Well, it was repeated on Radio 4 last September... I wish I'd recorded it, but I missed the first episode...
You can always buy the series from the BBC - but I'd spend the money on the Lord of The Rings CD set instead. The radio series of that was, well, superlative. It too is being rebroadcast (Radio 4, Sat 2.30-3.30pm, GMT of course).
Umm... I'm sure you really mean illogical and ungrammatical. But then, you must be right, given your mission statement. Or maybe (just maybe) you're actually not a suitable person to criticise other people's grammatical errors?
Oh no it doesn't, you stupid twat! Really, if all you're doing is whoring for karma, you can at least try to say something noteworthy. Oh, I forgot, this is/. Down with MS, that must be worth a point or two.
Oh, PLEASE come and sort out the sodding pcmcia on my laptop then!! Really, I'm having no small probs with Debian on my lappy. Having said that, it look me only an hour or so to get X up and running, so I should feel happy about that at least....
Given Bill's score of 20 CHR (as reported by The Onion), how do you see yourself not being beguiled by his silver tongue and god-like personality?
Would you require that some of his magic itenms (e.g. his "Polo Shirt of Thalkettoth, which grants a +5 saving throw against anti-trust litigation") be taken away from him?
So I hope you've done something about it and told them - or are you just the type to winge about something, sit of your arse and woder why it doesn't get fixed? Don't tell us, tell them!
What this book and its successor, "The Deeper Meaning of Liff" do is take place names and fit meanings to them, eg:
Sompting: The act of involuntarilty dribbling on your pillow in your sleep Lusby: The above bra bulge of a woman who insists she's actually a cup size smaller than she really is.
I suspect that the union of the sets of "New Users" who play games, visit chatrooms and download music is greater than a similar union of sets "Old Users", performing these activities.
In that respect, the statement "experienced Interneters are less likely to use chatrooms, play games, and download music than their newbie counterparts" looks to be valid. Let's face it, you're nit-picking, and that pettiness over 0.8% is pathetic.
If there's anything appalling about the statement you've taken exception to, it's the way that the noun "Internet" appears to have been made into a verb. Interneters, indeed....
Ye gods, are you really that thick? The article you refer to states that they will change their name, and now we're being told they have changed their name. Yes, there is a difference.
What does it prove? He has a suspended license therefore he is responsible for the hoax? I don't get your warped logic. (To quote the AC parent).
Just what I was thinking. Yes, you're very clever and all that, and we're all in awe of your investigative skills (oh yes, really), but what you're saying, in itslef means nothing.
Tom.
Tom.
Tom.
Tom.
"Fish of the day?"
(And yes, of course I bloody well know what it means)
Tom.
Try the main page, and I see it now says:
Okay, the google cache for his main page is at: http://www.google.com/search?q=cache:ta1nhhNpbHMCTom.
Tom.
- Community's (instead of communitys)
- Browser's (instead of browsers)
Simple enough, we're talking possessive, not plural. Just doing the job the Grammar Nazi's not awake to do right now....Tom.
Tom.
You can always buy the series from the BBC - but I'd spend the money on the Lord of The Rings CD set instead. The radio series of that was, well, superlative. It too is being rebroadcast (Radio 4, Sat 2.30-3.30pm, GMT of course).
Tom.
I sacrifice my karma on tha altar of smugness...
Tom.
Tom.
Tom.
Would you require that some of his magic itenms (e.g. his "Polo Shirt of Thalkettoth, which grants a +5 saving throw against anti-trust litigation") be taken away from him?
Tom.
Tom.
Don't you mean "There are some here"?
Tom.
Sompting: The act of involuntarilty dribbling on your pillow in your sleep
Lusby: The above bra bulge of a woman who insists she's actually a cup size smaller than she really is.
Tom.
I suspect that the union of the sets of "New Users" who play games, visit chatrooms and download music is greater than a similar union of sets "Old Users", performing these activities.
In that respect, the statement "experienced Interneters are less likely to use chatrooms, play games, and download music than their newbie counterparts" looks to be valid. Let's face it, you're nit-picking, and that pettiness over 0.8% is pathetic.
If there's anything appalling about the statement you've taken exception to, it's the way that the noun "Internet" appears to have been made into a verb. Interneters, indeed....
Tom.
Think forward planning.
Tom.
What, like McDonalds, several retches per mouthful of food?
Tom.
Tom.
Tom.
Just what I was thinking. Yes, you're very clever and all that, and we're all in awe of your investigative skills (oh yes, really), but what you're saying, in itslef means nothing.
Tom.
Tom.
Admittedly, I haven't actually filled in the forms properly (tax return? No thanks! TV license? No thanks!), but it all looks pretty good.
Tom.