"Men's voices generally are more represented in government than are women's voices," Carey said. "Women might be less able to migrate out of a flood zone during a sudden glacier melt. In Peru, we know that men migrate to the cities for jobs, whereas women are more confined to their homes and child rearing."
This whole thing reads like an auto-generated thesis.
What they're not generally designed to do is survive in an operational manner.
Wrong.
See here for the requirements.
This article (quoted below, emphasis added) puts the former article into easier-to-understand English.
Current standards, for both multiple and single bird engine ingestions into a single fixed wing aircraft engine, exist in equivalent form in 14 CFR Part 33-77 and in EASA Airworthiness Code CS-E 800 ’Bird Strike and Ingestion’. The basic requirements for engine ingestion were revised in 2000 to take account of both evidence of an increase in the size of birds impacting aircraft and issues raised by the development of very large inlet, high by pass ratio, engines. The requirements, to be demonstrated by testing, are, in outline, now as follows:
* That at a typical initial climb speed and take off thrust, ingestion of a single bird of maximum weight between 1.8kg and 3.65kg dependent upon engine inlet area shall not cause an engine to catch fire, suffer uncontained failure or become impossible to shut down and shall enable at least 50% thrust to be obtained for at least 14 minutes after ingestion. These requirements to be met with no thrust lever movement on an affected engine until at least 15 seconds have elapsed post impact.
* That at a typical initial climb speed and take off thrust, ingestion of a single bird of maximum weight 1.35kg shall not cause a sustained thrust or power loss of more than 25%, shall not require engine shut down within 5 minutes and shall not result in hazardous engine condition.
* That at a typical initial climb speed and take off thrust, simultaneous ingestion of up to 7 medium sized birds of various sizes between weight 0.35kg and weight 1.15kg, with the number and size depending upon the engine inlet area, shall not cause the engine to suddenly and completely fail and it shall continue to deliver usable but slowly decreasing minimum thrust over a period of 20 minutes after ingestion. [Engines with inlet sizes of less than 0.2 m2 (300 square inches) only have to meet the standard for a single bird of this weight]
* That at a typical initial climb speed and take off thrust, simultaneous ingestion of up to 16 small sized birds of weight 0.85kg, with the number dependent upon the engine inlet area, shall not cause the engine to suddenly and completely fail and it shall continue to deliver usable but slowly decreasing minimum thrust over a period of 20 minutes after ingestion. [Direct testing to this standard may not be required if the medium bird multiple standard is demonstrated or if this bird size can pass the inlet guide vanes into the rotor blades]
Regarding Pandora, check out 'pianobar'. It doesn't ship with a GUI, but it is a desktop Pandora application that doesn't require flash. Also, unlimited skips and no ads, even if you're not a Pandora One subscriber. Been using it for the past 2 years now.
Yes. Assuming it has the correct algorithm and the three remaining motors can thrust enough to compensate for the additional load. (if not, maybe the quad could at least slowly descend vs a total crash)
Flying machines arena demonstrated this a while back, here's a video
A six prop arranged coaxially (referred to as a Y6) can, so long as the failed motor doesn't take out the other motor attached to the same arm. And I'm sure the algorithm for the quad can be applied to a hexacopter, allowing autorotation for a controlled decent. The real question is how much power the remaining good motors can produce, and I suspect the answer to that is "not enough"
You must have missed the part of the article that laments the fact that "the future of digital TV and movies is destined to be fragmented across several services..."
If you have to hop between 2 dozen services to get to your content, whereas 'pirates' can get basically anything they want from one central location, that is where the media industry has failed.
Strange, I've never had a problem with that.
I'm on AT&T and whenever someone sends me MMS, I get a text saying "MMS Recieved" and an email with the media as an attachment, within seconds.
It's far from ideal, but at least for me its not silent.
Well, they're "new" in the sense that they just purchased them, and knowing how much red tape there can be at universities, I'd say that is something to be impressed at.
Slashdot Mirror
I personally like the wrench, welded to the steering column....
It's not the slash, it's the &
Discussed here: https://games.slashdot.org/com...
"Men's voices generally are more represented in government than are women's voices," Carey said. "Women might be less able to migrate out of a flood zone during a sudden glacier melt. In Peru, we know that men migrate to the cities for jobs, whereas women are more confined to their homes and child rearing."
This whole thing reads like an auto-generated thesis.
they're designed to not fail catastrophically
Correct.
What they're not generally designed to do is survive in an operational manner.
Wrong.
See here for the requirements. This article (quoted below, emphasis added) puts the former article into easier-to-understand English.
Current standards, for both multiple and single bird engine ingestions into a single fixed wing aircraft engine, exist in equivalent form in 14 CFR Part 33-77 and in EASA Airworthiness Code CS-E 800 ’Bird Strike and Ingestion’. The basic requirements for engine ingestion were revised in 2000 to take account of both evidence of an increase in the size of birds impacting aircraft and issues raised by the development of very large inlet, high by pass ratio, engines. The requirements, to be demonstrated by testing, are, in outline, now as follows:
* That at a typical initial climb speed and take off thrust, ingestion of a single bird of maximum weight between 1.8kg and 3.65kg dependent upon engine inlet area shall not cause an engine to catch fire, suffer uncontained failure or become impossible to shut down and shall enable at least 50% thrust to be obtained for at least 14 minutes after ingestion. These requirements to be met with no thrust lever movement on an affected engine until at least 15 seconds have elapsed post impact.
* That at a typical initial climb speed and take off thrust, ingestion of a single bird of maximum weight 1.35kg shall not cause a sustained thrust or power loss of more than 25%, shall not require engine shut down within 5 minutes and shall not result in hazardous engine condition.
* That at a typical initial climb speed and take off thrust, simultaneous ingestion of up to 7 medium sized birds of various sizes between weight 0.35kg and weight 1.15kg, with the number and size depending upon the engine inlet area, shall not cause the engine to suddenly and completely fail and it shall continue to deliver usable but slowly decreasing minimum thrust over a period of 20 minutes after ingestion. [Engines with inlet sizes of less than 0.2 m2 (300 square inches) only have to meet the standard for a single bird of this weight]
* That at a typical initial climb speed and take off thrust, simultaneous ingestion of up to 16 small sized birds of weight 0.85kg, with the number dependent upon the engine inlet area, shall not cause the engine to suddenly and completely fail and it shall continue to deliver usable but slowly decreasing minimum thrust over a period of 20 minutes after ingestion. [Direct testing to this standard may not be required if the medium bird multiple standard is demonstrated or if this bird size can pass the inlet guide vanes into the rotor blades]
If all they're looking for is a .edu email address (which they probably are), sign up for a free account at australia.edu
At least reading Slashdot isn't dange^^&*((_-/... NO CARRIER
Why don't we simply apply the rules to drones?
Those rules do apply to drones, as they apply to any UAS.
Some dumbasses just don't follow the rules.
News at 11.
Regarding Pandora, check out 'pianobar'. It doesn't ship with a GUI, but it is a desktop Pandora application that doesn't require flash. Also, unlimited skips and no ads, even if you're not a Pandora One subscriber. Been using it for the past 2 years now.
Yes. Assuming it has the correct algorithm and the three remaining motors can thrust enough to compensate for the additional load. (if not, maybe the quad could at least slowly descend vs a total crash)
Flying machines arena demonstrated this a while back, here's a video
A six prop arranged coaxially (referred to as a Y6) can, so long as the failed motor doesn't take out the other motor attached to the same arm. And I'm sure the algorithm for the quad can be applied to a hexacopter, allowing autorotation for a controlled decent. The real question is how much power the remaining good motors can produce, and I suspect the answer to that is "not enough"
Install jitsi on a webserver you run, and just give them the URL. It's completely web based, no need for standalone programs or accounts.
confidentially, we assume
Well there's your problem!
Are you paying these companies for access to their information database? If you're not paying, YOU'RE THE PRODUCT.
Issue closed by NSA
But first, let me take a #selfie!
Fuck. That. Noise.
Oscilloscope master race!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
Yup. Shielding around each pair.
(Also note the Cat8 section)
Just as long as you ensure that your botnet doesn't use Belkin routers.
But if they help the traveler leave, how will they extract more money out of them?
Won't somebody think of the 'convenience' shops selling $10 candy?!
tech-savvy criminals will be able to cover up or destroy evidence contained on their phones before the police can crack [it] open
And fire-savvy criminals will be able to cover up or destroy evidence contained in their house. What's the difference?
"2 dozen channels"
You must have missed the part of the article that laments the fact that "the future of digital TV and movies is destined to be fragmented across several services..."
If you have to hop between 2 dozen services to get to your content, whereas 'pirates' can get basically anything they want from one central location, that is where the media industry has failed.
Strange, I've never had a problem with that. I'm on AT&T and whenever someone sends me MMS, I get a text saying "MMS Recieved" and an email with the media as an attachment, within seconds. It's far from ideal, but at least for me its not silent.
If a sender continues to send you email after you tried to unsubscribe from their messages, new messages from this sender will go directly to Spam.
Google has their shit together when it comes to filtering spam
Well, they're "new" in the sense that they just purchased them, and knowing how much red tape there can be at universities, I'd say that is something to be impressed at.
And because that's a well known fact means that Google can't just block THOSE companies too?
And phishers everywhere rejoiced