Like what? What is there that easily allows people to create databases that exist as a single file, which can be sent to others in email and opened without any setup at all?
This is a very good post; you show a remarkable understanding of both sides of these issues. Tell me, why are you a conservative? What is it in particular that makes you identify with one side, when you can clearly see the merits and shortcomings of both?
If you're driving a $30,000 car and don't have the wherewithal to easily absorb "several thousand dollars in medical bills", you've got personal finance problems.
In light of such actions, how can one associate "liberty" with "liberal" anymore?
Yes, because all liberals are in favor of this and are going to be running this software, clearly.
Logic is such a scarce commodity when political propaganda is involved. Nice one-liner, though . . . I expect I'll hear the sound bite on Fox News tonight.
Grandparent has a point . . . a sound file produced with lossy compression is of lower quality than the same song purchased on CD. This is a fact, not a matter of opinion.
In other words, the digital vs. analog argument is a COMPLETELY DIFFERENT discussion from the compression vs. no compression argument.
That's exactly what it means; the point is that the term "consumer" coming from the Attorneys General is inappropriate at best. "Constituents" would be a more proper term.
When you have the NAACP endorsing a white democrat over a black republican, what is going on here?
If that candidate's policies are better for African Americans overall, the NAACP's action was right. Blindly endorsing a candidate solely based on the color of his skin would be silly.
Oh, and don't forget - you can't lodge a complaint through the phone system. You have to use their website. Smells like BS to me. How many people are going to take the time to do that extra step?
More importantly, how many people are going to take that extra step ON A BROKEN COMPUTER?!
Slashdot Mirror
NetHack's Mail Daemon has been delivering spam to me for years.
Isn't "spam firewall" just a marketing term for "filter"?
On the other hand, if it had actual keys that could change their labels on the fly . . .
Why, are we just supposed to look the other way and ignore Java's enormous overhead now? You're not suggesting it's actually gone, are you?
Like what? What is there that easily allows people to create databases that exist as a single file, which can be sent to others in email and opened without any setup at all?
This is a very good post; you show a remarkable understanding of both sides of these issues. Tell me, why are you a conservative? What is it in particular that makes you identify with one side, when you can clearly see the merits and shortcomings of both?
To paraphrase: conservatives believe the poor should be helped, just that they shouldn't have to be the ones doing it.
If you're driving a $30,000 car and don't have the wherewithal to easily absorb "several thousand dollars in medical bills", you've got personal finance problems.
Unless they're saying they only asked 56 kids to begin with. In which case the "fact" is bunk and shouldn't have been published.
Actually having WMD is not a prerequisite for U.S. invasion.
Is "terrorist" now interchangeable for "enemy"?
Please submit evidence that the Democratic Party is behind this, thx.
Yes, because all liberals are in favor of this and are going to be running this software, clearly.
Logic is such a scarce commodity when political propaganda is involved. Nice one-liner, though . . . I expect I'll hear the sound bite on Fox News tonight.
Grandparent has a point . . . a sound file produced with lossy compression is of lower quality than the same song purchased on CD. This is a fact, not a matter of opinion.
In other words, the digital vs. analog argument is a COMPLETELY DIFFERENT discussion from the compression vs. no compression argument.
Just admit you didn't get the joke the first time around. It's really quite obvious that you were teh 0wned.
Because it's against the rules and dishonest, duh. I sincerely hope you don't make all of your ethical decisions based on the financial outcome.
That's exactly what it means; the point is that the term "consumer" coming from the Attorneys General is inappropriate at best. "Constituents" would be a more proper term.
Kurt Vonnegut foresaw exactly this in Player Piano. Even the secretaries had PhD's.
RTFA; the story is about Australia. Hot snow falls up.
Your article was interesting until I got to the part where you're trying to sell some bullshit garbage, you fucking spammer.
However, it didn't have about a billion cheaper, better alternatives for what it did, like the Segway does.
If that candidate's policies are better for African Americans overall, the NAACP's action was right. Blindly endorsing a candidate solely based on the color of his skin would be silly.
More importantly, how many people are going to take that extra step ON A BROKEN COMPUTER?!
Half a brain, or low ethics? I don't think ethical business behavior is tied directly to intelligence.
I guess I should tell you, then, that your computer's case already contains animal products.