Actually I fly under those conditions (not sure when I am coming back). I just best guess my return time and rebook if necessary. A round-trip with a rebook is still cheaper than two last minute one-ways. I suspect that "service techs" (or at least the company paying for the flight) also know this.
Oxidation. If you want to bite your apple and leave it for later, sprinkle some lemon juice (vitamin C, anti-oxidant) on it and it will sit for much longer before browning. Also handy if you like you apple sliced and want to do so at home before work.
Nowhere in the MA proposal does it suggest anyone has to use Open Source software. The Open Doc license allows any software vendor to produce a compliant product whether open or not, free or not. The reason this proposal will likely be shot down by the MS legislature is that the fight is billed (by parties who want it to be billed as such) as an Open Source versed established vendors who do not support Open Document. (To the uneducated, 'lunatic fringe' vs 'respectable companies')
This 'fight' needs to be framed correctly to the appropriate decision makers so that they can make effective decisions. If the MA IT department believes that OpenDoc is the way to go, then they should be educating the state senators and reps that OpenDoc is about true digital accessibility and that by making it a requirement (to be phased in a reasonable amount of time), more users will have access to the data for a longer (indefinite?) period of time. If MA and/or other major organizations institute OpenDoc, Microsoft and other vendors will add support. It will then, and only then, make good business sense to do so.
Open Doc has next to nothing, if anything, to do with disabilities or with the political/price format of the software from which it is read and written. It is about agreeing to a storage format we can all 'unstore'. It is up to the software reading the document to provide the disabled with access. A digital document is mearly the data to be presented maybe with hints on how. Exactly how it is presented is largely up to the reader.
Most (not all to be fair) of what I see is how Open Doc equates to Open Source. While there are parallels, they are not the same nor are they inexorably tied. When discussing Open Doc, fight the Open Doc fight. Leave the Open Source fight for another discussion. Allow each idea to flourish in its own right.
Then, and most likely only then, Open Doc will be given a shot by those who could shoot it down (no pun intended).
Set up a email scanning tool that blocks encrypted zip files, but allows unencrypted, scanned to be clean zips through. MailScanner does this ( http://www.mailscanner.info/ )
When I have to protect a an email server that MailScanner is not compatible with (eg Exchange, qmail (qscanner is only for reletively low traffic sites)) I build a prefiltering system using MailScanner and Postfix on Linux.
You *could* have your local mail server forward all outbound email *through* your ISP's mail server and, viola!, you can use your local mail server with all its conviniences and still be able to mail the outside world since they will see the SMTP connection coming from your ISP's mail server. Kinda nifty, no?
Those who think you can not make a buck hitting people have not watched the old 80's and 90's televangelists 'heal' people by hitting them in the head. And to complete the financial transaction, these 'healed' people give the evangelist money for the priviledge of being hit while up on stage!
Then there is always the bouncer at your local bar. He provides a service that frequently involves punching people.
Actually there are plenty of legitimate uses of the wildcard feature. One you might use everyday:
*.sourceforge.com
How do you think they keep on top of that many DNS entries that constantly come and go? You see it at ISPs that do third level (and higher) DNS virtual hosting and and group systems where the URL might be in the form of username.domain.com instead of domain.com/~username/
DNS supports it because it is a legitimate feature. And less you think removing wildcard support would fix the issue, as it has already been mentioned in this discussion, all Verisign has to do is modify their DNS server to supply responses that appear to make the domain legitimate. They already use non-standard DNS software, why not make a few more changes to enhance their bottom line?
Even after the ISC makes the patch to disable wildcards at the TLD level, Verisign can as mentioned above work around it if they really want to by modifying how their servers respond.
You are partially correct. The real dynamic content and interactivity comes from a combonation of DHTML and server side coding (eg: perl, php, asp, etc...) I have several pieces of work where the dynamic comes from php or perl and the interactivity assist comes from javascript created/modified by the php/perl. Need to dynamically repopulate select boxes? Create the various javascript arrays in php and then use on tags to load/unload the arrays.
To do this kind of work requires a good understanding of DHTML and the server side language involved.
It could be a forgery or it could just mean that one of the mailservers this message passed thorugh had mailscanner with an anti-virus package out of date or none at all (not to be confused with the 'none' AV setting which would disallow.pif attachments). It is easily possible to run mailscanner ineffectively.
Whether or not you consider Office 2K stable is a point of view. From an admin point of view I find it rather irritaing that export from Great Plains to Excel only works if I give "Everybody" write access to the excel binary and the MAPI interface to Outlook is not only a moving target between patches because of bad security design, but as of SP3 randomly drops MAPI generated emails. So in this case "stable" really depends on what parts of it you use.
Does it cause blue screens of death or "crash" often? No. Does it behave as advertised all the time? Also no. That makes it "unstable" in my book.
Ask him why in potential violation of the DMCA, the BSA is using software to circumvent a protection device? I am referring to the bogus email supplied as the password for FTP logons. It is clearly stated by most FTP server connections that a valid email address is required for access.
Me. Some of us still follow the distinction that the original tlds had (.edu for schools,.com for commercial,.net for networks, ISPs, etc...,.org for organizations such as community orgs, non-profits, etc..., and so forth).
While I think the whole tld was a terrible idea applied in an even worse fashion, I still register my domains based on what general tld they best fit. I have no interest in leading people to believe that our LUG is a commercial interest or that my business is some community group or non-profit. Although I am not above availing myself of the.us tld if that is the only non-misleading tld left for a given name.
With the advent of search engines like Google, the whole "what cool FQDN is your site?" is becoming irrelevant anyway.
Fujitsu used to advertise just that. You could destroy most of the outer casing (keyboard, mouse, display etc and just plug in the external equivelents and keep on running. Their example though was "a sharp heavy object pierces the upper casing and takes out the display"
I had an old Fujitsu Lifebook (Pent133MMX) and short of the battery it took every bit of the beating they said it would and in some case, then some.
First off, this is the US Marshals, not the police. Different group, different mentality.
That said, police, fire departments, and other such "public" services have sent out bills for ages. It is not unusual for such an organization to bill a prank caller, or someone who causes a situation or problem through extreme neglegence or disregard for the obvious. This is especially true for volunteer based organizations like rural firefighters, etc...
You can find all sorts of advice on car repair online too (want to add nitro yourself?), but what does that have to do with certified computer technicians *working* on your computer? I am not necessarily for regulation, but the implied correlation does not fit.
Just do not use a Dell PowerEdge 1.5u system as a desktop. They sound like jet engines at idle. Noise was NOT a design factor. If one of the fans is goes underspeed or one of the temp sensors pings hot, the thing kicks in the afterburner and you can not hear yourself think.
I have noticed over the range of Compaqs we have bought at work in the last year that they are getting quieter each round. The last one has multiple fans running at low speed to keep the circ up and noise down with directed airflow to cool the important parts. Runs quiet as a mouse and was cheap. P4 2G EvoD500. Of course, anything beats this refrigerator of a clone I have under my desk right now. Fortunately, my new workstation is on the way...
Slashdot Mirror
Actually I fly under those conditions (not sure when I am coming back). I just best guess my return time and rebook if necessary. A round-trip with a rebook is still cheaper than two last minute one-ways. I suspect that "service techs" (or at least the company paying for the flight) also know this.
Oxidation. If you want to bite your apple and leave it for later, sprinkle some lemon juice (vitamin C, anti-oxidant) on it and it will sit for much longer before browning. Also handy if you like you apple sliced and want to do so at home before work.
Nowhere in the MA proposal does it suggest anyone has to use Open Source software. The Open Doc license allows any software vendor to produce a compliant product whether open or not, free or not. The reason this proposal will likely be shot down by the MS legislature is that the fight is billed (by parties who want it to be billed as such) as an Open Source versed established vendors who do not support Open Document. (To the uneducated, 'lunatic fringe' vs 'respectable companies')
This 'fight' needs to be framed correctly to the appropriate decision makers so that they can make effective decisions. If the MA IT department believes that OpenDoc is the way to go, then they should be educating the state senators and reps that OpenDoc is about true digital accessibility and that by making it a requirement (to be phased in a reasonable amount of time), more users will have access to the data for a longer (indefinite?) period of time. If MA and/or other major organizations institute OpenDoc, Microsoft and other vendors will add support. It will then, and only then, make good business sense to do so.
Open Doc has next to nothing, if anything, to do with disabilities or with the political/price format of the software from which it is read and written. It is about agreeing to a storage format we can all 'unstore'. It is up to the software reading the document to provide the disabled with access. A digital document is mearly the data to be presented maybe with hints on how. Exactly how it is presented is largely up to the reader.
Most (not all to be fair) of what I see is how Open Doc equates to Open Source. While there are parallels, they are not the same nor are they inexorably tied. When discussing Open Doc, fight the Open Doc fight. Leave the Open Source fight for another discussion. Allow each idea to flourish in its own right.
Then, and most likely only then, Open Doc will be given a shot by those who could shoot it down (no pun intended).
No, because set uid bit by itself does not validate the parent process/user against any data store like sudo command does (eg: against /etc/sudoers)
Reverse DNS, eg: 192.168.1.1 -> mail.yourdomain.com
forward DNS: mail.yourdomain.com -> 192.168.1.1
Woody
Set up a email scanning tool that blocks encrypted zip files, but allows unencrypted, scanned to be clean zips through. MailScanner does this ( http://www.mailscanner.info/ )
When I have to protect a an email server that MailScanner is not compatible with (eg Exchange, qmail (qscanner is only for reletively low traffic sites)) I build a prefiltering system using MailScanner and Postfix on Linux.
Woody
You *could* have your local mail server forward all outbound email *through* your ISP's mail server and, viola!, you can use your local mail server with all its conviniences and still be able to mail the outside world since they will see the SMTP connection coming from your ISP's mail server. Kinda nifty, no?
Those who think you can not make a buck hitting people have not watched the old 80's and 90's televangelists 'heal' people by hitting them in the head. And to complete the financial transaction, these 'healed' people give the evangelist money for the priviledge of being hit while up on stage!
Then there is always the bouncer at your local bar. He provides a service that frequently involves punching people.
Actually there are plenty of legitimate uses of the wildcard feature. One you might use everyday:
*.sourceforge.com
How do you think they keep on top of that many DNS entries that constantly come and go? You see it at ISPs that do third level (and higher) DNS virtual hosting and and group systems where the URL might be in the form of username.domain.com instead of domain.com/~username/
DNS supports it because it is a legitimate
feature. And less you think removing wildcard support would fix the issue, as it has already been mentioned in this discussion, all Verisign has to do is modify their DNS server to supply responses that appear to make the domain legitimate. They already use non-standard DNS software, why not make a few more changes to enhance their bottom line?
Even after the ISC makes the patch to disable wildcards at the TLD level, Verisign can as mentioned above work around it if they really want to by modifying how their servers respond.
As does The Onion (www.theonion.com).
You are partially correct. The real dynamic content and interactivity comes from a combonation of DHTML and server side coding (eg: perl, php, asp, etc...) I have several pieces of work where the dynamic comes from php or perl and the interactivity assist comes from javascript created/modified by the php/perl. Need to dynamically repopulate select boxes? Create the various javascript arrays in php and then use on tags to load/unload the arrays.
To do this kind of work requires a good understanding of DHTML and the server side language involved.
It could be a forgery or it could just mean that one of the mailservers this message passed thorugh had mailscanner with an anti-virus package out of date or none at all (not to be confused with the 'none' AV setting which would disallow .pif attachments). It is easily possible to run mailscanner ineffectively.
The CVN 65, USS Enterprise is an Enterprise class (single ship class). The Enterprise was our first nuclear powered carrier (hence the N in CVN).
e rs /cv-list1.html
i ps /ship-cv.html
The CV 63, USS Kitty Hawk and CV 64, USS Constellation are Kitty Hawk class.
The CV 67, USS John F Kennedy is a Kennedy class (also a single ship class).
AS a footnote to those counting, the CV 66, USS America is decommissioned and was a Kitty Hawk class carrier.
http://www.chinfo.navy.mil/navpalib/ships/carri
http://www.chinfo.navy.mil/navpalib/factfile/sh
I bet the designers of such programs never saw this coming.
Whether or not you consider Office 2K stable is a point of view. From an admin point of view I find it rather irritaing that export from Great Plains to Excel only works if I give "Everybody" write access to the excel binary and the MAPI interface to Outlook is not only a moving target between patches because of bad security design, but as of SP3 randomly drops MAPI generated emails. So in this case "stable" really depends on what parts of it you use.
Does it cause blue screens of death or "crash" often? No. Does it behave as advertised all the time? Also no. That makes it "unstable" in my book.
Ask him why in potential violation of the DMCA, the BSA is using software to circumvent a protection device? I am referring to the bogus email supplied as the password for FTP logons. It is clearly stated by most FTP server connections that a valid email address is required for access.
Me. Some of us still follow the distinction that the original tlds had (.edu for schools, .com for commercial, .net for networks, ISPs, etc..., .org for organizations such as community orgs, non-profits, etc..., and so forth).
.us tld if that is the only non-misleading tld left for a given name.
While I think the whole tld was a terrible idea applied in an even worse fashion, I still register my domains based on what general tld they best fit. I have no interest in leading people to believe that our LUG is a commercial interest or that my business is some community group or non-profit. Although I am not above availing myself of the
With the advent of search engines like Google, the whole "what cool FQDN is your site?" is becoming irrelevant anyway.
Tango is a web (?) programming enviroment used on Mac systems. So I am sure they would get a nice document from some nice lawyer had they done that.
Try "at" under any NT variant (4.0, 2K, XP). It supports one time and repetitive simple schedules (every night at 10, m,t,t,f @ 8, etc...)
It can call any script or executable with or without switches. It may be ugly, but it is basically functional.
Fujitsu used to advertise just that. You could destroy most of the outer casing (keyboard, mouse, display etc and just plug in the external equivelents and keep on running. Their example though was "a sharp heavy object pierces the upper casing and takes out the display"
I had an old Fujitsu Lifebook (Pent133MMX) and short of the battery it took every bit of the beating they said it would and in some case, then some.
First off, this is the US Marshals, not the police. Different group, different mentality.
That said, police, fire departments, and other such "public" services have sent out bills for ages. It is not unusual for such an organization to bill a prank caller, or someone who causes a situation or problem through extreme neglegence or disregard for the obvious. This is especially true for volunteer based organizations like rural firefighters, etc...
How much they might collect is a different story.
You can find all sorts of advice on car repair online too (want to add nitro yourself?), but what does that have to do with certified computer technicians *working* on your computer? I am not necessarily for regulation, but the implied correlation does not fit.
Just do not use a Dell PowerEdge 1.5u system as a desktop. They sound like jet engines at idle. Noise was NOT a design factor. If one of the fans is goes underspeed or one of the temp sensors pings hot, the thing kicks in the afterburner and you can not hear yourself think.
I have noticed over the range of Compaqs we have bought at work in the last year that they are getting quieter each round. The last one has multiple fans running at low speed to keep the circ up and noise down with directed airflow to cool the important parts. Runs quiet as a mouse and was cheap. P4 2G EvoD500. Of course, anything beats this refrigerator of a clone I have under my desk right now. Fortunately, my new workstation is on the way...
Oregon has the same type of law. Consumers are not allowed to pump gas.