Fortunately Hong Kong's Star Sports was accessible through Sopcast P2P.
Great match! I watched the back nine and the sudden death playoff hole. Unfortunately the commentators were horrible. They did not announce the length of the puts (huge annoyance) and they spoke when there was nothing to say!
We want Jim Nantz, or perhaps the British announcers at The Open.
Ruby was created because the Object model in Perl was understructured and therefore impossible to engineer with. Compare Damian Conway's 1999 Object Oriented Perl and Damian Conway's Perl Best Practices published eight years later. Half the OOP tips in the new book tell you to do the opposite of the techniques taught in the old book.
more open and receptive about this than they ever have
No, they have not!
All frontline coverage of the disaster should "uphold unity and encourage stability" while "giving precedence to positive propaganda", ordered Li Changchun, a member of the party's supreme politburo standing committee. Such edicts are a reminder that - in spite of a flourishing market economy, social liberalisation and a media revolution - the party still holds to the Maoist tenet that power depends on control of "two barrels": that of the gun and the pen.
I don't think we should declaring China's government response favorable based on the standard of Burma! If you think wall-to-wall coverage of disaster recovery is a concession to free speech, you're wrong. It appears more like they are trying to exploit this for nation building.
You idiot, the US Federal Government would be immune to all of these taxes, including services purchased from contractors or companies in the state. This legal precedent goes all the way back to McCulloch v. Maryland, 17 U.S. 316 (1819).
The concept of the 'real journalist' is just a modern construct, however.
Same as the concept of the "real biologist" or the "real computer scientist"
These days, you flunk out of calculus, decide you can't be an engineer, and the English department is too snooty (you'd have to READ BOOKS and all that awful stuff), so you transfer to J-School. And become part of the 'News Elite.'
I know a lot of people at the Medill school of journalism, and I can assure you the vast majority of these people could handle a year of Calculus. They also work as hard as the premed kids.
Many of the historic classic 'reporters' started out in the news industry as copy boys and clerks.
Every print journalism major does at least one internship where they go off to a paper and... copy edit. Do you really think this has changed? The only difference is that today there is so much competition for jobs that the real full-time copy editors don't usually get a chance to advance until they get more credentialed. Yes perhaps it is unfair but that is a function of how credentialism and status work in societies that overproduce workers of certain skill sets.
But even those who graduate from "elite" j-schools usually don't get good jobs. There are a very limited number of spaces at the top national papers, so that even a job with so-so at a medium market paper is considered a "good" job. This is a function of declining readership and especially downsizing...
So I submit to you that the "News Elite" that you are happy is "melting away" is a product of concentrated ownership and downsizing managers, and not the elitist school system. Because unless you are a highly sought minority (I was surprised to find out how much this counts in that line of work), or you did really, really exceptional writing work as an intern, you will not get a job at any "elite" media institution. And even then, you will never hold elite media power, because that is not in the hands of mortal journalists, with the exception of a very limited number of NY Times foreign policy writers who seem to get us sucked into wars.
What will be taught in the class-room about the early Internet is how it allowed the production of value to be independent of the physical location of a business.
This isn't a US issue. The British public has the same objections over the Labour Party's National ID proposals.
Furthermore, the complaints are legitimate. We already have a secure "national ID" in the US if you consider the passport that... but not everyone holds a passport, so your passport number doesn't get abused like Social Security numbers do.
The problem with the national ID proposal is that it links your photo ID to a commonly used identification number linked to all kinds of nasty databases. Thus the danger if something breaks/gets abused is even worse than what goes on now with Social Security numbers. If you are a resident of the US and you follow the news, you would probably consider the federal government to be a greater threat to your liberty than local governments.
Yes, I think I got confused. My roommate had a GSM phone with Verizon in California, and I mixed that instance up with another roommate who has Cingular/ATT.
I get the exact same headaches he describes when I chew Orbitz gum. I have to assume it's the aspartame because there aren't many other weird chemicals in the product.
You are correct that it is better to drink water than soda. That's what I do. However I think it is still worth having a debate over aspartame. The problem is that there are alleged conflicts of interest in the approval process for chemicals--including artificial sweeteners and countless others.
The army guy who posted above was just trying to convey his experience, which I don't think were alarmist.
In the nineteenth century, the Supreme Court at one point interpreted the Constitution (Amendment XIV, privileges and immunities clause) as guaranteeing an inalienable "right to work" to all persons of the U.S. Many scholars today consider this to be the correct interpretation.
Once you have an inalienable right to work, there is no constitutional way the government can put a burden on you to show ID or a Social Security card to your employer because any barrier to work is illegitimate. Of course that means illegal immigrants would have a de facto right to work as well, because if you harassed them, you would accidentally and unconstituionally interfere with legal U.S. persons' work.
And I don't think my quality of live would be adversely affected if we lived in a world like that.
Slashdot Mirror
Fortunately Hong Kong's Star Sports was accessible through Sopcast P2P.
Great match! I watched the back nine and the sudden death playoff hole. Unfortunately the commentators were horrible. They did not announce the length of the puts (huge annoyance) and they spoke when there was nothing to say!
We want Jim Nantz, or perhaps the British announcers at The Open.
If you think that wild attack monkeys with a taste for human blood is a "who cares?" story, then you must get very wound up every time you load /.
Ruby is becoming popular because it resembles Perl with easy OO conventions bolted on.
I shouldn't have used the term 'object model' rather I should have said 'conventions'
The conventions provided by Ruby are helpful for people who have less experience
Ruby was created because the Object model in Perl was understructured and therefore impossible to engineer with. Compare Damian Conway's 1999 Object Oriented Perl and Damian Conway's Perl Best Practices published eight years later. Half the OOP tips in the new book tell you to do the opposite of the techniques taught in the old book.
All frontline coverage of the disaster should "uphold unity and encourage stability" while "giving precedence to positive propaganda", ordered Li Changchun, a member of the party's supreme politburo standing committee. Such edicts are a reminder that - in spite of a flourishing market economy, social liberalisation and a media revolution - the party still holds to the Maoist tenet that power depends on control of "two barrels": that of the gun and the pen.
I don't think we should declaring China's government response favorable based on the standard of Burma! If you think wall-to-wall coverage of disaster recovery is a concession to free speech, you're wrong. It appears more like they are trying to exploit this for nation building.
Please try finding the article "Media edicts recall China's Maoist past" from the Financial Times' website (14 May 2008, ft.com)
You idiot, the US Federal Government would be immune to all of these taxes, including services purchased from contractors or companies in the state. This legal precedent goes all the way back to McCulloch v. Maryland, 17 U.S. 316 (1819).
The GAO tends to do quite well, only no one listens to it.
OS X 1.4 Tiger has different install CDs for each platform.
But even those who graduate from "elite" j-schools usually don't get good jobs. There are a very limited number of spaces at the top national papers, so that even a job with so-so at a medium market paper is considered a "good" job. This is a function of declining readership and especially downsizing...
So I submit to you that the "News Elite" that you are happy is "melting away" is a product of concentrated ownership and downsizing managers, and not the elitist school system. Because unless you are a highly sought minority (I was surprised to find out how much this counts in that line of work), or you did really, really exceptional writing work as an intern, you will not get a job at any "elite" media institution. And even then, you will never hold elite media power, because that is not in the hands of mortal journalists, with the exception of a very limited number of NY Times foreign policy writers who seem to get us sucked into wars.
Some foolish mods didn't like our insightful and true comments.
Try the Motorola v195s. No camera. Long battery life. T-Mobile [they allow one year contracts and are less inclined to hand over your data to feds].
Furthermore, the complaints are legitimate. We already have a secure "national ID" in the US if you consider the passport that... but not everyone holds a passport, so your passport number doesn't get abused like Social Security numbers do.
The problem with the national ID proposal is that it links your photo ID to a commonly used identification number linked to all kinds of nasty databases. Thus the danger if something breaks/gets abused is even worse than what goes on now with Social Security numbers. If you are a resident of the US and you follow the news, you would probably consider the federal government to be a greater threat to your liberty than local governments.
Yes, I think I got confused. My roommate had a GSM phone with Verizon in California, and I mixed that instance up with another roommate who has Cingular/ATT.
You are correct about this phone, but in the past AT&T has used CDMA phones.
But telegraph communications are protected by statue just as telephone calls are.
The World Cup and the Summer Olympics are every four years. Super Bowl is US centric.
yeah. just try to take over Switzerland and put the pro v. part-time army logic to the test.
You are correct that it is better to drink water than soda. That's what I do. However I think it is still worth having a debate over aspartame. The problem is that there are alleged conflicts of interest in the approval process for chemicals--including artificial sweeteners and countless others.
The army guy who posted above was just trying to convey his experience, which I don't think were alarmist.
Got a link for that?
There are no restrictions on man on the street photos in the US.
Once you have an inalienable right to work, there is no constitutional way the government can put a burden on you to show ID or a Social Security card to your employer because any barrier to work is illegitimate. Of course that means illegal immigrants would have a de facto right to work as well, because if you harassed them, you would accidentally and unconstituionally interfere with legal U.S. persons' work.
And I don't think my quality of live would be adversely affected if we lived in a world like that.