Not to mention the tests which C++ wins even in his, um, differently biased conditions: Nested loops and matrix multiplication. I may be a special case, but more than half of the codes I write have matrix multiplication; all of them have nested loops.
Baseball hat + 400 lbs. means that you are more likely to be mistaken for Michael Moore. Here's your check for $50M. Go fool some more "little people."
XML? Bah. Next generation languages will be written in "WIMNNWIS" (What I mean not necessarily what I say) and will run on processors liberally sprinkled with pixie dust.
He's right, this time. Using more procedural elements is not likely to result in smaller datasets for rendering. What's more likely is that other parts of the scene will get more complicated and always exploit the full resources available. Procedural grass, hair, etc. means that the other non-procedural textures can now be more numerous and complex.
The problem was in choosing an obviously generic word in the first place. They would have been wiser to choose something unique, but recognizable. For instance, when I trademarked the name "Halitosilicious®" I wanted to make sure my subsequent infringement case against my coworkers would hold up.
Not to subtract from the truth of your statement, but the fact that your comment needed to be made at all, much less modded insightful, says a lot about Slashdot.
Whoa- Synchronicity. I was about to undertake installing some yet-to-be-determined Linux distro (probably FC2) on my wife's Sony laptop. I wanted to make sure that the 1394 interface and the built-in memory stick reader worked. I also wanted to check if the support for 802.11b on cardbus is ready for prime time.
And this is why it was genius to watermark the files as well as DRM them. DRM can always be broken, if you can play a file at all. "Scratching out" watermarks will seriously degrade sound quality, since the watermark is in the audio even after decoding. Even if you break DRM for your own backup purposes, you can't release anything into the wild without fear of being nabbed for illegally distributing copyrighted material.
Wow you are so insightful and like, totally zen to voluntarily erase obvious distinctions in your head. Not to mention how brave you are to speak such thoughts when the worst consequence imaginable is that someone will disagree with you.
YOU ARE THE MAN. Could you give the teeniest description of what you would like to say about making that, and allow us/.'ers to use it with attribution?
Slashdot Mirror
Not to mention the tests which C++ wins even in his, um, differently biased conditions: Nested loops and matrix multiplication. I may be a special case, but more than half of the codes I write have matrix multiplication; all of them have nested loops.
Baseball hat + 400 lbs. means that you are more likely to be mistaken for Michael Moore. Here's your check for $50M. Go fool some more "little people."
Nah, that's too hard. I'll just flip a couple more pages and read Goofus and Gallant.
XML? Bah. Next generation languages will be written in "WIMNNWIS" (What I mean not necessarily what I say) and will run on processors liberally sprinkled with pixie dust.
I'll wait for the third edition: Protocol Handler Exploit Programming for Mac OS X.
Cochran who? Acquitted who for murder? What family? I'm not following. How about some background here?
He's right, this time. Using more procedural elements is not likely to result in smaller datasets for rendering. What's more likely is that other parts of the scene will get more complicated and always exploit the full resources available. Procedural grass, hair, etc. means that the other non-procedural textures can now be more numerous and complex.
Well, from a cursory look, RCDefaultapp is way more flexible and comprehensive than MoreInternet.
Which is pretty close to an order of magnitude of orders of magnitude.
Type Aircraft Glider Type Engine None
Make sure you deactivate the Excelsior's Trans-Warp Drive.
The problem was in choosing an obviously generic word in the first place. They would have been wiser to choose something unique, but recognizable. For instance, when I trademarked the name "Halitosilicious®" I wanted to make sure my subsequent infringement case against my coworkers would hold up.
Not to subtract from the truth of your statement, but the fact that your comment needed to be made at all, much less modded insightful, says a lot about Slashdot.
Whoa- Synchronicity. I was about to undertake installing some yet-to-be-determined Linux distro (probably FC2) on my wife's Sony laptop. I wanted to make sure that the 1394 interface and the built-in memory stick reader worked. I also wanted to check if the support for 802.11b on cardbus is ready for prime time.
SCO wants their name changed to Sourceforgery.
And this is why it was genius to watermark the files as well as DRM them. DRM can always be broken, if you can play a file at all. "Scratching out" watermarks will seriously degrade sound quality, since the watermark is in the audio even after decoding. Even if you break DRM for your own backup purposes, you can't release anything into the wild without fear of being nabbed for illegally distributing copyrighted material.
To be extra safe, you should remove your write permissions from those encrypted folders too.
Wow you are so insightful and like, totally zen to voluntarily erase obvious distinctions in your head. Not to mention how brave you are to speak such thoughts when the worst consequence imaginable is that someone will disagree with you.
Hey, if pulp numerology is your thing, look here.
YOU ARE THE MAN. Could you give the teeniest description of what you would like to say about making that, and allow us /.'ers to use it with attribution?
I would agree, except for Q_OBJECT and "moc."
Anyone know how to seamlessly compile Qt apps in XCode?
I like the one year graph better. It looks like Ayers Rock.
But I can't buy a computer yesterday. My choices include today and tomorrow. I'll pick tomorrow.
Silly, they're not part of the US; they're only our hat.
You just have to beware of "ootsourcing."