As accustomed to ultra-consumption as we are 20 minutes to learn something new in an area you're (at least I was) totally unfamiliar with isn't all that much time.
Plus the video is rather well done and informative.
Let's be like the auto industry and play "catch up". This stuff should have happend years ago.
Sure the government could track my spendings, but guess what I want to track my spending, see trends, create budgets, etc...all without having to deal with 17 different companies (thank god for Mint.com; oh wait I'm sure they're datamining my transactions too).
Once we all go digital credits we just need to make sure we don't have monopolistic companies controlling the digital dollars and that there isn't some nonsensically high bar to get into that market for new companies.
But that's probably a laughable dream for this US citizen (with papers).
Could someone explain exactly why an author (which I am not) of a written work is unable to release his/her content to the masses without the need of a publisher?
I imagine I can publish a document to an ebook store (which I am assuming is not considered a "publisher" since it is a "store") or even a website for purchase and bypass the need for these publishing companies.
Of course my imagination can be rather wild so maybe this ease is out of the scope of reality.
Everytime we keep getting articles about this I wonder how accurate LEXX was in saying how M class planets always end up destroying themselves when attempting to find the mass of the Higgs Boson.
Get a scrum master (not a project manager, those are worthless). Train people in Agile or at least some form of iterative process if you decide against an Agile environment.
Since your delivery rates are slipping start estimating time for projects and see which give the most value; complete those first.
This whole idea that things can wait a year to be looked at was ridiculous in 1990. If you're not interative already you're decades behind.
I've seen tons of Drupal, HTML 5, jQuery and jQuery Mobile job openings (those are all "open source" if you will).
It also seems that at least in the past few weeks the number of job hunters that have been contacting myself and co-workers has increased, which is hopefully a good sign for my unemployed brother and sister college grads...
You have to be careful what we try and warn people about though.
The fluoride mineral found in water itself isn't carcinogenic, it's been in water sources for eons and we've grown up/evolved while being exposed to it (much like UV radiation everyone is in a huff about).
Just as when we add man-made substances to what we ingest we shouldn't be so quick to remove them either don't you think?
I agree man-made artifices are ridiculous, but not all fluoride is intrinsically harmful, in fact it's essential for our dental health.
If people really cared they could use reverse-osmosis to remove the fluoride; but those of us with well water (albeit a small %) don't have much to worry about.
Link to shoddy looking site and ambiguous/pompous "educate yourself".? lol
Refute the actual question instead of some link you aren't able to elucidate: Are you denying fluoride occurs naturally in streams and underground water sources?
I'd find more recent sources than 2000 on some shoddy website to support my claims as well.
or perhaps its from years of flouride in the drinking water
You know fluoride has and still does occur naturally within nature right? It's found naturally within streams and underground sources? Like my well water for instance?
Maybe people are just lazy and uneducated; thinking everything is man made and carcinogenic. For example UV radiation.
Slashdot Mirror
Suicide is a personal choice, not anyone else's. I don't see why everyone always tries to blame bullies, commenters, family, etc.
Regardless of if it's a rational decision or not it's my own choice, just like robbing a bank is my fault.
Do I get to blame commenters urging me to commit other crimes too?
As accustomed to ultra-consumption as we are 20 minutes to learn something new in an area you're (at least I was) totally unfamiliar with isn't all that much time.
Plus the video is rather well done and informative.
I'd just use this as a screening question for potential employees.
If you willingly give me your login credentials I should just assume you're a moron and not hire you.
Yea younger than Captain Jack please. He's getting too old to be the hot boy on the block; it's getting a little unbelievable.
So let me ask then: are you still on the Exchange team?
Let's be like the auto industry and play "catch up". This stuff should have happend years ago.
Sure the government could track my spendings, but guess what I want to track my spending, see trends, create budgets, etc...all without having to deal with 17 different companies (thank god for Mint.com; oh wait I'm sure they're datamining my transactions too).
Once we all go digital credits we just need to make sure we don't have monopolistic companies controlling the digital dollars and that there isn't some nonsensically high bar to get into that market for new companies.
But that's probably a laughable dream for this US citizen (with papers).
Does anyone else hate the phrase "deep dive"?
Seems only 50+ year old salesmen use it to try and sound worthwhile.
If you were truly a "good" citizen you would have dropped the BlackBerry off in the nearest trash can.
Could someone explain exactly why an author (which I am not) of a written work is unable to release his/her content to the masses without the need of a publisher?
I imagine I can publish a document to an ebook store (which I am assuming is not considered a "publisher" since it is a "store") or even a website for purchase and bypass the need for these publishing companies.
Of course my imagination can be rather wild so maybe this ease is out of the scope of reality.
10 years in jail seems extreamly low for 500 HD movies.
Everytime we keep getting articles about this I wonder how accurate LEXX was in saying how M class planets always end up destroying themselves when attempting to find the mass of the Higgs Boson.
Yea the sub might be pretty cool, but I'd hardly call it "sexy".
And it would like it's "news" article back.
Get a scrum master (not a project manager, those are worthless). Train people in Agile or at least some form of iterative process if you decide against an Agile environment.
Since your delivery rates are slipping start estimating time for projects and see which give the most value; complete those first.
This whole idea that things can wait a year to be looked at was ridiculous in 1990. If you're not interative already you're decades behind.
Maybe one day they'll be able to patent managers that actually manage and get to know their programmers.
But really I mean by then there will be no such thing as managers and they'll all be Scrum Masters and power will go to the development team itself.
I've seen tons of Drupal, HTML 5, jQuery and jQuery Mobile job openings (those are all "open source" if you will).
It also seems that at least in the past few weeks the number of job hunters that have been contacting myself and co-workers has increased, which is hopefully a good sign for my unemployed brother and sister college grads...
Are you paying your workplace $15-$40k a year to teach/educate/house you?
Is that because all the pharmaceutical companies are using Waterfall instead of Agile/Scrum?
I'd be curious how their development works because it's probably 20 years outdated as well.
ICE the new Peacekeepers of the planet.
With the same type of public perception and welcome.
You have to be careful what we try and warn people about though.
The fluoride mineral found in water itself isn't carcinogenic, it's been in water sources for eons and we've grown up/evolved while being exposed to it (much like UV radiation everyone is in a huff about).
Just as when we add man-made substances to what we ingest we shouldn't be so quick to remove them either don't you think?
I agree man-made artifices are ridiculous, but not all fluoride is intrinsically harmful, in fact it's essential for our dental health.
If people really cared they could use reverse-osmosis to remove the fluoride; but those of us with well water (albeit a small %) don't have much to worry about.
Link to shoddy looking site and ambiguous/pompous "educate yourself".? lol
Refute the actual question instead of some link you aren't able to elucidate: Are you denying fluoride occurs naturally in streams and underground water sources?
I'd find more recent sources than 2000 on some shoddy website to support my claims as well.
What about the ones that live in areas that are going to be covered in water?
Indeed ;)
1970 - Waterfall
2000 - Iterative
or perhaps its from years of flouride in the drinking water
You know fluoride has and still does occur naturally within nature right? It's found naturally within streams and underground sources? Like my well water for instance?
Maybe people are just lazy and uneducated; thinking everything is man made and carcinogenic. For example UV radiation.