In a case where there's enough floors to make a lot of difference there's also likely to be enough footprint that the coordinates of your actual location are not useful; the coordinates of an entrance to the structure plus supplementary information on how to navigate inside are what's needed. There are cases where that supplementary information is not already there and you do want actual lateral coordinates, but even in those cases "X, Y on second floor" is going to be more useful than "164 feet above sea level" or even "26 feet above ground" (is that the third floor or the fourth? Depends on the building.)
probably not, but being able to easily express which watering hole they're camped next to this week may be useful for the guy hauling ebola vaccine doses.
I like that idea. They say you don't really understand something until you can teach it, so this will also help the military unit ensure good proficiency. Win-win!
That would be nice, not least because then it wouldn't matter that guns are easy to get.
I've heard various theories: we allow more bullying so folks feel more marginalized, we have greater wealth disparity so folks feel desperate and marginalized, we publicize the shooters so folks feel like a spree is a way to be famous, we stigmatize mental health issues so they don't get treated, lots of things. But whatever the cause (or causes) it doesn't look like we're handling it well at the moment, does it?
I think the theory goes like so: There are two kinds of spree shooters: the ones who expect to survive and escape, and those who expect to die. The first kind may be deterred by knowing that the general populace may be able to shoot back, and if they're not deterred the spree may get cut short. The second will probably not be deterred but the spree may get cut short.
Neither case asserts that nobody will get hurt, only that there's a significant possibility that the spree will end with less deaths than otherwise. (I read somewhere that the average attempted mass shooting that does get stopped by an armed bystander winds up with few enough deaths that it doesn't actually qualify as a mass shooting. I do not have a citation, though.)
I have two WAPs, but they're daisy-chained, not redundant. I should see if I can get them both to talk to the cablemodem; I think it's got enough ports.
Do you know if there's a website with good instructions on how to do a real redundant setup? When I got the second wap I tried to make them independent but ran into "Not gonna share the network" issues.
... makes it uneconomical to capture, you mean? Extraction happens as a byproduct of extracting the natural gas, as far as I'm aware; it's just a question of whether it's captured or thrown away.
okay, so you're fine with "a little unfair metal anguish". How about a little unfair physical injury? A lot of unfair physical injury? Accidental death? Where's your limit? And why is your limit more deserving of being the legal limit than someone else's (whether that's less or greater)? And is it still all worth it if it doesn't convince even one person? (I actually intend these as serious questions and would love to see reasoned explanation of your answers.)
Most of those seem to be because of the fluorine rather than the thorium, no? Not to downplay them, but you might want to rephrase it as "the fluorine needed to work with thorium is very dangerous".
The assertion (by BMG/RHM) is that Cox has not fulfilled the requirements for safe harbor, which include terminating the accounts of repeat offenders. Cox has replied that it takes action on every report of infringement and that in some cases they do wind up terminating access, but BMG/RHM are saying that's not good enough, and a Federal judge has ruled (as I understand it) that the assertion can go to trial, rather than being summarily dismissed as Cox requested.
Which I suspect means that this trial may wind up clarifying exactly what criteria define "repeat offender" for the purposes of the DMCA. Or, more likely, Cox will settle and then get really strict to avoid having to deal with this again.
I read the links. The only bit I can find about why Axel Springer SE is suing boils down to "ad blockers threaten our revenue". Is there something else somewhere I'm overlooking, or is that about the size of it?
I suspect most folks who are comfortable being passengers and comfortable around computers will be capable of getting used to this. That is, admittedly, a limited subset of humanity, but growing over time.
if a car needs someone to take over _suddenly_ it doesn't matter. Nobody's going to be paying enough attention to what's going on every minute of every trip to be ready to take over on the one trip when the car can't handle it.
the problem is that reading them to see if they're readable puts more wear on them. If you're ready to transfer the data to something else, that's fine, but if you're just trying to determine which to try first and which to not even bother, it's less useful (and possibly more time consuming).
Slashdot Mirror
In a case where there's enough floors to make a lot of difference there's also likely to be enough footprint that the coordinates of your actual location are not useful; the coordinates of an entrance to the structure plus supplementary information on how to navigate inside are what's needed. There are cases where that supplementary information is not already there and you do want actual lateral coordinates, but even in those cases "X, Y on second floor" is going to be more useful than "164 feet above sea level" or even "26 feet above ground" (is that the third floor or the fourth? Depends on the building.)
probably not, but being able to easily express which watering hole they're camped next to this week may be useful for the guy hauling ebola vaccine doses.
Japanese addresses are so generally screwy that it is normal behavior to draw maps when giving directions.
Then you add "unit N", like you do now.
I like that idea. They say you don't really understand something until you can teach it, so this will also help the military unit ensure good proficiency. Win-win!
His career was over when he got tagged for causing a huge data breach. At least this way he's unemployable for something he actually did.
That would be nice, not least because then it wouldn't matter that guns are easy to get.
I've heard various theories: we allow more bullying so folks feel more marginalized, we have greater wealth disparity so folks feel desperate and marginalized, we publicize the shooters so folks feel like a spree is a way to be famous, we stigmatize mental health issues so they don't get treated, lots of things. But whatever the cause (or causes) it doesn't look like we're handling it well at the moment, does it?
I think the theory goes like so:
There are two kinds of spree shooters: the ones who expect to survive and escape, and those who expect to die.
The first kind may be deterred by knowing that the general populace may be able to shoot back, and if they're not deterred the spree may get cut short.
The second will probably not be deterred but the spree may get cut short.
Neither case asserts that nobody will get hurt, only that there's a significant possibility that the spree will end with less deaths than otherwise. (I read somewhere that the average attempted mass shooting that does get stopped by an armed bystander winds up with few enough deaths that it doesn't actually qualify as a mass shooting. I do not have a citation, though.)
I have two WAPs, but they're daisy-chained, not redundant. I should see if I can get them both to talk to the cablemodem; I think it's got enough ports.
Do you know if there's a website with good instructions on how to do a real redundant setup? When I got the second wap I tried to make them independent but ran into "Not gonna share the network" issues.
less dense gas also provides less of a cushion for the drive heads. Lose too much and you get head crashes.
... makes it uneconomical to capture, you mean? Extraction happens as a byproduct of extracting the natural gas, as far as I'm aware; it's just a question of whether it's captured or thrown away.
okay, so you're fine with "a little unfair metal anguish". How about a little unfair physical injury? A lot of unfair physical injury? Accidental death? Where's your limit? And why is your limit more deserving of being the legal limit than someone else's (whether that's less or greater)? And is it still all worth it if it doesn't convince even one person? (I actually intend these as serious questions and would love to see reasoned explanation of your answers.)
50GB after installing windows is more like 15GB (seriously, my Windows folder is 36GB) and that'll get eaten up fast with photos and music.
This is what I found on the subject. (I'm not saying, btw, that it proves you're wrong... or right. I just present it as an information source.)
Most of those seem to be because of the fluorine rather than the thorium, no? Not to downplay them, but you might want to rephrase it as "the fluorine needed to work with thorium is very dangerous".
It's the heirarchy of evil. *AA > cable > cthulhu > kittens.
The assertion (by BMG/RHM) is that Cox has not fulfilled the requirements for safe harbor, which include terminating the accounts of repeat offenders. Cox has replied that it takes action on every report of infringement and that in some cases they do wind up terminating access, but BMG/RHM are saying that's not good enough, and a Federal judge has ruled (as I understand it) that the assertion can go to trial, rather than being summarily dismissed as Cox requested.
Which I suspect means that this trial may wind up clarifying exactly what criteria define "repeat offender" for the purposes of the DMCA. Or, more likely, Cox will settle and then get really strict to avoid having to deal with this again.
I read the links. The only bit I can find about why Axel Springer SE is suing boils down to "ad blockers threaten our revenue". Is there something else somewhere I'm overlooking, or is that about the size of it?
proving bad faith (i.e. malice) is difficult, when so much can be explained through stupidity.
I suspect most folks who are comfortable being passengers and comfortable around computers will be capable of getting used to this. That is, admittedly, a limited subset of humanity, but growing over time.
if a car needs someone to take over _suddenly_ it doesn't matter. Nobody's going to be paying enough attention to what's going on every minute of every trip to be ready to take over on the one trip when the car can't handle it.
the problem is that reading them to see if they're readable puts more wear on them. If you're ready to transfer the data to something else, that's fine, but if you're just trying to determine which to try first and which to not even bother, it's less useful (and possibly more time consuming).
plus, from what I understand (based on other postings in this thread) they've already sold the ad time for the next year, so they're stuck with it.
it works pretty well when there's actual competition and the consumer has enough relevant information. It's taken quite a while to get to that point.
yes, but all they have actually bought is an opportunity to be exposed to eyeballs, not a guarantee.