Slashdot Mirror


Time Warp Computer Pricing Revealed

Agg writes "OCAU has posted an article which shows just how much computer pricing has changed over the last 20 years or so. During a 24-hour period I asked OCAU readers to scan and send me an ad page from the oldest Australian computer magazine they could find. This snapshot of historical pricing is fascinating and, quite frankly, a little scary. How does $5999 for an 8.6MB hard drive strike you? For reference, 1 Australian Dollar is worth 70 to 80 US cents."

350 comments

  1. newsflash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Hardware prices drop over time.

    1. Re:newsflash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      +1 sarcastic

    2. Re:newsflash by ron_ivi · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Software too. Used to be you had to pay for an OS, or a C compiler, etc. Now $0 is a fair price.

    3. Re:newsflash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      you mean via kazaa or sub $1 USD Hong Kong night markets?

    4. Re:newsflash by popeyethesailor · · Score: 1

      The Parent comment alone shows how much undervalued the contributions of so many brilliant free software volunteers.

      Is this what Software freedom is all about? $0 ?

    5. Re:newsflash by JWSmythe · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The way I see it, the initial cost is $0. If you find it worth while, it's worth paying a few bucks for. That reminds me, it's about time to pay my tribute to a few of the groups I use their stuff frequently. Time to buy a round of CD's and T-shirts to give away to friends. :)

      My Slackware hat is starting to look kind of ratty, I guess I should get one for myself too.

      If I ever bump into Linus in real life, I'm going to take him out drinking. :)

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    6. Re:newsflash by XemonerdX · · Score: 0, Informative

      FOSS

    7. Re:newsflash by ron_ivi · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Personally, I'd rather pay/donate/whatever for these guys to make _new_ advances.

      A C compiler, relational databse, and OS are such mature technology, I don't see paying much more for them than I would a screwdriver, 2x4, or plastic bag.

      New stuff -- facial-expression-recognition-input-devices, 3D heads up displays, a computer that understands my mood -- that's what I'd be happy to pay for (open source or not).

    8. Re:newsflash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
      Is this what Software freedom is all about? $0 ?

      no, that's what war3z is all about.

    9. Re:newsflash by ron_ivi · · Score: 1
      That sounded too harsh.... I bought support from Linux vendors before - because that is an easy-to-identify value-add that saves time==money.

      And agreed, I'd buy Linus a drink - but more because I'd be interested to hear his thoughts than for creating a nice alternative to BSD.

      I admit that the Linux kernel hackers are making significant advances beyond what OS's used to be. But these technologies - like all technologies - really are maturing and becoming more and more commodity-like as time moves forward.

    10. Re:newsflash by geekoid · · Score: 2, Insightful

      thats funny, I'd like to buy Linus a drink as well. Mostly becasue I'd like to swap a lot of NON computer stories. He seems like an interesting fellow.

      I think stories about our kids would be far more interesting then talking to him about something he's already told 100000 people.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    11. Re:newsflash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, the price of music hasn't dropped over time. Despite the same advances in making it cheaper.

    12. Re:newsflash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > If I ever bump into Linus in real life, I'm going to take him out drinking. :)

      I bet he makes more than you do.

    13. Re:newsflash by Mordaximus · · Score: 1

      Way back when, The OS shipped free with the computer (I'm talking the good ole TI 99/4A, Atari 800XL days) and BASIC for free.

      As for hardware, a full outfit (Display, Computer and storage) from Commodore, Atari etc. was cheaper or equivalent to what you'd pay for a stock PC now.

      And BTW, you often still have to pay for an OS today. Sometimes, even if you don't want it!

    14. Re:newsflash by adam.skinner · · Score: 1

      Ironically, you're simply indicating how geeky you really are. A normal person, if talking with the creator of Linux, would be interested in computer stories, just like they would want to talk to Warren Buffet about some enticing financial stories.

    15. Re:newsflash by Commander+Trollco · · Score: 1

      The price of music has dropped. The consumer only needs to ignore a few copyright laws. It is easier than ever to get $0 music.

      --
      http://persianews.on.nimp.org/?u=Tar_Baby
    16. Re:newsflash by westlake · · Score: 1
      As for hardware, a full outfit (Display, Computer and storage) from Commodore, Atari etc. was cheaper or equivalent to what you'd pay for a stock PC now.

      The original list price for rhe C-64 was $695 US. In 1980 Reagan dollars.

      Way back when, The OS shipped free with the computer

      What makes an Atrai or TI OS ROM install fundamentally different from an OEM Windows hard disc install?

    17. Re:newsflash by menkhaura · · Score: 1

      Yay, let us all pay Linus a drink (does anyone know if he likes lagers?), and make him drunk, and see if he will allow graphics to be integrated into the kernel

      --
      Stupidity is an equal opportunity striker.
      Fellow slashdotter Bill Dog
    18. Re:newsflash by Dick+Faze · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually, they don't.

      20 years ago a killer system cost $4000 and you could get entry-level computers for $600 (I know this since that's what I paid for my brand-new TRS-80 model III).

      Ten years ago, a killer system cost $4000, and you had the newest 486/33 before anyone on your block. You could still get Commodores and others for around $600.

      Today, a killer system costs around $3000, granted you get the best of everything, but at this price-point you always did. You can also get a 90-day warranteed crapo Dell for around $600 that will perform basic requirements for a few years.

      Hardware prices don't change much over decades. What you get for the money changes pretty drastically, but the price-points are much as they were in 1980.

    19. Re:newsflash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      One word: Inflation

    20. Re:newsflash by micromoog · · Score: 1

      RTFA; the story is about Australia. Hot snow falls up.

    21. Re:newsflash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't be too suprised if the site doesn't work - (both the) poor servers can't handle it.

    22. Re:newsflash by JWSmythe · · Score: 1


      I seem to recall seeing a picture of a slightly drunk Linus with a beer bottle in front of him. Damned if I can remember what brand it was off-hand.

      I know me and some of my friends have done amazing programming when we're drunk, I wonder if we could put some really whack stuff in the kernel on a good drunken weekend. Of course, it would need it's own category in the 'make menuconfig', something like "Drunken Ideas".

      The 2.6.7 kernel does have something about including graphics into it. I didn't read too much into it, I was busy getting it ready for a new server. :)

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    23. Re:newsflash by JWSmythe · · Score: 1


      He's probably heard all the computer stories he can tolerate.

      I'd have to assume it's kind of like walking into my office saying "I have a problem with...." Like, I don't want to hear it, go away. Tell me about the hot girl you met the other night, or the new stuff you put on your car, and I'll listen. :)

      Unfortunately, for Linus, most of the "Hey Linus, this doesn't work" questions usually turn out to be user failure. I field plenty of those right now for our Linux workstations and servers. Very very rarely does anything come back to something in the kernel.

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    24. Re:newsflash by JWSmythe · · Score: 1


      You don't know how much I make. :)

      But in either case, it's not a game of "my wallet is bigger". If he makes more than me, he doesn't need someone to pay for drinks, so it's just a "thank you".

      I appreciate someone taking me out for drinks, if I've done work for them. Sure, I may have spent a week programming something for a friend, and sure a night of drinking doesn't even approach the time invested, but it seems to make everything right. :)

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    25. Re:newsflash by ron_ivi · · Score: 1

      Interestingly, this was one of the first ways Linus was paid: From a former office-mate of Linus's... However, things went as they did, and Linux prospered. The success has resulted in fame and also material rewards for rewards, including money. One of the first rewards wasn't money, but virtual beer. You may have heard the expression, since it is still used somewhat, but these days it is just a general good wish phrase. Originally, it had a very concrete meaning. Two guys from Oxford, England, calling themselves the Oxford Beer Trolls, wanted to buy Linus some beer, but since it was impractical to move either themselves, Linus, or the beer physically around, they asked me to receive the money via mail, and buy Linus beer with it, and that's what happened. So, virtual beer really means money, preferably money sent to me.

    26. Re:newsflash by ron_ivi · · Score: 1
      formatting messed up.

      Interestingly, this was one of the first ways Linus was paid for Linux: From a former office-mate of Linus's...

      However, things went as they did, and Linux prospered. The success has resulted in fame and also material rewards for rewards, including money. One of the first rewards wasn't money, but virtual beer. You may have heard the expression, since it is still used somewhat, but these days it is just a general good wish phrase. Originally, it had a very concrete meaning. Two guys from Oxford, England, calling themselves the Oxford Beer Trolls, wanted to buy Linus some beer, but since it was impractical to move either themselves, Linus, or the beer physically around, they asked me to receive the money via mail, and buy Linus beer with it, and that's what happened. So, virtual beer really means money, preferably money sent to me.
    27. Re:newsflash by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

      And that leaves me wondering, what's the easiest way to get something to Linus? :) I believe he's up in San Jose now, it should fairly cheap to FedEx a case of beer and a thank-you card from LA. :)

      OOhh, I found This Page that says he drinks Guinness. What a coincidence, that's what I've been drinking since an Irish friend of mine introduced me to it years ago (at an Irish pub, of course). I'm planning on going to the Guinness brewery in Ireland sometime this year, maybe I'll get him a gift. :)

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    28. Re:newsflash by ron_ivi · · Score: 1

      That could be a fun project... /.ing his physical mail box with beer :) If we (/.) did this, I kinda wonder how many guinnesses we could get him -- and if we'd be invited to the party to drink it.

    29. Re:newsflash by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

      Haha, I can just imagine the post office being like "Sir, you have a lot of packages at the post office. Please bring a truck to pick them up."

      Maybe someone local to him can arrange the first annual "Slashdot - Getting Linus Drunk" party. :) I'd be in not only for funding some of the beer, but I'd make the drive up there to attend. What a great way for a bunch of Slashdot geeks to meet. :) Maybe we'll all find out only like 50% of the folks here are "geeks", and the rest are normal folks.

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
  2. Australian Dollar? by dnahelix · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Has the Australian Dollar always been worth 70 to 80 US cents?

    --
    Slashdot Eds Link Anonymous Posts With Logged Posts
    They Are Vermin Feeding On Each Other's Feces.
    I Hate \.
    1. Re:Australian Dollar? by conufsed · · Score: 3, Informative

      Wildly inaccurate probably, but it has varied between 50-80cents over the last ten years, I know at some stage (in the 70s?) the aussie dollar was stronger for a while, which caught out a number of aussies who taken US$ loans

    2. Re:Australian Dollar? by FannyMinstrel · · Score: 0

      That's what it was in the 90's, right now it's worth about 0.704932 USD per 1 AUD.

      In the 90's, it was worth more, and in the 80's it was worth even more.

      ( http://www.usyd.edu.au/su/fasts/2000/DollarClock.p df , remove the space)

    3. Re:Australian Dollar? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it was worth more in the early 80s and less in the late 90s and early 00s.

      Lately it has gone back to somewhere near its "normal" value, hovering around the 70 US cent mark.

    4. Re:Australian Dollar? by log2.0 · · Score: 1

      When the aussie $ was first floated (before i was born :)), it started out at $1.20US but then quickly went down.

      Over the last year or so its been 70 to 80.

      --
      Can your karma go above being Excellent?
    5. Re:Australian Dollar? by dcstimm · · Score: 1

      Does that mean that the US economy is better than Australis? We are kicking their ass! :-)

    6. Re:Australian Dollar? by MasterB(G)ates · · Score: 5, Informative
      --
      In the Slashdot moderating system, humourless based offenses are considered especially heinous.
    7. Re:Australian Dollar? by slash.dt · · Score: 1
      And the Brits are therefore whipping yours! (1 Pound = ~$1.84)

      Even the French and Germans with the Euro are giving you a kicking (1 Euro = ~ $1.20)

      bummer dude.

    8. Re:Australian Dollar? by chimpo13 · · Score: 2, Informative

      More importantly, what's the Aussie dollar going to be like in the next 2 months?

      I made some payments for the bike I'm riding round the world a couple years ago when the OZ dollar was worth 52 cents American. Now it's up to 78 cents and I'm screwed. I still owe money on the bike. It would've been cheaper for me to pay the credit card interest (it's been bouncing between 0% and 3.9%).

      I tried to pay but I think the guy who's building the bike thought he was doing me a favor by not getting more money. Argh!

    9. Re:Australian Dollar? by hazem · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It seems to me that you cannot use the poster's "1 Australian Dollar is worth 70 to 80 US cents" to make a meaningful evaluation of a harddrive costing Australian $5999 at some time in the past.

      To get a meaningful comparison, you'd either need to adjust the $5999 for inflation of the $Australian, THEN convert to dollars, OR convert the $Austrialian to $USD way back then, THEN adjust for the inflation of the $USD.

      I'm not sure if you'll get the same results. I doubt that currency conversions and inflation rates are path-independent. Otherwise, arbitrage would seem to be possible.

      Any economists out there?

    10. Re:Australian Dollar? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      The Government *wants* it to fall (good for exports), but it all depends on the economy in the rest of the world. The US economy has been in a bit of a rut lately, so they have low interest rates to stimulate the economy. Much of the rest of the world is in a similar position. On the other hand, Australia's economy has been steady, so interest rates are high by international standards. As a result, investors put their money into Australia to get better returns. This drove the dollar up.

      Once the interest rates elsewhere rise, money will flow out of Australia, driving the AUD down. So, I guess all you can hope for is US interest rate rises.

      The current position of the AUD at 70 cents is actually pretty close to its long-term stable position, but I have a gut feeling that when rate rises occur in the US, it will dip back down to the 60 cent mark (I could be wrong though).

    11. Re:Australian Dollar? by tarunthegreat2 · · Score: 5, Informative

      Oh For the love of God, get an education in economics. Currencies don't really represent the strength of your economy, they're a measure of a lot of other things (of course, if your currency is tanking by more 10%, I think it's safe to say the economy is bad). Currencies that float mostly represent trade imbalances. The middle eastern currencies are almost worth 2 US$ - hint:The world depends on the middle east for a critical resource...
      If you want your country to export more, you try and devalue your currency, if you want to reduce inflation, your currency may start rising, blah blah. Currency and economic strength are not always directly related.

    12. Re:Australian Dollar? by zambuka · · Score: 1

      When it comes to exchange rate for technology the Australian dollar always buys significantly less than the official exchange rates.
      compare
      prices here with
      prices here

      It works out at about A$1.00 = US$0.56
      This is pretty typical for any technology purchased in Australia and shipping costs and volume issues just don't make up for the difference.

    13. Re:Australian Dollar? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The dollar has plummeted against the pound in the last few years... its gone from just under 1.6 to nearly 1.9 $/£ in about 3 years. Its now much cheaper for me to buy CDs from the US on EBAY and import them to the UK (at ~$6 postage) than it is to buy them in the high street here.

      I blame Bush. I'm pretty sure the fall has mostly happened during his presidency.

    14. Re:Australian Dollar? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Currencies all have different origins as well. If we set all currencies at the same value tommorrow (i.e. US$1 == GBP1 == AU$1 == 1 Yen), and adjusted prices accordingly, then the movement of the currencies over the long term would provide an economic indicator of some sort (but not a very useful one).

      However, this has never occurred, so it is simply the case that one Yen represents less wealth than one Dollar, and always has (AFAIK).

      Also, many Governments intentionally try to drive down the value of their currency at times to stimulate exports. Currency trends are important (i.e. if the value of a currency drops too fast or rises too fast you are in trouble), but actual values are meaningless.

    15. Re:Australian Dollar? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Currency values are not a really useful measure of economic performance. In fact, they are one of the worst.

    16. Re:Australian Dollar? by incast · · Score: 4, Informative

      I am an economist... a young one, but one nonetheless!

      In a perfect world, the exchange rate will adjust perfectly to inflation. However, in our world, thanks to imperfect information, inflation and exchange rates will vary in the short run. Arbitrage does exist, as humans do not have perfect knowlege of the future. We can make ex ante predictions, but we will still end up with ex post deviations from such predictions.

      SO.. if you're adventurous, try a job in currency exchange markets to make (or lose) a buck or two!

    17. Re:Australian Dollar? by chimpo13 · · Score: 1

      International finance is one of those things that I've never studied and haven't paid much attention to. Thanks for the explanation.

      Are you thinking the US interest rates will rise in the next 60 days? Or are we inbetween times for that? Just wondering how much I should offer to the guy building my bike.

    18. Re:Australian Dollar? by shellbeach · · Score: 1

      It seems to me that you cannot use the poster's "1 Australian Dollar is worth 70 to 80 US cents" to make a meaningful evaluation of a harddrive costing Australian $5999 at some time in the past.

      Hmmm ... I think the point was that $6000 for an 8.6Mb hard drive was funny in itself, irrespective of inflation, cost of living, or whatever other benchmark you care to think up.

      (Consider - adjusting as you propose for inflation will only *increase* the equivalent price above $6000. I'd imagine that the conversion rate for the AUD was merely given so that wierd aliens don't think we're living in some banana republic where 1 USD = several thousand AUD ;)

    19. Re:Australian Dollar? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Aussie dollars "NORMAL" value was closer to the British Pound till Keating f#*ked it up!

      Dun fahrrgeeet, it was the Australian "POUND" till 1966.

    20. Re:Australian Dollar? by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      Has the Australian Dollar always been worth 70 to 80 US cents?

      Prior to the stock market crash of October 1987, it was about US$1.20. I was travelling at the time and found that my traveller's cheques, in AUD, were suddenly worth about half in local currency than the day before. That hurt.

      A good site for tracking the AUD is here, though it only goes back about two years.

    21. Re:Australian Dollar? by DigiShaman · · Score: 2, Funny

      If you look really close at the graph, you can spot the outline of a kangaroo. That's right, hop to it mate!

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    22. Re:Australian Dollar? by xelah · · Score: 1
      Currencies all have different origins as well. If we set all currencies at the same value tommorrow (i.e. US$1 == GBP1 == AU$1 == 1 Yen), and adjusted prices accordingly, then the movement of the currencies over the long term would provide an economic indicator of some sort (but not a very useful one).


      Erm, no, not a very useful one. It'd quite possibly be mostly a measure of inflation. Imagine: US$1 == GBP1 one year. Over the next year UK inflation is zero and US inflation is 100%. If everything else stayed the same you'd expect to end up with US$2 == GBP1 but absolutely no real difference whatsoever.


      The purchasing power parity exchange rate will do exactly that - by definition. IIRC there have been some fairly sizable academic arguments over whether there is a tendency for market exchange rates to tend to revert towards PPP rates. The last I heard was that it was very difficult to find statistically significant evidence of this (because a very wide span of data is required) but someone had managed to do it. The span of data was something like 100 years, though, so there was plenty of scope for something to be wrong.

    23. Re:Australian Dollar? by corellen · · Score: 1

      Yen is a bad example here because it is a non decimal point currency system. Things are priced as 300Y which with out doing a true conversion is akin to something costing $3.00US. Just FYI.

    24. Re:Australian Dollar? by ignavus · · Score: 1

      Definitely NOT.

      Back in late 1976, I used less than $AU 2,500 to buy over $US 3,000 in traveller's cheques. Shortly afterward, the Australian govt devalued the $AU, and it was roughly at parity with the $US. By early 1977, the $AU had drifted back up and was worth about $US 1.10. And it wasn't that long ago that the $AU was worth less than 60 US cents.

      Moral of the story: currencies are volatile - don't use current exchange rates for prices long ago.

      --
      I am anarch of all I survey.
    25. Re:Australian Dollar? by nfabl · · Score: 1

      The thing is correct for exchange rates is pretty meaningless. All it says is how much $1AU is worth to an american, not how much its worth to an aussie. A better way to do it would be to rank it on the relative costs of something like a big mac. Or as a fraction of GDP/capita. I believe the cost of city living is roughly half what it is the US in AU. In summary, the harddrive was fucking pricey.

    26. Re:Australian Dollar? by OhHellWithIt · · Score: 1

      Arbitrage does exist, as humans do not have perfect knowlege of the future.

      I didn't realize humans had any knowledge of the future.

      BTW, you sound like Allen (sp?) Greenspan. (That's a compliment.) Maybe you'll have his job in a few years?

      --
      "Who controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past." -- George Orwell
    27. Re:Australian Dollar? by untaken_name · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Don't be silly. Humans have 'knowledge' of the future in the same way we have 'knowledge' of the far past: by popular convention. For example, I 'know' that the sun will rise tomorrow. Is there a chance that it won't? Sure. However, I 'know' that it will be there tomorrow morning, just as always. I am sure I 'know' more about what will happen tomorrow, but unless you're willing to wager there's no point showing off.

    28. Re:Australian Dollar? by Rob+Riggs · · Score: 1
      Yen is a bad example here because it is a non decimal point currency system.

      Sure it is. They just moved the decimal two places over to the right. :-)

      But to be serious, for examples of how this works in practice, see the current price of dollars in yen. You'll note the use of a decimal.

      --
      the growth in cynicism and rebellion has not been without cause
    29. Re:Australian Dollar? by RLW · · Score: 1

      So, get a credit card that lets you specify USD's, pay with that. You'll get the better exchange rate. What does it cost to ship a Mac from Iowa to N.S.W. ?

    30. Re:Australian Dollar? by bertboerland · · Score: 1
      I am an economist... a young one, but one nonetheless!
      In a perfect world, [...]

      Yes, thats how economist sound like alright. In The Real World, we have sysadmins, netmasters and .. God forbids... customers and users.

      --
      -- for undocumented cisco commands, take a peek @ dotu
    31. Re:Australian Dollar? by sploo22 · · Score: 1

      Maybe a two-headed one...

      --
      Karma: Segmentation fault (tried to dereference a null post)
    32. Re:Australian Dollar? by thephotoman · · Score: 1

      I don't know that it's ever been there, but the poster screwed up the ratio. It's about $0.80 Au to $1.00 US.

      --
      Haec merda tauri est. Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam.
    33. Re:Australian Dollar? by easter1916 · · Score: 1

      You can do that with any credit card. The US$ amount will just be converted to the equivalent local amount at current exchange rates, plus the usual gouging that the card issuer adds.

    34. Re:Australian Dollar? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry for the delay replying - it is due to international time differences (the world would be simpler if it was flat).

      I am totally unqualified to say whether there will be a rate rise in the USA, but I think that leading into an election it is unlikel. However, that is just a guess.

    35. Re:Australian Dollar? by palfreman · · Score: 1

      You're missing the point. Economics use terms like "in a perfect world" to set the model out. They then show how the real world differs in the particular example. If you didn't work backwards from assuming a perfect world, you would not be able to think & write about thise kind of ideas very easily. Staring with a hypothetically perfect example and adding in faults to make it more real, lets you see get some idea of the effect of those real world factors, and hopefully get a handle on the problem - so you can make more sensible predictions than plain guesses.

    36. Re:Australian Dollar? by yobbo · · Score: 1

      At one stage it was around $1.40 US to an aussie dollar.

    37. Re:Australian Dollar? by bertboerland · · Score: 1

      no, i am afraid you are missing the point. reread my posting (economist and the "say we have a perfect market" axiomas are not unknow o me)

      --
      -- for undocumented cisco commands, take a peek @ dotu
  3. reasonable by schneidafunk · · Score: 5, Insightful

    considering money is just a symbolic representation of value, it seems reasonable that 8 megs was more valuable 20 years ago and cost a lot more money.

    --
    Some people die at 25 and aren't buried until 75. -Benjamin Franklin
    1. Re:reasonable by dnahelix · · Score: 1

      I think the point is to study the specific pattern of the cost (value) reductions, which is an obvious trend, but can't be used to predict prices if not studied.

      --
      Slashdot Eds Link Anonymous Posts With Logged Posts
      They Are Vermin Feeding On Each Other's Feces.
      I Hate \.
    2. Re:reasonable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      symbolic representation.... redundant.

      booyakasha

    3. Re:reasonable by Amadodd · · Score: 1

      Very true. And you could do a lot more with 8 megs 20 years ago. The only people seeming to buck the trend is Microsoft (picture with old prices). Seems they haven't dropped their price a lot.

      --
      Freedom of speech doesn't come with bandwidth.
    4. Re:reasonable by untaken_name · · Score: 1

      My favorite item on that price sheet:

      Win 3.1 Free TT Fonts - $131.00

      Nothing I could say would make that better.

    5. Re:reasonable by Minna+Kirai · · Score: 1

      Seems they haven't dropped their price a lot.

      I don't think they really still ask $465 for Excel.

  4. I still remember 8088 was hot by xiando · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I remember this box called IBM XT, it had like 640k RAM, 4.77 MHz horcepower and could do amazing things. My athlon 2k can do even more amazing things, and I'm very happy with the way prince pr. MHz has gone the last years.. and it just keeps on getting better and better! Excellent.

    1. Re:I still remember 8088 was hot by MrChuck · · Score: 5, Insightful
      1. The 8088 sucked. Z80 with better carburators.
        Segments.
        The 68000 came out soon after and would have spared us YEARS of working around stupid ickiness that Intel foisted on us (like bank switching which should have died with the Apple //.) I was delighted to move from 68000->68040 without having to redesign software. Microcontroller makers passing them off as microprocessors.
      2. 4.77MHz.
        Skipping predictive branching, caching up the kazoo and that current chips are closer to RISC than CISC classic, etc:
        Is your 2000MHz Athlon 400 times more useful than the XT? (adding in variables, and DDR it's several THOUSAND times more powerful).
      I still find that my 30MHz Sparc 2 running fvwm wasn't a ton less useful than my current FreeBSD setup.

      I *know* that my 40MHz NeXT (in the office) isn't 1/20th the speed of my 867MHz (RISC) PPC.

      The issue with really fast systems is really bad and bloated software is allowed.

    2. Re:I still remember 8088 was hot by travail_jgd · · Score: 3, Interesting

      "I still find that my 30MHz Sparc 2 running fvwm wasn't a ton less useful than my current FreeBSD setup. I *know* that my 40MHz NeXT (in the office) isn't 1/20th the speed of my 867MHz (RISC) PPC. The issue with really fast systems is really bad and bloated software is allowed."

      Part of the problem is that users haven't kept up with their computers. A desktop computer's CPU is fairly idle, waiting either for the user to do something or for some kind of I/O. Eight-bit computers were able to do tolerable GUIs with WYSIWYG applications -- but having less responsiveness, no multitasking, limited task switching, and none of the flexibility of today's systems.

      Try doing something CPU intensive -- you may find that your NeXT really is a fraction of the speed of your PPC. (Just out of curiosity, I timed my computer systems a few years ago by making an MP3 with LAME (the .wav was already ripped). The systems were vastly different in terms of OS, RAM, hard drives, etc... but were representative of their generation IMHO. The reduction in encoding times was pretty much what one would expect based on MHz ratings.)

      Bloat can be a real problem. But one person's bloat is another person's feature. And with so many idle CPU cycles, it's a no-brainer to add more features.

    3. Re:I still remember 8088 was hot by untaken_name · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The issue with really fast systems is really bad and bloated software is allowed.

      So true. It seems like Office takes about the same amount of time (if not a little longer) to open up now as it did under win 3.1 on a 386
      Why bother having a faster chip and more RAM if you're going to get progressively lazier with the coding? Sigh. The idea seems to be, "We now have more processor speed and RAM, so there's no need for optimization. After all, why would anyone want to use more than one program at a time?"

      Here's my favorite site for Anti-Bloatware products and funny writeups of bloatware:

      http://www.radsoft.net/

    4. Re:I still remember 8088 was hot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A 40mhz NeXT? A NeXTstation Turbo was only 33mhz. What did you end up with? I could only afford a pithy (8mb ram 200mb HD) NeXTstation in 1991. The memory and hard drive upgrades were UNGODLY expensive.

      Now I have 16 times the ram on my keychain because of a 20 dollar impulse buy at Frys.

    5. Re:I still remember 8088 was hot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "one person's bloat is another person's feature". True, but it misses the problem. The problem is that manufacturers' dislike their customers. User-unfriendliness. Both the bloat problem and much of the security problem can be solved by making features installable. Give the user the freedom to decide for themselves what they want-and rely on actually making a better product to make your profit. Not old-line autocratic so I doubt if we'll ever see it, but it would solve the problem.

  5. Look at more recent stuff by metalac · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I bought a laptop about 3 years ago for around $2000 and at the time it was an average laptop. Look at what you can get for $2000 today, it's usually top of the line stuff, mine would probably cost around $1000 now. I guess the price change goes along with the time no matter what the only thing is that we are blind to the fact that some things that used to cost thousands of dollars ten years ago where top of the line back then, while now they're considered garbage. Look at these new plasma displays and stuff that sell for few thousands. I bet our grandkids will make fun of us and call us dumbasses because we spent so much money on displays that they could get (in year 2030) for about $150 each with a FARRR better quality and size.

    1. Re:Look at more recent stuff by PedanticSpellingTrol · · Score: 1
      Grandkids? Hell, you'll probably do it yourself. I'm still using my Tandy 1000 RL...

      to prop up my monitor ;-)

    2. Re:Look at more recent stuff by ron_ivi · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Ray Kurzweil has made some pretty well thought through predictions that by 2030 a $1000 computer will be far more powerful than the human brain. By the end of the century, he predicts a typical computer will have more computation power than _all_ human brains put together.

      If these trends continue, we're in for a very intereseting time.

      And Ray isn't just any old crackpot. He has a good track record at not just forseeing the future, but executing well on it - he's responsible for the first omni-font optical character recognition, the first print-to-speech reading machine for the blind, the first CCD flat-bed scanner, the first text-to-speech synthesizer, the first music synthesizer capable of recreating the grand piano and other orchestral instruments, and the first commercially marketed large-vocabulary speech recognition....

    3. Re:Look at more recent stuff by JWSmythe · · Score: 4, Funny
      Judging by most of the computer "users" I've met, computers surpassed the average users mental capabilities in about 1998. :)

      Most users can be replaced by a simple shell script anyways, so that wasn't hard to prove.
      #!/bin/pseudoperl
      #
      # Replacement for average user
      # v1.0b

      use ICQ;
      use email;
      use browser;

      while (1){
      while ( period = "waking hours" ){
      $input = browse( randsite() );
      send_icq( To => randuser(),
      Message => "$input ! hahaha!");

      $input = read_mail();
      send_email (forward_message());
      );
      sleep (8 hrs);
      };
      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    4. Re:Look at more recent stuff by foobsr · · Score: 1

      computers surpassed the average users mental capabilities in about 1998. :)

      Hmm, not because computers became more complicated or major paradigms shifted. Just an access issue. Similar story may be written with respect to the automobile.

      CC.

      --
      TaijiQuan (Huang, 5 loosenings)
    5. Re:Look at more recent stuff by transient · · Score: 1
      In some respects, computers have long surpassed the power of a human brain. Solve the following for values of n from 0 to 100:

      (2^n + 15) / 4

      This takes an immeasurably small amount of time for my computer to do. I'll bet it takes you a bit longer.

      I've read The Age of Spiritual Machines, and I think Ray Kurzweil is full of crap. He has certainly produced impressive things in the past, but his ideas about the mind take reductionism to a ridiculous extreme. He should stick to building hardware and leave philosophy to people who actually know something about it.

      --

      irb(main):001:0>
    6. Re:Look at more recent stuff by [000000] · · Score: 1

      while true;
      Gosub with no return

    7. Re:Look at more recent stuff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "What was the most enjoyable thing you did yesterday?"

      This takes considerable longer to teach a computer how to answer.

    8. Re:Look at more recent stuff by transient · · Score: 1

      And it has nothing to do with computation.

      --

      irb(main):001:0>
    9. Re:Look at more recent stuff by Jozer99 · · Score: 0, Troll

      You mean $150,000,000,000. You forgot to factor in inflation of the US Dollar resulting from the disasters of the Bush Presidency in 2000-2004, then the Stratosphere wars of the Bush III presidency from 2016-2020. Also, displays are made from plastic, which is made from oil, which is gone.

    10. Re:Look at more recent stuff by WuphonsReach · · Score: 1

      I bought a laptop about 3 years ago for around $2000 and at the time it was an average laptop. Look at what you can get for $2000 today, it's usually top of the line stuff, mine would probably cost around $1000 now.

      Back when I bought my first laptop, I paid around $3600 and it wasn't even top of the line at the time. (Usual price for a business laptop was closer to $4000 back in 1992/1994 timeframe.)

      Four years ago, a top of the line laptop was around $3000. You could pay more, but for $3k you could easily get a desktop replacement with lots of memory and a decent hard drive.

      Prices have now fallen (as you pointed out) to around $2200 for a top-of-the-line laptop. That includes a higher res screen (1400x1050), 1GB of memory instead of 256/512, 60GB HD instead of 30GB, plus a DVD-writer.

      Just wish I could get a 127ppi *desktop* LCD. All of the ones I've seen are either 96-100ppi or you have to pay $$$$ for a 200ppi LCD. A 1600x1200 127ppi LCD would be sweet (or even better, a 1920x1080 LCD at that density).

      --
      Wolde you bothe eate your cake, and have your cake?
  6. And yet, little seems to have changed... by jkrise · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Those days, with a 10MB Tandon hard disk on my $1,000 Personal computer, I could edit documents, use the humble telnet to log in to the Unix server priced at $2,000; I could update a bit of data on to that Ingres database using 'Forms'. To update a form on a server from a client still seems to need about $1,500; so it's not all that big of a difference.

    --
    If you keep throwing chairs, one day you'll break windows....
    1. Re:And yet, little seems to have changed... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One change -- the OS seems to take a bit longer to boot these days.

    2. Re:And yet, little seems to have changed... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lot's of things have changed. If you really just wanted to do only that, used PC that do all that and more can be had next to nothing. Heck, I bet you can get it completely for nothing if you looked around. So why don't you use that? Because you want *more*. You want a PC that can store your entire music collection and browse through thousands of photo in seconds in millions of colors in high resolution.

      I could buy my childhood dream computer (Amiga 2000) for $25 now if I wanted, yet I don't. It still does everything it did when I drooled over it in the stores but could afford. Nostalgia is nice, but let's not forget that many things truely *have* improved.

    3. Re:And yet, little seems to have changed... by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 0, Flamebait
      so it's not all that big of a difference
      There is a big difference... The point is that it's not just that prices of individual bits of hardware are coming down, but overall prices as well, e.g. the price you can expect to pay for an average system.

      My father's first computer was a self-built jobby and (for the time) top of the line. He must have spent $10.000 on that thing. With the advent of personal computers, prices dropped rapidly... and for a long, long time, it seemed that an average computer would cost about $1500 or so. The last 5 years or so, this price has come down. Check out Dell... they're offering a system for as low as $500 (and even throw in a printer). A few $100 more and you'll have a decent home computer suitable even for games (no, not Doom3 at 20 million fps of course).

      If all you do is surfing, word processing, spreadsheets, and the occasional game, then you can get something good for about $750. Computers certainly weren't that cheap 5-10 years ago.
      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    4. Re:And yet, little seems to have changed... by toby · · Score: 1
      The UNIX server was likely a lot pricier than $2000.

      For instance, here are real leasing figures dated 1 June 1993 for a MIPS RC3240 RISComputer, 16.7MHz, 8MB RAM+8MB expansion, RISC/os (UNIX), 766MB 5.25" SCSI drive.

      Monthly lease cost was $551.84 over a 1 year term! (Australian dollars).

      --
      you had me at #!
  7. /.'ed by Joey+Patterson · · Score: 4, Funny

    I hope that site wasn't hosted on a 128K Mac that they brought here in a flying DeLorean.

    1. Re:/.'ed by Agg · · Score: 2, Informative

      No, it's a P4 3GHz doing the webserving with a dual AthlonMP 2800+ doing the database back-end. S'funny, the servers are both coping fine, so I'm wondering if we're being capped on a router somewhere..

  8. How by Julian+Morrison · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...does $5999 for an 8.6MB hard drive strike you?

    As silly. I mean, why didn't they want that one more dollar?

    1. Re:How by bobhagopian · · Score: 1

      For the same reason that a gallon of gasoline costs $1.49 and nine tenths. If they were to sell the hard drive for $6000, I'm sure a lot of people would think "Hmm, $6000 is a lot of money" even though it's only a dollar more. Something about that first digit tends to affect consumer decisions.

    2. Re:How by eingram · · Score: 4, Funny

      So they could advertise, "8.6MB hard drive now LESS THAN $6,000!"

      Woo! Sign me up.

    3. Re:How by Cornelius+Chesterfie · · Score: 1

      Umm...I was told when I was a child that they do this xxxx9.99 pricing to avoid entering a higher sales tax bracket (here in Canada at least). Could someone confirm/deny? Because "it sounds less expensive" seems like a pretty silly reason...not that we haven't seen things far more retarded from marketing drones.

    4. Re:How by darkewolf · · Score: 1

      Marketing theory (based on something I read a number of years ago) is that prices that contain many 9s in them sells better.

      A product for $14.99 will sell better than one for $14.95 if similiar products.

      For some reason 9s sell.

      Although given that australia no longer has 1c or 2c coins, most sub-dollar values are now in 5c increments.

      --
      "That is not dead which can eternal lie...."
      Nimheil
    5. Re:How by Tim+C · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The theory I heard was that it was to force the cashier to open the till (to get the customer's change), thus making it harder for them to simply pocket the money as the customer turned away.

      I also imagine that there's an element of truth to the marketing angle, of 49.99 being advertised as "under 50!" and seeming cheaper subconsciously.

    6. Re:How by name773 · · Score: 1

      i doubt the cent has a significant effect on tax. in the us, we do sales tax proportionally (5.6% where i live), and i am fairly certain that it's just a cheap marketing trick.

    7. Re:How by AnotherFreakboy · · Score: 1

      My understanding is that they are both right.

      In Australia (though I am not an accountant, and this may have changed since last I looked into it) the tax is based on the dollar amount, ignoring the cents, so you could get 99c untaxed by charging $X.99 rather than $X+1.

      The "It sounds less expensive" reason also works. If you charge $6 and your competitor charges $5.99 the gain in profit from making an extra 1c per sale is less than the loss from people saying (or thinking) "that product costs $6.something, and this one is only $5.something, I'll get the cheap one". The difference is marginal, but when it takes so little effort to just charge 1c less, hey, why not?

      --
      Why not get the real ultimate power?
    8. Re:How by tarunthegreat2 · · Score: 1

      I took a few marketing classes in college, and the "Sounds cheaper" explanation was the reasoning they gave for the .99 pricing. They said that when people recall 5999, they say 5000+ dollars instead. But what's the point really - when you add on taxes, it's no longer 9.99 anyway...

    9. Re:How by Yokaze · · Score: 1

      > here in Canada at least

      In other countries, there are no such tax brackets for prices. Still, there are such Price-1 values.

      I also heard the story about "sounds less expensive". IRC, at one point in time, a research showed that people subcounsciously choose that way. But, I also heard that people have already adapted to it and nowadays are usually rounding up, so it is totally useless.

      --
      "Between strong and weak, between rich and poor [...], it is freedom which oppresses and the law which sets free"
    10. Re:How by AnotherFreakboy · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Thats something I love about Australia, that I know will severely annoy me should I ever travel to the USA. In Australia the price shown on the item/menu/shelf/whatever, is the price you pay for it. If it says $5.95 on the price tag, you pay $5.95 at the register. Taxes are already added in (items which attract the GST are marked as such on the reciept), and you aren't expected to tip anyone for anything. Incidentally I never quite got tipping. To me its your employers job to pay you to serve me, not mine. If your boss doesn't want to pay you, they should set up as a self service business. I would expect the cost of providing service to be factored into the total cost, not tacked on at the end.

      --
      Why not get the real ultimate power?
    11. Re:How by ZimZamBillaBam · · Score: 1

      Tell that to WalMart. Rarely (if ever) is something priced ending in 9.

    12. Re:How by tarunthegreat2 · · Score: 1

      Yea this is something that used to bother me too. In India, they take it even one step further than Oz, and have the manufacturer publish a Maximum Retail Price inclusive of taxes (MRP) on the packaging itself. As for tipping, I remember reading somewhere that economists consider tipping and corruption as the same phenomenon as both exhibit the same effect on demand & supply...something like that...Paying $17 bucks for a haircut in USA used to hurt! So Americans, if you see any unkempt Indian Software Monkeys (as I'm sure you will), it's because it only costs them 90 cents to have it done back home, no tips!

    13. Re:How by really? · · Score: 1

      Someone better tell this to the Japanese. Here all prices seem to end in "8", or more precisely "98"

      --

      "Consistency is contrary to nature, contrary to life. The only completely consistent people are the dead." A. Huxley
    14. Re:How by darkewolf · · Score: 1

      Could be a cultural thing as well. I really should find the book the paper / article / study was published in again. Oh well :)

      --
      "That is not dead which can eternal lie...."
      Nimheil
    15. Re:How by dukeisgod · · Score: 1

      Changing to un-even values also forced cashiers to use the register to make change. Round numbers were much easier to calculate in one's head, making life much easier for a theif with his/her hand in the drawer. (According to my marketing professor.) This is in addition to the other reasons listed here.

    16. Re:How by Diag · · Score: 1
      In Australia (though I am not an accountant, and this may have changed since last I looked into it) the tax is based on the dollar amount, ignoring the cents, so you could get 99c untaxed by charging $X.99 rather than $X+1.


      I think that's wrong. I believe the cents are counted.
      --
      Serving Suggestion: Defrost
    17. Re:How by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And if you add even more 9s, it gets even easier to sell. $999,999,999...

      No wonder I always get a feeling that marketing people are stupid. Come'on, everyone knows that 0 is better than 9, and even with stupid prices like $14,999 we still round upwards.

    18. Re:How by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really? When the price says $5,999 I say "around $6,000".

      I always round upwards to be sure I'll be on the safe side, money-wise. So, if the price is $6,000, there is no reason to round up, and I will use the exact price. But if it says $5,995 I will see it as more expensive than it really is.

    19. Re:How by Diag · · Score: 1

      I'm Australian. I like having the option to tip someone working a relatively low-paid job if they've looked after me more than they need to. I always tip in restaurants unless the waiting staff were *bad*. What annoys me is seeing a "sur-charge" added onto the bill. If that's the service charge, what's the rest of the bill for?

      --
      Serving Suggestion: Defrost
    20. Re:How by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      ...does $5999 for an 8.6MB hard drive strike you?

      Please stop striking me even though I am an AC!! It is no fun striking someone you don't know.

      $5999 worth of heavy equipment striking me hurts my body as well as wallet...

      Does it come with 10 licenses to run Linux?

    21. Re:How by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LESS THAN $6,001!

      should work too.

    22. Re:How by ignavus · · Score: 1

      So that the sales assistant had to put the $6,000 in the cash register and ring up the one dollar change.

      I was told that prices are odd amounts so that the customer always waits for the sales assistant to register the sale and print out the change required on the cash register. If the cost were an even $6,000, the customer would just give the assistant the money and walk away, leaving the sales assistant to decide whether to register the sale ... or pocket the cash.

      --
      I am anarch of all I survey.
    23. Re:How by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      Let me guess. . . you and the other non-tippers also object to being called Mr. Pink. You'd rather be called Mr. Purple, right?

      Well, Mr. Purple is some other guy on some other website.

      Damn, Lawrence Tierney was great in that movie.

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    24. Re:How by NeuralAbyss · · Score: 1

      Cents are counted for sales tax (GST), but for income tax and other individual-based taxes, cents are excluded.

    25. Re:How by untaken_name · · Score: 1

      Yes. I imagine it wouldn't be suspicious at all when inventory time came 'round. I find it far more likely that they were using the time-honored method of dropping the dollar (or cent, as is even more likely) to put their product 'under' a certain price point. This has been mentioned before ITT but it's worth noting again. Also, most people spending more than $20 or so want receipts, which you must wait for. It is very doubtful that many people would simply throw down six grr and then just walk away with no receipt. Perhaps your theory would work in places where most things were inexpensive, but then the smaller the transaction, the less likely embezzling is to be detected. Also, you theory is flawed in another area. An employee familiar with the pricing scheme can easily remember common totals, and even give change properly, and not actually ring it up. Obviously, if you can see the cash register screen and you are paying attention, this is not likely, but then do you *always* look at your total? I assert that many people only look when the total they're given verbally sounds wrong, or when the screen is prominently displayed. Sure, some people pore over every item with a microscope; most of us don't bother.

    26. Re:How by untaken_name · · Score: 1

      not really. it's not just the fact that the price is less than some arbitrary number. it's that $6000 seems to morons like a lot more than $5999. This is because they are processing only the first number in the price, which is why it is *vital* to change that first number. Examples:
      $30.00 - no getting around it, it's thirty bucks.
      $29.99 - seems like ~$20 to morons, still thirty bucks though, especially after tax
      $5000 - five thousand - ouch!
      $4999 - *under* $5000 - seems like ~$4000 to morons - now you're saving a whole grand!
      etc.
      in contrast, $6001 - six thousand - $6000.99 - still six thousand, even to morons. hope this helps you.

    27. Re:How by stanmann · · Score: 1

      True, and if you know the pattern, you can determine how much on sale something is by the last number... Starts at 7, then 5 then 4 then 6 and finally 9.

      --
      Food not Bombs is a nice platitude but it breaks down when you notice that the Bombees are usually well fed
    28. Re:How by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1
      I was told that prices are odd amounts so that the customer always waits for the sales assistant to register the sale and print out the change required on the cash register. If the cost were an even $6,000, the customer would just give the assistant the money and walk away, leaving the sales assistant to decide whether to register the sale ... or pocket the cash.

      Someone's going to buy a $6000 item and not wait for a receipt? Besides, show me a place where sales tax doesn't ALREADY turn the price into an odd number requiring change. No, the reason for prices like "$5999" has always been marketing psychology.

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    29. Re:How by Fred_A · · Score: 1

      Any place outside of the US from what I saw. The US is the only country I've seen so far that doesn't display the full price of goods. And when travelling cross country, it gets tiresome to always have to go to the counter to add what the sales tax are locally.

      What's wrong with just adding them on the damn label, people know they'll pay them anyway.

      --

      May contain traces of nut.
      Made from the freshest electrons.
    30. Re:How by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Here in the US, you can be paid less if you are considered a tipped employee, the minimum wage is like two bucks less. This supposedly gives waiters the incentive to actually do their job in a nation which seems free from the burden of the "work ethic". Just today I walked out of a mexican restaurant from which I usually get decent service because they started taking someone else's order before mine even though I'd been there, trying to get the attention of the waiter, for about five minutes before the other people walked in. They were seated and their order taken in less time than it took me to get my chips.

      Aside from that, tipping makes perfect sense in a capitalistic society. The most honest way to show someone your appreciation in such a system is to give them money, because money represents work.

      The only thing wrong with a tipping system is that people seem to sometimes think that a tip is always warranted. (A certain song by (I believe) the band "Live" suggests that you should leave some change even if your waitress was, and I quote, a "bitch".) Well that's a bunch of horse shit. People have told me "they have to eat too" - well, I come to a restaurant for service. Service from the kitchen, and service from the waitstaff, and even service from the dishwashers. Maybe I should make that especially service from the dishwashers. If I'm not getting service, why should I pay a premium?

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    31. Re:How by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you want to pay the sticker price, go to Delaware (no sales tax). I get screwed because I commute to Delaware and get 'withheld' for the high state income tax.

      Waiters/Waitresses are allowed to be paid below minimum (they can be paid as low US$3.00/hr) because their tips are figured into their pay. So if you have a big tip, your waitress may break into 'Like a Virgin'!

    32. Re:How by cas2000 · · Score: 1

      the service staff should be properly compensated for their time and labour, not reduced to begging in the hope that a customer's whim will see them paid.

      their employer is taking up their valuable time, which has value even if no customers actually walk in the door.

      tipping as an optional extra is a good thing, but an evil thing when it is used as an excuse for an employer to evade their obligation to pay their staff.

    33. Re:How by really? · · Score: 1

      I was 1/2 joking. One of the reasons it's not .99 in Japanese is because the pronounciation for "99" has almost the same sound as that for "emergency".
      So, in a way it is cultural.

      --

      "Consistency is contrary to nature, contrary to life. The only completely consistent people are the dead." A. Huxley
    34. Re:How by darkewolf · · Score: 1

      Thats a rather interesting linguistical / cultural point. Rather interesting indeed.

      --
      "That is not dead which can eternal lie...."
      Nimheil
  9. Slashdotted - Try overclocking the webserver by LardBrattish · · Score: 1

    I couldn't get to page 2 - just when it was getting interesting...

    --
    What are you listening to? (http://megamanic.blogetery.com/)
  10. Blast from the past by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Damn! Slashdotted on 2 of 4 comments. I guess they're still using 8 MB drives. That's all cool, but warp into the future already!

    1. Re:Blast from the past by Joey+Patterson · · Score: 1

      That's all cool, but warp into the future already!

      [as Doc Brown] "1.21 gigawatts?!?! How am I going to generate that kind of power? It can't be done, can't!!!"

  11. Expensive on either end by TheOtherAgentM · · Score: 1

    Prices are high for really new stuff and really old stuff. That's not just for initial cost. That is for maintenance too. The idea is to keep your hardware in the middle, probably upgrading between 2-5 years. It saves money. I mean, think about how many hours it takes to troubleshoot a DOS program now. Who knows the stuff anymore? This is an idea a colleague of mine and I are trying to get studied by an economics professor I used to work with back in college.

  12. Pentium P5 64 bit CPU ? by weighn · · Score: 1

    I'll have one of those (137KB jpg).
    But can I overclock it from 60Hz to, say, 3000Hz?

    --
    Mongrel News all the news that fits and froths
    1. Re:Pentium P5 64 bit CPU ? by marol · · Score: 0

      Since it's claimed to run at 60000Hz, your demands for awesome speed won't likely be a problem.

    2. Re:Pentium P5 64 bit CPU ? by orionpi · · Score: 1

      I belive they are refering the 64bit data bus, rather than 64bit registers and address space that was featured in the Alpha at that time.

  13. July 1983 : Oracle by sloth+jr · · Score: 1

    In Byte Magazine, July 1983, Oracle was mentioned in the updated products section (I think it was version 2 or 3), with multi-user licenses priced between $600 - $2000.

  14. How silly by Turn-X+Alphonse · · Score: 4, Interesting

    We're living in an age where things no longer just run, they take leaps and bounds. We're starting to look at Terabytes of storage for the average web monkey (leech if you perfer) at a reasonable price, go back five years and it was impressive to have a HD collection going to even half that.

    Once you have got 2x2 you start to get 4x4, 6x6, 12x12 and take much bigger leaps at each step untill you're talking 100 tera HDs.

    --
    I like muppets.
    1. Re:How silly by PsychoFurryEwok · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Indeed, this one company we were doing work for had a Petabyte of storage at this one data center. For cheap too...ridiculously awesome how things have come down.

    2. Re:How silly by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

      Funny, I was just working on one of our multi-terabyte multi-cpu multi-ghz machines today. My first "modern" machine was a 486/33 with a 20Mb hard drive.

      This one isn't our fastest, it just has the largest storage. I'm sure in 10 years, it'll be nothing that I'd even want to work with, because it'll be so slow.

      $ uname -a
      Linux server 2.6.7 #1 SMP Tue Jun 29 03:51:47 EDT 2004 i686 unknown unknown GNU/Linux

      $ df -h
      Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
      /dev/md0 19G 2.7G 15G 16% /
      /dev/sda 3.2T 407M 3.2T 1% /array1
      /dev/sdb 3.2T 407M 3.2T 1% /array2

      $ cat /proc/cpuinfo
      processor : 0
      vendor_id : GenuineIntel
      cpu family : 15
      model : 2
      model name : Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 2.40GHz
      stepping : 5
      cpu MHz : 2400.080
      cache size : 512 KB
      [SNIP]
      processor : 3
      vendor_id : GenuineIntel
      cpu family : 15
      model : 2
      model name : Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 2.40GHz
      stepping : 5
      cpu MHz : 2400.080
      cache size : 512 KB

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    3. Re:How silly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can you donate it to me when you don't want to use it? Sure would be useful for all that german porn.

    4. Re:How silly by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

      I'll mention it to my bosses. :)

      We have a 6u Dell Quad Xeon 500 box that we're retiring in the next few weeks, that we're trying to figure out what to do with. I suggested it would make a very nice boat anchor. Aparently we're still paying the financing to Dell on it. Maybe they'll take it back. :)

      You wouldn't really want it as a workstation, it sounds like a freakin' turboprop airplane taking off when it's running.

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    5. Re:How silly by mandalayx · · Score: 1

      Actually I think the most impressive leaps have already been taken in a previous age.

      check out this graph of the population of the world. the sudden explosion during the Industrial Revolution is staggering, dwarfing even the exponential increases in computer power.

      graph 2
      graph 3

    6. Re:How silly by Diag · · Score: 2, Funny

      That's a lot of empty disk.

      The storage administrator I once was is screaming "Give it back! Wasting money!"

      --
      Serving Suggestion: Defrost
    7. Re:How silly by lucas+teh+geek · · Score: 1
      /dev/sda 3.2T 407M 3.2T 1% /array1
      /dev/sdb 3.2T 407M 3.2T 1% /array2


      wow, that sure is a lot of empty space you got there!
      --
      TIAEAE!
    8. Re:How silly by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      My 4 year old G4 edit station has had (at various times) over a terrabyte of storage, which really is no big thing these days. Back in 1992, I paid $1100 USD for a Micropolis 2112 AV drive in an external scsi enclosure!

      Here's the kicker. I recently put the drive in an old Apple Powermac 7100, and it still works great! I'm even running OS 9 on it.

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    9. Re:How silly by general_re · · Score: 1
      Aparently we're still paying the financing to Dell on it. Maybe they'll take it back.

      There you go - stop paying and let them come repo the thing. Problem solved ;)

      --
      ABSURDITY, n.: A statement or belief manifestly inconsistent with one's own opinion.
    10. Re:How silly by PsychoFurryEwok · · Score: 1

      Ouch and now we pay roughly a dollar a gig. $1100 just shocks me! I could never justify spending that. If prices go up again I'll be forced to become a thief.

    11. Re:How silly by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      The work that I was doing paid for it many times over. Still, I'm afraid to tell you what I paid for a slightly used TruVision Nu Vista + video card back then. $3000, which was a bargain. I forget what it retailed for, maybe twice that.

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    12. Re:How silly by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 1
      Well, no.

      The graph shows an order of magnitude increase in population since the beginning of the industrial revolution. My computers' speed has increased more than 2 orders of magnitude in 20 years, mass storage 3 orders of magnitude, RAM more than 3 orders of magnitude.

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    13. Re:How silly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (counts the drives here in my home office)

      24 spindles... 2590MB (net usable space).

      To be fair, about 1024MB of that is simply scratch storage space for holding video files that are being worked on.

      However, I plan on adding another 1000MB in the near future as I upgrade a 6 drive RAID5 array (275MB) with new 250GB drives. It'll end up as (2) drives in RAID1, plus (4) slow 5400 scratch drives for online backups. That will also allow me to get rid of (3) spindles in external storage devices.

      And if I finish building my HDTV PVR, that's going to have a 80GB O/S drive, 150GB backup image drive (Acronis imaging software), 2x250GB RAID0 (450GB) for storing the video files, plus a removable 150GB drive for off-loading content to carry to another room.

      Considering that the wattage requirement for an 80GB drive is almost identical to a 250GB drive, it makes some sense to consolidate in order to save on electricity costs. (Each drive costs around $2/mo to spin 24x7.)

    14. Re:How silly by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

      :)

      Actually, I just made some more changes to it yesterday, and wiped out just about everything to do it.

      I was having a bastard of a time trying to get the OS to boot from one of those 3Tb arrays, and I had been previously booting from an old 6Gb IDE hard drive from the RMA pile, so I transfered everything from the 6Gb to a pair of 20Gb drives (RAID 1), and wiped all the partition information from /dev/sda and started over.

      Today, we start populating it. Wheeee. :) I have 400Gb to go onto it immediately, and plenty more to follow.

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    15. Re:How silly by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

      I'll be more than happy to leave it unplugged laying just outside of the cabinet. I'll even put a big sign on it saying "Take this one!" :)

      I don't think my boss would appreciate getting the bad marks on his credit though.

      It'll still make a mighty fine boat anchor.

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
  15. I can buy what now?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    a time warp computer...

    hmmmm but does it run linux?

    1. Re:I can buy what now?! by JWSmythe · · Score: 1


      Any 386 or better, my son.. :)

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
  16. This makes profit margins great... by TheOtherAgentM · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Who keeps up with current prices? No your average person, that's for sure. Coming out of an era when the last computers purchased were $3000, convincing someone to pay $1200 for a Dell is not too difficult.

  17. Hard Drives by Brainix · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Every hard drive I've bought has been bigger than every previous hard drive I've bought combined. (40 MB, 200 MB, 2 GB, 4 GB, 20 GB.)

    I hope my children will be able to make similar claims.

    --
    Raj Against the Machine! http://social-butterfly.appspot.com/
    1. Re:Hard Drives by macosxaddict · · Score: 1

      That's not so impressive. To do that, you only have to double the size on each new hard drive. How many people really need a hard drive more often than every year and a half?

      Yeah, I know. Moore's law is for transistors, not magnetic storage. But it's close enough for Slashdot.

    2. Re:Hard Drives by rembem · · Score: 1

      I hope my children will have free access to unlimited free storage space for free. (Albeit it will probabaly be monitored access to virtually unlimited storage space for viewing ads.)

    3. Re:Hard Drives by jmv · · Score: 1

      That was roughly true for me... until I bought a laptop:
      1.2 GB, 1.6 GB, 3.2 GB, 13 GB, 20 GB, 45 GB, 80 GB, (laptop) 30 GB, 60 GB. That's one of the main drawbacks of laptops right now I think.

    4. Re:Hard Drives by ediron2 · · Score: 1
      Every hard drive I've bought has been bigger than every previous hard drive I've bought combined.
      Maybe you're not doing it right or often enough. Or perhaps you'd break this trend if you had a wife/girlfriend with her own demands.

      Mine in reverse chronological order... 30g (laptop), 120g, 80g, 80g, 40g, 30g, 27g (laptop), 20g, 20g, 15g...

    5. Re:Hard Drives by Epistax · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That's a very interesting thing to note. This would have almost happened with me but I bought an SATA drive for speed, not storage. As far as I'm concerned *gasp* 80 gb is currently enough for me. That's enough for several games and every application I own to be installed at the same time with lots of media on the side. If I need more space, sure I might have to sacrifice (swap out a game, some media) but it's really not an issue with CDRWs anyway-- I'm not losing anything.

      That being said I'll buy larger, faster drives when they come available for around the same price. How about a similiar list with the "units" being $/(gig speed)? Of course I'll need a handy expression for speed, but you get the point.

    6. Re:Hard Drives by swtaarrs · · Score: 1

      I'm the same way, I went 13GB, 40GB, 120GB, 250GB. From the sizes, I'm guessing I could probably be your kid. Also of note is that I think each drive was cheaper than the one before it. I'm not sure about the 13GB because it came with my first computer, but my 40GB was $200, my 120GB was $180, and my 250GB was $150. It's really hard to put limits on how large hard drives will go. When I got my 40GB hard drive, I was sure I'd never fill it up; now I have my 120 and 250 in my computer and both almost full (digital video). This is all over a span of only 3 or 4 years, it's almost scary to think where we'll be in another 10 years.

    7. Re:Hard Drives by strider44 · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately I can't as of a month ago when I bought a 120gb drive. It went like this: 512kb, 4mb, 50mb, 512mb, 1.18GB, 8.6GB, 40GB (37.7GB), 80GB (77GB), 120 GB.

    8. Re:Hard Drives by untaken_name · · Score: 1

      now I have my 120 and 250 in my computer and both almost full (digital video)

      Come now. This is slashdot. It's ok to simply say 'porn.'

  18. Ahh.. the "good ole days". by IOOOOOI · · Score: 2, Interesting
    My first hard drive, 325MB, cost $1 per MB. Then I bought an expanded (or was it extended?) memory board and 512K of RAM for $450.

    Not too long after that I paid almost $800 for four 4MB SIMMS for my new illegal installation of Win95, and thought I was a badass.

    1. Re:Ahh.. the "good ole days". by SocietyoftheFist · · Score: 1

      You sure you have your timeframe right? I paid $300 for 24 megs around the same time. Memory manufacturers ramped up production in anticipation of a massive Win95 migration that never happened and memory dropped through the floor. I do remember paying roughly $300 for a 486DX/33. Sadly that was to upgrade my 486SX/25.

    2. Re:Ahh.. the "good ole days". by IOOOOOI · · Score: 1
      Hey, I'm not saying I got the best deal in town, but yes the numbers and time are correct. I remember thinking I was getting a good deal because when I built that computer 6 months or so earlier RAM was about $60 per meg.

      I remember memory prices dropping around that time though, and suspecting that M$ was subsiding the memory market in order to help Win95 get a foothold.

  19. not *that* amazing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    when you consider that programs were measured in hundreds of K back then.

    Also like a lot of old-timers (in my 30's), I wax nostalgic for the days when you put in the disk, turned the computer on, and used your program. No DRM, no crashes (not as often as now, anyway), no spyware, no internet or solitaire or slashdot, no mysterious slow-down in your OS over a period of months (KDE, why do you do that????).

    Then again, no powerbook, no OSX, no VMWare, no wifi or bluetooth, no Ruby (okay, well, there was Lisp and SmallTalk, that's true), no Zaurus linux workstation that fits in your pocket.

    That stuff is cool but I really miss the simplicity and reliability.

    1. Re:not *that* amazing by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

      Ahhh, the days of the text based video games.. I miss "Hitchhikers Guide To The Galaxy"

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    2. Re:not *that* amazing by servognome · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Think the nostalgia has clouded your vision.
      DRM - Those 5 1/4 disks had anti-copying features. Try to copy and they made a terrible grating sound. Thats why there were programs like Copy II Plus, and Locksmith, to circumvent the copy protection (I think it was some intentionally bad sectors on the disk). Not to mention the other ghetto anti-piracy features, like code wheels, and "find the 3rd word of the second paragraph of page 6"
      Crashes - There were horrible compatibility issues. Lots of games made you select from a list of components for video and sound. Alot of times my stuff wasn't on the list (darn you Tandy!). So I'd end up with junky graphics, and/or glitchy or non-working sound. Later on sound cards (like the first sound blaster) would randomly crash your system if things weren't setup just right (IRQs, memory addresses). Then when the first dedicated video cards started coming out they were the random crasher.
      Internet - No, but there were BBS's which were as good, or bad as the internet. Chat, door games, message boards and 125k pr0n file... just start downloading and come back the next day.
      Solitaire - Solitaire has always existed. This program references one version made in 1985.

      Mysterious slow downs - No, pretty much everything was slow so didn't matter. Of course to get certain things running you'd have to mess around with the autoexec.bat and config.sys files to free up enough main memory, 640k my ass billy G!

      --
      D6 63 0D 70 89 81 BB 8E 7B 7C 5F 5D 54 EA AB 73
    3. Re:not *that* amazing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I liked that the C64 had the OS built into firmware. You *couldn't* corrupt it, and if you wanted to get back to the first screen, or if a program crashed, you would just reach for the on-off switch, and it was back up as soon as you flicked it on.

      I'd like to see another half-console like the C64. Pop in a game, and it runs without configuration, but plug in a monitor and it is a useful entry-level computer. The XBox could potentially become something like this if MS stopped locking it down.

    4. Re:not *that* amazing by G-funk · · Score: 3, Informative

      Crashes - There were horrible compatibility issues. Lots of games made you select from a list of components for video and sound. Alot of times my stuff wasn't on the list (darn you Tandy!). So I'd end up with junky graphics, and/or glitchy or non-working sound. Later on sound cards (like the first sound blaster) would randomly crash your system if things weren't setup just right (IRQs, memory addresses). Then when the first dedicated video cards started coming out they were the random crasher.

      Hehehe... Youngsters. I believe the grandparent poster was lamenting the times before the days of irqs and hercules adapters and PC compatibles. I read his post and missed my apple //c :)

      --
      Send lawyers, guns, and money!
    5. Re:not *that* amazing by robin · · Score: 1

      If you read the source to that page you can see the URL for the Z5 file, which you can then download, and play with the interpreter of your choice. See The Interactive Fiction Archive for one of those. If you enjoyed the HHGTTG you may also be interested in the CD "The Masterpieces of Infocom" -- I got mine from lacegem I think. There's loads of good stuff in ifarchive as well.

      --
      W.A.S.T.E.
    6. Re:not *that* amazing by Diag · · Score: 1

      I'm trying to remember my Apple //e crashing. Didn't it crash out to the "monitor" occasionally, where I think you could screw around with the contents of memory and registers.

      After that I had an Amiga 500. Spent a lot of time looking at the "Guru Meditation" crash screen.

      --
      Serving Suggestion: Defrost
    7. Re:not *that* amazing by dcw3 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Also like a lot of old-timers (in my 30's), I wax nostalgic for the days when you put in the disk, turned the computer on, and used your program. No DRM, no crashes (not as often as now, anyway), no spyware, no internet or solitaire or slashdot, no mysterious slow-down in your OS over a period of months (KDE, why do you do that????).

      Damn you wipper-snappers (in my 40's), I wax nostalgic for the days when if you had a disk you were probably rich, cuz they were only available on mini, midi, or main-frames. I was lucky enough to be a technician back in the mid '70s, and enjoyed many a day repairing multi-platter disk crashes.

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    8. Re:not *that* amazing by zakezuke · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Later on sound cards (like the first sound blaster) would randomly crash your system if things weren't setup just right (IRQs, memory addresses).

      Tell me about it.

      2nd printer port, defult address IRQ 5
      sound card, prefered address IRQ 5
      SCSI card, default address IRQ 5
      Network adapter, default address IRQ 5
      QIC02 adapter, Default address IRQ 5

      8 slots, everything set to IRQ 5. Common problem. Who needs to use their modem, tapedrive, scsi card, etc...etc.. at the same time anyway.

      Com1/Com2 default IRQ4/3 respectivly
      Internal modem com3/com4 default irq4/3
      Mouse not working when you go online, well who needs it anyway. AOL not working because your internal modem set to a diffrent IRQ, not their fault!

      And not to speak of pre vesa video cards. Either you were fortunate enough to get 8bit color in a game, or you were screwed if your chipset wasn't supported.

      While there are those days I'd like a good old dos application to do some tedius tasks... for the most part the good old days were pretty horrible.

      --
      There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
    9. Re:not *that* amazing by sporty · · Score: 1

      30 does NOT make you old.

      -s

      --

      -
      ping -f 255.255.255.255 # if only

    10. Re:not *that* amazing by JeffWhitledge · · Score: 0

      Stop it, you're making me cry.

      Ah, the good old days. AUTOEXEC.BAT, I hardly knew ye.

      (sigh)

      --
      These comments do express the opinions of my employers, and, personally, I think they're complete rubbish.
    11. Re:not *that* amazing by Archibald+Buttle · · Score: 1

      640k my ass billy G!

      Let's face it Bill's a nerd, and he has a particularly bad record at predicting computing trends. What he is good at is business.

      Remember too this was in the days of DOS. Microsoft took a while to realise that GUIs would be important. Graphical interfaces suck up memory. If you're using a GUI 640kb isn't even enough memory to display the screen you're looking at these days, let alone run some programs too.

      An even greater example of short-sightedness in the area of RAM was Steve Jobs insisting that the Mac should be restricted to 256kb, since it was intended to be a comodity appliance. Fortunately the engineers didn't listen to him and made sure it could be upgraded.

    12. Re:not *that* amazing by untaken_name · · Score: 1

      Com1/Com2 default IRQ4/3 respectivly
      Internal modem com3/com4 default irq4/3
      Mouse not working when you go online, well who needs it anyway. AOL not working because your internal modem set to a diffrent IRQ, not their fault!


      Actually, I have to take issue with your statement here. You can easily set up a mouse on com1, irq 4. then you can set up an internal modem on com3, irq 4. Then you can happily use both at the same time forever with no problems (assuming you don't introduce any)
      I had much more trouble trying to make com3 use a different inturrupt request back in the old days.
      Also, if you used a winmodem (who else just shuddered?) it would sometimes come up with things like: com 12, irq 7. Now, your printer port and your modem don't share irqs too well. However the com1/com2/com3/com4 system was designed so that 1/3 and 2/4 shared irqs. It worked just fine. Now, trying to set up com1, irq4, 3F8H and com3, irq4, 3F8H, you had trouble. (3F8H was com1's base port address, com3 was 3E8H by default)

    13. Re:not *that* amazing by zakezuke · · Score: 1

      Actually, I have to take issue with your statement here. You can easily set up a mouse on com1, irq 4. then you can set up an internal modem on com3, irq 4. Then you can happily use both at the same time forever with no problems (assuming you don't introduce any)

      You can now perhaps... but I was talking about the days of old. 386/486 class systems to be specific. Many people didn't notice a problem with a mouse / modem sharing an IRQ until they started using windows.

      I can think of many a system that came from the maker configured in this way, a pair of com ports, and an internal modem that shared an IRQ port with either com1 or com2. My cheepo resolution was to take the user's mouse and put it on a diffrent com port. Fine for your average joe who only needed one com port, but it seemed annoying to me that systems shipped with a conflict, a conflict that you only noticed if you tried to use the modem and the mouse at the same time.

      --
      There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
    14. Re:not *that* amazing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i remember playing an old star wars games (x-wing something or other) that you had to enter symbols for, that were on the top of the page below the page numbers.

      god that was frustrating

    15. Re:not *that* amazing by untaken_name · · Score: 1

      What I am saying is that very few modem/mouse combinations have problems *unless* you are putting both the modem and the mouse on the exact same com port. if the mouse is on com1, and the modem is on com3, there is no problem, even though both use irq 4. this is because the base port address is different. i have personally set up hundreds of such systems, as i used to work for a computer store and that's how we built our machines. very, very seldom did we have any problems at all, unless someone set com1 and com3 to the same base port address, or just put both devices on com1. we *did* see a problem sometimes where windows would put the wrong base port address in by default occasionally, but that was very easily fixed. I am speaking of 386/486 machines running windows 3/3.1/3.11

    16. Re:not *that* amazing by zakezuke · · Score: 1

      i have personally set up hundreds of such systems, as i used to work for a computer store and that's how we built our machines. very, very seldom did we have any problems at all, unless someone set com1 and com3 to the same base port address, or just put both devices on com1.

      And I've seen many systems direct from the computer store with the same configeration. In the 386/486 age, sharing an IRQ wasn't so big a deal because people didn't typicaly multitask. You wouldn't print and modem nessicarly at the same time, you wouldn't modem and use the sound card, or modem and network, just for example. I strongly suspect you never noticed an issue because dos terminal programs (telex/procomm/communique) were likely still in vogue which didn't use the mouse.

      I know the time period well as I talked to many a computer store who configured their systems in that way. They didn't really give a shit about the mouse and modem sharing an IRQ because so few people would ever notice. I understand because those who did choose a non-standard irq for their internal modem ran the risk of AOL or the users terminal software not working.

      This was the major issue that caused me to screw the PC and go Amiga for a time.

      --
      There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
    17. Re:not *that* amazing by untaken_name · · Score: 1

      irq sharing is common, and often intentional. even when using the two devices simultaneously, it is rare that there is a problem. this applied during the 386/486 era as well. some devices had problems with it, true. however, configured properly, the vast majority did not. I did see hundreds of incorrectly configured machines, however. when I was consulting, I'd move the modem to com2 if possible. I preferred it because you could avoid even the possibility of a conflict. again, though, for the most part it was fine. most problems that people attribute to hardware are in fact improperly configured hardware/software.

  20. Cost of hard drive space over time by calvrak · · Score: 5, Informative
    The Historical Notes about the Cost of Hard Drive Storage Space website has an incredible list of the cost per megabyte and then cost per gigabyte over the history of storage.

    Someone else pointed out that the price of computers never really change, but that there is more power for the same price. In 1987 our family computer (mid-range) and printer cost around $1200. Today the same amount of money will also buy a mid-range computer (at least for gaming). However, this idea is getting less and less true as computers become commoditized and "powerful enough".

    1. Re:Cost of hard drive space over time by HonkyLips · · Score: 1

      I'm a video editor, and non-linear editing eats up hard drive space. Our company has on file the original quote we got in June 1995 for 18 gig of hard drive space, for a Media 100 editing system. The cost was $18,000 for 4 x 4 gig 5400rpm Seagate SCSI drives in a RAID array. By the time the company decided to purchase the system, one year later in May 1996, the cost of 18gig of SCSI RAID storage was down to $8,000. Four years after that, in June 2000, we purchased an additional 36gig for $3,600, which bought us 10,000 rpm Seagate cheetahs. And in March 2003 we bought 240 gig of RAID storage for $1,200. But the more drives we buy, the more we fill them up. We also used to have hard-drive towers for an old "lightworks" editing system. In about 1992, 30 gig of storage cost over $60,000- an array of 10 3.2 gig drives.

      --
      Putting syrup in coffee is some form of blasphemy.
    2. Re:Cost of hard drive space over time by Diag · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I started working as a mainframe operator for a financial company in 1990.

      At home around that time, I had a 486/DX33 with 1 MB of RAM and a 256MB hard disk.

      At work, we had a data centre full of these refrigerator sized IBM 3390-1 disk boxes that held a massive 1GB. These were slowly being replaced by the new 3390-3 (er, 3GB). I *think* a single drive was about $US30,000. We bought them in strings of 8 or 16 or more.

      Tape was cheap and plentiful at $100 for a 200MB tape. The place I worked at had a library of 70,000 active tapes.

      --
      Serving Suggestion: Defrost
    3. Re:Cost of hard drive space over time by Diag · · Score: 1

      Sorry to reply to myself, but I just had to add that I was very happy when the robotic tape libraries arrived!

      --
      Serving Suggestion: Defrost
    4. Re:Cost of hard drive space over time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't see anything about inflation adjustment in any of these lists. Far from staying constant, the price of a family computer has come way down, if you use constant dollars.

    5. Re:Cost of hard drive space over time by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      That's a bunch of hooey. A mid-range computer is only about $600 with a printer today, and you can get a high end computer (in terms of desktop systems) for about a grand. You can also get a refurb system for a reasonable price these days. Back then, a refurb cost about what a new one cost, maybe 10% less. These days, it's about 30% less. Check out geeks.com's refurb systems section if you don't believe me.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    6. Re:Cost of hard drive space over time by jmcneill · · Score: 1

      Wow -- I just wasted a ton of time reading some of the links from the link you gave us. I'd especially recommend the History of Telegraph and Telephone Companies in Nova Scotia -- Thanks (and well done to the author)!

  21. Absolutly true. by Pathway · · Score: 1

    I remember when I was going through my old stuff, stubmled on a early 90's copy of Computer Shopper Magazine, and flipped to a vender who was selling an EGA monitor for $2995.

    But, this is the case with competition: To make money, you must have either a better or cheaper product.

    This is also true with other electronic devices as well: Video Game Consoles, Cell Phones, Toys, etc...

    Eventualy, I see that we'll have throw away computers avalible to everybody. I just wonder how long away that really is... Sm:)e.

  22. Here's their first mistake... by TiMac · · Score: 1

    Too many sites do this, and then face the fury of /.

    Unfortunately some of the images are quite large (none more than 250KB)

    --

    1. Re:Here's their first mistake... by Agg · · Score: 2, Informative

      Well, we've sent out more traffic than this in the past, in terms of bytes/sec. So large images aren't too much of a concern for us. I figured it was the usual servers-dying slashdot effect, but they're both coping fine. Current theory is that we're being capped on a router or something. Anyhoo, site is working, but slow.

    2. Re:Here's their first mistake... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      were working on /. ing the servers now then too :o) good article thou...

  23. Moore money. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "Time Warp Computer Pricing Revealed"

    And yet the cost of computer magazines have gone up. $12 for a Linux magazine with a CD.

  24. the good ole FDD by weighn · · Score: 1
    from the article: the scariest thing of this group is the special on two boxes of 3.5" floppy disks for just $99.50. Add $16 if you want double sided!

    Considering that the HDD from the same ad is a whopping 20MB - I'd like common removable media format that holds around 5% of the capacity of my HDD.

    --
    Mongrel News all the news that fits and froths
    1. Re:the good ole FDD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      got a 94GB HDD?

  25. Radio Shack Model 16 by Stephen+Samuel · · Score: 3, Informative
    Ran Microsoft Xenix (which was later sold to (old) SCO).

    It had a 68000 and a Z-80. When running as a Unix box, the Z80 functioned as an I/O processor. When runing as a Radio Shack Model II, the 68000 was essentially idle

    The first box to land in Edmonton ran Xenix/Unix on 256KB of ram, and an 9MB hard disk. I don't remember how much the box cost but the (14" platter) Hard Disk was about $10K.

    I actually managed to get Xenix, vi and nroff running off of one 1.2MB (12") floppy disk (including a swap partition) with the second floppy disk being used for user data.

    --
    Free Software: Like love, it grows best when given away.
    1. Re:Radio Shack Model 16 by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

      The first computer I used was a TRS 80 Model III. It was at my school. There were no floppy drives, just a single cassette deck, but we didn't have anything to actually put in there. :) I think the most productive thing it ever ran were the basic programs I'd type in from a learning basic book.

      Wheeeee, I can make text scroll on the screen. :)

      Oh, the good ol' days. Now if I were to write the same thing, it'd scroll by faster than you could see.

      [insert obligatory "walking to school in the snow uphill both ways every day" here]

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    2. Re:Radio Shack Model 16 by Stephen+Samuel · · Score: 1

      The original TRS80 Model 1 Level2 had 16K of memory and cost about $2000.
      The first program I did for took a simple moon lander program (where you entered the brun for the next second) and changed it into a real-time display.
      (I had to read the keyboard by peeks and pokes, and build the number input the hard way.) I used double-sized characters to fill the screen with data, and I think I even had a visual indicator of distance to the ground, and did the work to make sure that you didn't bounce off the ground. It was a couple of weeks work, and I was told I could have sold it. I lost my tape a long time ago.

      --
      Free Software: Like love, it grows best when given away.
    3. Re:Radio Shack Model 16 by JWSmythe · · Score: 1


      I found an old catalog a while back that showed the Model III to be just over USD $3000.

      You could have probably sold that. That would have been a great game back in the day. That's way beyond what I could have written then. But again, I was only about 8 years old.

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    4. Re:Radio Shack Model 16 by Stephen+Samuel · · Score: 1
      The model III was touted as a home/business model. It started at either 16 or 32K with no floppy disk.

      The Model II was a massive business-oriented machine. it started with either 32 or 64K of RAM and an 8" floppy disk (capable of holding 512K single sided and (later) 1Meg double sided vs. 360K for the (later) double-sided 5.25" floppies that were optional on the Model III.).

      As for the game -- yeah, I was told that I could have sold it, but I really didn't believe that until I saw some of the other garbage that was being sold commercially. By then, I was having a hard time finding the audio casette that I'd stored the program on. I was told the same thing

      --
      Free Software: Like love, it grows best when given away.
  26. erm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Like a lot of old timers (in my 90s), I am nostalgic for the days when you whip out a wooden portable rack with beads and start flickering them around. No DRM, no crashes (even survives jasmine tea spilled all over it), no buttons, no radiation from screens, no need for power, no mysterious disappearance of your work when the power goes out.

    Then again, no $modern_gadget1, $modern_gadget2, $modern_gadget3, $modern_gadget4.

    That stuff is cool but I really miss the simplicity and reliability.

  27. Yeah but.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But at least back then they weren't getting faster faster than you could upgrade them.

  28. Hard Drives-The chronicles of "Dick". by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    "I hope my children will be able to make similar claims."

    Viagra, Viagra-II, Viagra-III, Viagra-"Is that a space elevator, or are you just happy to see me?"

    1. Re:Hard Drives-The chronicles of "Dick". by AndroidCat · · Score: 2, Funny

      Then again, IBM used to call them Fixed Drives. What was that about children?

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    2. Re:Hard Drives-The chronicles of "Dick". by untaken_name · · Score: 1

      Holy shit, I'm a pedantic fucker.
      Fixed Disks, good sir. Fixed Disks.
      Yes, I know some people call them 'Fixed Drives,' but not IBM.

  29. Amdahl V6 by Stephen+Samuel · · Score: 1
    This box had 24Meg of RAM and ran at roughly 1 MIPS in 1979. I Can't remember just how much hard disk space it had (I think it was well over 200Megabytes), but Don't believe it was included in the price tag.

    It could handle up to about 300 simultaneous users before it started to slow down real noticably, and it cost about $6Million Dollars.

    --
    Free Software: Like love, it grows best when given away.
  30. Honeymoon present by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    in 1987 an aussie colleague got married and went on a honeymoon to the us. his proudest revellation on his return was the 5mb harddrive he bought for $1000!

  31. Location of Manufacture by Tlosk · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Of course back then a lot of kit was made in the US, are there any significant parts that are made in the US anymore? On a related note, how much does it cost to ship say a standard ATX case from China to the US? Is it on the order of a couple pennies or dollars or what?

    1. Re:Location of Manufacture by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course back then a lot of kit was made in the US, are there any significant parts that are made in the US anymore? On a related note, how much does it cost to ship say a standard ATX case from China to the US? Is it on the order of a couple pennies or dollars or what?

      Strangely enough, I know of at least one large company which makes generic ATX cases in south
      Georgia, USA, then ships them to China to be stuffed with electronics. Then back here to be sold.

  32. who are you? by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    his hollywood agent?

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:who are you? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Nah, just a guy with an interest in the history of technology.

      When your average academic make silly claims predicting the future, I tend to discount them ("if you're so damn smart, why don't you do something about it"). When someone _does_ show that his predictions are good -- by putting himself in the right place at the right time -- IMHO it gives him a lot more credibility.

      [though we've drifted pretty far off topic]

  33. /.ed! by desmogod · · Score: 0

    I remember my old 386sx kit computer I bought.... Could probably buy a sports car with what I paid for it...... You've gotta love it when they know they're fscked :P /.'ed (0 Comments) Thursday, 5-August-2004 17:19:49 (GMT +10) - by Agg Things will be a bit slow for a while, as we're being slashdotted at the moment. Hi slashdotters!

  34. Modern hardware is expensive rubbish .. by Peter_JS_Blue · · Score: 1, Funny

    .. my ZX81 only cost me £200 20 years ago ! OK, it doesn't do all the fancy things the new machines can do ( Email, Browsing, Word processing, Spreadsheets, Databases, Sound, CD-ripping ..) but it does all the things I need ( Door stop or ammo to sling at next doors cat when it craps on my lawn).

    --
    Art Makers Just an excuse to show photos of naked women !!
    1. Re:Modern hardware is expensive rubbish .. by easter1916 · · Score: 1

      It did not, you big fibber... I bought one in Ireland at the same time for IE£55 or so, and the pound sterling was worth a hell of a lot more than an Irish pound... God, brings me back. Christmas Eve 1984, up all night punching in my first "program" from Computer & Video Games magazine. By the next morning, I was completely hooked.

  35. Orders of magnitude by wolfdvh · · Score: 2, Interesting
    We should probably talk in terms of how many orders of magnitude of change we have seen. My first 'real' PC came with a 4 mhz z-80 and had a whopping 64K of memory. It had 2 floppy drives, One for the OS and program I was running, Wordstar, dBase II, etc. and one for the data. Came with everything you would expect in a business computer but a printer for about $1700 US. At 23 pounds, with a handle, it was considered a portable.

    I remember the first time I saw super good deal on a HD. 10 Meg for only $1000 dollars! I'm mean to say at only $100/meg that was amazing--and that was in Early '80s dollars. A few months ago I went over a terrabyte at home with drives well under a dollar a gig.--simply amazing!

    Comm has come nearly as far. I was living in Germany in the early '80s and you could get a 300 bps acoustic modem for about $350 or if you actually wanted to touch their wires you could rent a 1200 bps modem from the BundesPost for about $90/month. It was all x.25 packet back then so to connect to 'The Source' or Compuserve you got to pay about $12.50 an hour and pay per character which I later calculated at about $20/hour at 300bps.

    My first months bill, just looking around at stuff, was about $800 (that is when I learned it was per character) and even though I cut back drastically, next month was $400 because of the billing cycle before I stabilized out at $70-80/month.

    But it was worth it, I was hooked into the world!

    It still never ceases to amaze me how far we have come in such a short time every time I look at the adverts.

    SET trip_down_memory_lane=OFF
  36. A$120 for 8Mb RAM? by Jafar00 · · Score: 1

    I remember my first RAM expansion for my Amiga. A$120 for 8Mb! The reason I remember so vividly is that the next week, RAM prices took a dive and the same expansion cost A$80 ;)

    --
    RebateFX.com - Spread rebates for Forex traders
  37. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  38. Cool, not scary -- Hitachi 9980 in my future! by ediron2 · · Score: 1
    This isn't scary, it's the coolest thing imaginable.

    I've spent a chunk of time lately playing with a Sun/Hitachi 9980. Imagine a fiber channel array of hard drives the size of a nice, hefty subzero 2-door refrigerator (2m x 2m x 1m, roughly, for 1 control module and 1 array module).

    It hooks up to a dozen computers, has room for over 100TB of drivespace (raid-5), has an configuration console beyond the OS that allows some slick on-the-fly tricks, is compatible with virtually ANY OS, lets you slice the array a zillion ways, gives you a data pipe of Gigs per second, and costs a million dollars. Now that's some serious power: you could capture the entire speex-quality audio of 400 people's entire 80-year lives on it (400 x 80 x 365.25 x 24 x 3600 x 1k/s = 1.0098 x 10^15 bytes, or 100TB).

    But... one day I was trying to find words for how cool this thing is, and I realized: I can remember paying a buck a byte for memory, and wincing at HD prices. I also still have a ST225, for nostalgia or whatever reason. And a 250gig drive is down around $100 now, so I'm just 2^9 away from 100TB. A conservative pseudo-Moore's law rate for HD's gets me there in 20 years: my ST225 (20Meg) is about 20 yrs. old, or 2^13 in 20 yrs).

    Given the exponential rate of storage growth, I am less than 20 years from being able to buy one of these puppies at commodity prices. And by 2030 it'll fit on my wrist.

    EX-cellent...

  39. newsflash-Old as time. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Software too. Used to be you had to pay for an OS, or a C compiler, etc. Now $0 is a fair price."

    What do you mean "use to"? Piracy is as old as the computer industry. Remember Bill Gate's "letter to hobbiests"? The whole mish-mash of software protection schemes on games, and other software.

  40. My benchmark has moved was $5,000 by oo_waratah · · Score: 2, Interesting


    First computer Z80 64k $5,000 (second hand)
    Second computer IBM AT $5,000 (second hand)
    Third computer 386/25 $5,000 (new)
    Fourth computer Pentium $4,000
    Fifth computer Pentium $3,000
    Current computer $1,500

    As a programmer I no longer need to be on the bleeding edge just to do my work. A cheap computer is sufficiently fast. My requirements of a computer have gone down in essence.

    1. Re:My benchmark has moved was $5,000 by Mr+Teddy+Bear · · Score: 1

      Sorry dude... if you're talking US dollars... you got ripped every single time up until the last computer you bought. Especially the used ones.

  41. I've got some late 70s mags at home, somewhere by Kris_J · · Score: 1

    Shame I didn't know about the original request for scans. I've got a substantial magazine collection going back to at least the late 70s. The trick is finding them. I started off storing them chronilogically, but I got a huge heap from someone else all at once and they haven't been in an order since. Still, I bet I could dig up some seriously insane prices.

    1. Re:I've got some late 70s mags at home, somewhere by Agg · · Score: 1

      you're welcome to email them to me. I don't have plans for a followup article, but I could always put them on our news page. credited to you of course, if you like.

    2. Re:I've got some late 70s mags at home, somewhere by Kris_J · · Score: 1

      Best I've found so far is an '86 Australian Mac User. $495 for an 800k floppy drive. $12,599 for a 172MB Hard drive and 40MB Tape bundle. $7,395 for a Mac Plus with a 20MB HDD. More interesting, $194 for a Laserwriter toner cartrdige (3000 pages).

  42. Answer: NO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When perennial drunk (in the old days at least) Bob Hawke was Prime Minister, his Treasurer Paul Keating DEVALUATED the Australian dollar on purpose.

    Till that time I used to order everything from the U.S. as most items were cheaper when postage (across the Pacific) and import duty was factored into the price.

    There was a time when 70 cents Australian was worth $1 U.S. and then there the was the price of petrol (gasoline) ... now I'm starting to side track ... the good old days ... no police radar and V8 cars you could actually afford ... sigh !!!

    1. Re:Answer: NO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But exporters were screwed, and the trade deficit was massive, so the dollar *had* to be devalued.

  43. Technology is cheap now, but... by huchida · · Score: 2, Insightful

    A bit offtopic, but... Yes, technology is much cheaper now than in the dawn of computers... But think of all the monthly charges we've taken on as just a part of life. I can remember when all I paid were phone and electric bills... Now many of us pay $35 and up for a cell phone (on top of the land line), $30 and up for broadband, easily $50 and up for digital cable... And more.

  44. Considering... by ashitaka · · Score: 1

    That would have been a full-height 5.25" hard drive I would imagine it would strike you very hard.

    --
    If you don't want to repeat the past, stop living in it.
  45. Geforce 6800 = Rediculous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Theres graphics cards that are 500 USD's, GeForce 6800 Ultra. In the future this will be rediculous, sense this is greater than the cost of my excellent emachine computer and monitor.

    Especially with the beginning of onboard directx compatible aperatures, in the new Intel 915/925 motherboards.

  46. Not to date myself, but ... by anorlunda · · Score: 4, Insightful

    When I started in this business in 1966, RAM cost $1 per bit. That's more than 25 million to 1 times more expensive than today's RAM.

    More to the point, in those days a man-day of programmer's time was worth 2 or 3 bits of memory. Therefore one could justify several days of work to save a single byte. That economic was the cause of much of the often criticised spaghetti code from those days. Even when it was not true, the programmers believed that sharing a single line of code between more than one if-then-else clause was worth a month's pay.

    Even today, writing for clarity as opposed to writing for performance is far from being universally accepted.

    1. Re:Not to date myself, but ... by tryone · · Score: 1

      Even today, writing for clarity as opposed to writing for performance is far from being universally accepted.

      Though writing for neither seems to be quite catching on.

  47. A quick lesson in economics. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The 8MB hard drive was not more valuable 20 years ago than it is today, the currency was less valuable. Let's say an 8MB hard drive costs 8 cents today. Since it was worth 5999 dollars 20 years ago, it is reasonable to assume that the value of the Australian dollar has decreased by 74987.5% since 1984. And since the US dollar is worth only 70 Australian cents, it is also reasonable to assume that we're in even deeper shit than they are. Check the math, it's all there.

  48. I know this is PC only... by XemonerdX · · Score: 0

    ...But back in the '80's when home computers such as the Commodore 64, ZX Spectrum and MSX were popular, prices for those never ever really sky-rocketed. Compared to the way more expensive PC's at that time (AT/XT), they could do pretty much the same stuff like word processing etc, except they were used way more as gaming computers (and had way better & nicer games at the time than PC's).

  49. Depends on what you want to spend. by houghi · · Score: 1

    The price I pay is not what I could GET for a certain price, it is what I can afford for a certain price.

    For me on average the computers I bought are the same price. I look at my budget and with that I buy a new computer. If I would have 6000$ now as a budget, I am sure I will find a PC that will match that.

    So a more interesting thing would be how the change in anual $ per person is compared to then. Remember that then there were a LOT of people who did not even HAVE a PC, so the amount will be 0 and increasing.

    People will have a treschhold on when to buy. When the amount drops enough, they will buy. At 6000$ almost nobody bought, at 600$ there will be a lot more. At 6$ still more.

    Demand increases production.
    Production lowers prices.
    Lower prices increase demand.

    --
    Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    1. Re:Depends on what you want to spend. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Demand increases production.
      Production lowers prices.
      Lower prices increase demand.


      Maybe. but in 1979, a Northstar Horizon with 80K ram, 2 floppy disk drives, a 300 baud modem and os
      was $8,995.00. A new Datsum pickup (loaded) was
      considerably cheaper than that.
      They make more pickups now than they did in '79,
      but the price has at least trippled. What happened?

  50. Has computer price really dropped? by pe1chl · · Score: 1

    Sure when you compare byte-for-byte, the price has dropped dramatically over 20 years.
    But when you compare price of a typical user's system, is the difference really that much?

    Today a typical office desktop machine would be around 1000 euro (or US$). That is also what I paid for my first computer in 1980. Of course it had 16K instead of 512M of RAM, a tape recorder instead of a 120GB harddisk drive, a 2 MHz Z-80 processor instead of a 3 GHz Pentium 4, but the users of that time bought it for the same purpose as the users of today.

    So while you get a lot more for your money today, it is not like the price of a desktop system dropped from 'about the same as a car' to 'about the same as a candybar'.

    1. Re:Has computer price really dropped? by alex_ware · · Score: 1

      for office machines now days it is a lot less : dell do b2b machines at aroiund (GBP) £400

      --
      If you have nothing useful to say post as AC.
    2. Re:Has computer price really dropped? by krgallagher · · Score: 1
      "But when you compare price of a typical user's system, is the difference really that much?"

      That is what I found interesting. If you look, an entry level system in any of the adds that listed one could be had for about $400 US. At that same time, the bleeding edge of technology would cost you over $3000 US. I thought it interesting that the author did not recognize this fallacy in his logic. He even commented that software prices had remained stable. What he did not acknowledge was that a 15 year old game does not have the complexity or richness of game play that new titles possess. Sim City 2000 is no comparison to Meet The Sims, just like an AMD 486-DX4/100 processor is no match for an AMD 64.

      --

      Insert Generic Sig Here:

    3. Re:Has computer price really dropped? by rjstanford · · Score: 1

      What he did not acknowledge was that a 15 year old game does not have the complexity or richness of game play that new titles possess. Sim City 2000 is no comparison to Meet The Sims, just like an AMD 486-DX4/100 processor is no match for an AMD 64.

      And yet I find myself feeling nostalgic for a lot of the old games which I spent orders of magnitude more time with than the current set - they were just a lot more playable. For me, at least. So while the graphics may not have been as realistic (just as those of a word processor weren't back then), their percieved value was at least as high.

      Ah, Carrier Command. Or way back, Munch Man. Adventure. Hack. Heck, I spent way too many hours on Hunt the Wumpus.

      --
      You're special forces then? That's great! I just love your olympics!
  51. Tandy by Trillan · · Score: 1

    I remember seeing one of Tandy's first PC-compatibles for $5100 CDN. I don't remember if that included a monitor -- I think it included a CGA one. That must have been a 386 at most.

    1. Re:Tandy by TheToon · · Score: 1

      Typically, 8086/88 had CGA or MDA, 80286 had EGA or BW Mono and 80386 had VGA or BW Mono. Not very likely to have a CGA in a 80386 machine... :)

      BW Mono was considered state-of-the art for desktop publishing and text work, that started to enter the stage on 80286 class machines.

      This is just meant as a general idea, I'm sure lots of you have examples of a 80386 PC with CGA in it -- but it wasn't the norm.

      --
      //TheToon
    2. Re:Tandy by Trillan · · Score: 1

      I think the high end machine was a 286, and all the others were 8088s. I was deliberately vague. :)

  52. Hyper ROM by Peter_JS_Blue · · Score: 0

    A very long time ago, I read a short story about a programmer who is given a 1Meg upgrade for his C64 (I think) by aliens. He was totaly amazed when his trusty C64 boots up with "1048578 BASIC Bytes Free" instead of "38911 BASIC Bytes Free". Today I could lose many times that much RAM and not even notice

    --
    Art Makers Just an excuse to show photos of naked women !!
  53. The fastest machine in the building by Dr_Java · · Score: 1

    I remember as the only "developer" at a company got the fastest computer in the officea 486dx2 50Mhz. (~12 years ago) It was so fast that people came round just to look at it.

    New thinking, old and new games

  54. Not so by geekoid · · Score: 1

    factor in inflation, and the fact that most everything else has gone up in price for the equivilent item.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  55. Inflation people, inflation. by geekoid · · Score: 1

    A lot of people are saying that they pay the same amout for a computer today, as they did 10 or 20 years ago. But if you factor in inflation, you are paying less.
    Plus, most things go up in price for the equivilent product.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  56. Upgrading slowly & over vast distances by Bushcat · · Score: 1
    Early in the 80's, I bought one of the first BBC Micros (serial # 13?) for my brother. It maxed out my credit card and I upgraded it from 8kB to 16kB (or maybe 16kB to 32kB) by ordering one chip a week from the US.

    In 1988 I upgrade the company's 286 desktop from, I think, 5 MB to 30 MB. It was much cheaper to fly from Japan to Singapore, buy a drive and fly back, than to purchase locally.

    Not long after, I built the company's first drive rack out of unexpectedly big, heavy full-height 5" drives, learning in the process how important spindle sync can be. I can't remember the cost, but I do remember the company CEO pointing out that I got the drives instead of him getting his new company car.

    We also had the local Apple rep try to "unsell" us our Laserwriter, because he couldn't believe it was working with a PC.

    Not only was everything expensive, companies were learning only slightly faster than their customers.

  57. Same script, 10 years earlier... by geekoid · · Score: 1

    #!/bin/pseudoperl
    #
    # Replacement for average user
    # v.1b

    use Game;

    while (1){
    while ( period = "waking hours" && tsr = "working" ){
    $input = game;

    );
    sleep (5 hrs);
    };

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  58. Not too mention by geekoid · · Score: 4, Funny

    that everybody know Australa is populate by thieves, and therefore stole the computer anyways. ;)

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    1. Re:Not too mention by Manaz · · Score: 1

      Of course, the US was never a British penal colony either.

      How quickly we forget... :/

    2. Re:Not too mention by Braken · · Score: 1

      You mean..

      "That everyone knows Australia is populated by thieves, and therefore stole the computer anyway."

      At least we know how to spell.

  59. server fast again :) by Agg · · Score: 1

    Thanks for the server stress-test! We've tweaked the config a fair bit and things look happier now. If you had trouble reading the article earlier, sorry about that. Should be good to go now, touch wood. :)

    1. Re:server fast again :) by tracker1972 · · Score: 1

      After getting the bad request error and something about cookies I binned your adserver cookies and everything was fine, for a while, then I had to bin them again. One of your advertisers who can't keep up? Bomb your www.overclockers cookies and get the site back viewers. Tracker

    2. Re:server fast again :) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Should be good to go now, touch wood. :)

      This is Slashdot. No encouragement is needed in
      that regard.

  60. Yes, it has... by imsabbel · · Score: 1

    Did you 1000 computer from 1980 have a printer? A monitor? Disk drives?
    I think not. With this stuff, even 1986 a cpc6128 cost 2000+.

    1980 a simple disk drive cost more then a whole pc now. A 9.6k modem was more expensive than a tft monitor. A 4MB EISA Gfx card 1990 was more expensive than a dual cpu DELL server today.

    and thats not even considering inflation.

    --
    HI O WISE PRINCE. WHT TOOK U SO DAM LONG?
    1. Re:Yes, it has... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know I'm not the one you asked, but anyway...

      Did you 1000 computer from 1980 have a printer?

      Yep. My PC doesn't, though.

      A monitor?

      Yep. Although the TV also worked.

      Disk drives?

      Floppy, yes. Harddrive, no. But it wasn't necessary, because I didn't have Microsoft Office 2003.

      Hardware prices calculated as $/MB may have gone down, but hardware prices calculated as $/effective speed have gone up, because even as the clock frequency and amount of RAM doubles all the time, "system requirements" seems to triple in the same time.

      Time from hitting the power button until Visual Studio 2003 is ready for use -> long enough that I leave the computer on over night. Time from switching on my Commodore 64 until basic is ready to use -> less than a second. And that's just for bootup speed, Visual Studio can't even keep up with my typing speed, although it's running on a 2.6 GHz machine, 2600 times as fast as that old 1MHz MOS 6510 CPU.

    2. Re:Yes, it has... by pe1chl · · Score: 1

      What I want to state is that the average price of the average computer has not dropped that much.
      It has dropped a bit, but not that much as when you look at price-per-memory-byte etc.

      Sure I have spent lots of money on parts that are cheap now, like $400 for a floppydrive or $1000 for a 5MB diskdrive.

    3. Re:Yes, it has... by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 1
      True. However, when you factor in inflation, it has dropped quite a bit. Since 1980, in the USA, inflation has increased prices by a factor of ~2.4 (according to this inflation calculator.

      So, $5000 back then is ~$12000 now. Don't know about you, but even ignoring superior performance, I don't pay anywhere near $12000 for a decent computer these days. Closer to 1/10th that.

      And when you factor in superior performance, it gets positively frightening. Modern PC is to 1980 PC as Concorde is to DC3. And Concorde doesn't cost 1/10th of what a DC3 cost.

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
  61. Well, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    great story. REALLY GREAT! Extraordinary pieces of hardware are ALWAYS expensive.

    Sigh. Slashdot seems like getting dumb.

  62. Why studying Economics is a good thing by palfreman · · Score: 1

    Excellent little bit of economics there incast. Short, accurate & to the point. I'd have liked to have writted that :)

    1. Re:Why studying Economics is a good thing by adam.skinner · · Score: 1

      Short, accurate, and to the point? I wouldn't know. I didn't know what half of the terms he was talking about meant =p

    2. Re:Why studying Economics is a good thing by Llama_STi · · Score: 1

      obviously you studied economics instead of english. maybe try a 50/50 split next time, eh? ;)

    3. Re:Why studying Economics is a good thing by incast · · Score: 1

      ok so it's off-topic, but here's some plain english:

      > In a perfect world, the exchange rate will
      > adjust perfectly to inflation. However, in our
      > world, thanks to imperfect information,
      > inflation and exchange rates will vary in the
      > short run. Arbitrage does exist, as humans do
      > not have perfect knowlege of the future.

      If we have perfect knowledge about the future (e.g. future currency prices and corresponding times that those prices will prevail), exchange rates will adjust perfectly to inflation due to market pressures. Otherwise, it is possible to buy or sell currency today and sell or buy it back in the future to make money. This is called "arbitrage" -- making money by exploiting adjustments in the market over time. It is extremely risky, but ultimately profits could exist in the immediate term.

      (Reading: see articles on interest rate parity)

      > We can make ex ante predictions, but we will
      > still end up with ex post deviations from such
      > predictions.

      "Ex ante" (roughly) means "before the fact".. I can predict that the price of a Canadian dollar will be $0.75 US dollars tomorrow. However, if the price of a Canadian dollar is $0.76 US dollars tomorrow, there is a $0.01 "ex post" (after the fact) deviation from my prediction. The nature of time here is important: if I bought yesterday and sold today, general price inflation between yesterday and today must be about one and one third percent to wipe out the gain I could make. And such price inflation (1% per day) is quite extreme for relatively low-inflation modern economies.

      basically...... the original parent to my response was saying that currency markets adjust perfectly no matter what the time period is. Interest rate parity, the condition that should make this happen, is a long run condition, so odds are good that they do not. Inflation rates and exchange rates are correlated, but not perfectly.

    4. Re:Why studying Economics is a good thing by palfreman · · Score: 1
      Yeah, I don't think "writted" is a real word :)
      I still thought incast wrote a nice tight little piece of descriptive economics there, which is pleasing, like a neat little bit of code.

      /me previews post this time :)

    5. Re:Why studying Economics is a good thing by Llama_STi · · Score: 1

      heheh, np ;)

  63. Not surprising at all by iamdrscience · · Score: 1

    Is anyone surpised that hardware gets cheaper over time? This has been going on as long as people have been selling computer equipment. I was looking through a filing cabinet the other day and found the original invoices for my first computer (Apple IIe) and the hard drive for my first PC (540MB, at the time it was huuuuge amount of storage). Their respective prices IIRC were about $3,000 and $500.

    With $3,000 I could buy at least 4 of my current systems, each of which would be well over 1,000 times faster.

    1. Re:Not surprising at all by mc6809e · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Is anyone surpised that hardware gets cheaper over time?

      What really is surprising is that it continues to happen. There is nothing about the universe that guarantees cheaper and better products will be produced over time. It is only human cleverness that sustains this progress. That applies to most products.

    2. Re:Not surprising at all by tracker1972 · · Score: 1

      "each of which would be well over 1,000 times faster."

      Well that got my attention, what are you going from, Palm III to *****, or ***** to dual G5/P4/Athlon/whatever.

      trying to think what you get for $750 or £500.

      Tracker.

    3. Re:Not surprising at all by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 1
      Is anyone surpised that hardware gets cheaper over time?

      Moderately. Automobile hardware stays moderately close to constant price in real dollars. Performance improvements are incremental at best.

      Admittedly, computer hardware is not a mature technology. Or perhaps, only became mature in the last few years. Even so, when you look at a comparable period in automobile development (there was no exact analog, because computers were in mass production long before they were "mature", and mass production was developed for the first mature automobile), you do not see such a dramatic price/performance improvement.

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
  64. It's a cry for attention! by YeeHaW_Jelte · · Score: 1

    ... no mysterious slow-down in your OS over a period of months (KDE, why do you do that????).... Your computer is begging you to dump KDE and install WindowMaker, you insensitive clod!

    --

    ---
    "The chances of a demonic possession spreading are remote -- relax."
    1. Re:It's a cry for attention! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps... Another, possibly easier, solution would be to try to clean the cache of web addresses.

      While I haven't looked at the code, I believe the reason of this slow down is that the component in charge keeps them sorted alphabetically in some list. Also, I think there's a bit of un-necessary data structure (vector, list, hash, whatever) copying going around, which makes a lot of a difference with numerous URLs stored.

  65. Tandy 1400 LT by NothingToSeeHere · · Score: 1


    <eyes watering>

    Ah, memories... the Tandy 1400 LT was my first home computer. I must have been around 9 at the time. Before that, I always played on friends' computers (C64, Atari, Neckermann etc.) or on the Siemens and VAX systems at my father's lab.

    I remember getting to know DOS the hard way, because nobody told me to use "dir" to look for "*.exe" files (once I knew, I executed just about anything I could find...)

    Later, I spent weeks "optimizing" boot time by using a RAM disk and playing LHX Attack Chopper on its CGA display. Luckily, I didn't go blind. :-)

    Today, its mostly Macs, my Sun and my NextStation running OS X, Linux, OpenBSD and NeXTStep... MS-DOS 6.0 was bloated after all, so I never checked with Microsoft again. ;-)

  66. Did anyone scan "Electronics Australia" magazine? by N+Monkey · · Score: 1

    I inherited a copy of EA from about 1971 which featured a "build your own computer" project. It had words to the effect of

    "we decided not to use one of the 'new fangled' microprocessors"

    I think it had about 64 bytes (yes, bytes) of memory and was done in 7400 series logic!

  67. With apologies to John Mayer... by Skadet · · Score: 1

    ...boy I'm glad my life isn't more like 1983! Those prices...eek!

  68. The solution is simple... by lucason · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "The issue with really fast systems is really bad and bloated software is allowed." To really get performance, run 20th century software on 21st century hardware. Now that's a performant system.

    1. Re:The solution is simple... by mrjb · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I actually tried something similar. The mother of a friend had bought an old second hand machine that wouldnt accept an IDE CD-ROM drive yet. So I took out the hard drive and installed windows 3.1 on my own machine to put back the drive later. Sure enough, win 3.1 absolutely *flies* on a 233 MHz pentium.

      --
      Visit http://ringbreak.dnd.utwente.nl/~mrjb/growingbettersoftware to download your free copy of the book
  69. 64K? by pommiekiwifruit · · Score: 1

    Flash git! I had 5K of RAM and a 1Mhz processor and I loved it. By using the entire memory and loading text from tape I got it to display 40 columns of text! (4 pixel wide characters)... :-)

  70. Prices never changed by Oscaro · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Actually I think prices never changed. For example, over the last 15 years or so, I've alwasy spent 100$ for a reasonable amount of memory, every time I needed a memory upgrade. Of course the amount changed, but if you buy a "reasonble" PC today, you end up spending the same money you spent for an Amiga 500 in 1989.

  71. ZX Spectrum/Timex upgrade by 16K+Ram+Pack · · Score: 3, Interesting
    In 1983, I bought a ZX Spectrum with 16k of memory and later upgraded to 32K. The 32K upgrade chips cost me about 25UKP (about $40).

    On that price basis, I worked out that 1GB of memory would have cost me over 1 million dollars at the time.

    1. Re:ZX Spectrum/Timex upgrade by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      And just think of the horizontal totem-pole of modules in a line that would plug 1GB into the back of the ZX! Working with 256Kx1 DRAMs, that would be .. a lot.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    2. Re:ZX Spectrum/Timex upgrade by 16K+Ram+Pack · · Score: 1
      For the upgrade I did, I had to open the case and invalidate the warranty and pop the chips in.

      If you are thinking of the old 16K Ram Pack on the ZX81, then the number of these would be 64,000. They were unstable enough with 1. If each was about 2 inches high, that would be about 10,000ft tall!

  72. 1984 and 1987 by dcw3 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    No, I'm not talking about Geo. Orwell, I'm talking about the first year of the Mac. I've probably still got the ads for the 128k Mac...I know I've got copies of MacWorld and MacUser from back then, when I bought mine at an Air Base in Germany...if I recall correctly for around $1800

    I moved up to the 512ke, and then paid over $4000 for the Mac II in 1987, $1200 for a 12" Sony color monitor, another $1400 for an 80M disk drive, and around another $1000 for 1M of RAM! Yes, prices are a bit better these days.

    --
    Just another day in Paradise
    1. Re:1984 and 1987 by Life2Short · · Score: 1

      Yeah $4000 for the Mac II sure seemed like a lot of money, but Apples became even less affordable in the years to come. I caught Jurassic Park as I was flipping through the channels the other night, and I was struck by the sight of the Quadras and the huge SuperMac monitors that were used in that movie. I remember seeing it in the theatre and thinking those were machines I could only dream of. The Quadra 900 was introduced in 1991 for $7200!!! Quadra 800s came out in 1993 and were a comparative steal at $4700!!! My first computer was an Apple IIc $1000, amber monitor $99, and analog joystick $35.

    2. Re:1984 and 1987 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you really need to abbreviate George? I mean, really. You saved yourself two keystrokes in a many-word post. I mean....come on. Are you one of those people who type things like "U aren't going 2 believe what happened 2 me and my family and some friends the other day!"
      Minimal keystroke saving, maximum annoyance for the reader. You're typing comments on a web page. Take the extra five seconds to type your fucking words out, you fucking twit.

    3. Re:1984 and 1987 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about this: F U.

    4. Re:1984 and 1987 by jaysones · · Score: 1

      Have you looked at the Apple store lately? I don't think they have changed their RAM pricing since then!

      Kidding! Actually, I remember watching my dad upgrade our original Mac 128k to 512 like I was watching brain surgery.

    5. Re:1984 and 1987 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about this: suck my fucking dick, you retarded piece of shit. yeah, it took an extra few seconds to type it all out, but I think the reward is worth it.

  73. Reminds me of a joke... by beakburke · · Score: 1
    about a wall street trader and an economist.

    They are walking along the street when the trader sees a dollar laying on the ground and says to the economist "there's a dollar laying there on the ground". As the trader picks up the dollar, the economist chuckles and exclaims that it cannot possibly be, since if it really was a dollar someone would have already picked it up. So the trader examines the dollar and tells the economist that it is, in fact, a real dollar, and chuckles at the economist's folly. "Well that may be true" the economist responds, "but it's not on the ground anymore."

    --
    ----- Question authority, but not ours. Hate the man, but we're not him.
  74. people expect too much for nothing by danielrose · · Score: 1

    Why is it that anything more than $5 or $10 is too much for anything to do with a computer these days?

    Everyday I get customers come in and when you tell them it will cost them $100 AUD per hour for labour, or $300 for XP they scream blue murder.

    "But my neighbours friends son told me it was just something cheap and blah blah blah..."

    God forbid they are stupid enough to have no backups when their HDD dies, or a virus corrupts their filesystem. Sure, I can get it back your data but it will cost about $200 in labour.

    "What do you mean I have to pay for it??"

    IT work is just expected to be free, all because of that damn Billy kid down the street who "knows computers".

    --
    i hate pansy republicans
    1. Re:people expect too much for nothing by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You charge. . . .money? All it used to take was a 2-liter bottle of Pepsi (or Dr. Pepper) and a bag of Doritos. Or a medium pizza and a sixer of decent beer if it was a problem that took all night.

      Back then, though, I was receiving help from people that got paid for their computer skills during the day*. And they weren't solving my computer problems so much as teaching me to solve my computer problems.

      Of course, they were trying to make me into one of them. Obviously, they succeeded.

      *I think many were suprised that they were getting paid good money for what they would have done for pepsi and doritos or pizza and beer. Or other intoxicants. =)

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    2. Re:people expect too much for nothing by danielrose · · Score: 1

      Its not the nerds that complain about the pricing, for them price is no problem - it's usually the "richies" who buy a laptop "just because" and naturally everything should be free after you spend $1500 right?

      --
      i hate pansy republicans
    3. Re:people expect too much for nothing by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      My nostalgia for the good old days aside, this is a problem. It's one that good old CompUSA has solved by incessantly pushing extended warranties on cutomers, past the point of rudeness. =)

      The funny thing is that you might have some rich customers who aren't so obnoxious, but they're generally not the type to let you know they're "rich and powerful" off the bat. But it's the ones that do let you know that are the problem.

      This is a problem in other areas as well. I've achieved enough success in my line of work that I can pick and choose my clients, but I also think I achieved this success because I've always tried to pick and choose my clients. And there are some clients or potential that just aren't worth the trouble. I've developed a knack for screening these, but in the past, if I had to learn through experience about a particular client, I was always too busy for them the next time. I was always profusely apologetic, but unavailable.

      In your current line of work, you might or might not be able to use this technique. If you can apply it, however, you'll enjoy your work and the people you work with much more. And one thing I've noticed is that when I really am enjoying my work, financial rewards tend to follow.

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
  75. I am not interested in time-price-differences by thrill12 · · Score: 1

    but more interested in the relative prices for equipment back then compared to the now.
    Say a harddisk of 8 Mb cost 6000 dollars in 1970 - what did the minimum (lowest price) computer specification that could use this harddrive cost back then ? Divide those prices and you get the relative price-index for the combination HD/PC .
    Compare that to the same index in the current era (ie. (minimum price for HD with size X) divided by (price for a minimum PC)), and you'll get some numbers that start to interest me.

    --
    Slashdot: stuff for news, nerds that matter, matter for news, stuff that nerd
  76. One bad experience was enough for me then by labradort · · Score: 1

    I bought a whole TRS-80 set up when I was 16 or 17 and learning to program in BASIC. I recall the floppy drive expansion interface cost me $750. The whole set up cost me $3500 CDN in 1980.

    I had no idea it would be so short lived and obsoleted in 2 years.

    I thought I was making an investment in my future as a computing professional.

    I couldn't afford to do it again and never bought a computer or even something similar to it until 1997 when it seemed that things were becoming more stable and upgradable with the Pentium I. And there was that Internet thing that made it more interesting! Note that even today, 7 years later, the P-I is useable today as a web browsing and email platform.

  77. In the 1970's it was $1.25 AUD to $1 USD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    but that was along time ago. Since Hawke floated the dollar it has remained around the 78-80c mark, except for the period in the late 90's when it dropped to as low as 49c.

    omicoo--

  78. Nightmares! by emorphien · · Score: 1

    Ohhh crap I remember some of that stuff. I played Cyberia 2!

    Man this is giving me all kinds of crazy nostalgia.

    --


    Presently here, but not there.
  79. Don't forget workstation pricing. by Graemee · · Score: 1

    Remember when a Sparcstation 330 was $80,000+ consider it had the same MIPS as a 486DX33.

    As PC's goes, the office I shared at my first good IT job had an IBM 286 in it. With 30MB HD, two 5.25 Floppies, EGA card, 512K of memory. Cost $14,000. It was the first model of 286 running a brisk 6MHz. I think it was a 5160

    Ah, blee^H^H^H^Hcutting edge.

  80. Insightful ? Bah! by anti-NAT · · Score: 1

    I'm from the state of South Australia, which was started by a company - The South Australia Company.

    Even now, only a very small portion of SA's population are serial killers (Snowtown) or terrorists (David Hicks).

    --
    The Internet's nature is peer to peer - 20050301_cs_profs.pdf
  81. Each one bigger than all previous ones by iamanatom · · Score: 1

    Not only that, but each new drive has been bigger than all the previous ones put together! Same thing is happening to me. 40MB, 500MB, 2GB, 4GB, 30GB. I'm not certain this trend will continue.

    --
    "This is crazy, you realise we could all go to jail for this?" - my manager, somewhere I used to work.
    1. Re:Each one bigger than all previous ones by untaken_name · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Not only that, but each new drive has been bigger than all the previous ones put together!
      - Your post

      Every hard drive I've bought has been bigger than every previous hard drive I've bought combined.
      - Post you replied to

      Hi! My name is Reading Comprehension. I see you haven't made my acquaintance. Nice to meet you.

  82. I knew intel was lying by Core-Dump · · Score: 1
    Look at this pic, and you'll see that intel has a 64bit CPU for over 20 years!!!!

    The genuine P5 64bit cpu at 60 MHZ. PCI bus with........


    --
    What would you do without a monitor? Sit and look stupid behind a keyboard and a mouse
  83. In 1978 my father paid... by maynard · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    ... $350.00 for a set of 8 4116 300ns (16K) RAM chips. And it was a fair price! --M

  84. MOD PARENT FUNNY by crownrai · · Score: 1

    Insightful? Hardly. I'm sure it was meant to be a joke based on the origins of the British-Australian immigrants.

  85. Computer Pricing? by Mordaximus · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Since when are PCs and compatibles the only computers? Back in the 80s, HOME computers were quite cheap, on par with what we'd pay today for a commodity PC today.

    In 1983, you could get a complete Commodore 64 System (Montior and floppy drive included) for ~$730 US. Basically, everything you would need (word processing, games etc...)

    20 years later, you'd be getting a very good deal to get a modern system for that price. Sure the technology is much more advanced today, but in the end you get the same amount done, for the same price.

    Of course, let's not talk about modem prices ;)

  86. Re:Pentium P5 64 bit CPU ? - The Turbo Button by mikael · · Score: 1

    One of the places I worked in had computer labs with PC's exactly like those (assembled by a local suppler). Except each system also had "Turbo button". The idea was that if you wanted extra computing power for a particular task, you could press this button, and the system clock would be boosted up from 8.00Mhz to 16.00Mhz.

    Usually, every user would just keep the turbo button on all the time, only releasing it to play some game which wasn't time synchronised (dragnfly.exe).

    Later PC's actually had a LED display which displayed the clock speed at the front. Our technician once had to to repair a system because a user complained the turbo button wasn't changing the displayed speed. Rather unsurprisingly, we found out that the turbo button was only hardwired to the input pins of the LED display and the cooling fan motor. Pressing the Turbo button had no effect except to rev the cooling fan and make the PC sound a little louder.

    --
    Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
  87. $5000 by pedestrian+crossing · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I seem to remember an old "law" that went something like "The computer you want will always cost $5000". I think it still pretty much holds true....

    --
    A house divided against itself cannot stand.
  88. What's scary is... by michaelmalak · · Score: 3, Funny
    This snapshot of historical pricing is fascinating and, quite frankly, a little scary. How does $5999 for an 8.6MB hard drive strike you?
    No, what's scary (to me) is that some slashdot readers don't remember this first-hand.
  89. When the 386 came out.... by Junks+Jerzey · · Score: 1

    ...it was used in *way* overpriced machines, ranging all the way up to US$10,000. Remember, at the time it was a top of the line super processor.

  90. Make a fair comparison by pedestrian+crossing · · Score: 1

    Sure your $3000 would get you 4 of your current system, but you are comparing apples and oranges (pun intended).

    Consider what the IIe and the 540MB drive were at the time, absolutely top-of-the line stuff.

    You need to compare that with what is currently top-of-the line.

    The price will be about the same.

    --
    A house divided against itself cannot stand.
  91. Let's Go Shopping by PingPongBoy · · Score: 1

    I think it's about time to replace the punched card system. My first computer was an abacus.

    The abacus is about as close to looking at the Matrix through a monitor as you get in real technology. The I/O is completely left to the interpretation of the user but the interpretation is typically still plausible. I never could interpret any punched card.

    I was hoping to upgrade to a slide rule.

    --
    Know your pads. One time pad: good for cryptography. Two timing pad: where to take your mistress.
  92. Computers Depreciate Like Ripe Bananas by 4of12 · · Score: 1

    No computer vendor in their right mind ought to hold much inventory in new computers with the expedited rate of depreciation that applies to them - I think it's gotta be even worse than cars or mobile homes.

    Somewhere I recall a figure of 1.5% per week, but I"m not positive about that. But neither would I be surprised.

    --
    "Provided by the management for your protection."
  93. A different way to look at pricing though..... by CFD339 · · Score: 1

    A more interesting approach would be to look at a year over year pricing for three categories of retail computer gear. The idea is that the state of the art changes, but the pricepoint consumers pay for "current" gear has remained pretty constant until very recently. I go back to about 1985 with these numbers and there will be dissagreement about the specifics, but I think we'll all agree that the TREND is right.

    Low end -- which used to be around $800 and recently is closer to $400

    Average desktop -- Which used to be around $1500 and lately is between $600 and $800

    And high-end desktop -- which used to be around $2500 and now runs around $1800

    --
    The problem with quotes on the internet, is that nobody bothers to check their veracity. -- Abraham Lincoln
  94. We've come a long way on capacity. by MtViewGuy · · Score: 1

    I still remember when a 20 MB Seagate ST225 hard drive with controller was something like US$500 back in 1985! =:-O

    Today, you can get three 200 GB Serial ATA hard drives for that same price--and still have pocket change left.

  95. "386-20MHz: Fast. Expensive. And worth it!" by Slashdolt · · Score: 2, Funny

    I remember that being the cover of PC-Magazine in (I think) 1989.

    The Price? It was posted on the cover in big-bold letters at a mere $10,000.

    It was probably only a couple issues later where they announced that the "386 is dead". ;-)

  96. But it's not that funny by RLW · · Score: 1

    Maybe Australia started as a penal colony. But I am afraid the U.S. may end up as one: with the largest per capita incarceration rate and limits on court access for certain crimes and secret wire taps, searches and seizures, everyday seems to bring the country as a whole in to a police state. Didn't we fight a war against a government that tried to this sort of thing once before ?

    1. Re:But it's not that funny by satans_advocate · · Score: 1

      .... everyday seems to bring the country as a whole in to a police state. Didn't we fight a war against a government that tried to this sort of thing once before ?

      Ah yes, but since the National Socialists failed to adequately protect their intellectual property, the police state methodology assets were seized by the United States, along with a bunch of rocket scientists, genetic researchers and what not.

      So really your government is simply maximising shareholder value by leveraging assets gained as part of a settlement from a failed hostile takeover.

      The gov. will also gain new market share by exploiting the synergy between the police state assets and under-utilised cold war assets, and will form new alliances with strategic global partners, who will bring fully securitised energy commodities and low-dollar human resources to the partnership mix.

      So relax .... all is well.

    2. Re:But it's not that funny by RLW · · Score: 1

      Oh, good.

  97. THESE are the "good old days" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just think, 20 years from now we'll be nostalgic about when we had to pay SCO "ONLY" $699 for Linux.

  98. The Conclusion by OldCrasher · · Score: 1

    I read the conclusion of this story and have a comment: These were not hobbist computers and parts. Instead they were really what at the time were called Business Systems. Byte in those days was subtitled something like "For Small and Business Systems" making a case for the classification of these computers and their use. I worked in 1981 for a small company selling "Business Systems" (ZR Computers). The $6000AU disk drive was for businesses, not the home computer owner. NASCOM-1's were for Home buyers, as were many smaller Z80 / CP/M systems (Trash 80 and Sharp MZ80's come to mind).

    My first job for ZR was to work with a 'network' of 3 Commodore 8096 PET's that used a single Commodore 10MB disk unit. 2 computers used the the IEEE-488 bus to access the Hard drive, the other used the network to communicate with one of the drive connected PET's to get it's data. I called it Master/Slave. But what did I know about political correctness. This drive was a 5000 Pound UK drive unit, at a time when the Pound was worth something (!)

    The software I wrote, a machine tool parts catalogue, was billed out at 400 pounds UK (say $800) and took me about 6 months to write. I was paid 3000 pounds / annum, therefore the software cost ZR, even at my stunningly low wage rate, 1100 pounds. Business idiocy is not something new!!

  99. Tandy by Jozer99 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I have an almost mint condition RadioShack Tandy catalogue from 1981. In it is offered a 9.0 MB hard drive for US $ 5999. They also introduced the NEW and IMPROVED 16-bit Tandys. I got this catalogue while my grandfather was cleaning out his closet. I noticed a bunch of old magazines lying on the floor in the trash pile, and right on top was this catalogue. What a find!

  100. That's like a new car... by Agent+Green · · Score: 2, Interesting

    $6,000 in 1983 was enough to buy a brand new compact car. In fact, the previous year, my parents purchased a Chevrolet Citation X11 V6 for about $9k. (more of a 2-door sedan) American or Aussie dollars...doesn't matter...that was a lot of coin from back then.

    Unfortunately, I can't find a good Internet link to new car prices from that era...and I don't have any of my dad's Kelley Blue Books from then either.

    --
    // Agent Green (Ian / IU7 / KB1JQO)
    // IEEE 802.3: All 10base Are Belong To Us
    1. Re:That's like a new car... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Hint: A Chevrolet Citation was never worth $9,000. I'm sure they paid that, but they made a big, big mistake.

      Of course, things are worth what someone will pay for them, right? :)

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  101. RE: bad/bloated software by King_TJ · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Eh.... Sometimes I'm tempted to make a similar statement, that "Today's PCs really aren't THAT much more useful than the ones I used 10 or 12 years ago!"

    But then I think about the tasks people do with modern computers, and I realize that statement is short-sighted.

    Yes, you can argue the old favorite, that "I could type a letter just as well on my old XXX system as on today's Pentium 4 3.0Ghz PC!", or "Spreadsheets worked just fine for me using Visicalc."

    The value of faster machines becomes immediately apparent when you start talking about such things as editing DV video from a camcorder, or printing out photo quality prints after downloading from from your multi megapixel digital camera and editing them, or encoding your music CDs into MP3 format. Heck - try just *listening* to MP3s in the background while you work using anything older than a Pentium class PC. The older systems tie up their entire CPU just processing the music file.

    Anyone developing software can surely tell you that compiling times are drastically reduced on modern PCs, as well. No more "Running off to eat dinner while my program compiles." And how about people composing music on their computer? Sure, the old machines handled MIDI data fairly well - but virtual instruments? That was just a fantasy before modern systems made it possible.

    Gaming is always debatable, because it's subjective. One person can rave about how many thousands of times better new games are with near photo-realistic graphics and 3 dimensional surround sound, while another scoffs at that, and says they preferred the "block graphics" type games of the Atari 2600 game system era. But surely, it's clear that gaming has accomplished things that just weren't possible on older hardware. Network gameplay is vastly superior, for example. (I can remember trying to play the first 2-player modem-based games. You had to wait for the game to "synch up" with the other player before you could start, and then it often lost synch in the middle of playing, due to phone line noise or whatnot.)

    You wouldn't even have things like usable broadband internet access if the world was still using 4.77Mhz XT class machines. It takes more CPU power than that to handle things like PPPoE protocol for DSL!

  102. Thanks for the Info by apruszynski · · Score: 1

    How did this make it on, must be a slow news day. Soon we will have an article pointing out, in shocking fashion, that hardware just keeps getting faster and that electronics are getting smaller... even in Australia! Andrew

  103. Hard drive prices by tin+foil+hat+dude · · Score: 1

    Many many years ago, I purchased a 52Mb External hard drive (my first) for $310. I was amazed at the freedom from floppies that it gave me and I was so enamoured with it that I told my wife that it was all the space I would ever possibly need, and that I would never need to buy another hard drive. (that's how I got the $310)

    I still have the drive, and it is used daily... so are about 900 Gigs worth of it's brothers, but to this day any request for money for computer equipment is met with a quote like "yeah, right, just like that hard drive of yours" from the wife.

    --
    Reality is all that stuff that doesn't care if you believe in it or not.--Solomon Short
  104. Heh. I was just talking about this the other day. by A.S. · · Score: 1

    I was helping a friend clean out his garage. (That's where he stores his piles for spare hardware.)

    We we sorting things into boxes by category, when he comes over to me, holding a shit-load of SIMMs. They were rubber-banded in a cylinder shape. There were so many, he could barely hold them together.

    "These are one-meg chips," he says. "By my estimate, this bundle retailed for 1.2 million dollars when they were new."

    "What're they worth today?" I asked.

    "Maybe a few pennies each."

    Fuckin' A.

  105. Re:"386-20MHz: Fast. Expensive. And worth it!" by MikeBabcock · · Score: 1

    I bought a 386SX-20 with an IIT math coprocessor in 1990 I believe it was; paid about $2100 canadian.

    --
    - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
  106. Bah! by nlindstrom · · Score: 1

    Bah! Why, back in my day, an upgrade for the rocks we were banging together cost like 100 deer hides! And we liked it!

  107. Sounds like ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... a good reason to run Debian.

    Only half kidding here.

    Software is like a bicycle -- better tools enable you to do better things. However, there comes a point where you're better off riding the bicycle more often than spending all your time tinkering with it and upgrading it.

  108. exchange rates by cas2000 · · Score: 1

    > How does $5999 for an 8.6MB hard drive strike
    > you? For reference, 1 Australian Dollar is
    > worth 70 to 80 US cents.

    prices like that were from before the australian dollar was floated in the mid 80s. at that time, $AUD1.00 was worth about $US1.50. so, $6K australian was about $9K american (although there's shipping and duty and a few more layers of middlemen markup in that $6K price).

    since then, currency speculators and other parasitic vermin have had the same influence on our economy as they do on many others.

  109. Pentium 64bit by dizzy+tunez · · Score: 1

    Take a look at this one http://www.overclockers.com.au/image.php?pic=artic les/296910/ad1.jpg
    It says the old pentium (586?) was a 64bit CPU. that aint right, is it?

    --
    "If you loved me, you`d all kill yourselves today"
    Spider Jerusalem
  110. ZX81 Price by Peter_JS_Blue · · Score: 0
    Hi easter1916, Please select from the following excuses as to why I got the price wrong :-
    1. I was adjusting for inflation
    2. It was a long time ago
    3. They saw me coming
    4. All of the above
    Have fun Peter
    --
    Art Makers Just an excuse to show photos of naked women !!
  111. Prices by ohasten · · Score: 1

    I sold some 16kb, S-100 memory boards for $1300.00 each in 1980. In those days $81,250,000,000, would have purchased a GB.

    $50.00 for a box of disk or a printer cable. My Ratshack Model 1 had a memory upgrade of 4kb for $499.00.

    --
    "You can tell the pioneers by the arrows in their backs"
  112. Unnovation by MrChuck · · Score: 1
    You validly bring up that MORE things are possible and easy with faster computers. Yes, clearly.

    But what I find (esp on non-true Unix/X machines) is that doing the SAME tasks is no faster.

    Great, closing a window makes a pretty little animation kick off. Joy! MS Word has every feature in it that was every suggested by anyone including MS programmers on their first drunk trying to impress a girl.

    And yes, when the 4.77MHz XTs came out, I *was* playing on a 1.5Mb/s line on the Vax (with 1MB of RAM).

    Is PPPoE there because it's BEST and EFFICIENT? Or is it in use because, well, we could get it out quick, our vendor for modems supports it and people have CPU to burn?

    SUV think.

    Yes, any 486/66 can handle current broadband speeds just fine (I firewall/route 2 WiFi + 3mb/s cable with an 8 watt 486/133 that's as silent as my 8 port netgear switch).

    You bring up gaming, but gaming is the leading factor in video and machine acceleration in home machines. DDR Ram is largely motivated by gamers. (hell, I've spent $30,000 on a bleeding edge SGI video card that as fast as the $30 "deal bin" card I tossed in a friend's machine).

    RE: Old machines?
    I was asked to recover a BUNCH of (well preserved and stored) disks from a Z80 CP/M system. I found a program that would run (and read/write) CP/M programs under DOS and found DOS disks.

    Shoved a 5 1/4" drive into an (old) 800MHz machine and kicked up WordStar. Somehow the fingers remembered.
    The friend was stunned at the speed as I whipped through the files looking for something. "How come my new windows machine isn't this fast?"
    Well, wordstar can't send email or do bad grammar checking as you type can it?

    That said, a friend's mom is a novelist and using WordPerfect 5.1 to write in.
    A simple electronic typewriter that doesn't annoy her with underlines or other visual crud while she's focusing on composition and tying together plot lines and developing characters. A spelling mistake should not interrupt the train of thought. That's why you spell check afterwards (or have Jr Editors at the publishing house).

    The overall point is that app programmers and OS writers are giving us crap - lots of little fluff without, by and large, much innovation.

    Star/Open Office seek to emulate MS Office for acceptance sake, but non of them offer any new ways of trying to come to me, the user, to help me in my tasks.

    My mom still has to remember to "Save" a file. - but it's right there, why is it MY job to do this when the computer that's really 3 orders of magnitude more powerful is not doing anything.

    Radical research into user interface design, operating systems and in specific Human Computer Interface design within apps is pathetic.

    AutoCAD, by and large, is the same program I ran on SPARC 1s in 1991.

    There are few (mainstream and findable) "idea managers" like Think!

    Apple *used* to encourage and offer a forum for interesting new ideas in computing,but at this point they're scrambling to keep any ISVs and backfilling holes in their portfolio (see addressbook, iTunes, etc).

    We live in a time of Unnovation.

    1. Re:Unnovation by King_TJ · · Score: 1

      Yes - I'm in agreement with you on all of that! I've done work for a number of law firms over the years, and still find that most use WordPerfect on their PCs - even if they also have MS Word installed.

      There are simply too many good legal secretaries/assistants out there who spent years getting good at using all the WordPerfect macros and shortcuts, and they've developed lots of great templates for cranking out forms, letterhead, etc.

      It *could* probably all be done in MS Word, but there's no motivation to expend the effort to re-learn things and rewrite things to function identically to what they've already got in WordPerfect.

      The core issue, I think is this: The "traditional" applications for computers are really just simulations of things done with dedicated office tools before. (A word processor, no matter how fancy, still boils down to a typewriter simulator. A database or address book acts like a giant card catalog or rolodex, ultimately.) We've reached the point where everything new that can be done to these apps just carries them further and further away from working as replacements for the original tools they're meant to simulate/replace.

      When it comes to word processing, I think the biggest "innovations" that people *really* cared about were these:

      1. spell checking
      2. WYSIWYG
      3. easy access to multiple font sizes/types
      4. mail merge functionality

      In the rush to keep adding new things, it seems these basics have gotten lost in the shuffle! What I mean is, spell checkers often seem to come with pretty poor default dictionaries. What's with that? With today's powerful PCs, it should be able to quickly scan pretty much *every* possible word in the language! Mail merge is still "tough to figure out" for most people. It's not something you need often enough to really memorize a lot of complex steps to do it. It needs to be "brainless" to get it working, because when you DO need it, you need it! WYSIWYG isn't even quite right, most of the time! With proportionately spaced type, people get all sorts of problems lining up columns and rows. What looks "lined up" on the screen doesn't always print that way on paper. People are forced, sometimes, to hit their TAB key instead of the spacebar 4 or 5 times, to get the desired indention on a line. (Can't today's software just deal with that in the background, seamlessly? People shouldn't have to understand how line breaks work in a program!)