Have you not see any of the studies or read reports on them investigating precisely this situation? They all show people are very suseptible to instruction from people suposedly in a position of authority see: The Milgram Experiment.
It's all well spouting the general libertarian personal responsibility stuff, but people aren't logical robots who act intelligently all the time, if a person in a position of authority has told someone to do something unethical they should be held partially responsible.
Nope, just nope
The Home Office has a specialist unit set up to deal specifically with forced (aka "arranged") marriages, and efforts are being made to educated people about the danger of cousin marriages. Compared to America, where entire communities are free to setup cults, marry each others daughters and eject unwanted sons.
Also see the case of Banaz Mahmod, her father and uncle were jailed of her murder in 2007, and more recently two cousins also jailed for life for murder. Prosecuting to the full extent of the law is hardly "turning a blind eye".
I was going to let this slide, but you blew it at the end (and in the middle).
"Two times more" is perfectly acceptable and correct english, it means the same as "double the number of cells". "one times more" does not makes sense at all, I think you are getting confused with "100% more" which also means double
"X is two times more than Y" translates as X = 2*Y + Y
Im sorry, but no, just no, it does not mean that. Your confusion seems to be about the word "more" eg. "there are twice as many apples in that box" and "there are two times more apples in that box" both mean the SAME
I'm English, I know.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criminal_Records_Bureau#Enhanced_disclosure
Some things are guilty until.... no wait always on your record nothing you can do about it
BP owned the well
Transocean owned and operated the rig
Haliburton (how are they involved?)
I'm not quite sure how BP is getting all the blame, is Transocean just a front company owned by BP or something?
Who is responsible (apart from Obama, who seems to be the only person saying that atm)?
Slashdot Mirror
that's a great quote, will store later use
And the possibility that you only go to heaven if you're an athiest
Jailhouse rock.mp3
Unless people are putting bugs in open source software, then claiming the bounties for finding them, the analogy is just plain wrong.
What are the odds of this passing?
Oh handcuffs, you shouldn't have!
No really, you shouldn't have.
oh god, oh god, oh god OH GOD ohhhh
Stream 3d porn to my holodeck
Have you not see any of the studies or read reports on them investigating precisely this situation? They all show people are very suseptible to instruction from people suposedly in a position of authority see: The Milgram Experiment.
It's all well spouting the general libertarian personal responsibility stuff, but people aren't logical robots who act intelligently all the time, if a person in a position of authority has told someone to do something unethical they should be held partially responsible.
I am very much looking forward to not being beholden to various despicable middle eastern regimes simply because of what lies underneath their feet.
However i do wonder if those same places will remain valuable simply because of what lies above their heads, ie. the sun.
Yes, you might even say, a Giant bean
True, all forced marriages are arranged, but not all arranged marriages are forced, needed to be more careful with that distinction
Nope, just nope The Home Office has a specialist unit set up to deal specifically with forced (aka "arranged") marriages, and efforts are being made to educated people about the danger of cousin marriages. Compared to America, where entire communities are free to setup cults, marry each others daughters and eject unwanted sons.
Also see the case of Banaz Mahmod, her father and uncle were jailed of her murder in 2007, and more recently two cousins also jailed for life for murder. Prosecuting to the full extent of the law is hardly "turning a blind eye".
Indeed, community service is a much more suitable punishment for this specific crime
Germans on the Manhattan project wat? I think you mean building rockets and leading NASA
because anything under $500 is small change...
Er no, rich guilty people pay the same as poor guilty people Rich/poor still pay nothing if innocent
HNNNNNNGGGGG......
it only has one time more
I was going to let this slide, but you blew it at the end (and in the middle). "Two times more" is perfectly acceptable and correct english, it means the same as "double the number of cells". "one times more" does not makes sense at all, I think you are getting confused with "100% more" which also means double
"X is two times more than Y" translates as X = 2*Y + Y
Im sorry, but no, just no, it does not mean that. Your confusion seems to be about the word "more" eg. "there are twice as many apples in that box" and "there are two times more apples in that box" both mean the SAME I'm English, I know.
!ti edoced nac tneipicer dednetni eht tub eno on ylerus ,gniod ma I sa egassem ruoy tpyrcne ot refas raf si ti ,dewalf si noitseggus ruoY
Nun puns?
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criminal_Records_Bureau#Enhanced_disclosure Some things are guilty until.... no wait always on your record nothing you can do about it
More choice? why not let people choose if they want to pay more for some extra for extra functionality
...To Release Eyes
BP owned the well Transocean owned and operated the rig Haliburton (how are they involved?) I'm not quite sure how BP is getting all the blame, is Transocean just a front company owned by BP or something? Who is responsible (apart from Obama, who seems to be the only person saying that atm)?