I think that technology is sending up farther apart. It's possible to go through life with barely any human contact now. You can order most things online and have them delivered to your door. When you go shopping there are some places you can check out yourself. You don't ask people how to do things anymore because you look it up online. Sure we may know what fifty of our "friends" had for dinner last night but when was the last time we sat down and had a proper talk with one of them? Well, there might be a couple and a few members of family that we would do that with but it's a short list of people that we have meaningful interactions with.
Might be a reason to get an older phone. If you ever get attacked so that you can't remember or speak for yourself immediately after then how are the cops going to know where to start their investigation if they can't access your phone?
I don't know how cheap nuclear plants are going to be. The Ontario government was going to build two new ones but stopped when the proposals came back with a price of $26 billion. In 2013 they said the cost had gone down a bit but not enough to justify building them. (Not that I trust the Liberal government with anything financial. They are the ones that paid $1B to cancel a gas powered electricity generating plant in order to win a riding.) For info about the price of the nuclear plants see here http://business.financialpost....
I don't know about the US but in Ontario if you don't want a driver's license then you can get a photo ID from the provincial government for $35 that is valid for five years. You still have to go and get your picture taken but you don't have to write the first test and then take the practical driving tests which means that you don't need access to a car.
Actually he was saying that anyone who left the country would be chipped. Supposedly it would help finding them in a disaster. Don't see how. Maybe with the identification. But it's not like they could sweep a detector over the snow or rubble and find the chip under a meter. A good search and rescue dog would find a person in that case. Besides they would have to know the person was a Finn in the first place because nobody else would have a chip.
And it wouldn't be just for people going to live abroad. Just thinking about someone on social security. Imagine if they had a child, relative, or friend and they paid for their visit out of country. It wouldn't have to be extravagant, maybe a train ticket to Germany. Or what if they did a day trip for some cross border shopping? In both cases they would get chipped but it's not something that anyone would complain about them doing.
So as part of the safe browsing it looks like all of the URLs you are going to and anything you download is being sent over to Google. I wonder what they are going to do with them?
Not every application that gets installed in an enterprise is mission critical. If you sell stuff on the web then your site is mission critical. An app that analyzes your logs to send reports to the managers, while high profile, isn't mission critical. I was in a government department that had an application that was used to vote for favourite images. (They built it internally and did a crap job but that's beside the point.) Hardly something that needs to work 99.999%.
It doesn't matter the source of the software, if you have your process then you are going to test it to make sure that it isn't going to upset your environment. If any provider can't support you with the required coverage then you aren't going to go with them. It doesn't matter if it's a big multinational charging millions or a freemium package or open source.
Slaves is a bit of a hyperbole as the real slaves are the poor foreigners that they bring in to do labour and other jobs that they don't want to do themselves. Women are more property there and face severe restrictions on what they can do.
You can go to Saudi Arabia if you are not a Muslim. There are many people from Europe, North America, Australia, etc that go there for work in IT, engineering, medical and other such jobs. They are limited from going to some areas if they are not Muslim. And the restrictions on women don't apply to them. I knew a woman who was there and she said that she always got stared at when she went out alone, especially at restaurants. It didn't click with her why until I pointed out to her that women there weren't allowed to do that.
If the problem is that the men can't stop themselves from harming the women then the solution isn't to treat the women as objects and force them to cover up. It's to get the men to change their behaviour and act civilized. Let the women dress however they want and if a man can't control the urges then they must be blindfolded. The problem is with them and not with the women. People are not property. You can say it was created for whatever noble cause you want to but it still is slavery and it needs to be stopped.
Let's start flinging objects around that can hurt other people or damage other things if you miss the drone (and you probably will miss the drone). Yes, the person flying the drone over your backyard is being a jackass but I doubt your neighbours are going to be won over to your side if you break their windows with a slingshot or hit them with a paint gun. If the neighbour is throwing crap into my yard I'm going to be upset at my neighbour and not at the guy flying the drone. Just because one person in your area is acting like a twat doesn't mean give everyone the excuse to.
In this case your doctor is just acting as a middleman and your pharmacist or a nurse practitioner could probably issue the prescription. Or maybe just have your doctor give you the prescription without a visit. But then do you really want to use up their time on such a task when they could be using their skills on something else? I think anything that helps doctors do what they are supposed to do is a good thing.
They definitely will take into account the information that they are given by the referring physician but often they don't have the whole patient's file there. Many places now just have technicians take the images and they are sent to the radiologist off site who does the diagnosis. And it's not a one-to-one ratio. There's not some radiologist sitting around in the lab waiting around for your x-ray to be taken.
People complain all the time that all Hollywood puts out is the same crap year after year. There's so many comments on there about how terrible the reboots are and that there are so many superhero movies that they are getting tired of them. The movie industry is only putting out those movies because people keep going to those movies. When it takes $100M or more to make a movie are you going to do something that you are pretty sure that people are going to see or take a risk?
If you want to see well written, well acted, and just plain great movies then we are going to have to stop going to see the crap we're being fed and only support the few gems do get out.
It may be true that he didn't put his picture up on the Web for 20 years. However, especially in the last five years, given the parties and events that he probably has to attend for his job I'm sure that someone has captured him in a photo and posted it onto the Internet. He may not be the primary person of interest in the picture but I'm sure that he's on there.
Of course to verify that there are no pictures of him on the Web then he would have to upload a picture of himself onto the Web.
And technically he's talking about the WWW. If he's ever e-mailed a picture, sent a fax of his picture over a VOIP line, or transferred some files of FTP then he's had his picture on the Internet.
No, it means out of people working and people actively looking for work then 97% of them are working. It doesn't count the people that have gotten so frustrated with the job market that they've gone back to school or just given up completely. It also counts a person working part time as working (though I don't know if the hours are counted as a percentage of a full time worker or not). And it doesn't take into account underemployment where you get people doing jobs that they are overqualified for.
If you were to subsidize the pay of people taking the leave so that companies wouldn't have to (it would be a huge burden on very small businesses to have to pay a worker for parental leave) then that might just been seen as too much like socialism.
Create an app that echos back lines from the play when you feed it another line. You can learn so much about the play from that.
Here's an idea. How about using the money to get a proper teacher instead of a babysitter and actually learn about the play, what things might mean in it, what Scotland was like during the time it was set in, and even about Shakespeare's time and life and how it would impact his writing. Get an inspiring teacher and the students would learn much more. When I studied plays for the most part we just went around the room and took turns reading a few lines. There was a bit of discussion about what things might mean but not much. For the most part it was very boring.
I had a really nice Canon multi-function (MX-850) but when I bought a new Mac it came with the OS X 10.10 and I found out that they weren't going to make the drivers for it. So I had to get a new machine even though the old one worked perfectly. Actually the replacement model (MX-922) had a slower print speed and wasn't designed as well.
Slashdot Mirror
I think that technology is sending up farther apart. It's possible to go through life with barely any human contact now. You can order most things online and have them delivered to your door. When you go shopping there are some places you can check out yourself. You don't ask people how to do things anymore because you look it up online. Sure we may know what fifty of our "friends" had for dinner last night but when was the last time we sat down and had a proper talk with one of them? Well, there might be a couple and a few members of family that we would do that with but it's a short list of people that we have meaningful interactions with.
With 4,600 here and Airbus sending up 900.
No, they are just looking for better people to train the H1Bs.
Get a Ouija board?
Might be a reason to get an older phone. If you ever get attacked so that you can't remember or speak for yourself immediately after then how are the cops going to know where to start their investigation if they can't access your phone?
I don't know how cheap nuclear plants are going to be. The Ontario government was going to build two new ones but stopped when the proposals came back with a price of $26 billion. In 2013 they said the cost had gone down a bit but not enough to justify building them. (Not that I trust the Liberal government with anything financial. They are the ones that paid $1B to cancel a gas powered electricity generating plant in order to win a riding.) For info about the price of the nuclear plants see here http://business.financialpost....
I don't know about the US but in Ontario if you don't want a driver's license then you can get a photo ID from the provincial government for $35 that is valid for five years. You still have to go and get your picture taken but you don't have to write the first test and then take the practical driving tests which means that you don't need access to a car.
Actually he was saying that anyone who left the country would be chipped. Supposedly it would help finding them in a disaster. Don't see how. Maybe with the identification. But it's not like they could sweep a detector over the snow or rubble and find the chip under a meter. A good search and rescue dog would find a person in that case. Besides they would have to know the person was a Finn in the first place because nobody else would have a chip.
And it wouldn't be just for people going to live abroad. Just thinking about someone on social security. Imagine if they had a child, relative, or friend and they paid for their visit out of country. It wouldn't have to be extravagant, maybe a train ticket to Germany. Or what if they did a day trip for some cross border shopping? In both cases they would get chipped but it's not something that anyone would complain about them doing.
So as part of the safe browsing it looks like all of the URLs you are going to and anything you download is being sent over to Google. I wonder what they are going to do with them?
Not every application that gets installed in an enterprise is mission critical. If you sell stuff on the web then your site is mission critical. An app that analyzes your logs to send reports to the managers, while high profile, isn't mission critical. I was in a government department that had an application that was used to vote for favourite images. (They built it internally and did a crap job but that's beside the point.) Hardly something that needs to work 99.999%.
It doesn't matter the source of the software, if you have your process then you are going to test it to make sure that it isn't going to upset your environment. If any provider can't support you with the required coverage then you aren't going to go with them. It doesn't matter if it's a big multinational charging millions or a freemium package or open source.
Slaves is a bit of a hyperbole as the real slaves are the poor foreigners that they bring in to do labour and other jobs that they don't want to do themselves. Women are more property there and face severe restrictions on what they can do.
You can go to Saudi Arabia if you are not a Muslim. There are many people from Europe, North America, Australia, etc that go there for work in IT, engineering, medical and other such jobs. They are limited from going to some areas if they are not Muslim. And the restrictions on women don't apply to them. I knew a woman who was there and she said that she always got stared at when she went out alone, especially at restaurants. It didn't click with her why until I pointed out to her that women there weren't allowed to do that.
Sure we'll be able to do it but the cost of the cartridges to do so will bankrupt you.
If the problem is that the men can't stop themselves from harming the women then the solution isn't to treat the women as objects and force them to cover up. It's to get the men to change their behaviour and act civilized. Let the women dress however they want and if a man can't control the urges then they must be blindfolded. The problem is with them and not with the women. People are not property. You can say it was created for whatever noble cause you want to but it still is slavery and it needs to be stopped.
Let's start flinging objects around that can hurt other people or damage other things if you miss the drone (and you probably will miss the drone). Yes, the person flying the drone over your backyard is being a jackass but I doubt your neighbours are going to be won over to your side if you break their windows with a slingshot or hit them with a paint gun. If the neighbour is throwing crap into my yard I'm going to be upset at my neighbour and not at the guy flying the drone. Just because one person in your area is acting like a twat doesn't mean give everyone the excuse to.
In this case your doctor is just acting as a middleman and your pharmacist or a nurse practitioner could probably issue the prescription. Or maybe just have your doctor give you the prescription without a visit. But then do you really want to use up their time on such a task when they could be using their skills on something else? I think anything that helps doctors do what they are supposed to do is a good thing.
Well, you wouldn't know with a radiologist anyways since you never see them. You only ever deal with the technologist to get the images done.
They definitely will take into account the information that they are given by the referring physician but often they don't have the whole patient's file there. Many places now just have technicians take the images and they are sent to the radiologist off site who does the diagnosis. And it's not a one-to-one ratio. There's not some radiologist sitting around in the lab waiting around for your x-ray to be taken.
It doesn't matter when you give them the money. If you see it in the theater or buy the DVD for these bad movies then they will keep making more.
People complain all the time that all Hollywood puts out is the same crap year after year. There's so many comments on there about how terrible the reboots are and that there are so many superhero movies that they are getting tired of them. The movie industry is only putting out those movies because people keep going to those movies. When it takes $100M or more to make a movie are you going to do something that you are pretty sure that people are going to see or take a risk?
If you want to see well written, well acted, and just plain great movies then we are going to have to stop going to see the crap we're being fed and only support the few gems do get out.
It may be true that he didn't put his picture up on the Web for 20 years. However, especially in the last five years, given the parties and events that he probably has to attend for his job I'm sure that someone has captured him in a photo and posted it onto the Internet. He may not be the primary person of interest in the picture but I'm sure that he's on there.
Of course to verify that there are no pictures of him on the Web then he would have to upload a picture of himself onto the Web.
And technically he's talking about the WWW. If he's ever e-mailed a picture, sent a fax of his picture over a VOIP line, or transferred some files of FTP then he's had his picture on the Internet.
No, it means out of people working and people actively looking for work then 97% of them are working. It doesn't count the people that have gotten so frustrated with the job market that they've gone back to school or just given up completely. It also counts a person working part time as working (though I don't know if the hours are counted as a percentage of a full time worker or not). And it doesn't take into account underemployment where you get people doing jobs that they are overqualified for.
Sounds like a good way to get some more funding, "find out" that it doesn't work, and then fold up shop.
If you were to subsidize the pay of people taking the leave so that companies wouldn't have to (it would be a huge burden on very small businesses to have to pay a worker for parental leave) then that might just been seen as too much like socialism.
Create an app that echos back lines from the play when you feed it another line. You can learn so much about the play from that.
Here's an idea. How about using the money to get a proper teacher instead of a babysitter and actually learn about the play, what things might mean in it, what Scotland was like during the time it was set in, and even about Shakespeare's time and life and how it would impact his writing. Get an inspiring teacher and the students would learn much more. When I studied plays for the most part we just went around the room and took turns reading a few lines. There was a bit of discussion about what things might mean but not much. For the most part it was very boring.
I had a really nice Canon multi-function (MX-850) but when I bought a new Mac it came with the OS X 10.10 and I found out that they weren't going to make the drivers for it. So I had to get a new machine even though the old one worked perfectly. Actually the replacement model (MX-922) had a slower print speed and wasn't designed as well.