Actually both will fall with the cube of the distance. The problem is you do need to use your brain since the fields react differently between near field, far field and depending how the source of the radiation is setup.
If you don't use your brain at all then the GP was correct. Magnetic fields will fall off with the cube of the distance always. But then magnetic dipoles don't radiate and therefore don't generate a far-field response. If you think about it more then they are even more correct since the magnetic field here is used to charge an inductor within the device, they aren't talking about far-field and both magnetic or electric fields presented here would follow the inverse cube law.
We have millions of Americans who still cannot afford to go to the doctor, who cannot afford education, who cannot afford housing, and this asshat thinks we need to send people to the moon to do what, exactly?
Scope out of a new construction area for a Trump Hotel.
On the off chance that he wins a second term Trump is looking for something (anything) positive to add to his legacy and I think at this point he'll settle for something we did years ago.
We'd have our own tech if American companies would stop buying EU companies and destroying what was created. I live in the EU and I wish American companies would pull out as well. They won't though because we have money and American companies have a self destructive addiction to money.
We all know how this will end. Google, Facebook et al are going to just drop all EU content and depending on how aggressive the individual laws are may even just block entire countries outright.
You can be the first to go to the shareholders and say "Rather than figuring it out we're leaving the biggest market of wealthy westerners in the world."
I mean maybe the CEO wants his golden parachute, but there's easier ways to ask for it.
Why? What makes your arbitrary choice any better than anyone else's arbitrary choice? Also how many timezones can we split the world by? The sun isn't at its peak at noon here, it is somewhere within our timezone, but not here. So what are the error bars on your arbitrary decision?
and then adjust your schedule accordingly rather than pretend that the clock
You don't live in our reality do you. Or do you understand why the concept of a clock was developed in the first place?
Nuclear could be made safe, but not by these people.
It's not those people who prevent nuclear from being made safe, but rather people like you who oppose continuous development. You would sooner see the car banned than have Volvo invent and standardise the seatbelt.
Part of the problem is that these services have too much blind faith in their ability to make predictions based upon incomplete knowledge.
These services are making billions and users happily click on the recommendations. This problem won't be solved unless it is a) legally regulated, b) regulated by industry code of conduct, or c) users decide they want to play outside a rabbit hole. That last one clearly isn't happening.
Go back to recommending the kind of stuff I'm NORMALLY interested in.
The line of videos immediately under recommendations is from your subscriptions. It's easy to get back to normal viewing.
Google and Facebook reported they searched their 2016 records for ads purchased by Russian agents, and found some. But in order for that to mean anything, they should have also searched for ads purchased by anyone else, and compared.
That was a very solid analysis but ignores some key points that are very specific to elections. Advertising for elections is regulated. The question of interference in that regard doesn't need require you to identify through random selection patterns in advertising, but rather only identify the presence of actions that fall outside the regulations. In that regard the presence of foreign bought and paid for advertisements through American companies is election interference as these fall outside the rules that "anyone else" are obliged to follow.
Personally, this tells me they're desperate and concerned about their chances in 2020
Non-sequitur. Having dirt on an opponent is a critical strategy whether you're incredibly far in front of the polls or incredibly far behind. By all accounts every red-tie is currently throwing their hat into the ring as a presidential candidate precisely because of Trump's disapproval rating being almost historically high for a sitting president at this time of their first time and they think they have a sure chance of winning.
We have been enduring the Muller farce for the last 2 years.
A farce? The only thing that has made this a farce is Trump's reaction to it. For the rest of the world it was an investigation into election fraud which didn't implicate the president but nonetheless resulted in 9 convictions.
Oh? Only "Corporate Progressive Nazis" are able to see the rise of anti-vaxxers and conspiracy nut-jobs? That's a new one. Do you have a newsletter I can subscribe to, or better still, an anti-Corporate-Progressive-Nazi Facebook group?
Yes. Political nerds are a kind of nerd too. The story has been up for only a short time and it has over 100 posts so it's clearly the thing a large portion of this site is interested in.
If this is unexpected for you maybe you should find another site to suit your more particular tastes.
Sure, but only if Facebook, Twitter, Youtube, Whatsapp, Hotmail, Gmail, and all radio and TV broadcasts are also considered terrorit rectruitment sites.
No, No, No, Yes by some, No that's silly, No that's silly, No and No. Now if you care to figure out what the nos and yeses have in common you'll find that the Nos actively engage in censoring and removing content from their sites. The yeses do not. The "that's silly" is just that, silly since 1-to-1 communication is not recruitment.
Otherwise it just seems like scapegoating and hypocrisy. Though that's pretty par for the course I guess.
Slashdot Mirror
Actually both will fall with the cube of the distance. The problem is you do need to use your brain since the fields react differently between near field, far field and depending how the source of the radiation is setup.
If you don't use your brain at all then the GP was correct. Magnetic fields will fall off with the cube of the distance always. But then magnetic dipoles don't radiate and therefore don't generate a far-field response. If you think about it more then they are even more correct since the magnetic field here is used to charge an inductor within the device, they aren't talking about far-field and both magnetic or electric fields presented here would follow the inverse cube law.
To boot, the early models were even thinner at the slim end.
Easy solution. Use a file to get the edge of the laptop to a knife edge. Boom a laptop that is 0.001mm thick on it's "slim end".
Seriously are you in marketing?
I recall seeing zero reviews praising that aspect of the keyboard - just the overall thinness of the laptop itself.
Not sure if trolling or just stupid...
We have millions of Americans who still cannot afford to go to the doctor, who cannot afford education, who cannot afford housing, and this asshat thinks we need to send people to the moon to do what, exactly?
Scope out of a new construction area for a Trump Hotel.
Why? Is it going somewhere?
On the off chance that he wins a second term Trump is looking for something (anything) positive to add to his legacy and I think at this point he'll settle for something we did years ago.
They were the first to achieve this without resulting in debris that will orbit the earth for many decades.
That already exists. https://www.amazon.de/Lovense-...
Too bad freedom of speech is dead now.
Freedom of speech never existed in Australia or in many countries in the world.
let them try to make their own tech
We'd have our own tech if American companies would stop buying EU companies and destroying what was created. I live in the EU and I wish American companies would pull out as well. They won't though because we have money and American companies have a self destructive addiction to money.
We all know how this will end. Google, Facebook et al are going to just drop all EU content and depending on how aggressive the individual laws are may even just block entire countries outright.
You can be the first to go to the shareholders and say "Rather than figuring it out we're leaving the biggest market of wealthy westerners in the world."
I mean maybe the CEO wants his golden parachute, but there's easier ways to ask for it.
Laws not written by the people for the people, the EU showing it doesn't give a fuck about democracy.
No country does. Not by your definition anyway.
and it's called solar noon. Aim for that
Why? What makes your arbitrary choice any better than anyone else's arbitrary choice? Also how many timezones can we split the world by? The sun isn't at its peak at noon here, it is somewhere within our timezone, but not here. So what are the error bars on your arbitrary decision?
and then adjust your schedule accordingly rather than pretend that the clock
You don't live in our reality do you. Or do you understand why the concept of a clock was developed in the first place?
Nuclear could be made safe, but not by these people.
It's not those people who prevent nuclear from being made safe, but rather people like you who oppose continuous development. You would sooner see the car banned than have Volvo invent and standardise the seatbelt.
Real ones, or Han's boring shortcut
Worlds biggest democracy arrests children for playing games.
I'm confused, what are you complaining about? That children in some countries are obliged to follow laws? How ... errr.... horrible?
Part of the problem is that these services have too much blind faith in their ability to make predictions based upon incomplete knowledge.
These services are making billions and users happily click on the recommendations. This problem won't be solved unless it is a) legally regulated, b) regulated by industry code of conduct, or c) users decide they want to play outside a rabbit hole. That last one clearly isn't happening.
Go back to recommending the kind of stuff I'm NORMALLY interested in.
The line of videos immediately under recommendations is from your subscriptions. It's easy to get back to normal viewing.
Google and Facebook reported they searched their 2016 records for ads purchased by Russian agents, and found some. But in order for that to mean anything, they should have also searched for ads purchased by anyone else, and compared.
That was a very solid analysis but ignores some key points that are very specific to elections. Advertising for elections is regulated. The question of interference in that regard doesn't need require you to identify through random selection patterns in advertising, but rather only identify the presence of actions that fall outside the regulations. In that regard the presence of foreign bought and paid for advertisements through American companies is election interference as these fall outside the rules that "anyone else" are obliged to follow.
Buying ads and posting on social media is not "interference".
You know that political advertising is legally regulated right?
Personally, this tells me they're desperate and concerned about their chances in 2020
Non-sequitur. Having dirt on an opponent is a critical strategy whether you're incredibly far in front of the polls or incredibly far behind. By all accounts every red-tie is currently throwing their hat into the ring as a presidential candidate precisely because of Trump's disapproval rating being almost historically high for a sitting president at this time of their first time and they think they have a sure chance of winning.
The shitty kind...
What's that make you given you spend your time frequenting a site where "shitty" topics are the most discussed?
We have been enduring the Muller farce for the last 2 years.
A farce? The only thing that has made this a farce is Trump's reaction to it. For the rest of the world it was an investigation into election fraud which didn't implicate the president but nonetheless resulted in 9 convictions.
Oh? Only "Corporate Progressive Nazis" are able to see the rise of anti-vaxxers and conspiracy nut-jobs? That's a new one. Do you have a newsletter I can subscribe to, or better still, an anti-Corporate-Progressive-Nazi Facebook group?
Yes. Political nerds are a kind of nerd too. The story has been up for only a short time and it has over 100 posts so it's clearly the thing a large portion of this site is interested in.
If this is unexpected for you maybe you should find another site to suit your more particular tastes.
A nothingburger? You should tell the 8 people in jail that they were jailed over nothing. I'm sure they'll be happy to know.
Sure, but only if Facebook, Twitter, Youtube, Whatsapp, Hotmail, Gmail, and all radio and TV broadcasts are also considered terrorit rectruitment sites.
No, No, No, Yes by some, No that's silly, No that's silly, No and No. Now if you care to figure out what the nos and yeses have in common you'll find that the Nos actively engage in censoring and removing content from their sites. The yeses do not. The "that's silly" is just that, silly since 1-to-1 communication is not recruitment.
Otherwise it just seems like scapegoating and hypocrisy. Though that's pretty par for the course I guess.
Actually it seems more like ignorance.