You could always complain about the-place-formerly-known-as-Nieuw-Amsterdam.
FTFY. Nieuw is Duch for New, Nieuw Amsterdam was founded by the Dutch. Not fixing it because pedantry, but because city and new were illegal words according to GP.
The amount of metallic elements available is a feature of the gas cloud at the time of creation. How much metals are available determines what kind of planet forms. In the beginning, when the first stars where created, there was almost only H and He. This star is from that age, but has relatively high concentrations of "metals" (non H and He elements). Because it was assumed no gas only planets could be formed, it was also assumed stars like this could not have planets. This one seems to have 'em, so the current theory on planetary development isn't complete.
IANAAP, but I once heard everything has a base frequency (not mechanical, but something else, based on the mass of the object). With the speed of the cat this results in a wavelength. I'd guess the maximum slit size is connected to the resulting wavelength (a to wide a slit would not give an interference pattern). The question is: how fast do we need to launch the cat (using a catapult of course) to get the wavelength long enough to make the maximum slit wider than the cat?
Kittens: Force them to run in a hamster wheel until they die of exhaustion. Burn the corpses in a modified thermal power plant. Sunshine: Molten salt towers for large scale operations, PV panels for small scale operations.
All kidding aside: I agree with your point wholehartedly. Gimme nukes until fusion is feasible.
I still favor the "giant nuclear explosion in the natural uranium layer around the core of the planet blasted enough of the mantle into space to form the moon" theory. According to that theory there is a layer of uranium around the core. This layer is infused with carbon (a neutron regulator). As the width of this layer increased, so did the density of slow neutrons, up to the tipping point where a nuclear cascade reaction was the result. The sheer size of the layer ment lots of fuel for this explosion, pushing some of the mantle in orbit. This formed the moon. Of course this has to have happened before the surface of the earth turned solid, or the results would have been visible. haven't heard much of that theory lately, so it may have been disproven.
SuperMicro X7SLA-H board (E150 when I bought it more than a year ago) A couple of WD Greens(E100 each at the moment) A low power silent PSU (E100) (WARNING: this one has no ground and therefore no decent surge protection. Always combine with an external surge protector) Some RAM that fits (E50) (FreeNas advises 1 GB/ TB of harddisk, but will function perfectly under low loads with much much less) A case (free if you have one idling in the attic) FreeNAS (free). Total: E600 for 3x 1,5 TB (3Tb under raid 5), expandable quite a bit with PCI-E Sata cards (E50 for 4 devices. Raid controllers are overrated for home use. Soft raid gives les trouble if the hardware dies)
Its like: you shouldn't place a Sony laptop directly on your crotch, as the batteries may explode. Always have a tray inbetween your crotch and the laptop.
That may be the reason I was in 2 airbag deploying crashes with my hands approx at 10 and 2 with my thumbs inside the steering wheel (which, myth has it, should have broken my thumb) with only a minor injury in my left hand from the door falling shut on my hand when I was out of the car (The car was on it's side, I had my finger in the door gap when the door fell shut. Autch.). Long live European cars and rules (this has some exeptions).
Nuclear reactors have wear in the parts that can't be repaired or even checked. Inside the reactor is a lot of neutron damage, which lowers the structural integrity of the reactor building. Loading new fuel rods into them well after the original designed lifetime keeps the neutron wear up and causes a risk of collapse of the inner containment stucture. When that happens it's a nuclear disaster, although the second containment structure should keep the radioactive dust inside. God forbid something happens to that structure. Best thing to do with old reactors IMHO is build a new one, and the old one up with concrete. A couple of hundred years will lower the concentration of short-halflife isotopes (the dangerous ones) and make it safe to clean up. Having said that: I don't know every decay path. There may be decay paths that stay dangerous for long times (as in: the decay product has a half life of years, the decay product of that has a halflife of years and so on untill it's long-halflife or even iron (the endgame of fission and fusion)).
as in my search for Kwantum Mechanics? If a combination has X times as much results with a slightly different spelling Google assumes you made a typo, but gives you a link to force the results.
No, a prevailing question is "How will this get us off this rock?". That's using the results of research, not assuming all things are meant to get us off this rock. Now those who feel effort is useless if it doesn't help us get off this rock are just off their respective rockers.
Slashdot Mirror
You could always complain about the-place-formerly-known-as-Nieuw-Amsterdam.
FTFY. Nieuw is Duch for New, Nieuw Amsterdam was founded by the Dutch. Not fixing it because pedantry, but because city and new were illegal words according to GP.
That it's normal doesn't mean it's true. There seem to be evolutionary advantages to having an religion, without it being true.
You are right.
s/nukes/fission
The amount of metallic elements available is a feature of the gas cloud at the time of creation. How much metals are available determines what kind of planet forms. In the beginning, when the first stars where created, there was almost only H and He. This star is from that age, but has relatively high concentrations of "metals" (non H and He elements).
Because it was assumed no gas only planets could be formed, it was also assumed stars like this could not have planets. This one seems to have 'em, so the current theory on planetary development isn't complete.
IANAAP, but I once heard everything has a base frequency (not mechanical, but something else, based on the mass of the object). With the speed of the cat this results in a wavelength. I'd guess the maximum slit size is connected to the resulting wavelength (a to wide a slit would not give an interference pattern). The question is: how fast do we need to launch the cat (using a catapult of course) to get the wavelength long enough to make the maximum slit wider than the cat?
Kittens: Force them to run in a hamster wheel until they die of exhaustion. Burn the corpses in a modified thermal power plant.
Sunshine: Molten salt towers for large scale operations, PV panels for small scale operations.
All kidding aside: I agree with your point wholehartedly. Gimme nukes until fusion is feasible.
I still favor the "giant nuclear explosion in the natural uranium layer around the core of the planet blasted enough of the mantle into space to form the moon" theory.
According to that theory there is a layer of uranium around the core. This layer is infused with carbon (a neutron regulator). As the width of this layer increased, so did the density of slow neutrons, up to the tipping point where a nuclear cascade reaction was the result. The sheer size of the layer ment lots of fuel for this explosion, pushing some of the mantle in orbit. This formed the moon.
Of course this has to have happened before the surface of the earth turned solid, or the results would have been visible.
haven't heard much of that theory lately, so it may have been disproven.
Back it up to a 1 TB USB drive and store that at your parents' or a friends place.
SuperMicro X7SLA-H board (E150 when I bought it more than a year ago)
A couple of WD Greens(E100 each at the moment)
A low power silent PSU (E100) (WARNING: this one has no ground and therefore no decent surge protection. Always combine with an external surge protector)
Some RAM that fits (E50) (FreeNas advises 1 GB/ TB of harddisk, but will function perfectly under low loads with much much less)
A case (free if you have one idling in the attic)
FreeNAS (free).
Total: E600 for 3x 1,5 TB (3Tb under raid 5), expandable quite a bit with PCI-E Sata cards (E50 for 4 devices. Raid controllers are overrated for home use. Soft raid gives les trouble if the hardware dies)
Its like: you shouldn't place a Sony laptop directly on your crotch, as the batteries may explode. Always have a tray inbetween your crotch and the laptop.
I believe that would constitute as driving while distracted.
That may be the reason I was in 2 airbag deploying crashes with my hands approx at 10 and 2 with my thumbs inside the steering wheel (which, myth has it, should have broken my thumb) with only a minor injury in my left hand from the door falling shut on my hand when I was out of the car (The car was on it's side, I had my finger in the door gap when the door fell shut. Autch.).
Long live European cars and rules (this has some exeptions).
Flag it as such.
She/it would have killed us centuries ago.
Nuclear reactors have wear in the parts that can't be repaired or even checked. Inside the reactor is a lot of neutron damage, which lowers the structural integrity of the reactor building. Loading new fuel rods into them well after the original designed lifetime keeps the neutron wear up and causes a risk of collapse of the inner containment stucture. When that happens it's a nuclear disaster, although the second containment structure should keep the radioactive dust inside. God forbid something happens to that structure.
Best thing to do with old reactors IMHO is build a new one, and the old one up with concrete. A couple of hundred years will lower the concentration of short-halflife isotopes (the dangerous ones) and make it safe to clean up. Having said that: I don't know every decay path. There may be decay paths that stay dangerous for long times (as in: the decay product has a half life of years, the decay product of that has a halflife of years and so on untill it's long-halflife or even iron (the endgame of fission and fusion)).
Is there horizontal gene transfer between plants? Is there a mechanism for it?
My house is getting more and more illegal by the week.
Last step: be happy.
Instructions should always end in an instruction to be happy.
One could repair them with a modified old sovjet era submarine.
Yes, I missed that. That film sounds like a laugh.
Most watercooled systems dislike an overdose of electrolytes. Try running salt water through an RVS pipe...
I sure hope they didn't outsource to the Welsh or the Finns...
That is the goal of this action. Rank SEO'd sites lower so they don't muddy the search results.
Showing results for quantum mechanics
Search instead for kwantum mechanics
as in my search for Kwantum Mechanics? If a combination has X times as much results with a slightly different spelling Google assumes you made a typo, but gives you a link to force the results.
No, a prevailing question is "How will this get us off this rock?". That's using the results of research, not assuming all things are meant to get us off this rock.
Now those who feel effort is useless if it doesn't help us get off this rock are just off their respective rockers.