This is why I suspect most systemd advocates are paid shills, or something.
When people advocate systemd, typical all they do is ad hominem attacks.
I have yet to see a strong, logical, argument in favour of systemd. I suspect there are no good arguments for systemd, just the same tired, childish, insult spewing.
Sure sounds like it. The remain crowd said the market would crash. The anti-Trump crowd also made numerous brain-dead predictions that have already been proved false.
> They... hacked some servers and released information which influenced voters. That's it. It doesn't require anything else.
Okay emails were leaked. Public got information that Hillary did not want the public to have.
How is that any different than Trump having his "pussy grabbing" comments leaked? Certainly Trump thought his conversation was private. Certainly the public got information that Trump did not want the public to have. Certainly that could have influenced voters.
Seems to me there is just anonymous sources, and baseless assertions.
As I understand it: the FBI, and the NSA, are not convinced of such hacking. And the CIA refuses to allow congress to see it's so-called "evidence." I also understand that Putin has essentially asked Obama to put up or shut up - provide evidence or stop accusing.
I want real evidence. I don't care if it's pro-Trump, or anti-Trump, or whatever.
I am sick to death of baseless assertions from anonymous sources. That sort of thing is beneath the standards of the National Enquirer.
IF (and I do say "IF") the CIA has evidence, then have the head of the CIA come out on national television and say that he has unequivocal evidence that Russian hackers substantially affected the US election. And let him explain exactly how the election was hacked, and explain exactly what evidence the CIA has. And let other agencies, such as FBI, and NSA, review the evidence and come to the same conclusions, and make similar announcements.
Also, what do they mean by "hacked?" Do they mean the Russians actually changed the vote counts? Or do they mean that Russia gave hacked emails to wikileaks? Or what?
If it's just email, then what difference does it make if they came from Russia, or another source?
If the dems don't want their shameful behaviour publicised, maybe they should stop their shameful behaviour.
Before we do something as drastic as overthrowing the election, let's have such actual facts.
Slashdot Mirror
> The fact is you should be indenting consistently anyway, so braces and semicolons are superfluous, and ugly.
Why do python advocates always assume you have the luxury of exclusively working with your own code?
This is why I suspect most systemd advocates are paid shills, or something.
When people advocate systemd, typical all they do is ad hominem attacks.
I have yet to see a strong, logical, argument in favour of systemd. I suspect there are no good arguments for systemd, just the same tired, childish, insult spewing.
That is what I seen. I can't remember the last time I saw a job ad for just C.
They don't live long enough to test. Stroke is very common when you live on that diet.
I am using FreeBSD 10.3 - it's not bad. I am thinking about moving to slackware.
Mint 17.3
Slackware 14.2
Gentoo
CentOS 6.5
Calculate Linux
FreeBSD 10.3
Something else?
Just more crap from the crap factory. And they call alternative media "fake news."
Or will that get disneyfied out?
Actually, before the election, they were saying the election couldn't be hacked.
According to Obama: a leak == a hack.
And because information, unflattering to Hillary, was leaked: that means the election was hacked.
What about Trump's Access Hollywood comments? I doubt Trump wanted those comments to be public. Clearly that recording was leaked - i.e. hacked.
> The Nordic states have been the best examples of Socialism anywhere and have not approached anything resembling authoritative regimes.
Are they "socialist?" What makes the Nordic states more socialist than the UK?
The Nordic states will all be under Sharia law soon anyway, followed by the rest of Europe, then the US.
Why not ask Venezuela?
Very good point. I agree $499 is way too high.
Sure sounds like it. The remain crowd said the market would crash. The anti-Trump crowd also made numerous brain-dead predictions that have already been proved false.
You know that Clinton got huge amounts of money from China, and Saudis, right?
Clinton Foundation is worth hundreds of millions, thanks to Hillary's pay-for-play state department.
Trump is working for $1 a year, and turned down a new Air Force Once.
Don't let facts get in the way of your irrational hatred.
Not as if Hillary lied about Benghazi. Four Americans dead because of her incompetence. At this point, what difference does it make?
I suspect that many twitterers were just repeating what they were hearing on MSM.
Is MSM also toast?
> Mocking crippled people
He wasn't. That has already been proved.
> questioning a judge's impartiality based on his ethnicity
Is that so impossible?
> urging his followers to violently deal with protestors
Protesters? You mean the violent thugs that Hillary hired to disrupt Trump rallies?
WTF!? Last I checked Obozo was still president. Trump is just a private citizen.
Want to try again?
> If the public sees DNC's dirty laundry but not the RNC's dirty laundry, then the public is getting lopsided information.
It would be true if it were the other way around as well.
What about Trump's "pussy grabbing" comment being leaked? I don't remember anybody complaining about that?
> They... hacked some servers and released information which influenced voters. That's it. It doesn't require anything else.
Okay emails were leaked. Public got information that Hillary did not want the public to have.
How is that any different than Trump having his "pussy grabbing" comments leaked? Certainly Trump thought his conversation was private. Certainly the public got information that Trump did not want the public to have. Certainly that could have influenced voters.
Seems to me there is just anonymous sources, and baseless assertions.
As I understand it: the FBI, and the NSA, are not convinced of such hacking. And the CIA refuses to allow congress to see it's so-called "evidence." I also understand that Putin has essentially asked Obama to put up or shut up - provide evidence or stop accusing.
I want real evidence. I don't care if it's pro-Trump, or anti-Trump, or whatever.
I am sick to death of baseless assertions from anonymous sources. That sort of thing is beneath the standards of the National Enquirer.
IF (and I do say "IF") the CIA has evidence, then have the head of the CIA come out on national television and say that he has unequivocal evidence that Russian hackers substantially affected the US election. And let him explain exactly how the election was hacked, and explain exactly what evidence the CIA has. And let other agencies, such as FBI, and NSA, review the evidence and come to the same conclusions, and make similar announcements.
Also, what do they mean by "hacked?" Do they mean the Russians actually changed the vote counts? Or do they mean that Russia gave hacked emails to wikileaks? Or what?
If it's just email, then what difference does it make if they came from Russia, or another source?
If the dems don't want their shameful behaviour publicised, maybe they should stop their shameful behaviour.
Before we do something as drastic as overthrowing the election, let's have such actual facts.
Everything about dBase was in your dBase directory, etc.
From what little I know, Thorium seems like it might be viable alternative.
Decide for yourself:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qGVSA2Jjelo