Slashdot Mirror


First-Ever Private Spaceport Nears Final Approval

bobhagopian writes "According to the article on Space.com, the Federal Aviation Administration is nearing the final stages of certifying the Mojave Airport as the first-ever private spaceport. Both Scaled Composites and XCOR Aerospace (the two leading competitors in the X-Prize competition) currently fly out of Mojave Airport. The approval of a commercial spaceport will certainly facilitate the creation of even more private-sector space technologies."

231 comments

  1. But before launch... by Bingo+Foo · · Score: 4, Funny

    Make sure you deactivate the Excelsior's Trans-Warp Drive.

    --
    taken! (by Davidleeroth) Thanks Bingo Foo!
  2. Now by supe · · Score: 5, Funny

    There will finally be a place for *visitors* to land
    and visit!

    1. Re:Now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Yeah I wonder if John Travolta's will reserve a parking space to allow Ron Hubbard to return...

    2. Re:Now by cebarro · · Score: 4, Funny

      Just what we need. Said visitors land, disembark, and are immediately hit with advertising and ushered into a starbucks....

    3. Re:Now by Captain+Splendid · · Score: 1

      Eh, that'll probably be a relief after DHS is done with them.

      --
      Linux, you magnificent bastard, I read the fucking manual!
    4. Re:Now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh! This Leader, he sounds like a grand fella!

    5. Re:Now by AGMW · · Score: 1
      Said visitors land, disembark, and are immediately hit with advertising and ushered into a starbucks

      I hope they're going to get the same sort of grilling that non-US visitors are currently getting trying to get into the good 'Ol US-of-A!

      But how's the finger printing and retinal scans going to work if they don't have fingers or retinas?

      As a side note, I once mis-read "Retinal Scan" as "Rectal Scan". I can tell you, I wasn't queuing up to go there for my holidays!
      It'd sure be an interesting looking machine though! Queues of tourists all waiting to take their turn at Passport Control. "Please wait behind the white line until called". You bet!

      --
      Eclectic beats from Leeds, UK
      handmadehands.co.uk
    6. Re:Now by CreatureComfort · · Score: 1


      Thus imeediately proving to them that there is no intelligent life on this planet.

      --
      "Unheard of means only it's undreamed of yet,
      Impossible means not yet done." ~~ Julia Ecklar
  3. Alien Landing Authority by DaHat · · Score: 3, Funny

    Does this mean that ET will not need government approval to set down at this space port?

    1. Re:Alien Landing Authority by tds67 · · Score: 3, Funny
      Does this mean that ET will not need government approval to set down at this space port?

      Finally, a reduction in illegal aliens!

    2. Re:Alien Landing Authority by DrEldarion · · Score: 4, Funny

      No, but it's commercial so he will have to find some way to pay. Maybe he can bring along some three-breasted aliens like the one from Total Recall...

    3. Re:Alien Landing Authority by azatht · · Score: 0

      Wonder how many illigal aliens there is?

      lets see...

      J. Bush
      P. Pot
      M. Monroe
      S. Connery

      ??? only four?

      --
      ------- In the end there are no begining
    4. Re:Alien Landing Authority by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And not like the one from "Tripping the Rift"...

    5. Re:Alien Landing Authority by linzeal · · Score: 1

      I don't need 3 breasts till I have 3 hands and trisymetrical. I don't know what kind of freak you think these people are, the humanity!

    6. Re:Alien Landing Authority by 0racle · · Score: 1

      I thought that fell under the authority of the MIB.

      --
      "I use a Mac because I'm just better than you are."
    7. Re:Alien Landing Authority by iminplaya · · Score: 1

      As Al bundy said, "The perfect woman has three breasts - one on the back for dancing!"

      --
      What?
    8. Re:Alien Landing Authority by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, you know that middle one was paper mache, right?

    9. Re:Alien Landing Authority by pablo_max · · Score: 1

      He only needs to insure a proper turtle check has been done. Besides, landing is the simple part, its the taking off that pisses off the goverenment.

    10. Re:Alien Landing Authority by MachDelta · · Score: 3, Funny
      Dude, you know that middle one was paper mache, right?
      And the other two were silicon. So who cares?! ;)
    11. Re:Alien Landing Authority by Max+von+H. · · Score: 1

      I'd rather go with the triple-breasted whore on Eroticon 6! I hear she's an unforgetable experience!

      --
      -- It's always darker before it goes pitch black.
    12. Re:Alien Landing Authority by Mysticalfruit · · Score: 1

      Yeah that was until she got declarian worms. I heard her last customer upon returning to his vessel, exploded. The worms then took over his vessel and have since started a wave of infestation across the galaxy!

      --
      Yes Francis, the world has gone crazy.
  4. So does this mean... by macshune · · Score: 5, Funny

    That they'll change all the signs to the Mojave Airport to the Mojave Spaceport? That would be really cool and I bet those signs 'll disappear every week or so:)

    1. Re:So does this mean... by pudding7 · · Score: 1

      Heck yeah. I'd pull over with a ratchet set and get me one next I'm on my way up to Willow Springs.

    2. Re:So does this mean... by stuktongue · · Score: 5, Funny

      "Mojave Spaceport. You will never find a more wretched hive...." :-)

    3. Re:So does this mean... by Fearless+Freep · · Score: 1

      Albuquerque already has the "Sunport" and I can't remember what Pheonix calls theirs...Skyport?

    4. Re:So does this mean... by Jaysyn · · Score: 4, Funny

      Cause, "Jezus it's fucking hot on this tarmac" wouldn't fit on a sign.

      Jaysyn

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
    5. Re:So does this mean... by Canadian+Idol · · Score: 1

      Mojave Spaceport won't be a real Spaceport unless they have a cantina (with a live band).

      --


      -
      My other .sig is a Mercury!
    6. Re:So does this mean... by tubbtubb · · Score: 4, Funny

      Will Han shoot first in this one?

    7. Re:So does this mean... by the+gnat · · Score: 1

      Dude, seriously, I saw this image in the story and thought the exact same thing.

    8. Re:So does this mean... by red+floyd · · Score: 1

      "Sky Harbor".

      --
      The only reason we have the rights we have is that people just like us died to gain those rights. -- Cheerio Boy
    9. Re:So does this mean... by Reziac · · Score: 2, Informative

      The bizarre thing about your post is that Mojave looks hardly different from Mos Eisley!!

      (I live about 20 miles down the road from there :)

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  5. There's just one small problem by dkleinsc · · Score: 1, Insightful

    No one has won the X-Prize yet. If they aren't going into space yet, isn't calling where they're flying from a "spaceport" a bit premature?

    --
    I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
    1. Re:There's just one small problem by nizo · · Score: 3, Funny
      No one has won the X-Prize yet. If they aren't going into space yet, isn't calling where they're flying from a "spaceport" a bit premature?

      Ahh, but once they do make it into space, they won't have to change all the signs/business cards/etc. Saves time and money!

    2. Re:There's just one small problem by cemaco · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Think of it as a sign of confidence and commitment. It means even the government is beginning to realize that the private sector has a better chance of making space exploration a going concern. Sort of an approving nod. Official recognition is usually a good thing. With all the red tape involved, making the efort main stream is absolutely necessary. This is a start.

    3. Re:There's just one small problem by The_K4 · · Score: 1

      Well the theory is that if they DO get into space for the X-prise, it would suck to be told, oh you can't land here we arn't a spaceport please circle while we get FAA approval to land a spacecraft at our airport!

    4. Re:There's just one small problem by alienw · · Score: 1, Funny

      You're kidding, right? Commercial space exploration? Who do you think will invest money in something that's expensive and unlikely to yield results?

    5. Re:There's just one small problem by midifarm · · Score: 1
      Well the goal is for the craft to get into space, much like the planes at the airport. I seem to recall planes crashing on takeoff, so it might be OK.

      Peace

    6. Re:There's just one small problem by snake_dad · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I kinda wanted to mod you down, but since you asked nicely, I'll just reply. Scaled Composites (Burt Rutan's company) seems to believe in it enough to invest a lot into creating a sub-orbial spacecraft. In case you don't know: Scaled Composites is the company most likely to win the X Prize, and I think they've invested a lot more than the $10m prize money. Some of the other X Prize contenders seem to have the same faith in a profitable market.

      --
      karma capped .sig seeking available Slashdot poster for long-term relationship.
    7. Re:There's just one small problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're kidding, right? Commercial space exploration? Who do you think will invest money in something that's expensive and unlikely to yield results?


      Please provide the engineering analysis (with calculations shown, please) which supports your conclusion that commercial space exploration is "unlikely to yield results."

      If you have no such calculation, then how, pray tell, did you reach that conclusion? I'm hoping that you can do better than an Argument From Incredulity.
    8. Re:There's just one small problem by Anubis350 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I agree. The problem with government spending on space exploration/commercial usage is its funding is fickle and politically charged. Unfortunately many governments for quite a while could not accept that they simply were not as well equipt as the private sector for this type of work, they were looking at sheer amounts of money available and not at the innovation that comes with having to do more with less. now dont get me wrong, NASA has done a fine job, often doing their best work under fiscal stress (see comment above about innovation). But extraterrestrial exploration on a large scale has to come from the private sector. With this private spaceport designated as such, more companies in the private sector will be able to more easily enter the arena. As the parent said, this is a start. Lets hope it ends as well. --Aaron

      --
      "goodbye and hello, as always" ~Prince Corwin, from Zelazny's Amber series
    9. Re:There's just one small problem by pinkocommie · · Score: 1

      Trump? Gates? George Soros? Warren Buffet? The Ikea owner Just saying there's a bunch of people that wouldnt blink while pissing away a couple of billion dollars if they see any advantage to it.

    10. Re:There's just one small problem by alienw · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I don't consider duplicating something NASA achieved decades ago to be space exploration. I'm sure there is quite a market for launching Earth satellites and possibly space tourism, but as far as traveling to different planets and actually exploring space -- that's a money pit, and no commercial company likes to get into money pits.

    11. Re:There's just one small problem by alienw · · Score: 1

      The problem is that it takes a lot more than a couple of billion dollars to accomplish anything space-related. Hell, even a simple communications satellite costs more than that to put into orbit. No sane investor will put money into something that's extremely unlikely to pay off in the short-to-medium term. I don't see how a commercial company can justify the enormous investment serious space exploration would require.

    12. Re:There's just one small problem by alienw · · Score: 1

      How about you explain what results it is likely to yield? Space exploration is just not commercially viable right now, and I don't see how it can become viable. If it was profitable, then NASA wouldn't be suffering from money shortages, would it?

    13. Re:There's just one small problem by snake_dad · · Score: 1

      Ok, that is a fair distinction, I withdraw my sarcasm :)

      --
      karma capped .sig seeking available Slashdot poster for long-term relationship.
    14. Re:There's just one small problem by Grab · · Score: 1

      Except it doesn't, and Scaled Composites and the rest are out to prove that. Cheap access to orbit equals cheap access to putting things in orbit, equals cheap way of getting bits up there for bigger missions.

      One of the original intentions of having an orbiting space station (way back when) was to serve as a staging post for missions to Mars and other planets, including providing the facilities to assemble craft to get there (because such craft would be too big to get out of the Earth's gravity well with current rockets, so it's easier to ship them up in bits). Shame that all went tits-up with the ISS, but then the ISS turned into a political goal in itself, rather than a way of getting space exploration further, mainly due to NASA's usual massive budget overruns.

      Commercial companies are actually the only people likely to achieve anything in space, if you think about it. NASA are so wasteful that even the US gov can't provide enough funding for them to do meaningful work. NASA *could* do anything they wanted, given their funding, but they just don't seem to have the mentality of using money wisely and keeping their engineers under control. It either needs a total rethink of NASA's management, or it needs NASA to be disbanded and the money used to "outsource" to commercial companies who *do* have a history of meeting cost targets and deadlines.

      Grab.

    15. Re:There's just one small problem by NineteenSixtyNine · · Score: 0

      Announce that the wickedest hallucinogenic known to man has been discovered in the sub-surface of Mars and I guarandamntee you Columbia will be the first nation to set foot on another planet.

      --

      --
      What would Bill Clinton do?
    16. Re:There's just one small problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about you explain what results it is likely to yield? Space exploration is just not commercially viable right now, and I don't see how it can become viable. If it was profitable, then NASA wouldn't be suffering from money shortages, would it?

      I notice you didn't answer my question. Why not? Answer mine, and I'll answer yours... though, given the sentence I highlighted in your post, I suspect your answer will be something along the lines of "I can't see how it could be viable, so I conclude that it can't be." Ignorance is a poor basis for a point of view.
    17. Re:There's just one small problem by Shurhaian · · Score: 1

      Space exploration might not be presently viable, but low-orbit travel just might be. Need to be elsewhere in a real hurry? Well, a low-orbit flight would probably spend more time preparing in the terminal, and launching/landing, than it would in flight...

      --
      NB: YMMV. IANAL. Take the above with a grain of salt.
    18. Re:There's just one small problem by CKW · · Score: 1

      If you look through all of Scaled Composites' aircraft, you'll see that they've got a LOT of aircraft for which they only built a couple flying prototypes which never went anywhere commercially.

  6. location location location by proj_2501 · · Score: 5, Funny

    is mojave a proper locale for a wretched hive of scum and villainy?

    1. Re:location location location by kavachameleon · · Score: 1, Informative
      Yes.

      You've obviously never been there. It's way the hell out in the middle of no place.

    2. Re:location location location by paintballluvr · · Score: 0

      It's way the hell out in the middle of no place.

      I've been there, it's still striving to be "way out in the middle of no place". Maybe being a spaceport, it'll be offically be "in the middle of no place".

      But who knows.

    3. Re:location location location by OldManAndTheC++ · · Score: 5, Funny
      is mojave a proper locale for a wretched hive of scum and villainy?

      You must be thinking of Bakersfield ...

      --
      Soylent Green is peoplicious!
    4. Re:location location location by kavachameleon · · Score: 1

      How is this flamebait? It IS out in the middle of nowhere! It's between Bakersfield and Barstow...

    5. Re:location location location by Zog+The+Undeniable · · Score: 1

      These aren't the SUVs we're looking for. He can go about his business. Move along.

      --
      When I am king, you will be first against the wall.
  7. $Bling$Bling$? by neuro.slug · · Score: 4, Funny

    Great... now rappers won't be content with having their own armada of Escalades... the only question is: How does one attach 24s to a shuttle?

    -- n

    1. Re:$Bling$Bling$? by jwriney · · Score: 1

      Well, from a site I randomly googled, Shuttle mains are about 44s....so, estimating roughly, about fitty-twos should be good enough for a start. With built-in RCS (Reaction Control Spinnaz).

      *beep*Aww jeah!*beep*

      --riney

  8. Government Issued ID? by kmankmankman2001 · · Score: 5, Funny

    But when the aliens land there, how will Homeland Security be able to verify the required government issued ID?

    Probably not a real issue; once aliens sample what passes for food in an Earth airport, err, I mean SPACEport the word will travel quickly and they will all stop coming.

    --
    "The bigger the lie, the more they believe." - Det. Bunk
    1. Re:Government Issued ID? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Humans in airports probably don't taste significantly different.

      Humans at bus terminals, though, would certainly deter an hungry space-faring race.

    2. Re:Government Issued ID? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...once aliens sample what passes for food in an Earth airport, err, I mean SPACEport the word will travel quickly and they will all stop coming.

      Nonsense...When I was taking flying lessons, an entry into my logbook would include a critique of airport burgers(hotcakes weren't bad either) on my "cross-country" flights. Those little airport diners were good motivation to get in a few extra hours logged in. Not that I needed extra motivation to get all the stick time I could afford.:-)

    3. Re:Government Issued ID? by meadowsp · · Score: 1

      They'll probably just ship them off to Iraq for a good torturing.

    4. Re:Government Issued ID? by kunudo · · Score: 1

      Or maybe they'll sample us instead?

  9. What are they going to do? by GFLPraxis · · Score: 2, Insightful

    So...what are the civilians going to DO in space?
    Unlike astronauts, they don't have to take scientific readings of everything.

    Other than the wow-factor of, "I've been in outer space!", there really isn't a reason for the average civilian to go...It's not like they're going to visit relatives on Mars ;)

    1. Re:What are they going to do? by Chairboy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Was there any real reason for non-explorers to visit North America back in the 1400-1500s?

      I mean, aside from the wow-factor of, "I've been to the New World!", there wasn't really a reason for the average civilian to go. It's not like they're going to visit relatives or anything.

    2. Re:What are they going to do? by cmowire · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Dude..... Zero-g sex...... nuff said....

      But seriously, there's plenty to do, assuming that you've got a cheap way to get stuff up there. Part of the reason why com sats, mapping sats, etc. are so expensive is because they need to be incredibly lightweight to economize on launch costs. Remember, a cellular phone satelite doesn't have people complaining about it being in their back yard.

    3. Re:What are they going to do? by mrright · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Tourists will do all kinds of things. Favorite activities will be looking out of the window, all kinds of strange zero gravity sports, and of course zero-gravity sex.

      And who says that civilians can not do science in space? There is a lot of science that has not yet been done by NASA, so you can expect many of the initial customers to be from universities and private research labs.

      --
      Private property is the central institution of a free society (David Friedman)
    4. Re:What are they going to do? by dustinbarbour · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I don't think civilians will go to space merely for the wow factor. I mean, space tourism will have a small niche, but I don't see it getting big just yet. However, getting civilian companies into the business of launching satellites, hiring private astronauts, and other such things seems (to me, anyway) the future of the business. We need to stop relying on NASA and the Europeans to launch our satellites. We all know that governments are ridiculously bad at spending more than need be. Civilians companies are much, much better at it (though not perfect). And that's the whole idea, right? To lower the cost of getting into space? NASA and government-backed space agencies don't have the same impetus to lower costs and raise productivity.

    5. Re:What are they going to do? by Goldsmith · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Maybe YOU don't have relatives on Mars...

      Why do people go to Florida in the summer? It's hot, humid and full of bugs. Yet, people from around the world go to Disney just because they've never been there. I think the X-prize winners will find enough people to make a buck.

    6. Re:What are they going to do? by mirio · · Score: 2, Informative


      So...what are the civilians going to DO in space?
      Unlike astronauts, they don't have to take scientific readings of everything.

      Other than the wow-factor of, "I've been in outer space!", there really isn't a reason for the average civilian to go...It's not like they're going to visit relatives on Mars ;)


      I think you're missing the point. You could just as easily ask why people climb Mt. Everest or run marathons. It's not like anyone climbing Everest is set to make some big scientific discovery. They are doing it to do it..for personal achievement.

      I think you also miss the entire point of Scaled's interest in this venture. They have spent more money than the X-prize pays out, so what's their motivation? It's called space tourism. There are literally only a handful of people that can shell out 20 million for a ride to the space station, but there are a helluva lot more than can shell out $100,000 for a subortial flight. Seriously, look at the pictures. Can you honestly say that you wouldn't want to do that????

    7. Re:What are they going to do? by digifuzz · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Was there any real reason for non-explorers to visit North America back in the 1400-1500s?

      Sure.. even if they weren't "explorers", i'm sure many of the people who came over here were after other things, like potantially acquiring vast ammounts of wealth, or possibly just to escape from their otherwise oppressive homeland.

      Just two reasons off the top of my head.. im sure you can think of others if you really try. ;)

      --
      http://www.digifuzz.net
    8. Re:What are they going to do? by miketang16 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      A fair majority of scientists and researchers are civilians. I'm sure they'd be lining up to get out of the atmosphere and run their experiments. Plus, privatizing space travel keeps it from becoming a government "monopoly". In other words, if we don't think the government is making effective use of its space travel ability, then (with enough funding) we can do it ourselves.

      --
      -------
      "In times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act."
      -- George Orwell
    9. Re:What are they going to do? by Sgt+York · · Score: 5, Insightful
      They were going for fame & fortune. OK, so fame is "I've been to the New World!", but there was the crucial "fortune" aspect as well. They were after gold, or land, or trade, or some other natural resource. People went because they wanted more than what they had; they wanted land, or wealth, or freedom. Besides, most people who went to the New World stayed there. Kinda loses the coolness factor when everyone you know did the same thing.

      The reason there was a mass influx unto the New World is because there was money in it. And that is the same way you'll see an influx into space from the private sector : once there is money in it. And yes, I know 15 quadrrillion dollars worth of minerals on each asteroid, the moon is a giant lump of He-3, and we can beam down solar energy from microwave stations.

      Make the harvesting of asteroids feasible and profitable. Find a present-day use for He-3, and then find a way to collect it that is feasible and profitable. Make the microwave-beaming-thing feasible and profitable, too. Then you will see people enter space.

      --

      There is a reason for everything. Sometimes that reason just sucks.

    10. Re:What are they going to do? by azatht · · Score: 0

      See this as an analog as the www, when it first was formed in CERN no one thought it would be the www, no companys wanted it, no average-"users" no what it was, but it's here and it's big.

      What is saying we shouldn't go to space, just because no one can see a point now to go there? Who is loosing on letting people go to space?

      I can see several positive events that people move to space, for example it minimize the risk for extermination of the human race, other is that perhaps not everything can be discovered on earth, depending on some undetectical absent that shudder our sensors etc...

      Space is the only way to get from earth, and I would like to be there

      --
      ------- In the end there are no begining
    11. Re:What are they going to do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They are doing it to do it..for personal achievement.

      flying in a spaceship build, owned and operated by a business and run by business owners looking to make money on space tours will be a GREAT personal achievement.

      even greater if that have roasted peanuts!

    12. Re:What are they going to do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, after all the hard work is done. People, who needs them? Space for the spacers!

    13. Re:What are they going to do? by Saeed+al-Sahaf · · Score: 1
      Dude..... Zero-g sex......

      Good way to throw your back out...

      --
      "Who are in control, they are not in control of anything - they don't even control themselves!" - Glen Beck
    14. Re:What are they going to do? by 91degrees · · Score: 4, Insightful

      So...what are the civilians going to DO in space?

      Good question. I'll let you know in 20 years.

      50 years ago, you might well have asked why someone would want a computer in their home. I doubt anyone could have given you a particularly good answer to that one at the time. So, I think the answer is that we don't know. Hopefully something fantastic. Of course, it also quite possible that the whole thing becomes a huge waste white elephant.

    15. Re:What are they going to do? by Kenja · · Score: 1
      "And who says that civilians can not do science in space? There is a lot of science that has not yet been done by NASA, so you can expect many of the initial customers to be from universities and private research labs."

      Like studying the effects of too much Pop Rocks, Pepsi and burritos consumed by an overweight man in zero gravity.

      --

      "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
    16. Re:What are they going to do? by MrDickey · · Score: 1

      I'd put a few sic spacesound system in my spaceship and crank it up full. Then, I'd spacecruise around space suburbia, but because a spacevaccum doesn't carry sound, no spacesoccer moms will call the spacecops

      --
      I hate my sig
    17. Re:What are they going to do? by John+Hurliman · · Score: 3, Funny

      According to Sid Meier's Alpha Centauri, we can launch hyrdoponics labs that will feed the nation, energy collecting solar satellites, and a missile defense system.

      Who said computer games never taught you anything!

    18. Re:What are they going to do? by Drakon · · Score: 0, Offtopic
      or possibly just to escape from their otherwise oppressive homeland.


      You mean like the United States of John Ashcroft?
    19. Re:What are they going to do? by Trailwalker · · Score: 1

      People want to ship their relatives to mars, and then, not visit them.

    20. Re:What are they going to do? by The_K4 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Or the ever popular "If I was still in the old-land I would have been put in jail/put to death" argument. A number of people came here to avoid prosecution.

    21. Re:What are they going to do? by OldManAndTheC++ · · Score: 2, Funny
      So...what are the civilians going to DO in space?

      Space is merely what tourists will pass through on their way to exciting destinations. For myself, I intend to start selling trips to the surface of the sun. Can you think of a hotter, more exciting place to be? I can think of several groups off the top of my head who would be good sales prospects:

      The American Bar Association
      The Internal Revenue Service
      The Recording Industry Association of America
      SCO Management
      The International Organization of Spammers
      The International Organization of Spam Purchasers

      and of course,

      The League of Telephone Sanitizers

      --
      Soylent Green is peoplicious!
    22. Re:What are they going to do? by _Sprocket_ · · Score: 1

      There was also that whole where-to-dump-debters thing. That was working fine until the first colony had a revolution and they had to turn to another, more southern locale.

      Not that we have any kind of prison overcrowding issue these days. Which leads on to ponder how well a population of drug-related offenders would do on the moon.

    23. Re:What are they going to do? by erpbridge · · Score: 1

      Shoulda answered that with "WHO are they going to do?"

      New area for the porn industry. Anyone done experiments on how well the condom regulation can be withheld in space?

    24. Re:What are they going to do? by Penguinshit · · Score: 1


      the moon is a giant lump of He-3, and we can beam down solar energy from microwave stations.

      You mean "giant frickin' laser beams"?

    25. Re:What are they going to do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "So...what are the civilians going to DO in space? Unlike astronauts, they ... Other than the wow-factor of, "I've been in outer space!", there really isn't a reason for the average civilian to go..."

      Sounds _more_ useful than astronauts. The Wow factor can produce a zillion dollar travel industry.

      Other than volcano-scientiest, why would civilians go to Hawaii.

    26. Re:What are they going to do? by JabberWokky · · Score: 1
      I doubt anyone could have given you a particularly good answer to that one at the time.

      Hell, 20 years ago, one of the major selling points of home computers were that you could keep all your recipes on them.

      --
      Evan "Even now, people keep thinking that they need personal databases"

      --
      "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
    27. Re:What are they going to do? by mobby_6kl · · Score: 1

      >Dude..... Zero-g sex...... nuff said....

      Uhh... 9.8g sex would be enough for me 8|

    28. Re:What are they going to do? by red+floyd · · Score: 1

      So, you want to weigh like what... 2000 pounds?

      I think you mean 1g sex. 9.8m/s^2 is acceleration in a 1g field.

      --
      The only reason we have the rights we have is that people just like us died to gain those rights. -- Cheerio Boy
    29. Re:What are they going to do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "governments are ridiculously bad at spending more than need be"

      Actually, governments are ridiculously good at spending more than need be.

    30. Re:What are they going to do? by Idarubicin · · Score: 2, Insightful
      So...what are the civilians going to DO in space?

      So...what are the civilians going to DO in Hawaii?

      Oh. Right. Spend a ton of money on transportation, gawk at the scenery for a while, and go home. This seems to be a viable economic model.

      --
      ~Idarubicin
    31. Re:What are they going to do? by kryptKnight · · Score: 1

      >Dude..... Zero-g sex...... nuff said....

      When ever you made contact you would begin to float away. You would need assitants or creatively placed handles. The problem with assistants is know one but perverts will do it and handles would have to be reconfigured for different sized people.

      --
      Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored. -Aldous Huxley
    32. Re:What are they going to do? by mirio · · Score: 1

      flying in a spaceship build, owned and operated by a business and run by business owners looking to make money on space tours will be a GREAT personal achievement.

      No, having $100,000 to blow on it is.

    33. Re:What are they going to do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Uhhh, has anyone here noticed the cost of the most expensive pharmaceuticals? Roughly half of the most expensive drugs are expensive because it's deucedly hard to purify them. There've already been test runs onboard the old spacelab module that prove you could cut the production cost by over 60% by doing it in orbit, even after accounting for transport costs. The only thing missing is a commercial, and reliable, transport system. That's why the X prize exists, and that's the kind of commercial enterprise that will provide the "fortune" for the first wave of space habitants. The second wave will probably be much like the second wave of American colonization, misfits, dreamers, and adventurers looking for new challenges and a different mode of living. While the first wave'll build minimal and utilitarian digs, the second wave'll actually support construction of long-term habitation (like cities in space), because they'll be moving in permanently, instead of just visiting. It may take a while, but it'll certainly be interesting.

    34. Re:What are they going to do? by iminplaya · · Score: 1

      We all know that governments are ridiculously bad at spending more than need be. Civilians companies are much, much better at it...

      Hmmm...There aren't too many private companies better or cheaper than these guys.

      --
      What?
    35. Re:What are they going to do? by farzadb82 · · Score: 1

      Guess you can't call it the mile high club - It's probably be more like the 50 mile high club (Just doesn't have the same ring to it!)

    36. Re:What are they going to do? by iminplaya · · Score: 1

      Yet, people from around the world go to Disney just because they've never been there.

      You just won the X-Prize! Whaddya gonna do?
      We're going to Disneyland!
      Traitors!

      --
      What?
    37. Re:What are they going to do? by dasunt · · Score: 1

      Ah, Alpha Centauri -- we better hope we don't go down that road.

      Or do you want to be nerve-stapled just because you protested the Gov't?

    38. Re:What are they going to do? by Jardine · · Score: 1

      Or do you want to be nerve-stapled just because you protested the Gov't?

      I found that usually by the time my population was pissed off enough at me to need nerve stapling, the other groups were also pissed off enough that the minor atrocity of nerve stapling would get them to want to kill me. At that point my only option was to scour the face of the planet with missiles. Mwhahahaha!

    39. Re:What are they going to do? by Jardine · · Score: 1

      Why do people go to Florida in the summer?

      The people around here go to Florida in the winter and early spring. And because they're Canadians, they're very easy to spot. They're the ones wearing shorts.

    40. Re:What are they going to do? by Jugalator · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I mean, aside from the wow-factor of, "I've been to the New World!"

      This being modded +5 shows how much some moderators here lack fundamental history knowledge... :-(

      It was a journey for wealth, power and hopes for a better life than where they lived now. Many failed to find what they were looking for, although some did. It was everything but a travel for "taking a look" and being able to say "hey, I've been to the New World!". Actually, they usually didn't return to say anything at all.

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    41. Re:What are they going to do? by themusicgod1 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      being in a backwards hicktown that is probably 40 or 50 years behind the rest of the world, I still get asked why on earth I need a computer for, and what possible use anyone could have for a computer in their home. The internet, and by extention computers, to most of the world, is just a place with a bunch of bad people, pornography(what is pornography? information that they don't agree with?), pedophiles(ie anyone in any chat rooms) and really nothing more interesting than television on it(if porn isn't your thing).

      On a related note, there are still people here that honestly beleive the earth revolves around the sun, and not the other way around...and not whacko's either, just average, run-of-the mill people who are trying to make it through this life. Before space exploration becomes something the common person can get involved in, we need to get the common person able to read, write, and understand that they live on a planet that can be left in persuit of other planets. Before that happens I don't see very impressive progress.

      --
      GENERATION 26: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation.
    42. Re:What are they going to do? by 0123456 · · Score: 1

      "When ever you made contact you would begin to float away."

      Simple answers: bungie cords or gaffer tape :).

    43. Re:What are they going to do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At least you can breath in North America. Or at least, you could, in the 1400-1500s.

    44. Re:What are they going to do? by chiph · · Score: 1

      They'll be going to the MGM Grand in geosync orbit. Billy Crystal will have 2 shows nightly.

      Chip H.

    45. Re:What are they going to do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
      And if you have any younger brothers or sisters, a fun game to play in a sufficiently large room in zero-gravity:

      1. Hook feet under railing on floor. (Pick any wall and call it the floor. If this doesn't make sense, read Ender's Game before liftoff.)
      2. Lift sibling no higher than halfway between floor and ceiling.
      3. Carefully let go of sibling, being careful not to impart significant velocity to sibling relative to room.
      4. Crouch, grab railing, and leave room quickly.
      5. Laugh hysterically as sibling screams and flails about in hopes of propelling him/herself to a wall.

    46. Re:What are they going to do? by Captain+DaFt · · Score: 1

      "Other than the wow-factor of, "I've been in outer space!", there really isn't a reason for the average civilian to go...It's not like they're going to visit relatives on Mars ;)"

      Not yet, but...

      --
      The U.S. really needs an English to Wisdom dictionary.
    47. Re:What are they going to do? by DerekLyons · · Score: 1
      Why do people go to Florida in the summer? It's hot, humid and full of bugs. Yet, people from around the world go to Disney just because they've never been there.
      You are correct... They go to Disney, and Seaworld, and Universal Studios. They go to *places*. Now, take a look in space and ask 'where are the places they will go'?
    48. Re:What are they going to do? by Goldsmith · · Score: 1

      You make a good point. There are no places in space. I would be shocked if there were. I really don't know how exciting or boring it is up there.

      Those places in Florida weren't always there. Someone spent a lot of time and money building them. Why can't the same be true in orbit? (The answer obviously is the cost.) So maybe it's not ready yet. Hernando de Soto and Ponce de Leon weren't asked to build a themepark.

      There will be some people who will pay just to say they've been in space. Maybe if it's actually boring up there, not enough people will pay, but I bet those few people who don't puke the whole time will find it a lot of fun.

    49. Re:What are they going to do? by Chairboy · · Score: 1

      Are you familiar with sarcasm? At the risk of burning karma, that was the mechanism I was using in my post. The parent post said 'why bother going to space?' and I used their exact structure to say 'why bother going to the new world?' to make a comparison. Of course it was immensely profitable to come to North America, and I'm suggesting in my reply that the same logic applies to space.

      Did you really not get that?

    50. Re:What are they going to do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hang on to ur partner - i can think of a few positions

  10. Now all we need... by AKAImBatman · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...are the actual space ships. I'm definitely looking forward to many of the X-Prize contenders, but so far they're only building simple rockets to go up and down. It's a great in-between stage, but I'm looking forward to the day when orbital rockets will be built.

    The one caveat to that is that a manned orbital rocket would probably be launched from the ocean rather than land. The reason for that is that water makes a plentiful rocket fuel. Tote along a reactor (nuclear is preferable, but diesel will do), convert sea water to LHOx, and launch your rocket. (This was the premise behind the Sea Dragon craft.) While a nuclear generator would probably be out of the range of a private company, using a diesel and/or solar reactor to make the fuel could cut the costs of the launch considerably.

    Oh, and it's environmentally friendly.

    1. Re:Now all we need... by kippy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I guess you could launch from the ocean but water is available elsewhere. Just turn on the tap or get it from a local river or lake. It would be a whole lot easier to get some replacement parts or whatever if you were on land than on some oil rig in the middle of nowhere.

    2. Re:Now all we need... by AKAImBatman · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Usually you're talking only a few miles off shore. That way, the rocket can launch toward the rest of the ocean (making for plentiful abort options) and any rockets that are destroyed don't land on people's heads. That's pretty much the same reason why NASA launches from Florida. Although I've never quite understood why they don't manufacture fuel on site. Probably has something to do with special additives and/or purity levels that improve the fuel combustion. A private venture might be slightly less concerned with the same levels of fuel efficiency.

    3. Re:Now all we need... by f97tosc · · Score: 2, Informative

      Clearly if you have the technology and money to Tote along a reactor (nuclear is preferable, but diesel will do), convert sea water to LHOx, and launch your rocket, transporting a truckload of water to wherever you please is a small matter.

      Tor

    4. Re:Now all we need... by Cyberherbalist · · Score: 2, Interesting
      A private venture might be slightly less concerned with the same levels of fuel efficiency

      Oh, come on! You believe the myths that say public (read: government) ventures are more efficient or work better than private? A private venture with limited funding absolutely must get the most efficient use of resources or they are toast -- unless they have very deep pockets and are willing to squander. Which pretty much describes government projects. If you want bloat, look at NASA. If you want efficiency, look at smaller private operations like Scaled Composites.

      --
      "The generation of random numbers is too important to be left to chance."
    5. Re:Now all we need... by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      ansporting a truckload of water to wherever you please is a small matter.

      Um... try a few thousand tons of the stuff.

    6. Re:Now all we need... by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      You believe the myths that say public (read: government) ventures are more efficient or work better than private?

      No, I'm saying that private ventures know "good enough" when they see it. If it costs your private company an extra $50 mil to improve fuel efficiency by 3%, why do it? Just build a bigger *$%^ing rocket!

    7. Re:Now all we need... by sean23007 · · Score: 1

      A private venture may well be much more concerned about fuel efficiency. After all, that's one of the major complaints about NASA: they spend too much money. Private companies would not be interested in wasting nearly as much money. And while it probably costs more to produce better rocket fuel (there are also ways to prevent this), it costs a hell of a lot more to lose a payload on account of bad fuel. I'm sure space-faring companies would be able to recognize this.

      --

      Lack of eloquence does not denote lack of intelligence, though they often coincide.
    8. Re:Now all we need... by AKAImBatman · · Score: 2, Informative

      The whole point of getting the fuel from the ocean is to make it cheaper. By making the fuel cheaper, it becomes more cost effective to simply make the rocket a little bigger. The interesting part about the aforementioned Sea Dragon project was that the study showed that rockets are pretty much a fixed cost. The bigger you make them, the cheaper they get. That's why the idea behind the Sea Dragon was to build something the size of our largest ocean going vessels in a shipyard, then drag it out to sea where it could be fueled by a nuclear powered aircraft carrier.

      The reason why NASA didn't pursue the project was because the government no longer wanted big rockets. All they wanted was a token project that displayed the fact that the U.S. was still the leader in space technology. Beyond that, Nixon's administration wanted NASA dead. Thus NASA had to make a hurculean effort to build a craft that "sort of" met all the stupid requirements that were thrown at it. The end result was technologically impressive (kudos to the engineers!), but was never going to be cost effective.

    9. Re:Now all we need... by zCyl · · Score: 1

      A private venture with limited funding absolutely must get the most efficient use of resources or they are toast ... If you want efficiency, look at smaller private operations like Scaled Composites.

      and Halliburton.

    10. Re:Now all we need... by Cyberherbalist · · Score: 1

      Ah, very good. I misunderstood you --- and definitely agree with your sentiments.

      --
      "The generation of random numbers is too important to be left to chance."
    11. Re:Now all we need... by Cyberherbalist · · Score: 1
      Halliburton?

      Nah. Too big. Also, too exclusive --- they're in a class of firm with too little good competition, so they probably feel no pressure to be better.

      Just a guess --- based on what little has been reported. I could be totally off-base.

      --
      "The generation of random numbers is too important to be left to chance."
  11. Watch out for tortoises by Void_of_light · · Score: 1

    I bet the make one hell of a speed bump

  12. "Private" Spaceport by Cyberherbalist · · Score: 3, Insightful

    That is a neat thing, to have an actual "official" spaceport, but it will be even more exciting when the FAA designates a "public" spaceport! But I am looking forward to spacecraft with "RyanAir" markings setting down at our local municipal air... ahem SPACEport!

    --
    "The generation of random numbers is too important to be left to chance."
    1. Re:"Private" Spaceport by MrDoh! · · Score: 1

      Ask and you shall receive...

      http://www.spaceref.com/news/viewpr.html?pid=629 0

      --
      Waiting for an amusing sig.
  13. Really Cool Place by kavachameleon · · Score: 5, Informative

    The Mojave Airport is a really cool place... you drive by it and there's nothing but random planes, everything from jetliners to fighter jets. They're mostly an aircraft storage yard. Picture of their storage yard Link to their main site

  14. Pardon My Ignorance... by FudgePackinJesus · · Score: 1

    but what makes this special?

    Is there really a future for "horizontal launches of reusable spacecraft"?

    The lingo sounds great. I mean "Mojave Spaceport" certainly has a ring to it. But would this be any more than a red tape cut for private experimentalists?

    1. Re:Pardon My Ignorance... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >> Is there really a future for "horizontal launches of reusable spacecraft"?

      Not if the space elevator is built in the next ten to twenty years. All that's needed right now is a good way to bond carbon nanotubes.

  15. How to keep the signs up. by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 3, Insightful

    So does this mean that they'll change all the signs to the Mojave Airport to the Mojave Spaceport? That would be really cool and I bet those signs 'll disappear every week or so:)

    Modes proposal for keeping the signs up:

    Make up extras. Sell them at the spaceport office (profits to help fund the spaceport or space exploration in general).

    Print notice on the back of the ones on the road that reasonably-priced souvenirs are available at the office or by mail-order at (x) for ($y) and how big the fine is for stealing THIS one. B-)

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
    1. Re:How to keep the signs up. by Kenja · · Score: 4, Funny
      "Print notice on the back of the ones on the road that reasonably-priced souvenirs are available at the office or by mail-order at (x) for ($y)"

      What a great idea, people would never take something for free when they can just buy it someplace else!

      --

      "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
    2. Re:How to keep the signs up. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      That's why iTunes works so well!

    3. Re:How to keep the signs up. by osu-neko · · Score: 1
      What a great idea, people would never take something for free when they can just buy it someplace else!

      Actually, assuming the price isn't excessive, this is mostly true.

      --
      "Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies."
    4. Re:How to keep the signs up. by Y-Crate · · Score: 1

      "What a great idea, people would never take something for free when they can just buy it someplace else!"

      One word: iTunes

    5. Re:How to keep the signs up. by Kenja · · Score: 1

      Do you realy think that if Apple posted all the iTunes content direct on the web but then ASKED people to not download it but instead go to the iTunes store and buy it, that they would?

      --

      "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
    6. Re:How to keep the signs up. by Thomas+Shaddack · · Score: 1
      Print notice on the back of the ones on the road that reasonably-priced souvenirs are available at the office or by mail-order at (x) for ($y) and how big the fine is for stealing THIS one. B-)

      Improvement: Mount the sign to the post with either rivets, or rusty-enough bolts. Make the signs easier to buy than to "borrow" - and make the price actually reasonable.

  16. New Sig, anyone by SoSueMe · · Score: 5, Funny

    Space is big. Space is dark. Now we have a place to park

    1. Re:New Sig, anyone by johannesg · · Score: 1

      As I recall, the original went something like this: "Space is big. Space is dark. It's hard to find a place to park.". This little poem was one of many that appeared in a simple desktop game for the Amiga. You had a spacecraft, floating free on the desktop, and a window (little more than a title bar in fact), and had to land the spacecraft on top of that window. Landing it too hard, or moving off the screen, destroyed the spacecraft. Ahh, memories ;-)

  17. There's already a spaceport by xil · · Score: 5, Informative

    What about the Green River Intergalactic Spaceport in Wyoming?

    1. Re:There's already a spaceport by Alioth · · Score: 1

      I've BEEN to Green River Intergalactic Spaceport. I've not landed/taken off a plane from there though - I visited in a Jetta TDI on my way back from Utah one day... However, the runway is certainly usable for many light aircraft.

  18. Good location. by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 4, Informative

    That's a good location:

    - Just over 1/2 mile up.
    - Latitude 38 (not ideal but still good)
    - Handy highways.
    - Town and roads to the West, lots of nice empty desert to ditch in to the east (which is the direction you're headed if you want the earth's help getting to orbit).

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  19. Considering that the large number of ... by burgburgburg · · Score: 3, Funny
    Tusken Raiders in the vicinity tend to stay far enough away, I'd say the location is servicable. There are also a pool of Huttese looking to invest in spice trading opportunities and other diversions.

    And a close Sarlac pit.

    1. Re:Considering that the large number of ... by the+gnat · · Score: 4, Funny

      And a close Sarlac pit.

      Those of us in northern California have also been known to refer to it as "Los Angeles".

    2. Re:Considering that the large number of ... by shadowbearer · · Score: 1

      Sorry, no, the Tusken Raiders are wearing suits now, and working in Hollywood. As much as they bemoan the death of their desert culture, they realized the benefits involved in becoming Corporate Raiders.

      pool of Huttese

      *cough* Rosie? *cough*

      SB

      --
      It's old. The more humans I meet, the more I like my cats. At least they are honest.
  20. Re:At last! by Adriax · · Score: 1

    I can get you out of the atmosphere, cheap!

    On a tatally unrelated note, anyone know the required force to send a 300lb object into orbit, how much C-4 would be required to achieve that, and where can I order some?

    --
    I don't suffer from insanity, I enjoy every minute of it!
  21. Interesting scaled facts: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    No one ever saw this last scaled article;
    Check it out!
    White Knight, the carrier is N318SL.
    SS1, the spacecraft is N328KF.

    Note below that SS1 is a model 316 and WK is model 318.

    (previously discussed, there is no model 317)

    [begin FAA registry querry results]

    N318SL is Assigned
    Aircraft Description
    Serial Number 001 Type Registration Corporation
    Manufacturer Name SCALED COMPOSITES LLC Certificate Issue Date 07/05/2002
    Model 318 Status Valid
    Type Aircraft Fixed Wing Multi-Engine Type Engine Turbo-Jet
    Pending Number Change None Dealer No
    Date Change Authorized None Mode S Code 50663044
    MFR Year 2002 Fractional Owner NO
    Registered Owner
    Name SCALED COMPOSITES LLC
    Street 1624 FLIGHT LINE
    City MOJAVE State CALIFORNIA Zip Code 93501-1663
    County KERN
    Country UNITED STATES
    Airworthiness
    Engine Manufacturer AMA/EXPR Classification Experimental
    Engine Model UNKNOWN ENG Category Research and Development
    A/W Date 07/01/2003
    Other Owner Names
    None
    Temporary Certificate
    Certificate Number T024366 Issue Date 07/05/2002 Expiration Date 08/04/2002
    Fuel Modifications
    None

    N328KF is Assigned
    Assigned/Registered Aircraft
    Aircraft Description
    Serial Number 001 Type Registration Corporation
    Manufacturer Name SCALED COMPOSITES LLC Certificate Issue Date 03/20/2003
    Model 316 Status Valid
    Type Aircraft Glider Type Engine None
    Pending Number Change None Dealer No
    Date Change Authorized None Mode S Code 50706357
    MFR Year 2003 Fractional Owner NO
    Registered Owner
    Name SCALED COMPOSITES LLC
    Street 1624 FLIGHTLINE HANGAR 78
    City MOJAVE State CALIFORNIA Zip Code 93501
    County KERN
    Country UNITED STATES
    Airworthiness
    Engine Manufacturer NONE Classification Experimental
    Engine Model NONE Category Research and Development
    A/W Date 12/09/2003
    Other Owner Names
    None
    Temporary Certificate
    None
    Fuel Modifications
    None

    1. Re:Interesting scaled facts: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      OK, if you payed attention last time, you know that there is an interesting meaning to the SS1 tail number.

      N328KF

      As in N (US air vehicle)
      328KF as in 328,000 Feet!

      Burt and company are supurbly cool folks!

    2. Re:Interesting scaled facts: by Bingo+Foo · · Score: 1
      Which is a lot more impressive than:


      Type Aircraft Glider Type Engine None

      --
      taken! (by Davidleeroth) Thanks Bingo Foo!
  22. Re:"Space, the final frontier ..." by miketang16 · · Score: 1

    Now all we need is a global government or at the very least a "space exploration alliance", with some good guidelines. Ah.. we can dream can't we?

    --
    -------
    "In times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act."
    -- George Orwell
  23. Not the First by DynaSoar · · Score: 5, Informative

    It remains to be seen whether Mojave will in fact get approved. Either way, Southwest Regional Spaceport near Las Cruces NM had already been announced by Ansari/X-Prize, as the spaceport site chosen for at least an annual X-Prize event, and expecting the X-Prize contenders who (win or lose) continue on and offer services to the public. Plus, according to the articles which may or may not be accurate, Mojave is being considered for horizontal launched craft. SRS is not being restricted to horizontal launch. My money says SRS will become a regular gathering place for the next step in rocketry, those growing out of amateur/hobbyist rocketry ($100 gets you a model that goes Mach 1 and a mile up) and those following hot on the jets of Ky "Rocketman" Michaelson and CSXT's recent first private rocket into space.

    --
    "I may be synthetic, but I'm not stupid." -- Bishop 341-B
    1. Re:Not the First by jfoust · · Score: 1

      Actually, SRS doesn't have a commercial spaceport license yet. In fact, it still needs to be built! (Which is why the first X Prize Cup might be held at nearby White Sands, a federal facility.) Also, while CSXT's GoFast rocket is certainly the first amateur rocket to reach space, that doesn't make it the first private rocket to make it into space.

  24. I can certify... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Redundant

    I can certify my patio as an official commercial shipping port, but that doesn't mean super tankers will float up along the side and start loading/unloading cargo...

  25. Re:At last! by eln · · Score: 1

    In order to get him into orbit without vaporizing him first, you're going to need some sort of container for him. However, you quoted the total payload as 300 pounds, and I seriously doubt you're going to be able to build a good enough capsule that will weigh only 2 pounds.

    Of course, just vaporizing him would probably be a lot cheaper.

  26. Absolutely right by fiannaFailMan · · Score: 1
    I thought that very same thing when watching Cowboy Bebop. There's a spaceship that lands on water, no need to worry about getting the approach to the runway right first time, you just land at your leisure. A totally sensible proposal, and the Mercury and Apollo missions did likewise, albeit in the vertical rather than hosrizontal fashion.

    I've also thought the same thing about atmospheric travel. I was up in Vancouver last year and was intrigued by the floatplanes. I was thinking, 'why aren't there more of these things elsewhere in the world?' All you need is a reasonably calm body of water, a cheap little jetty, a small terminal building, and presto! Instant airport for personalised air travel for small groups of people running at flexible schedules. Of course in Vancouver it's a bit busier and requires an air-traffic control tower, located at the top of EA Sports' building in a wonderful example of efficient use of urban space.

    --
    Drill baby drill - on Mars
    1. Re:Absolutely right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was up in Vancouver last year and was intrigued by the floatplanes. I was thinking, 'why aren't there more of these things elsewhere in the world?' All you need is a reasonably calm body of water, a cheap little jetty, a small terminal building, and presto! Instant airport for personalised air travel for small groups of people running at flexible schedules.

      A few clues:

      1. Floats are heavier then landing gear?
      2. Issues with drag / power required to hit take-off speed?

      Ah screw it... google for it yourself.

    2. Re:Absolutely right by fiannaFailMan · · Score: 1

      For spaceflight I was thinking more in terms of flying boats where bouyancy is provided by the shape of the craft itself. And I was thinking about landing only. As for the problems you indicate with floatplanes, I would have though that if these were insurmountable then floatplanes wouldn't exist.

      --
      Drill baby drill - on Mars
    3. Re:Absolutely right by jandrese · · Score: 3, Informative
      Floatplanes have numerous disadvantages that you must consider.
      1. Water has a higher drag than rubber-on-concrete, so you need more power to get up to speed to lift off, which lowers your max gross takeoff weight.
      2. Floats are generally bulky and cannot be retraced, so they cut into your fuel efficency in the air. The floats themselves are also heavier than the wheels they replace (and sometimes incorperate wheels), which lowers the amount of cargo you can carry
      3. Water can turn choppy at a moments notice, and choppy water is treacherous to land in.
      4. Land next to water is expensive, and your airport consists of more than runways. Your terminal, fuel shed, and hangers will be on expensive waterfront property
      This only touched on a few points, but it should be obvious why most airports are not on the water. For small "puddle jumpers" seaplanes are the perfect solution, but for generalized travel they just aren't economical.
      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
  27. When do they start taking bids... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...from companies who want to manage the cantina?

    1. Re:When do they start taking bids... by isorox · · Score: 1

      As long as there's Music and blasters and old Jedi Masters

  28. Spaceport, Oklahoma by MrDoh! · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Err, there's already one out there in Oklahoma, called, funnily enough;

    SpacePort, Oklahoma.

    Google it up, there's alot of good info about it, and makes a pretty good site too. Just enough out the way.

    --
    Waiting for an amusing sig.
  29. There's a saying in Spanish... by kevlar · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "A monkey dressed in silk is still a monkey."

    Not to discourage people's efforts for commercial space ventures, but I think that quote is suitable in this case :-P

  30. Screw that by Art+Tatum · · Score: 1

    Once aliens hear what passes for MUSIC in an airport, they'll all start freaking out.

  31. Are there discount rates for long-term parking?... by Sir-Techlot · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... a mission to Mars could be bit pricy for a car owner.

  32. Spaceport security? Run by the TSA? by kc8jhs · · Score: 1

    Lets just hope it's better than airport security.

    -Mikey P

  33. Control Tower by Vasan · · Score: 1

    OK now they need to build the Control Tower add-on upgrade to the Starport...

    1. Re:Control Tower by GeekyGurkha · · Score: 1

      And a science facility, and attach a physics lab! Wraiths won't do! we need battlecruisers DAMNIT! oh, and get the Yamato cannon & reactor upgrade too (as well as the various weapon/armour upgrades)

      We'll show those evil Zerg that Earth won't just roll over & die quietly.

      This insanity brought to you by the 'starcraft is real foundation'

      --
      Hey! What pretty widgets?
    2. Re:Control Tower by osu-neko · · Score: 1
      ...Yamato cannon...

      I believe the proper term is "wave motion gun", but that would have gotten Blizzard sued...

      --
      "Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies."
  34. Spaceport Security? by MBCook · · Score: 1
    I am the only one worried about spaceport security in this day and age?

    To go through a normal airport I get scanned and they may make me take off my shoes and do a pat down and take an invasive look into my luggage.

    What kind of search will I have to go through to get into SPACE?

    Note: for the humor impaired, this is a joke.

    --
    Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
    1. Re:Spaceport Security? by grozzie2 · · Score: 2, Funny
      What kind of search will I have to go through to get into SPACE?

      This is SOOOO obvious. You will be subjected to a 'wallet search'. The purpose of the wallet search is to 'lighten the load' to the point where it's light enough to actually lift into space. If the wallet search proves successful, then, the rest will be minor formalities. If the wallet search is unsuccessful, boarding will be denied on 'financial security' grounds.

  35. A few corrections by jfoust · · Score: 5, Informative
    • The original poster called this the "first-ever private spaceport", but it's not clear this is true, depending on one's definition of private. It is certainly not the first commercial spaceport: FAA/AST has issued commercial spaceport licenses for years to facilities in Alaska (Kodiak), California (Vandenberg), Florida (Cape Canaveral), and Virginia (Wallops). Mojave, though, would be the first commercial inland licensed spaceport.

    • XCOR Aerospace is not a competitor for the Ansari X Prize.

    • Technically, Scaled does not need a spaceport license to perform its flights from Mojave. (Recall that Scaled already has a launch license from AST.) As far as the FAA is concerned, SpaceShipOne's launch "site" is the White Knight carrier aircraft, which takes off from Mojave under an experimental airworthiness certificate, as I recall. Thus Scaled does not need to wait for Mojave Airport to get a spaceport license.

    1. Re:A few corrections by osu-neko · · Score: 1
      XCOR Aerospace is not a competitor for the Ansari X Prize.

      This is correct. However, it should be noted that, "While XCOR is not competing in the ANSARI X PRIZE, they do plan to participate in the follow on ANSARI X PRIZE CUP." (Quoted from www.xprize.org front page.)

      --
      "Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies."
  36. It's a Dry Heat by MacWiz · · Score: 1

    Live in the desert long enough and anything seems like a good idea.

  37. That hardly qualifies as an airport. by douglips · · Score: 4, Funny
    The description reads like Jeff Foxworthy: "You might be a redneck if your airport has..."

    Surface: dirt, in poor condition
    ROUGH; DEBRIS FULL LENGTH OF RY; BROKEN BOTTLES & FIREWORKS DEBRIS.
    Runway edge markings: /22 MARKED WITH +10 FT STEEP DROP OFF SIGNS AT BOTH ENDS.
    • RY SOFT WHEN WET. DEEP RUTS & TALL GRASS FULL LENGTH OF RY.
    • ARPT ON TOP OF MOUNTAIN; LAND DESCENDS VERY STEEPLY FROM RWY ENDS.
    • NO LINE OF SIGHT BTN RWY ENDS.
    • NO SNOW REMOVAL AVAILABLE.
    • CAUTION RADIO CTLD MODEL ACFT OPERATION N SIDE OF RWY.
    1. Re:That hardly qualifies as an airport. by shadowbearer · · Score: 1

      They forgot to mention the steady 20-50mph+ crosswinds containing copious amounts of dust/soil from the Rockies :)

      SB

      --
      It's old. The more humans I meet, the more I like my cats. At least they are honest.
  38. XCOR is not competing for the X-Prize. by Robotbeat · · Score: 1

    Ummm... XCOR is not a competitor for the X-Prize. They are a private organization that is possibly capable of suborbital manned spaceflight, but they are not listed on the list of X-Prize teams.

  39. The necessity of privatization by the_meager · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I think we can all agree that privatization is key for /affordable/ civilian spaceflight. However, I sincerely hope that those pursuing privately pursuing spaceflight settle for heavily regulated and subsidized government regulation (control) of "private spaceflight". /We/ will never reach maturity in spaceflight as long as government is involved. Government just waists too much money and is too sluggish and inefficient. Any sort of [government] planning of capital and resources going into private/civilian spaceflight will have a negative effect. If government and NASA would stop with the Mars nonsense and the Impending Asteroid Impact bullcrap and completely privatize space, we'd be much further along --- technologically and financially.

    --
    Speckpot?
    1. Re:The necessity of privatization by Warlok · · Score: 1
      I sincerely hope that those pursuing privately pursuing spaceflight settle for heavily regulated and subsidized government regulation (control) of "private spaceflight".


      Huh? Doesn't this sentence completely emasculate the rest of your argument? You want a new private industry to settle for heavy regulation and susbsidies from government, then you say we'll never gain maturity with government involvment.


      I agree with every other sentence in your post but that one. I personally think this new private industry should spurn all government advances to "register", "license", "approve", "regulate", or other wise meddle with them. It doesn't take "heavy" regulation of an industry - just a few common sense restrictions for safety or competitiveness or whatever. Ask any gun manufacturer out there how the government does business.


      Personally, if I personally owned the Mojave facility (not sure if it's privately owned or "subsidized" by the government), I'd ask the FAA to provide proof of their jurisdiction over the proceedings on and above the facility. Of course, since the "licensing" is already on it's way, the right to question the FAA's authority over the happenings at this "spaceport" has already been waived. Oh well...

      --
      ...and you run and you run and you can't stop what's been done...
    2. Re:The necessity of privatization by the_meager · · Score: 1

      I have to totally apologize for that slip up. It was supposed to be "I sincerely hope that those pursuing private spaceflight do not settle..." Sorry about that. I was in a hurry when I wrote that post. I probably should have waited until I could spare the extra moment to review my post --- but alas I couldn't hold myself back and wait until I had the time. Again, sorry for that.

      --
      Speckpot?
  40. XCOR not participating in X-Prize by JCallery · · Score: 5, Informative

    Both Scaled Composites and XCOR Aerospace (the two leading competitors in the X-Prize competition) currently fly out of Mojave Airport.

    Scaled Composites is taking part in the X-Prize competition, but XCOR is not. They are developing their products to break into a market of suborbital payloads and microsatellites, as well as the passenger market (they are currently under contract with Space Adventures to provide the space travel experience to "adventure travelers" for $98,000 when the technology is ready). You can read more about their goals on their website.

    The X-Prize website hosts a list of the teams competing for the X-Prize.

  41. Not at all.. by raehl · · Score: 2, Funny

    Nobody said it had to have departures before it could accept arrivals.

    I better get moving on my patent for "A method for transferring alien tourists to Vegas".

  42. Hey Scottie by heybo · · Score: 2, Funny

    Boom me up Scottie

    No sign of intelligent life here

    Can I go now?

  43. How long will it take by JessLeah · · Score: 1

    ...before space travel is monopolized, like every other bloody field out there? It's not a question of "if". It's a question of "when". Monopoly (or quasi-monopoly, e.g. the Coke/Pepsi diopoly) seems to be the new way of doing business.

    1. Re:How long will it take by the_meager · · Score: 1

      So long as rediculous copyright laws and IP nonsense doesn't prevent others from pursuing space travel, you're likely to never find a monopoly in this field. If you don't want it to happen, then support reformation of copyright laws and total trashing of current IP laws.

      But without having to start a war over Microsoft, Pepsi/Coke, AOL, etc --- none of them are a monopoly. To be a monopoly means to be the only option.

      --
      Speckpot?
    2. Re:How long will it take by Teancum · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I would hope that it would take on more the flavor of the old time passenger cruise lines of the late 19th & early 20th Centuries. Still, once space travel starts to really emerge, it is going to be a very capital intensive business. Almost all of the capital that Wall Street & other exchanges can dig up is going to help fuel this next economic expansion.

      I predict that over the next 15-25 years you will see Wall Street (especially once the X-Prize has been won) get into space in a major way. You will see the whole dot Bomb thing happen all over again, unfortunately, with fly-by-night companies that do little but promise the Moon (this time in a more litteral fashion). Some companies are going to emerge and become very successful, but many others are going to take a whole lot of money from people and throw it down the drain.

      If the X-Prize team list is an indication with over 26 different teams listed, once it has been proven to be a practical business you will see many others jump into the business. Companies like Boeing, Airbus, and Thiokol (all companies you seemed to miss) are more than likely going to come in and join the party as well. They all have some sort of rocketry/avaition experience, deep pockets, and an aire of respectability when they start producing spacecraft.

      In this regard it would be more like the P.C. industry, where it started in a bunch of garages and small industrial parks, where several millionaires arose from relatively modest beginnings. In this case we have a few "modest" millionaires who are perhaps going to turn this into billions.

  44. She wasn't an alien. by Carthag · · Score: 1

    The three-breasted woman was a human mutant. She (and the other other mutants) were so because of ratiation getting through the inadequate shielding.

    SPOILER: There were no aliens in Total Recall, the only sign we saw of them was the huge handprint button used to activate the terraformer.

  45. but.... by garyrich · · Score: 2, Interesting

    There *isn't* a Starbucks near the Mojave Airport. At least there wasn't last time I was there. I think I will go open franchise now while land values are cheap!

    Seriously though: Mojave and California City have some of the cheapest raw land per acre in SoCal. I wonder if this would create a land boom there long term. Or if, when it became a more mature industry, would spaceports move to the traditional (at least in SF) equatorial areas.

    --
    -- your Web browser is Ronald Reagan
  46. Water powered rockets by weeboo0104 · · Score: 2, Funny

    The reason for that is that water makes a plentiful rocket fuel.

    I already have a water powered rocket.

    --
    It is easier to build strong children than to repair broken men. -Frederick Douglass
  47. hell man. by Simple-Simmian · · Score: 1

    It's in Kern County, in the desert and, windy as hell too. Your right.

    --
    If you don't like what I write don't be a CS and mod it down. Refute it.
    Yea I can't spell. So what is your point?
  48. You know what would be great? by ShadowRage · · Score: 1

    On opening day of it being a spaceport, and Elvis Impersonator would be there.
    That would be classic.

    1. Re:You know what would be great? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On opening day of it being a spaceport, and Elvis Impersonator would be there.
      That would be classic.


      An impersonator? Is he dead or something?

  49. You're trying not to get it. by Chmcginn · · Score: 1
    That's a terrible analogy - and besides, some people would still pay for it. Those people would fall mostly into two groups, a.)People who obey the law because it's the law, and they were raised that way/have an exceptionally strong moral code/feel they have to much to lose, and b.) those who figure that they'll definetely get their IP logged for downloading from that area.

    Either way, it's a bad analogy anyway - the risk of getting caught stealing a road sign is probably not all that high, but it's still a hell of a lot higher than the risk of getting caught for music swapping... that's up to, what, 1500 out of, say, 100 million? One in a seventy thousand?

    --
    Have you been touched by his noodly appendage?
    1. Re:You're trying not to get it. by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

      Note that there's a third class: c.) People who will obey the law even at some cost when it is convenient, but will break it to get what they want if a convenient legal way to obtain it is not offered.

      I think most of the people who downloaded music when online distribution was not available but now buy it online fall into this category.

      --
      Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
    2. Re:You're trying not to get it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I only rob banks when I'm REALLY strapped and it's inconvenient to get a second job.

  50. We're not really sure on the date.... by Chmcginn · · Score: 1

    cause the calendar keeps changing on us, but these guys aren't going to be around for a little while, at least...

    --
    Have you been touched by his noodly appendage?
  51. Remember Iridium ???? by pablo_max · · Score: 1

    "Remember, a cellular phone satelite doesn't have people complaining about it being in their back yard"
    First off a cellular phone does not transmit enough power to make a call to a satalite. That means people would have to get new phones and phone companies would have to get new techs.
    It will be a long long time before its cheaper to put a satalite in space then it is to stick a antenna on the water tower.

    1. Re:Remember Iridium ???? by 0123456 · · Score: 1

      "It will be a long long time before its cheaper to put a satalite in space then it is to stick a antenna on the water tower."

      But one satellite can replace an awful lot of cell towers: AFAIR Iridium planned to cover the entire planet with only 77 satellites. If the cost of launching them was to drop to a few dollars a pound, it's quite possible it would be cheaper than building cell towers on Earth.

    2. Re:Remember Iridium ???? by cmowire · · Score: 1

      Not necessarily.

      True, you'd have to replace current standards with a more Iridium-like standard, but it's better than you'd think, assuming that you can work around a few limits, which is entirely feasable. All you really need is more power on the satelite and a good antenna. (which really is just a function of launch costs more than anything else) In fact, already, digital cellular signals, most notably CDMA signals, are pretty damn low-powered simply by being spread-spectrum.

      Also remember that the signal dynamics change. Now you are overhead (which is absolutely great for non-city sorts of areas, although not so nice for cities) and most of the signal path is through the atmosphere. You don't have the pesky earth surface and trees and stuff getting in the way.

      The big win here is that with 60-120 satelites, you can cover easily just about everything but the cities pretty well. The reason why Iridium has so few capabilities is because it was limited by how much weight per satelite you can get away with. If you didn't need to wory so much about launch weight, signal power would be the last of your problems. So it's really more of a chicken-and-egg problem -- if launch costs were cheaper, it would be more competitive with things like cellular, but it won't get cheaper unless people really start to launch a lot of heavy stuff up to space, which won't happen until launch costs get cheaper.

  52. Arrr.... by Bo'Bob'O · · Score: 1

    At first I thought the headline said "First-Ever *Pirate* Spaceport Nears Final Approval"

    Now THAT'S news.

    1. Re:Arrr.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah I did too. and I got really excited.

  53. Can Anyone Provide A Precis of Spaceport Cert? by Newskyarena · · Score: 1

    I'm curious to know what the primary requirements are in order to qualify a location as a FAA approved spaceport. Can anyone provide some insight?

    1. Re:Can Anyone Provide A Precis of Spaceport Cert? by weglian · · Score: 1

      You need to follow the regulations in 14 C.F.R. Part 420. You can find the link here: http://ast.faa.gov/lrra/regulations/fr19oc00.htm You have to be able to show that an actual vehicle (not theoretical) can fly from your launch site and meet the expectation of casualty requirement (any launch has less than 30 in a million chance of causing a casualty to the uninvolved public). You also need to complete an environmental assessment, which will take several years and lots of money.

  54. Argh! Not our of the Mohave! by magarity · · Score: 1

    OK, the nice thing about launching from Cape Canaveral is that bad launches splash down in the mid Atlantic. I'm not to happy (as a Denver resident) about W(here)TF these amature efforts leaving from the left coast are supposed to ditch...

  55. uhck!!! by themusicgod1 · · Score: 1

    honestly believe the sun goes around the earth, and not the other way around.
    /me needs to proofreed

    --
    GENERATION 26: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation.
  56. Re:Are there discount rates for long-term parking? by Alioth · · Score: 2, Informative

    I believe the parking is free at Mojave. I've been there a couple of times (by light plane, not by car). Mojave itself is a bit of a dump, but the airport's pretty good.

    I went there to see the XCor unveiling (despite the article, XCor is not in the X-Prize competition). My writeup of the Xcor trip is here if you are interested.

  57. Pr0n in space? by wodelltech · · Score: 1

    I mean, that's what most home computers are used for, right?

    --
    Your monitor is staring at you.
    1. Re:Pr0n in space? by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      Well... Sex and porn has often been a driving force for new technology. It was the case for photography, printing, films, and videos and the internet. Others follow eventually, but the porn industry is usally the first to capitalise.

  58. XCOR is not an X-Prize entrant by BiggerBoat · · Score: 1

    Despite what the main post says, XCOR is not now, nor have they ever been an entrant in the X-Prize.

  59. Live on Mars -- Seriously? by boscodegama · · Score: 1

    How many people, given the chance, would leave their families and go live on Mars given reasonable (or not so) odds of making a life there, albiet a hard one? But you could still send them "mail" and possible someday have Internet like connectivity, but definitely atleast a "mail-like" situation, virtual that is.

    1. Re:Live on Mars -- Seriously? by dustmote · · Score: 1

      I know a few people that would. I would have, a few years ago. Assuming, of course, that it was sort of frontier-y, and not them just dropping me off on the surface without life support systems. In a couple of hundred years, if they've built habitation units and it's the new wild west (wild up?), I think you'll see a few souls adventurous enough to move there. Probably more than a few. There's always a contingent of humans interested in colonizing what seems like an impossible place to live, that's why we have eskimos.

      --


      -1, "1337" speak
    2. Re:Live on Mars -- Seriously? by boscodegama · · Score: 1

      I see it as not fundamentally that different than Magellan, Christopher Columbus and the Pilgrims. Of course there's no race of Martians that we can trick, enslave and kill, but I digress. :) cheers

  60. Re:"Space, the final frontier ..." by Asterisk · · Score: 1

    Yes, let's homogenise and bureaucratise everything right off the bat. That way we won't have to worry about the problems with international and private competition in space exploration, since there won't be any space exploration.

  61. And my mother said I could never really be a space cowboy.