Slashdot Mirror


Los Angeles Flirts With Pre-Crime (washingtonpost.com)

An anonymous reader writes: The city of Los Angeles is considering a new plan to fight prostitution: sending letters to men who solicit prostitutes in the hopes that the letters are seen by family members. Why not just arrest them while they're doing it? Because these letters aren't being sent to the houses of men who were convicted, or even arrested. Instead, automated license plate readers would scan the cars driving down streets known to have a prostitution problem, and the letters would be sent to the address associated with those vehicles. An article about the plan says, "There isn't 'potential' for abuse here, this is a legislated abuse of technology that is already controversial when it's used by police for the purpose of seeking stolen vehicles, tracking down fugitives and solving specific crimes."

390 comments

  1. A day that ends in "y" for LAPD by taustin · · Score: 5, Insightful

    They're used to being sued, and losing. I guess they're under budget this year, and need to spend a few more million before New Years day on legal fees.

    1. Re:A day that ends in "y" for LAPD by bagboy · · Score: 1

      Hey, in California, the government authorities are always looking for a reason to raise taxes. Making up the difference in legal fees might just be another way of skimming additional revenue.

    2. Re:A day that ends in "y" for LAPD by NoKaOi · · Score: 3, Insightful

      They're used to being sued, and losing.

      Yup, and apparently they don't care. I'm pretty sure what they are doing is the epitome of libel. It's not abuse of technology, and future president is not at question. They are intentionally trying to defame somebody by accusing them of something they haven't done.

    3. Re:A day that ends in "y" for LAPD by NoKaOi · · Score: 1

      President? Precedent. Thanks autocorrect.

    4. Re:A day that ends in "y" for LAPD by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      And fraud. And extortion. But it's only a crime when the plebes do it.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    5. Re:A day that ends in "y" for LAPD by Austerity+Empowers · · Score: 1

      Hey, in California, the government authorities are always looking for a reason to raise taxes. Making up the difference in legal fees might just be another way of skimming additional revenue.

      I see this as more a response to being unable to raise taxes. We have laws against prostitution which require money to enforce. We have much bigger problems that are more deserving of what law enforcement dollars exist. So how to enforce this law without spending money on it? Try to chill it. It's cheaper than enforcement and may reduce the incidence. Maybe. How can this plan possibly backfire!

      The next step, after the lawsuits of course, lawyers have to eat too, is to demand more in taxes to put cops back on vice. Maybe this time taxpayers will say "You know what? Policing this isn't worth the time. Legalize it.". But that's just silly of me, the religious lunatics and the misguided social justice types will want to step in to "protect the girls/family/values" when they should just let people who want to destroy themselves do it, and only put in laws to try to promote better safety, hygiene and abortion availability and minimize the actual social impact of prostitution.

    6. Re:A day that ends in "y" for LAPD by pete6677 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Prostitution should be legalized and regulated, and human trafficking should be aggressively prosecuted. Let consenting adults engage in whatever services they deem fit, and then focus law enforcement resources on those who actually harm others.

    7. Re:A day that ends in "y" for LAPD by Gizan · · Score: 1

      Says the COW!

    8. Re:A day that ends in "y" for LAPD by penguinoid · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If Jesus were alive today, the LAPD would send a letter to His family informing them that he might have a prostitution problem.

      --
      Don't waste your vote! Vote for whoever you want, unless you live in a swing state it won't matter anyways
    9. Re:A day that ends in "y" for LAPD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks, Obama!

    10. Re:A day that ends in "y" for LAPD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't even see the problem with prostitution. People should be allowed to do what they want with their own bodies and money.

    11. Re:A day that ends in "y" for LAPD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We tried that in the Netherlands, and it didn't work. Most prostitutes still turned out to be human trafficking victims. Not enough people took up prostitution willingly, I guess.

    12. Re:A day that ends in "y" for LAPD by FictionPimp · · Score: 4, Funny

      I'd start paying hookers to hang out in front of city hall so their families can get letters like this.

    13. Re:A day that ends in "y" for LAPD by KGIII · · Score: 1

      If Jesus were alive today, we'd probably all be Christians or, at least, believers. The dude would be over 2000 years old by now! I'd think that's plenty of proof of divinity and I'd certainly be a believer at that point.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    14. Re:A day that ends in "y" for LAPD by HyperQuantum · · Score: 0

      Let consenting adults engage in whatever services they deem fit, and then focus law enforcement resources on those who actually harm others.

      Look, I don't care if prostitution should be legal or not. But think about his: how do you define consent? How many prostitutes are doing it only because they really need the money, to feed their family? Or maybe they are addicted to drugs, and have no other way to pay for their addiction. Can you honestly say that being a prostitute is what they really want? Is that consent? What would happen if, say, a country starts providing basic income to all their citizens. How would that affect the number of people working in prostitution? Don't you think that number would drop dramatically?

      --
      I am not really here right now.
    15. Re:A day that ends in "y" for LAPD by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 2

      Prostitution should be legalized and regulated

      are you trying to kill the sexbot industry?! ;)

      --
      Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
    16. Re:A day that ends in "y" for LAPD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      According to the bible, Jesus was accused of being a friend of prostitutes at least three times. Not only did he never deny it, he claimed they were more acceptable to God than the rich and the religious.

    17. Re:A day that ends in "y" for LAPD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      NO, NO, NO!
      You must have your head in the clouds. That would equate to Freedom! That is the last thing that needs to happen in this country.
      The next thing you know, people would want to speak their minds, protect themselves from harm, choose a representative form of government, take control of their countries dealings around the world, too. Hell they might start demanding Freedom across the board or some other pie in the sky idealism. There might even be a call for some form of document that makes clear that they are entitled to freedom to do whatever they want in general and free from tyranny or something equally ignorant.
      Get a life, Sir!

    18. Re:A day that ends in "y" for LAPD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      THIS ^.

    19. Re:A day that ends in "y" for LAPD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We have laws against prostitution which require money to enforce

      Which are among the many stupid laws in California that I would prefer to see not enforced. By denying the government excessive tax revenues, we force them to choose between enforcing important law and order type rules, which is what they should be doing, or the potpourri of liberal nonsense laws passed by the idiots who run this state. It's starve the beast in action and it's all that ordinary citizens with common sense have left in California to protect themselves from the depredations of a liberal nanny-state government run amok.

    20. Re:A day that ends in "y" for LAPD by Calydor · · Score: 4, Insightful

      A lot of people only WORK because they really the money, to feed their family.

      Consent should be easy: If the prostitute wants to say no but another person is saying yes FOR her, that is not consent.

      --
      -=This sig has nothing to do with my comment. Move along now=-
    21. Re:A day that ends in "y" for LAPD by omnichad · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Prostitution *is* legal in the US. As long as you film it and sell the resulting video.

    22. Re:A day that ends in "y" for LAPD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wonder if Allah would get one as well?

    23. Re:A day that ends in "y" for LAPD by TWX · · Score: 0

      Prostitution *is* legal in the US. As long as you film it and sell the resulting video.

      ...and employ someone in the specific role of Health and Safety Officer for the incorporated company, and ensure that all participants are frequently and regularly tested for disease and that thsoe records are immediately available and properly stored.

      But don't let your TV cartoon legal lesson hold you back...

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    24. Re:A day that ends in "y" for LAPD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      According to the bible Mary was 12 years old when God raped her in an adulterous act to produce Jesus.

    25. Re:A day that ends in "y" for LAPD by Coren22 · · Score: 2

      Prostitution is already legal, it just requires a camera being used at the same time.

      "I'm shooting a porno, there is no prostitution happening here"

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    26. Re:A day that ends in "y" for LAPD by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      Damn, you beat me to it, now I'll get a redundant mod :)

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    27. Re:A day that ends in "y" for LAPD by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      or the potpourri of liberal nonsense laws passed by the idiots who run this state.

      I don't know that you understand the history of anti prostitution laws. It isn't the liberals that passed them originally.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    28. Re:A day that ends in "y" for LAPD by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't exactly call it adulterous, she was only engaged, not married in the current sense. It was a pregnancy out of wedlock though.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    29. Re:A day that ends in "y" for LAPD by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      Allah would be caught up in a child sex ring or the human trafficking sting.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    30. Re:A day that ends in "y" for LAPD by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      Doh, that should be Mohammed, Allah is god, Mohammed was his prophet.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    31. Re:A day that ends in "y" for LAPD by kilfarsnar · · Score: 1

      I don't even see the problem with prostitution. People should be allowed to do what they want with their own bodies and money.

      The problem is why they do it. Most do so out of desperation or coercion. I'm not saying we should put them in jail for it. But I am saying that it's not just a simple matter of two consenting adults engaging in a transaction. There is often a tragic side to it that needs to be dealt with in a constructive way.

      --
      "What the American public doesn't know is what makes them the American public." -Ray Zalinsky (Tommy Boy)
    32. Re:A day that ends in "y" for LAPD by DriveDog · · Score: 1

      Seems to me that it's designed to address the real goal of law enforcement—reduce STREET prostitution. That's what people object to and dislike. "Not nearly so many people complain about what goes on behind closed doors, so let's just get it out of sight." Also, I suspect that street prostitution spreads proportionately more disease than other types. Yes, legalization and regulation would be a more effective solution, but that's not likely to become law in many states outside Nevada.

    33. Re:A day that ends in "y" for LAPD by omnichad · · Score: 2

      And if prostitution was legalized formally those wouldn't be required regulatory procedure?

    34. Re:A day that ends in "y" for LAPD by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      If Jesus came back today, no one in America would recognize him because he wouldn't look Norwegian like all the paintings of him do.

    35. Re: A day that ends in "y" for LAPD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wouldn't it be better to provide the drugs directly? Cut out the cartels, crime etc.

    36. Re:A day that ends in "y" for LAPD by Holi · · Score: 2

      Sure, you added a few of the legal caveats. What did you say that refuted his point?
      "But don't let your TV cartoon legal lesson hold you back..." was a completely unnecessary attack on someone you were basically agreeing with. Learn to debate without resorting to insults and your arguments will be more effective. Otherwise your just another asshole on the internet.

      --
      Sorry, teleporters just kill you and then make a copy. A perfect, soul-less copy.
    37. Re:A day that ends in "y" for LAPD by JimSadler · · Score: 1

      It's not such a simple issue. Prostitutes tend to be wrapped up in illegal drug use or some other form of crime all too commonly. Some are caught up in a vicious form of economic slavery such that they can not get a decent job due to an earlier arrest and have no way to get by except by selling their bodies. It is almost as if the system demands that they remain prostitutes. we also have skin flint employers who use every trick in the book to pay starvation wages. If we want to allow voluntary prostitution we must make a serious effort to determine that is really voluntary and not compelled by an unjust economic and legal system. In my area, we just went through a long period of time when one question disqualified people from any hope of getting a job. The question was have you ever been arrested. If the answer was yes, even if charges were dropped, or you were found not guilty, you would not be interviewed or hired. It did not matter if it was a misdemeanor or a major crime. Either would keep you out of work for a decade. As employers need more employees, in good times, one might get hired now with a mark on their record.

    38. Re:A day that ends in "y" for LAPD by chispito · · Score: 1

      Jesus is alive today.http://yro.slashdot.org/story/15/12/01/231254/los-angeles-flirts-with-pre-crime#

      --
      The Daddy casts sleep on the Baby. The Baby resists!
    39. Re:A day that ends in "y" for LAPD by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      Part of "regulating" should involve not only month testing for all communicable disease, but also interviewing in private to make sure they are not being coerced in any way. Yes, I believe people have the right to exploit themselves, but if they are being exploited by anybody else against their will, the douchebags exploiting them should be delt with very severely. What could the Netherlands have done to make sure all sex workers were willing and informed well enough to give informed consent?

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    40. Re:A day that ends in "y" for LAPD by Cederic · · Score: 1

      It's possible to debate effectively and be an arsehole on the internet. You seem to be managing it.

    41. Re:A day that ends in "y" for LAPD by Hylandr · · Score: 1

      I don't consent to having to work for a living.

      That's not going to get me very far unless I have a government willing to pay for all my basic living expenses.

      Then who would the government tax to pay for the coverage of all those basic living expenses?

      You can see where I am going with this.

      --
      ~ People that think they are better than anyone else for any reason are the cause of all the strife in the world.
    42. Re:A day that ends in "y" for LAPD by Hylandr · · Score: 1

      You need to be very careful when talking like this sir. Even this warning may be considered treason in this land.

      I would hate to see anything bad hap-

      --
      ~ People that think they are better than anyone else for any reason are the cause of all the strife in the world.
    43. Re:A day that ends in "y" for LAPD by JesseMcDonald · · Score: 1

      But think about his: how do you define consent?

      I appreciate that this is a complex issue on which others can reasonably disagree, but as I see it a perceived lack of other options does not, in and of itself, prevent the relationship from being consensual. How many people would work in any sort of job if they could just stay home and practice their hobbies and still have all their basic needs met? Probably more than a few, but we still consider employment voluntary and consensual. The reason for that is that the need to earn an income is not something forced on you by other people through violence or other infringement of your rights, but by the nature of the universe itself. Put simply—people have an obligation to provide for themselves. The fact that people have inherent needs beyond their control does not make all their relationships for the purpose of satisfying those needs involuntary. Any mutually-agreed and non-fraudulent arrangement people come to for the purpose of making that task of subsistence easier through an exchange of their own goods and/or services is a consensual one.

      --
      "The state is that great fiction by which everyone tries to live at the expense of everyone else." - Bastiat
    44. Re:A day that ends in "y" for LAPD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you're saying that non-consent is not consent... thanks for clearing that up!

    45. Re:A day that ends in "y" for LAPD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And why not? He gets accused of everything else. Pedophile priests, war, famine, poverty, starvation, WBC, televangelists, you name it. Jesus gets blamed for all of it.

    46. Re:A day that ends in "y" for LAPD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought you were just trying to figure out some way to connect and blame this on Obama. Carry on.

    47. Re:A day that ends in "y" for LAPD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem is why they do it. Most do so out of desperation or coercion. I'm not saying we should put them in jail for it. But I am saying that it's not just a simple matter of two consenting adults engaging in a transaction. There is often a tragic side to it that needs to be dealt with in a constructive way.

      And what I'm saying is it's none of your damned business. Nor is your opinion on what is "tragic" or "constructive" applicable to anyone beyond yourself.

    48. Re:A day that ends in "y" for LAPD by Jack+Griffin · · Score: 2

      Just finished arguing why Australia's gun laws are better than the US, and now I can do the same with prostitution. It's legal, it's regulated and it works.

    49. Re:A day that ends in "y" for LAPD by KGIII · · Score: 1

      I'm slowly on my way to Florida (I made it to DC so far, I'm out of Buffalo, finally) and I have property there in Panama City. The supervisor for the lawn care company is named Jesus. The joke about Jesus being my gardener is true. Well, he drives the truck and lawn tractor while another guy picks up and then rakes and a third guy does trimming and weed whacking.

      So, slowly but surely, I'm on my way to meet Jesus!

      I have lost the uploaded picture and never felt it important enough to back up but I did have a picture proving that I'd found Jesus in Kutztown, PA. He drove a big blue Chevy pickup truck. I know it was Jesus because it said so on his license plate.

      Jesus is alive and well! I've met Jesus, several of 'em actually. I did not meet the one in PA, I just found him or, at least, his truck. If I could get an insurance adjuster named Jesus then I'd have an accident on purpose. Just so I can say, "Appraise Jesus!" Sadly, I'm only partially joking - I'm very easily amused and will go out of my way to amuse myself.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    50. Re:A day that ends in "y" for LAPD by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      In my area, we just went through a long period of time when one question disqualified people from any hope of getting a job. The question was have you ever been arrested. If the answer was yes, even if charges were dropped, or you were found not guilty, you would not be interviewed or hired.

      That is so far beyond ridiculous that there must be some hidden motivation behind it. It sounds like something from a Victorian novel where a woman spends five seconds alone with a man who is not her husband and becomes an instant social pariah.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    51. Re:A day that ends in "y" for LAPD by Shirley+Marquez · · Score: 1

      It doesn't even take arrests. Just having a history of sex work can close the doors to a lot of other jobs.

    52. Re:A day that ends in "y" for LAPD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, but a woman who has to get on her back to feed her 'kids' is frankly a bullshit excuse these days with enough government assistance out there to help them out. Furthermore, let's be clear here, many of these woman are trapped in a cycle of prostitution, pimping, slave control, or the more obvious drug/alcohol addiction and they are doing this to feed their habit.

      A small infinitesimal amount of these women actually do it for pleasure.

    53. Re:A day that ends in "y" for LAPD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but you are still missing out on the debate effectively part.

    54. Re:A day that ends in "y" for LAPD by david_thornley · · Score: 2

      I believe that varies by state, and I've read that one big distinction may be me paying a woman to have sex with me versus me paying a woman to have sex with you. BTW, legalizing prostitution without further ado may cause problems. In some cases, welfare mothers or women on unemployment may have their benefits dropped if they refuse a job, meaning that if "Maria's Sex-n-Go" is hiring some women are going to be coerced into working there.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    55. Re:A day that ends in "y" for LAPD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which was of course a capital crime ...

    56. Re:A day that ends in "y" for LAPD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you realize when you legalize it it makes the sex worker wages go down thus fewer will want to have sex with you

    57. Re:A day that ends in "y" for LAPD by Holi · · Score: 1

      Thanks. I never claimed not to be an asshole, but at least you are saying I debate effectively.

      --
      Sorry, teleporters just kill you and then make a copy. A perfect, soul-less copy.
  2. It reminds me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It reminds me of when I visited a friend in hospital, then as I walked back to where I had parked past an abandoned strip club a woman driving past yelled angrily at me "I hope you had a good time". False positives like that are bound to happen.

    1. Re:It reminds me by slazzy · · Score: 5, Interesting

      On "black friday" I had someone yell at me for parking in a handicap parking spot, until I pointed the the sign that actually said for parents with small children only (of which I had my two small children in the car... false positives are guaranteed to happen.

      --
      Website Just Down For Me? Find out
    2. Re:It reminds me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      It reminds me of when I visited a friend in hospital, then as I walked back to where I had parked past an abandoned strip club a woman driving past yelled angrily at me "I hope you had a good time". False positives like that are bound to happen.

      As a high school senior I was once visiting a building that had a bunch of picketers outside, a building with a medical clinic that provided STD screenings and abortions. When a pair of "grandmotherly" ladies with concerned looks approached me and asked if I was visiting the clinic on such and such a floor I truthfully answered that I was visiting the Marine Corp recruiter on a different floor. Their concerned looks turned into expressions of joy and love and they said "that's wonderful". When I responded to their reactions with "so its perfectly OK to kill once the other person is born?", their reactions changed to a bit hostile. I think they would have been less hostile had I said I'm meeting my girlfriend for her abortion. The hypocrisy of their "all life is sacred" argument annoyed me. I would have been polite had they offered me some bible versus to read before going in, made some sort of anti-war comment in keeping with their "all life is sacred" notion. Such comments would have been consistent with their beliefs.

    3. Re:It reminds me by Shadow+of+Eternity · · Score: 5, Funny

      That's just your inner rape culture talking. There's no such thing as false positives or false accusations.

      --
      A bullet may have your name on it but splash damage is addressed "To whom it may concern."
    4. Re:It reminds me by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      So it wasn't just me that thought it's odd that Jesus fan club is more concerned about the yet-to-be life than already existing life? They will fight tooth and nail for you to get born, but as soon as you get popped out, you're on your own.

      I can kinda understand it. I mean, projects are more interesting while they're still in creation than when they're done. But still.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    5. Re:It reminds me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      "If someone is accused of parking in a handicap space, it doesn't matter if it's a handicap space or not. They're just not the kind of person we want parking in our parking lots."

    6. Re:It reminds me by Shadow+of+Eternity · · Score: 2

      It STARTED A CONVERSATION!

      --
      A bullet may have your name on it but splash damage is addressed "To whom it may concern."
    7. Re:It reminds me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So it wasn't just me that thought it's odd that Jesus fan club is more concerned about the yet-to-be life than already existing life? They will fight tooth and nail for you to get born, but as soon as you get popped out, you're on your own.

      I can kinda understand it. I mean, projects are more interesting while they're still in creation than when they're done. But still.

      Just so long as we keep the unabomber wannabe retards who shoot up planned parenthoods to a minimum.

      I can't believe that idiot tried to blame his idiocy on Obama, but I guess it fits the type.. well he is not long for this world.. or Bubba in prison has a new girlfriend on the way..

    8. Re:It reminds me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So it wasn't just me that thought it's odd that Jesus fan club is more concerned about the yet-to-be life than already existing life?

      Jesus fan club? Wasn't Jesus the dude reported to have said something about not claiming to love that which you do not see when you do not love those you can see? I don't understand what religions have to do with the philosophy of that Jewish Heretic except to slander his message of universal love, forgiveness and acceptance.

    9. Re:It reminds me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So it wasn't just me that thought it's odd that Jesus fan club is more concerned about the yet-to-be life than already existing life?

      It's only odd because you are mischaracterizing them and generalizing all involved into a case that best fits your argument.
      Regarding those who do support the military while simultaneously being anti abortion, the obvious difference from their vantage point is that the unborn is innocent and is having all their rights violated, while those in the military (on both sides) generally choose to be in those positions. In war, civilian casualties do happen, but they are not the goal, and these same people would mourn and (likely) chastise actions that involve civilian deaths.

      Another way to view this along the "all live is sacred" line is to follow the same logic that the basic freedoms of US citizens follow, in that your free to do more-or-less anything until it impedes someone else's freedom. If (and that is one of the key questions)... If a fetus is a life, then they have the right to life just as everyone else does, and the right to privacy should not supersede that right. However, if someone else is threatening the life of others (ex. a murderer or opposing military), then taking their life may be not only OK, but may be ones duty in order to protect the freedoms of others (their right to life). Of course, all that shit can be argued a ton of ways, but there is some basic logic that follows pretty cleanly if one would assume only a couple positions.

      Feel free to disagree with any of the positions taken, but at least try a little bit to see things from other peoples perspectives.

    10. Re:It reminds me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Carlin said it best:

      Pro-life conservatives are obsessed with the fetus from conception to nine months. After that, they don't want to know about you. They don't want to hear from you. No nothing. No neonatal care, no day care, no head start, no school lunch, no food stamps, no welfare, no nothing. If you're preborn, you're fine; if you're preschool, you're fucked! Conservatives don't give a shit about you until you reach "military age." Then they think you're just fine, just what they've been looking for. Conservatives want live babies so they can raise them to be dead soldiers. Pro-life, pro-life... These people aren't pro-life, they're killing doctors! What kind of pro-life is that?

    11. Re: It reminds me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      then you're on your own

      What are you talking about? Churches are really big on charity.
      If you are ever in a bad spot financially and need to pay rent, electric or water, ask a church or group like St. Vincent DePaul. They will help.

    12. Re:It reminds me by Jason+Levine · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I know someone whose wife was pregnant. The pregnancy went horribly wrong and the fetus had zero chance of survival (congenital deformities as well as no bladder or kidneys). They had to make a choice I wouldn't wish on anyone: Have an abortion or carry it to term and give birth to a dead baby. The latter would also have put his wife in danger also so they decided on the abortion.

      On their way into the clinic, they were accosted by pro-life demonstrators who verbally abused them for "murdering their baby." Here's a couple who is making a horrible decision after being through a horrible situation and these people just walk up with no knowledge of the situation and pile more abuse on. When his wife was taken in for the procedure (he wasn't allowed in), he decided he had enough and confronted them. He even videoed it and posted it to YouTube as well as blogged about it.

      Regardless of your views, preying on people at their weakest (physically or psychologically) is just wrong. If you want to oppose abortion in the political arena, go right ahead (but don't be surprised if you're opposed by those who want abortion to remain an option). However, don't just assume you know the whole tale and then assume you know what's right for the person you're accosting. Some people need to re-learn the grade school lesson about what happens when you "assume."

      (NOTE: I'm using the general "you" here. Not referring to anyone in particular here.)

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    13. Re:It reminds me by currently_awake · · Score: 1

      One way to spread your religion is to force women to have more kids. Gotta keep up with the Godless Muslims/Protestants/Heathen/Some other group.

    14. Re:It reminds me by ShoulderOfOrion · · Score: 1

      You're not seriously asking people to think, are you?

    15. Re:It reminds me by climb_no_fear · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Unfortunately true similar tale:

      A friend of mine got pregnant, unplanned but she was old enough to be happy anyway and say what the hell, I'll be a single mom.

      She went for her checkups and scans and the doctor found a cyst in her uterus. The observed it for a couple of weeks and it was growing like crazy. Doctor told her it would kill her long before the baby could be born if she didn't have it removed (which meant removing her uterus and, of course, the fetus).

      She was naturally distraught but after a couple of days made the only sensible decision she could and went back to the doctor at that hospital.

      He told her with a horrified look and told her that they don't do "that sort of procedure" at this hospital.

      She went to a nearby city and had to re-explain everything, have records transferred, etc, in order to save her own life...

    16. Re:It reminds me by thej1nx · · Score: 0

      So just like you argue that civilian innocents casualties are unavoidable in war, consider abortions, unavoidable civilian innocent casualties of life. Happy to put things in perspective for you.

      If unborn are sacred due to innocence and not committing any sins, same applies for chicken, turkeys and buffaloes. So what did you have for thanksgiving?

      The only basic logic you have is an arbitrary once that makes sense to you alone. It is called hypocrisy.

    17. Re:It reminds me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I am a mute. Check your conversational privilege shitlord. And donate to my patreon!

    18. Re:It reminds me by Chrisq · · Score: 1

      . false positives are guaranteed to happen.

      Like the Paediatrician attacked by semi-literate vigil-antis who thought that it meant the same as Paedophile!

    19. Re:It reminds me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Holy fuck, are you for real?

      None of the above claims that every abortion is good just because some are, but the side you are defending is the one that wants to abuse a group of people just because you disagree with some of them.
      Why not just kill all niggers because you think that some of them are bad? You could probably find plenty of proof of at least one of them being deserving of it.

      The problem with the people protesting outside abortion clinics is that they are abusive and know nothing about the visitors they harass.
      Stop defending those horrible persons, they could have chosen to have a sane debate about regulating abortions to prevent some people from using it as "birth control".

    20. Re: It reminds me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is not a strawman, it is domestic terrorism of women. No other people face this sort of terror when going to a doctor in the United States.

    21. Re:It reminds me by Gavagai80 · · Score: 1

      I've never seen picketers accosting people outside of gun shops -- and I live in California a block from a gun shop and pass others gun shops fairly often as well. At abortion clinics it's every day life.

      --
      This space intentionally left blank
    22. Re:It reminds me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sure most of those whom you mock think marines are good when they DEFEND us; not when they're used in offensive capacities.
      They would frown upon terminating the life of an unborn child for reasons of convenience.

      But I suspect I'm wasting my breath (keystrokes) ...

    23. Re: It reminds me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except for thos Christians, and biologists btw, life begins at conception. There is argument about when/how personhood is obtained/maintained but not about if it is living. To the Christian the difference is that the killer has made an active choice to harm another, the zygote/fetus has not, so the z/f is "innocent" (in quotes because innocent means different things in different places of the bible) but the killer is not innocent.

      The innocent life is to be protected until it actively is no longer innocent, then it pays be the same rules as does everyone else, you kill those who take life.

    24. Re:It reminds me by donaggie03 · · Score: 1

      So just like you argue that civilian innocents casualties are unavoidable in war, consider abortions, unavoidable civilian innocent casualties of life. Happy to put things in perspective for you.

      If unborn are sacred due to innocence and not committing any sins, same applies for chicken, turkeys and buffaloes. So what did you have for thanksgiving?

      The only basic logic you have is an arbitrary once that makes sense to you alone. It is called hypocrisy.

      I don't really have a dog in this fight, but I couldn't let your abuse of logic go unchallenged.

      So just like you argue that civilian innocents casualties are unavoidable in war, consider abortions, unavoidable civilian innocent casualties of life.

      I'm pretty sure the part about being "unavoidable" is still under debate. Civilian casualties may be somewhat unavoidable depending on a number of issues, but abortions are in no way unavoidable.

      If unborn are sacred due to innocence and not committing any sins, same applies for chicken, turkeys and buffaloes.

      You are comparing innocent children to innocent . . . turkeys? That's just silly. Regardless of your views on abortion, valuing turkey life at the same level of human life is a bit over the top.

      --
      Three days from now?? Thats tomorrow!! ~Peter Griffin
    25. Re:It reminds me by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      This perfectly illustrates why arguments against "safe spaces" on the grounds of free speech are stupid. Imagine you were considering having an abortion with your partner, and wanted to discuss it with medical professionals. Would you prefer:

      A) A public free speech forum where pro-life activists are free to scream at you, wave pictures of aborted foetuses in your face and do their best to drive you away.

      B) A safe space where you can talk with people sympathetic to your position.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    26. Re:It reminds me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am genuinely trying to understand the story. Did this doctor recommend that she have the procedure? Why did the doctor or hospital refuse to perform the procedure? I am from a small community, and the hospitals in the area often have to turn people away because they do not have qualified doctors or equipment to perform certain procedures. This included a hysterectomy for a friend that had some complication that I do not recall.

    27. Re:It reminds me by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 1
      Semiliterate.

      Vigil-antis.

      ROTFL.

    28. Re:It reminds me by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 1

      but abortions are in no way unavoidable.

      While most are probably avoidable, saying that they are "in no way" unavoidable is somewhat over the top. Consider abortions for medical reasons, for instance (in cases where both the mother and child would die if the pregnancy came to term).

    29. Re:It reminds me by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 1

      I've never seen picketers accosting people outside of gun shops

      Yeah, I really wonder why that is....

    30. Re:It reminds me by donaggie03 · · Score: 1

      but abortions are in no way unavoidable.

      While most are probably avoidable, saying that they are "in no way" unavoidable is somewhat over the top. Consider abortions for medical reasons, for instance (in cases where both the mother and child would die if the pregnancy came to term).

      Agreed. I did not mean for my statement to be all inclusive. I should have said "the vast majority" of abortions are in no way unavoidable. Quick google: http://www.nrlc.org/archive/ne... http://www.abortionfacts.com/f... https://www.quora.com/What-per...

      --
      Three days from now?? Thats tomorrow!! ~Peter Griffin
    31. Re:It reminds me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So what? They would just let her and the baby die?
      What the fuck kind of doctor is that? It seems he took the hypocrytic oath when graduating.

    32. Re:It reminds me by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 1

      I'm afraid that there are hospitals, especially Christian ones, where the surgeons are not permitted to perform such surgeries by the owners of the hospital. There are, similarly, hospitals that will not aid with medical suicide in "right to die" cases.

    33. Re:It reminds me by tibit · · Score: 1

      First life hands one comedy gold, and then you hand that to us with some platinum sprinkles on top. Hats off, my day has been made. Thank you!

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    34. Re:It reminds me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This biggest issue is that this violates the RIGHT TO DUE PROCESS. A punishment is being given before any opportunity to defend yourself in court, and without following any standard of *proper* evidence. You merely go down the wrong street and your life gets ruined.

    35. Re:It reminds me by DarkOx · · Score: 1

      No the procedure abortion in that case is still entirely avoidable.

      Its just not reasonable in the moral system even the majority of pro-lifers (like my self use).

      --
      Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
    36. Re:It reminds me by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 1

      That's akin to saying "you can always say no" even if someone has a gun pointed to your head... Technically true, but you'd end up shot.

    37. Re:It reminds me by mr_mischief · · Score: 1

      There's nothing wrong with having a "safe space" for sensitive discussions. That should be encouraged. What should be discouraged is forcing your entire community to be one so you're never offended, embarrassed, or shocked out in public. You have your rights. I have mine. You can go to your safe space. I can go to mine. When we're out in public, neither of us has the right to tell each other what's acceptable speech.

    38. Re:It reminds me by DarkOx · · Score: 1

      I think there is big difference between aborting a viable baby and one that has not a chance of being carried to term or could not survive post birth even with every available medical intervention.

      That is the problem. You complain about the people 'preying on people at their weakest' but the vast majority of those people heading into the abortion clinic are about to kill a perfect healthy baby. To me and a lot of other people that is murder! So if a little unfair metal anguish is inflicted upon someone like your friend, that is sad but if those protesters convince even one person not to murder someone than I would have to say it was all worth it.

      You can't separate the political opposition of something like abortion form accosting people on the streets. The reality is we do have a republic. Most politicking is local, its canvassers going house to house making the case for their issue or candidate. Its getting out in front of an event and bringing attention of the public to an issue.

      The pro-murder group wants to control where the political debate takes place, they want to control the language and cast their position as something about choice, (hint is a hind unless you are rape victim you already made a choice) and not about murdering to avoid consequences. Why do they want to do this? They don't want enable a real debate at all. Its all about obfuscating the issue, the same thing you are doing making anecdotal arguments, making a big issue out rare cases where there is a clearly identifiable reason why a child cannot survive.

      --
      Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
    39. Re:It reminds me by DarkOx · · Score: 2

      A safe space where you can talk with people sympathetic to your position

      You mean an echo chamber with people who will tell you what you want to hear. I would say yours is actually the perfect argument why there should never be 'safe spaces'.

      --
      Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
    40. Re:It reminds me by kilfarsnar · · Score: 1

      Just so long as we keep the unabomber wannabe retards who shoot up planned parenthoods to a minimum.

      I can't believe that idiot tried to blame his idiocy on Obama, but I guess it fits the type.. well he is not long for this world.. or Bubba in prison has a new girlfriend on the way..

      Right-wing propaganda is a powerful drug.

      --
      "What the American public doesn't know is what makes them the American public." -Ray Zalinsky (Tommy Boy)
    41. Re: It reminds me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The innocent life is to be protected until it actively is no longer innocent, then it pays be the same rules as does everyone else, you kill those who take life.

      So do we kill those who kill those who take life? Because they have also taken life at that point.

    42. Re:It reminds me by kilfarsnar · · Score: 1

      If you want to oppose abortion in the political arena, go right ahead (but don't be surprised if you're opposed by those who want abortion to remain an option). However, don't just assume you know the whole tale and then assume you know what's right for the person you're accosting.

      But then how am I to feel superior and self-righteous?

      --
      "What the American public doesn't know is what makes them the American public." -Ray Zalinsky (Tommy Boy)
    43. Re:It reminds me by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Is that a paraphrase of an actual quote? I'd love to see the source for that. (Not doubting you either.)

    44. Re:It reminds me by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      How is the scenario where you have pro-life activists screaming at you not an echo chamber, echoing with their screams that drown out everything else?

      Imagine you are an evolutionary biologist, and you want to discuss some new evidence you have discovered that sheds light on certain complex changes in the cardiovascular systems of ancient mammals. Would you prefer:

      A) A free speech public forum where creationists constantly question the basic premise of evolution, making it impossible to discuss your carefully constructed and highly technical discovery. The discussion echoes with the sound of creationists screaming and internet atheists laughing at them, while your fellow evolutionary biologists are drowned out.

      B) A safe, private forum where only people who know something about evolutionary biology are allowed, who help you develop your ideas until you can publish them in a peer reviewed journal that doesn't accept papers from creationists claiming that early man rode a T-Rex.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    45. Re:It reminds me by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      I fully agree. Just remember that most of these places are not public, they are private web sites or institutions. And there are plenty on both sides, 4/8chan for near unlimited freedom to say what you like and Github to discuss matters of software engineering safe from unrelated harassment.

      People complain that Github should be more like 4chan, but since 4chan already exists can't we have somewhere different?

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    46. Re:It reminds me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This perfectly illustrates why arguments against "safe spaces" on the grounds of free speech are stupid.

      Quite the opposite. This perfectly illustrates why "space spaces" don't work even when we don't consider free speech implications.

      Inside the medical professional's office or your own house is your safe space. In fact, it's better than a safe space. It's private property. If protesters try to tresspass on your property, you might even be legally justified to shoot them!

      But cases like this demonstrate that the protesters can just stand outside the boundaries of your property or safe space.

      Imagine you were considering having an abortion with your partner, and wanted to discuss it with medical professionals.

      See above. Talk to your medical professional behind a locked door, on your own private property.

      See, the free speech opposition to "safe spaces" isn't when somebody deciding to lock their doors to outsiders on private property. The opposition is how special interest groups are wrestling public and semi-public spaces to become their personal safe spaces, ejecting any opposing or undesired ideas.

      What's particularly alarming is that a lot of this is happening on university campuses, places that are supposed to be where different ideas, even radical and uncomfortable ideas, get to be discussed and heard. Places where a lot of feminist ideas originally got to disseminate because they weren't shut down or chased out by the evil patriarchy (who would certainly be triggered by all that talk about women not staying in the kitchen and *gasp* burning bras)

      When it comes to the history of equality, equality is not won by those supporting it hiding in their own refuges patting each other's backs and licking each other's wounds. When it comes to pursuing their goal, they need to come out of their cave/mother's basements, stand tall, and actually defend their ideas against any and all comers. Including and especially the scary triggering ones.

    47. Re:It reminds me by suutar · · Score: 1

      okay, so you're fine with "a little unfair metal anguish". How about a little unfair physical injury? A lot of unfair physical injury? Accidental death? Where's your limit? And why is your limit more deserving of being the legal limit than someone else's (whether that's less or greater)? And is it still all worth it if it doesn't convince even one person? (I actually intend these as serious questions and would love to see reasoned explanation of your answers.)

    48. Re:It reminds me by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      I think there is big difference between aborting a viable baby and one that has not a chance of being carried to term or could not survive post birth even with every available medical intervention.

      So "viable embryo" is completely different than "viable embryo" because morals.

      You complain about the people 'preying on people at their weakest' but the vast majority of those people heading into the abortion clinic are about to kill a perfect healthy baby.

      And those flushing embryos are killing a perfectly healthy baby.

      unless you are rape victim you already made a choice

      So pregnancy is punishment for sex? And anti-choice is pushing punishing women for their choices, but never hold men to their choices. If there were no men involved, there's be no pregnancies. But the problem is 100% female, and they aren't allowed freedom to deal with it.

      making a big issue out rare cases where there is a clearly identifiable reason why a child cannot survive.

      The IVF trash (you call babies or children when in a female) is as viable, yet you have no issue with it if fighting for it doesn't harm a woman. It seems you want to harm women, not help embryos.

    49. Re:It reminds me by mr_mischief · · Score: 1

      Github is about code. I should be able to tell you that your code sucks. You should be allowed to tell me my code sucks. If one of us writes enough bad code, the other may even be able to make a claim of "you're a dirty hack and I doubt any of your code will every be useful to me." It's not a site about race, gender, age, national origin, sexual orientation, or general discussion. Anything that's not about the code should be left by the wayside pragmatically. Harassment of any kind is not productive and shouldn't be allowed to get in the way of discussing the code.

      4chan is a general discussion forum that's specifically for people to feel free to say anything. If that includes harassment up to the threshold where someone is legitimately threatened, so be it. People should still be held responsible if they are stalking, swatting, threatening, assaulting, or otherwise legitimately harassing people crossing over into real life. They shouldn't be bothered for calling someone hurtful names or for offending people, though.

      I don't want 4chan to be Github and I don't want Github to be 4chan. I do think both have the right to exist, both have the right to their own rules on their own sites, and people should stop bitching about the policies of both.

    50. Re:It reminds me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If God had wanted her to save her own life, he would not have given her such a cyst.

      At any rate, only Jesus can save. The only thing humans think they are capable of is extending their life. God had a plan for her, and she thwarted it.

      The sad thing is that the above is not enough for you to figure out whether I am being serious.

    51. Re:It reminds me by Hylandr · · Score: 1

      Any medical profession regardless of their discipline are mandatory reporters of certain statements.

      Your doctors office is *not* a safe place.

      --
      ~ People that think they are better than anyone else for any reason are the cause of all the strife in the world.
    52. Re:It reminds me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was loosely implied that is what happened here. It would be nice to know if that was indeed the case. I hate assuming such things.

    53. Re:It reminds me by climb_no_fear · · Score: 1

      Sorry for not answering, I was away on business yesterday. It is not a Christian hospital (county hospital) in a very conservative Catholic part of Germany. The doctor definitely recommended the procedure but also made it clear that no one at that hospital would do it on purely "ethical" reasons (not my idea of ethics).

    54. Re:It reminds me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is the idiotic feminazis like her that have caused me to go to Thailand for all my adult pleasures. The women are much more beautiful here, slim unlike the fat slobs of America, cheaper by the hour or by the night and they have a wonderfully fun attitude towards sex and men in general.

    55. Re:It reminds me by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      I don't call it a baby until it has human brain functions.

      Calling abortion murder is an attempt at an emotional response. I am unaware of any society where the punishments for murder and for abortion were the same. Your use of "pro-murder" is a pathetic attempt to obfuscate the discussion.

      Your comparison of abortion clinic harassment to politics is similarly fatuous and sophistical. Politics is not normally practiced by harassing your opponents in that way.

      Also, I am in favor of abortion rights. If you cause me to be in favor of murder rights, why shouldn't I start with you?

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  3. Really??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Big Brother is watching and he's a real dick...

    1. Re:Really??? by plover · · Score: 1

      WINSTON.SMITH.5,

      Your attempts to post anonymously are a sign that you may not love Big Brother with your whole heart. Please report to MiniLove Room 101 at 8:00 AM for a refresher course.

      You may bring your own caged rats, if desired. If you don't have any, rest assured we are not going spare in the caged rat department, but we cannot guarantee their cleanliness.

      Big Brother loves you.

      --
      John
  4. Why is prostitution illegal in the first place? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Seriously, if a girl wants to sell her body, why shouldn't she?

    1. Re:Why is prostitution illegal in the first place? by Bovius · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Two reasons:

      1. The expected moral indignation of those in our population who believe prostitution is just bad. I don't think there's much constructive discussion to be had here one way or the other.

      2. Prostitution is *heavily* associated with human trafficking, along with other behaviors that boil down to a girl being forced to sell her body, rather than wanting to. This is the reason that really matters.

    2. Re:Why is prostitution illegal in the first place? by Beck_Neard · · Score: 5, Informative

      In virtually all developed countries in which prostitution has been legalized, human trafficking issues have decreased.

      --
      A fool and his hard drive are soon parted.
    3. Re:Why is prostitution illegal in the first place? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you claiming those are good reasons, or just the random reasons puritans keep giving?
      The first one is clearly not a reason at all. Lots of people are against drinking and we allow that.
      As for the second reason, human trafficking is illegal. You can arrest people for that.
      Making prostitution legal would not change that. In fact, it might reduce human trafficking, since prostitution wouldn't have to happen behind closed doors (lol).
      It's a lot easier to check these things when the victims are less afraid to go to the police for fear of being locked up for prostitution.
      Will it be a perfect world? No. But it will likely be a better world just the same.

    4. Re:Why is prostitution illegal in the first place? by techno-vampire · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Strictly speaking, she's not selling her body, she's offering a short-term rental. And, of course, not all prostitutes are women.

      --
      Good, inexpensive web hosting
    5. Re:Why is prostitution illegal in the first place? by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1

      Seriously, if a girl wants to sell her body, why shouldn't she?

      Because the government hasn't figured out a way to collect tax on that kind of income without implicitly condoning the behavior/occupation and offending people. Same for drugs.

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    6. Re:Why is prostitution illegal in the first place? by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 2

      I think licenses, regular inspections, and tracking the girl/boy's finance would do much more to cut human trafficking/sex slavery.

      Relatively inexpensive, safe, legal prostitution would reduce demand for illegal, less safe, expensive prostitution enormously.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    7. Re:Why is prostitution illegal in the first place? by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      In Germany prostitutes are either employees and the employer pays the tax for them (deduces it from the wages), at the end of the year they file a tax declaration, like anybody else, or they are freelancers and they file their tax declaration at the end of the year.
      Most countries around us are similar in that regard.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    8. Re:Why is prostitution illegal in the first place? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And yet those "harms" have been reduced in countries like Australia and New Zealand because forced/illegal workers are able to come forward to police without fear of being prosecuted themselves.

      Legalisation also means
      Can force the use of condoms , prostitutes can say "no" without being blackmailed
      Can enforce regular health checkups , help prevent STIs spreading
      Police can go back to fighting real crime, so less tax money wasted
      Its legal, they can declare the income, so MORE taxes paid.

    9. Re:Why is prostitution illegal in the first place? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Actually prostitution is not heavily associated with human trafficking from a statistical perspective at all -- in the USA, Europe and Asia. There are some places in the world, like the Middle East and parts of Afrifa, where abduction is indeed a statistically significant issue. Trafficking is also largely associated with underage or child prostitution, which is an entirely different animal.

      But the issue here, as with narcotics (and alcohol prohibition, once upon a time), is that illegality begets higher-prices and higher risks, which in turn begets increasingly violent crime. Illegality also prevents the industry from being taxed and to some extent from accessing healthcare -- both of which carry significantly higher social costs than negligible human trafficking.

      Most importantly: we have civil liberties in the United States and in Europe which are supposed to protect the right to privacy, and the right for consenting adults to engage in consensual, sexual behavior. What is deeply ironic is how the very same feminists who demand that government "keep your laws off my body", seem to be quite alright with government telling them they don't have the right to engage in the oldest and most basic transaction.

      The fact that "money" is raised as a distinction between prostitution and sex is ultimately rather laughable, considering that money is almost never not an issue. Women will always and forever be attracted to wealth, and have sex for wealth. Female doctors do not screw male nurses. Female restaurant owners don't bang waiters. Female pilots don't shack up with male flight attendants. Female bosses don't get banged by their male secretaries. Money and power are always and everywhere part of female attraction -- be it long term, or a quick hook-up. But I digress. The point is, money and sex are now and forever inseparable concepts.

      Enlightened societies like Holland and Germany have long ago legalized prostitution, and so should the USA.

    10. Re:Why is prostitution illegal in the first place? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      STIs? What, is there something with Subarus now?!?!?

      Maybe we should all get the WRX instead.

    11. Re:Why is prostitution illegal in the first place? by Princeofcups · · Score: 1

      Seriously, if a girl wants to sell her body, why shouldn't she?

      Agreed. Call girls and escorts can make a good relatively safe living, with well to do clients. These are not them. These are drug addicts with pimps who beat them if they don't hustle enough. It's a tough, dangerous, and diseased lifestyle that is illegal in many ways besides the selling of their bodies.

      --
      The only thing worse than a Democrat is a Republican.
    12. Re:Why is prostitution illegal in the first place? by Shadow+of+Eternity · · Score: 2

      Something like 3/4 or more of human trafficking is actually for labor, not sex slavery. You want to find human trafficking look at factory farms.

      --
      A bullet may have your name on it but splash damage is addressed "To whom it may concern."
    13. Re:Why is prostitution illegal in the first place? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Get real.

      Parents hate prostitution because their natural kid-obsession means they don't want their kids to be involved (buying or selling, even when they grow up), and this is an enormous voting demographic.

      There are some women who hate it because they see it as competition for their men, and there are some people of both genders that are just outright intimidated by the whole prospect (and hence don't want it to exist at all).

      There is also a group of people who disapprove on moral grounds, and feel it is appropriate to legislate their moral principles and force them on others, but even here most of the motivation comes from the above reasons.

      Generally speaking, people are petty and self-serving, not concerned about justice. They just pretend to be champions of dignity in order to whitewash their petty motivations.

    14. Re:Why is prostitution illegal in the first place? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      1. The religious have to find a hobby other than digging their nose into business that ain't theirs.

      2. Actually it isn't. Prostitution is ONLY associated with human trafficking when prostitution is illegal and people working in that business cannot easily go to law enforcement agencies without risking prosecution themselves. I live in a country where it would be trivial to do human trafficking from areas where there is, let's say, less value put on human lives. And yes, we have prostitutes around the area that are from countries that are considerably poorer than ours. They came here themselves, though, because there's money to be made. Duh.

      Legal prostitution means that sex workers will pay taxes (and trust me, that's quite a lot of money, you wouldn't believe it!), that mandatory health checks can be enforced and especially the latter also makes it very unattractive for Johns to choose an "unlicensed" prostitute.

      Prostitution is legal in my country. And aside from the classified section in the newspaper simply being annoying and annoyingly long, I have to admit I can't point to anything that I'd consider bad about it.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    15. Re:Why is prostitution illegal in the first place? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Nevada, the only thing criminal about prostitution is the prices....

    16. Re:Why is prostitution illegal in the first place? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      So condone it. What exactly is the fucking problem?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    17. Re:Why is prostitution illegal in the first place? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Wow, where do you get your information from? Crime TV shows?

      You know, legal prostitution would instantly do away with these. Seriously. Who'd want to solicit sex from that kind of prostitute if you can have something else?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    18. Re:Why is prostitution illegal in the first place? by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 5, Insightful

      2. Prostitution is *heavily* associated with human trafficking

      Illegal prostitution is associated with human trafficking. This is a an argument for legalization. Anyway, "human trafficking" is a far smaller problem than commonly believed. It has been wildly exaggerated by law enforcement as an excuse to increase their funding.

      ... a girl being forced to sell her body, rather than wanting to. This is the reason that really matters.

      Again, this is something that is worsened by criminalization. The best cure for coercive prostitution is legalization and regulation.

       

    19. Re:Why is prostitution illegal in the first place? by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 2

      ... with pimps who beat them if they don't hustle enough.

      In the book Superfreakonomics the authors conducted a study of prostitutes and pimps, and found that the women who worked with pimps were paid better and were less likely to be victims of violence. Some pimps had waiting lists of freelance prostitutes that wanted to join their teams, to benefit from the better working conditions. The authors found that pimps rarely used violence against their own prostitutes.

    20. Re:Why is prostitution illegal in the first place? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Citation?

      The ones that I've seen that work quite well to curb human trafficking issues is where it's legal to be a prostitute, but illegal to solicit a prostitute.

    21. Re:Why is prostitution illegal in the first place? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because Republicans have a war on women, and they want us all to die. Also, NOW says we can't be trusted to be able to sell ourselves. We are under attack from both sides. Both feminists and Repukians want us to die. To die. They make us hate ourselves.

    22. Re:Why is prostitution illegal in the first place? by WaffleMonster · · Score: 1

      Seriously, if a girl wants to sell her body, why shouldn't she?

      The reason is governments prefer to spend their time fostering unground untaxed, unregulated criminal markets where people are treated like slaves and placed in unnecessary danger.

      I don't know why government actively seeks to erode their own legitimacy like this while subjecting their own citizens to unnecessary harm but they routinely do so with reckless abandon.

    23. Re:Why is prostitution illegal in the first place? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You might not be aware, but some countries have a thing called democratic elections. Try to imagine what would happen to a politician who condoned prostitution under that system.

    24. Re:Why is prostitution illegal in the first place? by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1

      In Germany ...

      Sorry, I thought we were talking about the USA - where all the prudes live :-)

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    25. Re:Why is prostitution illegal in the first place? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It isn't hard to figure out at all. If there is a product with very high/inelastic demand but also very high potential supply that would result in competition and low prices then the only way to maximize profit is for government to intervene in the market to artificially restrict supply. This can be done in several ways, but making the supply illegal will drastically reduce it leading to very high prices. Government is then in a position to benefit from their control over the market through selective enforcement of the ban to pick winners and losers.

    26. Re:Why is prostitution illegal in the first place? by hjf · · Score: 1

      This.
      A cop told me once she was tired of the low pay. And she's been around for a while. And if she had to start a business tomorrow, she'd just pimp two girls at a house. Provide them with security (the moment they yell, storm into the room and put a gun to the asshole's face), clean environment, etc, and the girls will gladly work for a pimp.
      Female prostitutes often prefer to be pimped instead of going freelance, because they can't get "good corners", due to transvestite/transsexuals beating the shit out of them for a good spot.

    27. Re:Why is prostitution illegal in the first place? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Australia, they got re-elected.

    28. Re:Why is prostitution illegal in the first place? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      not even a rental, unless a masseuse is offering a hand rental... it's a service, and only different from a massage because someone decided it should be.

    29. Re:Why is prostitution illegal in the first place? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "The religious have to find a hobby other than digging their nose into business that ain't theirs."

      Haha, yeah, completely unlike the non-religious.

    30. Re:Why is prostitution illegal in the first place? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      In virtually all developed countries in which prostitution has been legalized, human trafficking issues have decreased.

      ...as have rates of sexual assault, up to -25%.

    31. Re:Why is prostitution illegal in the first place? by Mr.CRC · · Score: 1

      Then the obvious solution is to end taxes on all personal business matters. Unless they are working out of a store front.

      People are so concerned about unemployment, low wages, etc., yet think everything has to be heavily controlled by government. Allowing more small scale business to be untaxed just means more economic activity.

      The government does not always have to "do something."

    32. Re:Why is prostitution illegal in the first place? by ultranova · · Score: 1

      The expected moral indignation of those in our population who believe prostitution is just bad. I don't think there's much constructive discussion to be had here one way or the other.

      And yet this discussion - to what extent do you have a right to force your moral standards on me - is the important one.

      2. Prostitution is *heavily* associated with human trafficking, along with other behaviors that boil down to a girl being forced to sell her body, rather than wanting to. This is the reason that really matters.

      Right, so the same people who consistently vote conservative positions because justice is something to be had only on the other side suddenly become concerned about human suffering when sex is involved. I call bullshit.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    33. Re:Why is prostitution illegal in the first place? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Incorrect. Numerous countries where prostitution is legal have trafficking issues. Here is but one example.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_trafficking_in_Belgium

    34. Re:Why is prostitution illegal in the first place? by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Cause all the [pejorative here] who couldn't sell it for $1 are jealous and would outlaw all sex if they could, but they can't, so they work to keep illegal as much as they can.

    35. Re:Why is prostitution illegal in the first place? by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      The ones that I've seen that work quite well to curb human trafficking issues is where it's legal to be a prostitute, but illegal to solicit a prostitute.

      Citation? If you've seen some, why not share them so we can make up our own mind?

    36. Re:Why is prostitution illegal in the first place? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Call girls and escorts can make a good relatively safe living, with well to do clients.

      I work in biomedical research. Next-gen sequencing technologies are now allowing us to starting sorting out all the various pathogens that can infect humans. And what's really striking to me is how much is out there that we really don't know that much about.

      And even a lot of the stuff that we do know about, we don't have cures for (e.g. the various forms of herpes) - and we don't even have fool-proof ways to prevent transmission (other than full quarantine). On one hand, I understand that for many, if not most, people sexual relations are a fundamental need. And I also understand that not everyone is able to find a loving spouse to satisfy those needs.

      But, on the other hand, wow, from the perspective of infectious disease, prostitution as it is usually practiced (i.e. multiple partners in a single night) is really really bad idea.

    37. Re:Why is prostitution illegal in the first place? by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 3, Insightful

      In many cases, legalising prostitution has increased human trafficking. Legalising prostitution increases the market and increases demand, hence the increase in human trafficking. Not just theory, there are statistics to back this up. [No citation given, do your own homework]

      I believe prostitution should be legal. It's a moral issue: as someone else pointed out, there is no reason to forbid two or more consenting adults to enter into such a transaction. That there are others being forced into it without consent is irrelevant to the morality of the matter: forbidding prostitution on this ground is like forbidding everyone to have sex because rapes do take place. With that said, there may be practical reasons to penalise prostitution: when the vast majority of cases is not consensual, for instance.

      With that said, legalising prostitution also gives law enforcement an opportunity to better police the market. If they take that opportunity, human trafficking can be reduced quite effectively. One way that seems to work well is to make soliciting an unwilling prostitute a punishable offence. Another thing they have done in my country is to change labour and tax laws a bit to make legal prostitution a lot easier and safer, for the johns, the women, and operators of establishments where this takes place. With plenty legal venues and prostitutes on the market and severe penalties for human trafficking, it's no longer very attractive to hire, exploit or solicit an illegal prostitute.

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    38. Re:Why is prostitution illegal in the first place? by drpimp · · Score: 1

      He/She is providing a service which is in many cases not taxable. This is the biggest reason why government does not approve of this. That said, prostitution is like the Uber of the past without the geolocational appity apps. Anyone can work that has a body and is willing to compromise on a price for said services. The real problems come with all the other crime and societal fallout involved in such activities.

      --
      -- Brought to you by Carl's JR
    39. Re:Why is prostitution illegal in the first place? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow. Please don't ever comment on posts that use words like "statistically significant" which you clearly do not understand.

      Secondly, please don't post irrelevant articles that discuss both male and female trafficking, (male is a bigger problem) and then attempt to conflate this irrelevant information to the question at hand.

      To be clear: Human trafficking is a statistically insignificant factor in the prostitution industry in Europe. In Belgium too.

      Now go back to watching cartoons, please.

    40. Re:Why is prostitution illegal in the first place? by Sloppy · · Score: 1

      This isn't about a girl. Read the summary: "...streets known to have a prostitution problem." Legal/illegal aside, the premise is that the street has already been determined to have a problem, present perfect tense. Imagine your local street had a pot hole problem, whom you would call and what measures you would expect them to take. If your local government doesn't have authority over streets' behavior, then pray tell: who does?

      Now, thanks to advances in police forensics, we have learned that some people drive on these streets, and in some cases we can identify these drivers or at least their associates. You've got a street coping with a problem, but insensitive commons-tramplers are using (relatively) heavy equipment upon it. What to do? I say there's no need to barbarously escalate. Just write 'em a letter, nicely asking them to transition toward a more tarmac-friendly lifestyle. My fellow Americans, we need more street-walkers and I think the leaders in visionary places like Los Angeles are just the policy-makers to help make that so.

      --
      As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
    41. Re:Why is prostitution illegal in the first place? by currently_awake · · Score: 1

      If you license prostitution then the government knows who they are, and the tax man has experience in following the money. If you don't have a license then the clients with money will avoid you.

    42. Re:Why is prostitution illegal in the first place? by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Yes, just wanted to give an example :D

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    43. Re:Why is prostitution illegal in the first place? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Considering the reality of the situation is that nearly all of the women doing it are doing it as a last resort, often in a borderline master-slave relationship with a pimp, I don't believe prostitution itself should be illegal, only paying for a prostitute or selling someone else's sexual services. Most of the rest are drug addicts, homeless, etc, who do it because there are no other viable options.

      The more equal a society is (in terms of gender and having a social safety net for those who have fallen on hard times) the more I would support legalizing it from both ends (har har). Throughout most countries in northern European, for example, I could see a serious argument for legalization because they have pretty decent gender equality, drug rehabilition, and support for impoverished individuals. In America, no fucking way unless it's regulated at least as well as in Nevada, we have socialized health care, and we offer rehab instead of prison for drug addicts.

    44. Re:Why is prostitution illegal in the first place? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Sorry, but we're far too blase a country for this to have any impact. If a politician wanted to commit political suicide, he'd probably have to push for something insane. Like, say, putting creationism into school text books and teach it like it was real.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    45. Re:Why is prostitution illegal in the first place? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      There are other agendas that some people ride on, correct. That has little to do with not having a religion, though, that's more one of having another agenda.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    46. Re:Why is prostitution illegal in the first place? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Less than 400 people annually. Including ALL kinds of human trafficking, like forced labor and illegal immigration. Wow. Even an atheist like me can't help but think of Matt 7:3.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    47. Re:Why is prostitution illegal in the first place? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why isn't it taxable?
      If I hire a clown for my birthday it's taxable. Why would it be any different if I hired a prostitute for my birthday?
      It's not like I'm going to let the government into my home to watch if I fuck the clown or not.

      You bring up an interesting argument, I just don't see how it can be right. Almost every service possible could be done without governmental oversight.

    48. Re:Why is prostitution illegal in the first place? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, that is the situation we have now, you know, since everyone who tries to do things the right way have been driven off.
      You can't criminalize something and expect legit businesses to keep doing it.

    49. Re:Why is prostitution illegal in the first place? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Again, this is something that is worsened by criminalization. The best cure for coercive prostitution is legalization and regulation.

      I for one am all for the legalization and regulation of elephant and rhino hunting.

    50. Re:Why is prostitution illegal in the first place? by donaggie03 · · Score: 2

      In many cases, legalising prostitution has increased human trafficking. Legalising prostitution increases the market and increases demand, hence the increase in human trafficking. Not just theory, there are statistics to back this up. [No citation given, do your own homework]

      Wasting my time searching who knows where trying to verify *your* claims is not *my* homework. If you want to be taken seriously, back your own claims up. If not, you're just another stranger on the internet spewing bullshit.

      --
      Three days from now?? Thats tomorrow!! ~Peter Griffin
    51. Re:Why is prostitution illegal in the first place? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Selling is legal. Fucking is legal.
      Why isn't selling fucking legal?

    52. Re:Why is prostitution illegal in the first place? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't the same principle at work (pun intended) here than with the legalization of cannabis, marijuana and other mild substances? More objective research, that is research separated from moralistic bullshit and wrong statistics, is needed to find the underlying mechanism and confirm the solution for various cultures and conditions.

    53. Re:Why is prostitution illegal in the first place? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Remember the Jewish joke about the world's most perfect business - prostitution - You've got it, you sell it - and you've still got it.

    54. Re:Why is prostitution illegal in the first place? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Getting re-elected is the problem.

    55. Re:Why is prostitution illegal in the first place? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed, if a person is coerced into prostitution, removing the ability to go to the police about it is the worst thing we can do.

    56. Re:Why is prostitution illegal in the first place? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Female bosses don't get banged by their male secretaries.

      I generally agree with where you are headed here, but not all of what you say is true. I have seen plenty of cases where women who enjoy positions of power over young attractive men, will use that influence to get sex. Women are perfectly capable of being every bit as predatory as men in that regard. Some people like having sex a lot and will do what they need to make that happen. Witness the various teacher student affairs that have made the news.

      I have personally observed the quoted situation above. Where it was plainly obvious the boss was diddling or receptionist and that it was primarily her idea.

    57. Re:Why is prostitution illegal in the first place? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      [No citation given, do your own homework]

      Which of course means you made it up.

    58. Re:Why is prostitution illegal in the first place? by Holi · · Score: 1

      >here are statistics to back this up. [No citation given, do your own homework]
      Sorry but that's your homework, you made the claim you back it up. In any college class you would get a failing grade for not supporting your argument. Why do you think it is any different in the real world.

      --
      Sorry, teleporters just kill you and then make a copy. A perfect, soul-less copy.
    59. Re:Why is prostitution illegal in the first place? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's "Small Business" though? Why should having a store front matter, and what is the definition of 'Store Front' ?
      When i did consulting I made over 200k/year and I had a phone and a website on a laptop; right now my fiance is 7 months into starting a bakery and she's looking to clear roughly $5k in profits; but has a 50' store front.

    60. Re:Why is prostitution illegal in the first place? by fyngyrz · · Score: 1
      --
      I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
    61. Re:Why is prostitution illegal in the first place? by Rudisaurus · · Score: 1

      Female doctors do not screw male nurses.

      I do know a female doctor who married a male nurse. Although I have no direct evidence of this, I assume that screwing is part of their relationship; they've had 2 children together and neither one seems to be the platonic type. It rather undermines your utterly unsubstantiated and unsupported arguments.

      Who modded PP insightful???

      --
      licet differant, aequabitur
    62. Re:Why is prostitution illegal in the first place? by werepants · · Score: 1

      Money and power are always and everywhere part of female attraction -- be it long term, or a quick hook-up.

      How in the world is this modded insightful? "Always and everywhere?" Ever heard of the loser boyfriend who won't pay rent? There are so many counterexamples to your claim that it's just absurd.

      Some women look for power or money in a mate. Some look for physical attractiveness, or creative ability - artists, musicians, writers all have a mystique for the opposite sex that's totally separate from power or money. Some look for kindness or the attributes that would make someone a good partner for raising kids.

      The point is, the worldview touted above sounds like the skewed opinion of a recent and bitter divorcee. It's a shame because otherwise the post makes some good points.

    63. Re:Why is prostitution illegal in the first place? by sudon't · · Score: 1

      Two reasons:

      2. Prostitution is *heavily* associated with human trafficking, along with other behaviors that boil down to a girl being forced to sell her body, rather than wanting to. This is the reason that really matters.

      That's like saying, "drugs are bad because criminals sell them". These situations exist precisely because the activities in question have been prohibited. Once you make a harmless activity illegal, then those engaged in it have no recourse to the legal system, and it becomes harmful. That's why "human trafficking" exists at all. That's why drug dealers resort to violence to settle territorial disputes, and beer distributors don't, (at least, not since the eighteenth amendment was repealed).

      --
      -- sudon't

      Air-ride Equipped

    64. Re:Why is prostitution illegal in the first place? by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      I believe the problem is fucking.

      Some people object to it on principle.

    65. Re:Why is prostitution illegal in the first place? by Joey+Vegetables · · Score: 1

      All of the main east-west streets through the west side of Cleveland - ALL of them - prominently feature prostitutes at varying times of both day and night. It would be difficult to get from my home just outside city limits, to my work or my church, without using several of these streets. The people working them are not particularly aggressive. I've never been approached in 30+ years of living here. But they are there, and to some people, that constitutes a "known problem." (It is a problem, IMO, but not the kind they think, and not for the reasons they think.) If they were to do the same thing here, they would quickly run out of paper and/or postage.

    66. Re:Why is prostitution illegal in the first place? by anmre · · Score: 1

      providing a service which is in many cases not taxable.

      And yet, I don't ever see cops arresting yard sale patrons.

      Also, your name is ironic [drpimp]

    67. Re:Why is prostitution illegal in the first place? by sudon't · · Score: 1

      You're absolutely right that this whole "human trafficking" thing is way overblown. It's another media panic.

      The interesting thing about all this is that, almost no one questions the government's right to regulate the behavior of consenting adults. Where it once took a constitutional amendment to prohibit the sale and manufacture of booze, (you still had the right to consume it!), and marijuana could only be prohibitively taxed rather than prohibited outright; now Congress merely has to invoke the Commerce Clause to infringe upon any right they care to. This is, of course, because there is nothing in this World which doesn't involve commerce. It continues to amaze me how little outrage this provokes.

      --
      -- sudon't

      Air-ride Equipped

    68. Re:Why is prostitution illegal in the first place? by jwhitener · · Score: 1

      Citation? I was just watching / reading something about Amsterdam having quite a lot of human trafficking issues. The difference is that the women are not chained in some house like people tend to think of trafficked women. They are licensed professional prostitutes, working in the windows of the red light districts, but under the control of basically pimps. Pimps who made false promises and transported them from eastern block countries. Typical slave labor tactics, like charging them transportation "fees" with interest that adds up faster than they can pay it off, etc..

    69. Re:Why is prostitution illegal in the first place? by techno-vampire · · Score: 1

      Now there's a thought: if prostitution were legal, it would be quite easy for somebody to create/sell an app that gives you a list of the closest providers, including gender, price and (if appropriate) specialties. The prostitutes pay a small monthly fee to be listed and the johns pay another small fee for each one they select. Set the fees small enough that nobody's complaining and rake in the moola!

      --
      Good, inexpensive web hosting
    70. Re:Why is prostitution illegal in the first place? by Copid · · Score: 1

      That's not terribly surprising, but it's also not something that's necessarily inherent in prostitution. The same thing goes on in manufacturing--filling sweatshops with people who were lured in with false promises or owe ridiculous sums of money to the traffickers. The problem isn't with the product itself but rather with lax enforcement of labor laws.

      --
      An interesting anagram of "BANACH TARSKI" is "BANACH TARSKI BANACH TARSKI"
    71. Re:Why is prostitution illegal in the first place? by Beck_Neard · · Score: 1

      There are a lot of misconceptions about prostitution in Amsterdam. It only became legal fairly recently (2000). Since then, the human trafficking industry there - which was huge and substantial - has been in decline.

      An example of a country where prostitution was legal before it became such a huge problem is Australia.

      --
      A fool and his hard drive are soon parted.
    72. Re:Why is prostitution illegal in the first place? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why are you so certain he's lying? What is it about his claims that if true bother you? You citation needed people don't actually want a citation. I doubt you'd even read and if you did and it disagreed with your beliefs you'd then try to figure out some way to claim it's invalid data or whatever. What you guys want is to be correct. You aren't always correct.

    73. Re:Why is prostitution illegal in the first place? by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      He asked for a citation first. I came into the thread after he'd already "citation needed" someone else, so I thought I'd try it on him to see if he had any. I didn't accuse him of lying. He requested a citation, then stated the opposite of the citation he requested. If he's so sure, why doesn't he have a citation?

    74. Re:Why is prostitution illegal in the first place? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      .as have rates of sexual assault, up to -25%.

      Presuming that's actually a real statistic (and that you meant 25% and not negative 25% as you wrote), are you sure that the sexual assault rates went up, or did the _reporting_ of sexual assaults that were already happening go up? When you don't get thrown in jail for reporting a rape anymore, you might be more inclined to report it.

    75. Re:Why is prostitution illegal in the first place? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do you say underage prostitution is a different animal than age-of-consent prostitution? Everywhere I have seen prostitutes I have seen underage prostitutes.

      The whole thing is sleazy as hell, and is ALWAYS accompanied by heavy booze, creepy security goons, and icky johns.

      My impression is that lots of people on this feed are looking at this from a rather academic perspective. Hookers are very different in real life, and they're pretty nasty if you ask me.

    76. Re:Why is prostitution illegal in the first place? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      . Legalising prostitution increases the market and increases demand, hence the increase in human trafficking. Not just theory, there are statistics to back this up

      that makes zero sense
      #1 how does it increase demand?
      #2 when an industry is legalized it is regulated so human trafficking should be on par with say, agriculture or tech workers since your workers need to be visible. By this logic we should have a glut of human trafficking happening with child factory workers here because there is a market for goods, and it is legal.
      #3 in California, being a prostitute is being a "human trafficker" by law

    77. Re:Why is prostitution illegal in the first place? by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Yard sales almost never generate taxable income. Typically, you buy an item for some price, and sell it at the yard sale for a lower price, so there's no actual profit.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    78. Re:Why is prostitution illegal in the first place? by RyoShin · · Score: 1

      But the issue here, as with narcotics (and alcohol prohibition, once upon a time), is that illegality begets higher-prices and higher risks, which in turn begets increasingly violent crime. Illegality also prevents the industry from being taxed and to some extent from accessing healthcare -- both of which carry significantly higher social costs than negligible human trafficking.

      What is deeply ironic is how the very same feminists who demand that government "keep your laws off my body", seem to be quite alright with government telling them they don't have the right to engage in the oldest and most basic transaction.

      Agreed in full.

      There are plenty of professions where people use their body, which society has no problem: modeling is probably the most obvious one, but football (American or European) is probably the most beloved one. What is football if not men using their bodies to transport a ball? There are other professions where someone's body is an intricate part of their job, such as gardener or construction worker, but these people usually have far more tools so it's not as direct a comparison. But put someone's nether-regions into the equation and suddenly all hell breaks loose. There are some fetishes that don't require interacting with the genitals to cause sexual satisfaction.

      Legalize it, give it some cleansing light (and regulation), and focus law enforcement efforts on actual problems like human trafficking, underage prostitution, or violence stemming from it.

  5. That is so not absurd. by rmdingler · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Instead, automated license plate readers would scan the cars driving down streets known to have a prostitution problem, and the letters would be sent to the address associated with those vehicles.

    Automated iris recognition scanning software should then be used to identify all milk drinkers as children, as a very high percentage of pedophiles drank milk as children.

    --
    Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

    Ernest Hemingway

    1. Re:That is so not absurd. by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      It's worse than this. I can't really let out too much yet, but I'm about to publish a revelation that will probably shock the nation. Nearly all, or even all, pedophiles once actually WERE children themselves.

      I know, I know, it's a huge controversy and everyone's saying "blaming the victim" and all that, but think about it: Who could better be attracted to a child than: Someone who was one himself?

      Hmm?

      IT SHOULD BE SO OBVIOUS!

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    2. Re:That is so not absurd. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you're missing the point. They only target pedophiles who drank milk as children AND live in LA. I think you can see where this is going. Who the hell wants to live in LA?

    3. Re:That is so not absurd. by currently_awake · · Score: 1

      This would tend to destroy legitimate street front stores in the area, as their customers would get slandered. This would result in that street losing its tax base rather quickly, and soon after accumulating only "unpopular" business activities.

    4. Re:That is so not absurd. by Chrisq · · Score: 1

      Instead, automated license plate readers would scan the cars driving down streets known to have a prostitution problem, and the letters would be sent to the address associated with those vehicles.

      Automated iris recognition scanning software should then be used to identify all milk drinkers as children, as a very high percentage of pedophiles drank milk as children.

      And what about the people who live there? Often elderly respectable people are left in areas which have become red-light districts, Sharia zones, or other undesirable areas through no fault of their own,

  6. Easy fix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Find scanner id politicians license plates put fake plates on car drive by scanner. Law repealed. Problem solved.

  7. Think about the obvious reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cities want your money. The courts make the city bonus money when when have to pay to use them. Divorce, child custody, etc. means lots of easy cash for the city. And then there's a new benefit after that, the city gets to collect property taxes twice, assuming both exes live in the same city.

    I mean, seriously, isn't that the point here? To wreck up homes? Can you think of any other benefit for the city from breaking up families? Because you know what they say, follow the money!

  8. WTF? by Etherwalk · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Are the police insane? So if someone drives down the wrong street because they don't know that you're not supposed to drive down that street, the police are going to ruin their marriage? For that matter, if someone happens to drive to a bar in that neighborhood, the police are going to harass them?

    *Headdesk*

    Also, cue the lawsuit in 3... 2... 1...

    1. Re:WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Irrelevant to thugs whose business is shaking down the populace for money. (These same cops also force prostitutes to have sex with them for free) Lawsuits are quickly settled and billed to the taxpayers.

    2. Re: WTF? by guruevi · · Score: 3, Funny

      If a baseless accusation of being a John ruins your marriage, you got bigger problems to worry about. I'd recommend you visit a good divorce attorney tomorrow.

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    3. Re: WTF? by bobbied · · Score: 1

      Um.... I'm not sure what's worse, paying an attorney or living with a woman who doesn't trust you, depends on the hourly rate I guess.... May I suggest that perhaps it is time for marriage counseling? Could be cheaper and might actually fix something...

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
    4. Re: WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Marriage is built on trust. Anything that puts a crack in that trust, unfounded or not, can ruin marriages. It all depends on who you're married to and what their reaction is.

    5. Re:WTF? by bobbied · · Score: 1

      Also, cue the lawsuit in 3... 2... 1...

      I think THIS will be the eventual result. The city will loose it's shirt if it tries this..

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
    6. Re: WTF? by cfalcon · · Score: 2

      > If a baseless accusation of being a John ruins your marriage, you got bigger problems to worry about. I'd recommend you visit a good divorce attorney tomorrow.

      Good fucking grief. No, if a baseless accusation of being a John ruins your marriage, you sue for libel.

      You understand that there are a lot of people who have a relationship that is ok, but that something like this would make a lot worse, right? And that your moralizing about how their relationship should be perfect or not exist at all wouldn't help that?

      This whole thing is ludicrous.

    7. Re:WTF? by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      re "So if someone drives down the wrong street because they don't know that you're not supposed to drive down that street"
      This tech has been used in boarder states for years on local roads, to get an image of the driver and passenger, front and back plates and a stingray like device to get the cell phone details (bonus voice print if in use).
      The tech is now so cheap that its been sold and supported at a city and state level.
      A not visible to the press digital Berlin wall that no registered transport can ever escape. Great around all kinds of sites, streets, at protest events, collect it all is cheaper than traditional methods and allows for parallel construction. A good way to get around the Constitutional protections too or any local stop and ID protections some states have.
      Wait for the next gen: hand-held Doppler radar devices, thermal, deep into a car scans, local body scanners, per city tethered aerostat (blimp with low cost 24/7 all weather look down systems).

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    8. Re: WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure it might be baseless, but an official letter from the police saying "you did bad thing, we saw you, please don't do it again" would sow seeds of doubts for basically anyone.

    9. Re:WTF? by demonlapin · · Score: 1

      Sovereign immunity. You can't sue them for official acts unless they let you.

    10. Re:WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The police is not sovereign.

    11. Re:WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I see. It sounds like you have driven down one of these streets. You are probably reacting out of fear because you know you are guilty, and soon your wife will too.

      I feel quite confident in making this judgment of you given solely the evidence provided in your post, as will anyone who finds out you have received such a letter from the police.

    12. Re:WTF? by eth1 · · Score: 1

      1. Note license plates in the LAPD employee parking lot, and around city hall
      2. Make license plate-sized signs with the numbers
      3. Hold them up in front of the ANPR cameras on these streets
      4. ????

    13. Re:WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also, back when I was in college the only way to get out of the Department Of Computer Science and head for the 52 bus was to wander down Trippet Lane, which is frequented by said ladies of the nocturne. Granted I wasn't in a car at the time but facial recognition can solve that. Also, newsflash, female prostitutes tend to cluster where men are. You generally want to sell your wares somewhere near where your customers are. This now sets up a bizarre cat-and-mouse game: the women go where the men are, the police shame the men to move away, the women move where the men go, repeat ad nauseum.

      Can we just stop with these shaming tactics now? We're shaming people who haven't even done anything wrong yet. Hopefully the outrage should at least lend some ammo to the argument that we need to take their surveillance toys away.

    14. Re:WTF? by martinQblank · · Score: 1

      Exactly. This isn't pre-crime, this is un-crime.

    15. Re: WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sure there are governmental exceptions built in. Just like red light and speed cameras

    16. Re:WTF? by MacDork · · Score: 1

      It could be so much more fun than this though. Think about it. They are MAILING the letters. Anyone can stick something in the mail. So drive your car down prostitute lane until you get one on purpose. Once you get one, scan, shop, print, mail to all the people you don't like. Hell, get one just to put together a web app and charge $5 to send them. Just enter a name and address of an LA resident. Web app will handle the rest.

    17. Re: WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > If a baseless accusation of being a John ruins your marriage, you got bigger problems to worry about.
      This sounds too much like "If you have nothing to hide". Legitimacy is pretty optional when weaponizing accusations. They've never needed facts to be consequential.

      Now, which would you prefer, your employer to receive a tip about your pedophilia, or your terrorist ties? For a small fee I can go old school with hard drugs, or be like SoCal here and smear by prostitute.

    18. Re: WTF? by goose-incarnated · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If a baseless accusation of being a John ruins your marriage, you got bigger problems to worry about. I'd recommend you visit a good divorce attorney tomorrow.

      If a baseless accusation of being paedophile/embezzler/thief/terrorist ruins your employers trust in you, you got bigger problems to worry about.

      (See how that works?)

      --
      I'm a minority race. Save your vitriol for white people.
    19. Re: WTF? by Jason+Levine · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If a baseless accusation of being a John ruins your marriage, you got bigger problems to worry about. I'd recommend you visit a good divorce attorney tomorrow.

      This isn't just some random guy walking up to a couple and saying "Your husband was seen with a prostitute." This is an official letter from the police. There's (for better or worse) a sense of authority there. People (such as his wife, family, friends, co-workers) will think "they wouldn't be accusing him of that unless there was proof it happened." Even if he denies it, the doubt will still be there. (After all, someone who is guilty would deny it too, right?)

      This could either lead to more problems or worsen existing ones. Perhaps the couple is going through money problems and stress is running high. The husband was supposed to be out looking for work (and was) but now the wife wonders if instead he was spending what little money they have left on prostitutes. Is it rational? No, but people can often be irrational when in the heat of the moment. Something like this could crumble a relationship all because LA is trying to "tackle pre-crime."

      Coming at this from another angle, if it doesn't ruin relationships, it could ruin the reputation of the police department (or what little reputation it has left). If people see these letters as a joke, then any accusation from the police might be seen as false. Actual criminal cases could be impacted because people don't take the police seriously.

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    20. Re: WTF? by guruevi · · Score: 1

      And it holds true there as well. If my boss heard that I was a terrorist without any proof, I doubt they could even legally let me go on those grounds but my boss wouldn't take it seriously either. If you work for an employer that has so little trust in you that anything will get you fired you won't enjoy working there and you have practically already been fired.

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    21. Re: WTF? by goose-incarnated · · Score: 1

      In bizzaro world your comment may possibly be correct. In the real world your employer does not want to deal with liability. They'll get rid of you one way or another, whether they want to or not, because any halfway competent lawyer will explain the consequences should something happen.

      --
      I'm a minority race. Save your vitriol for white people.
    22. Re:WTF? by fyngyrz · · Score: 1

      Entirely underrated.

      --
      I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
    23. Re:WTF? by bkr1_2k · · Score: 1

      While I agree with the idea that the people suggesting this action are morons, if your marriage is going to fail because someone sent a flyer recommending you stay away from prostitutes, your relationship is going to fail anyway.

      There is nothing in that article that would indicate what the letters would actually say so a lot of people are making huge leaps to reach the "you're a 'John' and we caught you on our cameras" conclusion. The flyers could be as innocuous as "this is a known prostitution area, please be aware of people approaching your vehicle" or they could actually be "you've been caught on candid camera". The FA is incredibly short on details but it's sure put slashdot into a frenzy. Job well done, Washington Post editors.

      --
      "Growing old is inevitable; growing up is optional."
    24. Re: WTF? by Cederic · · Score: 1

      Although it'll be comical when it's her car, not his.

    25. Re: WTF? by nytes · · Score: 1

      The news tends to carry a lot of stories, these days, of someone shooting their lover because of little things like being too friendly on Facebook.

      I could easily see these letters resulting in a couple of people being blown away before L.A. decides that maybe it wasn't such a good idea after all.

      --
      -- I have monkeys in my pants.
    26. Re: WTF? by hupasigas · · Score: 1

      Just want to say there is a difference between your boss just hearing a rumor that you are a terrorist and the city of Los Angeles sending a letter to him and informing him that you are one.

  9. Well then... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey Dave, can I borrow your car? I just need to run down the street and get some milk..

  10. When enforcement of a law looks like this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... it should be considered prima facie evidence that the law in question is stupid and anyone who supports it is also stupid and it should be repealed.

    1. Re:When enforcement of a law looks like this... by fyngyrz · · Score: 1

      ...and anyone who enforces it or otherwise participates in it is far too stupid to be in a position of public tryst, er, trust, and should be fired.

      --
      I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
  11. why not ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why not just decriminalise prostitution ?

    See solved the problem , it was easy. That way the police can go back to worrying about crimes that actually have a victim.

    With Legalised prostitution the prostitutes can come forward about abuse, blackmail, and other means of forcing them into what is currently a criminal activity. Removing the crime makes it easy to report REAL issues.

    Countries like Amsterdam, New Zealand, Australia have done so and there was no social collapse, no children being scarred for life. Its reduced STIs, reduced police time wasted, reduced the courts time being wasted and has significantly increase the welfare and security of those that work in the industry because they can report crimes without fear of being prosecuted themselves.

    As for the "morals campaigners" , decriminalising homosexuality has NOT lead to the collapse of civilisation and all the other mindless exaggerations that went with it, this won't either. Alcohol and cigarettes cause far more "harm".
    It happens
    It happens in YOUR neighbourhood
    You can't/won't stop it
    It causes no harm (and legalisation reduces harm)
    It saves wasted tax money on policing
    It will earn tax revenue (its legal, they can declare the income)
    And once legal it can be regulated, e.g. no brothels within 400m of a school/church.

    1. Re:why not ... by bobbied · · Score: 1

      You can make the argument that what two consenting adults do in private is THEIR business, and I'd be willing to entertain such a view if this was actually done in private. But it generally isn't. Oh sure, the actual act usually is, but the solicitation is decidedly public, at least on the few occasions when I've actually noticed such activity. So, come up with a way to keep it out of sight, and I'm prepared to leave each to their own.

      However, the problem with this "activity" is that it encourages things like human trafficking, which is far from a victimless crime. I don't think a sufficiently strict regulatory structure can be built to prevent such abuse that doesn't cost a lot more than the current enforcement efforts based on current law. So I don't think your idea would really work out as well as you imagine. Girls will be trafficked and abused like they are now.

      Remember, we've had quasi legal prostitution (still do in some places) in the past where the police colluded with brothel operators and it didn't work out all that great for the average worker, but made boatloads of cash for the owners. Consider Chicago in the 1920's, I don't think we want to do that again.

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
    2. Re:why not ... by Copid · · Score: 2

      You can make the argument that what two consenting adults do in private is THEIR business, and I'd be willing to entertain such a view if this was actually done in private. But it generally isn't. Oh sure, the actual act usually is, but the solicitation is decidedly public, at least on the few occasions when I've actually noticed such activity. So, come up with a way to keep it out of sight, and I'm prepared to leave each to their own.

      It seems likely to me that the main reason for that sort of solicitation is that there's no way for a legitimate business to advertise. You can't set up an office or a store. You can't put an ad in the paper and stay at a fixed location. You need to move around and proposition people who seem like they're not likely to be cops. I don't think any legitimate business would advertise that way, given the choice. It's not like dentists or hairdressers solicit in the streets.

      However, the problem with this "activity" is that it encourages things like human trafficking, which is far from a victimless crime.

      This seems again to be primarily a problem with it being a criminal activity to begin with. People don't get trafficked and sold into slavery as office workers. So what is it specifically about prostitution that makes it special? I'd say it's primarily because it's an illegal profession and people who go into it have two choices: 1) Do it alone and hope you don't get murdered by a client or by the organized criminal who stakes a claim to your territory. 2) Join up with a pimp who is an organized criminal and very likely a dangerous sociopath. Blaming prostitution for human trafficking of prostitutes is a little bit like blaming drugs for drug smuggling drive by shootings. Those things are a natural consequence of a profitable business being completely run by criminals without any oversight.

      Remember, we've had quasi legal prostitution (still do in some places) in the past where the police colluded with brothel operators and it didn't work out all that great for the average worker, but made boatloads of cash for the owners. Consider Chicago in the 1920's, I don't think we want to do that again.

      Can you flesh this out a bit? Are the problems of Chicago in the 20s still something we observe today in, say, Nevada? Without knowing more details, this still sounds like a problem with having entrenched organized criminals running an industry.

      --
      An interesting anagram of "BANACH TARSKI" is "BANACH TARSKI BANACH TARSKI"
    3. Re:why not ... by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      the solicitation is decidedly public

      The solicitation is public because it is illegal, and therefore normal channels of advertising (on-line, phone book, etc.) are not available. There are jurisdictions, including Britain, where prostitution is legal, but public solicitation is not. Most transactions are arranged on-line, where it is nearly invisible to anyone who doesn't seek it out.

    4. Re:why not ... by fred911 · · Score: 1

      " no brothels within 400m of a school/church."

      While you're at it how about making churches pay tax,
      god forbid you'd want consenting sex so close to a cult that has consistently protected pedophiles.

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B - D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0 45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
    5. Re:why not ... by WaffleMonster · · Score: 1

      However, the problem with this "activity" is that it encourages things like human trafficking, which is far from a victimless crime. I don't think a sufficiently strict regulatory structure can be built to prevent such abuse that doesn't cost a lot more than the current enforcement efforts based on current law. So I don't think your idea would really work out as well as you imagine. Girls will be trafficked and abused like they are now.

      Human trafficking is market based subject to supply and demand.

      If people who want to fuck for cash can go to their corner regulated, licensed brothel and buy all the sex they want there is less reason for underground unregulated markets to exist in the first place. Who is going to want to risk getting caught when the money is shit or they could open their own legitimate business?

      Government is good at beating down outliers like murders and thieves but the 1920's showed us what happens when you try to beat down millions of people by force with disasters like prohibition. Government loses its power to organized crime which steps up to meet market demand by any and all means. People suffer unnecessarily as a result.

    6. Re:why not ... by Mr.CRC · · Score: 1

      So in other words, you believe there are "aesthetic crimes." Well, what if we don't like your lawn? According to your logic, there is no principled reason why we can't haul you away for your poor choice of garden flowers, because, "we don't want to have to see that."

    7. Re:why not ... by EzInKy · · Score: 1

      So give the death penalty for human traffickers, just leave the prostitutes alone to sell what the "whatever good diety" gave them.

      --
      Time is what keeps everything from happening all at once.
    8. Re:why not ... by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      It's also illegal in the UK to run any premises to use as a place of prostitution, or to live off the proceeds of another person's prostitution. That makes it impossible for prostitutes to work together, so it's still a risky business. They have to work alone.

    9. Re:why not ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here in the Netherlands they are trying hard to get escorts to own their own business and they can order services like advertisements, telephone service, photography shoots and drivers from what used to be an escort agency.

      That way an escort agency don't 'own' the prostitutes and prostitutes can be with multiple agencies or decide be more self sufficient.

    10. Re:why not ... by bobbied · · Score: 1

      Ever heard of a home owners association created by deed restrictions? They are EXACTLY what you describe, and they obviously exist.

      Look, there are decency limits of what you can do in public enshrined in law, so apparently there exists enough reason to put limits on public activity beyond safety. Even in New York City in Times Square they have specific rules about how one must dress which are more about not offending the majority of the tourists who frequent the landmark. So YES it's about how things appear, but it's also about the public good in some ways too so you cannot focus too sharply on just one part of this.

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
    11. Re:why not ... by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      Why not? Because it's only a victimless crime if nobody else cares that you're there. Also, there is also a societal interest in preventing disease that dictates it must be closely monitored. Finally, even "legal" prostitution may involve fraud or coercion, so it must be closely regulated to make sure all participants truly give informed consent. In theory, I'm not opposed to the practice -- I just think it must be tightly controlled for practical reasons.

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    12. Re:why not ... by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      Cities could use the sex offender trick. No brothels within 400m of any church, school, shopping mall, ice rink, park, daycare center, stop on any school bus route, or hospital. What, the entire city is within at least one of those exclusion zones? Guess you can't have your brothel then.

    13. Re:why not ... by anmre · · Score: 1

      Actually, HOA's are a civil matter and violating a civil contract is not a crime. Thus, they are completely different than what Mr.CRC described.

      You don't want to see prostitutes soliciting on street corners. It seems that everyone whose replied to you agrees. The argument is how to get them off the streets, and I think it's been made clear that the way to do that is to legalize and regulate prostitution. We already have regulations on porn, which keeps the actors largely safe from violence, extortion, STDs, etc. (and really, porn is prostitution by any definition). And consensual sex behind closed doors in any other context is perfectly legal, obviously. So, your argument seems to be coming more from a moral perspective than a practical one.

  12. Remind me to send letters to: by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1

    Bankers, Hedge and Mortgage Fund managers reminding them to not tank the economy again so they can make an extra nickel.

    Police reminding them to not shoot unarmed civilians.

    ... etc ...

    --
    It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
  13. "Flirting" with pre-crime? by CrashPoint · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is a little beyond "flirting" with pre-crime. This is more like taking pre-crime to Bed, Bath and Beyond to pick out curtains for the apartment you and pre-crime are about to move into.

    1. Re:"Flirting" with pre-crime? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This isn't even pre-crime.
      Pre-crime would be if they had reason to believe you were going to visit a prostitute.
      Here they admit that they don't believe that, they just send the letter anyway.
      It's more like punishing people for being near a place where crime occurs.
      You might call it something like prope-crime,or just pro-crime for short.

  14. Ok, who thought of this idea? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Unless they're a fiction writer, they should probably be kept far far far away from anything important.

    If they're a fiction writer, I'll at least give them credit for coming up with a decent enough portion of a plot.

    Now if they can spin it out to a whole work, possibly a series.

  15. How long til by cdsparrow · · Score: 0

    someone decides to game google maps or the like? Use a bunch of fake traffic to get people's navs to route toward this strip... Results would be great for the printing company. Something like this could also be used to clear a getaway route or cause congestion near the police station, etc... Not sure how hard this would be to do, but seems like it would be doable for a group of organized jackasses. And that is what the internet does best, let jackasses organize their jackassery.

  16. An easy solution to this... by Irate+Engineer · · Score: 5, Funny

    Just steal a car before you start scoping out the whores. It works in GTA.

    --

    Left MS Windows for Linux Mint and never looked back!

    Vote for Bernie in 2016!

    1. Re:An easy solution to this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    2. Re:An easy solution to this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just steal a car before you start scoping out the whores. It works in GTA.

      Quick-scoping or hard-scoping?

  17. You can bet they will filter out police officers by sugarmatic · · Score: 1

    Perhaps someone needs to take pics of cops and post them publicly and to their managers as well.

  18. And the lawsuits will start in... by Ralph+Spoilsport · · Score: 2

    5... 4... 3... 2... 1...

    --
    Shoes for Industry. Shoes for the Dead.
  19. Everyone involved in this needs to be executed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No exceptions.

  20. Pass it on by nanoflower · · Score: 1

    I would take each letter and send it on to each of the people behind this idea. That way they get to experience the joy of explaining why the letter is being sent to them and maybe realize just why such a letter might be a bad idea.

  21. Sounds like they're sending advertisements by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    What's that? Prostitutes are on my way home from work? Thanks for letting me know!

  22. Legit business near adult theatre / massage parlor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I used to take the Karate PE classes in college, nice workout and something practical. During the summer breaks our instructor would let his college students take classes at his public dojo in town at no charge. The dojo was across the street from the bus station, an adult theatre a couple of doors south, a massage parlor a couple of doors north, an area known for some to offer their wares on the street at night.

    Now to be fair such letters would have generated laughs for most parents and significant others. Most were aware of the neighborhood, had been to the dojo for one reason or another. But a few might have had to explain where their dojo was. A minor inconvenience to laugh about later. But for a different type of legal business the police may literally be scaring away legitimate legal business, making the neighborhood even worse. Yeah, probably numerous grounds for lawsuits here.

  23. Re: hypocrisy by hackwrench · · Score: 2

    I think the reasoning goes something like, "all life is sacred until a person does something wrong to ruin their own life's sacredness."

  24. Follow the Money by Princeofcups · · Score: 5, Insightful

    As often is the case, you just have to follow the money trail. Someone paid off someone else to push their expensive license plate scanners and services. The police may not even have wanted to do this, but someone up the chain of command got a free vacation home in the Bahamas for implementing the program. It'll all get swept under the rug soon, after enough uproar.

    --
    The only thing worse than a Democrat is a Republican.
  25. Legalize prostitution, you assholes. by Garridan · · Score: 2

    Stop criminalizing sex. Just like pot, it's only sketchy 'cause it's illegal. Sure, there's still potential for abuse and harm... but in our present system, the laws mandate harm done to prostitutes and johns who are, by and large, just consenting adults. Unlike pot, shagging for pay doesn't harm one's ability to drive for the next few hours.

  26. Re: Why is prostitution illegal in the first place by hackwrench · · Score: 1

    Because among the entire English speaking population there is nowhere that prefers to use the word infection as opposed to disease?

  27. Wow, thanks Los Angelos by rsilvergun · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I've been trying come up with a concrete example of how license plate readers could be abused and here we are.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:Wow, thanks Los Angelos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Plate readers have been used before to blackmail the addresses of people visiting gay bars - it's just that back in 1998 this was considered illegal

      "In 1998, a Washington, D.C. police officer “pleaded guilty to extortion after looking up the plates of vehicles near a gay bar and blackmailing the vehicle owners.”

      https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2014/01/los-angeles-cops-should-release-automatic-license-plate-reader-records-eff-aclu

    2. Re:Wow, thanks Los Angelos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, photoshop does the lot.
      There are open source number plate readers, and camera's are so cheap nowadays.
      Record who has city hall car parks, and fire off a bunch of photo-shopped letters.
      Now stake out expensive well to do schools. Join the camera data.
      Now send a modified letter to the school suggesting one or both parents are sexually suspect. Enjoy.

      Be careful throwing stones. The technology to report where you slept last night and who with is already here.

  28. I'm not so sure about that by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    Most prostitutes aren't doing it because they want to, they're doing it because their either forced or it's the only way to make ends meet. Maybe if we had a robust social safety net + basic income so that we could honestly say that no one was coerced into it you'd have a point, but good luck with that.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:I'm not so sure about that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      "Most prostitutes aren't doing it because they want to, they're doing it because their either forced or it's the only way to make ends meet."

      You realize that there are lots of jobs that most people only take because they need to make ends meet? Yet we don't outlaw working in fast food, or a coal mine, or whatever other crappy jobs there are.

    2. Re:I'm not so sure about that by Garridan · · Score: 1

      Listen to what prostitutes have to say on the topic before you get all righteous about protecting them. Governments have been doing that since time immemorial, and the efforts to "protect" prostitutes tend to harm them. Arresting them is just awful. Arresting their johns is just as bad, because it forces it underground and establishes a black market complete with human trafficking, prevents prostitutes from conducting interviews in a safe way, from establishing brothels and hiring security guards, etc. We've been trying this "ban it 'til it dies" approach. It's never worked, there's no reason to think that it will tomorrow.

      Your statement about "most prostitutes" can only be interpreted as factual if it is backed by good science with a significant and representative sample of prostitutes. Since prostitution is illegal, there's major problems in finding people to participate in a poll, so there is heavy sample bias in all of the social science done regarding prostitutes.

      For example, such polls are often done when prostitutes are in the middle of an interaction with either the legal system or the health system. If you poll the prostitutes you find in a rape shelter, for example, you'll get very different statistics than you would in a legal brothel in Nevada.

    3. Re:I'm not so sure about that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The difference is that, try as they might, no other career offers quite such a devaluation of the human resource as a form of currency.

      Regardless of where you get your morality, most moral systems agree that prostitution is a bad idea. The same is not true of marijuana.

    4. Re:I'm not so sure about that by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      "Most prostitutes aren't doing it because they want to, they're doing it because their either forced or it's the only way to make ends meet."

      I belive this is known as 'employment.'

    5. Re:I'm not so sure about that by Copid · · Score: 1

      I don't know...there are a lot of pretty gross and demeaning jobs out there. There are certainly plenty of jobs that are more dangerous for the same pay. Singling out prostitution in particular seems a little bit strange.

      --
      An interesting anagram of "BANACH TARSKI" is "BANACH TARSKI BANACH TARSKI"
  29. Elaborate troll by the LAPD? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't see how they could pull this off without some serious legal liability. Just announcing that they'll do this (without actually doing it) may actually have an affect (at very low cost).

  30. If I had a business on that street by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I'd sue the police back to the stone age. Not only to I HAVE to drive down that street to go to work, but by doing this they are driving my customers away. This is just plain dumb.

  31. Enjoy having the crap sued out of you, L.A. by kheldan · · Score: 1

    Morons. They'll ruin peoples lives, likely based on some moron that saw Minority Report and thought it was a Good Idea. Someone doesn't just need to be fired outright for this, someone needs to be dragged out into the street and flogged publicly over it. You can't convict someone for a crime you think they MIGHT commit, and what they're doing here has essentially the same effect with regard to the general public.

    --
    Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
    1. Re:Enjoy having the crap sued out of you, L.A. by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      Morons. They'll ruin peoples lives, likely based on some moron that saw Minority Report and thought it was a Good Idea.

      The surprising thing, to me, was that the people making the movie and TV show seemed to really think it was a good idea. They didn't think they were making a dystopian cautionary tale, they thought they were making a clever crime story set in an actually desirable future.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    2. Re:Enjoy having the crap sued out of you, L.A. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even more idiotic if you know the author of the short story the film and shows are based upon (Philip K. Dick), had intended this story more as an warning than an manual..

    3. Re:Enjoy having the crap sued out of you, L.A. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which is probably why the movie was so good at portraying a dystopian future. People believe in it, therefore it is realistic.

      It works the same way that the 'bad guy' in a movie should have strong moral fiber and believes that he does the right thing from his point of view.

    4. Re:Enjoy having the crap sued out of you, L.A. by kristianbrigman · · Score: 1

      I don't know... in my opinion, 'Minority Report' (the short story, not the movie) went out of its way to defend it, even saying that while a conspiracy was trying to discredit pre-crime, it really was only possible to wrongly accuse Anderson because of his unique position. I don't know what PKD intended it to say, but that's how I read it...

    5. Re:Enjoy having the crap sued out of you, L.A. by kheldan · · Score: 1

      It works the same way that the 'bad guy' in a movie should have strong moral fiber and believes that he does the right thing from his point of view.

      There is nothing more dangerous than someone who fervently believes they are right when what they believe is so completely and totally wrong.

      Why are you posting as an AC? You actually said something intelligent!

      --
      Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
    6. Re:Enjoy having the crap sued out of you, L.A. by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      The system in minority report worked because they had a magic machine to view the future without error. If such a machine actually existed in the real world, a pre-crime department would be a great idea. The obvious problem is that such a machine doesn't exist, so the police have to make do with informed guesses about who is most likely to commit a crime - and they will be wrong, frequently.

  32. Re: hypocrisy by Cajun+Hell · · Score: 2

    I think the reasoning is, "I am an asshole so I need to act like one."

    --
    "Believe me!" -- Donald Trump
  33. You assume they want to... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Many of the women are actually forced into sex slavery. Someone conned them into immigrating illegally and now holds them captive, forcing them to have sex for money. There are also variations on this where the pimp has them addicted to some drug they supply. So the sex often is not actually consensual.

    1. Re:You assume they want to... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, they aren't.

      It's a common myth, but sex slavery is negligible in developed countries.

      And it's essentially zero in countries that have legalized prostitution.

  34. Solution by MobyDisk · · Score: 5, Interesting

    1. Copy legislator's license plates.
    2. Place phony plates on cars near streets known to have a prostitution problem.
    3. Hilarity ensues as Los Angeles legislators get prostitution warning letters.

    1. Re:Solution by Voyager529 · · Score: 1

      1. Copy legislator's license plates.
      2. Place phony plates on cars near streets known to have a prostitution problem.
      3. Hilarity ensues as Los Angeles legislators get prostitution warning letters.

      Foreseen problems:
      1. Legislator's license plates are whitelisted.
      2. Their mail gets screened, so only some lowly mailroom attendant sees the mail.
      3. Their spouse already knows they sleep around, so even a false positive would be filed along with the preapproved Discover card mailers.

  35. Police profiling... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BO8EpfyCG2Y

  36. Lawsuits? by eth1 · · Score: 2

    Hell, I'd show my SO what the PD is doing, and we'd get in the car together and go trolling for letters. Then it can "ruin our marriage," or whatever, and we can see if we can get a nice chunk of money.

  37. Ashley Madison by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's cool I've taken it upon myself to send Ashley Madison renewal letters to the people behind this. I figured why not cause family problems without any evidence of wrong doing.

    1. Re:Ashley Madison by zlives · · Score: 1

      that is an excellent idea

  38. Sovereign Immunity has been waived by Etherwalk · · Score: 1

    Sovereign immunity. You can't sue them for official acts unless they let you.

    You can sue the police for violating the Constitution, as a matter of federal law.

    1. Re:Sovereign Immunity has been waived by demonlapin · · Score: 1

      No damages, though. A federal court can make them stop, but it can't order them to pay up (unless there is a federal law directly relevant).

    2. Re:Sovereign Immunity has been waived by currently_awake · · Score: 1

      How about suing the company running the license plate reader? It's (maybe?) part of a criminal conspiracy to slander innocent people, and that's enough in lawsuit happy USA.

    3. Re:Sovereign Immunity has been waived by Etherwalk · · Score: 1

      No damages, though. A federal court can make them stop, but it can't order them to pay up (unless there is a federal law directly relevant).

      Not true, or at least there is federal law for constitutional violations generally and has been for a long time. Damages in 1983 actions are common; otherwise people would be much less likely to enforce their constitutional rights.

      See, e.g., http://www.sandberglaw.com/art...

    4. Re:Sovereign Immunity has been waived by demonlapin · · Score: 1

      Thank you. Duly noted.

  39. This is bannanas by seeker_1us · · Score: 1

    So you drive down the street and your home gets a letter saying you were driving down a street with prostitutes. So... why don't they just close the street?

  40. Change the phrasing a little... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... "We see that you were recently driving in a neighborhood that is predominantly African American. We incarcerate more blacks per year than any other race, and so we're concerned that your vehicle was seen in such a neighborhood. Please be aware that we are watching you and any criminal actions you might undertake in the black neighborhood may result in your prosecution. Sincerely, Your Friends, The Cops."

  41. FOIA Requests? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Since they are sending them in a non-criminal matter (the story makes it sound like they are people in an area, but not charged), would the letters be releasable in a freedom of information act type request?

    Just a thought.

  42. In a free market society prostitution would... by EzInKy · · Score: 1

    ...be regulated and taxed, not illegal. The idea that people should be forbidden to profit from their assets would be totally repugnant to Adam Smith.

    --
    Time is what keeps everything from happening all at once.
    1. Re:In a free market society prostitution would... by Mr.CRC · · Score: 2

      Why "regulated and taxed?" Why does everyone add "it should be regulated and taxed" to everything? Can you even imagine some economic activities that are simply unregulated? Should there be 2000 pages of rules and licensing boards for kids who want to make a few bucks from snow shoveling?

    2. Re:In a free market society prostitution would... by EzInKy · · Score: 2

      Regulated to prevent child abuse, taxed to fund enforcement. And, since you equated children shoveling snow with sex you are providing the very evidence as to why such regulations and taxes are needed. Consenting and adult are the key words here.

      --
      Time is what keeps everything from happening all at once.
    3. Re:In a free market society prostitution would... by EzInKy · · Score: 1

      And OMG Feds, focus on the child molester above here!

      --
      Time is what keeps everything from happening all at once.
    4. Re:In a free market society prostitution would... by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      Child labor law. It exists. If you want to hire children for your driveway clearance business, you'll probably run in to it.

    5. Re:In a free market society prostitution would... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Free market and regulations/taxes (assuming the typical government runs those definition) are mutually exclusive. You might as well just say in a communist society you would apply for a raise and buy your own bread.

    6. Re:In a free market society prostitution would... by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      "Regulated" meaning monitored closely to try to prevent the spread of disease, which is a valid function of the state. Taxed to cover that costs of regulation/monitoring. I'd also add regulated closely enough to make sure no fraud or coercion is involved. No economic activities are completely "unregulated", but for many, societal pressure and fear of getting sued for adverse results is sufficient "regulation". (That lemonade stand is "regulated" by the parents of the kids, trust me.)

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    7. Re:In a free market society prostitution would... by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      I'd say "informed consent" is the operative principle here. While minors are capable of consenting, they are generally not considered knowledgeable enough to give informed consent.

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    8. Re:In a free market society prostitution would... by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Sure, there are economic activities that aren't regulated. They typically don't involve close physical contact with customers, with a potentially high chance of transmitting horrible diseases. (A requirement to use condoms would be regulation.)

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  43. Re: Why is prostitution illegal in the first place by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The government is still essentially an arm of the church ramming morality down your throat... Enforced by dudes with guns.

  44. really not a problem by david_bonn · · Score: 4, Informative

    When you RTFA it says the proposal has been referred to the City Attorney.

    So the City Attorney will write back that this is a Stupid Idea. Said idea is circular filed and life goes on.

    1. Re:really not a problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's a lot of faith in humanity you have there. Which planet do you live on?

  45. Cops have solved all crime... by Lumpy · · Score: 2

    So now they are working on the easy stuff. So glad robberies and murders are over with...

    Oh wait....

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  46. Single guys ... by PPH · · Score: 1

    ... wouldn't care.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  47. Or a man by aepervius · · Score: 1

    Not all prostitute are female, there are so called gigolo too.

    --
    C. Sagan : A demon haunted world:
    http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0345409469/
    visit randi.org
    1. Re:Or a man by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      Not all, but the majority are.

  48. DMV Form 14 is Beneficial by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To designate your mailing address for a registered vehicle as a post office box, use DMV Form 14.

    And please be sure, when you enter the residence street address on that form, that it is truly your true street address. (Anything else would be improper and/or unlawful.)

    https://www.dmv.ca.gov/portal/dmv/detail/forms/dmv/dmv14

     

  49. Re: Why is prostitution illegal in the first place by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Like the ones where they make the iPhone.

  50. Human Trafficking by Etherwalk · · Score: 1

    I see. It sounds like you have driven down one of these streets. You are probably reacting out of fear because you know you are guilty, and soon your wife will too.

    I feel quite confident in making this judgment of you given solely the evidence provided in your post, as will anyone who finds out you have received such a letter from the police.

    Actually, no. I know the anti-human trafficking community quite well and have an understanding of the harm these places do to millions of women around the world every year, many of them underage. In the United States, tens of thousands of people are trafficked every year. Lots of kids. Lots of girls who run away and find a pimp to exploit them and make them feel loved. Lots of stupid guys who have no fucking idea are out on the street paying to rape those kids. The people who teach "John School" find they get a mix--the johns who just don't care what they're doing, and the ones who had no clue.

    But that doesn't make it right to send letters that risk breaking up marriages just because someone drives down the wrong block. At the very least, such a letter would need to be incredibly carefully worded, with a tact not many people can command. And even then, it may cause great harm to perfectly innocent people. Not to mention the expanded database of blackmail material that starts turning up in political opposition research.

    1. Re:Human Trafficking by fyngyrz · · Score: 1

      In the United States, tens of thousands of people are trafficked every year

      No, they aren't. Your "information" is completely incorrect. Please stop contributing to the mythology. You are only causing problems, not solving them or even bringing them to light.

      --
      I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
    2. Re:Human Trafficking by Cederic · · Score: 1

      https://www.dosomething.org/fa... suggests it's over 10,000.

      http://www.humantrafficking.or... suggests it's over 10,000.

      Your blog merely states it's less than 200,000.

      The truth is hard to ascertain, as official statistics can only count actual cases discovered, which are estimated to be a small (potentially only 0.4%) of the total cases. The 2015 state department 'Trafficking in persons' report (see http://www.state.gov/j/tip/rls... for details and a copy of the full report) suggests 1366 new victims were assisted just by the DOJ in 2014 - at a 0.4% discovery rate that would be an extraordinary number of actual victims.

      I think it's reasonable to suggest that human trafficking is a serious issue in the United States, whatever the actual fucking number.,

  51. Having sex with consenting adults is legal....... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ......so why exchanging money makes it illegal ?

  52. Re: hypocrisy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think the reasoning goes something like, "all life is sacred until a person does something wrong to ruin their own life's sacredness."

    Same A.C. here

    I missed that day in Sunday school. All I recall were turning the other cheek and that it is for God to judge not us.

    I don't recall fixing a bayonet (knife) onto the end of your rifle, jamming it into someone else's guts, and spilling them onto the ground. Something that last I heard every Marine is taught how to do. Seems like a very un-Christian thing to do, perhaps necessary at times, but still un-Christian.

  53. The land of the free by Bender+Unit+22 · · Score: 1

    What went wrong?

    1. Re:The land of the free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tough-on-crime politicians and post-9/11 conservative fear-based politics.

      If you want freedom, you have to convince people to stop pissing themselves at the sight of their own shadows and instead use their higher level cognitive functions rather than be controlled by their lizard brain.

  54. Re: hypocrisy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mine is: where is the thrill on killing someone who isn't even aware? Now, looking into someone's pleading eyes as they're moments away from having their lives taken from them... I think I just jizzed in my pants.

  55. Photoshop the letters by gijoel · · Score: 1

    Photoshop the letters and then send them to everyone involved in this stupid campaign.

  56. What about by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... automated license plate readers would scan the cars driving down streets ...

        • ... known to contain doughnut shops and letters would be sent to police officers snacking outside their allotted work-break.

    Calling everyone a criminal is dumb social engineering and guaranteed to produce mostly false positives because, at the very least, women drive cars too.

    Then there's the possibility the prostitutes and johns attempt to circumvent this: From attacking the reader, to a rotating roster of streets.

    1. Re:What about by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      Rotating locations defeats the purpose of hanging out in areas where they are most likely to encounter customers. Strange thing is, when I lived in LA and drove down Century Blvd. all the time, I never saw anybody that was identifiable as a prostitute... maybe I was there at the wrong time of day? The only street prostitute I've ever actually seen was midday in Manhattan; this black woman in a blue dress asked me, "Excuse me, sir, do you have the time?" I looked at my watch, and she said, "That's not what I meant!" (I just walked away.) Of course, she might have been a cop, too.

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
  57. Mailing list by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OH OH Where can I get that list!!

  58. Prostitution problem??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is this the medieval age come back or something?
    I can understand drug misuse problems, human exploitation problem but what kind of problem is consensual sex??? wtf?

    1. Re:Prostitution problem??? by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      What kind of problem? Apparently we're not afraid of HIV anymore, so rates of other STDs are going way up. Also, it's not a "victimless crime" if there is somebody other there that would be hurt by you engaging in this "consensual sex". Idealistically, yes, I believe people do have a right to exploit their own bodies for financial gain. However, the State also has a right to pass laws to protect the public health. Like drugs, the correct response is to legalize it, but regulate and tax the hell out of it.

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
  59. Lost by Tomahawk · · Score: 1

    So I'm a tourist that get's lost, or my GPS decides to bring me down one of these streets. Next thing I'm getting a letter?!

    Like, what?!

  60. Re: hypocrisy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You missed the day definitely as serving in the military is stated clearly as an honorable job in both the old and new testaments. The difference is that the soldier is the arm of the state, and the sword is the tool of the state as related to the bible. You do not have to believe the bible, but you do need to at least know what it says if you are going to try to define what is and is not Christian.

    So, I am sorry you think Christians are to be pacifists, they are to be in purely personal matters, but their holy book also makes an issue about the difference between acting to stop harm against yourself (your mentioned "turn the other cheek" as well as acceding to soldier/ civil protector demands such as carrying a soldiers burden further than required), protecting those around you from immediate bodily harm, and acting as the sword of the state.

    So Christians are to show dependence on their God be accepting personal abuse, defending others and doing the jobs the government requires of them.

  61. This way, please by behrooz0az · · Score: 1

    I parked the car outside.

    --
    Moderating "-1, Disagree" is simple censorship. Have the guts to post your opinion. -- Spazmania (174582)
  62. Works only in L.A. by nospam007 · · Score: 2

    Typical for L.A. In New York, people use the underground and taxis to drive to their extra-marital blowjobs.

    1. Re:Works only in L.A. by edtice1559 · · Score: 1

      If they track your cell phone in the area, maybe they can ask your phone provider to mail your spouse! One thing for sure that this guarantees is that those areas won't ever see a recovery. Can't get anybody to open a business no matter how many incentives you offer!

    2. Re:Works only in L.A. by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      Uh, kind of hard to get a blowjob in the front seat of your car when you're in a taxi or a train. As tacky as it sounds, I believe that's how a lot of street prostitution occurs, although I wouldn't know personally. This douchebag move is targeted at street prostitution, high-end prostitutes don't congregate in easily identifiable locations.

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    3. Re:Works only in L.A. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hate to break it to you, but playing saxophone in a jazz bar is not what people call a blowjob.

  63. Re: hypocrisy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did you miss the part where most wars are fought over protecting Christian values?

  64. It's WAYYYYYY overdue by MitchDev · · Score: 1

    Where the fuck is that earthquake that drops LA into the ocean?

  65. Re: hypocrisy by jbmartin6 · · Score: 1

    "Assholes always advertise" -Walter Jon Williams

    --
    This posting is provided 'AS IS' without warranty of any kind, implied or otherwise.
  66. What Could POSSIBLY Go Wrong? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This sounds like an EXCELLENT idea.

    Until the first powerful Assemblyman or City Councilman gets nailed cruising for trannies.

  67. Me! Me! Me! by jbmartin6 · · Score: 1

    I want to drive down this street just to get one of those letters! Public and widespread mockery is an effective countermeasure.

    --
    This posting is provided 'AS IS' without warranty of any kind, implied or otherwise.
  68. Re: hypocrisy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think the reasoning goes something like, "all life is sacred until a person does something wrong to ruin their own life's sacredness."

    Or, to put it more succinctly: Until a person starts acting like a person.

  69. Re: hypocrisy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I think the reasoning is, "I am an asshole so I need to act like one."

    Actually, their reasoning is that a women's right to an abortion has been painted by pro-abortion advocates as a right to kill a fetus for no reason whatsoever or a "morning after" procedure and not something that a woman might actually need for a medical condition. As a Catholic, I don't sympathize for the former but one can't be human if you aren't feeling for the latter. I would never want to be in that position.

    Pro-abortion advocates simply refuse to admit that abortion, as it stands now, it government sanctioned murder. Sure, a fetus can't live outside its mothers womb, but a 3 year old can't live without it's parents either and we don't allow people to kill them. The real problem with abortion is that the language used is so sanitized it becomes easier and easier to discount the value of life when it becomes an inconvenience whether a fetus, a baby, the elderly or the incarcerated.

  70. Or they could respect liberty and privacy by TheCarp · · Score: 1

    and maybe stop having ridiculous laws against the private exchanges between consenting adults.

    How is it any of their business? A worthless program of justifying jobs and budget to fight, nothing of consequence. Or what could be nothing of consequence, if not for their own bungling which turned it into a cesspool of criminal elements, from abusive pimps to human traffickers.

    This is hardly a fix for the mess they made.

    --
    "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    1. Re:Or they could respect liberty and privacy by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      The State has a constitutional right to pass laws to protect the public health. Arguably, unregulated sex trade has a harmful effect on public health. The same rationale is used in some locals to forbid strippers for touching customers.

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    2. Re:Or they could respect liberty and privacy by TheCarp · · Score: 1

      Yes I am well aware what excuses they use to violate people's private matters. I have never once felt it was an appropriate use of state power, nothing but abusive really.

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
  71. They did this in my area and it worked. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There was a neighborhood right off the highway that had a huge problem with people driving in and buying drugs that was near a prestigious university. The problem was so bad that the neighborhood street had cars lined up to buy drugs. The police department got volunteers to write down the license plates of these cars and sent them letters informing them that they were seen driving through a known drug dealing neighborhood and that they should be careful. They then got some angry calls from parents of students from said prestigious university saying that it wasn't possible that their car was driving through that neighborhood. The neighborhood cleaned up pretty quickly.

  72. Re: hypocrisy by TWX · · Score: 1

    But the fetus can't be declared a ward of the state and provided to a foster home for care either.

    Here's a little hint on how to seriously curtail abortion rates- teach adolescents how to use birth control and that the use of birth control is important. This isn't going to encourage teenagers to have sex, they already want to have sex and they already are having sex in many cases regardless of their parents' wishes. Teaching them to mitigate the consequences of sex is a lot more effective than trying to stop them.

    --
    Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
  73. Re:You have been modded down by Coren22 · · Score: 1

    That one was pretty moo.

    +5 cow pastures, would moo again.

    --
    APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
  74. Prostitution streets? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You mean like Hollywood Blvd? Everyone on that street is a potential john, really?

  75. small business owner by mr_mischief · · Score: 1

    Let's say Bob runs a small business. It's not in the fanciest part of town, but it's a safe enough mixed-use neighborhood. Some whore gets busted on the corner of the block. Now Bob and all his customers are defamed by the city as being criminals. How does Bob's business fair?

  76. Re: hypocrisy by kilfarsnar · · Score: 1

    But the fetus can't be declared a ward of the state and provided to a foster home for care either. Here's a little hint on how to seriously curtail abortion rates- teach adolescents how to use birth control and that the use of birth control is important. This isn't going to encourage teenagers to have sex, they already want to have sex and they already are having sex in many cases regardless of their parents' wishes. Teaching them to mitigate the consequences of sex is a lot more effective than trying to stop them.

    And yet the AC Catholic you replied to, if they are a good Catholic, likely opposed birth control as well. If not, I would question why they choose to follow some of the Church's values but not others.

    Abortion foes are usually just trying to control people's lives. The AC Catholic above is doing the same, as you can see from their objection to the "morning after" pill. That pill has nothing to do with abortion. But they disagree with its use because they think it allows women to just have sex without consequence. Like I said, controlling people's lives.

    --
    "What the American public doesn't know is what makes them the American public." -Ray Zalinsky (Tommy Boy)
  77. Not just flirting by Deep+Esophagus · · Score: 2

    Los Angeles is not just flirting with pre-crime; it's driving down streets known to have a pre-crime problem.

  78. Friends by phorm · · Score: 1

    This seems to border on the assumption that "ladies of the night" aren't people, and don't have friends etc. I had a buddy who regularly stopped to chat with the corner ladies, but to my knowledge did not engage their services. I've also hung out with a few gals who I didn't even know were in that particular occupation until somebody told me later.

  79. When Law Enforcement becomes Crime Prevention by wyseguyonline · · Score: 1

    The police are increasingly being expected to prevent crime, and the erosion of civil liberties will always follow. Until we let the police get back to enforcing the law instead of trying to prevent crime, this sort of crap as well as a host of other civil rights violations will continue.

  80. Un-American by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not just un-crime, un-American.

    In this country people are supposedly innocent until proven guilty, and we don't punish the innocent along with the guilty.

    The day we start prosecuting people for what they might do, it's game over.

  81. Human traffic narrative is nonsensical by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    2. Prostitution is *heavily* associated with human trafficking, along with other behaviors that boil down to a girl being forced to sell her body, rather than wanting to. This is the reason that really matters.

    Actual human trafficking is barely a blip on the radar. Almost all of the "it's a serious problem" statistics are complete fictions, particularly in most of the developed countries like the United States. As is true for quite a few of the "well knowns" related in any way to prostitution. The "association" is outright misleading.

    Here are some of the details. Quite a bit about human trafficking there, but also additional information, with references, related to the numerous false narratives promulgated WRT prostitution.

    "Human trafficking" isn't so much the "reason that really matters" as it is the "nonsense that most powerfully misinforms and misleads the public."

    --fyngyrz*

    * Posting anon due to mod points - c'mon slashdot, there's no good reason for that, and never has been.

  82. You are only repeating falsehoods by fyngyrz · · Score: 1

    Legalising prostitution increases the market and increases demand, hence the increase in human trafficking. Not just theory, there are statistics to back this up. [No citation given, do your own homework]

    Here's your homework - you can now learn how the myth you are repeating became the accepted (and wholly incorrect) public narrative. As well as many other relevant details.

    --fyngyrz*

    * Posting anon due to mod points - c'mon slashdot, there's no good reason for that, and never has been.

    --
    I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
    1. Re:You are only repeating falsehoods by fyngyrz · · Score: 1

      Whoops. So much for posting anon. Sorry folks, my already-entirely-spent mod points just went up in smoke. Too bad, some of you made some excellent points I had modded up.

      --
      I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
  83. maybe i missed the obvious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    but even if this is enacted, wont is just move the prostitution somewhere else?

    or is that the point, put up automated license plate readers up all over the city chasing the problem and then BAM, domestic surveillance?

    i know its a little 1984, but given the past 2 years.... i don't see it outside the realm of possibility/

  84. Re: hypocrisy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    WWJB ?

  85. i can't even by vel-ex-tech · · Score: 2

    You seem to be profoundly confused, my friend.

    A.) I speak to my doctor in a private space.

    B.) Support group is a safe space.

    C.) A public space is where pro-life activists get to scream at you and also where you're free to give them the bird.

    I hope that helps. Next time you need to discuss a sensitive matter of personal health with your doctor, go for A instead of C.

  86. Re: hypocrisy by alva_edison · · Score: 1

    Jesus's apostles, almost to a man, carried swords. When the priests and temple guards came for Jesus, one of the disciples sliced off an enemy's ear.
    In that section, Jesus isn't down with the violence, but he doesn't really condemn it either.

    --
    He effected a bored affect.
  87. News at 11: Jobs = best options by fyngyrz · · Score: 2

    Considering the reality of the situation is that nearly all of the women doing it are doing it as a last resort

    You think people work at McDonald's because they have better options? You think plumbers dig out your clogged toilet because they have better options? You think people dig ditches because they have better options? For that matter, you think I spend my time running a hugely successful business because I have "better options"?

    The vast majority of undertakings for pay are done specifically because they are the best options available to the individual. That's the point of it for most people.

    The entire meme that "it's a last resort" is nonsense as an attempt to demonize the undertaking. Prostitution is a job, the fundamental nature of which is service for money. Exactly the same as compensated massage, and compensated martial arts instruction, and compensated personal training, and compensated tutoring. The fact that it is an illegal job reflects the degree of idiocy of our laws and lawmakers, which serves to artificially make the job far, far worse than it would otherwise be. In other words, the job isn't the problem. Idiot lawmakers and the citizens that support them are the problem.

    --
    I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
    1. Re:News at 11: Jobs = best options by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Can you tell me what other job is as invasive as prostitution? A prostitute will normally have numerous men sticking their penises as far as they can into her vagina, and perhaps mouth and anus, and perhaps leave body fluids there. I've been told that body cavity searches are very unpleasant. What other jobs require putting something into your body?

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    2. Re:News at 11: Jobs = best options by fyngyrz · · Score: 1

      If having things stuck in orifices is your particular phobia, then either see to it that things aren't stuck in your orifices, or don't stick anything in anyone else's orifices, or hey, go for the gold and don't do either one. Hopefully, you'll be fortunate enough that no evil person will force you not to be able to make these choices for yourself, the way moralizing morons try to make other people's personal and consensual choices for them.

      As for leaving body fluids, protip: Don't kiss anyone. Ever. Also, sneezing... you're going to need a mask, I'm afraid. Also, doctors. They're quite prone to sticking things in orifices. Sometimes leaving things there, too. Sometimes they make their own holes in people and leave things there. Sometimes they take things away! In fact, I haven't been anywhere near my gall bladder since the 1990's... However, it was consensual, so there's that. And they gave me the stones, so at least I have a memento.

      Seriously. It's none of my, or your, business what choices some random person X makes in regard to what they do with, or to, or allow to be done to, their own body, and/or that of (a) consenting partner(s.) As soon as you or I or anyone else decides that what we think about something is to be the defining element for other people's personal and consensual choices, we've become oppressive tyrants deserving of nothing but being roundly ignored.

      Body cavity searches: A body cavity search is not consensual. You should roll that around in your head a few times, see if you can work out why coercively intruding into a body cavity without someone actually inviting you to do so is different than agreeing with someone that in return for (love, marriage, money, goods, services, shelter, offspring, just plain fun, or any combination of the foregoing), you're up for it.

      We should be free, of course, to make decisions about these things for ourselves. And to say what we think about anything and everything. But that in no way entitles anyone else to invade our actual decision making processes, or vice-versa.

      --
      I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
  88. Criminal activity by fyngyrz · · Score: 1

    Oh no, it's crime all right. Crime committed by the police.

    --
    I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
    1. Re:Criminal activity by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Technically, I don't think libel is a crime. It's prosecuted by the person libeled, not a public prosecutor.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  89. Letter writing by fyngyrz · · Score: 1

    Perhaps it's time to mail some similarly informative letters about the police officers. They drive down these streets quite often. I mean, it's obvious, right? They must be there to break the law. There's no other possible answer, and we simply must inform their families. It's our moral obligation, don't you see? And even the ones we don't see doing it, well, you know they are almost certain to drive on those streets anyway. So no need to bother with the whole license plate thing. Just get a list of all the police officers and start printing out form letters for their families. And sleep well, knowing that you have performed a Public Service.

    --
    I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
  90. Obvious solution is obvious. by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

    Make a copy of these letters and send it to the family of every local politician, then watch them fall all over themselves trying to ban the practice!

    --
    I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
  91. so do they round up the homeless in LA?? by laurencetux · · Score: 1

    what about folks running a ministry to benefit girls trapped in that lifestyle (or just making sure that they get FED/HOUSED)?

    this of course makes it a crime to drive down certain streets and increases the BlackMail potential.

  92. Re:Having sex with consenting adults is legal..... by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

    You're doing it wrong. If you film it, then you're producing XXX films using paid actors, so that makes it legal!

    --
    I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
  93. Re: hypocrisy by Cederic · · Score: 1

    Pro-abortion advocates simply refuse to admit that abortion, as it stands now, it government sanctioned murder.

    I'm pro-abortion and I'm pro-life. I fully support the right of any woman to choose whether to dispose of a parasite growing inside her, particularly if it's endangering her health.

    I'm very much against people using their archaic primitive superstitions such as catholicism to deny any actual debate on such issues.

  94. Similar situation by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

    This mirrors my reaction to people that protest strip clubs located in their neighborhood. My response is, instead of holding up signs, why not have volunteers photograph the license plates of every customer's vehicle, and publish the information somewhere? That seems like the most effective method to put these places out of business, although it only discourages the people that actually care whether or not people know they were there.

    --
    I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
  95. This is the second stupidest thing I've heard. by DrPeper · · Score: 1

    Seriously. Pre-crime prevention does not work. Nor is it an effective or efficient use of tax-payer dollars. This is simply incompetence in action.

  96. Big fucking deal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm pretty sure damned near every human on this planet WORKS because they really need the money. I'm not sure what your point was. If a pimp is making the call for his ho, then that isn't consent. Like you said, that should be easy. What isn't easy evidently is where the OP already said that:

    "Let consenting adults engage in whatever services they deem fit, and then focus law enforcement resources on those who actually harm others."

  97. Human trafficking: 100% insignificant in the USA by fyngyrz · · Score: 1

    a) it's not my blog, and you really need to read some of those links. The entire human trafficking narrative is an overblown pile of tripe.
    b) "estimating" cases that there is no evidence for is utter nonsense (as is what the hysterics call "human trafficking")
    c) 1366 "victims" in 2014. Really? REALLY? This is "over 10000"? (and note that most "victims" are only victims of the DOJ)
    d) at a .4 discovery rate... "discovery rate"? What kind of magic mumbo jumbo is that? Think about what you said there.

    Fact: There are very few cases of actual human trafficking, that is, people who are acting in ways not of their own free choice
    Fact: Prostitution is not "human trafficking", it is a service industry that is under attack from (powerful) moralizing morons
    Fact: If "the truth is hard to ascertain", then the truth is not known
    Fact: When we go from the previous fact to "OMG huge problem" we are engaging in purest hysteria

    --
    I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
  98. Re: hypocrisy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm atheist, but I agree with this quote from Bill Clinton

    Abortion should not only be safe and legal, it should be rare.
    -BILL CLINTON, speech at DNC, Aug. 29, 1996

    Regardless of the legality, abortions will be performed. So it's better to happen inside a clinic with a sterile environment than a back alley with a coat-hanger.

    That said, Abortion should relatively be a "last resort". Not used at a whim instead of birth control, but it really is hard to dictate under what exact conditions it can be used.

    I've never head of a story where a mother's decision to perform an abortion didn't weigh heavily on her.

  99. Re:Human trafficking: 100% insignificant in the US by Cederic · · Score: 1

    I didn't conflate prostitution with trafficking, merely pointed out that there are a non-zero number of cases with factual evidence.

    Maybe you didn't read the US State Department report I linked. It is evidence based, includes global assessments and doesn't make up spurious numbers because it doesn't need to.

    I don't think 0.4% sounds credible but your position that there are fewer cases than have been actually recorded is even less tenable.

    Clearly you don't give a shit about modern slavery. I do.

  100. Re:You have been modded down by Kiaser+Zohsay · · Score: 1

    Totally not offtopic, just a riff on an offtopic meme,

    --
    I am not your blowing wind, I am the lightning.
  101. Re: hypocrisy by tehcyder · · Score: 1
    If you get rid of a foetus with a morning after pill it's no different from using a condom and killing the poor spermies.

    Of course, Catholics don't believe in contraception either, so it's hard to have a rational conversation about it with them.

    --
    To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  102. Free people should flood the system ... by FreedomFirstThenPeac · · Score: 1

    Free people should flood the system with false positives by driving through those neighborhoods regularly.

    --
    "There is no god but allah" - well, they got it half right.
  103. this is not new by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They've been doing this in Camden for years if you drive through an area known for its open air drug market