No pulse:
Vampires have no pulse. Dead:
You are living on borrowed time. Need blood:
These artificail pump tend to damge blood cells. You need some kind of replacement for this. Long livetime:
form the article: " There is no predicted lifespan for VentrAssist because there are no wearing parts"
* Software, including the operating system and software added to the Dell-branded hardware products through our factory-integration system, third-party software, or the reloading of software
* Non-Dell branded and Solution Provider Direct products and accessories
* Problems that result from:
External causes such as accident, abuse, misuse, or problems with electrical power
Servicing not authorized by Dell
Usage that is not in accordance with product instructions
Failure to follow the product instructions or failure to perform preventive maintenance
[b]Problems caused by using accessories, parts, or components not supplied by Dell[/b]
* Products with missing or altered Service Tags or serial numbers
* Products for which Dell has not received payment
Since neither the USB dongle or the pci card would be supplied by dell your warranty would be not different after opening up the case.
avoid ALL USB solutions that are not usb 2.0, usb 1.1 simply has not enough bandwidth to do captures (think webcam quality).
Ati has announced a usb 2.0 product in april 2004, and i would be supprised if the parent of this post had a usb2.0 solution or the old "usb" solution.
Since setting your useragent to "googlebot" will allow you access to more and more sites without logging in this might be the next big browser in the browser wars.
What incentive does Google have to seriously reduce this type of fraud?
Wrong question: They have to pretend the try to reduce this fraud. publishing about this is a good thing. They do not really have to reduce this fraud because they take a percentage of each click-trough. Only the real obvious false clicks have to be filtered. (user_agent=clickmachine)
They never published how you would be paid for adsense, or when you reach the paiment theshhold. You can contact them if you run a BIG site is all they say. They can easily deduct a percentage from the clicks made as "False clicks". As a webmaster you have no way to check this since they do not reveal HOW they detected these false clicks.
from the review: we encountered a series of various errors and crashes or the software simply hung. This is part user error and part poor interface design, but once you learn the proper steps, the software worked as promised. We think ATI is truly going in the right direction with this, letting users record HDTV shows and back them up on DVD in a few clicks, but the process could be made easier.
If tom said: "MMC stinks and is full of bugs" then he would not get more hardware to review. multi media center keeps getting new features, but only a few of bugs are solved. Ati makes this software availble as upgrades, but the bugs are left there.
Despite that googling on "wifi denial of service" comes up with your link, the discovered vulnerabilty is not about the ones that are descibed in the article you found.
But I am worried about the one really unlucky Joe Sixpacks who get chosen as the first few test cases in the West. Some poor slob who think Freenet's just another way to "freely" swap MP3s with reduced risks of getting a nastygram from RIAA, but who wakes up to black-masked agents screaming "FEDERAL AGENT! WE KNOW YOU'RE HOSTING ILLEGAL PR0N! DON'T MOVE, YOU PERVERTED FREAK!"
First of all: You can always be sued by someone. The point is however that the charge will not stick(under western laws) if you are running a freenet node.(and if you do not store the download files on your HD to view them offline). Maybe you can sue back for damages, but this will not be fun.
Second: Freenet / Gnunet/entropy/pick your own anonymizer will never be good for downloading big files. This is because for a good anonimyzing network without a central server there will be always a multiple of network traffic required. There are networks-protocols that are better suited for this. (typical: if data travels a average of 6 hops, you will have to transfer 13 MB of data to download 1 MB)
It does not seem important, but it is to al lot of people on/. (and if you do not like it do not read these subjects, i excluded all patent subjects for that reason)
There are 2 mayor reasons: -If you are a programmer you contribute to a project you do not want to run anyone with your source, or you might want that, that is very important to things you spend many hours on. -If you are a user you do not later want to find out you have to pay someone for a licence (SCO) because it was not free software to begin with.
There are more roles to be thought of, and for all of these the definition of "free" is important.
Get one with a low LUX number Most sony's have a lux rating of "0" lux night vision ***cough***Sony***cough*** but have a really crappy LUX rating, hmm. You are contradicting yourself. Lux rating is not reliable and not properly documented. Most mayor camcorders have some kind of tick to be able to film in very lowlight condisitions, and publish the lux rating of that condidion. (nightvision/ slow shutters ->bad colors/bad movement etc etc)
In other words: don't trust the ratings of the supplier.
by the way: the build in light of the JVC camara's is not that great either.
In other words: if it is too dark to film turn on a light. 8-) In dark situation's indoors there is often the situation that there is back lighting from a windows, and the camara has a very hard time compensating for that.
1.) It includes 802.llb. This thing is more a router then a server. For a small office router wireless is fine. But since it is not a workstation it must be a server by definition of the/. editors. 2.) Crusoe Processor This is what made slashdot look at it. 3.) The price Cleary the weakstest spot. If they sold it for 300$ it might be a great thing to have next to the phone and the cable modem. Now it is just overpriced.
Well it could be even worse: Security was not comprimised. But the developer was accused anyway. It would be hard to prove anything, but it would give a lot of troubles to the developer.
And try to defend against "only people who have something to hide use cryptology"
1. Well first, about the "uncertainty". Mozilla isn't clearly GPL, so that is a lot to be uncertain about if you want to integrate it in commecial software. (suppose microsoft did a MS- mozilla, that would scare you? )
2. A lot do work fine, but the last few % don't work well. Can't tell you why, i just use a second browser for that. (javscript is the main culprit think)
Companies get what they want (the ability to cut development time and costs with prewritten code they can easily adapt). Which they have to release the source code for free. (GPL)
Consumers get what they want (a web browser that works at no cost). That works in only 95% of the cases since internet is optimized for MS-internet explorer today. Where their votes do not result in more effort on where they cast their vote. (check bugzilla for this.)
Hackers get what they want (a web browser they can hack, where their efforts will be recognised not cause a lawsuit). As long as they don't use the trade mark of other compagnies (like "netschaap", that is no spelling error!).
Developers get what they want (income from doing something cool). As long as you are one of the core mozilla developers. Did each and every developer land on his feet and is still active in the field he(/she) was before?
Slashdot Mirror
No pulse:
Vampires have no pulse.
Dead:
You are living on borrowed time.
Need blood:
These artificail pump tend to damge blood cells. You need some kind of replacement for this.
Long livetime:
form the article: " There is no predicted lifespan for VentrAssist because there are no wearing parts"
SMG: more work for you!
This limited warranty does not cover:
, standalone pc card from dell:
* Software, including the operating system and software added to the Dell-branded hardware products through our factory-integration system, third-party software, or the reloading of software
* Non-Dell branded and Solution Provider Direct products and accessories
* Problems that result from:
External causes such as accident, abuse, misuse, or problems with electrical power
Servicing not authorized by Dell
Usage that is not in accordance with product instructions
Failure to follow the product instructions or failure to perform preventive maintenance
[b]Problems caused by using accessories, parts, or components not supplied by Dell[/b]
* Products with missing or altered Service Tags or serial numbers
* Products for which Dell has not received payment
Since neither the USB dongle or the pci card would be supplied by dell your warranty would be not different after opening up the case.
Or you could buy a
First:
avoid ALL USB solutions that are not usb 2.0, usb 1.1 simply has not enough bandwidth to do captures (think webcam quality).
Ati has announced a usb 2.0 product in april 2004, and i would be supprised if the parent of this post had a usb2.0 solution or the old "usb" solution.
Since setting your useragent to "googlebot" will allow you access to more and more sites without logging in this might be the next big browser in the browser wars.
What incentive does Google have to seriously reduce this type of fraud?
Wrong question:
They have to pretend the try to reduce this fraud. publishing about this is a good thing. They do not really have to reduce this fraud because they take a percentage of each click-trough. Only the real obvious false clicks have to be filtered. (user_agent=clickmachine)
They never published how you would be paid for adsense, or when you reach the paiment theshhold. You can contact them if you run a BIG site is all they say. They can easily deduct a percentage from the clicks made as "False clicks". As a webmaster you have no way to check this since they do not reveal HOW they detected these false clicks.
from the review: we encountered a series of various errors and crashes or the software simply hung. This is part user error and part poor interface design, but once you learn the proper steps, the software worked as promised. We think ATI is truly going in the right direction with this, letting users record HDTV shows and back them up on DVD in a few clicks, but the process could be made easier.
If tom said: "MMC stinks and is full of bugs" then he would not get more hardware to review. multi media center keeps getting new features, but only a few of bugs are solved. Ati makes this software availble as upgrades, but the bugs are left there.
Despite that googling on "wifi denial of service" comes up with your link, the discovered vulnerabilty is not about the ones that are descibed in the article you found.
Check again:
HP to sharpen blade with Pentium M
And don't forget: high end servers don't use bleeding edge processors since they need some extra time to certify the hardware.
Hmm www.nerdylove.com is still free...
....
even better
seaching google finds no hits at all.
That is why he mentions unsermake as a automake replacement to parralel build files. This makes distcc scaleable over much more machines.
I can complain about STEAM, but Jacub at firingsuad.com summed up the problems with STEAM much better,
On the other hand Number 4 on the yahoo list loves you for giving up your place on number 4. as do nr 5 to number 50.
make up your mind...do you want 1 friend (yahoo) or 46?
dvd decryptor can make disk images that are identical to the orinal disks with the difference that they are decrypted.
Put thos images on some server (samba?)
A dvd drive emulator (demeamon tools) kan be used to mount the images
windvd can be used to play the disks
I did have a e-mail adres at deja-news (/mydeja). It was swallowed by google and they discontinued the e-mail service.
But I am worried about the one really unlucky Joe Sixpacks who get chosen as the first few test cases in the West. Some poor slob who think Freenet's just another way to "freely" swap MP3s with reduced risks of getting a nastygram from RIAA, but who wakes up to black-masked agents screaming "FEDERAL AGENT! WE KNOW YOU'RE HOSTING ILLEGAL PR0N! DON'T MOVE, YOU PERVERTED FREAK!"
/entropy /pick your own anonymizer will never be good for downloading big files. This is because for a good anonimyzing network without a central server there will be always a multiple of network traffic required. There are networks-protocols that are better suited for this. (typical: if data travels a average of 6 hops, you will have to transfer 13 MB of data to download 1 MB)
First of all: You can always be sued by someone. The point is however that the charge will not stick(under western laws) if you are running a freenet node.(and if you do not store the download files on your HD to view them offline). Maybe you can sue back for damages, but this will not be fun.
Second: Freenet / Gnunet
It does not seem important, but it is to al lot of people on /. (and if you do not like it do not read these subjects, i excluded all patent subjects for that reason)
There are 2 mayor reasons:
-If you are a programmer you contribute to a project you do not want to run anyone with your source, or you might want that, that is very important to things you spend many hours on.
-If you are a user you do not later want to find out you have to pay someone for a licence (SCO) because it was not free software to begin with.
There are more roles to be thought of, and for all of these the definition of "free" is important.
It all came down to the word "derived"
Get one with a low LUX number
Most sony's have a lux rating of "0" lux night vision
***cough***Sony***cough*** but have a really crappy LUX rating,
hmm. You are contradicting yourself. Lux rating is not reliable and not properly documented. Most mayor camcorders have some kind of tick to be able to film in very lowlight condisitions, and publish the lux rating of that condidion.
(nightvision/ slow shutters ->bad colors/bad movement etc etc)
In other words: don't trust the ratings of the supplier.
by the way: the build in light of the JVC camara's is not that great either.
In other words: if it is too dark to film turn on a light. 8-) In dark situation's indoors there is often the situation that there is back lighting from a windows, and the camara has a very hard time compensating for that.
Rarely do I get the same problem over and over after that.
After such a long story that did not help them with their computer, and being corrected in that story i would not bother asking you again either.
By the way, ever tried to give a 5 year old a list of 15 things to do?
1.) It includes 802.llb. /. editors.
This thing is more a router then a server. For a small office router wireless is fine. But since it is not a workstation it must be a server by definition of the
2.) Crusoe Processor
This is what made slashdot look at it.
3.) The price
Cleary the weakstest spot. If they sold it for 300$ it might be a great thing to have next to the phone and the cable modem. Now it is just overpriced.
Well it could be even worse:
Security was not comprimised. But the developer was accused anyway. It would be hard to prove anything, but it would give a lot of troubles to the developer.
And try to defend against "only people who have something to hide use cryptology"
-1 offtopic.
This is about simuling p2p protocols. Not about file-sharing. Now if you had referenced the "SIMS" this would be more ontopic.
1. Well first, about the "uncertainty". Mozilla isn't clearly GPL, so that is a lot to be uncertain about if you want to integrate it in commecial software. (suppose microsoft did a MS- mozilla, that would scare you? )
2. A lot do work fine, but the last few % don't work well. Can't tell you why, i just use a second browser for that. (javscript is the main culprit think)
3. mysql.
but.....
Companies get what they want (the ability to cut development time and costs with prewritten code they can easily adapt).
Which they have to release the source code for free. (GPL)
Consumers get what they want (a web browser that works at no cost).
That works in only 95% of the cases since internet is optimized for MS-internet explorer today.
Where their votes do not result in more effort on where they cast their vote. (check bugzilla for this.)
Hackers get what they want (a web browser they can hack, where their efforts will be recognised not cause a lawsuit).
As long as they don't use the trade mark of other compagnies (like "netschaap", that is no spelling error!).
Developers get what they want (income from doing something cool).
As long as you are one of the core mozilla developers. Did each and every developer land on his feet and is still active in the field he(/she) was before?
all these kind's of spam. We must be winning. They are getting desparate