Slashdot Mirror


Fake News Prompts Gunman To 'Self-Investigate' Pizza Parlor (arstechnica.com)

An anonymous reader quotes a report from Ars Technica: A rifle-wielding North Carolina man was arrested Sunday in Washington, DC for carrying his weapon into a pizzeria that sits at the center of the fake news conspiracy theory known as "Pizzagate," authorities said Monday. DC's Metropolitan Police Department said it had arrested 28-year-old Edgar Maddison Welch on allegations of assault with a dangerous weapon. "During a post arrest interview this evening, the suspect revealed that he came to the establishment to self-investigate 'Pizza Gate' (a fictitious online conspiracy theory," the agency said in a statement. "Pizzagate" concerns a baseless conspiracy theory about a secret pedophile group, the Comet Ping Pong restaurant, and Hillary Clinton's campaign chief, John Podesta. The Pizzagate conspiracy names Comet Ping Pong as the secret headquarters of a non-existent child sex-trafficking ring run by Clinton and members of her inner circle. James Alefantis, the restaurant's owner, said he has received hundreds of death threats. According to Buzzfeed, the Pizzagate theory is believed to have been fostered by a white supremacist's tweets, the 4chan message board, Reddit, Donald Trump supporters, and right-wing blogs. The day before Thanksgiving, Reddit banned a "Pizzagate" conspiracy board from the site because of a policy about posting personal information of others. Alefantis, the pizzeria's owner, told CNN, "What happened today demonstrates that promoting false and reckless conspiracy theories comes with consequences. I hope that those involved in fanning these flames will take a moment to contemplate what happened here today, and stop promoting these falsehoods right away."

789 comments

  1. Ring ring ring by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Podesta's pedophile pizza parlor, would you like to try a large Huma?

    1. Re:Ring ring ring by vel-ex-tech · · Score: 1

      I think I've figured out the deep meme at work here. Wait for it. Wait for it. Here it is:

      Loli haet pizza.

      There you go. Explains everything.

    2. Re: Ring ring ring by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, the article fails to state whether this guy actually broke any laws... What was he arrested for?

    3. Re: Ring ring ring by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He pointed the gun at the clerk AND discharged the firearm.

    4. Re: Ring ring ring by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      for carrying his rifle into the restaurant and firing it

  2. Spinning even now by ThatsNotPudding · · Score: 5, Informative

    The pizzagate psychos are now being told this was clearly a 'false flag' operation to cover up and discredit a world wide pedophile ring... running out of a fucking pizza place.

    Jesus wept, this country is doomed.

    1. Re:Spinning even now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Almost all "pizzagate" supporters do not actually believe it. They promote it because they think it's funny.

      This is 4chan, after all. They do it "for the lulz".

      People who actually believe it are in the minority and are simpletons or mentally ill.

    2. Re:Spinning even now by Geoffrey.landis · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Unfortunately, Poe's law.
      There is nothing in the way of satire any more that is outrageous enough that some fraction of the people won't believe it's true.

      --
      http://www.geoffreylandis.com
    3. Re:Spinning even now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here is a snippet of the research so far. Go check it out before you dismiss it.

      https://i.sli.mg/tePsQk.jpg

    4. Re:Spinning even now by h33t+l4x0r · · Score: 0

      People who actually believe it are in the minority

      Sure, but how about Conservative Facebook users who believe it? Are they in the minority?

    5. Re:Spinning even now by AK+Marc · · Score: 4, Informative

      The 4-Chan guys may have made it up as a joke, but I've seen it in the media (mainstream and alt-right) as a serious story. Proof the Clintons are dealing in child trafficking, based on some pizza emails.

    6. Re:Spinning even now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ha ha good joke

    7. Re:Spinning even now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I must be missing something, but I don't think all that means what you think it means. LMFAO. You are just proof we need to invest more in mental health.

    8. Re:Spinning even now by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      Businesses are going to need some robo-cop security robots to deal with this stuff in the future.

    9. Re:Spinning even now by freeze128 · · Score: 2

      The *REAL* story here is how you manage to Email a pizza. That is news for nerds that REALLY matters.

    10. Re:Spinning even now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why not? They've been getting away with murder for literally decades. Jimmy Hoffa, JFK, JFK JR, the Muffin Man, and more have fallen before their murderous ways.

    11. Re:Spinning even now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes.

    12. Re:Spinning even now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Yeah, it's all fake! Just like these crazy accusations against our pious clergy!

      Remember to give on Sunday. Our defense fund is depleted again...

    13. Re:Spinning even now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      So in which category would you place Trump's new National Security Advisor when he tweets a link to pizzagate saying "U decide" and "MUST READ" (yes these are quotes). ? I'm not sure which one would be worse.

    14. Re:Spinning even now by OverlordQ · · Score: 1

      Then they're no better than the people who do believe it.

      --
      Your hair look like poop, Bob! - Wanker.
    15. Re:Spinning even now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Believe what, exactly?

      Most people don't believe there's been any proof that these guys are pedophiles, no, that's why people are investigating. Nobody has been calling for violence or to do illegal things, only to examine public records, as is the right of every person.

      Now, if you mean that people believe the (gone but archived) jimmycommet Instagram was super-creepy, then yes, yes they do. If they believe that Podesta had some weird emails, like the handkerchief with a pizza-related map (whatever THAT is), then yes, anyone can go and read it. If they believe that there was an email asking whether they'd play dominoes better on pizza or pasta, then yes, there's a weird email like that. This led a lot of people to believe they're talking in some sort of code, because it makes no sense whatsoever.

      Then along comes a group of stores, like Comet Ping Pong Pizza where someone matched an FBI doc of known pedophile logos to the businesses there. Then they find this pretty creepy Instagram tagging pictures of a kid with things like #chickenlover (slang for someone who likes young males) and they have lots of questions. Someone investigating this dies in Haiti, they have questions.

      Even in this story, all of them say he shot the gun. But we have witnesses saying otherwise on Twitter:
      https://web.archive.org/web/20161205044956/https://mobile.twitter.com/bayreef/status/805593857744310272

      So it's really not clear WTF is going on any more. If you want to kill this, go down the list of evidence and figure out the innocent explanations for it. Because yelling that some lone nutcase did something idiotic isn't going to help and it's not going to answer any questions.

    16. Re: Spinning even now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I live six blocks from comet pizza; my daughter was there a few weeks ago for a birthday party.

      Lulz - fucking hilarious

    17. Re:Spinning even now by youngone · · Score: 3, Insightful

      People who actually believe it are in the minority and are simpletons or mentally ill.

      Who can own guns in North Carolina apparently.

    18. Re:Spinning even now by MightyMartian · · Score: 2

      And you know these people on twitter were there how exactly?

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    19. Re:Spinning even now by dbreeze · · Score: 1, Informative

      Agreed AC. Normalcy bias is a real thing. "It is easier to deceive a person than to convince them they've been deceived."
      Consider some of these...
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

      http://www.missingkids.com/Key...
      "Of the more than 11,800 endangered runaways reported to NCMEC in 2015, one in five were likely victims of child sex trafficking. Of those, 74 percent were in the care of social services when they went missing. " ...absolutely damning statistic IMO...

      Anthony Weiner, Dennis Hastert, Terrence Bean( https://www.youtube.com/watch?... ) - 'nuf said...

      Here's a fairly reasoned and straightforward examination of the "pizzagate" evidence that has surfaced to date...
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

      For those of you familiar with the Corbett Report, he did an investigation into political pedophiles a year ago...
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

      There's certainly a fair bit of disinformation mixed into all this, but denying that there's a real problem with spiritually wicked people in high positions of power around the world and in the USA is just head in the sand stupid and lazy.

      I'm going to post this as a parent thread also so don't squall at me, do some damned research yourselves lest someone you love falls prey to these &#@#^%&'s

      --
      When the king heard the words of the Book of the Law he tore his robes.2Kings22:11
    20. Re:Spinning even now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are these people actually crazy, or just deeply stupid?

      My money is on deeply stupid. Same goes for the guy in the story here. It's not like he is talking to people who aren't there, or doing other actually-crazy things. He is just doing stupid things, like believing obviously-made-up theories that don't make sense and have no support, and taking justice into his own hands.

      I also believe that stupidity of this depth qualifies as criminal negligence. Our actions impact others, and since we can put others at risk we have an obligation (and, in my opinion, it should be a legal obligation) to keep our minds keen, so we don't become dangerous as this man has. People who demonstrate such criminal stupidity should be brought up on charges of intellectual negligence (and, in this guy's case, ALSO assault with a deadly weapon, etc.).

      Stupidity is NOT a victimless crime!

    21. Re:Spinning even now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      Sure, but how about Conservative Facebook users who believe it? Are they in the minority?

      I doubt it.

      Most of the publics skepticism for conspiracy theory was metaphorically decanted off as "conspiracy theory" after conspiracy theory was successively shown to be true during this election season and the last year in general, or else the world actually turned into a conspiracy theory all by itself. The media have spun, lied, covered up, and covered for to such a degree that no-one has any reliable institutional sources to turn to anymore.

      Many people relied on newspapers and anchormen to inform them on what the truth was. What happens to all these people now that the media has thrown its credibility onto the same bonfire as the rest of the political class? How do they discern fact from fiction in the age of increasingly egregious bullshit, from poll numbers to Propornot, finding their way onto the front page of the New York Times?

      Answer: They start reading the National Enquirer. And journalism has nobody to blame but itself.

    22. Re: Spinning even now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You want to know what I think? I think these faux stories are looking for this exact kind of reaction. This is just like south parks skank hunt storyline, keep pumping out shit until someone gets hurt. Imagine the level of fucked up you'd have to be to enjoy seeing your trolling incite actual violence. The 4chan collective have been doing this sort of shit, remember how they flooded epilepsy boards with flashing gifs to try and trigger seizures? Yea, that's the same kind of people who have taken their trolling to national and next, global levels. And the more you think about how bat shit this crap is, you start thinking conspiracy yourself. Because what's happening in this country is pretty fucking big. I'm almost at the conclusion that there could be a larger influence behind all of this. Sounds crazy but how else do you explain everything that's happening? People can't trust anything anymore.

    23. Re: Spinning even now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      stupidity=thoughtless

      pure action without disernment or thought a gomer pile you can not trust judgment. the real question is how far do you take this?

    24. Re:Spinning even now by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 1

      Given the Catholic Church and UK's little ring I'm going to hold off a bit on judgement.

    25. Re: Spinning even now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I strongly urge you to do your own research on pizza are. It isn't a conspiracy theory and Hilary Clinton's campaign has failed to respond to some very serious questions about their involvement.

    26. Re:Spinning even now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How do we know that this story is not fake?

    27. Re:Spinning even now by skids · · Score: 1

      People who actually believe it are in the minority and are simpletons or mentally ill.

      You mean, like this guy?

      http://www.businessinsider.com...

    28. Re:Spinning even now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why are you taking the time to write this tripe on slashdot? The average IQ here *should* be higher, at least a little bit, than your typical target on Facebook and reddit.

      You and your cohorts have ruined a complete stranger's business and in addition endangered the lives of the employees and customers by riling people up to actually show up in person. It's OK for you since you don't know the owner, the employees, or any of the customers who might get caught up in your trolling stunt. You may sing a different song when your actions catch up to you.

    29. Re:Spinning even now by rrohbeck · · Score: 1

      That sounds just like the "make up fake news to expose the stupidity of right wingers" by a couple of democratic guys that backfired badly by mobilizing the dumb masses.

    30. Re:Spinning even now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well the 'gunman' is a registered actor with an imdb page.
      Whos father works for a protect the children type place that has connections to the very people accused of being pedos...

      How much more obvious would you like a flase flag to be?

    31. Re:Spinning even now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's the fucking difference? If the only distinction between a loser who champions idiotic causes because they think it's funny versus an idiot who actually believes those things is the loser tells themselves they're just doing it "for the lulz", they're not any different in the real world. The imaginary causes you manufacture in your neurotic little head for shitty behavior don't matter one goddamn bit in the real world, acting like a shithead is still acting like a shithead.

    32. Re:Spinning even now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This guy believed in it. Trumps newest security advisor made mention of it in a tweet. Which is the simpleton and which is mentally ill?

    33. Re:Spinning even now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It'd be kinda weird for an attorney using their real name on Twitter and talking about Comet positively to want to lie about that, but that would by no means be the strangest thing seen so far. You can see from his Twitter that he strongly believes pizzagate is false: https://mobile.twitter.com/bayreef The most rational explanation would be that any gunfire happened when he wasn't there given that the police report came out and it says this guy shot a door, a wall and a computer before surrendering peacefully:

      https://www.scribd.com/document/333348331/Edgar-Welch-Criminal-Complaint-Comet-Ping-Pong

    34. Re:Spinning even now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How many people voted for Trump? They might be a minority, but it's a sizable one.

    35. Re:Spinning even now by Boronx · · Score: 3, Informative

      Your concept of "fairly reasoned and straightforward" is completely nuttery. Pictures of kids with pizza is not evidence.

    36. Re:Spinning even now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      running out of a fucking pizza place

      To be fair, it is a pizza place owned and run by David Brock's former gay lover, with artwork by Biljana Djurdjevic and the occasional satanist singer.

      No, not a worldwide pedophile ring, but pretty weird anyway.

    37. Re:Spinning even now by jrumney · · Score: 2

      but I've seen it in the media (mainstream and alt-right) as a serious story

      Perhaps your notion of mainstream is a little off there. Even Fox News don't seem to have covered this as anything other than a conspiracy theory.

    38. Re:Spinning even now by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      In other words, you cannot verify any of these tweets claiming the accused did not fire.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    39. Re:Spinning even now by Z80a · · Score: 3, Interesting

      There IS something weird on those emails.
      But people are jumping on too much conclusions or being pushed into too much conclusions.

      I bet its something boring like regular corruption.

    40. Re: Spinning even now by Jesus+H+Rolle · · Score: 1

      We Kant.

    41. Re:Spinning even now by Kjella · · Score: 4, Interesting

      People who actually believe it are in the minority and are simpletons or mentally ill.

      Sadly I know a guy who really full-on believes this... and that Roswell was real, 9/11 was faked and a bunch of other conspiracies. Wouldn't be surprised if he believes in chemtrails and owns a tin foil hat either. But he's pretty good with words and is neither retarded nor obviously crazy. It's like he's just decided the world is a sham, we're all puppets dancing according to some agenda and that warps his perception of everything else. It's like he's just waiting for Morpheus to show up and offer him the red pill. Even if you manage to push back and disprove one little bit of his ramblings it's like okay maybe that was wrong but the other 99.9% is still on.

      It reminds me of some of those otherwise seemingly functional people who've been in ordinary jobs but end up fixed on some crazy idea that a Nigerian prince is offering them money or that they have an online girlfriend they never met who totally loves them and totally lose it. Many of these don't fit the "simpletons or mentally ill" who could never hold down a job profile. I saw someone else here mention Ben Carson, brain surgeon but thinks ancient aliens built the pyramids. No matter how smart you are, you see what you want to see. You believe what you want to believe. Then you use your brains to wrap reality around your beliefs, not the other way around.

      That's how you end up with scientists with a religion full of facts science has refuted. It turns out people don't have to have one coherent set of thoughts. We actually live quite well doing a day job and believing in the first woman was made from a rib bone at the same time. It's just that for some the last kind of "facts" take over and consume them, to the point where they can't accept reality as reality anymore. Mainstream media (MSM) is fiction, my alt-news is reality. Mainstream medicine is fiction, my homeopathy is reality. And Internet is the greatest boon to alternate realitys ever, here they all meet to agree on how right they are. Most are pretty harmless though.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    42. Re: Spinning even now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Kids are not in the care of social services. The social services place kids in foster homes. That system is more or less effective in different counties depending on caliber of administrators and social workers. In any rate it would be a scandal if the social workers actually had something to do with the cases you mentioned... but most of the time, it's bad people doing bad things, preying on weak and vulnerable people. You care about kids? Then put up some money so they can be placed in a castle instead of someone's barn.

    43. Re:Spinning even now by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      You can't email deep dish though, only thin crust.

    44. Re:Spinning even now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some interesting post about pizzagate;
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IUGj5IhepMg

    45. Re:Spinning even now by serviscope_minor · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "Of the more than 11,800 endangered runaways reported to NCMEC in 2015, one in five were likely victims of child sex trafficking. Of those, 74 percent were in the care of social services when they went missing. " ...absolutely damning statistic IMO...

      Not really sure why that's damning. Social services generally only gets kids in the worst of circumstances, so almost all of the kids in the charge of social services will be messed up.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    46. Re:Spinning even now by worf_mo · · Score: 1

      It's a bit tricky to email a pizza, it depends on the physical size of your routers (hence the name "pizza box" for some equipment). But you can always simply fax a pizza! (from a German candid camera show)

    47. Re:Spinning even now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I honestly think you're wrong. I've recently wandered to this "Breitbart News" site, because everybody was talking about it, checked the comment section of an arbitrary thread, and there were plenty of users talking about pizzagate and certainly not in a way that indicated irony or that they don't believe in it. They were complaining that mainstream news sites do not report about it, suspecting a conspiracy.

    48. Re:Spinning even now by allcoolnameswheretak · · Score: 1

      People who actually believe it are in the minority and are simpletons or mentally ill.

      So basically, Trump supporters. Sounds legit.

    49. Re:Spinning even now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll call the phenomenon "pranksters brainwash", a phenomenon where a group of online friends joke about a theme for so long that people start believing it. Most often the initiators of the prank, the core group who joke with each other regularly are unaffected, while new people joining in tries to find a footing in the joke and often does not get entirely into the mentality of the core group, which in addition find newcomers to be amusing apprentices and lesser minds that can be messed with while they are in a receptive state because they want to reach the social circle of the core group.

    50. Re:Spinning even now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And that is why it is a good thing to visit the pizzeria, so you can match your imagination of reality with actual reality. Just don't bring a gun m'kay.

      I'd recommend you take a trip with him to Roswell. That you take on a trip with him to a construction site, and talk with a person with responsibility for the integrity of the building while showing you around. Most importantly make him test the effectiveness of tinfoil as a protective hat against electromagnetic waves, it's a scam!

      The exercise is not meant to debunk anything, but to go to the real world and compare it with the imaginary world. You can not find any definite truths anywhere, it is a matter of challenging the feeling the imagination is true. Reality where you can see people, smell, hear and feel is an effective way ;)

      Oh, and if you stumble on any real evidence, do tell me ;)

    51. Re:Spinning even now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      thank you for pointing this out. people in situations like that tend to lash out, use drugs, run away and do whatever they feel empowers them in their powerless situation.

    52. Re:Spinning even now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your wrong, your a liar, and the evidence already uncovered links to a direct pedophile ring, washington polititions, many of the worlds bankers, and hollywood. Go shill somewhere else. Pizzagate is probably the most real story about the corruption and satanism in years and the proof is out there already. Good luck shutting that down.

    53. Re:Spinning even now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This forums/slashdot is completely compromised with CTR agents. Good luck they will troll you out of existence look at all the fake 1 liners above you.

    54. Re:Spinning even now by gweihir · · Score: 1

      Jesus wept, this country is doomed.

      More like the whole planet. The level of stupidity some people can reach is staggering...

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    55. Re:Spinning even now by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 1

      I am curious because I spend a lot of time on many different news sites (including a significant number which are considered alt-right, and almost as many which are ctrl-left) and had never heard of this "pizza-gate" until the story about the gunman. Where exactly did you see the stories about this?

      The only stories I saw connecting Hillary to pedophilia were about Anthony Weiner or about Bill Clinton hanging out with Jeffrey Epstein (or both).

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    56. Re:Spinning even now by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 1

      Except of course that it was NOT a link to pizzagate. It was a link to a story about Anthony Weiner sexting a minor.

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    57. Re:Spinning even now by dywolf · · Score: 1

      oh bull.
      this is the same cognitive dissonance whereby the same trump supporters will say they support trump because "he tells it like it is", while at the same time telling critics "don't take him so literally".

      you cant have it both ways.

      --
      The guy who said the election was rigged won the presidency with the second-most votes.
    58. Re:Spinning even now by necro81 · · Score: 1

      People who actually believe it are in the minority and are simpletons or mentally ill.

      I wouldn't be so sure of that: there are plenty of intelligent and sane people that believe all manner of demonstrably false bullshit. Unfortunately they vote, too.

    59. Re:Spinning even now by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      Yeah, at this point it should be clear that this is false. Obviously, Hilary's child pr0n operation is somewhere else.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    60. Re:Spinning even now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      These works of fiction. What is the motive? Is it to remove free speech on line?

    61. Re:Spinning even now by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      It's a false flag operation to distract everyone from Donald Trump saying he wants to bang his daughter.

    62. Re:Spinning even now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's a massive pile of cobbled together ignorant illogical lump of shit..

      pretty much unverified self referential bunch of bollocks...

      anyone taking that for anywhere near reality is fucking insane....

    63. Re:Spinning even now by slack_justyb · · Score: 1

      People who actually believe it are in the minority and are simpletons or mentally ill.

      Yeah the problem with that, is even if that value is 1% or even 0.1%. That's a lot flipping people who suddenly have a reason to open fire on unsuspecting folks. That's not to say that they weren't already unhinged, it's just, why the heck do some feel the need to toss matches into lakes of gasoline? The lake of gasoline is bad enough as is, and yes most matches just get extinguished because they never hit a vapor before hitting the liquid. Still though, why rock the boat for the simple reason of f'ing with everyone? Where's the fun in it? I obviously will never understand 4chan.

    64. Re:Spinning even now by meta-monkey · · Score: 0

      Even Fox News don't seem to have covered this as anything other than a conspiracy theory.

      Actually the thing I find weird (from the media point of view that is...the whole thing is weird) is that they're wrapping it up in this "fake news" narrative. Pizzagate isn't fake news...it's a conspiracy theory. Nobody sat down and said "oh man we're gonna make up this thing about this weird pizza place!" People followed clues and made connections (which are likely just a perfect storm of confirmation bias) but conspiracy theories are different than "fake news."

      --
      We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
    65. Re:Spinning even now by meta-monkey · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Sure, but conspiracy theory after conspiracy theory keeps coming true. If 20 years ago you were rambling about government mind control experiments, the CIA letting crack into black neighborhoods and the government recording all your phone calls people would think you were crazy. All that stuff was true though.

      Doesn't mean this is true, of course. But I just think we're kind of past the point where one can say "lol conspiracy theory" and have that be an argument.

      --
      We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
    66. Re:Spinning even now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WTF is this- I must have been living in a hole.

      So after seeing this in the news I took a look at what the nuts were writing about it, and after filtering the screechy stuff out, this situation reminds me of how people, including me, were rolling their eyes when other "nuts" were claiming that Jimmy Savile was a pedo and the BBC was covering for him. Later it came to light that this wanker was raping anything that walked and some that couldn't.

      While there's no real evidence for this pizza thing, it reads like a replay of the Savile situation.

      I think I'm going to reserve judgement this time.

    67. Re:Spinning even now by budgenator · · Score: 0

      There is at least a degree of plausability as Bill Clinton flew on Jeffrey Epstein's “Lolita Express” at least 26 times, ditching his Secret Service detail for at least five of the flights, Supposedly Hillary Clinton went 6 times and Donald Trump at least once; after all the best trolls have a basis in fact, a healthy dose of implication and exaggeration to make the lie more palatable.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    68. Re:Spinning even now by dcollins117 · · Score: 1

      Where exactly did you see the stories about this?

      This obscure site here

    69. Re: Spinning even now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for your insight, random nutjob.

    70. Re:Spinning even now by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      The global alt-right used it as an anti-government tactic. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... Many conseravtive nutjobs saw the lack of scrutiny in many knighted child abusers as a government-protection of pedophiles. "proof" of this global conspiracy included pizzagate. I don't have any cites, as it was conspiracy theories in 2012 when the case against Jimmy started to break, and pizzagate was added to the "list" when the wikileaks released the pizza emails and the conspiracy theory started.

      But then, I'm outside the US, so the media coverage is much different. It was initially used to prove the UK government was corrupt (not sure how cheese pizza in the US is proof of Crown abuses), and was eventually covered as a proof that the anti-crown groups were simply insane.

      US media never carried the international aspect, and never covered the "large" number of knighted persons being investigated for child abuses. Seems the US is more interested in covering the supposed abuses by Hillary and Donald, both of which now tied to child abuse/CP, though only Donald with any evidence at all.

      The pizzagate was an expansion on the previous links through Weiner and Epstein. Covered in some circles more soon and assertively than others.

    71. Re:Spinning even now by admin7087 · · Score: 1

      Selection bias.

    72. Re:Spinning even now by Jawnn · · Score: 1

      People who actually believe it are in the minority and are simpletons or mentally ill.

      Hey. Stop putting the mentally ill and intellectually challenged in the deplorable basket with the willfully ignorant who believe ridiculous shit because it simply feels better than the truth.

    73. Re:Spinning even now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who can own guns in North Carolina apparently.

      Or they do police work in Norway.

      http://www.thelocal.no/20161130/norwegian-politician-charged-with-human-trafficking-in-massive-peadophilia-case

      Guess Norwegian police took this whole "Pizzagate" evidence too seriously and busted up some paedophile ring that was found implicated in the amateur sleuthing. Shucks, sucks for people like you and Pope Ratzo that get their jollies off that way. Hope some of your friends got caught.

      Let's keep calling it "Fake News" though.

    74. Re:Spinning even now by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 1

      So, the link you gave is to a story on slashdot about a story on Reddit about pizzagate. If I saw that story I did not bother to read it because it referenced Reddit, which I did not realize anyone thought was a news site. Next thing you will be telling me I should know all about something because 4chan has stories about it. I mean basically this whole pizzagate thing appears to me to be right up there with the SPLC inspired shooter from a few years ago. No one thought it was necessary to shutdown the SPLC because some guy tried to go on a shooting rampage because they called a group a "hate group".

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    75. Re:Spinning even now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No matter how hard we try, we can never get it through to people that they shouldn't give the non-custodial parent the whereabouts of the child. The caseworker is forbidden from doing so, but the other parent, grandma, aunts and uncles, all *know* that the non-custodial parent would never hurt their child.

      - a social services caseworker.

    76. Re:Spinning even now by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 1

      US media never carried the international aspect,

      As far as I can tell U.S. media never covered it at all.
      As to the evidence of child sexual abuse against Donald Trump, it was the testimony of a single individual who claimed that it happened when Trump spent some time at a facility owned by Jeffrey Epstein, a convicted pedophile (I believe the incident was alleged to have occurred on Epstein's plane, but I am not sure. There is only one record of Donald Trump flying on Epstein's plane, as opposed to Bill Clinton's 26 documented flights. I have seen no references to Trump spending any time at Epstein's island resort, while Bill Clinton has been there at least twice. The woman who made the allegations against Donald Trump has now withdrawn them.

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    77. Re:Spinning even now by Serge_Tomiko · · Score: 1

      Vox Day is probably the largest supporter. The Right Stuff has run a couple stories about it, and they have brought it up on the Daily Shoah, but not particularly seriously.

    78. Re:Spinning even now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not the Muffin Man! No! I knew him. Nice chap from Drury lane.

    79. Re:Spinning even now by LunaticTippy · · Score: 1

      You can email deep dish, just need to use strong compression.

      --
      Man, you really need that seminar!
    80. Re: Spinning even now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why, specifically, have you decided that I'm a nutjob?

      As I said, while I haven't seen any real evidence to support "Pizza-Gate" accusations, I have decided to look around and think for myself, instead of simply jumping upon either band-wagon while taking up pitchfork and torch against accused or accusers.

      You believe, then, that I should simply accept what other people say without examining the situation myself?

    81. Re:Spinning even now by aristotheron · · Score: 1

      This is just completely false.

      The pizzagate people do believe it. They see bizarre discourse coming from a context totally alien to them and it triggers their curiosity and suspicion. Those feelings mix with stories (that by consensus are true) about pedophilia in politics and they believe they have "solid evidence" because they are at best half-educated (so is 98% of everyone).

      Why is everyone so revved up to discredit people's intuition? Sure, they are mistaken in claiming they have proof, but intuition is the start of every discovery of truth.

      This is all beside the real point.
      We have no idea about any aspect of the people who govern us.
      We do not have democracy and we know it.
      We want to do something about it but we have no idea where to start working.

      Funny how the mainstream universally denounces any and all "commoners" who want to do something themselves about government reform. Not to mention how they treat any leader that would do something on the behalf of the common interest (Ron Paul or even Donald Trump are recent examples)

    82. Re: Spinning even now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I might add that what I have seen so far regarding Pizza-Gate allegations appears to be a cascade of weak correlations; having said that, however, I have had my fill of running along with whichever crowd is the loudest.

      As I grow older, I choose to examine what information is available in order to form my own opinions.

    83. Re:Spinning even now by sudon't · · Score: 1

      People who actually believe it are in the minority and are simpletons or mentally ill.

      Well yeah, 25% of the populace is a minority. Let's hope they limit their activism to yelling at the TV and radio. It's bad enough they vote without going out and conducting their own investigations.

      --
      -- sudon't

      Air-ride Equipped

    84. Re:Spinning even now by sudon't · · Score: 1

      People who actually believe it are in the minority

      Sure, but how about Conservative Facebook users who believe it? Are they in the minority?

      Yeah. It's about 25% populace, and a little less than half the voters. Feel better?

      --
      -- sudon't

      Air-ride Equipped

    85. Re:Spinning even now by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      The woman who made the allegations against Donald Trump has now withdrawn them.

      And his wife who claimed he hit her withdrew her claims as well.

      In both cases, the change of story came with a confidentially agreement and payout from Trump who said he only settles when guilty.

    86. Re:Spinning even now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's a massive pile of cobbled together ignorant illogical lump of shit..

      pretty much unverified self referential bunch of bollocks...

      anyone taking that for anywhere near reality is fucking insane....

      As were allegations against Savile 10 years back, Inspector Foyle.

    87. Re:Spinning even now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >If 20 years ago you were rambling about

      >government mind control experiments,

      Well known and openly discussed in the the mainstream media for 40+ years. Project MKUltra was officially sanctioned in 1953 and officially halted in 1973. The New York Times reported on government mind control programs at least as early as 1974. The congressional Church Committee and presidential Rockefeller Commission reports revealed more information about the programs in 1975. Richard Helms had tried to cover-up the existence of MKUltra, but mislabeled files were discovered following a FOIA request in 1977. These documents were fully investigated during Senate Hearings in 1977.

      >the CIA letting crack into black neighborhoods

      Well known and openly discussed in the mainstream media for 20+ years. Gary Webb began researching the CIA-Contra-LA Drug gang "Dark Alliance" in July 1995. The series was published in the Mercury News in three parts, from August 18–20, 1996, with one long article and one or two shorter articles appearing each day. Although Webb faced serious negative personal and professional fallout for his reporting, he was vindicated by a 1998 CIA Inspector General report, which revealed that for more than a decade the agency had covered up a business relationship it had with Nicaraguan drug dealers. Researchers and journalists still debate the details of Webb's reporting, but the fact that the CIA has funded and otherwise supported armed gangs in Latin America that are among the sources of the illegal drugs sold in US cities has been well established for two decades.

      >and the government recording all your phone calls

      While the latest, broadest, and most costly set of domestic mass surveillance programs by the NSA date to the aftermath of the 9/11/01 terrorist attacks, their roots are in programs from the 90s, which in turn had roots in cold war programs. NSA dragnet surveillance, including illegal surveillance of US citizens, was an open secret in the telcom and computer security industries throughout the 80s and 90s (find audio or video of old DEF CON presentations and there are plenty of "haha, just serious" hacker jokes about the NSA mass tapping American phone calls). James Bamford's The Puzzle Palace was published in 1982. By 1998, overarching NSA snooping was a part of the popular culture, with the film Enemy of the State opening at the #2 US Box office slot.

      While a handful of rich and powerful people certainly do like fucking the underage, there isn't any substantial published evidence of a large-scale US government pedophile "ring". This hasn't stopped underground Internet culture from being obsessed with the idea. Check out how popular the film Conspiracy of Silence is on any popular documentary movie message board.

    88. Re:Spinning even now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's a massive pile of cobbled together ignorant illogical lump of shit..

      pretty much unverified self referential bunch of bollocks...

      anyone taking that for anywhere near reality is fucking insane....

      Spoken like a true chip-chucker from Aldershot.

    89. Re: Spinning even now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, my first clue was multi-paragraph multiple posts to a single sentence retort. My own life experience is that a baying mob with a clear ulterior motive, no direct experience of, or any evidence whatsoever crying "witchcraft!" and demanding stake burnings are going to be wrong.

    90. Re:Spinning even now by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 1

      OK, so a couple of fringe sites that are the conservative equivalent of the DailyKos. The sites you mentioned did not influence the election. I think MAYBE I have heard of The Right Stuff. The other two, not at all.

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    91. Re:Spinning even now by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 1

      You missed the point. There is as much or more evidence linking Clinton to pedophilia as there is linking Trump.

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    92. Re:Spinning even now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So after seeing this in the news I took a look at what the nuts were writing about it, and after filtering the screechy stuff out, this situation reminds me of how people, including me, were rolling their eyes when other "nuts" were claiming that Jimmy Savile was a pedo and the BBC was covering for him.

      First, Pizzagate is all screechy stuff.

      Second, it's nothing like the case of Savile, except in the sense that you were wrong about both.

    93. Re:Spinning even now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Roswell was real. There just weren't any aliens. There was a "weather balloon" that was really part of a high alititude system used to triangulate the position of any atomic bomb tests. They floated them in an area of the atmoosphere that traps sound waves and with only 3 mics could pinpoint anywhere on earth an atomic bomb had been detonated.

      Given what they were really doing, the cover up seems necessary. That seems to rarely be the case nowadays though.

    94. Re:Spinning even now by jez9999 · · Score: 1

      Why is everyone who entertains the idea that Pizzagate is true a "psycho"? You guys should realize that you have been conditioned to dismiss people whom the mainstream media are telling you to dismiss. It's perfectly reasonable to entertain ideas, even outlandish ones, rather than dismissing them out of hand presumably because it's less mentally stressful for you to do so.

    95. Re:Spinning even now by jwhitener · · Score: 1

      People who actually believe it are in the minority

      That is an assumption. You overestimate the intelligence of the US public I think.

  3. Fake News? by cirby · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    People really seemed to like it before Jon Stewart went off the air...

    1. Re:Fake News? by MightyMartian · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Maybe possibly some people know what satire is...

      This is like defending some armed fucking nutjob because of Onion articles.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    2. Re:Fake News? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Alt-reich fags on 4chan and reddit turned it up a notch. Not so funny anymore.

    3. Re:Fake News? by Gussington · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You mean Jon Stewart the comedian? Because I don't know of any Jon Stewart the journalist...
      The funny part is that the Daily show often contained more news than the actual news
      And at least the Daily Show is sometimes funny. Right wing fake news is always angry. I wonder why that is?

    4. Re:Fake News? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In fact, people still enjoy comedy.

      But this article is reporting about one particular consequence of fake news--not comedy. Fake news that was designed to deceive people, with the intention of discrediting a political candidate because the facts were insufficient to discredit her.

      If the perpetrators of the "pizzagate" story had made it clear from the beginning that the story was fictitious and was not intended to be taken seriously, then it would be fair to compare it with an unfunny version of The Onion. In order for a comparison with Jon Stewart to be apt, they would have to instead tell a series of jokes and puns about the *real* news.

    5. Re:Fake News? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      People really seemed to like it before Jon Stewart went off the air...

      If you have an example of one of Jon Stewart's segments being based on a fake story, I invite you to share it with us here.

      Otherwise, you can go directly to fuck yourself.

      In the Crossfire episode that pretty much sealed Jon Stewart's reputation as a political commentator as well as satirist, he himself referred to the Daily Show as a 'fake news show'. Poe's Law would seem to apply here. Or something. In any case, you need to thicken your skin. The reason Stewart's humour endures is precisely because he didn't take himself too seriously. You should consider following his example.

    6. Re: Fake News? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      true he made what was in the news funny with a libral bend. colbert the same with a republic/conservitive? bend.

    7. Re:Fake News? by PopeRatzo · · Score: 0, Troll

      Right wing fake news is always angry. I wonder why that is?

      If you were one of those dipshits, you'd be angry too. What kind of lives could they possibly have?

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    8. Re: Fake News? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      im a news buff and even outside mainstream sources. his show was usually old news.

    9. Re:Fake News? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Stewart i thought, referred to the Daily Show as a fake 'news show' not a 'fake news' show.
      Get it?

    10. Re:Fake News? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We're not angry anymore.
      Executive
      House
      Senate
      and soon the Supreme Court.

      Have a Merry Christmas!

    11. Re:Fake News? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually Jon Stewart was the lead in a COMEDY SHOW, something Trumpies should appreciate given their newly elected "leadership" lol.

      It's funny how a COMEDY SHOW would be their attack point for "fake news" though, given... you know. Fox, Breitbart. (ACTUALLY FAKE NEWS)

    12. Re: Fake News? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This says it all right here.

      I can't have my way so I'll wahhhhhhhh until the people I want in charge are in charge. Regardless of how shitty of a job they do, they are MY people.

      Go fucking die somewhere.

    13. Re: Fake News? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Preferably in a fucking fire, you right wing asshole

    14. Re:Fake News? by sexconker · · Score: 1, Troll

      And at least the Daily Show is sometimes funny.

      You lost me there.

    15. Re:Fake News? by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      So you're one of those people who is gullible and believes Jon Stewart's fake news?

      Don't be so hostile about it.

    16. Re: Fake News? by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      So angry, they are.

      He's all of our President in late January.

      Elections have consequences. I remember a community organizer saying that.

    17. Re:Fake News? by Ryanrule · · Score: 1

      /downvote

    18. Re: Fake News? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Colbert did the same not with a Republican/conservative slant, but while satirizing conservatives.

    19. Re: Fake News? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Same thing. They usually cant recognize satire. I'd point to an example, but I can't think with out pizza and the local place hasn't been open recently...

    20. Re: Fake News? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you guys actually read the emails? They're pretty wacky. I certainly wouldn't let them baby sit my goat or anything.

    21. Re:Fake News? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When still nobody cares about you and the world shits all over you.
      You'll have to either be angry at your guys. Or they'll have to convince you it's still Obama's fault.

      If by chance america becomes a utopia then I guess jokes on me and I'll just trot off to my new job that's better than my already good job or whatever the fuck.

    22. Re:Fake News? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, You Have it all.
      Now it is time to deliver the Pizza.
      We will see how the it Obama's fault works in 2 years.

    23. Re:Fake News? by king+neckbeard · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The problem is that Jon Stewart was literally the most trusted name in news despite being a comedic take on current events. If that's the best the fourth estate has, of course democracy is going to fail.

      --
      This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    24. Re:Fake News? by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 2
      It's because leftists made up their own fake news as a false flag attack. Oh, and money. They make good money doing it.

      "The whole idea from the start was to build a site that could kind of infiltrate the echo chambers of the alt-right, publish blatantly fictional stories and then be able to publicly denounce those stories and point out the fact that they were fiction," Coler says.

      And as the stories spread, Coler makes money from the ads on his websites. He wouldn't give exact figures, but he says stories about other fake news proprietors making between $10,000 and $30,000 a month apply to him.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    25. Re:Fake News? by EzInKy · · Score: 0, Troll

      Right wing fake news is always angry. I wonder why that is?

      There once existed a species of hominids known as Neanderthals that stubbornly resisted change. Unfortunately some of their genes persist even to this day.

      --
      Time is what keeps everything from happening all at once.
    26. Re:Fake News? by Jack9 · · Score: 1

      Tech Dirt is not a news outlet. Tech Dirt is a self-proclaimed rumor mill.

      --

      Often wrong but never in doubt.
      I am Jack9.
      Everyone knows me.
    27. Re:Fake News? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So you're one of those people who is gullible and believes Jon Stewart's fake news?

      Don't be so hostile about it.

      Jon Stewart took clips of actual news and commented on them. You may not like his comments, but the clips were quite real. Now if your big argument against the left is you can't trust comedy central for your news source, then congratulations for stating the obvious. If your trusting any one source for your news, well that would be bad, let alone a comedy channel. CNN, NBC,ABC,CBS, NPR, CSPAN, many newspapers, and various others are generally not fake. (I know someone will say NPR is, but please provide some non anecdotal proof.)

      Now what really scares the crap out of me is mainstream republicans refuse to call Don the Con out on his lies. Hell the speaker of the house refused to denounce trump's made of crap about millions of fraudulent votes, and there wasn't proof for a single one. That is the leader of the republican party continuing to just lie his arse off. He has frequently retweeted and used fake news. The sewage begins at the top. If the best you can bitch about is a comedy channel having a comedian on with a political opinion, well get over it and clean up your own party.

      The lies spread by the right, and well just people wanting to make money off stupid peoples clicks are going to get people killed, and those deaths will be on Trump's soul. The Pizzagate crap almost did.

      We should not be talking about being in a post truth world. Every politician who has ever retweeted, supported, or refused to denounce a fake story needs to be fired at the earliest possible time. No exceptions. No excuses.

      Truth before party before everything. Everything else is likely to end in tears.

    28. Re: Fake News? by Sartr · · Score: 1

      Those goddamn fucking pieces of fucking shit are always so fucking angry! Damn it!

    29. Re:Fake News? by SirSlud · · Score: 2

      Fake "news show" not "fake news" show.

      Good lord, man. Take 30 seconds to think before you write something.

      --
      "Old man yells at systemd"
    30. Re: Fake News? by dbIII · · Score: 4, Insightful

      will be deported because they aren't white, despite BEING citizens, just goes to show how fucking stupid they can be too.

      They believed one of Trumps tweets about removing citizenship from people.

      Yes it is fucking stupid to believe something Trump has written but he's getting into a position where some of the stuff he writes is going to have to be taken seriously no matter how stupid it is.

    31. Re:Fake News? by ArhcAngel · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I repeatedly have to remind a select group of friends when they send me sensationalist stories from The Onion that those stories are satire and not real. Their response to them is as funny as the posts themselves but extremely scary at the same time. For stories they send me from other sites I'm not familiar with I do a search for a reputable source with the same information. If I can't find any I tell them not to believe that site either. It's a constant whack-a-mole scenario. The average person just isn't that discerning.

      --
      "A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky dangerous animals and you know it." - K
    32. Re: Fake News? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Elections have consequences. I remember a community organizer saying that.

      And apparently one of the choices for consequences is spending four years with incessant obstruction. You know, just like we learned from the GOP.

      Don't you just love it?

    33. Re:Fake News? by mattack2 · · Score: 1

      But The Daily Show (and "The Colbert Report") pointed out hypocrisy of politicians on both sides, by showing video clips of them saying one thing and doing another, or flip-flopping (and claiming they weren't flip-flopping, or giving no reasonable reason for them having done so -- yes, of course there are good reasons someone can change their mind, but to do so and claim you haven't is wrong).

    34. Re:Fake News? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "people wanting to make money off stupid peoples clicks are going to get people killed"
      "lighten up Francis" What's going to kill people are those whose candidate lost so they want to tear down the system to undo the election. The same people who have no understanding of the checks and balances built into the government. Trump is different and the US needs different right now. His biggest accomplishment today is side lining the entrenched Democrats and Republicans. All the wealthy donors who funneled billions of dollars to their chosen candidate lost their money and with it the lever used to get a candidate to support their agenda. Clinton was a text book definition of a bought and paid for politician. People who donate millions of dollars in their candidates campaign expect a ROI.

      The least we can do is wait until he officially takes over and starts turning campaign rhetoric into real life action.

    35. Re:Fake News? by skids · · Score: 1

      You will be soon, when Trump betrays you.

    36. Re:Fake News? by king+neckbeard · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Yes, and that alone made Stewart legitimately the most trusted name in news. He even took Ron Paul and Bernie Sanders seriously when MSM was treating them like, as Stewart put it, the "13th Floor In A Hotel."

      I'm not going to knock Jon Stewart, he did an excellent job. But he was a comedian who was less of a joke than the rest of the news. That is what our problem is.

      --
      This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    37. Re:Fake News? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Trump is different and the US needs different right now.

      Trump lied and manipulated his way into the most powerful position in the world in ways undreamed of before him, at least in America. He has paved the way for people much worse than him. I will _never_ forgive him for how he won. The racism and lies were breathtaking.

      Truth must be the one thing that is never lost, especially not to this degree, for unless we get it back, well the whole arc of history thing is seriously unlikely to bend towards justice.

      If he wants to do one thing to improve his presidency, he needs to stop lying.

    38. Re: Fake News? by DaHat · · Score: 1

      Not at all. Colbert at least understood the role he was trying to play and came off as funny to many on both sides. Stewart was just so reflexive that he thought that he as a progressive, playing the part of an unabashed progressive would be funny to all... he wasn't.

      I haven't given the new guy much of a shot yet, but did recently watch the Tomi Lahren interview (my first time actually seeing/hearing) her speak... where she utterly mopped the floor with him, something I think he even knew in the end.

    39. Re: Fake News? by DaHat · · Score: 1

      You must have missed the Bush years when the Dems did much the same.

      I wonder then where the GOP got the idea from... or filibustering supreme court nominees. No, not a Dem idea at all.

      Now thanks to Reid largely getting rid of the filibuster, the GOP is poised to teach a lesson to the dems which will resonate for a generation.

      I'm no Trump fan, but the tears from the left over the last few weeks have been delicious... so it must be asked: how do you like them apples?

    40. Re:Fake News? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stewart i thought, referred to the Daily Show as a fake 'news show' not a 'fake news' show.
      Get it?

      Behold the power of the hyphen: fake news-show vs. fake-news show.

      Without a hyphen, we don't know whether a 'high school building' is a building that's a high-school, or a school-building that has many floors.

    41. Re:Fake News? by Aristos+Mazer · · Score: 4, Informative
      Your parentheses are in the wrong place. He described his show as a

      fake (news show)

      NOT a

      (fake news) show

      Big difference.

    42. Re:Fake News? by Boronx · · Score: 1

      There's a difference between making fun of the news, and trying to convince stupid people of bullshit for the lulz.

    43. Re:Fake News? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You got Insightful, but I wish there was a lever for Insightfully Sad and Frightening.

    44. Re: Fake News? by EmeraldBot · · Score: 1

      You must have missed the Bush years when the Dems did much the same.

      I wonder then where the GOP got the idea from... or filibustering supreme court nominees. No, not a Dem idea at all.

      Now thanks to Reid largely getting rid of the filibuster, the GOP is poised to teach a lesson to the dems which will resonate for a generation.

      I'm no Trump fan, but the tears from the left over the last few weeks have been delicious... so it must be asked: how do you like them apples?

      Resonate for a generation, sure. It's interesting to note how many of the Republican's policies - cutting social security, cutting climate protection, and trying to restrain social progress - offload all of their burdens to younger people. They tend to tell these kids, "we'll give you job oppurtunities, we'll save you taxes, anything's possible" - and then proceed to say, well, we'll be dead before climate change starts to seriously fuck us up, so no problem - pad my profits. Yeah, we know we're leaving younger people with no safety net - but hell and damnation if it's my social security that's being challenged. Yeah, we know younger people overwhelmingly support gay rights, we know they overwhelmingly support abortion rights, but they're just starting to be able to vote, so no, we'll try to plant our view in law and proceed to gerrymander districts so it's effectively unchangeable. Oh, and if the Constitution, which specifies that no religion is supposed to affect our law making process, gets in the way, then we'll ignore that part too. Hardcore Evengalical christianity isn't supposed to be a religion, it's the religion, and this process is the very kind of thing the Consitiution and the founding fathers wanted to prevent.

      Furthermore, I don't think we've ever a generation that was so hated by their parents, nor one that had to face roadblocks being placed in at every step of the way decades in advance. Add to that all of our other issues, such as the competition for something as basic as a job (any job, really), and I think we're setting up our kids to grow up in one hell of a stressful environment. It's no suprise, really, that depression and suicide rates are so high - I'm not sure I'd be able to face that, and I sure as hell know that you wouldn't if you feel that insecure that you have to gloat on Slashdot about "delicious tears".

      See you in four years - I fully expect you to own that vote, along with all the consequences that come with it - and that these consequences don't affect your age group isn't an excuse.

      --
      "Set a man a fire, he'll be warm for the rest of the night. Set a man afire, he'll be warm for the rest of his life."
    45. Re:Fake News? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is a whole group of people who think differently to you, and who you therefore demonize as being stupid.

      Now you're doing the same with the victims who your people killed off in a total genocide.

      You Nazi fuck.

    46. Re:Fake News? by mi · · Score: 1

      I repeatedly have to remind a select group of friends when they send me sensationalist stories from The Onion that those stories are satire and not real.

      What's even scarier is when a seemingly professional "fact-checker" decides to "debunk" satirical articles.

      --
      In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    47. Re: Fake News? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      SOME of the stuff yes, but its impossible for US citizenship to be stripped by anyone. It doesn't take a genius to know that, but hey the news will report that people have 'genuine concerns' rather than 'Trump makes another stupid statement, idiots panic.'...but hey a right-wing conspiracy nutbull does things a nutball does & its an example of how Trump is promoting racism/sexism/idiots etc., etc.

    48. Re:Fake News? by EzInKy · · Score: 1


      There is a whole group of people who think differently to you, and who you therefore demonize as being stupid.

      I said they were stubborn, not stupid.


      Now you're doing the same with the victims who your people killed off in a total genocide.

      Since Neanderthal genes survive in us today, they were more likely bred out, not killed off.


      You Nazi fuck.

      Wrong again, I'm a social libertarian.

      --
      Time is what keeps everything from happening all at once.
    49. Re:Fake News? by Gussington · · Score: 1

      Tech Dirt is not a news outlet. Tech Dirt is a self-proclaimed rumor mill.

      Right, so nothing they say can possibly be true, despite references to different studies from University of Pennsylvania, Pew Research and University of Delaware?
      This is exactly the issue that causes Fake news. You choose to believe something based on who says it, rather than the actual content being said.

    50. Re: Fake News? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I haven't given the new guy much of a shot yet, but did recently watch the Tomi Lahren interview (my first time actually seeing/hearing) her speak... where she utterly mopped the floor with him, something I think he even knew in the end.

      That's funny, everyone else says the opposite. Why do you think that's what happened when nobody else does?

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    51. Re:Fake News? by bazorg · · Score: 1

      In this case, the hyphen is replaced by a live studio audience laughing really loud. Maybe that's what Facebook needs.

    52. Re:Fake News? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To be fair, Jon Stewart didn't really purvey fake news per se; at least not in total. He showed real events (video of politicians making asses of themselves - they do that a lot BTW, etc.). He then gave it a satirical and humorous take. Sure, a quote or two taken out of context may have been common. Sometimes you have to laugh to take the pain away. Sort of like when you saw Ted Stevens saying that the internet is not like a big truck and is, instead, a series of tubes. Yep, criminal bridge to nowhere Ted did say that. The gag that the Daily Show made up showing porn, gambling, etc. filling up the tubes and blocking them up was, of course, a gag. But the news that spawned that gag - absolutely real.

    53. Re:Fake News? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok, I'll bite. What kind of news takes place on a (Fake) News Show? You say there is a big difference, so you seem to be indicating that it would have real news. If it has real news, then how if the show "fake"?

      I that it's a Real News show that doesn't claim to be unbiased or have the same gravitas or serious attitude of a typical news show. But that doesn't make it "fake".

      So really, it was a funny statement that was completely false

    54. Re:Fake News? by swillden · · Score: 1

      Right wing fake news is always angry. I wonder why that is?

      Because angry memes are more effective at spreading: https://youtu.be/rE3j_RHkqJc

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    55. Re:Fake News? by dywolf · · Score: 1

      man with good intentions gets corrupted by money.
      news at 11.

      and that still doesn't stop the core problem, which wasn't that he decided to keep doing it for the $$$, but that the idiots who read it still kept believing it.

      --
      The guy who said the election was rigged won the presidency with the second-most votes.
    56. Re: Fake News? by jeff4747 · · Score: 1

      You must have missed the Bush years when the Dems did much the same.

      Could you cite anything the Democrats alone blocked during W's term? The big efforts that got stopped, like ending Social Security and Harriet Miers nomination, were opposed by some Republicans in Congress too. Other things were only blocked temporarily, and events like the "Gang of 14" unblocked them.

      One of the problems in our two party system is one party has a spine, the other doesn't.

    57. Re: Fake News? by jeff4747 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Furthermore, I don't think we've ever a generation that was so hated by their parents, nor one that had to face roadblocks being placed in at every step of the way decades in advance.

      Grandparents, not parents.

      Millennials are large enough to challenge the political power of the Baby Boomers. The Boomers, having utterly dominated politics and been the focus of the vast majority of marketing for their entire lives, are not taking this transition well.

      Normally each subsequent generation is larger than the previous, so the power transition is more gradual and less shocking to those being replaced. For example, GenX's political and social beliefs are between the Boomers and Millennials. But GenX is too small to displace the Boomers so the Boomers retained power.

      The big gulf between the generation losing power and the generation gaining power has created a lot of acrimony, especially because the side losing power can't do anything about it. Their loss of power is as inevitable as death, mostly because death is the primary cause of it. So they rage, lash out, and abuse while they still can. But soon they won't have the influence to do so. And they know it.

    58. Re:Fake News? by Jack9 · · Score: 1

      > Right, so nothing they say can possibly be true

      I did not say that and that's not the point.

      > This is exactly the issue that causes Fake news.

      No, it is not and I don't think you understand the nature of the problem with Fake news. Believing every news source to be equal is the problem.

      > You choose to believe something based on who says it

      Tech Dirt has the journalistic integrity of Facebook, I don't need to "check it out" to treat it as such.

      --

      Often wrong but never in doubt.
      I am Jack9.
      Everyone knows me.
    59. Re:Fake News? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you read the rest of that article, he says they tried to do the same for the left but it never took. The sad truth is the right is composed mostly of gullible idiots because the ruling part of the right wanted it that way. Stupid people are easy to control. But they took it too far, lost control, and now they idiots are running the asylum. They forgot the cardinal rule that you MUST keep the masses placated or they revolt. It's a risk we run as we continue to ramp up automation but deny that there won't be enough jobs for everyone.

    60. Re:Fake News? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We're not angry anymore. Executive House Senate and soon the Supreme Court.

      Have a Merry Christmas!

      The funny thing is, from what I've seen you're still angry.

    61. Re:Fake News? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your logic sucks. The show satirized news shows and was a fake news show. Just cause it was mocking non-fake news shows does not mean the news it presented was not legitimate. But thanks for trying to compare your crazy conspiracy theories to a half way decent satire.

    62. Re:Fake News? by Quirkz · · Score: 2

      there are good reasons someone can change their mind, but to do so and claim you haven't is wrong).

      If I learned anything from the Bush-Kerry election, it's that to change your mind for any reason, even a good one, is also wrong.

    63. Re:Fake News? by budgenator · · Score: 1

      Onion articles are at least original and creative, most of the "alt-right" and the left counter parts like "Occupy" whatever just cut and paste crap from other sites. I honestly believe that none of them are any more than clickbait, none of the publishers have any emotional investment in the espoused ideology and the only way to throttle them is to dry up their revenue stream.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    64. Re:Fake News? by budgenator · · Score: 1

      I always suspected these guys were a combination of sleezy porn pedaller and predatory mortgage banker, your link just confirms it.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    65. Re:Fake News? by rahvin112 · · Score: 1

      These stories were carried as factual articles in right alt-right blogsphere and their major publications.

    66. Re:Fake News? by sudon't · · Score: 1

      Maybe possibly some people know what satire is...

      This is like defending some armed fucking nutjob because of Onion articles.

      You don't understand. When he mentions John Stewart, he's been taught that all fact-based reporting is fake news, a.k.a., The Liberal Media. These people live in a kind of backwards-world, where well-informed people are stupid, Trump and his family are "classy", the Clintons are monsters capable of anything, and facts are liberal propaganda. So, haha, the Daily Show = fake news. That's why they can take an obvious troll story seriously. Their entire news diet is essentially trollery. And, that they could take this obvious nonsense seriously is what took everyone by surprise.

      --
      -- sudon't

      Air-ride Equipped

    67. Re:Fake News? by Gussington · · Score: 1

      No, it is not and I don't think you understand the nature of the problem with Fake news. Believing every news source to be equal is the problem.

      No, that is what causes fake news to work in the first place. You think your source is always right and mine is wrong so don't apply your brain.
      You should treat all sources with equal cynicism. This is what critical thinking is, evaluating information based on the evidence, not the simply who is saying it.

      Tech Dirt has the journalistic integrity of Facebook, I don't need to "check it out" to treat it as such.

      And this is why fake news is so popular. People like you refuse to listen to views that don't already agree with your own.
      As stated, the link references research from three independent studies, all cited, but that seems to count for nothing unless shares your pre-existing views.

    68. Re: Fake News? by Gussington · · Score: 1

      But GenX is too small to displace the Boomers so the Boomers retained power.

      The big gulf between the generation losing power and the generation gaining power has created a lot of acrimony, especially because the side losing power can't do anything about it.

      This post makes no sense and makes all sorts of ridiculous assumptions. For one there is no defined boundary such as "a generation", there are merely approximations mostly based around the large population anomaly caused by WW2. Any other attempt to define people by generation is pointless.
      Old people have always complained about young people. Nothing is new here.

    69. Re:Fake News? by Jack9 · · Score: 1

      > You think your source is always right and mine is wrong so don't apply your brain.

      That's not what I said. Always right or wrong is nonsensical.
      Truth is subtle and the narrative can connect facts that aren't connected, so there's a question of why you would risk being manipulated by a source who formally states a lack of factual integrity. If you are tempted to claim "I can decide for myself", you are missing the point...you can be manipulated despite your best efforts.

      Once a source has shown to disregard basic standards of proof, there are other sources. Circle round if you find another. Shouldn't there be someone else who cites those studies outside of Tech Dirt?

      > Believing every news source to be equal is the problem.
      > No, that is what causes fake news to work in the first place

      You restated my assertion, while saying "no", as if it's a disagreement. Not believing something is the default position (skepticism).
      I feel like you're just too wound up now to be rational in an attempt to "win" something so good luck convincing someone else.

      --

      Often wrong but never in doubt.
      I am Jack9.
      Everyone knows me.
    70. Re:Fake News? by Gussington · · Score: 1

      I feel like you're just too wound up now to be rational in an attempt to "win" something so good luck convincing someone else.

      Interesting that you 'feel' something somehow, and just go with that. Not very rational.
      The fact remains, the link I posted has cited research from multiple universities. You chose to ignore the actual information and attack the messenger.

    71. Re:Fake News? by cwsumner · · Score: 1

      "Satire" is what people say when they get caught planting fake stories.

      It is not possible to use actual satire on the internet. Without the body language and face-to-face interaction, no one can tell if you are a doing satire, are a nutcase or have something startling but true.

      And for those that don't know it, the internet is -not- really anonymous!

    72. Re: Fake News? by jeff4747 · · Score: 1

      Old people have always complained about young people. Nothing is new here.

      The difference here is the old people actually have the political power to do something about it.

      Move back a few generations. The "old" generation had children, forming the "middle" generation. Time passes, and the "middle" generation takes political an economic power because it is larger than the "old" one. The "middle" generation has children. The "Old people" complain about this new generation. But they lack the political and economic power to really fuck them over. Because the "middle" generation outnumbers the "old" generation.

    73. Re: Fake News? by Gussington · · Score: 1

      The difference here is the old people actually have the political power to do something about it.

      Old people have always been in power. Take a look at all the presidents, congresspeople, generals, CEO's, and other leaders over time. All old, all of the time.

      Move back a few generations. The "old" generation had children, forming the "middle" generation. Time passes, and the "middle" generation takes political an economic power because it is larger than the "old" one.

      It has nothing to do with size. Leadership skills generally take decades to develop, so leaders are always in the 45-65 age range (give or take). It has always been this way, because advanced skills take a long time to accumulate.

      The "middle" generation has children. The "Old people" complain about this new generation. But they lack the political and economic power to really fuck them over. Because the "middle" generation outnumbers the "old" generation.

      Apart from everyone in political power being old you mean? You might want to check the age of the last two presidential candidates and tell me how this middle generation are supposedly taking over?

    74. Re: Fake News? by jeff4747 · · Score: 1

      Old people have always been in power. Take a look at all the presidents, congresspeople, generals, CEO's, and other leaders over time. All old, all of the time.

      Take a look at the people who put the elected ones there. They aren't shouting "get off my lawn!". Until now.

      It has nothing to do with size. Leadership skills generally take decades to develop, so leaders are always in the 45-65 age range

      You should probably actually open a history book before making that absurd claim.

      Apart from everyone in political power being old you mean?

      Again, a very large group of people put them in political power. They respond to that large group of people in order to retain power.

    75. Re: Fake News? by Gussington · · Score: 1

      Take a look at the people who put the elected ones there. They aren't shouting "get off my lawn!". Until now.

      Of course they are. Maybe you are just young, but nothing here is new. Do you think Lincoln was the establishment candidate? Or Caeser? Khan? Same as it always was, or do you genuinely think history just so happens to have shifted at the same time as you've matured as a person? Do you also think music was the best ever when you were between the ages of 14-24? And young kids these days aren't like when you were young?
      You are a robot playing that same old script that has been playing for millennia. "No but this time it's different". No it isn't, in 30 years we'll have this exact same conversation.

  4. Nah! by MightyMartian · · Score: 4, Funny

    No one on Slashdot would ever promote right wing conspiracy theories! How absurd...

    --
    The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    1. Re:Nah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's what you libruls WANT us to think!

    2. Re:Nah! by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      No one on Slashdot would ever promote right wing conspiracy theories! How absurd...

      As an experiment let's start GoatGate: Facetweet that goat.se is really a QR-Code to get access info to a Roswell warehouse where Obama stores saucers to be launched to collect all guns.

      I can just imagine all the suckers trying to scan that image with their phone at gun parties.

      (Warning: if you don't know what I'm talking about, google with browser images switched off. Trust me.)

    3. Re:Nah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OH NOEZ NOT GOATSE!

      Anyone who is still shocked by, let alone unfamiliar with, the picture(s) of that guy's worn out asshole is a pansy. Rotten.com is almost 20 years old for fuck sake.

      Fecal Japan, Asians eating dogs/children, (stop me when I mention one that's new to you) tubgirl, cherrycake, lemonparty, dickbird, motorcycle, meatspin, Mr. Hands, and yes goatse, are all dull ancient history. So are all the other gore sites like ogrish, bangedup and snuffx. Even 2 girls 1 cup, 1 guy 1 jar, the BME pain olympics and all the beheading videos (the ones that actually showed the sawing -- 5+ minutes of it, as opposed to the tame before and after propaganda bullshit from daesh) are pretty tired to anybody who's been on the internet for more than 5 years. All the "terrifying horrifying frightening nightmare fuel" from the past 5 years, as described by all the faggy hipsters and children these days, simply cannot compare. Maybe red rooms on the deepdarkwebnetwhatever. Maybe. If they even exist outside of myths. Far too many myths to give then any credence though...

      The age of the goatse pictures also wouldn't fit with the elaborate theories conspiracy theorists put together.
      They existed long before Obama was a twinkle in the left's conscious eye. Back when the left wasn't insane.

      Those were the days... try the 'member berries.

    4. Re:Nah! by Calydor · · Score: 2

      I am always concerned when I see the term "goatse" in a post that also includes the words "Trust me."

      --
      -=This sig has nothing to do with my comment. Move along now=-
    5. Re:Nah! by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Why is it I feel like I just lost a slashdot debate, without having any clue as to what the debate was about.

    6. Re:Nah! by budgenator · · Score: 1

      Sadly my favorite, Bonsai_Kitten is no more!

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
  5. But bringing an assault rifle??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    geez... you're going in to self investigate and bring an assault rifle? Why not just go in and order a pizza and have a look around. He's lucky some stressed out cops didn't just gun him down. What an idiot.

    1. Re:But bringing an assault rifle??? by PopeRatzo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      He's lucky some stressed out cops didn't just gun him down.

      He had whiteness to protect him.

      If this guy had been black, the pizza parlor would have been nuked from space.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    2. Re:But bringing an assault rifle??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like a honeypot or bait-car. Hey, at least there's one less wacko on the streets.

    3. Re:But bringing an assault rifle??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wait...the pizza parlor was in space?!
      Whoa.

    4. Re:But bringing an assault rifle??? by AK+Marc · · Score: 0

      He's lucky some stressed out cops didn't just gun him down.

      He's white.

    5. Re:But bringing an assault rifle??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If this guy had been black, the pizza parlor would have been nuked from space.

      And you were the one complaining about right wing conspiracy theories.

    6. Re:But bringing an assault rifle??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He was a failed actor turned crisis actor.

      Dec 2nd: CPP hires security
      Dec 3rd: traffic camera facing CPP is turned away fromCPP for no apparent reason (who turns traffic cameras?)
      Dec 4th: guy with a rifle walks in to "investigate"

      If he wanted to investigate, he would have gone in with just a concealed pistol, or hidden the long gun in a bag or something. No--this was, in fact, a false flag to drum up sympathy. The perpetrator was a crisis actor, and had links to CPP already.

      They locked Kanye up the very night he talked about pizzagate. Said he was crazy. Literally the exact same thing they did in the USSR to anyone who didn't think Communism was a fucking bowl full of cherries.

    7. Re:But bringing an assault rifle??? by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      Alternatively he's just a nut, like you.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    8. Re:But bringing an assault rifle??? by Deadstick · · Score: 1

      Well, he did accomplish some research: he waved his gun around and he learned something.

    9. Re:But bringing an assault rifle??? by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      The Longmire TV show had an episode where a white male suspect questioned in a firebombing and missing person case took the law into his own hand by pulling out a gun and kidnapping a black male from a bar. The barkeep signaled to another person not to draw his holstered gun. When the barkeep and police caught up with him, he told everyone not to shoot because he was helping the police capture a suspect in the case. He was confused as to why he ended up in jail and the black male was let go for not being a suspect.

      I suspect this scenario might happen more often in real life for the next four years.

    10. Re:But bringing an assault rifle??? by skids · · Score: 1

      Dec 2nd: CPP hires security

      Because they were getting death threats, moron

      traffic camera facing CPP is turned away fromCPP for no apparent reason (who turns traffic cameras?)

      Cops who've been asked to to protect patrons from insane alt-righters, idiot.

    11. Re: But bringing an assault rifle??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're a nut, and you have no room to call anyone else a nut. Your rabid support of global warming is extremely disturbing, especially because the earth is actually getting cooler. This is science fact, but you will respond angrily whenever someone points out the truth for you. The planet doesn't care about your investment portfolio or political ideology, and it's not about to start warming just because nutjobs like you want it to.

    12. Re:But bringing an assault rifle??? by Mashiki · · Score: 3, Informative

      If this guy had been black, the pizza parlor would have been nuked from space.

      Useful tip: You're more likely to be shot by police if you're white while carrying a weapon. It's in all the crime stats you'd care to look at. Don't let that fake media narrative get you down.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    13. Re: But bringing an assault rifle??? by MightyMartian · · Score: 0

      You really are a simpering moron.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    14. Re:But bringing an assault rifle??? by serviscope_minor · · Score: 2, Informative

      Good, point, but unfortunately, you're Mashiki. So, based on previous actions the link is:

      * 65% probability: doesn't say what you claim
      * 25% probability: from some very dubious site that also doesn't say what you claim
      * > 9.9% probability: a broken link
      * < 0.1% probability: actually backs up your claim. Note that 0.1% is an upper bound. We don't have any past data in this category.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    15. Re:But bringing an assault rifle??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The stats don't support this hypothesis and the article you linked doesn't even attempt to make it.

    16. Re:But bringing an assault rifle??? by admin7087 · · Score: 1

      The linked story doesn't seem to support your claim. We need the raw numbers and then we can calculate the percentages based on the ethnic profiles in the total population, alright?

    17. Re:But bringing an assault rifle??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wut... your article says the opposite of what you claim. nice statistics training you got there.

    18. Re:But bringing an assault rifle??? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 5, Insightful

      That would only be relevant if there were a 50:50 ratio of black and white people. In fact your own link doesn't suggest what you are suggesting, it instead accepts that black people are more likely to get shot by cops and blames it on them being violent criminals.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    19. Re:But bringing an assault rifle??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe because white people need to be carrying a weapon to be shot, whereas black people are just shot... Or just that more white people can afford weapons...

      So
      1000 black people shot, 10 with firearms
      100 white people shot, 20 with firearms
      "Look, twice as much white people are shot while carrying a weapon!1!!!"

    20. Re:But bringing an assault rifle??? by Mashiki · · Score: 0, Troll

      Good, point, but unfortunately, you're Mashiki. So, based on previous actions the link is:

      This coming from the person who can't click on a link. Refuses evidence when presented. Doesn't believe when a person actually posts something that contradicts the narrative, and believes that actual quotes are fake. I'll bet you still believe that Anita Sarkeesian was threatened by Gamergate too. FYI, this was the threat. The only thing missing is 300 confirmed kills and a navy seal.

      You keep enjoying that echo chamber.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    21. Re:But bringing an assault rifle??? by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      That would only be relevant if there were a 50:50 ratio of black and white people.

      Nothing is 50:50, and nothing is like that in criminology.

      In fact your own link doesn't suggest what you are suggesting, it instead accepts that black people are more likely to get shot by cops and blames it on them being violent criminals.

      And there's the part where you don't even understand the methodology, let alone what the data says. The article states that they're likely to be shot because of a known bias towards criminal behavior. Whites are still shot more often the blacks, and police are more likely to shoot a white then a black because of racial bias.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    22. Re:But bringing an assault rifle??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How to lie with statistics.

      From the article: "Whites were 50 percent of those victims, and blacks were 26 percent. By comparison, whites are 62 percent of the U.S. population, and blacks, 13 percent." See anything wrong with the conclusion that the article draws, namely "white people are more likely to get shot than black people"?

    23. Re:But bringing an assault rifle??? by Nikkos · · Score: 1

      Uh, no. It accepts that black people are more likely to get shot as a percentage of population.

      There's a reason for that - as a percentage of population, blacks are more likely to be involved in both non-violent and violent crime, which makes them (as a percentage of population) far more likely to interact with police, than whites. (FBI/Census)

      For example: despite blacks being only 13% of the overall population, there were more black murder victims than White and Latino combined - and over 90% were killed by black perpetrators.

      This is what annoys the hell out of me in regards to all these claims of police racism. For the most part, when controlled for actual crime rates and police interaction, the claims don't hold up and generally suggest the opposite.

      Fake news? Misleading news? Where does the deliberate selection of one statistic while leaving out context and 'explanatory' information in favor of an ideological position fit in to this discussion?

      These statistics aren't 'racist' but if you (or a newspaper) use them, that's the first accusation they'll face.

    24. Re:But bringing an assault rifle??? by TheCastro1689 · · Score: 3, Informative

      I read the linked article and it doesn't back up what you claim at all.

    25. Re: But bringing an assault rifle??? by admin7087 · · Score: 1

      You've got to wonder where all of those morons suddenly come from, though. It's as if the web had exploded with idiocy during the past few months. 2016 is the year of the morons.

    26. Re:But bringing an assault rifle??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which is true of most African Americans shot by cops.

    27. Re:But bringing an assault rifle??? by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      Apparently you can't read either, or not very well. Do you need me to break down the stats and use criminology to explain why my point was correct? Or do you want to learn on your own, I suggest the latter. It's an interesting field of science.

      In August of 2015 the Post zeroed in on unarmed black men, who the paper said were seven times more likely than unarmed white men to die by police gunfire. The article noted that 24 of the 60 âoeunarmedâ deaths up to that date â" some 40 percent â" were of black men, helping to explain "why outrage continues to simmer a year after Ferguson." By yearâ(TM)s end, there were 36 unarmed black men (and two black women) and 31 unarmed white men (and one white woman) among the total 987 victims. The rate at which unarmed black men were more likely than unarmed white men to die by police gunfire had dropped, but was still six-to-one.

      But the numbers donâ(TM)t tell the whole story. It is worth looking at the specific cases included in the Postâ(TM)s unarmed victim classification in some detail, since that category is the most politically explosive. The âoeunarmedâ label is literally accurate, but it frequently fails to convey highly-charged policing situations. In a number of cases, if the victim ended up being unarmed, it was certainly not for lack of trying. At least five black victims had reportedly tried to grab the officerâ(TM)s gun, or had been beating the cop with his own equipment. Some were shot from an accidental discharge triggered by their own assault on the officer. And two individuals included in the Postâ(TM)s âoeunarmed black victimsâ category were struck by stray bullets aimed at someone else in justified cop shootings. If the victims were not the intended targets, then racism could have played no role in their deaths.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    28. Re:But bringing an assault rifle??? by TheCastro1689 · · Score: 1

      " You're more likely to be shot by police if you're white while carrying a weapon. It's in all the crime stats you'd care to look at. " That's what you said, but even your quoted text from the article says nothing about this. It only talks about being unarmed white or black. So what are you smoking?

  6. "self investigate" == alt.right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Apparently, we should all agree that because one nutcase believes a highly contrived internet rumor and acts out, we should be against anyone investigating misbehavior of our elected officials. That is, unless properly licensed by the same government officials to do so.

    1. Re:"self investigate" == alt.right by sphealey · · Score: 1

      "Self-investigate" while carrying a high-velocity, rapid fire, large magazine rifle, pointing said rifle at hapless employees, and firing a shot into the floor = alt right.

    2. Re: "self investigate" == alt.right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you can find instances of just about anything to prove a point.

    3. Re:"self investigate" == alt.right by Qzukk · · Score: 2, Interesting

      properly licensed by the same government officials

      The guy showing up at a pizza restaurant with a gun to "investigate it" is a retard, but this case is yet another entry in the list of things that has been bugging me about the "fake news" thing.

      Why are we calling this "fake" news instead of "incorrect news" or "wrong news" or "wacko conspiracy theory"? My guess is that deep down, the people that are pushing back against what they call "fake" news doesn't care about truth or falsehood, only the messenger.

      --
      If I have been able to see further than others, it is because I bought a pair of binoculars.
    4. Re:"self investigate" == alt.right by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      Apparently, we should all agree that because one nutcase believes a highly contrived internet rumor and acts out, we should be against anyone investigating misbehavior of our elected officials.

      If you own a semi-auto rifle and several handguns, and carry them into a pizzeria in order to "self-investigate" government corruption (and you actually use the term "self-investigate"), yeah, then it's probably best to leave the investigating to someone else, Jethro. Even if you do consider yourself a double-naught spy.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    5. Re: "self investigate" == alt.right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Replace "Pizzagate" with "aliens" and "Comet Ping Pong" with "Roswell, NM" and suddenly it seems like the authorities are being strangely aggressive in their defensiveness.

    6. Re:"self investigate" == alt.right by MountainLogic · · Score: 2

      Fake news refers to some website that superficially appear to be a real news site such as a news paper to give them legitimacy. These "news" sites may only have one story, but they have a the gloss of a real news source. So they are more insidious than some typical deranged paranoid manifesto posted to redit.

    7. Re:"self investigate" == alt.right by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      we should [not] be against anyone investigating...

      "Self-investigate" while carrying a high-velocity, rapid fire...rifle [is overkill]

      Suspect: "But that's how they do it in the movies..."

    8. Re:"self investigate" == alt.right by sexconker · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "Fake News" is the rebranding of Hillary's failed "Correct the Record" campaign.

      Trump only won because of Fake News! Facebook needs to censor Fake News! <Bad Thing For Us> is just another example of Fake News! Voter fraud doesn't exist! Reports of dead people voting and people being bused in are MORE FAKE NEWS!

      Stay tuned to MSCNNNBC for REAL NEWS YOU CAN TRUST! How Vladimir Putin rigged the election for Donald Trump! 45 reasons the Electoral College is bad and needs to go away (#7 will shock you)! EXCLUSIVE - Voter fraud (it's real now, ignore that last report) helped Donald Trump win the election! BREAKING ALERT - Calls for a recount could put Hillary in the White House, where we desperately want her to be! Join the campaign to petition Electors to act faithlessly and give the Presidency to a losing candidate!

    9. Re:"self investigate" == alt.right by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      It's agreed this was one nutcase, then.

      No story beyond that. Except fake news stories claiming the one nutcase with a gun is anything more than that.

      When you use the word 'Jethro' that's your dogwhistle of anti-white-trash racism, correct??

    10. Re:"self investigate" == alt.right by sexconker · · Score: 0

      If you believe owning guns is wrong or worthy of criticism (to the point that you need to specifically call out a semi-automatic rifle and several handguns), you're an idiot.
      If you believe that saying "self-investigate" in contrast to the non-existent "investigating" law enforcement and the media have done is somehow worthy of criticism, you're an idiot.
      If you believe that calling someone "Jethro" is an insult, you're an idiot.

    11. Re:"self investigate" == alt.right by AK+Marc · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Wrong indicates something done in error. Fake news implies a deliberate action to invent the false news. One is an unintnetional error. The other is a deliberate fraud.

    12. Re:"self investigate" == alt.right by AK+Marc · · Score: 0

      Don't forget he was threatening people and firing inside, in the general direction of people, though without intent to kill. He was apparently mad and confused he didn't find the den of abused children promised.

    13. Re: "self investigate" == alt.right by jddj · · Score: 1

      Assignment Error: not an LVALUE

    14. Re:"self investigate" == alt.right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As sympathetic as I am to calling it a "wacko conspiracy theory" it seems to me that this stuff is correctly called "fake news" because the fakery occurs at the level of the news.

      * The sites aren't fake. They are real websites after all. That's too general.

      * They aren't a fake New York Times (or whatever) site along the lines of a fraudulent banking site designed to steal your password. That's too specific.

      * The news can't be "incorrect" or "wrong" if there was never any attempt to be correct. Fake medicine isn't medicine which was made badly, it's the wrong thing entirely. Likewise fake news takes the form of news but is not even an attempt to provide timely and accurate information.

      Note that there is some intent implied by "fake" which is not present in "incorrect" or "wrong". Something can be wrong by accident. A broken Rolex watch which ticks off 59 seconds per minute because a part wore out is incorrect or wrong while a fake (e.g. counterfeit) Rolex watch doesn't happen by accident or act of nature. There is effort being put into the creation of this "fake news". Like that fake medicine it is designed to match the form without serving the function in order to make money...

      * ...which is why fake news is not parody either. The point of parody is to, well, parody or satirize something, not specifically to generate profit.

      Not that these are perfectly strict categories. "Timely and accurate information" is a pretty good definition of "news" but I bet someone will nitpick it (probably without adding much to the conversation). Of course most commercial real/fake/parody news websites are trying to make money. Still, it seems to me that "fake news" is the correct term for content which is designed to take the form of real news without serving the same function, just like a fake pill or a fake poodle.

    15. Re:"self investigate" == alt.right by AthanasiusKircher · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Why are we calling this "fake" news instead of "incorrect news" or "wrong news" or "wacko conspiracy theory"?

      Because "fake news" has a very clear meaning that should be apparent to anyone who knows what the word "fake" means. Where do you use the word "fake"? You use it in places where something that is known to be false by the originator has the appearance of truth.

      That's different from "wrong" or "incorrect" because those can result from simple errors. "Fake" implies that the person who creates the "news" KNOWS it's fake.

      Fake news can have lots of different motivations.

      -- It can be satire or parody, like the Onion.
      -- It can be produced by people who just want to make money -- as it apparently were in this past campaign by some Balkan teens (who are hawking this fake news just like people hawk fake watches or "designer" purses).
      -- It can be deliberate propaganda, made up by someone with a particular perspective intended to energize (or outrage) other people with that perspective.
      -- It can even be a hoax created by those who want to embarrass their opponents by getting them to "take the bait" and then reveal that it's BS all along (again, something that multiple people have admitted doing to try to sabotage the past election).

      All of these things are encompassed by the clear and unambiguous word "fake," i.e., something KNOWN TO BE false that looks like the real thing.

      There are lots of folks who have been reading headlines about "fake news" recently and assuming it's about something else -- e.g., partisan sites spreading biased propaganda. But that's NOT FAKE NEWS. That's opinion or biased reporting or whatever. It may have its own problems, but biasing or distorting news by selectively choosing what to report or how to report it is NOT FAKE NEWS.

      Actually making something up and knowingly publishing something literally false ("Person X did Y in city Z" when you know that didn't happen) *IS* fake news.

    16. Re:"self investigate" == alt.right by gman003 · · Score: 1

      The difference, as I see it, is that "incorrect news" or "wrong news" lacks malice - it may have been wrong, but it was intended to be true, and either accident or negligence caused it to not be. "Fake news" was known by its peddler to be false, and yet was pushed anyways because The Cause mattered more than The Truth.

    17. Re:"self investigate" == alt.right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      properly licensed by the same government officials

      >

      Why are we calling this "fake" news instead of "incorrect news" or "wrong news" or "wacko conspiracy theory"? My guess is that deep down, the people that are pushing back against what they call "fake" news doesn't care about truth or falsehood, only the messenger.

      We make mistakes in pursuit of journalistic truth.

      You post fake news.

      They spread propaganda.

    18. Re:"self investigate" == alt.right by Jeremi · · Score: 1

      Why are we calling this "fake" news instead of "incorrect news" or "wrong news" or "wacko conspiracy theory"?

      Because the "news" in question isn't just false, it's deliberately false and inflammatory. As in, made up out of whole cloth by trolls, just to wreak havoc, or by paid provocateurs, to drive gullible people towards advertisements by provoking them. The people behind the fake news are well aware that it is 100% fiction, and they don't care.

      That's different from inadvertently getting a story wrong, and it's different from being genuinely insane and thereby sending out incorrect information that you honestly think is correct.

      "Fake" is in fact the most accurate way to describe it. So if you're going to question other peoples' ulterior motives, what dark motives are you concealing?

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    19. Re:"self investigate" == alt.right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Brian Williams still has a journalism job.

    20. Re:"self investigate" == alt.right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      > "Fake" implies that the person who creates the "news" KNOWS it's fake.

      So which of the people reporting on the weird Podesta email about the "pizza-related map" the realtor found and offered to return to Podesta believe the email doesn't exist? Which of the people who found the jimmycommet Instagram (now only available as archives...) believed the photos weren't creepy? Which of the people who saw the photo they tagged as #chickenlovers believes they didn't see that?

      See, if you actually want to debunk this, these are the questions you have to answer. These are the claims you have to shoot down.

      If you're just going to shout #fakenews! Conspiracy theory! And never touch the facts, well... it's only going to get worse.

      Compare to 9/11 nonsense: there were actual explanations about how and why the towers collapsed.

    21. Re:"self investigate" == alt.right by skids · · Score: 1

      It's agreed this was one nutcase, then.

      "One nutcase" would be a guy picking a random pizza shop for a random reason. This is fake news goading a nutcase. It will probably happen again. We've been trying to warn the right this would be the result of their constant pimping, but they'll do anything to get elected, fuck the consequences.

    22. Re:"self investigate" == alt.right by AthanasiusKircher · · Score: 1

      See, if you actually want to debunk this, these are the questions you have to answer.

      I wasn't trying to "debunk" anything. I was just offering a definition of "fake news" vs. erroneous or incorrect reporting vs. biased news.

    23. Re:"self investigate" == alt.right by king+neckbeard · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The repeated claims of Russian hackers regarding the DNC leaks would be an example. They even claimed that it had to be the Kremlin, when Podesta got hacked by a basic phishing scheme.

      --
      This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    24. Re:"self investigate" == alt.right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you really want us to quote your candidate's multiple claims regarding her email server? All of which were disproven by the FBI director who in the end opted to let her walk?

    25. Re:"self investigate" == alt.right by DaHat · · Score: 0

      We've been trying to warn the right this would be the result of their constant pimping, but they'll do anything to get elected, fuck the consequences.

      We've been trying to warn the left that their cozying up with #BlackLivesMatter was going to result in more people being killed, including all of the cops who have needlessly lost their lives in targeted attacks... all so you could try to gain more elected seats.

      As you said... and as Hillary so vividly said when bringing the mothers of attempted cop killers on stage with her... "f#%& the consequences"

    26. Re:"self investigate" == alt.right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      properly licensed by the same government officials

      The guy showing up at a pizza restaurant with a gun to "investigate it" is a retard, but this case is yet another entry in the list of things that has been bugging me about the "fake news" thing.

      Why are we calling this "fake" news instead of "incorrect news" or "wrong news" or "wacko conspiracy theory"? My guess is that deep down, the people that are pushing back against what they call "fake" news doesn't care about truth or falsehood, only the messenger.

      There's a better term for all this we're more familiar with on /. Forget incorrect, fake, wrong, crazy. It's all about intent.
      "Gays look over urinal partitions to check out your penis" could be a joke, could be an attack. Lets not pretend it's THAT hard to tell satire from actual homophobia, islamophobia, xenophobia bait. NOBODY wants to see your penis by the way.

      F.U.D. Fear, uncertainty, and doubt. Or disinformation... something like that. The basic idea is as old as dirt.
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fear,_uncertainty_and_doubt

      There's a combination of targeted attacks and plain old click baiting taking advantage of conservatives. I'm guessing someone noticed the prime click bait, conspiracy and gold coin buying audience, and figured they're ripe for other kinds of misinformation. I've been getting XYZphobia chain mails from family members for years before "fake news" became a thing. I still think it's evil whatever you call it.

    27. Re: "self investigate" == alt.right by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      "Rapid fire?" Uh, no; not really.

    28. Re:"self investigate" == alt.right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's agreed this was one nutcase, then.

      No story beyond that. Except fake news stories claiming the one nutcase with a gun is anything more than that.

      When you use the word 'Jethro' that's your dogwhistle of anti-white-trash racism, correct??

      What do you mean there's nothing more than "that"?

      Just a week ago, RIGHT HERE, I was reading how people were upset the Reddit CEO got directly involved in trying to shutdown this pizzagate bullshit, and the community was so butthurt about it they were going to leave. GOOD.

      If you're part of "pizzagate", you're more useful to me as a carbon sink than a human being.

    29. Re: "self investigate" == alt.right by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      Like the Moonies' Washington "Times."

    30. Re:"self investigate" == alt.right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not sure if you're blind, or just an idiot. He said if you own a gun AND carry it into a pizzeria. Maybe when you saw the mention of the word guns, your brain shuts down, I don't know.

    31. Re:"self investigate" == alt.right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So like CNN?

    32. Re:"self investigate" == alt.right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How is it different however in presenting blatantly biased news? In fact I'd argue that 'fake news' is far less disingenuous as its quite easily proven to be 'fake' (easy for anyone who wants to take 2 minutes to disprove it). Blatantly biased news is far hard to prove wrong/incorrect/misleading as you tend to have to go through many more 'perspectives' and actually believe that the people your trying to convince of the bias want to be convinced.

    33. Re:"self investigate" == alt.right by Kjella · · Score: 1

      Because "fake news" has a very clear meaning that should be apparent to anyone who knows what the word "fake" means. Where do you use the word "fake"? You use it in places where something that is known to be false by the originator has the appearance of truth.

      You do realize that would not include most conspiracy theories, right? Sure, some are created and perpetuated because it fits somebody's agenda but most of the unpopular ones are simply people seeing patterns that aren't there, explanations as cover-ups, ridicule as naivity or complicity resulting in some bizarre theory that doesn't make any sense or serve any recognizable purpose. Cardinal Richelieu said "If one would give me six lines written by the hand of the most honest man, I would find something in them to have him hanged", well so would a conspiracy theorist find the Illuminati.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    34. Re:"self investigate" == alt.right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just to add to this, there is another difference. "Fake" is one of those interesting intensional adjectives like "alleged" that kind of change what they are applied to. Incorrect or false news is still news (in some nonstrict sense), even though it's based on some error. It was forwarded by a journalist with the usual procedures, but there was an error somewhere e.g. in validating the source. In contrast to this, fake news is not news at all, it only appears as such. The same holds for alleged news. Likewise, a fake policeman is not a policeman at all. The difference between "alleged" and "fake" is maybe that an alleged policeman can still turn out to be a policeman, although unlikely, because somebody says that he's a policeman while it is presupposed that this person was wrong. A fake policeman, on the other hand, is definitely not a policeman. But I'm not sure about that distinction. These adjectives are really interesting from a linguistic point of view and not trivial to handle correctly in formal semantics.

    35. Re:"self investigate" == alt.right by admin7087 · · Score: 1

      How on earth can the above post have been modded "insightful"? It's obvious trolling and totally deviating from what the OP said. Has Slashdot sunken so low that even competely obvious troll attempts and flamebaits are now "insightful", just because they please someone's political views?

    36. Re:"self investigate" == alt.right by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Because "fake news" has a very clear meaning that should be apparent to anyone who knows what the word "fake" means. Where do you use the word "fake"? You use it in places where something that is known to be false by the originator has the appearance of truth.

      You do realize that would not include most conspiracy theories, right? Sure, some are created and perpetuated because it fits somebody's agenda but most of the unpopular ones are simply people seeing patterns that aren't there, explanations as cover-ups, ridicule as naivity or complicity resulting in some bizarre theory that doesn't make any sense or serve any recognizable purpose.

      It becomes fake news when they report bullshit without fact-checking because it sounds truthy and if true, supports their point. And this is what happens every time. Supposed chemtrail planes which are actually full of tanks used to create different weight distributions for testing, for example.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    37. Re:"self investigate" == alt.right by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      If you believe owning guns is wrong or worthy of criticism (to the point that you need to specifically call out a semi-automatic rifle and several handguns), you're an idiot.

      I own multiple firearms including a handgun designed specifically for concealed carry and I didn't read that the way you did, which is to say wrong. There are many idiots participating in this conversation, and you are at least two of them.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    38. Re:"self investigate" == alt.right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wrong indicates something done in error. Fake news implies a deliberate action to invent the false news. One is an unintnetional error. The other is a deliberate fraud.

      Ah! I see what you did here...

    39. Re: "self investigate" == alt.right by sphealey · · Score: 1

      Sorry, I'm a PL/I guy

    40. Re:"self investigate" == alt.right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you believe that calling someone "Jethro" is an insult, you're an idiot.

      Ever seen The Beverly Hillbillies?

    41. Re:"self investigate" == alt.right by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Because those adjectives mean different things. It is why these words exist in the first place.

    42. Re:"self investigate" == alt.right by jeff4747 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      So which of the people reporting on the weird Podesta email about the "pizza-related map" the realtor found and offered to return to Podesta believe the email doesn't exist?

      The "fake" here is:

      • The claim that there is only one possible meaning of an email between two people who know each other well. That two such people have zero "inside jokes" or other broader context to the things they say to each other in private.
      • That emails between such people always use perfect grammar, so any disparity between perfect grammar and what is in the email is an indication of a global conspiracy.

      Which of the people who found the jimmycommet Instagram (now only available as archives...) believed the photos weren't creepy?

      The fake here is the "creepy" was created by the conspiracy: The pictures of children enjoying pizza are creepy because of the pedophilia claims. ...Unless you want to claim Chuck-E-Cheese's entire marketing for the past several decades is creepy.

      Which of the people who saw the photo they tagged as #chickenlovers believes they didn't see that?

      And which of the people who saw they photo actually have any relevant information about said photo?

      This entire "scandal" is an updated version of the McMartin preschool hysteria.

    43. Re:"self investigate" == alt.right by meta-monkey · · Score: 2

      So are you agreeing Pizzagate is not fake news? It's a conspiracy theory. Nobody just made it up. They found weird emails with weird statements that no one would make that look like some kind of code and weird social media accounts with weird stuff posted to them. And nobody's bothered to explain "oh...this is what a pizza-related map handkerchief is, don't you feel silly now?" Or explain how one...I can't remember what it was "plays dominoes better on pizza or pasta" or whatever that weird message was.

      I'm not saying it's true. I doubt it...it's probably confirmation bias. But screaming "fake news!!!" isn't going to make it stop. Someone needs to offer an alternative explanation to the weird language and debunk the conspiracy theory. When people think they saw a UFO the g-man needs to explain that no, it was swamp gas reflecting off a weather balloon or whatever. You can't just stand there saying "nothing to see here move along."

      --
      We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
    44. Re:"self investigate" == alt.right by DutchUncle · · Score: 1

      How about "hoaxes"? Or "lies", possibly including "slander"? We don't need to make up new words,any more than we needed "identity theft" to describe "fraud by impersonation" or "criminal impersonation".

    45. Re:"self investigate" == alt.right by DutchUncle · · Score: 1

      Less judgemental: If a person carries a rifle and several handguns into a pizzeria, and points a weapon at people, and fires a weapon within the city limits of a city with strict gun laws, that person has committed assault with a deadly weapon (and some lesser crimes). Period. Doesn't matter why.

    46. Re:"self investigate" == alt.right by Cajun+Hell · · Score: 1

      This labeling pisses me off, because it used to be The Daily Show, SNL's Weekend Update, etc were what "fake news" meant. Fake news just meant satire or hoaxes of exposure done in a certain style.

      And not only was the term "fake news" already taken, but also, the stuff we're talking about here already had a name too: "lies."

      They're simply lies. WTF was wrong with "lies?" And what was wrong with letting "fake news" keep its meaning? Why fix what isn't broken?

      Death to the 2016 meaning of "fake news." Ye Olde English (how people spoke in 2015) was better than this. Yes, language evolves, but it doesn't need to happen this stupidly. This is the kind of crap that makes me think I'm going to have to re-learn what "hacker" means again, in 2017. Hacker: a person who carries a mobile phone.

      --
      "Believe me!" -- Donald Trump
    47. Re:"self investigate" == alt.right by tobiah · · Score: 1

      good points, hope the accuracy catches on

      --
      "The ability to delude yourself may be an important survival tool" - Jane Wagner -
    48. Re:"self investigate" == alt.right by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Fraudian slip?

    49. Re:"self investigate" == alt.right by strikethree · · Score: 1

      Fake news can have lots of different motivations.

      -- It can be satire or parody, like the Onion.

      ...

       

      So, out of curiosity, what do you call fake news that turns out to be amazingly accurate? http://www.theonion.com/articl...

      Seriously. Read it and get chills about the nature of reality.

      --
      "Someone needs to talk to the tree of liberty about its ghoulish drinking problem." by ohnocitizen
    50. Re:"self investigate" == alt.right by strikethree · · Score: 3, Insightful

      See, if you actually want to debunk this, these are the questions you have to answer. These are the claims you have to shoot down.

      WTF? I was mildly interested in this story and looked at the facts. None of the "facts" lead to anything terribly interesting. I am reminded of the (supposed?) words of Cardinal Richelieu: If you give me six lines written by the hand of the most honest of men, I will find something in them which will hang him.

      It is up to YOU to provide proof that YOUR interpretation of the facts is real. There are no facts like actual children disappearing or reporting things to the police. There are no facts like pictures of people doing bad things to children. There are no facts at all that directly support this theory in any way. It is all grasping at possible interpretations and running with them. Until YOU can show that YOUR interpretation has something real behind it, this is a fake news story.

      No wonder you are anonymous.

      --
      "Someone needs to talk to the tree of liberty about its ghoulish drinking problem." by ohnocitizen
    51. Re:"self investigate" == alt.right by budgenator · · Score: 1

      This time, but often these guys are found to be registered Democrats.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    52. Re:"self investigate" == alt.right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > The fake here is the "creepy" was created by the conspiracy: The pictures of children enjoying pizza are creepy because of the pedophilia claims. ...Unless you want to claim Chuck-E-Cheese's entire marketing for the past several decades is creepy.

      How about the little girl taped to a table?

      > The claim that there is only one possible meaning of an email between two people who know each other well. That two such people have zero "inside jokes" or other broader context to the things they say to each other in private. That emails between such people always use perfect grammar, so any disparity between perfect grammar and what is in the email is an indication of a global conspiracy.

      Some of the things, like #chickenlover or cheese pizza = CP are from established slang definitions that can be found on sites like urban dictionary which long predate any of this. There could definitely be a lot of confirmation bias going on but there's a lot of stuff. I feel I should also mention that it's already well known that there's no basement in CPPP (they're in a completely different building down the block), so I don't know what this idiot was even looking for.

      But I find this argument ironic when we talk about dog whistle politics so much....

    53. Re:"self investigate" == alt.right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if you didn't own them and carried them into a pizzeria you'd be in a lot more trouble

    54. Re:"self investigate" == alt.right by jeff4747 · · Score: 1

      How about the little girl taped to a table?

      Boy, there's a ton of pedophiles in the world!!....or maybe taping someone up is a pretty common prank.

      Some of the things, like #chickenlover or cheese pizza = CP are from established slang definitions that can be found on sites like urban dictionary which long predate any of this.

      And until you actually have evidence of pedophilia, it's idiotic to not use their "common" definition.

      But I find this argument ironic when we talk about dog whistle politics so much.

      Sometimes a cigar is just a cigar. And sometimes it isn't.

      And yes, I specifically decided to use that object, because it's a dogwhistle. Do you notice how little careful parsing and "what he really meant was...." was required to notice it?

    55. Re:"self investigate" == alt.right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > They even claimed that it had to be the Kremlin, when Podesta got hacked by a basic phishing scheme.

      You gloss over the important details by calling it a "basic phishing scheme."

      It was indeed a well-known phishing scheme using the exact same exploit and servers that had been identified as tools of a hacking group closely associated with the kremlin. The connection between those tools and that hacking group was made prior to the podesta emails being dumped on wikileaks.

      Based on those facts, the claim that podesta was hacked by the very same group that had previously used the same tools and same modus operandi is not fake - its the best available evidence. Is it 100% proven? No it is not. But such confidence is not just rare with online forensic evidence, its rare offline too. Requiring that level of confidence before reporting would result in very little reporting.

    56. Re:"self investigate" == alt.right by king+neckbeard · · Score: 1

      Believe it's pretty much been just Crowdstrike, and they blame everything on the Russians (unless another party is more convenient). Meanwhile, Clapper says they don't have good evidence of a link to Russia.

      --
      This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    57. Re:"self investigate" == alt.right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Believe it's pretty much been just Crowdstrike

      No. Its 17 intelligence agencies.

      > Meanwhile, Clapper says they don't have good evidence of a link to Russia.

      What bubble are you living in? Zerohedge?
      Clapper is director of the DNI which explicitly issued the statement referenced above.

    58. Re:"self investigate" == alt.right by king+neckbeard · · Score: 1
      Yeah, Clapper said "maybe, but we don't actually know" and the Clinton-backing press was 17 agencies that under Clapper all say that it had to be the Russians. That you believe sensationalist news doesn't make it true (but it does make your statement ironic). Here's the latest statement from Clapper, a man who had no trouble lying to protect their illegal spying programs, but will only throw a minimal bone towards Clinton and their Russia projections.

      As far as the Wikileaks connection, evidence there is not as strong and we don’t have good insight into the sequencing of the releases or when the data may have been provided.

      --
      This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    59. Re:"self investigate" == alt.right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are working the conspiracy theory logic hard.

      First you say its just Crowdstrike and that Clapper denied it.
      When confronted with proof that's not true, you just wave away the proof as being biased and then try to discredit the one guy who you just cited, in error.

      And to top it off you cite the guy who you just said was a liar, but you pick an oblique quote that does not say at all what you want it to mean. He's not disputing that the DNC was hacked by the russians, he's saying the part of the process where it was transferred from the russians to wikileaks is opaque. That perhaps there were middleman involved and that he doesn't know the exact timeline of that hand-off.

      You aren't arguing in good faith, you are just looking to justify your predetermined beliefs. What evidence would it take to convince you otherwise? If the russians admitted to it, would that be enough for you? Or is the bar even higher than that?

    60. Re:"self investigate" == alt.right by king+neckbeard · · Score: 1

      I would like to see ACTUAL evidence of Russian involvement instead of people who have an interest in parroting Dem/Establishment talking points doing so. I didn't forget the lessons we learned from the war in Iraq, where the government and those close to them lied to us. Powerful people will perpetuate bullshit lies, and yet Clapper, who was willing to tell a bald faced lie about surveillance, won't even give real support for the Russian conspiracy the Dems concocted. The closest thing I've seen to evidence is that the Guccifer leaks had some metadata suggesting a Russian language computer was involved in editing, and they had a scary soviet username.

      There's no need for Kremlin involvement. Podesta is a tech moron, as are most of the people surrounding the Clintons.

      --
      This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    61. Re:"self investigate" == alt.right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And what qualifies as "actual" evidence?
      Because to me, that sounds like an easy cop-out way of saying there is nothing, not even if the russians admitted to it.

    62. Re:"self investigate" == alt.right by king+neckbeard · · Score: 1

      Details of the specific evidence they have of Russian involvement, so it can be evaluated by truly independent security experts. That's where the conversation tends to go to handwaving about national security, state secrets, etc., and insistence that I should just trust them. I don't trust anything our government says any more than I would trust anything the Russian or Chinese government says.

      --
      This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    63. Re:"self investigate" == alt.right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Details of the specific evidence they have of Russian involvement

      What kind of details?

      > I don't trust anything our government says

      Then why would you trust the "details" provided by the government? The way you write - choosing to believe anything Clapper says that might possibly discredit russian involvement while categorically dismissing anything he says that supports it tells me you would do the same for any of these "details."

    64. Re:"self investigate" == alt.right by king+neckbeard · · Score: 1

      What kind of details?

      I want every forensic detail they have. IP addresses, any kind of 'fingerprints' left behind. Basically, I want enough information for someone like Bruce Schneier to be able to look at it and confirm, yes, it was the Russians.

      Then why would you trust the "details" provided by the government? The way you write - choosing to believe anything Clapper says that might possibly discredit russian involvement while categorically dismissing anything he says that supports it tells me you would do the same for any of these "details."

      Because it's a lot less work to say "Russia did it" than to forge extensive forensic evidence. The more extensive the ruse, the more difficult it is to pull off. Plus, some of those forensic details could possibly be independently confirmed. For example, we know that the email about Donna Brazille sending Clinton a debate question on the death penalty is legitimate because we have DKIM verification.

      --
      This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    65. Re:"self investigate" == alt.right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Basically, I want enough information for someone like Bruce Schneier to be able to look at it and confirm, yes, it was the Russians.

      So, you are saying that if Schneier agrees it was the russians that will be sufficient to convince you?

      > Because it's a lot less work to say "Russia did it" than to forge extensive forensic evidence.

      The NSA alone has a yearly budget of 52 billion dollars. If you believe that they are deliberately out to sell such a high-profile lie, then it is no leap at all to also believe they'd throw 10+ million dollars at faking extensive forensic evidence.

    66. Re:"self investigate" == alt.right by king+neckbeard · · Score: 1

      So, you are saying that if Schneier agrees it was the russians that will be sufficient to convince you?

      It would be a good start. So far, all he's claimed is "preponderance of evidence" to support Crowdstrike's claims, although it would appear that he's just getting a second or third-hand analysis. I would want him to be able to directly review evidence.

      He's also framing such attacks as 'standard political espionage,' acknowledging political and technological realities. They are high value targets with low security. We spy on Merkel, and she's an ally. I definitely believe that the Russian government probably tried and likely succeeded in attacking these targets. Same for Chinese government, independent hackers from China and Russia, and bored 4channers. That's why I want to see a more detailed analysis, because I don't believe for a second that any of those servers and accounts were only compromised once.

      The NSA alone has a yearly budget of 52 billion dollars. If you believe that they are deliberately out to sell such a high-profile lie, then it is no leap at all to also believe they'd throw 10+ million dollars at faking extensive forensic evidence.

      There's a lot more to building a conspiracy than money. There's plenty of people and politics involved, and the more involved the plot, the more likely it is to unravel. That's what I hate about many conspiracy theorists. They've got to concoct some elaborate scheme of planting explosives in the WTC and also hijacking 4 planes instead of Cheney calling up Bin Laden and calling in the attack. Likewise, it's a lot easier to call in some political favors to get some finger pointing done than it is to craft compelling forensic evidence in a relatively short time. The War in Iraq was a much easier job with a lot of money to be made, but they were quite lazy in retrospect about the evidence they used.

      --
      This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    67. Re:"self investigate" == alt.right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > That's why I want to see a more detailed analysis, because I don't believe for a second that any of those servers and accounts were only compromised once.

      So now you don't just want evidence that russia was involved, you want evidence that only russia was involved. Basically you are requiring proof of a negative. Color me unsurprised.

  7. Americans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    gullible as shit

  8. I don't think he understands trolling by chispito · · Score: 1

    ...the pizzeria's owner, told CNN, "I hope that those involved in fanning these flames will take a moment to contemplate what happened here today, and stop promoting these falsehoods right away."

    If only.

    --
    The Daddy casts sleep on the Baby. The Baby resists!
    1. Re:I don't think he understands trolling by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 0, Troll

      Besta Pizza's logo was one well-known to the FBI as a pedo symbol. If it wasn't incriminating, then why did they change it when it was exposed? Here's the same symbol on the The Elpida part of the Ratcliffe Foundation's website: all the way at the bottom row, first photo, the wall mural. Archived here for when it gets deleted - and why would it ever get deleted if it's not incriminating? Clearly a pedo symbol, aka "BL" aka "Boy Lover" according to the FBI. The art in Podesta's house is super-creepy and definitely pedo. See that gold one of the man bent over backwards? That's a recreation of a photo that a serial killer took after he beheaded his victim. More importantly, powerful people are telling you not to pay any attention. What should you do when this happens?

      The guy is screaming for the investigation to stop. This narrative is being forwarded by the same people who brought you the fake news about the election. Who do you trust? The gatekeepers that we know for a fact are corrupt, or a bunch of independent investigators? It's one thing if the investigation turns up nothing. But it is entirely another to shriek and demand that the investigation stop, and attack the investigators. It was the "crazies from the internet" who took down Michelle Fields and her lies. Nobody is telling you to believe a crazy conspiracy theory. Just read for yourself, make your own decisions, come to your own conclusions. Don't trust the gatekeepers, they don't deserve your trust. We're in a new era of real citizen journalism and the media is scared shitless.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    2. Re:I don't think he understands trolling by king+neckbeard · · Score: 1

      I would agree that our gatekeepers have proven themselves untrustworthy, which makes it harder to know much of anything for sure. However, it is plausible that they might have innocently had overlap with their logo and changed it when they found out that they had a pedo symbol for their logo. It's similar to how a building was actually a swastika, but apparently nobody noticed. Hanlon's razor, after all.

      --
      This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    3. Re:I don't think he understands trolling by skids · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If it wasn't incriminating, then why did they change it when it was exposed

      A) If I found out I accidentally used a pedo logo, I'd change it too.
      B) If I found out alt-right nutjobs were spreading shit around the internet about my shop, I'd get off my ass to change it because I don't want my customers or employees shot by fucking morons like you.

      Seriously, you need to go see a shrink.

    4. Re:I don't think he understands trolling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're replying to DNS-and-BIND, there is no point in mentioning plausibility or logic of any sort. It's nice to see someone try though.

    5. Re:I don't think he understands trolling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Besta Pizza's logo [bing.com] was one well-known to the FBI as a pedo symbol. If it wasn't incriminating, then why did they change it when it was exposed?

      Perhaps they changed it when they themselves found it out. Spirals are pretty common, designers love common designs, they're taught to. It's quite possible they paid a guy to design their logo and said "put a triangle like pizza in it" and then find out years later that its allegedly a pedophile symbol, so they quickly removed it. Makes a whole lot more sense than the pizzagate story.

    6. Re: I don't think he understands trolling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nice troll! However, it does not work if people follow the links. The art in Podestas home is neither particularily creepy nor definitely pedo. It is rather standard modern fare, not my cup of tea but far from e.g. Helmut Newton or the like.

    7. Re:I don't think he understands trolling by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 0
      Accidentally? Where do you even get that? It's not accidental. It's a logo of "boy love". From the FBI:

      Pedophiles who sexually abuse children as well as those who produce, distribute, and trade child pornography, are using various types of identification logos or symbols to recognize one another and distinguish their sexual preferences.

      Seriously, go and read the memo. Accidental? Where do you come up with this shit? I mean, in the absence of other evidence it might be nothing, but when Podesta himself has an artsy, sterile bedroom with children's stuffed animals in it, more investigation is called for. He's childless, by the way. What kind of grown man keeps stuffed animals in his bedroom? Much less a top-level political operative?

      That's all anyone wants, an investigation. If there's nothing there, then nobody will find anything. Judge for yourself, that's all everyone has to do. Absolutely DO NOT trust the media when they are telling you to pay no attention to the man behind the curtain.

      I mean, come on, look who's getting blamed for the incident - the crazy guy, or the people pushing the investigation! Use your brain! If there was nothing there they wouldn't be making such large efforts to suppress it!

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    8. Re:I don't think he understands trolling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...the pizzeria's owner, told CNN, "I hope that those involved in fanning these flames will take a moment to contemplate what happened here today, and stop promoting these falsehoods right away."

      Donald Trump might have his Twitter account strictly monitored by "his handlers" for the next week because of his large fan and inability to contemplate his actions. So there is hope Mr. Pizzeria owner.

    9. Re:I don't think he understands trolling by Bigbutt · · Score: 1

      I have stuffed animals from various events over the years like bears, a couple of dogs (one looks like Grimm from the comic), cat, dragons, a Domino's Noid, a Dilbert PHB, a dragon, Cthulhu, Nyarlathotep, and a bag of eyes from some Halloween thing.

      [John]

      --
      Shit better not happen!
    10. Re:I don't think he understands trolling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They also haven't filed any slander suits anywhere...

      Like NORMAL people would do...

  9. Damn Conspiracy Theorists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's almost as bad of a conspiracy theory as the US Govt claiming the Russians were behind the Podesta leaks. Just make up evidence!

    1. Re:Damn Conspiracy Theorists by haruchai · · Score: 2

      It's almost as bad of a conspiracy theory as the US Govt claiming the Russians were behind the Podesta leaks. Just make up evidence!

      Any nutbar who would like to go to Russia to "self investigate" the Kremlin at gunpoint has my full support

      --
      Pain is merely failure leaving the body
    2. Re: Damn Conspiracy Theorists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ^+1

      or your (local police station)/(the white house) for what ever

    3. Re: Damn Conspiracy Theorists by skids · · Score: 1

      (*+1)^2 lol

  10. Conspiracy theorists at work. by ASDFnz · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This is fairly typical thinking from conspiracy theorists.

    They are the most gullible of people and just believe any crap that is put up on the internet. They like to believe that everyone else has no idea what is going on but in reality they are just eating the shit that other people make up.

    1. Re:Conspiracy theorists at work. by smooth+wombat · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The problem with conspiracy "theories" is there's usually a smidgen of truth to them such that the gullible and true believers will believe it without a second thought to any veracity.

      One can see all kinds of nutjob whackery over the 9/11 attacks, the most notable being "fuel can't melt steel beams". Which is true, the fire from jet fuel can't melt steel beams but what it can do is weaken the steel such that all the weight it's supporting causes the beam to warp. This has been shown in recent accidents involving fuel trucks running into bridges where the steel beams sag and give way.

      At least if these folks would latch on to something not posing as a government conspiracy, such as when Trump was married to Marla Maples, had an affair and forced the woman to have an abortion, they might be taken a bit more seriously.

      --
      We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
    2. Re:Conspiracy theorists at work. by ASDFnz · · Score: 2

      Want a good laugh? Someone (who will remain nameless because I am embarrassed that I know someone that stupid) recently told me that all space travel is impossible and I am a fool for believing it. Astounded I asked him why he thought that and he pointed me to this website with "inconvertible proof";-

      http://heiwaco.tripod.com/moon...

      I want to know where my €9.000:-/month for life is for lying about it?

      But yeah, like I said, conspiracy theorists are gullible.

    3. Re:Conspiracy theorists at work. by king+neckbeard · · Score: 1

      And also, the Saudis had a lot more ties to it than we were initially led to believe. That's not a truth that's in any conspiracy theory I'm aware of, but it does mean that the conventional narrative was deeply flawed.

      --
      This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    4. Re:Conspiracy theorists at work. by sexconker · · Score: 1

      I pay since September 2012 anyone [EURO SIGN THAT I'M SURE SLASHDOT WILL MANGLE]1.000.000:- that can describe a manned space trip but no one has managed my Challenge.

      Well, take him up if you're so confident! http://heiwaco.tripod.com/chal...

    5. Re:Conspiracy theorists at work. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perfect example - Mighty Martian

    6. Re:Conspiracy theorists at work. by ASDFnz · · Score: 1

      Strangely enough no one has managed to win that bet.

      Probably something to do with him being the only judge he deems fit to decide if he is wrong or not.

    7. Re:Conspiracy theorists at work. by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 2

      Complete lack of understanding of simple Newtonian physics he should have learned in high school. He honestly believes that when you stop applying thrust to something in outer space, it stops moving. Amazing.

    8. Re:Conspiracy theorists at work. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      fwiw, we have only been to the moon. That's not exactly deep space.

    9. Re:Conspiracy theorists at work. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He only shows up to troll climate debates. He doesn't get paid for this.

    10. Re:Conspiracy theorists at work. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It seems like you are conflating all "conspiracy theorists" regardless of whatever they believe. Can you even exactly define what a "conspiracy theory" is? Why do you think you are entitled to judge what is true and what is not without even hinting at any kind of rationale?

      There are a lot of things I could point out about your post that hint at fundamentally flawed thinking, but why don't you step up to plate here and answer these two very simple questions?

    11. Re:Conspiracy theorists at work. by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      The conspiracy theory also has to reinforce the person's existing beliefs to get good traction. Such a person believing Hillary is a mass murderer is much more likely to believe the pizzagate story. Someone who thinks the government always lies is more likely to believe the moon landing is a hoax. Someone who believes there's a secret one world government is going to wholeheartedly accept the line about contrails and mind control.

    12. Re:Conspiracy theorists at work. by Calydor · · Score: 1

      I wonder what a round trip to the ISS costs. Is it less than a million Euros? If so, SEND HIM THERE.

      And don't let him come back until you have the money.

      --
      -=This sig has nothing to do with my comment. Move along now=-
    13. Re:Conspiracy theorists at work. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That was actually part of the conventional narrative, just not part of the official government stance for obvious reasons (=diplomacy, in case it's not so obvious to you). There were many news stories about the Saudi ties and how the government suppressed them in order not to jeopardize their relations to the Saudi families. No conspiracy and no secret, and deep flaw in the government story either, they just tried to downplay the role of the Saudi government a bit.

    14. Re:Conspiracy theorists at work. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the guy isn't even smart enough to run ads on his webpage. proof enough of his inferior intellect.

    15. Re: Conspiracy theorists at work. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is that the Time Cube's guys cousin ??

    16. Re:Conspiracy theorists at work. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's funny how some people like to use useful idiots to denigrate a group of people they don't agree with, so they don't have to apply some critical thinking and a little bit of attention span to keeping an eye on the lies that lead us into wars etc.

    17. Re:Conspiracy theorists at work. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny how many of what you call conspiracy theories actually turned out to be conspiracy fact later.

    18. Re:Conspiracy theorists at work. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem with conspiracy "theories" is there's usually a smidgen of truth to them such that the gullible and true believers will believe it without a second thought to any veracity.

      In the case of Hillary, she can't even get away with jay walking without a congressional investigation; so hear being involved in any kind of felony conspiracy is batshit crazy and those how actually believe that shit have no business being around sharp objects, small children, or pets, let alone a slingshot or firearm of any sort.

    19. Re:Conspiracy theorists at work. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not the OP, but I can do that with ease. A conspiracy theory a theory that is not backed up by reliable evidence, is (usually) invented by someone who lacks the proper skills to evaluate the evidence scientifically - i.e., the conspiracy theorist is usually not an expert in the respective field, though sometimes well-educated in another field -, and involves some kind of conspiracy claim. Conspiracy theorists love to rely on testimony, often given by other conspiracy theorists, that is presented as if it was expert witness (e.g. hobby ufologists do that all the time). They are practically always unable to distinguish between testable hypotheses, evidence, and plausible or allegedly plausible explanations and also frequently confuse the time someone investigates some subject matter with actual expertise about the subject matter. So for example a ufologist will consider himself an expert on UFO phenomenas when he's into this topic for decades, regardless of whether he makes the same methodological mistakes over and over or not.

      A telltale sign of conspiracy theorists is that they try to shift the burden of proof, because they erroneously believe that this somehow magically establishes the validity of their claim. For example, they demand of people who disagree with them, people from the "mainstream", to prove that their theory is false rather than showing, in each every detail, to those people why their story is true on the basis of shared, easily accessible evidence, peer-reviewed publications, proper expert testimony, logically correct reasoning and proper mathematics, and so forth. They also tend to insist that their 'theories' are true rather than only their personal opinion or just relatively likely, even when they have no grounds in being so decided about the matter, since they lack the background, skills, energy or access to the evidence to really get to the bottom of their claims.

      Conspiracy theorists often make basic logical mistakes. For example, they often think their own 'theory' can be confirmed by refuting or disconfirming competing theories.

      It's really easy to spot conspiracy theories and debunk them, and I could give you a list of criteria and simple steps to follow, but I'm too tired and have written enough already. Appropriate lists and criteria are surely available to find with a simple Google search.

      On a side note, I consider it plausible that many die-hard conspiracy theorists simply suffer from light schizophrenia and would not be conspiracy theorists otherwise, but this just a hunch with no claim of scientific validity.

    20. Re:Conspiracy theorists at work. by ripvlan · · Score: 1

      I read a blog post from a guy who worked at the pizzeria while in college. One tenant of the "theory" is that the members meet and run the operation from the basement.

      The previous employee says... "there isn't a basement in this building - it's on a cement slab." The owner has even confirm this separately in a BBC article.

      Of course this employee wasn't privy to the secret bat tunnel entrance in the back parking lot ! :-P

      Seriously - google search shows that there's a "Boston Bomber" like search of misinformation going on where somebody has discovered evidence of a "space beneath" the building because....well....there's a picture of a basement in the building next door. OMG. ha ha ha -- somebody else followed up and pointed out that the purported pictures show Round European electrical outlets so the pictures can't possibly be from the USA. Wrong building !! whoa duh.

      How uninformed can people be ? -- but doesn't stop them from Post First and Asking Questions Later. (pFAQl ?) Post FAQ. Post Truth. Interesting.

    21. Re:Conspiracy theorists at work. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i think the real conspiracy theory here would be.. why after "fake news" becomes a major real news story.. are we starting to see specific dangerous situations arise out of it? (not the long term, people can't handle thinking in years, sort of stuff like trump getting elected)

      i'm not saying it's aliens... but..

    22. Re:Conspiracy theorists at work. by ASDFnz · · Score: 1

      Heard of the Infinite monkey theorem? Here is a link;-

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      Basicly if you have a million conspiricy nuts making a million conspiracy theories about a million events sooner or later some of them are going to be right.

      Still makes them monkeys though.

    23. Re: Conspiracy theorists at work. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh you mean how we're batshit crazy to believe that the government would actually compromised systems all over the world and spy on its own people and other friendly allies?

      Oh wait..

    24. Re:Conspiracy theorists at work. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is it about crazy people that compels them to put their conspiracy theories on one incredibly long web page?

  11. Michael Flynn Jr believes it by haruchai · · Score: 5, Informative

    The son of Trump's likely National Security Advisor is one of those gullible simpletons

    http://www.independent.co.uk/n...

    --
    Pain is merely failure leaving the body
    1. Re:Michael Flynn Jr believes it by PopeRatzo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Even worse, Michael G. Flynn, member of the Trump transition team and son of the next National Security Adviser might be a 4chan shitstain and is spreading this story just for the keks.

      Either way, it does not speak well of the Trump transition team. I see this morning Trump nominated a medical doctor who thinks dietary supplements can cure cancer, AIDS and multiple sclerosis to be the next Secretary of Housing and Urban Development.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    2. Re:Michael Flynn Jr believes it by RoccamOccam · · Score: 1

      Even worse, Michael G. Flynn, member of the Trump transition team and son of the next National Security Adviser might be a 4chan shitstain and is spreading this story just for the keks.

      We need a government official to fact check this unsubstantiated allegation, right now, before these rumors get out of hand!

    3. Re:Michael Flynn Jr believes it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I see this morning Trump nominated a medical doctor who thinks dietary supplements can cure cancer, AIDS and multiple sclerosis to be the next Secretary of Housing and Urban Development.

      Good. The quicker Trump fucks up irrecoverably, the quicker he gets replaced. Won't be long now.

    4. Re:Michael Flynn Jr believes it by PopeRatzo · · Score: 5, Informative

      We need a government official to fact check this unsubstantiated allegation, right now, before these rumors get out of hand!

      No need to investigate. Michael G. Flynn's OWN WORDS:

      https://twitter.com/mflynnJR/s...

      http://www.slate.com/blogs/the...

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    5. Re:Michael Flynn Jr believes it by ClickOnThis · · Score: 1

      Either way, it does not speak well of the Trump transition team. I see this morning Trump nominated a medical doctor who thinks dietary supplements can cure cancer, AIDS and multiple sclerosis to be the next Secretary of Housing and Urban Development.

      Well at least he's not going to be Surgeon General.

      In all seriousness, I think that Ben Carson is an intelligent and accomplished man. And that's why I'm bewildered at the stuff he has said in public since he started his run for the Republican nomination last year.

      --
      If it weren't for deadlines, nothing would be late.
    6. Re:Michael Flynn Jr believes it by SirSlud · · Score: 1

      I think that Ben Carson is an intelligent and accomplished man. And that's why I'm bewildered at the stuff he has said in public since he started his run for the Republican nomination last year.

      Is him not being an intelligent man too complicated for you?

      --
      "Old man yells at systemd"
    7. Re:Michael Flynn Jr believes it by dbIII · · Score: 0

      I see this morning Trump nominated a medical doctor who thinks dietary supplements can cure cancer, AIDS and multiple sclerosis to be the next Secretary of Housing and Urban Development.

      When I see something like this it's hard to believe it's real and not one of those fake news stories written by Romanian teenagers for a few bucks.
      Reality has jumped the shark.

    8. Re:Michael Flynn Jr believes it by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      In all seriousness, I think that Ben Carson is an intelligent and accomplished man.

      Ben Carson has single-handedly put to bed the notion that brain surgeons are smart people. And it was done pretty much by his own words and actions.

      The fascinating part is that we now know you don't actually have to be very bright to do brain surgery. It's almost as if a person could be good at one thing and yet still be a total imbecile at everything else...

      He might be a good brain surgeon, but I wouldn't let him fix my computer, tune my car, or hem my pants. And I sure as shit wouldn't let him "educate me" on what the pyramids of Egypt were built for.

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    9. Re:Michael Flynn Jr believes it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm so far lost in the fake news meta discussion that at first I misread that as Romulan teenagers.

    10. Re:Michael Flynn Jr believes it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ben Carson has single-handedly put to bed the notion that brain surgeons are smart people.

      Maybe he tried self-surgery?

    11. Re:Michael Flynn Jr believes it by haruchai · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Good. The quicker Trump fucks up irrecoverably, the quicker he gets replaced. Won't be long now.

      Problem is his immediate replacement is Mike Fucking Pence. The cure may be worse than the disease.

      --
      Pain is merely failure leaving the body
    12. Re:Michael Flynn Jr believes it by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The fascinating part is that we now know you don't actually have to be very bright to do brain surgery.

      No, you have to be very intelligent. You spend a good chunk of your life learning about nothing but brain surgery.

      The opportunity cost being that you don't have that time to spend on learning other things.

      He might be a good brain surgeon, but I wouldn't let him fix my computer, tune my car, or hem my pants. And I sure as shit wouldn't let him "educate me" on what the pyramids of Egypt were built for.

      Why would you? What ever made you think you could trust a doctor with a computer?

    13. Re:Michael Flynn Jr believes it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're not far off. II saw a news story on trueamericannews.com.za the other day that Romulan teenagers are hacking the recounts and blaming Romanians for it.

    14. Re:Michael Flynn Jr believes it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HOLY SHIT! You fell for god damn fake news. You think you're so fucking smart. Good Job, you fuckin uneducated moron. You might have multiple degrees, but you sure are stupid.

    15. Re:Michael Flynn Jr believes it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny, that someone complaing about fake news is so sucked into fake news from his side

      Too lazy to log in.

    16. Re:Michael Flynn Jr believes it by PopeRatzo · · Score: 3, Informative

      HOLY SHIT! You fell for god damn fake news. You think you're so fucking smart. Good Job, you fuckin uneducated moron.

      That reminds me. Trump's nominee for Secretary of Housing and Urban Development also believes the pyramids were built to store grain and the mummies were just put there to act as scarecrows.

      http://www.cnn.com/2015/11/05/...

      There's also an embedded video of him actually saying that in case you think this is also fake news.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    17. Re:Michael Flynn Jr believes it by skids · · Score: 4, Funny

      Why would you? What ever made you think you could trust a doctor with a computer?

      Good point. Wait... then why wold we trust a real estate developer and pyramid marketing purveyor to run a country again?

    18. Re:Michael Flynn Jr believes it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He says it will "remain a story" until proven false. I'm not sure what part of that you disagree with?

      The MSM has basically taken to saying "this is false" without bothering to actually explain anything. The NYT did a little, but kind of ignored that the images came from the jimmycomet instagram (not random places on the web...).

      The loser with a gun is a lone nutcase. Nobody investigating the public information on this has been advocating violence, just investigation, as is their right.

    19. Re:Michael Flynn Jr believes it by SoCalChris · · Score: 1

      Don't forget, he also believes that despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary, the pyramids were built by Joseph to store grain in.

    20. Re:Michael Flynn Jr believes it by BlueStrat · · Score: 0, Troll

      Why would you? What ever made you think you could trust a doctor with a computer?

      Good point. Wait... then why wold we trust a real estate developer and pyramid marketing purveyor to run a country again?

      Because the Democrats couldn't figure out ways to both bring Castro back from the dead and get him elected as POTUS so they had to settle for the runner-up, HRC?

      Strat

      --
      Progressivism (aka US 'Liberalism'): Ideas so good they need a police/surveillance-state to enforce.
    21. Re:Michael Flynn Jr believes it by DaHat · · Score: 1

      Is him not being an intelligent man too complicated for you?

      If he is not an intelligent man... how did he reach the top of his field as he did?

      Repeated affirmative action hire/promotion? I don't know about that.

    22. Re:Michael Flynn Jr believes it by Enigma2175 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I see this morning Trump nominated a medical doctor who thinks dietary supplements can cure cancer, AIDS and multiple sclerosis to be the next Secretary of Housing and Urban Development.

      Good. The quicker Trump fucks up irrecoverably, the quicker he gets replaced. Won't be long now.

      LOL, that's the funniest thing I have heard this MONTH. Trump is a reality show buffoon with absolutely no qualifications or experience for this job. Do you really think the people who saw this and voted for him anyway will suddenly realize what a horrible mistake they have made? People tend to rationalize their choices in politics rather than admitting a mistake. That is why Congress always has an abysmal approval rating as a whole but each district tends to rate their own representative highly. Every time Trump opens his mouth and says something stupid there are plenty of people that instantly go to bat for him and try to "explain" what he really meant. Whether it's complete ignorance of diplomatic relationships on his phone calls with Pakistan and Taiwan, telling Duterte that extrajudicial executions to deal with his drug problem is a great idea, or just grabbing women by the pussy, the people who voted for him instantly rationalize it in their brains as "being presidential" or "a tough new diplomatic tack" or "locker room talk". These are the people who shut the government down and prompted a downgrade of the US credit rating because they were throwing a fit about raising the debt ceiling and paying for the shit they already budgeted for. They did demonstrable damage to the finances of the country and their supporters voted them right back in.

      You're delusional if you think Trump supporters will ever acknowledge a fuck-up. As Trump himself said, "I could stand in the middle of 5th avenue and shoot someone and I wouldn't lose voters".

      --

      Enigma

    23. Re: Michael Flynn Jr believes it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it isn't the pope.

    24. Re: Michael Flynn Jr believes it by Type44Q · · Score: 0

      No, you have to be very intelligent. You spend a good chunk of your life learning about nothing but brain surgery.

      Bullshit, unless... well, how intelligent is a library, anyhow??

    25. Re:Michael Flynn Jr believes it by Boronx · · Score: 2

      Well said. I think he's a shoe-in for re-election.

    26. Re:Michael Flynn Jr believes it by PopeRatzo · · Score: 3, Informative

      The MSM has basically taken to saying "this is false" without bothering to actually explain anything. The NYT did a little, but kind of ignored that the images came from the jimmycomet instagram (not random places on the web...).

      Literally none of the story is true. Not only did the whole thing start as an online hoax by pranksters, but the images in the supposed Instagram are from people who "liked" the pizza restaurant's page. None of the "FBI charts of code words" are from the FBI. None of the information that the #pizzagate morons point to is true. It is 100% false.

      Here is a comprehensive, detailed rundown with citations on the history of this hoax and whether a single fact or assertion about pizzagate has been proven true or is possible to be proven true:

      http://www.snopes.com/pizzagat...

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    27. Re:Michael Flynn Jr believes it by Boronx · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Listen to interviews with him back when he was a surgeon. He had that same slow, even mannerism, but spoke clearly about his profession. Either he's afflicted with some kind of dementia, or more likely, he's one of those people who's so focused on their field he doesn't know anything else, but so egotistical he thinks he knows everything.

    28. Re:Michael Flynn Jr believes it by Dutch+Gun · · Score: 2

      Good. The quicker Trump fucks up irrecoverably, the quicker he gets replaced. Won't be long now.

      The mainstream media has been saying that for the last year, and now he's heading for the White House.

      --
      Irony: Agile development has too much intertia to be abandoned now.
    29. Re:Michael Flynn Jr believes it by Boronx · · Score: 4, Informative

      Because Hillary Clinton sent emails not only from an email server, but also received emails on that same server. *Including* emails from some one named Huma Abadein, a foreign sounding name.

      Plus, if you vote for her instead of the game show host, your balls will shrivel and fall off.

    30. Re:Michael Flynn Jr believes it by RoccamOccam · · Score: 1

      Sorry, until Snopes covers it, or a government official verifies it, this allegation must remain "Fake News".

    31. Re:Michael Flynn Jr believes it by h33t+l4x0r · · Score: 1

      I imagine Trump himself believes there's "some truth to it", if he didn't he could end it with a single tweet. Because why would he not want to do that?

    32. Re:Michael Flynn Jr believes it by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1

      Why would you? What ever made you think you could trust a doctor with a computer?

      What ever made you think you could trust a doctor with the presidency, or a cabinet position like the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development?

      And not to put too fine a point on it, but what ever made you think you could trust a reality show host with the presidency?

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    33. Re:Michael Flynn Jr believes it by bestweasel · · Score: 1

      the Trump transition team

      The question is, transition to what? Nobody knows, not even Trump.

      With Carson in charge, expect many more new public buildings to be pyramid shaped, possibly with monumental stone statues of the (shudder) President.

    34. Re:Michael Flynn Jr believes it by ooloorie · · Score: 0

      The pearl clutching, concern trolling, and hysteria coming from progressives and socialists after this election is just delicious. I'm just waiting for some of your heads to explode.

    35. Re:Michael Flynn Jr believes it by Uberbah · · Score: 1

      Because the Democrats couldn't figure out ways to both bring Castro back from the dead and get him elected as POTUS so they had to settle for the runner-up, HRC?

      In some alternate universe, I'm sure that's very witty. Here, though, where Bernie Sanders - who's a 120 leagues left of any other elected Democrat - smeared Hugo Chavez as a "dead communist dictator". Here, where Chavez is 360 leagues to the right of Castro....

      It's just dumfuckery.

    36. Re:Michael Flynn Jr believes it by sheramil · · Score: 1

      Even worse, Michael G. Flynn, member of the Trump transition team and son of the next National Security Adviser might be a 4chan shitstain and is spreading this story just for the keks.

      We need a government official to fact check this unsubstantiated allegation, right now, before these rumors get out of hand!

      that should be pretty easy. ask him what 5millionGet was, without recourse to looking it up. if he can't answer then he's a summerfag.

    37. Re:Michael Flynn Jr believes it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Trump Trump Trump! Think of the alternative choice you gave yourselves, and breath a sigh of relief. The bitch lost. Long live Donald Trump!

    38. Re:Michael Flynn Jr believes it by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      I'd totally let him hem my pants. Sewing/stitching is one of a surgeon's basic skills.

      I grant that expertise has limitations, but you have to know where skills overlap.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    39. Re:Michael Flynn Jr believes it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      AND? He didn't nominate him to the Secretary of Health & Human Services so what are you worried about?

    40. Re:Michael Flynn Jr believes it by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      The Shockley/Chomsky syndrome? Possible.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    41. Re:Michael Flynn Jr believes it by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Here, though, where Bernie Sanders - who's a 120 leagues left of any other elected Democrat - smeared Hugo Chavez as a "dead communist dictator". Here, where Chavez is 360 leagues to the right of Castro....

      You're onto something. Castro is exactly in line with Chavez (as you say 360 degrees, one full turn).

      The only one that's off is '120 degrees to the left of any other elected democrat'. Which is, again, pretty much right on top of Castro, 'authoritarian asshole with a justification', going further left of that takes you back into right wing.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    42. Re:Michael Flynn Jr believes it by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      The fact that lawyers have done such a fucked up job.

      We had no good choices. But another crooked lawyer was 'right out'.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    43. Re:Michael Flynn Jr believes it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ben Carson is a self-confessed psychopath. There was an interview in the guardian where he explained the ability (pure focus and a need to prove himself and try to win every battle). This explains the ultra-narcissism and quick temper, religious fervor, the constant bullshit and drivel, and the fact that once something is said, no matter how ridiculous - even if he himself doesn't believe what he has said - he won't back down.

      Think: Steve Jobs, an asshole who wasn't the brightest bulb, but could read people like a book (a necessary trait for psychopaths as they don't have the same kind of empathy as most humans).

      So you are right as far as not trusting him. You can never truly put faith in a psychopath, they always come first, and they will always fuck you over at some point, just to show who's boss.

      It's handy to read up on the Dark Triad (psychopathy, sociopathy and narcissism) , so you can spot them.

    44. Re: Michael Flynn Jr believes it by Jesus+H+Rolle · · Score: 1
      I wouldn't let him fix my computer, tune my car, or hem my pants.

      Five bucks says he can hem a pair of pants. A needle and thread are tools of the surgical trade.

    45. Re:Michael Flynn Jr believes it by BlueStrat · · Score: 1

      Here, though, where Bernie Sanders - who's a 120 leagues left of any other elected Democrat - smeared Hugo Chavez as a "dead communist dictator". Here, where Chavez is 360 leagues to the right of Castro....

      You're onto something. Castro is exactly in line with Chavez (as you say 360 degrees, one full turn).

      The only one that's off is '120 degrees to the left of any other elected democrat'. Which is, again, pretty much right on top of Castro, 'authoritarian asshole with a justification', going further left of that takes you back into right wing.

      LOL!

      Careful, HW!

      His head may asplode, and *nobody* wants *that* mess around! :D

      Well played, Sir!

      --
      Progressivism (aka US 'Liberalism'): Ideas so good they need a police/surveillance-state to enforce.
    46. Re:Michael Flynn Jr believes it by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Trump won't appoint anyone who ever called him a dummy or unsuited for office, which eliminates essentially everyone qualified for any of those cabinet positions.

      Though really, he's probably just following what some of his advisers suggest, and his advisers have the goal of dismantling government by destroying it from within.

    47. Re:Michael Flynn Jr believes it by tsm_sf · · Score: 1

      Oh lord you're like 15 years too late.

      Our heads asploded when half of the country stood up and said they'd prefer the friendly simpleton over the dull smart man. To lead them. You're waiting for some colossal rage event at the election of a troll, but this is exactly what we expected from you.

      tl;dr "idiot does something idiotic" isn't news

      --
      Literalism isn't a form of humor, it's you being irritating.
    48. Re:Michael Flynn Jr believes it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lawl

    49. Re:Michael Flynn Jr believes it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because all the alternatives were even worse: Politicians.

    50. Re:Michael Flynn Jr believes it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good. The quicker Trump fucks up irrecoverably, the quicker he gets replaced. Won't be long now.

      He's already made a strong defensive move on that one. You know how in chess, you put your queen behind a pawn, and move the pawn towards your opponent? If he takes your pawn, you use your queen to take his piece and set him checkmate. Which effectively prevents him from touching your pawn.

      Well, Trump is doing the same thing. Except his "queen" is called Mike Pence.

    51. Re:Michael Flynn Jr believes it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're delusional if you think Trump supporters will ever acknowledge a fuck-up. As Trump himself said, "I could stand in the middle of 5th avenue and shoot someone and I wouldn't lose voters".

      The thing is, Trump almost[1] can't fuck up. He didn't get elected to be a good politician, he got elected to send a loud and clear fuck you to the establishment. The message is: "If you don't come up with some policies we can vote for, we will vote for someone like Trump". Anything Trump does that scares the crap out of the establishment is fulfilling his purpose.

      [1] The only way he can fuck up is if he ends up being just like Hillary or Obama.

    52. Re:Michael Flynn Jr believes it by senileoldfart · · Score: 4, Funny

      But . . . Soros.

    53. Re: Michael Flynn Jr believes it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't want to interrupt your circlejerk but he said "leagues" not "degrees"
      Might wanna read before you unbutton next time.

    54. Re: Michael Flynn Jr believes it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't want to interrupt your circlejerk but he said "leagues" not "degrees"
      Might wanna read before you unbutton next time.

      Don't want to interrupt your butthurt-party, but 'leagues' makes even less sense. He was actually credited with more sanity than he has demonstrated.

    55. Re:Michael Flynn Jr believes it by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      No, you have to be very intelligent. You spend a good chunk of your life learning about nothing but brain surgery.

      Why does that make you more intelligent than a plumber or electrician? Those guys actually have to do math.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    56. Re:Michael Flynn Jr believes it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      software nerds should be very, very familiar with the latter affliction, but self reflection is usually beyond them

    57. Re:Michael Flynn Jr believes it by Sique · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I never understood that. Whatever else Donald Trump may be, he definitely is establishment. You can't have any large real estate business without being in constant contact with local politicians. His whole economic message during the election was that he has the connections necessary to make Things[tm] work. So he is the establishment guy and insider, that will put an end to all those establishment guys and insiders, right?

      --
      .sig: Sique *sigh*
    58. Re:Michael Flynn Jr believes it by MFriis · · Score: 1

      He said league, not degees. League, any of several European units of measurement ranging from 2.4 to 4.6 statute miles (3.9 to 7.4 km). In English-speaking countries the land league is generally accepted as 3 statute miles (4.83 km), although varying lengths from 7,500 feet to 15,000 feet (2.29 to 4.57 km) were sometimes employed

    59. Re: Michael Flynn Jr believes it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That the number 360 confuses you, when it is used in another context, than the one you per reflex associate it to, does not mean it does not make sense in other contexts.

      I too read it as degrees per reflex. It is probably because reading comments on Slashdot is 360 leagues less important than a 90 league rise in a pants tent.

      I liked Castro and Chavez though. So I'm not commenting to jerk your opinion bubble on them.

    60. Re:Michael Flynn Jr believes it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So he is a valve, vent, drain invented by "the establishment"?

    61. Re:Michael Flynn Jr believes it by trawg · · Score: 1

      I completely agree but this Tumblr of Trump-regret Tweets is pretty excellent:

      https://trumpgrets.tumblr.com/

    62. Re:Michael Flynn Jr believes it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because the Lawyers and professional politicians haven't been able to fix things.

    63. Re:Michael Flynn Jr believes it by mcvos · · Score: 4, Funny

      Is him not being an intelligent man too complicated for you?

      If he is not an intelligent man... how did he reach the top of his field as he did?

      Whatever it is, he certainly put an end to using brain surgeon as a synonym for really smart.

      I wonder when a former rocket scientist will run for president.

    64. Re:Michael Flynn Jr believes it by xtsigs · · Score: 1

      I see this morning Trump nominated a medical doctor who thinks dietary supplements can cure cancer, AIDS and multiple sclerosis to be the next Secretary of Housing and Urban Development.

      Same doctor who apparently believes that urban development means taking away all support and let people somehow flounder their way to success on their own, like his own self deluded narrative. He seems to have forgotten that his own mother depended upon that same help just so that he could eat. It was a policy that worked well for centuries in cities all across the world--except for the vast numbers that were homeless, starved, and sick, of course. I guess some doctors are above the need to concern themselves with history, science, experience, or actual people.

    65. Re:Michael Flynn Jr believes it by squiggleslash · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Slashdot is a forum where the majority of users are IT professionals, our brains able to deal with some unbelievably complex problem solving that people outside of IT consider a type of magic. Most of us have been hailed as geniuses by our friends and family.

      Stray outside of IT related issues however, and the comments here vary widely from occasionally insightful to completely idiotic. You know it. I know it. Everyone here knows it.

      And it's not just us. From Thomas Edison to Richard Dawkins, remove them from their field(s) of expertise and they end up being advocates of really shitty ideas.

      The point is Carson is intelligent in his field, but that doesn't make him qualified in anything else. I'm not saying it precludes him from being smart in other fields, but it explains why in many areas he's said some really dumb stuff.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    66. Re:Michael Flynn Jr believes it by Bigbutt · · Score: 0

      Now now, you know snopes has a liberal bent and is not to be believed for anything political.

      [John]

      --
      Shit better not happen!
    67. Re:Michael Flynn Jr believes it by mjwx · · Score: 1

      You're delusional if you think Trump supporters will ever acknowledge a fuck-up. As Trump himself said, "I could stand in the middle of 5th avenue and shoot someone and I wouldn't lose voters".

      That was before he was elected. Whilst the hardcore supporters wont, I suspect we'll see a wave of Orange Remorse after they start seeing how bad he is. There are very few hardcore supporters and a lot of people who got conned. Much the same as after the Brexit vote where everything the remain campaign said would happen happened and nothing the leave campaign said would happened happened. If the Brexit referendum was re-held, we'd be a solid remain.

      There's nothing like failing under a spot light that makes you lose support. We saw this in the UK with Brexit, we saw it in Australia.. twice, once with the LNP and again with One Nation.

      You would have noticed Trumps tune changed after the election. All the firebrand stuff went by the wayside, he's never going to kick out the Mexicans because then he'd have to pay American wages for his hotel cleaners. He's never going to list all the Muslims because his supporters will be put on a different list. He's never going to "lock her up" because that is tacit permission for his successor to go after him in the same way.

      This will piss off almost all the people who voted for him, only the most hardcore ones will remain.

      People who get voted in out of protest rarely survive their first term, they almost never get another. Trump will have a very short honeymoon period, then everyone will realise he's terrible.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    68. Re:Michael Flynn Jr believes it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But they do have a liberal bias. Sure, believe them when they show you the evidence and draw a logical conclusion (the overwhelming majority of the time), but often they give very circumstantial evidence or none at all and make assertions that do not logically follow.

      A lot of this came to a head during the Clinton campaign because they would often "debunk" a claim by showing that it isn't proven (good), and claim that as being evidence that it is false (not good).

      I.E.
      Fact can either be T or F
      Y says that Fact is T based on E
      W proves that E is untrue/mistaken/does not prove Fact ...
      Therefore X must be F (this does not logically follow, but Wiki does it all the time).

    69. Re:Michael Flynn Jr believes it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Minimizing or glossing over a real crime, intentionally committed, and more importantly the blaze attitude of the person who committed the crime (and their unbelief that anyone would call them on their shit) is why Democrats lost the election.

      While obviously a silly comparison made just to illustrate a point; saying Clinton's issue was mistakenly using a private e-mail server is akin to saying a murder was simply the product of mistaken trust in a gun's safety mechanism. Fully glossing over the fact that the person was not legally allowed to have a gun, was using the gun in the commission of a crime, pointed it at a person with the intent to intimidate them, and pulled the trigger with the intent to kill. But sure, the un-engaged safety mechanism did in fact fail to stop the gun from firing.

    70. Re:Michael Flynn Jr believes it by Xyrus · · Score: 1

      The fascinating part is that we now know you don't actually have to be very bright to do brain surgery.

      No, you have to be very intelligent. You spend a good chunk of your life learning about nothing but brain surgery.

      The opportunity cost being that you don't have that time to spend on learning other things.

      *facepalm*

      You may not have time to learn about other things, but there's no excuse for being a fucking moron. The pyramids are something you learn about in grade school. At the very least you learn about King Tut, one of the most famous mummies they discovered from the pyramids.

      Being a brain surgeon and being intelligent, one would think Carson would have arrived at the conclusion of "Oh, they found a dessicated corpse inside a pyramid. They must have been fancy tombs!", not ""Oh, they found a dessicated corpse inside a pyramid. They must store grain there!"

      --
      ~X~
    71. Re:Michael Flynn Jr believes it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was investigated a while back by the fake news squad and they concluded it was false just like their previous case, flying pink ponies sighted over an Arkansas ranch.

    72. Re:Michael Flynn Jr believes it by Script+Cat · · Score: 1

      The stupid things he said. Did he even, in fact, say them? I heard he thought the pyramids were for storing grain during the time of Moses. Ouch!
      Proving the flimflam wrong is considerably harder than authoring it.

      I just don't know anymore.

    73. Re:Michael Flynn Jr believes it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you are correct Soros ownes Snopes. Keep trying folks.

    74. Re:Michael Flynn Jr believes it by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      or more likely, he's one of those people who's so focused on their field he doesn't know anything else, but so egotistical he thinks he knows everything.

      This. He knows everything about brain surgery and nothing about virtually anything else, including many medical topics. In all these non-neurosurgery areas the Dunning-Kruger effect is in full force.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    75. Re:Michael Flynn Jr believes it by PvtVoid · · Score: 1

      Even worse, Michael G. Flynn, member of the Trump transition team and son of the next National Security Adviser might be a 4chan shitstain and is spreading this story just for the keks.

      Either way, it does not speak well of the Trump transition team. I see this morning Trump nominated a medical doctor who thinks dietary supplements can cure cancer, AIDS and multiple sclerosis to be the next Secretary of Housing and Urban Development.

      Look on the bright side. At least he won't be practicing medicine.

    76. Re:Michael Flynn Jr believes it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you ever spoken to a brain surgeon? I have while working for my local state health department back in 1998.

      From what I gathered this doctor was a leader and one of the best in the region. He was working with the department and the local state university (Midwest - Big 10 - US Land grant) to work on a bill to provide funding for more neurosurgeons in the state.

      Very erudite. Very well dressed. A great guy and friendly as all get out. The Lawyer working with the bill writing team to get the H1-B1 visa waiver info straight went to lunch with me every week. He told me he wouldn't let that doctor touch his head, let alone his brain. Apparently the guy's standard take on his field is most of the brain is still an unknown and he can't be held responsible for the failures.

      You DO NOT need to be a genius to be a neurosurgeon. You just need to be very reassuring.

    77. Re:Michael Flynn Jr believes it by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      You have to be about as intelligent as a retarded redneck who knows everything about cars but nothing about anything else.

      That should tell you something about human intelligence.

    78. Re:Michael Flynn Jr believes it by Pascoea · · Score: 4, Insightful

      [1] The only way he can fuck up is if he ends up being just like Hillary or Obama.

      Really? Is that REALLY the only way he can fuck up?

      Disclaimer, I was not a Trump supporter, but I'm willing to give him a chance. But if you think being "more of the same" is the worst way he can fuck up I truly wonder how far your head is buried in the sand. What about wars, foreign relations, economy? As much as some people may not like it, the US does not exist in a vacuum. Things we do and say (and by "we" I mean our leadership) can have direct and severe consequences. What do you think is going to happen when the administration places a %50 tariff on Chinese made goods? Do you think our country is magically going to find the money to buy non-Chineese made goods, or come up with the extra cash to pay for them? Or worse, how is the world going to react when Mad Dog decides it's time to "finally do something" about North Korea or Afghanistan?

      Yeah, I know, the likelihood of either of those happening is pretty slim, but WW3 is never not a possibility. And we just elected someone with zero political experience, and he's filling his cabinet with unstable and inexperienced people. Yeah, now that I think about it, Status Quo is definitely the worst thing that could happen.

    79. Re:Michael Flynn Jr believes it by Pascoea · · Score: 1

      What ever made you think you could trust a doctor with a computer?

      Or running a national housing development program, for that matter.

    80. Re: Michael Flynn Jr believes it by jedidiah · · Score: 2

      > Bullshit, unless... well, how intelligent is a library, anyhow??

      A library has zero intelligence. It can't learn or apply what it learned. It also doesn't have the requisite physical skills to carry out surgery.

      Your kind of stupidity actually makes look like all of your claims and those of your cabal are pure nonsense. You completely undermine the liberal narrative.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    81. Re:Michael Flynn Jr believes it by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      > What ever made you think you could trust a doctor with the presidency, or a cabinet position like the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development?

      What is so special about that post anyway? What sort of extra special secret personal characteristics do you need for that job anyhow? It's a low profile domestic position.

      People are paying way to much attention to this trivial shit just because they're butt hurt that the other party won.

      It's like you morons thought that a Black President fundementally altered the nature of the universe and ended history.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    82. Re: Michael Flynn Jr believes it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't rationalize anything. I started listening to Rush Limbaugh and happily voted for W. the second time he ran. Worst mistake I've ever made and I've basically voted straight ticket Democrat ever since. Except for locally. I live in a county that's run by Democrats in the rust belt and they are corrupt as can be. I vote for Republicans at the county level every election. Outisde of that and a vote for our Republican governor (who isn't a right wing nut job) I've basically voted for Democrats. Voting for W., in a way, was the best thing I ever did in the booth. It woke me up and forced me to deal with the fact that I'd been hood winked. If the pendulum swings the other way and Democrats become the bat-shit crazy party I'll change my vote and go the other way.

    83. Re:Michael Flynn Jr believes it by ooloorie · · Score: 1

      Our heads asploded when half of the country stood up and said they'd prefer the friendly simpleton over the dull smart man.

      Well, that's because you are gullible enough to believe the Democrat's self-serving image as "philosopher kings". You're right about one thing: the rest of the country does prefer the friendly simpleton, or even the crude simpleton, to the "smart man/woman". I certainly do, and without apologies.

      You're waiting for some colossal rage event at the election of a troll, but this is exactly what we expected from you.

      The "colossal rage events" have been happening.

      And I have no idea what you mean by "expected from 'you'". I'm a former Democrat, now an independent. Until the election, I considered Clinton and Trump to be equally bad. Given what has happened since, I'm really glad that Clinton and her supporters are not in power, even though I still don't like Trump.

    84. Re:Michael Flynn Jr believes it by hey! · · Score: 1

      Oh, he's bright enough. He's just a fool.

      Smart people have their own, unique brand of folly. It's rooted in arrogance, but it's just as dysfunctional as folly rooted in stupidity. Perhaps more so.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    85. Re:Michael Flynn Jr believes it by hey! · · Score: 1

      The great virtue of Democracy is not in ensuring good government, it's in getting rid of bad governments.

      The fact that Congress is so reviled yet stable indicates we're no longer a functioning democracy. We're a plutocracy, where elections are determined by overwhelming advantages in fundraising.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    86. Re:Michael Flynn Jr believes it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why would you? What ever made you think you could trust a doctor with a computer?

      Good point. Wait... then why wold we trust a real estate developer and pyramid marketing purveyor to run a country again?

      Because the Democrats couldn't figure out ways to both bring Castro back from the dead and get him elected as POTUS so they had to settle for the runner-up, HRC?

      Strat

      Castro was alive during the campaign and election. So the Democrats could have run him. Just sayin'

    87. Re: Michael Flynn Jr believes it by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      You failed to understand my analogy while assuming that you did. Hardly impressive but revealing enough...

    88. Re:Michael Flynn Jr believes it by meta-monkey · · Score: 1

      The symbols from the FBI are apparently from the FBI, though: http://www.snopes.com/code-for...

      Whether or not the businesses that used similar symbols were aware of this is unknown (and unlikely), but there are symbols pedophiles use to signal to other pedophiles their preferences.

      --
      We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
    89. Re:Michael Flynn Jr believes it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, that last part must be true. Look at all this butt hurt whiny loser talk from people who voted for Hillary.

    90. Re:Michael Flynn Jr believes it by operagost · · Score: 1

      Because, of course, everyone is responsible for the actions of his adult children. They're essentially the same person, so if your offspring does something foolish, you should suffer the same fate.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    91. Re:Michael Flynn Jr believes it by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      If he is not an intelligent man... how did he reach the top of his field as he did?

      A physical skill. A very dexterous person

      I doubt that he is or was stupid. I suspect he might be showing some cognitive decline however. Seems like a nice and kind fellow with a few odd ideas.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    92. Re:Michael Flynn Jr believes it by operagost · · Score: 1

      That's funny, because we said the same things about Obama in regards to being a community organizer, and we were all called racists for it.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    93. Re:Michael Flynn Jr believes it by Mab_Mass · · Score: 1

      I never understood that. Whatever else Donald Trump may be, he definitely is establishment.

      This.

      It is certainly true that rural America has serious issues related to the dwindling manufacturing, centralization of agriculture, etc. At the same time, it boggles the mind that the solution is put in charge a millionaire who lives at the top of a tower on an island that is the biggest city in the U.S.

      You can't make this shit up.

    94. Re:Michael Flynn Jr believes it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wait an egotistical surgeon? Who thinks he's God? Now I've heard everything.

    95. Re:Michael Flynn Jr believes it by GameboyRMH · · Score: 0

      Pfft take your persecution complex soaked strawmen elsewhere, or better yet find the elusive wacko who actually called every criticism of Obama ever racist and confront him directly.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    96. Re:Michael Flynn Jr believes it by ClickOnThis · · Score: 1

      That's funny, because we said the same things about Obama in regards to being a community organizer, and we were all called racists for it.

      If that happened, then perhaps it's because his résumé is much longer than just "community organizer." That's what he did before he got his degree from Harvard Law School. After that he worked as a civil rights attorney, taught constitutional law at the University of Chicago, served in the Illinois State Senate and the US Senate, and then became the 44th POTUS.

      But in spite of that, you still want to call him a "community organizer?" That may not be racist but it certainly is disingenuous.

      --
      If it weren't for deadlines, nothing would be late.
    97. Re:Michael Flynn Jr believes it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you are over egging the puddin

      Brexit moron's still think it was a good idea...

      for them the fact that their cash is now worth 20% less is great....

      They all think that we can " have our cake and eat it", apparently from leaks that is the fucking plan and not 1 of them will face fucking reality.

       

    98. Re:Michael Flynn Jr believes it by Raenex · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Literally none of the story is true.

      So you bought that fake news narrative without checking?

      Not only did the whole thing start as an online hoax by pranksters

      How do you know that? Some things are pranks, some things are conspiracy theories (that may even have some truth behind them).

      but the images in the supposed Instagram are from people who "liked" the pizza restaurant's page

      Here's where you are dead wrong. Some of the images are from associations, but some very creepy ones involving children were found directly on the owner's Instagram account, "jimmycomet", including the young girl taped to the ping pong table with a male standing suggestively behind her. Ha ha, very funny?

      None of the "FBI charts of code words" are from the FBI.

      But the symbols are.

      None of the information that the #pizzagate morons point to is true. It is 100% false.

      Maybe if you weren't reading "fake news" and did some checking, you wouldn't be saying this. I haven't even gotten into the kind of art that Tony Podesta (John Podesta's brother) had at his home, which is documented by mainstream sources.

      Here is a comprehensive, detailed rundown with citations on the history of this hoax and whether a single fact or assertion about pizzagate has been proven true or is possible to be proven true:

      http://www.snopes.com/pizzagat...

      And here's an archive version of the summary Snopes is "debunking". It also has citations, with archives of pages that have since been made private, deleted, or changed.

    99. Re:Michael Flynn Jr believes it by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1

      We had no good choices.

      We had one good choice, but the DNC stabbed him in the back and conspired to make sure he didn't get the nomination. And I will never, ever forgive them for that.

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    100. Re:Michael Flynn Jr believes it by budgenator · · Score: 1

      Carson might be Okay at hemming pants, Surgery and sewing go together.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    101. Re:Michael Flynn Jr believes it by budgenator · · Score: 1

      I've seen what happens when Doctors get computers, it's not pretty, but at least you can read the prescriptions.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    102. Re:Michael Flynn Jr believes it by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      And here's [archive.is] an archive version of the summary Snopes is "debunking". It also has citations, with archives of pages that have since been made private, deleted, or changed.

      My favorite part of this "summary of pizzagate" is the fact that someone involved in Comet Pizza has a work of art by Jeff Koons.

      Yes, THE Jeff Koons. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      And also a bunch of instagrams from people who have nothing to do with Comet Pizza.

      I notice today that Trump fired the son of Michael Flynn from his transition team for pushing this insane garbage. I guess that means that Trump is in on Pizzagate, too.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    103. Re:Michael Flynn Jr believes it by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      LOL, no.

      Sanders only got that close because the Rs were supporting him, like the Ds supported Trump.

      America won't be electing any Castro loving commies any time soon. Trump was a once in a lifetime boob with the nomination, engineered to give the victory to the worst candidate ever to run for president.

      Sander is in a basket with 'what's his fuck' ('frothy mixture of shit and lube'). If you think he's a good candidate, it says more about you than anything. You are just as on the fringe as an evolution denying bible thumper, you just thump 'das kapital'.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    104. Re:Michael Flynn Jr believes it by ClickOnThis · · Score: 1

      Whatever it is, he certainly put an end to using brain surgeon as a synonym for really smart.

      I wonder when a former rocket scientist will run for president.

      Obligatory sketch from That Mitchell and Webb Look.

      --
      If it weren't for deadlines, nothing would be late.
    105. Re:Michael Flynn Jr believes it by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1

      What is so special about that post anyway? What sort of extra special secret personal characteristics do you need for that job anyhow?

      What is so special about cutting away some brain tissue? What sort of extra special secret personal characteristics (besides steady hands) do you need for that job anyhow?

      Yeah, why have experience at all? It's stupid. That's why when I'm sick I go see a gardener, and when my car has a problem I take it to my plumber.

      Republicans have somehow made a complete lack of experience into a positive qualification in politics. Is there anywhere else in life that rule would be taken seriously?

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    106. Re:Michael Flynn Jr believes it by Jzanu · · Score: 1

      It is as if someone read a lot of children's fairy tales and decided to modify the matrix.

    107. Re:Michael Flynn Jr believes it by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1

      Carson might be Okay at hemming pants, Surgery and sewing go together.

      Then the next time you need surgery just go see your tailor.

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    108. Re:Michael Flynn Jr believes it by Raenex · · Score: 0

      And also a bunch of instagrams from people who have nothing to do with Comet Pizza.

      I love how you ignore the fact one of those Instagram accounts is from the THE OWNER OF COMET PIZZA. You know, the one which includes the taped down girl. But go on, tell me again how it's 100% false.

    109. Re:Michael Flynn Jr believes it by bugs2squash · · Score: 1

      1 nm is a minute of arc at the equator, so a degree is about 20 leagues.

      --
      Nullius in verba
    110. Re:Michael Flynn Jr believes it by PopeRatzo · · Score: 3, Funny

      I love how you ignore the fact one of those Instagram accounts is from the THE OWNER OF COMET PIZZA. You know, the one which includes the taped down girl.

      This is the image he's talking about.

      https://img1.steemit.com/0x0/h...

      Clearly evidence of a secret pedophilia ring reaching into the corridors of power.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    111. Re:Michael Flynn Jr believes it by riis138 · · Score: 1

      Unless its IT related issues or Star Trek, the insightful comments are few and far between, you are correct.

      --
      Somewhere, something incredible is waiting to be known. -Carl Sagan
    112. Re:Michael Flynn Jr believes it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Informative, for ball shrivelling? C'mon, Slashdot.

      Take note: this is what a slippery slope looks like from the bottom.

    113. Re:Michael Flynn Jr believes it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Our heads asploded when half of the country stood up and said they'd prefer the friendly simpleton over the dull smart man.

      Well, that's because you are gullible enough to believe the Democrat's self-serving image as "philosopher kings". You're right about one thing: the rest of the country does prefer the friendly simpleton, or even the crude simpleton, to the "smart man/woman". I certainly do, and without apologies.

      Even knowing what he did in terms of starting disastrous wars, running up the debt, creating a massive structural deficit, expanding the surveillance/"security" state, you still prefer Bush?

      Can you maybe see why people might think that's pretty stupid?

    114. Re:Michael Flynn Jr believes it by Raenex · · Score: 0

      Remember, you said, "Literally none of the story is true.", and "It is 100% false." You parroted the claim that the images were, "from people who "liked" the pizza restaurant's page". You claimed, "a bunch of instagrams from people who have nothing to do with Comet Pizza", whereas many of the photos are from THE OWNER OF COMET PIZZA.

      Clearly evidence of a secret pedophilia ring reaching into the corridors of power.

      Well then, now that we've moved beyond the fact your starting position was complete bullshit, perhaps you would like to look at all the evidence?

      So far, there is no smoking gun. There are, however, plenty of disturbing facts that can't be handwaved away and derided as fake. Why is the press so eager to spin this story as 100% fake and debunked?

    115. Re:Michael Flynn Jr believes it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Trump nominated a medical doctor who thinks dietary supplements can cure cancer, AIDS and multiple sclerosis to be the next Secretary of Housing and Urban Development.

      Thank god he didn't put him in the FDA.

    116. Re:Michael Flynn Jr believes it by Dread_ed · · Score: 1

      Odd. I thought the mummies were found predominantly in the Valley of the Kings, not in the pyramids.

      Not that I think the pyramids were used to store grain mind you. Just that they weren't a place for mummified remains either.

      "Not even wrong" comes to mind.

      --
      When the only tool you have is a claw hammer every problem starts to look like the back of someone's skull.
    117. Re:Michael Flynn Jr believes it by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      Lovely. If the show Designated Survivor plays out IRL, we'll be stuck with that kook as President.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    118. Re:Michael Flynn Jr believes it by amicusNYCL · · Score: 1

      He might be a good brain surgeon, but I wouldn't let him fix my computer, tune my car, or hem my pants. And I sure as shit wouldn't let him "educate me" on what the pyramids of Egypt were built for.

      He can be an intelligent and good surgeon and still have weird beliefs. For example, intelligence is knowing that a tomato is a fruit, and wisdom is knowing that a tomato doesn't go in a fruit salad. He very well might be (and probably is) a very intelligent person, he just didn't study ancient Egypt. That's OK. He's a brain surgeon, not an archaeologist.

      Now, why Trump wants him to head up HUD of all things, I have no idea. The only job that suits him is surgeon general.

      --
      "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
    119. Re:Michael Flynn Jr believes it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow!!! Your well reasoned arguments just changed my mind. I now realize that I am in fact a racist faggot and responsible for all the worlds problems. Yes I voted for Trump. Yes I brought about the destruction of human civilization. I will go kill myself now because I can not possible make amends for all my sins. I am sorry!

      I just wish someone such as yourself could have made that brilliant argument before I pulled that lever.

    120. Re:Michael Flynn Jr believes it by amicusNYCL · · Score: 1

      What sort of extra special secret personal characteristics do you need for that job anyhow? It's a low profile domestic position.

      It's the head of a department with a budget of around $50 billion annually, in charge of things like taking care of homeless people, community planning, public housing, and other urban issues. It's one of those agencies that you don't notice when it's doing its job well. Now that a neurosurgeon is in charge of it, you may start to notice it.

      HUD’s mission is to create strong, sustainable, inclusive communities and quality affordable homes for all. HUD is working to strengthen the housing market to bolster the economy and protect consumers; meet the need for quality affordable rental homes; utilize housing as a platform for improving quality of life; build inclusive and sustainable communities free from discrimination; and transform the way HUD does business.

      --
      "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
    121. Re: Michael Flynn Jr believes it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You might have equally have said "In the game of chess you never let your opponents see your pieces"

    122. Re:Michael Flynn Jr believes it by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1

      He very well might be (and probably is) a very intelligent person, he just didn't study ancient Egypt.

      Well, he says he did, and he says he believes that the pyramids were built to store grain. This is a breathtakingly stupid thing to come up with. Either he's wrong, or every Egyptologist, archeologist, and historian since the dawn of time who knows anything about Egypt is wrong.

      It's such an astoundingly stupid thing to think that I hardly know where to begin. The Egyptian pyramids aren't even hollow. They're almost completely solid and usually only contain a few very small chambers, connected by long, narrow pathways. It would be delusional to think that they were built to store grain.

      -

      Now, why Trump wants him to head up HUD of all things, I have no idea. The only job that suits him is surgeon general.

      With his whacky views and kooky religious beliefs, he's not even well suited to be surgeon general. The man is an idiot, except for one particular area of expertise. And the reason he has such a fantastic reputation is because he wrote a bunch of books wherein he claims to be a stellar surgeon.

      His peers rank him as "good" or "skilled", but he's also been sued for malpractice at least 6 or 7 times. In one case, Carson was accused of bungling a surgery to replace a shunt in the brain of an 9-year-old girl, leaving her disfigured for life and partially paralyzed. In another case, he allegedly punctured his patient’s eardrums during an operation and forgot a sponge in her skull, which he later claimed was a tumor.

      Is he suited to be surgeon general? I don't think so. And that's not even touching on his apocalyptic Seventh-day Adventist beliefs that "end times are likely upon us". I'm sorry, but the man is a lunatic.

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    123. Re:Michael Flynn Jr believes it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except when I cited Snopes in an online conversation, I was told 'LOL.' We I said LOL didn't refute my source, I was told 'Snopes.com is a liberal joke. Everyone knows that (except liberals).' I'm not even liberal...

    124. Re:Michael Flynn Jr believes it by More+Trouble · · Score: 1

      I'm going to go out on a limb here and suggest that politicians are better political leaders than, say, brain surgeons or real estate developers.

    125. Re:Michael Flynn Jr believes it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't that better than making him your senior doctor type (I forgot the title)?

    126. Re:Michael Flynn Jr believes it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Literally none of the story is true.

      Tell that to the Norwegians that broke up the pedophile ring, run by a big-time politician, based on evidence uncovered by "Pizzagate".

      Go on. Tell them. Tell them what a stupid piece of shit you are.

    127. Re:Michael Flynn Jr believes it by DarthVain · · Score: 1

      Yup. I remember prior to Trump winning the nomination hearing about a neurosurgeon running for the republican party. At that point I was like, OK wow, at least one of the 16 or so nominees will be smart and surely that guy will win. Then I heard him talk about things...

      That phraseology "well I'm no neurosurgeon, but..." just got flipped around and ironic.

      Though to be fair to the profession, perhaps there were 99.99% of neurosurgeon's doing a facepalm every time Carson got on TV... The exception to the rule if you will.

    128. Re:Michael Flynn Jr believes it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > images in the supposed Instagram are from people who "liked" the pizza restaurant's page

      They're from the jimmycommet instagram as well as some of his friends. Yes, some other people have posted random images, they're ignored.

      > None of the "FBI charts of code words" are from the FBI.

      Nobody ever claimed the code WORDS were, most of that was from sources like urban dictionary. The SYMBOLS (e.g. nested triangles) are from a FOIA doc found on the FBI twitter. A doc that can be seen in the Snopes article.

      So... you might want to double check that. There are a large number of factual errors in your own post.

    129. Re:Michael Flynn Jr believes it by Mike+Van+Pelt · · Score: 1

      Question: Did Carson just repeat some wild notion that Ellen G. White cooked up that he heard in Sunday School as a kid and never had any particular reason to question or look into, and all the usual suspects are playing "Gotcha!! Whadda maroon!!"? Or does he continue to maintain that the pyramids were for grain storage?

    130. Re:Michael Flynn Jr believes it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why are you lying, Liar?

    131. Re:Michael Flynn Jr believes it by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      Tell that to the Norwegians that broke up the pedophile ring, run by a big-time politician, based on evidence uncovered by "Pizzagate".

      I bet you have a link to a reputable site that backs up your claim.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    132. Re:Michael Flynn Jr believes it by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      Nobody ever claimed the code WORDS were, most of that was from sources like urban dictionary.

      You understand that anyone can post anything to Urban Dictionary, right?

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    133. Re:Michael Flynn Jr believes it by sudon't · · Score: 1

      The son of Trump's likely National Security Advisor is one of those gullible simpletons

      Not to mention the President-Elect, and other cabinet appointees. I don't know whether Pizzagate has come to his attention, but he's tweeted about fake news on more than one occasion.

      --
      -- sudon't

      Air-ride Equipped

    134. Re:Michael Flynn Jr believes it by PopeRatzo · · Score: 2

      Question: Did Carson just repeat some wild notion that Ellen G. White cooked up that he heard in Sunday School as a kid and never had any particular reason to question or look into, and all the usual suspects are playing "Gotcha!! Whadda maroon!!"? Or does he continue to maintain that the pyramids were for grain storage?

      If an adult neurosurgeon is just repeating wild notions that he learned in Sunday school when speaking to public gatherings, then he might not be the guy you want in a presidential cabinet.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    135. Re:Michael Flynn Jr believes it by aristotheron · · Score: 1

      You people are really getting bad. You have no respect for anyone who disagrees with you despite their status in the system that you completely base your identity on. Not to mention the ongoing total and complete lack of critical thought, rationale, and evidence in your discourse.

    136. Re:Michael Flynn Jr believes it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      snopes is run by liberal scum, can't be a trusted source.

    137. Re:Michael Flynn Jr believes it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Trump is a reality show buffoon

      He's many things, but he's not a buffoon. The fact that you're still parroting this tripe, completely unaware of how much he's mentally fucked you up, is proof enough. You've gone beyond "These aren't the droids we're looking for" and moved onto saying "And there's no such thing as Jedi!"

      and how did he get that reality show? Dumbass motherfucker. Do you even know?

      with absolutely no qualifications or experience for this job.

      When has that ever been an indicator of presidential success?

      You're delusional if you think Liberal shitbags will ever acknowledge a fuck-up.

    138. Re:Michael Flynn Jr believes it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Our heads asploded when half of the country stood up and said they'd prefer the friendly simpleton over the dull smart man.

      Well, that's because you are gullible enough to believe the Democrat's self-serving image as "philosopher kings". You're right about one thing: the rest of the country does prefer the friendly simpleton, or even the crude simpleton, to the "smart man/woman". I certainly do, and without apologies.

      I'm not expecting an apology, but I would like to ask why. What is so off-putting to you about smart people? Did a gang of nerds lock you out of the computer room in high school? Did the nerdy girl turn you down when you asked her to go to the prom with you? I am at a bit of a loss to understand this rejection of smart people in favor of the simpletons.

    139. Re:Michael Flynn Jr believes it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Holy shit, is Google too difficult for you now?

      http://www.thelocal.no/20161121/police-break-up-massive-norwegian-paedophilia-ring
      http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/norway-paedophile-ring-police-arrest-51-men-a7432441.html

      You should question your news sites as "reputable" if they DIDN'T report on this, asshole, but that might actually lead to some deconditioning on your part.

    140. Re:Michael Flynn Jr believes it by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      Holy shit, is Google too difficult for you now?

      No, I'm aware of those busts, but where is the part that says it was because of the "#pizzagate investigations"?

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    141. Re:Michael Flynn Jr believes it by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      I was not a Trump supporter, but I'm willing to give him a chance.

      For the uninitiated, this is code for, "I voted for Trump, but I'm too ashamed to admit it."

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    142. Re:Michael Flynn Jr believes it by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      You people are really getting bad.

      "You people"?

      You have no respect for anyone who disagrees with you

      When someone says that biblical Joseph built the pyramids to store grain, it's not a "disagreement". It's a delusion.

      It's like saying you disagree with a guy who says he's Napoleon Bonaparte.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    143. Re:Michael Flynn Jr believes it by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      Seems like a nice and kind fellow with a few odd ideas.

      You're being too generous. I realize you try to see the best in people, Ol, but,

      He said he believed prison makes people gay.

      He said that Obamacare was worse than slavery.

      He said the Big Bang is a “fairy tale” and the notion of evolution was encouraged by the devil.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    144. Re:Michael Flynn Jr believes it by tsm_sf · · Score: 1

      You're right about one thing: the rest of the country does prefer the friendly simpleton, or even the crude simpleton, to the "smart man/woman". I certainly do, and without apologies.

      Is there any reply you could give to the question "why would you do that" that wouldn't make you sound kind of gay for Trump?

      --
      Literalism isn't a form of humor, it's you being irritating.
    145. Re:Michael Flynn Jr believes it by mcvos · · Score: 1

      You people are really getting bad. You have no respect for anyone who disagrees with you despite their status in the system that you completely base your identity on. Not to mention the ongoing total and complete lack of critical thought, rationale, and evidence in your discourse.

      It is the complete lack of critical thought, rationale and evidence in Ben Carson's delusions that makes us dismiss him as an idiot. We have evidence that he is an idiot. Tons of it. How much do we need? I'm not sure what you mean by "their status in the system that you completely base your identity on", but it's certainly not mere disagreement. I even dismiss Jill Stein's (far lesser) idiocy, though she's from the exact party I would prefer to support.

      I disagree with Jeb Bush and John Kasich, but I respect them as fairly sane and rational people.

    146. Re:Michael Flynn Jr believes it by ooloorie · · Score: 1

      Is there any reply you could give to the question "why would you do that" that wouldn't make you sound kind of gay for Trump?

      Why? Because the primary job of a president is to negotiate, coordinate, and manage people, not to solve differential equations. Hillary's performance in dealing with people has been dismal, even those (or in particular those) who know her personally.

      Furthermore, the "friendly simpleton" and the "smart man/woman" are merely carefully constructed political personas and don't reflect actual intelligence anyway; Democrats like to present themselves as super-smart technocrats, while Republicans like to present themselves as folksy and down-to-earth. George W. Bush's SAT score (a good proxy for intelligence) seems to have been substantially higher than Bill Clinton's, for example.

    147. Re:Michael Flynn Jr believes it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Trump nominated a medical doctor who thinks dietary supplements can cure cancer, AIDS and multiple sclerosis to be the next Secretary of Housing and Urban Development.

      They can. If you are deficient in something then your body isn't functioning at its best. By improving your body (taking supplements for what you're missing), your immune system grows stronger and is better able to fight off threats and deal with cancer cells. Everyone has cancer. Everyone. Cancer is simply cells dividing too quickly and not dying off as fast as they're supposed to. But your body almost always keeps it in check. When your body no longer has the resources to do that, the cancer becomes a problem.

      So dietary supplements do indirectly cure/prevent a ton of things. When you're not eating healthy, changing your diet by eating healthier improves your health. Dietary supplements is a way to eat slightly healthier without changing the food you're eating. They do nothing for people who are already eating healthy. Do you drink milk, eat cereal, bread, donuts, orange juice, etc? All of them have vitamins artificially added to them. Unless you're making all your own food from scratch, those added dietary supplements are the only reason you're not gravely ill. People were growing up with misshapen bones and tons of other medical issues before they were added to the food supply. If you're eating the standard American diet, you're only alive because of dietary supplements. So yes, they greatly improve health because what we eat is crap.

      What this has to do with housing, I don't have a clue. As long as the guy is good and urban development what does it matter his views on medicine?

    148. Re:Michael Flynn Jr believes it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I see this morning Trump nominated a medical doctor who thinks dietary supplements can cure cancer, AIDS and multiple sclerosis to be the next Secretary of Housing and Urban Development.

      Good. The quicker Trump fucks up irrecoverably, the quicker he gets replaced. Won't be long now.

      LOL, that's the funniest thing I have heard this MONTH. Trump is a reality show buffoon with absolutely no qualifications or experience for this job. Do you really think the people who saw this and voted for him anyway will suddenly realize what a horrible mistake they have made?

      What does dietary supplements have to do with housing and urban development? Hilliary supports are their own worst enemies. The more you guys talk the dumber you guys look. Are you really going to tell me you don't have a single opinion outside your field of experience that someone else thinks is strange? Your world view is totally warped.

      And before you dismiss my comment as a Trump supporter, even though you have already, I voted 3rd party. Seeing things from different perspectives is a skill you should learn and practice. Otherwise you guys just look like idiots. Tell me which is more effective: venlafaxine or escitalopram? And remember according to your logic if you guess wrong or have to look up the answer then I get to discredit everything you've ever done in your life as well as anyone who recommended you for anything.

      Fuck off.

    149. Re:Michael Flynn Jr believes it by Pascoea · · Score: 1

      For the uninitiated, this is code for, "I voted for Trump, but I'm too ashamed to admit it."

      Close. Very close. If by "very close" you mean voted for Hillary and Obama twice, then yeah, I guess you deciphered the code. Someone give this guy a medal.

      I don't subscribe to the "not my president" bullshit, any more than I subscribed to the birther bullshit. Everybody's*** team wins once in a while, a balance that does reasonably well keeping our country in one piece. Conspiracy nutters and protesters (whiners) do nothing to further the cause of the people, the only serve as a distraction to real problems.
      *** everybody, except 3rd parties, and the Cleveland Browns.

      As far as Trump, the only thing he has actually done so far is pick cabinet members. While I am not impressed by his selections, I am withholding my judgment against him to see what him and his administration actually DOES while in control. The fun part of the next four years is going to be watching all of the Trump supporters blaming Obama for everything that is still wrong with the country, the same way that Obama supporters blamed everything on Bush v2, the same way Bush supporters blamed everything on Clinton, the same way Y blamed everything on X. I just hope I'm not enjoying my "fun" without a job in a fucked up economy, or sending my kids off to the next world war.

    150. Re:Michael Flynn Jr believes it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am truly amazed at how stupid you are.

      The SecDef does not declare war or go to war without the Congress voting to fund it and the President and Congress saying so.

      Mattis can think whatever the hell he wants to think, but the rest of the Executive and Legislative branch's have to agree in order for troops to move from point a to point b.

      Lastly, 4 star generals say a lot of shit. But what makes them have any stars at all on their shoulders is Congress seeing them as politically competent, but when they speak to privates who are being shot at, they say stuff that motivates privates, which may or may not be how they actually think, what they'd actually do, etc. You don't get 4 stars by being a loose cannon.

    151. Re:Michael Flynn Jr believes it by tbannist · · Score: 1

      The fact that Congress is so reviled yet stable indicates we're no longer a functioning democracy. We're a plutocracy, where elections are determined by overwhelming advantages in fundraising.

      That's the wrong lesson. Most congressional elections are determined by gerrymandering. The point of gerrymandering is to generate certain victories and subvert the will of voters. If you want to control congress, you have to control the state legislatures.

      --
      Fanatically anti-fanatical
    152. Re:Michael Flynn Jr believes it by Big+Bill+the+Conjure · · Score: 1

      Here, though, where Bernie Sanders - who's a 120 leagues left of any other elected Democrat - smeared Hugo Chavez as a "dead communist dictator". Here, where Chavez is 360 leagues to the right of Castro....

      You're onto something. Castro is exactly in line with Chavez (as you say 360 degrees, one full turn).

      The only one that's off is '120 degrees to the left of any other elected democrat'. Which is, again, pretty much right on top of Castro, 'authoritarian asshole with a justification', going further left of that takes you back into right wing.

      In what system of angular measurement are _leagues_ interchangeable with _degrees_? I am familiar with _leagues_ only as a linear unit, not an angular one.

      You seem to be confused.

    153. Re:Michael Flynn Jr believes it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More of the same would be great. What can go wrong - look at "W" Bush --- 9/11 (he was warned A MONTH before it happened and did nothing... while President Clinton was warned that there was a bombing threat before 1/1/2000 and they caught the person at the border). Two wars and thousands of people killed (but Cheney got rich from his Haliburton stock.. who received no-bid contracts), and a major economic meltdown caused by ... Deregulation. And don't tell me that the Democrats did that in their vote at the end of Clinton's presidency, there were warning signs during W's time and the did nothing.

      So what could go wrong? Last Republican in the presidency (can't say White House because Trump isn't going to live there). A LOT!

    154. Re:Michael Flynn Jr believes it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stray outside of IT related issues however, and the comments here vary widely from occasionally insightful to completely idiotic. You know it. I know it. Everyone here knows it.

      Shhh. You'll hurt their feelings.

    155. Re:Michael Flynn Jr believes it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good post.

      There was a fascinating article in Discover Magazine some years ago. They focused on science cranks. It turns out that a significant percentage of science cranks are themselves scientists or STEM career employees, and presumably successful. The unifying characteristic they have is that they are only cranks outside of their own specialty.

      People who have the proper training and work experience, learn what ideas have validity and success in their field. When those people attempt to use the fact that, "hey, I'm smart and successful, I can be good at anything!", they are vulnerable to crankish notions. They lack the educational grounding to know what has already been checked out, found invalid, and cannot be successful. Again, this is only outside of their career specialty.

      There was an xkcd about this but I can't find it now...

    156. Re:Michael Flynn Jr believes it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I too am eagerly awaiting this citation, and taking bets on whether it is from Breitbart, InfoWars or Twitter.

    157. Re:Michael Flynn Jr believes it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes,

      Smart people aren't smart at everything. And it doesn't take a smart person to make lots of money. and a smart person nor a rich person are always good. Typically they're bad.

      And that is why democracy works, sort of.

    158. Re:Michael Flynn Jr believes it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, you have to be very diligent. You spend a good chunk of your life training about nothing but [put sport in here].

      Intelligence is being able to adapt... EVOLVE. not being good at one thing--a athlete is a perfect example and we know how they are all super smart.

      Business folk put folks 100% focused on a pedestal, whether it's singing, sports, money making, brain surgery. Cause they need it to exploit them/it.

      Politicians folk put folks 100% in adaptability/knowledgeable on a pedestal, whether it's x number of degrees, x number of languages, experience, diversity & credentials. Cause they need it to exploit them/it.

      hence we are in interesting times.

    159. Re:Michael Flynn Jr believes it by jwhitener · · Score: 1

      No, you have to be very intelligent. You spend a good chunk of your life learning about nothing but brain surgery.

      Learning facts and what to do with them does not make your more intelligent. More importantly, being told what is true by professors of medicine for 8 years, concerning medicine, in no way gives you the skills necessary to evaluate new non-medical facts and data on your own years later after you get out of school.

      Why would you? What ever made you think you could trust a doctor with a computer?

      What makes you think we can trust a doctor to read and understand archaeological journals (or even just a scientific american article) so they can comment intelligently on the history of the pyramids? Hint: you can't.

      You would be better off having a history, english/lit, or philosophy major, reading about the pyramids and then commenting on their history. At least those disciplines contain a lot of source evaluation practice.

    160. Re:Michael Flynn Jr believes it by Pascoea · · Score: 1

      I am truly amazed at how stupid you are.

      And you are a pussy for hiding behind AC. I'd be happy to have a civilized adult discussion, but you have to take off your diaper and put some big-boy pants on first.

      ...the rest of the Executive and Legislative branch's have to agree in order for troops to move from point a to point b.

      Yeah, I paid attention in high school gov't class too, but thanks for the reminder.

      Mattis can think whatever the hell he wants to think

      And he was just nominated for an extremely high level position, and will be highly compensated for providing his thoughts and opinions to the people who do make decisions about such things. It is literally his job to recommend combat action against our perceived enemies. Is it really inconceivable that some of those recommendations he provides to the Executive and Legislative branches might just be that we should go "do something" about Iran, North Korea, Syria, or whoever? It may be true that his "public" and "private" demeanor are two completely different representations of his opinion. I guess time will tell, but it doesn't seem like someone that two-faced would last very long.

    161. Re:Michael Flynn Jr believes it by Uberbah · · Score: 1

      You're onto something. Castro is exactly in line with Chavez (as you say 360 degrees, one full turn).

      No, I didn't say 360 degrees, as the AC pointed out. Was reading comprehension an elective at Ayn Rand Elementary?

      Which is, again, pretty much right on top of Castro, 'authoritarian asshole with a justification', going further left of that takes you back into right wing.

      If Chavez was an authoritarian asshole, he would have thrown the various fascists and bourgeois motherfuckers trying to sabotage the country into a gulag, not *gasp* merely refuse to renew broadcast licenses. For stations that participated in a coup attempt.

    162. Re:Michael Flynn Jr believes it by Pascoea · · Score: 1

      What can go wrong - look at "W" Bush

      GP was referring to Hillary and Obama as the Status Quo, so that is what I was commenting on. GW was a jackass, how he got two terms is a mystery to me.

    163. Re:Michael Flynn Jr believes it by tsm_sf · · Score: 1

      You know that, thanks to the magic of history, we can cast our gaze back and see if people were actually wise or foolish, right?

      --
      Literalism isn't a form of humor, it's you being irritating.
    164. Re:Michael Flynn Jr believes it by ooloorie · · Score: 1

      You know that, thanks to the magic of history, we can cast our gaze back and see if people were actually wise or foolish, right?

      Yes, and you should try that some time. Technocratic and/or progressive government has a lousy historical record.

  12. Fake and Baseless. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A rifle-wielding North Carolina man was arrested Sunday in Washington, DC for carrying his weapon into a pizzeria that sits at the center of the fake news conspiracy theory known as "Pizzagate," authorities said Monday. DC's Metropolitan Police Department said it had arrested 28-year-old Edgar Maddison Welch on allegations of assault with a dangerous weapon. "During a post arrest interview this evening, the suspect revealed that he came to the establishment to self-investigate 'Pizza Gate' (a fictitious online conspiracy theory," the agency said in a statement. "Pizzagate" concerns a baseless conspiracy theory about a secret pedophile group, the Comet Ping Pong restaurant, and Hillary Clinton's campaign chief, John Podesta. The Pizzagate conspiracy names Comet Ping Pong as the secret headquarters of a non-existent [...]"

    And, just in case you didn't get it yet, it's non-existent, fake news conspiracy theories. Baseless, too.

    1. Re: Fake and Baseless. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's almost like they are trying to push an agenda. Nah, they must have already performed a thorough, transparent investigation and turned up no evidence of wrongdoing to make such claims. Anybody have a link? Anyone? Hello?

  13. Re:"self investigate" == mental illness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    = someone with a mental illness

    If you can't see it for what it is, you've got a problem.

  14. I wonder why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I wonder why every official/mainstream outlet is so unified in denouncing this as "fake news", why it must be mentioned several times in anything mentioning Pizzagate, why the "fake news" phenomenon suddenly started getting a lot of attention around the same time. Hmmm. Nothing to see here, move along citizen. If your beliefs need to be changed then you will be notified through approved channels.

    1. Re:I wonder why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wonder why every official/mainstream outlet is so unified in denouncing this as "fake news"

      They are obviously part of the conspiracy. Duh!

    2. Re:I wonder why by sexconker · · Score: 1

      I wonder why every official/mainstream outlet is so unified in denouncing this as "fake news"

      They are obviously part of the conspiracy. Duh!

      This is correct.

    3. Re:I wonder why by Maltheus · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yeah, I never really saw this reported as "news" anywhere (not that it wasn't eventually picked up on several blog sites). This was more of a discussion board/twitter "investigation." I never really gave it much credibility, but when all the MSM sites start yelling "fake news" in unison, it does peak my curiosity. It's not like pedophile scandals are that rare among people in power.

      It might be inaccurate news, but I have no doubt that the people looking into this believe its real.

    4. Re: I wonder why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You guys joke about it, sure it seems ridiculous and I don't believe it's likely there's some giant government run pedo ring. On the other hand, if you actually read the emails, which have been supposedly verified, there is indeed something weird going on..... but no idea what. That guy and his friends seem like real fuckin' weirdos.

    5. Re:I wonder why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Because there is good reasons to think that these fake news turned a good number of people in rabid Trump voters.
      Because Trump and his future government routinely tweets fake news (as if they were real news) while calling good journalism crooked.
      But, no reason really, future POTUS is not a stupid scam-artist insane megalomaniac fascist lunatic, everything's good, nothing to see, move along.

    6. Re:I wonder why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because there is good reasons to think that these fake news turned a good number of people in rabid Trump voters.

      Speaking of conspiracy theories...

    7. Re:I wonder why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The slashdot description is highly editorialized, I suggest the Ars technica story. He didn't just bring a gun in, he pointed it at an employee and it also went off or he shot it once inside the restaurant, causing patrons to flee.

    8. Re:I wonder why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If i had to bet MY MONEY.

      I would bet it's real. Too many questionable things.

      That the msm even picked it up and ran hard with discrediting it should tell you it's a little more than 'crazy conspiracy'.
        don't recall cnn's last story about bigfoot. or aliens. etc...

    9. Re: I wonder why by skids · · Score: 1

      Where were you guys for Jeff Gannon? Oh right, you don't care unless you can smear someone on the left.

    10. Re:I wonder why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When do Tweets become news, really?
      Do you really think tweets from below bear less weight than "MSM false coverage" to a whole range of the population?

      Pizzagate: Son of Donald Trump's national security adviser shares wild conspiracy claims surrounding Hillary Clinton and a pizza shop paedophile ring

    11. Re:I wonder why by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      It might be inaccurate news, but I have no doubt that the people looking into this believe its real.

      Yes, but the people posting it clearly don't believe that it's real, they're just trolling people dumb enough to believe it. That's why they have used pictures which were shared with the pizza parlor by fans and claimed that they came from other sources. When you find a blatant, obvious lie used to support a story, that story is bullshit — or at the bare minimum, you have to throw away that evidence. Okay, so if you throw away the supposed photographic evidence, what's left? Fuck-all. And that is how much attention this "story" deserves.

      Until we learn to be basically discriminating, trolls will be able to wind up the media with trivial amounts of energy. A direct analogy can be drawn to terrorism.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  15. Use their stupidity against them by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    How about we scale up Jade Helm conspiracies to scare right-wing wackos right out of the country altogether.

    1. Re:Use their stupidity against them by rholtzjr · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't work, many states have their own standing militias which have the same capabilities as the US active duty forces (they get their shit from the same places). And as far as I know, these exercises were monitored by said state militias, it is a non-issue.

      Do not put too much trust into a centralized government such that the state no longer has any control over their own prosperity and direction or pretty soon you will be spelling America with a 'k'.

    2. Re:Use their stupidity against them by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      The only people I know of who spell America with a 'k' are left wing fanatics who've believed too much fake news.

    3. Re:Use their stupidity against them by meglon · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't work, many states have their own standing militias which have the same capabilities as the US active duty forces (they get their shit from the same places). And as far as I know, these exercises were monitored by said state militias, it is a non-issue.

      There is no state that has the same capabilities as the US military, and there's certainly not any of these fat, drunk, inbred "militias" who have the capacity for anything more than drinking beer or getting themselves killed when their ignorant macho bullshit writes checks their bodies can't cash.

      --
      Fascism: An authoritarian and nationalistic right-wing system of government and social organization. See also: NAZI's
    4. Re:Use their stupidity against them by meglon · · Score: 1

      Sorry, it's the reich-wingers that are the ones kept stupider than shit by the only "news" channel you actually get less news than not watching anything at all. You'd have to be stupider than fuck to want this country run by neo-nazi mother fuckers. Sick fucking conservative fascists are too fucking stupid to realize how truly fucking stupid they are.

      As for this guy... he's a perfect example of a fucking stupid conservative.

      --
      Fascism: An authoritarian and nationalistic right-wing system of government and social organization. See also: NAZI's
    5. Re:Use their stupidity against them by rholtzjr · · Score: 1

      That shows you just how informed you really are. Or in this case, misinformed. Most of the state militias are called "National Guard", which I believe that last time I checked made up about 20-30% of deployments to Iraq, Afghanistan, etc. So before spouting utter BULLLSHIT, do some research.

    6. Re:Use their stupidity against them by skids · · Score: 1

      Too late. Putin is already preparing net year's dictionary.

    7. Re:Use their stupidity against them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Registered Democrat actually if you believe the REAL NEWS.

    8. Re:Use their stupidity against them by rholtzjr · · Score: 1

      Wow, snappy comeback by throwing in all those expletives describing someones intelligence. "Stupider????", Oh, never mind, definition says it all

    9. Re:Use their stupidity against them by parkinglot777 · · Score: 1

      I believe that national guards can be called by the President as well, not state. Besides, national guard in most states are funded by federal.

      And you are talking about this data about deployment rate in Iraq?

    10. Re:Use their stupidity against them by rholtzjr · · Score: 1

      Exactly my point, "they get their shit from the same place". However, with the National Guard, they are commanded by the Governor of their state at least they are in my state. And YES they can be called by the state and the President as well. It is a dual command structure since 1933.

  16. Double plus Ungood by locater16 · · Score: 1

    We have always been at war with Eastasia, we have always been Allies with Eurasia. Our alliance is double plus ungood. Do not believe the lies of the MSM. All must love our great leader!

  17. Re:Podesta by Tablizer · · Score: 2

    They have shitty evidence - But John Podesta does like to bugger little children. You can tell because he looks like an old man version of a programmer.

    "Psst, kid, wanna try Linux? It's free..."

  18. Re:"self investigate" == mental illness by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

    = someone with a mental illness

    If you can't see it for what it is, you've got a problem.

    Lots of people seem to have that problem... if the person is Muslim.

    --
    #DeleteChrome
  19. Deinstitutionalization + Social Media + Guns = ? by ErichTheRed · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's interesting how much these fake news social media campaigns are drawing out the nutcases. It makes sense, social media tools are designed to reinforce one's beliefs and continuously show you things that interest you -- as well as relevant ads of course! I could definitely see a conspiracy nut get hold of an idea from Facebook or Twitter, then have it keep popping up in his feed over and over again, then have his friends repost it, then see streams of tweets reconfirming their beliefs.

    Social media in this case is kind of like conservative talk radio, in that the most devout listeners to it seem to get locked into a feedback loop over certain ideas, never to change them again. Their host is angry, gets the listeners riled up and the audience feeds on the anger.

    That said, this whole story is a pretty sad statement on how we treat mentally ill people these days. New York (where I live) is completing the process of shutting down almost all of their custodial-care institutions and dumping people out onto the streets. Basically, you'll need to be Hannibal Lecter to get an inpatient psych bed, so you'll likely end up in prison instead -- or if society's unlucky, you'll just sit there stewing for years until something makes you snap and shoot up a pizza place. I'm not saying we should go back to the bad old days of locking people up for depression, giving them lobotomies or abusing them...but I do think deinstitutionalization went way too far. People should be able to seek a diagnosis for mental illness without stigma, and get treatment if they need it. I'm convinced this is why we have so many mass shootings in the US. Look at Adam Lanza (the Newtown guy) -- according to all accounts, his mother basically hid his developing mental illness for years and refused to accept there was a problem. But, the sad thing is that even if she had sought help for him, she wouldn't have been able to get it.

  20. Re:"self investigate" == mental illness by rednip · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    If you can't see it for what it is, you've got a problem.

    It is simply the expected end result of GOP lead lies combined with their rabid insistence of weaponizing lunatics for poltical gain. One would be silly to think otherwise.

    --
    The force that blew the Big Bang continues to accelerate.
  21. These wackos are cows with guns by presidenteloco · · Score: 0, Troll

    Seriously, extreme right-wing nutjob gun owners with mad cow disease dementia https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

    Run for your lives.

    --

    Where are we going and why are we in a handbasket?
    1. Re: These wackos are cows with guns by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      zombies with guns aaah

    2. Re:These wackos are cows with guns by DaHat · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      So when an extreme left-wing nutjob gun owner went into the Family Research Council office in DC, complete with a bag of chick-fil-a and a list of 'hate groups' from the Southern Poverty Law Center and shot someone before being wrestled to the ground... he was what? Nothing to worry about?

    3. Re:These wackos are cows with guns by rholtzjr · · Score: 1

      What, you mean that the US has a hidden cow level? WHERE!!!!! I want to go there.

    4. Re:These wackos are cows with guns by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 5, Insightful

      He was a nutcase, just like in this instance.

      Apply Occam's Razor.

      One nutcase, wound up by online trolls.

    5. Re:These wackos are cows with guns by Sam36 · · Score: 1, Troll

      You should buy a gun. It's a great experience, kinda like loosing your virginity.

      I was not a gun owner until Nov 1st. I was prompted by not only Hilary's attitude on gun control and the possibility of her getting into office, but also by her supports protesting against the "right" and white people in general. I've never felt so unsafe in my life.

      So I googled for "best 9mm 2016," can came across several recommendations for the CZ 75 P01 9mm, it holds 18 rounds. Cool! I went the next day to a local gun shop and they had one in stock, so I bought it for $630.

      Normally I never spend money, so that was a big step. But it felt good and I figured it was now or I'll never be able to buy a gun again.

      I also wanted something that was smaller and something with more style. So the next weekend I went to a local gun show. At the second table I looked at was an older man selling a collection of Smith and Wesson revolvers that he bought at an estate sale. I bought a never been fired smith and wesson revolver with a 2" barrel for $600 and a larger one with a 4" barrel also for $600 (still in the original box, both were from the 1970's).

      Then I bought about $300 in ammo online.

      Went to my grandparent's farm only once so far to shoot, but it was great.

      Now the other thing is that I want to carry my guns around with me everywhere. It feels great so I've got to get my concealed carry license.

      With three guns in the house I can pretty much always be in a room with one. I've never felt so safe. Just the other night some neighbors were playing loud spanish music and there was lots of people shouting. I couldn't tell if they were fighting or just partying (this went on for hours). I just got my 2" smithy and laid it on the dining room table which is where I was working with my laptop at the time. I even at one time thought I could hear these party people running in my backyard, but I didn't care. I got smithy sitting right here, I just kept working.

      And just today, I was in the bathroom taking a crap, my wife was out and I was the only one home. I heard some noises coming from another room, probably just the walls popping from the cold front that came in, but still. I was like what is that? I didn't have any of my guns in the bathroom with me, I didn't really like that at all. Guess I'll have to do something different next time.

      In short, buy a gun. It's great. It's also your right. And you should carry it around with you everywhere. If having a gun in your possession makes you feel unsafe then I'm sorry, but you need to fix that. If the price is keeping you back, there are plenty of non-american made guns out there that are $300 new, and $100 - $200 at a pawn shop. I wanted something made in america and something that I could pass down to my kids. So just buy something.

    6. Re:These wackos are cows with guns by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Good troll. 5/5 would read again.

    7. Re: These wackos are cows with guns by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Democrats have the best gun marketing campaign in the nation! What wonderful times we live in! USA USA USA!

    8. Re:These wackos are cows with guns by kat_skan · · Score: 2, Funny

      https://goo.gl/maps/Lvj4ec9pE9...

      It's not actually as exciting as it sounds.

    9. Re: These wackos are cows with guns by skids · · Score: 1

      It's the ones in police body armor that suck. Especially in that highly irradiated vault where you have to put on a radiation suit.

    10. Re:These wackos are cows with guns by rrohbeck · · Score: 1

      The fake news cycle had a significant effect on the election. There are lots of mad cows in the US.

    11. Re: These wackos are cows with guns by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why would i have faith in the police? They are just another gang running the streets as far as i am concerned

    12. Re:These wackos are cows with guns by klueless · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      This is not a"right-wing" nutjob conspiracy that the mainstream media is falsely categorizing it as. Their attempts to debunk the results of this citizen investigation are laughable. They 1st article that ran a piece that claimed it was debunked was the New York Times, which did not even begin to respond to the damning evidence that has been uncovered. Journalist David Seaman responding to that attempt to cover this up. https://www.youtube.com/watch?... As for this "rifle-wielding North Carolina man", he is an actor. Comet pizza also just hired the same crisis management firm that Obama used for the 2012 Secret Service prostitution sex scandal: https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/14... The mainstream media is lying to everyone and attempting to cover this up. Just go and read the Podesta wikileaks emails for yourselves. Podesta likes to play dominoes on pizza, likes to get a pizza "for an hour". Everyone needs to do the world a favor and dig into the evidence and make a determination for themselves, rather than taking the "fake news" mainstream media at face value. These are the same propaganda rags that said Hillary had a 98% chance to win.

    13. Re:These wackos are cows with guns by Uberbah · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So when an extreme left-wing nutjob gun owner went into the Family Research Council office in DC, complete with a bag of chick-fil-a and a list of 'hate groups' from the Southern Poverty Law Center and shot someone before being wrestled to the ground... he was what?

      The exception, not the rule. Any more stupid questions?

    14. Re: These wackos are cows with guns by fastest+fascist · · Score: 1

      It's all a conspiracy. You're a troll on the Russian payroll, tasked to create chaos. I'm a monarchist pretending to be a confused bleeding-heart liberal to create chaos. Obama of course is a lizard pretending to be a muslim pretending to be an American, all the better to create chaos. Or maybe you're just nuts.

    15. Re:These wackos are cows with guns by LeftCoastThinker · · Score: 0

      Oh sure, because there has never been a left wing nut with a gun? Try again. There are crazies of all flavors. In the US, we used to put them in sanitariums for everyone's safety, including their own. Then the bleeding heart idiots on the left (ACLU specifically) sued in 1972 to let all the poor, incarcerated nut jubs loose into society with all of their constitutional rights and we saw a massive jump in homelessness, vagrancy, assaults, and yes, shootings, all by these crazy people that had no place in our society.

      Here are a few left wing nuts you may have heard of. For some reason they do wall to wall coverage of affiliation if the gunman is right wing; if they are liberal Democrats, those details are largely unreported by the MSM:

      – Nidal Hasan – Ft Hood Shooter: Registered Democrat
      – Aaron Alexis, Navy Yard shooter – black liberal/Obama voter
      – Seung-Hui Cho – Virginia Tech shooter: Wrote hate mail to President Bush and to his staff, registered Democrat.
      – James Holmes – the “Dark Knight”/Colorado shooter: Registered Democrat, staff worker on the Obama campaign, #Occupy guy,progressive liberal,
      – Amy Bishop, the rabid leftist, killed her colleagues in Alabama, Obama supporter.
      – Andrew J. Stack, flew plane into IRS building in Texas – Leftist Democrat
      – James J. Lee who was the “green activist”/ leftist took hostages at Discovery Channel – progressive liberal Democrat.

      --
      If you disagree, please post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like
    16. Re:These wackos are cows with guns by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      I'm a conservative and strong supporter of the 2nd amendment, but can we please let that bogus list die. It's false example
      Nidal Hassan, No political registration in either Texas or his prior state of residency Virginia, because neither requires registering as a member of a particular party.
      Seung-Hui Cho, resident alien with no voting rights. As such he never registered to vote, party affiliation not known.

      That's just a couple examples off the top of my head. The list you pulled these from was debunked years ago. Nutjobs come from both sides of the political spectrum.

    17. Re: These wackos are cows with guns by wilsone8 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Violent crime is down significantly from the 1970s. How does that jive with your theory?

      --
      The real problem is not whether machines think but whether men do. - B.F. Skinner
    18. Re:These wackos are cows with guns by Greystripe · · Score: 1

      You misspelled SPLC.

    19. Re:These wackos are cows with guns by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was wrong of that left-wing, mentally ill individual to do what he did. I apologize for the incident for all liberals and call for that person to be locked up until he is no longer a threat to society and the world in general.

      Now it time Trump supporters do the same.

    20. Re: These wackos are cows with guns by furasato · · Score: 0

      I just wish the news media would also publish this fact. They have so many people believing gun deaths are skyrocketing, when in fact, they are declining.

    21. Re: These wackos are cows with guns by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fake news. Ted Cruz misrepresented the results of a study. Trolls and others who liked what Cruz was implying spread the story further. Fake news warning over.

    22. Re: These wackos are cows with guns by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is an exception. Left wingnuts only use guns as a last resort. They normally rely on carefully crafted logical fallacies, outright lies and the media to propogate them.

    23. Re:These wackos are cows with guns by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I was prompted by not only Hilary's attitude on gun control

      Go ahead and watch that first Trump/Clinton debate again. Go ahead, I'll wait....

      Did you see what I saw? Both Trump and Clinton agreed with each other about gun control.

      42:15 is when they start talking about gun violence

      44:30 - Trump - "you take the gun away from criminals that shouldn't be having it"

      45:35 - Trump - "we have to take the guns away these people that have them and they are bad people and shouldn't have them"

      50:10 - Clinton - "if you are too dangerous to fly you are too dangerous to own a gun" *Trump nods agreement*

      They have the same stance on gun control...

    24. Re: These wackos are cows with guns by jedidiah · · Score: 2

      Most gun violence is perpetrated by low income people living in high crime areas. The people in those particular high crime areas tend to vote overwhelmingly Democrat (when they do vote).

      Liberal news media outlets only care about gun violence when people outside of that demographic are involved. They usually focus on weapons that only account for a tiny minority of gun mayhem.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    25. Re:These wackos are cows with guns by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget about the app appers! apps!

    26. Re: These wackos are cows with guns by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Liberal news media? Hahaha. DNE.

      This country doesn't have liberals. It has centrists. The right here is just so bat shit crazy it makes the centrists look liberal.

      I wish people would get over the left/right bullshit. Both groups in this country are ignorant as fuck and unable to get their way outta a wet paper bag.

    27. Re:These wackos are cows with guns by TheCastro1689 · · Score: 1

      FYI, CZ is not American made, you were also ripped off on the price. You probably overpaid for the snub nose as well.

    28. Re: These wackos are cows with guns by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have data? Because this sounds like your opinion, buttercup.

      Most dumbass poor people who don't live in cities overwhelmingly vote republican.

      Correlation is not causation.

    29. Re: These wackos are cows with guns by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should not have guns if you're that afraid. Your emotionally unstable and I fear for your wife as you're likely going to kill her or the person she's having an affair with because you're so bat shit.

      Or you're gonna kill one of your kids.

      Seriously. You feel safe because you've shot your guns once? That's fucking stupid. So. Fucking. Stupid. You're the reason we can't have nice things.

    30. Re:These wackos are cows with guns by TheCastro1689 · · Score: 0

      You forgot the part where she wants to ban most guns.

    31. Re: These wackos are cows with guns by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Would "data" change your position or would you just go on to question the source to avoid change in your position?

      Rural poverty doesn't have the gun violence record that urban poverty has (statistics of population density/proximity and human nature makes that blatently obvious).

      Black-on-black, under 25, urban, poor. It's not a question. The true issue is, what do we do about it? The true crime is that the answer so far has been to use it as political leverage and not treating it as a real problem to solve...

    32. Re:These wackos are cows with guns by admin7087 · · Score: 1

      I admire your honesty, klueless.

    33. Re: These wackos are cows with guns by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Provide data. Stop talking about and just do it.

    34. Re:These wackos are cows with guns by Sir_Eptishous · · Score: 1

      Your user_id says it all.

      --
      We play the game with the bravery of being out of range
    35. Re: These wackos are cows with guns by ilsaloving · · Score: 1

      Considering your statement flies exactly 180 degrees from reality, I'm gonna stick a [citation needed] right here.

    36. Re:These wackos are cows with guns by The+Grim+Reefer · · Score: 1

      Your name isn't Homer Simpson by any chance, is it?

    37. Re:These wackos are cows with guns by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He was a nutcase, just like in this instance.

      Apply Occam's Razor.

      One nutcase, wound up by online trolls.

      He is pretty representative of a large part of the population.

    38. Re:These wackos are cows with guns by rochrist · · Score: 1

      Go to a doctor and get yourself on some sort of medication.

    39. Re:These wackos are cows with guns by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      While CZ is a Czech company, manufacturing pistols in the Czech Republic and rifles in Turkey, CZ-USA is an American company and does have a design and warehouse facility in Kansas City, Missouri. Most guns distributed from that facility are made in the Czech Republic or Turkey, regardless of where they were designed, but CZ-USA does also have a custom shop in Warsaw, Missouri, where some of the American designs (including the Safari Classics and 550 Tactical lines of rifles) are built. They also own Dan Wesson Firearms, based out of Norwich, New York; they do all their manufacturing in-house, as well.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    40. Re:These wackos are cows with guns by magarity · · Score: 1

      Comical, in a sad "I know nothing about firearms therefore I make fun of people who do" way, but you lost it with the huge error in the third paragraph.

    41. Re: These wackos are cows with guns by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then why is it when BLM and Muslims promote fake narratives that wind up people and end with stabbings and dead cops is it not a crime?

      Let me guess, marginalized victims never lie...

    42. Re: These wackos are cows with guns by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unless they are black and their guns are pointed at white people, then the are anheros.

    43. Re:These wackos are cows with guns by Sam36 · · Score: 1
    44. Re: These wackos are cows with guns by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You seem to be mistaken. I'll help.

      Extreme left: let illegals become citizens, free welfare, medical, college for all. Abortions at any time for any reason.

      Left: let illegals stay / path to citizenship, moderate welfare/medical/college assistance/loan forgiveness, only first trimester abortions

      Right: kick illegals out, build a wall, ok with tiny welfare but nothing else, no abortion

      Extreme right: execute the illegals, build a wall, no welfare, prison time for anyone having or assisting with abortions

      I know people from each category.

    45. Re: These wackos are cows with guns by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Extreme left is still barely center, sugar tits. Nice assumptions but this is my point. People here don't know what left really is all they know is the rhetoric they hear on the news and from trolls.

    46. Re: These wackos are cows with guns by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's because you hadn't invented that position for her yet.

    47. Re: These wackos are cows with guns by LeftCoastThinker · · Score: 1

      Not sure if you are trolling, but OK I will assume that was an honest question:

      Total crime and mass shootings by crazy people are not the same thing. Fully 50% of all mass murders committed in the US were done by mentally ill in 2013, despite being only 11% of the population (excluding depression). The US rates of involuntary commitment for mentally ill people is far below that of other modern nations i.e. EU etc.

      https://www.hsaj.org/articles/...

      Total crime is down because of 3 strikes laws, lifetime incarceration of habitual criminals, record high gun ownership, castle doctrine laws, etc. Dead or incarcerated criminals do not commit crimes. Most crime is still committed by people because they chose to, for a myriad of reasons, not because of mental health issues.

      http://www.cnsnews.com/comment...

      --
      If you disagree, please post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like
    48. Re: These wackos are cows with guns by Uberbah · · Score: 1

      They normally rely on carefully crafted logical fallacies, outright lies and the media to propogate them.

      You mean Korean Central Television? Because that's how far you'd have to travel to find a controlling left wing media. Here in the U.S., it's hard core neocon neoliberal horsefuckery all day long, all day strong.

    49. Re: These wackos are cows with guns by Uberbah · · Score: 1

      Then you're an idiot, unless you're talking about the Black Panthers, who only got guns for self-defense from the police state. You know, something NRA ammosexuals should have been 1010% behind, if they weren't completely full of crap.

    50. Re: These wackos are cows with guns by TheCastro1689 · · Score: 1

      https://www.nraila.org/article... Just look up Hillary gun control executive order.

    51. Re:These wackos are cows with guns by TheCastro1689 · · Score: 1

      I was talking specifically about the CZ75 he bought.

    52. Re:These wackos are cows with guns by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      Then, perhaps, you should have said "that CZ" or "the CZ 75", in which case you would have been correct. However, you simply said "CZ", which was, as proven above, incorrect.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
  22. The Internet and dumb people by DogDude · · Score: 4, Insightful

    As evidenced by this sad case (I hope the pizza shop owners sue this idiot and garnish his wages for the rest of his life), and the election, I think the case can be made that the Internet doesn't necessarily enhance society. It's an interesting turn of events, and certainly not one that I considered seriously. I had always thought that the Internet went to shit in the early-mid 90's, when the public-at-large started to use it in large numbers. I couldn't imagine how bad it would end up today, though. And, sadly, we have such a large amount of the world's population still not online, I fear that it's going to get that much worse. I'm honestly disappointed in humankind that something with so much potential as the Internet can go to such shit so quickly.

    --
    I don't respond to AC's.
    1. Re:The Internet and dumb people by sexconker · · Score: 0

      As evidenced by this sad case (I hope the pizza shop owners sue this idiot and garnish his wages for the rest of his life), and the election,

      The election was 4 weeks ago. Get over it. Accept it. Love it. Shrek it.

    2. Re:The Internet and dumb people by Major+Blud · · Score: 1

      I fear that it's going to get that much worse. I'm honestly disappointed in humankind that something with so much potential as the Internet can go to such shit so quickly.

      The same things have been said about television, radio, and print. The game stays the same, only the delivery has changed.

      --
      If you post as Anonymous Coward, don't expect a reply.
    3. Re:The Internet and dumb people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Accepting Trump's election _IS_ criticizing the shit out of every stupid shit he says and do in the hope of something reaching the lunatics who voted for this sorry excuse of a human being.

    4. Re:The Internet and dumb people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The internet died when community died.

      This may surprise you but in the "flyover states" that hasn't happened (yet), but in the cities, it has.

      Lots of people don't seem to realize this, having never been a part of that.

    5. Re:The Internet and dumb people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > I think the case can be made that the Internet doesn't necessarily enhance society.

      We were doing pretty good with it until social media came along.
      And yes I've been on the net since '89, back before DNS and long before the web.

      > I'm honestly disappointed in humankind that something with so much potential as the Internet can go to such shit so quickly.

      Progress is never linear. We are figuring this shit out. Social media removed the middle-man of news reporting. Turns out that all those editors and journalistic standards like having multiple independent sources and using fact-checkers were actually useful. All this hysteria about fake news should produce a replacement - for example when something gets shared on facebook, facebook can automagically include ratings from debunkers - say for example a snopes rating -- right on the headline of the facebook share and a link to a detailed criticism in the share itself. Not only good for pizzagate fake-news, but propaganda of all kinds like say from ISIS to impressionable muslim youths too.

    6. Re:The Internet and dumb people by ooloorie · · Score: 1

      I had always thought that the Internet went to shit in the early-mid 90's, when the public-at-large started to use it in large numbers.

      Nobody is forcing you to read Facebook, CNN, Twitter, or any of the other sites. If you want to hang out with only your half dozen best buddies online, set up your own IRC and USENET and you don't have to worry about the other couple of billion users.

    7. Re:The Internet and dumb people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well that's what you get when you 'commercialize the internet'. I've been around a long time on the 'internet', it doesn't have anything on newsgroups, same shit different packaging. The big difference is now the same people spouting stupid shit on newsgroups are getting paid for it on websites.

    8. Re:The Internet and dumb people by Xyrus · · Score: 1

      You're focusing on the wrong thing. Fake news, idiots, etc. are just a side show really.

      The question we should really be asking is, how did someone like this manage to get an AR-15?

      --
      ~X~
    9. Re:The Internet and dumb people by lorinc · · Score: 1

      Me too. It seems the Internet does not turn dumb people into smarter people. It's simply an enabling tool. Of course the last thing you want to do is to give dumb more power, and this is exactly what the Internet has done. I used to think of it as something that would start an education revolution, but it's marginally the case. Too bad.

    10. Re:The Internet and dumb people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sitting around playing the banjo and yelling the took my jerb, and fucking your relatives is not community.

    11. Re:The Internet and dumb people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      News flash: You are a fucking idiot.

      Kiss hillary's hairy ass. It is believed to help grow brain.

    12. Re:The Internet and dumb people by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Hopefully fake news can be dealt with just like any other design flaw in the internet has been patched over and fixed up over the years. If we have learned anything it's that solutions don't have to be perfect, merely good enough to fix 90% of the issue and the rest will mostly self-correct.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    13. Re:The Internet and dumb people by Calydor · · Score: 1

      Maybe that second amendment should be updated from well-regulated to well-MEDICATED?

      --
      -=This sig has nothing to do with my comment. Move along now=-
    14. Re: The Internet and dumb people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ummmm......it's America. There's your answer right there.

    15. Re:The Internet and dumb people by strikethree · · Score: 1

      (I hope the pizza shop owners sue this idiot and garnish his wages for the rest of his life)

      Eh? No harm no foul. He was honestly investigating something that would be considered as terrible by most of us. He shot nobody. I think he essentially had cold water poured on him and reality has become more clearly defined for him. The soft lies should now be completely gone for him without anyone being hurt.

      This shit is just so crazy. We NEED to teach critical thinking to our children. If you have children and have not taught them to think for themselves, then shame on you. Unfortunately, our society is controlled by people who will NOT allow critical thinking to be taught in public schools, but we can still educate our children individually.

      --
      "Someone needs to talk to the tree of liberty about its ghoulish drinking problem." by ohnocitizen
    16. Re:The Internet and dumb people by xbytor · · Score: 1

      > I had always thought that the Internet went to shit in the early-mid 90's,

      The Eternal September was in 1993 when AOL opened up access to usenet to the masses.

    17. Re:The Internet and dumb people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He still has to deal with the consequences of those who do.

    18. Re:The Internet and dumb people by jez9999 · · Score: 1

      This shit is just so crazy. We NEED to teach critical thinking to our children.

      How about something like, "Now Johnny, just because a big media company says something is false doesn't necessarily mean it's false. Look at the evidence for yourself before dismissing it, and certainly don't dismiss other people as 'crazy conspiracy theorists' just because they're considering the information too."

  23. Fake Fake News by sexconker · · Score: 0, Troll

    Was he wielding a rifle as stated in TFS, or was he carrying it?
    Why would he be arrested for carrying a rifle? It's his right to do so.
    Why is investigating something on your own bad? In this era of Fake News, it's the only way to be sure.
    Further, why are we saying this is bogus conspiracy theory? Read the emails, something is definitely up. The media and powers-that-be are trying VERY hard to discredit this revelation. "Nobody is listening to your phone calls." and "You can keep your plan." hard.

    Fear not - in a few short weeks President Trump's justice department will drain the swamp that is Washington, D.C..

    1. Re:Fake Fake News by laughingskeptic · · Score: 2

      Read the story: "According to police, the suspect entered the Comet Ping Pong restaurant in DC around 3pm and pointed the firearm at an employee. He then discharged it without anybody getting hurt. Witnesses said restaurant patrons scattered from the venue."

    2. Re: Fake Fake News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not his right to do so in DC and in someone else's place of work. You can't just walk around with a fucking assault rifle. And to bring an assault rifle into a place of business is a 100% a no no. The store owner doesn't know your intentions. Even if you don't plan on using said rifle; it's still not a good look. He's lucky he didn't get his head blown off.

    3. Re:Fake Fake News by Ryanrule · · Score: 1

      he pointed it at someone and suhot it inside the business you stupid neo nazi fuck. INTERESTING that the summary didnt cover this part as well.

    4. Re:Fake Fake News by sexconker · · Score: 1

      That's clearly fake news.

      If he pointed it at an employee then discharged it, the employee would have been hurt.
      Either he didn't discharge it or didn't point it at an employee, or didn't do either.

    5. Re: Fake Fake News by sexconker · · Score: 1, Insightful

      It's his right to do so everywhere in the United States of America, actually. You actually CAN walk around with an assault rifle! A few decades ago, nobody even gave a shit!

      Who said it was an assault rifle? Do you know what an assault rifle is?

    6. Re:Fake Fake News by edtice1559 · · Score: 1

      Or first he pointed at the employee and then, later, when it was no longer pointed at the employee, he discharged it. This is really by far the most likely thing. He could point it at the employee and then shoot near the employee intentionally missing in order to maximize fear without actually hurting the employee. He doesn't want to kill a witness to the conspiracy!

    7. Re:Fake Fake News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Go look at Twitter and you have witnesses saying there was no gunfire.

      https://web.archive.org/web/20161205044956/https://mobile.twitter.com/bayreef/status/805593857744310272

    8. Re: Fake Fake News by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 1

      It's his right to do so everywhere in the United States of America, actually. You actually CAN walk around with an assault rifle! A few decades ago, nobody even gave a shit!

      Who said it was an assault rifle? Do you know what an assault rifle is?

      Actually it doesn't. There are plenty of places in the US where it is illegal. In his case, he was on private property and he has no 2cd amendment right to carry there, he may only do so if the property owner allows it.

      --
      I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
    9. Re:Fake Fake News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      INTERESTING that the summary didnt cover this part as well.

      It's part of the conspiracy.

    10. Re:Fake Fake News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Aaaaaand.... this is how fake news gets started. Some idiot who read a headline somewhere does not bother to do basic research, then posts a comment extrapolating the incident with his own internal bias. In an echo chamber, such as those fueling most conspiracy theories, the post gets repeatedly reposted, each time the story gets further away from the truth.

      Then you have one of the nut jobs shoot up a pizza place because he thinks an international child trafficking ring, funded by one of the world's most popular non-profit organizations and headed by a political celebrity is hiding under everyone's nose.

    11. Re:Fake Fake News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you read the article? He fired his AR-15 after pointing it in the direction of an employee, who felt sufficiently scared to flee.

      Mr. Welch is not a member of a militia. And if we’re going to let him “bear arms” without being in one, where does it stop? Can Mr. Welch have a Stinger? A B-2 bomber? How about tactical nuclear weapons?

      The point of the second amendment is to repel on oppressive government, but I think we can all agree that the most powerful military in the world can no longer be opposed unless you have your own army, navy, and air force. Should private citizens be able to have those as well?

      Also, throughout most of this country’s history, no court had ever ruled a citizen has a right to bear arms, that is only a recnet wet dream by the radical right.

    12. Re:Fake Fake News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mr. Welch is not a member of a militia.

      Yes he is

    13. Re:Fake Fake News by meglon · · Score: 1
      Are you intentionally being a fucking idiot, or is that just your natural state?

      According to police, the suspect entered the Comet Ping Pong restaurant in DC around 3pm and pointed the firearm at an employee. He then discharged it without anybody getting hurt. Witnesses said restaurant patrons scattered from the venue.

      I'm going to go with that being your natural state.

      --
      Fascism: An authoritarian and nationalistic right-wing system of government and social organization. See also: NAZI's
    14. Re:Fake Fake News by dbIII · · Score: 1

      His justice department will be creatures from the swamp.
      What's wrong with you people - if you wanted to send a message to the "establishment" why vote for a fucking trust fund baby who has been the embodiment of the "establishment" for his entire life? He only knows how to play and not how to work for a living.

    15. Re: Fake Fake News by blindseer · · Score: 2

      I'm calling BS on this.

      First, no military in the world issues AR-15 rifles as standard equipment. The AR-15 design was the basis for the M-16, M-4, and other rifles but the AR-15 as available to the civilian population is far from common in any military.

      Second, an "assault rifle" is a class of weapon that is capable of burst and/or fully automatic fire. There are some true assault rifles in private possession in the USA but the people that own them would not carry them into a pizzeria to put holes in their walls. To own such a weapon one would have to pass a stringent background check, pay considerable fees in lawyers and taxes, and be required to keep it under close guard.

      Third, anyone that has had an actual drill sergeant would know how to spell "sergeant".

      Fourth, a drill sergeant would never call such a weapon an "assault rifle". It would be called a "rifle" or "weapon". No one in the military would bother to expend the effort in calling such things an "assault rifle" in common conversation. That term would only be used to differentiate such a weapon from a sniper rifle, machine gun, carbine, sidearm, mortar, tank, or other weapon if there was some reason one might be confused. Even then the "M" designation would likely be preferred, as in calling it a "M-16" or "M-4".

      If you were in fact in the military then I suspect that you were tossed out with a BCD. Probably from calling your weapon an "assault rifle" in front of your drill sergeant one too many times.

      --
      I am armed because I am free. I am free because I am armed.
    16. Re:Fake Fake News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    17. Re:Fake Fake News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know that sometimes, not everything happens at once, right? You noticed the word THEN? As in, "AND THEN, he.. etc.". Man, are you dense.

    18. Re:Fake Fake News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      NYPD are supposedly the ones who uncovered this. This is why the second FBI investigation was opened. Obama pardoned Hillary. End of story.

    19. Re:Fake Fake News by sexconker · · Score: 1

      He doesn't need to be a member of a militia for the 2nd amendment to apply to him. The 2nd amendment simply states that a well regulated militia is necessary. That's not a condition for keeping or bearing arms, and nothing in the text states or even implies that. What IS stated in the text is that his right to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.

    20. Re:Fake Fake News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You cannot open carry in DC.

      Also you cannot "investigate" by threat of force, or threaten people who attempt to leave. He should be charged with kidnapping.

    21. Re: Fake Fake News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Were you stroking your cock while you typed that ? Mmmmm....mmmm...feels so good...mmmmm..M16....stick the bullets right in it....right down deep inside it, the fucking bitch.....take them all you little slut...you know you want it....mmmm...mmmm...ohhhhh...mmmmm....fucking oily little bitch.....so long, so hard....mmmmmmm...mmmmmm......fully auto little whore....yes..yes!

    22. Re:Fake Fake News by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      Unless you are bat shit crazy or a felon. there are laws that cover that and every sane gun rights person supports them.

      The dude is bat shit crazy.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    23. Re: Fake Fake News by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      Federal law was passed against longarm open carry in response to the Black Panthers in the 60's and 70's. Learn your laws.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    24. Re:Fake Fake News by DutchUncle · · Score: 1

      Break aim and fire into the floor to show you're serious - and too stupid to consider the danger of a ricochet. If a police officer had done it, they would call it a "warning shot". But since it was a random citizen pointing a weapon at another random citizen, it's assault with a deadly weapon, followed by the discharge of a firearm within city limits, reckless endangerment, reckless handling of a firearm, and a bunch of other citations for which the moron should be locked up.

    25. Re: Fake Fake News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uggh hammers kill many more people in the USA than assault riffles. So can the owner of the store ban assault hammers?

      African Americans kill even more people in the USA than assault hammers. Does that mean the store owner can ban African Americans?

    26. Re:Fake Fake News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      one of the last 3 people out of the restaurant never heard any gunshots, and expressed surprise on twitter after seeing a journalist claim that, according to police, shots were fired

      so far the only source I can find for claiming that shots were fired are the police reports

      https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/5gobb0/someone_isnt_telling_the_truth_about_edgar/

    27. Re:Fake Fake News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      also, there was a traffic cam that was pointed to watch the street that Comet was on

      the day before this guy showed up, it was turned away from it's usual position to point away, and with an obscured view

    28. Re: Fake Fake News by painandgreed · · Score: 1

      Second, an "assault rifle" is a class of weapon that is capable of burst and/or fully automatic fire.

      Just to be pedantic, IIRC, an "assault rifle" is a class of weapon that is capable of selective fire and fires a cut down rifle round which results in a shorter range and less stopping power but allows soldiers to carry more ammo. There are pistols with selective fire, and guns that fire a full battle rifle round with selective fire, such as the BAR, are usually classified as light machine guns. Probably just overlooked as unimportant in the discussion but the ability to carry more ammo and less need of long range and stopping power was critical to the change in tactics that lead to the development of assault rifles.

    29. Re: Fake Fake News by budgenator · · Score: 1

      My DI called it an Assault Rifle one, actually he said "This is the M16A1 Assault Rifle" circa 1973, Drill Sergeant Billy Marten, same name as the Detroit Tiger's Manager.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
  24. democracy sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    if there is one things those fake news have been good for, it is to make the case for a Noocracy. Democracy sucks, too many dumb people.

    I mean how stupid and completely void of common sense do you have to be to believe that Hilary Clinton was running a pedo-sex ring in the backroom of a pizzeria.

  25. Impossible by the_mushroom_king · · Score: 1

    You cannot argue with someone who believes only information from their propaganda spigot is true. They will just dismiss you argument as false without needing to critically refute it. You literally cannot reason with these people.

    1. Re:Impossible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I came across one woman, late twenties, who would not vote for Hilary because she was convinced that Hilary wanted to legalize abortion up to 36 weeks. I pleased her to check out www.senate.gov and hilary's official campaign website. Nope, waste of time, she sticks to whatever crap she read on FB.

    2. Re:Impossible by king+neckbeard · · Score: 1

      It probably doesn't help that she pretty clearly lied about her stance on TPP (among other things), which we have extensive documentation about, thanks to Wikileaks. If they correctly identify Clinton as a horrible human being, it's much easier to get something to stick even without evidence.

      --
      This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    3. Re:Impossible by buddyglass · · Score: 1

      Already legal at any point prior to birth so long as a physician concludes the mother's "emotional well-being" is endangered by a continued pregnancy. Doe vs. Bolton.

    4. Re:Impossible by skids · · Score: 1

      ...and somehow that same standard doesn't apply to Trump?

    5. Re:Impossible by king+neckbeard · · Score: 2

      There are bullshit narratives used against Trump, although it's easy for them to get lost in the media covering everything he tweets. One bizarre claim was that 'drain the swamp' was racist.

      --
      This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    6. Re:Impossible by jeff4747 · · Score: 1

      Depends on the state. Federal law allows abortion until birth.

      Some state laws restrict abortion to an arbitrary cut off and those laws have been upheld, except when the cut-off is extremely early. The current battlefield is over 24 weeks vs 20 weeks.

  26. Re:Deinstitutionalization + Social Media + Guns = by Ryanrule · · Score: 2

    reagan trashed the mental health system. kept too many republican voters locked up.

  27. Re:"self investigate" == mental illness by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 0

    No.

    Occam's Razor.

    It's an individual nut with a gun.

  28. Re:Podesta by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just because Podesta's friends are convicted child molesters doesn't make him one. In the US, we don't believe in guilt by association.

  29. Re:Podesta by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

    That reminds me of the graybeards who would hang out in the back rows of the auditorium at LUG meetings in the mid 90's.

  30. Pansise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Just amazing how cowardly the right is.

    I mean your god-damn Pansy Elect was crying on twitter about needing a safe space because his bro was bullied by a bunch of thespians in musical theater.

    I have never seen such a fucking wimp in my life.

  31. Stochastic Terrorism by Matt_Bennett · · Score: 1

    Fake news is stochastic terrorism- not for a political goal, but for profit.

  32. Re:"self investigate" == mental illness by AK+Marc · · Score: 2, Insightful

    A white person does it and it's a mental illness, and we should feel sorrow and empathy. A black person does it and he's a thug who needs to be made an example of.

  33. Fuck this guy by Snotnose · · Score: 2

    Prosecute him to the fullest extent of the law. Asshole's an idiot, I'd rather he be in prison than in the general population.

    1. Re:Fuck this guy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, fuck you. You need to be prosecuted in prison. Heil hillary.

    2. Re:Fuck this guy by RogerWilco · · Score: 1

      Prosecute him to the fullest extent of the law. Asshole's an idiot, I'd rather he be in prison than in the general population.

      And hos is that going to help anything?
      The nutjobs will accuse "the government of covering up the truth".
      His peers will still believe the story, maybe even more so.
      The problem with these people is that anything contradicting their views is considered part of the conspiracy.
      I don't know how to break through that, but making one of them a guest of the state for a long time isn't likely to solve it.

      --
      RogerWilco the Adventurous Janitor
    3. Re:Fuck this guy by strikethree · · Score: 1

      Prosecute him to the fullest extent of the law. Asshole's an idiot, I'd rather he be in prison than in the general population.

      I disagree completely. There is no doubt that he is an idiot; however, calling him an asshole is an entirely different thing. He thought there may be children in trouble and wanted to INVESTIGATE. Yes, he brought a tool along to help "fix" the problem if the situation was what he was told it was. If he had not brought the gun, would you still be seeing his actions in the same light? He clearly was not going to use the gun unless he found something atrocious; otherwise, he would have went in shooting.

      Yes, something "bad" should happen to the guy, but do we really need to hang him? Is that what justice should be in America? I am tired of every infraction being grounds for instant and eternal punishment. I don't want to live in that kind of world.

      --
      "Someone needs to talk to the tree of liberty about its ghoulish drinking problem." by ohnocitizen
    4. Re:Fuck this guy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Follow up on that. If this was a false flag, this guy will quietly be released back into the wild when people are no longer paying attention.

      As a matter of fact, shortly before this event, he was arrested for an unrelated crime... err, wait, why was he wandering around DC, in front of an army of cops, with a rifle, then? For that matter, why didn't the cops, whose job it was to protect Comet Ping Pong against exactly this kind of attack, stop the guy from walking in with an AR-15? That's odd, it's almost like... but no, if CNN calls something a "conspiracy theory" there's absolutely no way it can be true, so it's not worth doing independent research, or checking evidence. It's, like, Galileo's 5th law of physodynamix or something.

      Never mind that the pizzagate investigators predicted last month that a false flag event like this would take place, and even got the timeline right (a couple weeks before Christmas, before people are too busy with the holidays to miss it, but so that the holidays would quickly sweep in to distract everyone and provide cover for the anti-free-press legislation which will be quietly rushed through in 3... 2... 1...)

      If anyone wants to read some actual facts, rather than just dismiss this whole debacle out of hand because CNN and FOX said you could, here's a good place to start:
      http://stateofthenation2012.com/?p=58937

  34. Bubba Boy Names by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why are people like this always identified by using a middle name? This should be known as the Billy Sol Estes effect.

  35. The pedulum swing, and this is what lies bring by s.petry · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    The pendulum was extremely far left for a very long time. People have to expect the same thing to occur in the opposite direction. Combine that fact with the fact that media in the US has been manipulating people for decades, so now that people see a glimpse of a different truth more questions should be expected.

    Let us also be honest on what the Pizzagate starter as. It was due to some very cryptic emails from the Podesta dumps, not some wacko on Twitter. Again, we have a Federal Government and MSM not doing their respective jobs. People, like it or not, feel obligated to step in where our Government is failing.

    This should all be expected, and the answer is not "ban speech" but FIX DISHONESTY IN GOVERNMENT AND MEDIA!

    --

    -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

    1. Re:The pedulum swing, and this is what lies bring by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      Far left for a long time, really? It's not like we have elected anyone that really believes in socialist concepts, like Bernie does.

      Last 5 presidents:

      - Reagan (right wing Republican)
      - Bush I (centrist Republican)
      - Clinton (centrist Democrat)
      - Bush II (right wing Republcan)
      - Obama (elected as slightly left of center but wound up pretty close to Clinton if not a bit to the right of him)
      - Trump (who the fuck knows but he sure isn't a lefty)

      You could fix FIX DISHONESTY IN GOVERNMENT AND MEDIA by at least pretending to support a candidate that doesn't slander and lie at the drop of a hat.

    2. Re:The pedulum swing, and this is what lies bring by dbIII · · Score: 2

      Funny, we were discussing mental illness and the "9/11 was faked" guy turns up - well timed!

    3. Re:The pedulum swing, and this is what lies bring by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not funny. Sad. Sad as fuck.

    4. Re:The pedulum swing, and this is what lies bring by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let us also be honest on what the Pizzagate starter as. It was due to some very cryptic emails from the Podesta dumps, not some wacko on Twitter.

      Since you like to believe in conspiracy theories, let me help you:
      FACT: All of the DNC emails, including Podesta's emails, were hacked by Russia and dumped through unofficial, unverifiable channels.
      What was to stop Russia from adding a little falsehood into the mix? Maybe they added those Podesta emails so they could propagate the Pizzagate conspiracy? Maybe it is Russia's way to test how much they can control you.
      Either way, it is not provable. It is all lunacy.

      Again, we have a Federal Government and MSM not doing their respective jobs. People, like it or not, feel obligated to step in where our Government is failing.

      This should all be expected, and the answer is not "ban speech" but FIX DISHONESTY IN GOVERNMENT AND MEDIA!

      Based on my conspiracy theory, it is the Russian trolls getting you to do their bidding because you "feel obligated to step in" for some unknown reason.
      It is simple lunacy.

    5. Re:The pedulum swing, and this is what lies bring by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The fact that you think Obama is a centrist (or 'close to Clinton') says something about where you get your news.

    6. Re:The pedulum swing, and this is what lies bring by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck me petry, you take dumbfuck RWNJ to a whole new level.

  36. "According to Buzzfeed" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    lol

  37. Re:"self investigate" == mental illness by rednip · · Score: 2

    It's an individual nut with a gun.

    Who happened to walk into a business and shoot because he was goaded on by GOP propaganda spread not just by random trolls, but party leaders. The Republican party has a real mess on its hands. This will not end well.

    --
    The force that blew the Big Bang continues to accelerate.
  38. Re:Deinstitutionalization + Social Media + Guns = by Major+Blud · · Score: 2

    People should be able to seek a diagnosis for mental illness without stigma, and get treatment if they need it.

    They already do, depending on the "diagnosis". It seems like having aspergers, ADHD, or being on some part of the spectrum is almost a badge of honor in some circles, especially in tech:
    http://nymag.com/news/features...

    And just think about the amount of people getting prescribed Xanax, Prozac, or Adderall nowadays.....seems like people are getting what they want (whether or not this is "treatment", or course, is debatable).

    Look at Adam Lanza (the Newtown guy) -- according to all accounts, his mother basically hid his developing mental illness for years and refused to accept there was a problem. But, the sad thing is that even if she had sought help for him, she wouldn't have been able to get itc

    Hogwash. She was fairly well-off financially, and it's been said that what set him off was that his mother had finally decided to have him committed.
    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/...
    Although the details behind that were somewhat speculative, he was at the very least seeing a psychiatrist, one that was in the news recently with his own set of problems:
    http://www.nydailynews.com/new...

    I'm not saying we should go back to the bad old days of locking people up for depression, giving them lobotomies or abusing them...but I do think deinstitutionalization went way too far.

    Maybe. But you need to be careful of what you're asking for:
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

    --
    If you post as Anonymous Coward, don't expect a reply.
  39. News by b783719 · · Score: 1

    Fake news? you sure it's not an advertisement?

    Breaking News: Kids saved 60% on car insurance by buying 100% beef Big Mac. Buy your Big Mac today!

  40. Re:Deinstitutionalization + Social Media + Guns = by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    reagan trashed the mental health system. kept too many republican voters locked up.

    The second half of your statement doesn't help your point.

  41. Re:"self investigate" == mental illness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Serious question. I've seen you bring race in to this several times. Why is race so important to you? I didn't even care enough to inquire about the race of the guy. You should stop letting your opinions be defined so much by race. It's the way a society moves beyond racism. When race is no longer important.

  42. Why the right wing focus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's not like left leaning mental patients don't exist: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earth_Liberation_Front

    Sheesh, Slashdot is full of conspiracy nuts, but since its part of the group think, no one questions the lunacy.
    Captcha: Halloween papers

  43. Re: President. For all that it matters by hackwrench · · Score: 1

    I never asked for a president.

  44. "Fake News" spawns from crazy, doesn't cause it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    "Fake news" did not cause this guy to go to the pizza parlor anymore than Dungeon's and Dragons turned me into a sewer dwelling satanist. The chances of this guy living a normal, balanced life if the pizzagate conspiracy never surfaced are about zero. Conspiracy nuts and crazies existed long before the internet or fake news, JFK theories and Aliens at Rosewell all started well before the internet (or did they?!?! dramatic music playing). Fake news is also not a alt-right issue. Anti-vaxxer's and GMO conspiracists seem to cross all political spectrums and sites like "thefoodbabe" have been spewing mind numbingly stupid "fake science news" for years (and anti-vaxxer's do cause real personal harm and even deaths). It's an "issue" now because the media needs someone to blame for their colossal f**k up with this years election. As the great and wise sociologist Ron White has observed, you can't fix stupid.

  45. there is a bit more to it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

    The Pizzagate conspiracy names Comet Ping Pong as the secret headquarters of a non-existent child sex-trafficking ring run by Clinton and members of her inner circle. James Alefantis, the restaurant's owner, said he has received hundreds of death threats.

    James Alefantis isn't just a restaurant owner, he's the former gay lover of David Brock, and listed as one of the 50 most powerful people in Washington. Podesta and Clinton have used Alefantis' pizza parlor for political events. I think the rumors of a pedophilia ring come from a combination of the Podestas' bizarre taste in art (in particular, an artist called Biljana Djurdjevic, Alefantis' Instagram, and the odd set of bands performing at Coment Ping Pong. There were also odd references to pizza, dungeons, and children in Podesta's leaked E-mails.

    Of course, none of that justifies showing up with a gun at Alefantis' restaurant. Furthermore, there seems to be no evidence of a pedophile ring. On the other hand, these seem to be some pretty weird people with some pretty weird tastes and pretty weird social relations.

  46. Just because someone went overboard... by dbreeze · · Score: 0

    ...doesn't mean there's not a real issue. Normalcy bias is a real thing. "It is easier to deceive a person than to convince them they've been deceived."
    Consider some of these...
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

    http://www.missingkids.com/Key...
    "Of the more than 11,800 endangered runaways reported to NCMEC in 2015, one in five were likely victims of child sex trafficking. Of those, 74 percent were in the care of social services when they went missing. " ...absolutely damning statistic IMO...

    Anthony Weiner, Dennis Hastert, Terrence Bean( https://www.youtube.com/watch?... )

    Here's a fairly reasoned and straightforward examination of the "pizzagate" evidence that has surfaced to date...
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

    For those of you familiar with the Corbett Report, he did an investigation into political pedophiles a year ago...
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

    There's certainly a fair bit of disinformation mixed into all this, but denying that there's a real problem with spiritually wicked people in high positions of power around the world and in the USA is just head in the sand stupid and lazy. I encourage everyone to do some legit research on this issue lest someone you love falls prey to one of these perverted ^#$$^*@#$'s...

    --
    When the king heard the words of the Book of the Law he tore his robes.2Kings22:11
  47. The US hasn't had a leftist prez since FDR by Overzeetop · · Score: 5, Informative

    What we consider "left" is somewhere between centrist and moderate right in the rest of the first world.

    --
    Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    1. Re:The US hasn't had a leftist prez since FDR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      we havent had a leftist president since never. the closest was fdr, who adopted left wing policies to avoid a revolution. he was a classical liberal. I want to see what america would do with a true left wing president like Leon Trotsky

    2. Re:The US hasn't had a leftist prez since FDR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, what you consider "left" is what we call right-wing extremists :)

    3. Re:The US hasn't had a leftist prez since FDR by dwpro · · Score: 1

      so roughly 10% of the world population has a more left-of-center view than a nation of immigrants. Unsurprising.

      --
      Millions long for immortality who do not know what to do with themselves on a rainy Sunday afternoon. -- Susan Ertz
    4. Re:The US hasn't had a leftist prez since FDR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Provided you define "rest of the world" to include only the most left countries.

  48. Re:Podesta by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    The graybeards wearing trench coats and selling recycled AOL floppy discs with illicit programs? Yeah, I stayed away from them too.

  49. No, keep it up! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "I hope that those involved in fanning these flames will take a moment to contemplate what happened here today, and stop promoting these falsehoods right away."

    I kind of hope they won't - the people that believe BS like this probably should be locked up. It's like dateline for crazies.

  50. IANAL, but by doug141 · · Score: 2

    doesn't the hard-working small business owner, who is now getting death threats and business disruptions, have a really good libel case?

    1. Re:IANAL, but by PopeRatzo · · Score: 2

      doesn't the hard-working small business owner, who is now getting death threats and business disruptions, have a really good libel case?

      I don't know how you go about suing a Reddit user called, "u/DumbScribblyUnctious" but there have already been legal actions filed against certain websites that pushed the stories.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
  51. Re:"Fake News" spawns from crazy, doesn't cause it by buddyglass · · Score: 1

    It was the proximate cause of him going to this specific pizza place. Yes, the guy's probably unhinged. No, if this fake news story had never run, he probably wouldn't have gone to this specific pizza place to investigate.

  52. Innumeracy for the fail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    > It's not like pedophile scandals are that rare among people in power.

    Uh, yes they are fucking rare.

    Just because you've seen a handful of them busted on the news doesn't make it common, it just means you are yet another innumerate. How many people in power are there? Tens of thousands - celebrities, congress, their staffs, corporate officers, millionaires, etc. Add them all up and then compare them to the number of cases of pedos among them. Its no different, probably less in fact, than the ratio of pedos to non-pedos in the general population.

    Its precisely your kind of stupid-ass logic, completely untethered from reality, that let idiots like the shooter convince themselves that pizzagate is real.

    1. Re:Innumeracy for the fail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's the same calm cool logic that gets ignored when you factor number of law enforcement engagements with black americans against the number of shot black americans by said law enforcement. But hey, it's 'white priv' that kept him from being shot according to other posters.

    2. Re:Innumeracy for the fail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The question is why are there so many "law enforcement engagements with black americans" in the first place?
      Your "calm cool logic" only works if you ignore the fact that "driving while black" is a thing.
      When what are essentially random pull-overs of black people yield less busts of drugs than pull-overs of white people, but cops keeping pulling black people over at disproportionate rates, something ain't right.

    3. Re:Innumeracy for the fail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Speeding
      Dangerous driving
      Tailgating
      Driving while intoxicated
      Failure to obey lawful police instructions

      Stereotypes are created for a reason.

  53. Trump Trump Trump by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Trump!!! Lol, 4 years from now you will remember this is the election that taught the nation that the president doesnt do shit because nothing will have changed.

  54. Re:"Fake News" spawns from crazy, doesn't cause it by skids · · Score: 1

    you can't fix stupid

    ...while I would differ with that opinion, I would point out that whether or not you can fix stupid, you can stop telling stupid people that specific real people are part of a giant nefarious conspiracy. If you continue to, you should be held partially liable for their actions.

  55. Re:"self investigate" == mental illness by DaHat · · Score: 2

    Does this mean you are willing to accept responsibility on behalf of Dem propaganda for the 2010 shooting at the Family Research Council where a guy walked into a business with a gun, bag full of chick-fil-a and a list of 'hate groups' from the SPLC and shot someone?

    No?

  56. I think you protest too much. by Iamthecheese · · Score: 1

    fake news conspiracy theory... fictitious online conspiracy theory...baseless conspiracy theory...non-existent ...white supremacist...false and reckless conspiracy theories...falsehoods

    You know, you're not going to convince anyone by running dozens of slanted articles. Why not present the whole (weak) case including all the evidence and let readers decide for themselves? Or have you learned nothing from losing the election?

    --
    If video games influenced behavior the Pac Man generation would be eating pills and running away from their problems.
  57. Some, not all Trump supporters by myid · · Score: 1

    The summary says "Donald Trump supporters", among others, fostered the rumor. The summary should say "some Donald Trump supporters".

    I voted for Trump, and I would never spread rumors like that about anyone. Anonymously spreading this kind of rumor is cowardly and unfair, and can lead to violence.

    I'm very glad that no one was hurt physically, although the people who work there must be suffering emotionally. My best wishes to them. If I were in the area, I'd stop by for pizza there, to show my support for them.

    1. Re:Some, not all Trump supporters by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      it's an open carry state, holster or sling up and stop by for pizza

    2. Re:Some, not all Trump supporters by myid · · Score: 1

      Heh, I'll skip the gun. I don't own one, and don't know how to use one. If sometime I had to use a gun, my first questions would be, "Where's the safety catch, and how do you set it or unset it?"

    3. Re:Some, not all Trump supporters by coinreturn · · Score: 2

      it's an open carry state, holster or sling up and stop by for pizza

      WTF? First DC is NOT a state; second, DC does NOT allow open carry. Here's your cheat sheet: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

    4. Re:Some, not all Trump supporters by GungaDan · · Score: 1

      Washington DC is not a state, and it is most certainly not open carry friendly. The pizza joint is in DC. The wacko who open-carried into it is from NC (and yes, we're open carry friendly).

      --
      Eloi are stupid, throw morlocks at them!
    5. Re:Some, not all Trump supporters by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      I was speaking of the man's home state NC which is open carry and which theoretically one could go for pizza with a gun

    6. Re:Some, not all Trump supporters by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      Yes I was speaking of how he could carry gun into pizza store in his home state. I actually don't have a problem with responsible open carry.

  58. Re: Podesta by Type44Q · · Score: 1

    "Lesbians Until Graduation?"

  59. Re:"self investigate" == mental illness by Enigma2175 · · Score: 1

    This will not end.

    FTFY

    --

    Enigma

  60. Sounds like fake news to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seriously, who believes this shit? Can we get some verification this guy isn't a false flag operative or a low-IQ cutout?

  61. Re:Deinstitutionalization + Social Media + Guns = by BlueStrat · · Score: 1

    reagan trashed the mental health system.

    That's some nice revisionist history except for one detail.

    It's wrong.

    It was Progressive Democrats who had a majority in Congress that thought they were 'defending the rights of the mentally-ill' and pushed through the de-institutionalization of the mentally ill and forced them out on the streets and also 'defended the right to refuse medication' for the mentally ill so they are now wandering the streets un-medicated or self-medicating with street-drugs.

    Republicans at the time opposed these moves but were outvoted in Congress and demonized in the media for their opposition.

    Strat

    --
    Progressivism (aka US 'Liberalism'): Ideas so good they need a police/surveillance-state to enforce.
  62. Holy Shills Batman! by crhylove · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Seriously. Every top rated comment is saying "nutjob" "conspiracy theory" "conspiracy theorist" "Fake News".

    Stop and consider the evidence on a point by point basis. Then consider that Bill Clinton is a KNOWN pervert. Then consider former speaker of the house Hastert literally went to prison for pedophilia. Then watch all the videos of Biden being a creep. Then look at the digitized wanted posters for the abductors of Madeleine McCann. Then look at the artwork that the Podesta brothers have all over their house.

    I mean, I don't believe every conspiracy theory. But the evidence here is frankly overwhelming that SOMETHING is fucked up, at least with the Podestas, and possibly with an incredibly large cross-section of Washington DC.

    Then consider the motives of people who might have actionable blackmail evidence on all the most powerful members of congress/senate/executive.

    It's AT LEAST worth looking into. Then once you look into it, it's hard not to think there's some there. But whatever, just keep watching your corporate television narratives that are obvious lies and fraud and call the rest of us crazy.

    --
    I hold very few opinions. I hold information based on observation and fact. If you wish to disagree, please use facts.
    1. Re:Holy Shills Batman! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's AT LEAST worth looking into. Then once you look into it, it's hard not to think there's some there. But whatever, just keep watching your corporate television narratives that are obvious lies and fraud and call the rest of us crazy.

      Like the FBI has been doing with the recent massive pedoring busts? Wouldn't it be horrible if some edgy kids blew the biggest bust yet?

    2. Re:Holy Shills Batman! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fact free right trash drivel yawn, nah only a fucking moron would believe that.

    3. Re:Holy Shills Batman! by Ryanrule · · Score: 1

      whos paying you?

    4. Re:Holy Shills Batman! by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I mean, I don't believe every conspiracy theory. But the evidence here is frankly overwhelming that SOMETHING is fucked up, at least with the Podestas, and possibly with an incredibly large cross-section of Washington DC.

      Yes. They are rich and making rules for the poor. That's wrong. Nothing, however, points to a child trafficking ring. And this rumor was clearly started as a troll, and a lot of obviously false things have been said to promote it.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    5. Re:Holy Shills Batman! by coinreturn · · Score: 1

      ...I mean, I don't believe every conspiracy theory...

      But you do believe this one.

    6. Re:Holy Shills Batman! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you fucking kidding?

      HRC's been hounded by the Republitards for 25 years with a taxpayer cost over 500 Million dollars and they haven't even been able to nail her for jay walking, much less any felonies. Are you really so stupid as to think she could be engaged in any actual form of conspiracy?

      If you want to look for a conspiracy perhaps you should investigate Trump for treason in conspiring with Putin to rig the election.

  63. Re:Deinstitutionalization + Social Media + Guns = by Mashiki · · Score: 1

    Bzzzt. Return to go, do not collect $200. Democrats and progressives had control of congress and pushed defunding. On top of that, various state legislatures also pushed defunding, and then there's the multiple judges which were democrats who allowed the defunding of state institutions. Many of the arguments basically boiled down to "even the insane have right."

    I agree, they do have right. So do the public, and that includes the protection from those who are mentally unstable.

    --
    Om, nomnomnom...
  64. What are you doing, Eddie? by bestweasel · · Score: 1

    Edgar Maddison Welch? Is that you, Edgar Maddison Welch?
    Edgar Maddison Welch, you get right back in the bell curve this instant, you hear me?

  65. Re:"self investigate" == mental illness by Mashiki · · Score: 1

    Who happened to walk into a business and shoot because he was goaded on by GOP propaganda spread not just by random trolls, but party leaders. The Republican party has a real mess on its hands. This will not end well.

    You want to show everyone where the GOP had anything do to with this? I'll wait. You already know you're spewing bullshit, the fact that you immedetly jumped to the "It's the GOP ELEVENTYONE!!!!111111111111111111!" Means you're already sucking back on some great fake news.

    Useful tip: The GOP has nothing to do with this, it was all independently by people on both sides of the isle. And this was done by one person who looked down the rabbit hole and saw that he was the savior. Despite everyone doing one thing, digging for connection that may or maynot exist.

    --
    Om, nomnomnom...
  66. Re:"self investigate" == mental illness by rednip · · Score: 1

    Sure, but only if you in turn 'accept responsibility' for the kid who shot up a black church, or the other that shot up a school, or the others that shot up another school, or that other one. Or the dozens and dozens of times every day that the GOP has lead America in the gun culture which hands dangerous weapons to unstable people. Oh, wait, right wing lunatics only talk about 'personal responsibility' when pointing at other people.

    --
    The force that blew the Big Bang continues to accelerate.
  67. Re:"self investigate" == mental illness by rednip · · Score: 1

    The guy that is the leading contender for Trumps 'national security advisor' which is arguably a major position of trust is perhaps the most notable of many Republican leaders who pushed this story and even claimed that it would end in an prosecution. This is common knowledge that anyone who has followed this story has seen, yet you choose to ignore it. In fact Flynn's son (been called his 'chief of staff') has even recently doubled down on that very statement. The simple fact is that you and other republicans have chosen to ignore the party leadership's direct complicity in spreading these dangerous lies.

    --
    The force that blew the Big Bang continues to accelerate.
  68. Thanks 4chan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bravo. Well done. Good on you.

  69. Pedophile coverup could never happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is impossible to think that the 1% could engage in pedophile activities. Luckily, this sort of fake news will soon be illegal.

  70. Ok, so by bytesex · · Score: 1

    The guy's going to have to give up all of his toys and he's never going to qualify for a gun license again in his lifetime, right?

    --
    Religion is what happens when nature strikes and groupthink goes wrong.
    1. Re:Ok, so by jeff4747 · · Score: 1

      Google "gun show loophole". If he wants new toys, he'll be able to get them very easily.

  71. Jon Stewart as full of shit as PopeRatzo by mi · · Score: 1, Insightful

    If you have an example of one of Jon Stewart's segments being based on a fake story, I invite you to share it with us here.

    How about the — completely bogusmeta-story of the "campus rape epidemic"? Which Jon Stewart and others have covered.

    You go rape yourself now...

    --
    In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    1. Re:Jon Stewart as full of shit as PopeRatzo by heff_sf · · Score: 1

      An opinion editorial (by a writer from The American Enterprise Institute, described as "the most prominent think tank associated with American neoconservatism" [wikipedia.com]) in no way refutes the story the Daily Show was highlighting.

    2. Re:Jon Stewart as full of shit as PopeRatzo by mi · · Score: 1

      Whoever he is, the facts he cited are incontrovertible — the only evidence ever offered of the supposed "epidemic" is a survey, in which 19% of women reported having been "sexually assaulted" while in college.

      No comparison has been offered with non-college women of the same age, and these "assaults" ranged from attempts at unwelcome touching to actual rapes. There is no other evidence to back the bombastic claim that "every fifth woman is raped by the time she graduates college" and therefore the story, which Jon Stewart and others have peddled, is a fake.

      Even Politifact finds it dubious — gotta tell you something, uhm?

      --
      In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
  72. Re:"self investigate" == mental illness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who wouldn't be happy for both of them to be held responsible! Thanks for working at keeping us divided!

  73. Yeah it is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You ain't fucking the right relatives.

  74. politicalcompass.org by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://politicalcompass.org/

    Educate yourself. plus look at the historical rankings. There is also a trend towards the top right for both parties.

    People know nothing about FDR it's almost as if they are trying to erase him from society's memory; they certainly are trying to undo all his accomplishments. Including restoring Fascism which arguably we've surpassed them (remember it is Italian, not german and democratic Fascism is possible. )

  75. Because they are different by aepervius · · Score: 1

    Incorrect news : an error was made during the reporting, but usually that error is due because of the speed the reporting was (e.g. reporting about one of more gunman activities on campus having fired shots), or because the reporter simply made an error.
    Hoax new on the other hand, or what they call fake news, is made solely with the intention to lie, misrepresent. They are not a recent invention, mind you, you could probably find some of that as far as the invention of paper. But they took really foothold in the last 20 years, it isn't only with 2016 that it became apparent. But it became a real problem in the last year.
    See a democracy is supported by voter being informed. An informed voter then take a decision to chose a politician based on that information. The problem is, when those voter are basing their information on what is mostly hoax.... Then democracy dies a little. It does not matter if the mis information is left, right, trump, hilary, Merkel, pizzagate or about santa's elf. If voter base their vote on that....

    --
    C. Sagan : A demon haunted world:
    http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0345409469/
    visit randi.org
  76. Re: Podesta by fisted · · Score: 1

    Losers' Unix Group.

  77. FTFY by LeftCoastThinker · · Score: 1, Interesting

    "Trump nominated a ONE OF THE TOP NEUROSURGEONS IN THE WORLD AND A GUY WHO IS DAMN SIGHT SMARTER THAN I AM who thinks dietary supplements can cure cancer, AIDS and multiple sclerosis to be the next Secretary of Housing and Urban Development." FTFY

    A: He didn't nominate him for surgeon general
    B: Remember Pellagra, Beriberi, Scurvy, Rickets etc? Probably not because no one in developed countries gets them because they are all easily cured by vitamins. Cancer and MS both potentially have features that behave similarly to a vitamin deficiency, but until we understand what chemical compound it is and how it works, it seems like trivializing deadly diseases, just like the diseases I mentioned above did to people who lived with those diseases before they were eliminated by vitamins.

    http://listverse.com/2012/03/1...

    Also, the cure for cancer is at least in part based on the Hunza mountain people who live an average of 120 plus years and do not get cancer. Ever. Their tribe likely was the real life seed of truth behind the legend of Shangri-La an earthly paradise where people live forever. Why they don't get cancer is what everyone wants to know and the jury is still out, but you can't argue with their lifespans. The problem with cancer at least in part is it appears that the diet of your entire life plays a key role in when or if you will get it, so testing a potential vitamin cure is problematic at best.

    http://www.shughal.com/health-...

    --
    If you disagree, please post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like
    1. Re:FTFY by Sique · · Score: 2

      Also, the cure for cancer is at least in part based on the Hunza mountain people who live an average of 120 plus years and do not get cancer.

      The longest ever documented lifespan of a human being was that of Jeanne Calment, who died in 1997 being 122 years old. She was no Hunza, but a french woman from Arles. Most other persons being named as the oldest person currently living die between 114 and 117 years old.

      I thus seriously doubt any information about people getting older than 120 years on average. You need a very strong proof for that claim.

      --
      .sig: Sique *sigh*
    2. Re:FTFY by Sique · · Score: 4, Informative
      Oh. I found the reason:

      The great Hunza secret to old age turned out to be its absence of birth records. The illiterate elders didn't know how old they were, and they tended to overestimate their ages by a decade or two, as I discovered by comparing their recollections with known historical events.

      Read yourself: The Optimists Are Right.

      --
      .sig: Sique *sigh*
    3. Re:FTFY by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      There are plenty of clusters of long living people. They now seem to be the new trendy thing in cancer quackery.

      Chances are, the only thing they have on their side is luck. They tend to have both a distinct genome and a unique (usually isolated) environment.

      There is likely no magic elixir to be distilled from them.

      Although I will agree that all matters of human biochemistry are still so poorly understood (despite our own hubris on the matter) that anything could be possible.

      I just won't believe anything in particular until it's very well understood and well tested.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    4. Re:FTFY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yep, that's what I expect from a left coast "thinker".
      This is beyond fake news, this is pure ignorance.

    5. Re:FTFY by quax · · Score: 1

      "A GUY WHO IS DAMN SIGHT SMARTER THAN I AM"

      Funny thing is, if I just try to quote this, slashdot throws up a lameness filter for the all caps yelling.

      Anyhow, I think I can agree with what you yelled there.

    6. Re:FTFY by LeftCoastThinker · · Score: 1

      It is possible that it is just luck, but until we fully understand Cancer, which is apparently caused by everything, we can't really say what theories are right or wrong. Essentially we don't understand cancer that well or specifically what causes it. This is informative considering we spend billions of dollars every year on cancer research the globe over. It may well indicate that modern medicine has been on the wrong track with cancer, just like we have been with heart disease (remember partially hydrogenated oils? Those were supposed to be great for your heart, up until we figured out that they were causing ~80% of all heart attacks. Oops.)

      I have no idea if the Hunza have the cure for cancer in their DNA or in their environment, but until we are willing to do even simple, real science (find people who are at high risk for cancer and get them to live/eat/drink like the Hunza for 20 years) then we can't discount the fact that they don't get cancer.

      --
      If you disagree, please post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like
    7. Re:FTFY by LeftCoastThinker · · Score: 1

      What a really deep, reasoned argument. You are the epitome of why AC posting should be eliminated.

      --
      If you disagree, please post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like
    8. Re:FTFY by RespekMyAthorati · · Score: 1

      then we can't discount the fact that they don't get cancer.

      We can on the basis that their claim of extraordinary long life is total fucking bullshit.
      They don't live any longer than anybody else: it's a institutional fantasy of their culture.

  78. But for them it is Irony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Had the unwanted child of a drug user NOT BEEN BORN he would never have existed to attack The Family Research Council.
    Had he been taken from his lousy parents and given to proper parents (by government) he may not have become that nutty.

    At least the man attacked the organization who fights to create people like him.

  79. the guy has an imdb page by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    top kek

  80. That's nothing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fake News prompted the US to 'Self-Investigate' Iraq for WMD's - perhaps we should ban practically all of our newspapers for peddling such dangerous/wacky conspiracy theories?

    1. Re:That's nothing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      P.S. In fact, you know what, maybe Putin was behind that one too? We should let everyone know, and then invade Russia next, to teach him a lesson.

  81. Propaganda by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The only "fake news" is that these pedophile rings aren't real.

  82. Fake? by taylorius · · Score: 0

    Setting aside this undoubted idiot with the gun, I see everyone one here laughing at the conspiracy nuts believing Pizzagate - is it now settled that there's nothing to it? It doesn't seem at all clear to me that it can all just be dismissed, if the evidence I've seen and read about is genuine. I'm not saying I know either way, but there were some highly unpleasant pictures from that pizza place, and the emails from Podesta - why is it suddenly considered crazy to think something untoward was going on?

    1. Re:Fake? by KozmoStevnNaut · · Score: 2

      Have you read the stickied list of so-called "proof" at the Voat Pizzagate page?

      Sentences deliberately taken out of context, obvious office in-jokes, tons of dad humor that I recognize from all the places I've worked.

      People are reading a hell of a lot more into this than it warrants. E-mail correspondence taken out of context can be interpreted in a lot of ways, especially if it was related to conversations, text messages or chats that happened beforehand. People are only seeing maybe only the 20% of the correspondence that was written down, and they're interpolating wildly to match their agenda.

      --
      Eat the rich.
    2. Re:Fake? by meta-monkey · · Score: 1

      It would be nice if Podesta and pals would explain the in-jokes then. After all, nutjobs are taking it seriously and someone might get hurt. Also just for my own curiosity I'd really like to know what a pizza-related map handkerchief is.

      --
      We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
    3. Re:Fake? by KozmoStevnNaut · · Score: 1

      The nutjobs may be taking it seriously, but we shouldn't take the nutjobs seriously. It would be a waste of time to address them, they would never believe it anyway.

      --
      Eat the rich.
    4. Re:Fake? by meta-monkey · · Score: 1

      Just sayin', when people say they saw a UFO, the g-man comes out and says "no it's just swamp gas reflecting off a weather balloon." Podesta and the people connected to him exhibit very strange behavior and there's no explanation except "FAKE NEWS FAKE NEWS!!!" If someone can't come up with a better explanation for their behavior and communications then it'll never end.

      --
      We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
  83. Re:Deinstitutionalization + Social Media + Guns = by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

    Mashiki, you have repeatedly posted this conspiracy theory to Slashdot, claiming it to be true and backed up by convincing evidence. You complained bitterly that the "mainstream media" wasn't giving it enough attention, only the real journalists on the trumped up blogs you read were. You were completely suckered in and swallowed the lie whole.

    So if you are worried about protection from people who have a mental illness that makes them susceptible to this kind of manipulation through fake news, perhaps you should start by getting some help yourself.

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  84. Slashdotters prove they are idiots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    So, you come to Slashdot to get the meaty tech news. But when someone offers alternate news of a different type, you call it "fake" news.
    It's obvious that none of the "fake" news posters here have done any research on the subject. That makes you idiots.

    It's sad how a little learning can be a dangerous thing. You're calling Ben Carson stupid but he's a brain surgeon. You guys consider
    yourselves smart because you know computers, but you don't know shit about the real netherworld of dirty politics and vice.

    You're the bag of deplorables who voted for the Clinton CrimeLords.

    1. Re:Slashdotters prove they are idiots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know what's even sadder? We don't give the slightest fuck about stupid whinny AC posts. You should definitely go and troll somewhere else, where your genius, insight and endorsement of Ben Carson is more appreciated.

  85. On the plus side by DrXym · · Score: 1

    That's one less nutcase out on the streets

  86. Agreed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, fake news is what got Trump elected, innit? And seeing the Hillary won the popular vote, I would have to agree, people who believe it are in the minority, they are simpletons AND they are mentally ill.

  87. Not jus fake news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This case also shows how dangerous stupid white men with guns are.

  88. Pizzagate is real by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's very funny how despite the blatant changes in logos. Changes to their profiles, and outstanding evidence, the media keeps on pushing that this is a 'debunked' conspiracy theory. No surprise, since all the players are in big positions, and a CTR founder.

    Please look up all the cases agaisnt sysadmins who found child pornography on top NASA and FBI computers. The people that got fucked over were the sysadmins. If this has happened before, why does everyone disregard pizzagate, WHEN ALL THE EVIDENCE IS THERE.

    Seriously, at least research it.

    1. Re:Pizzagate is real by KozmoStevnNaut · · Score: 1

      I did. There's no evidence.

      Literally everything in the stickied Voat post is bullshit allegations and complete guesswork, based on sentences taken out of context and obvious groan-worthy dad jokes.

      And seriously, wouldn't you change your logo if it turned out to bear a similarity to an design allegedly used by pedophiles? It's a really simple design, which has been used in a lot of other contexts. A similar thing happened with the heart-within-heart symbol, which has been used by a group of ice cream manufacturers for decades, but also happens to allegedly be used withing pedo circles. Again, a very simple design, that a lot of designers probably all came up with independently.

      --
      Eat the rich.
  89. Re:Deinstitutionalization + Social Media + Guns = by dywolf · · Score: 4, Informative

    If anyone is trying to revise history, it's you.

    Yes it was Reagan.
    No, it wasnt a democratic congress.
    No, the democrats in congress at that time could not be considered progressive (much as you like to use the word as an invective).

    Deinstitutionalization began in California, just before Reagan became governor. It was a response to a set of legitimate problems, originally as a concept of trying to get patients into more local care, with less federal and state funding. But that didnt happen, patients instead began ending up on the streets or in privately run (for profit) facilities.

    And then Reagan as governor continued it, expanded it, oversaw the increasing privatization of it, and got paid by the people who profited off of the privatization.

    At the national level, Carter and the Congress (the one you mistakenly say was to blame...) crafted a law, just before Reagan became president, to roll back deinstitutionalization, and provide federal funding to be gin getting a handle on the growing problem.

    and Reagan along with a Republican controlled Congress killed the law as soon as he became president.

    From American Psychosis:

    In November 1980, Republican Ronald Reagan overwhelmingly defeated Jimmy Carter, who received less than 42% of the popular vote, for president. Republicans took control of the Senate (53 to 46), the first time they had dominated either chamber since 1954. Although the House remained under Democratic control (243 to 192), their margin was actually much slimmer, because many southern “boll weevil” Democrats voted with the Republicans.

    One month prior to the election, President Carter had signed the Mental Health Systems Act, which had proposed to continue the federal community mental health centers program , although with some additional state involvement. Consistent with the report of the Carter Commission, the act also included a provision for federal grants “for projects for the prevention of mental illness and the promotion of positive mental health,” an indication of how little learning had taken place among the Carter Commission members and professionals at NIMH. With President Reagan and the Republicans taking over, the Mental Health Systems Act was discarded before the ink had dried and the CMHC funds were simply block granted to the states. The CMHC program had not only died but been buried as well. An autopsy could have listed the cause of death as naiveté complicated by grandiosity.

    President Reagan never understood mental illness. Like Richard Nixon, he was a product of the Southern California culture that associated psychiatry with Communism. Two months after taking office, Reagan was shot by John Hinckley, a young man with untreated schizophrenia. Two years later, Reagan called Dr. Roger Peele, then director of St. Elizabeths Hospital, where Hinckley was being treated, and tried to arrange to meet with Hinckley, so that Reagan could forgive him. Peele tactfully told the president that this was not a good idea. Reagan was also exposed to the consequences of untreated mental illness through the two sons of Roy Miller, his personal tax advisor. Both sons developed schizophrenia; one committed suicide in 1981, and the other killed his mother in 1983. Despite such personal exposure, Reagan never exhibited any interest in the need for research or better treatment for serious mental illness.

    [..]

    California has traditionally been on the cutting edge of American cultural developments, with Anaheim and Modesto experiencing changes before Atlanta and Moline. This was also true in the exodus of patients from state psychiatric hospitals. Beginning in the late 1950s, California became the national leader in aggressively moving patients from state hospitals to nursing homes and board-and-care homes, known in other states by names such as group homes, boarding homes

    --
    The guy who said the election was rigged won the presidency with the second-most votes.
  90. Re:Deinstitutionalization + Social Media + Guns = by dywolf · · Score: 1

    Honestly, at this point, since BlueStrat and Mashiki keep consistently posting the same wrong information, I must conclude they are in fact the same person.

    Reality:
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
    Senate Majority: Republican (first time since the 50s)
    House Majority: Democratic, but with a big caveat: the majority of southern democratic delegates were Boll Weevil democrats who voted with the Republicans (a continuation of the southern democrats, dixiecrats, etc, who simply hadn't gone over to the republican party in the 70s as part of Nixon's successful southern strategy)

    So no, Democrats did NOT have control of congress.

    And, the previous congress, which WAS Democrat controlled, actually voted to try and fix the deinstitutionalization mess, passing the Mental Health Systems Act, which was then signed into law by Pres. Carter about a month before the 1980 election.

    It was this Act that Reagan, along with the GOP controlled Senate, then killed and repealed wholesale (all but the patients' bill of rights) in the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1981.

    So again: you, like BlueStrat, are wrong on all counts.

    So I'll take my $200, thank you very much.

    --
    The guy who said the election was rigged won the presidency with the second-most votes.
  91. Now I'm waiting for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    some off the wall liberal calling for common sense pizza control.

  92. Translation... by Lumpy · · Score: 1

    Drooling Moron that believe everything and has no understanding about safety or even proper etiquette goes on a ego building adventure and finally gets what he needs from the police.

    The dude is a mental patient that needs serious help and because of how unstable he is needs to have firearms removed from his possession. Sorry but if you are that much of a headcase, you do NOT need to own guns.. There are laws in place that already state this.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  93. Two things wrong with this by RogueWarrior65 · · Score: 1

    First, even though this is a conspiracy theory, there is some historical fact on which it is based. This goes back to the days of Ted Kennedy and Chris Dodd engaging in the waitress sandwich. No prizes for pointing out the obvious hypocrisy. But the second and much much larger problem is how non-law-enforcement citizens are increasingly engaging in vigilantism. This case is that of one person but when one group decides to target the livelihood of a person because that person won't toe the group's ideological line, that's a very very dangerous behavioral pattern.

  94. Re:Deinstitutionalization + Social Media + Guns = by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If we all agree that de-institutionalizing the mentally ill was a mistake, can we skip the blaming step and just come up with the money to at least get us back to the state things were before that time when it happened due to nobody's fault? And since we all agree that "it" is a good idea, there shouldn't be a problem paying for it, right?

  95. There should be an internet license by Sir_Eptishous · · Score: 2

    I know this is completely untenable, but there should a license to get online.

    There should be training, perhaps like going through drivers ed or hunters ed, to get a license to get on the internet.
    These dipshits, these FB idiots who believe every bizarre and completely unverified story or anecdote they see online should not have the ability to even be there in the first place.

    --
    We play the game with the bravery of being out of range
  96. The level of cognitive dissonance in this thread.. by Crizzam · · Score: 1

    I find it incredible that so many people deny all the evidence relating to conspiracies!
      What is harder to believe? That conspiracies dont exist, or that they do exist? conspiracy: a secret plan by a group to do something unlawful or harmful
        It is literally impossible that conspiracies don't exist and the people who control the sources of power in the world have their own private agendas which include illegal activities. Really, people need to pull their heads out and grow up.

  97. MSM still primary source for fake news by walterbyrd · · Score: 2

    Is the mass media responsible for fabricating stories and inciting riots? Seems to me the media routinely fans the flames of racial division by releasing false information.

    Remember the Charlotte riots? The media first reported that Keith Scott was unarmed. This was a major factor that led to the riots. Turns out, Keith Scott was armed. Is this a case of media fabrications causing riots?

    In the 2014 shooting of Michael Brown, the media first reported that Brown was on his knees with his hands up. Turns out, that was another media fabrication which also led to riots.

    In the Ahmed Mohamed clock incident, the media first reported that Ahmed was just building a clock, as a project for his electronics class, but the principal called the police because Ahmed was a Muslim. Turns out, that was another media fabrication. Ahmed used a clock that he bought at a department store, along with a briefcase and other props, to make a fake bomb. In a post-Columbine world, what should the principal have done? What if it had been a bomb? BTW: although he was richly rewarded for this stunt, Ahmed has been posting extremely anti-American rants: he called the 9/11 attacks self defence, he supports BLM, and much more.

    When George Michael Zimmerman shot Trayvon Martin, the media first posted photos of an 11 year old Trayvon. Months after the incident, some people still believed that Zimmerman attacked a small child, which was not the case. Trayvon was an athletic 5'11" and 160 lbs. and was beating the snot out of Zimmerman. Maybe Zimmerman was not justified in shooting Trayvon, but Trayvon was not an 11 year child, and the media tried to insinuate.

    1. Re:MSM still primary source for fake news by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      As far as Ahmed Mohamed goes, in what sense was it a fake bomb? It was clearly not a bomb, since his English teacher confiscated it and put it in her desk drawer. He never claimed it was a bomb. I'd think that a fake bomb would either look enough like a bomb to cause a teacher to call for an evacuation, or have someone claim it was a bomb.

      If it had been a real bomb, that English class would have been in grave danger, whether or not the police got involved.

      There is no set of assumptions under which the reaction was justified. If it looked like it might be a bomb, the school authorities screwed up big-time. If it didn't, the police should not have been involved.

      It's perfectly reasonable to support BLM, although that doesn't include supporting certain activities done in the name of BLM. There's a real problem out there, and with every unjustified killing of a black going unprosecuted or unconvicted it gets worse.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  98. Is it so impossible that Podesta is a pervert? by walterbyrd · · Score: 0

    It is not as if there have never been sexual predators in DC.

    Wiener is clearly a pervert, and his wife was Hillary's top aid. Hillary's husband has admitted to hundreds of affairs, and disgraced himself while in office. Lots of sexual weirdos seem to surround Hillary.

    Has anybody looked at Podesta's emails from wikileaks? Even Podesta does not deny that those are his emails. Podesta is also a collector of perverted "art."

    If you look at the emails, it is very clear that they are using some kind of code. I do not know what the code means. But a lot of terms, including "pizza" are used out of place.

    I won't just to conclusions here. I am keeping an open mind. I would encourage others to do the same.

  99. Re:Deinstitutionalization + Social Media + Guns = by ripvlan · · Score: 1

    Yes - and the liberals get caught in a loop where they believe that an endless stream of money exists to hand out and support different programs. And the environment is on fire leading to environmental terrorism.

    It isn't just a Conservative problem. Liberals get stuck in the same loop. I think -- *People* get stuck in a loop and their personal bias skews the information presented.

    I love how talk radio hosts make things up too. "I can't find anything disproving this - so ... I don't know... this might be true" Nothing proving a negative so it must be true.

  100. PizzaGate Is 100% Real, Why Is Media Lying? by walterbyrd · · Score: 0

    Decide for yourself:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qGVSA2Jjelo

  101. pizzagate is real, go to wiki leaks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    search for podesta and pizza in https://wikileaks.org/

    If you think this isn't code for child trafficking, what ELSE could it be? Check this for help understanding as well.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vB2y419rx20&t=5s

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qGVSA2Jjelo

    REAL children are suffering, how can you all be so cavalier to ignore the issue just because it seems so unlikely. Like the DNC would never rig the system against Bernie, wait that did happen.

  102. In Totally Reel News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Donald Trump is a racist and want's to kill Brown people. So mobs of people go around beating the shit out of anyone wearing a red hat. Sure you can beat the shit out of that old homeless black lady. She has a red hat so she is a racist.

    Yes. Unreal news and irresponsible journalism only works one way.

  103. Every PROVEN historic child abuse called 'fake' at by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Britain currently has a scandal of mass child rape at football club coaching units. Now the sheeple are told that they were naive and unaware of 'child abuse risks' in the 1990s, so it is their fault. Funny cos during the terrible child abuse scandals of the 1960s, then 1970s, then 1980s (all at facilities run or encouraged by the British government), the people at the time were told their kids were making FALSE ACCUSATIONS, then decades later when the abuse was admitted, the same sheeple were told it was their fault for being naive and unaware about child abuse risks at the time.

    It is a proven FACT that both the Clinton monsters prefered to spend their social time with convicted child mass rapists- mass rapists who provided children for the sexual use of their guests- and their guests included the Clintons. Clinton's closest advisors had emails leaked that clearly used coded language to refer to child abuse. To cover this up, state actors (using outlets like 4chan) began a campaign of a type known as 'poisoning the well'- in other words subverting true evidence by conflating it with wild nonsense.

    In the UK, the most powerful Jew, Greville Janner, (now burning in hell or rotting in Israel) was the head of the British Board of Jewish deputies as well as a Member of Parliament. He was an active cheer-leader for every Israeli atrocity in Palestine, Syria, Lebanon and Iran. He was also a lifelong pedophile- using his 'hobby' as a magician to get close to the young boy children he desired. His closest friends in his home city of leicester were some of the worst State employed child abusers in Britain's history (Google Frank Beck- but be warned you'll throw up). Though witnesses made complaints about Jenner all across his career, they were dismissed in just the same way as the abuse by Clinton and her mates is being dismissed today. Jenner, like Clinton, had the back of Israel, and powerful Friends of Israel in the media had his back. The owners of Slashdot are just part of this circle.

    'Fake news' is another word for FACTS the owners of Slashdot don't want you sheeple knowing about!

  104. Its too late.. by uslurper · · Score: 1

    Literally none of the story is true. Not only did the whole thing start as an online hoax by pranksters, but the images in the supposed Instagram are from people who "liked" the pizza restaurant's page. None of the "FBI charts of code words" are from the FBI. None of the information that the #pizzagate morons point to is true. It is 100% false.

    Here is a comprehensive, detailed rundown with citations on the history of this hoax and whether a single fact or assertion about pizzagate has been proven true or is possible to be proven true:

    http://www.snopes.com/pizzagat...

    The fact that we need a "comprehensive, detailed rundown with citations " in order to recognize that this is complete and utter bullshit is why we have failed as a society.

    --
    oldhack: "Security is a waste of money until shit hits the fan. 5 minutes later, it becomes waste of money again. "
  105. Re:The level of cognitive dissonance in this threa by admin7087 · · Score: 1

    It is completely irrelevant whether conspiracies exist or not, what matters is whether you base your beliefs on solid evidence or not. If you don't base you're beliefs on actual, solid, reliable corroborating evidence, then the chances that your beliefs converge to the truth and that you will ever uncover even just a single real conspiracy will go against zero. That's the difference between an investigative journalist and some conspiracy nut, the journalist will look for actual proof and evidence rather than reading bullshit on blogs from clueless idiots. Sure, there are real conspiracies, but not a single conspiracy theorist has ever uncovered one.

  106. Fun times and quirky coincidences by thejynxed · · Score: 1

    Interesting things to note about this incident:

    The suspect in custody is an actor, and has an IMDB page.

    The traffic camera(s) that covers the street and intersection where this incident happened were removed/moved one day before the incident.

    Almost every article covering this story appeared online hours before the event ever took place. The Washington Post reported that the incident happened around 3pm on December 4th. How is it then that everyone from Anandtech to Above Top Secret on to Democratic Underground and The Gateway Pundit had their article times listed in Google as being posted up to 20 hrs before The Washington Post article on the same day this event took place?

    A 4chan user from the UK made a post claiming an incident such as this was going to be reported as happening in a post dated November 30th.

    --
    @Mindless Drivel: 100% of Twitter posts ever Tweeted.
  107. Re:Every PROVEN historic child abuse called 'fake' by admin7087 · · Score: 1

    Are you being paid for writing these nut posts? Just being curious.

  108. Re:"self investigate" == mental illness by budgenator · · Score: 1

    Who happened to walk into a business and shoot because he was goaded on by GOP propaganda spread not just by random trolls, but party leaders. The Republican party has a real mess on its hands. This will not end well.

    it wasn't the GOP that baited the bear;

    “The whole idea from the start was to build a site that could kind of infiltrate the echo chambers of the alt-right, publish blatantly fictional stories and then be able to publicly denounce those stories and point out the fact that they were fiction,” Coler says. ... Coler, a registered Democrat, says he has no regrets about his fake news empire. He doesn’t think fake news swayed the election.
    NPR Reporter Tracked Down a Fake-News Creator; Here’s What She Learned

    --
    Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
  109. And yet the Dems in Cali haven't fixed it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why? If Evil Ronnie did a bad thing why hasn't the dem controlled congress and dem governors in California reversed these bad things.

    Probably because it is so much easier to just blame someone else.

  110. Summary is fake news by AnonymousCube · · Score: 1

    Pizzagate isn't fake news, it's a conspiracy theory, meaning that this is fake news. I haven't seen any news outlets do anything but discredit the theory and call the people who believe it lunatics.

  111. Re:The level of cognitive dissonance in this threa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sure, there are real conspiracies, but not a single conspiracy theorist has ever uncovered one.

    Sometimes you have to break into an FBI office or release a massive trove of NSA documents to be taken seriously, otherwise you're just a 'conspiracy theorist'.

    Problem is, what is an actual investigative journalist these days? Someone like O'Keefe and the videos where he has people admitting to conspiracy on tape? Can you name even one 'investigative journalist' who could be trusted with purveying facts? Can you even say that the news media is even trustworthy when so much of it has been consolidated, leaving only a scattering of independent sources? Oddly enough, it is then these independent sources that get the 'conspiracy theory' label, even when plausible and substantive evidence is presented.

    Bottom line, its a fucked up world, and anything is possible as shown by historical fact. Now we have the 'truth' brigade out in full force; Me thinks they dost protest too much.

  112. Re:Deinstitutionalization + Social Media + Guns = by BlueStrat · · Score: 1

    If we all agree that de-institutionalizing the mentally ill was a mistake, can we skip the blaming step and just come up with the money to at least get us back to the state things were before that time when it happened due to nobody's fault? And since we all agree that "it" is a good idea, there shouldn't be a problem paying for it, right?

    The problem is not so much the costs, but in turning back the legal clock, so to speak, and removing rights from the mentally ill. That's a big hurdle and one with many pitfalls and dangers. If taken too far, those people who are merely 'odd', 'unique' or who hold 'unusual' ideological or political beliefs, suffer an isolated bout of depression, temporary PTSD, see a therapist, etc etc could find themselves in a rubber room under heavy sedation. The USSR routinely locked political dissidents away in mental wards.

    Strat

    --
    Progressivism (aka US 'Liberalism'): Ideas so good they need a police/surveillance-state to enforce.
  113. Ok, how do you explain... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    100's of 1,000's of dollars worth of 'contributions' to a small shop from Obama, Clinton, Soros, Podesta + others in that obviously satanic clique (Maria Abramovic is the ringmaster of that part - practically Aleister Crowley reincarnated)?

    * The ONE record that's ALWAYS without fail ACCURATE, is taxes & money!

    (Come on - THAT kind of level of money? Money for 'hotdogs' (yea, right), 'pasta' (yea, right) & 'pizza parties'? Please. They like 'pizza' that much? I know what kind of pizza they mean, & it's not Italian food!

    PopeRatzo - Are YOU one of their "clientele" by any chance??

    APK

    P.S.=> Explain that - I can: They're sick bastards & satanic cult types that abused little kids (sick fucks)... apk

    1. Re:Ok, how do you explain... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stop pretending to be me.

      APK

      P.S.=> Agents of disinfo are here on Slashdot too now.

  114. It's not like there'a investigative journalism any by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Make me think of the Foundation series.

  115. Cunt ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You actively promote cyber-eugenics - only those that I deem worthy are entitled to unfettered access to information (both quality and shit).
    You are a boil on the internet's buttocks, sir!

    Why don't you encourage compulsory indoctrination before permitting people to breed too?

    The ignorant will always be among us - get used to it, and let them live too.
    Maybe they, in their own turn, will let ignorant you live too when the tide turns.

  116. Just the tip of the iceberg? by Bitbeisser · · Score: 1

    Makes you wonder how many more of those (armed) airheads are out there...

  117. How about by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Fake News Prompts Riots in Major Cities Across the US".

    Oh, wait. I forgot that the logic is only applied in one direction.

  118. Depends on the situation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The election was rigged: "We should totally investigate that, If there's nothing to it the investigation won't turn anything up".

    There is a pedophile ring: "Why are these morons listening to fake news, we should ignore it completely".

  119. Statistical data needs to be contolled by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Statisticians make their studies meaningful only when their data is controlled for other risk factors.

    It's an inconvenient fact that members of some races are more likely to become violent offenders than members of other races. To properly control for this, one should measure the degree of police racism by asking: are violent offenders of race X significantly more likely to be shot by cops than violent offenders of race Y?

    But CNN et. al. never report the answer to this question. They just provide 24/7 coverage of, for example, rioting in Ferguson, thereby fanning the flames of racial division in ways that the president-elect never has and never will.

  120. No, you're pretending to be ME... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject: You're the "disinfo agent" PopeRatzo impersonating me DAYS later & NO DENYING that Clinton, Podesta, Soros, Obama & others contributed that money to Comet PingPong in Pizzagate! Your attempt @ disinformation (which you accused the REAL me, meaning me, of) failed right there.

    APK

    P.S.=> VERY pitiful & weak... apk