I mean, i don't believe in magical pink unicorns either, but you can't pretend to be more enlightened than someone else when you have no evidence that a magical pink unicorns doesn't exist.
The burden of proof lies with the one making the outrageous claim. The existence of an all-powerful being is an outrageous claim.
God, I hope you're trying to make a joke, and not just being stupid. "cells" is the proper way to write the plural of "cell", and "plurals" is the proper way to write the plural for "plural". You could even say that "cell's plural is cells, and plural's plural is plurals"
How does that change anything? I have a valid license to a copy of Photoshop, but that's on my laptop at home. Should I feel justified in using a pirated version at work because it would allow me to "get my work done faster" than if I drove home to fetch my computer?
But the law isn't just saying that the game shouldn't be allowed for children. It's saying that it shouldn't be allowed at all; so the analogy to pornography isn't valid.
Re:No. $500 for ADC membership that comes with ext
on
Tiger Early Start Kit
·
· Score: 1
That price is only if you want a physical CD. To download it, after logging in at https://connect.apple.com/ :
Click on "Download Software" in the navigation area on the left
Click on "Developer Tools" under "Download Software"
Xcode Tools v1.5 is the third item in the list on the right
However, I still reckon there is a good chance that XCode will become a standalone product.
What evidence do you have that suggests that? The way that Apple is dealing with seeding Xcode 2.0 is exactly like what they've done for all previous versions of Xcode and ProjectBuilder
Re:No. $500 for ADC membership that comes with ext
on
Tiger Early Start Kit
·
· Score: 1
Requiring people to fork out $500 for a beta, an ADC account, non-specific discounts on hardware and a release of 10.4 when it eventually appears seems like rather a lot. In fact it appears more like a revenue stream than as a way to keep the unwashed masses away. Perhaps if you were an Apple shop it might be worth it for the development lead in, but I don't see any reason for individual programmers to bother.
I've been a select member before, and I'm planning on renewing soon; the hardware discounts alone make it more than worth the $500. And, for a large enough shop, the Premier membership is a great deal, for the same reason ($3500, but you get 10 discounts, and a pass to WWDC)
That is of course if the ADC weren't being changed too. XCode used to be a free download but since 1.5 not any more. I would not be surprised if 10.4 shipped without XCode 2.0 at all.
What are you smoking? Xcode 1.5 was indeed a free download, as has been every single version of Xcode and ProjectBuilder; there's no reason to suspect that Xcode 2.0 won't be.
Unless, of course, the numbers are reported to 3 significant digits. Then the "real" speed could be slightly higher, like 26,049 mph, in which case, the miles per day would be 625,176... which, when rounded to 3 significant digits is 625,000
blows my mind how incredibly stupid some people are, please go learn physics before you open your mouth again.
Woah, look in a mirror
You do realize that when two objects collide, the *exact same* amount of force is applied to both. If I throw a baseball at a mountain, the force that the baseball applies to the mountain is no stronger and no weaker than the force that the mountain applies to the baseball.
(You know... that whole pesky "equal and opposite reaction" notion)
Yes, I know, but my point was that, even with my liberal estimates, it fit well within the capabilities of USB 2. Any extra benefits from reducing the framerate, resolution, or color depth only serves to make my point that much more valid.
Uncompressed TV-quality video doesn't take that much bandwidth, by my calculations (assuming a resolution of 648 x 486, 32 bits per pixel, 30 frames per second), it would come in at about 302 Mbps, which USB 2.0 (or either FireWire for that matter) could handle without breaking a sweat.
(I specify "family movie" because kids under 13 can't read subtitles.)
Wow, you must know some very developmentally challenged 13 year olds. If a 13 year old cannot read, (s)he has bigger problems than not being able to watch foreign movies.
If he meant he'd ignore references to that famous book by Orwell, the title is "Nineteen Eighty-Four"; it is most certainly not, never has been, and never shall be, "1984".
That's odd. Every copy that I've ever seen has "1984" printed on the cover; and I have never seen one with a cover printed "Nineteen Eighty-Four".
Now I know the default shell in Linux is usually bash, as well, but many shell scripts that are written for ksh or c shell or something of that sort will behave a little differently in bash
Umm, if a script is written for a specific shell, then put:
The Family Guy is now a part of Adult Swim on Cartoon Network. It's written specifically for AS, so now it's become much...how to put it...less subtle in it's skits. However, my roommates and myself find it even more humorous now since they don't have the limitations that they had on Fox...
The new episodes haven't been released yet. What you see on AS (except for the "When you wish on a weinstein" episode") are the exact same episodes that were shown on Fox.
There really isn't. I've ripped many "copy-protected" CDs, both on WinXP and MacOSX, and listen to them every day on my iPod. That's what the "Use error correction when reading Audio CDs" checkbox is for in the iTunes preferences.
If it can play in a normal CD-player, then it can be ripped by a computer. There's no way to put "additional software on the CD [to] make it unreadable by unsupported ripping applictions" without rendering it unreadable to the CD player in your car, or your discman, etc.
Slashdot Mirror
I mean, i don't believe in magical pink unicorns either, but you can't pretend to be more enlightened than someone else when you have no evidence that a magical pink unicorns doesn't exist.
The burden of proof lies with the one making the outrageous claim. The existence of an all-powerful being is an outrageous claim.
An honest question: How was that post racist? If anything, it was ageist, as it makes fun of the old and senile, bet racist? come on.
God, I hope you're trying to make a joke, and not just being stupid. "cells" is the proper way to write the plural of "cell", and "plurals" is the proper way to write the plural for "plural". You could even say that "cell's plural is cells, and plural's plural is plurals"
How does that change anything? I have a valid license to a copy of Photoshop, but that's on my laptop at home. Should I feel justified in using a pirated version at work because it would allow me to "get my work done faster" than if I drove home to fetch my computer?
But the law isn't just saying that the game shouldn't be allowed for children. It's saying that it shouldn't be allowed at all; so the analogy to pornography isn't valid.
What evidence do you have that suggests that? The way that Apple is dealing with seeding Xcode 2.0 is exactly like what they've done for all previous versions of Xcode and ProjectBuilder
Unless, of course, the numbers are reported to 3 significant digits. Then the "real" speed could be slightly higher, like 26,049 mph, in which case, the miles per day would be 625,176 ... which, when rounded to 3 significant digits is 625,000
... thanks for asking!
Woah, look in a mirror
You do realize that when two objects collide, the *exact same* amount of force is applied to both. If I throw a baseball at a mountain, the force that the baseball applies to the mountain is no stronger and no weaker than the force that the mountain applies to the baseball.
(You know ... that whole pesky "equal and opposite reaction" notion)
Yes, I know, but my point was that, even with my liberal estimates, it fit well within the capabilities of USB 2. Any extra benefits from reducing the framerate, resolution, or color depth only serves to make my point that much more valid.
Uncompressed TV-quality video doesn't take that much bandwidth, by my calculations (assuming a resolution of 648 x 486, 32 bits per pixel, 30 frames per second), it would come in at about 302 Mbps, which USB 2.0 (or either FireWire for that matter) could handle without breaking a sweat.
It does look a bit funky at 800x600. The text doesn't wrap, and the "Supported routers:" text intrudes into the second paragraph.
Wow, you must know some very developmentally challenged 13 year olds. If a 13 year old cannot read, (s)he has bigger problems than not being able to watch foreign movies.
#!/path/to/my/specific/shell
in the first line. Problem solved.
The new episodes haven't been released yet. What you see on AS (except for the "When you wish on a weinstein" episode") are the exact same episodes that were shown on Fox.
They could use satellites in polar orbit, which would be visible from either pole about half the time.
They're not talking about taxing a serivce. They're talking about taxing the use of a technology.
Yes, because we have anti-virus software that can see into the future, and protect against viruses that haven't been written yet.
There really isn't. I've ripped many "copy-protected" CDs, both on WinXP and MacOSX, and listen to them every day on my iPod. That's what the "Use error correction when reading Audio CDs" checkbox is for in the iTunes preferences.
If it can play in a normal CD-player, then it can be ripped by a computer. There's no way to put "additional software on the CD [to] make it unreadable by unsupported ripping applictions" without rendering it unreadable to the CD player in your car, or your discman, etc.