dent on either side.

    --

    .sig: Open Source, Open Mind

  78. Incentive by Halcyon-X · · Score: 1
    "There seems to be no incentive in the US for people to favour the PS2"

    It's called game preference. People who like Metal Gear Solid 2, Gran Turismo 3, and Tony Hawk Pro Skater 3 more than Halo, Project Gotham Racing, and Tony Hawk 2x are more likely to buy a PS2 than an X-Box, no?

    Also, by your logic, everyone would be buying a GameCube since it has the power of the X-Box (PPC 495MHz vs Intel 733MHz, ~Radeon 8500 vs ~GeForce 3, 24MB 1T-SRAM + 16MB DDR or SDRAM? vs 64MB DDRSDRAM) yet it's $100 cheaper.

    --

    .sig: Open Source, Open Mind

  79. Scary by Halcyon-X · · Score: 1
    Does Microsoft really expect everyone who buys an X-Box to use the online plan? That's kind of frightening. I don't plan on playing online with the X-Box (I don't even like online PC games, my preference) and I'm sure many traditional console gamers prefer single player or just popping in another controller.

    However, with Microsoft betting the bank on online gaming, it's scary to think that they might 'force' you into online gaming by making games that actually require a connection, or games where you can hardly do anything without a connection to the internet.

    I would feel cheated if I had paid $60 on a game and then had to be part of an online plan to be able to enjoy the game. I would also feel cheated if I bought a console expecting 5 years of great games, yet being limited to half the games on the shelf simply because I don't enjoy online gaming. I'm also afraid that Microsoft might feel so strongly about online gaming in consoles that this might even make developers stop producing single player games after a while in a similar way that ever since 3D was available it's been extremely difficult finding any 2D games.

    Developers might program online games simply because they can, not because it would provide the most enjoyment... they programmed Contra in 3D, and even though it didn't work the first time, they tried it again the second. Now I feel they have dropped the entire Contra series without having considered going back to its 2D roots where it enjoyed the most success, simply because they might think 2D is obsolete. They might also think not being online is obsolete.

    --

    .sig: Open Source, Open Mind

    1. Re:Scary by lordvolt2k · · Score: 1

      Does Microsoft really expect everyone who buys an X-Box to use the online plan? That's kind of frightening. I don't plan on playing online with the X-Box (I don't even like online PC games, my preference) and I'm sure many traditional console gamers prefer single player or just popping in another controller.

      You missed the part of the Xbox 'license agreement' where you are required to purchase online service, else the license expires ;p

      Seriously though, does the xbox come with any form of "agreement", and if so, has anyone read it?

  80. Slightly off topic but.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If anyone is interested, the Atari Jaguar was declared to be an open system (anyone can write games for it without paying royalites. and the encyption has been released to the public) a few years ago.

  81. -1, Offtopic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's spelled, definitely, dammit. No 'a' in it.

  82. Money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ah, ye of little mind. Where does the money go, do tell?

  83. Shenmue exclusivity by Ephol · · Score: 1

    Sega people have said Shenmue 2 will be an Xbox title. I'm not sure about the rest of the series (since before Shenmue 1 they've said it will be like a five game or more series) though. An interview about it can be found at http://dreamcast.ign.com/news/39017.html.

    1. Re:Shenmue exclusivity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can get Shenmue II for the Japanese and UK Dreamcast. Solution to DC owners who want SII without buying eX-Box is to import from Japan/UK.

  84. MGS2 is coming to Xbox, too by Glonk · · Score: 1

    Metal Gear Solid 2 is coming to the Xbox (in an enhanced package, no doubt).

    Source: http://gamespot.com/gamespot/stories/news/0,10870, 2630903,00.html

    Games like GTA3 are also comin' on over.

  85. So? It's the games that make a console great by Otis_INF · · Score: 2

    Even if MS sold only 300K units, they will be selling an aweful lot next year. You know why? Because the average game targeted at the XBox is much greater than the average nintendo game. At least for people older than 12 years. (which is also the target audience for the PS2). Nintendo lives because of the pokemon hype. So buying a gamecube will limit your choice in games. I think a lot of people will understand that soon :)

    --
    Never underestimate the relief of true separation of Religion and State.
    1. Re:So? It's the games that make a console great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Even if MS sold only 300K units, they will be selling an aweful lot
      >next year. You know why? Because the average game targeted at the XBox
      >is much greater than the average nintendo game. At least for people
      >older than 12 years. (which is also the target audience for the PS2).
      >Nintendo lives because of the pokemon hype. So buying a gamecube will
      >limit your choice in games. I think a lot of people will understand
      >that soon :)
      >
      >
      Err....Wrong. The newest PS2 games are definately going for an older/Adult target. Can't say Final Fantasy X,Devil May Cry,Ico and Grand Thief Auto 3 among others are aimed at the PC Gamer/Script Kiddie Crowd which games like Halo are aimed at.

    2. Re:So? It's the games that make a console great by WillSeattle · · Score: 1

      Exactly. It is the games that sell the console.

      I popped into EBX this Saturday after catching Harry Potter at the Cinerama, and they were saying it's still not doing well.

      MSFT can keep it up for years, admittedly, but initial reactions amongst gamers who live and breathe this stuff says that they're not panting for the xBox enough.

      As a side example, my son's half-brother demo'd both the xBox and the GameCube (he's 16) and said that the xBox games weren't that interesting. He's target market - and he's not wowwed. Ran into some problems in playing the xBox too - the expectation of a console is that it works once, works always. If it fails that criteria, it's toast.

      Still like Munch's Oddyssey - wonder how long till they get a version for GameCube?

      -

      --
      --- Will in Seattle - What are you doing to fight the War?
    3. Re:So? It's the games that make a console great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Great FUD. Care to astroturf some more.
      As of now there are no Pokemon games up for release on the gamecube, care to try dumb ass argument #2 "Gamecube is kiddy,for 12 and under".
      There are a number of gamecube games aimed at i'd say 13 and OVER crowd (like um adults).

  86. IRC #xbox-online on EFnet by Sarkoon · · Score: 1

    Until a gamespy-like GUI is released for any of these ethernet bridging solutions, #xbox-online of EFnet is the place to be to gather net games together. Enjoy!

    -Sarkoon

  87. Don't buy M$ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why would any self respecting Slashdot reader buy ANYTHING from Micro$oft? This is pathetic. On one hand you people complain about their monopolistic practices, on the other you salivate over their inferior products and actually support the expansion of their monopoly into other areas. What this world needs is a 100% cold-turkey Micro$oft boycott.

    All X-Box buyers should be bitch-slapped.

  88. how dare you?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    goddamn Taco, how hard it is to just say 'no' to all MS bullshit? this LANhack is meant just for those lost souls who don't understand why buying and supporting MS is bad. just so that they can save what there is to saved from their grave mistake: buying a MS product.

    if you must have one (xbox) then buy a stolen one or whatever but don't give any money to MS. don't buy games made for xbox and don't buy accessories made for xbox.

  89. first hit is always free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They know what they're doing.