It's been my observation over years of dealing with them.
Most people who use computers aren't the Slashdot crowd. They "kinda, sorta" know enough to be able to check their email, surf the web, or play some games.
Usually when they have a failure from malware, they've been infected (perhaps with other things as well) for some time. If they can even find the original system restore disk, they're way ahead of the game.
They get Cousin Jimmy (or one of their kids), cause he's good with computers, to clean up or reinstall their computer. Usually leaving many of the same holes that got them zapped in the first place.
Or, they get some computer store to deal with it. They just gripe about losing some stuff, but it was a game they liked and can no longer find, or an email from momma before she died, etc. not something life and death. They may start copying some things to a thumb drive, if you're lucky.
So many times I've asked "When was your last backup?" and get a vacant stare even from people with PhDs at the university I work at. Let alone the everyday person on the street who has a computer at home.
As computer files become more valuable to ordinary people (rather than just IT geeks and businesses), backup plans become more important.
Most general users don't do this, but as the data becomes more damaging if it's lost, encrypted or maliciously destroyed, they may need some sort of solution.
Even a pretty sophisticated ransom-ware would have a hard time if you take an occasional backup and check it by restoring/reading the file on another machine.
I have this sneaking suspicion that the real damage that could be done to Sony is if the group that broke in got into the internal financial data rather than what gets reported.
Word has long been that the accounting practices of Hollywood and the music industry make Enron look pretty tame. And Sony is into both.
Imagine how many lawyers/accountants would be going over any financial records that get released. There are lots of actors and musicians that have felt they got shafted with what they were paid versus what they were actually owed.
"why would some intentional geoengineering be so bad?"
If it fails, not much.
But if it works, and global warming is controlled, it would undercut the best fundraising, societal engineering and lobbying arguments many organizations have.
Example: It'd remove a massive issue for the Democrats and Republicans to argue about and scare voters with.
Repeat that with both environmental and conservative organizations losing that issue, and you have a worse crisis for them than just the prospect of getting cooked by rising temperatures.;)
You mean, like is combined with arsenic (a deadly poison) to use for all sorts of evil things like LEDs and high speed transistors for things like cell phones?
And you can combine it with that nitrogen stuff that is part of so many explosives. And use it for (wait for it) even brighter LEDs!
Wow. That's some real exotic stuff there. Certainly wouldn't want any of that in the world.
Yeah, this is the sort of BS I'd expect out of The Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. It's sad they've figured out that submitting everything to Slashdot is a way to shovel their message.
Nasty. Swans are already mean as all get out and now you want to genetically engineer them with African bee dna, so they behave like killer bees.
Black swan: Cygnus atratus Africanized honey bee: Apis mellifera adansonii
Africanized Black Swan: Cygnus atratus adansonii (variety: Winged Death).
Attacks in flocks of thousands and chases you for miles. Almost as bad as sharks with lasers, but can fly and travel on land. Doctor Evil would be proud.
That was in the 68 campaign (i.e. I'm a bit young to remember much of it personally, unlike Watergate and the fall of Saigon). How much effect it really had can be argued. One thing I do know is that even later the Paris talks weren't looking all that promising until at least 1972, and Thieu had to be strongarmed to go along. Whether Johnson/Humphrey could have delivered Thieu to the negotiating table even without interference is a question we'll never know the answer to.
In some ways, his Vietnam policy is similar to Obama's in Iraq. Then it was called Vietnamization, now it's called having the Iraqi's assume responsibility for their security. In the case of Nixon, we have 40 years of history to know it didn't work very well. In 40 years, we'll know a lot more about how Iraq works out.
All depends on how you define "playing in that sandbox". We had several hundred military advisors there during the 50s. Now, you may be able to say that Truman was also "playing in that sandbox" while it was still French, but you can't say the US wasn't there in more than just casual numbers during Eisenhower's administration.
Now, if you mean standard combat troops, that was the Kennedy administration. But, advisors and intelligence personnel are a nebulous area (a bit like our current anti-gravity personnel in Iraq who in no ways have their "boots on the ground").
"But.. if I feel like Nixon hating there is always Vietnam"
Which part do you hate him for? Ike and especially Kennedy were already playing in that sandbox. LBJ was the one to get the Tonkin Gulf resolution passed and massively enlarge the commitment of troops.
If it's that you think he lost the war, that was already well underway since the crisis of US public opinion after Tet. The draw down of troops and the cut off of ammunition to South Vietnam were nearly mandated as a result of public opinion and congressional action.
Yes, Nixon increased the bombing campaign and implemented a blockade, but also pursued peace talks with North Vietnam (The agreements which N. Vietnam basically violated when they pushed south.)
I've been appalled by how often when I've heard one of the younger set say that Nixon started the Vietnam War. That's a pretty major failure of history knowledge. I'm hoping that's not what you were thinking.
Sure. Or, just make it a hybrid drive with charging from the grid and have the best of both worlds.
Fire trucks are a small enough part of the vehicles out there to be less of a worry for efficiency. Reliability is a big thing for emergency vehicles.
There are a lot of garbage trucks and other utility type trucks out there that do short range stop and start runs that would probably make a lot bigger difference.
I'm quite familiar with intermodal transport. It becomes useful on longer runs. But, being able to just hook in to a powered feed is a lot more flexible.
For intermod, you have to have a truck and driver on either end of the rail link, plus the time to assemble the train, etc. It's quite efficient in a lot of ways, but unwieldy for mid range loads.
The short haul is a lot easier to do with batteries.
I like the idea of catenary wires or some other way for a truck on a freeway to get electric power from the road itself.
Use battery or a hybrid system to get from the customer pick up to the nearest interstate and them hook up to the electric for the long drive, and let the truck drive itself. Have that lane separate from the manual driving lanes.
An alarm sounds when it's time for the driver to take back over (or stops the truck in a safe place if the driver fails to take back over).
Makes the control system for the automatic driving part much easier as it's just following a wire or other guide.
Fire trucks have to use their engines for extended periods to run the on board pumps during major fires.
Bad enough having to find a hydrant. Imagine having to find an electrical outlet with sufficient current capacity to keep electric pumps going after the batteries are down.
Is it one of the weakened strains that's used for making oral polio vaccine? Those aren't terribly dangerous as they're already given orally to kids. They also tend to be present in the water in the areas oral vaccine is still given, as people shed the vaccine strain virus as they are building immunity.
Is it a full up wild type polio that might be used at some stage of making the injected vaccine?
And that's just a couple of questions I've got. Details makes a difference.
Not so random. Maybe a long ways distant. (i.e. It's vaporware, but give us more money.)
One of the problems of current quantum computing qubits is they are easily upset by thermal and other noise from their surroundings.
There are certain systems that involve Majorana fermions that have been theorized to be what are called topologically protected states. These would be largely immune to noise in a way similar to how electron pairs in a superconductor are immune to the normal energy losses that cause resistance in a wire.
A problem with this, is, we hadn't really shown that Majorana fermions actually existed.
This is a hot area of solid state physics research. Note that these are not particles in the usual sense, but things that behave like particles (like electron pairs in a superconductor behave kinda sorta like single particles). They fall under the general term of quasiparticles.
Slashdot Mirror
He's just unhappy they aren't eating Quisp instead.
By this thinking, wouldn't threatening to plant a bomb would be a superpower?
"How can you even say that."
It's been my observation over years of dealing with them.
Most people who use computers aren't the Slashdot crowd. They "kinda, sorta" know enough to be able to check their email, surf the web, or play some games.
Usually when they have a failure from malware, they've been infected (perhaps with other things as well) for some time. If they can even find the original system restore disk, they're way ahead of the game.
They get Cousin Jimmy (or one of their kids), cause he's good with computers, to clean up or reinstall their computer. Usually leaving many of the same holes that got them zapped in the first place.
Or, they get some computer store to deal with it. They just gripe about losing some stuff, but it was a game they liked and can no longer find, or an email from momma before she died, etc. not something life and death. They may start copying some things to a thumb drive, if you're lucky.
So many times I've asked "When was your last backup?" and get a vacant stare even from people with PhDs at the university I work at. Let alone the everyday person on the street who has a computer at home.
As computer files become more valuable to ordinary people (rather than just IT geeks and businesses), backup plans become more important.
Most general users don't do this, but as the data becomes more damaging if it's lost, encrypted or maliciously destroyed, they may need some sort of solution.
Even a pretty sophisticated ransom-ware would have a hard time if you take an occasional backup and check it by restoring/reading the file on another machine.
I have this sneaking suspicion that the real damage that could be done to Sony is if the group that broke in got into the internal financial data rather than what gets reported.
Word has long been that the accounting practices of Hollywood and the music industry make Enron look pretty tame. And Sony is into both.
Imagine how many lawyers/accountants would be going over any financial records that get released. There are lots of actors and musicians that have felt they got shafted with what they were paid versus what they were actually owed.
"550,000 million dollar Kepler space telescope"
I think you're about 3 orders of magnitude too high.
So... The two of you are in agreement that we're completely fucked unless we follow your path.
However, you seem to disagree strongly about what that path is, save that yours is the "right" one.
Here are two cricket bats. Beat on each other until one of you is unconscious or you reach a consensus.
The rest of us will continue blundering our way to the future while you have it out. Hopefully, by then the answer won't matter anyway.
If it fails as badly as the rabbit infestation, you've given the pols another wonderful issue to send out direct mailings about!
Not to mention, a whole slew of disaster movies that will make Night of the Lepus look positively tame.
"why would some intentional geoengineering be so bad?"
If it fails, not much.
But if it works, and global warming is controlled, it would undercut the best fundraising, societal engineering and lobbying arguments many organizations have.
Example: It'd remove a massive issue for the Democrats and Republicans to argue about and scare voters with.
Repeat that with both environmental and conservative organizations losing that issue, and you have a worse crisis for them than just the prospect of getting cooked by rising temperatures. ;)
"What are ya programmin' for, Timmy my boy?"
"Helps with my hallucinations. I get to see the world in its real black and white!"
(We're all coders on this bus.)
"hillbilly echo-chamber constantly circle-jerking while chanting "fuck you, got mine"."
Oh, really?
What type of echo-chamber do you circle-jerk in, and what mindless mantra do you chant?
They will very soon have a comprehensive database of the very best automated troll entry coding skillsets that GNAA and other such groups can muster.
Or didn't they get the memo that Hank the Angry Drunken Dwarf won man of the year over a decade ago?
You mean, like is combined with arsenic (a deadly poison) to use for all sorts of evil things like LEDs and high speed transistors for things like cell phones?
And you can combine it with that nitrogen stuff that is part of so many explosives. And use it for (wait for it) even brighter LEDs!
Wow. That's some real exotic stuff there. Certainly wouldn't want any of that in the world.
Yeah, this is the sort of BS I'd expect out of The Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. It's sad they've figured out that submitting everything to Slashdot is a way to shovel their message.
Nasty. Swans are already mean as all get out and now you want to genetically engineer them with African bee dna, so they behave like killer bees.
Black swan: Cygnus atratus
Africanized honey bee: Apis mellifera adansonii
Africanized Black Swan: Cygnus atratus adansonii (variety: Winged Death).
Attacks in flocks of thousands and chases you for miles. Almost as bad as sharks with lasers, but can fly and travel on land. Doctor Evil would be proud.
"bootstrapping a solar system civilization with no additional money"
FTFY.
It's Ingrid Newkirk. What did you expect?
That was in the 68 campaign (i.e. I'm a bit young to remember much of it personally, unlike Watergate and the fall of Saigon). How much effect it really had can be argued. One thing I do know is that even later the Paris talks weren't looking all that promising until at least 1972, and Thieu had to be strongarmed to go along. Whether Johnson/Humphrey could have delivered Thieu to the negotiating table even without interference is a question we'll never know the answer to.
There's plenty of things to dislike about Nixon. He's always been a mixed bag in a lot of ways. Yes, he was a crook. But, some of the diplomacy during his administration may have reduced the chance for nuclear war (détente with the USSR, and the opening with China).
In some ways, his Vietnam policy is similar to Obama's in Iraq. Then it was called Vietnamization, now it's called having the Iraqi's assume responsibility for their security. In the case of Nixon, we have 40 years of history to know it didn't work very well. In 40 years, we'll know a lot more about how Iraq works out.
All depends on how you define "playing in that sandbox". We had several hundred military advisors there during the 50s. Now, you may be able to say that Truman was also "playing in that sandbox" while it was still French, but you can't say the US wasn't there in more than just casual numbers during Eisenhower's administration.
Now, if you mean standard combat troops, that was the Kennedy administration. But, advisors and intelligence personnel are a nebulous area (a bit like our current anti-gravity personnel in Iraq who in no ways have their "boots on the ground").
"But.. if I feel like Nixon hating there is always Vietnam"
Which part do you hate him for? Ike and especially Kennedy were already playing in that sandbox. LBJ was the one to get the Tonkin Gulf resolution passed and massively enlarge the commitment of troops.
If it's that you think he lost the war, that was already well underway since the crisis of US public opinion after Tet. The draw down of troops and the cut off of ammunition to South Vietnam were nearly mandated as a result of public opinion and congressional action.
Yes, Nixon increased the bombing campaign and implemented a blockade, but also pursued peace talks with North Vietnam (The agreements which N. Vietnam basically violated when they pushed south.)
I've been appalled by how often when I've heard one of the younger set say that Nixon started the Vietnam War. That's a pretty major failure of history knowledge. I'm hoping that's not what you were thinking.
Sure. Or, just make it a hybrid drive with charging from the grid and have the best of both worlds.
Fire trucks are a small enough part of the vehicles out there to be less of a worry for efficiency. Reliability is a big thing for emergency vehicles.
There are a lot of garbage trucks and other utility type trucks out there that do short range stop and start runs that would probably make a lot bigger difference.
I'm quite familiar with intermodal transport. It becomes useful on longer runs. But, being able to just hook in to a powered feed is a lot more flexible.
For intermod, you have to have a truck and driver on either end of the rail link, plus the time to assemble the train, etc. It's quite efficient in a lot of ways, but unwieldy for mid range loads.
The short haul is a lot easier to do with batteries.
I like the idea of catenary wires or some other way for a truck on a freeway to get electric power from the road itself.
Use battery or a hybrid system to get from the customer pick up to the nearest interstate and them hook up to the electric for the long drive, and let the truck drive itself. Have that lane separate from the manual driving lanes.
An alarm sounds when it's time for the driver to take back over (or stops the truck in a safe place if the driver fails to take back over).
Makes the control system for the automatic driving part much easier as it's just following a wire or other guide.
Fire trucks have to use their engines for extended periods to run the on board pumps during major fires.
Bad enough having to find a hydrant. Imagine having to find an electrical outlet with sufficient current capacity to keep electric pumps going after the batteries are down.
The links aren't very informative.
Is it one of the weakened strains that's used for making oral polio vaccine? Those aren't terribly dangerous as they're already given orally to kids. They also tend to be present in the water in the areas oral vaccine is still given, as people shed the vaccine strain virus as they are building immunity.
Is it a full up wild type polio that might be used at some stage of making the injected vaccine?
And that's just a couple of questions I've got. Details makes a difference.
Not so random. Maybe a long ways distant. (i.e. It's vaporware, but give us more money.)
One of the problems of current quantum computing qubits is they are easily upset by thermal and other noise from their surroundings.
There are certain systems that involve Majorana fermions that have been theorized to be what are called topologically protected states. These would be largely immune to noise in a way similar to how electron pairs in a superconductor are immune to the normal energy losses that cause resistance in a wire.
A problem with this, is, we hadn't really shown that Majorana fermions actually existed.
This is a hot area of solid state physics research. Note that these are not particles in the usual sense, but things that behave like particles (like electron pairs in a superconductor behave kinda sorta like single particles). They fall under the general term of quasiparticles.