Slashdot Mirror


BSA Accuses OpenOffice Mirrors

sqrt529 writes "A German university was accused by the BSA of pirating MS Office, because they mirrored OpenOffice.org. The scripts from the BSA only check for "Office" in the filename and then automatically send out notices to the ftp admins. Did any of you get similar notices from the BSA?"

724 comments

  1. Open Office Outlawed by Almace · · Score: 5, Funny

    This is really funny actually. I'm going to start uploading mp3s named "office.mp3" to ftp sites now for fun.

    --
    Remember,democracy never lasts long.It soon wastes, exhausts and murders itself. John Adams (1814)
    1. Re:Open Office Outlawed by ketamine-bp · · Score: 5, Funny

      /me think we should setup some sort of ftp server that fakes every microsoft software's files, like

      SlashDOT_MS_OFFICE_2K_1_of_37.zip

      heh.

    2. Re:Open Office Outlawed by 1010011010 · · Score: 1

      Better yet, structure the OpenOffice files to look like the MS Office installation files.

      --
      Napster-to-go says "Fill and refill your compatible MP3 player", which is a lie. It's not MP3. It's WMA with DRM.
    3. Re:Open Office Outlawed by caseydk · · Score: 4, Insightful



      Why doesn't the RICO Act apply to the BSA (not the Boy Scouts)?

    4. Re:Open Office Outlawed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For the non-US amongst us, could you please tell me what the RICO act is?

    5. Re:Open Office Outlawed by jdiggans · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) Act

      The BSA is certainly morally corrupt but I must admit I don't understand what the parent poster was trying to say by suggesting they should fall under RICO.
      -j

    6. Re:Open Office Outlawed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think they should be penalized by the Ronco act. That will teach them to act like asses!

    7. Re:Open Office Outlawed by WindBourne · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Many of the tactics that BSA employs would actually be illegal if the law was applied in an even-handed approach. BSA operates be threats and false premises. The problem is that they have the backing of our current admin (Clinton's admin was not much better). If they treaten you and you do not comply, they get a warrent and come back with Ashcroft's FBI, who then take ALL of your computers for the next year. I have been told by somebody that they can hold the equipment up to 5 years. We used to get upset when these kind of actions were done in Soviet Union, Nazi Germany, and a number of third world dictatoships. Now, it is all in the name of security.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    8. Re:Open Office Outlawed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Food dehydrators?

    9. Re:Open Office Outlawed by forgetful_ca · · Score: 5, Funny

      I would think we should add a link to open office with the comment "My word, this version of office really does excel".

    10. Re:Open Office Outlawed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      RTFA numbnuts. they had copies of OpenOffice.

    11. Re:Open Office Outlawed by Fembot · · Score: 1

      "I heard that aliens killed Kennedy. That doesn't make it true."

      Duh everyone knows he killed himself (Series 7 episode 1 I belive)

    12. Re:Open Office Outlawed by anthonyrcalgary · · Score: 5, Funny

      What I find funny is this...

      BSA represents that the information in this notification is accurate and states, under penalty of perjury, that it is authorized to act in this matter on behalf of the copyright owners listed above.

      Does the BSA represent OpenOffice.org? Perjury it is then...

      --
      When someone might yell at me, it has to be OpenBSD.
    13. Re:Open Office Outlawed by jasonditz · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "Do you prefer they eliminate the middle step and go straight to the FBI when you learn about your illegal copy of Office?"

      Why not? They already eliminated the first step where they actually make sure you have an illegal copy of office.

    14. Re:Open Office Outlawed by infront314 · · Score: 5, Funny

      "Click here to Access it."

    15. Re:Open Office Outlawed by dohcvtec · · Score: 5, Insightful

      But regardless, if you are doing nothing wrong there is no harm.
      Bullshit... if they have some reason to believe I'm pirating software, even if I'm not using said software, it can be tough for me to prove I'm innocent. After all, their standard is "guilty until raided and proven innocent." So they can come in and raid me, and even though I'm innocent, they can disrupt my business and confiscate my computers. Who else has the power to do this? Nobody I can think of, definitely not legally.

      Do you prefer they eliminate the middle step and go straight to the FBI when you learn about your illegal copy of Office?
      Actually, yes. I think that's what everyone wishes would happen. If the BSA is accusing you of less than $5,000 worth of piracy, the FBI will tell the BSA to f'off. If they're accusing you of more than $5,000, then the FBI will conduct a proper investigation, unlike the BSA's slash and burn approach. The BSA is a vigilante group, and they should be stopped.

      --
      -- Never hit a man with glasses. Hit him with a baseball bat.
    16. Re:Open Office Outlawed by moncyb · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You misunderstand what a cease-and-desist letter is all about. But regardless, if you are doing nothing wrong there is no harm.

      If the BSA sent a false complaint to your ISP / hosting provider saying you violated copyright laws, there would be no harm? Even if they take down your site or cut off your internet access?

      Whats wrong with that? Do you prefer they eliminate the middle step and go straight to the FBI when you learn about your illegal copy of Office?

      If they went straight to the FBI with a false complaint like this, they'd probably end up in jail.

    17. Re:Open Office Outlawed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a system that worked extremely well with informers and the KGB in the Soviet Union, no use re-inventing the wheel.

    18. Re:Open Office Outlawed by phatlipmojo · · Score: 5, Funny

      "Because I can't post it on the FrontPage."

      --

      Nice things are nicer than nasty ones.
    19. Re:Open Office Outlawed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not sure if this should be modded as Funny.

      This is serious, take those motherfuckers to court and get them bitchslapped.

    20. Re:Open Office Outlawed by jbolden · · Score: 4, Interesting

      To get raided by the FBI a warrent needed to be issued. For a warrent to be issued evidence needed to be presented. If the BSA fabricated evidence they're liable for all the damages caused by the raid + punative damages.

      The BSA is effective because many companies are rather cavalier in terms of piracy to the point that executives have moved right into the criminal violations catagory. Faced with a choice between paying the BSA's fine and actually having a law enforcement agency invistigate they go for the fine. I've seen far more piracy in corporations than I have BSA abuse. Managers that would never think of allowing (or sometimes even ordering) employees to steal physical goods have no problems ordering them to do the same with electronic property.

    21. Re:Open Office Outlawed by Atzanteol · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Perjury must be "knowingly lying under oath" though I believe. Perhaps Fruad?

      --
      "Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge"

      - Charles Darwin
    22. Re:Open Office Outlawed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not quite. Perjury is lying under oath about a material matter: if you say you're 30 when you're really 34, and the case concerns what you saw on the night in question, then it ain't perjury.


    23. Re:Open Office Outlawed by homer_ca · · Score: 1

      I suppose if you make false statements under oath due to stupidity or incompetence that's not perjury. Maybe there's some crime for negligently making false statements under oath.

    24. Re:Open Office Outlawed by sconeu · · Score: 1

      Make sure your Visio n is good before you open the file! (oops, I made a typo!)

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    25. Re:Open Office Outlawed by opie92115 · · Score: 1

      I do belive liable is the word that you are looking for. I think Openoffice can sue them for it also.

    26. Re:Open Office Outlawed by Old+Uncle+Bill · · Score: 1

      Yeah, really. They should just stick to motorcycles, it's what they're really good at anyway.

      --
      Yes, I am an agent of Satan, but my duties are largely ceremonial.
    27. Re:Open Office Outlawed by Atzanteol · · Score: 1

      Fraud even...

      --
      "Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge"

      - Charles Darwin
    28. Re:Open Office Outlawed by mr.+methane · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I read the correspondence. It seems like the exchange went something like this:

      "Hello, we see something that looks like illegal software on your public server. If so, please take this opportunity to remove it."

      reply: "You're mistaken, it's a legal, well-known package."

      response: "You're correct, please accept out apology."

      Now maybe I missed the part where the stormtroopers break down the door, but it seems like an honest mistake, quickly rectified, and politely explained.

    29. Re:Open Office Outlawed by stinky+wizzleteats · · Score: 4, Funny

      This sounds like the "one of us always lies" riddle. If the BSA did not lie, then they are guilty of perjury (according to their own statement). If they did lie, then they are guilty of perjury in claiming that they made the statement under the penalty of perjury when, in fact, this was not the case.

    30. Re:Open Office Outlawed by Fujisawa+Sensei · · Score: 2, Interesting

      IANAL but according to the email these statements are being made under oath. Also according to the apology:

      Appearantly our system detects the OpenOffice files as MS Office programs and alarms me, which in turn sends the notices. I failed my part by not reassuring clearly enough which property was infringed...
      BSA represents that the information in this notification is accurate
      1. She freely admits that she was notified about the discovery of the software.
      2. She also admits that she did not verify the information.

      She purgered herself by when she declarce the info was correct without validating it.

      --
      If someone is passing you on the right, you are an asshole for driving in the wrong lane.
    31. Re:Open Office Outlawed by stinky+wizzleteats · · Score: 3, Informative

      I have been told by somebody that they can hold the equipment up to 5 years.
      I heard that aliens killed Kennedy. That doesn't make it true.

      I have performed forensic analysis on computer equipment held for 5 years related to a defense case where I was an expert witness. I have testified to these details under oath. You know nothing of the fuck of what you speak.

    32. Re:Open Office Outlawed by suicidal · · Score: 1

      I believe the million dollar question is, where did the scan come from, and is anyone collecting THIS information to add to an ACL to block all traffic from BSA goons?

    33. Re:Open Office Outlawed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Definitely an "honest" mistake, but clearly indicative of negligence. Do you think you'd appreciate it if somebody sent your boss a letter saying that you have child pornography on your server, because they saw a file called "APAReportOnChildPornography.doc"? Would you feel that your time, your boss' time, your hr rep's, etc., time would be usefully served by such a complaint being lodged with your company? No didn't think so, so why shouldn't the BSA be required to demonstrate that this isn't the normal level of evidence gathered when levelling charges at organizations and individuals? This type of event shows that they aren't actually making a real effort to identify and track down actual infringers, but rather just using a shotgun approach to sending automatically generated legal threats.

    34. Re:Open Office Outlawed by doublem · · Score: 1

      My cousin Bob told me about it. Some guy names Asheron in his Flight Simulator design class told him about it. He's using it in all his Freelancer contracts. He said it normally makes him WinCE to pay for this kind of software, but this is free! BTW: If you download this software, please log into our Developers' Exchange and help find ways to spread the Word about what a great product this is.

      --
      "Live Free or Die." Don't like it? Then keep out of the USA
    35. Re:Open Office Outlawed by ShinmaWa · · Score: 1

      I do belive liable is the word that you are looking for. I think Openoffice can sue them for it also.

      You mean libel right?

      And no. Since the letter wasn't "published" to a mass audience by the BSA, they are not guilty of libel. You can not libel someone by sending them a private letter -- no matter how many untruths are in that letter.

      --
      The /. Effect: Thousands of users simultaneously accessing a site to not read its content.
    36. Re:Open Office Outlawed by stinky+wizzleteats · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I read the correspondence.

      I read it too. I saw this:

      ... none of the materials or activities listed above have been authorized by the rightholders, their agents, or the law. BSA represents that the information in this notification is accurate and states, under penalty of perjury, that it is authorized to act in this matter on behalf of the copyright owners listed above.

      BSA is not the representative of OpenOffice and made fraudulent legal statements based on that falsehood. That the statements may also have been negligent does not excuse that fact. If I get a debt collection letter printed by an automated machine that threatens me with broken legs if I don't pay, the sender is still criminally liable under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act.

      Please advise us regarding what actions you take. Please include the following CaseID in any response you send: Case ID 588853

      That the site in question was, in fact, not guilty does not make it fair to have presumed them guilty in the first place. This incident demonstrates that allowing a commercial entity to conduct law enforcement activities not only encourages abuse, but proves that such abuse actually takes place.

    37. Re:Open Office Outlawed by stinky+wizzleteats · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Many of the tactics that BSA employs would actually be illegal if the law was applied in an even-handed approach.
      Name three, please.

      Extortion, racketeering, and violation of due process.

    38. Re:Open Office Outlawed by stinky+wizzleteats · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If they went straight to the FBI with a false complaint like this, they'd probably end up in jail.
      Untrue. The FBI investigates, and thats that. You go the FBI with suspicion, they investigate. That is how it works.

      Wrong. If I as an individual make a false criminal complaint against someone, I can be criminally liable for doing so. Extensive law and precedent of civil liability is also associated with making false accusations.

    39. Re:Open Office Outlawed by opie92115 · · Score: 1

      ahh thank you for the correction and the proper spelling.

    40. Re:Open Office Outlawed by ShinmaWa · · Score: 1

      Perhaps Fruad?

      Fraud = intentional perversion of truth in order to induce another to part with something of value.

      Doesn't really seem to fit, does it.

      --
      The /. Effect: Thousands of users simultaneously accessing a site to not read its content.
    41. Re:Open Office Outlawed by sharkey · · Score: 1
      "Because I can't post it on the FrontPage."

      My Publisher wouldn't allow it. He says I didn't put the correct PowerPoint in his Project InfoPath, so his Data Analyzer didn't OneNote it.

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    42. Re:Open Office Outlawed by ruiner13 · · Score: 1

      Hmm, that's an interesting Outlook on things.

      --

      today is spelling optional day.

    43. Re:Open Office Outlawed by leek · · Score: 1

      IE 6 ways to spell Microsoft as an Internet Explorer?

    44. Re:Open Office Outlawed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So they can come in and raid me, and even though I'm innocent, they can disrupt my business and confiscate my computers. Who else has the power to do this? Nobody I can think of, definitely not legally.

      The DEA can seize anything they think you bought with drug money.

    45. Re:Open Office Outlawed by Moofie · · Score: 1

      How do you prove a negative? How do you prove that no, we don't have any copies of MS Office around here?

      And why the hell am I now guilty until proven innocent?

      That, my friend, is the problem.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    46. Re:Open Office Outlawed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you use the Powerpoint importer with the presentation wizards, you can look like a real foxpro, er, fauxpro at your next netmeeting!

      Note 1: This release has significant functionality improvements. The interface improvements only rate a VisualC++.

      Note 2: This is the last release to be hosted on this server. Future releases can be found on the SQLserver, er, sequel server.

      Advertising: What can you do to improve the outlook for an open source software project that competes with Microsoft? Exchange your labor for mention on this site as a contributor!

      Advertising: Uranium, radium, radon, palladium, plutonium. What do they have in common? Its a bad idea to let any of them into your house. Think safety first!

      Public service: You could beg Microsoft to give you Windows 2000/XP/2003 for free, or just download linux. You choose, but choose wisely.

    47. Re:Open Office Outlawed by lfourrier · · Score: 1

      not so funny, MS "proved" in a law suit that internet explorer was to generic to be trademarked (by a small company not bougth by them)

    48. Re:Open Office Outlawed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      To make it realistic, the files would have to have some size to them. Maybe an installer which randomly places pictures of the goatse.cx guy.

      Multiple Screenshots Of Fricking Freak In Compromising Exposure - Xtremely Pr0nographic

      If nothing else, it would cause some employee turnover. Ugh! I'm blind!!

      Hey! They've got WINDOWS XP too!!

      Why I Now Don't Open Wrapper programs Showing - Xtreme Pr0n

    49. Re:Open Office Outlawed by harmonica · · Score: 1

      Damn those computer-confiscating Nazis!

    50. Re:Open Office Outlawed by eMilkshake · · Score: 1

      But your Entourage has a rosey Outlook.

    51. Re:Open Office Outlawed by ethereal · · Score: 1

      IANAL, but by voluntarily incurring the perjury statute in their communication, hasn't the BSA effectively signed themselves up as knowingly lying? I mean, they're the ones that brought up perjury, not us.

      --

      Your right to not believe: Americans United for Separation of Church and

    52. Re:Open Office Outlawed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obviously, the statement is intended to intimidate and demonstrate that the BSA has the 'authority' to be harassing you. Too bad for them it has come back to bite them in the ass. If I sign a statement which says, 'I declare under perjury the foregoing is true and correct' then I am held accountable for what I signed, even if I didn't bother to read it first or check it accuracy.

    53. Re:Open Office Outlawed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      So they can come in and raid me, and even though I'm innocent, they can disrupt my business and confiscate my computers. Who else has the power to do this?

      The treasury dept (Secret Service). Read about Operation Sun Devil.
    54. Re:Open Office Outlawed by Grim+Grepper · · Score: 1

      Better send it to the Publisher then.

    55. Re:Open Office Outlawed by WindBourne · · Score: 4, Informative

      If the FBI has a warrant, they will come in and search your computers and premises. If they find Office, and you dont have licenses, then you are guilty, and will be fined/prosecuted. If you have no copies of office, then nothing happens, you are innocent. Therein lies the problem. At a friends business, the BSA asked to search the premise. They told them that they only ran Linux and no, the BSA was not allowed. The FBI came that afternoon with a warrent and took the equipment. All of it. 3 computers, keyboards, monitors, 2 printers, a network switch, cable modem, speakers, CDs, and DVDs (all commercial movies and music). They still have it after nearly a year. They will search it and return it WHEN they feel like it. The FBI has not filed charges. Somebody told me that they can hold it for 5 years. Somehow, i find that hard to believe, but who knows in this day and age. I do know that when they call the FBI, that they say that it will be returned when they are done examining the evidence.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    56. Re:Open Office Outlawed by carlos_benj · · Score: 1

      I do believe you're liable to find libel to be the word you're actually looking for....

      --

      --

      As a matter of fact, I am a lawyer. But I play an actor on TV.

    57. Re:Open Office Outlawed by Negadecimal · · Score: 1

      Word.

    58. Re:Open Office Outlawed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So what you are suggesting is that it be illegal to threaten people with lawsuits. I think this is a fairly obvious abridgement of the Anglo judicial system, at the very least (although I understand your intentions are good). Imagine, however, that it were illegal for you to say that you would sue, say, a business contracter for breach of contract as a predecessor to actually filing. I can think of two possible applications of the law; one which allows you to still sue, and one which does not. If you are prevented from suing, this is quite obviously bad.

      If you are prevented from threatening to sue before actually filing, you may say, whats the harm, I can still sue. However, this would force more actions to actually go to court (sine the vast majority are currently settled out of court), which would be a huge burden on the judicial systems.

      Granted, the threat of suits can be abused to lead to an unfair settlement, and there are limited (for the obvious civil liberties issues) standards by which the judicial system can actually throw out silly suits, ignore frivolous suits, hold the plaintiffs responsible for monetary damages, and even ignore suit-happy plaintiffs henceforth. Nonetheless, the threat of suit is often enough to resolve an unjust situation, e.g. you telling your business contracter that you will sue if he does not stick to the contract.

      So really, what the BSA is, if not exactly a wise use of the judicial system, nonetheless one which we could never outlaw or discourage without losing further liberties in the process.

    59. Re:Open Office Outlawed by darnok · · Score: 3, Funny

      "Don't you agree, Bob"

    60. Re:Open Office Outlawed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's a PowerPoint!

    61. Re:Open Office Outlawed by jackbox · · Score: 1

      It will improve your Outlook on life.

    62. Re:Open Office Outlawed by kien · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Who moderated danheskett's post as Flamebait? C'mon people. Disagreement with a post does not make that post flamebait. (Thanks to the more objective, sane, moderators that fixed this while I was typing this response.)

      "Many of the tactics that BSA employs would actually be illegal if the law was applied in an even-handed approach." You misunderstand what a cease-and-desist letter is all about. But regardless, if you are doing nothing wrong there is no harm. The BSA works under the premise that they gather evidence and contact offenders. If the offenders do not comply they get law enforcement involved. Whats wrong with that? Do you prefer they eliminate the middle step and go straight to the FBI when you learn about your illegal copy of Office?

      Perhaps someone can clarify what a cease-and-desist order really implies, but I've always considered them a thinly-veiled legal threat which, financially speaking, could be considered analogous to a mob thug showing up at my business demanding "protection" money. Even if I'm doing nothing wrong, I still have to pay a lawyer to prove it...which I think the BSA is entirely aware of. I don't believe that RICO could be applied to the BSA's strongarming tactics, but their methods certainly underscore a severe need for an Anti-Barratry Act.

      --K.
      --
      Sig: Bad people happen. Try to avoid being one of them.
    63. Re:Open Office Outlawed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      of the copyright owners listed above.

      which would be MS not OO

    64. Re:Open Office Outlawed by fussman · · Score: 0

      I guess I'll just have to paint the word and tell my messenger to get the media player and prevent the DOS attack before I become a solitaire. I must also stop the sound recorder before my microphone gives out.

      --
      Support Israeli punk bands. Man Alive.
    65. Re:Open Office Outlawed by JoshWurzel · · Score: 1

      Word up, G.

    66. Re:Open Office Outlawed by anon+mouse-cow-aard · · Score: 1

      The outlook for this thread is grim.
      Hopefully in will fade to invisio soon.

    67. Re:Open Office Outlawed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > I do belive liable is the word that you are looking for. I think Openoffice can sue them for it also.

      I do believe you're liable to make the Slashdot community think you're an uneducated buffoon for misusing the word "liable" when you in fact meant, "libel".

      Get an education, fuckwad! (Now THAT'S libel)

    68. Re:Open Office Outlawed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      and the piece o' resistance:

      ln -s /dev/zero SlashDOT_MS_OFFICE_2K_1_of_37.zip

    69. Re:Open Office Outlawed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And misspell My as Ms

    70. Re:Open Office Outlawed by mpe · · Score: 1

      Many of the tactics that BSA employs would actually be illegal if the law was applied in an even-handed approach.

      e.g. RICO...

      BSA operates be threats and false premises. The problem is that they have the backing of our current admin (Clinton's admin was not much better).

      One of the ways in which the US "two party system" in practice acts more like a one party setup.

    71. Re:Open Office Outlawed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You kow, on a German keybord, the y is just left-below the s, and with ms frequent mistsping this might read as:

      "Ms word, this version of office really does excel".

    72. Re:Open Office Outlawed by Spectre · · Score: 1

      You have my Word on it!

      --
      "Flame away, I wear asbestos underwear"
    73. Re:Open Office Outlawed by Rares+Marian · · Score: 1

      It was always in the name of security.

      --
      The message on the other side of this sig is false.
    74. Re:Open Office Outlawed by baggins2002 · · Score: 1

      Is there a listing of companies that have actually been affected be BSA. Except for some city in North Dakota I have never actually heard of anyone being audited by BSA . Or any company actually being prosecuted/fined. After 3 years of hearing this I'm beginning to think that BSA is 3 guys at Kinko's copying and stuffing envelopes.

  2. Wow. That's stupid. by nitehorse · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "I've got an idea! Let's write scripts that will automatically log in on FTP servers, waste bandwidth, cost people money, and also do a shitty job looking for pirated software!"

    Yeah, that's really bright. If I were operating any servers that had been raped by the BSA's scripts like this, I'd be extremely pissed off. They should realize that bandwidth isn't exactly free, especially not in countries != US.

    1. Re:Wow. That's stupid. by Angry+White+Guy · · Score: 5, Funny

      Google:
      Searched the web for Office.
      Results 1 - 10 of about 78,600,000. Search took 0.10 seconds.
      Start sending the letters!

      as an interesting side note, the first link is US Copyright Office

      --
      You think that I'm crazy, you should see this guy!
    2. Re:Wow. That's stupid. by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      They don't have a robots.txt file in there. Presumably this means that searches are permitted.

    3. Re:Wow. That's stupid. by Draoi · · Score: 1

      Yeah, like MS's wonder-shell-script is going to read a robots.txt field. They can't even parse a dir listing correctly!

      --
      Alison

      "It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education." - Albert Einstein

    4. Re:Wow. That's stupid. by 91degrees · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Of course it wouldn't. That's not my point.

      It's just that the ftp site owners can't claim it did any more damage than any other spider that is written correctly.

    5. Re:Wow. That's stupid. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wouldn't want my company wasting money paying the BSA to protect my IP in such a fuckwit way.

    6. Re:Wow. That's stupid. by maan · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I dislike the BSA just as you, but when you have a public FTP site up, then by definition, it's open to everybody. It's ok for hundreds of people to log in and download hundreds of megs worth of files, but not for BSA to just do an "ls"?? Come on...let's not push it.

      And what do you mean by "bandwidth isn't exactly free, especially not in countries != US"?

      Maan

    7. Re:Wow. That's stupid. by grub · · Score: 2, Informative

      Correct me if I'm wrong but I thought robots.txt files were for websites, not FTP sites.

      --
      Trolling is a art,
    8. Re:Wow. That's stupid. by nitehorse · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Public FTP servers usually have the restriction that the user enter a valid email address, which the BSA's spidering/searching software faked in order to gain access.

      Hell, isn't that illegal under the DMCA? They're circumventing a protection measure to gain access to digitally protected work. Heh. That'd be awesome, if someone would sue the BSA for breaching the DMCA...

      Also, here in the US, it's very common to be charged a flat fee for internet service, such that one would pay (say) $400 a month for a guaranteed pipeline of 3Mbits (numbers are made up, but you get the idea.) Whereas, in other parts of the world, billing is much more commonly based on the amount of data transferred. Which means that if I host a server here, I pay for the line to it - no matter if the machine is accessed once or two million times in a month, whereas in other countries (especially Europe, including Germany), the difference between once and two million accesses is quite large, and may result in higher bills due to more data transfer.

      My point is that the BSA wasted bandwidth, needlessly scared a sysadmin at a German university, and may have even violated the DMCA in doing so. Again... Wow, that was stupid of them.

    9. Re:Wow. That's stupid. by blowdart · · Score: 1

      When did robots.txt start applying to ftp?

    10. Re:Wow. That's stupid. by Kierthos · · Score: 1

      Would it have been that much more of a burden for BSA to actually do their job correctly? Yeah, illegally copied software is a problem. BSA's goon-squad tactics are not the answer. (Yes, goon squad. They apparently can't parse the word "Open" in relation to the word "Office".)

      Kierthos

      --
      Mr. Hu is not a ninja.
    11. Re:Wow. That's stupid. by chrystoph · · Score: 1
      It's ok for hundreds of people to log in and download hundreds of megs worth of files, but not for BSA to just do an "ls"?? Come on...let's not push it.

      There is abosutely nothing wrong with them performing an ls of your public site. What is 100% percent wrong is that they have made False Accusation and threatened legal action.

      Perjury applies to statements sworn under oath, and, as a direct result, is not something you can deal with, but the civil court offense they have committed is Libel (see the following for a definition of Libel) http://www.ldrc.com/LDRC_Info/libelfaqs.html.

      You could probably get the BSA cited with Perjury in a court, but you would have to sue for Libel to get them into court.

      The obligatory IANAL applies. However, I know this one from experience.

      --

      -------------------------
      As easy as herding cats!
    12. Re:Wow. That's stupid. by Verteiron · · Score: 1

      Hey, when I read your sig my monitor went dim and my head started to hurt. You really ought to do something about that.

      --
      End of lesson. You may press the button.
    13. Re:Wow. That's stupid. by 91degrees · · Score: 2, Funny

      Last Tuesday. Did you miss the meeting?

    14. Re:Wow. That's stupid. by bofkentucky · · Score: 1

      Anyone want to take this to court? We can sue the BSA and get the DMCA limited if this works, a win win situation.

      --
      09f911029d74e35bd84156c5635688c0
    15. Re:Wow. That's stupid. by superdoo · · Score: 4, Funny
      >Google:
      >Searched the web for Office.
      >Results 1 - 10 of about 78,600,000. Search took 0.10 seconds.
      >Start sending the letters!


      Hey, at $400 a copy that's $31,440,000,000 in lost revenues! Damn pirates...

    16. Re:Wow. That's stupid. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Google Searched pages from www.bsa.org for office. About 450. Search took 0.14 seconds I think I might sue them!

    17. Re:Wow. That's stupid. by andrew_0812 · · Score: 1

      Or maybe, as suggested in the response email, this is an intentional "accident" to see if they can get people to remove OpenOffice links out of frear. Every site that they scare into doing that is another small victory for Bill, and consequently, BSA.

    18. Re:Wow. That's stupid. by Mitreya · · Score: 1
      My point is that the BSA wasted bandwidth, needlessly scared a sysadmin at a German university, and may have even violated the DMCA in doing so. Again... Wow, that was stupid of them

      Actually, NO IT IS NOT. It would have been stupid of them if YOU had the resources to sue them and they did not have the resources to defend themselves. As things stand now, it is the opposite so they have nothing to fear.

      I am surprized they don't send all the thread letters to *everyone*. Sortof like junk mail. Either they scare someone into buying licences/ taking down a server or they won't. No risks, no problem.

    19. Re:Wow. That's stupid. by maan · · Score: 1

      I absolutely agree that making a false claim is very wrong of them. But hey, they made a mistake, the person who received the email pointed that out to them, and they retracted their claim and apologized. I think that's very correct of them. (As long as they actually start being more careful about what they do in the future.)

      Maan

    20. Re:Wow. That's stupid. by maan · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yes, public ftp servers require a valid email address. But default configurations in browsers, including IE and mozilla send "fake" email addresses, including if I remember right command line ftp clients, such as ncftp. So I don't think that's very wrongful behavior of them. And certainly, not suable under DMCA. Otherwise, we're all (at least, most of us) guilty... Giving a fake email address is not circumventing a protection measure. I mean, public ftp servers don't ask for that email address as a protection measure. It's more for logging purposes. But any ftp operator knows that it's no use logging those addresses, since they're probably 90% fake.

      Again, I'm not trying to defend the BSA, but I think accessing an FTP server and looking at what files are on there is not wrong. What they did after that, however, was wrong, but they retracted their accusation and apologized. If they indeed fix their spider, I think it's very correct of them.

      Maan

    21. Re:Wow. That's stupid. by mcrbids · · Score: 1

      Public FTP servers usually have the restriction that the user enter a valid email address, which the BSA's spidering/searching software faked in order to gain access.

      Hell, isn't that illegal under the DMCA?


      This is possibly a legitimate point!

      I recently did some work making an industry-specific search engine. Part of the material obtained was done through a freely obtained login/pw, and the spider would crawl nightly (4 AM) for any new information.

      Extensive review was performed by very high dollar lawyers to make sure that no copyright infringement was done. And yes, the algorithm used was as bandwidth tight as could be done to get the effect needed.

      As the ISP, I got a DMCA removal request, because making the materials obtained through the (free or very cheap) login/pw essentially amounted to a copyright protection circumvention device!

      Needless to say, the offending material was removed, even though the action of circumventing the "protection device" was so trivial.

      This sets a very clear protection mechanism - anytime a password is requested, you have a "copyright protection device".

      Look out FTP indexes!

      --
      I have no problem with your religion until you decide it's reason to deprive others of the truth.
    22. Re:Wow. That's stupid. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe that universitys ftp administrator failed to agree to the GPL, yet continued to redistribute GPL materials.

      I bet the BSA has a mole in that university that heard the administrator mutter "I do not agree to the terms of this GPL"

    23. Re:Wow. That's stupid. by jcast · · Score: 1

      (As long as they actually start being more careful about what they do in the future.)

      Yeah, but what are the odds of that? I wouldn't hold my breath.

      In any case, I'll let the BSA off because they're sorry once I hear of them letting a company with unlicensed software off because they're sorry.
      --
      There are reasons why democracy does not work nearly as well as capitalism.
      -- David D. Friedman
    24. Re:Wow. That's stupid. by Spyffe · · Score: 1

      Wow. This is the best post I have ever seen on Slashdot.

      --
      Sigmentation fault - core dumped
    25. Re:Wow. That's stupid. by Swaffs · · Score: 1

      You forgot to multiply by each time each of those files were downloaded.

      --

      --
      "Karma can only be portioned out by the cosmos." - Homer Simpson [1F10]

    26. Re:Wow. That's stupid. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, at $400 a copy that's $31,440,000,000 in lost revenues! Damn pirates...

      1 months lost revenue :/ how would MS cope?

    27. Re:Wow. That's stupid. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No this is.

    28. Re:Wow. That's stupid. by Skater · · Score: 2, Funny

      Be sure to multiply by 3 times that number to account for the people with broadband connections...

    29. Re:Wow. That's stupid. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, we're all guilty. That's the point of the DMCA: It gives arbitrary power to the police, and to those with the money to win a colurt battle.

    30. Re:Wow. That's stupid. by arkanes · · Score: 1

      It's at least as much of a protection measure as simple encryption is. Even more so, because it it's specifically presented as one. Under the letter of the DMCA, I see no reason why this wouldn't be illegal, whether we're all guilty or not.

    31. Re:Wow. That's stupid. by spasm · · Score: 1

      " Public FTP servers usually have the restriction that the user enter a valid email address, which the BSA's spidering/searching software faked in order to gain access."

      And now we know what address the BSA spider uses & can block accordingly : )

      >> FTP Login Name: anonymous
      >> FTP Login Password: guest@nowhere.com

    32. Re:Wow. That's stupid. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Public FTP servers usually have the restriction that the user enter a valid email address, which the BSA's spidering/searching software faked in order to gain access."

      If its a public FTP server then there aren't any restrictions. A restriction would be something like a username (come on I'm sure you already know that one). An FTP server that requires you to put your email address under your password does not cut it. Only way your arguement would be valid is if they hacked into the FTP server to get access to the files. And also consider how many browsers such as Mozilla or IE might put in phony passwords when they try to log you onto an FTP site - are they all circumventing protection measures as well? SUE THEM!

    33. Re:Wow. That's stupid. by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 1

      I am surprized they don't send all the thread letters to *everyone*. Sortof like junk mail. Either they scare someone into buying licences/ taking down a server or they won't. No risks, no problem.

      Can we say class action? I don't know what grounds the suit could be based on, but when you threaten the entire population of the world, the laws of statistics pretty say flat out that you'll be coldbloodedly slaughtered in the wee hours of a moonless night....

      --
      Like what I said? You might like my music
    34. Re:Wow. That's stupid. by ReTay · · Score: 1

      Accually here is the case law on the matter

      SEC. 217. INTERCEPTION OF COMPUTER TRESPASSER COMMUNICATIONS.
      Chapter 119 of title 18, United States Code, is amended--

      21) `computer trespasser'--
      `(A) means a person who accesses a protected computer without authorization and thus has no reasonable expectation of privacy in any communication transmitted to, through, or from the protected computer; and

  3. Those darn Boy Scouts. by Morky · · Score: 4, Funny

    The Boy Scouts of America should stick to tying knots and keep their jamboreeing noses out of I.T.!

    1. Re:Those darn Boy Scouts. by Duke · · Score: 4, Funny

      BSA is a trademark of the Boy Scouts of America. The Business Software Alliance is to be referred to as the BS Alliance. I am sure the BS Alliance would not want to infringe on a trademark.

    2. Re:Those darn Boy Scouts. by Kierthos · · Score: 1

      BS Alliance? And BS stands for Bullshi.... no, too easy...

      Kierthos

      --
      Mr. Hu is not a ninja.
    3. Re:Those darn Boy Scouts. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is the funniest joke follow-up comment I have read in a long time.

    4. Re:Those darn Boy Scouts. by mmol_6453 · · Score: 1

      Trademarks only apply in the field that their owner does business in, AFAIK.

      But I can certainly see "BS Alliance" becoming the new popular name for them on Slashdot.

      --
      What's this Submit thingy do?
    5. Re:Those darn Boy Scouts. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WOW! This is the funniest reply to a funny reply to a joke I have read in a long time.

  4. Feature by chain_from_hell · · Score: 1, Funny

    "It's not a bug, it's a feature."

    1. Re:Feature by johnnyb · · Score: 1

      Or, as I often have to tell Microsoft-users - it's not a feature, it's a bug. Usually referring to the fact that you can embed Flash in an email in such a way that it Outlook doesn't ask you if you're sure you want to use flash. Windows people think this is a great feature, and don't understand the security risks involved in running arbitrary OLE objects on your computer without your permission.

    2. Re:Feature by trauma · · Score: 1

      Or, as I often have to tell Microsoft-users - it's not a feature, it's a bug. Usually referring to the fact that you can embed Flash in an email in such a way that it Outlook doesn't ask you if you're sure you want to use flash. Windows people think this is a great feature, and don't understand the security risks involved in running arbitrary OLE objects on your computer without your permission

      I've got news for you: there are solid reasons for intelligent, knowledgeable people to use Windows under certain circumstances. Yes, it was exceedingly foolish of Microsoft to enable automatic execution of untrusted files in HTML document by default, but this is a reflection of the stupidity of Microsoft, not on "Windows people" as a group. I use Windows, I use other software to read my mail (software which does not parse HTML or execute anything), I know how to secure the rest of my box, and I don't appreciate being lumped in with "Windows people" and being told what I think is a great feature. Windows fits my current needs on the desktop better than the available alternatives, and I am far from stupid.

      By the same logic (assuming you primarily use *nix), is it safe to assume you are a 40-year-old virgin with taped-together hornrim glasses, who plays MUDs for 20+ hours a week and has the most complete collection ever of Star Trek, The Original Series (on Betamax, because somebody convinced you it's technologically superior)? Welcome to the land of prejudice and over-generalization.

    3. Re:Feature by johnnyb · · Score: 2, Funny

      Touchy aren't we?

    4. Re:Feature by Vuarnet · · Score: 1

      a 40-year-old virgin with taped-together hornrim glasses, who plays MUDs for 20+ hours a week.
      Hey! Who says you can't play MUDs for 20+ hours a week, and also get some? It is insulting to imply that you can't be a part of an online text-based role-playing community and also have a frecuent sex life. Hours and hours of pleasure and all.

      Oh, you meant real life sex? With another person?

      Uh...

      Move along, nothing to see here.

      --
      Tongue-tied and twisted, just an earth-bound misfit, I
      Learning to fly, Pink Floyd.
  5. BSA Manual: by AikenDrumGotWired · · Score: 1, Funny

    1. Create automated application to look for piracy 2. Shoot self in foot

    1. Re:BSA Manual: by Kadagan+AU · · Score: 1, Funny
      1. Create automated application to look for piracy 2. Shoot self in foot

      You've got it all wrong... it's:

      1. Create automated application to look for piracy
      2. Shoot self in foot
      3. ???
      4. Profit!!
      ~Jon~
      --
      This space for rent, inquire within.
    2. Re:BSA Manual: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not only is that joke so old and dead that you'd have to be Herbert West, Reanimator, to have any hope of instilling the least spark of life in it, you couldn't even tell it right.

      I pronounce you "King of Asshats". Go forth and rule like the complete and utter failure you are!

    3. Re:BSA Manual: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      just saw "The Bourne Identity", and not to give it away, but there was NO UNIX coding involved =(

      In fact the spooks are using Windows and it is easily identifiable when they are pulling up the information on the gypsy girl right after Bourne escapes the embassy. It's a bit fuzzy but if I had to guess its Windows 98 First Edition with Star Office or Corel Office.

    4. Re:BSA Manual: by CrazyDuke · · Score: 1

      I always thought it was:

      1. Threaten, coerce, and extort.
      2. Shoot self in foot with machine gun.
      3. Blame the pirates for bloody foot.
      4. "Donate" money to polititians.
      5. Get more powerful laws to do #1.
      6. Rinse and repeat.

      The BSA is (technically) non-profit so there isn't any "#. ??? #. Profit!"

      The RIAA and MPAA like to use a similar algorithm.

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced influence is indistinguishable from control.
  6. wow... by Kadagan+AU · · Score: 3, Funny

    this HAS to be one of the dumbest things I've heard!

    If Office Depot had an ftp site where you could get their latest catalogue, they'd be accused of pirating M$ Office?!

    I think they went a bit too far this time.

    ~Jon~

    --
    This space for rent, inquire within.
    1. Re:wow... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      this HAS to be one of the dumbest things I've heard!

      Isn't that one of Bill Gates' favorite phrases to use?

    2. Re:wow... by Spudley · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I think this maybe proves a point about why it's a bad idea to use generic words as your product names (ahem... "word", "office", "windows", et cetera...)

      --
      (Spudley Strikes Again!)
    3. Re:wow... by TKinias · · Score: 2, Insightful

      scripsit Spudley:

      I think this maybe proves a point about why it's a bad idea to use generic words as your product names (ahem... "word", "office", "windows", et cetera...)

      Bad idea from whose perspective? It's very intentional, I am sure, that MS uses these kinds of names. They want their products to be ubiquitous, to equate in the public's minds with the generic. In other words, the possible confusion between the specific and the generic is very intentional.

      It also helps if you can achieve a legally-protected trademark on a generic term, preventing competitors from accurately identifying their software. Just try to make a new product -- let's say a window manager for Gnome called ``Gwindows'' -- and watch the fun.

      --
      In principio creauit Linus Linucem.
    4. Re:wow... by Minna+Kirai · · Score: 1

      That is very, very intentional. It's more important when it happens with file extensions than actual programs, though.

      Today, it is no longer possible to tell someone "Send me a bitmap file from the document", without him assuming you mean the output of MS Paint and MS Word, respectively.

    5. Re:wow... by Kadagan+AU · · Score: 1

      Didn't Lindows already do that and win?

      --
      This space for rent, inquire within.
    6. Re:wow... by n-baxley · · Score: 1

      SQL Server!

    7. Re:wow... by Hektor_Troy · · Score: 1

      Well, just suppose they had a webpage with a wording like

      "Can we have a word on how you access your office? Did you know, that we excel in making protective measures that works - including vulnarable windows? With our equipment your outlook on security need not be so bleak! Download our catalog today."

      --
      We do not live in the 21st century. We live in the 20 second century.
    8. Re:wow... by An+Onerous+Coward · · Score: 1

      You're absolutely right. I'm going to write Bill Gates and recommend that they change the name of their office suite to Microsoft Xwclju3_fffk. :)

      --

      You want the truthiness? You can't handle the truthiness!

    9. Re:wow... by An+Onerous+Coward · · Score: 1

      Oops, I mean, Microsoft Xwclju3_fffk.NET! My bad.

      --

      You want the truthiness? You can't handle the truthiness!

    10. Re:wow... by TKinias · · Score: 1

      scripsit Kadagan AU:

      Didn't Lindows already do that and win?

      I forgot about Lindows... (Does some googling...) It looks like the Lindows case still isn't settled. But MS sure did go after them.

      --
      In principio creauit Linus Linucem.
    11. Re:wow... by Locutus · · Score: 1

      it's also amazing that a group can threaten legal action using an automated system and walk away with a "I'm sorry" letter. And if a human was involved, THEY should be fired and civil charges filed against them, and the organization, for punitive damages. IMO.

      With all the stupid patents being awarded and laws being passed these days, The Baird's words regardings lawyers sound more prophetic every day.

      LoB

      --
      "Anyone who stands out in the middle of a road looks like roadkill to me." --Linus
    12. Re:wow... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck, this one pisses me off to no end. You ask someone what SQL server they're running, and it's invariably 'SQL Server, duh', when you go 'huh?!' and prompt them, they'll probably reply with 'SQL 7'. Fuckers.

  7. With solid work like this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    Let's make sure BSA gets some legal police powers soon.

  8. Sounds like BSA needs to... by Fallen+Kell · · Score: 0, Funny

    A) Get a life
    B) Hire some real programmers
    C) Spend more time actually doing their job
    D) Figure out a better way to do their job
    E) Change their paradyme from assuming pirating to assuming not
    F) Hire CoyboyNeal to do their dirty work
    G) All of the above

    Well, I leave it up to you guys to figure out what they should do.

    CoyboyNeal anyone?

    --
    We were all warned a long time ago that MS products sucked, remember the Magic 8 Ball said, "Outlook not so good"
    1. Re:Sounds like BSA needs to... by Kadagan+AU · · Score: 1

      Yes! And they can chage their Paradigm while they're at it!

      ~Jon~

      --
      This space for rent, inquire within.
    2. Re:Sounds like BSA needs to... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The BSA needs to be taken to court over this. For instance, next time someone gets a letter like this, don't tell them it's a mistake. Refuse to take the material down. Let them take you to court. Let them lose. Then countersue.

    3. Re:Sounds like BSA needs to... by MarkGriz · · Score: 1

      Hey, cool. Can we make this an offical slashdot poll?

      --
      Beauty is in the eye of the beerholder.
  9. P.E. problem? by JohnnyBigodes · · Score: 0, Funny

    Can anyone say "premature ejaculation"?

  10. At least vigilante retaliation isn't legal yet by lavalyn · · Score: 5, Insightful

    And imagine what the BSA would have loved to do to these servers if they were allowed to hack the offending boxes.

    FTP is a file-sharing protocol, isn't it?

    --
    Doing the Right Thing should not be preempted by making a buck.
    1. Re:At least vigilante retaliation isn't legal yet by Moloch666 · · Score: 1

      Not to nitpick, it's a file transfer protocol. Hence, the acronym FTP.

      --
      Understanding is a three-edged sword. -- Kosh Naranek
    2. Re:At least vigilante retaliation isn't legal yet by Surak · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but the parent poster is trying to make the point that, really, there isn't a whole hill of beans worth of difference between Gnutella, Kazaa, and FTP except for the fact that Gnutella and Kazaa have built-in automated global search capabilities. You could do basically the same thing with ftp search sites...

    3. Re:At least vigilante retaliation isn't legal yet by Moloch666 · · Score: 1

      Your right, I undetstand what the point was now. In that case, FTP is like newsgroups, it has been around early in internet life. Unlike newsgroups it is very widely used for a lot of legit purposes as well. I don't think they will ever take that away from us, hopefully.

      --
      Understanding is a three-edged sword. -- Kosh Naranek
    4. Re:At least vigilante retaliation isn't legal yet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought it meant Fuck The Police, which is a clear reference to its use by underground "Open Source" groups who distribute copyrighted works without charge?

      I'm sure its right, I read it here!

    5. Re:At least vigilante retaliation isn't legal yet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you saying newsgroups are not widely used, or are widely used for illegitimate purposes?

    6. Re:At least vigilante retaliation isn't legal yet by Moloch666 · · Score: 1

      Are you saying newsgroups are not widely used, or are widely used for illegitimate purposes?

      I actually thought about that while typing the previous message, decided it wasn't neccassry... oops.

      I'm implying that newsgroups aren't as widely used when compared to http and ftp as it was in the past. The ratio that is, not actual numbers. I do realize that newsgroups are still widely used though.

      --
      Understanding is a three-edged sword. -- Kosh Naranek
    7. Re:At least vigilante retaliation isn't legal yet by Alsee · · Score: 1

      Unlike newsgroups it is very widely used for a lot of legit purposes as well.

      LOL, yep [sarcasm] those tens of thousands of newsgroups are all "illegit".

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    8. Re:At least vigilante retaliation isn't legal yet by Anonym0us+Cow+Herd · · Score: 1

      except for the fact that Gnutella and Kazaa have built-in automated global search capabilities. You could do basically the same thing with ftp search sites...

      Back in the day, I seem to rember these tools called Archie and Veronica. These were, well basically, search engines. You could search for a file, and it would tell you what FTP site and directory where you could get it.

      --
      The price of freedom is eternal litigation.
    9. Re:At least vigilante retaliation isn't legal yet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      FTP is a file-sharing protocol, isn't it?


      Eh, so is HTTP I think...

    10. Re:At least vigilante retaliation isn't legal yet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The server at the University of Muenster is located at Münster in Westfalen, Germany. So it is under german jurisdiction, and it is government property. A BSA cracker would have been accused of Computersabotage and warrend issued. The next time the person would visit germany or one of the many countries that have a extradicton treaty with germany he would go to jail. IANAL

    11. Re:At least vigilante retaliation isn't legal yet by Moloch666 · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Are you saying newsgroups are not widely used, or are widely used for illegitimate purposes? -- an AC

      I actually thought about that while typing the previous message, decided it wasn't neccassry... oops.

      I'm implying that newsgroups aren't as widely used when compared to http and ftp as it was in the past. The ratio that is, not actual numbers. I do realize that newsgroups are still widely used though.

      --
      Understanding is a three-edged sword. -- Kosh Naranek
    12. Re:At least vigilante retaliation isn't legal yet by sbaker · · Score: 1

      ...and http for that matter.

      --
      www.sjbaker.org
    13. Re:At least vigilante retaliation isn't legal yet by bzzz · · Score: 1

      > FTP is a file-sharing protocol, isn't it?

      with a hidden meaning: F*ck The Police

    14. Re:At least vigilante retaliation isn't legal yet by iabervon · · Score: 1

      They're probably glad they didn't get that law passed, because (I've heard) there were sufficiently drastic consequences for hacking someone who you couldn't prove had violated copyrights. That's why the MPAA isn't still pushing it.

    15. Re:At least vigilante retaliation isn't legal yet by einhverfr · · Score: 2, Interesting

      And imagine what the BSA would have loved to do to these servers if they were allowed to hack the offending boxes.

      FTP is a file-sharing protocol, isn't it?


      You actually have a very interesting point. Lets look at file-sharing protocols and RPC-based protocols for generating and sharing files:
      FTP
      HTTP
      SMTP
      Jabber
      Various proprietary IM systems
      NFS
      AFS
      Etc.

      If the BSA/RIAA/MPAA was allowed to do retaliatory attacks, it would be theoretically possible to attack any site at any time.

      --

      LedgerSMB: Open source Accounting/ERP
    16. Re:At least vigilante retaliation isn't legal yet by glesga_kiss · · Score: 1

      Hmm, in Scotland, it means F*ck the Pope. Ironic, because RFC means "Rangers Football Club", who's supporters will often shout the above slur! ;-)

    17. Re:At least vigilante retaliation isn't legal yet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey meanies, don't mod me down ;(

    18. Re:At least vigilante retaliation isn't legal yet by drivers · · Score: 1
      FTP has an automated global search facility. It's called archie. At least it used to. Interesting... it looks like there is no archie anymore:


      After nine continuous years of service, the Archie Gateway is not functional any more, because working Archie servers do not exist any more.
      I leave the page as it is, since it was one of the first working forms on the Net, programmed in the night the Mosaic Team created the Forms extension to HTML in October 1993. It was one of the first applications to actually return dynamically created Hypertext.

    19. Re:At least vigilante retaliation isn't legal yet by jon787 · · Score: 1

      Chances are the US has an extradition treaty with Germany. Chances are they won't obey it too.

      --
      X(7): A program for managing terminal windows. See also screen(1).
    20. Re:At least vigilante retaliation isn't legal yet by Surak · · Score: 1

      Interesting... it looks like there is no archie anymore

      Now you know why I said that ftp lacks an automated global search facility. ;)

      Ironic that statement from the old archie gateway...I think it was exactly that Forms extension and the subsequential creation of search engines that rendered archie obsolete. :)

    21. Re:At least vigilante retaliation isn't legal yet by sean23007 · · Score: 1

      No, it's a file transferring protocol. Heh. ;)

      --

      Lack of eloquence does not denote lack of intelligence, though they often coincide.
    22. Re:At least vigilante retaliation isn't legal yet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      LOL, yep [sarcasm] those tens of thousands of newsgroups are all "illegit".

      By traffic (and post) volume, yes they are.

    23. Re:At least vigilante retaliation isn't legal yet by CoolQ · · Score: 1

      > Back in the day, I seem to rember these tools called Archie and Veronica. These were, well basically, search engines. You could search for a file, and it would tell you what FTP site and directory where you could get it.

      Not quite. Archie was an FTP search engine, and it is indeed dead. But Veronica was a gopher search engine, and its descendent, Veronica-2 is still alive and kicking.

      Here's a good introduction to Gopher:
      http://gopher.quux.org:70/Software/Gopher

      And here is Veronica-2 itself (running on a mySQL database):
      gopher://gopher.floodgap.com/1/v2

      --Quentin

  11. MS Windows? Money ? by mikeleemm · · Score: 1

    Soon they will be going after anything with Money. Or might as well go after anything Windows.

    1. Re:MS Windows? Money ? by Snork+Asaurus · · Score: 1
      Soon they will be going after anything with Money

      Especially since a big client of the BS Alliance pretty much owns the process of going after anyone with money.

      --
      Sigs are bad for your health.
  12. What IP are they using by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wonder if they can figure out what IP block they are coming from and block them. On the other hand, all my mp3's are now named MSOffice_99.mp3, MSOffice_XP.mp3...

  13. Change the LA for ftp sites by binaryDigit · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I know that some search sites "spider" ftp sites, but couldn't ftp site owners change the license agreements for their sites to disallow the spidering of their site for the explicit purpose of trying to find specific files. In this way the search spiders can still work, but a spider "looking" for anything specifically would not be allowed? I don't know if this type of thing is common in other contexts that may negatively be impacted by such a change though?

    1. Re:Change the LA for ftp sites by Mournblade · · Score: 1

      All you'd have to do to get around that is set up your own, private, search engine. That is, rather than having your spiders searching for a specific file, you have it search for everything, put the info in a db, and search the resulting db for specific files. Technically, you haven't spidered the site for a specific file.

    2. Re:Change the LA for ftp sites by McWilde · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't the legitimate spiders expose their results somewhere? The BSA could simply use one of the search sites for their purposes. If the search is as simple as checking for Office in the filename I would think they already do this.

      --
      Maybe
    3. Re:Change the LA for ftp sites by EvanED · · Score: 1

      How 'bout this? Say that no bots are allowed and that only humans (and other intelligent life forms if you'd like, so your friend from the planet near Betelgeuse can get in) are allowed to log in. Get some OSS ftp server and make the user press enter to accept.

    4. Re:Change the LA for ftp sites by Mournblade · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that would probably work, and Ford would be happy that he could still get the latest version of OOo. But it reduces the usability of the server, don't you think? And to stop the server from being spidered by the BSA? Better to send them a letter back saying "you f**ked up, now leave us alone or we'll sue you" than to go to all the trouble of setting up a new ftp server.

    5. Re:Change the LA for ftp sites by CTho9305 · · Score: 1

      That isn't possible with FTP unless the user is using some commandline app where the user has to enter all the FTP commands.

    6. Re:Change the LA for ftp sites by Manfre · · Score: 1

      Better idea. Give anonymous ftp access only to a readme with a user agreement and a limited account that has a password. If the BSA manages to spider the password out of the agreement file, then they will have violated the allowed use of the site.

    7. Re:Change the LA for ftp sites by Audity · · Score: 1

      They wouldn't have to change their liscence agreements at all. Just deal with the robots.txt file.

      All bots (or spiders or whatever you like to call them) that surf the internet are supposed to check for a file named robots.txt in the root directory of any url (ex: http://slashdot.org/robots.txt). This file contains a list of directories that robots should not visit. If you don't want any bots to see your site just say

      User-Agent : *
      Disallow: /

      See http://www.robotstxt.org/wc/exclusion-admin.html for more information.

    8. Re:Change the LA for ftp sites by Fig,+formerly+A.C. · · Score: 1
      humans (and other intelligent life forms if you'd like

      I don't think that most humans qualify as "intelligent life forms", for that matter.

      --
      Murphy was an optimist.
    9. Re:Change the LA for ftp sites by EvanED · · Score: 1

      It just adds an extra prompt... how 'bout this then:
      present the terms before requesting user/pass and state that by logging in they accept them.

  14. BSA is right by LemurShop · · Score: 3, Funny

    Those damn communists and their "open sores" threaten the good, god loving corporations.

    --

    This sig was cut off by the sla
  15. Do a good deed daily by jmb-d · · Score: 4, Funny

    A German university was accused by the BSA of pirating MS Office, because they mirrored OpenOffice.org. The scripts from the BSA only check for "Office" in the filename and then automatically send out notices to the ftp admins.

    Dadgumit, the Boy Scouts of America have gone too far this time! Back in my day, we helped little old ladies across the street... Now they're policing for pirated software? Sheesh...

    --
    In walking, just walk. In sitting, just sit. Above all, don't wobble.
    -- Yun-Men
    1. Re:Do a good deed daily by Gallifrey · · Score: 1

      How long have you been waiting to use that one? :)

    2. Re:Do a good deed daily by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I used that one like 3 months ago! REDUNDANT!

    3. Re:Do a good deed daily by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Probably as long as you've been waiting to meet a girl. Well okay, not quite that long.....

    4. Re:Do a good deed daily by sbaker · · Score: 1

      Hey - how else are they going to get their Microsoft Lackey badge?

      --
      www.sjbaker.org
    5. Re:Do a good deed daily by Sylver+Dragon · · Score: 1

      What, you hadn't realized that the hitler^H^H^H America's Youth (BSA) was really just an indoctrinization of the youth of the US?

      --
      Necessity is the mother of invention.
      Laziness is the father.
    6. Re:Do a good deed daily by jc42 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Heh, heh; you're right; we've gotta stop those aging Boy Scouts before it's too late ...

      Since this was the second story today of copyright enforcers using file names as evidence of infringement, I've added these names to one of my web directories:

      Barbarian.html
      OpenOffice.html
      SoldierOfFortun e.html

      This should get me some cease-and-desist letters. Can we get a list together of other file names that we should have that will attract their attention? I'll link to all of them. Everyone else should do the same. Maybe we can get this idiocy out into the open. Or even better, into a courtroom.

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
    7. Re:Do a good deed daily by GimmeFuel · · Score: 1

      Better yet, this article makes me want to put up a webpage with links to my FTP server and describes it as having a ton of awesome "free" software. Then I'll have OOo renamed as Office, XFree86 renamed as Max Payne, etc. Stick as readme.txt in that says what the files really are. The BSA scripts might come in searching and report me, but I don't have any actual illegal stuff. Real humans visiting will read the readme and download the renamed software.

    8. Re:Do a good deed daily by jc42 · · Score: 1

      Or even better: Have a primary web page that lists the files by their proper names and describes their actual content. But inside the heyperlink you have the actual file name, which to a BSA scanner will look like a ripped-off MS product. Human visitors won't be confused by the funny file names, but BSA search scripts will.

      Of course, is sounds like this might not be very necessary. After all, they matched a file with a name like OpenOffice*.rpm and thought it was a MS product. Sounds like you don't have to be very tricky to attract their attention.

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
  16. Up for penalty? by Espen · · Score: 5, Interesting

    From the letter:

    BSA represents that the information in this notification is accurate and states, under penalty of perjury, that it is authorized to act in this matter on behalf of the copyright owners listed above.

    So the BSA has perjured itself; now what is the penalty?

    1. Re:Up for penalty? by ketamine-bp · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Actually, they are UP for their penalty. This is because they announced that they are representing the Openoffice.org, but actually they do NOT.

    2. Re:Up for penalty? by Sarcazmo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I think you are parsing that wrong.

      [The BSA] states, under penalty of perjury, that it is authorized to act in this matter on behalf of the copyright owners listed.

      Seperate clause from the first half, I believe.

    3. Re:Up for penalty? by dschuetz · · Score: 5, Interesting

      BSA represents that the information in this notification is accurate and states, under penalty of perjury, that it is authorized to act in this matter on behalf of the copyright owners listed above.

      Ha!

      I'd've spent DAYS scouring every open directory on the aforementioned server, just to verify that no copy of MS-Office was on there, then send them the bill. And use that clause as justification. Run it through court, and you've got a decision against the BSA showing that, at least once, their practices were shoddy and their information unreliable.

      Wouldn't *that* be a great thing for the next recipient of a BSA-extortion-threat to point to?

    4. Re:Up for penalty? by Zathrus · · Score: 1

      And then the judge would throw you out of court and suggest you take a remedial English class so you, too, can understand the use of commas.

    5. Re:Up for penalty? by cgenman · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Hmm... Good questions. Any lawyer know how much the Open Office team can sue the BSA for claiming, under penalty of perjury, they represent them?

      Or, does the Open Office team have to sue the script that sent out this letter?

      (I'm not opposed to people sending out thoughtful, intelligent cease-and-desist letters on a case by case basis. I'm opposed to blanketing legal threats like spam across the world, and taking up other company's time and money instead of doing your job as a lawyer properly. This letter obviously was never seen by a human being until such a time that it was recieved by the school, who like so many other institutions had to take a large chunk of time to investigate the claim. Only piles of money allows the BSA to do such a thing: no smaller company would ever be allowed to get away with flagrantly false legal threats.)

    6. Re:Up for penalty? by frdmfghtr · · Score: 1

      What "copyright owners lised above"?

      I read the post a few times, and couldn't come up with whom they are working on behalf of.

      RE: Unauthorized Distribution of the following copyrighted computer
      >> program(s):
      >>
      >> Microsoft Office

      Could this be the list? I didn't realize that "Microsoft Office" was its own separate business entity. Maybe the Microsoft breakup DID occur and nobody has told anybody about it yet.

      So, after reading this, I come up with two conclusions: (1) The letter could be seen as Microsoft appearing to claim copyright on somebody else's work (i.e. the many contributors to OpenOffice) which wouldn't be new for Microsoft, or (2) The BSA is operating independently of anybody else, and is in itself claiming copyright.

      In any case, the BSA is really starting to make themselves look like a bunch of horse's asses.

      I bet if the economy wasn't in the tank, that you wouldn't be reading about all these patent/copyright violations and ensuing litigation.

      LITIGATION IS NOT A FORM OF INCOME (unless you're a lawyer)

      --
      Government's idea of a balanced budget: take money from the right pocket to balance...oh who am I kidding?
    7. Re:Up for penalty? by Chester+K · · Score: 1

      I think you are parsing that wrong.

      Nope, he's parsing it right. The BSA pretty much said that they're authorized to act on behalf of the copyright owner of the files they asked to be taken down; namely OpenOffice.org.

      I doubt the people at OpenOffice.org have authorized the BSA to act on their behalf. This amounts to perjury and barratry by the BSA. I would so love if someone managed to nail them on this.

      --

      NO CARRIER
    8. Re:Up for penalty? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By my reading, the copyright owners listed above refers to The above computer program(s) ... copyright owner(s). Which, in turn, refers to the OpenOffice application.

      So, as I read it, they just claimed, under penalty of perjury, that they represent the OpenOffice copyright owner(s).

    9. Re:Up for penalty? by Anonym0us+Cow+Herd · · Score: 1

      I don't think they listed OpenOffice.org as one of the copyright owners they represent.

      --
      The price of freedom is eternal litigation.
    10. Re:Up for penalty? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Commas? What about appostrophes? I'd've? jeez

    11. Re:Up for penalty? by Sarcazmo · · Score: 2, Informative

      The are authorized to act on behalf of the copyright holders listed above i.e., MS.

    12. Re:Up for penalty? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Offtopic:
      I was just as surprised as you, but I looked it up, and it's a completely valid double contraction.

      I've used it in speech before, but I've never seen it written.

      I'd've = I would have

    13. Re:Up for penalty? by CowboyMeal · · Score: 1

      The C&D letter never lists Microsoft specifically as the copyright owner, it just lists that Microsoft Office is being pirated.

      --
      Your credit card information wants to be free.
    14. Re:Up for penalty? by ichimunki · · Score: 1

      Since the files they list as infringing are clearly OpenOffice as distributed by Mandrake, I'd say they are misrepresenting themselves-- as an organization with a clue, that is. Further, since when is a Cease & Desist actually admissable/enforceable/anything else when sent via email? Is this unique to Europe or did I sleep through that class? Don't C&Ds normally need to have some semblence of evidence of proof of delivery, like what is required for summons?

      --
      I do not have a signature
    15. Re:Up for penalty? by hoggy · · Score: 1

      Hmm... Good questions. Any lawyer know how much the Open Office team can sue the BSA for claiming, under penalty of perjury, they represent them?

      They were claiming to act for the copyright holders of "Microsoft Office". I think you'll find the original letter says:

      RE: Unauthorized Distribution of the following copyrighted computer
      program(s):

      Microsoft Office


      The only reference to OpenOffice in this letter is in the filenames of the supposed "infringing content". The mistake on their part was in mistaking the files for Microsoft Office, not in mistakingly believing they represent OpenOffice.org.

      This whole "let's sue the BSA for perjury" is all very amusing, but it wouldn't stand up longer than a carefully balanced cocktail stick being pissed on.

    16. Re:Up for penalty? by Mitreya · · Score: 1
      And who is going to charge that penalty? The government? The German University perhaps? You?

      Problem is that I know that I am going to pay if they DO find something, or at least concentrate enough attention to me. But are they going to pay if they needlessly harass me? I think not.

    17. Re:Up for penalty? by kirkjobsluder · · Score: 1

      Actually, no they have not. Part of the definition of perjury is not only that the statement was false, but that the witness knew the statement was false and intended to mislead the court. (Source The 'Lectric Law Library). While the statements are technically false, there apparently is no intent to mislead anyone, the BSA admitted a mistake, and offered remedial actions to change future behavior. Courts deal with clerical errors all the time.

    18. Re:Up for penalty? by fwoomer · · Score: 1

      Umm... guys. I think you're reading this wrong:

      BSA represents that the information in this notification is accurate and states, under penalty of perjury, that it is authorized to act in this matter on behalf of the copyright owners listed above. (emphasis mine)

      They're only stating that they're authorized to act. They are not asserting that their accusations of piracy are correct. They probably really are authorized to act.

    19. Re:Up for penalty? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A taxpayer provided office and security in Harlem.

    20. Re:Up for penalty? by bubbha · · Score: 1

      I'm not a lawyer but it seems to me that if the BSA is working on behalf of the "copyright owners listed above" then the University should sue the "copyright owners listed above" not the BSA. It's up to the "copyright owners listed above" to sue the BSA.

      --
      I want to be alone with the sandwich
    21. Re:Up for penalty? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unfortunately the actual email the BSA sent stated exactly what files had set off their alarms. They never told you to spend days searching for files that don't exist, so there's no way they'll pay for that time.

      From the letter:
      What was located as infringing content:

      Filename: /mandrake_current/SRPMS/OpenOffice.org-1.0.1-9mdk. src.rpm
      (199,643kb)
      Filename: /mandrake_current/i586/Mandrake/RPMS/OpenOffice.or g-libs-1.0.1-9mdk.i586.rpm
      (35,444kb)

      The above computer program(s) is/are being made available for copying,
      through downloading, at the above location without authorization from the
      copyright owner(s).


      On the other hand, if you want to delete the offending files by melting down the platters (that's the only way to completely destroy data, right?) and replacing them with a 2TB RAID array, and bill the BSA for time and equipment, you might have a little more luck. Even better if the files are stored on some ancient disk type (8" floppy-based file server anyone?), and no replacements are sold or even exist, and your network is somehow utterly dependant on said file server/ancient disk drive, forcing you to completely replace your network to comply with the BSA's demands.
      Actually, that's all probably unbillable too, since if the BSA's wrong and you're not infringing any copyrights nobody is forcing you to do anything, but it sounded good/funny when I wrote it.

    22. Re:Up for penalty? by dildatron · · Score: 1

      You can only sue for famages. They would have to somehow prove, in dollars, how they were damaged by this. You can't just sue someone because you think what they did was wrong - you have to be damaged by their actions.

      --


      If you had nuts on your chin, would they be chin nuts?
    23. Re:Up for penalty? by ShinmaWa · · Score: 1

      The C&D letter never lists Microsoft specifically as the copyright owner, it just lists that Microsoft Office is being pirated.

      Nor do they specifically list OpenOffice.org as the copyright holder.

      In fact, OpenOffice.org is not mentioned anywhere in the C&D letter at all. Microsoft, however, is.

      It seems very obvious to me that the C&D letter claims, under the penalty of perjury, that they are acting on behalf of Microsoft -- which they are.

      They have not committed perjury, IMHO.

      --
      The /. Effect: Thousands of users simultaneously accessing a site to not read its content.
    24. Re:Up for penalty? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wether you like it or not, apostrophes can be used to replace any amount of letters in any word(s), as many times as you like. M'ch'r is a perfectly valid way to write Manchester, for example, and is seen on many road signs in England.

      You can create all sorts of neat contractions like that, for ex'e'sl't'su's.

    25. Re:Up for penalty? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      They have not committed perjury, IMHO.

      They also claimed that the information given was accurate (i.e. a copy of MS Office was being offered), but it wasn't, and it's obvious no human even looked at this. They probably are guilty of perjury, but somebody would need to sue them to prove this (could the owner of the FTP site sue, or can only the government sue for perjury?).

    26. Re:Up for penalty? by ShinmaWa · · Score: 1

      They also claimed that the information given was accurate (i.e. a copy of MS Office was being offered), but it wasn't, and it's obvious no human even looked at this. They probably are guilty of perjury, but somebody would need to sue them to prove this (could the owner of the FTP site sue, or can only the government sue for perjury?).

      Re-read what they said. There are TWO statements there and perjury only applies to the SECOND of the two. The two statements are:

      1) The information they provided is accurate. This is false, and so is a lot of other things they claimed in their letter. However, they didn't say this under "pentalty of perjury". They didn't apply that "oath" until --

      2) They assert, under penalty of perjury, they are working under the copyright holder of Microsoft Office. This is true.

      --
      The /. Effect: Thousands of users simultaneously accessing a site to not read its content.
    27. Re:Up for penalty? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      fourth time
      get a clue
      they are not claiming to represent OO

      they are claiming to represent MS

      basic reading/grammar skills are vital in todays world. please catch up.

    28. Re:Up for penalty? by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

      However, they have violated the DMCA by failing to verify that the file they are demanding be taken down is in fact an unauthorized copy of a work owned by one of their customers. They will never be prosecuted, though, no matter how many times they do this.

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
  17. Could this be ... by Draoi · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ... a sneaky way for MS to hit OpenOffice by threatening mirror servers with legal action? The SysOp at uni.Muenster wasn't sure whether he was on shaky legal grounds or not. If the name OpenOffice gets any way muddied, people would turn off it. In short - more FUD.

    --
    Alison

    "It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education." - Albert Einstein

    1. Re:Could this be ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I get the impression this is actually just a sneaky way for MS to hit OpenOffice with free publicity, and make a bunch of people say, "OpenOffice, what's that?"

    2. Re:Could this be ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The name is OpenOffice.org though

  18. Guilty of Perjury by weave · · Score: 3, Interesting
    They should be sued...

    BSA represents that the information in this notification is accurate and states, under penalty of perjury, that it is authorized to act in this matter on behalf of the copyright owners listed above.

    And how is this different in truth from the common statement "You are receiving this message because you opted-in to our marketing list to receive special offers."

    1. Re:Guilty of Perjury by 91degrees · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Probably not perjury. They didn't check at all, so didn't know they were wrong.

      Nevertheless, adding this seems to be a formality. I'd love to see someone prosecuted on that line just to force lawyers to think about how inimidating sending a letter is.

    2. Re:Guilty of Perjury by TheMidget · · Score: 4, Interesting

      OpenOffice should sue for "unlauterer Wettbewerb". A competitor of theirs is using scare tactics to dissuade people from distributing OpenOffice. It's as if Burger King employees disguised as FDA inspectors raided a Mac Donald, showed phony badges, and told all customers standing in line that the hamburgers were infested with salmonella...

    3. Re:Guilty of Perjury by roca · · Score: 1

      If they didn't check, they shouldn't make statements like that.

      Having made such statements, they should be held accountable.

      You can't just go into a court and make up your testimony and then, when you get caught, say "oops, I didn't check".

      However, Sun is the copyright holder for OpenOffice, and I suspect that Sun is a BSA member. Therefore technically it's true that the BSA is authorized to act on behalf of the OpenOffice copyright holders. Unfortunately then, they escape a perjury charge this time.

      I wonder if the statement "The BSA represents that the information in this notification is accurate" carries any legal weight, though. They should be slapped for that.

    4. Re:Guilty of Perjury by iworm · · Score: 1

      OpenOffice != StarOffice

    5. Re:Guilty of Perjury by moncyb · · Score: 1

      Sun is the copyright holder for OpenOffice, and I suspect that Sun is a BSA member.

      Funny, I didn't see them on the list. Are they a silent member?

    6. Re:Guilty of Perjury by n-baxley · · Score: 0

      It is nothing like that at all!! You're spreading more FUD than BSA could possibly due with their letters.
      1) BSA did not impersonate anyone or show any signs of pretending to be a government agency.
      2) They did not say that anything was wrong with the files, they only said that they owened them.
      3) You're a dufus.

    7. Re:Guilty of Perjury by moncyb · · Score: 1

      Sued? I thought perjury lands one in jail?

    8. Re:Guilty of Perjury by TheMidget · · Score: 4, Informative
      1) BSA did not impersonate anyone or show any signs of pretending to be a government agency.

      BSA did impersonate the owners of OpenOffice. And BSA likes to portray themselves as an organisation that has para-governmental rights (such as forcefully searching companies' premises).

      2) They did not say that anything was wrong with the files, they only said that they owened them.

      They said it was wrong to have the files on the ftp server...

      3) You're a dufus.

      Thanks. Same to you!

    9. Re:Guilty of Perjury by chrylis · · Score: 1

      It depends. It lands normal citizens in jail and wealthy ones in office.

    10. Re:Guilty of Perjury by roca · · Score: 1

      True, but OpenOffice contributors must assign copyright to Sun.

    11. Re:Guilty of Perjury by iworm · · Score: 1

      Fair point, but I thought it was more along the lines of having to share copyright with Sun, rather than handing it over and in some way losing it?

    12. Re:Guilty of Perjury by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd be willing to donate $$$ to the Open Office folks if they chose to do battle with the BS Alliance.

  19. This beggars belief by Hittite+Creosote · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Excerpt from the BSA email...
    Filename: /mandrake_current/SRPMS/OpenOffice.org-1.0.1-9mdk. src.rpm
    The above computer program(s) is/are being made available for copying, through downloading, at the above location without authorization from the copyright owner(s).

    It seems almost astonishing that even the BSA can be as utterly incompetent as this (does BSA stand for Bloody Stupid Alliance?). Unless you go for the conspiracy theory that they're deliberately hassling their clients rivals...

    1. Re:This beggars belief by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't this statement a libel of the copyright owners?

    2. Re:This beggars belief by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      nope - Bloody Stupid Assholes

  20. This is almost funny..... by curtisk · · Score: 1
    How much more generalizing can you be? Makes you wonder exactly what strings they search under....that would be a interesting list, dontcha think?

    At least they were quick to admit the mistake and quick to speak of correcting it, which would make sense, otherwise they would be doing not much more than pissing off admins everywhere

    Yeah, I see alot of pranksters naming files this weekend.... LOL
    KARMA BURRRNNN
    --

    Sehr geehrter Toilettenbenutzer!

    1. Re:This is almost funny..... by Hittite+Creosote · · Score: 1, Funny

      Well, look at the filename - it contained
      SRPMS/OpenOffice
      Look it contains 'MS' and 'Office'! Just ignore the '/Open' bit inbetween and send off the letters!

  21. Yeah... by mschoolbus · · Score: 1

    The damn troup leader actually comes to my door! We didn't do these type of things when I was in boy scouts! =P

    1. Re:Yeah... by Reziac · · Score: 1

      It's just like spam. If nobody bought their cookies, it wouldn't happen! ;)

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  22. 50 million people download OpenOffice by monkey_tennis · · Score: 5, Funny

    Quote: "As you know, illegal on-line activities can result in 50 million people on the Internet accessing and downloading a copyrighted product worldwide without authorization - a highly damaging activity for the copyright holder."

    Well I suppose 50 million people downloading OpenOffice would damage Microsoft's Office sales :)

    1. Re:50 million people download OpenOffice by jamesangel · · Score: 1

      And of course, 50 million people downloading Microsoft Office would be highly damaging to MS's image!

    2. Re:50 million people download OpenOffice by Swaffs · · Score: 2, Informative

      50 million people, eh?

      A friend of mine says his MS Office 2K Pro cd has 506 megs of data on it.

      506 megs x 50 million downloads = 25,300,000,000 MB transfered.

      25,300,000,000MB / 1,048,576MB/TB = 24,100 terabytes of data transfered.

      I would like to know what pirate can afford to transfer 24,100 terabytes of data.

      I guess that whole 50 million people bit was just bullshit.

      --

      --
      "Karma can only be portioned out by the cosmos." - Homer Simpson [1F10]

  23. ha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wonder if they even check to make sure
    the file is >100MB. I mean, a 6MB MP3 file
    named OfficeSucks.MP3 surely can't be a pirated
    copy of office

  24. Time for a witch hunt! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Please form two lines, right line collect your pitchforks, left line collect your torches!

    two, four, six, eight who is evil?
    BSA and MS!
    two, four, six, eight, what are we going to do?
    Burn them!

  25. Disturbing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    What is perhaps more disturbing is that the script logs into an anonymous FTP site using the password "guest@nowhere.com". The site allows anonymous access only if you provide YOUR EMAIL ADDRESS as the password. guest@nowhere.com is not the email address of anyone at the BSA. The BSA therefore ILLEGALLY ACCESSED that ftp site and should be taken to court for COMPUTER HACKING.

    1. Re:Disturbing by program21 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Hacking, as well as perjury for this statement:
      "BSA represents that the information in this notification is accurate and states, under penalty of perjury, that it is authorized to act in this matter on behalf of the copyright owners listed above."

      Unless OpenOffice authorized the BSA to do that, then it's perjury, by their own statement.

      --
      This has been a test. Had this been a real emergency, we would have fled in terror and you would not have been informed.
    2. Re:Disturbing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So why not have your FTP servers check for "guest@nowhere.com" and reject the attempt? In fact, why not just block their entire IP range?

  26. Hey you stole my joke... by Monofilament · · Score: 2, Funny

    Hey you stole my joke :)... I can forgive you.. i love that joke.. and I'm glad others think of it..

    Here's my post.

    Ha beat you to it.. but seems nobody noticed mine :P

    --


    Who makes you Sig?
  27. Slashdot to be sued by worst_name_ever · · Score: 3, Funny
    Dear Sir/Madam,

    As president of Ashdo Software Inc., I take software piracy very seriously. Recently, the sophisticated scanning software of the Business Software Alliance has detected that your website "www.slashdot.org" is most certainly hosting and distributing illegally-obtained copies of proprietary Ashdo programs. You are hereby ordered to cease and desist the above activities, which I'm sure are also in violation of the DMCA in some way or another.

    Sincerely,
    Hiram Ashdo
    President, Ashdo Software Inc.
    cc: BSA

    --

    In Soviet Rush, today's Tom Sawyer gets high on you.
    1. Re:Slashdot to be sued by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nice one hehe, took me two reads to get the joke, but hey thats why I'm Anonymous ya know =)>

  28. invalid e-mail address? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    From the BSA letter in the article:
    >> FTP Login Name: anonymous
    >> FTP Login Password: guest@nowhere.com


    Hmm. Using a spoofed (or at least, invalid) e-mail address?
    As most FTP servers allow anonymous access if you "Please provide e-mail address as password", I'd call that gaining access under false pretences. Is the BSA representing those same companies that get so pissy when people (for privacy reasons) use spoofed details on web "please register" forms?
    If they can do it, so can we. I won't feel so guilty - not that I did anyway - next time I install software and register it to "nobody@mindyourownbusiness.com"..

    1. Re:invalid e-mail address? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're supposed to register with "piracy@bsa.com" or "abuse@microsoft.com".

    2. Re:invalid e-mail address? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Speaking of which, let's sign dmca@bsa.com up for a load of spam. Those morons even put nospam in their FROM field - bwuhahahahaha much good that'll do them

    3. Re:invalid e-mail address? by spacefight · · Score: 1

      Sysadmins all over the world: check your ftp logs for guest@nowhere.com as it seems it isn't widely used beside the BSAs crawler...

    4. Re:invalid e-mail address? by LetterJ · · Score: 1

      I frequently register software under the name Nonna Urbixness. Gets past pretty much every filter set up and isn't obvious until you try to pronounce it.

    5. Re:invalid e-mail address? by schon · · Score: 1

      I frequently register software under the name Nonna Urbixness.

      My fave is "Nunya Bidnes" for pretty much the same reason :o)

    6. Re:invalid e-mail address? by sbaker · · Score: 1

      It's irrelvent whether it's commonly done or not. Driving over the speed limit is commonly done - and I still get a ticket when I get caught.

      --
      www.sjbaker.org
    7. Re:invalid e-mail address? by spacefight · · Score: 1

      I wanted to point out that it might be easy to check if you've been scanned by them - no matter if it's legal or not, just for your knowledge.

    8. Re:invalid e-mail address? by stephenbooth · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Apparently nowhere.com belongs to an artist by the name of Nick Phillip. It seems that he has hooked it up to a bank of fax machines to print out the mail bounces that get sent to it due to spammers using that domain name for their return email addrees.

      Perhaps someone should contact him and suggest that he sue the BSA for attempted identity theft?

      Stephen

      --
      "Don't write down to your readers, the only people less intelligent than you can't read" - Sign on Newspaper Office Wall
    9. Re:invalid e-mail address? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Using a spoofed (or at least, invalid) e-mail address?

      Oh, like you've never done that...

    10. Re:invalid e-mail address? by tankrshr77 · · Score: 1

      interesting, mod this up!

    11. Re:invalid e-mail address? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Domain Name: NOWHERE.COM
      Registrar: TUCOWS, INC.
      Whois Server: whois.opensrs.net
      Referral URL: http://www.opensrs.org
      Name Server: NS19A.NAMESERVERS.NET
      Name Server: NS19B.NAMESERVERS.NET
      Status: ACTIVE
      Updated Date: 04-jan-2002
      Creation Date: 21-dec-1994
      Expiration Date: 22-dec-2007

      >>> Last update of whois database: Fri, 28 Feb 2003 05:46:32 EST

      NOTICE: The expiration date displayed in this record is the date the
      registrar's sponsorship of the domain name registration in the registry is
      currently set to expire. This date does not necessarily reflect the expiration
      date of the domain name registrant's agreement with the sponsoring
      registrar. Users may consult the sponsoring registrar's Whois database to
      view the registrar's reported date of expiration for this registration.

      TERMS OF USE: You are not authorized to access or query our Whois
      database through the use of electronic processes that are high-volume and
      automated except as reasonably necessary to register domain names or
      modify existing registrations; the Data in VeriSign Global Registry
      Services' ("VeriSign") Whois database is provided by VeriSign for
      information purposes only, and to assist persons in obtaining information
      about or related to a domain name registration record. VeriSign does not
      guarantee its accuracy. By submitting a Whois query, you agree to abide
      by the following terms of use: You agree that you may use this Data only
      for lawful purposes and that under no circumstances will you use this Data
      to: (1) allow, enable, or otherwise support the transmission of mass
      unsolicited, commercial advertising or solicitations via e-mail, telephone,
      or facsimile; or (2) enable high volume, automated, electronic processes
      that apply to VeriSign (or its computer systems). The compilation,
      repackaging, dissemination or other use of this Data is expressly
      prohibited without the prior written consent of VeriSign. You agree not to
      use electronic processes that are automated and high-volume to access or
      query the Whois database except as reasonably necessary to register
      domain names or modify existing registrations. VeriSign reserves the right
      to restrict your access to the Whois database in its sole discretion to ensure
      operational stability. VeriSign may restrict or terminate your access to the
      Whois database for failure to abide by these terms of use. VeriSign
      reserves the right to modify these terms at any time.

      The Registry database contains ONLY .COM, .NET, .EDU domains and
      Registrars.

      Found crsnic referral to whois.opensrs.net.

      Registrant:
      Lisa Seaman
      1621 Haight Street
      Apt 26
      San Francisco, CA 94117
      US

      Domain name: NOWHERE.COM

      Administrative Contact:
      Seaman, Lisa ThinkAboutItForASecond@yahoo.com
      1621 Haight Street
      Apt 26
      San Francisco, CA 94117
      US
      415 533 4619
      Technical Contact:
      Seaman, Ted ItIsYouWhoAreMistaken@yahoo.com
      1621 Haight Street
      Apt 26
      San Francisco, CA 94117
      US
      415 533 4619

    12. Re:invalid e-mail address? by Erasmus+Darwin · · Score: 2, Informative
      "next time I install software and register it to "nobody@mindyourownbusiness.com".."

      Rather than indirectly harassing the innocent third-party that runs mindyourownbusiness.com, you're better off using an address the ends in example.com. That domain is guaranteed to always be invalid.

    13. Re:invalid e-mail address? by londenberg · · Score: 1

      My favorite fake address is

      not@telling.com

    14. Re:invalid e-mail address? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or hotline@mpaa.org

    15. Re:invalid e-mail address? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Rather than indirectly harassing the innocent third-party that runs mindyourownbusiness.com, you're better off using an address the ends in example.com. That domain is guaranteed to always be invalid.

      Or just use anything in the .invalid TLD, which is also, (surprise!) guarenteed to be invalid. For example, use erasmus@darwin.invalid. What fun!

    16. Re:invalid e-mail address? by zurab · · Score: 1

      Hmm. Using a spoofed (or at least, invalid) e-mail address?
      As most FTP servers allow anonymous access if you "Please provide e-mail address as password", I'd call that gaining access under false pretences.


      I wonder if anyone has implemented such a feature where anonymous FTP access is gained after e-mail has been verified? Like those for some account registration - server sends an e-mail to the supplied e-mail address and gives a random username/password valid for first login, say, next 30 minutes. Somewhat inconvenient but could cut down on abuse such as this one by BSA.

      Well, at least they would have to give their e-mail address, and in that e-mail you could specify that by logging in user agrees to use this service for such and such purpose, any abuse is strictly prohibited and may result in abuser responsible for bandwidth and related fees. In the U.S., you could even throw in a DMCA threat.

      IANAL and maybe I'm on the wrong track here.

    17. Re:invalid e-mail address? by juan2074 · · Score: 1

      Last name Seaman? Right!

    18. Re:invalid e-mail address? by green1 · · Score: 1

      I used to register things with the email address not@chance but too many scripts started checking for that "." so I made it not@bloody.likely unfortunatly, it seems most scripts now check the tld to make sure it is valid (and a surprising number check the domain itself as well) so basically you have to decide who you want them to spam... because spamming an invalid domain isn't always an option anymore...

    19. Re:invalid e-mail address? by mbstone · · Score: 1

      "By logging into, or using, our FTP site you hereby certify to the truthfulness and accuracy of your FTP login name and password under penalty of perjury under the laws of [FTP site state or jurisidiction]. Clicking on the "OK" button below shall constitute your electronic signature under the Electronic Signatures in Global and National Commerce Act (P.L. 106-229) and your acceptance of the above terms."

  29. Harrass them right back! by Thud457 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Send them a bill for the bandwith used.
    Then take them to small claims court when they don't pay!

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    1. Re:Harrass them right back! by gmuslera · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Sue them for diffamation. In some moment they should learn that accussing someone for things nobody did have a cost (at least a generous salary for the one that had to check their affirmation, administrative costs, etc).

      Terrorists don't have to send bombs around to spread terror and cause economic chaos... just mail in the name of BSA letters to all companies that inform that illegal software was detected in their systems and next week will go a team to check licenses, and billons of dollars will be lost.

      In fact, I think BSA is fitting very well in the "terrorist" definition, could US army invade them to avoid further damage?

    2. Re:Harrass them right back! by lfourrier · · Score: 4, Interesting

      not for defamation, for perjury:

      from the mail :
      BSA represents that the information in this
      notification is accurate and states, under penalty of perjury, that it is
      authorized to act in this matter on behalf of the copyright owners listed
      above.

      they (BSA) obviously played it very softly(apologies and thanks), cause they feel a little weak on this one.

    3. Re:Harrass them right back! by Aquitaine · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It is stating under penalty of perjury that it has the authority to act on behalf of Joe Bob Copyright holder. Not that you have broken the law. That's like suing the prosecution for perjury during your trial because you think they're lying.

      Seems like a very simple misunderstanding. Like it or not, the BSA exists, and is full of people who are trying to do their jobs. If it were you, tell me that the notion of a net spider wouldn't appeal to you.

    4. Re:Harrass them right back! by lfourrier · · Score: 1

      It is stating under penalty of perjury that it has the authority to act on behalf of Joe Bob Copyright holder for preventing you to provide open office. It is an obvious lie.

    5. Re:Harrass them right back! by Marc2k · · Score: 4, Insightful

      A net spider would appeal to me, but you can be damn sure i wouldn't be mailing out legal threats the moment the spider caught the word "office" in the filenames. Why wouldn't they just plop the server name and file name into a database where human eyes can check it out before mailing threats?

      --
      --- What
    6. Re:Harrass them right back! by sbaker · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yeah - but at least I'd have my software check some checksums on the allegedly pirated files - then have a human go check them out BEFORE mailing out threatening letters.

      This sort of harassment needs to stop.

      The problem is that it's cheaper to send out a threatening letter than to check carefully and THEN send letters only to true offenders. You just bet that 99% of recipients will stop doing whatever it is you suspect them of - which makes it a cost-effective way to work. The BSA doesn't have these people as customers - so what does it care if it pisses them off?

      I suppose, what the world needs is a law to say that if you send someone a letter threatening legal action if they don't do something - then if they don't do it, you should be REQUIRED to take them to court - and to be liable for their costs, pain & suffering, mental anguish, etc, etc if they turn out to be innocent.

      --
      www.sjbaker.org
    7. Re:Harrass them right back! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is stating under penalty of perjury that it has the authority to act on behalf of Joe Bob Copyright holder. Not that you have broken the law. That's like suing the prosecution for perjury during your trial because you think they're lying.

      Happens all the time, it's called prosecutorial misconduct and it's grounds for an appeal.

    8. Re:Harrass them right back! by danoatvulaw · · Score: 1
      Sue them for diffamation. In some moment they should learn that accussing someone for things nobody did have a cost (at least a generous salary for the one that had to check their affirmation, administrative costs, etc).


      Would be a nice idea, wouldn't it? However, you can't. A defamation action requires a false statement of fact, published to a third party. It's a tort based around your loss of reputation in the community.

      Cease and Desist letters are perfectly legal, and are used all the time. Now, please don't think that I condone the BSA's strongarm tactics, but sending out a letter "asking" someone to comply if they are already not is a cheap way to say "hey, we know, or truly think you are doing x, so please dont do it anymore or we'll be forced to take additional action." If you're not doing what they say you are, ignore it. Let them try and bring an action. No reasonable organization would bring suit without any evidence of wrongdoing.
    9. Re:Harrass them right back! by Citizen+of+Earth · · Score: 1

      BSA represents that the information in this notification is accurate and states, under penalty if perjury, that it is authorized to act in this matter on behalf of the copyright owners listed above.

      "Perjury"? "Corporate Fraud" has so much more buzzword appeal.

    10. Re:Harrass them right back! by lfourrier · · Score: 1

      yes, but the legalese of the bsa email seems (from memory) directly extracted from the dcma

    11. Re:Harrass them right back! by Alien+Being · · Score: 1

      "billons of dollars"

      The courts assign dollar values to wrongful death suits. "His life was worth $5million", or whatever.

      So when I hear about corporations stealing/extorting billions, I equate them with mass murderers.

      "Sure Mr. BSA guy, you can look at my computer. Plop your ass right down in this, uh, heated seat."

    12. Re:Harrass them right back! by muffen · · Score: 1

      Yeah - but at least I'd have my software check some checksums on the allegedly pirated files - then have a human go check them out BEFORE mailing out threatening letters.

      This is probably more difficult than you think. If we asume that the checksum will be MD5's, you would need MD5's for every version of office in every language, compressed with every major compression utility. Right there you have a few thousand MD5 sums. On top of that, a one byte change will cause the MD5's to not "hit".

      I do agree that more checks should be required before sending out emails such as this one (a human actually checking the files quickly would be nice), but the idea of spidering the web for illegal software is not a bad one in itself. I get atleast 5 search engine hits a day to my website, One hit extra a month (or however often it may be) will not make any difference in my cost for keeping the site up.

      In the end, pirated software is illegal. Wether people like to use it or not because of the cost factor should be disregarded. Would the software industry be better off without the BSA? Probably not.

      Having that said, I must add that I am no saint myself, and I don't really like the BSA. But after thinking about it for a while, I do understand what they are trying to accomplish, and why.

    13. Re:Harrass them right back! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      could US army invade them to avoid further damage?

      Do you have evidence that the BSA has used chemical and biological warfare? Have they conducted lethal tests on hundreds of civillian death row prisoners with said biologica/chemical warfare agents?

      Have they broken international law to that degree? Do they have a serious Human Rights problem? Further (and this one is important), does the liberal wing of the Civil Liberties community change the subject when these abuses come up?

    14. Re:Harrass them right back! by Lonath · · Score: 1

      That's what I think they should have done with those energy companies that purposely blacked out California a few years ago. Go through all accident/death reports from that time period, and find any and all deaths and/or injuries that could have been caused by the lack of power, and then haul every person from the lowly operator who flipped the switches up to the highest execs who oversaw this abuse into court and charge each of them with premeditated murder or assault for every one of the cases where someone died or was injured.

    15. Re:Harrass them right back! by mmol_6453 · · Score: 1

      Not to mention the possibility that there may be extra data (viruses, etc.) included in the compressed image.

      <joke>
      And have you tried to get a utility that compressed using the same algorithm as gzip? They're all free (as in speech)!. Using stuff like that has got to be worth a reprimand or demotion in an organization like the BSA.
      </joke>

      --
      What's this Submit thingy do?
    16. Re:Harrass them right back! by jbolden · · Score: 1

      No for preventing you from providing Microsoft Office. Being an idiot and getting confused is not the same as perjury. Stupidity is not a crime.

    17. Re:Harrass them right back! by jcast · · Score: 1
      --
      There are reasons why democracy does not work nearly as well as capitalism.
      -- David D. Friedman
    18. Re:Harrass them right back! by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 1
      I suppose, what the world needs is a law to say that if you send someone a letter threatening legal action if they don't do something - then if they don't do it, you should be REQUIRED to take them to court - and to be liable for their costs, pain & suffering, mental anguish, etc, etc if they turn out to be innocent.

      If you think about it, there are already many laws against gaining an advantage via menaces in most places. Things like harrassment, racketeering, blackmail and libel are of dubious legality almost everywhere. What it takes is for them to make one big mistake against someone with the legal might to hit them back with a test case that sets a sufficient precedent, so all the little people can queue right up behind and sue the **** out of them based on that same precedent.

      Of course, it helps if, like the UK, the loser of a court case typically winds up paying the costs of both sides. That means if someone really hasn't got a case against you and you know it, you can call their bluff, and it actually costs them money to look stupid, while costing you nothing but a little time. Alas, I gather the US legal system does not work this way; perhaps it should...

      --
      If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
    19. Re:Harrass them right back! by Alien+Being · · Score: 1

      >premeditated murder

      2nd degree probably, depraved indifference.

      I was thinking of the money they (Enron) stole from their employees, and that even though they didn't murder anyone, the overall human damage ranks right up there with a mass murderer.

      Thank you for reminding me of one of the other effects of their depravity.

    20. Re:Harrass them right back! by MrNemesis · · Score: 0

      Personally I'd wait until they shut down the server, and then sue them for lack of savings.

      "Dear BSA

      Following the illegal shutdown of our FTP mirror server resulting in 4 months downtime whilst we made you look like idiots in court, we regret to inform you that our valued customers have requested us proceed with a claim for needless expenses on their behalf.

      Our product, of which by now you will almost certainly be aware, is usually downloaded approximately 800 times a month from this server. Since the use of OpenOffice.org saves the user approximately $300US that would otherwise be spent on MS Office [TM, R, C], you have seemingly cost our collective users roughly $1million US (including interest).

      We would appreciate a prompt payment, preferably in cash.

      Sincerely;

      All the staff at OpenOffice.org"

      --
      Moderation Total: -1 Troll, +3 Goat
    21. Re:Harrass them right back! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wait. I thought it was illegal to threaten legal action and not do anything: I believe it's called "barratry."

    22. Re:Harrass them right back! by timeOday · · Score: 1
      We all know a defamation suit isn't going to happen, or to succeed.

      Too bad we can't figure out an effective way to blacklist them though. Basically hang out a "you're not welcome" sign. Oh, sure, they could get new ip addresses sooner or later, but it would be a fitting gesture nonetheless.

    23. Re:Harrass them right back! by Vulture_ · · Score: 2, Funny
      Stupidity is not a crime.
      Damn shame, too...
      --

      The only way the typical /.er can pick up a chick is with a forklift. -- AC

    24. Re:Harrass them right back! by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      This is probably more difficult than you think. If we asume that the checksum will be MD5's, you would need MD5's for every version of office in every language, compressed with every major compression utility. Right there you have a few thousand MD5 sums. On top of that, a one byte change will cause the MD5's to not "hit".

      So download a couple files and check the contents. That cuts the number of versions considerably.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    25. Re:Harrass them right back! by Blkdeath · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Send them a bill for the bandwith used.
      Then take them to small claims court when they don't pay!

      I suppose, then, that I should also send a similar bill to Google, Ask Jeeves (Taeoma), and all the other web search engines that hit my site every day, hmm?

      They provide an open, anonymous FTP service. People are more than free to connect and browse the site. It's implied by leaving the port, and access to the service on the port, open and freely available.

      And no, it's not like a wicker basket, a convenience store, arcade, car dealership, household, tea party, donut shop, sheep farm, or anything else. It is running an openly accessible file service to the global Internet. Period.

      Want to see what it looks like when you don't run an anonymous FTP server?

      Feb 27 07:42:44 zeus proftpd[6051]: zeus.snerk.org (65.163.236.131[65.163.236.131]) - FTP session opened.
      Feb 27 07:42:45 zeus proftpd[6051]: zeus.snerk.org (65.163.236.131[65.163.236.131]) - no such user 'anonymous@ftp.adobe.com'
      Feb 27 07:42:45 zeus proftpd[6051]: zeus.snerk.org (65.163.236.131[65.163.236.131]) - USER anonymous@ftp.adobe.com: no such user found from 65.163.236.131 [65.163.236.131] to 64.56.236.215:21
      Feb 27 07:42:46 zeus proftpd[6051]: zeus.snerk.org (65.163.236.131[65.163.236.131]) - FTP session closed.
      Feb 27 13:32:51 zeus proftpd[19433]: zeus.snerk.org (61.21.160.185[61.21.160.185]) - FTP session opened.
      Feb 27 13:32:51 zeus proftpd[19433]: zeus.snerk.org (61.21.160.185[61.21.160.185]) - FTP session closed.
      Feb 27 13:33:35 zeus proftpd[19436]: zeus.snerk.org (61-21-160-185.home.ne.jp[61.21.160.185]) - FTP session opened.
      Feb 27 13:33:44 zeus proftpd[19436]: zeus.snerk.org (61-21-160-185.home.ne.jp[61.21.160.185]) - FTP session closed.
      Feb 27 14:50:45 zeus proftpd[22443]: zeus.snerk.org (217.167.52.229[217.167.52.229]) - FTP session opened.
      Feb 27 14:50:46 zeus proftpd[22443]: zeus.snerk.org (217.167.52.229[217.167.52.229]) - FTP session closed.
      Feb 27 17:35:45 zeus proftpd[28643]: zeus.snerk.org (comprint.oklaosf.state.ok.us[204.62.24.205]) - FTP session opened.
      Feb 27 17:35:45 zeus proftpd[28643]: zeus.snerk.org (comprint.oklaosf.state.ok.us[204.62.24.205]) - no such user 'Anonymous'
      Feb 27 17:35:45 zeus proftpd[28643]: zeus.snerk.org (comprint.oklaosf.state.ok.us[204.62.24.205]) - USER Anonymous: no such user found from comprint.oklaosf.state.ok.us [204.62.24.205] to 64.56.236.215:21
      Feb 27 17:35:45 zeus proftpd[28643]: zeus.snerk.org (comprint.oklaosf.state.ok.us[204.62.24.205]) - FTP session closed.

      I get probably, on average, about ten attempts per day, every day. I suspect that the vast majority of them are automated robots, perhaps even the BSA has tried a time or two (I rarely investigate these probes).

      Were I running an anonymous FTP server, I'd have to accept the consequences of people connecting, like above, at random, and perhaps actually utilizing the service. Tracking down these robots and attempting to charge them bandwidth utilization for all of five minutes is patently ridiculous, and you'd never get a law authority to take you even remotely seriously.

      Now please, can we skip the usual rhetoric and try to see the big picture?

      Oh, my apologies, I seem to have forgotten where I am ...

      --
      BD Phone Home!

      Shameless plug. Like you weren't expecting it.

    26. Re:Harrass them right back! by gmuslera · · Score: 1
      "billons" is an estimative.

      Here was an example of what happened to Virginia Beach... they have to do a search in 3600 computers and buy the licenses that they not found (not because they had not buyed it, just because they can't find them in that moment). All that funny stuff costs to the city US$80.000. Extrapolating to every city and company of USA you maybe could reach close to the "billons" number.

      Today also I saw this article on how BSA/Microsoft is checking companies, and just to check that you are ok you could have to spend money (and more if you can't find every single piece of license you buyed in your history).

    27. Re:Harrass them right back! by Azureflare · · Score: 1

      Yeah, only one problem. The site mirrors openoffice...Guess what. It probably doesn't have much money. IMHO, this is BSA's Microsoft-fueled tactics. Target the little guys with lawsuits, commit perjury...and get away with it because the little guys can't afford as many lawyers as you have. Of course, this would never happen in a democratic society.

    28. Re:Harrass them right back! by hal200 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I hate posting RTFA responses, but RTFA.

      Their scripts screwed up, they admitted the mistake, appologized and have promised to adjust the scripts. What more could you want?

      While I may disagree with their initial tactics, they've been most understanding and civil about the whole matter. One could only hope more of their member organizations behaved in as level-headed a fashion.

      Case closed. Move along. Nothing to see here.

      --

      I just want to take over the world...Why does that automatically make me EVIL?

    29. Re:Harrass them right back! by CrazyDuke · · Score: 1

      "Being an idiot and getting confused is not the same as perjury. Stupidity is not a crime."

      . . . being stupidly reckless is. Otherwise, all the drunk drivers that kill people could claim temporary stupidity.

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced influence is indistinguishable from control.
    30. Re:Harrass them right back! by ErikTheRed · · Score: 1

      Better yet, sue them for the time it took for your sysadmins, legal staff, etc. to deal with the issue. My (IANAL) advice: make it for $1 less than the maximum amount allowed by your local small claims court (here in San Diego, CA, that's $4999). Explain to the judge the seriousness of their accusation - that the crime they are accusing you of is a felony and that penalties include prison terms of up to 5 years and fines of up to $250,000 plus damages they could be awarded in a civil action ($millions). Because of this, you felt obligated to do extra dilligence to ensure that you were definitely not infringing on their copyrights. However, because it is patently (ha ha) obvious that they did no due dilligence of their own before accusing you of a major felony, you should absolutely be entitlted to reimbursement for your time and expenses.

      --

      Help save the critically endangered Blue Iguana
    31. Re:Harrass them right back! by jbolden · · Score: 1

      Actually being stupidly reckless is not a crime (though it can create civil liability) unless it results in death or injury (not just money losses). There is a specific law against driving while intoxicated.

    32. Re:Harrass them right back! by Phleg · · Score: 1

      Wrong again, it actually says that it has the authority to act on behalf of Joe Bob Copyright holder in this matter, which is a huge difference.

      --
      No comment.
    33. Re:Harrass them right back! by phriedom · · Score: 1

      "It is stating under penalty of perjury that it has the authority to act on behalf of Joe Bob Copyright holder."

      No, not Joe Bob, they say they represent the specific copyright holder of OpenOffice. But they don't really have that right, do they. There ought to be some legal repercussions to alleging some legal authority when there isn't any, or for being negligent in their accusations.

      --
      Don't moderate flamebait as Troll. Know the difference or you will be Meta-moderated.
    34. Re:Harrass them right back! by sbaker · · Score: 1

      So nobody thinks to rename the files when they offer them for piracy?

      --
      www.sjbaker.org
    35. Re:Harrass them right back! by torndorff · · Score: 1

      Unless there was a MOTD that stated who can and can not access what and where. I'm pretty sure there has been legislation passed stating that. But I am not a lawyer, I've just seen mnay, many servers citing it in the past.

    36. Re:Harrass them right back! by GlobalEcho · · Score: 1

      We do tax it, though.

    37. Re:Harrass them right back! by arkanes · · Score: 1
      Stupidity CAN be a crime - if you claim, under penalty of perjury, that you know something to be true, and it's actually not - note that they are claiming to have the authority to act on behalf of the copyright holder. This sort of notice should NEVER be automated, and someone who makes this claim in error should he held liable. At best it's a failure of professional judgment in a lawyer, which is actionable.

      Unlike a DMCA notice FROM the copyright holder, where they asser that the have reasonable cause to believe something is true (which would be fine in this case, assuming that they make an effort to fix the automated scripts), this is a case where someone signed off, sight unseen (apparently) to a legal document. It most certainly should be actionable in one way or another.

    38. Re:Harrass them right back! by Blkdeath · · Score: 1
      Unless there was a MOTD that stated who can and can not access what and where. I'm pretty sure there has been legislation passed stating that. But I am not a lawyer, I've just seen mnay, many servers citing it in the past.

      Oh, you mean like the Internet Privacy Act and similar legislation that 'protects' pirates from law enforcement and copyright holders? Yeah, sure.

      Public, anonymous FTP sites can and will be crawled by a plethora of spiders, and the "requirement" to provide a valid e-mail address is an optional tracking system, essentially honour-system based, not a legal requirement. Want precedent? Tell me the e-mail addresses passed by Internet Explorer, Netscape, Mozilla, Squid, etc. in connecting to FTP sites.

      I do believe that any remotely technically adept judge with any ounce of common sense or grasp of the law would tell you that if you don't want people to access your files, don't make them available to the world. Moreover, if you're making illegal content available to the public at large, expect repercussions and be prepared to deal with them.

      --
      BD Phone Home!

      Shameless plug. Like you weren't expecting it.

    39. Re:Harrass them right back! by nursedave · · Score: 1
      I suppose, what the world needs is a law to say that if you send someone a letter threatening legal action if they don't do something - then if they don't do it, you should be REQUIRED to take them to court - and to be liable for their costs, pain & suffering, mental anguish, etc, etc if they turn out to be innocent.
      I think this is already a legal principle called barratry (sp).
      --

      The Democratic Party: We've been pussies since 1968!

    40. Re:Harrass them right back! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "on behalf of the copyright owners listed above."

      once again, thats MS not OO

    41. Re:Harrass them right back! by jbolden · · Score: 1

      To perjur yourself you have to say something you know is false. For example making a math error is not perjury but making an intentional math error (plus other criteria) is. Theybelieved in good faith they were acting for the copyright holder. Again the stupidity defense works.

      As for a lawyer signing off on something sight unsean they could be disbarred for that. But again that's not criminal.

    42. Re:Harrass them right back! by John+Hasler · · Score: 2, Informative

      You can't sue someone for perjury. You'd have to convince the US Justice Dept. to prosecute them for it. What do you think the chances are of that?

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    43. Re:Harrass them right back! by andrewski · · Score: 1

      The Nuremburg trials set a precident here: that the excuse that somebody is 'just taking orders' or 'just doing his job' is not a valid one. When we are confronted with leeches on society, don't heed their bleatings about how they are "just taking orders." Call them out as the pimples they are! This goes for spammers, politicians, the BSA / MPAA / RIAA / &c. We must have no mercy for them. By trying to intimidate and frighten people while, by their own admission, they are commiting PURJURY is obviously wrong.

      Take 'em to court!

    44. Re:Harrass them right back! by Almost-Retired · · Score: 1

      Yeah, sure, great idea man. Just one problem with it.

      You would have to start with the esteemed govenor, probably one Mr. Grey Davis, who got, and spent his political kharma on promoting the NIBY attitude every time a power entity wanted to build any more capacity within the borders of the great state of California. You couldn't buy a construction permit there for many years for any amount of money. From the reports I've read, PG&E alone wasted well over a billion on applications that were turned down. Then when the state was buying OP power, and the price went up due to simple supply and demand economics brought on by the lack of new construction, so what did they do?

      They passed a state law regulating what they could sell power for, but not what the utilities had to pay for it. When it became a loss to move it, obviously they quit, hence the blackouts. Simple business economics, you cannot buy at 1.00 and sell for .50 and make money.

      Even the much maligned govenor moonbeam was smarter than that.

      I agree, go after the perps, but make very sure you have all the responsible names on the perp list before you issue the warrants. In this case, it certainly appears to start from the highest office in the state. But remember, he ran, and won with that as a plank in his platform. You gonna arrest the voters that put him there too?

      I thought not. In the meantime I think there may even be some new construction going on now after receiveing that particular nastygram in the form of the blackouts at the statehouse, I can't say that for sure though, It's been 20 years since I lived there, and 8 since I last visited. Good place to visit, not as great to work in though.

    45. Re:Harrass them right back! by sfe_software · · Score: 1

      ...if you claim, under penalty of perjury, that you know something to be true, and it's actually not ...

      IANAL, but I don't think perjury applies just because you say it does. Eg, I could easily say, under penalty of perjury, cross my heart and hope to die, that I am actually a monkey. Did I just commit perjury? Well, no, but that's because I am actually a monkey.

      But either way, just saying "under penalty of perjury" in an email (or letter) doesn't make it so.

      Unlike a DMCA notice FROM the copyright holder, where they asser that the have reasonable cause to believe something is true...

      I think that if someone has been contracted for this purpose, they can in fact act "on behalf of" the copyright holder. Microsoft's lawyers act on behalf of Microsoft -- and the BSA has been contracted for this specific reason. ...this is a case where someone signed off, sight unseen (apparently) to a legal document. It most certainly should be actionable in one way or another.

      And I agree, this was negligence on the part of whoever approved the mailing. But, it wasn't intentional, eg, the letter wasn't sent with malicious intent; it was just sent out of failure to verify the information. I don't think that's criminal, as long as it doesn't become regular practice, and (as you said) they take steps to fix the script, and better verify the results.

      --
      NGWave - Fast Sound Editor for Windows
    46. Re:Harrass them right back! by mpe · · Score: 1

      The problem is that it's cheaper to send out a threatening letter than to check carefully and THEN send letters only to true offenders.

      Especially when their are no negative consequences to them.

      You just bet that 99% of recipients will stop doing whatever it is you suspect them of - which makes it a cost-effective way to work. The BSA doesn't have these people as customers - so what does it care if it pisses them off?

      Their basis is more getting money for their "members". Using an "innocent until proven guilty" approach where they set the standard of "proof". To the extent that it may cost someone less to pay for their software again than do an "audit".

      I suppose, what the world needs is a law to say that if you send someone a letter threatening legal action if they don't do something - then if they don't do it, you should be REQUIRED to take them to court - and to be liable for their costs, pain & suffering, mental anguish, etc, etc if they turn out to be innocent.

      The last place the BSA would want their claims examined would be in a court. Since they would be required to prove the "guilt" of the person or corporation they were accusing. As well as the risk that a judge might start taking a pen to various EULAs.

    47. Re:Harrass them right back! by mpe · · Score: 1

      No, not Joe Bob, they say they represent the specific copyright holder of OpenOffice. But they don't really have that right, do they. There ought to be some legal repercussions to alleging some legal authority when there isn't any, or for being negligent in their accusations.

      It's possibly "copyright fraud", which is claiming to hold a copyright when you are not the copyright holder (including cases where the work is public domain). Thing is that the penalties for copyright fraud are a lot less than those for copyright infringement. Alternativly it's plain standard "fraud", which can be serious. But as usual criminal law often can't handle the situation where the accused is a corporation very well.

    48. Re:Harrass them right back! by mpe · · Score: 1

      You can't sue someone for perjury. You'd have to convince the US Justice Dept. to prosecute them for it.

      Are private prosecutions not possible in the US? Under any jurisdiction...
      Anyway the accused is in Germany, so they'd presumably use an appropriate German statute.

    49. Re:Harrass them right back! by Marc2k · · Score: 1

      A google search looks for all of the occurrences of "Office", not filenames on searched servers. "office" is a common word in the English language, while filenames with "office" in them would seem upon first glance to be infintessimal by comparison.

      --
      --- What
    50. Re:Harrass them right back! by DavidTC · · Score: 1
      The problem is that the BSA is not the police. Solicters can't walk past a no solicting sign and solict, and the BSA can't walk past a 'no BSA' sign. That's how trespassing laws work. You don't get to 'lie' to a sign and keep walking, that's nonsensical.

      The problem is that most people don't even see the FTP login messages. (There's a similar problem with SMTP login message prohibiting spam.) So you can't really bar people there if you have anonymous FTP set up. Anyone can click past that in a web browser and never see it, much like you can't get solicters arrested for trespassing if you have a 'no solicting' sign at one entranceway and they come in another.

      However, you can actually set up a real password system, and give out the username and password to a certain group of people on a webpage, which obviously does not include the BSA. They had to read the page to get the username and password, and thus had to read the fact they were not allowed on the server.

      This won't protect your from the police, though, but they will need a search warrant. (Which will be incredibly easy to get if you claim to have warez or MP3s on the server.)

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
  30. BSA aren't the only idiots these days by Schwartzboy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I think that the practice of letting computers/searches/scripts do all of the work without applying any human intelligence to the process has become more and more common. Yes, it's worse in my mind when the BSA does it because I'm biased against them in the first place, but to be fair it's spread to just about everybody in my recent experience. I just moved, and when my wife and I changed our driver's licenses over she got a semi-threatening letter because she didn't also change over her car registration (our only car is registered in my name for no reason I can think of). I recently had my account put on hold by PayPal and then restored, but in the interim I sent a question to their help staff regarding something else entirely. Someone (apparently a bot?) from PP replied to me and said, basically "we can't restore your account until you do X, Y , and Z. Please contact us if you have any further questions. Thank you!" I don't think it's a good thing that organizations have become this brain-dead, but the BSA certainly can't patent a method for making themselves look like idiots by letting a search tool plow blindly through a set of data for them. Plenty of prior art there...

    --
    "Linux doesn't exist. Everyone knows Linux is an unlicensed version of Unix"- Kieren O'Shaughnessy
    1. Re:BSA aren't the only idiots these days by Feztaa · · Score: 1

      the BSA certainly can't patent a method for making themselves look like idiots by letting a search tool plow blindly through a set of data for them. Plenty of prior art there...

      Since when has prior art ever stopped anybody?

    2. Re:BSA aren't the only idiots these days by pmz · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I think that the practice of letting computers/searches/scripts do all of the work without applying any human intelligence to the process has become more and more common.

      This, in itself, isn't bad. For example, I use scripts almost every day to make me much more productive. However, as any decent programmer can tell, a quick, dirty, and untested script can wreck a system or, at least, output garbage (like in the example you provide).

      What this incident with the BSA shows us, is that their impulsive and uneducated lawyers and businesspeople hired incompetent and lazy programmers to do their dirty work. If one of those people is reading this, then, yes, I do mean to offend you (you should be in a different line of work...perhaps custodial engineering, instead?).

    3. Re:BSA aren't the only idiots these days by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > I think that the practice of letting computers/searches/scripts do all of the work without applying any human intelligence...

      If BSA memebers did it, would that qualify as human intelligence?

    4. Re:BSA aren't the only idiots these days by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the programmers might not be as incompetent as you think. it may have been intentional.

  31. Why is this story under the MS Borg section? by gpinzone · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Microsoft had nothing to do with this. This should be a YRO article.

    1. Re:Why is this story under the MS Borg section? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please see:
      http://www.bsa.org/usa/about/members/

      Who do think is funding these idiots.

    2. Re:Why is this story under the MS Borg section? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The BSA acted on the behalf of Microsoft.

      Additionally, Microsoft probably influences the BSA more than any other company.

    3. Re:Why is this story under the MS Borg section? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Disagreed. Microsoft is a major stakeholder in the BSA. This could very well be an attempt to wipe out some competition.

    4. Re:Why is this story under the MS Borg section? by gpinzone · · Score: 1

      The BSA acted on the behalf of Microsoft.

      They may have acted on their behalf, but were note directed by MS to take this action. It's like hiring a contractor to fix the roof on your home, only to find out the contractor went crazy and burned your neighbors house down. Are you responsible for his actions?

    5. Re:Why is this story under the MS Borg section? by Gyan · · Score: 1

      but were note directed by MS to take this action.

      Actually, they are. The BSA was conducting activities in line with Microsoft's demands of the organization. In your analogy, burning a house next door has nothing to do with fixing roof.

      But, searching for pirated software IS what your client NEEDS you to do.

    6. Re:Why is this story under the MS Borg section? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Microsoft had nothing to do with this. This should be a YRO article.

      Dumbass moderators... This article IS under the YRO section. Don't you even look at what you're moderating?

  32. This is a simple case of ignore by Wizri · · Score: 0, Troll

    This is a simple case of ignore.
    Look at it, think for a sec that the BS Association is a Microsoft puppet, they are probably running VB for doing the testing with some really crappy programmer doing the work (and probably very last minute) on those scripts.

    Either way the BS Association has nothing on the university.

    1. Re:This is a simple case of ignore by Kosi · · Score: 1

      Hell, even with VBS you could program a decent ftp-spider. (If you were able to...)

      And: reviewing your search results before sending cease & desist letters can even be done without programming anything! Needed software: brain 1.0, maybe the BSA lacks here.

      Kosi

    2. Re:This is a simple case of ignore by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ignoring it means they will just send more bogus threats out. The only *right* way to treat this is by taking them to court for extortion or perjury or whatever a good lawyer can come up with.

  33. The BSA aren't without Sin here by doctor_oktagon · · Score: 4, Interesting

    If you check the BSA e-mail, they logged into the anonymous FTP resource with the address "guest@nowhere.com", which is obviously fake.

    In the UK this could be construed as attempting to access a system un-lawfully ... they have lied when asked for their e-mail address!

    1. Re:The BSA aren't without Sin here by Niles_Stonne · · Score: 1

      (Possibly) From a computer in the USA.

      Surely that would be a violation of the DMCA as well as international cybercrime laws?

      Why don't we let those stupid laws work on our side for once?

      --
      Sticks and Stones may break my bones, but copyright will always protect me.
    2. Re:The BSA aren't without Sin here by Reziac · · Score: 1

      I wondered about that too -- but could "guest@nowhere.com" be the server's own generic login? I know lots of FTP sites just assume I'm "anonymous:guest" and don't even bother to get an ID from me.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    3. Re:The BSA aren't without Sin here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      If you check the BSA e-mail, they logged into the anonymous FTP resource with the address "guest@nowhere.com", which is obviously fake.

      It is my understanding that, to protect the civil liberties of the citizens, a law enforcement agent must first obtain a search warrant before performing a search of this nature. It is very sneaky for the BSA to find a way to only act as a law enforcement agent without actually being recognized as one, since they are not constrained by the same requirements as official law enforcement agents. That lets them get away with whatever violations of the citizens' civil liberties that they want to, without being constrained by the other branches of government in the way that these branches check the executive branch.

    4. Re:The BSA aren't without Sin here by Citizen+of+Earth · · Score: 1

      In the UK this could be construed as attempting to access a system un-lawfully ... they have lied when asked for their e-mail address!

      In the US, it would be construed as circumventing a security system and is illegal under the DMCA, the very law that BSA members purchased.

    5. Re:The BSA aren't without Sin here by pclminion · · Score: 1
      If you check the BSA e-mail, they logged into the anonymous FTP resource with the address "guest@nowhere.com", which is obviously fake.

      Ok, I agree, but let's think here. I generally use the address "-a@" when logging into anonymous FTP. This is because (shock) I believe that anonymous FTP should be, well, anonymous. If someone really wants to track me down, he can get my IP address easily.

      Is it "OK" for normal folks to do this, yet "not OK" for the BSA? Or is it "not OK" for anyone?

      In my (what, 9? 10?) years of using FTP this way, I've never been tracked down and reprimanded by an FTP admin for trying to remain anonymous. Are you actually suggesting that, over all this time, I've been doing something wrong?

    6. Re:The BSA aren't without Sin here by sustik · · Score: 1

      The domain nowhere.com is registered but obviously not ot the BSA.

    7. Re:The BSA aren't without Sin here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is it "OK" for normal folks to do this, yet "not OK" for the BSA?

      Live by the sword, die by the sword.

    8. Re:The BSA aren't without Sin here by TC+(WC) · · Score: 1

      Why would law enforcement need a warrant to access a public FTP site? Sure, they'd probably need to put a valid e-mail address in, but they're more than capable of legally accessing a publicly available server without needing a warrant. That'd be like saying a Police officer can't go into a public building without a warrant. Sure, he can't search things with impunity, but he can go in and act in a civil manner. If he's asked to leave, he will, but he can still come in to begin with.

    9. Re:The BSA aren't without Sin here by nytmare · · Score: 1

      Worse than lying, they forged an unaffiliated existing third-party domain name, "nowhere.com". They have no right to abuse that domain name.

    10. Re:The BSA aren't without Sin here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "That'd be like saying a Police officer can't go into a public building without a warrant."

      This is just bullsh*t. BSA was accessing the FTP site in search for the evidence of illegal activities, and that is different from accessing the FTP site to download the files that are publicly available. I think you would agree that what BSA did was not "[to] act in a civil manner." It was very clear that the acess to the site in question was regarding the specific activity, not just any access. So, why are you going against this idea of requiring a warranty to access a public FTP site to find a criminal evidence here?

      There are people addressing minute technicalities whenever they have chances, and I personally like that attitude. The comment like the above simply makes those good people look bad, and there are so many comments like that here in /., so many that many people are just tired of the posts that dwell on details. Don't try dumbing down all people to your level.

    11. Re:The BSA aren't without Sin here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is anyone suggesting that you've been doing something wrong? Are you collecting any evidences to use in threats? I guess you have no idea what I am saying since you can't differentiate what you do and what BSA is known to have done in this post?

  34. Bust Them by Bob9113 · · Score: 1

    >> Based upon BSA's representation of the copyright owners in anti-piracy
    >> matters, we have a good faith belief that none of the materials or
    >> activities listed above have been authorized by the rightholders, their
    >> agents, or the law. BSA represents that the information in this
    >> notification is accurate and states, under penalty of perjury, that it is
    >> authorized to act in this matter on behalf of the copyright owners listed
    >> above.


    They apologized? Whoop-de-fucking-do. Give them a little taste of their own medicine. Fire a few broadside volleys of lawyers at them.

    1. Re:Bust Them by TheMidget · · Score: 1
      Fire a few broadside volleys of lawyers at them.

      Do so! Lawyers would love those perjury claims! There are jail terms on perjury, aren't there?

    2. Re:Bust Them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      they apologized because they know that if someone had the inclination this could be very bad for them.

      they are kissing ass to save their ass

    3. Re:Bust Them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's a more sinister implication to all of this. Consider the possibility that the new US Dept of Homeland Security might use this strategy, and send threats to people that their data mining software decides are terrorists.

      If the precedent isn't stopped, there may be worse problems later.

    4. Re:Bust Them by rsax · · Score: 1
      Give them a little taste of their own medicine. Fire a few broadside volleys of lawyers at them.

      Who's picking up the tab?

  35. my rights online by syle · · Score: 1, Troll
    So, the someone at the BSA made a mistake with their scripts, and when it was noticed they immediately apologized and said they would fix the problem.

    What exactly should they have done if not this? If your answer is that their search engine is inherently a flawed concept to begin with, then you are arguing a different issue.

    I don't see what this has to do with my rights online.

    --

    /syle

    1. Re:my rights online by program21 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Well, they made a mistake, fine, that's forgivable. The thing here is that the BSA's first email here stated:
      "BSA represents that the information in this notification is accurate and states, under penalty of perjury, that it is authorized to act in this matter on behalf of the copyright owners listed above."

      Note the second part, where they claim to be acting on behalf of the copyright holder, under penalty of perjury. It's a step that they apologized, at least, but by their own statement, are liable to a lawsuit for perjury here.

      --
      This has been a test. Had this been a real emergency, we would have fled in terror and you would not have been informed.
    2. Re:my rights online by Kosi · · Score: 1

      What this has to do with YRO: It can't be right that any organization bulkmails cease & desist letters without checking the individual case properly.

      Kosi

    3. Re:my rights online by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't think people who run free and perfectly legal FTP sites have a right not to be harrassed by overzealous morons with a financial ax to grind?

    4. Re:my rights online by TheMidget · · Score: 1
      What exactly should they have done if not this?

      They should have avoided writing a script that might accidentally perjure them. Just remove the following line:

      BSA represents that the information in this notification is accurate and states, under penalty of perjury, that it is authorized to act in this matter on behalf of the copyright owners listed above.
    5. Re:my rights online by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The issue is not that a mistake was made, but that the mistake was a legal threat that had the potential to cause the recipient to incur major expenses.

      They seem to have taken the attitude that it is better to shoot first and ask questions later.

    6. Re:my rights online by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So XYZ company made a mistake and forgot to remove Office '95 from that group of P120's they retired and now have in storage. After the BSA audit finds those machines and the new machines the licenses were redeployed on, I'm sure the company will just be able to "immediately apologise and say they will fix the problem" and all will be well, right?

      Finally, if your overall intellect can be gleaned by the drivel posted above, it's obvious why you don't understand how this affects YRO.

      Go troll somewher else.

    7. Re:my rights online by mysticgoat · · Score: 1

      So, the someone at the BSA made a mistake with their scripts, and when it was noticed they immediately apologized and said they would fix the problem.

      Oh, it's worse than that. Much, much worse.

      Their message alleges criminal activities. The evidence they offer is so absurd that it would have been rejected out of hand by anyone with any knowledge commercial software on a quick reading of the message. The inescapable conclusion is that BSA is not having a human review these allegations before sending them out.

      BSA is churning out allegations of criminal activities through an automated process without even minimal human oversight. That is not prudent. It is probably legally actionable-- I think it is probably harrassment (but IANAL).

      The law deserves more respect than BSA is giving it. At the very least, this Corina Beck person whose name is on the message should have read its content before sending it. That she failed to do so points to a serious problem with her ability to fill her position in a responsible way. And it points to a serious problem with BSA, that it would fill this position with an incompetent person.

      Tossing around allegations of criminality is a serious business.

    8. Re:my rights online by dpt · · Score: 1

      What exactly should they have done if not this?

      Commit ritual suicide?

      I know, too much to hope for ...

    9. Re:my rights online by someone247356 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      They couldn't have.

      If memory serves me correctly, and it has been known to fail me at times, one of the requirements under the DMCA is that an expedited "takedown" notice has to be stipulated "under penalty of perjury" to be valid.

      Arguably, this was to prevent people from making stuff up to get other people's sites taken down. Otherwise I could send a letter to your ISP claiming that your site infringed on a copyright that I or someone who employed me held. The ISP would immediately take your site offline, doesn't want to loose its "safe harbor" immunity. By the time you contested it, your site would have been off line for a day or longer. This way, if you do send out a "take down" notice that you haven't checked and made sure that it did indeed contain infringing materials, you could be punished.

      I think that the BSA should be taken to court. If they can have a program automatically generate notices to hundreds or thousands of sites automatically, whether or not they are actually infringing, it makes a mockery of swearing to something under "penalty of perjury".

      Scripts shouldn't be allowed to threaten legal action. The DMCA is bad enough as it is. If someone doesn't put a stop to this soon, a large swath of the net could be censored by bogus "take down" letters. Saying "Opps, so sorry 'bout that" when some one calls you on your lie isn't good enough. What about all of the other sites that may have or will get taken down because of things like this that weren't caught?

      --
      Just my $0.02 (Canadian, before taxes)
    10. Re:my rights online by syle · · Score: 1
      Thanks for taking the time to reply in an insightful manner instead of questioning my genetics/intelligence/lineage/sexuality like most slashdotters do. You're right, I didn't think about that.

      And in case any moderators or other people who responded read this: The original post is not a troll. It was my real opinion. Even if you disagree with my opinion, that doesn't make it a troll. Please learn the difference.

      --

      /syle

    11. Re:my rights online by sbaker · · Score: 1

      > What exactly should they have done if not this?

      They should have had their script check the checksum on the file.

      Then, if it still reported a violation, they should have had someone
      download the file and verify that it's infringing the MS Office copyright,
      and THEN - AND ONLY THEN - sent out a threatening letter.

      --
      www.sjbaker.org
    12. Re:my rights online by WhiteWolf666 · · Score: 1

      And then, they should be sure to be using a valid login password (not guess@nowhere.com, or whatever they used), so that they are circumventing the ftp admin's wishes. They are public ftps, but you are supposed to supply valid credentials: Public != free to abuse.

      --
      WhiteWolf666 an exBush supporter. All you new-school,compassionate,save the children Republicans can rot in hell
    13. Re:my rights online by Mr.+Sketch · · Score: 1

      Scripts shouldn't be allowed to threaten legal action

      I would disagree with that. If the creator (person who wrote it or authorized it's creation) of the script is willing to take responsibility for all the scripts actions, then the script should be able to legally do everything that a person could do if they're programmed with the same logic that a person would use. However, the script can't be programmed with common sense unfortunately. The creators of the script should have been 100% sure there were no false positives (perhaps with a few test runs to see what files it actually finds) before blindly running it and sending out e-mails asserting that what it found was valid copyright infringement under penality of perjury. If they had done some test runs then perhaps they could see that maybe they should be searching for m.*s.*office (case insensitive) or something else instead of just 'office'. Or they could have had the files reviewed by an actual person and selectively sent out the e-mails. Or they could download the file, uncompress it, and look for key files (winword.exe) or grep the installer for key files.

      In any case, the BSA has no excuse, they authorized the scripts creation, they authorized its execution and they should take full responsibility for each and every action the script takes.

    14. Re:my rights online by jcast · · Score: 1

      Arguably, this was to prevent people from making stuff up to get other people's sites taken down.

      Obviously, it didn't work.
      --
      There are reasons why democracy does not work nearly as well as capitalism.
      -- David D. Friedman
    15. Re:my rights online by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Their premise is that you are guilty until proven innocent. How does this not affect your rights (online or otherwise).

      The reaosn people are upset is that the BSA presumed guilt without even a cursory investigation.

    16. Re:my rights online by danila · · Score: 1

      How about getting some money from the community, than paying some spammer for assistance and sending millions (or, better, billions) of threatening e-mail to every website owner in the world, demanding to remove some random files. Just imagine all the havoc! People will have to wake up and realise what the world had turned into....

      Isn't that a good idea?

      --
      Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
  36. In Yo Face by 4of12 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It's clear the much feared BSA has made a mistake.

    However, since their actions in the past have caused untold scrambling to find licenses on the part of many law-abiding but sloppy businesses, I think it is only fair that BSA likewise be caused to scramble. Because the BSA, likewise, has now been sloppy.

    The university should have lawyer draft up some pompous letter indicating that

    1. the BSA has not done its homework,
    2. is accusing the university falsely,
    3. has maligned the reputation of the university,
    4. is beginning to cause the university to incur expenses to deal with the BSA's flimsy and false accusations and to repair its reputation as a law-abiding university, and
    5. that, furthermore, the BSA should expect an invoice shortly for these expenses.

    [I know, it will be only a paper tiger and never stand up. But I'm sure I'm not the only one that fantasizes about seeing the BSA have to eat their own dogfood for a change.]

    --
    "Provided by the management for your protection."
    1. Re:In Yo Face by igaborf · · Score: 4, Funny

      6. That BSA must allow uni unrestricted access to BSA premises for the purpose of auditing BSA spider systems to ensure they will no longer falsely detect uni's legitimate files.

    2. Re:In Yo Face by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget:

      6. Loss of consortium.

    3. Re:In Yo Face by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Could the university sue them for libel?

  37. Ironically by Zog+The+Undeniable · · Score: 2, Funny
    you can still find Russian FTP servers mirroring the real thing.

    /me is glad the Cold War is over :-)

    --
    When I am king, you will be first against the wall.
    1. Re:Ironically by banzai75 · · Score: 1

      Dear Slashdot User,

      Under penalty of perjury, we at BJA (Bad Joke Alliance) have detected that you submitted a 'in Soviet Russia' joke. Please cease and desist from this activity since most are not funny and make no sense.

      The Management

      // in Soviet Russia Filter
      if ereg("russia", strtolower($comment))
      send_notice($email_address);

  38. What the about the those BSA banners by gumbright · · Score: 1

    I saw one on FC "Want to get back at your boss...?" The BSA is really a bunch of scumbags. Sheesh.

  39. This is too much... by Raetsel · · Score: 4, Funny

    I don't know what's funnier... that they're claiming copyright infringement of OpenOffice, or that they thought Microsoft Office came as RPMs!!

    This is the part I refer to:

    • What was located as infringing content:

      Filename: /mandrake_current/SRPMS/OpenOffice.org-1.0.1-9mdk. src.rpm
      (199,643kb)
      Filename: /mandrake_current/i586/Mandrake/RPMS/OpenOffice.or g-libs-1.0.1-9mdk.i586.rpm
      (35,444kb)

      The above computer program(s) is/are being made available for copying, through downloading, at the above location without authorization from the copyright owner(s).

    Oh hell, I needed a laugh this morning...
    --

    "...America's great minds of today, teaching America's great minds of tomorrow. Poor bastards." -- A Beautiful Min
    1. Re:This is too much... by Surak · · Score: 3, Funny

      I don't know what's funnier... that they're claiming copyright infringement of OpenOffice, or that they thought Microsoft Office came as RPMs!!

      Filename: /mandrake_current/SRPMS/OpenOffice.org-1.0.1-9mdk. src.rpm
      (199,643kb)



      And *source* RPMs at that! The day I see source RPMs of Microsoft Office is the day I eat my right shoe!

    2. Re:This is too much... by Hieronymus+Howard · · Score: 1

      I don't know what's funnier... that they're claiming copyright infringement of OpenOffice, or that they thought Microsoft Office came as RPMs!!

      Not just that but SOURCE RPMS too.

      HH
      --

    3. Re:This is too much... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > And *source* RPMs at that! The day I see source
      > RPMs of Microsoft Office is the day I eat my
      > right shoe!

      No problem. I can send you the source...in assembly language;-)

    4. Re:This is too much... by plexxer · · Score: 2, Funny

      even funnier - they thought it was under 200MB!

      --
      The government's moral compass is controlled by GPS.
      In times of crises, they alter it to suit their needs.
    5. Re:This is too much... by spektr · · Score: 1

      And *source* RPMs at that! The day I see source RPMs of Microsoft Office is the day I eat my right shoe!

      *G* China was quicker than I thought...

  40. whats by m1chael · · Score: 0

    in a name. just because i changed my name to Windows95 doesnt mean im an illegal alien.

    --
    I know you are psychotic, but please make an effort.
  41. Re:Sad news... Wil Wheaton dead at 30 by cliffiecee · · Score: 3, Insightful

    No, you're confused.

    It's Mr. Rogers that passed away, at 74. Now that's an American Icon.

    Back on topic: The BSA rep apologized for the mistake, which implies she's a) not a lawyer, and b) knew something about OpenOffice- if only that it's GPL/free-as-in-beer.

    It would have been more of a story if the BSA started trying to find out which company owns OpenOffice, or just blindly pressed on with their accusations... but they didn't.

  42. FTP Robots.txt? by Rayen · · Score: 2, Interesting

    There should be some way of specifying that FTP are not allowed to be spidered. There is robots.txt on websites, a similar idea should exist for FTP's... Or, you could just find out the IP block(s) of the BSA scanners and disallow them from entering the FTP :)

    1. Re:FTP Robots.txt? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But robots.txt has no legal force. And even if it did, these gallant crusaders for truth and justice would be right to ignore robots.txt if they were looking for illegal material. It's a simple clear-cut case of good vs evil. Haven't you seen those films where the good guy breaks a bunch of laws (murder, breaking and entering, theft, etc.) but it's OK because it's in a good cause? Real life is just like that - ask George Bush.

    2. Re:FTP Robots.txt? by program21 · · Score: 1

      At least you can could claim later that you made an effort to prevent that behavior, and that it was blatantly disregarded. It's better to have done something and not had it work than to have done nothing at all.

      --
      This has been a test. Had this been a real emergency, we would have fled in terror and you would not have been informed.
    3. Re:FTP Robots.txt? by bookroach · · Score: 1

      you could just prevent them from running ls. The only links in ftp are filesystem links.

      --
      GTA3 is like the Sims to me - MC Hawking
  43. This is Intentional by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is exactly the behavior Microsoft is looking for. Any organization running an Open Office mirror gets a nasty letter, routine management checks turn it up and guess who's looking carefully at the admins from now on?

    Might make some question running such a mirror. Time for me to set one up I guess :)

  44. Wrong section? by ceeam · · Score: 1

    Shouldn't it be under "It's funny...", not "Y.R.O."?

    1. Re:Wrong section? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No

  45. infringing content: by ftvcs · · Score: 1

    What was located as infringing content:

    Filename: /mandrake_current/SRPMS/OpenOffice.org-1.0.1-9mdk. src.rpm
    (199,643kb)
    Filename: /mandrake_current/i586/Mandrake/RPMS/OpenOffice.or g-libs-1.0.1-9mdk.i586.rpm
    (35,444kb)

    The above computer program(s) is/are being made available for copying,
    through downloading, at the above location without authorization from the
    copyright owner(s).

    Corinna Beck
    Business Software Alliance
    1150 18th St NW Suite 700
    Washington,DC 20036

    EOF

    Sure this isn't a hoax? I can't imagine them being that stupid in Washington.

    1. Re:infringing content: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mystery solved!
      http://mason.gmu.edu/~cviedt/
      She minored in I.T. :-)

    2. Re:infringing content: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh... you cant imagine Washington people being stupid? Look what youve got for a president.

    3. Re:infringing content: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's mindboggling to see the ignorance of the typical fed type here in DC. Walk into any gov't office beyond the building lobby, and prepare to be amazed. It's 100% swarm theory, and no single individual has a fucking clue as to what's going on around them, other than their 4-6 hour work day.

    4. Re:infringing content: by ln+-sf+head+ass · · Score: 1

      Already yanked--403, and Google's cache returns a blank page. But it's still at the Wayback Machine, for the moment.

  46. BSA sue BSA by thinkliberty · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The Boy Scouts of Ameria should sue the Business Software Alliance and force them to change their name, kind of like what the World Wildlife Federation(Foundation?) did to the World Wrestling Federation which is now WWE.

    They might also be sued for for cyber squatting on BSA.org,com,net,etc...

    1. Re:BSA sue BSA by fizban · · Score: 0

      World Wildlife Fund...

      --

      +1 Insightful, -1 Troll. What can I say, I'm an Insightful Troll.

    2. Re:BSA sue BSA by mysticgoat · · Score: 1

      The Boy Scouts of Ameria should sue the Business Software Alliance and force them to change their name, ...

      This would be a good idea. The Boy Scouts of America have enough of their own image troubles without being confused with the other BSA (whose image is just going to get worse and worse as their chickens come home to roost).

      There is nothing quite as off-putting as the spatterings you see on the heads of persons who choose to support a chicken roost.

    3. Re:BSA sue BSA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, The World Wrestling Federation sued the WorldWise Fund For Nature. Being senseible, the courts chucked out the claim, AND forced the wrestlers to change! 8o)

  47. Microsoft Stretch? by Schnapple · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I notice this is a Microsoft Logo topic (though it's "Your Rights Online"). And of course the logo is the "Evil Bill Gates" logo. Meaning that since Microsoft is tangentally involved, we'll use that logo.

    Seriously, though - isn't this an "evil stupid BSA" topic? We'e had a dozen or so "evil stupid BSA" stories in the last few months - why not make an "evil stupid BSA" logo? Since "BSA" is also the initials of the Boy Scouts of America, why not make it like a three fingered salute with a big "NO!" slash through it?

    Then again, after hundreds of stores on Google there's still not a Google Topic, so maybe you have to piss of Slashdot before you get your own topic. I'd say you have to advertise on Slashdot, but Google already does that (with those little, yellow, different server rack accessories).

    1. Re:Microsoft Stretch? by Titusdot+Groan · · Score: 2, Insightful
      The BSA was representing the supposedly infringed upon copyright holder, in this case Microsoft, so the logo is an good one.

      As one sig I see here on Slashdot goes: Behind every sleazy lawyer is a sleazy client.

      In this case the BSA is acting as a hired gun for Microsoft, so Microsoft should be getting the bad PR.

    2. Re:Microsoft Stretch? by Queuetue · · Score: 1

      IMHO, the MS logo is accurate - they own, finance and control the BSA, don't they? Having a seperate BSA logo would be a lot like having a seperate "MS Office" logo.

    3. Re:Microsoft Stretch? by sbaker · · Score: 1

      Because then, /. would be sued by *BOTH* BSA's! :-)

      --
      www.sjbaker.org
    4. Re:Microsoft Stretch? by mysticgoat · · Score: 1

      ...isn't this an "evil stupid BSA" topic? We'e had a dozen or so "evil stupid BSA" stories in the last few months - why not make an "evil stupid BSA" logo? Since "BSA" is also the initials of the Boy Scouts of America, why not make it like a three fingered salute with a big "NO!" slash through it?

      That's not a bad idea, but I think it would be better if we do something with the logo to visually distinguish between the two BSAs. I suggest that The Business Software Alliance logo be just one saluting finger with the "NO!" slash through it.

      That would pretty much visually capture my gut reaction to what they seem to be attempting to do to everyone else.

    5. Re:Microsoft Stretch? by Citizen+of+Earth · · Score: 1

      Since "BSA" is also the initials of the Boy Scouts of America, why not make it like a three fingered salute with a big "NO!" slash through it?

      Why not make it the borgified heads of the big-bads of the four top members of the BSA hooked into Borg/BSA alcoves.

    6. Re:Microsoft Stretch? by liquidsin · · Score: 1

      The *real* BSA (Boy Scouts of America) use a three fingered salute. The pretend BSA (the idiots we're discussing here) should only get a one fingered salute. Any suggestions as to which one fingered salute we should be using to represent them?

      --
      do not read this line twice.
    7. Re:Microsoft Stretch? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since "BSA" is also the initials of the Boy Scouts of America, why not make it like a three fingered salute with a big "NO!" slash through it?


      How about a one-fingered salute?
  48. Boy Scouts of America? Ohhhh... by ksyrium · · Score: 1

    I think I need another cup of coffee, for some reason "BSA" registered in my head as the Boy Scouts of America before the Business Software Alliance....sheesh.

  49. BSA scanner ranges by Ransak · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Anyone have the IP ranges of the network the BSA scans from? I don't need my bandwidth wasted by these clowns.

    --
    "Powers. I have them."
  50. Conspiracy theories aside . . . by brickbat · · Score: 1

    . . . this is all quite humorous, and certainly a source of embarrassment to the BSA, who apparently can't write scripts sophisticated enough to distinguish MS Office from OpenOffice. (I wonder if Sun has received a similar notice about StarOffice? Just think of the field day Scott McNealy would have with that one.)

    But I think it was just a silly mistake on the BSA's part. This story really should be filed under "It's funny. Laugh."

  51. "good faith belief" by _|()|\| · · Score: 2, Interesting
    One phrase struck me in the BSA and IDSA letters (emphasis added):
    • "IDSA has a good faith belief that ... [WoS] infringes the rights of one or more IDSA members."
    • "[BSA has] a good faith belief that none of the materials or activities listed above have been authorized"
    I'm sorry, but Ms. Beck's apology doesn't cut it. A web robot cannot assert a "good faith belief."
    1. Re:"good faith belief" by igaborf · · Score: 1
      A web robot cannot assert a "good faith belief."

      But a human can assert a "good faith belief" that a Web robot is detecting files properly, which is what BSA is doing. One might argue that BSA's belief was arrived at negligently...

    2. Re:"good faith belief" by Jaysyn · · Score: 1

      It's just standard leagalspeak.

      Jaysyn

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
    3. Re:"good faith belief" by mysticgoat · · Score: 2, Insightful

      One might argue that BSA's belief was arrived at negligently...

      Exactly. The signatory to the letter, Ms Corina Beck, was clearly negligent in allowing this allegation of criminal activity to be made in her name, without first making at least a cursory review of the "evidence". As she was acting as the legal agent of the BSA, the BSA is responsible for her incompetence. BSA either failed to train Ms Corina Beck properly or failed to supervise her activities, or both.

      As a result, BSA has accused an institution of criminal behavior. That is not something that should be taken lightly. The law deserves more respect than BSA is currently giving it.

      At its best the law is a precision instrument. If we allow it to be used as a hammer, we'll lose a core part of civilization. There are other ways BSA can accomplish its goals.

    4. Re:"good faith belief" by stonedCoder · · Score: 1

      "But a human can assert a "good faith belief" that a Web robot is detecting files properly, which is what BSA is doing..."

      Except that's not what they said. It doesn't say anywhere 'we have a good faith belief that our software which tracks down illicit copies of copyright software and issues legal documents is correct'.

      --
      ermmm... don't take any notice of me... I'm too old...
    5. Re:"good faith belief" by igaborf · · Score: 1

      It doesn't say anywhere 'we have a good faith belief that our software which tracks down illicit copies of copyright software and issues legal documents is correct'.

      It's still BSA that's asserting the belief, not the software that's making the assertion, which is the point I was making. No, they didn't say their belief is based on confidence in their software, but clearly it is.

    6. Re:"good faith belief" by stonedCoder · · Score: 1

      "It's still BSA that's asserting the belief, not the software that's making the assertion, which is the point I was making. No, they didn't say their belief is based on confidence in their software, but clearly it is."

      I agree. My (implicit) point was if they are automatically issuing a form of document that requires specific detail (ie: legal) they should cover the fact that it is automatically generated and not the work of a human. If they fail to do so, then surely they should/would be held accountable for what was actually sent, not what they meant.

      --
      ermmm... don't take any notice of me... I'm too old...
  52. a question Can we turn BSA in? by linuxislandsucks · · Score: 1

    A question can we turn in BSA for using priated software?

    It would be very ironic If we could try and have them make the same big mistake :)

    --
    Don't Tread on OpenSource
  53. analogy time by t_aug · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Someone knocks at your door. You don't know who the hell it is but you let them anyways. You serve them tea. Then they accuse you of copying a wicker basket design of theirs. You say nope, its all my own original work. They agree. Then you send them the bill of .73 cents for their tea bag. Who is the dickhead in this situation?

    1. Re:analogy time by Angry+White+Guy · · Score: 4, Funny

      Micro$oft!

      Been here long?

      --
      You think that I'm crazy, you should see this guy!
    2. Re:analogy time by program21 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      This is more like, you run a shop and sell wicker baskets you created, so your door is always open (anonymous FTP access in this case). Someone walks in, masquerading as someone else (guest@nobody.com for the password field). A day later, you get a letter saying you copied a design of theirs; you contest, they agree.
      The thing of note here is the time that it took to respond to this letter, if nothing else, the BSA should at least be billed with that, nonwithstanding the original letter's claim that under penalty of perjury the BSA was acting on behalf of the copyright holder (which they were not).

      --
      This has been a test. Had this been a real emergency, we would have fled in terror and you would not have been informed.
    3. Re:analogy time by nomadic · · Score: 5, Funny

      No, it's more like this:

      After college you use a small inheritance to open up a wicker basket shop. What's wrong with that? Just because you're a man doesn't mean you can't sell wicker bastkets! It has NOTHING to do with your sexuality. Anyway, one day an odd man walks into your shop, picks up a basket, and starts screaming "You haff stolen mein design! Look at zis basket!"

      Quickly you rush over to get him to stop screaming. He looks at you oddly for a second, then mutters "my mistake" and shoves the basket into your hands and stumbles out. As you start to put the basket back on the shelf, you notice a strange capsule on the bottom. "Odd." you think.

      Since it's your lunch hour the next time the shop is empty you put up your closed sign and sit back in your office. Examining the small capsule you realize that you can open it. When you do so a small piece of translucent plastic pops out. "Wait a minute," you think, "that almost looks like microfilm..." This has turned into a strange day. You put the plastic back in the capsule and hide it in the office safe, behind the picture of dogs playing poker. All through the rest of the day you puzzle over the odd events. Finally, you close up shop and leave; since tomorrow is Saturday, you open up late. Maybe you can head over to your alma mater, the local community college where you studied Wicker Science and use one of their microfiche machines to see if that strange strip of plastic really is microfilm.

      As you stop by your office early Saturday morning you sense something is wrong. Quickly entering your office you're horrified to find that the place is trashed; papers are strewn about, furniture has been moved, and figurines from your porcelain kitten collection have been thrown to the ground, and now lay in shards. Breathlessly you check your safe; apparently they didn't check the painting, and the capsule is still there. You feel a cold ball of fear settle in your stomach; what the hell is going on?

      If you've read this far you'll find it's not really an analogy, but I wanted to write a little story featuring a wicker shop. Maybe next time a post on slashdot mentions a wicker basket shop I'll write part II of the story.

    4. Re:analogy time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ahh, I'd kill for some mod points right about now...

    5. Re:analogy time by ichimunki · · Score: 3, Funny

      You missed the part where you actually get inside one of the baskets and hear a voice, "It is dark here. You may be eaten by a grue." :)

      --
      I do not have a signature
    6. Re:analogy time by program21 · · Score: 1

      Best...reply...ever...

      I got a good laugh reading this :)

      --
      This has been a test. Had this been a real emergency, we would have fled in terror and you would not have been informed.
    7. Re:analogy time by esper_child · · Score: 1

      such a shame I can't mod today or I would give this a +1 underrated. This is by far the best post I have read in ages. Thank you for posting this, you have just added a bright light to my dismal day.

    8. Re:analogy time by rilian4 · · Score: 1

      Where's the rest of the story damn it...you just had to leave us hanging...

      --

      ...quicker, easier, more seductive the darkside is...but more powerful, it is not.
    9. Re:analogy time by beebware · · Score: 1

      And on the microfilm is printed the source code of MS WickerBasket(tm) which the BSA wanted to arrest you for using for to make your own Wicker Basket?

    10. Re:analogy time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Soviet Russia, Wicker baskets have shops of NINNLE! Fo Shizzle.

    11. Re:analogy time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL!

    12. Re:analogy time by alienw · · Score: 1

      Some people need to be forced to take a reading comprehension training class. They said that they are authorized to act for the copyright holder LISTED ABOVE. They didn't list OpenOffice.org there, did they? Why do so many slashdot posters act as if they are in 8th grade? Maybe because they are?

    13. Re:analogy time by program21 · · Score: 1

      I'll concede that particular line was a bad choice, but there are other lines without the possible ambiguity:

      The above computer program(s) is/are being made available for copying, through downloading, at the above location without authorization from the copyright owner(s).

      Based upon BSA's representation of the copyright owners in anti-piracy matters, we have a good faith belief that none of the materials or activities listed above have been authorized by the rightholders, their agents, or the law.

      And yes, I am aware that neither of these mention perjury in any sense.

      --
      This has been a test. Had this been a real emergency, we would have fled in terror and you would not have been informed.
    14. Re:analogy time by Stephen+VanDahm · · Score: 1

      This is probably the best +5 Funny post that I've ever read on Slashdot. Thought you should know....

      Steve

  54. Time to make some "Special" zip files... by CSG_SurferDude · · Score: 5, Funny

    Just remember everyone, Unix-like operating systems (Free-BSD, Linux, GNU/Linux, HPUX, Solaris, etc.) have the capability to have "Empty" files. When you do an `ls`, they CAN show up as huge....

    I think I'll go making a download page at my website with "Office.zip", "Word.zip", and "Outlook.zip", which all will appear to be 600 megs or larger.....

    1. Re:Time to make some "Special" zip files... by ins0m · · Score: 2, Funny

      Of course, if you have the spare bandwidth and nothing better to do, you could just make those zip files as symlinks to /dev/urandom. The fun would never end!

      --
      Never attribute to Hanlon that which can be adequately attributed to Heinlein.
    2. Re:Time to make some "Special" zip files... by Alien+Being · · Score: 1

      "if you have the spare bandwidth"

      Conserve bandwidth. Hook the ftp server to Duke Nukem's machine gun and send them one byte/bullet. "Eat lead you BSA pig."

    3. Re:Time to make some "Special" zip files... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How?

    4. Re:Time to make some "Special" zip files... by jim3e8 · · Score: 1

      An easy way to create an empty file with a hole is to use dd:
      dd if=/dev/zero of=office.zip seek=600M bs=1 obs=1 count=1

      This writes a single zero byte at 600 megs from the start of the file. On Linux (ext2) the resulting 600 meg file uses only a few K (check the output of df). On OS X, though, it does appear to take up the full 600 megs, so be warned.

    5. Re:Time to make some "Special" zip files... by tlund · · Score: 0

      Yeah, i did that at once on my public ftp-server when reading the story :(

      -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 306863661 Feb 28 15:19 Microsoft_Office.iso
      -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 58798080 Feb 28 15:20 Microsoft_Windows_XP.iso

    6. Re:Time to make some "Special" zip files... by Dr.+Photo · · Score: 1

      Of course, if you have the spare bandwidth and nothing better to do, you could just make those zip files as symlinks to /dev/urandom. The fun would never end!

      What, and let them gobble up your entropy pool?

      Why not just feed them /dev/zero instead?

    7. Re:Time to make some "Special" zip files... by ianezz · · Score: 2, Interesting
      echo ":-)" | dd bs=1M seek=600 of=NotMicrosoftOffice.zip

      "600 MB" which takes just a couple of KB on your HD.

  55. Why? by ComputarMastar · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Why on earth would you write a script/program that automagically sends out nastygrams without a human being first checking to make sure the "hit" is even valid?

    1. Re:Why? by kindbud · · Score: 1

      Especially a nastygram that vouches for the allegations made "under penalty of perjury."

      What a moron! I would definitely be filing a complaint to enforce that provision if this had happened to me.

      --
      Edith Keeler Must Die
  56. pirating by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Pirated software can actually increase
    profits in the long run. Would DOOM
    have been so popular, consequently giving ID
    profits on Quake, had millions not had a
    pirated copy?
    One reason MS office is so popular is because
    years back it was often pirated, increasing the
    user base that depends on it.

    1. Re:pirating by Exedore · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yes, and now that there's a huge user base that depends on Office, the time is ripe to go after them for everything they've got.

      MS no longer needs to build market share for Office... it's pretty much the standard. Now that businesses around the country have a $300 dollar per seat (or whatever) crack habbit that they can't (or won't) shake, the dealer's not allowing any more free samples. He's gonna hire enforcers to be sure he's paid for every last vial.

      --

      I take drugs seriously.

  57. What the script probably found was... by XTaran · · Score: 5, Funny

    .../mandrake_current/SRPMS/OpenOffice.org-1.0.1-9m dk.src.rpm

    Hmmm, seem's as if their regexps need some fine-tuning...

    --
    -- There is no place like $HOME.
    1. Re:What the script probably found was... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      even worse...

      .../mandrake_current/SRPMS/OpenOffice.org-1.0.1-9m dk.src.rpm

      ....the script checked to make sure it wasnt an old version.

    2. Re:What the script probably found was... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let's write a polite but still humiliating note to the BSA with suggestions for improving their script. Better yet, how' bout we provide one?

    3. Re:What the script probably found was... by frozenray · · Score: 1
      > Hmmm, seem's as if their regexps need some fine-tuning...

      Regexps? Given the clue level they generally display, I'd guess the code would be more along the lines of
      IF InStr(A$, "Office") <> 0 AND InStr(A$, "MS") <> 0 THEN GOTO Send_Mail_To_Sucker
      Disclaimer: I don't know how to code in basic. I only write programs in C++, perl and shell scripting language. I had to ask a 9-year old slightly retarded kid in the neighborhood to code the above for me.
      --
      "There are already a million monkeys on a million typewriters, and Usenet is NOTHING like Shakespeare." - Blair Houghton
  58. There's a huge shiny bright spot in this: by jolshefsky · · Score: 3, Funny

    Alternatively, one could say, "The Business Software Alliance (BSA) declares that OpenOffice is identical to Microsoft Office." Wow! That's how to sell software!

    --
    --- Jason Olshefsky

    Karma: Poser (mostly affected by adding this line long after everyone else did)

    1. Re:There's a huge shiny bright spot in this: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >> Corinna Beck
      >> Business Software Alliance
      >> 1150 18th St NW Suite 700
      >> Washington,DC 20036
      >> http://www.bsa.org
      >> E-mail: copyright-europe@bsa.org

      You shall sent her a letter and ask why the BSA writes letters like these. Since when is Germany under US law? Note, there is also BSA Germany http://www.bsa.de

      They do a fine job to promote software patents in europe to fight Open Source in the EU. that's why we oppose MS BSA!
      http://www.noepatents.org

      That is also a good example how US copyright law restricts the rights of the rest of the world. DMCA changed some of the most regarded specialists to criminals and harms the US economy. No IT specialist wants to go to the US if is was sentenced by a court. That's why Alan Cox released no-US to protest.

    2. Re:There's a huge shiny bright spot in this: by slide-rule · · Score: 1

      We could take a page from the Lik Sang story:

      "OpenOffice.org : So close to MS Office, neither you, nor the BSA, can tell the difference!"

  59. Hmmm.... by BJH · · Score: 1



    Let's see... where did I put that procmail recipe to send an automatic reply saying "Bugger off bloodsucking retards" to any mail from bsa.org?

  60. BSA logo looks like ... by Migraineman · · Score: 1

    Has anyone else noticed that the BSA corporate logo resembles the act of penetration? Kinda sets your expectations ...

  61. MS trying to sabotage Open Office? by _|()|\| · · Score: 1

    Mr. Schild forwarded the BSA letter to the Open Office team, with the observation that "someone is trying to remove your product from FTP-Servers." If it weren't for Heinlein's razor, I might raise an eyebrow that a legal agent of Microsoft is trying to purge the net of a competitor's product.

    1. Re:MS trying to sabotage Open Office? by morzel · · Score: 1
      If it weren't for Heinlein's razor
      That would be Occam's razor you are referring to.

      --
      Okay... I'll do the stupid things first, then you shy people follow.
      [Zappa]
    2. Re:MS trying to sabotage Open Office? by morzel · · Score: 1
      Or even Hanlon's razor ;-)

      --
      Okay... I'll do the stupid things first, then you shy people follow.
      [Zappa]
    3. Re:MS trying to sabotage Open Office? by seanmeister · · Score: 1

      well, it certainly isn't Stallman's Razor...

  62. So what would you ask the BSA? by Clovert+Agent · · Score: 4, Interesting

    As it happens, I'm due to meet with the chairman of the BSA in the UK, a fortnight from now, to grill him about issues like this. What would you put to him, in that position?

    1. Re:So what would you ask the BSA? by program21 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'd ask him what measures they're taking to ensure things like this don't happen, and then, what went wrong here and why?
      Maybe add something about there not being a human element to all this, which may have been able to spot a good number of false positives.

      --
      This has been a test. Had this been a real emergency, we would have fled in terror and you would not have been informed.
    2. Re:So what would you ask the BSA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I'd ask him who is going to the big house for perjury? "BSA represents that the information in this notification is accurate and states, under penalty of perjury, that it is authorized to act in this matter on behalf of the copyright owners listed above."

      Mike

    3. Re:So what would you ask the BSA? by radja · · Score: 1

      why oh why are there clauses in a lot of EULAs that are illegal in some countries, yet those EULAs are not corrected?

      this may cause many problems, since it is unsure what parts of a licence can be legally enforced. Do you think this kind of misrepresentation of consumer rights should be illegal?

      --

      No one can understand the truth until he drinks of coffee's frothy goodness.
      --Sheikh Abd-Al-Kadir, 1587
    4. Re:So what would you ask the BSA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Personally I agree with everyone else here and they need to be fried, and fried REALLLY hard.

      The BSA needs to be slapped with a huge lawsuit and charged the $35,786,232.51 it cost to check for the alleged software and to repair the damage done to the university.

      Hey if the BSA and it's members can boldly lie about the costs it's time we nail them with the same.

      Hell can I ride in my bill of $97,987.54 because of the damage done to me personally by hearing of the Open office reputation being smeared? and the losses I will incur because of it?

      Otherwise having a eminim looking character sitting behind the BSA representative quitely saying *fucker* randomly would be a good touch.

    5. Re:So what would you ask the BSA? by Repugnant_Shit · · Score: 1

      What would you put to him, in that position?

      Ooh, that would depend on what position it is. Something sharp and pointy I think.

    6. Re:So what would you ask the BSA? by ajs · · Score: 1

      There's not much too ask. The BSA is the enforcement arm of a business model that is dying. They should be slowly legislated out of existance where possible and otherwise ignored until dead.

    7. Re:So what would you ask the BSA? by Wee · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Tell him to take off the jackboots and brown shirt and stop harassing people.

      OK, seriously: Tell him to presume innocence rather than immediately assume guilt. Tell him that, believe it or not, there are a lot of people and businesses that use software which is not only ok to copy freely, but such copying is highly encouraged. He needs to find a way to get his mind around that and set policies in place to deal with it.

      If I were grilling him, I'd ask him something along the lines of "So if you find this small business that is using illegal copies of non-free/commercial software, do you immediately persecute them or do you suggest free alternatives? Why not? You want businesses to stay in business, right? Well then why not show them the error of their ways, and then show them how not to get in trouble again -- without causing any artifical financial hardships on them? If they pirated MS Office because they couldn't afford it, why try to get blood from a stone?"

      Pipe dream, I know. The BSA is basically the brute squad, and exists only to enforce "taxes". But it sure would be nice if they were at least slightly constructive, and actually helped businesses build the economy.

      -B

      --

      Ash and Hickory, straight-grained and true, make excellent bludgeons, dandy for the cudgeling of vegetarians.

    8. Re:So what would you ask the BSA? by Bastian · · Score: 4, Funny

      What would you put to him, in that position?

      I don't know. . . stuff. Nothing grandiose or complicated - just simple things like leg irons, hot pokers, thumbscrews. . .

    9. Re:So what would you ask the BSA? by LordWoody · · Score: 1

      Ask him why in potential violation of the DMCA, the BSA is using software to circumvent a protection device? I am referring to the bogus email supplied as the password for FTP logons. It is clearly stated by most FTP server connections that a valid email address is required for access.

      --
      Never meddle in the affairs of dragons,
      for you are crunchy and good with catsup.
    10. Re:So what would you ask the BSA? by kalidasa · · Score: 1

      Well, you might tell them to stop the "audit" model they're using and the "disgruntled employee" model and instead just go with things like double registrations, requiring registration on protected software, etc. The audit model inconveniences even the innocent, and the disgruntled employee model encourages perjury.

    11. Re:So what would you ask the BSA? by moncyb · · Score: 1

      I'd ask them how they can be so stupid as to file DMCA complaints based only upon the results of a search bot. They need to check the results to see if there is a real case of infringement, and not send false complaints.

    12. Re:So what would you ask the BSA? by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      EULAs and real contracts always have a little clause that states if any one clause is illegal, the rest are still valid.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    13. Re:So what would you ask the BSA? by pmz · · Score: 1

      What would you put to him, in that position?

      Why are they so naive and lazy to think this sort of scheme would not land them in trouble?

    14. Re:So what would you ask the BSA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ask about ftp sites having something to do with office furniture. The internet is useful for many things that have nothing to do with computers or software.

    15. Re:So what would you ask the BSA? by MrIcee · · Score: 1
      to grill him about issues like this

      Grilling is too good for the likes of the BSA. I recommend sauteing, or perhaps boiling in oil, or even deep fried.

      Or better yet... barbequed over an open flame fueled with MS crap (I hear shit burns really good).

    16. Re:So what would you ask the BSA? by Alien+Being · · Score: 1

      >What would you put to him...

      A cluestick? Nah, a .44 Magnum, the most powerful handgun in the world...

    17. Re:So what would you ask the BSA? by Just+Jeff · · Score: 1

      I think I would ask the BSA...

      1) Why should a falsly accused University refrain from taking BSA to court for damages?

      2) What is involved in becoming a BSA member?

      3) What influence would such a member have in setting the standards by which BSA operates?

    18. Re:So what would you ask the BSA? by Luveno · · Score: 1
      Tell him to presume innocence rather than immediately assume guilt

      Yeah, but that's soooooooo much more work!

    19. Re:So what would you ask the BSA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, but here's the kicker - that clause isn't valid either.

    20. Re:So what would you ask the BSA? by geekotourist · · Score: 1
      Well...(retorical questions all, and based on the US BSA...)

      Does the BSA believe that an *actually innocent* small business can afford to fight the BSA if the BSA is wrong? In the US penalties are so high no one except the largest companies can fight it. You'll fight a traffic ticket because you can afford to lose. What if the original ticket was $100,000, with a "negotiated" fine of $1,000? This is extortion, not a negotiation- you'll accept whatever the court says because you cannot risk losing. Not to mention if *you* had to show that you didn't speed, even a little bit, and lack of evidence = proof of guilt. (And the prosecution was allowed to dismantle your car, putting it out of service for days...) Extraordinary fines should require extraordinary proof, but instead the BSA has you do all the work, and even if you are entirely innocent you can still get hit.

      Why is software piracy worse than activities that actually can harm life? Is software piracy that much worse than discharging toxic substances into waterways (max fine $125,000)? Misbranding a drug in interstate commerce (max fine $100,000)? Violating the Sherman Antitrust Act (the fine listed in Section 3571 (d) is "not more than the greater of twice the gross gain or twice the gross loss" caused by the conduct...)?

      Are the BSA members willing to accept their own rules for their own activities? Would they accept a Software Consulting Association that can send audit letters out checking for late payments to consultants? If you've paid a consultant more than 30 days late, you get fined $200k. Or an Hourly Workers Association- you have to prove you've never underpaid hourly workers, or its $50k. How about a Pricing Mistake Association- if an online store misprices an item, you get not double the difference, or 10x, but 1,000x for each instance. [No, they wouldn't, because the rules that the BSA use wouldn't work if applied to all of society. Unless a mistake can cause extraordinary harm, you don't usually get to treat mistakes like a felony!]

      How does the BSA get to levy fines so out of proportion to actual damages? In this Slashdot / Salon / LATimes coverage we saw Microsoft and the BSA vs the LA School District where "hundreds" of unlicensed copies were found. The threat was $150,000 fine for each copy of a $100 per license product. ($100 at best. 1/3 were MSDOS, and schools get very good rates). They "negotiate" down to a $300,000 total fine, and the school district probably felt very grateful for this kindness of the BSA. This is a 150,000% fine negotiated down to a 1,000% fine. (or 1,500x down to 10x). Yes, illegal copies are a crime (as is speeding), but the LAUSD wasn't running a mass piracy operation. Assuming that "hundreds" = 500 copies found, then the LAUSD had found roughly 1 copy per school, or 1 copy per 120 employees. The BSA got to treat the LAUSD as if it had found widespread felonious behavior rather than a few years worth of a few people deliberately or mistakenly making copies. No proof of bad intentions needed.

    21. Re:So what would you ask the BSA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ask him if he knows what the penalty for perjury is.

      Then ask him why practices they use shouldn't be considered extortion?

    22. Re:So what would you ask the BSA? by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      Standard boilerplate for any contract that I've seen. (Your laws and colour of sky may vary.)

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  63. Has Microsoft a copyright for "Office" now? by the_other_one · · Score: 1

    To avoid infringement and further confusion they should rename the program. To better represent the work environment where producivity software is used these days. Call it OpenCubeFarm.

    --
    134340: I am not a number. I am a free planet!
  64. Good news for the good guys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This really is good news--nothing will discredit BSA and their ilk faster than their making multiple false claims. We should all hope they next run searches on GUI, window, and desktop.

  65. Oldie but a goodie by emtboy9 · · Score: 0

    All your office are belong to us!

    --
    "Our funds have never taken part in toxic or death spiral convertible financings of any sort" -BayStar's managing partne
  66. Re:Sounds // Something that always bugged me [OT] by LemurShop · · Score: 0

    A) Get a life

    We're here discussing the advantages and disadvantages of using vi over emacs more often that having hot, steamy sex while eating grapes. Why do -they- need to get a life?

    --

    This sig was cut off by the sla
  67. So the BSA made a very embarassing mistake. by sawilson · · Score: 1

    Oh, and it's becoming highly publisized. If they
    truly are microsoft in disguise, wouldn't this
    mearly be business as usual?

  68. sue them. by kevin+lyda · · Score: 4, Insightful

    seriously. they sent you a legal notice that was false. they logged into your ftp server with false information.

    if you sent the bsa a legal document that was false, could you get away with, "oops, sorry?"

    --
    US Citizen living abroad? Register to vote!
    1. Re:sue them. by PMuse · · Score: 1

      Sue them for what? BSA sent a letter, not a lawsuit. BSA sent it privately to the univeristy, not publically. The university was not hauled into court and its public reputation was not assaulted. When the (unbelieveably dumb) mistake was pointed out, BSA (to my shock and surprize) apologized.

      I don't like BSA's tactics either. As this case makes obvious, they work from the assumption that they own rights to anything that looks, sounds, or smells even vaguely like one of their clients' products. However, you can only sue someone who injures you. As with junk faxes and spam, it would take a special law to make 'sending out copyright cease-and-desist letters' into an injury you could sue on.

      Hey! Now there's an idea!

      --
      "We reject as false the choice between our safety and our ideals." --The American President (20.1.2009)
    2. Re:sue them. by jackbox · · Score: 1

      I agree completely. I was amused by this thread until I actually read the notice the BSA sent.

      It is falsely accusatory, and, as others have pointed out, makes the patently false claim that they represent the copyright holders (for GPL software).

      IANAL, but - I would think that a (false) accusation of piracy like this could have demonstrably negative effects on a business (particularly on a University, or a software distribution site). Maybe they can get off with that "we have a good faith belief" clause. But there's also that "under penalty of perjury" clause.

      Yeah - sue 'em. Get help and sue 'em.

      Between this and the RIAA cutting off Internet service to someone with a "Photo of Mrs. Harrison" this stuff just has to be stopped.

  69. So Send 'em A Legal Letter Back by Greyfox · · Score: 1
    Tell them that the files in question are being distributed with the permission of the copyright holder and that any further communication from their company will be considered harassment and prosecuted under the harassment laws in whichever juristiction has nastier harassment laws.

    IANAL but I've seen all the episodes of Ally MacBeal.

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

  70. Problem solved by Trollificus · · Score: 2, Informative

    From the linked list;

    "Hi
    We received this message from Christian Schild of Muenster. I immediately
    contacted the BSA and clarified the situation; they apologized for the
    misunderstanding.
    --
    Quote:
    Dear Mrs. Suarez-Potts,
    I apologize for the obvious mistake I made.
    Apparently our system detects the OpenOffice files as MS Office programs and
    alarms me, which in turn sends the notices. I failed my part by not
    reassuring clearly enough which property was infringed and now that I am
    aware of that fact we will try and fix the search terms of our system and of
    course be more aware of the possible mistake.
    Thank you very much for your e-mail.
    Sincerely,
    Corinna Beck"


    So the BSA rep apologized for the error and all was forgiven. At least they had the decency to rectify the problem before it got out of hand.

    --

    "People should be allowed to keep midgets as pets."
    - Gov. Jesse Ventura

  71. Whoa is us... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...if Microsoft ever puts out a product named "MS Porn"...

    The BSA would have a field day finding the billions of hits on that one. Of course with my luck they'd come after me first!

  72. Cluestick time? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    It kind of highlights just how silly automated emails like this can be.

    Snippit from the email from BSA to the uni:


    Filename: /mandrake_current/SRPMS/OpenOffice.org-1.0.1-9mdk. src.rpm (199,643kb)
    Filename: /mandrake_current/i586/Mandrake/RPMS/OpenOffice.or g-libs-1.0.1-9mdk.i586.rpm (35,444kb)

    The above computer program(s) is/are being made available for copying, through downloading, at the above location without authorization from the copyright owner(s).

    Based upon BSA's representation of the copyright owners in anti-piracy matters, we have a good faith belief that none of the materials or activities listed above have been authorized by the rightholders, their agents, or the law. BSA represents that the information in this notification is accurate and states, under penalty of perjury, that it is authorized to act in this matter on behalf of the copyright owners listed above.


    Shouldn't someone go and slap this lawyer with a solid cluestick since they have basically stated that these are the facts, i.e. that they are working on behalf of the copyright owners (OpenOffice team, anyone?)

    Maybe someone from the OpenOffice team could find a nice pro-bono lawyer to go and inquire about what happens to lawyers when they claim the incorrect information under penalty of perjury. One would assume a cluestick hit would be the minimum, although getting this persons license to practice law revoked would be nice (not for her, but anyway...)

    A good example of a lawyer losing her license to practice law (and her livlihood, one would assume) might act as a really good deterrent to other lawyers sending (and/or signing off on...) stupid automated emails like this.

  73. BSA using bad anonymous login by RichMan · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I note that the BSA email includes the details of how they accessed the "violating" software. This includes the anonymous ftp login using
    login: anonymous
    password: guest@nowhere.com

    I doubt that the address guest@nowhere.com connects to the person that runs the script for the BSA. If servers had the policy requirement that all anonymous access required a valid email address as the anonymous login password the letter from the BSA would provide a valid point to charge the BSA with illegal access to a system.

    Also if the BSA does not represent the copyright/left holders for OpenOffice then the BSA is open for a claim of false representation.
    >> Based upon BSA's representation of the copyright owners in anti-piracy
    >> matters, we have a good faith belief that none of the materials or
    >> activities listed above have been authorized by the rightholders, their
    >> agents, or the law. BSA represents that the information in this
    >> notification is accurate and states, under penalty of perjury, that it is
    >> authorized to act in this matter on behalf of the copyright owners listed
    >> above.

    1. Re:BSA using bad anonymous login by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Something even more interesting is that nowhere.com is registered to "Lisa Seaman", according to whois data, and has a www site. I've been wondering what would happen if Ms. Seaman decided to sue the BSA.

    2. Re:BSA using bad anonymous login by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And there is a real nowhere.com.
      birds
      (Caution: requires Macromedia Shockwave or some such)

      Extremely unlikely to have any relationship with BSA. Forging someone else's return address is not ethical behaviour.

    3. Re:BSA using bad anonymous login by samdu · · Score: 1

      And, as it turns out, there IS an actual nowhere.com. I'd be kind of pissed if I owned the domain and the BSA was falsely claming to originate their spider scripts from there.

  74. The BSA mail is classic spam by wdb · · Score: 1

    Is it just me, or is the BSA mail discussed here a classic spam run? First scour sites for hits on anything that might remotely look like a reason to send the message, then send an impersonal, blatantly commercial email to the administrative address(es) of those sites. Walks like a duck... -wdb

  75. Oh dear. by hoegh · · Score: 1

    Not only do I have OpenOffice installed, but also X-Windows... Oh boy - I must be in deep troubles now...!

    1. Re:Oh dear. by devnullify · · Score: 1

      X is safe, the proper name is X Window System, the major implementation, XFree86, is generally referred to as such in filenames. Too bad, that'd be even more fun ;)

  76. different position! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    I'd put him in a different position, for starters. Preferably one involving a plunger and some vaseline.

    1. Re:different position! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Screw the vaseline.

  77. Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    tni maine{ tni argc, chra *argv[])
    {
    prinft("Ths si consistant!\m");
    reten 0;
    }

    Your argument doesn't seem to work, for some reason.
    1. Re:Really? by Walterk · · Score: 1
      Amateur.
      typedef int tni;
      typedef char chra;
      #define prinft(x) printf(x)
      #define reten return
      and if you fix the { you could also do a:
      #define maine(x, y) main(x, y)
  78. But what if everybody had a file called Office? by geoff+lane · · Score: 1

    If I create a file on my ftp server called "Office.Exe" will I eventually get a threatening email? What about a file called "Windows3.11" or "FrontPage".

    But, if everybody did that the BSA would have to apologise a lot more and may even eventually be thought to be an inefficient or incompetant organisation.

    On the other hand it may just be simpler to find out the ISP they use and block them using a packet filter...

    1. Re:But what if everybody had a file called Office? by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Do an FTP search for "frontpage" -- every server in the known universe that supports the FP extensions comes up.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    2. Re:But what if everybody had a file called Office? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now a virus that just happen to append "office" is all file names would seem to cause quite a problem...

  79. False identification by jdevers77 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I don't see where anyone else has noticed this, but doesn't the BSA more or less falsely identify itself by using the e-mail address of guest@nowhere.com?

    Infringement Details:

    First Found: 24 Nov 2002 15:31:40 EST (GMT -500)
    Last Found: 24 Feb 2003 01:19:59 EST (GMT -500)
    IP Address: 128.176.191.21
    IP Port: 21
    Protocol: FTP
    FTP Login Name: anonymous
    FTP Login Password: guest@nowhere.com

    I'm sure the owners of that domain would be happy to know about the false identification the BSA is using...

  80. Re:New business plan. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    40000 bytes? For Microsoft Office? Not even the BSA's scripts are going to be stupid enough to believe that!

  81. New company policy by digitalgimpus · · Score: 1

    I have a new company policy... all MS Office created documents must be safed as:

    [filename]_office.doc
    [filename]_office.xls
    [f ilename]_office.ppt

  82. Funny by ackthpt · · Score: 1
    This is really funny actually.

    Yes, it is FUNNY as in Funny-Ha-Ha. Why is it listed under the Microsoft Bill-Borg? Smells like blind incompetence on the part of the BSA (or whomever did this work for them, and your guess on that account is as good as mine.)

    I wonder if the tables could be tipped, using this , to counter BSA Terrorism.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    1. Re:Funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why is it listed under the Microsoft Bill-Borg

      Microsoft founded the BSA, and represents an overwhelming majority of the software they check in thier jackbooted raids.

    2. Re:Funny by mpe · · Score: 1

      Microsoft founded the BSA, and represents an overwhelming majority of the software they check in thier jackbooted raids.

      Maybe the idea is to protect their assets if/when the BSA gets prosecuted or sued out of existance...

  83. How about this? by Ty · · Score: 1

    Someone please write a script to search ftp sites for "Office" and additionally check for the OS licence on any hits. Then send the offending admins notification that they're in violation of the Open Office license...

  84. Pointless waste of time by kinnell · · Score: 1

    Any real pirates who want to distribute MS Office, will just rename the file on their ftp servers to something obfuscated as soon as they cotton on to this scripting lark.

    --
    If I seem short sighted, it is because I stand on the shoulders of midgets
    1. Re:Pointless waste of time by MarkGriz · · Score: 1

      I'm renaming all my files from "office" to "0ph1c3".
      We'll just see if they can crack that code.

      --
      Beauty is in the eye of the beerholder.
  85. MPAA does this too by Christianfreak · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I have a friend who had a program called 'decss' which removed CSS tags from a webpage, hosted on a University computer. The MPAA emailed the University with a threat of legal action if the program wasn't removed. Really quite humorous.

    1. Re:MPAA does this too by Junta · · Score: 2, Interesting

      To be fair, that program was intentionally meant to draw just that kind of confusion. I was quite amused by its existence, but IIRC, the page itself said they didn't think the application was very practically useful, but it fit the name and creating confusion over the issue was more the goal than anything.

      I could understand using 'decss' as a string to find and automate warning letters about (*If* you are willing to accept that decss was an immoral program, I disagree, but for the sake of argument..), as it is a rather unique name to the application at hand, and is not likely to be shared by something accidentally.

      Office, however, is a rather generic name. It happens to be the only part of the MS Office name that is common to most of the warez zip files, I would guess (I actually don't have a warez copy of Office, the only copy of Office I have is the Office 97 that shipped with an older Gateway system, and I happen to only use it on that system, since it also is the only Windows machine in the house).

      StarOffice, OpenOffice, and probably others would share this problem, and their script should be more careful about checking for this.

      Of course, I don't expect too much out of the BSA, they are essentially a group of professional extortionists whose practices are probably illegal if thoroughly tested in court. Threatening to tell on you unless given money seems illegal to me, I would think they would have to go straight to court before doing anything, and that is only if the company being represented has signed off to let the BSA act on their behalf.. Of course, people running Linux and OpenOffice have nothing to worry about ;)

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
  86. So the BSA is sending unsolicited bulk email then. by sawilson · · Score: 2, Informative

    Time to add their mailserver to the spam filter.
    Everybody else should probably do the same. If you
    aren't mature enough to know when and who to email,
    you don't deserve to send email to any of my
    machines.

  87. nowhere.com? by geoff+lane · · Score: 1

    Is a real site at 128.121.175.50 and has a web page.

    If the BSA don't own the site haven't they committed identity theft?

  88. Flood em by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    upload everything named Office.txt Office.pdf Office.mp3 Office.mpeg Office.exe all kinds of Office files

  89. RE: Case ID 588853 by MasterBlaster · · Score: 1

    To whom it may concern: Bite me. Herman

  90. drug dealer analogy by stud9920 · · Score: 1

    If you sell flour or sugar in little bags, in a back alley, pretending it's cocaine, you WILL get in jail for selling cocaine, even though it wasn't.

    1. Re:drug dealer analogy by tellezj · · Score: 1

      In order to prosecute this, the laws had to be written to allow it. No such law exists for distributing software that "appears" to be pirated.

      --

      End of Line.

    2. Re:drug dealer analogy by PhoenixFlare · · Score: 1

      Plus, they were in no way trying to pass OpenOffice off as Microsoft's Office, and the files weren't/aren't even designed to run on the same operating system...

      What exactly are you trying to insinuate with that analogy?

    3. Re:drug dealer analogy by JohnnyBolla · · Score: 1

      See, there is a difference between conterfeit dope and this. This isn't illegal.

      --
      Carpe Deez
  91. Score -1, AC is a dork! by multipartmixed · · Score: 1

    What the AC misses is that Doom was shareware! Millions of people bought the *shareware* copy!

    Only episodes 2 and 3 were pay-for-play. Sheesh.

    (and what the hell is wrong with slashdot today???

    --

    Do daemons dream of electric sleep()?
  92. Not really. by PrimeNumber · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Not too much of a stretch. Microsoft has been a major contributor to the BSA since its inception. It harasses companies based on rumors of software non-compliance co-opting US Marshalls to act as a the gestapo. It is also growing power and influence worldwide.

    Read this interview with Gates himself for more insight on Microsoft and the BSA.

    To sum it all up, the BSA *is* Microsoft.

  93. just a matter of time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    You realize, of course, that it's just a matter of time before the BSA and Microsoft pay^H^H^Hpersuade Congress to outlaw Open Source software outright. Then their spiders would be advancing the cause of America by rooting out evil Open Source software.

    I'm almost surprised that they don't have an Open Source skunkworks that secretly inserts buggy code into various projects. Or what if they bought VA Software? Maybe they already own it! You know that time is coming when you see Microsoft ads on Slashdot.

    Time to go back to my padded cell....

  94. TERRORISM!!! by NineNine · · Score: 1

    Whoa! Looks like we're up to level RED! Seriously, drop a line to the FBI notifying them of "terrorists" that attempted to hack into your machine with false information. Let the FBI kick their doors down. I'd do the same, but unfortunately, they didn't check any of my FTP sites :( (I just checked my logs for the past few months).

    1. Re:TERRORISM!!! by samhalliday · · Score: 1
      hey FBI, there is a really old guy who looks like he might be tasting some wine over here, you want me to alert the authorities and have him thrown in jail? (regards recent 'intelligent' FBI work in South Africa, see link)

      BBC Story

  95. Penalty of perjury by innocent_white_lamb · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The BSA's notice states that they make their claims under penalty of perjury.

    As their information is easily shown to be false and incorrect, and as it's also easily shown that they should have known enough to check simple facts like these....

    How about applying to the court for the application of the penalty for perjury, which I believe is time in jail, to the folks who are responsible for this obviously faulty notice that they obviously didn't bother to check for accuracy and that they themselves have sworn to the accuracy of.

    Penalty of perjury isn't just a form of words like "How do you do" or "Have a nice day". The penalty is real and should be applied where warranted. The BSA requested the penalty for perjury in their notice. It should be delivered.

    --
    If you're a zombie and you know it, bite your friend!
    1. Re:Penalty of perjury by parliboy · · Score: 2, Interesting
      What the notice says is that the BSA is authorized to act on behalf of the copyright owners listed in the notice. It then fails to list any copyright owner. Oh sure it lists the program Microsoft Office, but that's not a copyright owner. Thus the BSA has not actually committed perjury.

      IANAL, but I'm evil and devious enough to be one.

      --
      "You're never ready, just less unprepared."
  96. Free Positive "Switcher" Review for OO.org? by misfit13b · · Score: 1
    This might be good news for openoffice.org, provided they're willing to put a fun little spin on it. Time to convince more people to switch! ;^)

    I can see it now...

    Download OpenOffice 1.0 - Hear what people are saying!
    "Virtually identical to Microsoft Office" - Corinna Beck, BSA

  97. source for this story? by choad · · Score: 1

    Does anyone have the source for this story? It's rather unclear if this is a genuine story or just a rumor.

    1. Re:source for this story? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What, apart from that great big fucking link in the article body, that takes you to the mailing list with the original email(s) from the BSA on it?

      Yeah, there's no source at all. Fucktard.

  98. Quite the contrary, by thatguywhoiam · · Score: 2
    I think the generic names are the whole point.

    Ladies (ha!) and gentlemen, I have discovered why MS named their products in such a way. It makes keyword searches harder.

    Ever try to search for 'The The' on Gnutella? It's NOT easy.

    --
    If Jesus wants me it knows where to find me.
  99. Hmm... by paulhar · · Score: 2, Interesting


    Hmm... when I log into the server it asks me for my complete email address:

    User (128.176.191.21:(none)): ftp
    331 Guest login ok, send your complete e-mail address as password.
    Password:

    Yet the BSA used
    >> FTP Login Name: anonymous
    >> FTP Login Password: guest@nowhere.com

    But nowhere.com exists, and is someones homepage! Is it good that they

    a) abuse someone elses domain by logging requests as being from someone else

    b) don't comply with the very valid request to supply contact details for the person accessing the ftp server.

    Grr!

  100. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2, Flamebait

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  101. Making a legal "illegal" server by phorm · · Score: 3, Interesting

    After building up some more money, I've often considered doing the following (this applies to music but could easily apply to other mediums):

    Putting up a server with tons and tons of mp3 files named after popular songs. Don't put up the real files however, just audio clips with a voice saying "this is not the file you are looking for" and enough silence or noise to make the filesize/length similar to an actual mp3 of the song.

    Next, let several well-respected citizens, or perhaps those in law see that the site does not contain any real copyrighted music.

    Wait for the cease and desist. Ignore or send a somewhat ambiguous reply stating something like "there's nothing to cease" but not mentioning the lack of actually pirated files

    Wait for the court case...

    Even with a crap lawyer, having some strong witnesses and playing 1-10 of the supposed pirated files to demonstrate that the *AA (or BSA) do not actually check file contents but simple use shitty filters and scare tactics should make the case an easy win - and leave the plaintiff with egg on their face.

    *note: This works better since I'm in Canada. Loser pays the legal fees, and there's always the countersue, etc, as well as I believe measures for frivolous lawsuits.

    1. Re:Making a legal "illegal" server by st0rmcold · · Score: 1

      I am canadian as well, and very interested in persuing this email me at rdoiron@acoa-apeca.gc.ca :)

      --
      Posting useless rant since 2003.
    2. Re:Making a legal "illegal" server by Junta · · Score: 1

      They may be cease&desist happy, shooting them off without much verification, but before they would bring things to court, they would at least try to collect preliminary evidence and realize they have nothing...

      It would be amusing, but I doubt anyone will bother to file a case before getting admissable evidence and reviewing it.

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
    3. Re:Making a legal "illegal" server by fliplap · · Score: 1

      Yes, and for your next trick, sell a bag of powered sugar to an undercover police officer telling him its cocaine.

      I'm sure they won't arrest you once you tell them it was a joke.

    4. Re:Making a legal "illegal" server by Poeir · · Score: 1

      Better use noise, since silence has been copywritten.

      --
      Sigs are like bumper stickers.
    5. Re:Making a legal "illegal" server by phorm · · Score: 1

      Yes, but in that case if it's not sale of a controlled substance, it's fraud or something else. The files aren't for sale, they're simple on a server with visible filenames.

  102. filled my ftp by solidox · · Score: 4, Funny

    ftp> ls -la
    227 Entering Passive Mode (127,0,0,1,249,244)
    150 Here comes the directory listing.
    drwxr-xr-x 2 502 502 4096 Feb 28 15:40 .
    drwxr-xr-x 12 502 502 4096 Feb 28 15:36 ..
    -rw-rw-r-- 1 502 502 0 Feb 28 15:37 BSA-are-morons.zip
    -rw-rw-r-- 1 502 502 0 Feb 28 15:36 Microsoft.Office.XP-sucks.zip
    -rw-rw-r-- 1 502 502 0 Feb 28 15:39 hazxxx0r
    -rw-rw-r-- 1 502 502 0 Feb 28 15:39 illegal
    -rw-rw-r-- 1 502 502 0 Feb 28 15:38 illegal.mp3
    -rw-rw-r-- 1 502 502 0 Feb 28 15:39 microsoft.salty.bastard.zip
    -rw-rw-r-- 1 502 502 0 Feb 28 15:37 microsoft.zip
    -rw-rw-r-- 1 502 502 0 Feb 28 15:37 office.zip
    -rw-rw-r-- 1 502 502 0 Feb 28 15:37 openoffice is better than microsoft word.zip
    -rw-rw-r-- 1 502 502 0 Feb 28 15:38 touchisagreattool
    -rw-rw-r-- 1 502 502 0 Feb 28 15:39 warezr0kr.rar
    226 Directory send OK.

    now i just sit back and wait for them to spider my ftp and send me a notice, then i can have the joy of telling them to piss off.

    hopefully this will fuck them off a bit.

    --
    1. Re:filled my ftp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I tried connecting to your ftp server on 127.0.0.1 but I didn't see the same files you have above - just a lot of pron vids, which I quite enjoyed.

      I therefore believe that you made up the above post.

      Respect

  103. Calling Lisa Seaman by coyote-san · · Score: 1

    The BSA really f*cked up on this one.

    First it confused "office" and "openoffice" while officially representing Microsoft. Microsoft is fighting attempts to invalidate its use of trademarked generics for its products (e.g., claiming that Lindows is infringing), and MS lawyers will have a far harder time defending this practice if even their own representatives are unable to correctly identify Microsoft products. (And no, trademarks can't apply to every possible phrase containing the words Windows, Office, Word, etc.)

    But now we learn it's using Lisa Seaman's domain for commercial purposes, almost certainly without authorization. "nobody.com" is a registered domain, and while she may not have many practical solutions to the dofuses (dofi?) that use her domain personally, an organization using it commercially (they get money for strong-arming people, right?) is a different thing.

    --
    For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong. -- H L Mencken
  104. SUE THE BSA! by TheConfusedOne · · Score: 1
    From the letter that they sent out:
    BSA represents that the information in this notification is accurate and states, under penalty of perjury, that it is authorized to act in this matter on behalf of the copyright owners listed above.

    Sounds like they can launch a perjury suit against the BSA. How the heck can they feel in the least bit legally justified to send out automated letters with this type of language in them?
    --
    --- I wish I could hear the soundtrack to my life. That way I'd know when to duck.
  105. God loving? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Only if the god you're talking about is Mammon.

  106. nowhere.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >> FTP Login Name: anonymous
    >> FTP Login Password: guest@nowhere.com

    I wonder whether the BSA had permission to use nowhere.com from the domain name owners. Wonder what the repercussions will be if they didn't....

  107. How come nobody sends a complaint for perjury? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    After all, BSA has no basis for any "good faith belief" that OpenOffice is copyrighted, has not in fact apparently looked at anything beyond part of a filename. Thus it is swearing to something under penalty of perjury which it knows or should know is false. Seems to me legal action against them (criminal action, that is) is called for. Locking up BSA people for awhile might just convince them that they need to go further rather than issue complaints.

  108. I once made up a fake software company... by karlm · · Score: 1
    ... about 4 years ago to get a free 6 month subscription to a magazine. It's mailing address is my old Fraternity house. The fake company got sent a letter by the BSA last month. The funny thing is, I think it was a Linux magazine. You'd think they'd check for incorporation before sending letters. The fake company gets corporate credit card offers all the time, but I used to think the BSA was more careful than that.

    Being and Eagle Scout, I should have sent them a cease and dessist letter asking them to stop infringing on the Boy Scouts of America's trademark, using the business-reply-envelope of course. I thought about sending them Mardi Gras beads from the party and a condom with a note saying "It's a fake company. The address is my old Fraternity house. Good thing I'm in the area and stop in for parties. There's a good Mardi Gras party tonight. Next time tell the girls at the office." I've heard that companies have to pay the extra postage if you make the business reply mail too heavy. Plus, it'd be great in a few years to see something I did getting put on one of those "most outrageous yet genuine recieved mail" joke emails that go around. If I get another letter maybe I'll send them some sand from the next beach party.

    --
    Copyright Violation:"theft, piracy"::Anti-Trust Violation:"thermonuclear price terrorism"<-Overly dramatic language.
    1. Re:I once made up a fake software company... by program21 · · Score: 1

      karlm....hmmm, I think I know exactly who this is.

      --
      This has been a test. Had this been a real emergency, we would have fled in terror and you would not have been informed.
  109. hrm, rather like a certain international crisis... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    This reminds me of the current imbroglio at the UN:

    "Iraq was accused by the US of harboring weapons of mass destruction. It seems the Pentagon only checks for whether Saddam Hussein is in power, and automatically issues new resolutions to the UN calling for war."

  110. Programming Excellence award by deadmongrel · · Score: 1

    This years programming excellence award goes to the programmers at BSA. Apparently all we have search for is "office" to findout if you have a pirated version of M$ office. kudos to the programming team

  111. Request: BSA rep for /. interview by Hanno · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Ok, I doubt anyone from them would dare to do it, but I'd love to see an official BSA representative to step up for a /. interview.

    --

    ------------------
    You may like my a cappella music
  112. Then go the next step... by tellezj · · Score: 5, Funny

    and put in the public/pirated/ms directory. Maybe the files can be filled with repeat copies of the US Constitution and the GPL. Add links from your website. Put out advertisements for it on Kazaa.

    --

    End of Line.

    1. Re:Then go the next step... by lildogie · · Score: 1

      Put in a legal cease and desist notice.

      Beat them at their own game.

  113. Selective but not selective? by JeffRC · · Score: 1

    Interesting. Mandrake's default GUI is KDE and it automatically installs KOffice for you in default installations. But the BSA algorithm didn't find the KOffice rpm. Could it be they really are targeting OpenOffice? Trying to get whatever gullible system administrators they can find to remove it from their sites?

    1. Re:Selective but not selective? by Junta · · Score: 1

      I would imagine that simply matching the word 'office' could be *WAY* too broad. I would suspect they search by filemasks, i.e.:
      *office*.zip
      *office*.exe
      etc...
      They probably don't search for Office without an executable or archive format extension common to windows, as rpm is not.

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
    2. Re:Selective but not selective? by JeffRC · · Score: 1

      But what they found were Mandrake OpenOffice*.rpm's not zip or exe files. They were specifically named for linux distros supporting rpms

    3. Re:Selective but not selective? by Junta · · Score: 1

      I stand corrected, guess I should RTFA. Now that is an interesting issue. Perhaps it is a case sensitive search program and caught the string "Office" and not "office"? Would seem stupid, but it is the only technical reason I could see...

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
    4. Re:Selective but not selective? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A previous poster guessed that the magic keywords were "MS" AND "Office" as in /mandrake_current/RPMS/OpenOffice.org-1.0.1-9mdk.i 586.rpm.

      It is possible that a file size requirement *could* exist, but somehow I doubt the BSA's script writer would have bothered.

  114. Wasting an opportunity by TheConfusedOne · · Score: 1

    Don't use nobody@mindyourownbusiness.com

    Use the reply to address from this C&D letter. Make sure you check all of those "Yes! I want valuable...blahblahblah" boxes too. :-D

    --
    --- I wish I could hear the soundtrack to my life. That way I'd know when to duck.
    1. Re:Wasting an opportunity by NamShubCMX · · Score: 1
      --
      We've always been at war with Eurasia.
  115. BSA fact check??? by p7 · · Score: 1

    What is really sad here, isn't that they are spidering ftp sites, but that evidently when their script gets a keyword hit, the legal team just gets the sites address and sends them a nastygram. You would think that there would be some verification that the file they found was what they claimed it to be.

  116. This isn't the only one. by sabri · · Score: 1

    I am network contact for one of the dutch largest toy companies, Bart Smit who sell online games. I have received at least 5 seperate "DEMAND FOR IMMEDIATE TAKEDOWN" emails from the BSA and Microsoft Anti Piracy. When replying and explaining the matter, I never got a reply so not even an excuse. I now have their envelope from addresses in my spamfilters. Sorry, bad luck for them.

    --
    I'm not a complete idiot... Some parts are missing.
  117. Who is Corinna Beckl? by rigorist · · Score: 1

    If Ms. Beck is an attorney, someone (anyone who knows of this) should file a complaint with all the states in which she is licensed. She has made a false statement and a false threat, which is serious lawyer misconduct.

  118. In the same spectrum... by st0rmcold · · Score: 1



    How about we kill everyone that looks remotly like bin laden, eventually we will get him. :)

    Hence the Office scan...

    --
    Posting useless rant since 2003.
  119. MIT's policy about the BSA by megazoid81 · · Score: 4, Interesting
    To: Members of the MIT Community
    Subj: MIT's policies regarding copyrights
    ---------------

    In recent weeks, many members of our Community have received a letter from BSA (Business Software Alliance; www.bsa.org) and/or heard BSA sponsored advertisements regarding software licensing compliance.

    At this time, I write to remind people of the Institute's copyright policy (see: for a complete statement of the policy):

    • MIT respects copyright law and Institute policy calls for our community not to violate copyrights and to adhere to license requirements.
    • Claims of copyright infringement are promptly investigated. If the clam is found to be valid, MIT will take prompt action to have the infringing activity stopped.

      At this time, MIT is not aware that the BSA has been granted authority to enforce the copyrights of its members. If the BSA contacts you regarding an alleged infringement, MIT's standard practices should be followed. The BSA should be directed to Stop-it, the MIT unit with responsibility for following-up on copyright infringement complaints resulting from network-based activities. Stop-it is found at stopit@mit.edu or at .

      Without specific written authority from a copyright holder or other valid legal authority, the BSA has no right to inspect MIT computers for illegal copies of software. MIT most likely will have licenses covering the software in question. Those licenses often spell out the audit rights of the vendor as well as the rights MIT has to make copies of the software. Anyone approached by the BSA with a complaint of software piracy should confirm the license status before proceeding further. In the event appropriate licensed use cannot be confirmed, James D Bruce, VP for Information Systems, should be contacted for appropriate follow-up with BSA representatives.

      For further advice on matters concerning BSA inquiries or copyright infringement in general, please contact the Office of Intellectual Property Counsel at (XXX) YYY-YYYY, the Office for the VP for Information Systems at (YYY) XXX-XXXX or Stopit (stopit@mit.edu).

    1. Re:MIT's policy about the BSA by jonesvery · · Score: 1

      At this time, MIT is not aware that the BSA has been granted authority to enforce the copyrights of its members.

      According to a "fact sheet" on the BSA site (PDF, HTML-ified Google cache is here), they do actually have that authority:

      What legal authority does BSA have to sue companies or conduct raids?
      On behalf of each of its worldwide members, BSA has the power of attorney to their rights under the copyright laws. BSA also works directly with law enforcement officials on criminal prosecutions.

      --

      * * *
      It is a dada story -- it has no moral.

  120. Even better... by ryman · · Score: 1

    Why not just use one of these convenient, yet real, addresses:
    webmaster@bsa.org
    info@bsa.org
    supportBSA@bsa.org
    software@bsa.org

    --
    "We are far too easily pleased." --C.S. Lewis
  121. Who is infringing who? by Halvard · · Score: 5, Insightful

    From the BSA apology: (italics and emphasis mine)

    Apparently our system detects the OpenOffice files as MS Office programs and alarms me, which in turn sends the notices. I failed my part by not reassuring clearly enough which property was infringed and now that I am aware of that fact we will try and fix the search terms of our system and of course be more aware of the possible mistake.

    Apparently, they automatically assume that some one/organization is a crook by the "which property was infringed" statement. No human oversite of the 'bot, no extensive verification routines, etc. and the result is frivolous threats and accusations. This isn't the first time I've heard of this happening. To me, this sounds like routinely making false accusations against innocent people and businesses.

    IANAL, however let's see if I can layout objectional behavior and possibly illegal behavior:

    Frivolous accusation of wrong doing without due diligence to verify allegations made by threat. This cost the University money because employees had to deal with a claim without merit. At least 2 employees, and a potentially expensive number of man-hours. No doubt, the person who received the threat sent it to their boss, who either sent it to their boss or the legal department. At least one meeting would have ensued as well as researching the claim that the University stated that they did to check that in fact they were not distributing MS Office. That could be several thousand Euros or even more that ten thousand Euros based on time involved where these people could have and would have been engaged in productive work.

    Despite the point of entry being anonymous FTP, the BSA engaged in what might possibly be theft of service (by consuming a finite resource for other than the purpose the allowed reason of access that the University pays for). This may also prevent others from using the system legitimately because of the expense of the system.

    Trespassing possibly. SPAM has been cited as trespassing due to the use of others assets for transmittal and storage. Perhaps this can be construed like this as well.If in fact accusations like these directed against the University of Muenster have been occuring for some time against others for doing similar things, than the apology (from the organization since I can't speak for the individual) most likely is not sincere and means that this behavior will in all likelihood continue, the the University and others. I believe we can be reasonably sure that the BSA has not ceased this behavior because of this incident.

    I feel that this situation is akin to this scenario: I give or sell a dozen cookies to people or organizations in Boston. Then, I walk into every office in New York City and exclaim that because there is some food on a desk, food waste in the trash, etc., that they obviously stole my cookies because cookies are food. Cookies are the metphor for software and an unlocked door at an office is the metaphor for anonymous FTP.

    What this shows is that the BSA is engaging in activities in multiple countries. Because their membership is dominated by the major software companies, and here they threatend the distribution of a competing, if free, product, perhaps this can be construed as collusion by the software giants and anticompetive behavior. Can someone cite other similar instances?

  122. Do they own "nowhere.com"? by RMH101 · · Score: 1

    It's illegal if not as they're either posing as them...

  123. The real copyright owners should... by moncyb · · Score: 1

    get together and charge the BSA with fraud. After all, the BSA claimed they represented the copyright owners of OpenOffice, didn't they? As far as I can tell, they don't.

  124. It's a good thing... by feidaykin · · Score: 1, Interesting
    It's a good thing Slashdot doesn't have an MS Office topic, because the topic image would likely be titled "topicmsoffice.gif" and be flagged as piracy by the BSA's trigger happy script.

    This just makes the BSA look extremely lazy... you'd think they'd at least have someone that verifies what when script finds before the emails are sent out.

    --

    "To confine our attention to terrestrial matters would be to limit the human spirit." -Stephen Hawking

  125. my favorite BSA ad by Twister002 · · Score: 1

    I get these in my daily job search email.

    =============SPONSORED ADVERTISEMENT==============

    Bust Your Boss!

    Is your current or former employer using pirated software
    in their office? Hit'em where it really hurts - report their
    illegal software use today.

    Click to visit www.bsa.org

    --
    "For a successful technology, honesty must take precedence over public relations for nature cannot be fooled." -Feynman
  126. what about x windows ?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    on some ftp mirror sites, xfree86 is in directories such as 'xwindows'. imagine if bsa'a spidering thingie also looks for anything with 'windows' in it... bingo! threat letters!!
    IANAL, but they seem to be stupid enough to do it.
    [http://goto.gosub.dk]

  127. Why not by ngnMan · · Score: 3, Funny

    why not place on every server one or more link to msoffice.exe pointing to a fake file? BSA would send million of notices... (and spend a lot if the notice is sent by snail mail)

  128. Stupid to just check filenames by jwjcmw · · Score: 1
    They are going to run into even more trouble if they attempt to just check filenames. What if I have a FTP server with a self-extracting zip file of word documents that I have written named MS-Office.exe?

    They should have to identify themselves to the server(none of this nobody@imacoward.com crap), download the file, and compare that file against a database of their member's software before any cease and desist letters go out.

    Of course, some of the software they download might get installed... and they might start to like it... and they might turn against the overlords.

  129. I wouldn't know by slow_flight · · Score: 1

    Did any of you get similar notices from the BSA?
    I wouldn't know - if the envelope says BSA, it gets spit on and circular filed immediately. I did keep one BSA letter that I trot out to BSA member vendors when they come knocking, though.

    --

    Karma: Professionally Doomed (mostly affected by inability to keep opinions to self)
  130. Lets.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Add files with "office" in the filename on any public ftp servers we have rights on.

  131. Re:Sounds // Something that always bugged me [OT] by Bull999999 · · Score: 1

    "vi over emacs"

    Everyone knows Pico is all you need.

    --
    1f u c4n r34d th1s u r34lly n33d t0 g37 l41d
  132. Timely Story by 4of12 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This USA Today account of a small business owner that went through license flogging, a fine, then wiping clean and starting fresh with open source software.

    --
    "Provided by the management for your protection."
  133. The BSA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I never like the Boy Scouts of America! They make little boys dress up like Nazis and march around.

  134. The accused response by SCHecklerX · · Score: 1

    ...was certainly more well-mannered than mine would have been!

  135. Windows by mrbrown1602 · · Score: 1

    I have an FTP full of pictures of Windows from houses. Is the BSA going to come after me?? ;-)

    1. Re:Windows by kyoko21 · · Score: 2, Funny

      That's a great idea. Maybe someone should get in contact with the folks from the TV show "This old house" and get them to take a bunch of photos of windows that are used from their shows. They have a lot of windows that are shipped directly from the manufacturers and sometimes I am sure some have to get shipped back. Put these images on a CD and make it into an ISO. Call it: Windows2003-TOH-RTM.iso. I'm sure the BSA will get a great kick out of it. (TOH in the file name is for This Old House.)

    2. Re:Windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you add a picture of the glass from one of the buildings from 1 Microsoft Way on your server, do you have an illegal copy of Microsoft's Windows? ;)



  136. Question... by chinton · · Score: 1

    This burns me every time I hear one of their "Grace Period" ads on the radio. On what authority can the BSA come into my place of business, audit, and fine me? They aren't a government or law enforcement agency, are they? What could they really do if they show up at my door and I tell them to take a leap?

    1. Re:Question... by jonesvery · · Score: 1

      On what authority can the BSA come into my place of business, audit, and fine me?

      Easily answered:
      On behalf of each of its worldwide members, BSA has the power of attorney to their rights under the copyright laws. BSA also works directly with law enforcement officials on criminal prosecutions.

      See Google's HTML-ified cache of a fact sheet from the BSA Web site.

      --

      * * *
      It is a dada story -- it has no moral.

  137. Let's write her a letter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1. Does US law affect Germany?
    2. Why doesn't she write in German?
    3. It is unlawful in Germany to write letters that proclaim further legal action will be taken.
    4. Are there similar cases?
    5. what about a letter of excuse to the public?

    RE: Unauthorized Distribution of the following copyrighted computer
    program(s):

    Microsoft Office

    Dear Sir/Madam:

    The Business Software Alliance (BSA) has determined that the connection
    listed below, which appears to be using an Internet account under your
    control, is operating an FTP server to offer unlicensed copies or is engaged
    in other unauthorized activities relating to copyrighted computer programs
    published by the BSA's member companies.

    The above computer program(s) is/are being made available for copying,
    through downloading, at the above location without authorization from the
    copyright owner(s). ...
    Based upon BSA's representation of the copyright owners in anti-piracy
    matters, we have a good faith belief that none of the materials or
    activities listed above have been authorized by the rightholders, their
    >> agents, or the law. BSA represents that the information in this
    >> notification is accurate and states, under penalty of perjury, that it is
    >> authorized to act in this matter on behalf of the copyright owners listed
    >> above.

    We hereby give notice of these activities to you and request that you take
    expeditious action to remove or disable access to the materials described
    above, and thereby prevent the illegal reproduction and distribution of
    pirated software via your company's network. As you know, illegal on-line
    activities can result in 50 million people on the Internet accessing and
    downloading a copyrighted product worldwide without authorization - a highly
    damaging activity for the copyright holder.

    We appreciate your cooperation in this matter. Please advise us regarding
    what actions you take.

    Please include the following CaseID in any response you send: Case ID 588853

    Yours sincerely,

    Corinna Beck
    Business Software Alliance
    1150 18th St NW Suite 700
    Washington,DC 20036
    http://www.bsa.org
    E-mail: copyright-europe@bsa.org

    1. Re:Let's write her a letter by fussman · · Score: 0

      6. ??? 7. Profit 8. Insert favorite beowulf cluster here.

      --
      Support Israeli punk bands. Man Alive.
  138. False claim of copyright by Animats · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Making a false claim of copyright is a criminal offense in the US, punishable by fine or imprisonment. (17 USC 506(c)). That's come up in a case where one vendor made a false claim of copyright to induce a customer not to buy a competitor's product. That's libel.

    In California, it's probably extortion, too. "Extortion: To unlawfully obtain money, property, or any other thing of value, either tangible or intangible, through the use or threat of force, misuse of authority, threat of criminal prosecution, threat of destruction of reputation or social standing, or through other coercive means." That's a felony. Because there was an illegal predicate act, the "unlawfully" element of extortion is satisfied.

    Some legal action is definitely indicated.

  139. Start a new organization... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is in fact illegal to impersonate people.

    guest@nobody.com

    Using nobody.com 's domain to impersonate the account on their system named guest is in fact illegal, Isnt it?

    Maybe we should start our own little faggy organization like the bsa that focuses primarely on looking for logs of businesses and peoples accounts being impersonated by other people on ftps via the internet.

    Signed,

    Anonymous Coward haha

    1. Re:Start a new organization... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Help! Help! I'm being impersonated!

  140. This is an easy one. by JGski · · Score: 3, Interesting
    The BSA is so fond of applying legal sticks, well, it's time for "back at ya' punk"! The BSA uses their legal muscle as a terrorist weapon. They should either be treated like terrorist or have their own methods used against them. I'd start with:
    1. Keep track of all expenses involved in replying to this foolishness including cost of lawyers, IT staff, etc. and send the BSA a bill. Sue them for the expenses incurred by their false accusation.
    2. Demand an audit on BSA (at their expense, of course) assuring that a) no derogatory records (that could amount to libel) exists in their records, b) processes are in place to assure that similar mistakes with OpenOffice or any other non-BSA software application won't occur again. , c) others have not been similarly mistreated - require such "proof" be made as legal deposition what would allow future disclosures to the contrary to be treated as perjury by the BSA.

      If they don't comply with the audit sue for the additional costs incurred to accused organization to protect itself from future false accusations (extra, unnecessary due-diligence required to deal with the BSA's reckless behavior).

    3. File for libel anyway. Be sure that individual officers of BSA and representatives of member companies are named in the suit so that either they or their lawyers get their rears dragged into court at least once or twice even if the suit is refocused back on the BSA by a judge. Let them personally feel the fear-of-God that comes with being a legal defendent.

    Hopefully this can become a $1M mistake for the BSA which might begin to moderate their behavior.

  141. Mod parent up, and isn't BSA=spammer? by WhiteWolf666 · · Score: 1

    Here Here! Mod this parent up---We should blacklist the BSA.

    On second thought, isn't this e-mail that they are sending out spam? Shouldn't the BSA be submitted to the RBL?

    --
    WhiteWolf666 an exBush supporter. All you new-school,compassionate,save the children Republicans can rot in hell
    1. Re:Mod parent up, and isn't BSA=spammer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Shouldn't the BSA be submitted to the RBL?

      I wouldn't do that. What if some jerk cracks your server and uses it as a warez FTP? I'd rather clean up the box myself after a C&D letter from the BSA than having it confiscated by the FBI.

  142. Trademark Violation by bwt · · Score: 1


    OpenOffice.org is a registered trademark. I believe that MS has commited a trademark violation by conflating the valueable OpenOffice.org band name with its own crummy one. This letter is clearly likely to cause confusion and to intimidate users of OpenOffice.org software who fall prey to this confusion. It is also likely to dilute the OpenOffice.org trademark because potential users of this software may mistakenly beleive that its use is somehow an infringement on Microsoft's intellectual property.

    OpenOffice.org should immediately send the BSA a cease and desist letter, and if necessary take legal action to stop this garbage.

  143. REPLY WITHIN 10 DAYS EVEN IF BOGUS by repoleved · · Score: 4, Informative

    IANAL but (pay attention this is important!) ...

    Even though the legal claim is bogus, it is important that everyone that receives such a notice replies within 10 days to (in pretty much these words) respectfully agree to withdraw offending files, provided that the BSA can prove that there is a legal reason for you to do so.

    The alternatives:
    * To ignore such a notice is a strike against you should you ever go to court against the BSA.
    * To be disrespectful is also a strike against you should you ever go to court against the BSA.
    * (Strangely,) To disagree is a strike against you should you ever go to court against the BSA.
    * And finally, to admit any wrongdoing is a definite strike against you in court, and would give the BSA a good reason to bother you even more....

    1. Re:REPLY WITHIN 10 DAYS EVEN IF BOGUS by jschrod · · Score: 1
      IANAL too, but I have a good one.

      This is Germany, not US. If you disagree, let it handle your lawyer. If the c&d letter (called "Abmahnung" here) is not founded on truth, they will have to pay all your legal expenses. If there is really a case, drag them to court. Again, you will have to pay no cent for your lawyers. (OTOH, you have to invest your time. That's often more worth.)

      Oh yes, and this was obviously no real c&d letter. They must be on paper. Fax may work as well, there our law cases differ.

      --

      Joachim

      People don't write Manifestos any more -- what's going on in this world? [Frank Zappa]

  144. More BSA Fun by pesky25 · · Score: 1

    While on yahoo I saw a BSA add that said stick it to you boss, report software piracy. Interestingly, the page that pops up when you click on it is a php page. http://www.bsa.org/usa/report/report.php

    Maybe the BSA will illustrate that using open source is a better alt. than the proprietary software, mainly because of their efforts to crack down on piracy. Could this be an open source silver lining?

    1. Re:More BSA Fun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, I think the BSA's efforts will drive companies to Open Source, thus backfiring on M$.

  145. difference between "guest@nowhere.com" and "-a@" by JCholewa · · Score: 1

    > > the BSA ... logged into the ... FTP ... with the address "guest@nowhere.com"

    > Ok, I agree, but let's think here. I generally use the
    > address "-a@" when logging into anonymous FTP. This is
    > because (shock) I believe that anonymous FTP should be,
    > well, anonymous. If someone really wants to track me
    > down, he can get my IP address easily.
    > Is it "OK" for normal folks to do this, yet "not OK" for
    > the BSA? Or is it "not OK" for anyone?

    A few things: First, your address ("-a@") would just give an error in any normal email client. The email address that the BSA provided was owned by someone else.

    Secondly, the BSA was using some sort of automated crawler, so they could have possibly posted this email address to hundreds or thousands of places, which means that the person who owns nowhere.com will be getting a bunch of erroneous hate mail and a huge load of extra spam in the future. This could affect this person from both a financial (bandwidth abuse, loss of productive time, etc.) and an emotional (I don't know about you, but I get absolutely thrown into a breakdown when I get large amounts of flames and spam) standpoint.

    And then there's the fact that the BSA is using this person's email address for commercial gain. They stand to make money indirectly for doing this service from their client organizations. There's a lot of collateral damage involved, but the end result will likely be a temporary decrease in intellectual property infringement of software products (it's kind of like if we napalmed all of the Middle East: yeah, other countries would get messed up, but the primary target of removing Saddam Hussein from power would be achieved). So it's an ethics thing. Are you okay with making millions of dollars by knowingly hurting millions of innocents? If you are, then it's all good.

    Incidentally, it never occurred to me that these domains are owned by somebody, and I now regret using them in my anonymized passwords. I think that I will use a method like the one you use when I want to be anonymous.

    -JC

  146. BSA goes after Hyundai owners as well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Recently, several servers that host fan pages for the Hyundai Excel have received similar warnings. The automaker already gave in to MSFT's request back in the late 1980's, but some drivers of this classic economy hatchback refuse to take down there sites.

  147. Complain to the Bar Association! by po8 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    One appropriate response to this sort of letter that I don't see advocated much on these forums: find out what Bar Association has authorized the lawyers sending the letter to practice law, and send the Bar Association Ethics Commission a politely-worded formal letter of complaint. IANAL, but IMHO the lawyer is definitely engaging in unethical behavior under the Canons by sending legal notices on behalf of clients without any kind of legal basis to do so. It would be nice to get them sanctioned.

  148. your sig by teamhasnoi · · Score: 1
    1. Re:your sig by Angry+White+Guy · · Score: 1

      Should this be true, I can now consider my quest complete!

      I shall now prepare for the age-old ritual of seppuku.

      Can I keep my nick when I get reincarnated?

      --
      You think that I'm crazy, you should see this guy!
  149. Website Logs by OYAHHH · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    On a related note, couldn't the fact that Internet Explorer reports itself as being Mozilla 4.0 (etc.) in my website's log be construed as a misappropriation of intellectual property?

    --
    Caution: Contents under pressure
  150. What I think is interesting ... by Compulawyer · · Score: 1

    ...is the fact that the BSA is logging into an FTP server that requires a (valid?) email address as the password for anonymous logins with an apparently false email address (guest@nowhere.com). So far as I can tell from a WHOIS lookup and visiting the home page for nowhere.com, the owner of that domain has nothing at all to do with the BSA. Seems like nowhere.com's owner may have a legal claim against the BSA, but how am I supposed to know, I'm only a lawyer ....

    --

    Laws affecting technology will always be bad until enough techies become lawyers.

  151. RICO by jbolden · · Score: 3, Informative

    Essentially RICO allows an enterprise to be defined as primarily criminal in nature even if it is involved in some non criminal activities. For example a massage parlor chain that makes 10% of its money from massages andd 90% from prostitution could be charged under RICO.

    The poster is suggesting that the BSA's abuses are so widespread that the BSA should in and of itself be considered a criminal organization and not a legitimate organization that has committed some crimes (though to the best of my knowledge the BSA has never been charged with a crime at all so the original poster is really off base here).

    1. Re:RICO by ninewands · · Score: 1
      Essentially RICO allows an enterprise to be defined as primarily criminal in nature even if it is involved in some non criminal activities.

      Actually, what RICO does is brand an organization as "racketeer-influenced" and/or "corrupt" if they engage in a "pattern and practice" (defined in the statute as 2 or more documented cases of one of the specified offenses within a ten-year period) of committing certain offenses (e.g. extortion, fraud, bribery).

      I don't recall off the top of my head, but I don't believe perjury is one of those offenses. However, extortion (the BSA's primary modus operandi) definitely IS one of them.

      So, all we need is for a few companies to voluntarily subject themselves to the business disruption of an unjustified BSA raid (what the hell, it's only money, right?) and it is possible they could be convicted.
    2. Re:RICO by jbolden · · Score: 1

      Threatinging someone doesn't constitute extortion. You have to threaten to take illegal action. So "pay for your software or we will contact the FBI" isn't extortion while "pay for your softweare or we will burn down your building" is extortion.

      Now if the BSA were actually a government agency their actions would be extortion.

      Think of it this way. Given the size of the fines don't you think corporations would love to hit back if they could? The BSA doesn't break the law.

    3. Re:RICO by mpe · · Score: 1

      Threatinging someone doesn't constitute extortion. You have to threaten to take illegal action. So "pay for your software or we will contact the FBI" isn't extortion while "pay for your softweare or we will burn down your building" is extortion.

      The former is probably a more serious threat to someone's business. In the latter case you can set the cops on them even if they do carry out their threat there is always insurance.
      But their dosn't appear to be an obvious way in which the average business can defend against the former kind of threat. (Other than getting a military contract PDQ.)

  152. It is quite possible... by Harker · · Score: 1

    It is quite possible that the email address was changed in the post by the university folx.

    Beyond that, I'm still wondering why they haven't been lambased by the university for using a bot on there ftp server. I thought that was frowned upon by those who operate them because of the bandwidth cost.

    --
    When VCR's are outlawed, only outlaws will have VCR's.
  153. Re:Open Office Outlawed [Australian] by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh no, I can't plug my computer in, there's no power point!

  154. No way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not the same thing.

    The whole drugs thing is another issue completely.

    We're talking SOFTWARE here. SOFTWARE, not drugs... hello? McFly???

  155. Eh??? by Krumme · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I don't get this - but granted, I didn't read the article.

    I sell Microsoft Office for a living, and the installation files for Microsoft Office (or any other product) can be purchased from us at approx. $40 a piece.
    For this amount of money, you get an original, holographic cd complete with codes and all. This is perfectly legal - but in order to actually use the program, you have to buy a license, but this is in no way coupled to the physical installation files...

    In other words, if you have a copy of Office lying around, it has a value of $40. Not a lot, eh?

    1. Re:Eh??? by NightEyez · · Score: 0

      You are an idiot -- plain and simple.

  156. Nowhere.com might be able to sue... by Muad'Dave · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Note that they impersonated someone from "nowhere.com" when they signed in to the FTP server - that domain is owned by:

    Domain Name: NOWHERE.COM
    Registrar: TUCOWS, INC.
    Whois Server: whois.opensrs.net
    Referral URL: http://www.opensrs.org
    Name Server: NS19A.NAMESERVERS.NET
    Name Server: NS19B.NAMESERVERS.NET
    Status: ACTIVE
    Updated Date: 04-jan-2002
    Creation Date: 21-dec-1994
    Expiration Date: 22-dec-2007
    --
    Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
  157. BSA Spam ? by Rogan · · Score: 1

    Hmmmm - so a programme has gathered email addresses from web pages, and sent inappropriate messages to them. That sounds like spam to me... just report it to the BSAs ISP - they may be violating the terms of their service agreement :-)

    Cheers -- Dave.

  158. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2, Informative

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  159. She Exists... by Fringe · · Score: 3, Funny

    On the bright side, Corinna Beck is real. I telephoned the BSA 202-872-5500, waded through the directory (hit 3 and then type in "BECK", 2325, and asked her if she could clarify their policy on issuing warnings to web sites with the word "office" on them.

    She put me on hold and didn't pick up again before I gave up, but at least she exists.

  160. firewall by pr0nbot · · Score: 1

    Anyone have the BSA's IP addresses? I want to protect my network against this sort of intrusion.

  161. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 0

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  162. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 0

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  163. Attack them like the DeCSS issue. by DankNinja · · Score: 0

    We need to start setting up ftp sites and listing hundereds of files with "Office", "Microsoft", etc. Stuff that there scripts would likely check for and then start submitting them to Google, DMOZ, etc. We could easiliy overwhelmthem.

  164. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2, Informative

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  165. So, how BSA will react on this post? :) by ivlad · · Score: 1

    Microsoft Office, Windows 2000, msoffice.zip, microsoft_office_XP.rar,windows_dotnet.zip, Windows_XP_registration_crack.zip, Microsoft Office, Windows 2000, msoffice.zip, microsoft_office_XP.rar,windows_dotnet.zip, Windows_XP_registration_crack.zip, Microsoft Office, Windows 2000, msoffice.zip, microsoft_office_XP.rar,windows_dotnet.zip, Windows_XP_registration_crack.zip, warez, crax, naked_bill_gates_XXX.zip

  166. Go BSA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Keep thoes ftp sites clean from that Open Office junk.

  167. Ha! interesting! by Azureflare · · Score: 4, Interesting
    look at this:

    What was located as infringing content:
    Filename: /mandrake_current/SRPMS/OpenOffice.org-1.0.1-9mdk. src.rpm (199,643kb)

    Filename: /mandrake_current/i586/Mandrake/RPMS/OpenOffice.or g-libs-1.0.1-9mdk.i586.rpm (35,444kb)

    Notice the line:

    Filename: /mandrake_current/i586/Mandrake/RPMS/OpenOffice.or g-libs-1.0.1-9mdk.i586.rpm (35,444kb)

    The bolded text is what the script must have caught! how hilarious! it searches for *MS*OFFICE* LOL What a lame script! whoever wrote that script needs to be shot!

  168. Birmingham Small Arms? Multiple Sclerosis? by DABANSHEE · · Score: 1

    Is someone now claiming that open office worskpaces have negative side effects in regards to Multiple Sclerosis.

    Did Birmingham Small Arms convert their headquarters into the open office plan style? & as a consequence rates of Multiple Sclerosis shot up? Is that what their interest is?

  169. Since you can't be modded past a 5 by dimer0 · · Score: 1

    I'd like to quantify my appreciation for that AWESOME post with a reply. :-)

  170. BSA Honeypot Server by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    I think it is time to start to develop a special "BSA Honeypot Server", wich is just producing big big files with filenames wich are very close to commercial products.

    I would kill my self to see them diging around at my ftp and trying to download the files.

    To fool them eaven more you could add serval *.nfo and *.diz files to the directory containing those "fake" files.

    And don't forgett to use the letter Z as much you can: aPPz, GaMeZ, UpLoAdZ, WaReZ, SerialZ, CrACkZ, KeyGenZ, etc...

  171. ok, all together now by JohnnyBolla · · Score: 1

    In your anonymous FTP directory, do the following

    # cat /usr/dict/words | grep -v \' | xargs touch

    Sit back and wait for the spider. In fact, just append those touches to the string Microsoft.
    Maybe the postal fees will kill the BSA.

    --
    Carpe Deez
  172. Microsoft sues HomeDepot, Lowes and home builders by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Redmond News:

    Microsoft has filed a formal class action suit on copy right against Homedepot and other home builders and suppliers due to fact they cannot sell any products with windows name on it.

    Microsoft wants 1 trillion dollars of punitive damage to its windows name . They would like all home builders to purchase the subscription fee for the life of this earth.

  173. Would probably to straight to my killfilter.. by Kjella · · Score: 2, Informative

    Somehow, I doubt it serves as a real legal notice. Why? Because there's absolutely no proof of delivery. The email server could have choosen to eat it. Server-side spam filters could have stopped it. Client-side spam filters could have stopped it. I thought legal stuff, like supoenas and other stuff must be signed for, to have proof?

    Kjella

    --
    Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    1. Re:Would probably to straight to my killfilter.. by repoleved · · Score: 1

      I thought legal stuff, like supoenas and other stuff must be signed for, to have proof?

      I cannot speak about your jurisdiction, but where I come from, subpoenas can be signed as delivered by the deliverer and not the recipient. Other than that, your point about not being able to guarantee delivery is well taken. Except that if *you* can guarantee delivery and *they* don't respond within 10 days, that's a point against them and your efforts are still rewarded.. ;-)

  174. http://www.bsa.org/usa/report/report.php to submit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.bsa.org/usa/report/report.php

    Submit web links for the bsa to investigate...

    I wonder if humans go through each one, and I
    wonder what they do when you submit addresses
    copied & pasted out of spam links.

    Sadly, the first page has a huge drop down for
    where did you hear of us, but slashdot isn't an
    option.

  175. 1-888-NOPIRACY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They also have a phone number
    1-888-NOPIRACY

    (I read somewhere that you should only call
    toll free numbers from pay phones)

  176. Re:Problem solved - NO it's not! by JetScootr · · Score: 1

    The problem got "out of hand" when the BSA sent an automated legal threat without bothering to check ANYTHING in their claims. They lied, under penalty of perjury, by claiming:
    > to represent the copyright owners of OpenOffice.org;
    > the material was posted illegally;
    > it was a "good faith belief" (I don't consider ANY results from a search engine to be accurate until I check it myself);
    > that anything they said in the notice is accurate.

    Legal threats cost real money. They have a real chilling effect on people's freedoms. They must be taken seriously, even if nonsensical.
    The BSA is wrong here in so many ways it's hard to count. They deserve to pay with more than just an apology.

    --
    Pavlov wouldn't be so famous if he'd used a can opener instead of a bell.
  177. The BSA is Open Source's friend! by frozenray · · Score: 1

    >What would you put to him, in that position?

    Well, I would tell him to put even more pressure on the despicable criminals that distribute commercial software illegally, and indeed encourage him to lobby for draconian laws against software piracy.

    No, I'm not trolling. I am convinced that the BSA and their ilk, and Microsoft's mandatory registration procedures, are Open Source's biggest friends. Think about it: as long as Windows and Office were essentially free (the price of 2 downloads from a warez site and 2 blank CD-Rs), there was little incentive to use alternatives just because they were free (as in speech). By making it harder to obtain and install Windows and Office illegally without risking a visit from the police, people may begin to see the advantages of Open Source.

    Furthermore, the sinking prices of computer hardware make it increasingly hard for Microsoft to justify their outrageous prices - it's hard to compete with the price of free (as in beer) software. At the very least the competition will get us lower prices and maybe (I'm quite the optimist, you know) better quality from Microsoft.

    So, let the BSA raid corporations and fine them to bankruptcy. Let them pursue warez site operators and even individuals who use illegal copies and keygens. Spread the word that using illegal copies may put you into jail. But most importantly, spread the word that there are legal, free alternatives. Along with the corresponding installation CDs filled with Free software, of course.

    --
    "There are already a million monkeys on a million typewriters, and Usenet is NOTHING like Shakespeare." - Blair Houghton
  178. Why don't you set up a honeypot ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Consider setting up a honeypot ?

    I think you just put in some links, marked to be invisible so that humans won't traverse them, which link to dynamically generated web pages, filled with mailto links, and perhaps, links to Office_10.zip, Office_9.zip, MSExcel-8.zip, and so forth.

    It seems a fun tactic for combatting spammers; you can watch your web server logs and see when the spammer spiders hit, and see how far they go in the dynamic web pages. Oh, the idea is you make the dynamic pages have dynamic links, so the spammer spider can happily loop forever reading invented file links and mailto links.

    I think a nifty trick (but probably not easy) would be to build some feedback in, so that when the web server is serving out pages in the honeypot area (perhaps http://99.99.99.99/downloads/Office/stuff
    and many invented files & directories related), it notifies the network stack to start slowing down response times, because it (the web server) really isn't in any hurry with this traffice, and it (web server) wouldn't mind if all responses were held for a random amount of milliseconds (eg, 1-1000 ?)

  179. not tooo stupid and yet there is a hidden issue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First off the script isn't AS stupid as every one is assuming! it didn't find Office, it found MS*Office

    mandrake\...\rpMS\....Open.Office....

    A big deal to me is why they can come in and look at ftp servers for anything they want? even if I leave my house unlockedthe police can't come in and look around... Its time we had connect licenses... if you connect to my ftp site you are entering a legal agreement with me. Seems to me that the university ought to see BSA for trespassing :)

  180. Heheh ... by Mr.+Marabou+Man · · Score: 1

    Gooooooogle [ office site:bsa.org ]

    Searched pages from bsa.org for office. Results 1 - 10 of about 450. Search took 0.13 seconds.
    ..

    Hehe, perhaps they should clean their own site first ... something about a stone and a glass house ... ;)
  181. required compensation by person-0.9a · · Score: 1

    The BSA should be required to compensate any organization the resources it takes to comply with their demands. Wether or not the target organization is or isn't in compliance.

    If they suddenly had to start paying the time for IT organization spend counting licenses, or in this case investigating an allegation, they'd be way more careful about picking their targets. They couldn't afford to roll through entire cities telling companies to "audit or die."

  182. He didn't fail it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    His goal was to get second post so he was successful.

    Way to go second poster!

  183. part II by cliveholloway · · Score: 4, Funny

    With your heart beating heavily, you grab the capsule and head off to the college.

    The library is busy, with both microfiche machines in use. You pace impatiently, waiting for one machine to become free. After the longest five minutes that you can remember, the student at the right hand machine gathers up his papers, pushes the chair back, stands up and leaves.

    Quickly, you grab the chair and sit, tense with anticipation of what you might find. Opening the capsule hastily, the film flutters out onto the desk. Carefully, you place the film in the viewer.

    Blurry lines come into view. A few seconds play with the controls and you start to see a photograph of a document. It looks like an internal memo for some organisation. At the top of the page, a small logo that look like an eye in an equilateral triangle stares blurrily at you from the screen. Underneath the logo, two succinct sentences explain:

    "Le Méridien Heliopolis, Cairo. March 1st, 4pm Main Bar.

    "1-555-648-9777"

    Why would this need to be on microfiche? What was the eye in the triangle? Why was there a phone number?

    You quickly copy the details and, pausing only to see if your activities have attracted attention (they haven't), you grab the film and head to a nearby phone booth. You stare at the phone for a long time before deciding to call the number. I mean, what harm could it do? A public phone. Whatever the number was, you could call it and hang up if things got weird.

    You dial the number. Within one ring, a women answers, addresses you by name, and tells you that your flight will be leaving this evening and that it would be in your interest to be there on time. Oh, and your ticket, passport and expenses can be picked up from the AirEgypt check-in.

    "But, hang..." - the phone is already dead. You redial. This time you get a line disconnected tone.

    Your shop is trashed, you're no longer the Wicker Man(tm). Curiosity killed the cat but, after the day you've had, you decide you need to follow this through.

    The pickup at the airport is smooth, the passport is a perfect fake. "Dr. Kim Brown, Phd". Apparently you are an Australian importer going to check out some sculptures for your company. Wicker to sculptures? You're sure you can make the transition easily enough.

    The flight is long and uneventful. You sleep fitfully with omenous dreams. You awake as the screach of tyres on asphalt announces your arrival. You go straight to the hotel and unpack. Still an hour to go.

    AT five minutes to four, you enter the bar and buy a large shot of Bourbon to steady your nerves. As you bring down your glass, you see a man sat opposite you smiling.

    "Dr. Brown, welcome. Please come with me. I need your help to move some 'rocks'."

    You follow the small stranger down several back alleys until the streets open up and you are in a field. With real rocks. Not rocks.

    "Help me push this rock", your guide motions.

    Both of you push the rock, but it is stuck solid.

    "We need some more help. Go to the street and grab five or six people to give us a hand. Tell them I'll pay them 5 pounds each if they'll help."

    Ten minutes later I return with six locals, happy to make some easy money. We all push together, but the stone is still solid. My guide thinks for a second.

    "We need more help."

    He asks each of the locals to run off and grab some others to help.

    Suddenly, realisation dawns on you and you run, run for your life. What a fool you have been. You travel halfway around the world under mysterious circumstance, only to find out it's a damn Pyramid Scheme.

    Better luck next time, eh?

    cLive ;-)

    ps - if you made it here, well done :)

    --
    -- Trinity in high heels carrying a whip: The donimatrix - there is no spoonerism
    1. Re:part II by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OK, that should be modded up with the first analogy. Good story.......

    2. Re:part II by adamfranco · · Score: 1

      Simply wonderful. Up until now, I hadn't realized what I was missing reading slashdot so much: good, humourous writing. Even though we are [pretty much] all techno-geeks, some good writing about something other than router specs. There are quite a few funny blips out there, but they are usually just one-liners and not nearly as engrossing.

      --
      "When ideology and theology couple, their offspring are not always bad but they are always blind." -- Bill Moyers
    3. Re:part II by Cybrex · · Score: 1

      What frightens me about this is that I happen to be friends with a Dr. Kim Brown, PhD, and strangely haven't heard from her in some time. Not that I'm a conspiracy theorist or anything [FNORD].

      BTW, cool story. :-)

      -Cybrex

      --
      Boundless Expansion, Self-Transformation, Dynamic Optimism, Intelligent Technology, Spontaneous Order- BEST DO IT SO!
    4. Re:part II by cliveholloway · · Score: 1

      I chose Kim because the sex is ambiguous and it was the first gender neutral name I thought of. I added Phd so I could prefix with Dr (again...).

      No idea where brown came from.

      Weird psycho shit coincidence or what?

      cLive ;-)

      --
      -- Trinity in high heels carrying a whip: The donimatrix - there is no spoonerism
    5. Re:part II by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No idea where brown came from.

      From your subconscious. In Quantum Leap (Curse of Ptah Hotep) Sam worked with a female PhD egyptologist from Browns U.

  184. How many sites do they search? by LuckyStarr · · Score: 1

    I reckon their script follows a route over some
    ftp-search engine like http://ftpsearch.unit.no
    (i know it has moved). Then they might log on and
    try to download the file, check if it has a reason-
    able size (5kB isn't MS-Office) and then trigger
    some stuff. That would be quite elegant, but by
    no means an excuse for the stupid matching they
    made. ;)

    -rw-r-r MSOffice.tif 153.412k - Mary Shellys Office. Historical Document. High Resolution.

    I initially had a strange feeling that the BSA
    runs a bandwidth eating monster, which would
    explain why so many ftp-sites are so slow this
    days... but who knows. :)

    --
    Meme of the day: I browse "Disable Sigs: Checked". So should you.
  185. Re:Sad news... Wil Wheaton dead at 30 by zurab · · Score: 1

    It would have been more of a story if the BSA started trying to find out which company owns OpenOffice, or just blindly pressed on with their accusations... but they didn't.

    Don't worry. They still have time, they've got another thing coming when they discover StarOffice and KOffice.

  186. BSA Snitch System by tweakt · · Score: 1
    Turn in those evil pirates:

    http://www.bsa.org/usa/report/report.php

  187. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  188. Open Office XP by Imazalil · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Alright, so now that all of Satan's children who are trading the Evil Microsoft Office know that someone is out to get them, I bet they will rename their MS office files to OpenOffice version 2000/XP/whatever. Be careful, next time you download your favourite GPL'd Office suite, it may be the real deal.

  189. Defamation? by shepd · · Score: 1

    Why not sue Microsoft for libel and defamation? According to the letter, the BSA was informed by Microsoft that you had illegal copies of their software on your servers.

    Doesn't that constitute libel? Saying untruths about one company to another?

    --
    If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
  190. No Perjury Here, Move Along by spun · · Score: 1

    Why does everyone assume the phrase "On behalf of the copyright owners listed above" indicates that the BSA is claiming it is authorized to act in this matter by OpenOffice?

    To me, this simply states that they are authorized by Microsoft to look for MS products and take action. I really can't parse it any other way. Now, the fact is, NO copyright owners are listed anywhere in the letter. Both "Microsoft Office" and "OpenOffice" show up above the phrase, so the obvious assumption is that they are operating on behalf of whoever owns "Microsoft Office," not whoever owns "OpenOffice."

    That being said, spidering sites and sending out automated threats kinda sucks, but they apologized when their mistake was brought to their attention.

    --
    - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
  191. Office filenames by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That'll hold them off until lawyers incorporate filenames into the DMCA.

  192. Probable Search String by tmundar · · Score: 1

    The search string was probably something like "MS.*Office" and it matched the full path:

    /mandrake_current/i586/Mandrake/RPMS/OpenOffice.or g-libs-1.0.1-9mdk.i586.rpm

    Tom

  193. Re:http://www.bsa.org/usa/report/report.php to sub by statusbar · · Score: 1

    Someone needs to make a script to feed that report.php a huge list of urls!

    --jeff++

    --
    ipv6 is my vpn
  194. Be careful, though by fizbin · · Score: 1

    After all, you'd hate to end up in a situation where you needed to prove to your hardware that your software was a legitimate, signed copy of a "legitimate" operating system. (where "legitimate" means the same thing it does with SSL certificates: paid off the right people)

    Focus instead on having them crack down on people who do the copying, if possible try to have them communicate the message "You can't copy Microsoft's (or Borland's, or Corels's, or whatever) stuff freely". Get the name of the software company in there, and make it clear that it is the nature of the ownership of the software that makes this act illegal.

    We don't want to spread the meme that copying software is illegitimate and fundamentally shady; instead, we want to spread the meme that (traditional) commercial software is owned, and that that's why copying it can get you in trouble - we want people to approach buying closed source as similar to renting a car, not buying one. With this meme firmly in place, free software alternatives don't automatically appear legally shady or risky (I've been in places that had explicit IT policies which barred people from installing any "free or shareware" software); however, if people felt at all guilty about giving away copies of free software, that would hurt us.

    Above all, we don't want copy-protection schemes mandated in generic computing software.

  195. Re:difference between "guest@nowhere.com" and "-a@ by gpoul · · Score: 1

    FYI: You can use @example.com, which is IANA reserved.

  196. Hehe by Trogre · · Score: 1

    I love it when groups like this threaten to audit our software licenses and I can calmly tell them "sorry, we don't permit Microsoft software on these premises. Would you like a copy of OpenOffice?".

    --
    "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
  197. BSA harrases YOU! by MonopolyNews · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    ... in Old Soviet Russia, just like here.

    --

    Slashdot Journal on Monopoly News
  198. Anyone know how to highlight this to the EFF? by darnok · · Score: 1

    I figure the EFF, with several prominent legal people "on call", might be very interested in this as a possible test case of the legality of the BSA's modus operandi...

  199. Saddam, don't read this... by darnok · · Score: 1

    Does this strike anyone as a fairly effective terrorist strike against a country? Terrorism doesn't necessarily have to involve killing lots of people...

    1. Acquire some paperwork containing the BSA letterhead. Probably not that tough by the sound of it

    2. Scan and print some blank letters that would pass casual muster as having been printed by the BSA

    3. Print the standard BSA "cease and desist" message and send it to EVERY business in the country

    4. Large chunks of the corporate population stop what they're doing to devote time to checking their software compliance. I doubt any business of more than (say) 100 employees running non-free software could verify their software licences are 100% in order without wasting quite a bit of time

    5. Productivity goes down, profits go down, people get laid off, country enters recession, etc., etc.

    Total cost: a lot of stamps and envelopes

    The "country enters recession" scenario is maybe a bit extreme, but I can see how this would hurt a lot of businesses and cost very little (and not involve those expensive pilot training courses) ...I'm assuming, of course, that this isn't already happening today

  200. That's ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I read bovine serum albumin. Whee, let's do a Bradford!

  201. OpenOffice.org does *NOT* own OpenOffice by linux11 · · Score: 1

    There have been several comments that the BSA claim to represent the copyright owners is false because OpenOffice.org is not a member of the BSA. I wanted to point out that while it is true that the OpenOffice.org is not a member of the BSA and has probably never asked the BSA to represent them, they also still are not the owners of OpenOffice. Rather, anyone that contributes to OpenOffice is required to sign a Joint Copyright Assignment (JCA) which assigns the Copyright to Sun Microsystems. While this might seems like a simple symatics, you should also take not that the JCA does not require that future version be provided under the GPL or even under the SCSL. I raised this issue over two years ago and was told that the JCA would be changed to assign copyright to OpenOffice when they became a legal entity. Since then nothing has changed. While Sun MicroSystems has had a history of avoiding membership in the BSA, they still may change their minds.

    On a side note, Santa Cruz Operations (or formally Caldera Systems) *IS* a member of the BSA and therefore indirectly (or directly) contributing to issuing these false positives with strong threatening legal language against Free Software works. As already pointed out the "apology" was not in regards to the claim of infringement being false but rather the apology was in regards to the fact it did not figure out "which property was infringed." Anotherwords, the SCO sponsered group still claims there is a copyright infringement but no longer that they represent the owner. At the same time, the notifiction clearly shows that the site is distributing the source code, thus complying with the terms of the GPL (one of the two licenses which can be used for distribution of OpenOffice). Anyone that does buy products from SCO may wish to let them know that their membership in the BSA helps contribute to activities of threats of legal action against the distribution of Free Software and probably will have a chilling effect on the adopting of Free Software based products if it continues.

  202. What if I license my ftp site with a charge? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What if I put up an ftp site, witha banner message that use is free to all, EXCEPT to BSA and its agents. For those users, there will be a $500 charge for each use.

    The banner continues: "Disconnect now or accept the terms of use above. If you proceed beyond this point, you will be deemed to have accepted the terms of use"

    Then I put a file called "Office.zip" or something similar. When BSA contacts me, I ask them for more details of when they discovered the file and send them a bill for $500. On non-payment, I proceed to the small claims court.

  203. SPAM report by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Someone should add copyright-europe@bsa.org
    to a spam filter !!!

  204. Bill them in the future. by Tjp($)pjT · · Score: 1

    I am changing all my FTP banners to include language that any BSA (or like organization) is disallowed from scanning the archives for purposes of collection of evidence for legal proceedings and that violation of this is evidenced through mail or email indicating any potential legal actions related to "fill-in-the-blank" ...

    Any suggestions for wording?

    --
    - Tjp

    I am in wallow with my inner money grubbing capitalistic pig. ... Oink!

  205. Oh, now I see why!!! by grolschie · · Score: 1

    It's because MS actually _OWNS_ the word "office" - and the word "word" for that matter. Arrogance!

    1. Re:Oh, now I see why!!! by Charm · · Score: 1
      _OWNS_ the word "office" - and the word "word"

      Actually they can't own words. They own a trademark on the words Office and Word in relation to their products. I can't sell a Word processor called word but I can sell a book called Word. Similary a file called OFFICEXP "might" break their trademark but that is trademark law not copyright law. You would have a very hard time in court trying to prove that the person was using the word OFFICEXP for a filename, in the sence that Microsoft has it trademarked.

      --
      -- RTFM:Slackware::Beer:Saturday
    2. Re:Oh, now I see why!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Microsoft owns trademarks to
      Microsoft Windows
      Microsoft Office
      Microsoft Word

      Their legal team seems to think otherwise.

  206. Thats the problem with using common names. by Bert64 · · Score: 1

    Well if you will use common words as the name for your program, then you make it far more difficult to have an automated tool searching for people pirating it.
    Also, those who are really pirating it will likely start renaming it 0ff1c3 or such.... the idea of substituting numbers for letters first started as a means of hiding warez from sysadmins while keeping it recogniseable for anyone who wants it.

    --
    http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
  207. hmm, a question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i'm confused. the only BSA I know of is boy scouts of america. and i don't recall them going after software pirates. so what is this bsa and isn't that copyright infringement. or something??

  208. I've gotten numerous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    BSA notices, I generally ignore them, and once even replied with a string of profanity. The licensing agreement by which they claim to have the authority to search your stuff is in fact NON-EXISTENT. The software vendors cannot CEDE control of your click thru agreement with them, or assign rights to a 3rd party without their entering into the agreement as well. Tell them to blow off and call the vendor directly and complain about harrassment. But of course, you'd BETTER be squeaky clean :) There is not much you can do if they go the law enforcement route with a search warrant, but they've at least had to go to a judget, and THEY ASSUME GOOD faith with the police.

  209. I got it! by gostats · · Score: 1

    Quick, do a checksum of both OpenOffice and MS Word. They must be exactly the same! Finally, I cracked the methodical process witch BSA uses to validate their claims!

    # md5

    Oh wait a minute...

    nevermind

    No wait I got it again. They use the following algorithm:
    1) Does the file have a filename? (yes: goto 2, no: goto 2)
    2) send email to everybody claim they are pirates
    3) ...
    4) Profit!


    In Soviet Russia [Profit] Profits You?

  210. You should have pitched them OpenOffice. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0



    Your response should have included the benefits of using OpenOffice.org, and the drawbacks of using msoffice. The notice, and your response may make it into the congressional record, and into "mainstream" press. It may be making light of the situation, but it also is getting the word out to the masses.

    Everyone reading this should do the same if presented with the opportunity. Not only does the possibility of making "mainstream press" make this important, or getting it out to the masses, but there is also the possibility of convincing insiders in the notifying organization, and if the emails end up in court for any reason, it could only help your case.

  211. Purged, Purgered, Perjured by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    She purgered herself by when she declarce the info was correct without validating it.

    You mean she perjured herself. Saying she purgered herself sounds like she had the shit scared out of her when OpenOffice confronted her. Which may be the case. BSA thinks they're always right, they don't expect to be challenged.

  212. the logo is the "Evil Bill Gates" logo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    does /. have a non-evil bill gates logo?

  213. Let the BSA do their job (badly if needed) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is excellent news for Free Software.

    The more the BSA appears like a stupid bully to people, the more they harass, annoy, threaten, and audit actual pirates and innocent people alike, the better for everybody.

    The worst threat to Linux and all the Free Software is freely (as in beer) available (pirated) commercial software. Down with the pirates!

  214. Re:Sad news... Wil Wheaton dead at 30 by Azureflare · · Score: 1

    It is quite nice that the BSA rep did apologize, but personally I think they were just covering their ass, not being nice. They routinely use scare tactics (Isn't that all they do anyway? They don't really have the force of the law) and it seems like someone goofed on their end by making a lazy, half-assed script to search for stuff. I just wish they would go mind their own business and stop sticking their noses in everyone elses.

  215. In retribution... by clonebarkins · · Score: 1

    Anybody looking for a good email address to use when signing up for pr0n? Try copyright-europe@bsa.org

    --

    "The evil of the world is made possible by nothing but the sanction you give it." -- Ayn Rand