Slashdot Mirror


Low Powered Mini-Server for the Masses

ServerSam writes "Sudhian has a review up on EmergeCore's "IT in a Box" IT100. Designed for small business use, it comes equipped with a Transmeta Crusoe 533MHz, 128MB RAM, 20GB IBM TravelStar, 802.11b Access Point, and boots from a 32MB Flash card. The IT100 is powered by a 60 watt external PSU and is smaller than a PS2."

351 comments

  1. hmm by FinestLittleSpace · · Score: 0, Insightful

    ... i dont trust reviewers who have those god awful 'mini' 'cube' PCs as their workstation!

    Still, a nice light bit of hardware, i must say. Hats off, even if it's weak.

    1. Re:hmm by Cthefuture · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Erm... What?!

      My friend, silence is the future of computing. I really hate, I mean I - HATE - those god awful gianormous skyscraper towers that blast out 90dB of concentration breaking whirring and grinding sounds. Not to mention the heat and wasted space. Who needs 8 PCI slots, 12 drive bays, and a 600W power supply?! That's legacy garbage from the ;lt%90's man.

      Smaller, faster, QUIETER. That is the future.

      You sound like one of those "old timers" that likes inefficient crap just because that's all you know.

      You would probably take a CRT over an LCD any day, right? (*)

      * By the way, CRT's do have there uses in high speed games (Quake) but other than that they just burn your retinas.

      --
      The ratio of people to cake is too big
    2. Re:hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      But.....
      It's a CUBE!
      You can do amazing things with it like...
      ...
      .....
      ..
      Comeon! It's a CUBE!

    3. Re:hmm by slashd'oh · · Score: 1
      (Since I just acquired a mini system myself...)

      What's wrong with small form factor systems? The product under review is in the same category. For me, the mini system fits my needs because I only forsee utilizing an AGP slot and PCI slot, if at all, since the motherboard has graphics and sound built in and multiple firewire/USB 2 ports. Plus, I can put it into a carry-on bag should I need to take it somewhere (that has a monitor!), and I can upgrade the system with non-laptop parts.

      Ok, have I defended my purchase now? :)

    4. Re:hmm by LeoDV · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Insightful? How so?

      I so happen to have one of "those god awful 'mini' 'cube' PCs" and it's fantastic, thank you very much. I used to be a vocal opponent of those things because they were kludgy and underperformant, but I got myself one of them "mailboxes" some time ago and it's been great. I had the mother of all great big cases, the Antec 1080, which I loved (and still do, for its purpose it's the best case out there), but I realised that for normal PC operation, something that weighs 35 kilos and has eight fans is overkill.

      When it was time to upgrade, I was simply going to get the same only smaller, but a friend sold me into getting one of "those god awful 'mini' 'cube' PCs" and I must say, it's one of the best computing choices I've made.

      With a combo drive it can do everything a regular PC can, without significantly more noise/heat, while being smaller, lighter, and looking damn cool in black. I already upgraded the system twice with no worries, and as the time draws near to update the system again, I'm thinking about going 64-bit, but whatever I do you can bet it's going to come in a tiny black box.

    5. Re:hmm by FR-lopet · · Score: 1, Funny

      What do you say ? I can't HEAR you !

      --
      I love the smell of lithium in the morning
    6. Re:hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Derrr, try a text to speech system or something.

    7. Re:hmm by secolactico · · Score: 1

      I really hate, I mean I - HATE - those god awful gianormous skyscraper towers that blast out 90dB of concentration breaking whirring and grinding sounds.

      Hell, yeah! As I grow older my tolerance for this kind of noise diminishes, for some reason. I'm seriously considering buying one of those noise cancelling headphones for the times I have to work in the server room. Not only are there about 50+ machines plus switches/routers etc, each with multiple fans, but there's a couple of AC vents on the floor that are almost over the AC machine thingy and that thing is *LOUD*.

      I might already have some Tinnitus (I have yet to go to the doctor) and I'm not taking any chances.

      --
      No sig
    8. Re:hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must be a Mac user.

    9. Re:hmm by tsmccaff · · Score: 1

      sff is great. I live in a cramped box-room and besides the quiet and the just plain coolness of the arrangement of its innards, it provides me valuable space for heaps of dirty clothes and paper plates.

      --
      "the starry sky above and the moral law within"-Kant
    10. Re:hmm by JohnSmith42 · · Score: 2, Funny

      I agree with everything you said, but the heat dissipation. If i didn't have my two computers during winter I would freeze to death. Taking my computer away is like taking vodka away from a russian in siberia!

    11. Re:hmm by HitchHik · · Score: 1

      Well My server at home is still housed in a 1992 Gateway 2000 AT Tower - same power supply - running for 12 years most of it 24x7. I better go and see if the are any MTBF figures for it. Beside the powersupply and floppy everything else has been upgraded :)

      --
      -- &&
    12. Re:hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm with you 100% (almost. but more on that later). I grabbed the closest machine to use as a home webserver, and sat it in a spare room. While it wasn't an unmaintained clunker, it still pumped out heat and noise, and the room was unmistakeably warmer for it. I didn't realise how much the noise permeated the house until I was given a 350mhz iMac as a freebie. To learn a bit about how they ran, I made it the webserver for a day.

      I haven't turned the original server on since then. The iMac runs cooler (but still somewhat warm) but wow, the comfort of walking into every corner of the house and hearing things I hadn't before just because the noise was gone was heaven.

      Servers are designed to server humans. If I'm putting up with the noise of the thing in order for it to perform its job, then I'm serving it. No more.

    13. Re:hmm by tigga · · Score: 2, Insightful
      My friend, silence is the future of computing. I really hate, I mean I - HATE - those god awful gianormous skyscraper towers that blast out 90dB of concentration breaking whirring and grinding sounds. Not to mention the heat and wasted space. Who needs 8 PCI slots, 12 drive bays, and a 600W power supply?! That's legacy garbage from the ;lt%90's man.

      Do not confuse issues. Silence and space are perpendicular. Or may be not. It's much easier to silence tower than those tiny boxes. If you have powerfull processor you should have choice in cooling arrangements and in case of tiny box you do not have one.

      You sound like one of those "old timers" that likes inefficient crap just because that's all you know.

      This is unfair and non-mature.

    14. Re:hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hear! Hear!

      I have the same box for my server. I inherited it from an upgrade at a customer site (5 years after I installed it for him), replaced eveything but the PS and floppy 2wice and I would get rid of it, but it just will not die!

    15. Re:hmm by anagama · · Score: 1
      • I'm seriously considering buying one of those noise cancelling headphones for the times I have to work in the server room.
      Probably a good idea, 8hrs exposure at 85db is considered injurious. You can get a rough idea if the noise level approaches 85db by standing about an arm's length from another person (who has normal hearing). If you need to raise your voice to be understood, the environment is too loud to be in w/o hearing protection for extended durations. Note that "raise your voice" doesn't mean yell, it just means to talk a little extra loudly as you might while driving down the freeway in a tin can car (also an injurious activity if the duration is sufficient).

      --
      What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
    16. Re:hmm by buck_wild · · Score: 1

      Ho about an 'old-timer' that detests spending ~$1400 for a $400 computer. I know the $1400 number includes a fancy new 32MB (only 32MB, really?) CompactFlash card, but I'd rather have the 512 USB 2.0 flash drive for ~$75 anyway.

      Those specs are really weak for $1400. I'd buy (put together) the $400 model and then spend $75 rigging it to run silently.

      "Smaller, faster, QUIETER" Faster is the most important aspect to me, with QUIETER coming in second. Even with five computers running 24/7, people are still suprised when I tell them they're all on. Smaller is not really an issue, as I have my own computer room, but I don't believe in a server-sized case in a non-server application.

      I would take a CRT over an LCD, but only because I bought a nice 21" Viewsonic for $185. I'm not made of money, so getting the LCD equivelent (one that can run 1600 x 1200) for over $900 is not an option.

      --
      If all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail.
  2. Feel the energy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    "Transmeta Crusoe 533MHz, 128MB RAM, 20GB IBM TravelStar, 802.11b Access Point, and boots from a 32MB Flash card."

    I think my Cisco router has more behind it...

    1. Re:Feel the energy by Cpt_Kirks · · Score: 2, Funny

      Bah.

      Wait until the nano-itx boards come out. I have a *TINY* pc planned. 1Ghz CPU, DVD and TV tuner included.

      Is that a PC in your pocket, or are you just glad to see me?

    2. Re:Feel the energy by whee · · Score: 1

      Nano-ITX motherboards are going to be fun. I'm planning on taking a Nano-ITX board and one of Toshiba's 1.8" hard drives and replacing the internals of a digital clock, complete with a new front display. Perfectly discrete server for any room.

    3. Re:Feel the energy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      With a sig like yours I'm surprised anyone would talk to you at all, even if you did have a working mini PC in your pocket.

    4. Re:Feel the energy by generic-man · · Score: 1

      If you're going to hate Sealab 2021, hate it while you're logged in.

      --
      For more information, click here.
    5. Re:Feel the energy by Cpt_Kirks · · Score: 1

      pod-six.net

      Pod six? I frickin' HATE pod six!

  3. Re:I have a mini server for you god dammit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    That sound you hear is the sound of you having failed it.

    Suckah.

  4. Cowards! by penguinoid · · Score: 1

    EmergeCore's IT100 runs Linux, but you will never notice as all the server configuration is done through a well designed web interface, called "CoreVista."

    So they have it run Linux but behind a "web interface". I don't get it -- what's wrong with a user interface?

    --
    Don't waste your vote! Vote for whoever you want, unless you live in a swing state it won't matter anyways
    1. Re:Cowards! by illogique · · Score: 1

      every workstation has a web browser, so the configuration can be done from anywhere and from any platform, no software to install...

    2. Re:Cowards! by stripes · · Score: 1
      hat language is that supposed to be? It's not C, because in C, a string is delimited with "" and you'd need strcmp(karma, "excellent") instead of the equality. It's not Java or C#, because they don't have a printf function that looks like that.

      It could be C++ which has a printf, and can use == on string class objects (which are not the same as quoted strings, but can take a quoted string as the left or right argument if a string object is the other).

      That doesn't explain the single quotes though.

    3. Re:Cowards! by punkass · · Score: 1

      and every workstation doesn't have telnet? Or can't get ssh?

      --
      "Nobody owns the fucking words man." - James Dean
    4. Re:Cowards! by uberslack · · Score: 1

      and you can't install telnet or get ssh?

      --
      Just because you're paranoid does not mean that the world is not full of assholes.
    5. Re:Cowards! by frenetic3 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      if you think about the target market for these devices, they're for small businesses that probably don't have a very experienced IT staff (or none at all.) everyone knows how to use a browser though and an ssl-encrypted https session is a secure way to manage. and most non-computer types freak out at CLIs and conversely love shiny graphics and buttons. gotta understand people that would buy this thing just want to see it at staples or compusa, grab it, unwrap it, and have it just _work_.

      -fren

      --
      "Where are we going, and why am I in this handbasket?"
  5. Slashdotted Already? by cerebralsugar · · Score: 2, Funny

    I guess that rules out using it as a web server...

    --
    Easy guys, I put my pants on one leg at a time. The difference is after I put on my pants I make gold records!
    1. Re:Slashdotted Already? by L0C0loco · · Score: 5, Informative

      There is some info and a less than glowing review Here.

      Enjoy

      --
      -- Instant Karma's gonna get you! [320848 = 2*2*2*2*11*1823]
    2. Re:Slashdotted Already? by Hektor_Troy · · Score: 3, Informative

      Less than glowing?

      hrmm ...

      Overall recommendation: Recommended

      Editors' rating: 7.6 out of 10 (Good)

      Setup and ease of use: 8 out of 10

      Features and security: 8 out of 10

      Performance: 7 out of 10

      Service and support: 7 out of 10


      Okay, I guess I'm stupid. 5 out of 10 would be average, more than that would be positive, and an average of 7.6 puts it in the top 25%.

      When did anything less than 9 out of 10 become crappy?

      --
      We do not live in the 21st century. We live in the 20 second century.
    3. Re:Slashdotted Already? by ccp · · Score: 1


      My exact thoughts.
      You beat me to the keyboard.

      Cheers,

    4. Re:Slashdotted Already? by lpangelrob2 · · Score: 1
      When did anything less than 9 out of 10 become crappy?

      When my parents would yell at me for getting a C in high school and college. :-)

    5. Re:Slashdotted Already? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You clearly did not attend an Ivy-League school.

      Grade inflation is even creeping into slashdot...

    6. Re:Slashdotted Already? by Atario · · Score: 2, Funny
      When did anything less than 9 out of 10 become crappy?
      The first time an eBay-er complained about a positive feedback not containing the string "A+++++++++!!!!!!!".
      --
      "A great democracy must be progressive or it will soon cease to be a great democracy." --Theodore Roosevelt
  6. Slashdotted ALREADY by Zog+The+Undeniable · · Score: 2, Funny

    Must be using one of those portable server thingies.

    --
    When I am king, you will be first against the wall.
    1. Re:Slashdotted ALREADY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Request canceled or ignored by serverServer busy or unable to fulfill request. The server is unable to fulfill your request due to extremely high traffic or an unexpected internal error. Please attempt your request again (if you are repeatedly unsuccessful you should notify the site administrator). (Location Code: 26)
      Translation: We're being slashdotted
  7. Other than size... by BJZQ8 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Other than size, I think one of those $199 Walmart Microtel machines would be a better deal...they now have 1300MHz Durons in them. They are a bit skimpy on memory (come with 128MB), but you can buy 512MB of the SDR stuff they use for $50 these days. I have a bunch of them, and they've been flawless!

    1. Re:Other than size... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I used to run my router with an old Dell computer with a couple of NICs. Then I realized that most days I'm only routing for 2 other computers.

      Saved myself a lot of space, electricity, and noise pollution by getting a damn Linksys.

      There's no reason to use a full blown minitower when you can use one of these.

    2. Re:Other than size... by bwy · · Score: 1

      The $200 Microtels from walmart.com are too noisy for use inside the living area of a person's home, IMHO. When the thing powers up, it literally sounds like a bathroom exhaust fan or a loud kitchen range hood fan. The C3 based Microtels were rather quiet. But, the Duron gets hot and they've put a very, very CPU cheap fan in there. Oh, and the CPU heatsink & fan stack is about 1/4 of an inch from the power supply, so it is hard to get a good replacement as most stacks will be larger. Plus some of the noise is caused by the fact that it only has 1/4" breathing room to suck air.

    3. Re:Other than size... by nacks1 · · Score: 1

      Well... I doubt that the $199 Walmart Microtel machine will have a simple easy to use web gui for setting up all of the services that this system offers (DNS, DHCP, NFS/SAMBA, etc). It also looks like it will function as a simple firewall. This pretty much looks sort of like a linksys firwall box just that it has a hard drive that you can use as a file server.

      One thing is that I can't seem to find any pricing info on one of these boxes. It may not be suited all that well for someone who could build all of these features into a cheap linux box on their own, but might do well for a small business owner that doesn't know the low level knowledge of configuring dns/dhcp but has the need for a firewall/fileserver.

  8. I think... by metamatic · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...they're using it to run their web site.

    --
    GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
    1. Re:I think... by Cpt_Kirks · · Score: 1

      You stole my sig! ...or did I steal yours?

    2. Re:I think... by iaredam · · Score: 1

      I always thought the reason the servers were so big is so that no one could steal them

      What is the point in putting all of the networking into one box, If that device were to fail you couldn't log onto the network, wireless connections would stop, wired connections would fail, and all of your data stored on the device could be lost. If they plan on actually selling the device they should include some kind of a backup solution. For the price it should have a dvd burner. just my .02

    3. Re:I think... by JDWTopGuy · · Score: 1

      Nice touch with the "bork" language setting.

      --
      Ron Paul 2012
  9. Er... by FrostedWheat · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Yes, you can use Linux and other "free" operating systems, but the concept of Linux, and it's "unaccountability" scares most small business owners

    Yes ... because as we all know Microsoft or Apple are completly "accountable" for any errors or damage there OS causes...

    1. Re:Er... by kinnell · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Yes ... because as we all know Microsoft or Apple are completly "accountable" for any errors or damage there OS causes...

      What matters is that most people who make business decisions to use commercial software believe that the vendor is liable, and continue to believe it despite any evidence to the contrary, such as "we do not guarantee that this software will do what it is designed to do".

      --
      If I seem short sighted, it is because I stand on the shoulders of midgets
    2. Re:Er... by tabdelgawad · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The two parent posts reflect conventional wisdom here in slashdot. Unfortunately, they miss the point, which is that even if there is no strict 'legal' liability (and there are reasons to think even this may not be true), there's always some 'effective' liability imposed by business reality.

      For example, suppose TurboTax makes a certain error in filing that affects a certain percentage of its customers, who are then punished with fees/audits by the IRS. If the case is publicized and the error is strictly TurboTax's, could TurboTax really afford to say that they're not liable because of their EULA? What would that do to their sales the following year? And what would consumer recourse be if they used a non-commercial tax package instead of TurboTax? Who would they hit up for their fees and damages?

      Additionally, there's no guarantee that all EULAs would stand a legal test in a liability case. I believe that was what UCITA was all about, strengthening EULAs to limit software liability. If EULAs were always legally biniding, UCITA would probably be unnecessary.

      I don't claim that commercial software vendors will always be liable, but there are formal and informal ways of accountability available with commercial vendors. It's not fair to claim that businesses are being completely irrational in continuing to believe this.

      --
      Imposing Libertarian views on everyone online since 1992.
    3. Re:Er... by jimmy_dean · · Score: 1

      Yes, you do make a very good point. However, this type of thinking, though appearing to be financially responsible, is the reason why, for instance, products like Microsoft Windows still is plagued by security hole after security hole. It did not initially create the security holes, because that's Microsoft's fault, but it doesn't do anything to help the situation. If companies want to play the liability (or blame) game, then security will always be a joke in most commercial software. This is because, instead of taking action after an attack to remedy the situation, a company just wants financial restitution. Sometimes things have to be a total loss before they get better. Linux (and other open source OSes like the BSDs) are much more secure than Windows because it operates outside of money. Money does not drive it. Security will be a concern whether someone funds Linux or not. Security in Windows was never an issue until the Internet took off and crackers exploited the bugs just waiting to be found. From day one however, Linux was designed to be inherantly more secure than Windows.
      No, security isn't everything that makes up a good OS, but this was just an example as to why I think many companies today are ignorantly still choosing Windows as their OS. The other reason is people don't like change, even if it's better in the long run. But over time, companies that don't run risks usually lose out. If you want liability with Linux from a company, then buy Red Hat or Suse.

      --
      -> Sometimes, you just gotta break free from the shackles of proprietary code.
    4. Re:Er... by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "Yes ... because as we all know Microsoft or Apple are completly "accountable" for any errors or damage there OS causes..."

      That isn't what that phrase means. Apple and Microsoft, thanks to money, have a fire lit under them to keep the software up to date. The Linux/OSS Community fixes things 'for fun'. It's the "when they get bored" bit that makes the demand for accountability go up. No money changing hands = no percieved incentive to fix the latest greatest bug.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    5. Re:Er... by tom_purl · · Score: 1

      I really think you just proved the previous poster's point: proprietary software vendors aren't accountable to the vast majority of their customers when it comes to software quality. Your argument that there are invisible forces that guarantee quality support is interesting, but flaky at best.

      If I were purchasing proprietary software for a business, and the salesperson told me that the market dictated the quality of his software, I would laugh him/her out of the room. Windows 98 has got to be some of the worst software ever released on a large scale, and at one point is was the most popular os in the world!

      The vast majority of customers that use proprietary software are home and small-to-medium-sized businesses. These groups typically receive no direct support from their vendors, except for the ocassional patch. Ease of use to these customers is much more important than support options, because they know they'll hardly ever see the latter.

      The missing "support" piece for cusotmers that are looking for an alternative to Windows is small consulting shops. Once small-to-medium sized companies are confident that they can install and use Free, quality software, they'll be happy to not pay for licensing and receive equal (if not better) support.

    6. Re:Er... by Minna+Kirai · · Score: 1

      there's always some 'effective' liability imposed by business reality.

      But that 'effective' liability is not effective, because the effect of Microsoft selling safe products hasn't been realized.

      That point is additionally bogus because the topic is the percieved non-accountability of Linux as compared to Microsoft Windows. The "business reality" that supposedly puts an "effective liability" on Microsoft effects Linux in exactly the same way: if the software screws up, people will use something else next time.

      In fact, the accountability of Linux is much greater from that perspective, as Linux users are more able to quickly switch to a competitor (their same apps will run on BSD or Solaris, but Windows-specific programs aren't so easy to migrate)

    7. Re:Er... by Brandybuck · · Score: 1

      most people who make business decisions to use commercial software believe that the vendor is liable

      Actually they don't. Your average Joe Blow might believe this, but business people don't.

      The main reasons are support, training, etc. Sun support is expensive, but very good. Redhat doesn't have any local support reps. Microsoft doesn't offer realistic support options, but trained and experienced Windows IT contractors are everywhere. Rational came out and gave my company training for Rose. Is anything similar available for Umbrello? Teachers for MSOffice are a dime a dozen, but OpenOffice teachers are nearly impossible to find.

      If I were setting up a company, I would like to go with Linux and FreeBSD. But the lack of ubiquitous support is a factor I would have to enter into my equations. Starting out small, I won't have the budget for a full time IT department. But when I grow big enough to afford one, I won't want to throw out the existing infrastructure. A local reliable source for Linux/BSD support will make all the difference in the world.

      The main thing is that a company can go to someone for help. This is changing, but it's still easier to get reliable support for Solaris, AIX and Windows than it is for Linux or BSD.

      --
      Don't blame me, I didn't vote for either of them!
    8. Re:Er... by Minna+Kirai · · Score: 1

      Windows 98 has got to be some of the worst software ever released on a large scale,

      Step into the carnival of pain, and witness the cruel world of Windows 3.0 or the perverse horror of Windows ME...

    9. Re:Er... by Wiseazz · · Score: 1

      Don't blame the business owners for that (entirely)... I'd say that the saying "perception drives reality" isn't far from the mark in most cases, and certaintly within the IT industry.

      I see it every day. That being the case, the challenge becomes changing perception. Not whining about it... because we all know how effective whining is.

      --
      My sig sucks.
    10. Re:Er... by Oliver+Defacszio · · Score: 1
      ... but business people don't ... Microsoft doesn't offer realistic support options

      Guh. I know this is no Microsoft haven, but that's just wrong. Having dealt with Microsoft's paid support on several occasions, I can't recall a time where they didn't solve the problem. I didn't necessarily like the solution, but one was provided. On more than one occasion, the chimp on the phone has gone well beyond the call of duty to get me going.

      And, business people do believe that Microsoft is liable. Unlike most other options (aside from Sun, Apple, etc), Microsoft gives the PHB someone to yell at, if absolutely nothing else, and that is what is seen as being accountable to many. I use FreeBSD to run my own server and, were I a PHB, who would I call when things go south at the obvious fault of the OS? Nobody. Bosses figure that enough wrangling and threats will get things solved (often true), and, Microsoft, being an actual entity with real phone numbers and real people answering them, makes this possible. That's how accountability is defined these days -- as someone to listen while you vent your spleen over the product they purvey.

      This is what creates the principal divide between the "reputable" companies and "free" alternatives. What am I supposed to say when the boss says, "FreeBSD, huh? Who do we call when it all falls apart at midnight on a Sunday?" "Well, there are newsgroups..." No thanks, I like my job.

      --

      -
      Inventor of the term 'pardon my French'.
    11. Re:Er... by Brandybuck · · Score: 1

      ...the chimp on the phone...

      When I think of realistic support options, the last thing I think of is a phone. I want someone on site fixing the problem. While 90% of the problems can be solved over the phone, that remaining 10% are the ones that make the price worth it.

      Unless Microsoft (or any other company) was involved with everything from front to back, they're not going to have the information needed to properly support me over the phone. Someone on site can save hours of my time since I don't have to recite to them every possible nuance of my infrastructure.

      Example:
      Darl: Our webserver is down
      Support: Reboot into single user
      Darl: Nothing happens, I've got a blank screen
      Support: Do you get any beeps when it boots?
      Darl: No.
      Support: Can you ssh to it?
      Darl: No.
      Support: Can you access the serial console?
      Darl: No.

      Hours later, the support guy realizes that Blake tripped over and pulled out the plug. If he had been there on site, he could have quietly plugged it back in, charged them $699, and pretended to be a hero.

      Sure, onsite support is going to cost a lot more than phone support, but I'm still going to have to have *someone* on site. Sometimes it might be cheaper to upgrade my support than to hire a full time admin. With Windows I have a lot of options for onsite support, but it's not going to be from Microsoft.

      --
      Don't blame me, I didn't vote for either of them!
  10. Cobalt RaQ and Cobalt Qube? by ThogScully · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Anyone recognize the niche as that of Cobalt, before Sun took them over? Did those do well enough that this can be popular?

    Unfortunately, as an operator of a Cobalt RaQ for many years, I found it to be very limiting once we did figure out how to really use it and how little the custom interfaces allowed, but it was great for people who just wouldn't learn that stuff.

    I hope no one thinks these are patch-proof though,. Our Cobalt needed patches and even with them had trouble avoiding a few compromises since patches were so delayed. Now it runs Debian and I couldn't be happier with the little box.
    -N

    --
    I've nothing to say here...
    1. Re:Cobalt RaQ and Cobalt Qube? by danamania · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's not a bad small out of the way server for the old learning experience. The whole idea of starting admins-in-training on the most minimal hardware instead of having them throw 3GHz PIVs at serving a home site that gets 5 visitors a day just begs for inefficiency down the line.

      I started my site on a 33MHz Quadra. It'd still be using that if I didn't rely on quite a bit of PHP in places. There was no reason to jump up too far, so a PPC601 was the next machine up.

      What the whole experience has taught me is how to keep things running efficiently by knowing the system well, and remembering never to do stupid things, like post the URL on slashdot. :)

    2. Re:Cobalt RaQ and Cobalt Qube? by ThogScully · · Score: 4, Funny

      and remembering never to do stupid things, like post the URL on slashdot. :)

      Looks to me like your URL is posted to slashdot every time you post a message. http://www.danamania.com appears under your username.

      But don't worry - your secret's safe with me ;-)

      --
      I've nothing to say here...
    3. Re:Cobalt RaQ and Cobalt Qube? by danamania · · Score: 2, Funny

      Thanks!

      I shall remember to mention in each message not to click on the above link. That could have done some real damage! ;)

      (PS. Don't click on the link)

    4. Re:Cobalt RaQ and Cobalt Qube? by beholder77 · · Score: 1

      I've had PHP4 running on a Quadra 610 (25Mhz) running NetBSD 1.6. I also had PostgreSQL running on the same machine, and according to apache bench I was still getting some decent page response times with simple db driven pages.

      NetBSD seems to handle small hardware really well. This thing only had a 250 meg SCSI hard drive, and I could still install the base OS and all the web serving/db related packages and still have about 150 megs to spend on DB :)

      Check it out sometime, make that 33Mhz scream :)

      --
      Success is as dangerous as failure, hope as hollow as fear.
    5. Re:Cobalt RaQ and Cobalt Qube? by Artifex · · Score: 1

      the captions for your animal pictures are cute.
      Muis looks very content, too.

      --
      Get off my launchpad!
    6. Re:Cobalt RaQ and Cobalt Qube? by gmhowell · · Score: 1

      You may want to check for updates for gallery. Can't remember when they fixed some of the security issues mentioned yesterday on slashdot. I upgrade my install last night. A bit too garish, I think I have to play with the skins a bit:)

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    7. Re:Cobalt RaQ and Cobalt Qube? by JDWTopGuy · · Score: 1

      Whatever you're running, it's probably melted by now... slashdotted.

      --
      Ron Paul 2012
    8. Re:Cobalt RaQ and Cobalt Qube? by tooth · · Score: 1

      I like you commodore ute "hack" ;-)

  11. Smaller than a PS/2? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Funny how PS2 doesn't mean what it used to.

    1. Re:Smaller than a PS/2? by Emil+Brink · · Score: 1
      Okay, this is really simple, but since you managed to confuse it even in that very minimal post, I'll bullet it for you:
      • PS/2: A computer model introduced by IBM sometime in the eighties, I think. Also introduced the mini-DIN connectors for mouse and keyboard that are now what most people mean by the term.
      • PS2: Short for Playstation2, a pretty nifty video game console by Sony.
      There, see? It's all in the slash.
      --
      main(O){10<putchar(4^--O?77-(15&5128 >>4*O):10)&&main(2+O);}
    2. Re:Smaller than a PS/2? by jargoone · · Score: 1

      Suppose you go into a store, and ask for a mouse. The guy behind the counter says "USB?", and that's not what you want. What is your response?

      Please tell me you don't say "Pee ess slash two"...

    3. Re:Smaller than a PS/2? by pete-classic · · Score: 4, Funny

      I was just going to ask how many MCA slots it has. Thanks for taking the wind out of my sails.

      -Peter

    4. Re:Smaller than a PS/2? by sporktoast · · Score: 1


      Hey, and it really IS smaller than my PS/2! And just as quiet.

      --
      In a related story, the IRS has recently ruled that the cost of Windows upgrades can NOT be deducted as a gambling loss.
    5. Re:Smaller than a PS/2? by ptomblin · · Score: 2, Funny

      I used to have a PS/2 model 80 under my desk at work. IBM thoughfully put a large handle on the top so that when the urge to throw it through the window got too great, you could get a good grip on it.

      Damn thing probably weighed 40 pounds.

      --
      The next Cmdr Taco duplicate will be ready soon, but subscribers can beat the rush and see it early!
    6. Re:Smaller than a PS/2? by LordNimon · · Score: 1

      No, you say "pee ess two", but you write it "PS/2".

      --
      And the men who hold high places must be the ones who start
      To mold a new reality... closer to the heart
    7. Re:Smaller than a PS/2? by sharkey · · Score: 2, Funny
      Suppose you go into a store, and ask for a mouse. The guy behind the counter says "USB?", and that's not what you want. What is your response?

      Well, the type of person that would walk past the shelves loaded with mice to ask for a mouse would most likely say, "No, I want a mouse!"

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    8. Re:Smaller than a PS/2? by generic-man · · Score: 1

      There's no such thing as a PlayStation 2 mouse.

      --
      For more information, click here.
    9. Re:Smaller than a PS/2? by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

      and if there was it would be a USB mouse

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    10. Re:Smaller than a PS/2? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fibrechannel.

    11. Re:Smaller than a PS/2? by jargoone · · Score: 1

      A place like Best Buy might meet your definition of a "store", but not mine. The computer retailers I shop at have no inventory on the floor. Only a couple glass cases with motherboards and CPUs, and a couple terminals to search their stock.

    12. Re:Smaller than a PS/2? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Moderation totals
      +1 Insults Best Buy
      +1 Scare quotes ("store")
      +1 Pronounces superiority over typical user
      +2 Additional "Arrogant Slashdot User" bonus
      +5 TOTAL

    13. Re:Smaller than a PS/2? by VivianC · · Score: 1

      OS/2 for PS/2: Half an operating system for half a computer.

      --
      Viv

      Gmail invites for ip
    14. Re:Smaller than a PS/2? by jargoone · · Score: 1

      Even though you're slamming me, it's still funny! I didn't intend to come off like that, but I guess I did anyway. I have become what I once hated. Time for another posting hiatus...

    15. Re:Smaller than a PS/2? by M-G · · Score: 1

      Damn thing probably weighed 40 pounds.

      At least. Don't you remember the big yellow warning label next to the handle saying it weighed 40+ pounds?

    16. Re:Smaller than a PS/2? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes. Very "funny."

    17. Re:Smaller than a PS/2? by ptomblin · · Score: 1

      I forgot all about the warning label.

      You've spurred me to look it up - according to this source
      it weighed 52 pounds!

      --
      The next Cmdr Taco duplicate will be ready soon, but subscribers can beat the rush and see it early!
    18. Re:Smaller than a PS/2? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Nah, can't Microsoft, their patches are monthly. I'd be worried that any weekly "contrceptive" patches are for some other, nefarious, utility.

    19. Re:Smaller than a PS/2? by freakmn · · Score: 1
      Suppose you go into a store, and ask for a mouse. The guy behind the counter says "USB?", and that's not what you want. What is your response?

      Please tell me you don't say "Pee ess slash two"...


      I just say serial and then they look at me funny.
      --
      warning: This post is likely to contain gobs of dripping sarcasm. Consume at your own risk.
    20. Re:Smaller than a PS/2? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, you say "pee ess two", but you write it "PS/2".
      Exactly. Just like how you write it "TAFKAP", but you pronounce it "squiggle".

  12. Uh oh! by shystershep · · Score: 1
    just looking at the machine specs it's doubtful that it would be able to handle massive amounts of traffic.

    Like, say, from /. for example?

    --
    The bigotry of the nonbeliever is for me nearly as funny as the bigotry of the believer. - Albert Einstein
  13. Imagine... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A beowolf cluster of these!
    [Posted AC to encougage Karma growth]

  14. "The IT100 did it all at a cost of $1,395" by no_such_user · · Score: 5, Insightful

    $1395?! Why not just buy a laptop? Or two? It would be (much!) faster, similarly power efficient with an external power supply, could likely boot from CF, could act as an AP, would even have an integrated diplay for debugging... and MUCH more. C'mon folks -- I was hoping something like this would go for $400, not $1400!

    1. Re:"The IT100 did it all at a cost of $1,395" by itsnotthenetwork · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think this is supposed to be for people who are too ignorant or too lazy to set up their own servers. If you want to be lazy it is going to cost you .

    2. Re:"The IT100 did it all at a cost of $1,395" by GNUALMAFUERTE · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yep, but there is an advantage:
      Think this is going for a server, the real meaning of server is 24*7; so heat is your enemy here ... there is no notebook out there that can manage to have 7 months of uptime with a high cpu usage without burning out or hanging all the time ... Crusoe is a beatifull cold processor. But i agree with you ... this kind of device is for marketroids that wants some big company behind their hard/soft, because they think that is a kind of warranty of profit (like all those assholes using redhat) ... If you have the knowledge *and* the balls to tell the manager that you are going to put home-made hardware in their raqs; it will work as well as any of this closed boxes.

      --
      WTF am I doing replying to an AC at 5 A.M on a Friday night?
    3. Re:"The IT100 did it all at a cost of $1,395" by MURD3R3R · · Score: 1
      Hehe yea. This price is way high. Want a small server about the size of a PS2 and exactly the size of an XBOX? :-D WELL JUST BUY AN XBOX THEN!! It can be a cheap and sexy LINUX server.

      Just buy Mechassault, download mechinstaller and buy a xbox-saves memory device and buy a 180 GB HDD!! Total price, umm just under $325 dollars and it looks cool too! Details on how to mod your xbox are detailed here.

    4. Re:"The IT100 did it all at a cost of $1,395" by Cthefuture · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yeah but you could certainly build a VIA mini-itx system for a hell of a lot less and with a faster processor.

      Anyone else notice that Newegg seems to have stopped carrying mini-itx boards? Why is that?

      --
      The ratio of people to cake is too big
    5. Re:"The IT100 did it all at a cost of $1,395" by GrenDel+Fuego · · Score: 3, Informative

      I think the main problem here is the slashdot headline, not the product itself.

      At $1,395 this is hardly a "mini-server for the masses". To me that implies personal use. This is the mini-server for small businesses.

    6. Re:"The IT100 did it all at a cost of $1,395" by penguinoid · · Score: 1

      I thought the whole idea was that it would save on power. I don't think xboxen are that power efficient.

      Multiply the difference in power consumption by a year or two and by the price of electricity, and it might come out cheaper than an xbox.

      However, I'm sure there are better and cheaper alternatives.

      --
      Don't waste your vote! Vote for whoever you want, unless you live in a swing state it won't matter anyways
    7. Re:"The IT100 did it all at a cost of $1,395" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're bugging dude, the difference in price due to power consumption wouldn't balance out in 100 years much less one or two.

    8. Re:"The IT100 did it all at a cost of $1,395" by tourette · · Score: 1

      $1,395 does seem too high for this. Although it is the entire package you are purchasing, and not just the hardware. Uptime, good support, easy administration, and the simplicity of a turnkey solution all play into this.

      I would look at NetMAX way before I would consider paying this much for a network appliance however. For $399 you can get similar (if not better) linux based software installed on a Toshiba Magnia SG20. These machines are very similar in their specifications (566 Celeron, 2 NICS, 8 port switch, 128MB memory, 20 GB drive, etc...). And from my experience with the NetMAX software, it would be hard to beat it in terms of ease of use and flexibility.

      Of course you could do better than either of these solutions if you had the technical know how and time to build your own machine and knew your way around linux. But for many small businesses, this isn't possible, and that is where the strength of solutions such as these lie.

    9. Re:"The IT100 did it all at a cost of $1,395" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting
      there is no notebook out there that can manage to have 7 months of uptime with a high cpu usage without burning out or hanging all the time


      Where the hell did you get that idea ? Did you personnally tested all the notebooks available out there ? Or do you have any pointers to back up that assertion ?
      I personnally use my laptop as my internet gateway, and the thing is on 24*7. I never needed it to stay up more than a month, but I never kept it off more than a couple of hours in between uptimes. It is still working great yet being ready 2 years old (and I've been using it that way for a year). I don't use it for serious server duty though, but would you use a plug and play system like the IT100 one for any serious matter ?
    10. Re:"The IT100 did it all at a cost of $1,395" by cgreuter · · Score: 2, Insightful

      $1395?! Why not just buy a laptop?

      Consider the cost of the time spent configuring the laptop or PC to work as an office server and add that to the cost. Keep in mind that most people aren't Unix experts and even the ones that are will likely have to spend several hours reading HOWTOs and man pages before they can get everything working. The advantage of one of these devices is that you plug it in, turn it on and it just works. That means, you can go back to doing profitable work sooner.

      I have no doubt that if you really need an office server, $1395 is not to high a price to pay if you don't have to sink any time into it.

      That being said though, it looks to me like NetWinder will do the same job at less than half the price.

    11. Re:"The IT100 did it all at a cost of $1,395" by TCM · · Score: 1

      The advantage of one of these devices is that you plug it in, turn it on and it just works. That means, you can go back to doing profitable work sooner.

      Uh yeah, those pesky unprofitable tasks of setting up your IT infrastructure properly. I bet this box has a sticker "admin monkey not included".

      Unpack, plug in, forget is a wet dream of marketing wankers. Every device on a network should be maintained.

      --
      Of course it runs NetBSD. BTC: 1NT7QvbetmANwaMzhpVL6
    12. Re:"The IT100 did it all at a cost of $1,395" by phorm · · Score: 1

      Which brings me to the question: whereabouts would you look for good pricing on a mini-itx nowadays? How about for a mini-LCD (7")

    13. Re:"The IT100 did it all at a cost of $1,395" by zulux · · Score: 1

      there is no notebook out there that can manage to have 7 months of uptime with a high cpu usage without burning out or hanging all the time ...

      We use old IBM thinkpads as remote database servers in some jobsites - The have worked quite well over the years under load.

      --

      Moneyed corporations, non-working 'poor' and criminal prisoners are turning productive citizens into tax-slaves.

    14. Re:"The IT100 did it all at a cost of $1,395" by GNUALMAFUERTE · · Score: 1

      yep, y have 2 notebooks right now. And yes, there are machines which are a hell, and some that are well designed, but notebooks hardware won't last if it's stressed that way (hard disks and processors specially).
      In your case it's not a real example, since to do NAT there is no real disk use (only if you have squid or some other proxy w/cache) and the overhead is really low, so the machine may be using some powersaving capabilities, but you obviusly won't buy a machine like the one in the history just for routing (while there are cheap routers for $100 bucks and less), you will use it for something else, and i can tell you: if a notebook is really running on heavy load all the time (and you can't have power saving features enables for a server, imagine a server spinning down their disks) the processor will fry after some time. Just think about the cooling you have in your Desktop, and the limited cooling that you have in a notebook ... (You can touch it a little to put a cooler on it, but that won't be of much help if she's going to be in a raq)

      --
      WTF am I doing replying to an AC at 5 A.M on a Friday night?
    15. Re:"The IT100 did it all at a cost of $1,395" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      Nice timing. I was on hold with Newegg to place an order when I read your post so I asked them. The order person transfered me to a manager. She said it was because of the huge number of returns. She said returns on RAM, motherboards, and processors was killing them, but returns on the few ITX boards they sold would have killed them if they had kept it up. She said most of the ITX boards they sold came back since the Via boards are so horrible at compatibility. She said the usual comments were "can't get X Windows to run," "can't get the network adapter to work," "can't get the sound card to work," and so on. Every single one of those pieces are proprietary on the Via ITX boards.

      I've been a Linux user for over 10 years, and I've used X Windows on PC's for 9 years, but it still took me two entire days to get X Windows to work on the Via garbage. You don't even get the source to their X Win driver so you have to upgrade or downgrade to the version of X Win that they demand you to. For us, we have a company standard to use Debian, so we can't use Via boards. Where my wife works, they use a newer version of X Win for their ERP software than Via allows you to, so they can't use them. Via is shooting themselves in the foot and screwing customers and dealers in the process with their proprietary garbage. The Newegg manager's statement was the reason I expected.

    16. Re:"The IT100 did it all at a cost of $1,395" by Rick+the+Red · · Score: 1

      1) Find unsuspecting, IT illiterate small business owners who bought a $1395 "turn-key" solution.

      2) Sell them real IT support.

      3) Profit!

      --
      If all this should have a reason, we would be the last to know.
    17. Re:"The IT100 did it all at a cost of $1,395" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Someone's already doing it for $499, plus you get more...

      http://www.axentra.com/products/multifunc_server _a ppliances/rumba_soho_series/

    18. Re:"The IT100 did it all at a cost of $1,395" by paxmark1 · · Score: 3, Informative

      I was in RMA hell for 12 weeks with a via-itx. I would go back to it, but bottom feeding ECS said board had been problems and they gave me a P-4 barebones with my old hard drive back. VIA - itx still have a few kinks to work out on the itx line and their linux support and drivers still needs help - just look on the via-arena. A different video than a C-media or whatever problematic video chip they attach to the board that would work seamlessly with XFree86 would be nice and why bundle a winmodem with a distro empty machine. The USB driver was very rocky from the start, finally installing the driver via Win98 (I dual boot, I have people from all over the planet using my machine here at a L'Arche house) finally fixed that, etc. etc. little niggling things. Oh not to mention the malloc stuff in compiles, and the pickiness of distros to correctly identify the VIA cyrix chip. So it is $1395 USD. If it works out of the box and functions 24/7, well, hopefully the price will go down. The ITX is not just a walk down the park. It is sweet, but a pain to get linux (or FreeBSD for that manner, I had problems withthat also) just exactly the way you want it and some of the companies distributing it do not have stellar track records for service. Shalom, Mark

    19. Re:"The IT100 did it all at a cost of $1,395" by cgreuter · · Score: 1

      Uh yeah, those pesky unprofitable tasks of setting up your IT infrastructure properly.

      This thing is aimed at small businesses, the sort that, if they actually needed to hire a network admin, would do better to just go back to passing around floppies. For them, this is proper IT infrastructure.

      Unpack, plug in, forget is a wet dream of marketing wankers. Every device on a network should be maintained.

      Since there is exactly such a device sitting behind me, I'm inclined to disagree with you. The device, a Linksys router/switch/access point, is a complete Linux system. It took less than an hour to go from shrink-wrapped to deployed and now just works. Yes, it needs the occasional point-and-click, but that's a couple of minutes per month.

      The reason it works that way is that it's extremely limited in what it can do. The designers traded flexibility for simplicity.

      The IT100 and its ilk are basically the same idea. They do a small set of things--and only those things--so the user doesn't have to think of it as a computer. It's just an appliance.

    20. Re:"The IT100 did it all at a cost of $1,395" by Christopher+Bibbs · · Score: 1

      Actually, I use a laptop with a broken battery connector as my server now. It was too expensive to fix and too good to toss out. It does the same tasks as the IT100 except I have a switch connected to it. It is neither loud nor hot.

    21. Re:"The IT100 did it all at a cost of $1,395" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      my old NEC did. i had it running 24/7 for 11 months. although there was a bit of burning, but not the insides... the lil rubber feet on each corner on the laptop melted and stuck to the desk heh. besides that, it ran fine. good ole NEC 6050 (P150MMX)

    22. Re:"The IT100 did it all at a cost of $1,395" by crush · · Score: 1

      Why would you want it to boot from CF? I thought the point of CF was that it was a nice small quite replacement to a HD, but if you're using a laptop it's going to have a HD in it already. Or am I missing something?

    23. Re:"The IT100 did it all at a cost of $1,395" by mmj_ngen · · Score: 1

      I just built a server with the Via mini-itx M10000 board, adn SuSE 9.0 Pro (512MB, Mad Dog DVD/CDR, and Seagate 80GB drive). No problems at all yet. No problems with components either as others have mentioned. I might have gotten lucky. I also haven't used the combo drive for anything other than playing CDs, but $320USD is a hell of a lot better than $1,395. Admittedly, I don't have 802.11b in it, but I'm not sure why you'd even need it. I'm not sure why there were so many returns to Newegg, but I'm very happy with it.

    24. Re:"The IT100 did it all at a cost of $1,395" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "If you have the knowledge *and* the balls to tell the manager that you are going to put home-made hardware in their raqs; it will work as well as any of this closed boxes"

      This product is DESIGNED for the office with NO computer expert or geek or consultant. In the targeted office, YOU are not there - just managers and go-fers and butt-kissers who know how to web surf, change one or two preset values, and spell a few buzz words.

      Their site says:

      "Designed specifically for the needs of the small business, offering a suite of services and management tools, the IT-100 can be administered with minimal networking knowledge. Utilizing a graphical user interface, designed and engineered for ease of use, the IT-100 will revolutionize IT system use, help to reduce your overall cost of IT"

      The overall cost is reduced cause WE are not there.

      By the way, it IS getting rave reviews for its ability to be set up and used by ANYBODY - even clueless managers.

    25. Re:"The IT100 did it all at a cost of $1,395" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why don't they just put up warnings saying it is not compatible with Linux. I have been waiting for them to start carrying the boards again and for some new itx cases. Thanks for asking Newegg.

    26. Re:"The IT100 did it all at a cost of $1,395" by GNUALMAFUERTE · · Score: 1

      >>The overall cost is reduced cause WE are not there
      Well, that may happend in the USA, but here in [Argentina], work is actually cheaper than Hardware (because of the change, the dollar costs $3 of our units (Pesos)), so many small busnisses chose to hire some student to make a router with a 386.

      --
      WTF am I doing replying to an AC at 5 A.M on a Friday night?
    27. Re:"The IT100 did it all at a cost of $1,395" by Jaeger- · · Score: 1

      I have a Magnia SG20 (refurb direct from Tosh) with a wireless card in it and a Netwinder. I definitely prefer the Magnia because its x86-based (NW is ARM, kind of a hassle) and the Magnia has other plusses. But either device is cool. For $399 its an OK price, I paid more like $200, but mine did not come with NetMax just the basic Toshiba admin panel stuff...

      For more info on the Magnia line (SG10, 20, etc) there are a couple fairly active YahooGroups that are worth checking out...

      --
      E V E R Y T H I N G I W R I T E I S F A L S E
  15. mini-itx by hatrisc · · Score: 2

    until i realized i didn't have the money, i was going to build a mini-itx system to serve nfs, do NAT, pppoe, serve ssh into my local network, and some other things. i had everything planned out, just no money.. :(

    --
    I write code.
    1. Re:mini-itx by odyrithm · · Score: 3, Funny

      you know, you CAN just run that lot on the box your using now.. just an idea.. you crazy wierdo.

      --
      moo
    2. Re:mini-itx by hatrisc · · Score: 1

      yeah, i KNOW i _COULD_ run all that stuff on my box now. however, i'd rather dedicate a machine to it, which
      a) is low power and can be left on 24/7 without doubling my electric bill.
      b) provides a more customizable gateway and firewall, than my current linksys router and iptables setup.
      c) provide a lot less noise in my living room by not having to keep my computer on all the time.
      d) store everything on one computer, rather than having to sftp/scp stuff all the time between my laptop/desktop and my other desktop.

      since my desktop system, is loud and uses a 300 watt power supply, it cannot be left on all the time, unless i :
      a) rebuild it with a smaller power supply (but eve n still i'm going to need much more than 60 watts (whereas the mini-itx i can get away with 60watts .. or less)
      b) kinda with a. convince my girlfriend that it makes sense to waste more power than is necessary.
      c) buy a new case and eliminate noise via noise reduction techniques.

      all in all, it seems as though, the little server would be the best for all of this.

      --
      I write code.
    3. Re:mini-itx by BenjyD · · Score: 1

      The power drawn by a PSU isn't the maximum rated power *all the time*. Add together the usage of the components and you probably won't go over 100 watts at full load. If the 300W power supply drew 300W and only supplied 100W to the computer, it would have to dissipate 200W itself, which would get pretty hot!

    4. Re:mini-itx by saintlupus · · Score: 1

      yeah, i KNOW i _COULD_ run all that stuff on my box now. however, i'd rather dedicate a machine to it

      Do what I did. Use a Pentium 75 with a nice, quiet power supply and passive cooling. The thing is silent as can be and runs NetBSD like a champ. And it was free from the scrap heap at work.

      --saint

  16. Wish the link wasn't Slashdotted. by blixel · · Score: 1

    Sounds like it might be what I've been looking for. I've been wanting to "build" (or buy) a small e-mail server. I just don't like the idea of running a complete PC based Linux Server just for e-mail for myself. Waste of power consumption, big foot print, etc.. I'd like something about the size of my cable modem that uses very little power. I have been look at these. Anyone know of any other ideas?

    1. Re:Wish the link wasn't Slashdotted. by metlin · · Score: 3, Informative

      Not really. Its a Transmeta 533. Even one of those el-cheapo $199 things from Walmart or an old Celeron or P3 would give this thing a run for its money.

      At $1150 (?) and odd, it really isn't worth it. You're better off building your own mail server from scratch. Cheaper and better than this.

    2. Re:Wish the link wasn't Slashdotted. by Gleef · · Score: 2, Informative

      Some really nifty quiet machines at nOrhTec. Their MicroServers are smaller than any cable modems I've seen.

      Lots of small (but bigger than the MicroServer), low power machines at Mini-ITX

      --

      ----
      Open mind, insert foot.
    3. Re:Wish the link wasn't Slashdotted. by blixel · · Score: 1

      Not really.

      Not really what?

      Even one of those el-cheapo $199 things from Walmart or an old Celeron or P3 would give this thing a run for its money.

      Understandable. And at $1,150 (I couldn't get to the site to the see the price) - it's not worth it. But the small size interests me. I don't want to have another Desktop case or Mid Tower in my house. I have enough of them already.

    4. Re:Wish the link wasn't Slashdotted. by metlin · · Score: 1

      I meant to say, not really a good idea. It was in response to you saying that it sounded like something like what you might have been looking for.

      The thing is that if you get the components, you can build one of these smaller ones yourself for not more than $500 - we have a space constraint in our lab and do this all the time. Works wonders and is cheap, and keeps the profs happy :)

      In fact, I think its much higher - $1395 or something, which is *waaaaay* more than what this thing is really worth.

      Come on, its easier to build a _small_ and _compact_ 1 GhZ celeron with a better config for about $400-500 with off the shelf components than shell out that kinda money for this thing.

    5. Re:Wish the link wasn't Slashdotted. by blixel · · Score: 1

      Come on, its easier to build a _small_ and _compact_ 1 GhZ celeron with a better config for about $400-500 with off the shelf components than shell out that kinda money for this thing.

      I don't doubt it. And as I pointed out in my first post - I have been looking at a way to do it myself ... and as I pointed out in my second post, I have not yet been able to get to the site to see the price. I wasn't aware that it was "$1395 or something"

  17. Ripping off by MikeyG79 · · Score: 3, Informative

    $1400.. I'll build my own mini tower or go out and buy something much more powerful... like a 2.2GHz w/ 1gig

    The things people get ripped off with these days.

    1. Re:Ripping off by wwest4 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      you don't need a 2+ GHz P4 to run common net svcs. you need a cold-running reliable box, preferably with no fans or drive spindles to wear out.

      for small businesses, appliances make a lot of sense. they just want stuff to work and be simple to understand from a high level - they don't want a custom hack job (as fun as that may be).

      these boxes (along with the slew of thin client appliances out there) often run open-source software, and not all are as expensive as this baby. i, for one, welcome our black box toaster overlords - at least at the mom&pop level.

    2. Re:Ripping off by AmericanInKiev · · Score: 1

      I see the benefit here is the appliance - and oddly - the high likelyhood that the help will not screw it up.

      Anyone can screw over a computer - reformat - install a video game - insert a virus.

      An appliance should be immune to that - and simply turn on.

      The cost savings is over time - when this works and works and works.

  18. Re:Already slashdotted... by metlin · · Score: 2, Informative

    Details are available on their forum.

    Link here to the Sudhian Forum.

    If the current state of their server is any indication of this thing's performance, its sad :)

  19. Smaller then a PS2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...and is smaller than a PS2.

    Most everything is smaller then a PS/2. I remember learning on those things many years ago; they're all big and clunky. I wonder why the OP is comparing it to that...

  20. I don't trust them either... by twoslice · · Score: 2, Funny
    ... i dont trust reviewers who have those god awful 'mini' 'cube' PCs as their workstation!

    I believe that they are all members of the Borg collective just waiting to have critical mass to assimilate us all...

    If you just put on a tinfoil hat, you too will see the real conspiracy. The Borgs have brain altering waves to make you trust them...

    --

    From excellent karma to terible karma with a single +5 funny post...
  21. No Fault Tolerance? No Server by Slider451 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Without at least RAID 1 (mirrored drives) I never consider a hardware device a server. A PC running backend applications with no redundancy is a bad idea in a busy business.

    --
    Nostalgia isn't what it used to be.
    1. Re:No Fault Tolerance? No Server by LazloToth · · Score: 1



      Bingo.

      --


      It's only funny until someone gets hurt. Then, it's hilarious.
    2. Re:No Fault Tolerance? No Server by wwest4 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      for a small business, fault tolerance is having a spare appliance complete w/ flash image.

      you wouldn't be smart to use an appliance like this for file serving applications, but for DC/AD/NIS/DNS/BOOTP/DHCP, static web content, it would be a good choice for a small business if you skip the HDD and use a bigger CF card. no moving parts, longer useful lifetime and poor-man's N+1. perfect for a no-nonsense small bus.

    3. Re:No Fault Tolerance? No Server by mrtroy · · Score: 1, Insightful

      For small business, I dont see a reason why you would not use raid-1.
      #1. You can set it up yourself, with minimal costs, and skills.
      #2. If a drive fails, you have no problems. No time/cost to you for backups.
      #3. You could build a server for much cheaper than these premade "small cheap" ones.
      #4. Dont go for the trendy small things so you save costs, or if you do, build your own and build your own box for some creative input.

      I realize that not everyone has amazing computer skills, but to setup a server like that, it would require not much skill or time, and its a one time setup. With raid-1, you dont even have to make backups. So make an informed choice, instead of saying that this crappy expensive server is prefect.

      --
      [I can picture a world without war, without hate. I can picture us attacking that world, because they'd never expect it]
    4. Re:No Fault Tolerance? No Server by Slider451 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Good points. However:

      With raid-1, you dont even have to make backups.

      That's a common misconception with RAID. Redundant disks only protect you from hardware failure. You still need to make backups to recover from human failure. If Bob in accounting deletes your Quickbooks files, they're gone. I just had to restore a giant spreadsheet from tape a couple days ago, onto a RAID 5 system.

      RAID won't save you from Bob.

      --
      Nostalgia isn't what it used to be.
    5. Re:No Fault Tolerance? No Server by mrtroy · · Score: 1

      Hahaha...well i dont mean NO backups...

      I meant no excessive amount of backups of your entire system, in case you need to restore all your services.

      And we are talking small business here...you dont have Bob in accounting, you the boss are also the accountant.

      And if you did have Bob, you would fire him.

      For big business, you should have appropriate enterprise content management which will not let you delete important files like that without permissions, but will let you update a new "version" of the file so you can still edit and save it, keeping the original intact.

      --
      [I can picture a world without war, without hate. I can picture us attacking that world, because they'd never expect it]
    6. Re:No Fault Tolerance? No Server by wwest4 · · Score: 1
      You can set it up yourself, with minimal costs, and skills.


      1) most of the neighborhood kids working on the local widget shop's computer do not have experience using or maintaining hw or sw raid systems.


      2) if a drive fails, you have to know about it and no how to replace it.


      3) no shit, but ma and pa can't send it back the vendor when you break the cupholder or fry a drive because they have no clue


      4) don't tell me what to do, and btw it has nothing to do with trends, but common sense and experience working with people who have no clue. you are giving joe six-pack too much credit.


      With raid-1, you dont even have to make backups.
      au contraire, mon frere. raid != backup. what if a sector fails, corrupts a file and the raid duplicates the corrupt blocks to the other disk? looks like you're really fucked now.


      > So make an informed choice
      indeed

    7. Re:No Fault Tolerance? No Server by kulpinator · · Score: 1

      This is OT, and I'm nitpicking, but what do you mean by "at least RAID 1" (emphasis mine)? That's basically as redundant as you can get; IIRC there is no other RAID scheme that has as much redundancy (actually, that takes as much extra hard disk to make it work). RAID 1 schemes (1, 0+1, 10) are also capable of running without a performance hit when one drive fails, unlike RAID 3/4/5 systems, some implementations of which cannot run at all until rebuilt.

      Just wondering what you consider the "best" redundant configuration.

      --
      Karma: Positive (mostly due to rash moderations)
    8. Re:No Fault Tolerance? No Server by wwest4 · · Score: 1

      raid-1 won't save you from your 400W power supply frying, it won't save you from you replacing your CPU fan every 10 months, and it won't provide total n+1. why use raid-1 when the MTBF of the other components is much lower?

    9. Re:No Fault Tolerance? No Server by adrianbaugh · · Score: 1

      Surely the whole point of RAID1 is that if a sector on one disk fails so that there is a difference between the (corrupt) file on one disk and the (non-corrupt) file on the other disk the MD controller (whether hardware or software) will flag an error, not overwrite things in an inconsistent way.

      --
      "'I pass the test,' she said. 'I will diminish, and go into the West, and remain Galadriel.'"
      - JRR Tolkien.
    10. Re:No Fault Tolerance? No Server by JediTrainer · · Score: 2, Insightful

      RAID 1 schemes (1, 0+1, 10) are also capable of running without a performance hit when one drive fails, unlike RAID 3/4/5 systems, some implementations of which cannot run at all until rebuilt.

      Not to nitpick myself, but believe it or not I've run across a Compaq Server (less than 2 years old) that couldn't boot properly while the 0+1 array was being rebuilt. Yes, the data was preserved, but having to wait a few hours to get the machine back up was agonizing.

      Fortunately we had a backup server (with just the critical parts of the app), so we switched to that in the meantime, then waited patiently to get everything else up.

      We're now working on eliminating the Compaqs from our critical infrastructure. They are way too failure prone, and a failure of a one-inch fan against the CPU (out of 3) meant the box would shut down and refuse to start until it's replaced. And this happened multiple times to several of our servers.

      Why have 3 fans at all if you can't tolerate the failure of one of them?

      --

      You can accomplish anything you set your mind to. The impossible just takes a little longer.
    11. Re:No Fault Tolerance? No Server by Slider451 · · Score: 1

      why use raid-1 when the MTBF of the other components is much lower?

      Because it's much easier and quicker to recover from a PSU or fan failure.

      I just replaced a PSU in a PC in the office this week. Downtime - less than two hours from failure to fully functional, including the travel and shopping time for a replacement unit.

      If this had been a server hard disk, with no redundancy... we're talking several hours and no sleep until it's done.

      If you can't afford a hot spare for your server, RAID is your best first choice for redundancy.

      --
      Nostalgia isn't what it used to be.
    12. Re:No Fault Tolerance? No Server by wwest4 · · Score: 1

      yep, you're right

    13. Re:No Fault Tolerance? No Server by wwest4 · · Score: 1

      it depends on how exotic the psu or fan is and how good your backups are. i think the original point is missed anyway - mom an pop don't have any desire or clue when it comes to swapping out components. they just want a new black box to replace the broken black box.

    14. Re:No Fault Tolerance? No Server by magarity · · Score: 1

      Without at least RAID 1 (mirrored drives) I never consider a hardware device a server

      I was going to suggest that this thing could use an external drive and software RAID. But then I noticed that this brand new design has USB 1.1 and not Firewire or even USB 2.0. What a crying shame; you'd think for $1,400 they could have done that.

    15. Re:No Fault Tolerance? No Server by Clover_Kicker · · Score: 1

      >And if you did have Bob, you would fire him.

      I'm sure I'd enjoy firing Bob, but I doubt it would magically recreate my quickbook files.

    16. Re:No Fault Tolerance? No Server by drinkypoo · · Score: 1
      Using a versioning system is the proper way to protect yourself from bob. The thing that RAID won't save you from is a fuckup in the driver or controller, because the changes will be made to both drives.

      I just lost the contents of a 160GB RAID0 because the software RAID driver (silicon image medley) fucked up on me. Okay, so it wasn't a mirror, but if it had been, I still would have lost the data, because it was an error in the driver. I should have been doing backups. :P

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    17. Re:No Fault Tolerance? No Server by zulux · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Redundant disks only protect you from hardware failure. You still need to make backups to recover from human failure.

      RAID alos wont protect from...

      Viruses/Trogens that wipe the file-system.
      Bad memory sticks that cause file-system corruption.
      Flaky RAID controllers that randomly screw up a stripe now and then.
      A netowrk card that sends bad packets and causes the filesystem to bork.
      Bugs in your uber-filesystem that cause corruption. (NTFS I'm looking at *YOU*)
      Power spikes that go through tour surge protectory, into your power supply and through the 12v line that connects to the hard-drives and frys the controllers.
      New useres playing with the rm command.
      "What do you meand, the server doesen't have a 'Recycle Bin'?? !!? ?? "

      All the these things *have* happend to me.

      --

      Moneyed corporations, non-working 'poor' and criminal prisoners are turning productive citizens into tax-slaves.

    18. Re:No Fault Tolerance? No Server by TCM · · Score: 1

      RAID 1 schemes (1, 0+1, 10) are also capable of running without a performance hit when one drive fails, unlike RAID 3/4/5 systems, some implementations of which cannot run at all until rebuilt.

      Isn't it the point of RAID[345] to not only provide data integrity but also accessibility in the case of a failure? What good is a RAID[345] if it needs to be rebuilt before providing the data again?

      --
      Of course it runs NetBSD. BTC: 1NT7QvbetmANwaMzhpVL6
    19. Re:No Fault Tolerance? No Server by Slider451 · · Score: 1

      Heh. I guess I used "at least" because 5 is bigger than 1. Not necessarily better, from a redundancy standpoint.

      My favorite disk implementation is at least five disks.

      Two disks - RAID 1 - OS Volume (C:)
      Three disks - RAID 5 - Data Volume (D:)

      This way you can reformat and reinstall the OS without touching your data (This assumes hardware RAID).

      --
      Nostalgia isn't what it used to be.
    20. Re:No Fault Tolerance? No Server by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, it does get your data back! I dunno, I'd say that's a good thing.

    21. Re:No Fault Tolerance? No Server by kulpinator · · Score: 1

      You're right. That's the difference between RAID 0+1 and RAID 10, according to

      http://www.acnc.com/04_01_10.html
      http://www.acnc.com/04_01_0p1.html

      "RAID 0+1 has the same fault tolerance as RAID level 5" and "RAID 10 has the same fault tolerance as RAID level 1," demonstrating your point.

      --
      Karma: Positive (mostly due to rash moderations)
    22. Re:No Fault Tolerance? No Server by bottlerocket · · Score: 1

      But would it save you from Microsoft Bob?

      --
      where the comment ends and sig begins
    23. Re:No Fault Tolerance? No Server by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Was Bob subsequently beaten with a frozen rubber hose?

      More importantly, was his salutation "Microsoft"?

    24. Re:No Fault Tolerance? No Server by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What for heaven's sake is a 'trogen'?

    25. Re:No Fault Tolerance? No Server by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What for heaven's sake is a 'trogen'?

      It's a brand of kondams.

      Alos, some evil program that hijacks your netowrk card, goes through tour surge protectory, and frys new useres. (ok, I guess that is kinda meand.)

  22. Look at the power of emergicore! by dimer0 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Warning: mysql_select_db(): Too many connections in /var/www/htdocs/www.emergecore.com/php/functions.p hp on line 13

    Warning: mysql_select_db(): A link to the server could not be established in /var/www/htdocs/www.emergecore.com/php/functions.p hp on line 13

    Warning: mysql_query(): Too many connections in /var/www/htdocs/www.emergecore.com/index.html on line 167

    Warning: mysql_query(): A link to the server could not be established in /var/www/htdocs/www.emergecore.com/index.html on line 167
    could not execute query
    Warning: mysql_num_rows(): supplied argument is not a valid MySQL result resource in /var/www/htdocs/www.emergecore.com/index.html on line 171

    Warning: mysql_fetch_array(): supplied argument is not a valid MySQL result resource in /var/www/htdocs/www.emergecore.com/index.html on line 174

    Warning: mysql_fetch_array(): supplied argument is not a valid MySQL result resource in /var/www/htdocs/www.emergecore.com/index.html on line 174

    Warning: mysql_fetch_array(): supplied argument is not a valid MySQL result resource in /var/www/htdocs/www.emergecore.com/index.html on line 174

    Warning: mysql_fetch_array(): supplied argument is not a valid MySQL result resource in /var/www/htdocs/www.emergecore.com/index.html on line 174

    1. Re:Look at the power of emergicore! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Hey thanks for the mirror mate.

    2. Re:Look at the power of emergicore! by Oliver+Aaltonen · · Score: 1
  23. Not just size by Gleef · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The noise level and power usage are also key for this machine. Of course, there are other fanless machines, many of them much cheaper than this one. (Note: Not all of the machines at that site are fanless, but many are, check out the Tranquil PC and the Hush). (Also Note: Fanless doesn't equal silent, you still get drive noise and monitor whine, unless you replace those with solid state components)

    --

    ----
    Open mind, insert foot.
    1. Re:Not just size by jerkychew · · Score: 1

      "(Also Note: Fanless doesn't equal silent, you still get drive noise and monitor whine, unless you replace those with solid state components)"

      Where do I get a solid state monitor?

    2. Re:Not just size by tuffy · · Score: 2, Informative
      Where do I get a solid state monitor?

      Here's a few.

      --

      Ita erat quando hic adveni.

    3. Re:Not just size by falzer · · Score: 1

      Solid state? Not quite.

      LCD: Liquid Crystal Display.
      Also, most (all?) LCD monitors are lit by fluorescent tubes.

    4. Re:Not just size by Gleef · · Score: 1

      I've heard two definitions of solid state:
      * No moving parts (eg Flash rather than drive platters)
      * No vacuum tubes (eg Transistors/IC's rather than tubes)

      The working definition I use is: "an electronic device with neither moving parts nor vacuum tubes". A liquid crystal would certainly qualify. A liquid crystal display that happened to be backlit by florescent tubes really wouldn't.

      Regardless of whether or not I was perfectly accurate in my characterization, I don't hear the monitor whine with LCD or Gas Plasma monitors, and they were what I was refering to (along with inarguably solid-state Flash memory to replace hard drives).

      --

      ----
      Open mind, insert foot.
  24. Re:Eat shit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Steve Jobs worked for Transmeta?

    Gay's Health ... yes
    Transmeta ...... no

  25. might eb good for the guy in Uganda by Raleel · · Score: 1

    The one in ask slashdot, and in macslash asking the smae question. Of course, it'd be good if they removed the hard drive, used the compact flash to nfs boot it, etc.

    --
    -- Who is the bigger fool? The fool or the fool who follows him? --
  26. Wheres the source? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I didnt see any mention of available source on the website (just made a quick look though, maybe I missed it?)

    Does it come with a cd or info on how to obtain it?

  27. Just think what a geek can do with $1100 these day by LazloToth · · Score: 4, Insightful


    Sure, I know that not everyone can build his own box and load it with Linux. But for this money, I'm thinking you could do pretty well with a Duron, a couple of ATA 133 drives, and a cheap 1U box. If you can run a web interface such as the one described here, you probably could do alright with Webmin, too. And think how much more useful and trustworth a thing you'd have.

    Ah, well - - aren't the do-it-yourselfers among us lucky?

    --


    It's only funny until someone gets hurt. Then, it's hilarious.
  28. Re:Let's get this out of the way. by KentoNET · · Score: 0

    A 10-day marathon!

    God I should be shot for that...

    --
    "You tried your best and failed miserably. The lesson is...never try. Heh!" -Homer
  29. I like the YellowDog/Terrasoft briQ more... by ewwhite · · Score: 2, Interesting
    The briQ is a much pimper... :) And just as expensive....

    http://www.terrasoftsolutions.com/products/briQ/in tro.shtml

    --
    Edmund White
    http://flickr.com/ewwhite
    1. Re:I like the YellowDog/Terrasoft briQ more... by repetty · · Score: 1

      "The briQ is a much pimper... :) And just as expensive...."

      And way, way, way faster.

      --Richard

  30. Why Oh Why Oh Why ... by ErroneousBee · · Score: 1

    does it have parrallel and serial ports. All you need is DVI-I , 4+ USB (keyboard, mouse + peripherals), WiFi, ethernet, Speaker ports, and possibly a TV-in (cos you'd want to run mythTV on it, right?).

    Also, its a bit light on disk space. It doesnt really need the CF card (although its a cheap enough way to do a bios I suppose).

    --
    **TODO** Steal someone elses sig.
  31. Small Servers? by mr_lithic · · Score: 5, Insightful
    When did size become a massive concern for people buying servers?

    I thought cooling, data transfer rates and reliability (redundant PSU's etc) were the main considerations. Processor speed and storage capacity are definitely up there as well.

    But Size?

    I don't understand

    1. Re:Small Servers? by Pfhreakaz0id · · Score: 1

      I think home servers are becoming a bigger deal. Also small businesses who don't have a computer room.

      I have a home server, but I just put the thing WAY up hi on a shelf and it works :)

    2. Re:Small Servers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, this is aimed at small businesses... ...whose owners often have size issues.

    3. Re:Small Servers? by TCM · · Score: 1

      I would love to have a small box with only a serial port and dual Intel lan that uses 10W and is fanless. Oh, and for 200.

      --
      Of course it runs NetBSD. BTC: 1NT7QvbetmANwaMzhpVL6
    4. Re:Small Servers? by sporty · · Score: 1

      For those of us who run servers in our homes or don't have space. Turning off a 1ghz machine at nite cuts off my electric bill by $30 a month. If i can do the same of my other computesr, joy. :)

      --

      -
      ping -f 255.255.255.255 # if only

    5. Re:Small Servers? by elviscious · · Score: 1

      I've always wondered why people didn't have rooms devoted to their huge ass '60sish servers. Shit you even get a free heater for you house.

      Size is definitely overrated, although I haven't heard any women say that yet.

    6. Re:Small Servers? by caveat+lector · · Score: 1

      Sigh. When your entire business is your spare bedroom, believe me -- size matters.

      (Double entendre wholly intentional.)

    7. Re:Small Servers? by RatBastard · · Score: 1

      For file/app servers, yes, you want power, redundancy and all that. For a domain controller/NAT/Firwall/etc... server, you don't need any of that. That's all pretty light stuff in all but the largest LANs.

      --
      Boobies never hurt anyone. - Sherry Glaser.
    8. Re:Small Servers? by mr_lithic · · Score: 1
      If that is all you want - then why would you get this box. Get an old desktop (p450 with limited RAM) and chuck either Windows 2000 or Open Source equivalents on it (ie samba etc).

      Heck of a lot cheaper then 1100 bucks.

      I simply cannot see the sense of this "server" system, it just seems underpowered and overpriced.

    9. Re:Small Servers? by blkmajik · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You obviously don't pay for floor space at a co-location data center.

    10. Re:Small Servers? by mr_lithic · · Score: 1
      This is a pretty expensive system for something that is underpowered and not specifically a "server". You could easily turn an older desktop into the same system.

      It seems you are paying for design rather than performance

      I doubt that co-location centres would look at this type of solution. If you want to get a lot of servers in a set amount of space, look to 1U racks and blades.

      As far as a home solution goes, a small form factor PC could do the same job for a fraction of the cost and in roughly the same space.

    11. Re:Small Servers? by Doctor+Crocodile · · Score: 1
      When did size become a massive concern for people buying servers? ...But Size? I don't understand

      Haven't you been reading all those emails about the patch that I sent you???????

  32. Re:I fucked up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You stupid asshole. Please apply here. Don't forget to check the 'lifelong' box!

  33. http://www.sudhian.com/showdocs.cfm?aid=471&pi by cyberben · · Score: 1

    Gee... I love coldfusion!! ;) Error Occurred While Processing Request Error Diagnostic Information Request canceled or ignored by serverServer busy or unable to fulfill request. The server is unable to fulfill your request due to extremely high traffic or an unexpected internal error. Please attempt your request again (if you are repeatedly unsuccessful you should notify the site administrator). (Location Code: 26)

  34. Well at least it's pretty... by Coaster-Sj · · Score: 1

    I like the looks of the thing. However I think they've missed the boat on selling these things.

    If they had made it so it was easy to hack whatever linux distro you wanted onto it and MUCH more affordable they might of had a shot at selling a ton of them.

    As it is you could build a Mini-ITX system and jam a 4 port switch into the case and have a nicer setup than this.

    --
    "Average intelligence is pretty damn stupid"
    1. Re:Well at least it's pretty... by bhima · · Score: 1

      My Qube2 is prettier, do wish it had a 4 port 10/100 switch built in though...

      --
      Nothing in the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity.
  35. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  36. Re:I fucked up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    how 'bout trying this simple formula:

    study more -- troll on Slashdot less.

    I know it sounds wacky... but do us all a favor and try it.

  37. Netwinder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I believe the Netwinder servers are still available and by now are probably a more mature product. Plus I believe they are in an even smaller case. See www.netwinder.net

    1. Re:Netwinder by jonnyfivealive · · Score: 0

      that netwinder looks to be almost exactly what this it100 is, for about the same price. same processor, but twice the ram. i couldnt rtfa, but seemed like the netwinder had a lot of features...

      hard to believe people are making 533's the size of my netgear 4port router.

  38. 128MB? by daveman_1 · · Score: 1

    A system with only 128MB or RAM is NOT a server in today's world. Ten years ago maybe but not today.

    --
    Russian Russian Russian RussianDollSig DollSig DollSig DollSig
    1. Re:128MB? by bigdavex · · Score: 4, Insightful

      A system with only 128MB or RAM is NOT a server in today's world. Ten years ago maybe but not today.

      Now there's some exageration. RAM was about $50/MB in 1993, making 128MB $6,400.
      --
      -Dave
    2. Re:128MB? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      A system with only 128MB or RAM is NOT a server in today's world. Ten years ago maybe but not today.

      I suppose it depends on what you were serving. Besides, in 1993, most computers only had from 4 to 16 Mb, and the internet was only 2 years old.

      I can understand needing more RAM these days. We demand a lot out of our computers. But ``only 128MB'' sounds almost as asinine as paying $1300 for a 566Mhz toy.

    3. Re:128MB? by adrianbaugh · · Score: 1

      Depends on what you have to serve, and to how many users. For a departmental print server, or for hosting the intranet for a small company it may well be plenty.
      Whereas for something that's exposed to a slashdotting... um... :-)

      --
      "'I pass the test,' she said. 'I will diminish, and go into the West, and remain Galadriel.'"
      - JRR Tolkien.
    4. Re:128MB? by matt-larose · · Score: 1

      Bah, i run a server with several PHP and Perl heavy scripts on it with only 128 MB of ram.

      --
      "Be glad you sailed for a better day, But dont forget there will be hell to pay" - Dave King/Flogging Molly
    5. Re:128MB? by zulux · · Score: 1


      A system with only 128MB or RAM is NOT a server in today's world. Ten years ago maybe but not today.


      Why do this bozo need 128Megs? So hecan run Pinball 3D on his server?

      WTF!!!

      I have servers with 8MB - and they kick ass for what they need to do.

      They do the following:

      LDAP authentication.
      VPN.
      Fileserving.
      Repmote backup.
      Database replication and backup.

      --

      Moneyed corporations, non-working 'poor' and criminal prisoners are turning productive citizens into tax-slaves.

    6. Re:128MB? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I have servers with 8MB - and they kick ass


      Maybe with 16MB they could spell-check for you, too.

  39. I wonder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    if SCO had switched to one of these babies for their web site?

  40. TigerDirect by CmdrTostado · · Score: 2, Interesting

    $500 for something similar, I suppose, but didn't read the manufacturer's specs because there site is down.

    1. Re:TigerDirect by donmiguel42 · · Score: 1

      Similar idea, perhaps, but the one you found at TD is VASTLY superior. More RAM, more disk space, faster CPU, etc. And, although it isn't explicit about its OS, looking at the feature set it almost has to run some Linux variant. Nice find...

    2. Re:TigerDirect by RatBastard · · Score: 1

      It is running Linux. A friend of mine is looking into buying one of them.

      --
      Boobies never hurt anyone. - Sherry Glaser.
  41. They also believe by rm007 · · Score: 2, Informative

    What matters is that most people who make business decisions to use commercial software believe that the vendor is liable

    They also believe, or at least behave according to, the old chestnut "no one ever got fired for buying IBM" (substitute well known brand in any technology realted field for "IBM" to adapt this to any category). Those in large organizations don't want to take risks that will jeopardize their careers, but at least they are more likely to have IT departments to make recommendations. In small organizations, there is neither the in-house expertise nor often the willingness to spend on outside advice. While they may not know just how little they know, they calculate risk on the basis of what little they do know and they know the Apple and Mircrosoft brands.

    --


    I've finally got around to changing my sig
    1. Re:They also believe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The reason being why I spend hours a day waiting on this intel rig to save data, process data or do anything regarding IO.

      They bought Intel and it shows. Well, theyre shity hardware is costing time which is money, I spend more time on the loo than doing work because of it. (Or the coffee machine).

      I could go home and use my rig and be faster than this shithole of a company.

  42. MySQL backend by gregarican · · Score: 1

    Hopefully the miniserver doesn't happen to have a MySQL backend. Judging by the problems the company's website is having handling the number of MySQL client requests I think perhaps an eMachines bladeserver might be the way to go.

  43. I Don't know about this... by cerebralsugar · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Think about it:

    1.) It includes 802.llb. How strange. Does anybody really feel a wireless server is a good thing? With 5 or 6 clients on an 802.llb network, things other than simple, tiny file transfers are going to start to slow down alot.

    2.) Crusoe Processor - I mean, why not a celeron? Heat issues? Power consumption? Why use a processor intended for mobile applications in a server??

    3.) The price - this thing should not break a grand. I work at a fairly major (Fortune 1000) computer reseller, and If I had a small office customer call me looking for an inexpensive server, I could sell them an IBM X series 205 for $769. It has a P4 2.4 GHZ and 256 megs of RAM. Its an honest to god server class machine.

    Unless you have 8 guys with notebooks that travel and need a traveling server, what is the point of this? And for the price, if you did have those 8 guys, you could jsut have a 9th notebook, and have better specs, AND be battery powered.

    --
    Easy guys, I put my pants on one leg at a time. The difference is after I put on my pants I make gold records!
    1. Re:I Don't know about this... by leuk_he · · Score: 1

      1.) It includes 802.llb.
      This thing is more a router then a server. For a small office router wireless is fine. But since it is not a workstation it must be a server by definition of the /. editors.
      2.) Crusoe Processor
      This is what made slashdot look at it.
      3.) The price
      Cleary the weakstest spot. If they sold it for 300$ it might be a great thing to have next to the phone and the cable modem. Now it is just overpriced.

  44. CF for boot? by jargoone · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Looks very cool, but I don't understand the need for CF card for booting. I can understand if you used a read-only medium to boot from, but this has a hard disk. Is there something in the architecture that creates this need?

    1. Re:CF for boot? by Foresto · · Score: 1

      Perhaps they do it this way to make drive crash recovery easier.

    2. Re:CF for boot? by crush · · Score: 1

      Heh... I wondered the same thing and asked before I saw your post. I don't understand the other response you got that says that CF would make crash recovery easier.

      My impression is that CF devices have potentially a longer life than HDs due to lack of moving parts and so this might increase the reliability.

  45. It's 10 am by way2trivial · · Score: 1
    and I'm sitting in my shed, typing on an old crappy laptop running pcanywhere.
    And look, it's running full screen my 2.53 p4 in the house!

    'course, you can't see the p4 if I took a picture.

    --
    every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
  46. this seems pointless by sbma44 · · Score: 1
    for development you'd be better off just using any spare PC -- more flexibility, cheaper.

    Why would someone use this rather than buying hosting from someone else? Obviously there are advantages to hosting your own site, but I don't think this machine particularly exposes them. Is the idea for momandpop.com to serve their site over their cablemodem or business DSL connection using this thing? They'd be much better off buying their hosting from someone else.

    If bigwebdevcompany.com needs a dumb, low-powered web server they'd save a lot of money with a trip to walmart and a set of linux ISOs. I just don't see where this enters the market as a useful tool.

  47. Just one thing... by z-kungfu · · Score: 1

    Way over priced...
    For $1300 I can buy (not build) at least 2 if not 3 significantly more powerful boxes. I can't figure their target market with this thing. Unless it's sill corporate purchasing agents with to much money, no sense, and think it's cute...

  48. (OT: I keep seeing this vi sig, but WHY?) by landaker · · Score: 1

    :wq!

    Why SHIFT ; UNSHIFT w q SHIFT ! UNSHIFT ENTER

    instead of SHIFT z z UNSHIFT ENTER

    ?

    Sounds like a waste of keystrokes to me... ;)

    1. Re:(OT: I keep seeing this vi sig, but WHY?) by hatrisc · · Score: 1

      yeah, you're right, however, i have :wq! embedded into my fingers and is a natural reflex.

      --
      I write code.
    2. Re:(OT: I keep seeing this vi sig, but WHY?) by Clover_Kicker · · Score: 1
      I find it easier to remember
      ESC write quit BANG ENTER
      than
      ESC SHIFT z z UNSHIFT ENTER
    3. Re:(OT: I keep seeing this vi sig, but WHY?) by FuzzyBad-Mofo · · Score: 1

      I think it's supposed to be humour.. normally one wouldn't need a bang (!) to write and quit. At least I only use the bang when i've modified a file and *don't* wish to save it.

    4. Re:(OT: I keep seeing this vi sig, but WHY?) by Fjord · · Score: 1

      Personally, I think seeing "ZZ" at the end instead of ":wq!" would be more ambigous. I wouldn't immediatly think of vi if saw two capital Zs but I do think of vi when I see ":wq!"

      --
      -no broken link
  49. Ripping off-Audiance participation. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You hit the nail on the head. I think the "I can do it cheaper, or better hardware" crowd is missing the point of "appliances". First I doubt that without lots of expertise, most geeks could come up with a good net appliance (if they could, then why are our regular interfaces so bad, and why aren't you guys running your own business?). Second the "cost" isn't so much for the hardware, but the simplification of the machine (not just the interface, but all the other aspects that go into a desirable machine) for the intended audiance (the one's who are not geeks). Hell, even geeks sometimes get tired of tinkering, and want something that "just works" (Macs anyone?). Now as a geek I'm waiting for the "Blade Servers for the masses". :)

  50. Just think what a geek can do with $1100-Ramen. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Buy lot's of Ramen noodles. If geeks can do so much with $1100.00 then they wouldn't be out on the unemployment line, and they would have their own line of "net appliances" for the masses to purchase.

    Funny how reality doesn't agree. Guess it isn't as easy as people think to come up with a desirable product that can accomodate the masses, as witness by the fact that we still haven't cracked the desktop market in any significent way.

    1. Re:Just think what a geek can do with $1100-Ramen. by LazloToth · · Score: 1


      No Ramen noodles for me, friend - - I'm on on Atkins. And even if I weren't, neither I nor anyone on my staff is the least bit worried about IT employment on the eastern seaboard of the U.S. - - plenty of demand for people who can do Windows/*nix/DB administration and security. My financial services company expects to double its IT staff in the next three years. Like I said, cheap carbs just don't do it for me anymore.

      --


      It's only funny until someone gets hurt. Then, it's hilarious.
    2. Re:Just think what a geek can do with $1100-Ramen. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or maybe it just takes money to make money. The problem isn't creating the product, the problem is marketing it.

  51. My 486 gateway is only 24 watts! by emil · · Score: 1

    Granted, it is a Compaq Contura laptop, but I thought that Transmeta systems were supposed to be conservative on power?!

    1. Re:My 486 gateway is only 24 watts! by arivanov · · Score: 2, Informative

      It is a standard PSU. Usually used in the ITX world. Actual consumptionis likely to be lower. While at it you can make the same system from standard components at LinItx.com (using Via instead of Crusoe) for a fraction of the cost.

      --
      Baker's Law: Misery no longer loves company. Nowadays it insists on it
      http://www.sigsegv.cx/
    2. Re:My 486 gateway is only 24 watts! by Nykon · · Score: 1

      I believe the bulk of what your paying for is not the hardware, but the "easy to use" GIU front end they developed to maintain the server.

      --
      "It's better to be a pirate then join the Navy"
  52. Article Text by B00yah · · Score: 1

    A low power, affordable server has been long overdue for both the enthusiast and small business markets. EmergeCore's "IT in a Box" performs most of the major functions of a standard Windows Domain Controller, at a fraction of the cost, and one-tenth the size.

    Most businesses in the world fall under the category of "small businesses". Small businesses have IT needs as well and most small businesses cannot afford to throw thousands of dollars at licensing for their network design and support. Yes, you can use Linux and other "free" operating systems, but the concept of Linux, and it's "unaccountability" scares most small business owners, especially when the owner may be the only IT department they have. If a small business owner is brave enough to run a Linux setup, he will often pay more for service/support of his Linux network in time if not also in cold, hard cash. EmergeCore's IT100 runs Linux, but you will never notice as all the server configuration is done through a well designed web interface, called "CoreVista."

    Sudhian was approached last month by Dave Brown, President/CEO, and Keith Murphy, Director of Sales and Marketing, of the Boise, Idaho-based company EmergeCore. After meeting with Dave and Keith, I had the sense that they had stolen some of my brainwaves while I was sleeping. You see, I have been yearning for a small, low power, and silent server for my home for almost a year, and I could never find anything that totally satisfied me. I looked at the Via EPIA systems, but I could never find the style of case I was looking for. Hush systems were gorgeous, but not what I needed for this project. I wanted to keep it simple: give me a hard drive, processor, external PSU, and quick and dirty WiFi setup. The IT100 did it all at a cost of $1,395.

    At first glance, the size of the IT100 will surprise you, but a server that is smaller than a Playstation 2 will do that to some people. Crammed inside this little box, you will find the following:

    Transmeta Crusoe TM5600 533MHz
    128MB SDRAM
    2.5" IDE HDD 20GB
    32MB Compact Flash (used for booting the system in conjunction with the hard drive)
    4-port 10/100 Hub/Switch
    Wireless AP 802.11b
    External PSU 60W/12V
    2x USB 1.1 ports
    Parallel port
    Serial port
    9.84" x 9.6" x 2.24"

    One of the beauties of the IT100 is the fan-less setup. Transmeta processors are designed to run at low power and low heat, and running the server for a month straight showed no heat problems and made absolutely no noise. The IT100 is designed for small businesses, but it's easy to see the niche it could occupy in the enthusiast market.

    You can use the IT100 as a network gateway or as a server node; however, it is designed to fill both roles simultaneously. We will breakdown the features essential for any small business or home network using the IT100 as a gateway.

    DHCP

    The IT100 works as a DHCP server and will run two separate subnets, one for LAN and one for WLAN.

    WAN Connectivity

    The WAN connection can be configured as a PPPoE connection, static IP addresses, or it also receive a dynamic IP address. In addition, you can assign specific MAC addresses with static IP addresses, or you can use that same MAC address to filter out unwanted traffic.

    Firewall

    The IT100 comes with an easy to setup firewall. The Basic Mode (Low, Medium, and High) and Advanced Mode allow any level administrator to feel comfortable configuring an often confusing setting. If the administrator wanted to block all traffic, with the exception of a few ports, he is fully capable of doing so with either the Advanced Mode or the High setting in the Basic Mode. The Medium setting will block the majority of traffic, while letting server side services run (e-mail, web services, etc.) which cannot be run in High mode. The Low setting only blocks file sharing and proxy from the outside, but is the only Basic Mode setting with which you are able to run the VPN service.

    NAT

    The IT100 performs Network Addre

  53. $1395? I can top that at $450 by sydbarrett74 · · Score: 1

    I built a computer custom with the following specs: Athlon mobo w/ Nvidia chipset Athlon XP 2500+ 350w PSU 512MB PC2100 DDR RAM 40GB Maxtor 7200rpm drive ATI 128MB video card ..all for $450. These specs blow away the ones of the 'mini-server'. Why would I pay 3x as much for wimpier h/w?

    --
    'He who has to break a thing to find out what it is, has left the path of wisdom.' -- Gandalf to Saruman
  54. Pictures Mirrored by B00yah · · Score: 1
  55. Even lower power home server (for the tinkerer) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    I run a headless embedded server at my house, which uses 4 Watts of power (verified with my Kill-O-Watt meter). It has less processing power (equivalent to a Pentium 133MHz)

    I purchased the device from embeddedx86.com. The model is TS-5400. You can see a picture of my finished server here and here. (It's in a boring-as-hell grey box... with a CD next to it for comparison - it's to the left of the access point)

    It runs Apache (with PHP extensions), NAT masquerading, and provided me with a great introduction to embedded systems (it's architecture is almost identical to standard x86, so it's an easy starting point). Even though it's much less powerful than the transmeta powered box in the article, you can still do a lot of useful stuff with it!

  56. Re:$1395? I can top that at $450 by Profane+Motherfucker · · Score: 1

    Some people masturbate to the low power theory. I suppose someone could say, "Well it uses less electricity for fuck's sake!"

    But you're absolutely correct -- it's a god damn sham. You could use that huge disparity in price to purchase green power (like wind) from your electric company and do a hell of a lot more for the world than waste money on some crappy little computer.

    Is this slashdot or PR Newswire, anyway? I can't tell the two apart anymore. I know one has an abortion of HTML code and garish graphics, but as far as content, I don't know anymore.

  57. Filesystem corruption by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    RAID 1 does nothing for filesystem corruption. For this you need backups. Either way, you get downtime. RAID1 is an illusion of safety that isn't really there.

    1. Re:Filesystem corruption by Slider451 · · Score: 1

      RAID 1 does nothing for filesystem corruption. For this you need backups. Either way, you get downtime. RAID1 is an illusion of safety that isn't really there.

      It protects you from disk hardware failure. Nothing more, nothing less. As data is your most important IT asset, and the most time consuming to recover, redundant disks are an important part of a healthy CBO strategy which, of course, includes off-site backups.

      --
      Nostalgia isn't what it used to be.
  58. at a cost of $1,395. by frovingslosh · · Score: 2, Insightful
    at a cost of $1,395.

    So I can get a tiny underpowered computer for $1395. Big deal. I can get a better computer for a lot less (even if I shell out a little extra for one of those small cube cases and M.B.) And at that price this toy is underpowered in every way, including hard drive space and memory. And a real computer will be less expensive in the long run, even after it's expected life this toy's power savings doesn't come close to justifying the price. Who can it be aimed at? The individual isn't gong to pay this and needs more anyway (or thinks he needs, if he thinks he needs a server at all), and can likely spare the space a single small format PC would take up as well as this. No large cluster of these is likely to be built (certainly not at this price), people who need lots of servers because of space will use Blade systems (and Google will continue to prove these are other low cost but amazingly functional approaches).

    --
    I'm an American. I love this country and the freedoms that we used to have.
  59. Waiting for wearable server+client by TheLink · · Score: 1

    And not the current intel style one - which is just a file/webserver.

    I want to be able to browse a SuperPDA webapp all on one small wearable computer.

    --
  60. Re:http://www.sudhian.com/showdocs.cfm?aid=471& by Profane+Motherfucker · · Score: 1

    Other than to aimlessly bitch, what's the point? So what? Would you be happy if it was PHP's error page? Would that please you?

  61. this seems pointless-Homo Logicus. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let's look at this from another angle. Have you ever designed an "appliance" for the "masses"? Do you know that is more than just the hardware, or just the software, but how the whole comes together. Your a geek so I don't expect you to know how the "masses" think.[1] But "appliances" is were things are heading because the "promises" of regular PC's have failed to materialize. People want to use their "tools" to get the "job" done. [1] Alan Cooper: The inmates are running the asylum covers this so much better.

    1. Re:this seems pointless-Homo Logicus. by sbma44 · · Score: 1
      Are you really saying that web appliances are the future?

      A web server is not the same as a toaster. A new ergonomic grip and translucent color styling does not matter when you're purchasing servers for your company.

      Sure, this thing is probably easy to administer than a "real" server. Is it easier to administer than a server hosted by someone else? Obviously not. And the latter solution is likely to be cheaper, able to handle more requests, and connected to a fatter pipe than you could afford for the same money at your hosting facility -- which for companies looking at this hardware, is probably an unventilated closet.

      My point is, you can go with ease of use or power. There are easier, cheaper solutions. And this is by no means powerful. It's a worst of both worlds situation.

  62. Big, er Small Deal by sysadmn · · Score: 1

    Yeah, it's expensive, and the typical slashdotter could do it cheaper with Open Source. The average small business can't, and will pay more for convenience. The real explosion will come as prices drop, and these features roll into your cable modem. My cable company already offers no-brainer wireless for a 'mere' $14/month. Within a year, I'll bet they offer data storage and some of these other features as well.

    --
    Envy my 5 digit Slashdot User ID!
  63. Rebel Netwinder by nickos · · Score: 1

    Does anyone remember the Rebel Netwinder? That was cooler than this but they still went bust.

  64. Re:Just think what a geek can do with $1100 these by drinkypoo · · Score: 3, Informative
    I don't think you understand how ridiculous this really is. People only need to save space like that when they're on a small boat, in a car, or something like that. You can get (aka, I just got) a Gigabyte nForce2 motherboard with everything but video onboard (including gigE, 1394, ATA RAID, SATA RAID, USB2) for $110. And an Athlon XP 2500+ for $100 or so. All told I paid about $240 shipped. $200 will get you a ~160GB hard drive; get two of them so you can mirror, and you're up to $650. 512MB of DDR333 is $80 or so, $730. A DVD-RW ($110) and a decent case with 400W PS ($100) bring us up to $940. Floppy drive (for emergencies), cheapie video card, and cheap keyboard and mouse will round this out to a complete server system with RAID-protected data, a backup solution for the data which absolutely positively must be protected and taken offsite (most people do not have data files larger than 4.7GB) and not just that, it has enough processor and memory to do probably anything you want to do in a small business. I stress that this is a complete solution; you could spend much less and get much less which would still be plenty for most people.

    Too much work for you? Go to geeks.com and pick up some refurb'd HP desktops for $500 each, with 17" monitors, CDRW, DVD-ROM, 120-160GB disks, keyboard, mouse, fucken speakers fer chrissakes... and a ~2.2 GHz celery chip.

    The fact is that the vast majority of people have space to put a full size computer for a server. It's only in very unusual environments where space matters so much that your only server must be smaller than a shoebox. Aside from such special cases, assuming anyone buys this device, it will mostly be people who don't understand computers, and think it looks really neat.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  65. Indeed by Tune · · Score: 1

    [From the article:] I was very pleased with the overall performance of the IT100, and would ask that anyone interested in this server not get hung up on the specs.[...]Too often people get caught up in the hype of Dual Xeon or Dual A64 servers, when the truth of the matter is that you do not need that kind of power to run a simple e-mail server and share files.

    Couldn't agree more. I understand that less is more, but *WHY* does it have to be more expensive than a similar laptop? Can't you get a discount for a system that's essentially stripped from all user interfaces?

    --
    Good marketing beats good engineering

  66. Use a Network Attached Storage instead by guanxi · · Score: 1

    I've setup $550 SnapServer NAS devices for a few small offices. They have built-in remote access and are very secure: They run a stripped down Unix that only allows Java apps to execute.

    Of course, that only functions to serve files, but it works very reliably.

  67. Re:http://www.sudhian.com/showdocs.cfm?aid=471& by cyberben · · Score: 1

    To have work more than a year and a half with coldfusion supporting dumbass programmers creating code that gave those location code : 26 many times per day and having to restart the whole service because it affected all other web pages because coldfusion couldn't handle loops, yes I would have prefer to have a PHP error page!

  68. Geek perspective on the masses. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually I think it's you who doesn't understand. If your combination is as good as you think it is, then why aren't you out here selling it to the masses? As I've repeatedly pointed out, these are for the masses, and what you've concocted is for geeks. GEEKS, not MASSES. When you've come up with something that is for the masses AND can beat what the mentioned company has come up with, then you'll understand.

    1. Re:Geek perspective on the masses. by drinkypoo · · Score: 1
      Please explain how the little slow shoebox-sized server is better for the masses. It's slower, it has less capacity, it does not provide any redundancy or backup solution, it is clearly overpriced for what it does. Its only advantage is the amount of space it takes up and perhaps the amount of power it consumes; however since this is clearly a product for the business environment (based on price) power consumption is not the most critical factor.

      Please also expain why MY combination of hardware is not good for the masses, but theirs is.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  69. server is a box, been there ,done that. by Bubba-T · · Score: 1

    i Dont see why this one would survive any better than the Toshiba Magnia SG20 Internet Appliance Server. Orginaly selling for close to $1500, now can be found $199.

  70. What is the draw for small business? by fygment · · Score: 1

    As a small business there might be a handful of modern boxes in the office/home to be used for word processing and accounting (maybe dozens in a larger small business ... but that's getting to be medium or large business ... but I digress). So why would this particular tiny box be useful?

    Cost: Well instead of buying a handful of modern boxen, buy some cheaper, slower models (800-900 Mhz) and with the money saved buy a nice high powered (+1.8 Ghz) box dedicated to the purpose of the "server in a box". And when time comes to upgrade you still have a useful computer vice an old useless mini-server (only hackers/geeks can put those easily into service).

    Power Consumption: 60 watts is small compared to 300 watts. But where is this a constraint except in a third world country (where you can't afford the 1300US$ for a power miser anyways.)

    Footprint: Without a monitor, your standard boxen-as-server can sit in a corner or closet or under a plant stand (with proper precautions ... as I've found out :) Plus, the small size of the IT-100 means it could easily be accidentally brushed off the corner of a desk thus adding new meaning to the phrase "The server is down.".

    So what is this thing offering? Nothing but a sexy desk ornament that a lava lamp would beat hands down anyways.

    --
    "Consensus" in science is _always_ a political construct.
  71. Anyone else notice? by PetoskeyGuy · · Score: 1

    The author of the article is named Stoner :)

  72. The price is too high... by josevnz · · Score: 1

    You can buy a MUCH powerfull server from EMachines or Dell, Load it with Debian, Mandrake or Fedora and have all the services (and more) for free.

    Need a web server: Apache
    Need mail: Sendmail or Postfix
    Need firewall: Netfilter with FWBuilder
    Need a proxy: Squid
    Need Windows fileserver: SAMBA
    Need Unix fileserver: NFS (with NIS)
    Need backup: Amanda
    Need an IDS: Snort

    The lisk can keep going....

    Sorry, but the price is too high for whay they offer. Even on E-Bay you can find more powerfull servers for less.

    JV.

    --
    Jose Vicente Nunez Zuleta RHCE, SJCD, SJCP
  73. Hub? Switch? Who cares? by magarity · · Score: 1

    From the specs list:
    4-port 10/100 Hub/Switch

    So which is it?? A hub? A switch? Or is it 4 NICs? Notice they don't list a NIC, just this hub/switch thing unless you count the built in 802.11b. So is THAT its link to the network? Obviously it would be nuts to incorporate a standalone hub (or switch) in the back of the thing without a NIC of its own except wireless, BUT that's the way the specs page reads! Someone needs to do a common sense proofread.

  74. Say whaaa??? by DesScorp · · Score: 1

    "Smaller, faster, QUIETER. That is the future."

    With a 533 Crusoe CPU, where do you see Faster at?

    And I'll take my dinasaur steel frame mechanical AT keyboard over your El Cheapo membrane "smaller faster quieter" keyboards anyday. Sometimes newer isn't neccessarily better.

    --
    Life is hard, and the world is cruel
  75. More info on your LCD vs CRT comment... by wodelltech · · Score: 1

    I know it's a tangent, but since you brought it up...are games the last remaining use for CRTs? I'm currently shopping for a new monitor, and that's one of the questions I'm asking myself. My other thoughts were:
    - CRT's support multiple resolutions (i.e., don't LCD's have a fixed resolution?)
    - CRT's support higher resolutions than LCDs
    - Do CRT's provide better color accuracy?
    - (LCD's are currently more expensive, but that's changing quickly so I'm trying to focus on technical differences...)

    --
    Your monitor is staring at you.
    1. Re:More info on your LCD vs CRT comment... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      LCD's do have a fixed resolution but can emulate lower resolutions if they divide evenly into the native one.

      LCD's do have some limitations. They cannot do true white. They therefore cannot do colors accurately. If you are doing desktop publishing you won't be using an LCD monitor.

      CRT's and LCD's both have pretty high resolution ceilings but LCD's will cost you a lot more to get there. Here at school we've got some IBM LCD monitors that go 3400 x 2400 or somesuch but are over $8,000. A comparable CRT will still run you a couple thousand.

      Latency issues with LCD monitors can be an issue and it is noticable. CRT does not have latency problems but many people claim with newer / more expensive LCD monitors it doesn't bother them even when gaming. I'm a little sensitive but thankfully I don't game.

      LCD monitors have accurate geometry. A square is a square. CRT monitors need to be calibrated for accurate geometry and the picture can become distorted over time or by a magnetic field. This can be very important depending on what you're doing.

      LCD monitors have significantly less radiation than CRT. They also produce significantly less heat and consume less energy. A 21" CRT can warm a room.

      Basically it comes down to this. Unless you do pre-press desktop publishing there's probably an LCD monitor for you. The costs are about the same now and the reasons to go LCD largely outweigh the reasons otherwise not to.

    2. Re:More info on your LCD vs CRT comment... by glesga_kiss · · Score: 1
      LCD's do have a fixed resolution but can emulate lower resolutions if they divide evenly into the native one

      Which is, never. Running a lower resolution than the native one will always look terrible. I used to game on laptops all the time. Not pretty. If you plan on using the same res all the time, LCD is great.

      The costs are about the same now and the reasons to go LCD largely outweigh the reasons otherwise not to.

      Size matters. I've got a great 19" CRT flat-screen monitor running at 1600x1200. There aren't any affordable LCD equivalents to that, and it looks beautiful with the DPI turned up in the OS.

      Ultimately, I'd go by desk space. If your desk can handle the bit sticking out the back, then get a CRT.

    3. Re:More info on your LCD vs CRT comment... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which is, never. Running a lower resolution than the native one will always look terrible. I used to game on laptops all the time. Not pretty.

      This is not true for modern displays (yes, the old LCD's sucked but those are long gone). I regularly run 1280x1024 and less on my Dell laptop (native 1600x1200) and it looks fine. Not as perfect as the native resolution but instead looks more like a CRT (ie. very slight blur). No big deal, it looks no worse than a CRT.

      I also use 640x480 for Quake and you can't even tell a difference from a CRT.

    4. Re:More info on your LCD vs CRT comment... by ImpTech · · Score: 1
      The costs are about the same now and the reasons to go LCD largely outweigh the reasons otherwise not to.

      I suppose costs are the same order of magnitude, if thats what you mean... Even then, they're still not really. Hopping around newegg, it looks like LCDs are on average 3-4x more expensive than CRTs.

  76. New != better by default by gosand · · Score: 1
    You would probably take a CRT over an LCD any day, right? (*)

    Show me an LCD that I can afford, see without being 3" away from it at a decent resolution, and can do ALL of my tasks, and I'll buy it.

    * By the way, CRT's do have there uses in high speed games (Quake) but other than that they just burn your retinas.

    Speaking of legacy garbage from the 90's (which I still love, BTW)...
    So if you have an LCD and need to play Quake, what do you do? Own both a CRT and and LCD? Talk about waste. And you know what I hate? People who can't get there/their/they're and your/you're straight, even though all it takes is learning simple English rules.

    --

    My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

    1. Re:New != better by default by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dell has their 20" 1600x1200 LCD for $750. Good 20" CRT monitors cost that much.

      Anyone can have a lapse in spelling while thinking about something else. Calm down, it ain't the end of the world homey.

    2. Re:New != better by default by anagama · · Score: 1
      • People who can't get there/their/they're and your/you're straight
      Your right about people getting a better grip on English - afterall, their going to need correct usage to survive in hour business climate.

      Heh. After reading slashdot for quite a while, I now have to make a conscious effort to get these right, and even when I think about, I sometimes get confused. How'd I do??

      --
      What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
    3. Re:New != better by default by buck_wild · · Score: 1

      A 20" CRT for $750? No, not really. I bought my 21" Viewsonic for $185, and I currently have it running 1600 x 1200 at 125hz.

      I'll bet you can't even find a 15" LCD that can run 1t 1600 x 1200 near that price. :)

      --
      If all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail.
  77. They Must Be by deliciousmonster · · Score: 1

    Running their site with one... ./ v Crusoe

    --
    I have a plan. Using mainly spoons, we'll tunnel our way out of the city...
  78. mini-itx + Transmeta chips = interesting market? by GeorgieBoy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I think Transmeta offering mini-itx boards with their processors could make the market for small-size devices quite interesting. I'm curious how well Crusoe/other Transmeta chips perform against the VIA parts with a similar clock frequency. . .

    Since they are low power parts that require minimal cooling, it seems almost obvious to me as an opportunity to compete (from my "50,000 foot" viewpoint).

  79. Indeed-Built-ins. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why so surprised? It's the same reason that prepared foods cost more than you buying the raw materials and cooking them yourself[1]. The fast food industry is based on that principle.

    [1] And you'll note that you get more by going the "buy and do yourself" route for the same amount of money. So why aren't more people outraged by that, instead of complaining about a product that serves a MASS need?

    Gee I guess it must all be about marketing, instead of the fact that we all have different priorities.

  80. Single Point Of Failure..no thanks.. by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    Single powersupply.. single drive..

    It might look pretty and be small/quiet, but id not trust using it in a real business, even a small office...

    Unless of course you bought 2 and had them mirrored... but that blows its 'cuteness'.

    Say waht yo uwill baout the 'old monster' servers, but when your drive dies on one of these things you will wish you had raid5...

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    1. Re:Single Point Of Failure..no thanks.. by jonnyfivealive · · Score: 0

      Unless of course you bought 2 and had them mirrored... but that blows its 'cuteness'.

      blows its cuteness and $3000
  81. IT500 coming 1Q04... by j0keralpha · · Score: 1

    to have dual 60GBs and built-in CSU/DSU
    Dont ask me. I just forward de info.

  82. Flash and a HDD by pete-classic · · Score: 1

    Can anyone offer any explanation why it has a flash card in addition to the hard disk?

    The article says:

    32MB Compact Flash (used for booting the system in conjunction with the hard drive)

    The only thing I can think of is decreasing the boot time.

    I'm genuinely soliciting comments here. My mind is boggled. (Doesn't take much :-)

    -Peter

  83. I'd hope so by ncc74656 · · Score: 1
    The IT100 is powered by a 60 watt external PSU and is smaller than a PS2.

    For something that bills itself as a "mini-server," I'd hope that it's smaller than a PS/2...wouldn't make much sense if it was larger.

    --
    20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
  84. What _would_ you buy? by randall_burns · · Score: 1

    Several folks here have been saying there are better deals in fanless, small servers. What are they? Where would you get them/the parts?
    Thanks!

    1. Re:What _would_ you buy? by thunderbee · · Score: 1

      Asus Pundit
      Even make a cluster of them.
      They go for 350 EUR w/ 2ghz cpu, 512M ram, 40Go Hdd
      Near silent, no external power supply, 2PCI slots if you remove the %*$@ modem.

      --
      In my opinion, Scientology is a cult you should avoid.
  85. You're missing a key point by brokeninside · · Score: 1

    This thing draws about as much power as a single light bulb. Sure, you can find more powerful servers for less money, but those high powered servers will cost four to five times as much power to run.

  86. Re:I fucked up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But,obviously, one of the courses he's failing is "CS0002 - Remedial slashdot trolling"!

  87. Re:$1395? I can top that at $450 by Doc+Scratchnsniff · · Score: 1

    Does that computer act as an 802.11b access point? As a four port switch? Have a single, easy to use web interface for configuring the VPN, Routing, Switching, NAT, DCHP, and firewall which the machine provides?
    I think that, as usual, the summary was way off on what this product actually is. It is not supposed to be the replacement for the fileserver on your network, it is supposed to replace a bunch of network infrastructure boxes. Now, one of the reviews shamelessly stolen from another post suggests it is not terribly effective at carrying out those tasks (perhaps unsurprisingly), but it seems like it would be quite a valid solution for a small business which can't support any full-time on-location IT staff.

  88. speed not required by sir_cello · · Score: 2, Insightful


    Firstly, disregard all of the useless comments about "it's not fast enough", these come from techie speed freaks who ignore the economics in favour of the sports-car. Most businesses don't want nor need sports-cars.

    I have a mini-itx at 500mhz running BSD: it handles 512K dsl + bluetooth + 802.11b+ + samba + nat + firewall + print server + http + everything else quite well - most of the time it idles at 10% CPU. Sure I could use an overblown 576ghz-latest-pentium, but it's just simply not necessary. Power consumption is also low. It's a perfect home server. Kernel build times are pretty good as well. It also hosts development environments for 4 web sites.

    I could have have purchased a fast machine, but what's the point ? I have a 2ghz desktop for power-use. In fact, I now wish that I'd gone for a smaller form factor. Even the mini-itx is too big: looks like a DVD player. PC/104 or smaller form factor would be perfect.

    Also, ignore the comments about "price": sure you could get a cheaper and faster commodity pc: but then you have to pay for the techie to install and configure the OS and enable everything else. What this appliance is offering is an out-of-the box solution, and you definitely pay for the added value. They're not in business to give things away :-). Most of the people hanging out in slashdot are competent (like me) to build platforms from scratch: but a vast majority of businesses don't have nor can afford nor even need to pay for that kind of approach.

    1. Re:speed not required by bhima · · Score: 1

      Same here, but mine is running at 250 mhz and it runs BSD. No bluetooth though, and I'm still trying to make 802.11x work. Anyone have 802.11x working in a Qube2?

      --
      Nothing in the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity.
    2. Re:speed not required by AmericanInKiev · · Score: 1

      Beyond competant - I know I don't want my business spending our development time inventing a custome server when we could pick this up and focus on what makes our company better than others.

  89. why geeks so rarely make good money by danharan · · Score: 1

    ... or get respect from management.

    Sure, you say you can build one of those servers for our enterprise for $300 less. That's great, Bob!

    And when you factor in the 10 hours it took you to order all the parts, troubleshoot everything, make sure there were no hardware incompatibilities...

    multiply that number of hours by your fully loaded salary costs (i.e., double your salary to see what you really cost your business per hour).

    What? Buying it ready made is cheaper? Gosh, I'm so surprised!!

    And no, I couldn't RTFA, it was /.'ed already.

    --
    Information: "I want to be anthropomorphized"
  90. Why not get a Netwinder? by trh · · Score: 1

    You can still get a Netwinder with approximately the same specs (including web-based server configuration software) for $899. It has three NICs built-in as well.

    http://www.netwinder.net/

  91. spuds by MoFoQ · · Score: 1

    what about the ol' spud server?

    though it seems it's down at the moment....it's VERY low powered.

  92. Misunderstanding by elviscious · · Score: 1

    It seems that most of you people really don't understand what this box is for. Are you a nerd like most of the people here? Then this box isn't for you. It's marketed for a small-medium business that doesn't have, or doesn't want to have to use an IT professional.

    The entire purpose of the box is to be easy to use for people. It has quite a few features considering the cpu and what not that it has.

    If you are going to bitch these guys out for something, at least make it for them including frontpage extensions on a linux box. That should be a sin in itself.

  93. It's not about not getting fired by sartin · · Score: 2, Informative
    no one ever got fired for buying [fill in the blank]

    That may be a fine excuse for people at large, or even medium, companies buying software or hardware from [fill in the blank], it doesn't explain why small business owners use PCs. It's not about getting fired - after all they own the business - it's about keeping the business running without getting lost on side issues.

    Apple just put out a story about Sullivan Street Bakery chose to switch (back) to Macs. The reason they switched is one of the owners preferred Macs, had done FileMaker work in a prior career, and they were not satisifed with the PC software they used (and the monthly maintenance fee).

    My experience is that small business owners are pretty pragmatic. If the cost of the solution is low enough and the advantages high enough (the applications are there), they will pick the software and hardware platform that works best. Macs have pretty low switching cost. There are thousands of small computer consulting firms ready to pitch Windows solutions. Linux is still hard for non-techies. It's not common to find places to purchase a machine preconfigured with Linux and some reasonable apps; Macs and PCs often come with almost everything they need (perhaps requiring a couple of easy to install applications).

    I work with a small non-profit, which is finally converting to Linux this year. First barrier was a Windows server with hosting service had been donated. That barrier went down when the donation of hosting stopped and the expensive monthly fee kicked in. Second barrier was a boatload of ASP pages that had been donated by a local Windows consulting fir, That barrier went down when the lack of licenses for the tools made it impossible to keep the updates going; we switched to JSP running on Windows. The final barrier came down when we found a donor to host the 30-odd web sites that we were hosting for clients. The move is happening this month; it's my Christmas vacation project.

    Here's what I think is needed to get small businesses on Linux:

    • Machines with pre-installed Linux at local computer stores
    • A handful of applications (a la Filemaker Pro I guess) installable from CDs, purchased at the same store as the computer
    • Local, cheap, computer firms that promote Linux will do setup and troubleshooting
  94. idot computers.. by josepha48 · · Score: 1
    I have been looking at idot computers ( http://www.idotpc.com/ ) this past few weeks. They have SBC's which is basically what this is. Basically if you wanted to build something like this ( probalby a little larger than a play station ) the following motherboard would get you started -> http://www.idotpc.com/TheStore/Desktop/859Spec.asp ?Product.id=859&Cate.id=5&Product.status=orang e (It has built in sound, dual lan, 600mhz, video card and CPU ) Then if you add 256Megs memory and a case and wifi card your at about $400. Then you add flash card and HD and OS of choice ( this can run Linux if you want ) and you have built a system for about 1/2 the price they are selling their systems for. Of course you have to do the work.

    If however, you are looking for an 'out of the box solution', then the extra 600 or so is well worth it. I didn't see where it said what OS this little device is running. Does anyone know? Is it possible to install another OS on this little thing? I'd imagine that it is possible, since it is a flash card. This will be real nice when they sell for $400 a pop. Then everyone can have one at home even.

    --

    Only 'flamers' flame!
    Does slashdot hate my posts?

  95. Re:Just think what a geek can do with $1100 these by elviscious · · Score: 1

    Considering I had an uptime of 120+ days on mine, I think you don't know wtf you are talking about.

  96. If you really really really want an appliance by Geekrob · · Score: 1

    Toshiba Magnia SG20 Appliance Server These are all over Fleabay for about $200-300 bucks. Runs RH 7.3 and supports WiFi. Can also do NAS so you have the whole show in 1 easy to fail,,,,,,, errrr use box. If you really want to spend more do a Froogle search, you can find them for anywhere from 600-2,000 bucks!

  97. only 20G? by iriles · · Score: 1


    I don't think a 20 Gig hardrive is adequate for any file server even if it was to be used by only one person who doesn't store video or music. How much of that is already used by the OS and pre-installed applications?

  98. too much money by drwho · · Score: 1

    $1395? no way. shiney tiny box too much geld.

    How about $300?

    Also using a laptop drive in a server worries me. Laptop drives are notoriously unreliable.

  99. Travelstar HDDs by ryanhos · · Score: 1

    If you leave a laptop HDD powered and writing more than 20% duty cycle (like a server...) the MTBF decreases significantly. I won't be buying one.

    --
    "I threw up my hands in disgust and wondered if it had been such a good idea to have eaten my hands in the first place."
  100. Re:Just think what a geek can do with $1100 these by LazloToth · · Score: 1


    In our server room, which, admittedly, is a tad cluttered, we once discovered a Windows 3.1/486DX-66 box that had been running for at least one year, and probably longer, without a reboot. No load of any kind on it, of course. The thing is, uptime isn't what makes a server a server. And even if it were, 120 days wouldn't be impressive in the least. If you put your confidence in such toys as this, more power to you. I hate seeing consumers - - like my dad, for instance - - being sold a "server" and all the things that word implies, when what they're really getting is a scrawny appliance with no fault tolerance. People who know better won't buy them. People that don't won't take a chance on that kind of money. Get it down to $400, say, and we might see what kinds of things we could do with it.

    --


    It's only funny until someone gets hurt. Then, it's hilarious.
  101. I can see where this is going by Doc+Squidly · · Score: 1

    Their page says, the IT-100 can be administered with minimal networking knowledge

    Translation: People will believe they can Admin networks with this thing, the same way that they believed they could *create* database apps with M$ Access. Instead, they end up an incomplete pile of crap that has no more functionality than a collection of spreadsheets.
    (Just for the record, if you're required to use M$ only, Access can be used to develop good database apps, if you know databases.)

    Yes, they'll have a network. Will it be efficient and secure? Probably not. Without the underlying knowledge of how a network is supposed to be run you're just asking for problems. Of course, then they'll just hire a real Network Admin and be forever greatful for being saved from themselves.

    --
    I think I think, therefore I think I am.
  102. Rats... by temojen · · Score: 1

    Someone else got my product to market first.

  103. security by M-G · · Score: 1

    While the performance freaks have been griping about the specs on the box, the thing that concerned me the most was the firewall settings. They have some canned configs of low/medium/high security, but a VPN connection can only work with the low setting. Be sure to encrypt your traffic, but have the box easily hackable.....

  104. TurboTax is a bad example by Christopher+Bibbs · · Score: 1

    Intuit explicity guarantees that you'll get the right results with the correct input.

    Liability is a tricky thing. Is Adobe liable if a potential customer can't open your PDF and you get tossed out of a contract bid as a result? Tough question and I'm not certain which way I want to go with that. For the time being, my own customers aren't guaranteed anything, but I've flown cross country on two hours notice in order to get a system up and working.

  105. Toshiba Magnia!! by JANYAtty. · · Score: 1

    Theres already a device like this out and Ive got one- Toshiba Magnia. Check on Ebay- I got mine New in sealed box for $170! Its a 533 mhz, low power (90w internal), and a bit larger. It has most of the same software features using arctus security linux, 7 ethernet ports and a crossover port for expantion, 2 laptop :( hard drives-(mine came with one 20gb but the top of the line has two 40's) (it also has a mirror hard drives function). Wireless is not built in but it has a pcmcia slot for that purpose. Also it has no USB ports.

    --
    I dont do meaning of life questions.
  106. I still prefer the briQ (better price/speed/power) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This one is more expensive and is more power hungry than a briQ . But it is a x86 architecture while the briQ is based on the PowerPC so for people more confident with the x86 architecture it might be a better deal.

  107. Not just human error by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    Dont forget if your raid controller freaks, it may blow the entire array.. and it DOES happen..

    No backup, in that case you are really screwed...

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  108. Perfect for a lot of IT Depts. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Over-priced machine with no provisions for tape or disk redundency. And no backups.

    Yep, that's some server there. Any pricier and it'd be a Mac

  109. Re:Even better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fuck you in the ass
    And your newborn son Janez
    See you both in hell

  110. Yawn... by PetoskeyGuy · · Score: 1

    Wake me up when there is a Low COST mini-server for the Masses.

  111. Form factor yes, but on servers why?? by Yogs · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Don't get me wrong, I like small, light laptops, and LCDs. Attention to form factor makes a lot of sense when you're lugging something around, or you want to have, say, some desk space.

    Now, servers are another beast. They sit there and do one thing. It doesn't really matter where they sit, so within reasonable limits, their size doesn't matter. They should also pretty much sit in one place, so why is wireless a selling point?

    Power consumption does make a difference cost wise but you're overpaying for this thing so much that you can pretty well throw cost arguments out the window.

    That leaves heat and noise as the remaining concerns. For heat, just add some fans, it's not that hard, and you don't even need to do that if you're using the machine so lightly that the a 533 with 128 mb of ram will do ya. Why do you care about noise (within reasonable limits) again? It's a server, you can put it wherever you want! How many times do I have to repeat that?

    What is this? It's a gimmick... say it's an affordable server and someone who doesn't know about alternatives will think it is, rather than the old, overpriced laptop without an LCD display that it really is.

    My 2c anyways.

  112. What is this crap? by shyster · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Okay, so for $1400, I'm getting about $300 or less of parts, a single point of failure for my entire network, and shoddy software.

    Okay, so it's pretty and unassuming...looks just like a typical SOHO router. Big whoop. With the mass of Ethernet cables and power cords behind it, it's looks won't garner any awards I'd reckon.

    The Low setting only blocks file sharing and proxy from the outside, but is the only Basic Mode setting with which you are able to run the VPN service.

    That makes a whole lot of sense...I suppose that folks who want a VPN don't deserve a firewall too?

    You can run multiple domains on the IT100, allowing for easy office setups where the hard drive space is shared between multiple companies.

    Yeah...I've heard a lot of clamoring for that feature in the SOHO market. Glad they decided that was worthy of the cut....

    ...you are not allowed to set folder-level permissions for users on the IT100 server. However, every user has a folder that will be private to them on the network, and there is a separate public folder for all users.

    A whole public folder, huh? And no folder or file level permissions? I suppose that granular Read/Write/Modify/etc. permissions are out of the question too then? Now I see why you may want multiple domains....

    We were initially thrown off on how to connect to the IT100 for file sharing, as it was not accepting our logins. We quickly discovered that when logging in, we needed to include the full domain username, meaning the username "colin" became "colin@mydomain.com".

    Does this mean it won't actually validate logins on say...login? Or that the reviewer couldn't figure it out? So much for replacing a domain controller, I guess....

    Your username is limited to 19 characters, so if you have a long domain name, you may be in for a shortened username.

    Okay, Bob, you're username is bob@sub.domain.local^H. Guess I'll have to fire Richard.

    You could potentially run into problems where you have an office with ten employees, but only two people in that office should be able to read the sensitive files you want to share; you cannot set individual permissions for the folders. However, you can use file sharing from your local Windows/Linux computer and allow those users to properly access the files on your machine, so there is a work around.

    Yep, it's a good thing I spent $1400 on a server so that I can resort to peer-to-peer networking. Won't this make backing up and finding files fun again?

    VPN allows me to connect to my machine on my network without opening up my computers to the rest of the world by assigning them a public IP address.

    Yeah, I guess since the firewall in this thing sucks ass, you would be opening your desktops to the rest of the world....

    The web server was another cool feature added to the IT100 and would be great for sharing pictures with family and friends, or documents and other work information with business partners....this Apache server supports dynamic content such as PHP and CGI.

    I know I always recommend running your dynamic content webserver on your domain controller and fileserver. Especially when your firewall (which is on the same box) sucks.

    When it crashed, we did not have to do any maintenance, as it rebooted itself after 2 minutes. Normal file sharing went off without a hitch; it was only under the heavy traffic from encoding high quality MP3s that we were able to get the IT100 to crack. Again, you can tell by the system specs that the IT100 is not designed to be a heavy-duty server, and if it were, you would be paying five-times as much.

    1. Re:What is this crap? by elviscious · · Score: 1

      Jesus Christ. Does anybody bother researching anything, or have brain one to start with?!

      Did the term easy to use to not sink in? This box is obviously not made for everybody, nor is it going to fit into everybodies niche.

      Contrary to your reasoning though this is a useful box and if you aren't smart enough to see it maybe you should get off your sofa watching Star Trek reruns and maybe walk outside a little bit. God forbid get some fresh air. You might notice that not everybody in the world is a IT, a linux guru, or a so called MS engineer.

      A lot of small businesses don't have time to fuck around doing this shit, and they don't want to pay a guy to come in everytime they want somebody to change one setting, add an email address, etc...

      Will a $600 pc with Debian installed on it do all of this? Absolutely. And it will be more powerful too... but guess what... if I'm starting my own business from scratch, or just don't have the money to pay for this, a $600 pc isn't going to do shit if I have no idea how to use linux.

      Just doing a casual glance at the emergecore website does tell me one thing.... they DO seem to be winning quite a few awards.

      Some little know company called 'NEWSWEEK' said 'The IT-100 is a GODSEND', but I'm guessing that was a typo.

    2. Re:What is this crap? by shyster · · Score: 1
      A lot of small businesses don't have time to fuck around doing this shit, and they don't want to pay a guy to come in everytime they want somebody to change one setting, add an email address, etc...

      That's fortunate, since there's really no settings to change. And if a small biz owner can't comprehend how to add a user to an existing Windows SBS network, I dare say s/he has much bigger problems than IT infrastructure. With the potential for security holes big enough for a 757 to taxi thru, I'll also say that an ISP's POP or IMAP mail would be a much better solution. Using the cash from the $100/year support contract, I think that SOHO email and website hosting needs would be more than taken care of.

      Just doing a casual glance at the emergecore website does tell me one thing.... they DO seem to be winning quite a few awards.

      No doubt praise is being heaped upon them like the glowing review from Sudhian, and such prestigious technology critics as channelweb.com and smallbiztechnolgy.com. Of course, if you actually read the reviews, you'll notice they point out the same flaws as I do: an anemic firewall, minimal functionality, and less than stellar performance. If one of these articles does an honest comparison to this prodcut's competition, I've yet to see it.

      Some little know company called 'NEWSWEEK' said 'The IT-100 is a GODSEND'.

      Interestingly enough, there's no article attached to that PR quote, nor could I find anything with Google. Either way, I'm not one to take Newsweek's IT opinion very seriously.

      There are good Linux server appliances available. This is not one of them. There are good solutions involving a low end server and Windows Small Business Server. This is not anywhere near comparable. There's even an argument to be made for peer-to-peer networking. This is not any better. This is a SOHO router, a SOHO Wireless Access Point, and a hard drive for very simple file sharing.

      I fail to see how this is any significant improvement over a peer-to-peer network and less than $150 in decent networking hardware. If you'd like to argue the technical merits of the product, please do so. If you'd rather channelweb.com and Newsweek do your thinking for you...well, I hope I never have the misfortune of hiring you.

  113. It's about time... by butane_bob2003 · · Score: 1

    ... someone at mini-itx wedged a server into a cable modem case. I just love servers-in-disguise! For my next feat, I will cram a Crusoe based server into my 2" x 12" APC power strip!

    --


    TallGreen CMS hosting
  114. it's garbage... by ethanms · · Score: 1

    We ripped a CD in EAC and then encoded the resulting WAV file in LAME. The CD was ripped from the workstation to the IT100, where LAME would then encode the WAV to MP3 and delete the old WAV file. This caused the IT100 to crash half way through every CD

    Crashed because you read/write from the HD? What a POS!

    It's completely useless, but hey! it's quiet! Meanwhile you can buy a cheap PC w/ assloads more HD space ($70 for 120GB at Best Buy!) for probably less moneym when it comes down to it.

  115. Save your time, the review is clueless by Excarnate · · Score: 1

    1. He doesn't want a mini-itx motherboard because he can't find a case style he likes other than the Hush. But this is supposed to be a server so who cares? It costs much more than mini-itx solutions.

    2. He states small businesses are afraid of Linux because there is no accountability. But that's FUD and crap. If you have a problem with Microsoft, guess what? They are big and powerful and Mr. Small Business Owner is weak and puny. If you just want someone to call, get your Linux software from one of the many companies selling it.

    3. He talks like this is inexpensive, but it ain't. There are cheaper, better solutions out there, as I'm sure many have already pointed out.

    4. There is likely a 4, and a 5 and 6, but I stopped there; I'd had enough. Save your time and read the comments here rather than the article.

    --
    .signature: No such file or directory
  116. Re:Er... (Joint response) by tabdelgawad · · Score: 1

    Apologies for replying to my own post, but I want to clarify a couple of issues that may answer some of the replies.

    First, the issue is not Windows or Apple vs Linux (even if that were the intention of the parent posts). It's commercial vs non-commercial software. If you prefer, it's Red Hat vs Debian.

    Second, I think (IANAL!) liability, whether legal or 'effective' is largely a matter of reasonable expectations. Nobody expects a hugely complex product like an operating system, or even a web server, to be completely secure. People understand that they will have to patch this type of software and expect its creators to provide timely patches. On the other hand, people expect that Excel will add the contents of two cells correctly, and if they lose money because Excel can't add, I bet we'd see lawsuits by users and settlements offered by Microsoft.

    Third, don't discount the profit motive. Altruism, professionalism, and integrity count for a whole lot, but if you're a non-commercial developer, they won't get you to fly "cross country on two hours notice in order to get a system up and working", as one of the replies indicates.

    --
    Imposing Libertarian views on everyone online since 1992.
  117. For $1395... by BigBadBri · · Score: 1
    Look, I know the dollar isn't worth much these days, but $1395 is far too much for a 20 gig 500 MHz with a piddling 20GB drive, even if it has got a WLAN included.

    Perhaps the pricing is for when the dollar reaches its eventual value of around 0.65 Euros, but I wouldn't spend 1395 rupees on this heap.

    --
    oh brave new world, that has such people in it!
  118. Sounds like a business opportunity by fizbin · · Score: 1

    IT outsourcing for small mom & pop businesses. Then, in a case like this, the downtime is how long it takes for the IT doctor-on-call to get to your place of business.

    Actually, I think I've seen people advertising this service locally.

  119. Re:$1395? I can top that at $450 by djeaux · · Score: 1
    Does that computer act as an 802.11b access point? As a four port switch? Have a single, easy to use web interface for configuring the VPN, Routing, Switching, NAT, DCHP, and firewall which the machine provides?

    For about $100, you could stick a 802.11b (or maybe g) access point on the rig & have all those things.

    So maybe it should've been "$1395? I can top that at $550"...

    --
    "Obviously, I'm not an IBM computer any more than I'm an ashtray" (Bob Dylan)
  120. Re:Just think what a geek can do with $1100 these by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Aside from such special cases, assuming anyone buys this device, it will mostly be people who don't understand computers, and think it looks really neat"

    You stumbled onto the truth : the product was designed for customers who don't understand computers; but never-the-less have to manage an office that has a few connected to each other and the web. And they can't afford to pay for decent computer consulting services.

  121. Re:$1395? I can top that at $450 by Doc+Scratchnsniff · · Score: 1

    I would be very much interested in this $100 WAP which integrates VPN. Do you have a particular model you recommend?
    Fundamentally, the fact that you or I could do such things is irrelevant. This product is aimed at minimizing the IT effort involved, because it is being placed in small offices with no IT staff.
    This also leads me to believe that this was perhaps a very ill-placed advertisement, since I haven't seen any consultants jumping in and saying "I'm installing 3 of these next week at client sites." I wonder if the fear is that it will eliminate too many "our network/wireless/computers are down" billable hours, er, I mean, service calls.

  122. And power... by xixax · · Score: 1
    and a decent case with 400W PS ($100) bring us up to $940

    As these things run on 60 watts (aka, a small light bulb' worth), I could run a stack of them without having a huge airconditioner. This would be pretty attractive in my current situation where we are paying much more to shift a huge air-con. Also remember that downtown commercial rents are by the sqaure metre/foot.

    Xix.

    --
    "Everything is adjustable, provided you have the right tools"
  123. Re:Even better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was once a client of the parent's poster and I was dissatisfied with his level of "service." STAY AWAY FROM LRSE HOSTING AT ALL COSTS. They are a bunch of imcompetent idiots and they're a huge DoS magnet to boot.

  124. Reliable unix notebook by rustman · · Score: 1

    A friend has an old iBook running OSX that rarely needs to be rebooted and runs 24x7. I think the last time he rebooted it was to upgrade OSX. Oh and the time there was a 12 hour power outage... the battery only works as a 3-4 hour UPS. :-)

  125. Yeah sure. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    If all what you are saying was at least remotely based on reality, MS would not have the stronghold they have in the desktop market because their reputation would be in shatters.

    There are people even here that defend them fro buuny's sake!

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  126. Anyone installed Gentoo on a VIA mini-itx? by horza · · Score: 1

    There are some fantastic looking STB-style PCs someone else pointed out here and they look perfect for installing MythTV as discussed here. I'm put off by the comments posted next to the parent of this comment by talk of reliability and difficulty of installing Linux. Does anyone else have any experience of these boards, and especially installing Gentoo on it?

    Thanks,

    Phillip.

    1. Re:Anyone installed Gentoo on a VIA mini-itx? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try viaarena. They have a couple of linux walkthroughs. They have a Linux forum as well.

  127. the webserver can handle "hundreds of requests"... by Jaeger- · · Score: 1

    I tried posting this on their site but it requires username, and I am not registering to post a single comment:

    I think if you do a little testing you will discover that your home broadband connection will be swamped well before the IT100 will be overloaded with web server traffic. Especially if it is all static content. "Hundreds of requests per day"?? More like thousands, easily.

    --
    E V E R Y T H I N G I W R I T E I S F A L S E
  128. hey, the guys name is Stoner! by CyberdogOSX · · Score: 1
    and this thing looks like a sandwich. no wonder he likes it.

    i notice he talks about this like it's an alternative to a Linux box, but then points out that it runs linux, but that you won't really notice that because of the interface.

    how exactly does that protect owners from the "unaccountability" of linux that he says is another reason that small businesses stay away from it?

    so, as i understand this, if you want to free yourself up from the support and indemnification hassles of a linux box, get this linux box!

    i think he's been smoking his Windows howto manuals(they oughta be good for something).

  129. Proper English? LOL !!! by aoteoroa · · Score: 1

    Your right about people getting a better grip on English

    Did you mean, "You're right?"

    If "afterall" is a word then it isn't in my dictionary, nor on dictionary.com. How about two words: after all.

  130. Re:Proper English? LOL !!! by anagama · · Score: 1
    • Your right about people getting a better grip on English - afterall, their going to need correct usage to survive in hour business climate.
    I hope you also noticed that I got "their" wrong (supposed to be "they're") and "hour" wrong (supposed to be "our").

    If your going to be a gramer nazzi, best cach all the errers or somewon mite think you're grammor skils arr week.

    (hint: this one was humor two)

    (hint: so was that!)

    --
    What changed under Obama? Nothing Good