Slashdot Mirror


Epson's 12 Gram Flying Robot

fraxinus-tree writes "Epson has developed a very small (8.6g w/o battery) flying device, something like a bluetooth-controled palm-top helicopter." Since it can carry 5 grams for only 3 minutes, I can't imagine much practical use, but it's still neat.

385 comments

  1. Not what I had in mind by qmchenry · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Was anyone else hoping it would look more like a bee or a dragonfly?

    1. Re:Not what I had in mind by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A version of the page that conforms to the HTML standards would be nice for those that don't use Internet Explorer. Shazbot!

    2. Re:Not what I had in mind by Jim_Maryland · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Agreed. Using NS 7.2 this doesn't display correctly (links are shifted to the right and overlap the story).

    3. Re:Not what I had in mind by Nos. · · Score: 1

      I'm wondering how much of a "skin" you can develop to make it look like an insect within its 5g capacity for lift.

    4. Re:Not what I had in mind by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That happens to me a lot in FireFox.

    5. Re:Not what I had in mind by xsupergr0verx · · Score: 5, Funny

      If it's anything like Epson's other offerings, you have to buy $40 of colored ink every month or so to keep it flying.

      --

      Click here for a free picture of an iPod!
    6. Re:Not what I had in mind by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're a Linux user, right? Probably using Enlightenment as your WM?

    7. Re:Not what I had in mind by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Amen, brother. Can't stand those caucasian heteros and their Mozilla zealotry either.

    8. Re:Not what I had in mind by mks180 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Rotors are much easier to build: just a revolute joint. While a flapping wing would be a more efficient way to produce lift for a small aircraft, it would be incredibly challenging to produce an actuator which can produce the required motion of a bee's wings, particularly at the proper frequency and scale. The wings actually flap and then twist, or flip over, at the end of each stroke. This way they use the vortex that is shed during the previous stroke to provide a boost in lift on the return stroke because the vortex passes over the upper surface of the wing. This produces a much greater pressure differential than just a regular airfoil in a free stream, because the core of the shed vortex has a much lower pressure than what can be produced by an airfoil due to it's shape. Let's not forget the control system which would probably be a challenge to design.

    9. Re:Not what I had in mind by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Eeight point something grams?

      The Proxflyer

      This guy's got 'em beat by a mile... And it dosen't LOOK like it's being suspended by monofilament--unlike this one.

    10. Re:Not what I had in mind by ZorinLynx · · Score: 1

      It just shows how far behind we are when it comes to nanotechnology.

      Nature accomplishes self replicating biological machines that can fly for much longer than three minutes, process stimuli, find their own fuel supply, and avoid self-damage...

      and we can't even come close.

      Biology is amazing. It's really the ultimate nano"technology".

    11. Re:Not what I had in mind by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Nature accomplishes self replicating biological machines that can fly for much longer than three minutes, process stimuli, find their own fuel supply, and avoid self-damage...

      Yeah, but they're not radio-controlled.

    12. Re:Not what I had in mind by NumbThumb · · Score: 1

      Supposing all text is intended to be centered, the page renders fine for me (Firefox 0.8 on Linux). But I guess it's not, is it?...

      --
      I have discovered a truly remarkable sig which this 120 chars is too small to contain.
    13. Re:Not what I had in mind by pkhuong · · Score: 1

      Correct me if i'm wrong, but dragonflies are extrememly simple insects, and their wings are completely "dumb". IOW, the muscles only have to flap the wings to produce lift and propulsion (thanks to some weird canard-like effect). So, i guess dragonfly-like is possible, but bee-like not :)

      --
      Try Corewar @ www.koth.org - rec.games.corewar
    14. Re:Not what I had in mind by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      Must be. Why else would someone think skinning a helicoptor would make it look like an insect?

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    15. Re:Not what I had in mind by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      We've also only been seriously trying for a hundred and fifty years or so, not three and a half billion.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    16. Re:Not what I had in mind by mks180 · · Score: 1

      Sorry, I'm not that familiar with dragonfly anatomy. My expertese is helicopters, and I work with some people who do bio-inspired flight. I won't even venture a guess since I have nothing to base it on.

    17. Re:Not what I had in mind by subtropolis · · Score: 1

      dragonflys are hunters, unlike bees, which are grazers (i wonder if dfs eat those). They've been around a lot longer than a lot of other flying insects. They fly pretty well and can move in any direction at amazing speed, with very high acceleration.

      There's a lab at ucla (i think) that's done some really remarkable work studying insect (and animal?) motion. I'd like to see if they've ever tracked a dragonfly's flight. Not trivial, i'm sure.

      --
      "Our interests are to see if we can't scale it up to something more exciting," he said.
    18. Re:Not what I had in mind by wulfhound · · Score: 1

      There have been experiments where they've connected electrodes to the brains of rats - http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2002/05/05 01_020501_roborats.html - and gotten them to turn left and right on command.

      I'm thinking the same principle could be scaled down small enough and light enough to produce a radio control apparatus for a living insect.

    19. Re:Not what I had in mind by aminorex · · Score: 1

      Or a Rush Limbaugh fan.

      --
      -I like my women like I like my tea: green-
  2. Thanks, Taco by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    For your brilliant insight. I agree, totally worthless with nary a chance of practical application.

    1. Re:Thanks, Taco by grub · · Score: 5, Funny


      They could use it to deliver grams of weed in Amsterdamn's cafes. That's a gimmick!

      --
      Trolling is a art,
    2. Re:Thanks, Taco by stratjakt · · Score: 1

      Sure, the military isnt investing millions into developing miniature unmanned aircraft that can do recon and surveillance inside buildings, etc..

      No practical uses at all.

      No chance that a device like this could one day find people trapped in collapsed buildings after an earthquake.

      Better let Epson brass know, so they can order these guys to get back to work making shitty printers.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    3. Re:Thanks, Taco by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Amsterdam, oops.

    4. Re:Thanks, Taco by Bandman · · Score: 1

      it can carry a camera easily enough

    5. Re:Thanks, Taco by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL

      Thanks :)

    6. Re:Thanks, Taco by Kosgrove · · Score: 1

      They could use it to deliver grams of weed in Amsterdamn's cafes. That's a gimmick!

      That's what I said after I took a hit of their best stuff: AmsterDAMN, this is some good shit!!!

    7. Re:Thanks, Taco by Saeed+al-Sahaf · · Score: 0, Redundant

      No chance that a device like this could one day find people trapped in collapsed buildings after an earthquake. Correct. No chance. More realistic would be crawlers that move like roaches.

      --
      "Who are in control, they are not in control of anything - they don't even control themselves!" - Glen Beck
    8. Re:Thanks, Taco by stratjakt · · Score: 1

      Ya sure? When you want to check out that huge open gap that was the 3rd floor of the underground parking garage, and the only access is a crevice that goes straight down about 40-50 feet?

      There is no one magic bullet for that type of rescue work. The people doing it need a huge array of different things for different circumstances.

      Hell, they'd probably want one that swam too.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    9. Re:Thanks, Taco by errxn · · Score: 1

      More realistic would be crawlers that move like roaches.

      I don't know about you, but if I was trapped in a collapsed building after an earthquake, I don't think I'd want politicians as the ones trying to dig me out.

      --
      In Soviet Russia, Chuck Norris will still kick your ass.
    10. Re:Thanks, Taco by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      I disagree- all I need is a 4g broadcasting camera that will broadcast for 3 minutes on a 1g watch battery, and I will have a probe I can control with my Ipaq!

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    11. Re:Thanks, Taco by shfted! · · Score: 1

      I prefer my roaches not to fly, thanks :D

      --
      He who laughs last is stuck in a time dilation bubble.
    12. Re:Thanks, Taco by daveo0331 · · Score: 1

      Or across the US/Mexican border, once they find a way to improve the range of these things. There's no way the border patrol could do anything about thousands of them flying into the country. Maybe catch 1% of them and hold a press conference to show off how much weed they caught (while ignoring the other 99% that got through). I can't imagine they'd really be able to do much to stop it.

      --
      Remember the days when Republicans were the party of fiscal responsibility?
    13. Re:Thanks, Taco by uhlume · · Score: 1

      *snort* Mod parent up "Funny".

      --
      SIERRA TANGO FOXTROT UNIFORM
    14. Re:Thanks, Taco by Dashing+Leech · · Score: 1
      The people doing it need a huge array of different things for different circumstances.

      Yeah, can you imagine a Beowulf cluster of these things?

    15. Re:Thanks, Taco by j0se_p0inter0 · · Score: 1

      Nah, man. As it was landing at your table it blow away your papers and any shake you had laying out.

    16. Re:Thanks, Taco by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmmm... some sort of small EMP source, or HERF system, and they'd fall like, well, flys.

    17. Re:Thanks, Taco by Al+Al+Cool+J · · Score: 1
      can you imagine a Beowulf cluster of these things?

      My thinking exactly. And if a large enough cluster could be taught to migrate, it could be used to carry around coconuts!

  3. Can carry a spare battery! by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 4, Informative

    12g - 8.6g = 3.4g battery. Can carry a spare and a half and fly for a few more minutes.

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
    1. Re:Can carry a spare battery! by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Or better yet, power the sucker with a microwave beam.

      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
    2. Re:Can carry a spare battery! by Alwin+Henseler · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Maybe a good candidate for using a tiny ethanol-powered fuel cell? Low empty weight, direct fuel -> electricity conversion, and ethanol has fairly good energy-weight ratio (better than batteries anyway). You could even use a lightweight plastic bag as fuel tank.

      Fill up just a bit for short flights, or fill up to max. for longer fun.

    3. Re:Can carry a spare battery! by fritter · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yeah, but subsequent 3.4g batteries cost $30 apiece and can't be recharged.

    4. Re:Can carry a spare battery! by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 1

      How well do drugs burn? Could use the payload as fuel.

      --
      Engineering is the art of compromise.
    5. Re:Can carry a spare battery! by Reducer2001 · · Score: 2, Funny

      That wouldn't work too well. The robot would get lost after using the 1st gram. By the time it gets the 3rd one, it would feel like finishing it's trip and fly in circles and look at the trees, man.

      --
      When you get to hell -- tell 'em Itchy sent ya!
    6. Re:Can carry a spare battery! by Reducer2001 · · Score: 1

      d'oh! That should have been wouldn't, not would.

      --
      When you get to hell -- tell 'em Itchy sent ya!
    7. Re:Can carry a spare battery! by Enigma_Man · · Score: 1

      That is, until the infomercials in the morning start hocking battery recharge kits.

      -Jesse

      --
      Nothing says "unprofessional job" like wrinkles in your duct tape.
    8. Re:Can carry a spare battery! by deragon · · Score: 1

      Yep, available for only 4 easy paiements of $29.99.

      --
      Remember the year 2000? They promised us flying cars. They delivered the PT Cruiser...
    9. Re:Can carry a spare battery! by schtum · · Score: 1

      Depends what you mean by "trip".

    10. Re:Can carry a spare battery! by FLOOBYDUST · · Score: 2, Funny

      Its not a'matter if it can grip it, Its a matter o' weight ratio...

    11. Re:Can carry a spare battery! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or better yet, power the sucker with a microwave beam [islandone.org].

      And I can heat my coffee while flying . . .

    12. Re:Can carry a spare battery! by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 1

      If you're getting fussy about your English, then you should have uses "its" instead of "it's". "its" is used for the posessive form (no '). "it's" is the contraction for "it is".

      --
      Engineering is the art of compromise.
    13. Re:Can carry a spare battery! by LuxFX · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but subsequent 3.4g batteries cost $30 apiece and can't be recharged.

      And the device only lets you use 80% of the battery's charge before shutting down, supposedly to avoid damaging the prin^H^H^H^H device

      --
      Punctanym: alternate spelling of words using punctuation or numerals in place of some or all of its letters; see 'leet'
    14. Re:Can carry a spare battery! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Yep, available for only 4 easy paiements of $29.99.

      Don't be silly. If you call within the next ten minutes they make the first payment for you.

    15. Re:Can carry a spare battery! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or better yet, power the sucker with a microwave beam [islandone.org].

      And I can heat my coffee while flying . . .

      Yeah, while frying your face.

    16. Re:Can carry a spare battery! by G-funk · · Score: 1

      Just don't fly it too close to your head?

      --
      Send lawyers, guns, and money!
    17. Re:Can carry a spare battery! by Wog · · Score: 2, Funny

      Wait a minute! Suppose two robots carried it together?

      No, they'd have to have it on a line.

      Well, simple! They'd just use a strand of creeper!

      What, held under the dorsal guiding feathers?

      Well, why not?

  4. Human Soul by spoodie · · Score: 1, Funny

    Wow, that's almost half the weight of a human soul.

    --
    I don't need a compass to tell me which way the wind shines.
  5. Coolest office toy ever! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    nuff said

    1. Re:Coolest office toy ever! by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      I'm thinking they'd go over extremely well as conference giveaways and kids toys. i.e. These are WAY better than the Earth Yo-Yo balls!

  6. TERRORISM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Obviously this will be used by terrorists. This kind of device should be banned.

    1. Re:TERRORISM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      If you ban miniature remote control helicopters only criminals will have miniature remote control helicopters!

    2. Re:TERRORISM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      they can have my miniature remote control helicopters when they pry it from my dead cold hands!

    3. Re:TERRORISM by AKAImBatman · · Score: 5, Funny

      Zoom in on large building and cue sinister music.

      Switch to close-up of the eeevile chopper about to make its attack run.

      Suddenly, the chopper swoops in with death defying speed!

      Closer and closer it gets to the building! We see the people inside running in terror as they notice the chopper!

      The chopper closes the distance, readies itself for impact, and...

      Bounces off harmlessly.

      Guess they should have built it a bit bigger, huh?

    4. Re:TERRORISM by atomicbirdsong · · Score: 1

      Yeah - But we will blow them UP!...er...DOWN! YEAH! USA USA USA

    5. Re:TERRORISM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      your mother could be used by terrorists, and we have not banned her have we?

    6. Re:TERRORISM by soft_guy · · Score: 1

      Of course! If I learned anything from playing Grand Theft Auto: Vice City it was that RC helicopters can be used to blow up buildings.

      --
      Avoid Missing Ball for High Score
    7. Re:TERRORISM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not to worry (in the US anyway). As the Second Amendment clearly says:

      A well regulated Militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear miniature remote control helicopters shall not be infringed.

    8. Re:TERRORISM by b4rtm4n · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Hopefully you'll give Douglas Adams credit for that!

      "For thousands more years the mighty ships tore across the empty wastes of space and finally dived screaming on to the first planet they came across--which happened to be the Earth -- where due to a terribble miscalculation of scale the entire battle fleet was accidently swallowed by a small dog"

      --
      "goatse? What's that? Anyone have a link?" - AC
    9. Re:TERRORISM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Soviet Russia, miniature remote control helicopter FLY YOU!

    10. Re:TERRORISM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I accept.

    11. Re:TERRORISM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ummm... you basically described the whole intro sequence to "Men in Black". You know... with the Dragonfly?

    12. Re:TERRORISM by surprise_audit · · Score: 1
      Bounces off harmlessly.

      How about - "Flys over the crowd, dropping anthrax dust..."

    13. Re:TERRORISM by blugeoned · · Score: 1

      More like...

      Zoom in on large building and cue sinister music.

      Switch to close-up of the eeevile chopper about to make its attack run.

      Suddenly, the chopper swoops in with death defying speed!

      And then keeps swooping until it hits the ground!

      It was launched from across the street and ran out of power before it could reach its target.

    14. Re:TERRORISM by aminorex · · Score: 1

      You'd get more deaths from Ricin. And it's cheaper.

      --
      -I like my women like I like my tea: green-
  7. 5 grams for three minutes? by djfray · · Score: 5, Funny

    The street drug trade finally gets a technology boost.

    --
    This sig is o Unfunny o Funny
    1. Re:5 grams for three minutes? by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      so it's high 3 minutes with 5g...

      must be some heavily laced shit.
      . /joke

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    2. Re:5 grams for three minutes? by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
      No kidding, they said 5 grams and IMMEDIATELY my mind switched to drug mode.

      I tell ya though, this brings a whole new meaning to "pass the joint". On second thought...perhaps I don't want my stoner friends flying an expensive mini HELICOPTER (one of the most difficult-to-fly machines ever invented) while they're stoned out of their mind.

      Trust me, it would be a lot worse than someone breaking your bowl.

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    3. Re:5 grams for three minutes? by MonkeyINAbaG · · Score: 1

      You must be American.... over here we measure EVERYTHING in metric, except drugs.... How much for 1/4 oz man?

  8. Not impressed yet.... by jeffs72 · · Score: 1

    Not until they engineer that cool little cockroach bug in 5th Element!

    --
    This article has recently been linked from Slashdot. Please keep an eye on the page history for errors or vandalism.
    1. Re:Not impressed yet.... by CompWerks · · Score: 1
      Wasn't it a "standard" cockroach with some kind of remote control and camera attached?

      Anywho, I don't know what it is about that movie, but everytime it's on I wind up watching the whole damm thing. I must be on my 40-50th viewing by now..

      --
      If you can read this sig - the bitch fell off.
    2. Re:Not impressed yet.... by voxlator · · Score: 1


      Milla Jovovich by any chance?

      It's what does it for me!

      --#voxlator

  9. Faked? by garcia · · Score: 3, Insightful

    After watching the video the first time I decided to watch it again and pay closer attention to the attendant's eyes.

    It's almost as if she wasn't seeing the item flying in front of her. I felt like I was watching a poorly done movie + animated character sequence.

    I don't doubt this item exists but I do have serious doubts about the origin of the video provided.

    1. Re:Faked? by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 1

      pay closer attention to the attendant's eyes. No just proves the drug theories proposed above.

      --
      Engineering is the art of compromise.
    2. Re:Faked? by birdwax2k · · Score: 0

      Yeah, definitely looks like George Lucas got his hands on a video of a girl in front of a BLUE SCREEN.

    3. Re:Faked? by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      Even if we assume that it's real, "flying" might a bit generous. It's more like "aimlessly bouncing through the air".

    4. Re:Faked? by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 1
      Notice the Tri-lateral commission logo on the unit's battery. If you watch the vehicle bobbing, it forms the same sort of mathemtatical patterns as a crop circle. Finally, you can see flecks of a tinfoil cap beneath the scalp of the person in the video.

      What can this all mean?

      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
    5. Re:Faked? by bass_ackwards · · Score: 1

      Yes, Epson has clearly demonstrated their superoir technological prowess when it comes to editing strings out of videos.

    6. Re:Faked? by Shagz · · Score: 2, Funny

      It's movie trickery, I say! Why else would she be standing in front of a BLUE screen. I half expect the next version of the video to have Godzilla in the backgroung with the Mothra twins flying the little helicopter.

    7. Re:Faked? by happyfrogcow · · Score: 1

      the fact that they cut out any changes in the state of the robot is sketchy. it's sitting there still, then they cut back, and it's sitting there with the blades spinning. cut again, and it's in mid air all of the sudden.

      i was hoping we'd see it go from a stand still to a lift off all in one smooth shot.

      Epson get's a C- on video editing today. Japanese chickadee gets a B+ for being apathetic. Way to go chickadee!

    8. Re:Faked? by BillyZ · · Score: 1

      I thought the same thing when I watched the video. It looks like the "helicopter" is dangling from a string and just swaying back and forth!

      --
      - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
      I take no responsibility for any spelling mistakes in the above post.
    9. Re:Faked? by BasilBrush · · Score: 1
      Nylon line doesn't take much editing out. And against a plain background it's extra easy. If you watch the movement of the helecopter it is quite clearly hanging on a line.

      Hoax.

    10. Re:Faked? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      As opposed to how a real 'copter flies?


      I swear. choppers can't fly...they are just so damned ugly the earth naturally repells them.

    11. Re:Faked? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Faked"

      That's what she said

    12. Re:Faked? by yRabbit · · Score: 1

      Something about it just doesn't look right, and that bright blue screen is rather suspicious.
      I don't know, if I was her, when it gets closer to my head, I'd kind of step and lean back, you know? I guess she doesn't mind two little whirling blades coming close to her forehead.

      I noticed when it goes midair all of a sudden, it's lower than the level her hand was. I guess that could be understandable, but..

    13. Re:Faked? by nettdata · · Score: 2, Funny

      It actually looks like it's hanging from a line of some sort, as there appears to be some pendulum action going on... as if it was swinging side to side while being raised and lowered on a string.

      --



      $0.02 (CDN)
    14. Re:Faked? by obj_pimp · · Score: 1

      Is that ellen fleiss holding the robot?

    15. Re:Faked? by rossifer · · Score: 3, Interesting

      No need. It's only 1/8 the weight of a kit you can buy, build, and fly yourself for a few c-bills: Helistar Micro Helicopter

      And if you've ever tried to learn how to hover a fixed pitch micro helicopter, you'll swear to god that there's a demon yanking on it with a string. Further, fixed pitch helicopters get harder and harder to fly the smaller they get, so I'm not suprised that hover isn't completely smooth, even in a controlled environment.

      As someone who owns and flies a micro-helicopter that's a bit bigger still, the video looked completely credible and believable. It looked like my copter did when I was learning to hover.

      Regards,
      Ross

    16. Re:Faked? by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      It's not the lack of smoothness of the flight that gives it away. It's the swinging on the line, with the apex of the rotor always pointing towards the end of the fishing rod.

    17. Re:Faked? by iomanip · · Score: 1

      It looked faked to me, but more like it was attached to some kind of wire. Note the pendulum-like swinging action.

    18. Re:Faked? by rossifer · · Score: 1

      That's what I meant: when you're learning to hover, there are many times it looks like the helicopter is hanging from the end of a line held by the devil.

      The heli starts to drift to the right, you bank to the left and increase throttle a little, but you overcompensate and the heli rises while overshooting the zero velocity point you were hoping to hit. You drop the throttle a little and bank back to the right as the helicopter slides back down and to the left. Repeat until you get the right balance (fairly long time).

      What's happening is that the pilot is overcompensating for the effects of slight wind currents on the heli. Because he's overcompensating in two dimensions, it looks like the heli is swinging around the end of a string.

      In fact, that's the exact observation that my fiancee made when she watched me learning to hover...

      Regards,
      Ross

  10. Practical uses by aminorex · · Score: 2, Funny

    You could deliver drugs and take payment with it.

    --
    -I like my women like I like my tea: green-
    1. Re:Practical uses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you cluster them into a group of 200, then you can carry a kilogram for three minutes.

      Alternatively, you can get them to work cooperatively. In that way, you could get them to fly into an unsuspecting appartment below crrying a floppy disk, insert the floppy into an unsuspecting system, turn on the computer, and 0wn that smartass who thinks a will offer protection!

      Eject the disk, turn the computer off, and fly back home leaving no evidence!

      That will teach that moron who... uh... nevermind...

    2. Re:Practical uses by PoPRawkZ · · Score: 2, Funny

      You've obviously never sold drugs. Money first.

      --
      peace,
      -Grokent
    3. Re:Practical uses by pclminion · · Score: 1
      You've obviously never sold drugs. Money first.

      You've obviously never bought drugs. Let's see the product first :-)

      I've always thought there was money to be had in the black market escrow business...

    4. Re:Practical uses by TWX · · Score: 1

      >>> You could deliver drugs and take payment with it.

      >>You've obviously never sold drugs. Money first.

      >You've obviously never bought drugs. Let's see the product first :-)

      Y'all've obviously never worked with somewhat advanced radio equipment that lets a third party pinpoint the user of a transceiver with relative accuracy.

      I sure as hell wouldn't want to do something high-profile illegal with anything radio transmitting from my location. That'd be a great way to lead the authorities right to me.

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
  11. Yeah, but I'd take one anyway. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Can I attach a X10 wireless camera to it? I've seen light camera censors (in cell phones). That would be awesome around the office.

    I hope they sell it to the masses. I'd buy one even if it was quite expensive (quite a few hundreds of dollars)

    1. Re:Yeah, but I'd take one anyway. by uhlume · · Score: 1

      They have laws, you know... That's what the camera censors are for, presumably.

      --
      SIERRA TANGO FOXTROT UNIFORM
    2. Re:Yeah, but I'd take one anyway. by CmdrTostado · · Score: 1

      From the article...

      To top it off, Epson added an image sensor unit that can capture and transmit aerial images via a Bluetooth wireless connection to a monitor on land, and they also devised two LED lamps that can be controlled as a means of signaling...

  12. Page broken in Firefox by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Seiko Epson Corporation ("Epson") today announced that it has successfully developed a lighter and more advanced successor to the FR, the world's smallest and lightest micro-flying robot. Turning once again to its micromechatronics technology, Epson has redefined the state of the art with its FR-II micro-flying robot--the world's new lightest and most advanced microrobot, which also features Bluetooth wireless control and independent flight*2. The FR-II will be on display at the Emerging Technology Fair, part of the Future Creation Fair that runs from August 27 to 30 at the Tokyo International Forum.

    Epson has long been engaged in the research and development of microrobots and in the development of applications for their enabling technologies. The FR-II is only the latest chapter in an Epson success story that began with Monsieur, a microrobot that was listed in the Guinness Book of Records as the world's smallest microrobot and was put on sale in 1993. Having made micromechatronics one of its core technologies, the company has since created and marketed several more microrobots in the EMRoS series*3. April 2003 saw the introduction of the Monsieur II-P, a prototype microrobot that operates on the world's thinnest microactuator (an ultra-thin, ultrasonic motor)*4 and is remote-controllable via a power-saving Bluetooth module. The following November, Epson unveiled the prototype micro-flying robot FR, which featured two ultra-thin, ultrasonic motors driving two contra-rotating propellers for levitation, plus the world's first*5 linear actuator stabilizing mechanism for attitude control during flight.

    However, the FR prototype microrobot's flying range was limited by the length of the power cord attaching it to an external battery, and although it was radio-controlled, it had to be kept within sight of the operator while flying. Consequently, Epson decided that the next step was to extend the flying range by developing fully wireless operation paired with independent flight capability. The main issue to be tackled with regard to wireless flight was the need to combine lighter weight with greater dynamic lift. Epson made the robot lighter by developing a new gyro-sensor that is a mere one-fifth the weight of its predecessor, making it the world's smallest and lightest*6 gyro-sensor. Also helping to shed weight is the high-density mounting technology used to package the microrobot's two microcontrollers including the Epson-original S1C33-family 32-bit RISC. Dynamic lift was boosted 30% by introducing more powerful ultra-thin ultrasonic motors and newly designed, optimally shaped main rotors. As for the challenge of independent flight, Epson brought its many years of micromechatronics experience to bear in realizing the development of a linear actuator with faster response time and a high-precision attitude control mechanism, and a flight path control and independent flight system (primarily for hovering).

    To top it off, Epson added an image sensor unit that can capture and transmit aerial images via a Bluetooth wireless connection to a monitor on land, and they also devised two LED lamps that can be controlled as a means of signaling. Epson was assisted by Chiba University's Nonami (Control and Robotics) Laboratory in developing the control system for independent flight. The company also received advice on the rotor design from the Kawachi (Aeronautics and Astronautics) Laboratory at the University of Tokyo.

    The key concept behind Epson's R&D efforts in micro-flying robots has been to expand the horizons of microrobot activities from two-dimensional space to three-dimensional space. Now, with the successful implementation of Bluetooth communications and independent flight in the FR-II, Epson has literally added a new dimension to microrobotics while greatly expanding the potential range of microrobot applications by incorporating image capture and transmission functions. At the Emerging Technology Fair, the FR-II micro-flying robot's features are expected to be showcased in artistic aeria

    1. Re:Page broken in Firefox by happyfrogcow · · Score: 1

      don't forget the last part:

      "About Epson
      The Epson Group increases its corporate value through its innovative and creative culture, who cannot design a proper HTML page."

  13. Great new way by Daath · · Score: 0, Redundant

    What a great new way of distributing drugs! :D Just too bad if the bluetooth is hacked and someone takes it over ;P
    In the video it looks suspiciously like it's hanging from a wire (by the motion it makes).
    But it looks like a neat little toy for the übergeek :)

    --
    Any technology distinguishable from magic, is insufficiently advanced.
    1. Re:Great new way by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      I also noticed that they never showed it lifting off.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  14. 5 grams? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It'll make midnight drug deliveries a lot more anonymous, anyway.

  15. Old Story From Nov 18, 2003 by landoltjp · · Score: 3, Insightful

    (blah! I hate when perssing "return" posts the story automatically)

    This story was posted quite a while ago here.

    It's still a cool little gizmo, though. I'd love one for Christmas!

    1. Re:Old Story From Nov 18, 2003 by mlyle · · Score: 4, Informative

      That was before it could fly untethered. Now that it's pseudo-autonomous and all, it's a lot slicker.

    2. Re:Old Story From Nov 18, 2003 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This story was posted quite a while ago here.

      Actually... Thats a different story about the ancestor of this robot... rtfa...

      from todays article:
      TOKYO, Japan, August 18, 2004 -

      Seiko Epson Corporation ("Epson") today announced that it has successfully developed a lighter and more advanced successor to the FR, the world's smallest and lightest micro-flying robot.


      from the article you reference:
      -TOKYO, Japan, November 17 -

      Seiko Epson Corporation ("Epson") has developed the FR ("Micro Flying Robot"), the world's smallest*1 flying prototype microrobot.

    3. Re:Old Story From Nov 18, 2003 by BasilBrush · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It's still tethered. Watch it's movement again and you'll see it's hanging on a line.

    4. Re:Old Story From Nov 18, 2003 by landoltjp · · Score: 1

      Whoops. Thanks for pointing that out. Too bad I can't mod the parent down

    5. Re:Old Story From Nov 18, 2003 by babbage · · Score: 1

      If you read the article, they explicitly state that this model is designed to operate wirelessly -- hence small motor components and Bluetooth for control. That isn't to say that the video isn't necessarily staged -- I haven't seen it yet, so can't say one way or the other -- but they do claim that the thing is supposed to be able to work untethered...

    6. Re:Old Story From Nov 18, 2003 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      (blah! I hate when perssing "return" posts the story automatically)

      Get yourself a better browser, then.

  16. 8.6 grams by Swamii · · Score: 1, Funny

    That's less than half an ounce, for us American folk. :-)

    --
    Tech, life, family, faith: Give me a visit
    1. Re:8.6 grams by WormholeFiend · · Score: 2, Funny

      but what is that weight in fraction of a volkswagen?

    2. Re:8.6 grams by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except Americans have been dealing in grams and litres and other metric measurements for many decades now.

    3. Re:8.6 grams by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's roughly 1/114078 of a VW Beetle. This answer brought to you by MS calc.exe.

    4. Re:8.6 grams by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

      millions of dollars for less than half an ounce, must be some good shit.

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    5. Re:8.6 grams by smooth+wombat · · Score: 1

      According to this site a 1999 1.6l Beetle weighs 1203 Kg. So, 1203 Kg = 1.203e+06 grams.

      If you take 1.203e+06/8.6 that gives you (if my math is correct and it probably isn't):

      1/139883720 of a volkswagen

      --
      We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
    6. Re:8.6 grams by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One 8,618,070th of the weight of a VW Bug (assuming 2,200 lbs.).

    7. Re:8.6 grams by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      oops. That is wrong.

    8. Re:8.6 grams by tkw954 · · Score: 1

      And how many football fields can it fly?

    9. Re:8.6 grams by White+Roses · · Score: 1

      Phaeton or Beetle?

      --
      Do not touch -Willie
  17. Did anyone else see a string? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Blue screen
    copters swings back and forth
    very fishy

  18. Bluescreen by Hardwyred · · Score: 1

    anyone else see that great big blue screen and have it just scream out "please send me to fark"

    --
    www.linux-skunkworks.com
  19. Not useful? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's got a camera. Who needs a payload to be useful?

  20. Great...Just what we need. by radiumhahn · · Score: 5, Funny

    Need E-mail virus targets new flying robots. Microsoft was brought down today by this new denial of service attack. Microsoft employees were quoted as saying "Those propellers really sting!"

  21. No, no...GIANT Robots. by Onimaru · · Score: 5, Funny

    I think I speak for everyone when I say that I don't want smaller robots. I want bigger robots. It would take, like, 300,000 of these guys to form Voltron. It's fair to say that the coolness factor of any given robot can be measured by the number of them which would be required to form Voltron. And, as you can imagine, I'll form the head.

    --
    adam b.
    1. Re:No, no...GIANT Robots. by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 1

      Yes, but is that the 5 lion voltron, or the 15 vehicle voltron?

      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
    2. Re:No, no...GIANT Robots. by Moofie · · Score: 1

      The five lion one is far cooler, although I did get a cheap Korean knock-off of the 15 vehicle one at Toys R Us one day. That was a good day.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    3. Re:No, no...GIANT Robots. by JoeLinux · · Score: 1

      Why would you want to form the head? That's just disgu....OOOOH! THAT head....never mind. :)

    4. Re:No, no...GIANT Robots. by White+Roses · · Score: 2, Funny

      OT, but while I liked Voltron, I never really understood the logistics of controlling it. Take the 5 Lion Voltron (aka the best one). Once it's all together, what do the other 4 people do? If the head dude had full control, what is the left leg pilot doing? Nothing? Fire control? Changing the tapes in the tape deck? If the head dude didn't, then some of the more complex maneuvers would have taken, well, a lot of coordination between pilots (see the Dexter's Lab spoof of Voltron for an interesting take on that). Yeah, it didn't bug me when I was 10, but it sure does now.

      --
      Do not touch -Willie
    5. Re:No, no...GIANT Robots. by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 1

      Let's not forget the three "gladiator" robots that formed another, lesser-known Voltron. I never saw the cartoon, but I saw the toys in a GC Murphy's (old nickel & dime store) years ago in the early 80s.

    6. Re:No, no...GIANT Robots. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And, as you can imagine, I'll form the head.

      No, the GZA is the head.

    7. Re:No, no...GIANT Robots. by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      What I want to know is, when Voltron runs or punches someone, what happens to the pilots in the feet or the hands? The pilots sat right behind or in the heads, right? That part becomes the heel, or sits right behind the wrist, depending.

      I suspect those people became the equivalent of a bridge crew, but I'd like to know why they didn't become jelly.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    8. Re:No, no...GIANT Robots. by mdrn28 · · Score: 1
      Yeah, it didn't bug me when I was 10, but it sure does now.

      Sounds like the same problem I have with Robotech. It was totally cool when I was 10, but when I watched it again as an adult a lot of things just didn't make sense.

    9. Re:No, no...GIANT Robots. by Cerebus · · Score: 1

      I always thought Hagar, Yurak, Lotor and Zarkon were pitiful strategists. Consider:

      One of Hagar's beasts was usually a match for any one Lion. Why didn't Yurak order Hagar to make six of the damn things, land five of them on equidistant points on the surface of Arus, and then use the sixth to dismantle one lion? Bingo, no more Voltron.

      --
      -- Cerebus
    10. Re:No, no...GIANT Robots. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did anyone beside me think that Princess Alaura was just super hot?

    11. Re:No, no...GIANT Robots. by lrucker · · Score: 1

      Chicks did giant robots.

    12. Re:No, no...GIANT Robots. by lowmagnet · · Score: 1

      The Power Rangers solved this particular logistical problem by teleporting all of the other rangers to the head when they created the Zord. Obviously, the Japanese have done a lot of thinking on the subject and engineered an acceptable solution.

      --
      Heute die Welt, morgen das Sonnensystem!
    13. Re:No, no...GIANT Robots. by White+Roses · · Score: 1

      Good thing, too. Since Voltron was their design in the first place. However, a pox on you for bringing the Power Rangers into a discussion of Voltron! Voltron is clearly superior and would kick the Zord's shiny metal @$$ any day.

      --
      Do not touch -Willie
    14. Re:No, no...GIANT Robots. by Zcipher · · Score: 1

      And, as you can imagine, I'll form the head.

      And I'm NUTS!!

      Had to be done.

    15. Re:No, no...GIANT Robots. by teamhasnoi · · Score: 1

      Thank you for the best thread on /. for the last 7.4 months.

    16. Re:No, no...GIANT Robots. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      women are a lot like voltron. the more you get together, the better it gets.

    17. Re:No, no...GIANT Robots. by jsebrech · · Score: 1

      I think I speak for everyone when I say that I don't want smaller robots. I want bigger robots.

      Maybe you should ask these guys when they're finally going to have something to show off and crush earthlings with.

    18. Re:No, no...GIANT Robots. by merlin_jim · · Score: 1

      I seem to remember that the chairs in the cockpits magically transported them to the center of the robot, high-speed elevator style, after the link up... this would be required unless some sort of artificial-gravity system were introduced

      --
      I am disrespectful to dirt! Can you see that I am serious?!
    19. Re:No, no...GIANT Robots. by bar-agent · · Score: 1

      See, and I just used my last mod point. That's just how my life works. :(

      --
      i'd hit it so hard, if you pulled me out you'd be the king of britain [bash.org]
  22. i wish by chaosmage42 · · Score: 1

    Yea, though those seem pretty impractical to build.

    It's still pretty cute though.. aww/

    --

    done
  23. Looks like a DiVinci Drawing by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I swear that little think looks like one of DiVinci's sketches of a human powered machine. Compare

    --
    "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
    --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
    1. Re:Looks like a DiVinci Drawing by slackerboy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Except that Leonardo's drawing was of a machine with a single screw-like rotor. This little guy appears to have two coaxial counter-rotating blades. I think the similarities are coincidental.

      --
      Things to do today: See list of things to do yesterday
  24. I am hoping that... by Crzysdrs · · Score: 0
    ...the potential for homicidal swarms (see: Prey by Stephen King) of these little robots that will soon become sentient and try to kill us all.


    Here's hoping.

    1. Re:I am hoping that... by Crzysdrs · · Score: 0

      Whoops, author was "Michael Crichton". Sorry about that.

  25. Solar powered? by Meostro · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Anyone know how much a light solar cell weighs? It'd be pretty sweet to hook one up so this little guy could fly around all day (in bright sun probably).

    1. Re:Solar powered? by Loether · · Score: 1

      IANAE (Engineer) but... A solar cell light enough to be carried would have nowhere near enough power for this guy.

      --
      TODO create witty sig.
    2. Re:Solar powered? by slashjames · · Score: 1

      If it was solar powered, I think the wind would have a heyday with this. It's not flying, just being blown around by the wind....

    3. Re:Solar powered? by Meostro · · Score: 2, Informative

      Did a little research, methinks the power-weight ration of solar is crappier than anything around.

      Even with this thin-film solar cell, this little fella would need 133in^2 of surface area, and the solar cells alone would weigh 21.6g.

      Too bad, but it'd still be cool to make an RC plane/predator/mini-uav/whatnot with the RC Aircraft series.

  26. laser-powered? fuel-cell? by otis+wildflower · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Laser power would be interesting, though only in a line-of-sight manner (possibly with beams from UAVs), since you could use the laser to do networking instead of bluetooth...

    Also, perhaps a higher-density power source like a fuel cell? Or can they not be built small enough..

    (or a nanotube-based fuel cell...)

  27. The video looks very fake to me ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ANON 2004 writes:

    Did anyone wonder a couple of things about the video like I did?

    1 - Blue screen background .. very easy manipulation can take place in front of a blue screen.

    2 - The video was not contiguous, rather it was choppy - first you see the little helicopter, then it jumps frames to the helicopter in the hand of the assistant with the propellors moving .. then it jumps frames again and you sort of see it flying around but moving in a wierd pattern with the assistant sort of looking directly at it but maybe looking over it, Jar Jar Binks style in Star Wars I ...

    3 - Why was the video 40 seconds if the thing can fly for three minutes?

    4 - Why was the helicopter flying facing the camera and sort of tilting left and right?

    Sorry, it looks completely fake to me.

    1. Re:The video looks very fake to me ... by Guano_Jim · · Score: 1

      Yeah, plus they're speaking some weird made-up language in the background.

      TOTAL fake.

    2. Re:The video looks very fake to me ... by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      sort of looking directly at it but maybe looking over it, Jar Jar Binks style in Star Wars I ...

      In ep1, they are looking directly at the FREAKING ACTOR IN FRONT OF THEM over which the CGI was superimposed afterwards.

      There's an actual guy there. If they're looking at him funny, its probably because they were aware of how stupid it all was, not because there was nothing there.

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    3. Re:The video looks very fake to me ... by brainstyle · · Score: 2, Insightful

      1 - Blue screen background .. very easy manipulation can take place in front of a blue screen.

      Well, if the whole robot is a CG effect, there'd actually be no reason for the bluescreen - it'd be moving on top of the background plate. Bluescreen is generally used to key out portions of a movie to composite it on top of something else. If you're compositing on top of a plate, you don't need to key anything out.

      Mind you, if they removed some strings that were guiding a real vehicle, and maybe composited just the moving blades in, then yeah, it'd be easier with a solid background.

      --
      "Why can't everyone just be straight with me?"
      "Because we live in a bendy world, dear."
  28. Thats just lazy by tAnkEmspAnkEm · · Score: 0
    They didn't even bother to remove the blue screen background. And did you notice how the thing swung back and forth as if on a string?

    Seriously, I think that this is a very cool thing. Though I have this bad feeling in the back of my head about how it can be used to invade our privacy. Floating cameras recording our every move ala Half Life 2, Star Wars, 1984 anyone?

  29. 5 grams in 3 minutes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mexican border here i come!

  30. Now, what weighs 5g... by Arathrael · · Score: 1

    I searched google for "weighs 5g" to see what it could carry, and on the first page of results it had this.

    It feels like there should be a use for a flying sapphire buddha. I just can't think what.

    Although it would explain why he's got his hands over his eyes.

  31. Re:CURSES!!! by virid · · Score: 1

    Agreed. That site was the worst offender I've happended upon in quite some time.

    --
    "The world only exists in your eyes. You can make it as big or as small as you want." - F Scott Fitzgerald
  32. voilla by Tsiangkun · · Score: 1

    I can just fly the money to the corner and return with a 3 gram package.

  33. Another use by xsupergr0verx · · Score: 5, Funny

    Perverts around the world are waiting for the model with a camera.

    --

    Click here for a free picture of an iPod!
    1. Re:Another use by StevenHenderson · · Score: 1

      is the x10 camera less than 3 grams? If so, someone might actually click their obnoxious popups/banners.

    2. Re:Another use by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean like... US?

    3. Re:Another use by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
      Dear god I hope the people at X10 aren't reading this thread.

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
  34. The future is now? by doombob · · Score: 1

    If you read Dan Brown's Deception Point, you would know that a robot like this (but even smaller) could lead to the deadliest of circumstances. Let's just say that I'm sure the special ops people already have something like this.

    1. Re:The future is now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not even a tinfoil hat can protect us now!

    2. Re:The future is now? by StevenHenderson · · Score: 1

      but those have cameras and can operate in cold, fictional climates. :)

  35. It's not old - this one has a video and new txt. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's not old - this one has a video.

    C'mon geek.

  36. This is not a new record. by chronophasiac · · Score: 5, Informative

    The Pixelito http://pixelito.reference.be/ is a far lighter RC helicopter. It weighs in at only 6.9 grams *with* battery. Check out the page for as size comparison with a hamster.

    --

    The future doesn't have to be like the past -- http://www.si
    1. Re:This is not a new record. by macz · · Score: 1

      But it is "autonomous" which they define as being able to follow a pre-programmed flight path.

      If the Pixelito's controls were computer controlled, then that would probably meet the standard too.

      My question is this why bother with the onboard computing power when you can put a linux supercluster on top of the joystick?

      --
      ...But I digress. TREMBLE PUNY HUMANS!ONE DAY MY SPECIES WILL DESTROY YOU ALL!
    2. Re:This is not a new record. by jehreg · · Score: 3, Funny

      Great, you just slashdotted a hamster...

    3. Re:This is not a new record. by g00bd0g · · Score: 1

      No-where in that article (that I saw) does it state it is capable of truly "autonomous" flight. It has on-board gyros for stability. I got the impression it would fly waypoints as directed by the wireless bluetooth network.

    4. Re:This is not a new record. by babbage · · Score: 1

      The page has melted. Here is the Google cache -- at least some of the images show up in Google's version...

    5. Re:This is not a new record. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can the Pixelito fly autonomously? NO. It needs a pilot in the loop.

      Does the Pixelito have a camera? NO. It is just a useless toy.

      Mod parent down.

    6. Re:This is not a new record. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Thanks for the very informative post.

      The Pixelito page does have one disappointment, though:
      The Pixel 2000 became as famous as the chick next to it,

      Before you slashdot the page, I should tell you that the word "chick" is used here in the unusual sense of "recently-hatched feathered animal".

  37. Call me when they by The_REAL_DZA · · Score: 1

    develop one that's human powered.
    Wait, wait, they have! (see the tiny little guy inside the egg-shaped cockpit?) BTW, this site also sets the internet record for most occurrences of the phrase BRIO Erector: Crazy Inventors Helicopter; 18!

    --


    This space intentionally left (almost) blank.
  38. Here's a lighter one... by JargonScott · · Score: 4, Informative

    at 6.9g With battery!

    http://pixelito.reference.be/

    --
    Nuke Gay Whales for Jesus.
  39. Page violates second law of thermodynamics! by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 2, Funny

    Gotta work with Firefox guys. Firefox is the one true pure test.

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
    1. Re:Page violates second law of thermodynamics! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seemed to work ok for me with Firefox 0.8 on Win 2k.

    2. Re:Page violates second law of thermodynamics! by robslimo · · Score: 4, Informative

      validator.w3.org reports that page has 338 errors (instances of non-compliance).

      Way to go, boys!

    3. Re:Page violates second law of thermodynamics! by the+pickle · · Score: 1

      You didn't really expect a major corporate site to follow Web standards, did you? :-p

      p

    4. Re:Page violates second law of thermodynamics! by szelus · · Score: 1

      This is slightly OT here, but I remember a few months ago I tried to use validator on slashdot.org, looking for any page, that was not reported to contain errors. And it reported many.

      Unfortunately, I have not been able to repeat this experiment today. Now, the validator reports, that http://slashdot.org URL returns "403, Forbidden" error.

      Way to go, slashdot! Seriously...

  40. Flight time: about 3 minutes: Not a whole lot by Louis+Savain · · Score: 1

    I was going to say that this would be perfect for spying on the enemy in the battlefield until I saw this. You would probably need at least 30 minutes of flight time to make this viable as a battlefield spying device.

    Having said that, what are other possible applications of this technology? Any ideas?

    1. Re:Flight time: about 3 minutes: Not a whole lot by sexylicious · · Score: 1

      Toss a few of these things into a building or room to get some intelligence before making an assualt. Say in a hostage situation, or bank robbery in progress.

      Or on the battle field if you wanted a bird's eye view, but didn't want an RC plane spotted. Toss some of these up or shoot a compacted version out of a grenade launcher (40mm rounds) and you get a prett good height. Just like flares at night... you only need a couple of minutes to do a quick body count, or get an idea of which direction the enemy is approaching your position.

      I could imagine things like these working near or inside buildings that are on fire as well. Just a quick recon. They'd have to be modified to withstand the heat and have a control system suitable to that kind of turbulent fluid mechanics environment.


      Just a few examples I suppose...

    2. Re:Flight time: about 3 minutes: Not a whole lot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Finally , someone asked! I immediately thought of a little "Bandit" that could fly ahead and see if there's a "Smokey" over the next rise or around the next bend (of course, I've dreamed of this several times...usually sitting beside the road...watching the pretty lights...)

    3. Re:Flight time: about 3 minutes: Not a whole lot by Cheeze · · Score: 1

      expensive cat toy

      --
      Why read the article when I can just make up a snap judgement?
    4. Re:Flight time: about 3 minutes: Not a whole lot by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 1
      Depends on how fast it is, really.

      It could be used for very short-term battlefield recon - say, checking through the door over there across the street for bad guys, just before you send men across the street. Assuming it could fly, say, 5 feet per second (that's 1.5m/s for the metric among us), it could be quite useful that way.

      Police might find a use for them for simple recon as well. Fly one through an AC duct (with a Judge's permission, of course) to look in on the lads you are interested in this week. Might save you the trouble of breaking down the wrong door....

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    5. Re:Flight time: about 3 minutes: Not a whole lot by Artifakt · · Score: 1

      A three minute lookaround time isn't much under most battlefield conditions, but maybe in a police hostage situation, or urban combat, i.e. just looking around the next corner. The thing is, three minutes total = less than 1 1/2 minuites useful time if the device is expensive enough you need to recover it and want a bit of a safety margin, so it's actually worse than it sounds.

      --
      Who is John Cabal?
    6. Re:Flight time: about 3 minutes: Not a whole lot by ricochet81 · · Score: 1

      well, there was the story earlier this year/last year about a pigeon getting into the pentagon...

      Perhaps 2 microrobots carried it by the husk.

      --
      Error: Id10t detected
  41. Practical Use by netfool · · Score: 3, Funny

    Epson added an image sensor unit that can capture and transmit aerial images via a Bluetooth wireless connection to a monitor on land

    Perfect for doing recon missions in the office!
    - Coffee in the coffee pot? Check.
    - Did the boss leave early? Check.
    - Is the coast clear to sneak out early? Check.

    --
    Left 4 Dead Gaming Group - http://www.l4dgg.com
    1. Re:Practical Use by glpierce · · Score: 5, Funny

      Perfect for doing recon missions in the office! [...] Did the boss leave early?

      I think the boss might catch on when a swarm of miniature flying robots flew by his doorway at 4:45 every day, stopping to peer into his office.

      --
      G
    2. Re:Practical Use by Rick.C · · Score: 3, Funny
      I think the boss might catch on when a swarm of miniature flying robots flew by his doorway at 4:45 every day, stopping to peer into his office.

      I think you give the boss far too much credit.

      --
      You were 80% angel, 10% demon. The rest was hard to explain. - Over The Rhine
      "Math in a song is good."-Linford
    3. Re:Practical Use by Fizzog · · Score: 1

      Depends on how soundly he is sleeping...

    4. Re:Practical Use by the_twisted_pair · · Score: 1
      Perfect for doing recon missions in the office!
      - Coffee in the coffee pot? Check.

      No, the internet was invented for that ;)

  42. And i thought bluetooth was dead by frankmu · · Score: 1

    now if they could get a web-cam attached to it, we'd get more annoying pop up ads.

    --
    Supreme executive power derives from a mandate from the masses, not from some farcical aquatic ceremony.
  43. It's great, but... by cbiffle · · Score: 1

    It's powered by these little replaceable compressed air cartridges, each one with an embedded chip to authenticate it to the helicopter. When it runs out, you gotta replace it.

    You might think you could just refill it, since air is cheap, but no! The chip won't let you!

    Don't try to reverse engineer the air cartridge, Epson will beat you with the DMCA-stick.

    1. Re:It's great, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right on the nose.
      I've got a little story about Epson's DMC chips. This is a trip.
      The really screwed up thing about Epson's inkjet refills is that they only put in that DMCA chip gizmo in certain markets. I bought an ultra cheap model in Asia, the C43UX, that all the English web pages I saw said had a chip that prevented refills. But at the place I bought it in an Asian country that shall go unnamed, they told me it was not a problem. I didn't believe it, but we tried refilling a cartridge and sticking it in the machine in the store and it worked without any special tricks. No problem. It was also noteable that the Windows driver software was mostly greyed out but it still worked fine. Since then I've had no problem refilling it many times.
      Now perhaps Epson puts that chip in markets besides the US, but I know they at least use it the US because other people who have the same model have found out I bought one and said, hah you sucker. But it's different. Mine works fine, beautifully in fact, because I bought it in Asia. Isn't that screwed up? The DMCA creates an incentive to jack up the US consumers while other markets are kept free. Is that a mess or what?

  44. Terminator 4? by StevenHenderson · · Score: 1

    Since Arnold is now a politician, is this the new robot? :) Guess it's the one thing that could make the franchise lamer!

  45. Ink? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How much ink does it use up and can I refill the cartridges?

  46. REDUNDANT! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sorry AC troller, garcia beat you to it.

  47. Re:excellent for drug dealing! by MyDixieWrecked · · Score: 1
    heh, that's exactly what I thought.

    "WOAH, 5 grams?!?! depending on the speed of that thing, I could have my friend fly something over for me from down 2nd ave! :D"

    brings new meaning to the phrase "gimmie a couple minutes and I'll fly down there"

    --



    ...spike
    Ewwwwww, coconut...
  48. Re:Know what would be clever? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Good printer drivers for Mac OS X.

    Dear makttkime,

    I got served.

    Sincerely,

    CEO of Epson

    PS We will be dropping all R&D immediately to focus on drivers for the OS X.

  49. Worth the Money? by buckhead_buddy · · Score: 1

    If the military or CIA likes these they could have a variety of subversive uses. With a little bit of plastic explosive an undercover agent could deliver all sorts of subversive destruction (blow out a structural support in a mosque without having to get too close, an assassination tool that could be launched such that it appears to frame someone else, etc)

    Of couse if the military or CIA doesn't want to spend the money, they'll frame them as a "terrorist tool" until the market disappears and the price comes down.

    1. Re:Worth the Money? by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Or until they realize this thing wouldn't last 10 seconds outdoors. A simple gust of wind would carry this thing WAY off course. It looks like it has a hard enough time dealing with normal air currents sans wind.

      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
    2. Re:Worth the Money? by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 1
      If the military or CIA likes these they could have a variety of subversive uses. With a little bit of plastic explosive an undercover agent could deliver all sorts of subversive destruction (blow out a structural support in a mosque without having to get too close, an assassination tool that could be launched such that it appears to frame someone else, etc)

      Unlikely. It weighs 8.6g, and could carry maybe 3g more payload. Some of that would be the detnoator for the explosive, so guess 2g of explosive. 2g of explosive is hardly enough to blow your nose, much less a mosque.

      You might be able to frighten someone badly if one landed on his face and exploded, but it is unlikely you'd kill him. Unless you sent a swarm of killer-bots after him, which would defeat the purpose of using such a tiny machine.

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    3. Re:Worth the Money? by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Or until they realize this thing wouldn't last 10 seconds outdoors.

      Lots of politics is indoors nowadays and not just in back rooms.

      Loaded with 3.5 grams of C4 this could be flown across a convention hall at a target on stage. Not much power, but at point-blank range probably enough.

      I'd be surprised if you couldn't make one that could fold down into a cell-phone case and be expanded past the security checks. Alot easier than getting a rifle inside.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    4. Re:Worth the Money? by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 1

      There are many simpler ways to deliver 4 grams of C4. It's called a slingshot. Or just make the thing into a baseball shape and toss it. Need accuracy? How about a robot controlled trebuchet?

      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
    5. Re:Worth the Money? by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      There are many simpler ways to deliver 4 grams of C4. It's called a slingshot. Or just make the thing into a baseball shape and toss it. Need accuracy? How about a robot controlled trebuchet?

      Now, don't get me wrong - I'm always trying to find a reason to use a trebuchet, but how do you sneak one past security?

      Slingshots and baseballs have limited range, this minicopter can fly for 3 minutes. Even at only a foot and a half a second that gets you across a football field.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    6. Re:Worth the Money? by LifeLyne · · Score: 1

      Unless you sent a swarm of killer-bots after him, which would defeat the purpose of using such a tiny machine.

      I think the boys in blue(and the men in black) at the RNC would shit proverbial bricks to see a swarm of microfliers zooming towards the garden and detonating everywhere amongst the crowd(think home-brewed clusterbombs).
      Instant riots with people trampeling, old ladies getting squashed underfoot, scores of people injured (forget the actual severity of any injuries incured, people screaming and yelling for medical help all over the place would be mayhem enough) and one totally fucked-up RNC for the global media to feed on. As an anti-terrorism analyst I see massive potential for this.
      Oh yeah, before I forget, 2gr. of sarin gas circulated indoors (like say the garden) via arosol vector will kill lots and lots of people.

      --
      (__,__) FATASS
      <*}}}<
  50. 3 minutes and video - I Spy! by wowbagger · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This can fly for 3 minutes and can return video images.

    Consider flying this (covertly) into a hostage situation, then shutting down the motor - how long could it return video then?

    Or corporate espionage - fly this between the drop ceiling and the real ceiling, land over the boardroom.

    Oh hell yes, I can see a lot of uses right now for this.

    1. Re:3 minutes and video - I Spy! by chaoticset · · Score: 1

      Fly, schmie. The real deal would be some sort of grippy walkbot with a cam -- go to the bathroom with it in your pocket, place it above the drop ceiling, leave the building. Return a few hours later, activate it, walk it along the inside of the drop ceiling punching tiny holes through here and there. Its camera is at the end of a 2 inch eyestalk. Poke the cam through the hole, look around. Once you've scoped out a place you'd like to surveil, you leave the eyestalk through the hole, turn off the motors, and let it coast as far as the batteries will take it.

      --

      -----------------------
      You are what you think.
  51. Since it's from Epson by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...one possible use would be to carry five grams of ink and squirt text and graphics onto any size sheet of paper you want. No more paper jams or limitations on size/shape of what you put in your printer.

  52. huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sorry, we're too busy out here actually surfing the web and getting things done instead of having to reformat our HD because yet again after some IE bug has let someone fuck our system up and set it on fire.

    You're too stupid to even be laughed at.

    1. Re:huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Huh? You're the ones that have to have someone else tell you what the article said because you run an assbackwards piece of shit browser.

      You have the single mentality of a Slash year old.

  53. Better picture by theluckyleper · · Score: 3, Informative

    Here's an in-flight picture, and another angle here.

    --
    Visit the Game Programming Wiki!
  54. One word in regards to the video of its flight.... by Sandman69 · · Score: 1

    Wires ;)

  55. I already have a defense against it, you superspy by Libertarian_Geek · · Score: 1

    Leaf Blowers.

    --

    www.facebook.com/DareDefendOurRights

    www.fairtax.org
  56. Re:Know what would be clever? by mattkime · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Dear CEO,

    Thank you.

    It warms my heart to know that I can post a message to slashdot on company time about a problem I have with a product I own privately and something will come of it.

    Sincerely,
    mattkime

    --
    Know what I like about atheists? I've yet to meet one that believes God is on their side.
  57. Plastic is light enough by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 1

    You could make a reasonable skin with 2 micron plastic. A 10cmx10cmx2micron of plastic will weigh approx 0.02g. Might interfere with the airflow and lift though.

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
  58. Reminds me of this by gid · · Score: 1

    6.9 gram infared controlled rc helicopter. It's lighter and smaller. I downloaded a video of it awhile back of the guy flying it around his living room that someone posted on a message board. Cool stuff.

    http://pixelito.reference.be/

  59. Practical use? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    5 grams? 3 minutes?

    1 botulinus toxin flask...

    1. Re:Practical use? by aaron_ds · · Score: 1

      But what good is reducing everyone's wrinkles?

    2. Re:Practical use? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ha ha.

      But anti-wrinkle treatments are a very tiny amount of botulinum toxin.

      Pure botulinum toxin is absurdly, unbelievably deadly. If you made it up people wouldn't believe you. 1 gram can kill ~50000 people - 0.02 milligrams kills an adult human male.

      2-3 grams (let's not forget the tiny flask and tiny flask-shattering and glass-shard-coated-with-droplets-spraying explosive charge) of fairly dilute botulinum toxin solution properly dispersed could kill thus a fair few people. Such a micro helicopter is not going to disperse it well... but it could almost be relied upon to kill a small crowd very dead if flown above the crowd and detonated.

  60. Not the lightest by glide · · Score: 0

    Go here for a lighter one. 6.9 grams.

    http://pixelito.reference.be/

  61. use it as a trigger by grikdog · · Score: 1

    Fill a room full of bombs, wait for the flame dancers to show up, fly the trigger in and set it off. Sure, there's easier ways, but there's points for STYLE, too!

    --
    ``Tension, apprehension & dissension have begun!'' - Duffy Wyg&, in Alfred Bester's _The Demolished Man_
  62. I don't know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    5 grams of pot is a nice amount.

    Crapdot.org - Still no counter.

  63. MOD PARENT UP! by g00bd0g · · Score: 5, Informative

    I never have mod points when I need em. Alexander Van de Rostyne pretty much single handedly created the micro r/c heli phenomenon. Really kicked off a whole new wave of ultra light/small electronics.

    Check out the forums here for more info on all things R/C.

    http://www.ezonemag.com

    1. Re:MOD PARENT UP! by garcia · · Score: 0, Troll

      Are we modding him up for the link to the even MORE obviously fake video of this flying device in action?

      At least the first one had a person, a hand, and an EPSON lab jacket on. This video just said 404 page not found...

  64. Troll - MOD DOWN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've never had to reformat a system becuase of an "IE bug". But what happens if I type rm -rf / on Lunix? Do I blame Lunix for that?

    1. Re:Troll - MOD DOWN by dcstimm · · Score: 1

      if you typed that as a user, nothing would happen until it got to your ~/ directory

  65. *batteries not inclulded by tverbeek · · Score: 1
    8.6g w/o battery

    *(2.3kg with battery)

    --
    http://alternatives.rzero.com/
  66. Oh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sort of like a mini-ornithopter. But we don't really have any reasonable human-scale ones yet, and small-scale low-speed flight is infinitely harder to deal with.

  67. Re:excellent for drug dealing! by StalinsNotDead · · Score: 1

    This thing would be great for selling drugs!!

    No, great for delivering them. How's the machine going to demand payment?

    --
    Thanks to the internet, we can now all die alone together! -SomeWoman
  68. 5 grams for 3 minutes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it must be for delivering joints rolled in the kitchen.

  69. Re:CURSES!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, don't complain here. Sent a complaint to the webmaster.

  70. Looks fake by blues-l · · Score: 1

    You never actually see it lift off of her hand and when she is "watching" it fly she doesn't really seem to be looking at it. And it is up against a blue screen. Too much the cynic?

    1. Re:Looks fake by bmf033069 · · Score: 1

      I was waiting for the interesting part when it lifts off from her hand as well. Lift-off is when you would see the available power and the ability for it to stabilize. Too bad it seems that it was edited out.

      Cynic? Maybe, but it isn't like they were showing it landing on the moon...

    2. Re:Looks fake by NeedleSurfer · · Score: 1

      I actually had the same feeling, plus the chopter is hovering in front of a blue screen, the easiest surface over which to place anything pasted from alsewhere and the chopter cast no shadow on the screen (which could be possible depending on lighting). I don't see any reason why someone would edit the lift-off and landing out especially since they are the critical part of a chopter flight.

      Looks fake, even if there are no reason to fake this, I mean this is not the invention to fame (cancer cure or some'), it,s just a nice toy, weird...

  71. Invalid everything (was Re:huh?) by happyfrogcow · · Score: 1

    invalid html

    a browser shouldn't be subjected to such torture. Not Firefox's problem.

  72. What?! by Neurotoxic666 · · Score: 1

    I can't imagine much practical use

    You obviously don't work in a cube!

    --
    You are more than the sum of what you consume. Desire is not an occupation.
  73. Broken in Safari, too, and... by tholomyes · · Score: 1

    ...probably any other standards compliant browser.

    Q: How many Microsoft engineers does it take to change a light bulb?
    A: None. They just redefine the standards for "light".

    But web designers should realize that there are more browsers out there than the almighty IE.

    --
    When did the future switch from being a promise to a threat? -C. Palahniuk
  74. Apparently it crashes into things: by theluckyleper · · Score: 3, Informative

    In the Globe and Mail version of the story, they say:

    In Wednesday's demonstration at the company's Tokyo office, the Micro Flying Robot barely managed to get off the ground by a couple of metres and crashed off a table at one point.

    The Globe article does have a picture of it hovering in front of some guy's face, however!

    --
    Visit the Game Programming Wiki!
  75. Biological/Chemical Warfare/Bond/Video by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 1
    Since it can carry 5 grams for only 3 minutes, I can't imagine much practical use,

    That's more than enough for many biological, and some nasty chemical warfare agents.

    But it would be more fun to see Bond use it in the next movie to sneak the microdot out, or receive a weapon while in custodity.

    Btw, aren't there video cameras that small now? Since it already has the wireless link installed...

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
  76. Yeah, its cool. by Zabu · · Score: 1

    But the Jetsons would laugh it out of sky.

    --
    It's all good.
  77. God damn crack smoker! by g00bd0g · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This is not a fake. I have been following this mans progress since he invented the Pixel micro heli like 6-7 years ago. I myself have several micro heli's and have seen many even smaller projects!

    Check your facts!

    Go read the micro-heli forums at www.ezonemag.com instead of spouting unsubstantiated claims.

    Lemme guess you think the moon landing was a fake and the earth is flat?

    1. Re:God damn crack smoker! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was a joke you moron based on the video link in the original story. You might want to get YOUR facts straight before you bash an obvious +5 Funny post.

    2. Re:God damn crack smoker! by g00bd0g · · Score: 1

      I still don't get it... All the links worked for me. I apologize if it was an honest attempt at humor.

    3. Re:God damn crack smoker! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It helps if the post was funny for it to be marked up to +5.

  78. DUH by Lord+Kano · · Score: 2, Funny

    Since it can carry 5 grams for only 3 minutes, I can't imagine much practical use, but it's still neat.

    Neighborhood weed delivery.

    LK

    --
    "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
  79. Re:Not what I had in mind -- Dune/Lexx by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 1
    Was anyone else hoping it would look more like a bee or a dragonfly?

    Too much reading Dune/watching Lexx.

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
  80. You are kidding, right?!?!? by eufreka · · Score: 1
    Exactly *what* makes this a "robot"? Compared to any typical RC aircraft/helicopter?

    I mean, sure, if you make them small enough, they will be completely useless...unless of course, you need to do "remote" aerial surveillance of the room you are standing in...

    Really, a Splinter Cell-like "sticky cam" would be better.

    *THIS* is a flying robot:

    http://www.moller.com/aerobot/

    And besides, I might end up with one of these (if you folks would just pass the hat for me):

    http://www.moller.com/purchase/purch_info.html

  81. I think the question on everyone's mind... by Oxy+the+moron · · Score: 1

    Is it African or European?

    --

    Proudly supporting the Libertarian Party.

  82. Picture, for those unwilling to download video by wiggles · · Score: 1

    Interesting pic of this beastie on the Chicago Tribune's website here.

    Free registration may be required....

  83. Sad news for geeks by augmenter · · Score: 2, Funny

    Building flying robots destroys all your html skills. I mean look at this page and the one in the original article.

    --
    There is no good and bad. There is only cause and effect.
  84. Yeah. by AyeRoxor! · · Score: 0

    Since it can carry 5 grams for only 3 minutes, I can't imagine much practical use, but it's still neat.

    Yeah, because things never improve.

    1. Re:Yeah. by AyeRoxor! · · Score: 1

      Troll-mods strike again.

  85. Re:FIREFOX DOESN'T DISPLAY A PAGE? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nobody ever claimed that there aren't broken sites, you clueless fucking moron. There's this thing called a 'life' that you really need to get one of.

  86. ONLY ONE NOT IMPRESSED AT ALL?! by enigmals1 · · Score: 1, Informative

    With all the other micro and even nano-mechanical devices out now... am I the only one not impressed at all? There is nothing original at all about this device: technology, design, implementation, etc.

    Maybe it's just me but this technology seems kinda dated at this point. Unless they make that thing the size of a dime or at least a quarter I'll just go back to my game of solitaire thank you very much. ;)

  87. Solar power? by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Could a solar panel be light enough and still deliver enough juice?

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  88. Think tactically ... by crovira · · Score: 1

    What advantage would having an eye in the sky, even for just a few minutes, specially one that's small and hard to shoot down, give our troops fighting in Iraq?

    You advance, launch a pile of there suckers, with a homing signal for easy retrieval, and a small explosive charge for those that find something nasty which means you don't want 'em back. And advance again without anybody being able to play hide-n-seek with guns.

    Air mail delivery of small, as snmart as the operator, mosque preserving, bomblets.

    Or if they were deployed in an urban gorilla theatre, you'd have something that you could send indoors on recon with a very small GPS homing beacon and BOOM!

    Now Moqtada al-Sadr would have a read problem on his hands, and some depleted uranium bullets up his ass, without even able to see us, never mind try to shoot at us.

    --
    MSBPodcast.com The opinions expressed here are my own. If you don't like 'em... Think up your own stuff.
    1. Re:Think tactically ... by surprise_audit · · Score: 1

      Evil Dictator: Note to self - make sure HQ is built in a permanently windy location...

  89. DUNE by Dark+Coder · · Score: 1

    That reminds me of the autonomously motion-guided poison dart in the movie, Dune.

    1. Re:DUNE by julesh · · Score: 1

      That reminds me of the autonomously motion-guided poison dart in the movie, Dune.

      Except of course (a) this isn't autonomous and motion guided, (b) it doesn't float motionlessly in mid-air until it spots its prey, (c) isn't lethal without serious modding and (d) just ain't that cool.

  90. Anti-Personnel? by Teahouse · · Score: 1

    How about rigging it with a half-ounce of C-4 and replacing the camera with an infra-red sensor
    ? Set 100 loose on a bunch of terrorists holding up in a holy-site like say, oh I don't know, a mosque in Iraq?

    It would take very little networking between the craft to make sure they all picked independent targets. It would take even less to provide "do not kill" RFID tags to those in a room you want to spare.

    No more special forces or SWAT teams are required to take out a bad guy hiding in a building. Simply run in a swarm of these through a window and set them to kill mode.

    --
    "Curiosity killed the cat, but for a while I was a suspect."- Steven Wright
    1. Re:Anti-Personnel? by micromoog · · Score: 1
      Set 100 loose on a bunch of terrorists holding up in a holy-site like say, oh I don't know, a mosque in Iraq?

      Is "terrorist" now interchangeable for "enemy"?

    2. Re:Anti-Personnel? by Kent+Recal · · Score: 3, Funny

      Just gotta make sure the terrorists are not equipped with fly swatters or newspapers.

    3. Re:Anti-Personnel? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It can carry 5 grams or so, not a half-ounce of C-4. Wouldn't hurt much.

  91. Insightfull? Stupid moderators. by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1

    This is version 2. The previous one still holds the record for smallest but this one doesn't use a cord for its power. It also adds a camera and some leds for..... well you got to have leds eh. Blue ones for extra speed!

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

    1. Re:Insightfull? Stupid moderators. by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      Get the right blue LED and you've got a pretty well workable flashlight (I've got one hanging on my jacket, just enough light to be able to get the key in the door).

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
  92. Mosquito fighter. by Vitus+Wagner · · Score: 1

    I've always wanted a small fighter chopper which would sit on my shoulder and every time a mosquitto gets to close to me would launch and shoot damned best down.

    Seems that technology moves in right direction. We only need a machine gun lighter than 5g (0.5mm would be enough even for biggesth horse-fly or hornet, and some clever design for shoulder mounted helicopter pad, which would allow thing to recharge before next mosquitto would attack me.

    Of course we would also need a clever control program. It seems that processor of my new java-enabled cell phone is powerful enough to control the beast.

    1. Re:Mosquito fighter. by surprise_audit · · Score: 1
      We only need a machine gun lighter than 5g...

      Just wondering - how much damage would a laser diode do to a fly/hornet/mosquito? I'm thinking of the type used in laser pointers, but without any kind of dispersing lens.

  93. Epson the arms dealer? by Teahouse · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I can think of one very effective purpose for these little buggers....anti-personnel.

    How about rigging it with a half-ounce of magnesuim shrapnel-encased C-4 and replacing the camera with an infra-red sensor? Set 1000 loose on a bunch of terrorists holding up in a holy-site like say, oh I don't know, a mosque in Iraq?

    It would take very little networking between the craft to make sure they all picked independent targets. It would take even less to provide "do not kill" RFID tags to those in a room you want to spare. The code would be simple.

    No more special forces or SWAT teams are required to take out the bad guy hiding in a building. Simply run in a swarm of these through a window and set them to kill mode.

    --
    "Curiosity killed the cat, but for a while I was a suspect."- Steven Wright
    1. Re:Epson the arms dealer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Units! Units!

      1 ounce is about 28 grams. Effective payload of this here device is about 1/6 oz. I don't know how effective 1/6 oz of C-4 would be for anti-personnel use. Perhaps a helpful /. soul will post up some pictures from a demo.

    2. Re:Epson the arms dealer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Set 1000 loose on a bunch of terrorists holding up in a holy-site like say, oh I don't know, a mosque in Iraq?
      Surely, instead of terrorist you meant to say Iraqi citizens living in Iraq and hold-up in their local Mosque, the one they and their families have built and participated in for a thousand years

      I'm sure that was just a minor typo on your part.
    3. Re:Epson the arms dealer? by Teahouse · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Surely I said what I meant. Anyone who uses a house of worship as a military bunker to hide in, kills and snipes from it's minarets, and holds a whole town hostage (whose people also built the mosque)simply because they are being left out of the decision making can not be considered a good, "Iraqi Muslim". There is a name for that, it's called a terrorist, not a Muslim, not an Iraqi. Grow up.

      --
      "Curiosity killed the cat, but for a while I was a suspect."- Steven Wright
    4. Re:Epson the arms dealer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try 1 gram of powdered anthrax instead.
      Or Botox.

      4 grams of delivery system (compressed air, etc.) Heck, the air currents from flying could be the dispersal method.

      Then we have something more, uh, interesting.

    5. Re:Epson the arms dealer? by danila · · Score: 1

      The name is "guerilla", "partisan" or "rational person". It makes sense to hide in a mosque when you face the aggressor who is obviously more powerful. In this situation pretty much everything goes. War is hell. Iraqi defenders can not be called terrorists simply because the attack the American [invaders].

      --
      Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
    6. Re:Epson the arms dealer? by tehcyder · · Score: 1
      You only get to be called a "guerilla" or "partisan" rather than terrorist if your side win the war.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    7. Re:Epson the arms dealer? by tehcyder · · Score: 1
      So what about the French Resistance during WW2? What would you call them? They fought using every dirty trick in the book against their invaders...but of course you wouldn't call the US army that would you?

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    8. Re:Epson the arms dealer? by Teahouse · · Score: 1

      Invaders? Yes

      Occupiers? No. Truth is, the US force-count would be half of what it currently is already if it wasn't for terrorists like Sadr risking security. The US WILL hand over Iraq to the Iraqis. There isn't enough public will for them to remain occupying this country for one second more than they have to. I don't recall the NAZI's giving the French (Resistance or otherwise) the same guarantee, do you?

      --
      "Curiosity killed the cat, but for a while I was a suspect."- Steven Wright
  94. It's true, this is a hoax!! by Peepsalot · · Score: 1

    The movement of the helicopter is so obviously swinging from a line.

    You don't even see it take off from the woman's hand or land for that matter.

    1. Re:It's true, this is a hoax!! by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      It's like an effect from an old Invisible Man movie. The low tech fishing rod approach to special FX.

  95. Danny Dunn, Invisible Boy, here we come by jimfrost · · Score: 2
    The first thing I thought of when I read the blurb on this was the dragonfly in Danny Dunn, Invisible Boy. I can't be the only one....

    Here's a link for you people who read boring books when you were kids:

    http://www.norder.com/nostalgia/Danny-Dunn-Invisib le-Boy.html

    --
    jim frost
    jimf@frostbytes.com
  96. HOW CAN THIS be modded up insightful? by Cigarra · · Score: 1

    RTFA, god damn it! This is the NEXT version of that robot.

    --
    I don't have a sig.
  97. Re:excellent for drug dealing! by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

    Pay now, or this unit will self destruct. You have 10 seconds. 9. 8...

    --
    SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
  98. RTFA by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1

    It can supposedly hover on its own. That makes it a robot. Next dumb question please.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

    1. Re:RTFA by eufreka · · Score: 1
      Actually, no, the fact that it can hover does NOT make it a robot (that just makes it a FLYING robot). RTFA, indeed! Next dumb answer, please...

      Now that we've addressed that, why not try to answer the *entire* question: What makes it *more* of a robot than an RC airplane or helicopter? Nothing; particularly since its only apparent actual capability is, in fact, to *hover*, as in not move around.

      The whole point was that it is the SMALLEST one. My intended original point was SO WHAT? Why not build micro dirigibles?

      Do helicopters (robotic or otherwise) *need* to be smaller (if so, whatever for)? I mean, sure, there are exciting issues to continue to pursue: payload, speed, duration and range of flight, etc.

      I provided a link to a functional flying robotic "hovering" machine and (implicitly) asked for any useful application example for this Epson device...

      Particularly telling to me was the toss-off buried in the footnote to the Epson press release itself (emphasis added):

      *3: "EMRoS" stands for "Epson MicroRobot System." This series included four main models: Monsieur (listed in the Guinness book of Records as the world's smallest--only 1cm3 in volume, 1993), followed by Nino (a 0.5-cm3 model introduced in 1994), Ricordo (1cm3, equipped with a recording and playback function, 1995), and Rubie (1 cm3, equipped with a capricious wandering function, 1995.) All of these models are independent traveling robots that chase a light source. Sales of the EMRoS series have been discontinued.
  99. funny video... by Dirk+Pitt · · Score: 1

    That video is absolutely hilarious. It looks like the copter is full-scale, and the woman is enormous. As she stared almost menacingly at the tiny device, I kept expecting to hear tiny Japanese men in the robot yelling 'godzira! godzira!'

    1. Re:funny video... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      AHhahaha!!! fucking japs!!

  100. Very nice video clip on page. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Look at the little helicopter. It's cool an... wow... cute chick in labcoat... want her to sit on my face... wait.. helicopter flying now... very cool gadget... drool...

  101. I can even see the string it is hanging from. by Peepsalot · · Score: 1

    When it "flies" into the upper left corner a camera flashes, and the string becoms visible for a brief moment.

    1. Re:I can even see the string it is hanging from. by cujo_1111 · · Score: 1

      And you can spot that in all those compression artifacts?

      --
      If I point out that you are incorrect, making me a foe does not make you any more correct.
  102. Didn't take off in the video by cvd6262 · · Score: 1

    Did anyone else notice that they show the thing spinning in the employees hand, but then cut to a shot of it apparently flying? I don't know, but the blue screen background and the girls there just to watch it fly around makes me question its reality.

    --

    I'd rather have someone respond than be modded up.

  103. 5 grams is a lot of coke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    now I can hussle in the ghetto without worring about the po-po trying to bring me down cause they always hating.

    nah, but seriously, 5 grams could be a lethal amount of many biotoxins.

  104. Practical uses. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bomb squad, S.W.A.T., etc. could utilize this type of robot to clear/check stair wells and other place were the traditional rover-bot would never be able to get to in a timely fashion. Mount a mini-cam, flash/CS bang....you get the picture. Also, what about it's use in dangerous work enviornments such as coal mines? I think the applications here are endless. I am wrong?

  105. Re:excellent for drug dealing! by StalinsNotDead · · Score: 1

    How much explosives will this thing really be able to pack. Maybe that would work if the fuel source was potent eanough.

    --
    Thanks to the internet, we can now all die alone together! -SomeWoman
  106. Easy by 2names · · Score: 1
    PayPal

    Money's in the account, crack is on it's way!!!!

    --
    "I'm just here to regulate funkiness."
  107. I gotta get one by johnny_cobol · · Score: 1

    Geezuz I gotta get one of these . . .

  108. Uses by 5m477m4n · · Score: 1

    So sum up it's "practicle" uses according to the slashdot cummunity:

    drug delievery
    boss recon for leaving early
    spying on naked girlies

    I love being a geek!

    --

    ---
    Those who can, do
    Those who can't, teach
    Those who don't know how, supervise
    1. Re:Uses by MonkeyINAbaG · · Score: 1

      You forgot:

      killing people
  109. bah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, sharp makes jumbotrons that are 2389749827346827364 ft across, but I'm still looking at the same old tv. when I can get me one for $100 I'll be interested.

  110. Autonomous Applications by Embedded+Geek · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Many posters have posted ideas about using this thing as a simple remote controlled helicopter (reconisance, corporate espionage, etc). While that's kinda neat, it misses the real value of this thing.

    If it can fly autonomously (not possible yet if you have to add more equipment like balance or barometric sensors and blow the thing's payload - but you can put the brainpower in the base station), it opens up a whole new world of possibilities. It could fly point to point in a warehouse on a security patrol, recharging at stops along the way. Automated inspections (attics, structual beams in large buildings, etc) could be done in detail with less strain on a manual pilot - you building inspector just watches the monitor and doesn't bother trying to fly the thing.

    The big thing, of course, is adapting this technology to be used outside. Think of a swarm of these released from roadside base stations to check freeway bridges, dams, or structures, minutes after an earthquake. Or a version that works in fluid (really, a submarine) checking ship hulls for damage - on infestations of foreign organisms like zebra mussels - as they steam into port.

    --

    "Prepare for the worst - hope for the best."

  111. add a balloon by flechette_indigo · · Score: 1

    I'll bet you could ad to it's range/lifting-power by adding a donut-balloon filled with hydrogen. Wrap it around that box-body.

  112. A drug dealer's dream come true! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Think about about it: this thing could carry 150$ worth of coke on a single trip! This is just great for our Mexican friends!

  113. Unsafe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The girl in the video should have been wearing
    safety goggles.

  114. 5 grams of C4! by duncanbojangles · · Score: 1

    Since the military likes to waste tax payers' money, strap five grams of C4 to that baby. A better use would be to carry a load of remotely deployable super glue. Just imagine the look on your coworker's face when they can't get out of their chair! Or when the keys fail to be typable and the mouse is stuck in park. Hehehe, that would kick ass.

  115. think of the applications by flacco · · Score: 2, Funny
    Since it can carry 5 grams for only 3 minutes, I can't imagine much practical use,


    it would be perfect for delivering, say, five grams of crack from, say, microsoft marketing to, say, microsoft engineering.

    --
    pr0n - keeping monitor glass spotless since 1981.
  116. 1/2mv square by tota · · Score: 1

    6 grams isn't a lot, but how fast does it fly?
    I am sure it has enough kinetic energy to be useful for something.

    It just needs longer autonomy, or the ability to fly into power sockets.

    --
    TODO: 753) write sig.
    1. Re:1/2mv square by the_twisted_pair · · Score: 1

      I am sure it has enough kinetic energy to be useful for something. Only a small proportion of the chemical potential energy stored in that tiny battery in the first place...

  117. What did you have in mind? by ackthpt · · Score: 1
    Was anyone else hoping it would look more like a bee or a dragonfly?

    Why, so you could terrorize coworkers with it? (not really a bad idea until it comes back as a thimble-full of smushed electronics) I liked what I saw and could probably remain entertained for several days with one of these, assuming it recharges like those BitCharG cars. I wouldn't simply wannit, but UltraWannit!

    Though there is a certain grace and beauty to a dragon or damsel fly, but we've a ways to go to get there.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  118. If you look closely, by uncl_bob · · Score: 2, Funny

    you could actually see a guy above the "flying" helicopter pulling the thing up with a tiny fishing rope!

    1. Re:If you look closely, by yRabbit · · Score: 1

      You must've seen a different video than I did.. I don't see anything that resembles a guy above it. It still looks a bit fake, however...

  119. enough for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    drug delivery...

  120. Can't imagine much practical use? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Since it can carry 5 grams for only 3 minutes, I can't imagine much practical use, but it's still neat.
    The first airplane carried only the weight of one man, and for only 12 seconds. That wouldn't seem to have much practical use, either, would it? :)
  121. no applications....? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    I want one of these on IR trigger in every room of my house, ready to fly into the air when a burglar enters the room and fire a poison treefog dart right between their eyes.

  122. standard? by berns · · Score: 1

    IMO idiot web developers are to blame for this, rather than IE or FireFox (what I use). They should always check that their fancy little websites work on all the common browsers, not just on their P.O.S. Dreamweaver. However, maybe someone out there could tell me where i can find a plugin for FF that will let me see those (almost IE-propietary) layers that have become so popular lately?

    --
    http://www.bernsonline.com/
  123. Man from U.N.C.L.E. by jmichaelg · · Score: 1
    Substitute model airplane for helicopter and you have an old Man From U.N.C.L.E. script.

    For those of you who don't remember the series, it was a television takeoff on James Bond which ran in the mid 60's.

  124. Military Use by accelleron · · Score: 0

    These would be great for military use, if the underlying technology were properly refined.

    It would be quite useful to have a silent, slow-moving miniature chopper with an X10-like camera attatched, if it had a remote that used a longer-range (radio, anyone?) technology for control, and a simple remote with a few simple controls (joystick; thrust; joystick for camera control, and a 2-inch LCD). If given a ~20g payload, they would easily carry a small, medium-res cam, control device for it, reciever for it, and a small payload (wireless mic, anyone?), as well as a good-sized ethanol fuel cell (i.e. the Toshiba prototype) for 2-3 hours of continuous flight, while remaining small enough to remain undetectable to radar, etc.

    --
    Genius may have its limitations, but stupidity is not thus handicapped.
  125. The Two Faces of Tomorrow (James Hogan) by Roadkills-R-Us · · Score: 1

    Now we just need DataBus and we're all set.

    (TTFOT is a novel about AI in which the demo uses little drones like this to maintain itself.)

  126. OT: your sig by Spunk · · Score: 1

    "Your mom goes to college"

    Heheh! I just saw that movie in the theater and that was the best line :) Only me and my friend laughed though. Hmm...

  127. AT LAST!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Naked booty on the tube and Grandma needs a pill? Dispatch her Milltowns via the Seiko Autonomous Delivery Robot. The measure of perfection will be capacity adequate to deliver her the gin to wash 'em down.

  128. Well, *someone* seems to thing they are important. by quadshop · · Score: 1

    The U.S. military (through DARPA and other agencies) has been funding research on micro-UAVs for years. Not too hard to think about what they would be good for if you change your mindset to try to solve the "problem" of being able to kill people more effectively.

    Some interesting links:
    Pretty scary justification for "why bother": http://www.darpa.mil/tto/mav/mav_auvsi.html
    For those that don't know, an "ACD" is a program where they actually build a working weapons system out of the technology: http://www.darpa.mil/tto/programs/mavact.html
    This is one of my favorate MAV's: http://www.aerovironment.com/news/news-archive/was p62.html
    A general links page that shows the amount of research being done in this area: http://www.casde.iitb.ac.in/IMSL/amitay.html
    FAS collects a ton of information about U.S. military programs and systems: http://www.fas.org/irp/program/collect/mav.htm

  129. Danny Dunn's Dragonfly Robot by jbum · · Score: 1

    Clearly, someone at Epson's been reading
    Danny Dunn, Invisible Boy one of my favorite childhood reads...

  130. But does it run Linux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would think that someone on /. would have hacked a Linux install on it and used it to control an iPod by now.

  131. Hmmmmm. by rspress · · Score: 1

    Maybe Epson could make an ink cartridge that last more than 30 pages of pictures if they weren't busy building flying machines of little use,

  132. Can a Beawulf cluster of these win the X-Prize? by peter303 · · Score: 2, Funny

    If I attach ten thousand or so to a lawn chair, and fly into space twice, then maybe win the $10M X-Prize!

  133. Homing in... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have experience with homing pidgeons and let me say that if you aren't far from the border that you can slightly overlord a strong male pidgeon with dry weed and he can fly for about 200 miles without rest.

    And a secret to raising dependent homing pidgeons is not to feed them with plain birdseed, but to actually mix seeds with weak THC-bearing canabis seeds that they will have reason to return if not for the nesting females.

    I learned this from some friends of mine...the feeding THC seeds to the pidgeon part. The part on loading a homing pidgeon with dry MJ is all me.

    1. Re:Homing in... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ummm...not sure exactly how I know this BUT substances bearing THC typically have to be heated to a certain temperature to become psychoactive.

  134. How close by randall_burns · · Score: 1

    is the current technology to enabling something like this to be somewhat self-powered via solar cells?

    IMHO there would be quite a few uses for something like this if it could run 10-15 minutes _and_ be self-charging--even if the payload went down a bit.

  135. Roach raids. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I prefer my roaches not to fly, thanks :D

    It's near impossible commanding a German cockroach to not spread, let alone fly. I mean, look at France; it's occupied Germany! and Brittain is Anglo Saxon germanic tribes but denies it by drowning themselves in English tea!

    Hmmm... maybe that's why ...Boston Tea raid^H^H^H^HParty...

  136. Kludgy micro by scdeimos · · Score: 1

    Neat device, shame about the page author. Did anyone else notice that the mu in uFR-II was consistently rendered with an image instead of using &micro;?

    And before the other /. grammar-nazi's get onto me about using uFR-II - have you tried posting an article to /. using &micro;? :)

  137. Now that's what I call a job! by GrahamCox · · Score: 1

    Work? Ha! Getting paid to think up, design and build model planes with the backup of a large R&D budget... sigh, I knew I should have done something different somewhere way back when - but what?

  138. In case it gets used for terrorism.... by tanthalas · · Score: 1

    ...shoot it down with the sniper rifle!

  139. Remote control dragonfly by desmogod · · Score: 0

    I remember reading a book as a kid where a "mad" professor built a remote control flying dragonfly (as opposed to a non-flying one, duh).... Soe schoolkid got hold of it blah blah blah, anyone else remember the book?

  140. Richard Gere by desmogod · · Score: 0

    Good afternoon Mr Gere.... Would you like the hamster or the helicopter today sir?

  141. Dude! by commodoresloat · · Score: 1

    Surely da Vinci's patent has expired by now!

  142. Are you sure that isn't a faked film? by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

    My wife and I think this is a faked film. Reasons:

    1. Liftoff is not seen.

    2. Blue screen of type used by filmmakers used for composite shots.

    3. Second shot (after closeup) looks kind of fake. Of course, it could be due to mpeg-ization, but it still looked bad, like it really wasn't on her hand.

    --
    (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
  143. How is it broken? Let me count the ways! by ekhben · · Score: 1
    1. It's got an XML declaration and an XHTML doctype, but it's served as text/html
    2. It most assuredly does not validate as XHTML, containing more errors than content!
    3. It has two <head> elements , one embedded in the body.
    I'd, er, enumerate the validation errors, but there are 338 errors in the markup. If they actually did serve it as an XHTML document, the browsers that can handle XHTML would refuse to parse it anyway.
  144. Border hoppers by Simonetta · · Score: 1

    A little device that could carry my 'sensitive items' in a little hop over the customs inspection station at night could be quite useful in some situations. It would fly for a few hundred feet and give off a little short-distance radio signal to allow it to be found after landing.

    I toy with the idea of filling an inflatable life raft with high-pressure hydrogen. It would float in the air at night and be dark against the sky. A light propeller (fueled by the hydrogen in the 'air raft' would push it and an air foil system would guide it under the direction of on-board GPS.

    It would carry a few pounds of sensitive goods through the rugged mountain passes between British Columbia and Washington State in a controlled drift about 10 feet above the treetops.
    A 32 bit microcontroller would have its route mapped out and would work with the GPS to a landing zone of about one square mile where it and its cargo could be retrieved by a person in a all-terrain 4-wheel-drive.

    ah, fantasy...

    1. Re:Border hoppers by surprise_audit · · Score: 1
      A little device that could carry my 'sensitive items' in a little hop over the customs inspection station

      A yard of knicker elastic should do the trick - catapult the package over.

  145. Slashback by ikegami · · Score: 1

    This appears to be a follow up of an earlier slashdot story.

  146. Think Of The Nanotech Weaponry by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 1

    I could deliver with this thing.

    Or maybe I could just fly it into somebody's eyeball.

    --
    Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
  147. Would it be possible by I7D · · Score: 1

    ...to use the wings as circuit boards in the next version? Thats a lot of flat space that might be able to do something else while it twirls.

    --
    Neil is that you? Yeah yeah, it's me... Neil...
    1. Re:Would it be possible by FishermansEnemy · · Score: 1

      Only if the components could be included within the wings interior, otherwise you spoil the aerodynamic properties of the wing.

      Also this just shifts the weight around rather than reducing it.

      Finally, you would have to have some kind of 'brush' connector at the rotor hub to pass power and data to the elecronics, also adding weight and complexity.

      Generally not sounding like a good idea.

      --
      -- If you think my attitude stinks, you should smell my fingers.
  148. I get to see this in real-life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As a NZ guest of the tokyo future creation fair, I get to see this thing for real sometime next week... expect to see some more pics later

  149. Re:Not what I had in mind - ZigBee by mamahuhu · · Score: 1

    Yeah - and I would have thought that ZigBee would be a more appropriate wireless protocol to use as well.

  150. Genetic algorithms to improve flight by tod_miller · · Score: 1

    A sotry on newscientist a long while ago about a robot that learned to fly.

    A genetic algorithm that judged the fitness rate of how high the robot was able to get for each generation of code.

    Robot learns to fly

    I thought of a very light weight helicopter with rotors that can hardly support thier own weight, but get straightened out by the G forces. Also the spin up speed for the rotors would be long, as the gearing system would strain the small motor.

    However, when airborn with high enough rpms, small twists to the frame could give agile peformance.

    About how useful this (cool looking) bot is: I expect to see some 'ferrying' a few grams of this and that between dorms on cold days at uni! :-)

    --
    #hostfile 0.0.0.0 primidi.com 0.0.0.0 www.primidi.com 0.0.0.0 radio.weblogs.com
  151. Oh, WOW! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    "...which also features Bluetooth wireless control..."
    Don't look now, but we can not only bluesnarf cell-phones, but small helicopters, too!
  152. hehe, the OLD revolution by fatgeekuk · · Score: 1

    Its nice to see DaVinci designing again...

    This bears a striking resemblance to his design for a "helicopter"

    As they say, "nothing new under the sun".

  153. Ideas... by pdamoc · · Score: 1

    I can't imagine much practical use, but it's still neat.

    Couple the gizmo with some good AI software and it can turn into a mini RoboPet. It could use rechargeable batteries, have it's own pod where it could feed with energy... and with the help of a mini buzzer it can even sing. Add a little bit of LED technology and you could have you own voice activated firefly. All it takes is a little imagination.
  154. already has it by babybird · · Score: 1

    From the article:
    To top it off, Epson added an image sensor unit that can capture and transmit aerial images via a Bluetooth wireless connection to a monitor on land, and they also devised two LED lamps that can be controlled as a means of signaling.

    Perverts around the world are happy! :D

    --
    Keith D.
  155. Ransom Pick-up by instarx · · Score: 1

    The weak point of any ransom scheme is the money drop.

    "Be at the the corner of 1st and Main at noon. Have six 3-caret diamonds."

    Police could never track it and kidnapper gets away.

  156. The press release is a dupe? by Basje · · Score: 0

    I mean, I saw this before

    --
    the pun is mightier than the sword
  157. How about by g0bshiTe · · Score: 1
    I can't imagine much practical use, but it's still neat.
    FUN
    --
    I am Bennett Haselton! I am Bennett Haselton!
  158. Danny Dunn by ninejaguar · · Score: 1
    You mean like this?

    = 9J =

  159. follows a computer-programmed flight path by michaelredux · · Score: 1

    From the article: *2: Independent flight is the ability to follow a computer-programmed flight path

    1. Re:follows a computer-programmed flight path by eufreka · · Score: 1
      Sorta...also from the article (again, emphasis added):
      Epson brought its many years of micromechatronics experience to bear in realizing the development of a linear actuator with faster response time and a high-precision attitude control mechanism, and a flight path control and independent flight system (primarily for hovering).
      So, they appear to be saying that they programmed the computer to tell the "robot" to, you know, hover...
    2. Re:follows a computer-programmed flight path by michaelredux · · Score: 1

      Hovering is one feature, and following a programmed flight path is a second feature. Together, they make a pretty cool computerized flying, camera-carrying robot package.

      The way I read it, there is a certain amount of attitude and position control hardware onboard so that when the aircraft gets a message to "hover", the robot flight systems handle the details of that task independently. And how small is it?

      The article is clear enough. Hovering has to be taken in the context of the other capabilities.

    3. Re:follows a computer-programmed flight path by eufreka · · Score: 1
      Okay, I'll beg...

      Please, please, oh pretty please, give me 1 (one) useful, practical and meaningful application in which this type of device would be the best (heck, let's just say a viable alternative) choice.

      One.