When you are good and ready, give your two weeks notice, BUT offer to stick around for... say... six months, if they need help finding and replacing you.
That way, you're fine either way, and come out like roses.
Russia would have lacked a tool to help Von Clownstick get elected.
There happens to be almost no evidence whatsoever of Von Clownstick working with the Russians.
There is plenty of evidence that the Obama Justice Dept, the FBI, The Hillary Campaign and the DNC working to get a fake dossier on Von Clownstick from Russian intelligence. It is perhaps the whole reason there is a Independent Counsel investigating Von Clownstick, especially if the fake dossier was the FISA court's only evidence of "Russian Collusion".
But that will be "old news" shortly when it is reluctantly outed by the Main Stream Media, and Hillary, Obama and all the powerful elites of DC will get away with rigging an election (and STILL losing). Don't worry, a few unimportant underlings will be sent to Fed Prison, so you can point to someone taking the fall.
But hey, stick with the whole "Von Clownface colluded with the Russian" talking points as long as you can.
Because Slippery Slope arguments are fallacious. Not because they aren't true (they sometimes are) but rather because they aren't always true.
However, in this case, I would suggest to you that given that progress is almost always progressing, that Slippery Slope is indeed accurate.
As for your "need more" argument, we don't "need" tv or streaming or video at all to survive. We don't even need 360i either (mid 90's tech) on 13" CRTs, but instead most of us are on 48+" 1080P.
Pay for your own wants.
Sorry, that is not how socialism works. First they declare it a right, and then they tax everyone so that everyone will have what they want! That way, it is "fair"
Decent coverage of types of rights and how they are used.
If someone has a "right" to a service or product, then someone else is obligated to provide it. The fact that obligation is spread out across multiple people doesn't negate the obligation eventually will fall upon one. And that is how Socialism collapses. It is built on rights for people that are built in obligations of others, and eventually you run out of others who are able (and willing) to fulfill those obligations.
That doesn't answer the actual question. It was an interrogatory. The assumption you make, is that more rules are always better. Better than asking more pointed questions that get at the real source of the issue, and solving THAT problem.
Again the problem is solvable without draconian rules and regulations that won't do whatever you think it will do.
Look, I'm all for solving the problem, but solving it correctly rather than bloated bureaucracy, I support letting PEOPLE actually decide which kind of internet they want, rather than having some idiot or the other idiot telling the rest of us how we're supposed to like it.
I learned that when I was fired from my very first job. The good job (pride) I was doing when the boss wasn't looking was immaterial. I was 15 when I learned that lesson. It sucked. Pride doesn't bring in a paycheck.
There is no failure if you learn something in the process. I learned how to never get fired again.
Franchise Agreements are substantial modifications of markets. The Market hasn't failed, governance has. I'm not an anarchist, I just want responsible parties to admit when they've screwed up. And those pushing for more totalitarian government rules and regulations (without a clue about unintended consequences) are tyrants?
I'm an anarchist because you can only think in binary terms.
Unless there is a fair competitive marketplace you do need regulation.
You are correct, 100%.
But my question is, why is the natural choice regulation and not making the marketplace fair and competitive?
Keep in mind government regulation caused this problem in the first place, and you're betting the solution is more of the same thinking that caused this .
The only thing that can solve this problem is ensuring that the people in congress are not horrible.
That is by far the weakest argument that makes assumptions that are provably false. I've proposed (many times on/.) a much better fix, by removing the previous government regulations that caused this in the first place, namely franchise agreements.
If Local municipalities treated last mile like infrastructure and allowed any number of service providers access to the last mile customer, it would solve this problem (and other problems we don't even know we have) without having to control the idiots in both the (D) and (R) parties that only gain power by taking it from us with draconian regulations of private networks.
My solution doesn't require people in congress to do anything, they can be the horrible people that they always will be, because that would be irrelevant.
FYI, the Grand Parent's comment " provide special treatment to a small amount of participants namely Comcast, AT&T and Time Warner." proves that they really don't know how the Internet is built. Most laymen have no idea that the "Internet" isn't a centralized controlled system. The reality is that it is a bunch of independent federated networks that use a common platform (IP) to interchange communication. Comcast doesn't get "special treatment", unless you call controlling its own networks, "special treatment".
That is the REAL problem with the proposed Net Neutrality fix, is that we are asking the Government to take control and dictate how private networks are managed in a one size fits all formula. I find such a concept horrifying.
But Remember, the Monopolists are the same people that are trying to "fix" this, the government. Whenever you see a monopoly, you almost always see government controls on production. Especially when the monopoly is protected, it is usually protected by laws, regulations and such of the government.
Trying to get people to realize where the SOURCE of the problem is, is quite difficult. They see the problem as entrenched and unsolvable. But if you recognize the source of the problem, then you can actually start fixing it at that source.
One of the early lessons in life I learned was, it wasn't how hard you worked, it was only important to work hard when the boss was looking. If you worked hard, and finished early, and the boss came around, you didn't do enough. If you didn't work at all when the boss wasn't looking but was busy when he showed up, you were okay.
That was 30 years ago, and it is still true today. Optics are the only thing that matters.
It has to do with current on the wire. A drop in cycles is an indication of problems in transmission. Which is probably what tripped the Coal fired plant.
What if I told you I actually believe the Election was hacked, and Trump won in spite of it? The Real story is the Obama Justice Dept's collusion with GPS to get fake Russian Intel on Trump. But the rank and file Democrats haven't figured out it was their party that did it, not Trump.
Remember, Trump is an idiot, and as an idiot, isn't smart enough to pull this off. But he is dumb enough he has framed the FBI to stick the wife of an investigator on the payroll of Fusion GPS.
At this point, what we do know after a year and a half investigation into "Trump Collusion with Russia" is that the Obama Administration's Justice Dept (FBI at least) was colluding with the DNC, Hillary Campaign, Fusion GPS to get fake Dossier from a British Spy paying for Russian dirt on Trump. The deep state was so involved, that people responsible for investigating Trump in the Justice Dept had their wife working AT Fusion GPS.
I am NOT supporting Trump here, just pointing out how much STINK is actually on Obama Administration, Hillary Campaign and the Deep State. This on top of previously acknolwedged spying on America Reports, and IRS attacks on conservative organizations.
This is full on Banana Republic material here, not how a first world super power should behave. But it was Racism!
Can I get the same for all the fat McDonalds eaters who don't have health insurance? All those coke drinkers. Smokers. Vape? All those with high risk behaviors?
I mean, if we're gonna restrict self inflicted illnesses and injuries, lets do it right.
Slashdot Mirror
Here is my $.02 worth.
When you are good and ready, give your two weeks notice, BUT offer to stick around for ... say ... six months, if they need help finding and replacing you.
That way, you're fine either way, and come out like roses.
Russia would have lacked a tool to help Von Clownstick get elected.
There happens to be almost no evidence whatsoever of Von Clownstick working with the Russians.
There is plenty of evidence that the Obama Justice Dept, the FBI, The Hillary Campaign and the DNC working to get a fake dossier on Von Clownstick from Russian intelligence. It is perhaps the whole reason there is a Independent Counsel investigating Von Clownstick, especially if the fake dossier was the FISA court's only evidence of "Russian Collusion".
But that will be "old news" shortly when it is reluctantly outed by the Main Stream Media, and Hillary, Obama and all the powerful elites of DC will get away with rigging an election (and STILL losing). Don't worry, a few unimportant underlings will be sent to Fed Prison, so you can point to someone taking the fall.
But hey, stick with the whole "Von Clownface colluded with the Russian" talking points as long as you can.
Because Slippery Slope arguments are fallacious. Not because they aren't true (they sometimes are) but rather because they aren't always true.
However, in this case, I would suggest to you that given that progress is almost always progressing, that Slippery Slope is indeed accurate.
As for your "need more" argument, we don't "need" tv or streaming or video at all to survive. We don't even need 360i either (mid 90's tech) on 13" CRTs, but instead most of us are on 48+" 1080P.
Pay for your own wants.
Sorry, that is not how socialism works. First they declare it a right, and then they tax everyone so that everyone will have what they want! That way, it is "fair"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
Decent coverage of types of rights and how they are used.
If someone has a "right" to a service or product, then someone else is obligated to provide it. The fact that obligation is spread out across multiple people doesn't negate the obligation eventually will fall upon one. And that is how Socialism collapses. It is built on rights for people that are built in obligations of others, and eventually you run out of others who are able (and willing) to fulfill those obligations.
That doesn't answer the actual question. It was an interrogatory. The assumption you make, is that more rules are always better. Better than asking more pointed questions that get at the real source of the issue, and solving THAT problem.
Again the problem is solvable without draconian rules and regulations that won't do whatever you think it will do.
Look, I'm all for solving the problem, but solving it correctly rather than bloated bureaucracy, I support letting PEOPLE actually decide which kind of internet they want, rather than having some idiot or the other idiot telling the rest of us how we're supposed to like it.
I aspire to goals greater than where we are, rather than succumbing to the ever encroaching tyranny of the state.
Take some pride in your work
I learned that when I was fired from my very first job. The good job (pride) I was doing when the boss wasn't looking was immaterial. I was 15 when I learned that lesson. It sucked. Pride doesn't bring in a paycheck.
There is no failure if you learn something in the process. I learned how to never get fired again.
Franchise Agreements are substantial modifications of markets. The Market hasn't failed, governance has. I'm not an anarchist, I just want responsible parties to admit when they've screwed up. And those pushing for more totalitarian government rules and regulations (without a clue about unintended consequences) are tyrants?
I'm an anarchist because you can only think in binary terms.
Not always a good idea ... (franchise agreements)
Unless there is a fair competitive marketplace you do need regulation.
You are correct, 100%.
But my question is, why is the natural choice regulation and not making the marketplace fair and competitive?
Keep in mind government regulation caused this problem in the first place, and you're betting the solution is more of the same thinking that caused this .
https://alliswel.us/image/1722...
The only thing that can solve this problem is ensuring that the people in congress are not horrible.
That is by far the weakest argument that makes assumptions that are provably false. I've proposed (many times on /.) a much better fix, by removing the previous government regulations that caused this in the first place, namely franchise agreements.
If Local municipalities treated last mile like infrastructure and allowed any number of service providers access to the last mile customer, it would solve this problem (and other problems we don't even know we have) without having to control the idiots in both the (D) and (R) parties that only gain power by taking it from us with draconian regulations of private networks.
My solution doesn't require people in congress to do anything, they can be the horrible people that they always will be, because that would be irrelevant.
FYI, the Grand Parent's comment " provide special treatment to a small amount of participants namely Comcast, AT&T and Time Warner." proves that they really don't know how the Internet is built. Most laymen have no idea that the "Internet" isn't a centralized controlled system. The reality is that it is a bunch of independent federated networks that use a common platform (IP) to interchange communication. Comcast doesn't get "special treatment", unless you call controlling its own networks, "special treatment".
That is the REAL problem with the proposed Net Neutrality fix, is that we are asking the Government to take control and dictate how private networks are managed in a one size fits all formula. I find such a concept horrifying.
But Remember, the Monopolists are the same people that are trying to "fix" this, the government. Whenever you see a monopoly, you almost always see government controls on production. Especially when the monopoly is protected, it is usually protected by laws, regulations and such of the government.
Trying to get people to realize where the SOURCE of the problem is, is quite difficult. They see the problem as entrenched and unsolvable. But if you recognize the source of the problem, then you can actually start fixing it at that source.
One of the early lessons in life I learned was, it wasn't how hard you worked, it was only important to work hard when the boss was looking. If you worked hard, and finished early, and the boss came around, you didn't do enough. If you didn't work at all when the boss wasn't looking but was busy when he showed up, you were okay.
That was 30 years ago, and it is still true today. Optics are the only thing that matters.
It has to do with current on the wire. A drop in cycles is an indication of problems in transmission. Which is probably what tripped the Coal fired plant.
Local Company only provides last mile transit, not the content/services delivered across that transit.
BINGO!!! We have a winner!
Its cousin: There are two types of people, those that can extrapolate from incomplete data.
I'd say, get a new ISP, but the Government actively prevents it.
The problem we have is solvable without more regulations. Why don't we solve it that way first?
In all likelihood, he only has no extra computer to spare. The Lock system is also booking, and email, and ....
Bet that 2 Bitcoin ransom was about the cost of a new system that he was trying to no buy.
"Good IT is expensive, bad IT is costly"
Single Payer is Health Insurance. Instead of private companies striving for efficiencies, you end up with what looks a lot like the VA health system.
elections have really been hacked
What if I told you I actually believe the Election was hacked, and Trump won in spite of it? The Real story is the Obama Justice Dept's collusion with GPS to get fake Russian Intel on Trump. But the rank and file Democrats haven't figured out it was their party that did it, not Trump.
Remember, Trump is an idiot, and as an idiot, isn't smart enough to pull this off. But he is dumb enough he has framed the FBI to stick the wife of an investigator on the payroll of Fusion GPS.
You can't make this shit up.
At this point, what we do know after a year and a half investigation into "Trump Collusion with Russia" is that the Obama Administration's Justice Dept (FBI at least) was colluding with the DNC, Hillary Campaign, Fusion GPS to get fake Dossier from a British Spy paying for Russian dirt on Trump. The deep state was so involved, that people responsible for investigating Trump in the Justice Dept had their wife working AT Fusion GPS.
I am NOT supporting Trump here, just pointing out how much STINK is actually on Obama Administration, Hillary Campaign and the Deep State. This on top of previously acknolwedged spying on America Reports, and IRS attacks on conservative organizations.
This is full on Banana Republic material here, not how a first world super power should behave. But it was Racism!
... JV Team ...
Can I get the same for all the fat McDonalds eaters who don't have health insurance? All those coke drinkers. Smokers. Vape? All those with high risk behaviors?
I mean, if we're gonna restrict self inflicted illnesses and injuries, lets do it right.