if someone already employed uses the money to change careers, I think that's pretty relevant, but nothing-to-something will probably show results faster.
No, not compressing UV radiation, compressing much of the EM spectrum (like, the block from 1cm to 10nm) into the visible range (700nm to 400nm). Mapping, or converting, if you would like a more apt word.
I want those too, though I'd be happy enough with goggles.
I think what he's pointing out is that your stated principle is very absolute, and applied as such even in significantly different situations may have issues, and perhaps a bit more nuance and situational awareness is called for.
My take on your statement is that we appear to need to go ahead and start hanging bad drivers.
It seems to me unlikely that the power company is going to let you make money through arbitrage; that would be coming directly out of their profits. The best I would expect would be that you can lower your bills to connection fee + zero net usage + taxes and fees.
they're also pretty visible (kind of the point) and (assumed in this thread) detectable with automated systems so using them is just begging to get busted. I mean, even if you avoid the cops directly seeing you, someone's going to pull the footage from one of the automated cars you brushed to the side and passed and turn your license plate number over.
It really depends what Alexander Roshal thinks "in separate form" means. So far I'm not aware of him claiming that a compiled binary is a form of source code, but I'm sure enough of a case could be made to take it to court if he wanted to.
he's saying _current_ standards will not be weakened, but _strengthening_ of standards will be delayed. Basically the difference between "slowing down" and "not accelerating"
those two statements are not the same. The folks making money off the silly cat videos are the ones with massive server farms, not the ones with the cats.
what they _mean_ is "we will sue anyone who wants more than the feds do, now that we've got them doing only what we're willing to support, but we'll claim to be supporting the principles we no longer have to actually implement."
you mean you'd specifically throttle fast.com, right? Otherwise you're just making it really blatant that you're treating netflix traffic differently...
given how many lawyers are in congress, that seems surprising. Perhaps the large number of lower level politicians (city council, mayor, etc) makes the percentage lower. I wonder if there's a way to do a weighted average by power level?
It is _a_ problem. _The_ problem is that for some reason, kids are deciding it would be nifty to kill a bunch of other kids. More generally, people are deciding it would be nice if a bunch of other people were dead. Removing guns is a bandaid - it's a useful step in reducing the ongoing impact of the issue, but it does not address the root of the issue.
Slashdot Mirror
the catch, of course, is defining "moderation". For most people, lacking a real definition, it winds up working out as "what I'm used to".
if someone already employed uses the money to change careers, I think that's pretty relevant, but nothing-to-something will probably show results faster.
No, not compressing UV radiation, compressing much of the EM spectrum (like, the block from 1cm to 10nm) into the visible range (700nm to 400nm). Mapping, or converting, if you would like a more apt word.
I want those too, though I'd be happy enough with goggles.
penicillin
I think what he's pointing out is that your stated principle is very absolute, and applied as such even in significantly different situations may have issues, and perhaps a bit more nuance and situational awareness is called for.
My take on your statement is that we appear to need to go ahead and start hanging bad drivers.
and it can't. That's the point of the senate.
Lawmaking also has the same issue with "unintended" consequences that technology does.
It seems to me unlikely that the power company is going to let you make money through arbitrage; that would be coming directly out of their profits. The best I would expect would be that you can lower your bills to connection fee + zero net usage + taxes and fees.
they're also pretty visible (kind of the point) and (assumed in this thread) detectable with automated systems so using them is just begging to get busted. I mean, even if you avoid the cops directly seeing you, someone's going to pull the footage from one of the automated cars you brushed to the side and passed and turn your license plate number over.
It really depends what Alexander Roshal thinks "in separate form" means. So far I'm not aware of him claiming that a compiled binary is a form of source code, but I'm sure enough of a case could be made to take it to court if he wanted to.
So you're saying the real answer is just "greed and abuse of power", with no particular reference to an economic system?
he's saying _current_ standards will not be weakened, but _strengthening_ of standards will be delayed. Basically the difference between "slowing down" and "not accelerating"
while I agree that's a lesson that needs to be learned, it might be more effective to teach them in another way when they're actually alert.
because the board of directors is largely made up of CEOs of other corporations who don't want to set a precedent that they might not be necessary?
those two statements are not the same. The folks making money off the silly cat videos are the ones with massive server farms, not the ones with the cats.
you're forgetting the option to collude. Sure, they're not supposed to, but that doesn't mean they don't/won't if they can profit from it.
no, no, all Americans deserve equal rights. 0 == 0. Money gets you _perks_.
what they _mean_ is "we will sue anyone who wants more than the feds do, now that we've got them doing only what we're willing to support, but we'll claim to be supporting the principles we no longer have to actually implement."
that just makes it an e-sport, only with car crashes.
you mean you'd specifically throttle fast.com, right? Otherwise you're just making it really blatant that you're treating netflix traffic differently...
given how many lawyers are in congress, that seems surprising. Perhaps the large number of lower level politicians (city council, mayor, etc) makes the percentage lower. I wonder if there's a way to do a weighted average by power level?
We need an "amusing snark" moderation :)
Have you not heard of prosperity gospel? e.g. Creflo Dollar?
I thought the biggest coup was getting people to conflate political systems, economic systems, and social status systems into one term. Go figure!
It is _a_ problem. _The_ problem is that for some reason, kids are deciding it would be nifty to kill a bunch of other kids. More generally, people are deciding it would be nice if a bunch of other people were dead. Removing guns is a bandaid - it's a useful step in reducing the ongoing impact of the issue, but it does not address the root of the issue.