(speaking from a small ent.) We're running "N" right now. If it can be rolled out in a firmware update, we may push for it. But, if worst case, we had to swap out all the AP's and possibly the controllers, then we'll have to wait a while. That wouldn't be cheap.
It sounds to me like you guys are what I'd describe as "late adopters" of n. I would expect the same group who were early adopters of N to adopt ac, or whatever this frequency expansion becomes to be the early adopters of ac/newband.
I wish this 'Scientist don't test GMO' nonsense would stop. Seriously, you look like an idiot.
Do you know what isn't tested? non GMO food; even though there is bacteria in the soil which does gene swapping between animals and plants. OMG it all going to END!!!
Did you actually read the link you posted? It clearly indicates that testing was done by Slovenia. I'm not necessarily saying that it IS the end of the world; but I am saying the government organizations in my country that are charged with ensuring food safety have not done any tests - so we don't really know if it's safe or not. At best it is suspicious that Monsanto has not been forthcoming and pushed the government to perform such testing and publish the results. If they had nothing to hide, it would go a long way to free them of their terrible reputation.
In countries where testing has been done, there have been negative results; such as the one leading to the article we are commenting on. Imagine that.
I personally find it useful. Particularly if I'm not 100% certain of the search terms I want to use. I hope they don't eliminate the feature as a result of this, but I guess it would be understandable if they did.
1: Monsanto put it there 2: On purpose 2b: Monsanto put it there to control the world 3: American scientists did not test the GM crops. 3b: neither, the crops were untested.
Actually, 1 and 2 are bullshit (most likely), but if you've followed the GM and anti GM saga (or just look it up) you'll find my answers to 3 and 3b are accurate.
Yes, the x86 tech has improved a lot.
However, the intel presentation at CES was empty. They presented a facelift of the same chip with stuff limited, and made false claims on it.
The competition (x86 or not) is not sleeping like that. intel needs to wake up if they want to survive.
Have you been smoking what Charlie Demerjian is selling? Intel has a huge lead over their closest competitor, AMD. Since AMD resigned its-self to the value market a few years ago they have not even attempted to take a shot at leading. Intel has no immediate threats, unfortunately.
It would seem so, since I saw similar survey results clear back in 2000... that is, 13 years ago.
The music industry has known about this. Their campaigns and lawsuits are not about fairness. They are about screwing as many people over for $$$ as possible.
I don't think they're necessarily out to screw people. I think they want to get as much $$$ as possible, and they don't care if it screws people in the process (or not). All the screwing is just a side effect. That's how business is done these days, and is a fundamental flaw in large entities such as MPAA/RIAA. Now that ethics aren't a factor in business, the only motivator is money. The only rare exception would be if you had a privately held company and the owner(s) believed that making money at all costs was not the overarching goal.
Also about your heating source. Burning natural gas or using steam radiators puts a lot more water in the air than burning oil does.
The past few years I have only had the heat on one or two nights a year. It really doesn't get very cold for extended periods here. I end up having to set the AC fan to "on" instead of "auto" just to circulate the air in the house.
I haven't had the flu. Not ever. I've got two dehumidifiers running full time to keep my house at 60% humidity. I pull several gallons of water out of the air every day. With them off (if I forget to empty the tanks before I leave for work) it'll creep up to 90% humidity.
Same here on the dehumidifiers. Guess it's about what part of the world you live in.
Google is changing it by coming an ISP. As soon as they offer service in a reasonable share of the market, they can refuse to pay anyone. If the ISP doesn't comply, they can't offer Google to their customers. Orange gets Internet lite.
They could even name it AOL and start mailing everyone installation thumb drives.
Jobs can't be healed, I'm afraid. Without him to sell garbage to the masses, the company will gradually shrink back down to the nothing it was prior to his return.
Natural gas is the future...
Wind is the future...
Geothermal is the future
Solar is the future...
Nuclear (fission) is the future...
Nuclear (fusion) is the future...
Embrace all of the above.
This is a zombie problem, not a werewolf problem.
i.e. We need a shotgun approach, not a silver bullet.
pssh... shotguns don't kill zombies unless you hit them in the head. A silver bullet would work just the same.
Can't you see the unholy hell that immortality would unleash on a civilization that is just starting to wake up to ideas of conservation and natural resource management? Or on a related note, how immortality would be handed out, managed and exploited under capitalism?
I guess that was supposed to be rhetorical since it's obvious such a thing would be only available to the 1% or some fraction of it like most high end medical care.
Sure, but the summary specifies that she doesn't age, so unless you know that's wrong, your point is kinda pointless.
Inferring that she doesn't age from "maintains the physical and mental appearance of a toddler" is a bit of a stretch.
That was what I got out of it as well. In fact, TFA says:
In addition to possibly learning about the aging process and the secrets to longevity, Shadt thinks the anti-aging effects of the genes could be used to develop gene therapies or drugs to treat Alzheimer’s, heart disease or cancer.
Which seemed to confirm what I thought I read.
Sorry guys, I know reading TFA is bad form here... I'll try not to let it happen again.
It really doesn't matter what the reason is. There really isn't much worthwhile content on Netflix these days. There was never enough content but it used to be substantially better with their starz content.
That's entirely a matter of opinion. I still watch far more content on netflix than I do on any other platform (including the cable tv service with several movie channel packages that I pay for). I wish they had even more, but to say there isn't much worthwhile... that's not been my experience.
Actually, the American way is to say that safety concerns are not an issue when I can't imagine they didn't know they are
No, the American way is to say that the market will find an optimal solution, and if customers want safe airlines, they're free to purchase from another carrier.
You know, the whole laissez-faire capitalism thing.
If we implement safety features on the more expensive airliners, the safety features will eventually trickle down to the less expensive ones.
It looks like Hasbro and Mattel both manufacture Scrabble, according to the omniscient* Wikipedia. Hasbro has copyright in the US, while Mattel has copyright everywhere else in the world.
*sarcasm
Those companies may own a copyright but scrabble is actually manufactured in China. The only thing I found surprising is that the packaging was still made in the US and hadn't been outsourced as well. Source: http://www.cbsnews.com/2100-202_162-589970.html
I don't think that anyone still doubts that there was water on Mars. Even at the time of Mars' discovery there was such clear evidence of water activity(erosion) that they thought that there were still water filled canals on Mars. WE KNOW IT HAD WATER, once upon a time. I don;t see any reason for more of these pseudo excited articles about "new evidence of water on mars".
Should they discover large quantities of liquid water or ice still on the surface, that would be interesting. We know there use to be lots there, but not anymore.
I have to agree. Coming up, a shocking article about a discovery of nerds trolling slashdot.
They hope to get lucky and find more illegal files so they can charge Kim with hosting them as well and go for extradition on new, tougher charges. Obviously.
(speaking from a small ent.) We're running "N" right now. If it can be rolled out in a firmware update, we may push for it. But, if worst case, we had to swap out all the AP's and possibly the controllers, then we'll have to wait a while. That wouldn't be cheap.
It sounds to me like you guys are what I'd describe as "late adopters" of n. I would expect the same group who were early adopters of N to adopt ac, or whatever this frequency expansion becomes to be the early adopters of ac/newband.
No 3 and 3b are not accurate.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16001857
I wish this 'Scientist don't test GMO' nonsense would stop. Seriously, you look like an idiot.
Do you know what isn't tested? non GMO food; even though there is bacteria in the soil which does gene swapping between animals and plants. OMG it all going to END!!!
Did you actually read the link you posted? It clearly indicates that testing was done by Slovenia. I'm not necessarily saying that it IS the end of the world; but I am saying the government organizations in my country that are charged with ensuring food safety have not done any tests - so we don't really know if it's safe or not. At best it is suspicious that Monsanto has not been forthcoming and pushed the government to perform such testing and publish the results. If they had nothing to hide, it would go a long way to free them of their terrible reputation.
In countries where testing has been done, there have been negative results; such as the one leading to the article we are commenting on. Imagine that.
I personally find it useful. Particularly if I'm not 100% certain of the search terms I want to use. I hope they don't eliminate the feature as a result of this, but I guess it would be understandable if they did.
1: Monsanto put it there
2: On purpose
2b: Monsanto put it there to control the world
3: American scientists did not test the GM crops.
3b: neither, the crops were untested.
Actually, 1 and 2 are bullshit (most likely), but if you've followed the GM and anti GM saga (or just look it up) you'll find my answers to 3 and 3b are accurate.
Tramiel's sons were idiots.
Of course, they are still rich, so i guess things worked out for them. Just not Atari employees and fans.
That's the American way. Assholes, maybe - but I don't think they were idiots.
Yes, the x86 tech has improved a lot. However, the intel presentation at CES was empty. They presented a facelift of the same chip with stuff limited, and made false claims on it. The competition (x86 or not) is not sleeping like that. intel needs to wake up if they want to survive.
Have you been smoking what Charlie Demerjian is selling? Intel has a huge lead over their closest competitor, AMD. Since AMD resigned its-self to the value market a few years ago they have not even attempted to take a shot at leading. Intel has no immediate threats, unfortunately.
To finally have internet access on their submarines must be a godsend. I wonder how they avoid getting the cable tangled as the maneuver though.
They've got a larger one of these: http://www.staples.com/GE-Phone-Cord-Detangler-Black/product_716304
"Is that a crime?"
It would seem so, since I saw similar survey results clear back in 2000... that is, 13 years ago. The music industry has known about this. Their campaigns and lawsuits are not about fairness. They are about screwing as many people over for $$$ as possible.
I don't think they're necessarily out to screw people. I think they want to get as much $$$ as possible, and they don't care if it screws people in the process (or not). All the screwing is just a side effect. That's how business is done these days, and is a fundamental flaw in large entities such as MPAA/RIAA. Now that ethics aren't a factor in business, the only motivator is money. The only rare exception would be if you had a privately held company and the owner(s) believed that making money at all costs was not the overarching goal.
Also about your heating source. Burning natural gas or using steam radiators puts a lot more water in the air than burning oil does.
The past few years I have only had the heat on one or two nights a year. It really doesn't get very cold for extended periods here. I end up having to set the AC fan to "on" instead of "auto" just to circulate the air in the house.
This is really, really interesting.
I haven't had the flu. Not ever. I've got two dehumidifiers running full time to keep my house at 60% humidity. I pull several gallons of water out of the air every day. With them off (if I forget to empty the tanks before I leave for work) it'll creep up to 90% humidity.
Same here on the dehumidifiers. Guess it's about what part of the world you live in.
It's the local ISP which would have to block Google.
Google probably decided they'd make more money by paying the extortion fee than loosing Orange's customers ad views.
Google is changing it by coming an ISP. As soon as they offer service in a reasonable share of the market, they can refuse to pay anyone. If the ISP doesn't comply, they can't offer Google to their customers. Orange gets Internet lite.
They could even name it AOL and start mailing everyone installation thumb drives.
..what can kill and what can heal them
Jobs can't be healed, I'm afraid. Without him to sell garbage to the masses, the company will gradually shrink back down to the nothing it was prior to his return.
Way to miss the point, moderator. Good job protecting us from CLEARLY off topic posts like this.
Way to miss the point, AC. Good job announcing that huge whooshing sound you just heard to the world.
WTF does this stupid argument keep coming up?
Natural gas is the future... Wind is the future... Geothermal is the future Solar is the future... Nuclear (fission) is the future... Nuclear (fusion) is the future... Embrace all of the above.
This is a zombie problem, not a werewolf problem.
i.e. We need a shotgun approach, not a silver bullet.
pssh... shotguns don't kill zombies unless you hit them in the head. A silver bullet would work just the same.
Can't you see the unholy hell that immortality would unleash on a civilization that is just starting to wake up to ideas of conservation and natural resource management? Or on a related note, how immortality would be handed out, managed and exploited under capitalism?
I guess that was supposed to be rhetorical since it's obvious such a thing would be only available to the 1% or some fraction of it like most high end medical care.
Sure, but the summary specifies that she doesn't age, so unless you know that's wrong, your point is kinda pointless.
Inferring that she doesn't age from "maintains the physical and mental appearance of a toddler" is a bit of a stretch.
That was what I got out of it as well. In fact, TFA says:
In addition to possibly learning about the aging process and the secrets to longevity, Shadt thinks the anti-aging effects of the genes could be used to develop gene therapies or drugs to treat Alzheimer’s, heart disease or cancer.
Which seemed to confirm what I thought I read.
Sorry guys, I know reading TFA is bad form here... I'll try not to let it happen again.
It really doesn't matter what the reason is. There really isn't much worthwhile content on Netflix these days. There was never enough content but it used to be substantially better with their starz content.
That's entirely a matter of opinion. I still watch far more content on netflix than I do on any other platform (including the cable tv service with several movie channel packages that I pay for). I wish they had even more, but to say there isn't much worthwhile... that's not been my experience.
No, the American way is to say that the market will find an optimal solution, and if customers want safe airlines, they're free to purchase from another carrier.
You know, the whole laissez-faire capitalism thing.
If we implement safety features on the more expensive airliners, the safety features will eventually trickle down to the less expensive ones.
It looks like Hasbro and Mattel both manufacture Scrabble, according to the omniscient* Wikipedia. Hasbro has copyright in the US, while Mattel has copyright everywhere else in the world.
*sarcasm
Those companies may own a copyright but scrabble is actually manufactured in China. The only thing I found surprising is that the packaging was still made in the US and hadn't been outsourced as well. Source: http://www.cbsnews.com/2100-202_162-589970.html
Scrabble: The Collectible Tile Game!
You bring your own tiles and devise a set that gives you optimal word options. And the loser is banished from the land of Dominaria.
Just imagine the black market revenue from counterfeit tiles!
The choice of OS made it vulnerable to the "malicious code" in the first place.
or... choosing windows based software, which is itself vulnerable to "malicious code"
ahh, I see your point! So you're saying they should have chosen an OS that is invulnerable to "malicious code"...
I don't think that's what's meant by "energy drink"...
Your cell phone disagrees!
I don't think that anyone still doubts that there was water on Mars. Even at the time of Mars' discovery there was such clear evidence of water activity(erosion) that they thought that there were still water filled canals on Mars. WE KNOW IT HAD WATER, once upon a time. I don;t see any reason for more of these pseudo excited articles about "new evidence of water on mars".
Should they discover large quantities of liquid water or ice still on the surface, that would be interesting. We know there use to be lots there, but not anymore.
I have to agree. Coming up, a shocking article about a discovery of nerds trolling slashdot.
They hope to get lucky and find more illegal files so they can charge Kim with hosting them as well and go for extradition on new, tougher charges. Obviously.
Or maybe they're thinking of going after users.