Of course when the 2nd Amendment was written, there wasn't even a cosmetic difference between "military-grade" weapons and hunting weapons, so unfortunately this purpose was not properly enshrined in law.
False: a close enough strike will induce currents in things that are unplugged. This is especially bad if the things that are unplugged are feedlines to antennae, but it can happen with any metal object, given a sufficiently close strike.
Yes, but a 4-core phone can do this at a quarter the clock speed the single-core phone would need. Power consumption is quadratic with frequency, so adding additional cores winds up giving a net power savings (at the expense of die area)
Re:Such systems have been proposed before
on
The Zuckerberg Tax
·
· Score: 1
But those goods will be subject to import duties when they arrive in the US. (Unless they're never imported, in which case it isn't really the US's business that they exist...)
The sun isn't an inertial frame of reference either. Both the sun and the earth orbit something called the barycenter, which is the center of mass of the sun-earth system. This just happens to be so near the center of the sun (because the sun is so massive) that for most intents and purposes, the earth can be said to orbit the sun.
This discussion, however, is not one of those intents and purposes.
Except that a physical key is "something you have", whereas a password is "something you know." A search warrant allows them to make off with physical objects, but a password is just bits in your head.
Of course, whether the court sees it that way is anyone's guess.
If we're going that far, we might as well assume that he won't speak English (and it will in fact be a dead, lost language) when the archives need reading. ASCII is really just a substitution cipher on the alphabet plus some punctuation. It can be trivially cryptanalyzed. (Even if we, the entire planet, magically forget the order the alphabet goes in.)
Unfortunately, planning ahead is a dying art. I used to have to plan hanging out with friends a week in advance to make sure everyone would be there. Now you have to call people at the time when you want them to be there in order to get anything out of them.
Federal government is federal. LEOs are, in most cases, paid for by local and state governments. There are a few exceptions (DHS, FBI), but one could make the argument they
1) don't contribute much to day-to-day safety anyway 2) shouldn't really constitutionally exist to begin with (DEA, I'm looking at you)
Rijndael and RSA are both deterministic. However, your implementation may be adding a random salt/initialization vector to the plaintext pre-encryption. I'm not sure why it would be doing this without being asked, especially in ECB mode, but I'm not familiar with BouncyCastle.
RSA encryption and decryption are both just modulo exponentiation by the public and private parts of the key. No random there.
The AES algorithm is slightly more complicated, and I don't have time to fully analyze it, but it is also deterministic. The issue is somewhere in BouncyCastle and how you're calling it. (AES was designed to be fast. Cryto-quality RNGs are really slow and complex: it wouldn't make sense to use one)
Also, imperative program flow is not "more real" than a functional-programming language definition of a function...
I understand how that is true, in a sense, but in another very "real" sense, your processor is imperative. Function calls are just a clever trick played on you by your compiler, your standard library, and some assembly macros.
(Well, unless you're running on a Reduceron or something.)
But there's no need to make the copyright on BSD-licensed stuff go away, for exactly the reason you described: you can make closed-source derivative works.
Although it looks like all of Amendments 1-8 (with 2 clauses of exception, related to excessive bail and right to a jury in a civil trial) have been held to apply to the states, the 9th and 10th have not.
Probably they tried to hide it. It looks like this breach took a month to expose? You can't backdoor a system without having a backdoor, and with sufficient scrutiny that's going to show up.
You appear to be right in the specific case, (which surprised me), but you're completely wrong in the general case. Most prototypes are given Y designations. For example, the F-22 started life as the YF-22, while the X-22 is a V/STOL technology demonstrator, not an air superiority fighter.
The production energy may be the same for a bioreactor vs. PV, but what he's saying is, the bioreactor has a longer lifetime to amortize production costs against.
In a market with no regulations, you can't enforce a contract.
What makes the muscle I pay to enforce my contracts with taxes inherently better than independently contracted muscle?
In a truly free market your grocer can sell you poison and not tell you.
He can do that now too. Occasionally does, by accident. (OK, perhaps salmonella in peanut butter and mad cow disease aren't poison per se. Close enough.) Incredibly bad for business, I might add.
The real free market, the one the people who coined the phrase intended, is a specific set of constraints to produce a fair marketplace. It is tightly regulated to ensure it works as desired, it is by no means a free for all.
I will admit to not having actually read Adam Smith as such. I feel virtually certain he has a quote I can use to answer this, but 5 minutes with The Wealth of Nations and firefox search was not enough to uncover it. Those economists in the Austrian school, at least, would however disagree vehemently.
The whole point of an Invisible Hand is that maintenance of order will arise spontaneously from chaos, because order benefits everyone. All the externally imposed order of government does is force men into a pattern that is slightly unnatural.
Slashdot Mirror
If you have to rebuild everything after every flight, it isn't a reusable rocket. It may get called "reusable", but it isn't really.
Of course when the 2nd Amendment was written, there wasn't even a cosmetic difference between "military-grade" weapons and hunting weapons, so unfortunately this purpose was not properly enshrined in law.
False: a close enough strike will induce currents in things that are unplugged. This is especially bad if the things that are unplugged are feedlines to antennae, but it can happen with any metal object, given a sufficiently close strike.
Perhaps the orbits are set up to attract visitors, rather than hide from them.
Yes, but a 4-core phone can do this at a quarter the clock speed the single-core phone would need. Power consumption is quadratic with frequency, so adding additional cores winds up giving a net power savings (at the expense of die area)
But those goods will be subject to import duties when they arrive in the US. (Unless they're never imported, in which case it isn't really the US's business that they exist...)
The sun isn't an inertial frame of reference either. Both the sun and the earth orbit something called the barycenter,
Perhaps more accurately, the barycenter is the only inertial frame of reference in the system.
The sun isn't an inertial frame of reference either. Both the sun and the earth orbit something called the barycenter, which is the center of mass of the sun-earth system. This just happens to be so near the center of the sun (because the sun is so massive) that for most intents and purposes, the earth can be said to orbit the sun.
This discussion, however, is not one of those intents and purposes.
Except that a physical key is "something you have", whereas a password is "something you know." A search warrant allows them to make off with physical objects, but a password is just bits in your head.
Of course, whether the court sees it that way is anyone's guess.
The key word being "ludicrous". Libel requires falsehood, which it isn't clear was present in this case.
Well, the BBC is British and presumably paying in pounds. 2000 pounds to a ton...
The idea wasn't to not overfly the Soviets, it was to only overfly them once.
Any second orbit would have been extremely predictable and run the risk of being intercepted.
If we're going that far, we might as well assume that he won't speak English (and it will in fact be a dead, lost language) when the archives need reading. ASCII is really just a substitution cipher on the alphabet plus some punctuation. It can be trivially cryptanalyzed. (Even if we, the entire planet, magically forget the order the alphabet goes in.)
Unfortunately, planning ahead is a dying art. I used to have to plan hanging out with friends a week in advance to make sure everyone would be there. Now you have to call people at the time when you want them to be there in order to get anything out of them.
Federal government is federal. LEOs are, in most cases, paid for by local and state governments. There are a few exceptions (DHS, FBI), but one could make the argument they
1) don't contribute much to day-to-day safety anyway
2) shouldn't really constitutionally exist to begin with (DEA, I'm looking at you)
Rijndael and RSA are both deterministic. However, your implementation may be adding a random salt/initialization vector to the plaintext pre-encryption. I'm not sure why it would be doing this without being asked, especially in ECB mode, but I'm not familiar with BouncyCastle.
RSA encryption and decryption are both just modulo exponentiation by the public and private parts of the key. No random there.
The AES algorithm is slightly more complicated, and I don't have time to fully analyze it, but it is also deterministic. The issue is somewhere in BouncyCastle and how you're calling it. (AES was designed to be fast. Cryto-quality RNGs are really slow and complex: it wouldn't make sense to use one)
Also, imperative program flow is not "more real" than a functional-programming language definition of a function...
I understand how that is true, in a sense, but in another very "real" sense, your processor is imperative. Function calls are just a clever trick played on you by your compiler, your standard library, and some assembly macros.
(Well, unless you're running on a Reduceron or something.)
But there's no need to make the copyright on BSD-licensed stuff go away, for exactly the reason you described: you can make closed-source derivative works.
hindsight is 20/20
Go back and read the rest of the comment before you complain about it.
The US Constitution overrides state law, if the Supreme Court feels like it that day.
Incorporation
Although it looks like all of Amendments 1-8 (with 2 clauses of exception, related to excessive bail and right to a jury in a civil trial) have been held to apply to the states, the 9th and 10th have not.
Probably they tried to hide it. It looks like this breach took a month to expose? You can't backdoor a system without having a backdoor, and with sufficient scrutiny that's going to show up.
You appear to be right in the specific case, (which surprised me), but you're completely wrong in the general case. Most prototypes are given Y designations. For example, the F-22 started life as the YF-22, while the X-22 is a V/STOL technology demonstrator, not an air superiority fighter.
The production energy may be the same for a bioreactor vs. PV, but what he's saying is, the bioreactor has a longer lifetime to amortize production costs against.
In a market with no regulations, you can't enforce a contract.
What makes the muscle I pay to enforce my contracts with taxes inherently better than independently contracted muscle?
In a truly free market your grocer can sell you poison and not tell you.
He can do that now too. Occasionally does, by accident. (OK, perhaps salmonella in peanut butter and mad cow disease aren't poison per se. Close enough.) Incredibly bad for business, I might add.
The real free market, the one the people who coined the phrase intended, is a specific set of constraints to produce a fair marketplace. It is tightly regulated to ensure it works as desired, it is by no means a free for all.
I will admit to not having actually read Adam Smith as such. I feel virtually certain he has a quote I can use to answer this, but 5 minutes with The Wealth of Nations and firefox search was not enough to uncover it. Those economists in the Austrian school, at least, would however disagree vehemently.
The whole point of an Invisible Hand is that maintenance of order will arise spontaneously from chaos, because order benefits everyone. All the externally imposed order of government does is force men into a pattern that is slightly unnatural.