You should have made that argument first instead of trying "it's not ad hominem if I don't like them". Still not sure I agree with it, but you'd be on firmer ground.
You might feel safe in ignoring them, but if you attempt to refute them, using "they're scum" is still a logical fallacy. If you feel there's no point in refuting them any more, that's a different matter. But laziness is not logic.
Yes, it is. The scumminess or non-scumminess of the source is not relevant to the strength of their argument. If they are scum, it may be more likely that they have made false arguments, but it is not guaranteed, and the proper counter is to root out the falsity of their arguments.
"This is the captain. We have a little problem with our entry sequence, so we may experience some slight turbulence and then explode" "We're gonna explode!? I don't wanna explode!"
You don't understand Zuckerberg. This is climbing, for him. He doesn't sell Facebook to do what he wants to be doing, because running Facebook is what he wants to be doing. There's no place else he'd rather be.
or 3) This is a phone with the original fault, unfixed. They haven't ruled that out yet. There are going to be thousands, if not millions of phones with the original fault unfixed out there for years. People don't always turn things in on a recall.
Which, of course, Trump will not do. Trump puts Trump first, last, and always. When he even bothers to lie about it it's so transparent as to be pathetic.
It's mostly because if the cabbie drives faster (and less safely) he can make more fares, and more money. The purpose of proposing that buses drive less safely is to speed up the schedule, which doesn't get the bus driver paid more and normally the bus driver doesn't get to define his schedule anyways.
Go is rather simple compared to other problems like image recognition
Not really. When looked at naively, the problem space seems much larger in image recognition, but there are algorithms to drastically simplify things in IR, while such things are very scarce on the ground for Go.
Slashdot Mirror
Sorry, I wasn't listening.
You should have made that argument first instead of trying "it's not ad hominem if I don't like them". Still not sure I agree with it, but you'd be on firmer ground.
You might feel safe in ignoring them, but if you attempt to refute them, using "they're scum" is still a logical fallacy. If you feel there's no point in refuting them any more, that's a different matter. But laziness is not logic.
Yes, it is. The scumminess or non-scumminess of the source is not relevant to the strength of their argument. If they are scum, it may be more likely that they have made false arguments, but it is not guaranteed, and the proper counter is to root out the falsity of their arguments.
...Basil Fawlty could've told you that.
They are supposed to be ruggedized. Apparently, they're not ruggedized enough.
"This is the captain. We have a little problem with our entry sequence, so we may experience some slight turbulence and then explode"
"We're gonna explode!? I don't wanna explode!"
Not when you have a selection bias, it isn't. If your sample selection is consistently biased, no sample size will be large enough.
You don't understand Zuckerberg. This is climbing, for him. He doesn't sell Facebook to do what he wants to be doing, because running Facebook is what he wants to be doing. There's no place else he'd rather be.
Jimmy Smits!
Historically, Mars probes have had a very high failure rate. NASA techs have made jokes about "The Great Galactic Ghoul" being responsible.
Apple only likes cults that worship buying their stuff.
Projections are that the atmosphere could be 78% nitrogen in the future if this is allowed to go forward!
or
3) This is a phone with the original fault, unfixed. They haven't ruled that out yet. There are going to be thousands, if not millions of phones with the original fault unfixed out there for years. People don't always turn things in on a recall.
They've had Doombots for years.
...only criminals will have cat videos!
The cameras aren't exactly hidden. They're generally right there in plain sight on the front of the uniform shirt, and fairly large.
Shouldn't it be: "Can NASA's Gryphon-X Projec Have Anything To Do With What NASA is Supposed To Be Doing?"
Which, of course, Trump will not do. Trump puts Trump first, last, and always. When he even bothers to lie about it it's so transparent as to be pathetic.
It's mostly because if the cabbie drives faster (and less safely) he can make more fares, and more money. The purpose of proposing that buses drive less safely is to speed up the schedule, which doesn't get the bus driver paid more and normally the bus driver doesn't get to define his schedule anyways.
Is anyone compiling a list of new cars you can get without this crap in them?
Both of them.
I think good-quality Velcro should last as least as long as a shoelace before it breaks--but replacing the Velcro is much more difficult.
You've invented the loafer!
Not really. When looked at naively, the problem space seems much larger in image recognition, but there are algorithms to drastically simplify things in IR, while such things are very scarce on the ground for Go.