> we almost always have managed to find untainted juries, or juries of > sensible people who can obey the law and leave any prior knowledge of > the case at the courthouse door.
I once had a drunken discussion of publication bans with a few Canadian lawyers. They used the OJ Simpson case as an example of what happens without publication bans.
A few years ago, several US papers covered a Canadian trial in defiance of a Canadian publication ban. That trial was a sensational double rape-murder, i.e. was interesting enough to defy the publication ban.
> And why would we want to subject ourselves to that kind of difficulty, > pain, and anguish? The tools that are already part and parcel of > Unix/Linux are complete and useful for that.
Ever used Zen on Windows? There's a lot to like.
> All it takes is someone that knows what the hell they are doing.
Heh. In case you haven't noticed, there's a severe shortage of people who know what the hell they're doing.
They're pissing in the groupware well. A competitor makes a lot of money from their groupware product, they're trying to "cut off their oxygen supply" by supplying a free alternative.
Just like MS destroyed Netscape by giving away IE.
Just like Sun is trying to devalue MS Office via Open Office.
I once needed a few thousand names for test data. The only big list I could find was the
list of men killed in Vietnam
Anyone have a less disturbing list of real or fake names? I suppose someone could grab some data from a geneology site, strip out just the names, and use that.
If anyone knows of (or starts) a project like this I'd probably contribute.
Slashdot Mirror
I call your respect for the jury system and raise you an OJ Simpson.
Love it or leave it, baby!!!!
We also sequester juries, but the juries for these criminal trials haven't been picked yet.
2 139257), here's some junk text.
The original plan was for the publication ban to expire once the juries were picked and sequestered.
fucking slashdot won't let me duplicate my old post (http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=144947&cid=1
> we almost always have managed to find untainted juries, or juries of
> sensible people who can obey the law and leave any prior knowledge of
> the case at the courthouse door.
I once had a drunken discussion of publication bans with a few Canadian lawyers. They used the OJ Simpson case as an example of what happens without publication bans.
We also sequester juries, but the juries for these criminal trials haven't been picked yet.
The original plan was for the publication ban to expire once the juries were picked and sequestered.
A few years ago, several US papers covered a Canadian trial in defiance of a Canadian publication ban. That trial was a sensational double rape-murder, i.e. was interesting enough to defy the publication ban.
You should be charged with battery and kept in a cell.
That's it for me, I'm going ohm now.
So make the max # of tabs a configurable setting, with a low default. Everyone happy.
Imagine a SMB password sniffer that discards 99.99% of the sniffed traffic and only stores account names/SMB hashes.
Put it on your resume. You passed the tests, you earned the title. It deserves 1 line in the education section of your resume.
Anyone looking for an MCSE will spot it, anyone who doesn't care about it won't hold it against you.
The ones I laugh at use the big official MCSE logo clipart to show how PROUD they are of their cert.
cal mee bak when u hav semi-literat gaming analysis, r0ffle!
I don't know if you're directly responsible for the Zen stuff, but there's an excellent Novell mailing list that might be of help.
http://netlab1.usu.edu/novell.faq/nvfaq-b.htm#B000
Good luck etc.
> And why would we want to subject ourselves to that kind of difficulty,
> pain, and anguish? The tools that are already part and parcel of
> Unix/Linux are complete and useful for that.
Ever used Zen on Windows? There's a lot to like.
> All it takes is someone that knows what the hell they are doing.
Heh. In case you haven't noticed, there's a severe shortage of people who know what the hell they're doing.
He's obviously talking about vi.
:wq
Have fun.
The ones about bullshit?
Everyone and their cousin includes OpenSSH in the base install these days.
pf is now available for FreeBSD and NetBSD, so some of this work benefits other people.
>So what's the rationale behind this?
They're pissing in the groupware well. A competitor makes a lot of money from their groupware product, they're trying to "cut off their oxygen supply" by supplying a free alternative.
Just like MS destroyed Netscape by giving away IE.
Just like Sun is trying to devalue MS Office via Open Office.
>Some of the better UseNet groups (e.g. alt.folklore.urban) have
>developed cultural immunity to trolls & sockpuppets.
Yeah, but it requires discipline from *every member* of the community. Not many communities can pull that off.
Not a new sig idea...
Ethereal is cool, but hardly innovative.
tcpdump might have been innovative back in the day, I'm not sure.
If you really want to future-proof, run a few pull wires to empty boxes.
Anyone have a less disturbing list of real or fake names? I suppose someone could grab some data from a geneology site, strip out just the names, and use that.
If anyone knows of (or starts) a project like this I'd probably contribute.
http://www.usenix.org/publications/login/2000-7/fe atures/resume.html
s/dirth/dearth/